clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Oakland A’s trade rumors: Is a Rich Hill contract extension on the table?

New, 213 comments

Ken Rosenthal of Fox Sports reports that the Athletics have engaged Rich Hill in extension talks ahead of Monday’s non-waiver trade deadline.

Pittsburgh Pirates v Oakland Athletics Photo by Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images

Discussions surrounding starting pitcher Rich Hill’s future with the Oakland Athletics took an intriguing turn in the final 24 hours as the club ponders how to handle the lefty. With other teams possibly concerned that Hill won’t make a start before the trade deadline after a long layoff due to a blister, might the A’s try to extend Hill instead?

Hill is scheduled to return Friday, manager Bob Melvin told the beat writers before Sunday’s game, but the A’s have been hopeful of Hill’s recovery from injuries before —including when they started him on July 17 only to have to remove him when the blister popped before he could even record a result against his first batter.

Teams are nervous enough that it sounds like the A’s are having to tell teams they won’t make deals conditioned on how many days Hill spends on the disabled list:

Teams can accomplish this by using the old “player to be named or cash” standby:

The injuries have even led some to question, including the San Francisco Chronicle’s Susan Slusser, whether the A’s would even offer Hill a qualifying offer if he was held to the end of the season. If that’s the case, now could be an ideal time to start to engage Hill on whether he wants the security of another year weighed against the risk that further injury could exacerbate concerns that he has not pitched 100 innings in a season since 2010.

If you’re wondering about an extension for Josh Reddick, it’s a different story for him because the impasse is over the number of years Reddick merits as well as on the odds that Reddick will be traded, not how much Hill should earn just next year. If Reddick is traded, he won’t have his free agent value hampered by the compensation for signing a player who was given a qualifying offer. If Hill is traded, he might not get a $17 million one-year deal, anyway.

Even with durability concerns surrounding Hill, it’s not like there are a lack of teams considering him:

That this rumor comes just before the non-waiver trade deadline indicates that the offers from all of them just aren’t where the A’s want them to be, compared to the chance of retaining Hill for 2017.

Twenty-one hours to go.