/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/13720133/165873591.0.jpg)
Coco Crisp's career-high OPS is .810, and that mark came in 2005 as a member of the Cleveland Indians. It's the only time he's ever finished a season with an OPS above .800.
Through 159 plate appearances in 2013, Coco has posted an .886 OPS, good for a wRC+ of 142. He is currently hitting out of his mind. OPS is a very blunt stat, though; what specifically is Coco doing differently?
He's not just getting lucky. One obvious small-sample test is to look at a hitter's BABIP, but Coco's mark (.274) is far below his career number (.300). He is posting a career-high in both slugging percentage (.500) and isolated power (.220), and part of that is fueled by a few cheap homers at Minute Maid Park in April. However, he's also hitting a ton of doubles (12 so far, plus a triple), so a lot of his slugging has come in the form of hitting the gaps and corners and using his wheels. He probably won't finish with an isolated power above .200, but he could certainly continue racking up extra base hits, especially if his career-low line-drive rate (15.7%) moves up toward his career mark (19.5%).
Coco's most glaring stats, though, come when he is not hitting the ball at all. Entering Monday, he has drawn 24 walks and struck out only 12 times. He has as many doubles as he does strikeouts. Coco's always been good at putting the ball into play and avoiding the K's, but he has taken it to another level this year. To illustrate:
BB% | K% | |
Coco Crisp, career | 7.9% | 12.8% |
Coco Crisp, 2013 | 15.1% | 7.5% |
Coco Crisp, previous career-bests (minimum 100 games) | 8.9% (2012) | 11.1% (2011) |
Those numbers represent the percentage of plate appearances in which Coco has either walked or struck out. He has never posted anything like these rates, for a full season or for his career. He did do something similar to this in his 49 games with the Royals in 2009, but he's never held it for a full season. Let's take a look at some of his underlying peripherals and see if Coco is actually doing anything differently at the plate.
Here is the standard intro, written by Cuppingmaster:
While most stats take some time to normalize, research has shown that plate discipline statistics reach some level of significance after only about 50 plate appearances. These data are derived from two sources: Baseball Info Solutions (BIS) classifications or PITCHf/x. BIS is basically guys sitting down watching baseball games and classifying pitches. PITCHf/x is MLB's in-house pitch classification that relies on a neural network to decide what pitches are what. Essentially, a really fancy and expensive computer program designed for decision-making. After all this, there are 9 pretty useful statistics:
O-Swing%: The percentage of pitches a batter swings at outside the strike zone.
Z-Swing%: The percentage of pitches a batter swings at inside the strike zone.
Swing%: The overall percentage of pitches a batter swings at.
O-Contact%: The percentage of pitches a batter makes contact with outside the strike zone when swinging the bat.
Z-Contact%: The percentage of pitches a batter makes contact with inside the strike zone when swinging the bat.
Contact%: The overall percentage of pitches a batter makes contact with when swinging the bat.
Zone%: The overall percentage of pitches a batter sees inside the strike zone.
F-Strike% - The percentage of first pitch strikes (BIS only)
SwStr%: The percentage of total pitches a batter swings and misses on (BIS only)Since I much prefer PITCH/fx classifications, but BIS has two data points that PITCH/fx doesn't use, I've merged the data into one table that describes it all. The first seven columns use data from PITCH/fx, but F-Strike% and SwStr% come from BIS data. All data itself (and the above glossary terms) are from Fangraphs.
We'll begin with the numbers, looking at both 2012 and 2013 (2013 stats and league averages are through May 26):
Coco Crisp plate discipline 2012-3, in percentages |
|||||||||
|
O-Swing |
Z-Swing |
Swing |
O-Con |
Z-Con |
Con |
Zone |
F-Strike |
SwStr |
2012 |
24.4 |
64.0 |
42.3 |
73.6 |
92.3 |
86.4 |
45.3 |
62.6 |
5.7 |
lgAvg |
29.0 |
62.2 |
45.3 |
63.6 |
87.3 |
79.6 |
49.2 |
59.8 |
9.1 |
2013 |
18.8 |
63.1 |
38,4 |
75.8 |
94.3 |
89.3 |
44.3 |
56.0 |
4.0 |
lgAvg |
29.7 |
64.9 |
45.8 |
66.3 |
86.6 |
79.5 |
45.8 |
60.1 |
9.2 |
All stats are from Fangraphs