"Gettin' Zoney With It"
Even I was starting to have trouble keeping track of my favorite team’s current and future roster, so I pulled a “Zonis” and created a long roster list so I could see what the heart of the 2008-10 A’s might actually look like. Here it is, with the players who don’t figure to start 2008 with Oakland in parentheses and their 2008 Opening Day age included:
1B Daric Barton (Chris Carter, 21)
2B Mark Ellis
SS Bobby Crosby
3B Eric Chavez / Jack Hannahan
OF Travis Buck (Ryan Sweeney, 23)
OF Chris Denorfia (Aaron Cunningham, 21)
OF Mark Kotsay (Carlos Gonzalez, 22)
C Kurt Suzuki
DH Jack Cust
SP/DL Rich Harden
SP Joe Blanton
SP Chad Gaudin
SP Justin Duchscherer
SP Dana Eveland
SP Dan Meyer
(P Greg Smith, 24)
(P Andrew Bailey, 23)
(P Gio Gonzalez, 22)
(P Fautino De Los Santos, 22)
(P James Simmons, 21)
(P Trevor Cahill, 20)
(P Brett Anderson, 19)
RP Huston Street
RP Andrew Brown
RP Alan Embree
RP Jerry Blevins
RP Santiago Casilla
RP Kiko Calero
(RP Henry Rodriguez)
What stands out, of course, is that while the 2008 team should be proud if they just finish at .500, the young pitching is simply stacked. We’ll see the ones who have failed in big league cups of coffee first (Meyer, Eveland), with one of the lowest-ceiling guys next (Smith), and then it just gets better and better, with six – count ‘em six – more really young and really promising prospects in Bailey, Gonzalez, De Los Santos, Simmons, Cahill, and Anderson.
I think Beane is gunning to be back in true contention in 2009. Why? Because I think Buck and Barton are truly special, because Denorfia and Suzuki could prove to be truly solid come 2009, because Carlos Gonzalez has a real chance to be another impact hitter by 2009, because as the best and readiest of the young pitchers emerge the rotation will be back to superior form come 2009 – and last but certainly not least, because the A’s are now deep enough in legitimate young starters that if Beane deems it necessary to trade for a new SS (or new any position), he actually has the trade chips to go out and do it. Not to mention the payroll flexibility to explore a 2009 free agent market that figures to be superior to this Winter’s crop.
The Angels had better enjoy 2008, because when the A’s rebuild they rebuild differently than most teams: Before you even realize they’re rebuilding, they’ve already gotten the permits and laid the foundation, and are on to looking at what color they want for the trim.
0 recs |
160 comments
Comments
If Henry Rodriguez jumps from low-A to MLB
in one offseason, I'll eat my hat. Publicly. (I'm assuming this is a typo of some kind.)
Also, as part of the inexorable Alex Arnold Leon campaign, I'm lobbying for his inclusion (he's 19) in the parenthesized dudes.
Someone over at Minorleagueball did a complete list of the A's pitching prospects. It's a pretty impressive list. While any one guy is probably no more than 50-50 to be a big league regular (and many are much less likely than that), the A's have enough quantity that they should be able to construct a very strong rotation in the next three seasons. I'll repost the list here in a bit.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 9:36 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought, maybe mistakenly, that
he had to be on the major league roster - maybe I thought he was a Rule 5. You have to forgive me that acquiring 2 Gonzalez', a Rodriguez, and 3 Garcias (all the same one, of course) have caused my head to spin and not land quite center.
So is Rodriguez under no restrictions, like any ordinary minor leaguer?
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 9:47 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
40 man
Rodriguez has to be on the 40 man or be subject to the rule 5. Are you thinking about Gonzales, the Rule 5 guy we picked up this year?
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 4, 2008 10:06 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was -
You see, THIS is why Billy only gets white guys. Like Chavez.
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 10:17 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let's clear this up
Fernando HERNANDEZ, Rule 5 guy-- MLB roster or he has to be returned to ChiTown.
Carlos GONZALEZ, on the 40-man roster. He has, IIRC, 2 options remaining, meaning he can be in the minors until the start of 2010.
Gio GONZALEZ, not on the 40-man roster.
Henry Alberto RODRIGUEZ, just added to the 40 man roster. He has four options remaining if I read the rule correctly, meaning he can be in the minors until the start of 2012.
Hopefully that was of some assistance.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 10:26 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oops
I said Gonzalez instead of Hernandez. I haven't had enough caffeine yet this morning.
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 4, 2008 10:32 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
PT
- Where does Chris Denorfia land on this list? And if Dan Meyer is on this list, why isn't Denorfia?
- Is Dallas Braden out of Beane's "Master Plan"?
----------------------------------------------------
- Carlos Gonzalez, OF, Grade B+
- Gio Gonzalez, LHP, Grade B+
- Fautino De Los Santos, RHP, Grade B+
- Daric Barton, 1B, Grade B+
- Brett Anderson, LHP, Grade B+
- Chris Carter, 1B, Grade B+
- James Simmons, RHP, Grade B
- Henry Alberto Rodriguez, RHP, Grade B
- Trevor Cahill, RHP, Grade B-
- Aaron Cunningham, OF, Grade B-
- Corey Brown, OF, Grade B-
- Ryan Sweeney, OF, Grade C+
- Andrew Bailey, RHP, Grade B-
- Sean Doolittle, 1B, Grade B-
- Javier Herrera, OF, Grade C+
- Dan Meyer, LHP, Grade C+
- Greg Smith, LHP, Grade C+
- Sam Demel, RHP, Grade C+
- Andrew Carignan, RHP, Grade C+
- Grant Desme, OF, Grade C+
- Travis Banwart, RHP, Grade C+
- Josh Horton, SS, Grade C+
- Jermaine Mitchell, OF, Grade C
------------------------------------------------
- Last Question for Anyone: Are we all just pawns in Billy Beane's little GAME?
by Colorado Fan on
Jan 4, 2008 11:06 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Braden
All the guys on that list still qualify as prospects, Braden does not.
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 11:12 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
IP / AB's
Is that based solely on IP in the MLB?
- Dallas Braden (24) - 72.1 IP
- Ryan Sweeney (23) - 80 AB's
- Dan Meyer (26) - 18.1 IP (Broke into the BIGS in 2004)
- Dana Eveland (24) - 41.1 IP
- Daric Barton (22) - 72 AB's
- Chris Denorfia (27) - 144 AB's
Is there an the official cutoff (IP, AB's, Age) for pitching prospects and hitting prospects for Sickels, BA, and BP?
by Colorado Fan on
Jan 4, 2008 11:26 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cut-offs
50 IP
150 AB
Service time (not sure exactly how long)
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 11:32 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Denorfia is over the number of at-bats
required to be a prospect; Braden is over the number of innings pitched. As to where either would actually appear on the list, I have no idea.
I suspect Braden will end up a reliever, and probably a pretty good one. He looked good in bullpen duty last season.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 11:29 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How does options work?
I mean Carlos Gonzalez has never been in the majors, but only has 2 left?
by jahs34 on
Jan 4, 2008 4:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Options is about the 40 man roster
When a young guy like Gonzalez is placed on the 40 man roster his team is given three options. If the team sends the player to the minors after ST they've exercised the 1st option. They can call him up from the minors and send him back down as often as they want during the year or they cannot call him up at all, the option is in play.
If Gonzalez was on Arizona's 40 man last year then he's used 1 option.
Don't worry too much about it though. If Gonzalez hasn't forced his way to Oakland by the time he runs out of options he's already busted!
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 4:41 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Excatly
That's why I think Barack Obama will win the democratic nomination......because he's also white........like Chavvy.
by mrod on
Jan 4, 2008 10:50 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But
Hilary is also a man. Somewhat like Jeter.
by methodrampage on
Jan 4, 2008 12:52 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This rebuilding
has made me really understand the genius of Billy Beane.
This, in my opinion, is going to be his masterwork.
Also, I'm no expert, but I've seen Chris Denorfia's minor league (and major league) numbers, and they're outstanding. How come nobody's talking about the Great Chris Denorfia?
by King Richard on
Jan 4, 2008 9:37 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Paul Thomas talks about him all the time
Denorfia definitely deserves a 500 at bat season to see whether his minor league numbers translate. He should get that chance in 2008 now that the A's traded Swisher.
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 4, 2008 10:08 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Man on Fire
A man can be an artist... in anything, baseball, food, whatever. It depends on how good he is at it. Beane's art is building a team. He's about to paint his masterpiece.
by ak_A on
Jan 4, 2008 10:31 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed...
Excellent diary Nico that is well founded, especially regarding the '09 free agent class. Also, not to be overlooked will be the better '08 drafting position and for that matter the '09 draft should have the A's with the fattest farm system in baseball. 2009 will be the beginning of our long rise and the beginning of the Angels demise!
Go A's!
by kcir on
Jan 4, 2008 9:40 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Can I pull a Zonis too?
I would say that Kotsay is likely out the door, and if he is still around, the only reason to play him is to give him enough value so that someone takes him from us.
Otherwise, I think we start the season a few different ways.
Either we have Gonzalez jump to the Majors and start in CF.
Or
Sweeney and Denorfia battle for the Centerfield job.
The bonus that comes from that is we can possibly get even more trade value, as when Gonzalez does come up, we have established Centerfielders who can either backup the team in the 4th OF role or be dealt for another prospect to make room for Gonzalez.
by Zonis on
Jan 4, 2008 9:47 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Gonzalez will fight for a
Street/Buck like jump to the bigs through a great spring training showing, because while he's only 22 he also does have 5 minor league seasons under his belt. But I think Kotsay will be on the Opening Day roster, because he probably has to play well in April-May to be sought by anyone - I foresee him being traded, or DFA, around May 15-30.
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 9:50 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The only problem I have with that is
our roster (and Bench) will likely be full come Opening Day, with too many players for too little slots. Kotsay, Johnson, Meyer, Eveland, Crosby and maybe even Denorfia can't be sent down because they are out of options or under contract. And for all I know, Murphy might be out of options as well.
by Zonis on
Jan 4, 2008 9:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He is
I would correct you, though-- Crosby can definitely be sent down, because there's no way in hell anyone would claim a contract that bad on waivers. And if they do, so much the better for Oakland.
Denorfia has an option remaining, because he spent all of '07 on the major league roster (sort of-- he was on the 60-day DL).
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 10:46 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What happened with him anyway?
Is he even still in the organization?
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 12:54 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He still appears on the Rivercats roster
at rivercats.com.
I assume it's up to date, since Gio Gonzalez is on there, too.
by iglew on
Jan 4, 2008 2:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Crosby = $2.55M
Suggesting that "there's no way in hell anyone would claim a contract that bad on waivers" is a bit of a stretch. Don't let your interest in this team and it's self-imposed budget cause you to lose sight of the fact that his contract was structured by Billy Beane so that it would be a bargain by now. There is a chance that it could be that IF Crosby could be healthy and perform well.
by bvank on
Jan 4, 2008 2:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wrong
Crosby's contract is for $3.5 million in 2008 and $5.25 million in 2009.
Gauranteed.
Would you sign someone to a 2 year/$8.75 million contract after they've missed large chunks of the last 3 seasons?
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 2:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No?
But I'm guessing on that one.
by methodrampage on
Jan 4, 2008 2:39 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The A's would: Milton Bradley
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 2:43 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bradley was close
But he was signed to 2 1-year deals at $3 and $4 million a pop. Plus he had shown he could actually hit a baseball.
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 2:46 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd be fine with signing Bartolo Colon to that
amount of money for 2 years.
The difference between the two being, obviously, that Bartolo Colon is actually good when he's healthy, while Crosby has basically been garbage.
As I've said before, players who are below replacement level have zero value no matter how much (or how little) time they miss due to injuries.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 3:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Colon doesn't qualify
He only missed large chunks of the past 2 seasons.
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 3:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But never breakfast or lunch
By the way, enjoy my post above - it's about as close as I'll ever get to defending Crosby!
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 3:20 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Bradley comment?
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 3:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It doesn't take much to defend Crosby ...
... you could probably handle it with only 2 infielders and 1 or 2 outfielders.
by monkeyball on
Jan 4, 2008 3:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Definetly need a catcher in the mix
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 3:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
only need a C with 2 strikes
Bring one OF in behind the plate to catch so Cros doesn't get to 1B on the K/WP.
by monkeyball on
Jan 4, 2008 3:35 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Someone's got to catch
the first two pitches Crosby would swing at.
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 3:39 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
why bother? The A's won't run
by monkeyball on
Jan 4, 2008 4:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or often just a catcher.
Yes, grover, I was referring to the Bradley comment.
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 3:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Interesting defense
Never mentioned the guy once.
I like it.
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 3:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Now THAT'S funny
by baseballgirl on
Jan 4, 2008 4:39 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yes, a most excellent rep-par-teh
by ak_A on
Jan 4, 2008 7:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Middling Infield
In the minors, we seem to have no real GOOD player depth at SS, 2B or 3B. We have roleplayers, but no real outstanding prospects.
Which leads me to believe that if we don't make a deal, such as dealing Chavez to LAD in a package to land LaRoche and/or Hu, that we will see Chavez at 3B for more years to come, and that the A's might go the All Defense-No Offense route at Middle Infield, likely with Petit at Shortstop and either Murphy or Pennington at 2B come mid 2008.
Middleinfield prospects, that is to say, GOOD Middle Infield prospects who can both field AND hit (The ARods, the Jeters, the Tejadas, the Garciaparas of the world) are very hard to find and maybe harder to acquire. The Devil Rays have one, and Hu might be a decent bet for the Dodgers, but I don't know if we can acquire one ourselves.
Though I still like the idea of a Blanton trade to Seattle with a subsequent conversion of Adam Jones back to Short Stop might be a good idea.
by Zonis on
Jan 4, 2008 9:51 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
For this reason, I favor
extending Ellis rather than trading him. He's the type of player (smart, fundamental) who probably won't decline as much mid-30s - likely a good choice for an extension given his position and our lack of prospects there.
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 9:54 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
yeah. I have much less problem with sticking with Petit, Crosby, or Murphy (or Sellers, Pennington, Horton) in SS if we have a good 2B. I'm much less worried about the lack of a perfect SS prospect in our system than I am the lack of a good 2B prospect.
For that reason I favor extending Ellis too.
by jakarta on
Jan 4, 2008 10:44 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ellis . . .
. . . may not want to stay on a team thats not winning. He will need a multiyear contract. Say 3+ years.
by jarforcefatherofforce on
Jan 4, 2008 7:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Murphy at second would be a real waste
His primary defensive asset is his arm, which is (in scout-talk) plus-plus.
He'll be best used in a platoon/super-utility role in years to come. Whether that platoon is with Melillo, Pennington or Hannahan, all of whom have some issues against lefty pitching (yes, I know Pennington is a nominal switch-hitter-- look up his splits), I can't say.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 10:36 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If Crosby is healthy during spring training, I
would get Murphy as many reps at 3rd as possible, he has a strong enough arm, but does he have the reflex, and reaction time to play 3rd.
by theblackpearl on
Jan 4, 2008 10:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with your thinking
Fernando Hernandez, our 23-year-old Rule 5 pick and former White Sox AA pitcher, is probably too old for this team.
by jubjub on
Jan 4, 2008 9:52 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I think Nico got Hernandez and Rodriguez confused
by Zonis on
Jan 4, 2008 9:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yup - make that
a Hernandez, a Rodriguez, two Gonzalez', and three Garcias (all the same guy) acquired so far this Winter!
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 9:56 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Happens to me all the time
"Hey Sanchez!.....I mean Garcia!.......errr I mean Delgado!........ahh whatever the hell your name is!"
-Rodriguez
by mrod on
Jan 4, 2008 10:57 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Denofria
May be too old.
by jarforcefatherofforce on
Jan 4, 2008 7:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree wholeheartedly
I don't think that Beane was aiming for a five-year rebuilding. He was looking at having the worst year for this team be 2008 and then have the team close to coming back into contention in 2009 with the real team poised to be among the American League elite in 2010.
And hopefully the team learned a lot from these last few seasons specifically in terms of how to prevent injuries. It's like a brand new reset and a chance to start over. The thing is you want to build towards greatness, you don't want to revel in mediocrity and just hope and pray you can stay healthy and hang with the other teams.
Now the A's just need to make a smart draft choice or two this year, hopefully get some value for a rebuilt Chavez and Kotsay (although not at the cost of giving Denorfia experience).
by Blez on
Jan 4, 2008 9:57 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
so...
is 2008 going more closely resemble 1997 or 1998? i'm saying '97, praying for '98.
by mk on
Jan 4, 2008 10:34 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think 2009 is in the cards
The best pitchers we got in these deals will either still be in the minors (Anderson definitely, DLS likely), or rookies who probably won't do that well. Cahill and Rodriguez will also probably not be up in time, and Blanton will likely be gone... C. Gonzalez probably won't hit that much since he still has a lot of improving to do. Plus, anything we get out of Carter and Cunningham won't come in 2009. So... I think we're looking at a rough year that year.
by mikeA on
Jan 4, 2008 10:36 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Cunningham reached AA last year
He would have to tank Sacto to not be up by mid-2009.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 10:41 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, he's a little older than I thought
by mikeA on
Jan 4, 2008 10:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The more I look at next year's team
The more it doesn't even look that terrible. I know major parts of it will probably still be jettisoned, but if everything actually broke right for that group (for a change)? They could finish with the same or better record that they did last year.
by jeepers on
Jan 4, 2008 10:44 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Well, sure
The typical luck "range" for a team is about 12 games (from 6 under their true ability to 6 over). 12 games is basically the equivalent of replacing an outfield of three Juan Pierres with an outfield of three Curtis Grandersons. That's a lot.
Since last season's A's were clearly at the bottom end of the spectrum luckwise, a "lucky" '08 team could easily surpass that record even with inferior talent.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 10:50 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let's not talk about things breaking
right or wrong.
by methodrampage on
Jan 4, 2008 12:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Never underestimate the value
of a player knowing he has a chance to get to the Bigs.
That is why every year guys come out of nowhere to be successful because a spot opened up for them and they got a real chance. The A's have created a wide open environment for guys to get motivated because they know a place is there to be had. Before the season last year Travis Buck was a certainty to play in Sacramento for at least another year because "he wasn't ready".
Cust lingered in the minors for 6 or 7 years, not major league quality they said, well he did just fine although he drove me crazy with the K's. I think there will be a lot of surprises in store for A's fans this spring, I for one am looking forward to it, think a trip to Phoenix is in order in March.
by china bob on
Jan 4, 2008 10:50 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Buck
The A's ran out of bodies to play in the outfield, that's why Buck got his chance.
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 11:03 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No chance of THAT happening again in Oakland.
by jeepers on
Jan 4, 2008 12:27 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
also, let's not get too excited
til they've had a chance to adjust to opposing pitchers' adjustments.
by OaklandSi on
Jan 4, 2008 11:05 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Does Sweeney win the Rightfield job?
Or do you guys see a better fit out there?
by asfaninpismo on
Jan 4, 2008 11:04 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Possible 3-Way Platoon in CF/RF?
LF: BUCK
CF: Kotsay/Denorfia/Sweeney
RF: Kotsay/Denorfia/Sweeney
DH/LF/RF: CUST
Bring Carlos "Santana" Gonzalez, aka Car-Go, up in June to save another year.
by Colorado Fan on
Jan 4, 2008 11:13 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good God
I hope not. Sweeney doesn't belong on an ML roster right now, he was pretty awful last season at AAA. I also agree with Colorado on giving Gonzalez some AAA seasoning. We have the warm bodies (Linden, Deno, Kotsay, Buck, Cust) to be patient with them.
by Sigur Ros on
Jan 4, 2008 11:47 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd like to see Buck in CF.
LF -- Denorfia/Sweeney/Cunningham
CF -- Buck
RF -- Kotsay/Gonzalez
Buck seems more like someone who could be part of the team backbone -- the spine if you will. Now I've no idea whether he can actually play CF.
by WaddellCanseco on
Jan 5, 2008 11:27 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Catchers
If Sweeney and Cunningham warrant a parentheses appearance, I don't see why one or two of our catching prospects don't appear behind Suzuki.
Am I the only one here who isn't sold on Suzuki? I think Denorfia has a better chance of being good than Suzuki does.
by iglew on
Jan 4, 2008 11:13 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
not the only one
but I'm waiting to see what the deal with Powell is. If he gets healthy, and can stay at catcher, he's the supperior bet behind the plate.
by Zonis on
Jan 4, 2008 1:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Better defender too
A healthy Powell would be a star. Unfortunately, like the mythical healthy Kotsay, Chavez, and Harden, the mythical healthy Powell does not appear to exist.
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 4, 2008 2:01 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Only because the starting job
doesn't appear to be in question at the moment - I wasn't aiming for a roster of 25, actually, just the key elements. But I did omit Santiago Casilla (I'm having trouble with Hispanics today) - I knew I was missing a reliever but couldn't for the life of me think of who it was. And I had two names available to think of it. I'll add his name now...
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 2:45 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Where's DJ?
Barton I look for as the starting DH and Johnson as the starting 1b. Now that Swisher was traded DJ place at 1st has been saved. Beane may trade Street and Blanton if the prospects are right. Travis Buck is going to have a break out year. just watch he will give us Swisher 2006 #s.
by Arcman on
Jan 4, 2008 11:15 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Que?
You're DFAing Jack Cust?
Kotsay/Denorfia/Buck/Sweeney/(Cust in emergencies) is the outfield I expect the team to field. That's already 5 position players. Add in the two catchers, the four primary infielders (Ellis, Crosby, Chavez, Barton) and Murphy and Hannahan as bench players and you're looking at a full roster. There's no room for DJ.
As for Buck, if he hits 35 HR... OK, I already put my hat in pawn to Nico above, so I'll eat my shoe if he manages that.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 11:37 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd be surprised if Buck ever clears 25 HR.
Good eye, gap power, not a lot of pop in that bat.
by salb918 on
Jan 5, 2008 6:05 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Where's DJ?
Hopefully in Kansas City, where he belongs.
by jeepers on
Jan 4, 2008 12:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Where's DiNardo?
And what about Casilla, Gray, and Lugo?
by thejd44 on
Jan 4, 2008 11:20 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Blanton ate them
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 11:31 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
official A's roster and stats
from ESPN
Pitchers
NUM NAME POS BAT THW AGE HT WT 2007 SALARY
55 Joe Blanton P R R 27 6-3 250 $380,000
13 Jerry Blevins P L L 24 6-6 175 N/A
51 Dallas Braden P L L 24 6-1 183 N/A
59 Andrew Brown P R R 26 6-6 230 N/A
50 Kiko Calero P R R 32 6-1 203 $1,600,000
44 Santiago Casilla P R R 27 6-0 202 N/A
35 Lenny DiNardo P L L 28 6-4 190 $389,750
58 Justin Duchscherer P R R 30 6-3 203 $1,187,500
41 Alan Embree P L L 37 6-2 190 $2,356,496
25 Dana Eveland P L L 24 6-1 258 N/A
57 Chad Gaudin P R R 24 5-10 180 $400,000
40 Rich Harden P L R 26 6-1 190 $2,250,000
56 Fernando Hernandez P R R 23 5-11 190 N/A
45 Ruddy Lugo P R R 27 6-0 190 $403,600
37 Dan Meyer P R L 26 6-3 210 N/A
20 Huston Street P R R 24 6-0 195 $380,000Catchers
NUM NAME POS BAT THW AGE HT WT 2007 SALARY
18 Rob Bowen C B R 26 6-3 225 $382,300
24 Kurt Suzuki C R R 24 6-0 205 N/AInfielders
NUM NAME POS BAT THW AGE HT WT 2007 SALARY
69 Wes Bankston 1B R R 24 6-4 200 N/A
10 Daric Barton 1B L R 22 6-0 224 N/A
3 Eric Chavez 3B L R 30 6-1 230 $9,500,000
7 Bobby Crosby DL SS R R 27 6-3 217 $2,550,000
14 Mark Ellis 2B R R 30 5-11 190 $3,500,000
22 Jack Hannahan 3B L R 27 6-2 205 N/A
29 Dan Johnson 1B L R 28 6-2 226 $390,000
8 Kevin Melillo DL 2B L R 25 5-10 197 N/A
12 Donnie Murphy SS R R 24 5-10 185 N/AOutfielders
NUM NAME POS BAT THW AGE HT WT 2007 SALARY
6 Travis Buck DL RF L R 24 6-2 224 $380,000
32 Jack Cust DH L R 28 6-1 231 N/A
19 Chris Denorfia DL CF R R 27 6-0 195 $382,500
28 Carlos Gonzalez LF L L 22 6-1 180 N/A
21 Mark Kotsay DL CF L L 32 6-0 204 $8,000,000
26 Danny Putnam CF L L 25 5-10 202 N/A
15 Ryan Sweeney LF L L 22 6-4 215 N/AAverage Age: 26.4
Average Weight: 205
Average Height: 6-1
Right-Handed Pitchers: 10
Left-Handed Pitchers: 6
Right-Handed Batters: 6
Left-Handed Batters: 11
Switch Hitters: 1
by ST on
Jan 4, 2008 12:01 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Average weight: 205
Holy crap, Dana Eveland is bigger than Blanton.
by danmerqury on
Jan 4, 2008 12:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good post.
The Angels had better enjoy 2008, because when the A’s rebuild they rebuild differently than most teams: Before you even realize they’re rebuilding, they’ve already gotten the permits and laid the foundation, and are on to looking at what color they want for the trim.
I like this paragraph...it's cheery and makes me feel better. I am not so sure that this great team will emerge in 2009, It may be in 2010 that we contend again but the sentiment strikes a happy chord in my A's lovin" heart. Thanks Nico.
by IM4Oakgal on
Jan 4, 2008 12:11 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Denorfia
I know a ton of people on AN love this guy. I have checked out his numbers but have never seen him play. Can someone help me understand why I should be excited about him? Has he been hyped by scouts and projected to be a stud and that's why AN loves him? Or, is he a big OBP/pitch-taking kind of player.
by migueltejada on
Jan 4, 2008 12:49 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
As one of the primary boosters,
here's my take:
Denorfia's a grinder. He's not the most talented guy out there-- heck, he didn't even get a baseball scholarship in college. He played in Division III. 19th round draft pick. Nonetheless, he managed to come out of nowhere to be the Minor League POY for the Reds in 2005. He has good makeup.
Scouts generally like him because he has all 5 tools. Not in superabundance, mind-- the only thing he's really good at is hitting for average-- but he's got pop, speed (he'll steal 15 bases over a full year), range and a good arm. He's primarily a groundball hitter, but when he hits flies, they do damage-- his hitting pattern is similar to Jeter's.
Statheads are mixed. Some don't trust his numbers because he was not dominant in the lowest levels and was somewhat older than a lot of top prospects when he tackled them. Others, like me, look at his super-high OBP and average and see a guy who can consistently get on base and avoid making outs-- and point out that if he was old for his levels, it was as much because of the Reds holding him back as it was anything to do with his own performance.
I don't know anyone who's predicting stardom for him, but he could be quite good-- and he's something A's fans haven't seen much of in a while, a guy who can legitimately figure on challenging for a .300 average each season. The real key is whether he can be above average defensively as a center fielder. If he can, he could be a mainstay for years to come.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 1:12 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree about 97% with all of that
The one slight change would be that if he can become a consistent .850 OPS guy while playing an above average CF that he would be a star. I think there is a numerically significant chance (10-20% maybe) that he could be that guy, and be one of the better CFers in baseball for a 4-5 year period.
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 4, 2008 2:05 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Denorfia
In order for him to be "a mainstay for years to come" or "one of the better CFers in baseball", first the guy needs to stay off the DL and on the field. Oakland is loaded with guys who "project" to be better than their eventual performance because they just can't stay out of the whirlpool in the trainer's room...
by kitoko on
Jan 4, 2008 2:15 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Which is exactly why no one is counting on him
Neither PT nor I is advocating stardom or even full-time playing status to him, just saying that he deserves a chance and that there is real upside there.
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 4, 2008 2:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Which number looks like the anomaly here?
128,136,155,132,0
Those are Denorfia's games played in each full pro season. (He also played 63 in half a season after being drafted.) So far as I can tell, he has never suffered a single injury other than the one he sustained last spring.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 3:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was going to be mad...
about Beane trading Swish. Really, I was. But then I found this nugget. (I put it in spreadsheet format for easy reading) Then I started reading about the prospects that Beane got in the Swisher and Haren trades.
Looking at that spreadsheet I linked to above, I noticed that the only teams with payrolls similar to the A's to get to the World Series since Beane has been GM were the Marlins and the Rockies. Both of them did it with young teams, like the A's are going to have for the next couple of years.
And with a new stadium coming(when?), there may be enough payroll to keep some of those guys after they get good.
Maybe not all is lost after all?
by Evanstruth on
Jan 4, 2008 3:35 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
good stuff
It always helps to look at the big picture, and it's exciting to think of a young, talented team emerging around the same time the club gets a new ballpark.
by kvn on
Jan 4, 2008 4:20 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
On the new stadium
Beane seems to be rebuilding around pitching. The offensive talent he's picked up doesn't quite match the pitching prospects. So I'm wondering: Does anyone know if the new stadium is going to be a pitcher's park like the Coliseum? Short or long fences and what kind of foul ground?
by Peter in Montreal on
Jan 4, 2008 4:41 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Actual Salaries v. Real Salaries
I'm pretty sure the Rockies were still paying for Mike Hampton and (maybe) Denny Neagle. Rockies should be able to spend more in the coming years.
The A's can't/won't take risks like that... A's & Marlins have to be almost PERFECT when it comes to spending money. I just can't believe we (AN) were devising ways to sign Vernon Wells last offseason. What a difference a year makes.
by Colorado Fan on
Jan 4, 2008 4:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
told you so
sorry it had to be this obvious before some of you get it
by notah8er on
Jan 4, 2008 3:57 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
obvious exhaust? No, that's me
by monkeyball on
Jan 4, 2008 4:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Duh!!! Me stupid!!!!!!
Me no will get it till it even more obvious is!!!! Me marry own sister by mistake!!!!!
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 5:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A's new refund #
The A's have a new phone number for season ticket holders who want their money back.
It's 1-800-UP YOURS
by Concord Fanz Dad on
Jan 4, 2008 4:00 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm gonna doubt someone named floorpimp?
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 5:06 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's run by grover
the real acronym is 1-800-TRY MUPPETS
by monkeyball on
Jan 4, 2008 5:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
For years I thought I had a hand in
grover's success. Turns out that's not his success.
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 6:36 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wouldn't say that
I was satisified.
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 7:05 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Question & Comment
- Where's Lugo? He figures in the deal.
- "Before you even realize they’re rebuilding, they’ve already gotten the permits and laid the foundation, and are on to looking at what color they want for the trim."
Who cares how they rebuild if they still tank in the postseason?
by Mudcat on
Jan 4, 2008 6:44 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
A's Payroll in 2008
So without Kendall, Piazza, Swisher, Haren et al, has anyone figured out what is the A's likely payroll for 2008 (even without additional trades)?
by SA on
Jan 4, 2008 6:54 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Nah
Waiting for the bleeding to stop. I feel bad for the guys at BP and BA, not to mention Sickels, they had their lists done and WHAMMO Beane throws a monkey into the works.
by grover on
Jan 4, 2008 7:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nah Nah
I wouldn't worry. A couple of computer keystrokes and they are moved to their new team.
by jarforcefatherofforce on
Jan 4, 2008 7:19 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
About this part...
I think Beane is gunning to be back in true contention in 2009. Why? Because I think Buck and Barton are truly special,
What makes you think of Buck as truly special?
by IM4Oakgal on
Jan 4, 2008 7:24 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
You weren't directing the question to me...
but since I agree that Buck is special, here's my answer:
He just turned 24 in November, and offensively there isn't anything he doesn't do well (even his home run power, which is his weakest skill, could develop). He reached the majors 1 1/2 seasons out of college - where he was tremendous.
His combined minor league totals are about one season's worth: .325/.398./507.
He was easily going to be the most deserving rookie of the year had he played a full season in 2007 (I'm sure a Red Sox player would've won regardless of Buck's performace though). .288/.377/.474 for a 23 year old rookie with 1 full minor league season under his belt is impressive. And it's not as though he'a a flea out there, so it's reasonable that he'll improve his power. He's fast enough to rack up plenty of doubles and triples, and he's not half bad on defense, either.
What makes you think Buck ISN'T special?
by thejd44 on
Jan 4, 2008 7:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
When did I say he wasn't?
Thanks for your opinion and for looking up the numbers. :-)
by IM4Oakgal on
Jan 4, 2008 8:02 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You implied it with
the expression on your face as you typed.
Along with what thejd44 says, Buck has "successful major leaguer" written all over him - and did from the moment he started his big league career earlier than he was "supposed to". He has great baseball instincts (e.g., on the bases), a fearless-but-not-reckless ability to turn 2Bs into 3Bs or make that instinctive "I can catch that" dive in the alley, he is patient and aggressive at the plate at the same time, can slap a single to left or take Papelbon deep to right in the 9th.
And while he has areas that aren't great strengths (arm, power) he has no big weaknesses - he can walk, beat out an infield hit, double in the alley, bunt, run, triple into the corner, hit leadoff, hit second, hit fifth and drive in runs.
But most of all, he is a "big leaguer" - not an athlete or a player, a big leaguer. I think he's more likely to be a star than he is to be average.
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 8:45 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Another good answer.
and...Thanks for the answer. I wasn't trying to be snippy about Buck. I felt the excitement too when he was on the field. Of course, that was the catch. He wasn't on the field enough. Let's hope he doesn't have a problem with chronic injuries and that he lives up to the "truly special" tag.
by IM4Oakgal on
Jan 4, 2008 8:51 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Somehow Buck doesn't strike me
as a Harden or Crosby type who will be "injury prone". It seemed like he had a specific elbow problem (bone chip) and an acute hamstring injury, and both should be 100% cleared up come March. I don't see it as a pattern so much as fitting into the "everything went wrong in 2007" big voodoo doll in the sky. But whereas I expect Harden to go down / under the knife, and think Crosby is an injury/year kinda guy, I think Buck is likely to play in 150 games any/all of the next few years.
OaklandSi: "JINX!"
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 9:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I hope that you are right.
After last year I'm paranoid concerning injuries.
by IM4Oakgal on
Jan 4, 2008 9:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And
a sports hernia. And a sprained right thumb. And a strained left forearm. And the other hamstring too, I think.
Sorry, but 5 or 6 different injuries in one 12-month period makes Milton Bradley seem healthy by comparison.
by andeux on
Jan 5, 2008 12:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the Athletics agree
with you, as Buck is now on their promotional picture on Oaklandathletics.com
by Shippee33 on
Jan 7, 2008 6:41 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think I interpreted the wrong tone
Something about how you worded the question made me think you didn't believe in him. Maybe because you didn't include Barton? Regardless, I wasn't intended to be combative with a reply. Just giving my analysis.
On second thought, what's "truly special" mean anyway? I don't think Buck is a Hall of Famer in the making. I do think he has All-Star potential though, but only if he finds one skill he will excel at. Right now he's just pretty good at everything, and those guys seem to be undervalued/underrated.
by thejd44 on
Jan 4, 2008 11:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah truly special
is the way I felt when I used to watch Rickey. But Buck was exciting. When he came to the plate you had the feeling that something was brewing. As for the other..I questioned Nico because I enjoy reading his thoughts about players. I like the way he writes. He has a very good head for baseball and I knew that he would explain himself well. The truly special comment did surprise me ...because I think of Buck as an above average talent with loads of potential. But truly special means to me automatic HOFer when eligible. As for Buck... I was so looking forward to seeing him play with Swish. but that's the life for us isn't it?
by IM4Oakgal on
Jan 5, 2008 10:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ahhhhh Rickey.......
Now he was is the epitome of the term truly special. I can't wait untill a player like that comes around again. We have not seen any player like him since him....
by Shippee33 on
Jan 7, 2008 6:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The first time I saw Rickey play...
I knew he'd be HOF someday if he could stay healthy. I said it to my husband and he replied" That skinny little dude,,,he's fast but you gotta be kidding." Next year I get to say " I told you so." :-)
by IM4Oakgal on
Jan 7, 2008 6:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Off-topic, but....
You guys see that Luis Ayala was shot while hunting in Mexico?
by ET90210 on
Jan 4, 2008 8:44 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
{shrug}
So he knows how the f***ing birds feel.
by Nico on
Jan 4, 2008 8:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
--Dick Cheney
by PaulThomas on
Jan 4, 2008 9:08 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Another thing to keep in mind..
When talking about youth movement, Beane isn't playing. We have the 2nd youngest roster in MLB, next to the Marlins. Of course this doesn't take into account ability or otherwise, but it's interesting nevertheless. The DBacks are scary! Both young and talented:
Rank of Average Age of 40 man roster
1 Florida 25.3
2 Oakland 26.4
3 Arizona 26.8
4 Washington 26.9
5 Pittsburgh 27.018 San Francisco 28.2
26 Detroit 29.0
27 NY Mets 29.3
28 St. Louis 29.4
29 Boston 29.5
30 Houston 29.5
by ST on
Jan 4, 2008 9:15 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Division rival ranks:
9 Texas 27.1
14 Seattle 27.5
16 LA Angels 27.8
by ST on
Jan 5, 2008 6:25 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah 28.2????
That seems much younger than I would have guessed.
by IM4Oakgal on
Jan 5, 2008 10:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
is chavez gone next?
He said he wants out, its not like he produced past couple years.
by buckfan6 on
Jan 5, 2008 12:19 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think he said he wants out -
He more acknowledged they won't be contenders during the life of his contract (which may not even be true). If he leaves the A's, who will walk his dog?
Speaking of which, last night Poochini got onto the table (after 12 years, he just figured out he can do that), and procured 14 pieces of brandy-filled chocolates. For once, my dog was drunker than I was. (Strangely, despite combining chocolate and alcohol, neither very good for a 22-pound dog, he seemed absoutely fine. He even walked a straight line, though he couldn't recite the alphabet backwards - but really, who can?)
by Nico on
Jan 5, 2008 9:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Since its "my" thread, I might as well
Our 25 man roster as it would be if the season started today...
C1 Kurt Suzuki
1B Daric Barton
2B Mark Ellis
3B Eric Chavez
SS Bobby Crosby
LF Jack Cust
CF Mark Kotsay
RF Travis Buck
DH Dan Johnson
C2 Rob Bowen
CF Chris Denorfia
3B Jack Hanahan
SS Donnie Murphy
SP Rich Harden
SP Joe Blanton
SP Chad Gaudin
SP Dana Eveland
SP Dan Meyer
CL Huston Street
RP Justin Duchscherer
RP Alan Embree
RP Andrew Brown
RP Santiago Casilla
RP Kiko Calero
RP Fernando Hernandez
by Zonis on
Jan 5, 2008 10:46 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Looks right, expect I'd say
Duke to the rotation, and either Meyer or Eveland to the bullpen - both to the rotation with DiNardo in the pen if Harden starts the season on the DL.
by Nico on
Jan 5, 2008 11:01 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hadn't quite fully cottoned to the fact
that the A's have 13 non-optionable pitchers on the 40-man roster right now. Maybe even 14, depending on Lugo's status.
Eh, Harden will be on the DL anyway, so who cares. And if Lugo gets DFA'ed, I won't be weeping bitter tears.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 5, 2008 11:21 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought Lenny had an option left.
In the unlikely event that no one is injured between now and opening day I bet he's in AAA. I'd also be amazed if DJ is still there without an injury to someone.
by WaddellCanseco on
Jan 5, 2008 11:32 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No way Lenny has an option left
That's why he was DFA'ed to begin with-- the Sox ran out of options on him.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 5, 2008 11:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Shannon Stewart
He was the only hope we had to stay fully integrated. . .
by dtownmbrown on
Jan 5, 2008 11:01 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Billy Beane
The George Wallace of GMs. Well, except I don't think Wallace ever said anything about robots.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 5, 2008 11:09 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This list reminds me why...
The worst move Billy Beane made this offseason, by far, was allowing Kiko Calero to play baseball for the A's again. There's about 6 pitchers not on this list I'd rather see with "RP" in front of their name. I'd also like to see a few position players there instead of Calero.
Bright side is he'll probably either be hurt, put up a 10.20 ERA, or both before April 1 so we might not have to see him.
I like what Beane has done mostly, but certain aspects (Calero, Kotsay, Crosby, preferring 12 pitchers to 5 bench players), drive me up a wall.
And, again, where is DiNardo? He's certainly worthy of the #4, maybe #3, starter spot in your rotation there.
by thejd44 on
Jan 5, 2008 11:23 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If Calero's injury wasn't structura, meaning he
would need surgery. He will be very tradeable. He is an above average reliever, and if healthy he will be of value to a contender.
by theblackpearl on
Jan 5, 2008 11:54 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Meh
I don't see the need for a 33 year old reliever who is coming off a terrible season and injuries. This isn't Mariano Rivera we're talking about.
Trading him would be fine, but I'm not sure he really has much value.
by thejd44 on
Jan 5, 2008 12:46 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This was the first time in the last 5 years his
ERA was above 3.50, and his injury persisted this whole year. I believe this was his last arby year, and I can almost guarantee with a year anywhere near what he has had in the past, he will net a draft pick when he leaves next year and he will be getting a salary somewhere south of 1Million dollars.
by theblackpearl on
Jan 5, 2008 1:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2 things
- This is not his last arbitration year.
- To thejd: No one-- I mean, NO one-- uses 5 bench players in the AL anymore. You might for a couple of days if a guy is day-to-day with an injury, or during the playoffs when you only need 4 starters. Otherwise, not a chance.
by PaulThomas on
Jan 5, 2008 11:32 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Blanton to Mets?
As we all know, the "re-building" has to continue at this point...
by ET90210 on
Jan 5, 2008 12:08 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs















