Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Billy Beane AN Interview September 07 Part I

These are the times that try fan's souls.  But apparently not Billy Beane.  I sat down with Beane in his hotel when he came to the OC over the past Labor Day weekend and talked with him about pretty much everything that's happened in 2007.  He was in surprisingly good spirits despite the fact that the Oakland A's have dealt with more injuries than ever in the team's 39-year-history in the city of Oakland.  Not that the injury issues haven't taken its toll on Beane this year, but it seemed like he had enjoyed trying some creative ways of fielding a team in 2007.

Without further ado, here is the first part of my exclusive interview with A's General Manager Billy Beane:

Blez: I feel like we have this conversation every time we’ve gotten together the last couple of years, but the injuries this year have been ridiculous.  Do you think that the team would’ve had a chance to compete for the division crown had the injuries not been of such epic proportion?

Billy Beane:  Oh yeah, I definitely think so.  I think the talent we lost this year has had a huge impact on what has happened this year.  In fact, given where we’re at right now and given all the injuries we’ve had, I’m actually kind of surprised.  We’ve kind of had to reinvent everything on the fly.  You start forgetting about the people who’ve been out.  Arguably, Rich Harden is one of the best pitchers in the game when he’s on the hill and he’s been out the whole year.  Kotsay has been out most of the year as well as Chavy (Eric Chavez).  And the other thing with Chavy is that not only has he been out, but he’s been battling these injuries when he’s playing.  You go back and think of a time when we had Milton and he only played 15 games for us.  Bobby Kielty, who is one of the best hitters in the league against left-handed pitching.  Loaiza missed everything but two starts.  You forget.  Even a guy like Duchscherer.  Even now when you start talking about it you remember the guys who are missing.  Duchscherer is an All Star set-up man.  It’s been overwhelming.  Absurd is the word we’ve used this year.  To answer your question, I absolutely believe we would’ve competed.  That’s not to say we would’ve won it, but I definitely think we would’ve been looking forward to a little bit of a different September than we are right now.  

Blez:  You seem like you’d be too analytical to believe in something like bad luck or coincidence.  So is there anything that the team can do to start cutting down on these injuries?  It just seems like the last few years it’s getting progressively worse rather than regressing back to what you would assume would be the mean.

Beane:  Agreed.  There’s only so many times you can keep saying bad luck.  At some point you really have to dig down and figure out why this is going on.  And I can say that we’ve already started that process.  In some cases, there is bad luck.  Bobby Crosby gets hit with a 94 mile an hour fastball flush on his hand.  That’s just bad luck because there’s nothing Bobby could’ve done there.  I think the things you get concerned about is when you have muscle and tissue injuries.  We’ve had some bone injuries and Eric (Chavez) has had some back issues as well as Kotsay.  But when you have the tissue problems like a few guys pulling hamstrings, calves and obliques.  Those are the things you need to take a hard look at what you’re doing in terms of prevention and warm up.  And ultimately after you’ve done all that, you have to realize that some guys just get hurt a lot.  History will usually tell you that the younger you are, the healthier you’re going to stay.  That hasn’t necessarily been the case with us.

Blez:  Like Travis Buck.

Beane:  Yeah, that one has been tough.  What happens is that we’ve had it come in such bulk and every day, one or two guys go down and what you really don’t want to do is create that culture and not know it.  In other words, constantly having guys nursing something.  In Travis’ case, in fairness, he has bone chips and spurs in his elbow and he did everything he could for as long as he could to stay on the field.  But he also had other issues like forearms and he pulled his hammy.  When that happened, we said, let’s just get this kid healthy.  We said the same thing with Eric.  You saw it in that one day when we announced that Eric, Kotsay and Travis were shut down for the year.  We just made a decision that we were better served taking advantage of this last month and fixing everyone first, whether that meant surgery or rest.  That would also allow them the benefit of a much longer offseason so they could prepare for the long season.  The roundabout answer to your question is that we’ve started the process (of how to prevent injuries).  We’re doing as a group.  When things like this happen, there is often a lot of finger pointing.  People want to say, “the medical staff is to blame” but that’s something we talked about last year.  Understand in most cases, the medical staff is there to treat injuries.  One thing we are going to look at is how we prepare ourselves.

Blez:  You mean like strength and conditioning?

Beane:  Yeah, but not just that.  One of the things that is difficult now is that a lot of the players have their own guys and do their own thing.  It’s very hard to keep track of what they’re doing.  Guys talk to each other and agents recommend guys who recommend their own doctors.  Nowadays when a guy gets injured, he’s going to go see two or three other guys regardless of who your team doctor is.  

Blez:  Is there a way to mandate that it be an internal process or is the MLBPA standing in the way of that?

Beane:  You’re limited.  In fairness to the players, it’s their careers and they want to take as much advice as they can when it comes to recommending guys.  But there are definitely times when there are too many cooks in the kitchen and it isn’t just with us, it happens to a lot of teams throughout the league.  Sometimes it’s good because we’ve had guys who have provided second, third or fourth opinions who have helped correct a problem.  But getting back to medical, in most cases, when they see the doctor is when they’ve already been hurt.  We’re definitely going to place a pretty heavy emphasis not only on what the guys are doing in the offseason to prepare themselves, but making sure we monitor them even closer than we have in the past.  We started a couple of weeks ago and we’re going to have a pretty good jump on this offseason.

Star-divide

Blez:  How are you guys going to do that if they’re all doing their own thing?

Beane:  We’re sitting down and going over every single injury we’ve had.  Some of them are unavoidable like Bobby (Crosby) getting hit on the hand is just bad luck.

Blez:  You guys just need to prescribe more milk in his diet.

Beane:  (laughs)  Yeah, but the videotape of every one of Bobby’s broken bones, they’re pretty violent.  I mean he got hit in the back in spring training with a 95 mile an hour fastball and cracked a rib.  He fractured his ankle on a collision at the plate.  And got hit in the hand with a ball.  Not too many bones would’ve stood up to what Bobby had to go through.  He wants to get back on the field.  We keep a daily log on everything, but we’re going to separate the broken bones on collisions from the tissue injuries.

Blez:  In other words, the injuries that you think are more preventable?

Beane:  Possibly preventable.  And we’re going to see what we can do.  We will do something.  There will be a change in at least what we suggest.  Remember, these are only suggestions.  When all is said and done, these guys more often than not have their own guys and their own programs.  

Blez:  I imagine that has to be pretty frustrating for you.

Beane:  Frustrating only in the sense that it would be nice if everything was centralized because you take a player with an injury, and I’m just going to use a shoulder injury as an example.  You’re doing certain exercises on certain days that are prescribed by the doctor or administered with a PT (physical therapist) and you might not know that that same player maybe doing something completely different with someone else as well and then just by virtue of you doing two different exercise programs, other factors might come into play.  You could have significant fatigue.  It’s not always that you don’t think they’re getting good advice, it’s just that you don’t always know the others things they’re doing which could impact it.  It’s not always more is better.  And if it becomes redundant or ultimately causes fatigue when you’re trying to rehab, it can cause more problems.  We’ve had that issue and it’s been tough on our trainers.  I think it’s one of the things we’ve emphasized with our players. If you’re going to go to someone else, make sure that we have the information as to what you’re doing so that we’re not being redundant with what we do with you at the ball park.

Blez:  The team went to the ALCS last year and this year it seems like, probably in large part because of all the injuries, this team is entering a phase of, and I know you don’t like this word, re-building. Would you agree that the team is entering a phase of rebuilding or because of all the injuries you don’t really know what you’re going to do yet?

Beane:  (laughs)  Well, re-building is such an all-encompassing word.  First, we’re trying to get healthy.  If you think about the players that are out that should be back and should be healthy, then it’s significant.  Take the pitching staff for example.  Take Joe Blanton, Dan Haren, Chad Gaudin and Rich Harden as your staff.  That’s a rotation you would want at any point that you have a team whether it’s a re-building team or it’s a competing team.  It’s a great starting staff.  Lenny DiNardo has also had a great year for us as well as some of the guys coming up.  And it’s still young.  We’re still a young team.  Just because Dan Haren has turned into one of the best pitchers in the game doesn’t mean you can forget about the youth of the team.  Haren is only 26 years old.  Gaudin is, what, 24 years old.  Joe (Blanton) is what, 26.  When you say re-building, for us it’s a different definition.  For us, it’s about getting healthy.  We’re always trying to get younger.  In our market, it’s critical that we’re constantly staying young.  We’ve got a young catcher in Suzuki and a young outfielder in Buck.  So we’re already kind of there any way.
Blez:  In other words, strategically replacing specific pieces of the puzzle.

Beane:  Yeah, maybe I’ll use that one (laughs).  But the first thing is getting healthy.  Chavy is still young.  He’s 29 years old.  

Blez:  You brought up Chavy.  He hasn’t really had an Eric Chavez-type season for, what two or three years now.

Beane:  It’s been a couple of years.

Blez:  Do you think if he has whatever surgeries he needs and rehabs and gets healthy, do you think that we’re going to see him get back to that level?  Are the injuries why we’ve seen such a rapid decline in him?

Beane:  I have no doubt.  I have absolutely no doubt.  The difference between Eric and other people is that he doesn’t talk about it.  It is really the case.  Eric has been battling a lot of things for the last two years.  And then last year, some of the things that wound up bothering him this year, we were hoping rest would’ve helped.  But when he came back, all those things flared up again.  All these things are things that should’ve been corrected a year ago.  But you’re always going to avoid surgery if you can.  But after rest and then after going through spring training, it started to flare up during the season.  For instance, he’s having shoulder surgery this week on Wednesday.  We think that contributed to a lot of the problems he had last year with his forearms.  So there’s no doubt, to answer your question.  Eric isn’t going to use that as an excuse.  In fact, we shut him down about a week ago when we announced it.  Eric wanted to get out there, even if it was for the last 10 days of the season he wanted to play.  He has a great sense of responsibility after being here as long as he has and being the highest paid player on the club, he knows what his role is.  You’re never going to hear him use it as an excuse.  So we finally said that we wanted him to take the month and finally start getting healthy.  Eric is still a very young man and I think his last years have absolutely been a result of the injuries.

Blez:  You have a legendary reputation for how competitive you are.  How much has this season worn on you emotionally especially since it’s been a very, very long time since the green and gold wasn’t a factor in the playoff hunt down?

Beane:  I’m not sure I would say emotionally.  I’ve never really had my self esteem placed on the next day’s game.  That being said, it’s a lot easier going through this in your 10th year as general manager as opposed to if it was your first.  I think in some respects, some of the things we’ve been able to do, and I say we because I include David and Farhan in this whole thing, we’re pretty proud of.  We’ve had to just completely reinvent things.  We’ve had 22 disabled lists and used 51 players, or actually it might be more than that depending on what’s happened today.  We’ve had to invent a team on the fly and we’ve had some great things come out of it.  There’s some satisfaction in that.  It’s never fun when you aren’t winning as much as you have in the past, but I think it’s more frustrating when you’re completely at a loss as to why it’s happening.  For us the frustration is not being healthy.  These are always times for opportunity and you get to try some crazy things.  Sometimes they work, sometimes they don’t.  But it’s part of the process.  The greatest thing is that Bob (Geren) hasn’t seen a day when he hasn’t gotten excited.  For him to have to go through this in his first season as a major league manager, I don’t feel bad for me, I feel bad for him.  If you even mention that to Bob, he looks at you as if you’re from Mars.  He’s like, “What do you mean, I have the greatest job in the world?  Why would I be down?”  That’s just his nature.  

Blez:  Was there a defining moment this year when you kind of said to yourself, well, the playoffs are now a huge uphill climb?  You mentioned finding out about the Bobby Crosby extended injury during the same game when Kielty hit the home run off K-Rod a few seasons ago, and knowing that the team would be missing Ellis during the last ALCS as similar moments.  Did you have a moment like that this year?

Beane:  I always resist answering a question or evaluating something like that especially since we’re sitting here September 3.  I think the way we look at this is that we still have goals for this year.  You mentioned how competitive I am, but let’s assume for one second that we’re not in the playoffs.  Every game we win is important.  I don’t ever want to spend the month of September just getting the season over with and that’s certainly not the case right now.  I think a point that we did realize that it was going to be a tough climb was probably the day before we went to the break and Rich came back on a Sunday.  He came in afterward and didn’t feel right and we had to shut him down again. At that point, the team had done a great job of just hanging in there.  The Angels hadn’t really had the run yet that they’d recently had.  You knew it was going to happen, but we were able to find a way of staying within shouting distance.  I think after the break, when we started thinking about the possibility, we would’ve been able to start firing Haren, Blanton, Gaudin and Harden had he come through it and Lenny going the way that he’s going, and any time you have those guys you have a chance to do some special things.  One of the reasons we’ve had such great second half runs here is that our starting pitching has largely been healthy and been great.  When you have that kind of starting pitching, anything can happen.  Because after all the injuries we’d overcome to that point and we were still within shouting distance, and the thought of having a Cy Young-caliber guy out there for the second half, it was something everyone was excited about.  So when he had that setback, the day before the break was a tough day.  Ironically, I think we beat Seattle that first day out of the break then lost the next three and really proceeded to stumble.  Injuries you just sort of get everyone to rally around and circle the wagons but you do have a time where everyone starts thinking there is an endpoint and people say, we’ll just find a way to get through this.  Like even Ellis last year in the playoffs.  We’d gone through so much last year just to get to that point and it was just really deflating.  It was like, “Not this again.”

Blez:  You’ve traded away or let go of quite a bit of salary as the season has progressed.  Bradley, Kendall, Kennedy and now Loaiza.  Were these moves mostly about cutting payroll?

Beane:  In most of those cases we didn’t really save that much payroll.  It was trying to move forward.  The toughest one was Jason (Kendall).  You talk about all these injuries and having all kinds of guys on the shelf and here you have a guy who you couldn’t drag out of a game.  He was very popular with everyone, including front office and staff.  He was just the ultimate gamer.  That one was very difficult because guys like that are great examples for younger players.  We were also wrestling with the fact that we had a young catcher who at some point needed to get major league experience.  As far as saving money, between Jason and Milton, there wasn’t significant money really being saved.  We did get some prospects that we really like.  It was really about saying, if we’re going to go through this difficult period and the year is turning out the way it’s turning out to be, let’s at least use this as an opportunity to find out where we’re at. With Esteban, when he was claimed off waivers and we gave him up to the Dodgers there was certainly significant salary savings there.  No question and that factored into it.  Each one was a little different.  By and large, it was trying to project into the future to try and project long-term assets.

Blez:  As for the guys you let go on waivers, Kennedy and Loaiza, is the fact that they were let go for nothing an indication of their lack of market value?  Because you never want to let go of something for nothing, right?

Beane:  Yeah, that is true.  In fairness to the players, it’s probably not fair to answer that question.  In those cases, having the flexibility in the payroll is a big addition.  If I said there was no interest in this guy or no interest in that guy…

Blez:  In other words, we can draw our own conclusions as to how it happened?

Beane:  Yeah, exactly.  The thing about trade market is that it’s always fluctuating.  I’ll give you an example.  As great a player as Mark McGwire was for us, and I was an assistant GM when Sandy (Alderson) was here, with the Cardinals it turned out to be a great deal for them.  But I’ve said this to you before, only one team had interest in him and that was the Cardinals.  That was the only team that thought they could use that player.  You never know.  The misconception people have in trade value is sometimes is all over the map.  For players you can have a player that you have a ton of interest one week and then none the next week.

Blez:  You’ve addressed this a bit already when talking about injuries.  But if there was one good thing about the injuries, they have given lots of opportunities to guys that might not have had them otherwise.  Guys like Gaudin, DiNardo and Cust have gotten extended looks because of the injuries and problems.  Do you think it’s going to make the team stronger moving forward by getting a chance to basically audition a lot of talent?

Beane:  No question.  You can include Jack Hannahan on that list.  In fact, I was talking to one of the players yesterday and you look at things a little different when you’re younger and look at things on a daily basis, but when you get to my age you look at things on a bigger picture.  Jack had just gotten a game winning hit and the player asked me, “Well, what are you going to do with him when Chavy gets back?”  I said, “What do you mean, having too many good players is a problem?”  Jack (Hannahan) has been given that opportunity and he’s a player we’ve always liked.  When Chavy went down we thought, who are we going to get to play third base, and we thought, let’s give this kid a chance.  We wanted to draft him years ago.  At the end of the day, hopefully we’re creating a problem for ourselves in that we’ll have a lot of players.  We’ve been looking for that kind of power and on-base in the middle of the lineup for a few years.  Jack certainly has a long-term future here.  And Chad, obviously with the way he’s pitched to go from middle reliever to do what he’s been doing at 24 years old is remarkable.  We’ve run across something pretty good that’s going to be here a few years.  

Blez:  Did you expect Cust to be what he’s been so far this year?

Beane:  You know, I think everyone, and I don’t think it’s unique to us, that everyone has always felt that if given an opportunity that he would be fine.  There’s just not too many DH spots open.  The surprising thing is that we’ve been running him in the outfield as often as we have.  We didn’t expect to do that and I think he’d be the first to tell you that’s not his strength.  Then again, for lack of a better term, he’s been playable which has allowed us to get Mike in there.  He’s had a couple of mishaps on first hitters of the game, but by and large, he’s shown himself OK.  I don’t think anyone expected that.  I didn’t think that he’d be knocking on 30 (home runs) and 100 (RBI) if he started the season in May, but I think we were all intrigued by what he could do if he played a lot.

Blez:  If there’s another good thing about the A’s being out of the race, it’s that you could possibly have a chance to draft in a better position than in many years.  That’s one thing that has got to bring a smile, albeit a small one, to your face, right?

Beane:  (laughing)  Well, I’m an optimist by nature and one year when Farhan got here, he accused me of “leader speak”.  It was the first year he was here and we had our usual terrible May.  I was saying, this is going to be fun, we can try things we wouldn’t normally try.  It was actually the year we traded Mulder and Hudson and we were like 5-25 that May.  I kept telling him, this is going to be fun.  We ended up finishing fine, but then at the end of the year he told me, I just agreed with you then but I honestly thought you were just giving me leader speak.  That being said, I always do look for opportunities because it’s my nature.  As for what you just mentioned, yeah, that is one of the great things.  Absolutely.  Listen, with 24 games left, I still want to draft as low as we possibly can.  But we haven’t drafted in the top 15 in a long time and Swisher was, what, 16th?  We haven’t drafted that high in a long, long time.  I still hope we’re in the 20s to be honest with you, but those are things you look at at the end of the season, not while it’s still going on.

Blez:  There has been a lot of speculation as to why the A’s are clearing out so much salary and that the team has definite off season free agent targets. Do you have an idea as to what you want to do this upcoming offseason already?

Beane:  We’re always thinking ahead, but you’ve probably heard this a lot on the national shows and whatnot, but this isn’t a great class of free agents.  There will always be some out there but we’re not exactly major players when it comes to free agents.  We’ve had some signings these past few years and so have worked out very well and some not so well.  But the class itself isn’t recognized as being a real good one.  I think what we have to do is get a handle on our health and where we project to be starting next year.  Where our healthy projects is the most important thing we need to find out.  We’ll know after some of these surgeries where these guys will be.  Justin (Duchscherer) is on the mend.  Eric will be having his shoulder surgery.  We expect everything to be fine but before we do anything we need to figure out where these guys are at.

Blez:  Is that why you’re bringing Rich (Harden) back rather than shutting him down in September?

Beane:  Rich is probably in as good a spirits as I’ve seen him in a long time.  And maybe that’s what happens when you kind of put it out of your mind.  Rich is such a talented pitcher that he’s one of those guys where you wake up every morning just wondering how Rich is doing?  With the setback he had before the All Star break we finally just said, he’s going to come back when he comes back.  As a result, it’s been sort of an out of sight, out of mind thing.  He’s been in Arizona, but he’s back with the team now being here in Anaheim.  He feels terrific.  We’re not going to rush him back at the end of the year.  He may go to instructional league if he doesn’t.  We anticipate he’s going to be back based upon how he’s doing before the season is over.  I think we’d be disappointed if he isn’t based on how he’s feeling.  That being said, we’re not just going to shove him out there.  We’ll see how he’s doing, if need be, in instructional league.  Right now, with the time we have left and based on how he’s feeling, we should see him.

Coming Monday:  Beane talks about opportunities in the free agent market, how one measures what a player contributes offensively and defensively and whether Jason Kendall's loss really impacted the pitching staff.

0 recs  |  Comment 120 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thanks, Blez...

You ask intelligent and incisive questions.

"The more self-centered and egotistical a guy is, the better ballplayer he's going to be."- Bill "The Spaceman" Lee

by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on Sep 6, 2007 8:46 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great stuff as always, Blez...

Thanks so much for these interviews.

But Monday??? Dude... that's a lot of waiting! :(

http://athleticssupporter.com

by Kelly on Sep 6, 2007 8:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

interesting

I wonder if he's also considering whether signing players with a history of injuries might also increase the chances of having a season like this one.

Looking forward to the rest of the interview...good job!

by OaklandSi on Sep 6, 2007 8:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Really great stuff, Blez.

You ought to have Joe Morgan's job.

That said, my 18-month-old should have Joe Morgan's job, so...

The Kendall Shift: 6 infielders and 2 catchers.

by Ozzz on Sep 6, 2007 9:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Joe Morgan?

Joe Morgan is a color commentator, not an interviewer. Color guys (excuse me, analysts) tend to be kind of a dime a dozen anyway.

Maybe he should have Buster Olney's job.

Got me to thinking, though, who WOULD I want as a SNB color man? Hershiser is probably the best one out there right now.

by PaulThomas on Sep 6, 2007 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

drawing my own conclusion ...

Esteban Loaiza will hit 71 home runs for the Dodgers next year.

Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 9:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

about the conditioning aspect

I played competitive soccer for 10 years and if we weren't match fit at the first practice we would not play.  Your muscles just can't handle the sudden shock of going full speed after a period of rest.  The problem is baseball is one of the only games where a 280lber is considered an athlete while drinking beer and eating hot dogs.  Beane is absolutely correct the injuries involving muscle are completely reliant on offseason fitness and the fact of the matter is baseball doesn't demand it, they hardly demand it during the season.  It is the "drinking man's game" and if you are a multimillion dollar athlete you need to take some responsibility and act like one.

"Just looking at Lackey's face, you just want to beat him" -Ray Fosse

by marco magic on Sep 6, 2007 10:24 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe relevant in the abstract...

... but this team doesn't have too many David Wellses.  Chavez, Buck, Kotsay, etc., are all ridiculously fit athletes.  Many think the problem with Harden is that we works too hard to get fit.  I agree with Billy that it's a bit of a deeper question than just off-season prep, and an investigation is worthwhile.

by Joey C. on Sep 6, 2007 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks again, Blez

Beane seems to be getting more and more comfortable with your style, and is actually opening up a bit. (Loaiza's value, for example.) I'm looking forward to the next installment.

"We've come a long way, and I'm not talking about Virginia Slims, either." - Art Howe

by EastCoastA on Sep 6, 2007 10:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I think Beane opened up, and Blez, once again you did an outstanding job with your Q&A.  None finer, IMO.

Blez, I think you definitely put a "defined edge" to some of those fuzzy areas we've all had re the Athletics management thinking.  I think what was particularly insightful was drawing out the commentary about a player's trade value being all over the map, with the MacGwire example particularly illuminating.  One has to remember, when a team (say like the Dodgers) is interested in a player one week (Blanton) then drops it, it may be that they have (1) a minor leaguer who looks good enough (2) another deal with another club.  It isn't simply a "gosh, that last start was a dud! Good bye!" attitude by the Dodgers.  Other factors play, and we all tend to omit "other factors" and instead use a very narrow "cause and effect" argument.

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Sep 6, 2007 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great interview

Regz Sez Blez for Prez (I stole that from Kaweah). Can't wait for the rest.

by Reg on Sep 6, 2007 10:46 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice interview

Thanks Blez!

It seems Beane was more willing to discuss the prevalent injury situation here than he was during AN Day.  I wonder if that has more to do with the format of the interview, or if there's been a change in thinking since then.

Will there ever be a boy born who can swim faster than a shark?

by JLeverenz on Sep 6, 2007 11:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

It seems to me that Beane isn't saying anything fundamentally different from what he said at AN Day, just different specifics (here, going into more detail on how it's ultimately individual players' responsibilities to stay/get in shape; at AN Day, going into more detail in defending the medical/training staff).

The only major difference I can see in Beane's responses (and this is only me reading between the lines here) is that we might not see Cockrell back next year.

Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

From what I recall hearing at AN Day (and I was sitting towards the back so it was difficult to hear everything clearly) it seemed that Beane was sticking to "all injury's are a bad luck, there's only so much the training staff can do" line and here he's making a distinction between hard luck injuries (broken bones) and injuries that should be preventable (muscle/tissue) , or at least more preventable than what we've seen over the last 2-3 years.  

He also specifically mentioned that the team is taking a hard look at prevention and warm-up.  It seems to me as though the front office has maybe admitted/realized/discovered that the reason an increasing number of A's players are getting injured each year has more to do with something the organization is doing/not doing and less to do with random chance/injury-prone players.

Boy, I do love my / marks.

Will there ever be a boy born who can swim faster than a shark?

by JLeverenz on Sep 6, 2007 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm thinking of a word...prejudice...

Monkey, I think you frontload a lot of your thinking with your own mental generations.

Consistently, I get the feeling your outlook is, "I know what is true, and the rest of the world needs to eventually catch up."

So when some additional information, such as this interview come up, you parse it parse it parse it until... "Hey, nothing new here... I still hold with my original idea!"

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Sep 6, 2007 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

guilty as charged
Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I intend to resign from AN as of 9/30

< dispatches Arlen Specter to lobby Blkez to keep me on >

Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Sep 6, 2007 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't tell

Is that primate tapping his foot?

by ozzman99 on Sep 6, 2007 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No. She just can't bear to contemplate ....

mb's resignation.  

In other news, this is her sign for "I am not now, nor have I ever been a gayrilla:"

(Okay, okay -- it's actually her sign for "fruit.")

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Sep 6, 2007 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fruit?

Who is she calling a fruit?  And isn't that unnecessarily derogatory?  I believe the term is homosexual.  How the hell did you find a non-PC gorilla?

by ozzman99 on Sep 6, 2007 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

While her vocabulary is limited ...

... I think it's safe to say that she knows fruit when she sees (and hears) it.  

She can also sign as follows:

Koko extends her index finger from her fist, with her fingertip held to her upper lip just under her nose. Sometimes she presses her lip and wiggles her hand, sometimes she moves hand away and downward. Koko uses this same sign for both "fake" and "false."

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Sep 6, 2007 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's nice

But can she ask you to pull her finger?

Until she masters that, I still say I am smarter than her.

by ozzman99 on Sep 6, 2007 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Sep 6, 2007 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who taught her that?

At least she isn't flinging poo at me.  I hate when that happens.

by ozzman99 on Sep 6, 2007 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

??!!!!

..that was refreshing!
QOTM!

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Sep 6, 2007 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hey, when I'm nailed, I'm nailed
Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, that and you accidentally added a 'k'

to your name

'I have a theory about Randy Bell, but it betrays such an abject lack of faith in humanity that I cannot voice it.' ~FSU

by LAXile on Sep 6, 2007 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey LAXile
Any chance you're going to be in town on 9/30?  I'd email you but your profile thwarts me...
The smart money lies

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 6, 2007 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My AN name can't begin to tell you how much I wish
wish I could be up there for those last games...but it looks like I'll remain in my smogged out exile.  (My email is now in my profile, btw.)
'I have a theory about Randy Bell, but it betrays such an abject lack of faith in humanity that I cannot voice it.' ~FSU

by LAXile on Sep 6, 2007 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fuels my fears

I'll stipulate that I am always inclined to see the most greedy motivations possible when it comes to ownership.  I'll further stipulate that I don't blame Beane for whatever fiscal marching orders he's been given by Wolffish.  Those things said, this continues to sound a whole lot like 2008 (and possibly '09) are being planned as low payroll, likely uncompetitive roster years.  To wit:

  • Re Kennedy and Loaiza:  "In those cases, having the flexibility in the payroll is a big addition...The thing about trade market is that it’s always fluctuating."  So, they got nothing in return, but in a fluid market, they maybe could have gotten something later.  Instead, the cutting payroll imperative was primary.
  • Re spending the money saved:  "..this isn’t a great class of free agents.  There will always be some out there but we’re not exactly major players when it comes to free agents...I think what we have to do is get a handle on our health and where we project to be starting next year."  Here, and also earlier in the interview, Beane says he believes that the health of the current core players could determine competitiveness.  Extrapolating, he claims that he thinks the A's can be a winning team as currently built, mostly, assuming a return to health.  

I disagree.  This roster looks closer to Texas than d'Anaheim, competitively speaking.  Billy doesn't say anything about trade targets, so perhaps Nico's hopeful scenario of getting a major payroll piece by way of trade hasn't been ruled out.  But the guys playing now, the payroll being saved for next year, and the answers in this interview all suggest a planned also-ran roster in '08, at least.  Sure, Billy and Lew and John will be delighted if the cheap guys succeed anyway...but that doesn't sound like the operating expectation to me.

Meanwhile, Billy's 4% of the potential 2008 $20-30 million operating profit (if that's how their partnership deal works) stands to be a pretty sweet Christmas bonus.

For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 6, 2007 12:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

OK, I have to ask this

What the heck is the deal with the "Wolffish" thing? It looks completely stupid.

by PaulThomas on Sep 6, 2007 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it looks totally cool

So there you have it.  The A's are fronted by Lew Wolff but primarily owned by Gap scion John Fisher.  While many people talk about the actions of "owner Lew Wolff," in fact it is mostly young John's cash.  Wishing not to be part of that mischaracterization when describing the actions of ownership, I opt for the hybrid Wolffish, and I like the way it describes both major owners' names as well as their sheepskin clad bottom line motivations.  Fun with language is what separates us from the trilobites.

For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 6, 2007 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Personally before I got it (a long time ago)

I hated it since I thought it was derogatory (which was when you were fuming way too heavily about the tarps/move to Fremont).  Once I got it, I understood it, still don't particularly care much for it, but meh, whatever, I guess it's clever in it's own way ;)

In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!

by DMOAS on Sep 6, 2007 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's grating to me

because it looks like an adjective. Every time I see it in a sentence, my grammar module starts screaming at me.

Meh. I can't stop you from using it. But I really, intensely dislike it.

by PaulThomas on Sep 6, 2007 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

meh hate me
habitually tragicomic approach @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 7, 2007 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wolffish is dead! Long live Wolffish!

I was also thinking about using "Wolfftoman" (as in, "We live in a society where man is..."), but it don't got that thing.  Why the fuck is everybody so picky on this site today?  First monkeyball's habitually tragicomic approach is attacked and now your clever wordplay.

Come to think of it, I'm mad too!  Who does Erik Being Erik think he's kidding? Sometime he acts more like a Victor.  And what's the deal with baseballgirl?  Her intelligence and elegant prose style suggest she's much more of a baseballlady.  And don't get me started on ohtobe21olikehouston, who doesn't even know how old the city is!

'I have a theory about Randy Bell, but it betrays such an abject lack of faith in humanity that I cannot voice it.' ~FSU

by LAXile on Sep 6, 2007 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You put an extra "o" before "like"

in O2B. Ruined the joke. Christ.

by mikeA on Sep 6, 2007 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

grover thanks you
habitually tragicomic approach @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's like a not-quite-healed scab

viz., niggling and annoying every time you're reminded of it.

What does one do with not-quite-healed scabs? Pick at them...

by PaulThomas on Sep 6, 2007 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here I was minding my own beeswax and then I

see the double-butcher of my username. Is Huston really a city?

"He thinks the lady doth protest too much." -Larry David (or Shakespeare)

by ohtobe21likehuston on Sep 6, 2007 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Technically

"LAXile" means you're exiled FROM LA.  Never understood why that would be a problem.

"Female ass are strange creatures. They come and go as they please." -- Sigourney Weaver

by oblique on Sep 6, 2007 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree in principle/prejudice, but ...

... given the FA class, unless we sign Bonds and/or A-Rod, there's no point in increasing payroll next year.

Even if we were to go all Steinbrenner and eat the contracts of Chavvy and Kotsay and try to trade for significant upgrades ... well, identify the expensive significant upgrades at those positions we could acquire with the talent we have in the system.

Beane's been eating his seed crop the last couple years. His only choice right now is to let the fields lie fallow and start leafing through the Burpee's.

I'm as eager to ascribe running-dog motive as you are, but for '08, I don't know that Beane has much realistic choice to do otherwise, without pursuing a Sabeanesque sign-old-crappy-guys-for-the-sake-of-appearances charade.

Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quite so

Whether by design or happenstance, the A's roster now has more holes than can be filled with money alone.  And I surely don't advocate spending the money poorly (though trade options are more intriguing than FA ones).  I offered in Taj's diary last week that I think the payroll slash is the cause and the youth movement the effect, but even if it's the reverse it adds up to the same product on the 2008 field.  

For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 6, 2007 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see how payroll

has anything whatsoever to do with it ("it" being the not-too-rosy outlook for next year.) Injuries, barren minor leagues, and bad FA contracts are/have been the problem.

Having spent an extra $10 million this year, or doing so next year on anyone except ARod/Bonds wouldn't do any good at all. It's not a matter of them thinking "Well, we could win in 08, or just pocket the money instead." The team just can't be improved much right now or last offseason  by increasing the payroll.

by mikeA on Sep 6, 2007 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

bad FA contracts?

More to the point, bad contract extensions and bad contract acquisitions.

Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are always ways to invest in success

including long-term success, like draft pick signing bonuses, player development infrastructure, and better fan appreciation giveaways (c’mon, baseball card sets on 9/30? Where are the new cars and trips to Maui?).  Rebuilding per se doesn’t bother me, and Billy’s declarations of current talent notwithstanding, rebuilding seems to be proper and greatly needed.  What does bother me is the sense that the extra money isn’t being set aside for spending at a time when it can be more wisely used.  I’m not willing to just trust ownership’s good intentions.

Like a lot of folks I’ve enjoyed rooting for the A’s to do more with less, better, than their 29 competitors.  But there’s a dangerous slippery slope from rooting for intelligent front officing to rooting for ownership’s bottom line...they sure as hell aren’t rooting for mine.  Until I see indications that they plan on plowing any "operating profit" back into the franchise’s baseball ops (and to date they don’t even give us vague assurances on that front), I’m going to assume the profit-taking worst...since MLB history clearly shows that’s where the smart money lies.

For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 6, 2007 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, that's a good point.

Probably some money could be well spent in "operations" or draft picks. It's not that I disagree with you on motives, just that such motives are a fairly negligible element of the current problems.

by mikeA on Sep 6, 2007 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

except that ...

... and both you and FSU weren't there, and I don't think this was disseminated broadly, but at AN Day, Beane specifically said he doesn't cross the budget streams -- if there's a cost savings in one area (say, player salaries) it does not get rolled into supplementing another (say, draft pick bonuses).

Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if Beane intentionally tanked the team ...

... he did it with great foresight three years ago.

Basically, this team is mediocre (and will continue to be mediocre through '08 at least) because Beane thought that a position-player core of Kotsay-Kendall-Chavez-Crosby-Swisher would be productive through the length of their contracts, and worth spending a lot of payroll on.

Getting rid of the deadweight this year seems to me to amount to a recognition that the approach with that core of player contracts has failed.

Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't entirely agree

First of all, I do think this team can be very competitive when healthy.  If the team is looking at ways to stay healthy, as Beane said, then he is right to re-evaluate this team before making any major moves.  Why throw away payroll on a replacement for Chavez if he will be fully healthy next year?  If it's true that he's had shoulder problems for 10 years, he may be on the verge of his peak years after surgery.  Combine that with an improving Buck and Suzuki, plus Cust, Swisher, and Ellis, and you have the makings of a serviceable offense.  On the pitching side, if Beane thinks they have found a way to keep Harden healthy and he expects Duke back, he has an excellent staff.

Secondly, if the FA class is weak and your minors are weak, all the more reason to start the season below budget on payroll.  This gives Beane more ability to make a midseason move to improve the team without giving up the few quality prospects we have.  For all we know, he may already have someone in mind.

by ozzman99 on Sep 6, 2007 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, yes, the midseason move savings account

Pays great interest, but there's a substantial penalty for early withdrawal, any time before 2010.

No doubt the start low/aim high plan leaves flexibility, on the chance that the plucky underpaid newbies manage to stay in the hunt into next July.  But if this all hinges on a the secret plan to win the war in Harden's shoulder, I'm guessing increased spending midseason ain't Plan A.

For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 6, 2007 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok

But look at who Beane got rid of, and what have we actually lost?  Loaiza?  Not a bad pitcher, but far from great.  Relatively cheap.  Fourth starter on this team, even without Harden.  Kennedy?  Useless.  Marshall, DiNardo, and even Meyer make him expendable.  Kielty?  Hits lefties.  That's it.  Might help us win 1 or 2 more games a year, if that.  Kendall?  Suzuki is more valuable.  Right now.  Bradley?  Talented, no doubt.  And hasn't played in 100 games since 2004.  Also, he always seems to have hammie problems, doesn't he?  Sounds like someone is too pigheaded to get himself properly conditioned.  What good is he to this team?  I think we're better off with Buck, plus Brown and enough money to re-sign Scutaro.  So how is this team any worse off without those guys?  And how is going on a spending spree really going to help?  I mean, if he had $30-$40 million, ok.  But for what he's got and what's available, do you really think he can buy a better team?

by ozzman99 on Sep 6, 2007 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he actually was quite good for the team in 2006

and it was no secret that he has trouble staying healthy.

by OaklandSi on Sep 6, 2007 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe he only played in 96 games

Too lazy to look that up, but it's somewhere around there.  He essentially amounted to a platoon player.

by ozzman99 on Sep 6, 2007 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he played in April

and after the All Star Break, basically...and was a key element in the team's winning the division and the ALDS (plus was one of the few bright spots in the ALCS).

by OaklandSi on Sep 6, 2007 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Platoon"

That movie was hilarious.

Sincerley,

Frank Drebbin

"He thinks the lady doth protest too much." -Larry David (or Shakespeare)

by ohtobe21likehuston on Sep 6, 2007 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that the team would have been competitive

with better health and Harden/Loiaza pitching a little more often.  Our starting pitching with a healthy Duke in the pen still gives us the capability to win a division in '08 if we can make minor improvements to our offense.  That being said the team will still not necessarily be very exciting to watch next year and that's okay with me.  I guess when it's all said and done, I would rather this team just win games rather than be entertaining.  My point is that winning 3-2 and 4-3 is fine if you are the team with the bigger number more often.  There doesn't seem to enough offensive talent to expect the team to score a lot of runs anytime soon so pitching has to remain the key.

I also don't see anything in the FA market (Hunter, Rowand) that would make a significant difference next year when considering the overall increase in payroll.  Both guys will come with a large price tag and I'm not sure I trust either of them to stay healthy, which may put us right back where we are right now.  The only reason that signing either of them might be a good idea is because they are both CF'ers and that is our only major hole going into next season.  I do realize that we have plenty of minor holes to improve but the team should be able to survive most of them.

I'm starting the "Keep Blanton in '08" campaign.

"He thinks the lady doth protest too much." -Larry David (or Shakespeare)

by ohtobe21likehuston on Sep 6, 2007 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will be the first to sign that petition!
It's supposed to be hard. If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard is what makes it great. - Jimmy Dugan

by AintEasyBeinGreen on Sep 6, 2007 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

3-2 and 4-3

Everything I've seen (though it's not as if I'm the most SABR-literate simian around) indicates that W-L% in one- (and, often, 2-) run games is nearly random.

Which is to say, my impression isn't that Beane has been building the A's the last couple years to win a lot of 3-2 and 4-3 games per se.

Rather, if you extrapolate the logic of low-margin-random-winning-percentage, it means that what you need to do to maximize your chance at winning more than half of your games is minimize the number of 1-2-run games your team is in. (Or, perhaps more accurately, work to reduce the number of 3-plus-run losses you're likely to suffer. Doing this specifically, though, still means exposing yourself to a fair amount of risk in the form of random distribution of wins in close games.)

Generally, that means that you have two options for doing so: suppress opposition runs, or increase your own run totals. (Or, if you're the Yankees or Red Sox, spend the money to do both.)

Up until recently, opposition run-suppression has been the most cost-effective of the two tactics. (I think part of Beane's trouble the last 2 years has been that the overall pitching market has inflated to match the OPS market, thereby eliminating cost-effectiveness from the equation.) So Beane has gone with the most cost-effective blowout-loss-prevention tactic: get good pitching, and settle for a mediocre offense. (Though I also think there was some over-projection of the offensive production of certain key players; Beane didn't intend to build this mediocre of an offense.)

The 3-2 and 4-3 games are indeed a product of this approach, but they're not themselves why Beane pursues this approach.

habitually tragicomic approach @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 7, 2007 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Christmas bonus

Operating profit doesn't automatically turn into a distribution to the shareholders. The company could make a big profit and retain all the earnings, or by the same token the company could lose money and they could make shareholder distributions anyway. Obviously there's some correlation, since you couldn't keep giving out money you're not making forever, but current year profits is only one factor in deciding what to pay out and it's not even the biggest one. I would assume the main factor would be what they anticipate their capital needs to be in the upcoming years.

Anyway, I'm not sure where you come up $20-30 million figure. If Forbes can't figure out a reliable number, I'm not sure any of us would do better.

For what it's worth, Forbes shows $14.5m operating profit in 2006. I assume you're familiar with all the problems involved in their numbers. The main thing is the teams don't have to provide information, so we're really just guessing, and even when they do provide information they probably have an agenda. Even supposing you've got a look at their financial statements there's all sorts of ways to push money around so that it shows up somewhere else than on the books -- and even more so for teams that are essentially a subsidiary of a megacorporation, like Nintendo's Mariners or (formerly) Disney's Angels. (As a general rule, I assume more money is being made than appears even on Forbes' estimates.)

Another thing I don't hear mentioned much about the Forbes figures is that their operating profit figure excludes debt servicing. (It also excludes taxes, but I tend to assume most teams find a way to avoid paying income tax anyway.) That makes perfect sense for what Forbes is trying to represent -- an analysis of the investment, more or less -- but in fan discussions I tend to see the operating profit figure treated as if it's the amount that goes into the owners' pockets, which it's not. Not so important for a team like the A's, but for a heavily leveraged team like, say, the Rangers, interest on stadium debt eats up the entire operating profit, at least according to the Forbes figures.

"Ten times thy self were better than ten Hattebergs" -- Monkeyball, channeling Shakespeare

by iglew on Sep 6, 2007 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Try to use a little layman's shorthand

and the accountants jump all over ya.

You're right, of course, though since stadium debt service trades off with revenue sharing obligations it's not an easy equation to include it.  And I too assume teams make more money than Forbes estimates, as witnessed by the laughable Yankee "loss" (no word on the YES network's "gain").

My Xmas bonus crack was (typically) more snark than substance, but my larger fear is that operating income by whatever name is not being re-invested in the on-field product, or even in the franchise's larger talent infrastructure.  I'd love to have that fear allayed, especially as juxtaposed with the scenario others have spun that Wolffish are on a 10 year plan, which culminates in flipping the asset once the development profits are banked.

For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 6, 2007 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

nice new sig line

I noticed that in your post, and almost snagged it myself.

Nothing beats first hand experience ~ grover @('.')@

by monkeyball on Sep 6, 2007 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just to clarify

I do believe that the Yankee operating loss is real, in the sense that the team itself probably really does operate at a loss in a way that would stand up with the IRS in an audit.

I don't think they're lying about it, and I don't think they're doing anything illegal. They're just shuffling their money around in perfectly legal ways so that the one company shows a loss to the benefit of others (such as the YES Network, as you mentioned). And of course Steinbrenner is making money on appreciation of the asset, too, as Forbes emphasizes.

"Ten times thy self were better than ten Hattebergs" -- Monkeyball, channeling Shakespeare

by iglew on Sep 6, 2007 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Call me old fashioned but I still have a problem

with rich ownership profiting from a game of entertainment.  I don't mind them making some money but it's ridiculous how guys like David Glass are pocketing a millions of dollars when it's really "peanuts" on their scale.  The fans are probably spending a larger percentage of their own income on baseball than most of these profit-mongers.

"He thinks the lady doth protest too much." -Larry David (or Shakespeare)

by ohtobe21likehuston on Sep 6, 2007 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you have the same problem with, say,

people who profit from making movies?  That's entertainment, too.

I'm sure movie fans spend a larger percentage of their own income on movies than the Weinstein brothers do.

"Ten times thy self were better than ten Hattebergs" -- Monkeyball, channeling Shakespeare

by iglew on Sep 6, 2007 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't care about the movies. Baseball used to

be a game filled with owners who simply loved the game and were thrilled to achieve their boyhood dream of owning a team.  I can safely say that I would never want to do better than "break even" if I had millions of dollars and was fortunate enough to own my own baseball team.  Of course... that kind of thinking is probably the reason I don't have millions yet.  

"He thinks the lady doth protest too much." -Larry David (or Shakespeare)

by ohtobe21likehuston on Sep 7, 2007 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think baseball owners

do accept a lower rate of return on their investment compared to what else they could be doing with their millions.  They do so for exactly the reason you state: because the pleasure of owning a baseball team is reward in itself.

However, they don't carry that logic so far as to make zero return on their investment, which I gather is what you mean by "break even".

The teams are profitable, but if you put them up against non-sports corporations of similar value, I think on average they're significantly less so.

(With the usual caveat that we don't actually know, since we don't have proper financial statements for private companies.)

"Ten times thy self were better than ten Hattebergs" -- Monkeyball, channeling Shakespeare

by iglew on Sep 9, 2007 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Looking forward to Monday's interview except...

for the part on "whether Jason Kendall's loss really impacted the pitching staff." Expect a generic, cookie-cutter answer for that one.  

"Losing Kendall really hurt. He was a great team leader and the pitching staff loved him.  However, we're heading in a new direction now and we have a great, young catcher that is ready to take over the reigns.  It was a bit of a struggle at first, as you would expect from a rookie catcher, but Kurt has really picked up where Jason left off and he holds the same work ethic that Jason had here. "

Blah, blah, blah blah

by black beane and rice on Sep 6, 2007 12:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

did Blez let you peek

at Monday's installment?

by OaklandSi on Sep 6, 2007 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's impossible

to pass judgment on what he says about Kendall unless you are in the clubhouse, etc.  You can't say, "Can't be!  Must be more!" without being on site, interacting with the team members.  You simply have to take it at face value, that Kendall is "this and that", because...

Beane's there, you are NOT there, NOT on the team!  So Kendall had a crappy, expensive season.  How does that mean the other stuff Beane said is simply rationalization?

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Sep 6, 2007 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah, one other thing

Regarding injuries:  "The difference between Eric and other people is that he doesn’t talk about it."

Are you kidding me?  If Dan Meyer was the love (of the game) that dare not speak its name, Eric Chavez is the love that won't shut its goddamn mouth.

For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 6, 2007 12:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, we're kidding you

weak comparison.

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Sep 6, 2007 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Chavez has said more publicly about his

physical condition in the last two years than every single other A's player combined.  So much so, in fact, that earlier this year he was ordered by management to stop talking about it.  So that statement of Billy's seems pretty indefensible to me.  By contrast, Dan Meyer wouldn't talk to anyone about his injuries, much to his and the team's long-term detriment.  I think the analogy works great, but mostly I just wanted to use the dare not speak/won't shut up line.  Perhaps I should have referenced Piazza...get it?

For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Sep 6, 2007 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not getting any of this...no

Eric Chavez?  The Oakland Athletics' 3rd baseman?  

Your stories don't coincide with my stories.

"I never predict anything, and I never will." Paul Gascoigne, English footballer

by One won lost won on Sep 6, 2007 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The smart poster lies...

Chavez speaks his mind about topics not related to his own physical condition.  One quote that immediately comes to mind was post-Bradley-DFA, when he said that the move did not surprise him, and, furthermore, that he wouldn't have been surprised if it had been Stewart, either.  You know, no matter how much you're overvalued by your GM, you're really not in position to say things to that, especially when you know that you are being plagued by the injuries that you're not discussing.  I wonder how that quote resonates now, with Chavez having a worse season than the two guys he viewed as expendable, and a farmhand being brought in who appears to be an adequate potential replacement.

And of course he perennially likes to tout the Angels as heavyweights.  In Eric's world, the Angels are always the team to beat in the AL West.  But hey, given your refusal to accept the yeswecan bet before this season, and your almost laughably dismal interpretation of this here interview as a series of subliminal messages that serves as a waving of the white flag for the next X amount of years, you should be ok with those quotes.  

All Beane essentially said here was that this team was a contender had it stayed healthy.  And while most of us want better methods for injury prevention and/or a roster that can more easily adjust to the injuries that are likely to occur, I don't see how we can really disagree that this team...was a contender if healthy.  Even ignoring Bradley...healthy Chavez and Harden have the A's fighting for the wild card.  Of course, your suspicion of ownership motives has lots of merit...but when you bring it up in the context of a discussion centered around personnel, that's when you veer into single-issue conspiracy theory territory.

On a positive note, I like "Wolffish."

by Cutthemullet on Sep 8, 2007 3:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beane's love affair with Chavez continues

Pro-Chavez-trade people are gonna be disappointed.

"We were s--, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Sep 6, 2007 1:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Do you know how tough it is to find reliable

dog babysitting?  I didn't think so!

"He thinks the lady doth protest too much." -Larry David (or Shakespeare)

by ohtobe21likehuston on Sep 6, 2007 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

meanwhile, in winning baseball land

ethier just hit a huge homer...  yet another NL superstar who WOULD be an A - byrnes, bradley, ethier - sure, we can feel smug for dumping zito - but look at all of the future talent we let go for a .450 team for the next 3 years.

by notah8er on Sep 6, 2007 1:54 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

no way you're serious

Colorado had Byrnes and gave him away for Larry Bigbie.  Baltimore didn't want him and he became free and fungible to every team, like Carlos Pena was for the Rays this year.

Bradley is a F.A. this year, the A's lost a half season of him this year, not future talent at all unless we resigned him, which we still could do IF we wanted to.

Ethier is fine.  It'd be nice to have him, though he's not a NL superstar at all.    

by jakarta on Sep 6, 2007 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ethier is Shannon Stewart,

basically.

He'd be of limited value to the team at this point. Diminishing returns, and all that. There's only so many corner outfielders you can play, and he's apparently not good enough to play center. It's stretching a point to say I'd rather have Andrew Brown, but certainly his expertise is more in the team's area of need right now.

by PaulThomas on Sep 6, 2007 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beane has made his mistakes

But there's no f****** way that Byrnes is a superstar. He's a leeague average or slightly above league average player. His OPS+ is 112 this year. That's about league average for a corner OF. His defense is above average.

On Sunday, Minaya ticked off a list of candidates to join the rotation, and for once this season, none of them was Jose Lima.

by rfloh on Sep 6, 2007 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

probably right

but what really bums me out is just how ENTERTAINING the guys we've lost are - jaypay, miggy, frank, the nl stars i mentioned - they just had a zest for the game.  i see none of that in the green and gold now.  a player like swish really feeds on that kind of energy, and it's just gone.

by notah8er on Sep 6, 2007 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Payton had a zest for the game?

Can't say I've heard that one before. I like how you think the same about Ethier though he never played for us.

by Dusty Baker on Sep 6, 2007 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do miss the 'Rally Miggy'
"Ten times thy self were better than ten Hattebergs" -- Monkeyball, channeling Shakespeare

by iglew on Sep 6, 2007 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

almost 1000 ABs in our system

which is almost 1000 ABs away from 'never'.

as far as jay goes, how many a's this year are going to equal his 165 hits last year?

by notah8er on Sep 6, 2007 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right, hits

Shit, forget batting average. It's quantity that counts, man. Who cares how many outs you make?

And I have to say, it's a damn shame Swish can't feed off Ethier's energy emanating all the way from the AA playoffs anymore. He was so energetic, Midland didn't even need electricity for the lights. They just hooked some electrodes up to his thigh muscles and, BAM! Let there be ^%$#ing light, my friend.

by PaulThomas on Sep 7, 2007 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we're good at making outs

and definitely have a gift for cultivating and keeping specialists in that department

by notah8er on Sep 7, 2007 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's not forget that Bradley got us one step

away from the WS last year.  I understand your point about Ethier but it's not like the trade didn't help our club too.  Without him we may have had another "ho, hum" season and Ethier could still be playing in the PCL playoffs.

"He thinks the lady doth protest too much." -Larry David (or Shakespeare)

by ohtobe21likehuston on Sep 6, 2007 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bradley didn't get us one step

away from the WS last year.

He played very well in the ALCS against Detroit.  But that didn't get us anywhere, since we lost.  The series that got us one step away from the WS was the ALDS against Minnesota, which we won, and Bradley didn't play particularly well in that.

(Bradley's post-season stats)

"Ten times thy self were better than ten Hattebergs" -- Monkeyball, channeling Shakespeare

by iglew on Sep 7, 2007 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You must have missed the 2006 season if you don't

think he was an integral part.  I wasn't referring to one particular series but, yeah, he was the only player who showed up against Detroit.

"He thinks the lady doth protest too much." -Larry David (or Shakespeare)

by ohtobe21likehuston on Sep 7, 2007 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You said:

"Bradley got us one step away from the WS last year." Which is nonsense. He had 6 great weeks at the end of last season. Fine. But he didn't pitch, he didn't play the other 8 positions, he didn't hold any sort of monopoly on great games or clutch hits.

His careeer is a series of flashes followed by mediocrity and injuries. We rolled the dice and got about as much as we could have reasonably expected out of him -- one nice flash and a lot of mediocrity and injuries. Time to get over it.

by andyinfremont on Sep 7, 2007 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ethier and Bradley?

Beside the obvious fact that he's not even close to a superstar, it seems wrong to complain that we don't have both of them when one was traded for the other. (Or should that be othier?)

He's not going to try to kill you, I'm just going to try to doink you. -Rex Hudler

by JediLeroy on Sep 7, 2007 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ha!
QOTM.
He's not going to try to kill you, I'm just going to try to doink you. -Rex Hudler

by JediLeroy on Sep 7, 2007 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i know, hard to whine about both sides of a deal

i wish we had both, or at least one.  but apparently we only make an effort to reverse trades with resignings when they involve offensive juggernauts like adam melhuse.  but, hey, it's hard to come up with too many brilliant ideas between all of those speaking engagements.  you'd be surprised how time-consuming a commitment to truly white teeth can be.

by notah8er on Sep 7, 2007 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol

last sentence is good stuff

by Cutthemullet on Sep 8, 2007 3:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What the A's Need

is one Art Master on the field.  Anywhere.  That would go a long way to turn things around.

by photonload on Sep 6, 2007 1:59 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A Question for Beane, or Geren, or Someone Else

Blez --- Very nice interview. I agree you got Beane to open up and go a little bit past his politician-speak of earlier discussions.

One thing I'm very curious about is whether there is a specific Oakland A's hitting philosophy, and whether such a philosophy is coming from the front office. To wit: In the old days, with a 3-2 count or any two strike count for that matter, hitters tended to protect the plate. Anything that could remotely seem a strike was fouled off. Lately, I've seen Swisher, Cust and Johnson in particular, but also other A's players, take that pitch, and go down on a called third strike --- I've seen this a lot on a 3-2 count. This has happened so often that I fear it's actually an Oakland A's policy. Is it, or are these players just not understanding the difference between patience and protecting the plate?

by richwol on Sep 6, 2007 5:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

it may be a Yankee policy, then, too

Bobby Abreu probably takes more 3-2 pitches than anyone.  And Giambi, when healthy.  It's just a component of being a selective hitter...

by Cutthemullet on Sep 8, 2007 3:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to Al Michaels

Olindo Mare is a long-time dolphin kicker.  Why would you kick a dolphin?  And how agile would you have to be to pull that off?

by ozzman99 on Sep 6, 2007 5:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Barton is

2-2 so far tonight.. He's looking like Mr. September out there right now.

by CoryC123 on Sep 6, 2007 7:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for another great interview, Blez-a-rino.

I think we all take these interviews for granted and I certainly don't see Arte Moreno or Bill Stoneman opening up for these long discussions over on another blog.  The access that you have gained to BB is nothing short of remarkable and I'm thrilled that your vision has allowed many of us to ride along as passengers.  

Keep up the good work!  One question- who is OaklandA23 because they are one-upping ya around here at times?  I am convinced that you have a "bat phone" that rings and then you turn into OaklandA23 to deliver the news.

"He thinks the lady doth protest too much." -Larry David (or Shakespeare)

by ohtobe21likehuston on Sep 6, 2007 7:26 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We don't need a "bat phone"

We need a bat.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Sep 6, 2007 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A bat for the A's would be nice...

but we all know it would turn out to have rabies and immediately be moved to the 60 day DL.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Sep 6, 2007 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Immediately???

You don't think it would foam at the mouth on the active roster for 53 days first?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Sep 6, 2007 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Followed by 3 months of

rest and re-evaluation.  Then treatment.  Then putting it down.

I don't know how you put down a bat.  Maybe suggest that it's momma was a shrub.

by ozzman99 on Sep 6, 2007 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it's a safe bet that

OaklandA23 is someone in the team's offices whose job it is to send out press releases to all the media outlets.  Someone determined that AN deserves to be on the list, too, but for a blog you don't fax the press release, you just post it.  So they registered as OaklandA23.

"Ten times thy self were better than ten Hattebergs" -- Monkeyball, channeling Shakespeare

by iglew on Sep 7, 2007 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks so much Blez.

And I for one, have long since not waken up each morning gosh-golly wondering how what's his name, Harden is doing.

The long sobs of autumn's violins wound my heart with monotonous languor.

by ak_A on Sep 6, 2007 8:20 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

UGH....

Jeffrey Gray again...

by BuckleyFan on Sep 6, 2007 9:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Thank you Blez!

Great interview. Bummer about the Rivercats bully. Ouch. Ziegler too. Oh well, Jeremy Brown and D. Barton are looking good. Hope they can sweep at home! Go Cats! Go A's!

by A'sfansince1970 on Sep 6, 2007 9:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow. Just looked up the box score

and two thoughts spring to mind:

  1. Those were two awesome games for fans to see
  1. Those were two awfully tough losses for the Rivercats

You have to like this line, though:

Blevins 3 IP, 3 H, 0 ER, 1 BB, 7 K

(Blevins is who Kendall became.)

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Sep 6, 2007 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's in AAA?

Interesting. Probably just a callup for the playoffs, but evidently the Powers That Be think he's valuable enough to keep playing this season.

by PaulThomas on Sep 7, 2007 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dsc00764_small
DLD - 11/07/2009 - How to Keep Yourself Occupied in the Off-Season
527918550406_0_bg_small
2010 Off-Season Blueprint
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #15
Super_grover_small
2010 Offseason Primer
Oaklandathletics_small
The (un)Official bit... uh.. Feedback thread for the layout change

Recent FanPosts

Bill_king_small
AFL Rising Stars Showcase Tonight on MLBN @ 5PM
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 4: The Biggest Off Season (Potential) Decision Doesn't Involve Free Agents
Oaklandathletics_small
Hardy to Minnesota. What's with the early offseason trades?
Tyler_at_maya_school_small
Happy 6th Birthday, AN!
Oaklandathletics_small
Let's Go Oakland: Keep the A's
Bill_king_small
Organizational Statistics: Winter Leagues
Funny-pictures12_small
My Rant Against The Champions And MLB In General

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans