Jack Hannahan-- Cust, part deux?
Well, probably not. But those of us who have followed the Continuing Adventures of Jack Cust with alert interest now have another guy to pull for.
The A's have apparently acquired Jack Hannahan from Detroit's AAA club.
I thought I'd give him a little introduction and look ahead to see what his role with the A's might be. His trade counterpart is Jason Perry, a slugging outfielder for AAA-Sacramento. This is a trade that makes sense for the A's, as their profiles are fairly similar (older guys who've finally put it together in the minors this season) but Hannahan plays a position of greater need (3B, rather than corner outfield) although Perry's stats are a hair better this year.
Who is this guy?
Jack Hannahan was a 20-year old star at third base when he passed out on a stranger's lawn. A talented player for the Minnesota Golden Gophers, Hannahan's baseball career was nearly over before it started. In the course of his high school years and the first two years of his college career, he had developed a serious case of alcoholism. He somehow managed to put up respectable numbers nonetheless-- Dan Johnson would be proud of the .327 batting average he put up in his sophomore year while sometimes seeing two or three balls at once-- but he came within an ace of being kicked off the Minnesota team.
After a stint in rehab (of the mental, not the physical, kind), he emerged as a standout player in his junior year, leading the Big Ten in most statistical categories and winning the conference Player of the Year award. Taken in the third round of the draft that year, Hannahan headed to the minor leagues seemingly destined for a quick rise.
It was not to be. AA proved to be Hannahan's bugbear, as he posted a line-- over parts of 4 seasons-- of approximately .250/.335/.370. He failed to develop power-- just 9 HR in 135 games in 2003-- and he had a truly wretched year in the field, committing 34 errors. By 2005, the Tigers were ready to advance him to AAA, but his progress was further delayed by injuries (he played a mere 75 games that season). He showed signs of progress in 2006, upping his OPS to a respectable .791 and earning him a cup of coffee with the big-league club, in which he went 0-for-9 with a strikeout and a walk. 2007, however, saw him back in AAA.
So why did the A's trade for him?
Glad you asked. Basically, it's a combination of three factors-- Hannahan's improved performance this year, Eric Chavez's injury, and Marco Scutaro's platoon split.
This season, Hannahan has greatly improved his offensive numbers (and if Baseball Prospectus is to be believed, his defense as well). Like Eric Chavez, he is a left-handed hitter at third base, and as a consequence he has been particularly tough on righties, pounding out 16 doubles, 9 HR, and a total line of .307/.443/.486/.929. He has been respectable against lefties as well, but his primary offensive value is against RHP.
As any good A's fan knows, the same is true for Eric Chavez, whose struggles against lefties seem to stem partly from the forearm tendinitis he's been battling for a few years. (Lefties can work him inside because the pain makes it hard for him to turn on pitches quickly.) Now battling a plethora of other conditions, Chavez has no known return date and may not return this season. Until now, the A's have had virtually no depth at third base. Marco Scutaro-- not really a third baseman-- has had to fill in for Chavez, while the AAA team has been a tryouts funhouse lately, with Jeremy Brown, Lou Merloni, JJ Furmaniak and Daric Barton all trying to figure out the position. Gregorio Petit-- whose value ultimately lies at shortstop-- has done time at the hot corner as well. Hannahan, as a major-league ready backup, provides desperately needed depth.
The A's now have the makings of a solid platoon at third base. Marco Scutaro, as a righty, has posted pretty respectable major league numbers against left-handed pitching. (His line: .298/.403/.491/.894) His numbers against righties are far worse (.227/.290/.331/.621), so there is little doubt that Hannahan can provide better offense than Marco against right-handed pitching. This also has the ulterior benefit of freeing up Marco, on some days when righties are hurling, to relieve Donnie Murphy or Mark Ellis, both right-handed hitters, and give them a day off.
How does he fit into the long-term plans of the A's?
He's going to have to play his way into a permanent job with Chavez out. He does have options remaining, so he may end up back at Sacramento when Chavez returns. Another possibility is that he's ticketed to replace Dan Johnson as the "third corner infielder" (assuming Chavez and Daric Barton are the primary two). Yet another possibility that occurs to me would be to have Hannahan, once Chavez returns, take over 1B against righties while Swisher plays the outfield, and have Swisher man it against lefties (thus, in effect, platooning Hannahan with a right-handed outfielder). Of course, he will have to hit righties well to hold one of these positions. I think he'll do fairly well, but you never really know.
And of course, he could hit 6 home runs in his first week and become the new DH for 2008. After all, the A's track record with oldish AAA players named Jack is impeccable!
0 recs |
36 comments
Comments
He's 27 right now and will be 28 next year
So he's entering his prime years. A's might be hoping he'll pull an Eric Byrnes and become a solid regular when he hits his peak (age 28-31 years according to Bill James).
I wonder when he'll get the call up though?
Will the A's add him to the 40 man, then bring him up and send down Furmainiak? Or will they wait till the rosters expand?
by Zonis on Aug 13, 2007 10:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
interesting...
if nothing else, he's someone for Dan Johnson to hang out with, being another Minnesota native with blurred vision. Both of their problems can probably be traced to having to deal with the horrendous lighting in the Metrodome during their childhood.
by Cutthemullet on Aug 14, 2007 2:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea of having a guy
who can fill in at both 1B and 3B next season. I'd really like to see Barton get most of the ABs at 1B in Sept to see if he's ready to take over next season, making DJ expendable. I also want to see Swisher put in RF and left there. Same with Buck - LF every day.
by boilerdan on Aug 14, 2007 4:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You left out the most important part
get rid of Kotsay no matter what it takes.
by china bob on Aug 14, 2007 7:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boy, you just can't wait to watch somebody turn
catchable fly balls into doubles, can you?
Good diary, Paul Thomas.
by McFood on Aug 14, 2007 8:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, he's just tired
of watching Kotsay turn hittable pitches into catchable fly balls.
by BlameChannel53 on Aug 14, 2007 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which would fall for doubles
if only Swisher or Buck were in CF...(And the debate rages on...)
by Nico on Aug 14, 2007 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sadly
At this point, I don't think Kotsay is capable of hitting a ball that would fall for a double if Joe Blanton were in CF.
by BlameChannel53 on Aug 14, 2007 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He'd have a great shot, though,
considering Blanton would be the only OFer out there, having eaten the LFer and RFer. Also, if it had rained earlier there's a decent chance Blanton would be beached.
by Nico on Aug 14, 2007 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll give you this
Kotsay would have a chance at a double if Blanton were in CF while it was raining after Blanton had eaten the LF and RF because they reminded him of that Grand Slam he had at Denny's for breakfast, if Kiki Calero was pitching to Kotsay.
by BlameChannel53 on Aug 14, 2007 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
New nickname for Calero
Kiki's Delivery Service-- because he's always serving up fat, delectable sliders.
by PaulThomas on Aug 14, 2007 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
John Joseph Hannahan - John Joseph Cust
Coincidence?
by WaddellCanseco on Aug 14, 2007 8:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not fooled.
Have you ever seen them in the same place at the same time?
by sec119 on Aug 14, 2007 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hanahan
Is Cust's illegitimate half-siamese brother-in-law twice removed.
by kaweahkaweah on Aug 14, 2007 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So no, it's not a coincidence.
by kaweahkaweah on Aug 14, 2007 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Next will be John Jacob Jingle-Heimer Smith added
to the roster.
by McFood on Aug 14, 2007 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't look too far into this...
The platoon splits are definitely there and there is no doubt that Beane made this move in order to cover for Chavez's injury, but I doubt this move was made with an eye for years into the future.
Like it or not, the A's are a much better team with Eric Chavez as the everyday third baseman, against any type of pitching, and any player brought in will strictly be of the stop-gap variety.
And comparing Jack Hannahan to Jack Cust is sort of far-fetched. Cust has a LONG track record of being a top minor league hitter and just bounced around from team to team for various reasons beyond his control. Hannahan looks like a guy who's always had a little bit better talent than the guy's around him, but has never really lived up to that potential, which is the storyline of pretty much every AAAA better... which is what Hannahan most certainly is at this point in his career.
Like Donnie Murphy, Hannahan will probably be given every opportunity to show what he can do in Chavez's absence, but I expect both guys to be sent back to AAA once Chavez/Crosby can make it back to the field.
You forgot to mention Kevin Melillo in your list of guys at AAA that have been tried out at 3rd base. If he can handle 3rd base defensively, then he'd be a guy to watch as a possible long-term bench player, since he can handle 2nd as well and is a much better hitter than Hannahan or any of the other candidates you mentioned above.
Interesting diary though!
by Taj Adib on Aug 14, 2007 9:11 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes, there's no question of him replacing Chavez
especially insofar as they have identical platoon orientation. I suppose that if he really torched major league pitching, he might stave off Daric Barton's emergence at first base for another season, but his role in future years is as a backup, except in the catastrophic event that Chavez can't ever return effectively.
Even there, though, he provides flexibility (the ability to play first, third and in an emergency shortstop) which is utterly lacking with Dan Johnson, who's annoyingly unable to play any position other than first.
Someone was asking about the rosters. I think he'll be added and called up to replace the Fuzzsaw (get it-- fur? maniac? Oh, never mind) today, but I could be wrong. One thing that did come to mind is that if he's not called up, he should be eligible for minor league free agency after this year. As such it's a virtual guarantee that he will at least be moved onto the 40-man roster by September.
by PaulThomas on Aug 14, 2007 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see a Hannahan/Scutaro platoon
being seriously considered. Scutaro isn't a good enough 3Bman to play there unless you have run out of options--he's not someone you plan for at 3B. Hannahan/Murphy, however, would make some sense. Murphy also has big platoon splits, and is a younger cheaper Scutaro to back up on the infield. Since you won't see Hannahan, Crosby, Murphy, and Scutaro all on the roster, I'm guessing Scutaro is the odd man out and that if he's not going to be the starting SS that Murphy learns 3B between now and April.
by Nico on Aug 14, 2007 9:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh. I'm not talking about next season
although I suppose in the direst of eventualities, if Chavez is out for half a year or more, a Hannahan/Murphy platoon might get the job done at third. We know Murphy has the arm to play third; the question is, does he have the reflexes?
by PaulThomas on Aug 14, 2007 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Murphy has the reflexes
His strength appears to be athleticism, his prior weakness immaturity. I don't think it would take long for Murphy to exceed the rather low standard Scutaro has set at 3B.
by Nico on Aug 14, 2007 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is the last piece
of the Carlos Pena unload trade.
Hannahan for Perry
Perry for John-Ford Griffin (always want to put John Ford-Griffin)
Griffin, Lilly, and Jason Arnold for Pena and German
Lilly begat Kielty
Arnold begat Durazo
and now Griffin c/o Perry begat Hannahan
Since the first two pieces flamed (literally) out, let's hope Hannahan is a keeper.
by jubjub on Aug 14, 2007 10:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
forgot to add him
since he was the PTNL
He's not doing so hot lately.
by jubjub on Aug 14, 2007 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So is he with the big club now?
Or is he going to Sacramento?
by OldhamA on Aug 14, 2007 12:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll miss Perry
at the Rivercats games anyway.
by luvsthecurveball on Aug 14, 2007 12:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
root for Nick Blasi instead.
I like Blasi. He works hard.
by The Pilots Dared Me To Die on Aug 14, 2007 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Classy" Nick Blasi?
Does he hate pencil-necked geeks?
by EddieVegas_NRAF on Aug 15, 2007 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frankly, I'm
pretty blasi about him.
by Nico on Aug 15, 2007 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Watch the third base coach wave him around 3B
in "Blasi Come Home!"
by Nico on Aug 15, 2007 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably a bad time to mention this
but in his entire minor league career, Hannahan has never managed even an .800 OPS.
He's proven he can't really hit minor league pitching, and he's 27, so I can't see him suddenly figuring out major league pitching at this point.
He was brought in because he didn't cost he A's anything and he can play 3rd base.
by MrIncognito on Aug 15, 2007 9:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Um
Stats:
G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO
101 336 56 99 20 1 13 63 5 5 76 92
AVG OBP SLG OPS
.295 .422 .476 .898
Not saying he's the next coming of Brooks Robinson or anything, but 4 months of an 898 OPS seems like a pretty healthy performance to me.
by PaulThomas on Aug 15, 2007 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brooks
my first thought after reading this comment was, "I don't think Brooks Robinson was actually that good of a hitter." We all know about the amazing fielding, but as for the hitting, I wasn't so sure. Indeed, baseball-reference.com confirmed my suspicions: lifetime .267/.322/.401 hitter, career 104 OPS+. Quite average. It seems as though he's really the only player from the past whose high profile is based almost entirely on his defense. So really, the more Chavez declines offensively, and the more gold gloves he accumulates (though it would be almost Palmeiro-level injustice to Beltre if he got a reputation-GG this year), the more accurate the Brooks Robinson comparisons are. As for Jack Hannahan...no Brooks Robinson fielding-wise, perhaps a chance to be better offensively. Rate-wise anyway...hard to beat him in counting stats considering Brooks lasted over 20 years.
by Cutthemullet on Aug 16, 2007 2:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















