Billy Beane AN Interview January 07 Edition Part III
Just in case you're visiting AN for the first time this week, you should read part one and part two of the exclusive AN Billy Beane interview before you go on. OK, done?
Now without further ado, my chat with Beane comes to a conclusion. Enjoy.
Blez: You brought this up yourself, but the upper levels of the A's farm system seem to be relatively bare in terms to top prospects outside of Buck and Barton. Are you happy with the state of the farm system right now as it's obviously been important to the A's success as a franchise?
Beane: We've graduated so many players the last 10 years. But I'd include Buck, Barton, Windsor and Suzuki in that as well. It's more than you think. We're used to naming seven, eight or nine guys. We forget about the guys that we're just brought up to get here. That's going to happen. It's hard to stay at a level where you're producing four big leaguers a year. Teams just don't do that. That being said, these next couple of drafts are going to be very important to us and we have a number of draft choices this year. We're all really looking forward to that.
Blez: Is the draft looking good this year?
Beane: It's supposed to be real good. Usually people around this time of year are saying, oh it's a terrible draft. All indications are that it's a young draft, but it's supposed to be very talented.
Blez: There have been different reports about what happened in the negotiations between you and Justin Smoak. Smoak's turned into a great prospect. Baseball America reported that he wanted $1 million and that you were offering $950,000. Was it ever really that close?
Beane: (Laughs) No, no. I'll try and give you the Reader's Digest answer. We never even made an offer to Justin. In fact, when we drafted him, we drafted him late. He was projected to go in the first or comp round. To his credit, he made it quite clear the amount of money that he was interested in signing for. We just said we'd draft the kid late just in case there was some point during the summer he changed his mind. Quite frankly, I'd spoken to him and he's a great kid. I know his coach a little bit at South Carolina and we at no point were trying to bribe him out of his scholarship because it's a great university. To put it plainly, we said we look forward to seeing you in three years, go out and have a great career. In fact, Justin and I had a conversation at one point even though he had a number that he wanted he was very committed to going to South Carolina and I congratulated him on that decision. We never even made an offer. That was total fiction. I can assure you that if we were between $950,000 and a million dollars we would've found a way to get it done. I was a proponent of the kid going to school. He was committed and he's a South Carolina kid. I think some of the college programs are a great developer of talent and I'm a big fan of these kids going and coming out three years later.
Blez: Does Erubiel Durazo have a good chance of being on the 2007 roster?
Beane: We'll see. I think it's all up in the air right now. Ruby had a great season in winter ball and was very productive when he was here. I think he enjoyed his time in Oakland and we enjoyed having him here as well. I think that's going to be better answered in the spring.
Blez: There have been a few different lists of the best GMs in baseball this year. ESPN.com conducted a poll of the fans and they chose you as the best GM and Dayn Perry recently named you the fourth best in baseball. Do you pay attention to those kinds of things and do they mean anything to you?
Beane: I think it's the kind of thing where you're only as good as your last year. They're more fun and humorous than anything.
Blez: The fans obviously seem to love you though.
Beane: (Laughs) Well that's the important thing, right? A real man of the people. This is a republic. They have new lists out every year, so it doesn't matter. But the truth is that it's never a bad thing when people appreciate what you do.
Blez: The stadium announcement was obviously huge news and while there is still a ton to get done, you referenced the A's being able to keep more of their homegrown stars finally. Assuming everything goes well and we're looking at a stadium possibly opening in 2011, when can fans anticipate the team starting to keep its stars?
Beane: Very good question because you don't necessarily have to be playing in that stadium to start anticipating. My personal feeling is once you start laying bricks and it's a matter of when it gets done, that's when your business plan gets more based around that stadium. That's why you really want to start building the thing so you can start planning for that. The clock is ticking on some guys here that you would probably like to keep around. But until you start to see bricks and mortar, you have to be careful in spending what you don't have yet.
Blez: Just because it can still potentially fall through?
Beane: Yeah, right. The date that will be important for me is when I see Lew (Wolff) with a hard hat and a shovel for the contrived photos and when they put that first brick in. That's when I'll say all right we can start planning long term here.
Blez: One of the things that makes me excited from a fan's perspective is the prospect of seeing you work with a bigger budget. How excited are you in thinking about the idea of having a bigger budget to work with?
Beane: It will be a lot more relaxing and we probably won't have to say "if" quite as much (laughs). I go back to what I said at the press conference. The ability to keep what you develop long term would be the best part about it. Instead of constantly waiting for the next guy to leave, and knowing that when you draft a kid out of college that he could possibly spend his whole career with you. Because for us, it's exhausting. We signed Loaiza last year because we knew we were going to lose Zito. You're almost doing moves in preparation for the exodus that's going to happen in two years. That does get exhausting. I don't mean literally.
Blez: I can imagine it would get a bit frustrating.
Beane: Yeah, and the one thing that we're the most proud of is that we've created expectations here. This organization has won a lot of games. I think we've been held to a higher standard of performance, which I'm very proud of. We have a sense of pride in putting a winner on the field. But it definitely gets more and more challenging every single year. It would be nice to go to Europe for a month and know that your team is in its mid-20s and locked in for the next five or six years.
Blez: One of the things that's become a mantra of yours is that you've always talked about people rooting for the name on the front of the jersey and not the name on the back. If the A's do start to keep stars for the duration of their careers, does that fundamentally change what an A's fan should root for? Or at least your message?
Beane: No. There are players that make a lot of money that are worth every penny. The tough thing we've had here is that there are some decisions that we can't make because of money. There's some that we would like to make if we had the money that would be good baseball decisions. For instance there are some players where we thought, we'd like to keep this guy, but we just don't have the resources to be able to do it. Ultimately, you like to combine the two where you have created a situation where, and it doesn't happen much in this game but if you have the revenues you do it, a guy starts his career and becomes one of the all-time great A's. You take a guy like Eric Chavez. At the end of his current contract he will have spent 12 years with the organization and at that point I expect Eric to maybe have 10 Gold Gloves. It would be nice for him to spend his entire career here. It'd be nice to create an entire generation of A's like they had back in the 70s where people always associate them with the A's. If you think of the last decade, we've had a lot of great people here, people aren't going to even associate them with this club because they've all gone onto other clubs. I do think that that's important for the history of the franchise. You had Hudson, Mulder and Zito here. And Barry just signed a seven-year deal. The length of that deal will carry him beyond his tenure here. It is important for a baseball team to have a history and associate themselves with players who are a part of that history. That's one thing this generation won't have. We will have accomplished a lot of success but we won't have created a history beyond winning on the field. I do think that's important.
Blez: Speaking of importance of history, will you be sad when the team leaves Oakland?
Beane: Well it would be more disheartening to not have them in the Bay Area. I view this whole East Bay as one area. I just think of this as a great thing. And the opportunity to remain in the East Bay is what's important. It would be more disappointing to have us not here at all.
Blez: One last question as it involves A's history. The Hall of Fame recently rejected Mark McGwire. Do you see him as a Hall of Famer?
Beane: It's not my vote and my opinion isn't a lot of value to anyone so it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to be giving it to anyone. He was a great teammate. He was a great player when I was here with him and that's for others to debate.
Blez: But if you had a vote, would you have voted for him?
Beane: I haven't talked to Mark since he left here in 97. It's been a long time. He was a great guy and great teammate. To have the conversation on the Hall of Fame, it's probably just not for me to give my opinion. Others are debating it enough, there's no sense for me chiming in there.
Blez: Thanks so much for your time today.
Beane: No problem Tyler, anything you need.
0 recs |
139 comments
Comments
WTF?
that smoak answer does not satisfy me at all.
"he made it quite clear the amount of money that he was interested in signing for."
so that part IS true.
"I was a proponent of the kid going to school."
"we at no point were trying to bribe him out of his scholarship because it's a great university."
???
is beane our GM or is he a guidance counselor?
"we said we look forward to seeing you in three years, go out and have a great career."
we look forward to seeing you get drafted by another team and having a great career.
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 9:08 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
To me it was clear that Smoak
by Blez on
Jan 31, 2007 9:12 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Then why draft him at all?
I agree with x, this Beane answer rings false.
by FreeSeatUpgrade on
Jan 31, 2007 9:27 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Two reasons
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 31, 2007 9:34 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Exactly
It was a smart chance to take with a late pick.
by Blez on
Jan 31, 2007 9:49 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I guess
by FreeSeatUpgrade on
Jan 31, 2007 10:05 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Depends on your definition of waste
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 31, 2007 10:12 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that could be the case
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 10:19 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Better to control his rights
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 11:10 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not that You or I will do this
If a player such as Smoak gets injured come draft time, yet is productive during his tenure he may indeed slip into Beane's hands. Yeah, that's it another injured Athletic farmhand, but this time we'll take em before Crosby has an opportunity to procure bodily harm.
by Gerard on
Jan 31, 2007 11:40 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Low Risk, high reward....
by norcalfan on
Jan 31, 2007 7:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In case his beloved great aunt bessie
In case the University of South Carolina baseball team's coach turns out to actually be a catholic priest.
In case shit happens and that shit has greater odds of happening than the team finding a real prospect in the 16th round.
by devo on
Jan 31, 2007 9:40 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
what about the odds
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 9:44 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A player is worth $X
by devo on
Jan 31, 2007 10:06 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's wise to pay 2X
I know it's early and the 2008 draft is 18 months away, but at the rate Smoak is going BA has already mentioned his name as the possible #1 overall pick in the 2008 draft. I'd give you a link but there isn't one that I know of. The mention is from the 2007 Prospect Handbook.
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 11:08 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Smoak is
By the way, was that the #1 player picked or the #1 non Pitcher picked that BA was saying?
by apilgrim on
Jan 31, 2007 11:23 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ah overall
by apilgrim on
Jan 31, 2007 11:24 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How can you be convinced he's
The A's took a chance drafting him late in case he decided he didn't want to go to school. It was a good risk in my opinion. He obviously wanted to go to school and the A's wound up getting a player who could potentially be joining the team this year instead. I'd say it was a good trade off. It was also a good move for Smoak as if he will be the first pick, he'll be getting a hell of a lot more than what he originally wanted.
by Blez on
Jan 31, 2007 11:29 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Convinced?
So if Smoak does indeed go 1st overall in 2008, he'll be looking at a $4 million signing bonus. If X = $1 million and 4X = $4million.
I'm not saying Beane lied to you. He bent the truth of the matter. You and I both know the A's discussed signing terms with any and all potential early round targets, that's SOP. He wanted $1 million, the A's were only willing to go $950K.
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 11:57 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In 2008, the team potentially drafting him first
Whatever Smoak may have been asking for, whether it was a million or a billion, Beane, giving what the world knew about Smoak at the time, did not think he was worth it.
More so, the $950k is not what the A's were reported to have offered him after drafting him in the 16th round -- it was what they were talking about offering him if they picked him with the 36th pick.
We drafted someone else with that 36th pick, gave that someone else the ~$950k that is appropriate for such a pick and, all of a sudden, we were left with ~$950k less in the budget.
As Billy Beane said, it is preposterous to suggest that the deal fell apart over $50k. You find it offensive to suggest that Smoak may said something different publically and privately, yet you assumed that Beane is flat out lying about something that it's just laughable to think he was lying about. Come on, you're smarter than that, Grover.
by devo on
Jan 31, 2007 12:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you're right, the deal fell apart over $950k
if anything changes after the move to fremont, i hope it's that. f*** rooting for the names on the back of the uniform instead of the front, and watching a player stay with the a's throughout their career. i don't even see how those are necessarily positive changes, it just means we're more likely to end up with todd helton / vernon wells type contracts.
i'll settle for "now we have enough money to draft actual first round talent in with our first round picks (moneyball draft) and to pay a 16th round pick first round pick money if we think he's a first round talent."
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 12:34 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The bottom line
by andeux on
Jan 31, 2007 1:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but the a's may have felt smoak was worth more
he was ranked 96th by BA, but the a's were most likely willing to take him 36th and give him $950k.
and the reason we didn't do so is probably because we're poor/cheap.
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 1:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, we didn't do it ...
Good for us, if we had a better read on Smoak than anyone else. It's hardly a fair criticism, though, to not realize that he was a no doubt future hall of famer, despite never having played against anyone over the age of 18.
by devo on
Jan 31, 2007 1:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that's not what i meant
and we DID think he was worth $1 million as the 36th pick, so whether we liked buck more or whether he had played against anyone over 18 isn't really the issue, because we could have had both buck and smoak.
we had a better read on smoak than anyone else, and instead of spending the $1 million to magically turn a 16th round pick into an extra 36th pick (meaning, we'd have pennington, buck, and smoak), we chose not to make him an offer.
so, once again, we're too poor/cheap to spend $1 million for an extra 36th pick. i hope that changes once we move to fremont.
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 1:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and that's the same reason
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 1:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He should have read my articles on SMOAK!!
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 3:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I guarantee that if Boston knew he would
Beane missed a layup and that's that.
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 3:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why are you throwing me batting practice, Devo?
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 1:40 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hello again
"In 2008, the team potentially drafting him first
will be getting a much more certain product than what we selected in the 16th round."
Yes. Which is why'd he'd get even more money than he wanted in 2005. My original comment re: 4X wasn't specifically about Smoak, it was in response to your generic question about signing an unspecified player to a 2X sum. This hypothetical equation of yours doesn't really factor in to the discussion over Smoak, the difference between the two sides wasn't twice the offered amount.
In fact, I think it's about time you dropped the vague dollar amount arguement all together. Smoak has said $1 million. Beane did not acknowledge that specific number but he alluded to the figure by saying "To his credit, he made it quite clear the amount of money that he was interested in signing for." This was an ideal setting for Beane to state something along the line of what you've been saying, that Smoak was saying one thing in public and another in private. But Beane didn't go there, did he? We're talking about a $1 million signing bonus.
So, in essence, the deal did break down over the difference of $50K. The A's floated $950K. Smoak said no, he wanted a million. Meanwhile, another prospect the A's liked at #36 (Travis Buck) said yes to a $950K bonus. So Beane didn't even try to negotiate with Smoak, he just went to Plan B. (And who knows, maybe Buck was the original Plan A but I just like the symmetry of Plan B and Buck. Yeah, I know, I'm easily amused.)
Beane said he never made Smoak an offer and HE DIDN'T... not a FORMAL offer anyways. But you can be sure the two sides discussed dollar figures.
"More so, the $950k is not what the A's were reported to have offered him after drafting him in the 16th round -- it was what they were talking about offering him if they picked him with the 36th pick."
This is a completely irrelevant arguement, devo. Smoak's price was $1 million and it didn't matter if he was drafted at #36 or #236... his price was going to be the same. Smoak was going to South Carolina unless someone made him a millionaire. The A's weren't willing to match that price.
There is only one question left to answer... are the A's going to regret that decision? We'll find out soon enough.
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 7:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
bending the truth
for example, in moneyball.
you're right, beane didn't lie. he just answered a question that no one was asking. i don't think any of us were wondering "did the a's ever make smoak a formal offer after drafting him?" but now we know the answer to that question.
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 12:15 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 31, 2007 1:10 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yes, but have you depodestaed people like Beane?
by monkeyball on
Jan 31, 2007 1:49 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Deposedesta"
- To relieve a general manager of his duties from the LA Dodgers baseball club, esp. at the behest of local media. Colletti better win the NL West, or else he might get Deposedestad.
- ar. To ignore the wisdom of a grizzled scout at the behest of a bespectacled assistant general manager.
by salb918 on
Jan 31, 2007 1:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Deposedusty"
- To come to one's senses, realize that one's farm system is only capable of producing pitching prospects, and not retain a manager with a penchant for shredding young arms.
- To leak incorrect but potentially damaging sensitive information about a soon-to-be-ex-employee to the media in order to avoid being Deposedestaed oneself.
by monkeyball on
Jan 31, 2007 2:27 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Deposedersty"
- To sign an expensive mediocrity in centerfield after a career year to replace another expensive mediocrity in centerfield who was alos signed after a career year.
- To extend a contract offer to a rival player only to withdraw after the alcohol wears off.
by salb918 on
Jan 31, 2007 2:50 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's all clear to me:
He made a mistake and cleared it up with Cahill. We have to move on.
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 3:52 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
possible #1 overall pick
once again: we look forward to seeing you get drafted by another team and having a great career.
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 12:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You mean
by Salvatore on
Jan 31, 2007 1:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
what is a ridiculous sum of money?
beane doesn't contradict that number, and he says smoak "made it quite clear the amount of money that he was interested in signing for."
smoak was projected to go in the first round, obviously he's not going to sign for 16th round money, that would be idiotic.
if you draft him in the 16th round and sign him for $1 million, that's like having an extra first round pick.
how much money did we give to cliff pennington in that same draft?
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 9:33 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Billy made it clear that they weren't $50,000
by Blez on
Jan 31, 2007 9:42 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you're totally misinterpreting his comments, blez
what it does mean is that smoak was most likely asking for $1 million, and the a's were most likely offering $0, as in no offer was even made.
therefore $50k apart is total fiction, it's $1 million apart.
evidence for smoak $1 million:
"To his credit, he made it quite clear the amount of money that he was interested in signing for."
evidence for a's $0:
"We never even made an offer to Justin."
"We never even made an offer. That was total fiction."
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 9:49 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think it's pretty clear that if he was
by Blez on
Jan 31, 2007 9:58 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
not true
smoak slides in draft from first or second round to 16th round due to questions about signability.
after the draft: "I'll sign for one million dollars, and nothing less," Smoak says. "Right now I'm planning to follow my dreams to South Carolina and play for Ray Tanner." (actual quote)
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 10:10 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well then someone is lying
We never even made an offer. That was total fiction. I can assure you that if we were between $950,000 and a million dollars we would've found a way to get it done."
When did this conversation take place? Was this after the 1 million comment or before. Is 1 million the number that he was "very committed" to according to Beane. If it was then hes saying we wouldve found a way to get it done.
Someone isnt telling the truth here.
by pickinmachine on
Jan 31, 2007 10:19 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There is another possibility..
Is there anyone at South Carolina who looms large on the radar that might be steered towards us?
Probably not, but it's possible.
by Ozzz on
Jan 31, 2007 10:33 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We have drafted a lot of South Carolina guys . . .
by BlameChannel53 on
Jan 31, 2007 10:35 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i don't understand what you're saying here
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 10:34 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
someone is lying
by pickinmachine on
Jan 31, 2007 11:56 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Beane said that if they were only $50 K
Regardless, the kid sounds like he was convinced he was going to school.
by Blez on
Jan 31, 2007 10:22 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
see BA article below
-smoak rejected it b/c he was planning on going to south carolina.
-smoak fell in the draft because everyone thought he was going to college.
-a's drafted smoak in the 16th round.
-smoak said he was happy going to south carolina, but that he'd sign with the a's for $1 million, no less.
-a's never made him an offer, so they were never $50k apart.
that doesn't contradict anything from the beane interview or the BA article.
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 10:30 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't know
BA claims the A's were offering $950 K. That seems like a pretty clear contradiction to me.
by Blez on
Jan 31, 2007 10:38 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i think he means after drafting him
"which was prepared to offer him $950,000 as the 36th overall pick"
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 10:46 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't know
by Blez on
Jan 31, 2007 10:50 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i agree
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 10:52 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The A's may not have made an OFFER
It's no coincidence that the A's signed the 36th pick, Travis Buck, to a $950K signing bonus. That's (appearently) all they were willing to spend/had budgeted to spend on the 36th pick.
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 11:04 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You have to wonder...
Unfortunately, Beane sees himself in a lot of these Talented High School Baseball Players w/ college aspirations. Why bowl a kid over with BIG $$$ when in the end, it might not be in the best interest of both parties.
by Colorado Fan on
Jan 31, 2007 3:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Heck, why pay a 36 Year Old reliever:
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 3:49 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You cannot make an offer to a HS Player
If Smoak said he would skip school they'd have drafted him in the 1st round and paid him "Officially" 950K.
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 3:47 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Smoak said $1 million prior to the draft
You're betting that Smoak is a liar. That looks like a losing bet.
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 11:13 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
why can't smoak
by fadedash on
Jan 31, 2007 2:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Smoak has no incentive to carry on the lie
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 4:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
one incentive
by fadedash on
Jan 31, 2007 6:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
More applicable to Billy Beane than Smoak
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 6:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, right.
by salb918 on
Jan 31, 2007 6:46 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So he continues to lie
Why are people so willing to believe that Justin Smoak is a liar and/or an idiot?
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 6:50 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Please understand
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 6:52 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
perhaps not even fudging the truth
blez: "Baseball America reported that he wanted $1 million and that you were offering $950,000."
when you put the two numbers in that order (not blaming blez for it b/c many of us believed this to be the case), it sounds like smoak wanted $1 million and beane's response was that he wasn't willing to go over $950k.
so obviously beane's answer is "that's not true" because it's not.
once again, everything fits together without anyone being a liar.
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 8:02 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it looks like
fortunately, even that has clarified things quite a bit.
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 8:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great Interview By the Way:
As the person on the board who followed this the closest, here is how I see it.
Smoak had signability issues before the draft.
He slipped to the 16th round.
Beane flew out to meet with him. Saw that he wanted to go to U of SC. Never offered him anything.
Smoak said he would not sign for less than 1 million dollars.
The 950K that WAS earmarked for him went to Buck.
If they thought he was still worth 950K they would have officially offered it. They didn't.
So, they were never 50K apart.
Smoak went to school and he will go down, next to Bonderman as Billy's NEXT biggest blunder.
The only way they would have signed him is if he was willing to take a minor league deal and a small bonus because he had a change of heart. he was not drafted in the 16th round and offered 1st round money, although that is what he wanted.
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 3:45 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
More Smoak
http://www.capecodbaseball.org/Weekly/Week2006/ThisWeek/thisweek_Awards_MVP.htm
Good talent in the Cape leagues... Wood Bats. That's pretty huge.
by Colorado Fan on
Jan 31, 2007 4:34 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not only was he outstanding:
by saint on
Feb 1, 2007 8:34 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
FIARE SMOAK NOAW!!!
by monkeyball on
Feb 1, 2007 10:14 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How the hec
by Salvatore on
Feb 1, 2007 10:55 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Who knows, maybe Billy talked to him and 1Million
by theblackpearl on
Jan 31, 2007 11:32 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If he was actually considered first round talent
BA ranked him I believe in the 90s among thast year's draft prospects -- that would make him third round talent.
by devo on
Jan 31, 2007 9:42 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you're right, 96th by BA
"Both were rated by Baseball America among the Top 100 Prospects in the draft--right next to each other at Nos. 95 and 96, appropriately--but both slipped far past where their talent would dictate in the draft amid questions about their signability."
but the a's may have wanted to take smoak 36th, and the red sox may have wanted to take reese havens 26th:
"Boston scouted both Smoak and Havens as heavily as any organization this spring, and according to Havens, Epstein indicated the Red Sox wanted to take Havens with the second of their two first-round picks, 26th overall."
"Smoak's first strong predraft inquiry came through his adviser from Oakland, which was prepared to offer him $950,000 as the 36th overall pick, a supplemental first-rounder the team received for losing free agent Damian Miller."
so it's total fiction that the a's offered smoak $950k after drafting him in the 16th round, it's what they were prepared to offer him before the draft.
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 10:05 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
timing
If so, it sounds to me like his real message is not that his price is $1 million, but rather that his price is a-little-bit-more-than-you're-willing-to-offer. In other words, no matter what you offer, he's not going to sign.
by iglew on
Jan 31, 2007 2:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's not entirely accurate
by grover on
Jan 31, 2007 7:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
can't be right
I just have a feeling that the money must've been more than that. Why would all these other teams pass on him as well. I imagine it mustve been in the 4-5 million range.
by pickinmachine on
Jan 31, 2007 10:03 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
what if they forgot a zero
by methodrampage on
Jan 31, 2007 10:14 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If we just chose Smoak instead of Pennington
DON'T FORGET A 40TH ROUND PICK WHO DIDN'T SIGN A FEW YEARS BACK. DOES JONATHON PAPELBON RING A BELL????? I BELIEVE HE IS PRETTY GOOD AND WOULD HAVE MADE THE "MONEYBALL DRAFT" ONE HELL OF A DRAFT.
by Bud Light on
Jan 31, 2007 12:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Smoak's Dad, AFTER THE DRAFT:
When it bacame 1 million, 29 teams would have signed him. In his own pompous way, Billy looked past him. It was his whole, "You know, I skipped out on Stanford and became a flop, don't let that happen to you!!!"
I really hope the M's don't get him. Or does Beane see us being the worst team in baseball in 2 years and drafting him?
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 3:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
what about the high school pitchers we drafted?
by xbhaskarx on
Jan 31, 2007 9:13 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I think we should only draft grads of ...
by monkeyball on
Jan 31, 2007 9:26 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Too many wrist injuries.
by Poppy on
Jan 31, 2007 9:39 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
but we could palm them off on other teams
by monkeyball on
Jan 31, 2007 9:57 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks Blez
by oblique on
Jan 31, 2007 9:19 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Good Job Blez
by Bud Light on
Jan 31, 2007 9:33 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
McGwire
Does anyone else think the very end of the interview is strange? I mean, >I< sure as heck don't have a vote either but I've sure got an opinion. What's to be lost by sharing your opinion on this one? I guess if you support his bid you could be seen as supporting steroids, but if you don't you could be seen as not giving the man his due, but both of those are pretty tenuous. Maybe BB knows a little more about the steroids than he wants to admit?
by BerkeleyDawg on
Jan 31, 2007 9:43 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, but
by iglew on
Jan 31, 2007 2:20 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Beane's Opinion
I'd lay money down on it.
And by the way, it would be pretty "News-Worthy" if Beane didn't back McGwire.
by Colorado Fan on
Jan 31, 2007 2:23 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes
by achiappanza on
Feb 1, 2007 12:10 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Smoak and History
I really liked his answer concerning the history of this current generation of the team. This is something I had not thought about until he mentioned it. It saddens me a bit to think that in 15-20 years most of the great A's players from the last 7 years are going to be associated with other teams. I suppose it's similar to how McGwire is typically associated with the Cardinals now.
It's heartening to know that Billy understands the importance of team history to fans and that he thinks about it in connection with keeping great players.
by JLeverenz on
Jan 31, 2007 10:00 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
The Only Reason (As you know)...
by Gerard on
Jan 31, 2007 11:31 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Doesn't McQuire Choose? ..
by Randy Bell on
Jan 31, 2007 11:35 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Hall of Fame picks the hat.
by OaktownPower on
Jan 31, 2007 12:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
catfish hunter
by vk on
Jan 31, 2007 12:34 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A's Tenure
Case in Point:
Hudson
Mulder
I could argue:
Tejada
Giambi
Will Zito last 7 Years @ SF? That's a big question mark, IMO.
Other quality A's (Damon, Dye) weren't A's to begin with.
by Colorado Fan on
Jan 31, 2007 2:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Weird
by Colorado Fan on
Jan 31, 2007 2:32 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great Interview!
Blez, you and Billy both rock!
by BobbyCrosbysGirl on
Jan 31, 2007 1:14 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Since Billy's
by Salvatore on
Jan 31, 2007 2:13 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
By the way,
by Salvatore on
Jan 31, 2007 2:15 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Beane is a SOFTY!!!
This IS a business Billy!!!
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 3:01 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I wonder if Billy regrets NOT giving him the Mil:
Billy seems to rarely admit mistakes, although he does learn from them. I wonder of signing Cahill was due to not looking past Smoak's Smoke?
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 3:34 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Eckerseley
I could see McGwire going in as a Cardinal even though he hit more home runs played more games and got a world series ring with the A's. It will be just like Reggie.
by BashBrothers89 on
Jan 31, 2007 4:05 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Reggie chose his own
by saint on
Jan 31, 2007 4:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I Thought it Strange ..
by Randy Bell on
Jan 31, 2007 4:15 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think he'd
by Salvatore on
Jan 31, 2007 5:36 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Choosing caps
From the horse's mouth, I might add! They used to choose it but then after the Boggs thing (not to mention the foul taste that one Reggie Jerkhead left in A's mouths when he dissed us despite having spent the majority of his career here) pushed them to go this way....
by BerkeleyDawg on
Feb 2, 2007 11:51 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Whew! What an exhausting thread!

by LAXile on
Jan 31, 2007 5:32 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I might have to move back...
by DieEarthlingScum on
Jan 31, 2007 6:20 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Well I guess we've concluded...
- that Billy Beane is an absolute genius for being the only GM in baseball who knew it would be possible to sign Smoak out of high school, and
- that Billy Beane is an absolute idiot for failing to sign Smoak out of high school.
by matthias on
Jan 31, 2007 7:48 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL
I figured the whole Oakland comment would've created a lot more discussion than one prospect picked in the 16th round who never signed.
by Blez on
Jan 31, 2007 10:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
were dying
Anyone else doing the March 3, 4 vs Cubs and vs Padres games?
by apilgrim on
Jan 31, 2007 10:27 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're missing the point
by FreeSeatUpgrade on
Jan 31, 2007 10:40 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fair enough
by grover on
Feb 1, 2007 7:06 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
word
by SwisherSweet on
Jan 31, 2007 10:30 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed, and even Bonderman is no big deal IMHO ..
by Randy Bell on
Feb 1, 2007 5:14 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bonderman was horrible
It was Billy's biggest gaffe, imo, by FAR. He was mad that someone on his staff drafted a HS pitcher and traded him because he couldn't stand having a HS prodigy in the system. It was Bonderman and two good prospects for Weaver, who was traded to NYY for Lilly, Jason Arnold and John Ford Griffin. The latter two were traded to Toronto for not much.
by noava22 on
Feb 2, 2007 12:42 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe, but not as big as Sabean's ..
by Randy Bell on
Feb 2, 2007 3:52 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
good interview tyler. thanks
by bigelephant on
Feb 1, 2007 6:27 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Great questions
I liked how Billy basically refused to comment on McGwire. Smart dude.
by Joey C. on
Feb 1, 2007 10:58 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
One of the frustrating things about Billy...
Blez deserves all the credit in the world both for establishing such a good rapport with him, and for fair but insistent questioning that really covers all the bases.
There's a side to me that wishes I came away from these interviews with a more concrete set of answers to Blez's questions...but BB would have to be a less good GM for that to happen.
by GreenNGoldSooner on
Feb 2, 2007 7:39 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Kudos
by afskycop on
Feb 1, 2007 11:29 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
I have one question for Billy
Sorry, just needed to rant.
by Philip Christy on
Feb 2, 2007 12:45 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe BB Likes the Team As Is ..
by Randy Bell on
Feb 2, 2007 3:58 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also, RE: Inexpensive Outfielders ..
by Randy Bell on
Feb 2, 2007 6:41 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Correction: Kielty is Better Batting From the ..
by Randy Bell on
Feb 2, 2007 10:50 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dellucci at 4 mil per is a lot for a 4th
by A'sfansince1970 on
Feb 2, 2007 7:49 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Speaking of the 4th ..
by Randy Bell on
Feb 2, 2007 10:47 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
CORRECTION: Got My Sides Wrong!
by Randy Bell on
Feb 2, 2007 10:51 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ricky Ledee?
by A'sfansince1970 on
Feb 2, 2007 7:12 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Split Allegiances
As a lifelong gamecock and USC graduate, I find myself wishing for a Smoak-led national championship . . . and hoping that Landon Powell gets healthy and turns his career around . . . and hoping that Kevin Melillo has a big year at Sacramento . . . and that someday they all end up winning a world championship while wearing the green and gold of the Fremont A's. Surely that's not too much to ask for, is it? And for Billy's relationship with Ray Tanner and USC, Tanner may be telling him that Lonnie Chisenhall is the real prospect: a stud of a third baseman with Smoak-like power and a 92 mph fastball that makes him a part-time closer too. How cool is that?
by Papago on
Feb 2, 2007 5:44 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs















