Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NHL Trade Rumors: Do You Make A Move For Rick Nash?

Blasphemy?

I know it's probably blasphemy to many to say things like LaRussa as a genius is a myth and Jim Leyland is overrated, but for once I tend to agree with Marcos Breton.  I think sports fans and media tend to overrate the impact that a manager can have on a team.

Obviously you can't have someone like Macha running things when apparently the majority of the clubhouse says that they lost all respect for their leader.

But I tend to believe that we harp on the manager too much when in reality, his role and impact is pretty minimal on the ultimate success of a team.  Typically teams that have a lot of talent and good players win and teams that don't, well, don't.  Jim Leyland looks a lot better this year because of the signing of Kenny Rogers, the addition of Verlander and Zumaya in key roles and a healthy Magglio Ordonez.  The Yankees lost in the first round because they faced a much better pitching staff.  And pitching always beats good hitting...even the Yankees fearsome lineup.  They didn't lose because of Torre.  The A's lost because their offense was miserable, but that's also because they faced the best pitching staff in baseball (statistically-speaking) and the A's starting pitching couldn't match them.  Macha could've made a few better decisions, but for the most part, the A's fate was sealed because of Rogers, Bonderman and Zito and Loaiza.

Any way, I know for many old schoolers saying that the manager has very little to do with a team's success is blasphemy, but that's how I view things.  So regardless of whoever fills Macha's shoes, the A's will either win or lose next year based on the players they have on the field (injuries included).

By the way, I'd like to ask that you take 5 minutes and fill out this survey.  We're trying to figure out who reads our SB Nation sites and would appreciate just five minutes of your time.  Please help us out if you can.  Thank you!

Comment 262 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

You're mostly correct
The fact that the A's won 93 games with a terrible manager like Macha shows how important a manger is.  I do believe that a good manager could be worth 5 or 6 games in the right situation, and I think a good manager could mean the difference of 1 game in a short playoff series.  On the margins, then, a manager can make a huge difference.  
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 10:09 AM PDT reply actions  

Pitching Street in 5 straight games:
One of which when trailing by three runs was a horific decision that could have cost the team 5 games over the course of the season itself!!!
"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Here is where we disconnect: :)
If a Good manager is a +6, an average manager is break even and a bad manager is -6, that is a 12 game swing.
"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:11 AM PDT reply actions  

Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive and...Dodge
If you catch the ball, the other person is out and one your players comes back in.  It's what we call a double switch!

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 17, 2006 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Blez.....
i agree with you to a certain extent. But, I would like someone to explain to me a team like the Marlins this year and Joe Girardi. Do you think that he made a team of underachievers better with some kind of motivational techniques, or related to the players in some kind of way that made them perform better than expectations? Things like this make me curious about how much a manager matters. I would like to have others share their opinions on a team like this years Marlins, who were picked to win like 60 games, and won around 80.
KGrand

by bigmacattack @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:14 AM PDT reply actions  

Marlins are not a good example
The Marlins were dismissed by "experts" because the didn't have proven veterans like Neifi Pere and Darin Erstad on their team.  What they did have were a bunch of talented but young players.  Their pitching staff was as talented as any team in the National League, and is likley to be one of the best in baseball over the next 5 years or so.  Thus, Girardi gets too much credit in my opinion.  Because the Marlins are a young team, and young players are very unpredictable, it would not surprise me if the Marlins have a bit of a regression next year.  People will attribute that regression to the loss of Girardi, but I think that would be incorrect.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly
Beinfest should be getting the credit instead of Girardi.  In fact Girardi wanted to play crappy veterans instead of the rookies that Beinfest recommended.

The Marlins also collapsed down the stretch.  I saw Giradi manage against the Mets in a big series and he tactically horrific.  He had Hanley ramirez bunting with 2 strikes and was giving away outs all over the place.  Girardi is by the most overrated manager in the game right now.  The top notch Marlins braintrust couldn't fire this guy fast enough.

by DKNJ on Oct 17, 2006 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

so maybe..........
is it somewhat safe to say that maybe the players connected better with Girardi because he was a first year manager? I just think of some teams that had much more talent than the Marlins and ended up with a worse record. I know they obtained a lot of good young prospects from many teams, but I was surprised to see them play so well.
KGrand

by bigmacattack @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

A team of
replacement level, triple A players would win 55 games. Beinfest loaded the Marlins up with premium prospects up and down the lineup.  They did a great job winning 75 games in a very weak NL, but I think that someone is going to overpay for Girardi.  He basically told his boss to shut up.

Girardi did a nice job getting the youngsters to play hard, but his in game moves made Bob Brenly look like Miller Huggins.  He doesn't even have a rudimentary understanding of the A's philiosophy of preserving outs.

by DKNJ on Oct 17, 2006 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think Girardi mostly stayed out of the way
Girardi did a good job of letting the young guys play and make mistakes.  A manager such as Dusty Baker or Lou Piniella probably would have destroyed those young players.  I disagree that other teams in the National League had more talent, but had worse records.  I would take the Marlins starting rotation over any team in the National League, and Cabrera is one of the best players in baseball.  Throw in underrated players like Uggla, Winningham, Jacobs and it should not have surprised people that the Marlins were respectable.  
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

no one......
saw Uggla having the season that he had. I ask this question: prior to the season would you take the Marlins rotation over ANY National League team? I would not thank so. I mean come on the Marlins had a better record than the Astros for a majority of the season, and you mean to tell me before the season you would have taken the Marlins rotation over Oswalt, Petitte, and Clemens? I think not. The Marlins over-achieved; whether or not Girardi had something to do with it is what's in question. It would have been hard to predict that Sanchez and Johnson, etc. were going to be this good this soon.
KGrand

by bigmacattack @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Performance vs talent
Based on talent alone, I would have taken the Marlins rotation over any other in the National League. Anyone who pays attention at all to prospects knew that the Marlins had an amazing collection of young talented pitchers (arguably the best of any team ever when considering quality and quantity) and several young talented hitters. Uggla was a surprise to everybody but his mama, but he did light it up in the AFL, so it's not a total surprise that he did well.  I would not have been surprised to see the Marlins win 90 games, and I would not have been surprised to see them lose 90 games.  They were a huge unknown given how young they were.  IMO Girardi's presence during their mostly successful year was more correlation than causation.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

many good points there--
there is so much uncertainty with a young team that is just hard to figure out if they were influenced in a certain way that they responded to. i did know of their many prospects and i did know that they received top prospects from the red sox, mets, cubs, and twins. The Marlins will prob. win the world series in 2009. Now it looks like the Rangers will win the 2007 World Series.
KGrand

by bigmacattack @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

exactly my point
I don't know that Girardi is not a great manager, he might well be if he can learn to play nice with his next owner and GM.  I just think it is silly that the media portrayed the Marlins as some talentless downtrodden bunch of stiffs who were led to new heights by the great Joe Girardi.  Girardi will get another chance to manage, and we'll see how he does.  
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

you seem like a fair and balanced fan..........
whom, or what kind of manager do you think the A's will respond better to? Is there a candiate you have in mind, or should it be one of the few internal candiates???  I like Washington a lot, and a little more aggressiveness would not hurt the A's, but I am not convinced he is the answer.
KGrand

by bigmacattack @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like Washington and Geren
Washington as first choice, but I think Geren is better than other AN folks give him credit for.  I agree with your reservations about Washington. He is a wild card, in that he has never managed.  I would take the chance on Washington if I were Billy Beane.    
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

I kind of find it interesting that Macha was fired
after doing his best managerial job to date, in my opinion. The team had so many injuries through out the season, and the team at times opened up a pretty sizable lead down the stretch. Maybe I read into things too much, but I think Beane senses a new era ahead of us. An uphill battle has started and we must now pass by an Angels team that is going to be a very, VERY formidable opponent for years to come, and we will be the Oakland "Zito-less" A's, too. I hope the A's make a play for Randy Wolf to "replace" him.
KGrand

by bigmacattack @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Old Schooler
Every player from the Oakland A's World Champions of the early 70's when asked say that having a great manager makes a big positive difference on a ballclub and means more wins if you want to count wins and losses. These are guys who played the game through all kinds of high pressure playoffs and world series, and they have no reason to lie.

by Salvatore on Oct 17, 2006 10:19 AM PDT reply actions  

Yes, but those were the days
before free agency and multi-millionaires in the dugout.  Evidently Macha didn't feel comfortable setting a curfew during the 2003 ALDS in Boston, which might have prevented Hudson's midnight barroom injury.  Was this because Macha didn't lead -- draw the line at a very important time -- or because the modern millionaire player culture won't put up with such old-fashioned things as curfews?
The score is _always_ 0-0 until the final out. Each pitch is a new ballgame.

by FanSinceKC on Oct 17, 2006 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, I don't know.
But , I go back yo old Jim Leyland,  again.  He'd spit in the face to any kind of modern millionaire culture trip any player of his would try to lay on him.

by Salvatore on Oct 17, 2006 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like Leyland.
But spit in the face of a player? AFAIK, Leyland for the most part is a players manager.
On Sunday, Minaya ticked off a list of candidates to join the rotation, and for once this season, none of them was Jose Lima.

by rfloh on Oct 18, 2006 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Read what I wrote again
a bit more carefully. Leyland would spit, (metaphorically), at the face of  any millionaire ballplayer culture that was a negative force to deal with. Now, I know how poor o'l Jesus of Galillee in the New Testament feels when his words are taken out of context.

by Salvatore on Oct 18, 2006 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

I've said for YEARS:
Give me Leyland and I'll give you a Championship. Now look. Even his players call him the MVP of thier team.

I'll take thier word over some "stat nazi"* any day. :)

Not inplying that you are such.

"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:22 AM PDT reply actions  

Stat nazi?
Wow. Referring to people as nazis is a new low, even for you.
Some are sabermetricians.

by andeux on Oct 17, 2006 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

HAHAHA!!!
Sorry to laugh if you are truly offended. That's what I get for reading Halos Heaven. I thought it was the term used for the guys who never played above Little League and think they can get all of thier info from numbers and formulas.

What is the term for that?

"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

BTW...Screw PC'ness...This IS America:
"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Isn't that what they burn at Burning Man?
"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, that's the term
that's used when you misrepresent the position of others to strengthen your argument.
Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hey Man:
I'm coming to the East Coast for the Mets and Yankee Series next year.

Do you know if Boston is in town at that time?

"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Found the schedule:
They play the Rangers that Friday.

Looks like the A's vs Mets on the 23rd, Yanks mid week and the Sawx on the 29th of June

"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Swing by Boston
and we'll get a beer (or, barring that, I may come down to NY to catch the A's play in the Stadium).
Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

My family, The St.Martin's, are still in Boston:
I want to swing by and see them and also visit Fenway. It's looking like we'll be there for atleast three days.

The Ranger Game on the 29th looks like the best game to catch.

"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

So who's more important to you,
me or the St Martins?
Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

The one makes having a beer with the other:
Possible!!!
"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hey Saint...
Jackie and I are going to NY for those series too.....

by BleacherDave on Oct 17, 2006 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Are you staying the week?
If so we should update eachother on deals we score. I'm gonna speak to the Boosters about getting tcikets ahead of time.
"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes.
You're all over it.  Haven't even begun to plan yet.  But, you're right.  Keep an eye peeled for deals.  We'll do the same.

by BleacherDave on Oct 17, 2006 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is it a booster trip?
I always try to score a front row CF bleacher seat for one game at each stadium.

by BleacherDave on Oct 17, 2006 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mr. Sabermetric Spork
Like so:

Eternal Springs™: The official 2007 bottled water of your Oakland Athletics

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Oct 17, 2006 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

HAHAHAHA!!!
That is where I read it first!!! Too, funny...Not to laugh at Andeaux's espense. Seriously.
"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good Managers help... a lot.
I think Billy had a little something to do with our resurgence in 1980, don't you think?  Or how about La Russa's decision to turn Eck into a closer when he came over and automatically stick Stew in the starting rotation when he wasn't a very good pitcher when he came to us.  A lot of times a manager's vision helps.  I'm not saying he's totally responsible for things -- but a good one sure helps.  Macha wasn't that good...period.  Then couple that with his inabality to communicate with the players... recipe for disaster -- and that's exactly what we got.

by Rick @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:24 AM PDT reply actions  

so basically
we have the best clubhouse chemistry in the history of sports, except for the manager, wow.

That Slusser article was amazing, unique insights I didn't expect to get.

I think that given the situation, if they hire Wash we have a very very great shot at bringing home the hardware next fall.

Thank you Athletics and AN for a magnificent 2006 to remember ... only 121 days until pitchers and catchers report

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 10:25 AM PDT reply actions  

shouldn't that be "Blezphemy"?
I'm in 100% agreement with you and Breton, Blez. Yes, there are things a manager has to do, and yes there things a manager can do to screw the pooch, but overall ... meh. Give me a team with Bradley, Sheffield, Frank Thomas, Barry Bonds, Kenny Rogers, A-Rod, John Rocker (during those 2 years when he was lights-out), AJ Pierzynski <washes hands furiously after typing that; defenestrates keyboard; washes hands again>, and I honestly don't care who the manager is.
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 10:26 AM PDT reply actions  

How it Went Down with Macha
1.    Beane essentially fired Macha last year but blamed it on the money disagreement. He thought there was a 0% chance of Macha ever taking the offer.
2.    Wolff intervened and called Billy on the deal. When Macha accepted the offer, Billy was trapped because he said it was about money, not competence.
3.    Macha now had some control because of the three year contract and the prospect of a dismissal was more tenable to him. He didn't need to be on best behavior anymore.
4.    Macha took his frustrations out on his coaches and players because he couldn't take it them out on the GM or owner.
5.    Management never coached Macha on how to deal better with the players because they wanted an excuse to let him go.

This was a lot like the Bill Callahan situation in his last year with the Raiders, when his frustration with Al Davis led to disengagement with the team. History repeats itself in Oaktown.

by scarr1 on Oct 17, 2006 10:31 AM PDT reply actions  

Macha was average
but it's crazy not to think he had a hand in some of the victories and losses.  It's amazing to me that everyone on the team is talking crap about him after the firing.  If I was a co-worker of half of these guys than I would consider them some of the least professional people with which I've ever been associated.

I thought Billy actually ran this team?  If they lose everyone gives him excuses as to why it happened.  If they win everyone gives him all of the credit.  I wonder which "little bitch"
BB is going to hire this year??  He obviously has some self esteem issues that won't allow him to get an above average manager... so it's kind of irrelevant IMO.

"A's Brand Baseball: The worst best baseball you've ever seen!" -Chavvy

by ohtobe21likehuston on Oct 17, 2006 10:32 AM PDT reply actions  

depends on the players
a manager can help create a good environment in the clubhouse to the point that the team plays a little harder than normal for him. but if they are already highly motivated, top-notch guys, you're talking about a few wins over a season. managing a game well  and adjusting to your opponents (bullpen, hit and run, smart baserunning, lineup, etc.) can also probably net a few wins. so, yes, probably not huge. however, 4-5 wins a year could make a huge difference in making the playoffs or not. but, if you're already a team with talented professionals, a great manager won't make a huge difference - well, probably not one worth shelling out a few extra million dollars for (see: pinella, lou)
"welcome to ME, motherf*^*er!" - tim hudson

by guy incognito on Oct 17, 2006 10:36 AM PDT reply actions  

I just think baseball fans
spend way too much lamenting over a manager.  What we should be discussing right now is how to make sure that the starting pitching improves next year despite losing Zito and how to get the offense to be better because I guarantee that those two things will have a bigger impact on whether the A's make the playoffs in 2007 than who sets the lineups.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Oct 17, 2006 10:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Get the offense to be better
by getting a manager that inspires self-coincidence with RISP....

by BleacherDave on Oct 17, 2006 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

How about a manager....
that can actually get Swisher to act on the notion that "a single is OK sometime" rather than one that consistenly tells it to the press, but can't his player to buy in.

Either shut up, or get Swish to trust you.

by BleacherDave on Oct 17, 2006 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

The offense will be better if we take advantage:
Of Kendall's strengths.

Bat injured Chavy lower in the line-up, where the pressure is off and he actually hits better.

Steal more bases with our team speed.

Hit behind runners.

Crosby returns and replaces Scoot.

"I think we just feel that now is our time." - Nick Swisher

by saint @ Athletics Nation on Oct 17, 2006 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'd lament more
of the GM of this team, and I do.

by Salvatore on Oct 17, 2006 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

even more important
getting a top notch training staff in place throughout the system, and getting players on some routines in the offseason (specifically guys like crosby [train w/ kotsay], blanton and kennedy [hello cardio, goodbye beer guts], chavvy [get the shoulder scoped and be done with that problem], harden [train those obliques, add just a little bit more body fat]). to have so many injuries in the whole organization is a failure of some kind - and those minor league injuries were horrible because they basically killed a year or so of development for basically all our top prospects.
"welcome to ME, motherf*^*er!" - tim hudson

by guy incognito on Oct 17, 2006 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

It is precisely because...
there are so few opportunities for managers to make a difference, that they make those opportunities count.

For Macha to say that they forgot to go over 2b coverage with Jimenez because Crosby had "handled it" all year, is a firing offense.  It didn't make a difference, but it could have.

Too often managers are judged on the outcomes of their moves, rather than the reasoning that went into them.

Creating a positive environment for success is the most important job of any leader.

by BleacherDave on Oct 17, 2006 10:44 AM PDT reply actions  

And that's where I agree with you
A manager needs to have strong communication skills above all else.  From all reports, Macha was channeling all of his communications through Eric Chavez.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Oct 17, 2006 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

the most telling comment
was Zito's.  It always seemed obvious that Macha was kind of a cranky, curmudgeonly, glass-half-empty kind of guy, and in the long grinding season that can add to the grindiness.  Leadership doesn't dwell too long on all that can go wrong because its too busy formulating and implementing what can go right.

The more I hear what the players seem to want and value, the more I think Wash is the guy.

Thank you Athletics and AN for a magnificent 2006 to remember ... only 121 days until pitchers and catchers report

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with this a lot:
It is precisely because there are so few opportunities for managers to make a difference, that they make those opportunities count.

Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Creating conditions for success
I think that's true, but even there, the manager's role tends to be grossly overstated.  One need look no further than our own '06 A's, who (to hear Kotsay tell it) created their own positive environment for success despite Macha, not because of him.
Eternal Springs™: The official 2007 bottled water of your Oakland Athletics

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Oct 17, 2006 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

To hear Zito tell it...
it wasn't that positive.  The September fades of the last few years seem to be a symptom.

by BleacherDave on Oct 17, 2006 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Evaluating a manager
It's helpful to seperate the manager's job into components. I see three large areas under a manager's control:
  1. Roster Management - this encompasses a manager's ability to get maximal value from a given roster. Is the best reliever in the game during the highest leverage situations? Was the closer forced to go 5 dys in a row? Are the backups getting enought at-bats to keep both the backup and regular players fresh? Are those at-bats timed to maximize value (i.e. is Kielty getting his ABs against lefties). This is long term planning.
  2. Tactics- There is a lot of interaction between tactics and roster management. Sometimes a manager is forced to employ sub-optimal tactics to keep a particular player rested, for example. Tactics is a different sort of decision making, though. It involves short term decision making. To bunt or not to bunt?
  3. Personell management- keeping players happy. Making sure a clubhouse atmosphere contributes to performance. Etc.
We aren't in the clubhouse, so it's hard to evaluate the 3rd category, but if the quotes in the paper are anything close to accurate Macha clearly failed at that part of his job.

In terms of tactics, I thought Macha did a good job. We didn't give up many outs to bunts. When a particular pitcher or catcher was vulnerable, the A's stole some bases. Generally, he evaluated his bullpen well.

It was in roster management that I think Macha had some serious shortcomings. Perez and Ginter's careers may both have been ruined by Macha's refusal to play them more. Street was overworked. Many of the regulars were clearly worn down over the course of the season. Macha didn't seem to do much planning ahead.

by MrIncognito on Oct 17, 2006 10:47 AM PDT reply actions  

presuming managerial talent ...
... is distributed similarly to (though likely less efficiently than) on-field talent, then we've got to figure that there are maybe 1-2 absolutely elite, difference-making managers in the majors, and maybe 2-3 second-tier subgeniuses, with all of the rest being essentially "replacement-level."

Which is to say that for 90% of the managers, it ain't gonna make any difference which one you pick. And even the elite ones ain't gonna give you that much of an advantage.

but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 10:49 AM PDT reply actions  

we need a Subgenius manager

               AND I VOTE FOR BOB DOBBS
Thank you Athletics and AN for a magnificent 2006 to remember ... only 121 days until pitchers and catchers report

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

A living God who walks Earth in huckster's shoes
Sounds like Bobby Valentine to me.
Eternal Springs™: The official 2007 bottled water of your Oakland Athletics

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Oct 17, 2006 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

separated at birth?
Thank you Athletics and AN for a magnificent 2006 to remember ... only 121 days until pitchers and catchers report

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agree to a point.
As I've said before, the primary job of the manager is to "first do no harm."  I believe there are a number of managers who are not good at this primary function and are net drags on their team; Buck and Dusty are examples.  This is the lowest tier of managers, and they can cause a team to play very poorly and below its talent level.

So I would amend your structure:

  1. Elite (0-2): by virtue of clubhouse psychology and in-game tactics, cause team to player several games better than its true talent.
  2. Subgenius (2-3): can add 1-2 wins per year based on  in-game strategy (bullpen usage), coaxing better-than-average performance from average performers (work ethic), or personnel management (platoon).
  3. "Replacement Level" (most): Don't do any harm; team generally plays to talent level.
  4. History's Greatest Monsters: as described above.
Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

wow, now I'm confused
I thought Stat Nazis were "history's greatest monsters."

Seriously, though, I do agree with you, Sal -- I was hinting at somewhat the same conclusion with my caveat that managerial talent isn't distributed as efficiently as playing talent.

but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

I've always
subscribed to the notion that the mananger in baseball is the least important of all coaches in the major sports.

Especially in the AL...

by JasonB on Oct 17, 2006 11:09 AM PDT reply actions  

agreed
And a follow-up question to the audience: how many people who place great import on the role of a manager also happen to be football fans?
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

{replies while holding laminated card over mouth}
"I miss taking showers with Kendall" ~ Brian Giles

by Poppy on Oct 17, 2006 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is someone out there crying?
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you keep losing me...
...I'm just going to have to stop talking to you.  :P~~~
"I miss taking showers with Kendall" ~ Brian Giles

by Poppy on Oct 17, 2006 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Simple question
For all the people who say the manager makes no difference, ask yourself one question: would you rather have your team managed by Jim Leyland or by somebody like Macha or Dusty Baker?

I think it's obvious.

The A's success should surprise no one. They're a much better team than people give them credit for. -- Joe Morgan

by BubbaDude on Oct 17, 2006 11:09 AM PDT reply actions  

I did!!!!
You owe me!!!!  Big time!!!!
Thank you Athletics and AN for a magnificent 2006 to remember ... only 121 days until pitchers and catchers report

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

I filled it out
Where's my stale cofee and $20 cashiers check?!
"so... I'll take that as 'none of your business'" ~ ArakSOT

by eamb on Oct 17, 2006 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

yes
despite being pre-emptively banned from every website in the SB nation....

by BleacherDave on Oct 17, 2006 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

I did it.
I'm looking forward to the hi-tech gadget ads.
"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 17, 2006 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

I did...
even though I hate filling out surveys.  

by AsGirl on Oct 17, 2006 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I did!
You can check by my email address!
Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I did
but I lied horribly on it.  Do I still get partial credit?

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 17, 2006 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I worry that
Wash doesn't have the experience that Geren does.  The  Licey story about Geren winning in the DR and Wash losing badly with the same team really interests me.  I also worry about Wash refusing to hone his craft in the minors the way Geren did.

by DKNJ on Oct 17, 2006 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Could have been the case with Wash and Licy
being a stranger in a strange land.

by Salvatore on Oct 17, 2006 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nothing is so wrong that Carl Crawford
couldn't fix it as our lead off guy!
Santa: PLEASE hear my Christmas wish, and I don't care what you have to give Tampa Bay instead so that you give us my Christmas wish!!!
"Even I don't believe half the things I say . . ." Barry Bonds to New York press corps, 2004

by millbraeforAsfan on Oct 17, 2006 11:23 AM PDT reply actions  

That survey is for marketing purposes
way to sell out guys
Badges, we don't need no stinkin Badges!

by henry85 on Oct 17, 2006 12:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Here we go again...
"...I say let's get the boys together again and take another shot."

by Jennifer on Oct 17, 2006 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

<grabs popcorn>
"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 17, 2006 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

no, it's not
It's for marketing porpoises. Blez and Kos are going to be selling aquatic mammals by mail. Like sea monkeys, but bigger! And illegal!
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's funny to you,
but we're the ones who end up with wet mailboxes.
Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

No we took preventative
measures.  We have them wrapped in hefty bags and cinched up tight.  Is there a problem with that?

by Tyler Bleszinski on Oct 17, 2006 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes.
It's cruel to the tuna that gets tangled up in the porpoise bag.
Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I made sure I cut the soda
can holder though...isn't that worth SOMETHING?

by Tyler Bleszinski on Oct 17, 2006 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

What?
I was really hoping for a free leashed seagull.  Thanks a bunch, SELLOUT.
Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

QOTM.
"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 17, 2006 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pffft.
You've sold out to the pinko community voting to determine qotm, too?  F--- off.
Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Christ, what a Stat Nazi
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

We're gonna need a bigger mailbox.
"...I say let's get the boys together again and take another shot."

by Jennifer on Oct 17, 2006 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

especially if you filled out the survey
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm with LCJ:
Regulators are always trying to ruin our best recreational opportunities.

by mikeA on Oct 17, 2006 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kos is the Anti-Christ
And he loves the Angels.
The A's success should surprise no one. They're a much better team than people give them credit for. -- Joe Morgan

by BubbaDude on Oct 17, 2006 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

And...so?
Sell out to what exactly?
Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

The MAN
Whenever people sell out, isn't it always to The MAN?

by Tyler Bleszinski on Oct 17, 2006 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or "they"
As in "that's what THEY want you to think."
"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 17, 2006 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sell out.
Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Blez tarped AN's third deck.
"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 17, 2006 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

AND he raised membership fees...
...AGAIN!

<rolls eyes>

The nerve.

Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fremont Nation, here we come.
"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 17, 2006 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

<starts rival blog>
"Athletics' Supporters"
Thank you Athletics and AN for a magnificent 2006 to remember ... only 121 days until pitchers and catchers report

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

bAnNeD!
"...I say let's get the boys together again and take another shot."

by Jennifer on Oct 17, 2006 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol
"I miss taking showers with Kendall" ~ Brian Giles

by Poppy on Oct 17, 2006 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I sold out to Chico
Mrs Monkeyball sold out to Fresno
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I sold out to Groucho
Get your tootsie-frootsie ice cream!
Some are sabermetricians.

by andeux on Oct 17, 2006 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I sold out.
EVERY SEAT IN THE STADIUM </Lew Wolff>
Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe A's will
rehire Macha again in about 24 hours.

by Salvatore on Oct 17, 2006 1:18 PM PDT reply actions  

While we're shopping for a manager,
anyone else think that the A's should take a look at the just-resigned Giants trainer, Stan Conte??? Chron points out he/Giants had 2nd lowest days-on-DL in the majors in recent years.
Might that make a difference -- keeping more of our guys on the field, than on the DL???
"Even I don't believe half the things I say . . ." Barry Bonds to New York press corps, 2004

by millbraeforAsfan on Oct 17, 2006 1:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Yes
I think we should take a look at a lot of other trainers.  Larry Davis seems to be lost somewhere in the 1980's.  Also, if I were a GM I would want a trainer who had some credibility on conditioning issues, and Larry Davis has the body of Larry Flynt.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

double yes
Larry Davis is to fitness what I am to guitar instruction

we've both been playing for over 20 years and still haven't a clue what's going on

next A's manager: Diego Chavez *CHANGE DIEGO NOW!!!!*

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

A trainer...
Should be fit to encourage players to be fit. Not a tie dyed t shirt wearing bloated sack of protoplasm.....Ren Hoek

by billyball1981 on Oct 17, 2006 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I sent Newhouse an e-mail
...advising him to lay off the loco-weed. His idea is so bad it's not even good enough to be wrong.
The A's success should surprise no one. They're a much better team than people give them credit for. -- Joe Morgan

by BubbaDude on Oct 17, 2006 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I sent him a wet porpoise in a Diego
Chavez mask.  Then the bad men came and took me away.  From my padded cell, I sent Bruce Jenkins, who also suggested Dusty, a picture of Jennifer's basement decorated like a medieval Applebees.  I'm now being shipped out to a secret US prison in Baden-Baden.  
I don't know how I did it, but I quieted this crowd in my head today. -Zito, 10/3/06

by LAXile on Oct 17, 2006 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cool
I enjoyed Baden-Baden, and you will too.
The A's success should surprise no one. They're a much better team than people give them credit for. -- Joe Morgan

by BubbaDude on Oct 17, 2006 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Tribune wants to run my letter to Newhouse
Because it was so snarky. Film at 11:00.
The A's success should surprise no one. They're a much better team than people give them credit for. -- Joe Morgan

by BubbaDude on Oct 18, 2006 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

There is something wrong here...
This team wins but they are "uncomfortable" with their manager. Does everyone think it's "comfortable" with Leyland or Torre or anyone else? I think our A's have gone a little prema on us and you all seem to buy into it! Macha won a hell of a lot of games, who cares how cool he was or not. You don't hire managers to make your team comfortable, like comfort in losing! So the guy was a little glum and a worry wort, what was he supposed to be with the Angels on his ass and Beane on his other ass? I simply don't get any of this plot, I lost it!

by baseballbill on Oct 17, 2006 2:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Uh oh...
...Macha hinted that he thinks Wash should replace him.

That means it won't happen.

Because...he always makes the wrong choices! Get it? Do you?

<sigh>

Fine. I feel a little sorry for him. I wished they'd kicked him out after 2004, to be honest. I would have thrown an Oakland parade myself. I thought he did a MUCH better job this year.

Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except
that whole leaving Loaiza out there until even the buzzards finally gave up on his corpse and left the field.  Oh, and keeping Kotsay in there vs. lefties.  Oh, and always going to his bullpen a batter (or two or three) too late.  Oh, and never ever ever having anyone warmed up in time at all.  It's almost like he'd been replaced by a zombie.

I liked Kenny okay.  But when Leyland went out there and pulled Robertson MID AT BAT in game one, it was clear that he was on a whole other level compared to our Nations-loving lump.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 17, 2006 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tony LaRussa
Both Bay Area jobs are open and LaRussa lives in and loves the area. I wonder if he'll stay in St. Louis after their tank job at the end of the season.

by Dann on Oct 17, 2006 2:53 PM PDT reply actions  

He'd be the worst fit every for Beane
That would be a mess, I think...and to be honest, I wouldn't be that excited to see him come back.
Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah
The A's might not be a good fit, though he was Beane's manager at the end of his career. It would take a shift of philosophy for it to work.

But that's why I kept it general. I could just as easily seem him across the Bay...

by Dann on Oct 17, 2006 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can't be serious
The thing that every A's fan wants to get beyond is watching this team kick azz in the regular season and then lay an egg in the postseason.

That problem definitely cannot be solved by hiring LaRussa, whose career resume shouts from the mountaintop, "kick azz in the regular season and then lay an egg in the postseason."

As the New York Times put it a couple of years ago in the headline of an article about LaRussa:

A Man For All Seasons -- Except Fall

by socal on Oct 17, 2006 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

No LaRussa..
yeah he brought the last WS to Oakland, but how the hell do you alienate Ozzie Smith from the St. Louis franchise?
No Way I want to see him leading Oakland again...as a matter of fact, I hope the cardinals are "cursed" until LaRussa is gone and Ozzie Smith is back with the team in some capacity, even if it's visiting spring training
"Straight outta Oakland, California where we sparkin on ya" - 2Pac

by Erik being Erik on Oct 17, 2006 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'VE GOT IT!!!!!
How about a reality TV show where Billy and 20 managerial candidates move into a mansion in the Oakland Hills and he gradually eliminates them from contention?  You'd have lots of compelling drama and you might even get to see Dusty Baker slap Buck Showalter and pull his hair.


or, he could just hire Flavor Flav as the manager.

next A's manager: Diego Chavez *CHANGE DIEGO NOW!!!!*

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 2:59 PM PDT reply actions  

You'd defintely see Pinella...
...make a guest appearance...and Rickey would talk in the third person!
Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Flava Flav for manager?
Way to sell out, guy!

(Oh, wait...wasn't that a Show 'Em Whatcha Got sample I heard on a car commerical yesterday?)

Eternal Springs™: The official 2007 bottled water of your Oakland Athletics

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Oct 17, 2006 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

you know what time it is!!!!
next A's manager: Diego Chavez *CHANGE DIEGO NOW!!!!*

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh God, it's worse than I thought
Blasphemy indeed.  It's a Budweiser commercial, and it's Jay-Z borrowing the PE riffs (signature horns included) and changing it to "Show Me What You Got," directed at the ladies.

Does Chuck D know about this?

Eternal Springs™: The official 2007 bottled water of your Oakland Athletics

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Oct 17, 2006 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I certainly
hope not.  I cannot imagine it, though his concepts of free access to music might also apply to corporations, no?  

BTW, are there any two former bandmates whose paths are as radically different than Flav and Chuck D?

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 17, 2006 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I nominate the responses to henry85
for Threadjacking Of The Year.
"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 17, 2006 3:01 PM PDT reply actions  

hmmmm......
wonder if they'd take a look at Fred Kendall for the job....

by msb on Oct 17, 2006 3:02 PM PDT reply actions  

Geren is a conflict of interest
after hearing the A's whining/bashing of Macha (he didn't have my back, blah, blah, blah) combined with a potentially horrific move in hiring the ineloquent Geren, I am feeling very bitter these days.

The A's hire Geren and I will not renew my season tickets, period.  

Lew and John need to tell Billy he is wrong here.

We also need more Big Hurt and Swishers on the team.  More geographic diversification.  More people who did not grow up in SoCal.

The SoCal clique needs to be de-empahsized. I wouldn't be surprised if Mark Judas Kotsay believes his own whining press about the lack of back from Macha. What a huge personal disappointment for me personally after reading those comments this morning.

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 3:11 PM PDT reply actions  

What is that based on?
Wash and Geren are both unknowns at this point.  If you looked closely Geren actually has a better resume given his title in the minors, his title in the DR amnd his experience as a bench coach.  Wash doesn't have any of these notches on his resume.

I like Wash and think that he is a great contributor to the A's, but this idea that he is no brainer over Geren is pure lunacy.

by DKNJ on Oct 17, 2006 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's a gut feel
Geren rubbed me the wrong way during live interviews. He talks like an 80 IQ (how many times can one really say 'you know' in a single interview).  

Since the players rule the roost, let's hear some postive comments about Geren.  I don't like the fact that we don't know anything about how the clubhouse feels about this guy.  Not true with Wash.

Besides, Macha did not like the guy. Never heard a comment about being uncomfortabale (code: dislike) with Wash.  

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

You think the problem
is that they have too many guys who are from SoCal?  What a random and ridiculous argument.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Oct 17, 2006 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Bitching A's
Who among the bitching A's made a good point about Macha in the Chronicle this morning?  It was always about what Macha did to 'ME'.  Not the team.  'ME'. "He didn't protect me".  "He questioned MY injuries".  "He didn't have my back".  Whaaaaaaaa!

And among the bitching A's in the SF Chronicle, it seems all were SoCal products (Zito, Kendall, Chavez, Haren, Kotsay). Its rather like a fraternity, where guys have a way of 'getting each others back' and saying how right they are without realizing how ridiulous they look to the outside world.  It's an observation that I personally don't think is that ridiculous.  

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

A manager not having your back is HUGE issue
There has to be an intense level of trust between a manager and a player.  Once that trust and respect is broken, there has to be a change.  Those players you named are all a lot more important than some manager who doesnt respect the team.  To lump them together because they happen to be from Southern California is in fact just like I said, ridiculous.  

It's not whining, it's pathetic the manager acted like that.

Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Oct 17, 2006 6:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree. Judas Kotsay was wrong.
Sorrry, but as far as grown men are concerned, the evidence of disrespect just wasn't there with the examples cited in the newspaper.  It was whining.  

Judas Kotsay can say "the most important thing that a manager does is protect his players", but it doesn't mean it's true. From all the quotes, I did not see a single example of Macha calling out his guys.  Maybe he was just too honest, maybe he truly didn't know why Kotsay couldn't take the field after an off-day.  But get over it - you won 93 games.  And it was with no thanks to Judas' weak hitting vs. lefties.

And to think, all this time, I thought Parcells and Walsh were just good NFL coaches, not player ego protectorates. Judas Kotsay and those other whiners in the newspaper today are just full of it.  

If the non-SoCal guys, Big Hurt, Little Hurt, Swisher, Blanton, Ellis, Harden, Street etc, had said something similar, my SoCal origins observation would be a little less valid.  Until they do, I stick with my concerns about groupthink in the clubhouse.

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

And..
You have an issue with guys on the team having each other's back???  That defines a team man....Absolutely defines it.  Each player on that team should have every players back....That is the brotherhood and bonding a team should have.  Any other way would be unacceptable.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Oct 17, 2006 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

How about hiring La Russa to manage both
A's and Giants for their respective "home games" only?

Both clubs then hire "away game" only managers -- there have to be enough managerial re-treads in every "away game" city that you could just plug them in when the A's/Giants come to their town:

Macha in Pittsburg,
Howe in Houston,
Tommy Lasagna in LA,
etc., etc

(Ok, so it isn't the best idea of the day, but what the hey!)  

"Even I don't believe half the things I say . . ." Barry Bonds to New York press corps, 2004

by millbraeforAsfan on Oct 17, 2006 3:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Hire Rickey== A's first base coach
Rickey could teach baserunners about base stealing, how to lead off first base, how to bother and distract pitchers like him and Campaneris used to. Thinking outside the box again--I know bad--very bad.

by Salvatore on Oct 17, 2006 3:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Agree
I completely agree with this.  Rickey should be the First Base coach, he would be great!

by okathlfn on Oct 17, 2006 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sal
When do I get my grand prize????
Friends don't let friends read HalosHeaven

by BruceBochte on Oct 17, 2006 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know, Bruce...
Do you live in the Bay Area?  I'm in the  San Jose area--by the way I have a niece who recently graduated from your old alma--Santa Clara University and anther one about to. The old college is much more built up now from the days of Bruce Bochte.

by Salvatore on Oct 17, 2006 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ricky says steal second
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

this is probably the best thing for everybody
macha wasn't happy.
the players weren't happy.
billy wasn't happy.

it was time for a change. it's just too bad macha had to be fired AGAIN after being re-hired not too long ago.

by gotgreen on Oct 17, 2006 3:36 PM PDT reply actions  

but change hurts!
hurts so good!
I don't know how I did it, but I quieted this crowd in my head today. -Zito, 10/3/06

by LAXile on Oct 17, 2006 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

. . . and if you put Rickey on the roster,
if someone slow (afoot, or savvy wise) reaches first late in the game, Rickey can put Rickey in to pinch run, leaving the player to coach first!
More thinking outside the box!!!
"Even I don't believe half the things I say . . ." Barry Bonds to New York press corps, 2004

by millbraeforAsfan on Oct 17, 2006 3:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Why don't we put Ricky at 1b coach..
wearing #35 and any time FT gets to first, they just switch, like in Softball...
"Straight outta Oakland, California where we sparkin on ya" - 2Pac

by Erik being Erik on Oct 17, 2006 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Brilliant!
Rickey say he gonna steal...I mean, Frank say he gonna steal second.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 17, 2006 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bruce Jenkins is touting Baker too
Check out the 3 dot blog at sfgate.com. Of the 3 retreads mentioned above (Dusty, Valentine and Showalter) Dusty is the least offensive. Just don't let him near the pitching staff.

I think a bad manager can do harm, but I don't think a good manager provides much upside. I can remember watching Joe Torre on WTBS suffer with the Braves. Casey Stengel was a laughing stock when the Yankees hired him. The Tigers got lucky when they hired the Pittsburg and Florida version of Leyland and not the impostor who managed Colorado.  The only manager I can think of consistently made an immediate impact was Billy Martin, who always wore out his welcome.

I hope the A's hire from within either Geren or Washington. I think all organizations, not just sports teams, benefit when they demonstrate that there is an advancement path.

by NoeValley on Oct 17, 2006 3:42 PM PDT reply actions  

besides Dusty would be too much $$$,
which we'd be better to spend on players . . . or a new trainer!
"Even I don't believe half the things I say . . ." Barry Bonds to New York press corps, 2004

by millbraeforAsfan on Oct 17, 2006 3:49 PM PDT reply actions  

not to mention the cost of toothpick-replenishment
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

and then there's that darn kid of his,
always trying to hand around home plate at the most inopportune times . . .
"Even I don't believe half the things I say . . ." Barry Bonds to New York press corps, 2004

by millbraeforAsfan on Oct 17, 2006 3:52 PM PDT reply actions  

uh, that be "hang", not hand . . .
"Even I don't believe half the things I say . . ." Barry Bonds to New York press corps, 2004

by millbraeforAsfan on Oct 17, 2006 3:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Money
Dusty and all of the "name' guys will be expensive and not worth it. A first order monyeball violation.

However, just for grins I googled Dick Williams. He is 77. The A's need the early 1970's version.

by NoeValley on Oct 17, 2006 3:54 PM PDT reply actions  

2nd-order violation ...
... would be paying some guy $2M+ not to manage for 2 years.
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Better 2nd than 1st..
I'd rather have a 2nd order violation, then a player mutiny for a year... (not to mention players are worth FAR more than 2 mil...especially when we're trying to resign some people cough frank cough)

by tomoyo on Oct 17, 2006 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, I agree ...
... but it strikes me as funny that Beane is willing to flush $2M (granted, on a demonstrated problem that required action) when previously he's been loath to DFA/DL players simply because of the cost.
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

It must have been a serious problem
...for Beane to spend $2M to make it go away.
The A's success should surprise no one. They're a much better team than people give them credit for. -- Joe Morgan

by BubbaDude on Oct 17, 2006 6:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

and even at 77, Williams couldn't be any slower
at deciding to pull a pitcher who was losing it than our former Fitzpatrick/Nation's front man . . .
"Even I don't believe half the things I say . . ." Barry Bonds to New York press corps, 2004

by millbraeforAsfan on Oct 17, 2006 3:58 PM PDT reply actions  

This is all part of Beane's
Master-plan to steal Buddy Bell from the Royals...

Seriously though, I'd love to see the A's use this opportunity to do something truly creative with the empty hat of the Manager role, but I doubt it...

http://www.royalsreview.com

www.royalsreview.com

by Freneau on Oct 17, 2006 4:11 PM PDT reply actions  

All the more reason to hire Wash
If it's true that the manager makes very little difference in the win-loss record (and I tend to agree), and if it's true that the manager is not so much the team leader as just a peculiarly visible middle-management position in the corporation (as Beane seems to believe), then why not hire Ron Washington?

The objection that Wash has less managerial experience is irrelevant. He's not going to make us lose more games, because the manager doesn't matter to win-loss record; and he's surely not going to cost any more in salary than Macha did. Where's the downside?

If choice of manager doesn't make a difference in wins and losses, the criteria for making the choice can other factors, like ... oh I don't know, maybe making the players and fans happy. Hiring Wash as manager makes good business sense for the same reason that it's good business sense to let the boys play loud music and video games in the clubhouse. It doesn't make them win any more, but it does help them enjoy their job.

"...but we're also always open to hearing about other sandwiches if it can make our lunch better." -- Nico, channeling Billy Beane

by iglew on Oct 17, 2006 4:31 PM PDT reply actions  

best argument yet for either side
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

AWESOME.
Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good argument
Here is the only possible counterargument I can think of, and this is coming from someone who also advocates that Wash be hired.  Billy may not want to hire Wash to send a message to the players, and he may be right in wanting to do so.  I think Macha should have been fired, but I was surprised at the level of animosity directed his way by the players.  This was either because he was a terrible people person or because the A's have an out-of-control clubhouse filled with huge egos.  Given that we have acquired a whole host of players noted for their "cancer" status on other teams, that is a legitimate concern.  Because I don't work for the A's I don't really know which explanation is accurate.  I am concerned about players like Kendall and Kotsay who are natural leaders and who have unrealistic opinions of their own abilities.  These types of players have wrecked may a clubhouse.  Billy may wish to get rid of these guys, or he may wish to keep them around but put them in their place.  In that situation, hiring someone who is not the players choice might be the smartest thing.  A team will not work if the players think they are in charge.  Billy is in a better position than I to make the determination as to what kind of clubhouse he has.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

once again, you and I are on the same page, BC53
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Scary
I better be careful or I might get labeled as a Monkeyball groupie :)
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

What?????
You agree with someone who criticizes Kotsay?

by mikeA on Oct 17, 2006 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I criticize Kotsay to this extent
I like Kotsay as a player and have liked him from the time he was a college player.  However, his comments during the season whining about his being platooned were stupid.  He needed rest and he doesn't hit LHs anywhere near as well as Kielty does. His comments today also give me pause, because I am concerned that he will lead rebellions in the clubhouse if he doesn't get his way.  I don't know if Kotsay will be that kind of problem, but if he is going to be he needs to go byebye or be put in his place by Billy/the next manager.  I am particularly concerned that Haren was parroting Kotsay's complaints about Kotsay.  That indicates to me that Kotsay was bitching about his situation to other players and convincing them that Kotsay should play against LHs.  Players do not decide when they play, particularly when they are a player of diminishing skills. Kotsay is a huge potential source of problems, and Billy needs to consider these potential issues in deciding who the manager is and whether Kotsay is tradebait.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great comment Channel53
Am a bit surprised that few others have been able to bottom line the implications of Kotsay's demonstrated me-first leadership in all of this.  It's a dark day A's fans.  
"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agree somewhat
I agree with you that its a concern.  I don't share your certainty on Kotsay, however.  I have a bad feeling that he is going to be a problem, but I don't profess to actually know whether Kotsay will be a cancer or will respond better to a new manager.  If I were Beane I would make it one of my offseason priorities to find out the truth if Beane does not know the truth already. Trading Kotsay may already be a go based on performance/dollars.  Clubhouse issues could make it a necessity.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

If we do that
and trade Kotsay, would we then resign JPay or do we look elsewhere and restructure our outfield?

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 17, 2006 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

IMO
Payton needs to be elsewhere if Kotsay returns.  He becomes a cancer when he doesn't play every day and he shouldn't be an every day left fielder.  I would keep him as a 1 year stopgap in CF for the right price.  His limited offense plays much better in CF.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

the main complaint
about JPay is that he doesn't play A's-style baseball though, right?  Meaning he cares little about OBP.  His average was the highest on the team for the regular season, and I know we do not talk about "feels like" much here in the land of Sabremetrics, but he does seem to get hits when it matters more than most other A's.

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 17, 2006 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

As a LF
Payton's OBP and Slugging % are below average.  LF is the second best offensive position in baseball, and his defense does not make up for his offense in LF.  In CF, Pyton is adequate defensively and slightly above average offensively.  For the right price, I can live with that.  I would rather that Kotsay find a way to get healthy and become the 2004 Kotsay, but based on my limited knowledge of back injuries it is likely that Kotsay will become worse instead of better.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good counter-argument
I think the issues you raise are serious concerns -- and I say that as one who was never a big fan of Kendall or Kotsay.

I think Washington is well-suited to address those concerns.  Even if hiring Washington is perceived to be the "player's choice", I don't see him knuckling under to player pressure at all.  Wash's best quality is the way he combines agreeable calmness with independent toughness.  If, for example, Kendall needs to be benched, Wash will bench him. And if Kendall bitches about it, Wash will have the balls to chew him out for it.  Much more so than, say, Macha.

More important, if such a confrontation were to occur, the team as a whole would be behind Wash. The fact that he commands so much respect from the players -- particularly from Chavvy and the young guys -- will make them stick with the skipper if the skipper has to discipline an out-of-line player who thinks he's the team leader. Macha couldn't stand up to Kotsay or Kendall because the team (as evidenced in the remarks coming out now) would side with Kotsay or Kendall.

It's precisely because Macha didn't have the respect of the team that there was a leadership vacuum that guys like Kendall and Kotsay sought to fill, and it's because of that same leadership vacuum that younger guys would fall in behind another player rather than the skipper.  The solution is to bring in a manager who will make that vacuum go away, and Wash could be that guy.

"...but we're also always open to hearing about other sandwiches if it can make our lunch better." -- Nico, channeling Billy Beane

by iglew on Oct 17, 2006 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well said
You've summed almost exactly why I favor Wash as the coach based on what I know.  The only way I would not hire Wash if I was in charge is if I believed that Wash would not be able to control the clubhouse.  I think he will for the reasons you stated and I hope Beane agrees with us.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 8:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

we have to give Ron the job
We dropped the ball when we hire Macha over Ron Washington.  We need to hire him before he gets a job elsewhere.  He is a hit in the clubhouse and the A's need that aggressive style manager.

by headfirst slide on Oct 17, 2006 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's a tough sell.
While I agree with your premise (managers don't make a big difference), part of the reason for that is that most managers have similar levels of ability - but they do have some ability.  So the question with Wash is: does he have the minimum level of ability to manage?  I don't know.  If he does, he's a very good candidate when coupled with his popularity with fans and players.  

But we do know that Geren - as the bench coach - does have some managerial experience and probably exceeds the minimum criteria.  Does that outweigh Wash's advantage in popularity.  I'm not sure.  But I don't think Wash is the slam dunk you make him out to be with this comment.

Stat Wonk Futurist

by salb918 on Oct 17, 2006 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Known vs Unknown
Yes, there is some risk in hiring an inexperienced unknown.  It can never be completely safe, but some risks are worth taking, and the way I add up the possibilities, this is one.

In spite of his lack of actual experience as a manager, Washington is not a complete tyro.  He's been around the game a lot, he's had ample opportunity to observe, and there's strong reason to believe he's taken advantage of that opportunity.  As inexperienced managers go, he's relatively safe.

You also have to factor in the fact that even an experienced manager is not without risk.  We know Geren has had success in Sacramento and elsewhere, but that doesn't guarantee his skill will transfer to Oakland.

I don't expect Ron Washington to be a genius manager, but I don't expect him to lose us games either.  I figure the chances are quite large that he's your basic replacement-level manager, and the small chance of him being a minus-manager isn't that much more than the small chance of him being a plus-manager. So let's roll the dice.

(Another consideration is that if you hire Wash and he turns out not so hot, it's very likely you can still have Geren in 2008.  But if you hire Geren he turns out not so hot, there's a good chance Wash is gone.)

"...but we're also always open to hearing about other sandwiches if it can make our lunch better." -- Nico, channeling Billy Beane

by iglew on Oct 17, 2006 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

What about Lew ?
We've seen him take bp...how about another A's owner/manager...a la Connie Mack!

Think that would make for some interesting owner/manager discussions with the GM?

"Listen, my attitude is a whole lot better when we win..." Our favorite GM

by LongTimeFan on Oct 17, 2006 4:48 PM PDT reply actions  

naw
you'd have Kotsay running to Billy about how the new manager walks around like he owns the place.
next A's manager: Diego Chavez *CHANGE DIEGO NOW!!!!*

by emperor nobody on Oct 17, 2006 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

LOL!!!
"Listen, my attitude is a whole lot better when we win..." Our favorite GM

by LongTimeFan on Oct 17, 2006 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Billy's reply
Hey, Kots -- at least he's ambulatory.
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 17, 2006 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Uncle Milton for player-coach
His visits to the mound would be inspirational, and his handling of the umps would be legendary. He'd probably get thrown out of 100 games a year. Bradley is by far my favorite A, and I'd love to see him infuse the team with his passion for winning.
The A's success should surprise no one. They're a much better team than people give them credit for. -- Joe Morgan

by BubbaDude on Oct 17, 2006 4:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Macha
The irony of the Macha firing is that this is really the first year that we all sort of thought that Macha did a decent job.

Back when Macha was the bench coach, the players used to love him and said his communication was great, but that Howe's wasn't.

by dylan on Oct 17, 2006 6:12 PM PDT reply actions  

Yep, totally.
Ho hum. Just another day for the OAKLAND ATHLETICS OF AWESOME! ~Kyli

by baseballgirl on Oct 17, 2006 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Most of the players are pleased Macha is gone
any doubts just read Slusser's article in the SF Chronicle.  http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgif=/chronicle/archive/2006/10/17/SPG4ULQPA71.DTL&type=as

"There were things that transpired over the course of the year that the players were unhappy about,'' A's center fielder Mark Kotsay said. "There's no question there were things throughout the year, but the fact of the matter is that that by the end of the year, the players didn't have the same feeling about the manager as they did at the start of the year -- and that was at a point you'd think everybody would be happy, with a six-game lead. ... I believe there was friction.''

Third baseman Eric Chavez, the longest-tenured member of the team, said several times in a phone interview Monday evening that he likes Macha and got along with him well personally, but Chavez had seen enough happening around him to realize there were problems.

"The whole thing was a weird situation for me because ever since he came here, we had a pretty good relationship, but over the last couple years, I could see things unfold, and I kept hearing things,'' Chavez said. "He's always been very open and communicative with me, and with some other players, that wasn't true. I heard some things that were kind of disturbing. I think there are going to be a lot of guys who are happy about this.''

Many of the players thought that the tone set by Macha was gloomy, even when the club was playing well.

"The atmosphere wasn't positive, for some reason,'' Chavez said. "That was hard for us to deal with -- here we are, winning the division, we're banged up but we're still doing what we should be doing, and every time he spoke to us, he'd say how much he appreciated the effort, but then you'd read things where he was always smashing people. ... This negative cloud was just eating at everybody.''

Some of the players had the impression that Macha was miserable in his job. Starter Barry Zito, who is a big believer in the power of positive thinking, said that Macha dwelled too much on what might go wrong and that that was detrimental.

by Vegas Ace on Oct 17, 2006 6:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Macha is Eeyore
and Tigger kicked his ass.
The A's success should surprise no one. They're a much better team than people give them credit for. -- Joe Morgan

by BubbaDude on Oct 17, 2006 6:40 PM PDT reply actions  

What ifs...
Anyone thinks Macha would be fired if the A's went to the world seris?

Anyone think A's could've beat the Tigers if they traded managers?

by asfansince1989 on Oct 17, 2006 6:43 PM PDT reply actions  

I do, I do!
(raising hand)

Alas, Mr. Beane would never hire Mr. Leyland, or anyone similar. That, I think, will continue to be an Achilles heel of the Beane regime. I hope that Beane will go against his previous manager-hiring tendencies this time, but I'd bet he won't.

by socal on Oct 17, 2006 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Counter to Blez's argument
If the manager doesn't impact the won-loss record, then why is it obvious that Macha shouldn't be managing this team?  The logic behind those statements is inconsistent.  The only reason to fire a manager is that he is negatively impacting the team, and impact is measured by the won-loss record.
The thought that a manager doesn't impact a team's won-loss record is only made when the manager (or head coach) is average or below-average.  Anyone who has played for an exceptional coach knows the impact a quality head coach can have on a team.  Just ask Curtis Granderson - he has said (and been supported by other members on the Tigers) that Leyland's behind the scenes work with the Tigers has given them confidence in situations they didn't have confidence in themselves before.  Blez, don't attribute the Tigers improvement to the signing of Kenny Rogers - he has crapped down his leg in every playoff appearance before this year.  This isn't a situation you can say happened before and is just re-occuring.  You really think that it is a coincidence that the year Kenny is playing for Leyland he turns in two of the most dominant playoff performances in all of baseball?  I don't, but color me biased because I was a coach.

by IndianaAsfan on Oct 17, 2006 6:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Well the pressure is certainly now on...
Without qualification, Macha had a great W-L record during his reign.

If the A's are not in the 90 win range next year, Judas Kotsay's post-Macha comments shall not be forgotten.  If they get to the WS, he can have his given first name back.

One question: why did Judas Kotsay bitch about the Kielty platoon one week before the post-season started (and on live TV to Ray Fosse the evening A's clinched in Seattle?).  Was he "having his teammates back" with such comments?

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 6:53 PM PDT reply actions  

The mystery ballplayer
To whom was Ken Macha referring to after the A's walloped the Red Sox 8-1 back in July?

"Keeping him on the field is huge," Macha said. "He's a grinder. You want all your guys playing like that. He sets an example of what to do. He's pretty much in charge of the dugout too."

Any guesses????  Grinder....sets an example...and in charge of the dugout.

<que the jeopardy theme song>

Times up. Your answer please.

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 7:05 PM PDT reply actions  

That's correct. Judas Kotsay!!
Good thing Macha didn't give him any "respect".
"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Talent is paramount
Having good players is perhaps the most important key to having a successful team. But to say that the manager plays a minimal impact is incorrect. I'm sorry, but it is the manager who decides who gets to play. Billy Beane has absolutely no say in who gets pinch run for or which relief pitcher is going to get in the game, in fact, the rules prohibit him from any communications with the dugout.

A good manager puts his players in position to make plays. A bad manager puts his players in positions where it's harder to make a play. Either way, the more talented the player the more likely he is to make a play. There is also the chance that the player will fail regardless of his talent. But there is absolutely no reason to make the job of the player any harder than it already is.

Why yes. I am a ray of warm and fuzzy sunshine.

by grover on Oct 17, 2006 7:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Judas Kotsay
Why does he feel the second coming of Chris Webber?  Hope not.  We all know what happened to the Warriors after Nelson got the boot.  

Nellie allegedly disrespected budding NBA stars like Billy Owens, the basketball equivlanet of a .260 hitter versus lefties.

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 7:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Didn't Nellie quit?
didn't he have some health problems AND QUIT?!
"Straight outta Oakland, California where we sparkin on ya" - 2Pac

by Erik being Erik on Oct 17, 2006 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

You got it backwards....
in one of the all-time blunders, Webber got the boot.

by BleacherDave on Oct 17, 2006 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

And what eventually happened to Nellie?
That was my point.  To me, the spirit of player betrayal was the same in both scenarios.  Successful, good bottom line coaches betrayed for unsatisfactory reasons IMO.

After that fiasco and the Googs trade, Nellie (and Donn) were dead men walking and the Warriors have not been the playoffs since.

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Kotsay is 'Judas Kotsay'
does that mean Macha is "Jesus Macha"?

(Come to think of it, maybe I did hear someone call him that when he left Loaiza in in game 2....  "Jesus Macha!  What were you thinking?")

"...but we're also always open to hearing about other sandwiches if it can make our lunch better." -- Nico, channeling Billy Beane

by iglew on Oct 17, 2006 8:37 PM PDT reply actions  

Billy Owens
was called a "Judas" by Nellie during the Webber mutiny.  In terms of the press, Kotsay was on the same level as Owens.  I feel betrayed.  I am (was?) a huge Kotsay fan.  But the bitching during the final stages of the division race and evening on the clinching night told me things I did not want to know about Kotsay.  

Pure hearsay, but I would bet dollars to donuts he was the one telling Mychael Urban that Bradley was a cancer. Urban admits he did have one source.

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 17, 2006 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

interesting theory
Urban has strenuously denied it was Zito, who was everyone's favorite guess for a while.

Mychael, if you're out there, has Sashulia broken the code?

but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 18, 2006 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bradley column source(s)
There were several. And I'll never give them up. Sincerely, Greg Anderson's cellmate.

by MychaelUrban on Oct 18, 2006 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

LOL
I wrote you a mailbag question a while back asking what you thought of the Fainaru-Wada/Williams mess.  I think I got my answer...

I don't doubt that people got tired of Milton's act from time to time.  It merely seems like that in general, they're more willing to put it with it than they aren't.

"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 18, 2006 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

put up with it, I mean.
"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 18, 2006 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I appreciate your conviction ;)
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 18, 2006 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

it doesn't appeal to me
"Having a vote for 'most clutch' baseball player is like having a vote for 'most real' monster." - Ken Tremendous

by ArakSOT on Oct 18, 2006 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

you're a Dusty Baker fan, eh?
(Not in favor of prior restraint, that is.)
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 18, 2006 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

girardi
i really hope they consider him if it's not wash
"He has no equivalent." -Paul DePodesta on Jeremy Brown

by flipgatey3 on Oct 17, 2006 8:38 PM PDT reply actions  

and get off your high horse kotsay bashers
he had a down year. it happens. and he was still pretty good. and it wasn't just him who was unhappy.
"He has no equivalent." -Paul DePodesta on Jeremy Brown

by flipgatey3 on Oct 17, 2006 8:47 PM PDT reply actions  

unfortunately
It's more than a down year, he has a chronic back injury that is causing a genuine and likely irreversible regression in his value both offensively and defensively.  If he couples the regression in skills with an attitude that he deserves to play regardless of his performance and a willingness to subvert the leadership, then he needs to be gone.  I am sadly confident that his performance regression is real and we will never see the 2004 version of Kotsay.  I am less confident that he will not respond well to that regression and the inevitable loss of playing time and will become a cancer.  Defend him if you want, but bring some analysis to the table beyond dreamcasting in support of your opinion if you want to change my mind.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 17, 2006 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

can I be a BC53 groupie?
but jesus--rhyming is a pain in the ass! -- Rubin Sierra @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 18, 2006 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sheesh, all this talk about
whether or not "Macha had Kotsay's back." Who the hell would want Kotsay's back?
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 17, 2006 9:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Um Um Um
<considers Kotsay's back> ME!

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 17, 2006 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Speaking of Kotsay
He's at the Sharks game tonight with two daughters and wife.

Maybe he's learning how to hockey brawl!!

He should ask Milton.

UC Davis Athletics KDVS 90.3FM www.kdvs.org/streams.cfm

by Hit4TheCycle on Oct 17, 2006 9:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Continuity vs. Change of Vision
If you want continuity, Washington or Geren would both work, and Washington would seemingly make the players happiest.

If Beane is looking for a stronger manager model, I think Bobby Valentine might really gel with a non-traditional ballclub like the A's.

by Dann on Oct 17, 2006 10:22 PM PDT reply actions  

FYI: wash spent 6 hrs interviewing w/ texas today
"My main goal is to simply let those guys be who they are," Washington said Tuesday evening. "I'm not trying to be a miracle-worker. I'm going to stress fundamentals and communication, and then I'm going to put some names on the lineup card and let them be who they are."
"There's nothing I can do about the lack of experience," Washington said. "But just because I don't have managing experience doesn't mean I can't be a leader."

link

by gotgreen on Oct 17, 2006 10:47 PM PDT reply actions  

why not?
I believe a minor league team let the fans manage for a while this year. things like internet votes for starting line ups and pitching changes... now, there are about a million problems with this system, but wouldn't that be cool if everyone on this site had some sort of say in what happened... i dunno, that way all a's fans could stop bitching about bad decisions... or not b/c democracy invariably pisses the minority off. ok forget it. im done

by kaijis on Oct 17, 2006 11:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Geren was bench coach this year...
...is that an open title that you stash an ineffective staff member into or is there some kind of real effort, talent or responsibility involved? I mean does the bench coach work with or help Crosby or our other troubled young players? ...did those efforts start before or after thier troubles began?

Who is the A's genius that came up with "take the first strikes" against Rogers? Kenny threw first pitch strikes to 18 of 25 batters! What a mastermind! I'm an old timer, and I believe that kind of "robotic formula managing" in a short series is suicide. That is why the A's get stuck in quicksand every post season. Player by player the A's have overmatched many playoffs opponents on the field, but never in managment.

But those teams actually respected and believed the manager and coaches can make a difference! Wow! ...and fluke of flukes, they won 9 of 10 attempts! Not to worry, small sampling!

Leaving Z in without a curve for strikes, leaving Loaiza in to give up 7 runs, pitching relievers beyond their proven capabilities back to back and too many innings. The A's office made the series with Detroit look like somebody feel asleep at the wheel with the car going 90 during commute hour! But anyone can manage, ...right?

I'm just an old timer overreacting, what does it matter who the manager is? Hell! Macha proved that right? Oops! I guess he can't! He was fired. ...Anyone can do it except Macha.

Anyone can be bullpen coach too!
Geren spent the three previous years; 2003-2005; as bullpen coach!
Talk about your memories!
Rhodes, Dotel, Foulke, Juan Cruz, Duke's tendinitis, Garcia-Cassilla, those consecutive seasons of reliever/bullpen meltdowns, ...complete utter bullpen disasters like that could happen to anyone! Geren just happened to be there! Kind of like an innocent bystander. I keep over reacting! Like a manager or coach is actually doing something!

...Geren and BB are from San Diego! ...What a coincidence! Same High school?

Blez, I think you realize Geren will be Mgr and the reason your essay stresses the over importance placed upon the MGR by some teams is that BB has no real choices. BB treats managers like jokes, mindless puppets, dunces on his short leash to jerk around at will.

What self respecting manager would work for BB?

Who would volunteer to take that ridicule and see the media heap story upon story of how Beane considers coaches as functional failures requiring his constant input and direction. Hell, they can't even follow directions!

Welcome on board Mr. Geren!
Green leash, or gold?

Are Rhodes, Dotel, Foulke even in baseball?

by A s Eh on Oct 17, 2006 11:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Kotsay over Macha!!!!!!!!
Fools!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by baseballbill on Oct 18, 2006 1:15 AM PDT reply actions  

What a fucking joke!!!!!!!!!!
Macha...the abusive employer!!!

You are all idiots!!! Have fun at 75 wins! I am done.

by baseballbill on Oct 18, 2006 1:19 AM PDT reply actions  

At least
We now know username Macha was using to cruise AN.
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 18, 2006 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

that
in between know and username
I still think the Big Hurt kicks ass.

by BlameChannel53 on Oct 18, 2006 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Here you go...
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
"Next thing you know, they'll have me taking an overdose of pills."--Milton Bradley

by jeepers on Oct 18, 2006 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Talking
I personally have no prblem with the firing it was surprising but Beane has good reasons it seems.

But If Im in Beanes Position, I have major issues with players airing the dirty laundry to the media

Ok Ill give them the fact they were frustrated by the ALCS Performance, always good to hold ones breath and cool off before speaking.

If I was BEane and Im not soon as I hire  a manager and get the chance I get everyone together and make it clear who runs the team, if you have problems this is how you deal with it, your paid to play basebal, ILL handle the rest, if you dont like it give up your contract and find work elsewhere.

by forester on Oct 18, 2006 5:17 AM PDT reply actions  

Pathetic Dirty Laundry
"But If Im in Beanes Position, I have major issues with players airing the dirty laundry to the media"

Once those guys read how ridiculous they sounded in the paper, I am sure there is some regret there.  At least I hope.  

There is no way Billy/Lew/Fisher support that. It was a total embarassment for the organization.  Look to see Kotsay at the double digit millions salary shipped in the offseason to clear up space for starting pitching.

"We owe it all to one man. And we are all extraneous. 'Billy' has denuded us of ego". Liar's Poker

by Sashulia on Oct 18, 2006 8:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

All these sumbitches
would have passed better if they knew when to keep their mouths shut, publically.

by Salvatore on Oct 18, 2006 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dusty Baker, A's manager !!!111!!!111
Since managers don't matter.
On Sunday, Minaya ticked off a list of candidates to join the rotation, and for once this season, none of them was Jose Lima.

by rfloh on Oct 18, 2006 7:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Macha was set-up...
to fail after the whole contract fandango last year. I am not defending him, but it was likeley clear to the players that Macha was not chosen but rather settled for. The players who had issues, real or imagined, new that BB was behind Macha -- way behind him. His departure is just a year too late and cost several million in severance. (Does he get to go to EDD and apply for unemployment insurance, or is he a seasonal worker who has to wait for next spring?)

by NoeValley on Oct 18, 2006 10:21 AM PDT reply actions  

By Tim Kawakami
Wednesday, October 18th, 2006 at 3:24 pm in A's, Baseball.

http://mercextra.com/blogs/kawakami/2006/10/18/a-great-beane-macha-moment-i-just-remembered/

Excerpt:

   Where did we go for the talk? Billy zipped right into Macha's office, which was empty for the time being, plopped down and started eating.
    Looked at me, said, "Go ahead, ask." Usually, everybody stays out of the manager's office, by the way, unless the manager is there and is fine with it. Not the A's way, though.
    I started asking (questions), but a few minutes later Macha and Curt Young came back, with plates of food and just in their underwear, obviously looking to eat, change clothes and relax.
   They stared at us, I stared at them, Billy just kept eating and talking.
   Macha tenatively sat down behind his desk for a few seconds. Very uncomfortable. Shot another glance at Beane. Glared at me. I shrugged, said to Beane, "Umm, maybe we should do this somewhere else."
   Beane looked up like this was the first he'd noticed Macha was there-or cared that he was there-dropped his plate, then just waved at Macha, pointing him out the door. Remember, this was Macha's own office. After winning for something like the 33rd time in 40 games.
    "Ken, you can let us do this, right?" Beane said as he waved.
    Beane turned back to me and never looked at Macha again as Macha and Young sighed, got up, and moved out.
   That was the relationship. Right there.

This is typical of BB and why I said "What self respecting manager would work for BB?"

by A s Eh on Oct 19, 2006 7:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Interesting...
Strange and interesting. If you post this on a new thread I bet you'd get some interesting comments.

by Salvatore on Oct 19, 2006 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook

Recent FanPosts

Small
Comcast needs two Hotstove shows!
Small
Moneyball Part II: Billy Beane Shocks the World. Again.
Hahaha_small
Let's Make Some Nicknames!
Fubarcloud_small
Wolf being told to spend money
Small
The wRC+ Challenge
Pumpkin_small
Maybe this is a stupid stats question
Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late