Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jim Irsay: We Can Make It Work With Peyton Manning

The Official FIRE MACHA NOW List of Gripes

[editor's note, by Nick86] It seems as if I've confused many ANers with an oft-used deviced known as "sarcasm." For the record, I think Macha is a perfectly capable and effective manager. Please read the entire article (not just the caps) before responding with "Your arguments for criticizing Macha are dumb" or "Boy, you're so right about Macha!" The following is a semi-accurate caricature containing anti-Macha arguments that I have heard too many times on AN.

Ever since Kenneth Edward Macha became manager before the 2003 season, I've hated him. In fact, I've sometimes questioned if he had ever partook in or witnessed a baseball game prior to his 2003 managerial debut.  I've also wondered whether he is the A's manager simply because he is blackmailing Billy Beane, or because Beane wanted a horrific manager so winning the World Series wouldn't be "too easy." Of course, many of you ANers feel the same way, so I decided to make a short lists of complaints I've heard from the various Macha-haters of AN. Here it is:

GRIPE #1: MACHA CHANGES THE BATTING ORDER ALL THE TIME!!!

Macha changes the batting order all the time, which prevents our star players from becoming comfortable in their roles.  One day, Dan Johnson is batting 6th, the next day, he's batting 7th, the next day he's batting 6th again.  How can a player go out and compete if he doesn't know where in the order he's going to hit?  What if he gets confused and forgets to bat at all?  We haven't seen that one yet...no thanks to you, Macha.

GRIPE #2: MACHA NEVER CHANGES THE BATTING ORDER, EVEN WHEN IT'S CLEAR HE SHOULD!!!

Remember when Macha had Kotsay leading off and Kendall hitting second, even though Kotsay is like Barry Bonds out of the two-spot and Lou Merloni leading off?  He finally switched them...but then he refused to hit Ellis first and Kendall ninth?  And even if he DID hit Kendall ninth this year, he would be punishing a gritty, hard-nosed player with a .380 career on base percentage on the brink of figuring it out who came on strong at the end of the year, and we'd STILL HATE HIM!

GRIPE #3: MACHA DOESN'T PINCH HIT, OR USE OUR LEFTY SPECIALIST RINCON!!!

For whatever reason, Macha refuses to put in our lefty specialist(s) against good lefty hitters, even though almost every other manager does.  As a baseball fan, I want to see a lot of mid-inning pitching changes where we substitute in Rincon to get that lefty-lefty advantage against Texeira, Garret Anderson, and other top lefties.

GRIPE #4: MACHA USES RINCON ALL THE TIME, AND OTHER RELIEVERS NOT NAMED DUKE OR STREET

Only an idiot would use a reliever with numbers as bad as Rincon's.  In fact, I don't think I can remember one time in all the games I watched where Rincon didn't blow an A's lead and pick up the loss. Every time Rincon gives up a run, I just say, "Crap, that was Macha's fault." But it's not just Rincon.  Macha last year pitched relievers Jay Witasick, Kiko Calero, Seth Etherton, Ron Flores, Joe Kennedy, and many other relievers not named Ducscherer and Street multiple times!  Every time he did, I cringed!  Even though Ducscherer was third in Innings Pitched among AL relievers last year...he should have been second, and Street should have been first!

GRIPE #5: MACHA NEVER EXECUTES THE HIT AND RUN, EVEN WITH CONTACT HITTER JASON KENDALL

From reading Moneyball, we all know about Billy Beane's fondness for the hit and run. Yet despite this fondness, Macha steadfastly refuses to adhere to his boss's wishes and hit-and-run. Shame on you, Macha.

GRIPE #6: MACHA NEVER PLAYS OUR BENCH PLAYERS, SO WHEN THEY GET IN, THEY STRUGGLE!!

Macha doesn't play our bench players as much as he should, and for whatever reason plays only OUR BEST PLAYERS.  In addition to damaging team morale, it renders our back-ups ineffective.  Macha should be blamed for the struggles of 2002 Al MVP Marco Scutaro, four-time All-Star Keith Ginter, Zeus's nephew Eric Byrnes, and future Hall of Famer Erik Karros.

There you have it: Macha sucks.  He always changes the lineup, he never changes the lineup, he never uses Rincon, he uses Rincon too much, he doesn't hit-and-run, and he only plays our best players. I'm sure there are more areas where Macha needs improvement. Feel free to add your own.
 

Comment 57 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

ROFL!!!
You forgot that his mere presence turns milk sour, horses to go lame, and chickens to become infertile.  In fact, Bonds 2005 injury was entirely Macha's fault when the two were within 10 feet simultaneously at the toll booths on the Bay Bridge.
"Our team has always been like, 'You're a rookie? OK, here's the ball,'" Barry Zito

by 510inDenver on Jan 26, 2006 2:37 PM PST reply actions  

But
that last one would make Macha a hero

by Alon on Jan 26, 2006 7:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Great Stuff
LOL.  HIRE MACHA NOW!!!!!
"Excellence is not an event, it is a habit." Aristotle

by Steve in Napa on Jan 26, 2006 3:00 PM PST reply actions  

Go get 'em
Be careful. These guys will brand you a heretic if you go against the Gospel according to Beane.

Just tell them your mom has won as many pennants as Billy Beane and they usually go away.

Macha isn't a good manager, but in the Moneyball belief system the manager isn't worth much. What happens then is that you have a laid-back college atmosphere that never galvanizes into a winner.

Just good enough is good enough for the majority of fans on AN.

by wonderbread74 on Jan 26, 2006 3:33 PM PST reply actions  

"Macha isn't a good manager" ...
... not because he's Not Lou Piniella, but because he's not very good at strategic decisions and because he doesn't stand up to Billy if it is in fact Billy who's making the larger strategic errors.

And please let's retire the "AN is a bunch of Gabba Gabba Beane zombies" nonsense. Posters get flamed on AN because of the quality of their argument and/or expression thereof, not because thee hath spat 'pon the sacred Beane.

@('.')@

by monkeyball on Jan 26, 2006 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Do I detect a hint of sarcasm in this post?
Are you saying Beane is not sacred? BASTARD!
Joe Blanton is phat

by gojohn10 on Jan 27, 2006 12:30 AM PST up reply actions  

You, sir, have earned a "Jenni"
HWY DOAN YOO GOE CHOO SUMM GUMM WIF YR BOYFRED MACHO!!!
@('.')@

by monkeyball on Jan 27, 2006 9:31 AM PST up reply actions  

I got a better reason
Late in the 2003 season with the A's enjoying a comfortable 2 run lead in Anaheim (I was there because I lived in Santa Barbara) I made a bet with my friend that the A's would win. THEN MACHA BRINGS IN MECIR THE QU..R!! I even called it while my friend was saying "Why does he walk like that?" I had to wash her car that weekend.
"If you throw at someone's head, it's very dangerous, because in the head is the brain." -- Pudge Rodriguez

by niallmack on Jan 26, 2006 3:55 PM PST reply actions  

Funniest. Macha. Diary. Ever.
That I can remember anyway...

Hilarious!

Victory without pants is just embarrassing.

by JLeverenz on Jan 26, 2006 3:58 PM PST reply actions  

I Blame Ken Macha
For pretty much everything.

Bad cup of coffee this morning....fire Macha.
Boss yells at me...fire Macha.
Got mad cow from lunch at McDonalds....fire Macha.
Sat next to a smelly dude on BART...fire Macha.
The girl I liked on "Survivor" gets kicked off...fire Macha.
Wife says, "not tonight, honey"...fire Macha.

Ken Macha makes life livable.

by Mission1929 on Jan 26, 2006 4:16 PM PST reply actions  

Finger in your Wendy's chili?
Fire roasted Macha now!
"Keep the juices going by jangling around gently as you move." - Satchel Paige

by McFood on Jan 26, 2006 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Also Macha's Fault
Our nation's health care crisis.
Abandoned puppies and kittens.
Latch-key kids.
Maria Carey getting fat.

by SportySpice @ Athletics Nation on Jan 26, 2006 4:40 PM PST reply actions  

I KNEW IT!!
"If you know Nick, having someone to talk to is a prerequisite for his sanity." ~Billy Beane on Swisher playing 1st Base.

by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Jan 26, 2006 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Actually...Maria Carey would be..
my fault.
"Keep the juices going by jangling around gently as you move." - Satchel Paige

by McFood on Jan 26, 2006 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Is this serious?
The first two contradict each other.  He changes the order too much, but he doesn't do it enough, or when its needed.  Come on.  We were using spare parts last year.

The third and fourth condradict eachother.  He never plays rincon, but he does all the time. huh?

5th is basically billy's call.

And for the last one, how many times is Macha supposed to play the bench.  The only guys who sat last year were Melhuse, because of kendall, and Ginter cause he blew.  Why would you want to replace a mark ellis, bobby crosby, or eric chavez, for Ginter?

I'm kinda getting tired of FIRE MACHA all the time. People, we were injured last year, started dreadfully, were counted out before the season started, and still battled into the last week.  What more do you want from a manager but an even keel who doesn't throw around blame, and keeps his team optimistic and feeling good.

People have too much time on their hands.

Feel free to critique.

Simming Offseason.....

by robber23 on Jan 26, 2006 4:55 PM PST reply actions  

Solution
Take out some starters when a game gets out of hand, not all of them (like the 20th win) but enough to get your bench players some ABs.
"Damn kids" -Ron Flores

by secret ASian man on Jan 26, 2006 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Not a contradiction
When the team is doing well, hitting on all cylinders, mashing away, he keeps on changing the lineup... till they fall into a slump, whereupon he immediately freezes the lineup and refuses to make any changes.

He does the exact opposite of what all other managers do.

by OaktownTribesman on Jan 26, 2006 7:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Rauber23....
Hmm...maybe I wasn't over the top enough.

by Nick86 on Jan 26, 2006 5:08 PM PST reply actions  

yeah, that must be it
The mix of intentional and unintentional comedy is what makes this thread so great.
Well done.
Bright moments!

by andeux on Jan 26, 2006 5:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I think it speaks
To the general intelligence of the Fire Macha Now members that they thought I was being serious.

by Nick86 on Jan 26, 2006 5:11 PM PST reply actions  

Yes,
and you too, '72. High fives all around.

by Alon on Jan 26, 2006 7:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I swear, when we win the World series....
.....you morons will still be clammering for Macha's head on a platter.

by Rob @ Athletics Nation on Jan 26, 2006 5:58 PM PST reply actions  

Point Number Five
Priceless.

It's not called hit-and-run with Kendall, though.  It's called a grounder-to-an-eagerly-waiting-middle-infielder.

He'll be better this year, though.

A Beane in the hand is worth $60M in payroll

by jeepers on Jan 26, 2006 6:58 PM PST reply actions  

Managing: More than just Being There
Funny diary, thanks.  And ultimately Macha's importance rates somewhere below Street's and above Ginter's.  But all reasons to want to FIRE MACHA NOW can be valid unto themselves...a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.  Barney Frank thinks ex-Rep Bob Barr is a fascist theocrat, while Barr thinks Frank is a tax squandering fairy.  This doesn't mean they're both wrong, though, when they jointly contend that the Patriot Act robs us of our liberty and thus lets the terrorists win.

I happen to think Macha sucks as a manager because he sits back and watches bad things happen without response.  Bad umpire calls, bad lineups, bad bench utilization...at least he's still smiling, if not actually doing anything.

Though civil engineer Kenny is clearly a smart fellow, as a manager he's fencepost material.  A few months back I dubbed him Chauncey Manager for the beatific placidity with which he's willing to watch disaster unfold around him.  I stand by that label...FIRE CHAUNCEY NOW!!

And if you insist there's some reverse intelligence correlation among us FMN'ers, I'm afraid I'll have no choice but to challenge you to a duel...say, No. 2 pencils at 30 paces?

They're not booing...they're saying Leeewwwwwww!

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jan 26, 2006 8:00 PM PST reply actions  

Hyphenation, please!
"reverse-intelligence correlation," or "reverse intelligence-correlation"?

Small difference, granted, but an important distinction.

I may grind slowly, but I do grind finely.

... and would the title of the movie in which Macha stars be ... Beaneing There?

@('.')@

by monkeyball on Jan 26, 2006 8:10 PM PST up reply actions  

I thought you were in the hyphens are archaic camp
Modern usage and style books had you resigning yourself to the hyphen free way of the future.  Or was that be re-signing yourself to the hyphen-full way of the future?

Of course, by the modern usage standard we'll soon all be talking about the lovable loosers of Wrigley Field letting lose their voices in the 7th inning.

Man, I gotta stop typing...in closing, only users loose drugs.

They're not booing...they're saying Leeewwwwwww!

by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jan 26, 2006 8:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Lucy goo, see!
Well, I'm definitely in the get-rid-of-hyphens-within-words-and-prefixes camp -- but I do get pretty persnickety about hyphenating compounds.
@('.')@

by monkeyball on Jan 27, 2006 9:30 AM PST up reply actions  

thank you
you just gave me my new signature, i was looking for one
"Macha's importance rates somewhere below Street's and above Ginter's" -FreeSeatUpgrade

by gWiLiKeRzZz on Jan 27, 2006 12:04 AM PST up reply actions  

I see a HUGE potential problem...
Milton Bradley and Macha might give A's fans a bit of deja vu...Remember T Long and Macha? I just have a bad feeling about this...If anyone heard Macha on KNBR today you probably feel the same way

by rsur5 on Jan 27, 2006 2:26 AM PST reply actions  

i heard it
and didn't read into it that way at all.  Macha said ,"[MB and I] talked after the trade, and MB said he was excited about it after Chavez and Kotsay called him, but not before that."

The "but not before that" referred to when Macha and Bradley talked, not to Bradley's enthusiam about the trade prior to hearing from Chavvy and Kots.  I know the comma use is confusing and can be misread, but I heard it with my own ears and didn't have the same take as you.

For more in depth analysis of this "HUGE potential problem" you cite, consult the recap diary of Macha's appearance on KNBR that I did along with AsGirl and eamb.

"...and in Joe [Blanton]'s case, it's almost like he crammed the whole rookie year in a month, then became a veteran." --Billy Beane

by rungood on Jan 27, 2006 4:16 AM PST up reply actions  

My two gripes
I know there aren't a lot of Joe Morgan fans around here (I actually like the guy), but one thing he said back in October 2003 really stood out for me. During the pre-game show of the game 1 broadcast of the A's and the bosox, Morgan predicted that having a rookie manager would cost the A's at least one game in the series. Both of my Macha gripes are directly related to that series.
  1. I was unpleasantly surprised when he went to Foulke in the 8th inning of game 4 (game winning double off the green monster by Ortiz).
  2. I will probably never forgive him for pinch hitting for Dye with runners on 2nd and 3rd, one out in the bottom of the 9th, down by one.
While this comment does nothing to recognize the humor of this diary, I figured it was an appropriate place to express these gripes that i've been carrying with me for over 2 years now,

by mendelbob on Jan 27, 2006 5:25 AM PST reply actions  

Foulke
You were upset he broght in the closer to face the Red Sox best hitters?

by regfairfield on Jan 27, 2006 7:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Yep
I felt very uneasy seeing Foulk in there in the 8th, like I had a sense it wasn't going to work out. I would have rather seen Bradford, or even Mecir, saving Foulke for the 9th. Of course the way things worked out, there was no 9th.

Again, this move didn't get to me as bad as pinch hitting for Dye the next day, but it didn't seem right to me at the time, and the results were awful.

by mendelbob on Jan 27, 2006 7:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Don't be mad at Foulke
That was just part of his new BoSox contract....
"HOLY TOLEDO!" Bill King

by 510inDenver on Jan 27, 2006 1:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Great list
My list looks the same, only it's serious, not sarcastic.

by OaktownTribesman on Jan 27, 2006 5:51 AM PST reply actions  

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Okay, that made me laugh out loud.

I hear you.

Best Coliseum promotion of the year? 2005 Oakland A's baseball.

by baseballgirl on Jan 27, 2006 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Macha
Used Foulke in the eighth all the time that year. I don't know how many times but he pitched 87 innings in 72 appearances (and some of those 72 were conceivably for less than an inning).  Macha put Foulke in for two innings all the time, but we remember game 4 against the Red Sox.  Macha put Mecir in all the time, but we remember his game against the Angels.  Macha is criticized for pinch-hitting Melhuse for Dye, but he would be criticized ten times more if he had left Dye in (and Dye had gotten out), who, if I recall correctly, had the worst season by anyone, ever.  Maybe it's just me, but I think people are on this site are maybe a little unfair to Macha.

by Nick86 on Jan 27, 2006 3:47 PM PST reply actions  

as a consistent Macha-basher ...
... I'm also one of the few to defend his pinch-hitting of Melhuse for Dye. Despite the outcome, I totally thought it was the right move at the time. I think one of his tactical shortcomings is his unwillingness to make such moves on a more regular basis -- which, as I've said before, may well be a result of Beane's pressure on him (or it may not; we'll never know).

Nick, here's my issue with your diary: you're looking for consistency in the amalgam of criticisms of Macha, as if there was a monolithic single point to be made against him. It's very rare that any single poster makes the self-contradictory arguments you've posited, and to imply that all arguments contra Macha are moot because of the self-contradiction en masse is, to me, foolish.

You also seem to imply that one can either love or loathe Macha, when, as is the case with most of the A's players, Macha actually presents an array of strengths and weaknesses that can be appreciated and critiqued on a one-by-one basis.

And, as with the "AN is a mass of glassy-eyed Beaneac zombies" posters who pop up occasionally, you're either creating a straw man or letting a tiny handful of zealots synecdochally stand for AN as a whole.

That being said, this post in particular I agree with you 100%: we do tend to recall the catastrophically bad outcomes over the established pattern of good outcomes that preceded them. And many folks (myself included) are occasionally a bit unjudicious in their critiques of Macha.

Billy Beane has hairy fingers. -- FireballerHARDEN @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jan 27, 2006 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

According to the OED
its synecdochically. Fantastic word either way :-)

by green star oakland on Jan 27, 2006 5:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Bah! Joyced by my own canard!
Blimey!
Billy Beane has hairy fingers. -- FireballerHARDEN @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jan 27, 2006 5:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Moist with your own bombard
after a nacho runs fueled poop toss goes horribly awry.

by green star oakland on Jan 27, 2006 7:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Royced by my own clayton
I'm actually a big fan of the bombarde.
Billy Beane has hairy fingers. -- FireballerHARDEN @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jan 30, 2006 10:15 AM PST up reply actions  

As a consistent Macha supporter...
...I think Nick is making a good point, and I don't believe he's necessarily asking for "consistency in the amalgam of criticisms of Macha" (although, it would be a nice change).  

What I think Nick was trying to humorously illustrate is that Ken Macha gets consistently ripped  no matter what he does, win or lose.  Perhaps the Cult of Beane is partly to blame, perhaps it's Ken's own mellow personality, but he gets far less credit, and far more blame, than your average Major League manager.  It's not a "straw man"....it's reality.  

Think back to the voting for AL Manager of the Year.  When Macha finished a distant fourth, there was hardly a peep of protest here at AN, or anywhere else (except for the ever equitable Mychael Urban, who thought Macha was shafted, and came out and said so).  Why?  Does anyone here actually believe that Joe Torre did a better job with the Yankees last year than Macha did in Oakland?  Where were the howls (or, even, whimpers) of protest?  

by Mission1929 on Jan 27, 2006 5:39 PM PST up reply actions  

b.s.
"gets far less credit, and far more blame, than your average Major League manager."

Back that up, please.

Billy Beane has hairy fingers. -- FireballerHARDEN @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jan 27, 2006 5:57 PM PST up reply actions  

b.s.????
I couldn't find that entry in the OED.

Perhaps the point of my last paragraph was unclear...

Ken Macha finishes below Joe Torre in the voting for AL Manager of the year...is that not a glaring example of Macha getting far less credit than he is due?

by Mission1929 on Jan 27, 2006 6:24 PM PST up reply actions  

o.k., Cletus ...
... perhaps your eyes got strained from looking at the OED's microprint, but I asked you to back up your statement that Macha receives more derision and less credit than the average MLB manager.

You cited his fourth-place finish for MOTY.

Now, correct me if my math is wrong (or if math is also too snooty and pointy-headed for your liking), but fourth out of 14 calculates out to roughly the top 29% of AL managers.

And that's even if you grant that MOTY voting by the BBWA members is a valid "measurement" of respect.

And if you grant that BBWA members are representative of the overall respect- and derision-granting baseball community; your initial comments implied more of a fan-wide sentiment regarding manager assessment, not just among beat writers.

I'm not intimately familiar with other teams' fan bases, but I'd venture a guess (not a certainty by any means, and I may well be 100% wrong) that Macha actually receives from AN more thoughtful and respectful critiques and appreciations -- yours certainly included -- than other teams' managers do in general or at the other SN sites. (That's my AN homerism: from my sporadic reading of other SN sites, we have a far better and bigger reader/writer population.)

A fourth-place finish for the manager of a team that finishes 7 games out of first is, to me, a pretty impressive result for Macha, given the biases of the BBWA voters. I won't even argue that that's an overrating of Macha -- Macha in fact did an excellent job keeping the team motivated and positive through a hard slog of what was frankly a rebuilding season for the A's.

Look, the FIRE MACHA NOW crowd is about as sizable as (and has a lot of overlap with) the annoying trolls at AN.

The number of posters who have legitimate and well thought out critiques of certain and various aspects of Macha's strategic decisions is broad and diverse -- and is in the main respectful of Macha's demonstrated strengths and/or acknowledging of the fact that managerial strategy is not, in fact, a significant determinant of the outcomes of a lot of games. As with most disputes at AN (and this one as well), it's splitting hairs, looking for granular distinctions at the thin edge of the factors that determine the likelihoods of wins and losses.

I'm entirely amenable to the sentiment "Cut Macha some slack"; I'm opposed to ludicrous assertions of nonfacts backed up by obstinate refusal to answer to the facticity of those arguments.

Excuse me, that last paragraph probably offends you. Let me put it this way: "You're wrong because you're making shit up." That better?

Billy Beane has hairy fingers. -- FireballerHARDEN @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jan 28, 2006 11:55 AM PST up reply actions  

pinch hitting for Dye
Yes, Dye had a horrible year, but he also was the only A to hit a dinger in the series.

Not only that, I read multiple reports after that game in which it seemed clear that the sox were going to intentially walk Dye, giving us bases loaded and 1 out, with Melhuse still available.

I also remember a very stupid Macha comment in which he basically said something like he went with Melhuse because he thought that was the best chance to win the game and he felt they needed to win it, not tie it. In other words, he was afraid that Dye would only hit a sac fly, and he didn't like our chances in extra innings.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think Macha single-handedly lost the series, he got a ton of help from Byrnes and Miggy in game 3. But with the season on the line (bottom of the 9th game 5, it doesn't get more on the line) I disagree with going to an unproven back-up catcher who happened to have a good game earlier in the series as opposed to an RBI machine who happened to have a crappy season.

by mendelbob on Jan 28, 2006 1:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Monkeyball
I gotta agree with you on some points. First, it seems sometimes that Macha undermanages, refusing to pinch hit or pinch run in certain situations.  I thought about this, and decided that it makes some sense.  If a righty relieves a lefty in a close game against the Whoevers in game 53 out of 162, it might make sense to pinch hit Kotsay for Bobby Kielty. But then again, making said substitution would give the A's such a marginal advantage the substitution hardly seems necessary. If you promised Kotsay the day off,  why put him out there to increase our odds of winning by a fraction of a percent?  Obviously, if it's a playoff game or an Angels game, then the substitution makes more sense.

I also agree that i've probably been a little unfair to the members (even the Macha hating ones) of AN.  Obviously I find some people on AN pretty intelligent and insightful, or I simply wold never visit.  Nevertheless, I have heard variations of all six arguments on this website many, many times, although people rarely put the arguments that contradict each other in the same thread.  If you don't believe me, look at the first twenty comments on this diary.

You also say that you have to either love or hate Macha.  I disagree. Personally, I think we could make Mark Kotsay player/manager and drop only a game or two in the standings.  To prove it, here are my two (actual) complaints about Macha.

  1. In game 3 of the 2003 ALDS, Eric Byrnes dashed home and was clearly interfered with by Jason Varitek. The umps got the call wrong, and Macha didn't go out to argue.  If he did, they probably wouldn't have overturned the call, but who knows?
  2. In a memorable indians game last year that the A's ended up winning, the A's had runners on first and second in a tie game with no one out after an impressive comeback.  Melhuse was set to pinch hit for Scutaro, but then Macha called Melhuse back so Scutaro could lay down a bunt.  Scutaro bunted and the runner was forced at third. Although this was certainly one of those rare moments where a successful bunt increased the odds of the A's winning a game, what Macha should have done was leave Scutaro in the game, and have him swing away (because everyone KNEW macha left Scutaro in to bunt).  It would have been more awesome if he showed bunt and took the first pitch, and then swung away at the second.
OK, no more posting for me.  Let the greaet Macha debate rage on!

by Nick86 on Jan 27, 2006 7:54 PM PST reply actions  

Macha is not a risk taker..he is a civil engineer!
Macha is very predictable; too predictable in my mind.

Sometimes is seems clear that for weeks on end the series of decisions we see coming from Macha (whether it be lineup decisions, sending runners or not, or pitching change decisions) are so predictable that most of us on AN can easily know in advance what he is going to do in most every situation......  I am a civil engineer, and Ken's educational background is also as a civil engineer, so although I sometimes want him to take more of a risk and try to pull a suprise now and then, he always seems to fall back on his conservative mind-set, "play it by the numbers" and "play it like Billy likes it" approach.

by robertmelvin on Jan 27, 2006 10:01 PM PST reply actions  

Now that I have read my own post........
I suddenly realized why Billy "rehired" Ken after a few days hiatus: Billy wanted a civil engineer to run the team!!

by robertmelvin on Jan 27, 2006 10:06 PM PST reply actions  

Don't forget Macha's role in the Tsunami
The Macha list of gripes...terific...LOL

One apparently serious comment about Macha above was:

"He does the exact opposite of what all other managers do"

Now, I'm not a philosopher or expert in logic but this comment raises some interesting questions doesn't it?

If Macha does the exact opposite of ALL other managers, does that mean they all do the exact same thing?

If this is true and Macha had not come back, it would have made absolutely no difference who replaced him since they all do exactly the same thing.

What is the exact opposite of making Haren the # 3 starter?

What is most opposite of bringing the infield in..putting them on the warning track?

What is the most opposite of yelling...Humm Now Chavvy!

What is more opposite of taking Haren out in the 6th...taking him out in the 5th, or 8th?

What is most opposite of batting Kendall in prime double play position?

If Macha chooses a Ham on Rye after the game, what would be the most opposite of that?

What is more opposite of a post-game Bud Light...a post-game Michelob or a pre-game Michelob?

signed..too much time on my hands in Nebraska

by ropeinthegap on Jan 28, 2006 7:59 AM PST reply actions  

I meant
Managers will usually mix around a lineup to find one that "works", and will keep a good lineup the way it is if it's working. Macha on the other hand mixes up the lineup constantly until he finds one that doesn't work, and keeps that one.

In other words, he fixes it if it ain't broke, but doesn't fix it if it is broke.

by OaktownTribesman on Jan 28, 2006 6:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook

Recent FanPosts

Fubarcloud_small
Wolf being told to spend money
Small
The wRC+ Challenge
Pumpkin_small
Maybe this is a stupid stats question
Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract
Small
fantasy baseball league for A's fans!
Small
NYY Proposal
Small
Roy Oswalt = opportunity

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late