Wheelin' and Dealin'
Well, my speculation was right. Eric Byrnes is gone to launch monster home runs at Coors Field. He was traded along with Omar Quintanilla to the Colorado Rockies for Joe Kennedy and Jay Witasick.
Good luck to Byrnes, who will thrive in Colorado (what guy with power doesn't?). Quintanilla's numbers had actually gone down the last few seasons, but there is a chance he might still wind up being a high quality player. I know Ron Washington had said several times he felt like Quintanilla would eventually be an outstanding middle infielder. But with Cliff Pennington poised to rise through the ranks quickly, the A's suddenly felt like they could move Omar. In his first two seasons in the minors, Quintanilla had a .387 OBP and a .329 batting average. This year, Quintanilla dropped to a .347 OBP and a .293 average. Those just aren't the kind of numbers that makes Billy Beane excited. Oh, and here is a key line from John Sickels The Baseball Prospect Book 2005 (which, by the way, was the only book Billy Beane had on his desk):
That batting average has dropped this year. Not a good sign.
Any way, the A's lose guaranteed right-handed thunder against lefties in Byrnes and a prospect who may still develop into a top flight ML infielder. Or he could go the way of Jose Ortiz, another A's "infielder of the future" who never quite made the jump to the bigs.
What do they get in return? I'll get to Joe Kennedy in a second. The A's get Gerald Alphonse "Jay" Witasick back for a second tour of duty by way of the Royals, Padres, Yankees, Padres (again), Giants, Padres (again) and now the Rockies. Ignore Witasick's lifetime 4.60 ERA for a minute and realize that this guy's stats have been climbing the last couple of years. He is striking out righties and lefties and neither is hitting him well. And get this, at home in the thin Coors Field air, Witasick has a 2.11 ERA this year and a 4:1 K/BB rate. This is a high-quality reliever. A strikeout pitcher who deepens the A's pen, and the best part is that he's versatile and can be used against righties and lefties, unlike Chad Bradford who was markedly worse against lefties (left-handed batters hit almost .298 against Bradford the last three seasons).
Getting Witasick signals to me that the A's are still thinking 2005, and not 2006.
As for Kennedy, the A's essentially swapped $2.2 million one-year contracts with the Rockies, attempting to get a deeper pitching staff. And possibly an extra LOOGY. Even though he's been battered around by lefties this year, Kennedy excelled against lefties last year who hit only .184 against him and had an OPS against of .594. That smells of classic LOOGY to me. The question is, can he get it back this season? I imagine the A's front office thinks so, otherwise they wouldn't have dealt for him.
Overall, these deals collectively look much better to me tonight than they did this morning. They probably wouldn't have if Witasick wasn't included in the deal, but that sends a clear message to me that the A's are going to try and win this year. Payton can hit righties who Kielty struggles against and he is now a solid backup centerfielder who can give Kotsay a day off here and there. I wouldn't rule out another deal for a power bat at some point too...it just depends on what is available.
Finally, I want to say something about Eric Byrnes. Byrnes always gave everything he had to the Oakland A's and it took everything he had to finally get on a major league roster. He's an example of what hard work and dedication can get you. His heart and hustle will be missed and I want to wish him the best in Colorado. He's going to a fastball league and playing in Colorado and I believe he will flourish. Best of luck, Byrnsie.
0 recs |
256 comments
Comments
*sob*
by Kimmaline on Jul 13, 2005 8:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bellwether
But these moves certainly are telling as well.
by monkeyball on Jul 13, 2005 8:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Payton's hitting .230 against righties...
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 8:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
over his career
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foolsh
by Dog Days on Jul 13, 2005 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have byrnes'
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I met Byrnes twice
I wish him all the best.
by Dog Days on Jul 13, 2005 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
no byrnes auto on my shrine
by burnone on Jul 13, 2005 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just got
by gigglingone on Jul 13, 2005 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Over the last three years
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jul 13, 2005 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, I'm sure he'll rake righties this year, too
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
got another $100 that says Byrnes out hits Payton
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
didn't think so... ;-)
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 9:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
HE IS GOING TO COORS
A better bet would be if he approaches the OPS that Payton had as a rockie (.982 in 2002 and .865 in 2003).
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry... it's Payton vs. Byrnes...
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
And I have no interest in a bet that A) involves somebody from the net that has a history of doing dishonest things with the cherrypicking of stats and I don't even know,
B) I would feel like I had to root against byrnes in coors, which is something that I don't want to do, and
C) the net is a pitchers park, one of the best in the american league and coors is the best hitters park in the history of baseball.
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I always knew you were a smart guy, AFAR
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am going to miss byrnes
Payton appears to basically be as good a hitter as byrnes and a better fielder, but I will miss byrnes.
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
2005
BB wants to win every minute of every hour of every day of every year.
What could be better for a fan? Go A's!
by Force on Jul 13, 2005 9:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Here here
Being one of the kool-aid drinkers, one of the Billy Believers, I'm on board and interested to see how these moves play out. I'm hopeful that Kennedy can be a solid lefty out of the 'pen and Witasick-Duchscherer-Street makes 7-8-9 seem like 1-2-3.
Let's go Oakland! See you guys at the game tomorrow night!
by Dog Days on Jul 13, 2005 9:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Witasick has flourished...
I'll be the first to eat my words if he has a solid tour of duty with the A's (in his second try), but... until then... I'll admit I'm not thrilled. It just seems too much tinkering for too little ultimate purpose-- the team's still basically much the same now as it would have been had Beane not done anything.
by Trocmagic on Jul 13, 2005 9:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hear hear
If Payton kills our chemistry, I'll be po'd.
by oblique on Jul 13, 2005 9:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Missing Byrnes Already
So long, Eric. I'll follow your career and work elsewhere, unfortunately.
I'm disappointed as hell right now.
by Dan_Honolulu on Jul 13, 2005 9:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
There's a new rumor going around
by Nico on Jul 13, 2005 9:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
can we trade
by gigglingone on Jul 13, 2005 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good luck Eric!
Good luck!!
by gigglingone on Jul 13, 2005 9:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
and she's 8 months preggo
by burnone on Jul 13, 2005 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will miss byrnes.
And here is a story about why you should hold off on getting jerseys for players. This year, I got myself an Eric Byrnes green jersey via the internet and they would not ship to canada for a reasonable price. So I had it shipped to my parents place in california. When it got there I told my parents to hold onto it as I would get it when I went back to visit. Some things came up (with my wife's health) and I decided to skip visiting in june. Well, as of now, my brand new Eric Byrnes # 22 green A's jersey has yet to be worn. And he is not an A anymore..... I also have a Durazo shirt that I have yet to wear.
seriously, I am going to miss him. I am going to miss the spark and the hustle. I am going to miss the diving catches and the energy. I actually understand why people tend to either love him or hate him and, even though I can tell that ultimatly he is an average player, he was ours and he was special. I think that he is the first of the players that came through sacramento and became a regular and those players are special to me.
Good luck in coors Eric, I hope that you hit 30 dingers there (and I hope that your glove improves!)!
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry to hear about the shirts...
by orange2299 on Jul 13, 2005 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
post-steroid era bullpen?
also, in the short term, it's probably a good thing to have plenty of long relief guys because this rotation is so young and a little unsteady (aces one month, terrible the next).
by xbhaskarx on Jul 13, 2005 9:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
More moves?
-- It this supposed to be in reference to this deal or possible future ones. I think we'll see a few more before the deadline--
"The two pitchers we got were exactly what we were looking for in terms of improving our pen," said Forst, emphasizing Kennedy's prowess against lefties. "
--Does this free up a Rincon deal to improve the team elsewhere?--
by gojohn10 on Jul 13, 2005 9:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm Sorry
My daughter loves him - we'd bust a gut watching him run out a triple... "Looks like he's gonna fly apart any second!"
But to be REALLY honest, I'm still nursing a grudge about not touching the plate in Boston. That and Miggy stopping to argue a call make up one of my worst A's nightmares.
Good luck Eric - may the thin Colorado air bring you much free agent success.
by tmail on Jul 13, 2005 9:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You had to bring that up?
by ak_A on Jul 13, 2005 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disappointed
I can't wait to hear what you have to say about all of this as you are always a good quote.
I'm in mourning right now and I'm pissed.
Sure, Billy makes some great trades and I hope this one works out for the team, but damn, I really liked this guy.
Payton is going to be on a very very very short leash.............
by Masaryk on Jul 13, 2005 9:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The biggest bummer
by oblique on Jul 13, 2005 9:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Doubtful
Now, yes, I can see Crotchby potentially GIPDing against Chadford -- but a swinging K is more likely.
by monkeyball on Jul 13, 2005 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hear Hear!!
by Wooka on Jul 13, 2005 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel so utterly sad.
by GreenNGoldGirl on Jul 13, 2005 9:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe he'll touch the plate in Colorado
In Billy We Trust
by vidabluefan on Jul 13, 2005 9:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder how Kennedy and Kendall will mesh...
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1864072
"Kendall was batting in the fourth inning of Pittsburgh's 3-0 win when a pitch from Kennedy hit the protective pad the catcher wears on his upper left arm.
Kendall dropped his bat and started toward first base. Kennedy stepped off the mound and appeared to say something to Kendall, which caused Kendall to abruptly turn and charge the pitcher. After a brief wrestling match that brought players out of both dugouts and bullpens, order was restored."
by FireballerHARDEN on Jul 13, 2005 9:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
jasonkendall.net
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha, sweet!
by xbhaskarx on Jul 13, 2005 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the video might
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's crazy about that...
I guess Kendall is one guy you don't mess with.
by FireballerHARDEN on Jul 13, 2005 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
With these trades Billy shows
But I don't think Beane is done yet
by OaklandSi on Jul 13, 2005 9:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
On the otherhand
by ogallalabob on Jul 14, 2005 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which Brynes will you remember?
by gojohn10 on Jul 13, 2005 9:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
THANKS
Look at him hopping around...goddammitttouchthefuckinplateyoumoron
I feel better and don't really miss him much anymore. He's got a phat payday coming after a couple years at coors anyways.
by FireballerHARDEN on Jul 13, 2005 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess I know which you will remember
by gojohn10 on Jul 13, 2005 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aggghhh, exactly
by ak_A on Jul 13, 2005 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dammit!!!
Okay... take a cleansing breath... CRAP!!!! DONTEVENGETMESTARTED!!!!
by tmail on Jul 13, 2005 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
chill out dude
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
steam....as i have related before on this site
by ak_A on Jul 13, 2005 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok gojohn10
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i need my pills to help me sleep tonight
by ak_A on Jul 13, 2005 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
a bit of consolation
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow
Really, to me the picture is annoying more than painful. The way the lost in 2001, I was devestated. Ever since, I've adopted a different way of dealing with painful moments. I really have to distance myself from the state I was in at the time (hyterics).
Just curious, do you cry when you see the Gibson HR from '88 (I did in real life when it happened - give me a brake, I was a kid)
by gojohn10 on Jul 14, 2005 12:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmm
Well, I was in California at the time and I still live here, so it's kind of tough for me.
I'm not a real crier. But at that awful Game 3, my wife and I were watching on a blurry TV wrestling with a rabbit-ears antenna trying to get a good picture. I definitely was doing a lot of pacing and yelling. That was definitely the worst playoff loss in my mind. The others at least I had grudging respect for the opposing team. But that version of the BoSox I really despised with my gut.
by Apricot on Jul 14, 2005 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh
by Apricot on Jul 14, 2005 12:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Recommended!
by gojohn10 on Jul 14, 2005 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Gibson's HR
I feel like going to the supermarket, buying that box of Wheaties featuring that homer on it, and slicing it up with an ax. :)
by FormerHuntsvilleStar on Jul 14, 2005 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Gibson "thing"
by ak_A on Jul 14, 2005 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ouch....
by FormerHuntsvilleStar on Jul 14, 2005 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
can I come to your party now?

20th consecutive win
by gojohn10 on Jul 14, 2005 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I'm talking about!
by FireballerHARDEN on Jul 14, 2005 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thank you, gojohn10
by rubin sierra on Jul 14, 2005 2:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
YOU ARE A VERY BAD MAN.
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Both...
It won't be the same without Byrnes. I'll miss his crazy energy, flair for the dramatic, and red-hot hitting streaks.
I won't miss the bonehead who made so many basic baseball fielding mistakes, could never hit (or lay off) a right hander's good slider, and forgot the most basic baseball rule - Touch home plate!
I think he will do well in Colorado, and wish him luck.
by bear88 on Jul 13, 2005 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'll remember
by ucla kid on Jul 13, 2005 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The one that cost us the playoffs
by paul75 on Jul 14, 2005 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
SAVES MONEY
Payton = free agent end of 2005
Witasick = free agent end of 2005
Bradford = $1.5m+ arbitration coming next year
Byrnes = $3m+ arbitration coming next year
I don't believe this talk from Beane/Forst at all. We are not going to pay Kennedy $3m next year (his likely arbitration figure next year) to be in the bullpen. We can't possibly be looking at Payton for LF or RF when we already have Kotsay patrolling on defense.
by athletics02115 on Jul 13, 2005 9:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Starting pitching
by Larry E on Jul 14, 2005 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's strange
i was at Fan Fest this year in the Q&A session when zito was talking about how him and byrnes surfed together. the guys on this team have nothing but love for byrnes and i'll bet they're all really sad right now.
on the other hand, i'm happy with what we got in that deal. the payton trade is really up in the air for me. now that we have witasick, i dont feel the loss of bradford is that big of a deal (except emotionally, another guy i like). kennedy could be excellent out of the pen.
we didn't think billy was going to go through half a season without pulling off a key/unexpected trade, did we?
by nycfan on Jul 13, 2005 9:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
DOESN'T MAKE US BETTER
You're crazy. Payton is deteriorating in his power. He'll never hit over 800 OPS again unless he was the one traded to Colorado. Byrnes is 3 years younger and maintaining an OPS over 800.
We don't need Witasick- we have Calero, Duchscherer, and Cruz is pitching great in Sacramento. Beane doesn't care about power in pitchers.
Payton duplicates Kielty or Byrnes- what you get in defense you more than lose in offense.
Witasick duplicates Bradford.
This move was to save money- we don't get better as a team unless you value depth absurdly.
by athletics02115 on Jul 13, 2005 9:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
disagree
Our bullpen is thin... remember the Great Street Pitch Count Scandal of '05? No matter which side you were on, I think we all agreed it would be nice to be able to trust the other four pitchers.
Bradford has been declining. He was incredible his first couple of years, but the last year he was getting clobbered. Recall his role in the Nightmare "I Hate Huddy" Bullpen of 04.
I'm willing to give Witasick a chance.
On the other hand, Payton frightens me.
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's next?
by OaklandSi on Jul 13, 2005 9:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Burnett?
by athletics02115 on Jul 13, 2005 9:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
mmmm
by burnone on Jul 13, 2005 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Burnett is the end game...
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Burnett is FA next year
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 9:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why rent him?
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
what are these
And I don't think Beane would use the $ on the starting rotation, which is looking pretty good in a year or two, when we really need more slugging.
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I
So this does improve the team for the short term and does not harm the team for the long term.
I think that you are just upset. Back away from the computer before you post something that you will regret in the morning.
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who does Payton replace in the outfield?
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
however it works out
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So far...
If these trades are destined to land us Burnett, then... hell ya, I'm for them!
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would say the lineup will be:
1B Swisher/Johnson
2B Ellis/Scutaro
SS Crosby
3B Chavez
RF Payton
CF Kotsay
LF Kielty/Swisher
DH Hatteberg/Swisher/Johnson
While DJ is good with the glove, Swish has Gold Glove potential at 1B. Payton is a HUGE improvement defensively over ANY outfielder not named Kotsay. Kielty plays vs. Lefties and some righties, Hatteberg picks AB's vs. righties or when DJ/Swish/Kielty/Payton/Kotsay needs a day off. Durazo is probably on the way out, maybe to Toronto. Having Payton here helps us give Kotsay a day off without the loss on defense.
by gatling on Jul 13, 2005 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
do you really think
by tblazrdude on Jul 13, 2005 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, but don't trade a younger, cheaper, better...
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bonehead plays aside...
by franks a lot on Jul 13, 2005 9:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Trading at Peak
by athletics02115 on Jul 13, 2005 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
sucks
by AllThingsOakland on Jul 13, 2005 9:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Byrnesie memories
But ultimately the thing I will always remember about Byrnesie is his appalling inability to hit when it really counted.
Two out and two on, you could GUARANTEE that Byrnsie would pop it up. Every friggin' time.
I wish him well in Colorado and predict that he will be the Rockies' All-Star next year.
But this is a good move for the A's.
In Billy we trust. And for good reason.
by As Exile in Atlanta on Jul 13, 2005 9:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
to be fair
But again, thumbs up for his hustle. I do think he was a genuine risk to injure himself; I'm glad Colorado is taking that risk on now...
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Game winning HR
by gojohn10 on Jul 13, 2005 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
All the best Byrnes! What's Billy really up to?
by BHooves78 on Jul 13, 2005 9:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bye Byrnsie! :(
by AsGirl on Jul 13, 2005 9:42 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Watson
Now for analysis:
I visualize either Payton or Kielty traded away to any of the other teams who might want them, and Watson called up as the new 4th outfielder - not sure how I'd split playing time among that four though. You could package a starting pitcher and a corner outfielder (take your pick which 5th starter - we have plenty) to a contender for something actually good.
If you don't mind seeing Watson as one of 4 outfielders, with some uknown amount of playing time, we still have the ability to trade away an above-average middle infielder (Ellis Ginter or Scutaro), an above-average corner outfielder (Kielty or Payton) and a 5th string pitcher - or a 4th or 3rd string for some teams - Sarlos, Etherson, or Kennedy. That's a LOT of trade bait without losing much important about the team.
P.S. - I know I can't spell the names of our players - sorry.
by Zakolantern on Jul 13, 2005 9:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Shef
by Zakolantern on Jul 13, 2005 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Get real about values for our players
by athletics02115 on Jul 13, 2005 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least you did pretty well...
by blueconversechucks on Jul 14, 2005 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the way
Payton obviously didn't feel the same way.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jul 13, 2005 9:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I have
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm wondering the same
by gojohn10 on Jul 13, 2005 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Payton = Complainer
by athletics02115 on Jul 13, 2005 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd actually read
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jul 13, 2005 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boston
by ogallalabob on Jul 14, 2005 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, good point, there is a difference
by grover on Jul 14, 2005 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most of the time he was quiet
by gojohn10 on Jul 13, 2005 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most of the time he was quiet
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jul 13, 2005 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
by rubin sierra on Jul 14, 2005 1:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Malcontents and Clubhouse Poisoners
As for Colorado deal, I have no opinion about these pitchers, but can you imagine a better place to find undervalued pitching than Colorado? (But I feel bad that Byrnes got exiled there. I don't think he deserves that.)
by SportySpice on Jul 14, 2005 7:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
look at Guillen
by Apricot on Jul 14, 2005 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure I understand
by ogallalabob on Jul 14, 2005 8:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither is Good
by SportySpice on Jul 14, 2005 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's interesting to me
The roles that were supposed to be solved by...2-buck Chuck and Juan Cruz...
Think about this...What if the Hudson trade had been for Dan Meyer, Jay Witasick, and Jay Payton. And we had to throw in Byrnes to make it happen, but we also got Cruz and Thomas for the minors/future.
Kinda how it worked out via BB's revisionist history, no?
by Nico on Jul 13, 2005 9:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
by athletics02115 on Jul 13, 2005 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think
Anyway, bottom line for me is that Byrnes, Bradford and Q were not going to be essential parts of the club. We got some high risk parts, but if any of Wit, Kennedy or Payton turns into a quality player, that will be a pretty good trade. It seems to me there is a good chance none of them will be a quality player. Then at least we're only on the hook for Wit and Payton for a year, and Kennedy for a couple more.
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
My point was that CT and Cruz haven't panned out, so BB did some "revisionist history" to upgrade them in the short term.
by Nico on Jul 13, 2005 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
what does that have to do with
Yeah, it's a neat way to think about the trades.
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And you thought that was fur...
by oblique on Jul 13, 2005 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What is BB Thinking??
- He swapped OFers of similar value. Payton's is more valuable defensively and he can play more games, since Byrnes had become fairly worthless vs. RHP;
- He upgraded the bullpen twice. Bradford had deteriorated the past couple of years, partic. against LHP. Witasick is getting better. Relief pitchers are a fickle bunch, but Beane appears to have helped the pen;
- as he has done with Kennedy.
and more depth from the right side with Duke, Calero and Witasick (and Yabu) before Street is ever necessary.
4) Plus he's thrown another potential LH starter into the mix in case: a) meyer doesn't pan out; or b) Zito prices himself out of the As range;
You can never get enough pitching. Pennington made Quintanilla expendable;
by oaktoon on Jul 13, 2005 9:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
By the way
Kennedy has a plus fastball with plenty of life. He started to trust the pitch more in 2004, and it showed in the results. He cut the fastball to run in on the hands of righthanded hitters. With his cross-body mechanics the ball is extremely hard to pick up, particularly for lefthanded hitters, who hit just .183 off him. However, there is concern that the cross-body mechanics will not only affect his health, but keep him from becoming real consistent in his approach. Kennedy has shown the makings of a quality 12-to-6 curveball, but seemed hesitant to use it at Coors Field. He does have a quality offspeed pitch that is vital for survival at Coors.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jul 13, 2005 9:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Blez...
Doesn't exactly account for the 7+ERA all year in 2005
by FireballerHARDEN on Jul 13, 2005 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Being away from Coors
by Nico on Jul 13, 2005 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Classic Beane Though...
by FireballerHARDEN on Jul 13, 2005 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes but
ps. Days like this are exactly what AN is all about. A bunch of nutballs to have group therapy as Beane trades a couple of sentimental favorites.
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And you can't
by Nico on Jul 13, 2005 10:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm okay!
by LowcountryJoe on Jul 14, 2005 4:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Kennedy shove it
Sorry, I have nothing else to contribute, other than I think maybe that performance (assuming it happened) may have stuck with the A's brass.
by Dog Days on Jul 13, 2005 10:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never mind
Kennedy Starts vs. the A's
9/2/01
6IP 6H 1ER 3BB 4K 0HR
5/27/02
5 IP 7H 6ER 0BB 1K 2HR
6/1/02
7.2IP 10H 6ER 1BB 2K 2HR
7/9/03
5IP 6H 1ER 2BB 1K 0HR
8/29/03
4.2IP 7H 5ER 5BB 2K 0HR
by Dog Days on Jul 13, 2005 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Byrnes at Coors
Good luck Eric.
by Lafayette Scotsman on Jul 13, 2005 10:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Upgrades, Major UPGRADES
And BB pulled a real coup. In addition to getting a better hitter than ByrnesBum vs righties, Payton is incomparably better on "D" and can play CF if Kotsay is hurt or needs to rest. Bumblin Burnsey is, as I've said, a disaster waiting to happen in CF. Or RF or LF for that matter. Hey, now we have OFs who at least are bright enough to consistently hit the cut-off man.
In a few seasons, the sole lasting memory of BrynesBrain will be his failure to touch homeplate vs the BoSox, probably costing the A's the playoffs.
And BB gave the A's an upgrade in the pen, with Witasick an improvement over Bradford in that he has a power arm to get out righties and he can get lefties out as well if called to do so. Lefties absolutely feasted vs Bradford when they had the opportunity. And Kennedy, under Young's tutelage, may reach fruition for the potential he was heralded as having with the D-Rays. Pitching in Coors can detonate any pitcher's confidence.
At first, look for Kennedy as a LOOGY with Flores being sent back to Sacto. I like Rincon, but he has been simply a middle of the pack LOOGY. Perhaps Kennedy can improve upon this. And if he demonstrates that he can approach his once acclaimed potential, look for him as a starter either this season or next.
Flores did a good job in a few appearances. But don't moan if he goes back to Sacto--he just doesn't have the stuff to get lefties out over the long haul. Kennedy is likely to be an upgrade here...
by reztips on Jul 13, 2005 10:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Foolsh Big on SELECTIVE Stats
But ByrnesBrain didn't do the job with the A's, couldn't hit righties, and was a Bumbler in the field. It's what he did--or more appropriately--didn't do with the A's that we will all remember: be it missing the cutoff man, taking the wrong route to fly balls, whiffing at the low and away pitch, or--most memorably--failing to touch home plate in the playoffs.
Kyli, when Foolsh inevitably posts his diarrhea diaries on ByrnesBrain, you can bet your ass I will have new, even more appropriate nicknames for his idol. ;-)>
by reztips on Jul 14, 2005 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thinking out loud
Witasick is the definition of a journeyman, but he is pitching well this year. Hopefully, he can be an effective sixth/seventh inning pitcher. He's probably a safer bet than Bradford for this year.
I don't really know what Beane wants to do with Kennedy. Is he a fifth starter, with Saarloos moving to the bullpen? (I don't see how that helps the team.) Is he insurance, in case someone gets hurt or goes into a slump? Is he a LOOGY? Another lefty out of the 'pen, replacing Flores or Rincon? Does he go to Sacramento for a while to get his act together? Or is he trade bait? Kennedy is the biggest mystery.
As for what Beane traded, I don't think Quintanilla will be a star. His numbers are going the wrong direction, and he makes too many errors. Bradford is a worthwhile risk for the Red Sox, and I do worry he will haunt us, but he might never make it back and has back problems that are unlikely to go away. Byrnes has been covered thoroughly. He is what he is. It won't be the same without him, but I'll never really forgive him for failing to touch home plate.
These trades are not about the future, aside from avoiding arbitration cases this winter. They are about this year, which is nice. But I'm not sure how much they improve the team.
by bear88 on Jul 13, 2005 10:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
weirdly
In reality, of course, he'll probably be used mainly against lefties in setup situations, but I hope he'll be more than a LOOGY.
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd agree with you about Witasick
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jul 13, 2005 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Witasick
Think about Sunday's game. Macha asked Duchscherer to pitch two innings, then brought in Street in the eighth. Witasick, if he's effective, can come in before or after Calero and bridge the gap. And he's not a ROOGY, as Bradford would have been.
The critical thing, obviously, is whether he will be effective.
by bear88 on Jul 13, 2005 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The trouble with Witasick
by grover on Jul 13, 2005 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't Moan For Foolsh
Expect Foolsh to give us regular reports of how well his idol is doing in the light atmosphere of Colorado. In fact, maybe said light atmosphere will get Brynes' brain moving in tune with his feet and he will occasionally hit the cutoff man and throw to the right base. Yep, the Rockies in his head might mitigate the rocks in his head.
Foolsh, we look forward to many a diary authored by you on how foolsh BB was to let the Bumbler go!
:-) :-) :-)
by reztips on Jul 13, 2005 10:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You are correct
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least with Byrnes gone...
Byrnes was a plus in the clubhouse and gave his all in the field. He deserves your respect for that.
Good luck in Coors, Byrnes! It's been a fun ride for the most part.
by grover on Jul 13, 2005 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said Grover...
by OaktownPower on Jul 14, 2005 12:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
accept my bet, reztips...
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why
Coors = tremendous hitter's park
Coliseum = pitcher's park
Of course Byrnes is going to have a better year playing at Coors than Payton will have playing here. I'd have a better year playing at Coors than Payton will have here.
Please help disabled kids in Sacramento play baseball by helping the Rivercats build a specially equipped field for them.
by kaweahkaweah on Jul 13, 2005 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, of course...
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My god.
by Kyli on Jul 14, 2005 2:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you have to understand
ignore him, you'll be better for it.
by kotsaykid on Jul 14, 2005 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
kotsaykid, you can't handle differences of
by reztips on Jul 14, 2005 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foolsh and Kyli, check my responses to you
:-) ;-) :-)
by reztips on Jul 14, 2005 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beane's not done yet...
by ZeroIndulgence on Jul 13, 2005 10:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Jay Payton jersey
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly...
by ZeroIndulgence on Jul 13, 2005 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
and my byrnes jersey that is so new
by Athletics fan and runner on Jul 13, 2005 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunn
Forget the money he'll be owed over the next couple years, the man is a fastball hitter coming to a breaking ball league and he already whiffs enough to serve as a gameday AC unit in most enclosed stadiums. If you thought Kendall struggled when he switched leagues just watch what happens if Dunn comes over to the AL. Bring some Dramamine cause it'll make you nauseas.
Gomes is an interesting idea, and maybe if we're lucky we could get them to throw in (my personal favorite D-Ray) Gathright. Tampa probably wants pitching in return, I'm guessing Windsor or maybe Saarloos.
by grover on Jul 13, 2005 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunn and Gomes...
I'd love to get Gomes. He's young, powerful, and on TB. They'd give him to us for pitching, which we have to spare. Jairo is overvalued by the league. He'd go a long way towards making a trade happen. Especially with TB. Maybe him and Kennedy (I dont see him sticking around). Jairo and a starter should pry Gomes away. We could probably get something else from them too (although I dont know TB's organization well enough to speculate).
by ZeroIndulgence on Jul 13, 2005 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cincy's Front Office is weak...
by grover on Jul 13, 2005 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunn
by ogallalabob on Jul 14, 2005 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forgot something
by grover on Jul 13, 2005 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's funny...
by lexdevil on Jul 13, 2005 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Colorado CF
Anyways, Byrnes will definitely be a fan favorite in Colorado.
As for the 2005 A's team: I just don't see how this trade makes our team better. Kielty should be a right-handed batter only, and this will only take good at-bats away from Kielty.
I hope BB is not done, because I fear that Payton still thinks he's an everyday player (cancer).
by Colorado Fan on Jul 13, 2005 10:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Joe Kennedy
This move only makes sense (to me) if Beane wants to shop Zito in the offseason. Kennedy gives the A's a legitamite stop-gap until the next generation arrives.
by grover on Jul 13, 2005 10:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Grover
I just don't see the A's spending $40-Million on Chavez, Kendall, Kotsay, and Zito. That's 2/3rd's of our exptected payroll in 2006. Signing Kotsay told me (and baseball GM's) that Zito is on the market.
I'm all for trading Zito. Billy Beane cannot justify paying a player who plays 35 games a year, 10-Million+ per season...especially after seeing what Mulder brought us this season. Beane is drooling to trade Zito for 3 more legitimate prospects.
by Colorado Fan on Jul 13, 2005 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Zito
Zito's durability sets him apart from Hudson and Mulder, and most starters in the major leagues.
That doesn't mean he won't be traded, although it won't happen this year. It does mean that I wouldn't be surprised if it does, assuming Zito meant it the other day when he said he wanted to sign an extension.
by bear88 on Jul 13, 2005 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see money being the issue
by grover on Jul 13, 2005 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's the mystery
He feels like more of a project - a young left-handed starter who has been successful on occasion and who might be again.
But to be honest, I don't get it. I don't know what he's even supposed to do on this team. There's no room for a starter right now. He has no experience out of the bullpen. He's no replacement for Zito next year unless he improves an awful lot.
The thing that makes the most sense is that there is some other team that wants Kennedy. We know another deal is forthcoming. I wouldn't be surprised if he is part of it. I wouldn't be surprised if Payton is dealt, either. We'll see.
by bear88 on Jul 13, 2005 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
by ZeroIndulgence on Jul 13, 2005 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
AAA
Witasick takes Glynn's place in the bullpen. Definitely an upgrade there.
AAA Rotation will soon be:
Juan Cruz
Joe Kennedy
Dan Meyer
Glynn (if he accepts demotion)
by Colorado Fan on Jul 13, 2005 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kennedy Had Lowest ERA In Rockies History
A young pitcher doesn't simply lose it overnight. Clearly, his mechanics and/or confidence took a hit this year. But if any pitching coach can help a talented young hurler rebound, it's Curt Young. Look what he's done with Blanton, Haren, Harden and Saarloos.
by reztips on Jul 13, 2005 10:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Kennedy
Other pitchers leaving Colorado to find success elsewhere:
Mike Hampton (ATL)
Darryl Kile (RIP)
John Thomson (ATL)
Kent Bottenfield (Does that count?)
Scott Elarton (CLE)
Todd Jones (Having a good year w/ FLA)
Anyways, I'm trying to be a little optimistic abou this trade. We're not really losing much.
by Colorado Fan on Jul 13, 2005 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm
by whiteshoes40 on Jul 13, 2005 10:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
two witasick data points
How unpredictable are relievers? Take the Baseball Prospectus Reliever Expected Runs chart which rates the performances, and the top 20 relievers in baseball, in order, are Cliff Politte, Chris Hammond, Jesse Crain, Chad Cordero, Huston Street, Roberto Hernandez, Al Reyes, Pete Walker, Todd Jones, B.J. Ryan, Danys Baez, John Grabow, Matt Miller, Scott Eyre, Hector Carrasco, Mike Timlin, Rudy Seanez, Rafael Betancourt, Jay Witasick and Lance Cormier.
From the same data combing of Baseball Prospectus numbers in this comment, I note that Witasick is ranked 51st out of 223 relief pitchers as of today.
I don't know why, but like Blez, I feel better about these trades due to Witasick.
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 11:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If Witasick makes you feel better...
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harikkala... Glynn... Witasick...
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 13, 2005 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmmmmm... I dunno...
I do remember a really good AB that Payton had as a Met in the WS vs. the Yanks. There was no way he was going to get an out (I'm blanking on who the pitcher was).
Yeah yeah his stats are fine this year (a last place team is not exactly high-pressure), but from what I've seen of him I think Witasick is one of those guys that at some point in the year in a crucial situation we are going to be saying "I can't #^@&*$^ believe Macha left #$@$^& WITASICK out there." Get out the 'Fear Witasick' signs...
I'm crossing my fingers that this is just beane's "phase 1" trade.
by miguel on Jul 13, 2005 11:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
2 Relievers
"The two pitchers we got are exactly what we were looking for in terms of bolstering our 'pen," Forst said.
by Colorado Fan on Jul 13, 2005 11:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Dream A Little Dream
And Kennedy - he's a 5th starter; LHP yes, but 5th starter no less... we have 5th starters in Saarloos and Yabu - heck, wasn't one of Duke's strong points supposed to be the fact that he could start too?
Put me in the camp that hopes BB moves more players for a power hitter - can I dream a little dream and ask for Gary Sheffield along with whirled peas?
by tmail on Jul 13, 2005 11:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
reading the tea leaves
I didn't see any quotes about Payton yet beyond ""I think there are enough at-bats to go around," which is hardly a ringing endorsement. I am holding out hope he is part of a bigger crazier trade.
by Apricot on Jul 13, 2005 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah.. good reading
by panchopunch on Jul 14, 2005 12:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given that the Yanks are no longer dealing with...
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 14, 2005 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Payton
by ogallalabob on Jul 14, 2005 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Swisher can play first base more
by jeepers on Jul 14, 2005 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Post-mortem
I like what Payton gives us. I've always liked him as a player and despite what some are saying here, his righty/lefty splits are actually pretty good over the last few years. If anything, he's hit righties better and with more power. As for Byrnes, I'm not sentimentalist about him, though it does seem strange to actually see him go.
I know the plan is to eventually put Kennedy back in the rotation, I've had glimpses of him being a DOMINANT lefty relief specialist. He's a big guy, a power pitcher, and perhaps he'll be better suited to a relief role, when he can let it all out for an inning or two. I think we can throw out all of his stats from the Rocks (good and bad) and prior to that, he was an average pitcher ... as a 21 year old. He's entering his prime and could be special if used the right way. I don't see him being a starter again, but who knows?
Overall, these trades are no f-in A trades by any means, but in terms of overall pieces acquired, I think we've done okay. We traded essentially one platooning outfielder and a pitcher who hasn't done anything (literally) for us this year for a package of good players. I like it ... for now ...
by Crosbino on Jul 14, 2005 12:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Zito isn't going anywhere...
As for Burn Baby Byrnes, he'll sorely be missed in Oakland. Team chemistry has always been paramount in the A's clubhouse. Byrnes was definitely a guy that kept things loose on the team. Plus, he was a spark plug. As the sports cliche goes, hustle is contagious. I thought last year's squad really missed the spark that Miggy brought to the ballpark every day. I know Byrnes didn't have that much of an impact, but he was a guy that energized the team. I hope Payton doesn't damper the mood or spirit of a team with a whole lot of momentum.
I'll personally miss Byrnes. He represented the everyman; he was a guy that went after it hard every day. Sure he may have frustrated us from time to time with his pop-ups, but he played his heart out and may have been guilty sometimes of trying too hard. But how can you get mad at a guy who gives it his all? I'll always respect a player that consistently rewards fans that pay their hard-earned money with all-out effort game in and game out. Byrnes was that type of player and he should always be applauded and remembered in Oakland.
by willem20 on Jul 14, 2005 12:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I will hold judgment as I always do with trades...
by OaktownPower on Jul 14, 2005 12:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
good luck Byrnes...
I'm not upset about Billy dealing him, but a few things come to mind.
First, I'm wondering if Billy will keep Payton. As Blez pointed out, he seems to be a problem in the clubhouse and assuming he does not get regular playing time (ala Byrnes) this could pose a problem since he was already complaining about playing time in Boston.
Second, as others have pointed out, Byrnes brings a lot of enthusiasm and energy to the field, that I think Payton lacks. There's no denying that some of those spectacular catches and timely homeruns gave the team a boost of energy (just look at some of their faces in photos/clips)....that's the kind of stuff that can't be quantified by statistics, and will be missed greatly.
Third, what's up with Witasick? My roommate (a giants fan) just laughed a bit at that and said, "we had him once....good luck with that". Now, I know that the Giants aren't exactly the standard by which to build a bullpen, but if my memory serves me right he didn't exactly kill while in SF...
However, on the flip side, Byrnes was a huge defensive liability. It always sucks when a homegrown ballplayer gets traded away, but I honestly think Colorado will be a good fit for him. And I'm actually pretty excited about Kennedy, despite his troubles this year. One thing I noticed - Kennedy is from CA, so hopefully he'll fit right in.
by high street on Jul 14, 2005 12:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
He's not had the best postseason experiences...
Kind of like Glynn, except a little more dramatic.
Though he's also capable of doing decently...
by Trocmagic on Jul 14, 2005 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess I'll give my take
Payton can be a solid reserve, but he didn't like that role in Boston. So why on earth would he embrace that role in Oakland. I sense a bad attitude coming our way....something the A's tend to avoid.
I will miss Byrnes. I see we brougt up the homeplate play....but the Gibson HR will forever hurt me so so so much more!!!! Heck even the Je Gi**bi play hurts more than that. Byrnes gave his all for the A's. I loved his hustle and attutude. He was given a much smaller role this year after a great season last year. He handled it very well.....better than I think Payton will.
Perhaps Billy isn't done yet, I don't believe he is. In Billy we trust, so I'm sticking to that!
by Unuscione on Jul 14, 2005 12:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
what's up with Chron Payton pictures?
ps. no socks.
by Apricot on Jul 14, 2005 1:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Goodbye to a pair of good guys
Bradford... man. That guy is my favorite pitcher to watch in baseball. Period. It kills me that he's going to the enemy, he doesn't deserve to and up in Boston, those fans eat relief pitchers alive. He's too nice, too good of a person to end up there. I hope he kicks the hell out of every damn player in the AL East. He's been such a huge part of our bullpen, I've been waiting for him to come back, it's gonna be strange for that not to happen anymore. He's one of the Moneyballers, and he's just been huge for us with those DP-inducing pitches. I hope Chadford succeeds and then gets the hell outta Boston when he can, to rule the relief world elsewhere.
And Byrnes. Man. Two kicks in the teeth is apparently what Beane is going for. He's gonna rock the hell outta Colorado. I think I'll go to SBC sometime when they're playing, sit in the LF bleachers and listen to the folks heckle the hell outta him for old time's sake, since that was always the funniest part of the A's/Giants series. It always killed me a little to see people bash Byrnes, since for all the mistakes he made, the guy genuinely wanted to be here, he genuinely played hard, and he made games fun as a fan. He threw his body out there, he got dirty by the end of the first, and he ran out walks like nobody's business. I respect that. I still remember when he was in that horrible slump after the cycle -- the papers reported how he did what Macha told him to do to get another chance to play, all the extra work he put in to earn the chance. I respect that. I respect a guy who spends his first days on the field in the DR practicing running into the fence just to see if he can do it in a game. Eric Byrnes is a guy I have always and will always have infinite respect for, he plays hard and is a good person and a good Athletic. I hope he tears it up in Colorado. His time has been limited forever, but I just... I wish it wasn't now.
I'm used to having only ONE absolutely brain-killing trade during a season+offseason, getting rid of Hudson, Mulder, Byrnes, and Bradford is just a lot to take. I know we're supposed to root for the name on the front, but that's just not all of who I am. I root for the name on the front, but I love the name on the back -- baseball's been the one thing to keep me afloat at times. 2003 was a rough, rough year for me, and Bradford and Byrnes were two huge pieces of the only thing that kept me sane for a long period. I can honestly say the A's have saved me in so many ways, and it always hurts to watch two boys that were a part of that go.
Especially for goddamn Payton and goddamn Kennedy. I know I'm always wrong about Billy's deals, but I really can't see the worth in either of those guys. Payton's gonna be a clubhouse cancer, Redman-style, we all know this. He'd better get flipped. You'll never, EVER see him doing a Chippendale's dance on the team. I'm tired of guys like Redman and Rhodes and Guillen coming in and bitching, let's just stop this trend.
Witasick is the only value we are getting.
by Kyli on Jul 14, 2005 2:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Right on, Kyli!!!
Oh well... Harden for Cy Young in 2005!
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 14, 2005 2:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
I know Billy always proves me wrong, but it doesn't make it any easier. And this... god, this looks more like the Redman fiasco than the Mulder deal.
by Kyli on Jul 14, 2005 2:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
fiasco?
adam kennedy will be a good arm to have out of the bullpen in my opinion. considering all the moaning about rincon and the complaining about street/duke being overused, getting witasick and kennedy as arms out of the bullpen is crucial.
relievers, especially good ones, do not grow on trees and are hard to come by. to get 2 for eric byrnes essentially is a very good deal by billy. of course, all trades can only be evaluated on how they turn out, but still. i'll miss byrnes (no matter how much i bashed him) but these trades could really make life better for the a's.
by nycfan on Jul 14, 2005 5:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
When you factor in Defense, the ability to hit RHP I just can not see how Payton is not an improvement over Brynes. Yes there are reports that he was a cancer in Boston but my guess is that you give him regular AB's (which he will get) those problems go away. Let's face it Byrnes and Kielty need a platoon partner for the tough RHP's, having both of them sharing time in Left field is not a great use of your resources.
Kennedy (I believe his first name is Joe) At one time was a top flight pitching prospect and had a good year last year for the Rockies. So he has been getting banged around this year in the thin air. I think it is a great gamble, I am sure the A's will see if they can straighten him out if they can he would be a great semi low priced option for your 3-4th starter. Also a great insurance policey in case an injury or 2 occures in the second half. Also a LHP who can go more then 1 inning out of the pen will be a great addition.
Witasik also a great addition to the pen, I think Billy has decided to see how this second half plays out for the first 30 games or so if the A's can get back in the race I think he will look to acquire another bat, if not I think he flips Witasik to a contender and recieves something more valueable (for 2006) then Brynes.
by ogallalabob on Jul 14, 2005 7:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
note: I didnt' say it was a fiasco
I doubt this is a fiasco, but I'm not exactly seeing Payton as a great impact player. I could be wrong, but the Oakland Coliseum is just a hell of a lot harder to succeed in than Colorado.
Kennedy has more hope, but his numbers aren't great, and look more in the line of someone like Glynn or Harikkala the Horrible. I'd rather see Flores get more chances than Kennedy.
Witasick does definitely look like he could be a help out of the bullpen.
Relievers do not grow on trees. So we're gonna get JAY PAYTON before at least letting Bradford throw a pitch for Oakland?
by Kyli on Jul 14, 2005 7:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
bradford had BACK surgery
by nycfan on Jul 14, 2005 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, no player is invaluable.
Having Kennedy and Witasick means that Glynn's down (thankfully), but probably also Flores -- and if they send down Flores, I'll be pissed. He hasn't gotten too much of a chance, and having another decent lefty in the 'pen who we could have for several years is valuable, while Witasick is the player of value, isn't he an FA at the end of the season?
Kennedy seems like just as much of a question mark as Bradford, though the A's have an awesome track record with reclamation projects... I don't know. Kennedy just raises some questions for me.
And I just don't like Payton as a player. Period. His defense may be better than Byrnes, but I really don't believe he'll hit any better -- coming from Coors and Fenway to the Coliseum is not giving me any faith whatsoever, and I'd hate to see Kielty's playing time suffer to get Payton in.
This just bugs me. Witasick looks good, but I'd hate to lose Flores's chance in the bullpen, and watching dead weight on the roster.
by Kyli on Jul 14, 2005 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Beane is done
by OaklandSi on Jul 14, 2005 6:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
"Crashtest Dummy" and USA Today
I also liked the love Byrnes got on the ESPN Top 10 highlights show, with Gammons and Harold Reynold consistently calling Byrnes "Crashtest Dummy". I think secretly Gammons was trying to highlight Byrnes to get him traded. He knows the power he yields.
Finally, on the trade, unless Payton is a whiz defensively, he adds no value to the team. He's an old guy and does nothing but threaten to decrease time for Kielty, Swisher and DJ - all guys who are absolutely vital to our current success and future success. Why risk the threat to our chemistry??? Everything is going GREAT right now. In the process we lose a guy who was hands down the best setup man in the biz 2 years ago. I assume Beane feels he's lost it for good. Furthermore, if he's any good he bolsters the Sox.
We also lose Byrnes and a prospect and gain 2 relievers with spotty track records. I agree with Beane that we need bullpen help, so 2 new arms is good. But will we be able to keep either at the end of the season?
In '06, we could have nothing (but maybe draft picks) from Bradford, Byrnes and Quintanilla.
All of that said I am very confident in Beane's ability. Which means I can't wait to see what happens next, because it's going to be good.
P.S. why all the love for Dunn? I think it's REALLY overinflated. The guy K's like a champ and with all this hype he's going to be completely overpriced. Meanwhile, we're threatening starting spots for the guys on the A's that already DO have power or power potential: Swisher and DJ.
Why mess with that good thing?
by TonyArmas on Jul 14, 2005 7:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
kotsay and payton
by SeanR on Jul 14, 2005 8:18 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
They have never played together...
by Coach Cleats on Jul 14, 2005 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the greatest Athletic of all-time...
by Coach Cleats on Jul 14, 2005 8:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Witasick:
he gets beat like an old red tomato in the post season.
by saint on Jul 14, 2005 8:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I am so sad!
I'm really going to miss Byrnes. It was great to go to games and just wonder, "Is Byrnes going to play today? PLEASE?" And then when he does get announced, everyone in the stadium just goes crazy for him. He was such a great player to watch. He's what baseball is all about, you know? You can't always be perfect. But you can always have fun.
At least... I can take comfort in the fact that Byrnes is playing with the Rockies. I'm wearing my CR cap today to work as a tribute to Byrnes... Although they might make me take it off. I might go to the game tonight just to see Kennedy. GreenNGoldGirl, I know you'll be there so if I see you by the bullpen I'll say hi...
Today is a sad, sad day :(
by Melody on Jul 14, 2005 8:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
What else can be said?
From what I know, I really like Witasick. Kennedy's a question mark with me -- we'll see how that goes.
Payton: I still can't help but think Billy Beane's up to something else. Unless he knows something about Payton that we don't that prevents a "Milo" being put on him.
But if there's any time I put faith in Billy's moves, it's July. So we'll see.
by FormerHuntsvilleStar on Jul 14, 2005 8:45 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I have to say
by lurkerD on Jul 14, 2005 8:48 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Reality Check
As for offense - can you say pop up? He has some talent against lefties but unfortunately those starts are few and far between. I much prefer an outfield of Kielty, Kotsay and Swisher with Payton relieving one of them once in a while.
I do wish Eric luck in Colorado. I have many fond memories of him. And I send my condolences to all the Byrnes fans out there. Please don't let this one trade turn you away from being an A's fan. Remember how we all felt after the Hudson/Mulder trades? And look at us now! Things get better over time.
by thebigbz on Jul 14, 2005 8:51 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
At least I slept well last night...
by LongTimeFan on Jul 14, 2005 8:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Flip your perspective:
At least Oakland has the advantage on the "upside" in this trade. Witasick is going to setup for a halfway contending team and Kennedy is a wildcard. But does Dan O'Dowd really think that Byrnes will be part of the next relevant Rockies team? If so, wouldn't O'Dowd want to sign Byrnes for the next three years or so? I can understand why Beane did this deal, what with Payton taking Byrnes's spot and Byrnes due for a hefty raise anyway. At least with Payton we can cut bait and maybe get draft picks, maybe flip him later. But for the life of me, I can't figure out why this benefits the Rockies one bit!
by salb918 on Jul 14, 2005 9:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Col.
- to get Brynes to play CF for the rest of this year. Though he is a terrible defensive CF(which is the worst possible match for the Rockies) he is better then any other option they have (after dealing Wilson).
- Cut payroll and save money by moving Wilson and breaking even on the Brynes trade.
- Witasik is having a decent year but they are not playing for this year, Kennedy after a bad year has fallen out of their long term plans so both are expendable.
- They take a chance on Omar Quintalla even though he is having a bad year and does not take walks (which is not a crime in the rockies organization) Some scouts still have him rated as a decent prospect and he might be a good potential 2nd baseman down the road.
by ogallalabob on Jul 14, 2005 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
possible reasons
Personally, I suspect Byrnes will always be streaky and always be a fan favorite.
by Apricot on Jul 14, 2005 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
2005 stats
Jay Payton rf 144 .263 .312 .429 2.8
Eric Byrnes lf 215 .264 .335 .472 9.6
Player G GS IP H9 BB9 SO9 HR9 ERA RA RA+ VORP
Jay Witasick 32 0 35.7 6.81 3.03 10.09 0.50 2.52 2.78 1.98 11.6
Joe Kennedy 16 16 92.0 12.52 4.30 5.09 1.17 7.04 7.92 0.69 -22.0
maybe this is about:
- getting a power reliever who's having a great year to help Street in the second half.
- picking up Kennedy when his market value is (very) low.
- not losing too much with the Byrnes/Payton swap. As Blez mentioned, Payton's longer-term numbers are better than these.
- keeping options open for the future: Witasick and Payton leave after this year, and the A's get draft picks. And Kennedy's here (with a reasonable contract) until his value is higher
- avoiding the risk that Bradford's back may be a chronic thing...
by wilyc on Jul 14, 2005 9:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i think the trades make sense but
We'll know if Beane is serious about this year if he gives up Payton and a couple prospects for a power hitting outfielder in the next couple weeks.
by wilyc on Jul 14, 2005 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
which i think is a very realistic possibility
by ZeroIndulgence on Jul 14, 2005 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It won't be Payton
by oaktoon on Jul 14, 2005 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
by wilyc on Jul 14, 2005 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Based on Forst's comments...
Witasick will fill out of the bullpen, and hopefully continue pitching as well as he has thus far this season.
It looks like Payton is the player most likely to be flipped at the deadline. But he could keep him, as he is probably better against right-handers than Kielty. Still, he's a short-term patch... if that.
by bear88 on Jul 14, 2005 9:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Insult to injury...
Mychael!!!
by baseballgirl on Jul 14, 2005 9:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
bye bye byrnsie
by Mark Brinda on Jul 14, 2005 9:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm drinking the kool aid
by A'sfansince1970 on Jul 14, 2005 9:45 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll miss Byrnes ...
That being said, one thing leaps out at me. If we can all just acknowledge for a moment - rightly or wrongly - that Byrnes was never going to be more than a platoon/4th outfielder on this team, doesn't it make more sense to spend that portion of the budget on relief pitching - guys who will actually get the chance to contribute significantly to this club?
by devo on Jul 14, 2005 9:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bye Bye Big League Byrnes
by pachydermOAFC on Jul 14, 2005 9:58 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Lets See Here
- increased ability to hit right handers although i doubt he will play much against right handers
- increased defense in the outfield
- decreased clubhouse intangibles (even if Payton doesnt whine he wont/cant fit in as well as Byrnes)
- Bradford is more reliable in a limited role but may never be healthy
- Witasick has "better stuff" but has been wildly inconsistent
* Kennedy is a talented pitcher but will have a hard time defining his role in Oakland, hopefully Macha can find situations to pitch him more than he did Mr. Flores
All in all the trades help the team almost by default, because Glynn and Flores were not ever used in tight games and presumably at least Witasick will.. so you have helped the bullpen and slightly upgraded your outfield
However, I feel the team would have been better by just activating Bradford to help the pen, pitching Flores more and keeping Byrnes... its like someone else said "alot of tinkering for a minimal gain"
in my mind the key to all the deals tho is Joe Kennedy, so alltho I dont think the A's got much better with these deals this year.. I think having Kennedy in the rotation in the future will justify all this midseason tinkering
by Duby on Jul 14, 2005 10:03 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
So, I've had time to sleep on this....
Like I said yesterday, he is on a short leash...
As for these trades, I'm an A's fan first, so I can do nothing more than trust Billy on this. Obviously, my gut/emotional reaction is not positive.
I hope everyone checks out Byrnes comments on the A's site today.....he gave the love back as much as he got in return....
Now, I will go back to creating my Byrnes shrine.
by Masaryk on Jul 14, 2005 10:12 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The enduring Byrnes memory for me......
The more guys they get rid of from the four straight years of first round collapse's the better.
I like this new look team quite a bit and my sense is that these guys won't choke when they get to the big games.
I'll never forget the frustration of watching that team lose game 5 FOUR STRAIGHT YEARS :o(
As much as I liked and miss Tejada, he was the epitome of the choking A's those years, with Chavez right behind him.
FWIW, I don't miss Hudson or Mulder at all. I like the future with this current pitching staff.
by eastbayrules on Jul 14, 2005 11:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh get over it
by devo on Jul 14, 2005 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Post
by reztips on Jul 14, 2005 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They also remember Gerald Ford
Just because some people don't have enough mental capacity to realize that events that happen outside of highlight/blooper reels matter, or even enough capacity to remember more than one thing about each person, doesn't mean it ain't true.
by devo on Jul 14, 2005 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Monday Morning LF
by Masaryk on Jul 14, 2005 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haha...wilting under pressure....
by OaktownPower on Jul 14, 2005 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
saw his last game
He was one of my favorites, stats be damned, and I have always thought, one of those guys with "intangibles" (I know...everyone hates that). He'll rock in Denver, and I wish him all the best.
Right now, I'd rather have Byrnes on our team than Payton or Kennedy, so I'm hoping one or both of those guys get dealt for something really worthwhile.
It feels like you just traded nice car in for a bike.
Best of luck, Byrnes!
by catfish hunter on Jul 14, 2005 2:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Off topic but,
by gatling on Jul 14, 2005 2:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was going to post a similar question...
by franks a lot on Jul 14, 2005 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The new players probably won't be on the active
by theblackpearl on Jul 14, 2005 3:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Money, Money
by dougald1 on Jul 14, 2005 3:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Goodbye, Byrnsie
by kent1 on Jul 14, 2005 6:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Tweak
For Witasick=Bradford and Payton=Byrnes, in both cases the new guy has a slightly different set of pluses and minuses, but on the whole fills pretty much the same role with about the same total value to the team. None of the four was likely to be re-signed in 06, so that's pretty much just a this-season consideration. If I'm reading the money right, it comes out about even all around, too.
So the outfielder and reliever are a wash, the money is a wash, and the sum of the deal is that we traded Quintanilla for Kennedy. Q was going nowhere in our system. As a prospect he was starting to look like he'll be OK but not great. Meanwhile, we've got plenty of guys we'll use before him in the middle infield, both short-term and long-term.
Sure, Kennedy isn't going to be the savior of the team, but he's a guy who might be able to help out right now, either as a lefty reliever or maybe as a starter who lets us move Saarloos to the bullpen as our double-play guy. So if we can get him in exchange for a so-so prospect we have no use for, why not? Sounds like a good tweak to me.
by iglew on Jul 14, 2005 6:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bradford makes Red Sox debut
by Larry E on Jul 14, 2005 6:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Why tweak when things are going great
Furthermore, these tweaks hurt team chemistry. The past fight btw Kendall and the new pitcher doesn't help. Adding a whiner to a situation without an outfield spot doesn't help either.
No one's brought this up. How does bringing 2 pitchers from the NL effect things? Is there a transition period?
Payton makes $3.5MM per year. That's a lot.
Kennedy makes 2.2. In each of his last 3 outings OUTSIDE of Colorado, his ERA's around 9.00.
Witasick: it doesn't post his salary. His numbers look good this year both inside and outside of Colorado.
We gave up a platoon OF who everybody loved and the 2nd highest SLG on the team for a reliever to help preserve Street and Duch. That's what I see, all in all.
I trust Beane, but I hope hope hope he sees more in these guys than the stats indicate.
If Payton starts bitching, I'm REALLY going to miss Byrnes. He is "A's Brand of Baseball" afterall, and I really think you shouldn't under-estimate that. A's brand of baseball is part of the reason guys love it here. And it shows.
by TonyArmas on Jul 14, 2005 8:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
WitasicK makes 400K
by dougald1 on Jul 14, 2005 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















