Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NHL Trade Rumors: Do You Make A Move For Rick Nash?

Where are the A's? Handing Out First Quarter Grades

No one said that the A's were going to have an easy go of it in 2005.  We all know the history.  Two of Big Three traded, Jason Kendall added, extra bullpen help in the form of Kiko Calero and Juan Cruz, young starters thrown into the mix.

Through the first 40 games, the team is 16-24 and seven games back of first place Anaheim.  Not exactly a sprinting start to the year, but 2005 was supposed to be a bridge year.  A year to get our young pitching the experience they need to mature and bring our Athletics back to prominence.  If the A's could remain competitive in the rapidly deteriorating AL West, then it would be a bonus.

Let's take a look at the team, player by player and assign first quarter grades to the Athletics crew.  Today we'll talk about position players, tomorrow we'll talk about the pitching.  One note: Career averages are averages per 162 games throughout the player's career.

Infield:

Eric Chavez: The A's built this team to be Eric Chavez's team for years to come.  He received the big money from ownership, signing the richest contract ever signed by an A's player.  Billy Beane made a calculated move because of the seemingly limitless potential Chavez has teased A's fans and management with.  But the numbers haven't been pretty so far.  Especially for someone who is likely the only member of the team who could ever approach the .300 BA, .400 OBP, .500 SLG level in one season.  Chavez had a good first series, but has floundered ever since.  He's also been inconsistent at times early in the year defensively, which is uncharacteristic of our four-time gold glover.  He is the main reason for the A's offensive nosedive, more so than any other player on the team.  The good news is that his OPS over the last seven games is .926.  But that won't help his grade here.

Career Averages: Avg - .273, OBP - .350, OPS - .843

Current Stats: Avg - .213, OBP - .274, OPS - .594

Grade: F

Scott Hatteberg: Hatteberg has drawn the ire of many of us this early season, especially because there is a younger, cheaper option playing his position and excelling with the River Cats.  But the truth is to look at it rationally, Hatteberg can provide some quality hitting.  He still possesses a good eye and has a knack of getting a big hit whenever the A's seem to need it.  The problem that I have with Hatteberg is his defense has regressed this season inexplicably.  He's done everything from drop routine foul pops to moving his feet with the skill and grace of Andre the Giant.  He also often goes down into crouch mode to block bad throws rather than try and dig them out like most MLB first basemen would.  I think at some point, the defensive lapses at first must draw the ire of the front office.  It also has impacted his overall grade because his offensive numbers aren't that bad.

Career Averages: Avg - .271, OBP - .359, OPS - .769

Current Stats: Avg - .288, OBP - .349, OPS - .722

Grade: C-

Mark Ellis: Ellis should be admired for his perseverance and hard work.  Most around the A's would tell you there's no one harder working or more well-liked than Ellis.  He's been the good soldier so far this year by sharing position time with Marco Scutaro and Keith Ginter.  For a little while, Ellis, Mark Kotsay and Scutaro were the only ones hitting on this team.  And that's remarkable when you consider that Ellis has been out for a season.  He also seems to have retained that great range and nice defensive footwork.  But the truth is that Ellis's offensive stats have about reverted to what you'd expect them to be.  Ellis isn't usually on the field for his offense.  Whatever you do get from him offensively is a bonus and he's been above his career norms so far.

Career Averages: Avg - .260, OBP - .332, OPS - .711

Current Stats: Avg. - .286, OBP - .346, OPS - .713

Grade: B+

Marco Scutaro: Marco has become an A's fan favorite.  And who could blame us?  The guy has been given no shot to make the team two years in a row and not only does he make the team both seasons, but he becomes a valuable contributor.  The A's wouldn't have had 16 wins already without the significant contributions of our little sparkplug.  Not only that, he seems to relish the chance to "play the hero" as he so eloquently put it earlier this season.  He's one player on the A's that seems to be at his best whenever the game is on the line.  He's slumped a bit offensively, but he's still been excellent defensively.  If not for Bobby Crosby's injury, Scutaro might've been in Sacramento or with another organization.  It's a shame because you've got to love his play, his attitude and his work ethic.  Soon, Marco may be gone with Crosby coming close to returning.

Career Averages: Avg - .257, OBP - .303, OPS - .681

Current Stats: Avg. - .234, OBP - .326, OPS - .673

Grade: C+

Keith "Hazy Shade of" Ginter: Ginter was brought over from Milwaukee to add right-handed pop to the A's lineup.  He hasn't provided it yet.  But Macha is proving that he hasn't given up on Ginter just yet, working him into the lineup regularly recently in hopes of awakening the sputtering offense.  Ginter hasn't really come through, but he's proven that he just might be turning the corner a little with the extra playing time.  The other thing that surprises me about Ginter, especially after seeing him up close and personal during spring training is the fact that his defense has improved ten-fold.  He was botching routine plays during spring training at second and now I feel comfortable with him out there.  During the recent Boston series, he made several sparkling plays to take away hits from David Ortiz.  Of course, Ginter credits Ron Washington with his improvement.

Career Averages: Avg - .250, OBP - .337, OPS - .775

Current Stats: Avg - .173, OBP - .261, OPS - .581

Grade: D-

Erubiel Durazo: OK, so Durazo isn't exactly an infielder.  But if they ever were to play him in the field, it technically would be first base.  Ruby can only be judged on his hitting and it isn't where it should be yet, much like most of the A's heart-of-the-order attack, as in it induces heart attacks while A's fans scream at the TV waiting for them to score.  Yet, Ruby isn't that far off what you'd expect from him power wise.  The A's need him to start protecting Chavez better if he's going to hit in the four-hole, especially if Chavy is really starting to break out of his slump.  Chavy is going to start to see more pitch-arounds and Durazo is going to be the key to making the offense go.  If he struggles, the A's are in deep trouble because the other player that's been used in the number four spot in the order is Hatteberg and I imagine Billy Beane does NOT want Hatteberg there for the majority of 2005.  Regardless, Durazo should be a part bigger of this middle of the order and he should be striking fear into opponent's hearts.  He isn't.

Career Averages: Avg. - .281, OBP - .381, OPS - .869

Current Stats: Avg. - .243, OBP - .313, OPS - .691

Grade: D

Jason Kendall: I think Jason Kendall would be the first to admit that the transition to the American League has not been an easy one for Billy Beane's new prized gem.  He's struggled offensively, his defensive work has been poor (although many of those stolen bases are on the A's young pitchers) and he just hasn't seemed comfortable in his new surroundings.  That would be OK if he makes a Kotsay-type of turnaround over the next three quarters of the season, but if he doesn't, the A's are taking a $10 million hit for that non-production.  That really hurts when it's a sixth of your total budget.  Look for Kendall to rebound over the coming weeks as he makes the transition, but it won't help his grade this early part of the season.  The one thing that I think has been a strength, and some would argue with me on this one (especially those calling for a Dotel slider against Boston in Boston - but I think we're finding out that Dotel wasn't OK to throw that pitch) is his handling of the youngsters.  From what I've seen, he's an excellent game caller.

Career Averages: Avg. - .304, OBP - .385, OPS - .798

Current Stats: Avg. - .234, OBP - .314, OPS - .593

Grade: D-

Adam "Maytag" Melhuse: Wait, the A's have a back-up catcher?  You can understand why Melhuse made some noise about wanting to be traded when the A's got Kendall.  He knew what he was in for.  A lot of time riding the pine with an occasional pinch-hit appearance.  You can't really judge Melhuse though because he hasn't gotten enough playing time.  He might not get a grade until the end of the season.

Career Averages: Avg. - .240, OBP - .297, OPS - .719

Current Stats: Avg. - .105, OBP - .105, OPS - .263

Grade: Inc.

Outfield

Mark Kotsay: Does anyone remember anyone else playing center field for Oakland?  I know I don't want to.  Kotsay is another fan favorite and for good reason.  The man plays center field like a man possessed, yet he's always in complete control.  If someone were to build the perfect center fielder, Kotsay would be the standard by which all others would be judged.  Not only that, but he swings a consistent stick.  You know that even if he makes an out, he's still going to do something positive like work the pitch count.  Here's hoping the A's lock this guy up until he retires.  He's a joy to watch and never lets you down even if he has slumped a bit of late.

Career Averages: Avg. - .286, OBP - .343, OPS - .766

Current Stats: Avg. - .285, OBP - .344, OPS - .728

Grade: B+

Bobby Kielty: If any player has become the poster child for judging a trade too early, Ronnie Mac is it.  Yes, it's still only a quarter of the season and Kielty is injured again (and who knows if he'll come back hitting the way he was), but the red-headed beast has been raking so far this year.  His magically disappearing left-handed stroke has returned and on the recent road trip, he seemed to be the only one hitting the ball.  Defensively, he's had some nice catches, but he's also muffed some routine plays a much of the outfield has at one point or another.  I'm looking forward to his continued improvement, and I believe it could be a big key for the remainder of the year.  If Kielty comes back hitting like he did and the heart of the order wakes up, then the A's offense won't be a laughing stock for long.

Career Averages: Avg. - .256, OBP - .362, OPS - .780

Current Stats: Avg. - .322, OBP - .419, OPS - .875

Grade: A-

Nick Swisher: Moneyball has already arrived in Oaktown.  Only for some reason, Swisher doesn't seem to be working the count like he did during his minor league career.  You've got to imagine the kid wants to make an impression, which might have something to do with his aggressiveness at the plate.  But he's shown signs of being a power threat, hitting two bombs in one game early in the year.  He's also worked hard to become a better outfielder and has made some nice catches.  But like every other outfielder for the A's (except Kotsay), he's had his share of botched plays.  I'm eager to see how Swisher comes back and if this time of sitting and watching has helped him.

Career Averages: Avg. - .232, OBP - .310, OPS - .701

Current Stats: Avg. - .218, OBP - .274, OPS - .646

Grade: C-

Eric Byrnes: Oh, Captain America.  You're a fan favorite.  We love your hustle.  You are Mr. Excitement, and that's sometimes good and sometimes bad.  But it is undeniable that when you get rolling with the bat, you can singlehandedly carry a team.  You can make highlight-reel catches like the one flying through the air in the bullpen and the one in left field in Boston, but you can also make a little league play.  It seems to be feast or famine with you.  But the A's can count on you for two things...walloping left-handed pitching and waving at the slider away from right-handed pitching.  And contrary to some people's opinions here, I do like you Byrnsie, I just get the shakes every time someone hits a routine fly ball to you.  I also think that if you are dealt, which seems likely, that during your inevitable hot streaks for your new team, us A's fans will be wishing we held onto you.

Career Averages: Avg. - .270, OBP - .336, OPS - .794

Current Stats: Avg. - .263, OBP - .333, OPS - .763

Grade: C-

Charles Thomas: Charles Thomas has been a bust thus far and seems to be the least promising acquisition from all of Beane's offseason trades.  At least Kendall shows signs on occasion of being his former self.  And Meyer was hurt, so he deserves some slack.  Juan Cruz has shown some recent signs of coming out of his funk.  The player who hasn't shown any flashes of promise so far is Thomas.  Since he's still a young guy (he's only 26), I'd like to see him get some more time in the minors to try and regain his stroke.  The A's need to find out if they have the player who had an .813 OPS for the Braves last year or something else.  And they aren't going to be able to figure it out with him sitting on the bench.

Career Averages: Avg. - .262, OBP - .354, OPS - .750

Current Stats: Avg. - .103, OBP - .271, OPS - .374

Grade: F

Matt Watson: Watson finally got the call up and he gets a solid incomplete thus far.  He's been solid in very limited action, but with the A's recent facing a bunch of lefties, Watson has been relegated to bench duty.  It's too bad because he was so hot when the A's called him up.

Career Averages: Avg - .195, OBP - .233, OPS - .501

Current Stats: Avg. - .222, OBP - .263, OPS - .541

Grade: Inc.

When the season started, people expressed mild concern over the A's lack of power on offense, but many believed that it was a good OBP offense.  But the truth is that the offense has been just as bad as last year's bullpen.  The problem can basically be pointed at three main culprits.  Chavez, Kendall and Durazo.  That's a good percentage of the A's entire budget right now and it's not producing.  That has hurt, but injuries have also hurt.  Losing Bobby Crosby's power hurts.  For a while, Scutaro was a good bandage, but now the band-aid has fallen off.  Luckily, the A's will be getting Crosby back shortly.

The power shortage has shown to be a bigger detriment than many thought it would be.  It remains to be seen if Crosby and Swisher coming back with help spark the team's slugging.

What grades would you give the players? Where do we differ?

Next up: The pitching.

Comment 95 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wow...well said...
I was expecting to disagree with soe of the grades....I dont see any that I see as way off.  Well done and very unbiased Blez.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on May 23, 2005 11:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Chavez Defense
No I am not defending him but upset with Blez for taking it easy on his defensive skills.

"inconsistent at times early in the year defensively"

He has been down rigth horrible.

Range Factor- 2.55 5th from bottom
Fielding Percentage- 937 5th from the bottom.
Zone rating- 770 15th in baseball.

by novaoakland on May 23, 2005 11:59 AM PDT reply actions  

wow blez
you're tougher than me.

Kielty-- I give him an A, but I suppose given the injury a A minus is more fair;

Watson-- I gave him a B minus;

Byrnes-- a C+-- at least he's hitting lefties well;

Ellis-- a B minus; the hitting still leaves a little to be desired;

Kotsay-- the other place where I'm tougher. His 1st inning numbers are so weak and the power so nonexistent that I have him as a C+ despite his other strengths. And he really doesn't work the pitcher that much;

Scoot-- I agree

Ginter-- I gave him a D+, but after last night I might be more inclined to agree with you;

Hatty and Swisher-- in agreement;

Durazo-- I have him as a D+-- no real reason;

I gave Two Buck Chuck a D+ on the theory that his plate appearances have been few and far between. I rated Melhuse the same because few and far between is part of the territory, even if exaggerated this year with the "ironman with the paper bat" playing nearly all the time;

Kendall I agree;

and Chavy I left a little short of a total failure at D, given the slight uptick lately.

But overall your tough curve is legit, as this team has really disappointed on offense.

oaktoon

by oaktoon on May 23, 2005 12:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Bumblin Byrnsey
ByrnesBrain doesn't merit a C-. His fielding hasn't even been average, costing the A's at least two-three games already. And his hitting hasn't been up to par. In the Gnat's series, he faced three southpaw starters and, I believe, had but two measly hits.

Come on, BB, rid the OF of the rotting stench of Byrnes Butcher Shop...

by reztips on May 23, 2005 12:08 PM PDT reply actions  

not trying to argue
but I thought the runs that Byrnes allowed came after we were already down? I agree that he should have had more hits in the bay series, but he actually did make a couple of nice plays on D (I was pleasantly surprised).
Hey Billy, let's sign Rickey!

by AllThingsOakland on May 23, 2005 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Byrnes bashers
are seldome objective.  Ther person you responded to is NEVER objective.
The Gadfly

by Just Me on May 23, 2005 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

You neglected to mention what Thomas does well
Getting hit by pitches: 4 times already this year, only 39 ab.
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on May 23, 2005 12:15 PM PDT reply actions  

great job
very good and commendably unbiased analysis.

I would only differ in a few places:

Thomas: as bad as he's looked he has hardly played. I'd give him an Inc. and rush him to Sacramento.

Scutaro: has pretty much played to expectations. I would give him a B or B-

I wouldn't give Kendall a lower grade than Ginter. while more was expected of Kendall, he has also played far more than Ginter -- and is being paid much more. If Kendall gets a D- (that's an F when you're looking for whatever reason to give a better grade)then Ginter deserves C- (charitably) or D+ (tougher).

by OaklandSi on May 23, 2005 12:17 PM PDT reply actions  

oops - meant to write that I
wouldn't give Kendall and Ginter the same grade.

by OaklandSi on May 23, 2005 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is F the lowest grade you can get?
Can we drop it down to "R" or "S" for Chavez, Thomas and Ginter?

by AlwaysSweatin on May 23, 2005 12:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Could quibble
with a half grade here or there, but very fair grades overall.  The main difference I have is in recognizing that Kotsay has actually been quite a bust in the past month.  Granted, his defense never falters, but in the past 30 days, his OPS is lower than Kendall's or Durazo's.  So a great start is masking his subsequent decline.  One intended strength of this team - top of the order OBP - has been non-existant, really making it difficult for Chavez and Durazo to bring anyone home.

by boilerdan on May 23, 2005 12:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Well said DS....
I love Kotsay too..but man he really has been bad the last month or so.
Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on May 23, 2005 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Funny.
A's lead MLB with Phantom LOBs?
Let the players do the batting lineups!

by A s Eh on May 23, 2005 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

2 F's?
Ouch.  You're a tough grader, Blez.  How about a D-- or something?  
As for Ginter's defense, you probably did his grades BEFORE last night's game.  He's STILL botching routine plays.  Yuck.  I don't wanna think about that game.

I can't wait to see the pitcher's grades.  Anything less than an "A" for Huston and I'll be disappointed.  :-)  And Yabu too.

When the world says, "Give up," Hope whispers, "Try it one more time." ~Author Unknown. LET's GO OAKLAND!!!

by AsGirl on May 23, 2005 12:44 PM PDT reply actions  

tough teacher
but you are right on. I agree with all of those grades except one, Kielty. I think he should be in the B range.

Did Chavy's grade reflect his performance soley as a player, or as our highest paid player ever?

Hey Billy, let's sign Rickey!

by AllThingsOakland on May 23, 2005 12:47 PM PDT reply actions  

Both...I take everything into account
their defense, expectations, career averages versus reality.  Plus, for Chavy, his first quarter was almost singlehandedly the reason our team has struggled so badly.  If he starts hitting, then suddenly the pressure falls on the others.  And he's shown signs of coming out of it, but I need to judge him based on his first quarter alone, not week stretches.

by Tyler Bleszinski on May 23, 2005 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

A D- for Ginter?
Wow, you're generous.

by MemphisA on May 23, 2005 1:02 PM PDT reply actions  

I took into account
the fact that he just started playing regularly.

by Tyler Bleszinski on May 23, 2005 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's fine...
I guess I'm just a little angry at him for getting me in trouble with my wife for abusing the TV set last night.

by MemphisA on May 23, 2005 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

But that's not Ginter's fault,
your getting in trouble with your wife. Clearly, that's Billy's fault.
"Look what we did!"

by ArakSOT on May 24, 2005 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Our GPA
based on Blez's grades, which I generally agree with, and A=4, A-=3.7, B+=3.3, B=3, B-=2.7, C+=2.3, C=2, C-=1.7, D+=1.3, D=1, D-=0.7, F=0:

1.7 or a C- average.

"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on May 23, 2005 1:02 PM PDT reply actions  

1.7 GPA?
No graduation with that average!!

Come on A's! Let's go!!!

by gigglingone on May 23, 2005 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

much like me in college....
the A's are on academic probation

But we haven't flunked! There is hope!

GO OAKLAND!!!

by LoveThemAs on May 23, 2005 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thomas deserves
an F right now, but it is hard for me to believe he won't pick it up sometime this season. After seeing him play with Atlanta I was impressed with his play. He was hitting the ball,driving in runs,and making great catches in the outfield. I know he hasn't shown anything like this yet in Oakland,but I dont think he could've just lost his ability to play the game. I think a move to AAA would be the best move for Thomas but what happens when he starts to play well? Someone will have to moved around if he will get any playing time. I would consider Thomas a better option than Byrnes if he can pick it up. Thomas led National League rookies in on-base percentage (.368), tied for third in triples (4) and was fifth in batting he also topped NL rookies with seven outfield assists. This is after only 83 games in his rookie season that is why Beane traded for him.
 

by SanTropez on May 23, 2005 1:11 PM PDT reply actions  

Those stats are old, "Gorman" Thomas,
25-30 years ago.
Let the players do the batting lineups!

by A s Eh on May 23, 2005 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Too tough on some, too charitable with others...
Chavez     D-  (not an F only because he's showing signs of coming around, of late)

Hatteberg  B-  (he's exceeded my expectations at the plate and I've never thought of him as a good defensive 1st baseman)

Ellis      B+  (agree with everything you said)

Scutaro    B   (where would this team be without Scoot right now?  Yes, slumping recently, but without him we'd have been forced to play Ginter everyday and that would have been a disaster)

Ginter     D-  (I'd grade him higher if it were based on my expectations only because he's giving us exactly what I expected)

Durazo     D   (agree with everything you said)

Melhuse    I   (for the same reason you stated; I'd like to see him in the lineup more since he does have some power)

Kotsay     B  (perhaps, the best defensive center fielder in MLB;  saying he's slumped a bit lately at the plate is very charitable, as his May has almost mirrored Byrnes' April, except that Byrnes' April OPS is actually slightly higher than Kotsay's May OPS)

Kielty     A   (very little to quibble with here... he's the comeback player of the year, so far.)

Byrnes     B   (in terms of living up to expectations, Byrnes has delivered or exceeded what was expected.  A slow, cold start, but, unlike other hitters on the team, heating up dramatically and, along with Kielty, the only one even approaching or exceeding their expected OPS.  Defensively, he has 2 errors in the outfield, with 3 assists and 1 DP.  Despite what your eyes tell you, he almost always makes the routine catches and often makes spectacular catches that no other outfielder on the A's would have a chance making.  Oh, and Kotsay's April/May splits versus Byrnsies' April/May splits:

                    APRIL                            MAY
            AVG OBP  SLG  OPS    AVG   OBP  SLG  OPS
Kotsay  .323 .376 .444  .820    .233  .291  .301  .592
Byrnes  .192 .263 .346  .609    .323  .354  .500  .854

Either Kotsay doesn't warrant his B+ or Byrnes deserves much higher than C-.

Thomas    F   (agree with everything you said.  He should be in Sacto)

Watson    I  (agree)

Ronnie Mac rules! Above .300... Props to the best hitting outfielder on the A's!

by FoolshGame22 on May 23, 2005 1:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Oh... I forgot
Kendall    F  (for what we're paying him, we're getting a failing performance in return)
Ronnie Mac rules! Above .300... Props to the best hitting outfielder on the A's!

by FoolshGame22 on May 23, 2005 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

1.95 GPA
Wow, you almost gave this team a passing average.  This team deserves an overall grade of D- or 0.7 GPA.

You need to re-evaluate those grades - Way too high, especially for Mr. 22.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on May 23, 2005 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Of course Byrnes gets a B from you
I'd give Byrnes a C+. It's funny how you still contend that his defense is good.

1. He doesn't "often" make spectacular catches. He makes them once in a blue moon. His defense is terrible there is no denying that.

Scutaro, a B? Maybe a C+ as well. I mean, he played well for three weeks. Now he's down to 234/326/347. He has mediocre range as a second baseman and shortstop and a mediocre arm from the SS position. I give him credit for having more BB's than K's (17-15) but now he is looking too tentative and too willing to take a walk. He's not making as much solid contact anymore. If Ginter was playing everday, not only would he have three times (not two times) the RBI's (and Ginter has hallf the at bats), but his average would be up as well. It wouldn't be a disaster, heck it might have been better. Surprisingly, Ginter has had solid defense, and anyone who says otherwise becomes of one 8th inning is a fool.

California here I come, right back where I started from, Californiaaaaa, Californiaaaaa, here I coooooome (June 24th). (OC, i was inspired)

by ohad on May 24, 2005 6:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

little dude...
I based my grades on objective stats...  I'm sorry that you don't agree with what's in black and white.  The facts are...  Kotsay's May is worse than Byrnes' April.  Byrnes' May is better than Kotsay's April.  Pure fact.  Can't argue it.  I posted it there for you in black and white.  That's why Byrnes' season OPS is better than Kotsay's.  Wear it.
Ronnie Mac rules! Above .300... Props to the best hitting outfielder on the A's!

by FoolshGame22 on May 25, 2005 1:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks for reminding me what you wrote
Kotsay's May is what, 15 points less than Byrnes April as far as OPS (only because of a few home runs). What about productive outs and situational hitting? What about getting the runner home from third with less than two outs? What about all the trillion pop-ups Byrnes loves to hit? I don't see how you can give them the same grade when we are counting things such as DEFENSE and Leadership and how he affects the other players on the team.
California here I come, right back where I started from, Californiaaaaa, Californiaaaaa, here I coooooome (June 24th). (OC, i was inspired)

by ohad on May 25, 2005 5:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Blez, I'm proud of you
I figured you to cut Chavez some slack .... good for you for being fair and giving him the grade he deserves.  Big, fat F.

The thing that makes it really tough to swallow, is giving an A student an F. (I'm a teacher part-time.) It's one thing to fail a kid who is just unable to do the work (which rarely happens in reality.)

But it breaks my heart to fail someone with great ability. Chavez is an Ivy-League talent with kindergarten results. Shame, shame, shame.

VacaAsFan

by Vacafan on May 23, 2005 1:30 PM PDT reply actions  

So I did mine last night at a Starbucks.
One thing first, take a quick look at the following stats (without checking) and how similar they are:

Player A: .285/.344/.384
Player B: .286/.346/.367
Player C: .288/.349/.373

These guys have been the same player with the bat...
I'll say who they are in the grades.

My grades:
Crosby Inc.
Watson Inc.
Melhuse C-

Swisher D+; shown real power potential and an ability to adjust...
Thomas F; have to hit better to deserve a roster spot, especially on this LHB rich team
Kielty A; since 0 for 16 start he's been .391/.482/.554
Byrnes C-; best AB of the season, best catch of the season, was really jerked around by management, hitting with some power (more than anyone but Kielty).  These are the reasons he doesn't get a D
Kotsay C; defense and leadership is great... his hitting is not nearly good enough.  He is Player A.

Hatteberg C+; is Player C, hitting better than Durazo, hitting okay for his role and salary. His numbers would look better if Swisher was able to    take some ABs against lefties, The A's aren't expecting Hatty to produce in those roles.  Defense has been bad.
Durazo D; The A's are built to need real offense from Durazo, if he is not producing, it really stinks up what we can do with the roster.  He's getting paid twice what Hatty is getting
Ellis B-; what did we expect?  He is hitting just like Kotsay and Hatteberg, he is Player B.  defense has been fine, not great.  
Scutaro C; filled in, had a few good hits and a few good walks.  Defense is mediocre.  Shouldn't be a starter in MLB
Ginter D; until Sunday night game, his defense has been solid enough.  Clearly has potential to hit better, he's playing for his career right now.

and

Chavez D; He has not complained, he has kept working, he has been able to play every day, he has made adjustments, he has hit better than the numbers show.  Even playing poor by his standards defense he allows Scutaro to cheat towards the middle.  For these reasons he doesn't get an F from me

Kendall C-; He has three roles: handling the pitching staff, handling the bat, and handling the running game.  All sounds out of the clubhouse say that Kendall is doing the first job well, we'll really know as the season goes on and we see what adjustments Blanton and Haren make to avoid their meltdowns.

his hitting has been horrible, but not as bad as the numbers show...
his throwing has been horrible, but he hasn't been helped by the Pitchers' lapses and inabilities in holding runners on.  

So now let me look at Blez grades and see how I compare...

by jakarta on May 23, 2005 1:46 PM PDT reply actions  

2 questions ...
what does, "he has not complained" mean?  What the heck does Chavez have to complain about???!!!

He should be apologizing every day for such a horrendous effort. (Mark off for not giving a portion of his salary back.)

"his hitting has been horrible, but not as bad as the numbers show."

Well, which is it? Is it "horrible," or not??

His hitting has been every bit as horrible as the numbers show, or else the numbers "wouldn't show it!!!!"

Dude, bad is bad. It amazes me how many passes people want to give this guy.

VacaAsFan

by Vacafan on May 23, 2005 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd give him a D- - - -
A slight uptick for recent performance.  Before this week: F.  I've been one of Chavez's biggest defenders against critics but I've never denied that his performance this year has been lousy.
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on May 23, 2005 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I dunno
I think that behind the scenes he has shown some real leadership and heart. He's even had the good sense to say stupid things in the papers to deflect criticism from his younger teammates.
The next time I slap a guy's ass, can we all just assume it's because I wish I was a baseball player?

by devo on May 23, 2005 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

ok devo
I'M NOT BITING ON THAT ONE!!!!! :-)
VacaAsFan

by Vacafan on May 23, 2005 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

shoot that's harsh
It amazes me how many passes people want to give this guy

I don't see how giving a guy a D is any kind of pass.  

Also, I won't give a D- or an F+, those are silly grades.  

And I really have issues with the guy should give back his salary kind of complaints.  There's a simple way to tie salary to performance, incentive laden deals.  Any GM and any player are free to sign this kind of contract if they want to.  But it  rarely happens because you can't keep most players without the guaranteed $$.  You really think that the Chavez contract is in the realm of  the Park, Driefort, Neagle, Hampton, Higginson, Mo Vaugn, Giambi, Jeter, Griffey, world of bad deals?

       

by jakarta on May 23, 2005 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I just had "issues"
with the "he doesn't complain," and "his hitting hasn't been as bad as the numbers show" comments.  

Almost like "I really hate to give him a D because he's such a nice guy, and well, he shows up on time, and um, he always has the right jersey on ....."

Man, the guy's EARNED an F all day -- give him the grade he deserves, that's all I'm saying.

He's failed. Miserably. F. No hesitation, no excuses. F.

VacaAsFan

by Vacafan on May 23, 2005 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

But that's as far as I'll go
What I take issue with is all the naysayers who surmise that because his first quarter of the season has been miserable, the rest of the season and heck, the rest of his career will be miserable.
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on May 23, 2005 7:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

My Grades
Kendall: C-
Hattie: C-
Ellis: B
Ginter: D+
Scutaro: C+
Chavez: F
Byrnes: B-
Kotsay: A
Kielty: B+
Thomas: D+
Swisher: C+
Durazo: D
Melhuse: INC
Watson: B

by RudiFan on May 23, 2005 1:47 PM PDT reply actions  

In Response to these last two
Kendall getting C minuses.

WTF??!!

  1. He's like 183rd out of 185 major leaguer regulars in OPS;
  2. He must be worst of the 40 or so catchers who play at least part time in throwing out runners. Sure the pitchers bear a lot of the blame, but have you seen his throws?
  3. his handling of the staff-- well we have three young pitchers with multiple meltdowns-- Haren, Blanton and Cruz-- and given up the most runs in the division.
And if that's all worth a C minus-- at 10 million a year-- then I'm the Easter Bunny. D minus is being generous and that's what I gave them.
oaktoon

by oaktoon on May 23, 2005 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh I Forgot....
The Great Oaktoon knows all. My mistake.

by RudiFan on May 24, 2005 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only comment
I'll make is a general one.  Very rarely does a 16-24 team have players with "A" grades.

Kendall: D-
Hatteberg: C-
Ellis: C
Ginter: D
Scutaro: C-
Chavez: F
Byrnes: C
Kotsay: C+
Kielty: B-
Thomas: F
Swisher: D
Durazo: D+
Melhuse: F
Watson: C

"If there is a fear of falling, the only safety consists in deliberately jumping." -- Carl Jung

by Steve in Napa on May 23, 2005 2:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Kielty, only a B-?
You're kidding?!?!
"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on May 23, 2005 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I had the same grades as you
for the most part, the highest grade i gave was to Kotsay (B).  My only F went to Kendall with Durazo and Chavez getting D-
"What I'm trying to do is set our pitching up for five years," said Beane

by Satchmo22 on May 24, 2005 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Great grades Blez,
I agree with you on all these so far.   I have to wonder about the whole Ginter trade.  Looking for right handed power from an infielder and all.  From what I've seen he might have some pop but hims fielding is terible.  I was watching over the weekend and Wash is in the dugout showing Larry Davis what he had just done wrong.  Then in betwenn innings taking him aside and trying to coach him in the dugout.  Man, this is a major leaguer?  I don't know?  

Kendall was filmed in Spring training with Chavez for an all star promo for Fox.  You have to wonder if it's like the curse of being on Sports Ilustrated cover or like Madden football box covers.  If this were the Military they would have been reported awol so far for this season.

Marco, should stay.  If there is anyway they can keep him they should.  When everyone else was quitting he was running out popups to the outfield and getting on second when the fielder dropped the ball.  He might be slumping right know but, remember he played winter ball to.  Just because he had to reprove himself to the organization.  He might be getting a little tired.  He just might be a bench player but he's a gamer and a keeper in my opinion.

I admit it...I just didn't see what we were keeping Kielty for.  But, he has looked great of late and looks like he is having fun again playing a sport and getting paid for it.  I hope he can keep it up for the whole season though.

I am ready to say goodbye to Hatteburg.  And Hello to Johnson.  I wish hiim luck where ever he would go though.  He is a good guy and might make a great firstbase coach or more someday for some team.  CATCHERS MAKE THE BEST COACHES YOU KNOW!!!!

I am like some people on this site done with Byrnes.  I can handle him diving for a ball and missing it or landing on the ground and have it pop out.  But, when he misses the cutoff or just tosses it in.....the failure to perform on a consistant level I can't take anymore.  I can't remember anyone at any level I played at who would forget to touch homeplate not once but twice on the same play.  With the level we are playing at lately why not play Watson or get a better look at at Charles Thomas.  It's time folks to let Eric go.  

Ellis has been a huge surprise for me.  After hearing the reports from Winter ball I thought maybe he was done.  That it just might be a crack in the window for Omar Quintanina to get through.  But, he proved me wrong and looks decent so far.  I don't see the power he had before but other than that he has looked almost like the Ellis of old.  A great story so far.

Swisher looked like a work in progress.  At times great other times....?????  He was striking out a lot so hopefully with Sac. he will regain his eye and at least make contact to make an out.

Melhuse needs to play more.  Enough said.

Durazo, I didn't expect the same thing has last year but, where are you Ruby?  On the Ranch in Mexico?  Keep this up and maybe we can sell your contract to Hermosilla they might be the only takers with your defense.

Kotsay allthough slipping of late is still the leader of this team in my opnion.  He looks beat up after his ab's of late in the dugout though.  Like he is pushing to much.  Trying to carry the whole team.

I think it's time for some Billy magic.  Something!!  Even if we don't win anything I at least want to see a team that can give an effort night in and night out and win some.  Even losing by a few runs would be easier to watch then not scoring any runs and watching the pitching be decent enough to win.  For the most part are starters have kept us in most of the games but we just aren't scoring.  We need a bat in a big way.  So much of this sport is physiological.  A infusion of a new mental approach is needed.  Maybe from the top and a new manager.  Wash, might be just what we need.  I for one am done with Macha.  

by Mike Heath on May 23, 2005 2:31 PM PDT reply actions  

I think
Mike just summed up a lot of what I wanted to say, so I won't repeat it.  But I also think Byrnes would make a great DH against lefty pitchers and I can see him sharing time with Durazo there when Swish comes back or as a result of a BB trade.

I think it's abundantly clear that Scooter needs some rest.  Like Mike, I think he's done a fantastic job and should sit on the bench for awhile, but stay on the roster.  Unfortunately, until Crosby comes back, we just don't have anyone who can play SS well enough, so Scoot'll just have to hang in there and keep toughing it out.

Forty isn't old -- for a tree.

by atomopawn on May 23, 2005 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

My Grades:
Kendall: D+

So far... he did switch leagues, has to learn new pitchers, a new staff... tough job.  He'll be fine eventually, and his FIRST job this year is handling our young staff (jury still out on how he's doing).  I hate being run on all the time, and his lineup-spot is a vortex.  Give him time, though, the guy is a professional with a long track record.  He'll bring the grade up, but as of today... it is what it is.

Hatteberg: D+

Has hit OK... better than most on the team.  But fielding has been attrocious.  And his batting peripherals (the moneyball shaz we PAY him for) are down across the board and his power is non-extant (he's old guys).

04/05 Comparisons.

#P/PA: 4.00/3.84
BB/PA: .113/.077
BB/K: 1.50/0.77
IsoP: .136/.085
SecA: .267/.163

Ellis: B

In my book, when you meet your reasonably expected performance, you get a B.

Ginter: C-

I'd like to see more ABs... I think he could hit if given consistent PT... like the swing.   Fielding was actually surprisingly good until very, very recently... lets not bais too much on very recent performance, no matter how embarrasing.

Scutaro: B+

In my book, when you meet your reasonably expected performance, you get a B.  Scoot is doing that and taking walks... what more do you want from him?

Chavez: F

What more do you want from him?  Lots more of everything... he's looking better lately (his past 2-wk grade is more like a C-) but on the season, there's no way he's passing.

Byrnes: C

In my book, when you meet your reasonably expected performance, you get a B.  Byrnes isn't quite there, as I would like to have seen him improve a little this year.  So far... still streaky, can't lay off a slider down & away, scares me to death in the field.  No improvement = underperforming a little... sounds like a C.

Kotsay: B

In my book, when you meet your reasonably expected performance, you get a B.

Kielty: A-

Hey, what did we really expect outta this guy coming into the season?  Nix the 0/22 start and an embarrassing dropped routine fly that, in effect, cost the A's a W a few weeks ago, and he gets an A.

Thomas: F

Perhaps Beane can trade Byrnes after he goes on an extended hot spell by convincing the other GM he's actually GOOD... in effect, reversing what happened to him when he traded for CT.  Maybe KC would do a Chucky for T-Long trade?

Swisher: C

Moneyball is a little impatient at the plate... to be expected for a rook, I'll give him a C.  

Durazo: D+

Ugh... lets move on.

Melhuse: Irrelevant

Too bad for Melhuse, seems a good guy who could put up decent stats if given some ABs.  Still, he's either a perma-backup or a very marginal starter on a crappy team.

Watson: Incomplete

I'd like to see some more... they'd probably platoon him with Byrnes if they weren't trying to showcase Byrnes for a trade.

2005 Oakland A's Baseball THAT's Not Gonna Do It!!!

by shmik on May 23, 2005 2:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Completely fair, but...
if the Kotsay Experience is any indication, guys who come here from the NL take at least half a healthy year to adjust. So I'm holding out some hope for Kendall, Ginter and Thomas.

It just sucks that the main guy we're waiting on to adjust takes up a sixth of the payroll. And even when Kendall plays to career values, he's a DP waiting to happen.

Call me a traditionalist, but I like my catchers to hit 6th and pop 20 homers. It would also help if he was young, smart enough to drop a bunt to win a playoff game, always around an .800 OPS...

"Yucky Head Bad Guy!" - my 5-year-old daughter to Manny Ramirez. She got ice cream immediately afterward.

by DMtShooter on May 23, 2005 2:55 PM PDT reply actions  

for every NL player who has trouble
adjusting to the AL we could name at least one (and more) who didn't have a problem, including other catchers such as Damian Miller. So while I'm willing to give Kendall every consideration for his questionable offensive and defensive play so far, there is this nagging worry that he may simply be wearing out physically -- and that we may be paying $10 million a year for a catcher on the downside of his career.

Oh gee, I sure hope not...

by OaklandSi on May 23, 2005 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

My bigger worry...
is that Kendall is a guy, much like Damon and Dye before him, that just never comes through on his promise in Oakland.

There's a few things you need in the Coliseum, due to the foul ground. You need a mobile 3B, 1B and C to make those 50-60 extra foul pop up outs a year count.

You need people who can hit when it's cold.

And you need to be able to grind it out when the crowds are small, and live with the fact that for no good reason, you're the second team in the media market.

Damon never really did that. Dye couldn't stay healthy. And Kendall... well... yeesh.

"Yucky Head Bad Guy!" - my 5-year-old daughter to Manny Ramirez. She got ice cream immediately afterward.

by DMtShooter on May 24, 2005 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kendall batting 2nd is why BB/Macha get F
for hitting lineups

(#3-4 Chavez & Durazo clinched the grade)

Let the players do the batting lineups!

by A s Eh on May 23, 2005 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree along those lines...
Eric Chavez should also get an F. About mid April, I expected him to get out of his slump. I kept waiting and waiting and waiting...

He's showing some signs that he could be getting out of it, but it's too late for this grading period. I, however, do not let the first 40 games override what he did the last five years, -- especially at age 27 -- so I'm still expecting him to crank it and pull that grade up.

I'm kind of split on Hatteberg. I expect him to hit better, but at his age I also expect him to hit what he's hitting now. That's why I agree with the "C" -- he's just...average.

I can't give Kielty an A because of his putrid April (.275 OBP), but I'd say it's up to B- or B because of his insane May (.500 OBP).

Byrnes is a C -- a bunch of As and Fs cancelling each other out.

Curious: What "trend" would you give each player to project whether each grade will go up or down by the next round of grades?

For me:

Stock up: Ellis (can't help but think he'll get better), Chavez (can't get much worse), Kendall (he'll figure this AL thing out), Kotsay (will warm up in June), Swisher (the kid's learning).

Stock down: Scutaro, Ginter, Durazo.

No change: Byrnes, Hatteberg, Kielty.

Eric Chavez: The last former Huntsville Star with the A's...

by FormerHuntsvilleStar on May 23, 2005 3:48 PM PDT reply actions  

I totally agree except for the A- on Ellis:
I am a HUGE Elly fan but am thinking that he needs to be th odd man out until he regains either:

A) 100% strength in his arm

B) The confidence to letter' rip

Ginter and Scutaro can and will fill in for him just as well if not better. ginter for the HR pop and Scutaro for 2B D.

I would give him a C.

The F's (In My Book) Chavy/Thomas

D's-Kendall, Durazo, Ginter

C's - Swisher, Byrnes, Hatteberg, Scoot, Ellis

B's - Kielty, Kotsay

To me, on offense, there are no A's in Oakland...yet!!! :)

by saint @ Athletics Nation on May 23, 2005 4:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Ellis is better than Ginter and Scutaro
Are you kidding me. Ellis is such a better player.

by athleticsgirl1425 on May 23, 2005 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

A healthy Ellis, definitely.
His HR over Minnesota plus his A-Mazing D, which has not been there this year.

He knows that one more bad fall and he is done for good. He's a battler, but, can you honestly say that he is anywhere near the defensive stalwart that he was in 02-03?

He was hardnosed and played 2nd base like a SS, which he is. Dive here, dive there, rocket arm. It's just not there.

I believe that on this date. 5-24-05. Scutaro is a better defensive option and Ginter is a better offensive option.

I could be wrong, but this is what I have seen this year.

by saint @ Athletics Nation on May 24, 2005 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Grades
Kotsay: A- = You can only carry a team for so long before you start to slump yourself. His defense has been impeccable, which is more than I can say for anyone else on the team. Plus, he has tried to lead.

Kielty: B+ = Been great recently, at least offensively. But if we'd given out grades a couple of weeks ago, this would be a lot lower.

Byrnes: D = Not only is he atrocious defensively, but he has the nerve to complain about playing time when he was still under .200. Yeah, he's a little hot now, but still not in the important situations.

Swisher: C = Was fine defensively, beginning to pick up offensively when he got injured. Somewhat incomplete

Thomas: D = Has not taken advantage of the opportunites he's had, but hasn't really had many opportunities.

Watson: N/A
Clark: N/A
Crosby: N/A

Hatteberg: D = The only reason he doesn't get an F is because he has come through in a few key situations. The problem is he often gives those benefits right back due to his regressing defense. He just looks awful at first, like his head isn't in the game. Johnson might not be much better, but at least they'd be giving the young guy a shot.

Ellis: B = Has played good defense, and has hit about as well as we can expect of him, although I think he has more power than he's shown. He should be in there every day--he doesn't look any worse at shortstop than Scutaro.

Ginter: C- = Another guy who's grade goes up a bit because of limited time to show what he can do. I wish they'd done more Ellis/Ginter tandems at SS/2b. Until last night, his defense had looked good, and I think given regular playing time he would come out of his funk.

Chavez: F = No way around it, this guy has been bad. He's not even holding his own defensively, and everything that comes out of his mouth points to low self esteem and no leadership ability. If you don't think you're any good, you'll never be any good.

Scutaro: B+=Slumping over the last month has shown why he isn't an everyday player. That said, he has done everything the A's have asked him to do, from working on his patience at the plate during winter ball, do busting his butt at SS, where his range and arm don't really profile well. I hope there is a place for him on the bench for this team, because he could be a secret weapon in that role.

Kendall: D = Only the switch in leagues saves him from an F, but this doesn't mean I don't think he'll get better. Kotsay was at 228 around this time last year. My real concern with Kendall is that while I think he's been calling games well, his defense at catcher has been bad. Many times, its not that his throws to second are late, its that he doesn't make them at all because he can't get the ball out of his hand.

Melhuse: n/a

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on May 23, 2005 4:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Forgot
Durazo: D = occasionally comes through in the clutch, mostly strikes out with RISP/less than two outs. Can't play a lick of defense, making him a liability in interleague. He'd be an ok player to have if he wasn't making so much money.  

by Alien @ Athletics Nation on May 23, 2005 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

this leadership myth.
A lot of you are excusing Kotsay because it is so hard to "lead". I'm sorry-- he's been in a horrible slump for 3 weeks and I for one can't blame the awful burden of leading. That's a crock. Either hit or don't.
oaktoon

by oaktoon on May 23, 2005 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just so everyone realizes
I didn't grade people on their streaks.  I graded them based on their current numbers and I judged their defensive play.  Kotsay got such a good grade not just because of his defense and hitting, but also because he tore the outfield a new one in the dugout when they were botching routine plays.  That's a leader to me.  His value from everything I've heard and seen goes beyond the offense and arguably the best outfield defense perhaps ever played in Oakland.

by Tyler Bleszinski on May 23, 2005 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great & honest evaluations from all
Position players also reap the praise or blame on their defense.

It is right to wonder about the D at Catcher, 1B, 3B and OF corners.

I agree that for that reason we need Scutaro and Thomas. Thomas needs to get something going offensively at AAA and wait for his call up later, if Watson doesn't steal it away like the guy the guy that took it away from Wally Pip.

Kielty, Kotsay, & Scoot definitely class stars in the first quarter.

Let the players do the batting lineups!

by A s Eh on May 23, 2005 5:01 PM PDT reply actions  

My grades and some props...
First, I wanna say god job on the grades Blez.  Looks like you put a lot of time and effort into them.  I pretty much agree with everything you said...

However, I had written down some grades earlier, so I thought I'd list them out, just to see how they compare.

Kendall: F
  I've been one of his biggest supporters, and I still think he is adjusting to the AL, but I can't give someone playing so bad anything higher.  I still think he'll turn it around tho.
Hattie: D
  I have not been impressed by Hatte.  His defense has slipped from adequate to bad, and his hitting has slipped as well.  He used to be the best 2 strike hitter in the bigs and one of the hardest to strike out.  Both are no longer true.  
Ellis: B
  Hey, he's come back pretty strong.  A bright spot!  His defense is good, and his offense hasn't been too bad either.  I'll take it.
Ginter: D
  It was higher after his Friday home run, but other than that, he hasn't done much.  I was expecting more pop from him.  And his defense is as advertised (bad).  Not too much good here.
Scutaro: B-
  He was one of the few ppl hitting for a while.  He's stepped up big when we needed him to.  His slump lately has brought down his grade from a B, but he's still doing well.
Chavez: F
  No explanation needed.
Byrnes: C
  I put Byrnes at a 50/50 spot.  Some times he's awesome and makes great plays and gets the big hits.  But the other times he is terrible, miss judging balls and striking out or poping up in foul territory with runners on 2nd and 3rd.  He's been good lately, but I don;t expect him to be in Oakland much longer, and I'm going to miss him.
Kotsay: B
  He's been good, but slumped as of late, preventing him from taking any higher a grade.  He's still anchoring our outfield, and he's still one of the bright spots in our lineup.
Kielty: B+
  He's been really good lately.  Our best hitter.  His bad start keep his grade down, also no A's player deserves an A this season so far.
Thomas: D
  He's been a bust so far, definately not worthy of being in the Huddy trade.  I agree he needs to go down to Sacto and get some work there.  There's still hope for him yet.
Durazo: D
  He's supposed to be our big hitter.  His only job is to hit.  He's not doing it.  But he's not doing as poorly as Chavvy or Kendall...thus the grade.

For a GPA of:  1.64, or a C-, which seems about right.

Crosby, Swish, Melhuse, and Watson I didn't grade b/c they either haven't played enough or are injured right now.  Small sample size leads to unfair grades.

I guess I've pretty much reiterated what everyone else had said, but I wanted to throw in my two cents b/c its fun to do.  Hopefully the midseason grades will be much improved!

A's fan for life!!!

by ZeroIndulgence on May 23, 2005 5:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Ginter
I think you can make a case that Ginter has done better than most people seem to think.  I think the 2 error game on Sunday has anchored people's opinions.  

Here's some Ginter props:

  • Highest RBI/AB ratio with 16 RBI in only 78 AB=.205 (#2 is Kielty .189, #3 is Kotsay .122)
  • 3rd Highest BB/PA ratio of .108 (#1 is Kielty at .133, #2 is Scutaro at .119)
  • 3rd Highest IsoP of .141 (#1 is Byrnes at .167, #2 is Swisher at .154)
  • 2nd Highest SecA of .269 (#1 is Kielty at .311, #3 is Scutaro at .266)
  • 2nd Highest P/PA of 4.00 (#1 is Kendall at 4.33, #3 is Thomas at 3.94)
Now, none of those numbers are great, but they're not bad on this club (I can't believe our top IsoP is Byrnes at .167 [Adam Dunn is almost .400]).  If we can get Ginter 400 AB's this year, I feel confident that he'll supply us with 75+ RBI, 15-20 HR, and play a decent 2nd Base.  His D isn't that bad and he had only 1 E before Sunday.  His Range Factor is actually almost 20% better than Ellis's.

Overall, I'd give him a C so far.  

by jubjub on May 23, 2005 7:47 PM PDT reply actions  

PS
Ginter has 16 RBI's with 13 Hits.  That's hard to do.  If Ichiro had that ratio, he'd have had 322 RBI last year.  

by jubjub on May 23, 2005 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Poor Ellis
Does anybody know why Ellis is sitting on the bench? He is way better than Ginter. They say Ginter has power, but he hasn't shown it except for that one homerun. Ellis is at least consistent and is batting like .284 or something. He's also better defensivly. Ginter's errors were horrible. Do you think they're playing Ginter to show him off for a trade? Because when Bobby comes back we'll have 4 middle infielders and that is crazy! Somebody needs to get traded and I hope it's Ginter. Ellis worked so hard to come back, is liked by all the fans, and is a major part of the A's. Please write back! I want to hear everyones comments! Go A's...maybe we'll win!

by athleticsgirl1425 on May 23, 2005 7:49 PM PDT reply actions  

Ellis
I totally agree with your comments on Ellis.  He should be playing regularily at 2nd base.  Mark plays much better defense than Ginter and better than Scutaro--he has them both on range.  And he has been fairly consistent with his hitting this year.  Ellis does have some power, which--like most other A's--hasn't shown in 2005.  He's as likely to show the power if played as the others.  

by racodd on May 23, 2005 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

they are just trying to see what Ginter has
Your comments are right on Ellis.  But they want to see if Ginter is a player with more pop in his bat.  So far, he's far less D, and there is very little pop.

but this is a rebuilding year, and time to figure this stuff out.

I'd say Ginter is close to out of here.

by alamedaman on May 23, 2005 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ellis Definitely Should Play More
I agree, athleticsgirl, Ellis should start more often. And at SS, the position he played for the most part until coming to the A's.

MinorLeague Marco is continuing his movement toward the Mendoza line and his range at SS is extremely limited. I give Scoots "A" for effort, but his abilities are simply not major league. When Crosby returns, Marco should pack his bags for Sacto.

Ginter's horrible game on Sunday has, in the words of one poster, skewed opinion at AN on him. But the power-deficient A's need his pop in the lineup (indeed, they need pop from whatever source they can find) and it's generally worth the tradeoff for his defensive deficiencies...

by reztips on May 23, 2005 8:28 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree
Either Scutaro or Ginter. We'll just have to wait and see what happens. Also, Ginter can't play short like Ellis and Scutaro can so that could be taken into consideration. Or, if Bobby needed a day off they could just slide Ellis over. Never mind. Ellis gets more base hits than homers, but we need that for situational hitting to drive the runners in. Hopefully Ellis will get the start Tuesday! Go A's!

by athleticsgirl1425 on May 23, 2005 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tough Love
Thanks Blez and all for your thoughts. We're sharing a lot of tough love with the guys we care about so much.

I can understand complaints about results but not about "effort" or other intangibles. Of course, we all have our opinions, but that's all they are. Stats are facts, results, quatifiable, but the other stuff is just 'my opinion' kind of stuff. Anyway, here's my three cents (inflation ya know):

I've always been a Chavvy fan. Of course his offensive production pretty much sucks this year - as does the whole team's, but I don't think it's from any imagined 'lack of effort.' And who annointed him The Team Leader? Just cuz he makes the highest salary? Cuz he got the glitzzy new contract? I don't think he has the traditional 'out-going/leadership' kind of personality that most are looking for. And it's crazy to expect him to change his personality. Adjust his stroke, sure; but not his personality.

I'm disappointed with Kendall too. I thought he'd be doing better at this point, but... is it really easier to adjust to a new league and a very new staff just cuz you make $10 rather than $2 million? Doesn't make sense. His caught stealing numbers will improve with everything else, but the pitchers have to do a much better job, too. And isn't that a job for the Pitching Coach?

And I think Scutaro is under-rated by most cuz he's a fairly quiet guy. He gives at least as much effort as Byrnes, but doesn't make a big show of it - and his results are much better. Of course, his objective numbers aren't what any of us would like, but who on this team is having a good, or even average, year?

It's been a tough couple months for us fans, but just imagine how the guys who do this for a living feel. I'm not trying to make excuses for them (cuz  the results speak for themselves) but I'm not going to join in the bashing of anybody for lack of effort or caring.

This is my team and I support them. Go A's.

"Holy Manama!" ~Bahrain, 5,000+ miles east of Toledo :-)~

by NomAd on May 23, 2005 10:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Great job Blez! Really thoughtful &
insightful I wonder if you are planning on grading management.  I would be very interested in the Macha grade--I've been apoleptic with his stubborness and lack of creativity about batting Chavez third (oh yeah, i'm forgetting the brilliance of moving him to 4th against left handed pitching).  But I'm so upset with that total ignorance, it's hard for me to see if there are offsetting plusses.

also looking forward to the pitching

by alamedaman on May 23, 2005 11:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Our players are no good...
So then who will represent our Oakland A's as the lone All-Star in Detroit this year?

by rsur5 on May 24, 2005 1:50 AM PDT reply actions  

Kotsay
Kotsay should represent.
Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on May 24, 2005 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I say Harden and Kotsay:
If Harden comes back soon. But, Kotsay's numbers do hardly an All-Star make at this point.

Matsui
Damon
Hunter

I'd put them all above Kotsay as far as All-Stars.

by saint @ Athletics Nation on May 24, 2005 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Harden
It's got to be Harden.  Only way Kotsay makes it is for late inning defense.  Only other person on the team with decent numbers is Duke.  

Here's a question:  If they pick Harden and he's on the DL and they then pick someone from another team, does that qualify as one Athletic on the team?

by jubjub on May 24, 2005 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good Question:
I think they would have Harden suit up and be introduced, like Zito in 2002. He would then just be unavailable and someone would be appointed to take his place.

That is where I too get lost.

Is an introdution enough to satisfy the rule?

I would hope not. The idea to me is that every team's fans have a rooting onterest in the game.

I do know that I just always have in my mind which A is in the game or coming in. It would not be the same. In fact if that did happen I would consider not watching it at all in protest.

by saint @ Athletics Nation on May 24, 2005 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Harden
And how has Harden qualified to be on the All-Star Team up to this point?

I think Kotsay has gets the nod from Terry Francona - He gets to choose some guys, correct?

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on May 24, 2005 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Managers
Only choose pitchers. If you must know why Harden deserves to be on the all star team, go check the stats.
California here I come, right back where I started from, Californiaaaaa, Californiaaaaa, here I coooooome (June 24th). (OC, i was inspired)

by ohad on May 25, 2005 5:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

OK, I will...
Stats:

Games Played = 7
Innings Pitched = 43

Those stats aren't going to change much before the All-Star Team is chosen.  How is Harden going to make the All-Star Team when other starters will have "earned" a spot?

---------------------------------------------

Ohad - You rub people the wrong way w/ your cockiness.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on May 25, 2005 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

What did i say this time?
Obviously he'd have to pitch well when he gets back. Don't act like i was saying something different, we all were assuming this.

I guess saying why Harden would be our representative is cocky? I was too lazy to go and get all the stats for you, and i figured you would know how well he has pitched...

California here I come, right back where I started from, Californiaaaaa, Californiaaaaa, here I coooooome (June 24th). (OC, i was inspired)

by ohad on May 25, 2005 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

This statement...
Ohad - "If you must know why Harden deserves to be on the all star team, go check the stats." (cocky)

You are saying that you are right (Harden will make the All-Star Team) and I am wrong (Kotsay will make the All-Star Team).

The way the A's handle injuries, and especially with a prized possession like Harden (and now that the A's are not competing for a playoff spot) Harden is at least 3 - 4 weeks away...All-Star Teams are chosen in late June.  

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on May 25, 2005 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Harden
Is already throwing again. No way 3-4 weeks.

Kotsay so far does not have all star stats, it's the truth.

California here I come, right back where I started from, Californiaaaaa, Californiaaaaa, here I coooooome (June 24th). (OC, i was inspired)

by ohad on May 25, 2005 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's right, though
your word choice did not give the impression that you were exactly being humble.

My 3.5 cents: If healthy, Harden is the only player truly deserving an all-star bid at this point. Of course, the decision won't be made for a month and a half, by which point Chavvy will have 18 homeruns, Bazito will have a run of three consecutive shutouts going, and Street will have 18 saves, despite his late start as closer.

The next time I slap a guy's ass, can we all just assume it's because I wish I was a baseball player?

by devo on May 25, 2005 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks Blez
Agree with almost everything

by china bob on May 24, 2005 3:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Management
How about D's for Beane and Macha? 1. Except for Kotsay the outfield has put the thrill back into the routine flyball,2. Batting percentages are amongst the lowest in the league,3. Catching has seen the opposition on a merry-go-round. 4.Playing 4and5 position players with D's and F,s without lineup juggling.,and 5.No leadership! can we borrow Huddy on his off-days to talk to this team? Please do something! It cannot make us any worse.

by Graybeard on May 24, 2005 10:32 AM PDT reply actions  

Grades for Macha
At some point when the kids don't do well, you gotta take a look at the teacher.  In my mind, the defensive lapses and the errors reflect on the coaching.  As mentioned, the lack of any significant jiggling of the order does not show a can do take leadership role.  And, sorry, from what I read Macha lacks any sort of intensity.    A good coach  gets his players to play above average, not below.  Grade:  F
Frantic - I sometimes wish it was only about baseball . .

by frantic on May 25, 2005 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here is the pitching grades
Lets start off with our so called Ace

Zito (D-)  The guy is just good sometimes and just plane bad the others. We will never see the 2002 Zito again. In his defense he gets no run support

Harden (B-) I have a feeling that he will be gone till after the All-Star break.  

Haren (D+)  This guys also gets no run support but he has been bad as well on some outing.  Good future.

Blanton (F)  The book is out on him and he is getting beat upside the head with it.  He needs to go back to the minors and work on his slider and get in shape.  I see a possible Sid Fernandez body on this guy.

Sarloos (B-) The reason I gave him such a high grade is I never would have thought he would stay up here this long.  Good job laddy.

Street (A-)  Best in the bullpen right now and our future closer.
Dotel  (C- or D)  Need a little help with this one.  Not sure if he would have blown those Boston games if he was healthy.

Cruz (F-) We got took on this guy.
Duke (B-) Back problems lowered his grade,
Calero (B-) Has been stady but injured
Ricon (I)  Do we still have this guy.  I hardly ever see him

This was no boating accident

by crd04us on May 24, 2005 11:45 AM PDT reply actions  

Harden
A B-? He was one of the top five pitchers in the AL before injury, and he gets a B-?

Oh, and Cruz F-? You got to know better than that.

Blanton F? Like Devo said, take away one start verse the Yanks and his ERA is 3.51

California here I come, right back where I started from, Californiaaaaa, Californiaaaaa, here I coooooome (June 24th). (OC, i was inspired)

by ohad on May 24, 2005 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Harden II
Ok maybe I was a little hard on Harden but you can not tell me that Cruz has been a positive in the bullpen. I am not counting the last week where he has been some what consistent.  But that is your opinion and that is why I love this site.

Blanton on the other hand did impress me early on but I still think he needs a year in Sacromento.

This was no boating accident

by crd04us on May 24, 2005 12:01 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook

Recent FanPosts

Small
Moneyball Part II: Billy Beane Shocks the World. Again.
Hahaha_small
Let's Make Some Nicknames!
Fubarcloud_small
Wolf being told to spend money
Small
The wRC+ Challenge
Pumpkin_small
Maybe this is a stupid stats question
Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract
Small
fantasy baseball league for A's fans!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late