Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation NBA Twitter List

Empty

Empty.  That's how I feel after tonight.

Even when Barry Zito, Joe Blanton and Danny Haren pitch well, they get nothing.

This offense is just plain offensive right now.  The first time the team has been shut out in back-to-back games since 1997.

Billy Beane likes to make moves before he is forced to make a move.  He's the master of the preemptive move.  But in the rare occasion where a team is skidding uncontrollably, he will do what is necessary.  That is where the Octavio Dotel deal originated last season.

In reality, it's going to take more than one bat to fix the lineup right now because too many players are struggling.  It's still too early to claim it's desperation time, but if Harden pitches another gem tomorrow and doesn't get any offensive support, Billy Beane's unused cell minutes from last month could be gone very quickly.

But wow, if this is deflating for us as fans, imagine how it must feel to the pitchers right now.

Empty.

0 recs  |  Comment 211 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Frankly, right now
I think Judy Garland could spin a 6-hit shutout against us. If I were Macha, I'd be looking incredibly neutral right now.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 25, 2005 10:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Judy Garland is spinning in her grave...
... which actually gives her curveball a wicked break.
"In the Mexican League his nickname was 'El Coyote', which means 'The Coyote'." - Tommy Lasorda, color-man extraordinaire

by seedspeed on Apr 25, 2005 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

love the quote, el coyote..lol
"Don't you play the flute, Huddy?"

by capper3 on Apr 25, 2005 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You shoulda heard...
... Lasorda a couple weeks ago when he was interviewed about the Pope dying. Whoever set up that interview was either an idiot, or an evil genius. Man, that was some good TV.
"In the Mexican League his nickname was 'El Coyote', which means 'The Coyote'." - Tommy Lasorda, color-man extraordinaire

by seedspeed on Apr 25, 2005 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A's
making a lot of pitchers look good by allowing the shut-outs....Lower ERAs? Go pitch vs the A's...whew!

by arch on Apr 25, 2005 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am going to check
the recap on Yahoo.  Avoid sports center and go to bed.  
Alaska-A, Number-one-A's-fan-in-southern-southeast-Alaska.

by ak_A on Apr 25, 2005 10:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I hope Billy does something soon!
Because I'm really tired of seeing this team flounder. We're making everybody look live a Cy young winner. I wouldn't want to pitch for this team because your slightest mistake would do you in and that's that. Just an utter dissapointment which I hope picks up. I hope this is rock bottom because I can't stand it anymore. Cmon, guys! Show some guts!

by A'sfansince1970 on Apr 25, 2005 10:34 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

while they're waiting for BB to do something
the A's can and should do something for themselves.

The players can hold a closed door session and air out some of those demons. Tough guys like Kendall can come through on their promises to kick some butts that need kicking.

Macha can shake up the batting order to bunch together those who are hitting at the top of the order, just to get some runs in for the pitchers.

by OaklandSi on Apr 25, 2005 10:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Seriously
Is Macha worried we might score less runs if he juggles the batting order a bit?

by AlwaysSweatin on Apr 26, 2005 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How much
less than 0 in 22 innings can we score? Seriously.

I want to see Macha try something.

by BillybUcko on Apr 26, 2005 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That puts the count at 22 innings,
dating back to Saturday, since the A's have scored a run.

by walk off bunt on Apr 25, 2005 10:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I totally agree, Blez...
Perhaps tonight is the true botoming out.  We've went from being a winning team with a high LOB to a losing team with a high LOB to a losing team who can't get enough people on base to get a high LOB.

This sucks.  I'm probably going to the game tomorrow, no matter how crappy it feels right now, I just need to see Harden pitch in the flesh.

"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Apr 25, 2005 10:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

this is getting embarrassing
about a week ago blez compared the offense to a tortoise pulling bartolo colon.  now it's more like pulling a 300 ton ship.

on a positive note, those of us in fantasy baseball leagues with non-a's fans can just leave a roster spot open to pick up whichever starting pitcher is scheduled to go against the a's...

by xbhaskarx on Apr 25, 2005 10:38 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I believe it was a tortoise pulling
Bartolo Colon AND David Wells in a Radio Flyer.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 25, 2005 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ooops
then my analogy might not work, because colon and wells put together might weight more than the 300 ton ship...

by xbhaskarx on Apr 25, 2005 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

pulled fitzcarraldo out of the bag, eh?
wow, you get mad points for the reference to this this crazy documentary....not sure I recommend it for viewing, but I appreciate the analogy.  The important thing to remember is that after an incredible amount of perseverance, Herzog gets the boat over the mountain.  So maybe there is hope for our A's.....

by rungood on Apr 26, 2005 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, It Hurts My Fanatsy Team
I still refuse to use a pitcher going against the A's.

by Eck on Apr 26, 2005 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What are you talking about?
The offense has not improved!
devo's gf: "what is it that you write about all day when they don't even play any games?"

by devo on Apr 26, 2005 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

see my reply to blez
if it's colon and wells, they might weigh slightly more than the 300 ton ship...

by xbhaskarx on Apr 26, 2005 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

remember when
Beane traded Jer. Giambi for Mabry like 2 years ago? Thats gonna happen again, hes gonna do somethind drastic like dump Durazo for Jay Peyton or something

by WhatElse on Apr 25, 2005 10:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

seriously though
its just downright unacceptable to get shut out in back to back nights.  But what do you do?  

1)Trade one our our marginal players (Byrnes, Kielty, whoever) for another marginal risk type guy thats not starting on another team, just like je. Giambi / Mabry.  We've seen Billy stomp his foot down before.

2)Send someone down, bring up the biggest stick in AAA.  Dan Johnson is the only one that I can think of.  Im not gonna get into who gets sent down.

3)Tough it out, We are in a "Re-tooling" year and no reason to be hasty, after all we still arent THAT bad record wise.

4)Turn into Michael Douglas from Falling Down when we get shutout by Buehrle tommorow.

by pickinmachine on Apr 25, 2005 10:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeh
But I wouldnt be surprised if we hit Buehrle hard tomorrow like "go figure"

by WhatElse on Apr 25, 2005 10:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Faithless
That's the way I feel right now. A complete and total lack of faith in the offense. Sure, maybe they'll turn it around, but for the moment... yeesh.

Living in SoCal, I don't get to see the team on TV much, so I was happy that they were the ESPN game last night. But as the game wore on I began to feel more and more hopeless that the offense would ever actually rally.

You know it's bad when the other team scores one run and you instinctively think, "It's over."

But it's worse when you turn out to be right.

And I realized that I haven't had this feeling about the A's for a long time. The empty, helpless, miserable feeling of watching a team play truly bad baseball... mixed with the utter frustration of watching the pitchers excell. It'd almost be better if they were getting lit up, in a weird, unexplainable way.

I'm rambling. It all comes down to two simple words: This sucks.

Something's gotta give, and I hope it happens soon.

"In the Mexican League his nickname was 'El Coyote', which means 'The Coyote'." - Tommy Lasorda, color-man extraordinaire

by seedspeed on Apr 25, 2005 10:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Also
Barry Zito's being pretty selfish with his "Strikeouts for troops" program.

If he really wanted to help them out, he'd donate money for every time he allows a home run.

by walk off bunt on Apr 25, 2005 10:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Shake up.
Geeeeshhh. And I thought sitting in the library through the game was painful. I think it would have been worse if I had skipped studying for this one.

I definitely think it's time for a lineup shakeup. Outside of making a trade, that's the biggest move they can make. It's just downright depressing to look at our lineup and see those sad batting averages. It's so frustrating to see players that we all know that can play well struggle so mightily. It's just completely baffling as to how such good players can perform so poorly. It's not time to hit the panic button, but I can't say it's  one of the happier times in Athletics Nation. We really need a guy like Kotsay to set a fire under this team and get these guys going.

I feel really sorry for our pitchers. It's got to be really difficult to think that even if you throw nine shutout innings, you stand a pretty decent chance of not picking up a win.

Maybe the ChiSox really are that good. Maybe Jon Garland is living up to the potential that he has long been rumored to possess. Whatever the deal is, this team needs a mini-shakeup just for the sole purpose of not letting this downward offensive spiral continue.

Hopefully we can touch up Mark Buerhle tomorrow and start putting these offensive woes in the past. Let's Go A's!

Go Beach.

by Dirtbag Pride on Apr 25, 2005 10:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not in the "Chavez sucks" camp,
but I've thought since last Thursday that a day off would be beneficial. Tomorrow would be an excellent opportunity, with Buehle going. A reasonable, but also shakeuppy lineup could look like:

Kendall
Scutaro
Kotsay
Byrnes
Hatteberg
Durazo
Ginter (3B)
Swisher
Ellis

Or draw it out of a hat. It worked for Billy Martin, a terrific manager and person except for the being crazy, killing pitchers' arms, drinking excessively, driving off a cliff on Xmas Day parts.

Nico

by Nico on Apr 25, 2005 10:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

as far as billy martin goes
I feel very strongly both ways.

by Apricot on Apr 25, 2005 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

zito good?
I have to question the statement that Zito piched well.

Now it is true no matter how well he pitched the Offense would have lost the game for us. And he did not suck today as he has in the past but

6 innings and 4 runs is not good!!! though it lowered his ERA.

by novaoakland on Apr 25, 2005 10:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

its not that bad though
zito was dealing.

Macha couldve had street up once zito got into a jam, whatver though, 1 run wouldve cooked us anyway

by pickinmachine on Apr 25, 2005 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If the A's had lead even 1-0
Zito might have gone 6 shutout, turn it over to Street-Rincon-Dotel to finish up. Zito's first 6 innings put us in position to win. It was an outstanding start regardless of the final stats.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 25, 2005 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zito is supposed to be the #1
He shouldn't have to turn the game over to the pen after 6 IPs!  He's got to pitch into the 8th and save the pen for when the young guys are pitching.  Or I (and everyone else) have to get over the idea that Zito is anything better than a #3-4.

by boilerdan on Apr 26, 2005 6:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where is it written that a #1 goes 8 innings?
When Zito is going good he'll pitch just like he did last night - twice through the line-up with little damage.  The third time through he'll get roughed up and might be able to bear down and get through.  The fourth time he's done.  He's got nothing left to show and the batters have figured out his timing.  I'm a fan and I know this, you'd think Macha - his coach - would too and have someone ready to go in the 7th in case of a jam.

Zito is the #1 because of his leadership, work ethic, and experiance.  This is what makes up the rankings.  Rarely have they been based on who is the best pitcher, sometimes it just works out that way.  (Example - see Zito in '02, our number three starter who wins the Cy Young.)

Sometimes I think I'd be better off dead. No, wait, not me, you. - Jack Handy

by Captain on Apr 26, 2005 8:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A true #1 has to go deeper than 6 innings
otherwise, he's just a mediocre pitcher.

by boilerdan on Apr 26, 2005 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

6 2/3
Z went 6 2/3, he did pitch well last night. A bad call, a bad pitch, 2-0 game over. After that he should have been taken out of the game.
Let's Go A's!

by AllThingsOakland on Apr 26, 2005 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If it was just one bad call and one bad pitch
then why should he have been taken out?  I don't get the logic.  A top of the rotation pitcher shouldn't have to be taken out at that point.

by boilerdan on Apr 26, 2005 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mediocre?
6 innings 3 earned runs in mediocre.
6 shut out innings is good!

by Hang Man on Apr 26, 2005 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

this time I agree with zito
he pitched well enough to win. With the team hitting and scoring he doesn't have the added pressure to be absolutely perfect going into the seventh with a high pitch count. He feels he made one mistake pitch, that pitch to the guy who hit the homer. Blanton also made only one mistake pitch in a masterful complete game. But he also is winless.

It all comes down to lack of hitting and scoring. All of our pitchers are pitching acceptably well, some spectacularly and others well within acceptable limits. Imagine what it must feel like to pitch when your team has not scored in days. One pitch among dozens can mean you lose, and even a perfect night doesn't guarantee you win.

by OaklandSi on Apr 26, 2005 5:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look at that 7th
He threw one really bad pitch to Widger, but in an at-bat with a perfect curve called a ball for no particular reason.  The Sox got 2 flares and a 25-hop single through the infield that inning, too, all before Everett's double, which was well hit.  He was not struggling with his control, or throwing bad pitches.  He actually did his job very well last night, and I think most people who watched the game would think that it looked like the "old" Zito out there.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 7:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The problem with the 7th was...
That Zito had guys flailing at off-speed pitches all night, but against Everett and Widger, when he was ahead in the count both times, he threw fastballs right down the middle. I don't know if these pitches were Kendall's idea, or Zito's, or the coaches, but they were completely retarded. Not that it would have mattered--Judy Garland's corpse could have been lobbing watermelons to homeplate and nobody would have hit them.

by jmoney on Apr 26, 2005 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mistakes
The pitch to Widger was a fastball that got too much of the plate.  Still, it was really a 2-3 pitch, given that the ump was using the newly-developed "donut" (or "doughnought" for you pedants out there) strike zone which has a big hole right in the middle of it so he can call perfect, overhand curves "balls".  And the Everett pitch wasn't good either, but again it was the end of a long inning extended by bad umping and lucky hits.

Cruz pitched badly, and gave up runs as a result.  Zito made a mistake or two but was still throwing well in the 7th.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correction
Zito went 6 innings zero runs!
6.2 innings 4 runs.

by Hang Man on Apr 26, 2005 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Face it..This isnt a good team..
Billy seems to have miscalculated the lineups ability to produce runs.  We miss Crosby but Rubie and Chavez are stinking it up.  I think Chavez will get on track but in hindsight the money should have gone to Miguel.

I would play Byrnes in left and see if he can get going. The Charles Thomas and Bobby Kielty experiments need to be over.  Dan Johnson should be recalled (shouldnt have been sent down in first place).Play Swisher in right every day.  Bench Rubie for DJ.

I would move Kotsay down in order as he is swinging at least well.  Maybe he can drive in run.

Billy sacrificed 2/3 of big 3 and banked on Kendall and Swisher to make up for Dye and counted on crosby, Chavez and Rubie to play to their normal level.

Shake it up!

by rickeyrules on Apr 25, 2005 10:49 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

rickeyrules: Change
"banked on" to "is banking on" and you're right on. But it's a big difference!
Nico

by Nico on Apr 25, 2005 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thats a good post
this has been painful

by denis52 on Apr 26, 2005 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You still have to have a runner to drive in
Moving Kotsay wouldn't make any difference... you need runners on base to score runs..

by 3up3dn on Apr 26, 2005 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

how about?
kotsay
scutaro
hatteberg
chavez
swisher
kendall
durazo
byrnes
ellis

Just to shake things up a little bit.  At this point, what do we have to lose?  It's hard to score negative runs....

by wilyc on Apr 25, 2005 10:51 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Or maybe...
... this?

R. Henderson (LF)
J. Robinson (2B)
Mays (CF)
Aaron (RF)
Ruth (DH)
Gehrig (1B)
Schmidt (3B)
Ripken (SS)
Berra (C)

Okay, most of 'em are old, retired, and/or dead. But I'm not convinced they could be any worse than what we have at the moment.

Plus, what a draw! Tell me you wouldn't buy a ticket to see the corpse of Babe Ruth hit.

I'm a baseball and marketing GENIUS!

"In the Mexican League his nickname was 'El Coyote', which means 'The Coyote'." - Tommy Lasorda, color-man extraordinaire

by seedspeed on Apr 25, 2005 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But could these dead guys
hit Judy Garland's curve? (Of corpse they could.)
Nico

by Nico on Apr 25, 2005 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dang...
... I AM making a lot of "dead" references tonight. But to be fair, we are talking about the current offense.

Your "King of the Groan-Inducing Pun" title is intact, by the way. :)

"In the Mexican League his nickname was 'El Coyote', which means 'The Coyote'." - Tommy Lasorda, color-man extraordinaire

by seedspeed on Apr 25, 2005 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i like that
nice limeup hatty inn the 3 spot.putting all the hot hitters at the top is better than tryin to froce some production out of chavvy and ruby.

by OakT0wnB0rNnRaZed on Apr 25, 2005 11:02 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

what needs to happen
thomas sent down. kielty benched but once a week. byrnes play everyday or traded, but none of this musical chairs. durazo dropped in lineup with dj getting some at bats, may the best hitter win. crosby get his broke ass back, fast!
"Don't you play the flute, Huddy?"

by capper3 on Apr 25, 2005 11:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I say we need to throw at some batters
nothing builds team unity and gets the adrenaline going like a good fight.

by kgknapp on Apr 25, 2005 11:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but...
I don't want Harden tossed from tomorrow night's game, either.
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Apr 25, 2005 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But if we lost the fight...
...we'd just be more demoralized.
I never criticize a player until they are first convinced of my unconditional confidence in their abilities. ~John Robinson

by baseballgirl on Apr 25, 2005 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True...
... It'd be terrible if our guys went to throw PUNCHES and whiffed.
"In the Mexican League his nickname was 'El Coyote', which means 'The Coyote'." - Tommy Lasorda, color-man extraordinaire

by seedspeed on Apr 25, 2005 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or!
They actually MAKE contact, and only manage to foul the other team's guys off into the stands.
"In the Mexican League his nickname was 'El Coyote', which means 'The Coyote'." - Tommy Lasorda, color-man extraordinaire

by seedspeed on Apr 25, 2005 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On base
The White Sox would learn that if they stood on 2nd or 3rd base then the A's wouldn't hit.

by Larry E on Apr 26, 2005 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I honestly think Byrnes would snap out of it...
...if he was ever given a chance to play!
I never criticize a player until they are first convinced of my unconditional confidence in their abilities. ~John Robinson

by baseballgirl on Apr 25, 2005 11:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

agree
play him or trade him
"Don't you play the flute, Huddy?"

by capper3 on Apr 25, 2005 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

heartbreaking
This is really heartbreaking.  I know it's early in the season (see my first post), but like mentioned earlier in this post, it is difficult to remain positive after 2 shutouts in a row.  

I agree, things need to get shaken up - good and fast!  While record-wise we are still right in there, it won't remain that way for long if this keeps up.  The last thing anyone wants to see is Oakland winning 30 less games than last year (like the Mariners).

Tomorrow is another day. Let's all pray it's better for our Oakland A's!

GO A'S!

Beki

by bekkib on Apr 25, 2005 11:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The power of prayer
It's not so good.  I was at church tonight, that didn't help the A's.  Beasides, I think it's a bit foolish to bring God into baseball.
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Apr 25, 2005 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Praying
to the baseball gods was what I was referring to, but if it makes you more comfortable - let's all cross our fingers, rub the lucky rabbit's feet - and anything else people do for good luck - perhaps that will tilt things in our favor...

by bekkib on Apr 25, 2005 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's still there!
I wasn't bad talking anyone.  Just stating the obvious - last night was heartbreaking...

by bekkib on Apr 26, 2005 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hay-zeus
I brought my Jesus figurine to opening day, and we all remember how well that went... maybe God is mad at us for invoking Him at a baseball game! Quick, everybody stop praying!

by LoveThemAs on Apr 26, 2005 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know it's bad when Blez is blue
I'm reading these posts and I'm afraid some folks sound like the Apocolypse is upon us.

KNOCK IT OFF!

I said it before the season started, and I'll say it again right now:

WINNING IS SECONDARY!

Chavez will hit better. Durazo will hit better. Kendall will hit better. Byrnes will hit better. It's all going to happen.

The offense will get better. When it will happen doesn't matter because winning does not take first priority in 2005. Beane is trying to build the A's for a 5 year run and that path does not start this year. The A's are a work in progress and change hurts.

Feel the pain?

Forget the dream of a 90 win season. Have your goodbyes ready for Zito and Dotel and Durazo and Byrnes. But most importantly bear down and remember these words...

"In Billy We Trust"

And I don't say that often. You can bet your last dollar Beane saw these struggles coming. Now is not the time to panic and make rash moves like firing Macha or dumping players. If he wants to truly see what he has on the roster he needs days like today and yesterday.

You always learn more when you fail.

"In Billy We Trust"

Time to live those words AN.

by grover on Apr 25, 2005 11:25 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That's a really intelligent comment
and probably closer to the truth than more people think.  Billy was always looking at 2006 as the year to rise again.  He would never throw in the towel on a season, but this team wasn't the team he envisioned in 06 and beyond.

grover, thanks for talking me to my senses.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 26, 2005 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Giving up our illusions
I understand the point.  The trouble with that is it confirms what I originally thought after the trades - we're giving up on this season.

That wouldn't be so terrible except for the fact that I've read - over and over again - that the A's are going to be an interesting team that will surprise a lot of people - and might even be a serious playoff contender in 2005.  And, of course, we're just going to be a monster in 2006.

Well, I started to let myself be optimstic.  It's spring, the Angels seem less imposing (or at least they did until Escobar and Colon's starts), and the young arms look good.

But we've been spoiled by our contender status, and I'm not looking forward to meaningless August games.  A dull, punchless team is bad enough.  A dull, punchless, out-of-contention team will be worse.

I'm not looking forward to the inevitable speculation about which players we're going to trade for which prospects.  That's what losing teams do, and I don't look forward to it.

Oh, well.  Harden's pitching tonight.  There's always that.

by bear88 on Apr 26, 2005 1:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Grover made great points
But the thing is, we can't give up on this year yet, and we are exceeding expectations. WHy? How? Because the reason we were supposed to struggle was because of the pitching. Now that the pitching has been phenomenal, we just need a few runs! Starting pitching would be something that would be extremely hard to get at the deadline (if we needed). But getting some type of offense with a trading chip like Dotel would be easier than some people think. The offense coming around is a given, it WILL happen. THe fact that the pitching is doing this when they "weren't supposed to" should help us keep hope.
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 26, 2005 4:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If I hear
"the offense WILL come around" again, I think I'll scream.  It's like hearing, "We don't need to put water on the fire.  The house will burn itself out eventually."  

There is no evidence so far that our batters will come out of their slumps.  None.  For all we know, our best hitters may have lingering injuries that are incapacitating them.  Or the league may have figured out how to pitch them.  Or maybe they've
got head problems.

There's no "law of averages" to even things out -- that's a mathematical fallacy.

I would change my mind if I saw any concrete action being taken by coaches to fix the problem or by Billy to acquire new bats.  But until then, I have no reason to think things will improve on their own.

Forty isn't old -- for a tree.

by atomopawn on Apr 26, 2005 6:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

don't be silly
Kendall has hit .300 for 9 years, and all of the sudden the league figured out how to pitch to him?

Regression towards the mean is a very strong force. It has to do with random fluctuations in small sample sized evening themselves out over the long run.

Honestly, the offence has had dead periods over the last few seasons, and has come around eventually.

This is very depressing to watch, but the gloom and doom is a bit overdone.

by MrIncognito on Apr 26, 2005 7:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
Kendall, Chavez, Durazo and Byrnes are much better players than their performances suggest.

The flip side is that sooner or later our starting pitching will struggle.  Harden and Blanton cannot keep this up forever.  It would be nice if great pitching could coincide with great hitting.

"Put a Milo on him."
-Billy Beane

by kaweahkaweah on Apr 26, 2005 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hitting is not a purely random event
like rolling a die.  The evidence that Chavez will have an OPS of .850 or better is that he's done exactly that for each of the last 5 seasons, totalling over 3,000 plate appearances.  I think those 3,000 plate appearances are a better indicator of the performance we can expect from here on out than the first 20 games of this particular season.

BTW, I also expect Harden to have an ERA over 0.50 for this season.  His performance will drop for the same reason that Chavez's will improve.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 7:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good points, Nick,
but the exception proves the rule: I think we ALL expect Brian Roberts to hit 56 homers this year.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 26, 2005 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

of course...
...you're getting the cliched expression wrong... it's actually "the exception proofs the rule"... as in tests, not proves. Roberts will come down to earth, too. He better, because my little brother drafted him in our fantasy league and is making me look the fool...
~SP

by eastbay on Apr 26, 2005 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not worried
This is obviously a very frusterating time but we shouldn't worry.

We knew the offence would be good this year, not great, but good. About the same as last year, maybe a little better. I still think this will be the case. There is a track record there. What was unproven and unknown was our pitching. And how the pitching turned out, especially the young starting pitching, would basically determining how the team did.  

Well the pitching and especially the young starters, Harden, Haren, Blanton, has been terrific so far. This is a great sign (though its still early) for how this team will do this year and in upcoming years. The hitting has been horrible but figures based on past history to improve. I would be a lot more worried if the offence was doing its job and the pitching was horrible.

Lastly, any contending we do this year is a bonus. The pressure is all on the Angels.

by Larry E on Apr 26, 2005 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is tough to take
the offensive slump right now.  Don't know why so many of them are pressing, and doing things that they do not do normally.

I think couples of guys on our regular line up needs to get their head straighten out so they could just relax and rely more on their natural ability instead of trying too hard.

During the mean time, I just want to see our team and us claw to some wins.

What a pitch!

by monteverdi on Apr 25, 2005 11:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It's Us....Not Them
Actually, I think this team is in a lot better frame of mind than we might imagine.

Think about it.

What was the big unknown before the season started?  That's right...the starting pitching.  How were we ever going to replace the vaunted "Big Three"?  Well, thanks to the wisdom of a certain somebody, we don't seem to be missing them one damn bit.  And I think these guys are proud of that...at least they should be.

The hitting never seemed to be a big question in the off-season, and it shouldn't be an overwhelming concern now.  These guys are all proven hitters.  They have done it before, and they will do it again.  It strikes me as kinda funny that A's fans, of all people, would get all nervous with what still amounts to a very small sample.

From what I can tell, the lack of offensive support hasn't really bothered these young pitchers.  I have a feeling that they're not exactly the prima-donna type...they seem to still be happy just to be in the big show.  

If we're singing the same tune at the end of May, then...maybe...it's time to worry.

And, for anyone else who was there tonight....did the fight over by the A's bullpen seem to throw Zito or the relievers off their game?  It seemed a big distraction at a critical moment.  Or, was it just me that was distracted?      

         

by Mission1929 on Apr 25, 2005 11:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The fight
The fight near the A's bullpen was the only interesting event all night.  The game was already over when Swisher made his sliding catch.
Shut up Joe Morgan!

by treble1313 on Apr 26, 2005 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

prima-donna
Thanks for spelling it correctly, as opposed to "pre-Madonna."
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Apr 26, 2005 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think we can choose the best move
until we know the answer to the Chavez mystery.

Why is he slumping?  Laziness?  Missing Mulder and Hudson? Steroid withdrawl(unlikely, but possible)?  Injury?

It's that last one that worries me the most.  If he's hiding a minor injury, it could take all season for him to break out of it.

I think our best move is probably to try to trade Durazo.  He still has some value, but sure hasn't contributed much this year.  In addition to whatever bat we acquire for him, we can bring up DJ to DH, if we need to.  

I also think that the revolving door game in the outfield may be part of the reason no one but Kotsay is hitting.  We need to get our guys more at bats and more consistent at bats.

Forty isn't old -- for a tree.

by atomopawn on Apr 26, 2005 12:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Steroid theories
I don't put much stock in them because while Chavez is cut, he's not big, like Canseco or Sosa.  But then and again, there's Alex Sanchez.
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Apr 26, 2005 12:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what about tejada, then??
this is a strange point coming from someone who writes about five "should have kept tejada over chavez" posts every day.

tejada:

came up through the a's organization

from the dominican republic (big steroid problems there)

gained about 20 pounds (190-215) - see the recent michael lewis article on weight gain

only 5 foot 9 inches tall, yet hits thirty home runs every year

by xbhaskarx on Apr 26, 2005 12:33 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Melhuse
Am I the only person who thinks that Melhuse should be given a shot at DH? Kendall won't share the catching spot, but I think Melhuse is largely underrated and should be given way more playing time than what he's got. Even with a `small sample size' [take last year into account too] he's got good solid stuff. Yeah I know, the whole "he's the only backup catcher we've got" argument, but I really think that he should be in more games and it's unfair that he's gotten to play in maybe a total of 11 innings so far. The risk of injury is just one they should take.

Anyway I ended up at the Giants/Padres game today... [Please forgive me! It was college night, I heard about last minute and tagged along because I've never gone to SBC before. I wore my Rockies hat and cheered for the Padres ;)] Anyway, when they changed the scoreboard for the A's/White Sox in the 7th and the 9th innings, you could hear fans in the upper deck cheer "LET'S GO OAKLAND!" That really made me smile.

So amidst all this negativity and disappointment, I must say that it felt great to know that the A's were being appreciated and cheered for at a Giants game.

by Melody on Apr 26, 2005 1:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If Melhuse becomes DH
Then we need to call somebody up to back up Kendall.

Who's catching @ sac?

"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Apr 26, 2005 1:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Melhuse...
Well I'm not saying that Melhuse should BECOME the DH. But maybe he should have the chance to play in a few games this week as the DH. I was hoping the fact that he's a switch hitter will play out to his advantage, but he hits better against RHPs. Oh well. Does anyone else out there agree that he at least deserves as many ABs as Kielty and Thomas?

I just spent the last 10 minutes comparing Kielty/Durazo/Melhuse stats. Melhuse's overall numbers [straight stats, I know numbers aren't everything but it's all I've got to work with] seem to indicate that he's even slightly ahead of Kielty. His OBP isn't that great, but the higher strikeout to walk ratio is probably influenced by less at bats.

What many people seem to not realize is that Melhuse HAS POWER. He hit 11 home runs last year in just 214 at bats. In 2003, he hit 5 home runs in just 77 at bats. If he was a starter, and he kept those stats up, he has the potential to average 20-30 home runs per year. His average and OBP is definitely comparable to other A's starters in the bottom half of the rotation, including Ellis [2003 stats], Crosby and Scutaro.

SO WHY IS HE SO UNDERRATED? Am I missing something? Too bad he sucks at 3rd base [slow, I bet] and Hatteberg is fine at 1st, because there really is no other position for Melhuse to play. I just hope he doesn't remain as "backup" his entire career.

by Melody on Apr 26, 2005 3:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Melhuse at DH
The problem with Melhuse at DH is that if Kendall gets hurt, and Melhuse takes over for him, then the pitchers have to hit for the rest of the game.

But the more I think of it the less sure I am that that's enough of a reason not to do it.

So I suppose the only reason it's not happening is that Bacha/Meane have faith that Durazo will turn around.

by matthias on Apr 26, 2005 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lets skip the middleman
and just let one of the pitchers DH.  Can we trade for Darren Dreifort?
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hear.....
Livan Hernandez swings a nice bat.

by AlwaysSweatin on Apr 26, 2005 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No we don't secreatasianman
Estimate the odds of Kendall getting hurt in the middle of a game at about 1 in 1,000. In that scenario we choose between letting the pitcher hit once or twice that game, or pinch hitting for the pitcher once or twice that game.

For this we should bench an above-average hitter on a team that's scoring less than a pimply virgin?

Nico

by Nico on Apr 26, 2005 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What?
If Kendall got hurt, why would that make pitchers hit? Is there some rule that  if a catcher gets injured you can move the DH to the catcher position as long as the pitcher hits or somethign?
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 26, 2005 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think...
you can't make a "defensive replacement" for the DH, as far as I understand... anyone care to confirm/deny?
I miss Matt Stairs.

by eastbay on Apr 26, 2005 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

DH
If the DH goes in to play the field, the pitcher is then batting for whoever he replaced.

Bob

ogallalabob

by ogallalabob on Apr 26, 2005 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm
I was not aware of this, thanks.
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 26, 2005 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow
learn something new every day. I figured it would be from school, but I guess since today's day 1 of a new term, I had to get the new factoid from AN! thanks!
The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face.

by JJ on Apr 26, 2005 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting
I wasn't aware of this fact either. Thanks for pointing it out :)

As it stands though, maybe it really wouldn't be a  bad idea to give a pitcher a few at bats. Okay I'm really streching it, but if the pitcher is batting at least 1) It would be interesting and 2) At this point they are probably just as likely to get a hit, but it's less frustrating when they don't.

by Melody on Apr 26, 2005 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well I was pulling the Mulhuse=DH
as a hypothetical.  I know having Melhuse as DH fulltime is not really a smart thing to do.  I do believe we need to bench Durazo for a few games and Melhuse should be given a shot.
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Apr 26, 2005 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't quite have that experience at SBC
I went to the Giants Dbacks game on Thursday, just to go and enjoy some baseball with some buddies of mine who like the Giants, and I decided to wear my A's hat. We were sitting in the bleachers, but about 20 people around me started a "Oakland sucks" chant, and someone threw my A's hat on the field. I got the hat back, and was able to laugh it off, but I would not really say that it was an A's friendly ballpark.

by maxnelson on Apr 26, 2005 1:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How rude of those Giants fans!
Well I'm sorry to hear that! That must have been pretty horrible. Who gave you the hat back? I got into a yelling match with a few drunk Giants fans, but it was about the Rockies. At least it was pretty interesting, and I don't feel bad about it at all since they were just downright rude.

Maybe it was were I was sitting [nosebleed] and the fact that there was probably a good deal of people in the section who either didn't really care about the Giants [people from SoCal who go to college in the Bay Area, and were just attending the game because their school was participating in College Night] or were flat out A's fans in disguise. Nonetheless, I really didn't expect an Oakland chant at a Giants game so it was just a really great moment :)

by Melody on Apr 26, 2005 3:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Team slumps
They happen.  The Astros are having the same problem.  It's contagious, especially on a team that's rather punchless to begin with.  I don't want to overreact, although I admit that I turned off the television after we got down by a few runs.  I don't usually give up that easily.

That said, I think this is going to be a chronic problem all season.  And it gets old to watch.

Durazo got off to a slow start last year (not as bad as this one).  He hasn't forgotten how to hit, but doesn't appear to be worth the money now.  I didn't expect him to replicate last year's performance, but this is brutal.

Chavez... well, he usually starts poorly.  But his slump is magnified, as Miggy's was in 2003, because of the offense's struggles and his big contract.  I was ambivalent about which player to sign when the decision was made, but it's hard to avoid the conclusion that Beane made a big mistake on the Miggy/Chavvy decision.  Chavez, even when he breaks out, will always be a streaky hitter who rarely comes through with the big hit.  And I am disturbed that he's taking his batting slump out there in the field.  We ought to be getting good defense out of the guy, if nothing else.

Left field is a black hole.  We've gotten as much as we can reasonably expect out of Scutaro and Ellis.  Crosby's performance, once he returns, is a question mark.  But he's not the savior.

Right now, it looks like the A's are going to get buried in May as the schedule gets difficult.  We can't expect our young starters to keep pitching so well, especially against Boston and New York.  And the news on the Calero front looks awfully grim.

It won't always be this bad.  The entire lineup isn't going to have the worst season of their careers.  But I doubt it's going to be all that good either.

by bear88 on Apr 26, 2005 1:05 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't boo...
But damn, I'm glad I was delivering pizzas (and making good tips! Thanks, San Ramon!) instead of sitting in the LF bleachers tonight.

by HigherPie on Apr 26, 2005 1:07 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not going to have this site
turn into a place where players are accused of using steroids with absolutely no solid evidence.  Chavez hammered the ball in spring training.  He's slumping right now...and 20 freaking games is not proof that someone has lost their power.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 26, 2005 1:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Amen...
A healthy Chavy still hits 30, easy.

by HigherPie on Apr 26, 2005 1:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would not call it an acousation
The person who posted it was certainly not accusing Chavez of using roids, and I personally think that it was good he brought that up. It is not a law that people have to be postive 100% of the time here, and like everyone else, I am wondering why Chavez is struggling. Clearly no one should be thinking that the most logical explanation is steroid withdrawl, but if you were going to make a list of possible reasons he is struggling, you have to put it on there.

by maxnelson on Apr 26, 2005 1:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

uhh...
hitters have slumped long before steroids even existed.  

it's not a censorship issue: herrera tested positive.  i can say that (about someone in the a's organization) because it's a fact not speculation based on no evidence.

by xbhaskarx on Apr 26, 2005 1:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chavez
Am I mistaken or did he not start slow last year as well?  Chavez will be fine.

Besides I do not think Steroids are the magical drug that the press has made them out to be, I think that overall wieght training and legal supplements account or lesson any impact that going off of them might have.  (not chavez in particular)

Bob

ogallalabob

by ogallalabob on Apr 26, 2005 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

good
and just to clarify because i know there are lots of tejada fans out there: i'm not accusing tejada of being on steroids in my comment above, as i have no evidence either way.  
it was originally a response to another comment that has since been deleted.  

by xbhaskarx on Apr 26, 2005 1:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Deleting Posts
Just curious. This is the first reference I've read to posts being deleted from this site.  Was it deleted by the original poster?  Or by you, Blez?  And, if by Blez, what is your policy about deleting posts from this site?  I read the FAQ and couldn't find any reference to it, other than the talk about using four-letter words, being nasty to other posters, etc.  

I'd prefer a site where intelligent discourse can take place, regardless of one's point of view (excluding, of course, bad language and plain rudeness to others), without fear of posts being pulled.  

by skigurl on Apr 26, 2005 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chavez's problem
isn't a loss of power.  That ball he hit in Texas traveled awfully far.  His problem is hitting the ball, or in some critical situations, swinging in the first place.

Chavez is obviously pressing, which explains his fielding miscues.  These things happen, a fact I keep explaining to my softball-playing daughter.  Watching her team, I am struck by how much of baseball is about confidence and timing.  If your timing is off, you lose confidence.  And then the best player on the team is suddenly striking out left and right.

The only difference is the best player on my daughter's softball team played really well in the field and helped them win the game.  I'd like to think Chavez can do the same.

by bear88 on Apr 26, 2005 1:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed!
Thanks Blez! I would expect more from AN!
The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face.

by JJ on Apr 26, 2005 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well, here is another slippery slope...
..."i would expect more from AN!" i'm not sure what standard you're using JJ to make a remark like that, but its a tad condescending with a pinch of patronizing.

i happen to believe everyone has a right to an opinion. if some on AN believe an athlete has used PEDs to boost his performance...well, thats their opinion. what are we worried about? maybe some of the players won't like us or something. geesh!

the blog environment was created by individuals, for individuals, to speak/converse beyond the mainstream. some of the most fascinating and more remarkable "questions" and "inquiries" originated in "the blog-sphere".

do i know for a fact that miggy has used 'roids? no. can i SUSPECT he has used 'roids? sure. hopefully, we can still have intelligent discussions about such items on this site.

 

"Hey Ho Let's Go!"- The 2005 A's, kickin' some ass.

by bigelephant on Apr 26, 2005 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

another slippery slope
A's offense is another slippery slope or actually slippery slop since a slope would mean some type of movement.
"What I'm trying to do is set our pitching up for five years," said Beane

by Satchmo22 on Apr 26, 2005 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just think it's a slippery slope...
and the more people say things like this, the more likely it is that people dogpile on the idea.

As I've stated many times here, I'm a firm believer in innocent until proven guilty.  You want to talk about Giambi, Bonds and Sheffield as roids users, fine, they've admitted to it.  But don't start asking if anyone who goes into a slump if they're off the juice.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 26, 2005 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure last night was frustrating...
But remember all the trite sayings that just happen to be true:
Long Season
Slumps End
In Billy We Trust
etc.

For me, the only good part of the game was that mlb.com sucked big time last night - kept dropping out - and I missed the Sox' scoring. Thank Allah for small favors!

Hang in there gang. And remember that it could always be worse - we could be fans of teams that havent't won all the championships our team has and who are crazy jealous of what we have.

"Holy Manama!" ~Bahrain, 5,000+ miles east of Toledo :-)~

by NomAd on Apr 26, 2005 3:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Seattle 2004
this team looks a lot like Seattle last year which is why they spent too much money on Beltre and Sexton.  It may very well be that we look back in 5 years and realize that the best year either Durazo or Byrnes ever had was 2004.  For that matter, maybe Ginter will never hit 20 hr's again.  4 shutouts in 22 games, this looks very bad, and I don't see where the improvement is going to come from.  Clearly a major shakeup is necessary and I think Beane will be the guy who does it.

by china bob on Apr 26, 2005 3:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Major shakeup
I think Billy realized that Durazo and Brynes had career years last year, but they still should be closer to 90% of those numbers then where thye are now.  On the other hand, when this many guys are not hitting there is not much you can do, but hope they breakout at the same time.  One bat is not going to do it and even if it would, what is Beane just to roll the dice and pull a name out of the hat as for as who to replace?

Bob

ogallalabob

by ogallalabob on Apr 26, 2005 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Byrnes needs consistent at bats
All of the melodrama with the off-season trade rumors (and look at the current marketing--no Byrnes anywhere which tells me that Beane was not just passively getting phone calls; he was actively working to see to it that Byrnes would be gone come opening day) the refusal to name Byrnes the starting left-fielder, and then benching him everytime he goes 0-for or just to give Thomas and Kielty the little-league fair chance in the lineup--no wonder Byrnes is off to a rough start.

If Beane could knock off the mind games and let Byrnes work his way out of his slump with some consistent at-bats, I'm sure he'd pull out of it quickly.

The Gadfly

by Just Me on Apr 26, 2005 9:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I totally agree.
I never criticize a player until they are first convinced of my unconditional confidence in their abilities. ~John Robinson

by baseballgirl on Apr 26, 2005 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's a major shake up....
How about giving the guys the greenlight to swing at a first pitch if they want to?  

Seems like they are standing in there and watching strike one go right down the pipe, then have to start their AB in a hole.   It's predictable as hell.

Give them the greenlight to swing away at the first pitch and it could be like Rocky II when Rocky started out the fight right handed then Micky gave let him switch back to southpaw near the end of the fight and he pounded on Apollo.

Let's just not wait until we're pounded into Hamburger!!

by AthleticsMojo on Apr 26, 2005 4:20 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

that's a good suggestion
and something that the A's can do without waiting for Billy to pull a good trade out of an untimely hat.

Swinging early in the count (contrary to opposing teams' expectations), team meetings, lineup changes, are all possible ways to shake the A's out of what has become a very predictable offensive routing.

by OaklandSi on Apr 26, 2005 5:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Longview people, longview.....
....keep some perspective on this team.

last year beane stated he had a "flawed team" that won 90 games and it was time to rebuild. i liked most of the changes he made in the off-season but understood he wasn't done retooling this team. to expect another 90-95 win season is really unrealistic and will only lead to extreme frustration. i'm chosing to sit back and watch in awe how BB retools this team for '06 and beyond.

sit back, relax, and enjoy the ride. billy is  poring the cement for the foundation.

"Hey Ho Let's Go!"- The 2005 A's, kickin' some ass.

by bigelephant on Apr 26, 2005 5:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

ok this is bugging me
If the A's played the Astros in a 3 game set, would they actually complete this series before the all-star break?
"What I'm trying to do is set our pitching up for five years," said Beane

by Satchmo22 on Apr 26, 2005 5:52 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

no
each game would take a week or so. By the end Durazo would be on the DL for pitching in three straight games with an era of 0.00. Nasty stuff.
"Don't you play the flute, Huddy?"

by capper3 on Apr 26, 2005 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If this wasn't a family friendly site..
I'd tell you to f**k off.
"Don't you play the flute, Huddy?"

by capper3 on Apr 26, 2005 8:24 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I never questioned
your fanhood, but reacting to your attitude expressed in that post of yours.
"Don't you play the flute, Huddy?"

by capper3 on Apr 26, 2005 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow
Another unprovoked dig at the t-shirts and those who bought them.

Bitter much?

Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. - Will Rogers

by McFood on Apr 26, 2005 8:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Red Sox nation
is always happy to accept somebody jumping onto their bandwagon.
athleticsnation.com, 164

by ArakSOT on Apr 26, 2005 8:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

damn skippy
I miss Matt Stairs.

by eastbay on Apr 26, 2005 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Half Empty, Half Full...
...either way ITS TIME FOR MORE! I share everyones frustration but I will remain an optimist for now. I was thinking about who we've lost and gained since last year. Lost Dye, brought in Swish. Lost Miller, brought in Kendall. Lost Crosby to injury, Scooters back. Ellis is back. Hopefully we drop Durazo and bring in Dan Johnson to DH. Who knows what we might get for Dotel when Street get the nod to close. I feel we have a very solid team thats simply in a contagious funk right now.I remain optimistic for our cold team in the warmer days ahead...

by heatchaser on Apr 26, 2005 8:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Rants / Team Meeting
Kendall:

How long will it be before he hits a homerun?  Seriously, this guy might have 600 AB's and not hit a homerun all year.  His presence in the dugout and behind the plate is great, but JK has absolutely NO POWER.  I wish he would dig in, and swing for the fences every once in a while.  Instead, he tries to slap the ball around the park like Neifi Perez.

Chavez:

I should have known there was a problem when Chavvy's slow start is just something to "Laugh" about...Dude - See Ball, Hit Ball.  And the fact that he hasn't shown one bit of emotion on the field only makes matters worse (for me).

Byrnes/Kielty/Thomas:

A 3-Headed Monster that has sucked the life out of this team.  They all seem so worried about playing time, but all do nothing about it.

Durazo:

How did he age 10 years in one offseason?

Swisher:

20 K's, 3 BB's - His plate discipline is not as advertised.  The A's hitting coach (Hudgens) told Swisher to be more "aggressive"...What?

Scutaro/Ellis:  

Why does it look like every bloop is barely going over their gloves.  I keep muttering to myself, "If Bobby was in there, he would have caught it"?

Kotsay:

Thank you!  Your leadership will pay dividends eventually.

Hatteberg:

Did Macha learn nothing from last year?  He can't keep running Hatteberg out to 1B everyday.  So far, there's been no reason to bench him, but that could have been said last year as well.  Rest Hatty so his numbers remain solid.  We might need him as trade-bait in July.

Melhuse:

Do we even need him on the bench?  Why not trade for a Brandon Inge type(IF/C)?

Starting Pitching Staff:

Thank you for keeping us in games!  Too bad that every pitch you make is a pressure pitch.  Trying to be too perfect (Zito) is reason teams get to you late in games.

Bullpen:

Macha is going to kill Huston Street before he has a chance to be our closer.  He should have put Calero and Cruz on the DL, and brought up Etherton and Mabeus/Garcia/Rheinecker to take their place.  Instead, he's going to ruin our best young pitcher (Street) during a semi-meaningless April game.

End of Meeting.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 26, 2005 9:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Melhuse
Sorry I keep talking about Melhuse, but I know he's played first before and Hatteberg was a catcher before he moved to first. They "need" Melhuse because he's the only decent backup catcher that Oakland has. As far as I know, Melhuse isn't going anywhere. While he's not getting played much (because Kendall "needs to be accustomed to the AL," ect.) they can't trade him. I really think he deserves more at bats, and perhaps he should play first base occasionally so Hatteberg could have a day off. Last year Melhuse caught everytime Redman pitched, if I remember correctly, and then he caught some other games too so Miller could have a day off.

Your analysis was harsh, but fair. I agree about the bullpen, and there should be at least one other person in there. Calero is great, and I wish he was healthy because he's been wonderful for the A's [and I have him on my fantasy team, grr] but if he can't pitch, might as well just send him down for a bit. The faster they send him to the DL, the faster he gets back. Stalling will only make the delay worse. As much as Street is a great pitcher to watch and it's exciting each time he's put into the game [tell me that "6-inch slide" isn't one of the most gorgeous moves ever!] he shouldn't be overplayed. I'm afraid that he'll get both worn out and `figured' out.

I also think that Etherton should be tried out in the bullpen, especailly if the whole "Let's trade Dotel, NICE HAVING YOU, THANKS FOR YOUR HELP :D" trade rumor is true.

by Melody on Apr 26, 2005 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

FYI
..."but if he can't pitch, might as well just send him down for a bit. The faster they send him to the DL, the faster he gets back. Stalling will only make the delay worse."

You can DL a person retroactive to the last day they pitched for the team.  Thus, Calero's last outing was April 14th (I Think) - If they DL'd him today, he'd be available to pitch on April 30th (approx.), or 15 Days from his last appearance.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 26, 2005 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Retroactive
You can only DL a person retroactive to a maximum of seven days. Since seven days have passed since his last outing, he'd be on the DL for 15 days from the day we put him there.
Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 26, 2005 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This was what I meant to say...
This was what I was referring to... I think. I have to admit that I'm still learning as far as baseball knowledge goes. But I figured if they had sent him down on April 15th, and he was okay to pitch by, oh, today, at least we'd get him back on the 30th, and meanwhile we could have another person in the rotation. But if they decide to send him down today, or tomorrow, or whatever, it's too late to get him back in time for the first Yankees/Red Sox series. And we all know how important it is to have strong pitchers for those series.

by Melody on Apr 26, 2005 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Etherton
Could be wrong but I think I read that Etherton is on the DL.

by Larry E on Apr 26, 2005 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

trade zito, replace hudgens, and retool this site
1 - zito's a liability.  one or two runs allowed per game is ok, 6 or 7 is not.

2 - let's face it, the a's hitting has stunk for quite some time.  a new hitting coach might get things going.  it couldn't hurt, at least.

3 - i love the idea of this site, but webpages that are six miles long and don't having easily navigatible categories are a pain.  split it into blez's blog and a community forum.

go a's!

by beccadog on Apr 26, 2005 9:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

but he's supposedly the "ace"
with a 6.60 ERA and no wins after 4 starts.  remember how we lost the AL West last year within the last 3 games of the regular season?

by beccadog on Apr 26, 2005 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what's in a name
so he isn't our "ace," so what. with the way harden has been pitching, how can anyone be better than that? I recall last year we lost during the final series of the year at home to the angels. I don't remember who pitched those last 3 games though, did zito lose all those games?
Let's Go A's!

by AllThingsOakland on Apr 26, 2005 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

no, he didn't lose "all those games"
zito pitched the second of the three games vs anaheim, but the bullpen blew that game to allow the angels to win the division.

but the point is that each game counts, slow start or not.  especially with the way the team has been hitting.  

by beccadog on Apr 26, 2005 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

don't ride him so hard..
..he has been good in his last 3 starts, our offense has let him down as well as the rest of our pitching staff. Z will get it together to be our #2 guy.
Let's Go A's!

by AllThingsOakland on Apr 26, 2005 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you're right
just disappointment rearing it's ugly head.  it's just a shame that the big three seems a big zero right now.

by beccadog on Apr 26, 2005 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are explanations for the slumps
Kotsay - not slumping, doesn't apply

Kendall - adjusting to a new league (see Kotsay, Mark); he'll hit, but it may take a while

Chavez - always a slow starter; pressing

Durazo - had a career year in 2004 after a slow start; wasn't as good as he was last year, isn't as bad as he looks now

Hatteberg - what you see is what you get

Ellis - has outperformed

Byrnes - streak hitter; everyone in the league knows how to get him out

Swisher - he's fine, won't hit for a high average anyway

Scutaro - has outperformed

Kielty - he's been a bit unlucky lately; mainly, though, he just isn't very good

Thomas - pressing the longer his hitless streak lasts

Ginter - never plays

Melhuse - never plays

Some of these players - Chavez, Durazo, Byrnes - will come out of their slumps at some point.  Crosby's return to the lineup should help, although it's not a guarantee.  Kendall may follow the Kotsay pattern of struggling early in a new league and then doing fine, but he could have adjustment problems all season.  We just don't know.  Byrnes may have peaked last year, as many of us suspected.

This lineup isn't that different from last year's.  You substitute Swisher for Dye, and Kendall for Miller.  Ellis is playing instead of Crosby.  The inability to hit with runners in scoring position is the same.  The lineup is never going to be especially imposing, but it will not always be this bad.

by bear88 on Apr 26, 2005 9:20 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

beautifully done, bear88--
worthy of a "Voice of Reason" award! I nominate your post as "post of the day." Of course, I nominate this one runner-up.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 26, 2005 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zito
I still say theres no better pitcher to watch when hes on his A game then Barry Zito

by WhatElse on Apr 26, 2005 9:28 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Quoth Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy: Don't Panic
These guys are ball players.  They all know how to hit and how to play.  Things will come around, and keeping faith in the lineup is the best thing to do right now.  

In addition it's also time to be absolutelly stunned by the numbers our pitchers are putting up this year.  I couldn't be happier with the team right now.  To bat around .230 and be only 2 games below .500 is truly amazing, and if we get any life in our offense then I think we might have a playoff year.

And that would be absolutelly incredible considering the inexperience of our starting pitching.

by dmcewan on Apr 26, 2005 9:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Detroit Bad!
Someone posted this at baseball primer:

2003 Detroit Tigers: 240/300/375, 247 EqA
2005 Oakland A's: 229/299/338, 228 EqA

I agree with most of you that they will snap out of it and a lineup change might be beneficial. My suggestion:

Swisher
Hatteberg
Kotsay
Chavez
Kielty
Durazo
Kendall
Ellis
Scutaro

Give Durazo two more weeks before you call up DJ.

by D Fords Cousin on Apr 26, 2005 9:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

My take ...
Colorado fan is basically right on, with a few midifications.
  Ruby has never been very.  He's basically a 26 pound singles hitter who would rather walk than drive the ball and is old before his time.
For the love of God, put freaking Melhuse in the game.  He can DH.  Melody is right, and stop worrying about the backup catcher.  If Kendall gets hurt, Melhuse stays in to catch and we lose our DH - for part of one game, no big deal!
Drop Chavy down in the lineup or take him out against Beurhle (sp?) tonight.  He can't hit lefty junk even when he's at his best.
Left field - who knows, they're all bad.
Huston Street - what in the world was he doing in the game when down 4 (which may as well have been 40)in the 7th inning.  You're going to destroy his arm.
As for Chavy and steroid suspicions.  Hey, everyone is a suspect at this point.  If the signs are there, they are hard to ignore.
Chavy gained alot of muscle last year from "lifting".
Miggy got very strong and had some acne a few years ago ... at age 26.
Mulder has had some very strange injuries after beefing up quite a bit.  A stress fracture of the femur is not commonplace.
How about Nomar, whose every muscle seems to pull tendon from bone?
I'm not accusing anyone of anything, but in the current world of baseball scrutiny can be expected.

by iceplant on Apr 26, 2005 10:01 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

who would..
..you have put in to take over in the 7th, if not Street?
Let's Go A's!

by AllThingsOakland on Apr 26, 2005 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yabu
  • Up or Down 4 Runs (Non-Save Situations), you put in Yabu, Duke, or Cruz.  
  • Up or Down 3 Runs or Less (Save Situations), you put in Calero (unavailable), Street, Rincon (lefties only), and Dotel.
Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 26, 2005 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On Street
Huston Street - what in the world was he doing in the game when down 4 (which may as well have been 40)in the 7th inning.  You're going to destroy his arm.

I really don't see this.  Street has pitched 4 times in the last 10 days, for a total of 5 1/3 innings.  He's thrown in consecutive days once this year, the second game being a 7-pitch outing against the Angels immediately after the win in the series finale against the Jays.  He hasn't thown 30 pitches in a game yet this year.

I favor being conservative with pitchers, especially young, talented ones who were almost certainly overworked in college, but Macha has been very responsible about giving Street adequate rest this year, even after Calero and Cruz became unavailable and ineffective.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would have
saved him for a more meaningful situation.  He is the glue of the bullpen right now.  There's a good chance of a close game tonight, and a 4 run deficit after 7 with their starter still dominating was not close last night.  If he had brought him in when it was 2-0 I could have understood it better.

by iceplant on Apr 26, 2005 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Front office is to blame
They're dragging their feet on Calero.

by boilerdan on Apr 26, 2005 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's a fair point
I think you're ready to promote him faster than Macha is.  But I'm not worried about Macha overusing him.  I think he's been very careful about the amount of work he gives Street and the types of situations he's put him in.  Maybe too conservative an approach, but not dangerous for Street's arm.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't understand
why someone wasn't ready in the bullpen at the beginning of the 7th.  Zito had already thrown close to 100 pitches, and that's usually his effective limit.  
Visit the beautiful Napa Valley, home of many Oakland A's fans.

by kkdaz on Apr 26, 2005 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

good point
I was at the game, and that was bizarre.  Macha was asleep at the wheel.  There was no way he could have predicted Widger's homer, but by the time Zito gave up Everett's double, he was throwing his 116th pitch.  At the start of the inning he'd thrown 94 pitches, and I said to my friend that someone would probably get up after one baserunner.  Instead we had a baserunner, a homer, another baserunner, a huge fight breaking out next to the bullpen in the leftfield seats, and then finally, Houston Street up in the bullpen.

by rubin sierra on Apr 26, 2005 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah it hurts right now!
I will try and smother my frustrations with the team right now, at least until June.  However, I'm affraid that our pitchers (our young pitchers) are going to grow incresingly frustrated with being "Hudson-ed".  

If our bats haven't returned by June 1st, I'm going to expect Billy to pull the trigger on those that are "underperforming" and move them for a RH power bat, prospects, cash, whatever.  It will be time to make room for some of the young talent that we have in Sac-town and really gear up for 2006.

I'm shocked at our performance thus far....

Now THIS is Billy Ball

by Masaryk on Apr 26, 2005 10:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

ZITO...
...has put up 19 "Z"'s this year, unfortunately our offense has posted more ZZZZZZZZZZZZ's... at what point do we post Z's at the coliseum for the offense? Im still waiting it out, one guy in this lineup has to go on a tear and ignite this team...

by heatchaser on Apr 26, 2005 10:27 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

simmer down
ya'll need to relax.  this year is going to be full of challenges and if you can't see them coming, they will drive you crazy.  

in a month, the we'll be in 3rd or last after bruising games against Boston and NY.  in two months, people will be moaning about the #5 spot being a disaster and the league figuring out Haren and Blanton.  in three months, people will be wondering why Street hasn't replaced Dotel and why the player we get for Byrnes, Kielty and/or Thomas isn't playing better.  in four months, people will be wondering why DJ isn't playing everyday.

These hitting woes will disappear or move to the back burner before long.  I could be mistaken, but I doubt it.

by mbrinda on Apr 26, 2005 10:28 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Challenges
"ya'll need to relax.  this year is going to be full of challenges and if you can't see them coming, they will drive you crazy."

I agree with this statement. However i just wanted to make it clear that these aren't the challenges we expected. Everything is the opposite of how we thought it was.

Kielty, rejuvenated by his new genetically created St.Pats Day/Oktoberfest, shows us why Billy and Ohad are geniuses.

by ohad on Apr 26, 2005 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed
If it was Haren, Blanton and Saarloos really stinking it up.  I really wouldn't mind.  They're pretty much rookies and this is part of the learning process.  But our offense isn't made up of rookies...
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Apr 26, 2005 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

confused...
i'd consider that a lot worse.  if haren, blanton and saarloos were stinking, that's something that could continue all year.  whereas the team batting average won't be .200 this year.

by xbhaskarx on Apr 26, 2005 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really
The pitching has exceeded my expectations.  I really am impressed with all of the young guys firing on all cylinders right now and really showing that they are maturing.

Kendall is forgiven right now because he's adjusting to the AL.

However the people on whom we rely the most for our offense has not delivered.  These people aren't rookies and the they aren't adjusting to a new league.  How can Chavez strike out so much?

"I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" -Brick Tamland, Anchorman

by secret ASian man on Apr 26, 2005 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey glad I can provide you with
a service that you love so much.  Thanks for your patronage.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Apr 26, 2005 11:20 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

2 consecutive SHO
I'm not ready to panic just yet, but how long before I should?  :/
Painful and frustrating.

Maybe the guys who aren't hitting right now should be moved down the order.  Oh wait.  Never mind.  If that's the case then everyone not named Hatteburg, Scutaro, and Kotsay would be tied... :(

GO A's!!!

by AsGirl on Apr 26, 2005 11:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hiccups
Well, after last nights loss I started drinking some Bacardi Rum, and igot the hiccups. Now when I woke up I have the hiccups again, i can't rid of em. any suggestions?

by mrlebowski79 on Apr 26, 2005 12:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A spoonful of sugar
Seriously, this works.  Take a regular teaspoon, fill it with ordinary, granulated sugar, and pop it in the back of your mouth.  Try to swallow it before it melts -- the granules will tickle your throat and interrupt the hiccuping signal.  It works for me, at any rate.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The best cure for the hiccups
is a sudden scare. Try opening the sports section quickly and looking at the A's stats with runners in scoring position.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 26, 2005 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a bad suggestion
because I think vomiting repeatedly also cures the hiccups.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow this site has gotten insanely popular
Like 25 new diaries per day.  Pretty heavy activity.  Blez you are going to have to come up with multiple rooms, et cetera, to try and accomodate all of this growth.  It's impressive.

I went to the game last night.  I think there is a sense of desperation; certainly consecutive shut outs for the first time since a season in which we lost 97 games makes us think, uh-oh, we might lose 97 games.

I don't think we will.  Our pitching is too good for that to happen.  But I do think that those who predicted 90+ wins at the season's outset are being proven wrong:  such predictions were based on the premise that last year's offensive actually underperformed, but my gut tells me that actually they overperformed.  Of course we will score our share of runs next year, but probably less than the average AL team.

As for Chavez, I think the desperation is not due to people thinking he's going to finish the season beneath the Mendoza line--of course he'll get his homers and his hot streaks.  But what really IS looking more and more probable is that we have seen the best he has to offer.  30-35 homers and a .270 average.  In other words, he's good enough to be an All-Star reserve, but not an All-Star starter, good enough to win a Gold Globe, but not an MVP.  That, I think, is the knot in our collective stomachs w.r.t. Chavez--that the 40+ homer, .300 season we've all dreamed of seeing from him is never going to materialize.  

But then, what are we going to do, give up?!  Judging by the activity on this site, not likely.

by rubin sierra on Apr 26, 2005 12:21 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm afraid that is correct ...
Most of Chavy's reputation is built on talent and projection or potential.  But the fact is that he is 26 and has never been able to hit for average and he has a history of going into "funks".  The more the A's have relied on him as a central cog in the offense, the more he has shown his inability to be that guy.  Last year's inability to score runs was probably not an accident due to bad "situational" hitting.  It was a reflection of the team's lack of good hitters.  Walks and soft line drives get people on base, but they do not drive in runs at the same rate as well hit balls.  Chavez desperately needs to get out of the 3,4,5 spot in the lineup so that he can be a force in the bottom of the order.  Unfortunately, it seems that is they he feels too and that is not consistent with the contract he signed.  I love Chavy's defense and personality, but maybe this is not the team for him.  Maybe he should go to the Mets, where he can hit sixth behind Beltran, Piazza and Floyd, and his contract will be more in line with a good player, not necessarily the franchise star?  I'm not really reccommending it, but I'm sure we could get a bundle of talent for him.

by iceplant on Apr 26, 2005 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sweet
Thanks Nick.

by mrlebowski79 on Apr 26, 2005 12:25 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Did it work?
n/t
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

YA
n/t

by mrlebowski79 on Apr 26, 2005 1:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The hitting coach
Has anyone called for Dave Hudgens' head yet?

by thebigbz on Apr 26, 2005 1:28 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, Al Swearengen
has it in a box and he's walking around talking to it.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Apr 26, 2005 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bring Back Jeremy Giambi
I expected Swisher to have some ups and downs...but sick of seeing Kielty, Byrnes and Thomas play crappy defense. They can't hit, can't get on base, and they plain just are awful.  Still will give Chavez the benefit of the doubt. Durazo too, but we can't get in a hole cause the Angels will start hitting too.  Maybe Jeremy Giambi, John Mabry, and Terrence Long aren't so bad afterall. Never thought I'd say that!  

by gloveman on Apr 26, 2005 1:51 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Rincon
Batting 4th for your oakland athletics... Ricardo Rincon!
Don't count us out in '05.

by Jordan33 in Santa Cruz on Apr 26, 2005 1:59 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

not a bad idea
that midget should be able to manage a few walks.
Let's Go A's!

by AllThingsOakland on Apr 26, 2005 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

blasphemy!
Jeremy Giambi will rot in hell for what he did to us.  SLIDE, Jeremy, SLIDE!!!

by mbrinda on Apr 26, 2005 2:22 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

While you're on the subject...
don't forget to explain to Byrnes that a basic fundamental of baseball is to actually touch home plate.

by CB77 on Apr 26, 2005 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zito last night
Zito certainly pitched well enough to win that ballgame. Macha had to stick with him to try to keep the CWS lineup in check until our offense came to life. Barry ran out of gas plain and simple. The offense did what they have been doing lately....nothing.

As much as we love these guys its killing us fans because we know they are better than this. Some of the new guys maybe need to go down to Sac to get some at bats and playing time, they certainly can't get any riding the pine here in Oak. Macha and BB need to find the right combination somewhere somehow, the team seems to be headed in the wrong direction.  

by Big Jim on Apr 26, 2005 3:26 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah....
I glanced through all of the messages from yesterday's game to today, and I didn't see anyone talk about how Macha SHOULD have left Zito in. I'm sorry if I missed something, but everyone seems to think that Zito should have been gone by the first baserunner. I think Macha was really hoping that Zito could pull through the top of the 7th and the offense in the bottom. Because with 6 previous scoreless innings and a 0-3 record, Zito REALLY needed that win, and it's not to say that a win was out of reach. Except it was.

by Melody on Apr 26, 2005 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Macha/Young
They appear to be re-active when they should be pro-active.  They new Barry struggles from pitch 100 and up - Hell, they even replaced him in game 161 last year after 115 pitches.

So all of a sudden the WhiteSox unload a 2-Run homerun, and Macha/Young are stumbling in the dugout, calling down to the bullpen, getting someone warm.  This should have happened during the bottom-half of the inning.  Street should have been ready to go just in case someone got on base.

Anyways, this can go back to Billy Beane as well.  If he had DL'd Calero/Cruz, and broght up a couple relievers, we wouldn't have to keep Barry in the game past 100+ pitches.

Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 26, 2005 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree to a point...
... but I dont think Chavez wants/has the "leader" in him. It would take a guy like Kotasy to call a team meeting, grab hold this ship, and steer it above .500. I have also been in disagreeance with some of Cacha's decisions, but how nice would it be to see Wash as Captain of the Ship...

by heatchaser on Apr 26, 2005 3:30 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Chavez as the team leader..
may not be a good idea, when he is hitting he is awesome and of course his D is certainly can't be questioned, but maybe he is a contributer and not a leader type of guy. Nothing wrong with that it just isn't his thing.

As far as Wash as the skipper that would be great, but we have to remember Macha only writes the lineup down on paper he can't play all the positions for everyone. The players have to do it themselves.        

by Big Jim on Apr 26, 2005 3:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I liked..
the rumor or comment to the fact that somehow Todd Helton was available. Maybe he is, to get him in an A's uniform would be awesome. But the salary he commands wouldnt fit the A's financial plans unless the new owners would be willing to open the wallet a little wider.  

by Big Jim on Apr 26, 2005 3:49 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Not happening
Helton will be a 20-Million per year in the near, near future (per contract).  Think differently than Todd Helton.
Let's Go Oak-Land!

by Colorado Fan on Apr 26, 2005 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Helton is due 16 Mil for each season ....
... through 2010 season AND 19 mil in 2011 !!

by HerbWashington on Apr 26, 2005 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I cringe
I say have Ellis or Kotsay leading off, and please drop Chavez in the lineup, this guy strikes out, grounds out, pops out, fouls out at the end of almost every first inning, maybe 5th then put Hatteberg 3rd with Kendall at 4th then Chavez after that,just expermient a little
You may have the greatest bunch of individual stars in the world, but if they don't play together, the club wont be worth a dime.-Babe Ruth

by doublehustle22 on Apr 26, 2005 4:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

it's a matter of time
We know the type of players chavez, durazo and kendall are, specially those 3, they'll start hitting like they have always do.

I think, right now Mr. Macha should play a little with the lineup until the invisible-bats disappear. Against Buehrle:
kotsay, ellis, hatty, kendall, chavez, byrnes, durazo, kielty, scutaro.

byrnes and kielty had batted very well against the enemy pitcher for today.

So Lets keep supporting the team and help them start their bats.

LET'S GO OAKLAND, FROM DOMINICAN REPUBLIC.

by haroldMD on Apr 26, 2005 4:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No Spark
What I don't really understand is if you are in as bad of a slump as the A's are right now, why you dont try and create things. The A's are last in the league in steals, do not go first to third like others do, and really seem scared at the plate. Its just so irritating as we have guys who really do have speed.

In addition to being more aggressive, IMO they still need another OF bat. Someone like say Preston Wilson could probably be had for cheap. I dunno, just throwing that out there. GO A's!

by Pucking Insane on Apr 26, 2005 4:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Have faith in this team....
there is really nothing new I can add to the comments from both sides...AN has passionate fans posting and the frustration is so evident..and like Blez said...if we are frustrated, how much worse do the pitchers,NOT TO MENTION THE HITTERS, feel.
This game truly makes one humble...Wash says that all the time...
We need to wait this out...doesn't mean we "like" it in any sense...just wait it out..appreciate the positives we are seeing.
You'd rather watch some other team play? I don't think so.
Let's get out to the park and support these guys..turn it around tonight!!! Let's go A's!
See you at the ballpark!

by LongTimeFan on Apr 26, 2005 4:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Long Time Fan is Right
I feel heartsick right now about the last few games, but we can't start turning on the players and each other. Nothing good will come of it.
Remember -- it's April. Remember -- Billy is very smart. Remember -- We love this team and you have to show some compassion for people you love when they're going through a bad time.

by SportySpice on Apr 26, 2005 5:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree
It's still April and I don't give up on teams this easily. They are eventually going to hit and hopefully when they do that's when the other teams go through their slumps. Considering the lackluster offense this team is still right there with Anaheim, Texas, and Seattle. If they were 6 or 7 games back I would probably be a little more worried. I like a fast start as much as anyone else but I'm not about to jump ship because of the slump. I learned a while ago that you gotta keep the faith (In Billy).

by DodgerLuv1 on Apr 26, 2005 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On an unrelated note...
Has anyone ever "homered for the cycle"? Because I think A-Rod has a 2-run HR, a 3-run HR, and a grand slam, against the Angels today--and the game is only in the 5th inning!
Nico

by Nico on Apr 26, 2005 5:51 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm totally watching this game...
...almost like a train wreck.

Hate the Yankees, but I do love seeing the Angels lose HORRIBLY. ;)

I never criticize a player until they are first convinced of my unconditional confidence in their abilities. ~John Robinson

by baseballgirl on Apr 26, 2005 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

didn't even try for a home run this AB
base hit up the middle, but he's up to 10 RBIs

by xbhaskarx on Apr 26, 2005 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know its bad when
A-rod single-handedly bats in as many runs in 4 innings that our A-team has in the last 4 games.

by green star oakland on Apr 26, 2005 5:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

And more RBIs in one game...
...than practically any of our players this season.
I never criticize a player until they are first convinced of my unconditional confidence in their abilities. ~John Robinson

by baseballgirl on Apr 26, 2005 5:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kotsay and Kendall each have 10
but its only the 5th inning in NY ...

by green star oakland on Apr 26, 2005 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who will have more RBI this week .. A-Rod? A's?
.... my money's on the Spankees third-baseman !!

Tho, I do like the career numbers of Kielty and Byrnes against Buerhle.

We'll soon see if those numbers amount to anything !!

by HerbWashington on Apr 26, 2005 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ho-hum ... only RBI single for A-Rod in 6th
... breaking Tony Lazzeri's 79-year old Spankee record !!

of course, lazzeri did it against Philly A's !!

by HerbWashington on Apr 26, 2005 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My new favorite Rex quote:
"Yeah, so I think Colon left the ball up to A-rod"

YEAH, YOU THINK? 3 HRs, 9 RBIs worth of "left the ball up".

Hilarious. :)

I never criticize a player until they are first convinced of my unconditional confidence in their abilities. ~John Robinson

by baseballgirl on Apr 26, 2005 5:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great insight, Rex
It probably WAS the ball.
Nico

by Nico on Apr 26, 2005 6:11 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

527918550406_0_bg_small
2010 Off-Season Blueprint
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #15
Dscf1071_small
DLD 11/5/09
Super_grover_small
2010 Offseason Primer
Oaklandathletics_small
The (un)Official bit... uh.. Feedback thread for the layout change

Recent FanPosts

Dsc00764_small
DLD - 11/07/2009 - How to Keep Yourself Occupied in the Off-Season
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 4: The Biggest Off Season (Potential) Decision Doesn't Involve Free Agents
Oaklandathletics_small
Hardy to Minnesota. What's with the early offseason trades?
Tyler_at_maya_school_small
Happy 6th Birthday, AN!
Oaklandathletics_small
Let's Go Oakland: Keep the A's
Bill_king_small
Organizational Statistics: Winter Leagues
Funny-pictures12_small
My Rant Against The Champions And MLB In General

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans