My Debut on Inside Baseball Postponed
The fever has finally broken, but now I have a painful and uncontrollable cough, so I won't be on Inside Baseball with Marty Lurie tonight. Although I suggest you tune in because Marty will be interviewing Ken Macha and a writer for MLB.com who covered the Dodgers during Milton Bradley's time there.
As for other news, Johnny Damon signed with the Yankees. This makes the Red Sox desperate for a new center fielder. I don't think the A's will be involved, despite the fact that the A's basically have three center fielders. Kotsay has a no-trade clause in his contract. Payton made a hasty retreat from Boston when he didn't get any playing time. And Milton Bradley is someone the A's have wanted for a while.
The Yankees also signed Octavio Dotel. They reportedly signed him for a $2 million one-year contract. It'll be interesting to see how Dotel performs this season coming off Tommy John surgery. The A's aren't the type of team that can take a chance on a player coming off surgery and risk tying up salary on a player who may or may not be healthy.
The truth is I'm more frustrated that the Yankees were able to sign Mike Myers. He could've been the ideal lefty specialist for the A's. Right now, the A's don't have a true LOOGY. Or at least one that is proven.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
sorry you can't do the show tonight
I've forgotten: what time is the program?
LOOGY
I guess the question is, do the A's have a bullpen strong enough to survive without a LOOGY? The Angels were able to do it--of course their pen was probably the best in baseball, with shutdown strikeout guys. Ours is strong, but is it strong enough?
Really, there are only a few guys in the league you really need a LOOGY for. Ortiz is a big one. Hafner's another one. The argument, I guess, is go for every little advantage you can get, but I wonder what the numbers show about pens that have depended on LOOGY's vs. pens that have not.
by rockbutt on Dec 21, 2005 11:41 AM PST reply actions
Yeah, butt of rock,
http://www.athleticsnation.com/story/2005/12/3/162726/476
I think Kennedy could be an above-average LOOGY, though 2.4 mil is too much for a team like the A's to pay for a LOOGY. His price tag leads me to believe he'll be used in middle relief, meaning either he'll double as a LOOGY when available, will share bullpen time with a second lefty, or will be part of a "LOOGY-free" bullpen.
in his last year with the A's
I find it difficult to believe that the A's will use Kennedy as only a LOOGY for that amount of $$. However, he would be a very affordable starter for someone else...
Warning: Old Zito Rumor
------------------------------------------------
I suppose they'll never go away.
That must be the easiest story
Mets after Zito!
Zito to the Mets?
And folks get paid to come up with that stuff.
Good Luck
by haren4prez on Dec 22, 2005 10:41 PM PST up reply actions
1550
by doublehustle22 on Dec 21, 2005 12:04 PM PST reply actions
What time is the show?
Thanks
I'd go crazy if that's what I hear during A's games.
[recycled joke]
I want to buy a radio station
make sure
Finley days again
by billyball1981 on Dec 23, 2005 6:11 PM PST up reply actions
Oh and thanks for all of your
by Tyler Bleszinski on Dec 21, 2005 12:08 PM PST reply actions
Yankees.....
2006 Yankees = 2001 A's
(OK, Maybe just seeing Giambi AND Damon in pinstripes is gonna give me the willies)
cant beleive dotel...
Don't think we wanted him anyway
by kaweahkaweah on Dec 21, 2005 1:32 PM PST up reply actions
We don't need him!
by A'sfansince1970 on Dec 21, 2005 1:37 PM PST reply actions
Bradford
Admittedly, I just like the guy so I'm not being 100% rational, but it wasn't so long ago that he was lights-out from the bullpen.
by WriteWingConspiracy on Dec 21, 2005 3:00 PM PST reply actions
Haha, I saw that this morning.
Aw man. Feel better Blez! :-/
And I totally agree about Mike Myers, he would have been a stellar fit for the A's.

by 
























