A's trade Ethier to Dodgers for Bradley and Antonio Perez
This deal will be announced in the next hour. The A's get Milton Bradley and Antonio Perez for prospect Andre Ethier. Looks like a great deal for the A's. Billy has done it again. But it raises a few questions. One, what does this mean for Frank Thomas possibly signing? What does Bradley coming to the A's mean for Jay Payton. What does Perez mean for Marco Scutaro? Great deal if you ask me.
Go A's
225 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
NO! ETHIER!
There goes the whole "Ethier in 2007" campaign...
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NOT ETHIER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Ethier????
Perez
Is this our backup 2B/3B Ginter type (but with less power) now?
So much for Bynum or Watson for the bench.
Wait? Wasn't this guy a Mariner? DAMNIT, that guy sucks...
I love the deal
Bradley is a very good player right now.
We're up to 102 wins.. and counting !!
damn, losing ethier hurts...
if zito is staying, if the a's are signing thomas, getting bradley is worth it. beane is trying to win in 2006 while doing minimal damage to the a's chances through 2010.
i just wish we also got choi, since i can't see how that would take much at all since the dodgers hate him.
a choi/kielty combo would be great for backup OF/1B and at DH in case frank thomas gets injured.
I've have the same thoughts about a Choi/Kielty
Ethier
Barton will be LF/1B/DH in 2007, but who will be the other LF/1B/DH?
Johnson, Swisher, Bradley
Fox Sports Reported it also
Raises a lot of speculation of other moves ????
hmm ...
As it stands right now, Swish moves to 1b, DJ to DH and Payton and Bradley in RF/LF, both backing up CF more than capably with Kielty backing up the corners.
If we signed Thomas, though, Payton is headed to the bench. Does BB project Thomas playing few enough games to get Payton the PT that would keep him happy or is Payton on the way out?
Look at it this way
- kotsay has back issues-- 20 games right there;
- Swisher can't hit lefties-- possibly 25-30 games right there;
- bradley will blow up at some point and get a couple of weeks off-- another 15 games or so;
- Thomas will play 100--
Ronald McDonald's the guy on his way out..
but what a bench we're developing all of a sudden.
good points, but ...
Payton's got perceived value and is expensive. My guess (and that's all it is -- yours is as good as mine) is that this means bye-bye Jay-Pay.
Kielty
Payton is super cheap in this market
what about the DH though
Maybe Thomas is signing elsewhere.
by pickinmachine on Dec 13, 2005 2:14 PM PST up reply actions
If Hurt is signed
Yes
by pickinmachine on Dec 13, 2005 2:20 PM PST up reply actions
there is no way
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:21 PM PST up reply actions
Makes him very tradeable
It will be more, Nebraska
i see the breakout of the 810 starts in the OF, 1B and DH as follows:
DJ-- 150
Kotsay-- 140
Swish-- 140
Jay Pay-- 130
Bradley-- 120 (he's never played more than 141 games, and only 100+ one other time)
Hurt-- 100
kielty-- 30
The problem is
Unless Thomas is only going to play on Mon, Weds, Fri, Saturday all season, I worry about Payton's acceptance.
WOW
Ethier is not a great prospect..
by Little Rickey on Dec 13, 2005 2:10 PM PST reply actions
for the record
In my opinion, this trade is awesome, cuz we get Bradley (and Perez) for an unproven MLB-player, and previously, we were talking about giving up 2 MLB players (Saarloos and Kennedy) for Bradley, or there were even rumblings about a Zito for Bradley trade (though I know none of us put much stock in it). So to get Bradley+ for Ethier, while sad to lose a top prospect, is a great deal for us.
It sucks losing Ethier.
Ethier??
Huge Gamble!
OK, biggest question. How will Bradley change the A's team chemistry?
by BruceBochte on Dec 13, 2005 2:13 PM PST reply actions
i'm bummed about losing ethier ...
And the Bradley diaries start rolling in...
;)
Ethier?
Random thoughts
- This means we still have Saarloos and Kennedy as trade bullets to spare
- I wonder if this means Colletti was chafing under Sabean's no-non-AARP-members policy?
- If the deal is as reported, this is a steal by the A's
- Boy, Colletti overplayed his Bradley hand
and ...
Random replies
- Yup, although if we don't play them - and if each player accepts his role - then we have a heck of a staff.
- Maybe.
- Wait till Bill Plaschke play the character card tomorrow morning. "Colletti shipped out the troublemaking Bradley for Andre Ethier, one of the nicest guys you'll ever meet."
- Yup. But remember, Ethier value was peaking, given his AFL performance.
Plaschke's thoughts right now?
by rubin sierra on Dec 13, 2005 5:43 PM PST up reply actions
NOOOOO!
The Ethier/Barton combination seemed so wonderful and enticing and hopeful. :-( This is one thing I loved about the Billy Beane Era, we traded away good prospects but we kept guys who seemed like gems.
I really thought Ethier was destined for this organization and with all the excitement here about him... it really seemed like he was going to be one of our own, a guy we'd be rooting for long after now. Our higher level ain't exactly uberstocked now that we've brought up so many guys, it was nice to have Ethier, our future ROY, to look forward to.
I guess what really bothers me is that we traded a great prospect for a guy that I cannot, in good conscience, root for.
I mean, Milton Bradley? Goddamn. I was so happy that, with a Rinconless team, I could finally have a year where I didn't hate anyone on the team.
Milton Bradley is a jackass, and given Jose Guillen and his tendencies towards drama, I was hoping that Billy would be smarter than a signing like this. We can do better than Milton Freakin' Bradley.
Although...
But Milton Freakin' Bradley? Oh Billy... he and Macha are gonna have some interesting fights... I just wish we could have gotten someone different and superior for Ethier if we packaged him with Cruz or Saarloos or someone.
I'm with you on this
by homerozzieandthestraw on Dec 13, 2005 2:26 PM PST up reply actions
A little surprising
well
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/P/antonio-perez.shtml
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:23 PM PST up reply actions
yeah it's weird...
It's definitely a mistake
Perez has talent
by NvrFrgtRamon55 on Dec 13, 2005 2:26 PM PST up reply actions
I hope Wash can help him. :-/
Antonio
by regfairfield on Dec 13, 2005 2:27 PM PST up reply actions
last year
But can be a good backup for Chavvy if the shoulder acts up.
What happens to Ginter now?
He stays in Sac.
by DC on Dec 14, 2005 8:36 AM PST up reply actions
Great trade
Payton may be the odd man out, unless somebody wants to give up a lot for Kotsay.
Great Trade
Do not worry about chemistry. BB would not have done this without talking long and hard with Paul DePo.
I dunno...
Bradley is OK
This Perez can also help. A great pickup of talent at a time Ethier's stock was at its highest.
Who else was after Bradley? Perhaps this is just the beginning of a delayed three way deal.
by Thomas Walker on Dec 13, 2005 2:54 PM PST up reply actions
I Second that motion!
Chemistry, shmemistry, Just Win Baby!
With the two-headed beast that now represents the Red Sox front office, I wonder whom he'll fleece from there? Perhaps the "Greek God of the Walk"?
This offseason so far...
Perez...
by Little Rickey on Dec 13, 2005 2:25 PM PST reply actions
Wow.....
Let's not forget
Oh crap.
Haha...
Just have to say, I love all this activity on AN right now. Almost feels like it's the baseball season again... sigh.
by whiteshoes40 on Dec 13, 2005 2:43 PM PST up reply actions
Hahaha
by RunRickeyRun on Dec 13, 2005 3:43 PM PST up reply actions
I love this deal
I'd rather have Thomas than Bradley
by JeffRoper on Dec 13, 2005 2:27 PM PST reply actions
wait
no sign...
by Gene Nelsons Mullet on Dec 13, 2005 2:29 PM PST up reply actions
I hope Bradley ...
Lets go A's!!!
My coworker, a huge indians fan, is giving me all sorts of crap for this trade. He's saying its the worst trade in 15 years. I want to hit him.
we should have a pool
We should also try to make sure that there's a big "Milton Bradley Fan Club" sign right in the corner of the stadium that corresponds to the place in Dodger Stadium where he had his tirade.
by rubin sierra on Dec 13, 2005 5:53 PM PST up reply actions
You should hit him
there is no way to know weather Ethier would be sucsesful in the majors. the ods say no. i hadden to believe that he would have beenbut most dont. now we have a deep bench for the next two years, power, defence, and pitching.
even if Ethier ends up being great some day this is still a good trade for the moment. they are going for it this year and these guys are going to help them get it done.
by DC on Dec 14, 2005 8:50 AM PST up reply actions
Now I won't have to worry...
No
by spal on Dec 13, 2005 3:47 PM PST up reply actions
Perez is quite a bit better than I thought
BB totally fleeced colletti. Ha ha ha.
I doubt thomas is signed now.
anyone know bradley's contract value?
by BruceBochte on Dec 13, 2005 2:28 PM PST reply actions
I cant imagine we only gave up Ethier....
Haha....It might have been all me :-)
by OaktownPower on Dec 13, 2005 2:31 PM PST up reply actions
I'd prefer
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:31 PM PST up reply actions
I meant "and"
But I'd still like Bradley + Perez for Ethier + Jairo.
ah
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:35 PM PST up reply actions
Who is this mystery man Oaklandas725
Whatever, keep up the good work!!!
Actually
by BleacherDrummer on Dec 13, 2005 2:47 PM PST up reply actions
Perez can back up 3rd & 2nd
yup
by guy incognito on Dec 13, 2005 2:34 PM PST up reply actions
More on Perez
by Little Rickey on Dec 13, 2005 2:30 PM PST reply actions
Defense
by regfairfield on Dec 13, 2005 2:32 PM PST up reply actions
What about Scutaro?
by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Dec 13, 2005 2:37 PM PST up reply actions
Scutaro
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:38 PM PST up reply actions
Hmmm...
by regfairfield on Dec 13, 2005 2:51 PM PST up reply actions
Defense
by NvrFrgtRamon55 on Dec 13, 2005 2:38 PM PST up reply actions
Great deal
by Jeff in Seattle on Dec 13, 2005 2:32 PM PST reply actions
Jay Payton
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:34 PM PST up reply actions
beane might also flip bradley
Jason Stark just confirmed the deal
Is this a precursor to trading Ellis?
i hope not
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:36 PM PST up reply actions
i agree
by guy incognito on Dec 13, 2005 2:36 PM PST up reply actions
ick
I mean, I'm not opposed to trading Ellis, but I really wouldn't like to see that as our 2B combo.
i agree
by guy incognito on Dec 13, 2005 2:36 PM PST up reply actions
Doesn't Seem Likely
by timed exposure on Dec 13, 2005 2:37 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, because
I suddenly
by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Dec 13, 2005 2:38 PM PST up reply actions
If it is you can all blame
I can't imagine who else it would be...
by Little Rickey on Dec 13, 2005 2:36 PM PST reply actions
Must believe payton is
VERY good point.
25- and 40-man
thanks,
maybe not
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:39 PM PST up reply actions
only because komine wasn't listed for some reason
he was drafted in 2002
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
actually
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 3:28 PM PST up reply actions
Roster
There isn't really a 25-man roster in the offseason.
Oh gross.
nah
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:40 PM PST up reply actions
two thoughts
- KNBR has an intimate familiarity with the inner workings of the A's their roster makeup -- erm, not
- I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to moving DJ if Thomas is in the bag -- I think DJ has a high perceived value and may not have much higher of a ceiling
if this is all for 2006
you keep saarloos as #6 starter because he will keep you in every game unlike glynn/etherton.
you keep kennedy because he can be the yabu (blowouts), the loogy, and the saarloos replacement if saarloos ends up in the rotation b/c of injury.
you keep payton because enough games will be missed between kotsay, bradley, and frank thomas that you still need him.
you keep keilty because he's cheap and has no trade value whereas he has some worth.
and finally the a's have depth. there will be injuries, there always are.
that's the lesson from last year, if the a's had one more major league caliber starting pitcher and hitter last year, they would have made the playoffs.
okay, mlb.com mentions it now too.
oaklandas725, are you billy beane?
if he was
although, BB has mentioned his appreciation for AN... that would be nice.
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:41 PM PST up reply actions
Check out Oaklandas725's
by timed exposure on Dec 13, 2005 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
yea
that's a pretty good track record...
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:46 PM PST up reply actions
oaklandas725 is officially freakin' awesome.
MLB.com
Bradley is recovering from knee surgery and he goes to Oakland hoping to turn the page after a turbulent two seasons in Los Angeles. Perez, a utility infielder with a live bat, was recently sidelined in the Dominican Winter League when he was hit in the face with a page and suffered a small fracture of his left cheekbone.
Bradley posted modest numbers in an injury-marred 2005, with a .290 average, a .350 on-base percentage, 13 homers and 38 RBIs. Perez batted a career-high .297 with 11 steals and 13 doubles.
Ethier, the A's top outfield prospect, was named the Texas League Player of the Year last season, and had a strong Arizona Fall League, hitting .366 with 21 RBIs and a .495 on-base percentage over 23 games.
The trade is the first for new Dodgers general manager Ned Colletti, who appears intent on reshaping the Los Angeles outfield and the roster as a whole.
Perez sounds like an injury risk
reshape the OF?
antonio perez
he can be this year's ginter, except hopefully he doesn't suck.
.360 OBP over 98 games last year, .353 over 159 major league games...
this is a good addition given how fragile crosby is and given that chavez didn't have surgery.
perhaps it's scutaro who is on the way out. i'd miss him because he's a nice guy, but he's just not that good.
Hmmmm
MLB Radio says it
Kirk Saarloos and Andre Ethier for Bradley
NOW its:
Andre Ethier for Bradley and Perez
wow
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:48 PM PST up reply actions
PLEASE
Other: Urban says "yeah, I was on MLB.com radio earlier today... (i'm a whore)"
Let's see if we can get Choi
Unbelievable
by pickinmachine on Dec 13, 2005 2:48 PM PST up reply actions
Well, that's definitely something
Desperation for moving Bradley scares me a bit... But damn. If BB'd taken the Saarloos/Ethier deal, that would have been an ugly day!!
highway robbery?
keeping saarloos is huge.
Dang.
"No, really, Ned. Let me help you. You really don't want Saarloos. Ethier is like Superman-- he can be your star rookie outfielder and your fifth starter. And you know, I think we could help you out a little bit more-- that Perez guy seems like he'd be a pain. We can take him off your hands for ya. Oh, it's no problem at all, Ned. Just trying to help out an old friend. Yup, see you for dinner this weekend. How's the wife?"
by whiteshoes40 on Dec 13, 2005 2:51 PM PST up reply actions
LOL!!!!!!!!!
had me laughing out loud.
I'm assuming that Swisher moving to 1b
no
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:49 PM PST up reply actions
but that's if Thomas isn't signed.
yea
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:53 PM PST up reply actions
I think Payton is in his way out....
I think
by Alien @ Athletics Nation on Dec 13, 2005 2:52 PM PST up reply actions
my point is that
I guess there's been so much talk of the Big Hurt signing with Oakland, that I'm still thinking he's going to be here.
several possibilities
And of course, there may be more trades...
anyone else upset about losing Either?
That's certainly not a given..
by Little Rickey on Dec 13, 2005 2:54 PM PST up reply actions
i agree i do love the deal
Another trade in the works
somebody has to go. If we sign Thomas maybe two of them have to go. Payton has the most value and is the most expensive plus possibly we could spin perez as part of a bigger deal.
by OakAs33 on Dec 13, 2005 2:49 PM PST reply actions
there has to be another one
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:51 PM PST up reply actions
maybe for a cheaper LOOGY
I keep seeing Ginter's name mentioned ...
by rubin sierra on Dec 13, 2005 6:09 PM PST up reply actions
i got it
Not for prospects, for a LOOGY
What about Scutaro????
marco! ... scutaro?
by Ryan Armbrust on Dec 13, 2005 2:52 PM PST up reply actions
Payton is now either benched, or gone..
by Little Rickey on Dec 13, 2005 2:51 PM PST reply actions
He will be playing as soon as Game Buy melts down.
by OaktownPower on Dec 13, 2005 2:58 PM PST up reply actions
"Oaktoon turns to doom and gloom"
Did you see, in wake of the Bradley trade he now predicts 102 A's wins in 06!
by BruceBochte on Dec 13, 2005 3:02 PM PST up reply actions
could it be ...
With Perez, we'll have a substantially more flexible/redundant IF (especially if Ellis or Scutaro aren't traded).
Could Billy have finally realized the importance of having roster flexibility/redundancy for his position players?
but you can only carry so many players on a roster
Watson
by timed exposure on Dec 13, 2005 3:00 PM PST up reply actions
No shame
by BruceBochte on Dec 13, 2005 3:05 PM PST up reply actions
He hasn't been given much of a chance...
by Little Rickey on Dec 13, 2005 3:13 PM PST up reply actions
Doubting Thomas
Great move Billy. Amazing, he gives up unproven AA talent for two PROVEN major leaguers, one of whom has star potential!
by BruceBochte on Dec 13, 2005 2:57 PM PST reply actions
So is Zito safe now?
It's looking more and more that way...
by Little Rickey on Dec 13, 2005 3:17 PM PST up reply actions
Move Bradley
Payton and Bradley don't fit on the same roster in my opinion. Even though the OF Defense would be amazing, and the IF too w/ Swish at first.
by FireballerHARDEN on Dec 13, 2005 3:01 PM PST reply actions
Keep Bradley AND Payton
Obviously BK broiler is the odd man out, but he has had a grand total of what, one good month in the G & G?
by BruceBochte on Dec 13, 2005 3:04 PM PST reply actions
You dont sit GameBoy every 4 days...
by OaktownPower on Dec 13, 2005 3:08 PM PST up reply actions
Perez is injured...
link
by FireballerHARDEN on Dec 13, 2005 3:14 PM PST reply actions
How?
by BobbyCrosbysGirl on Dec 13, 2005 3:17 PM PST up reply actions
lol
My best guess is "pitch" not "page"
by FireballerHARDEN on Dec 13, 2005 3:20 PM PST up reply actions
Maybe it's the page
by RunRickeyRun on Dec 13, 2005 3:53 PM PST up reply actions
maybe ...
... OK, I'll do it myself: BAnNeD!!!
talking toa dodger fan
its the dom league
This should be great
got my question answered on MLB Radio
Said Kielty has no trade value (correct), but I was more talking about PAYTON being traded to a team needing a CF, rather then Kielty as a CF.
Brushed over my Perez injury question.
Frank Thomas
If in fact we do end up signing Thomas, we can trade Payton to the Yanks who are still looking for a CF. As of now, DJ is our DH, and we have arguably the best defense in baseball.
by OaktownTribesman on Dec 13, 2005 3:43 PM PST reply actions
Got another question answered
Asked "If Dinosours existed today, would they belive in Carl Everett"
He didn't have an answer :P
let's just remember...
Miltion Bradley, please meet:
Dave Stewart and Dennis Eckersley
Here's hoping you follow in their footsteps to a bright future!
Black Mike
I still remember..
Although the catcher charged the mound, Stewart picked him up and threw him against the ground and just started pummeling him!
For a pitcher, Stewart was immensely intimidating with his death stare and his ability to pitch inside, then utilize his fork ball to get people out, not to mention his physical presence and attitude!
by ST on Dec 13, 2005 5:54 PM PST up reply actions
Perez's D....
by Schwanie2 on Dec 13, 2005 5:31 PM PST reply actions
ST
Thanks for reviving the old baseball brawl memories. I frequently re-hash that game with my friends...
Don't Worry About Milton's Temper
Second of all, all of these so-called Bradley blowups are blown WAAAAAAY out of proportion. Milton's "history" of domestic abuse is tied to allegations and charges, he's never been convicted of anything. His dugout "brawl" with Jeff Kent was... oh wait, did you say Jeff Kent? That explains everything -- Jeff Kent is a fucking asshole. And as for crawling into the stands... let's just say I fully support any player's right to come into the stands if some dickhead fan is hurling racial epithets or batteries at them. Fans need to learn how to behave if they expect players to learn how to behave.
Lastly, our clubhouse is about as cohesive as it gets. Milton will fit right in... don't you worry. Let's get excited about the fact that we just robbed LA blind in this deal. We add a #2-6 switch-hitter with good defense for an unproven prospect with one good year in AA and an outstanding AZ Fall League season. Adam Piatt anyone? Shane Spencer anyone? Flash-in-the-pan you very much? I may be wrong, but I'll take the guy with the longer track record...
Exaggerations
by OaktownTribesman on Dec 13, 2005 8:40 PM PST up reply actions
Good points...
If we get Thomas, Payton has to go.
by magnantecandunk on Dec 13, 2005 8:45 PM PST up reply actions
Has anybody heard about Perez's character?
"Perez, 25, also flashed potential but his attitude was consistently in question. He was less than popular in the clubhouse and it hardly appears coincidence he already has been traded four times in his young career."
I don't really like this trade,
by EglAthltcsFan @ Athletics Nation on Dec 14, 2005 3:21 PM PST reply actions
I'm a Niners fan
PAST TEXAS LEAGUE MVP's
2000- Keith Ginter, Round Rock (.333 AVG, 26 HR, 92 RBI)
2001- Jason Lane, Round Rock
2002- Chad Tracy, El Paso
2003- Justin Leone, San Antonio
2004- Ryan Shealy, Tulsa
2005- Andre Ethier, Midland (.316 AVG, 18 HR, 79 RBI)
and piatt and ginter drawf Ethier....i really love this deal now

by oaklandas725 on 

























