Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: An Indy 500 Rookie's Impressions

The three problems with the A's


While I am as happy as anyone that Beane finally fired Geren I can't say that it makes me anymore optimistic about the future. There are still 3 major factors that are slowly suffocating this once proud franchise.

1) Ownership -As a lifelong A's fan for 20 years I have seen the good and the bad. I remember growing up and going to a packed stadium and watching future hall of famers like Ricky and Eck. It was the Giants that had the old crappy stadium with no marketable players. But ever since the Haas family gave up ownership it has been nothing but old rich men sitting on their hands collecting there revenue check. I cannot think one thing the Wolfe ownership has done to try and draw more fans or make the stadium and team more fan friendly.

2) Beane- As the years go by I believe more and more that Billy's success was more a product of having three #1 starters and steroids. Ever since the big 3 left, Beane has made some terrible trades and questionable free agent signings. I will never live down the Andre Either for Milton Bradley deal followed by the Cargo, Street and Smith for Holliday deal. All we have to show for that now is Michael Taylor who looks like a right handed Ryan Sweeney. And while the A's rarely spend money on free agents when they do or try to, it is on questionable players. Anyone remember what Estaban Loiaza did with the A's for 20M? I am thankful Rafael Furcal and Marco Scutaro turned down our multiyear 20M offers, as they have both been busts. The only good trade Beane has made in the past couple years was the Swisher for Gio, Sweeney, De Los Santos trade.  What Beane also doesn't understand is fans need a core group of players to latch on to year after year to identify with the team.  During Billy's entire time as the GM he has only keep one player, Eric Chavez for the duration of his career.  

3) Selig-Everyone seems to forget that the A's gave the Giants the territorial rights of the South Bay back in the 80's when they were desperate for a stadium and the A's didn't ask for anything in return. But the bad guy here isn't the Giants, its the commissioner who has refused to give the A's a simple yes or no answer on whether they can move to San Jose. Any answer is better than no answer so the A's can at least move on to other options if their move to San Jose is denied. But After 2 years of hearing nothing from Selig a simple answer appears too much to ask for. I don't know how a commissioner can stand ideally by and let a franchise go down the toilet. A stadium would not cure every problem for the A's but it would solve the largest problem and distract almost everyone from the other issues.

Again it was time for Geren to go but until one of these problems is resolved the A's are not any closer to becoming a winning franchise once again

Comment 70 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm surprised

I thought this was going to say 1. Hitting, 2. Defense, and 3. Pitching…

WordUpThome: GWEN STEPHANIE IS CONFUSING AND MAKES ME UNCOMFORTABLE

by pbruins92 on Jun 12, 2011 2:35 PM PDT reply actions   5 recs

+1

I was thinking the same thing…

What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.

by winchester5 on Jun 12, 2011 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dont harsh the mellow

I’m still stoned from the firing of Bob Geren.

by brian.only on Jun 12, 2011 2:53 PM PDT reply actions  

um...

bradley and loiaza were major contributors in 2006, and while it would be great to have ethier now, without bradley and loiaza we probably never would have experienced the absolute bliss of marco’s base-clearing double in game three against the twins. i question plenty of beane’s moves, but not those two.

also, while you bash ownership (and perhaps rightly so), you then blame selig for the san jose situation. wolff is one of the people pushing for san jose, so if you’re upset with selig for slowing that down, aren’t you indirectly supporting lew’s efforts?

in my opinion the a’s have 4 major problems:
1. total lack of offense
2. surprisingly crappy defense
3. incapability of maintaining a healthy pitching staff
4. an alienated local fanbase

Zito: You ever think about the space time continuum?
Huddy: Uh... no.

by mendelbob on Jun 12, 2011 3:09 PM PDT reply actions   3 recs

Yeah these are bigger problems, at least in terms of the team right now.

What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.

by winchester5 on Jun 12, 2011 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

The three problems mentioned in the articles are problems, but stuff like the lousy lineup and horrible defense are real on-field issues that really affect the team on a day-to-day basis.

by Jason James on Jun 13, 2011 4:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

you hit nail right on head

quick, what crappy movie is that quote from?

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Jun 13, 2011 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

here, let me google subzin that for you. hmm. that doesn’t have quite the same ring…

just kidding! anyway, i’m not finding it without the “the.” you sure it’s from a movie?

http://www.subzin.com/s/you%20hit%20nail%20right%20on%20head

by AV on Jun 14, 2011 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

nope

it was this one Man of the House (1995) with Chevy Chase and Jonathan Taylor Thomas. Chase is “talking” like an Native American because they joined the Indian Guides (kind of like boy scouts). I don’t know why that phrase stuck with me.

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Jun 16, 2011 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

i guess subzin isn’t that complete yet. this movie isn’t in there.

by AV on Jun 16, 2011 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I stopped reading at "Ricky"

Was the rest good?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jun 12, 2011 3:43 PM PDT reply actions  

See! It's exactly this kind of attitude that drives off...

I can’t do it. Never mind.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Jun 13, 2011 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

…i a cadillac?

by AV on Jun 14, 2011 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

gggr. “in” a cadillac.

by AV on Jun 14, 2011 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Trades
The only good trade Beane has made in the past couple years was the Swisher for Gio, Sweeney, De Los Santos trade

A few other decent trades Beane has made since then:

- Scott Sizemore for David Purcey
- Guillermo Moscoso for Ryan Kelly
- Adam Kennedy for Joe Dillon
- Michael Wuertz for Richie Robnett & Justin Sellers

There are more that I think were arguably good, but I don’t want to argue about those. The point is, it’s easy to notice the trades where the guy we gave away turns into a star, and it’s easy to forget the ones where the guy we gave away fizzled out and went nowhere.

All we have to show for that [the Matt Holliday trade] now is Michael Taylor.

That’s not quite true. We also still have Shane Peterson and Ethan Hollingsworth. Neither is beating down the door right now, but they’re still in the system and still might amount to something.

Anyway, you can’t judge a trade based on what we have to show for it now. Sometimes you trade present for future and sometimes you trade future for present. If a trade is a few years old, what we got for it may all be in the past now. Would you say the Jermaine Dye trade was a bad trade because “all we have to show for it now” is … nothing?

Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.

by iglew on Jun 12, 2011 4:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah, but take away the 2 and he's only batting .85

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jun 12, 2011 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

only .85? damn, that's great.

the artist formerly known as inbillywetrust

by stm72 on Jun 12, 2011 7:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

And here I thought the A's had low batting averages!?

Someone just has dropped the first number from them all season long!?

by dwishinsky on Jun 12, 2011 8:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like Peterson and am pulling for him

Watched him a ton at Long Beach State. He and Danny Espinosa played together and seemed pretty comparable with the bat. He had a 20-game hit streak I think his jr year. He was even a decent pitcher.
Smart kid – an academic all-american, and comes from a good family. Maybe even some NorCal roots. I think his mom said they lived in the Bay Area at one point.

by easyraider on Jun 13, 2011 8:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

I personally don’t have any issue with the A’s moving to San Jose. I want the franchise to succeed and it’s not like Oakland is getting any nicer or having corporations moving there. And while the Scuturo playoffs were great the A’s would be in playoff contention every year with Brett, Cahill and Gio leading the pitching and Either and Cargo leading the offense, now that would be exciting.

by Boone55 on Jun 12, 2011 7:45 PM PDT reply actions  

that's a valid point, cargon and ethier would be great to have right now

but after the 4 consecutive division series failures and the team being way better in 2005 than anyone could have expected, i think trading some future for some present in 2006 made sense, and clearly it paid off that year. i don’t know what to make of the cargon trade, that one really is a head scratcher for me (although if holliday had led us to a division title, i wouldn’t be nearly as troubled by it), but when ethier was traded away, anderson and gonzalez weren’t even in the picture yet. in a’s years, you’re mixing two different generations. and besides, there’s still plenty of time for cargon to prove himself a bust. 1 good year and 1 great year in colorado isn’t all that meaningful (sour grapes anyone?).

Zito: You ever think about the space time continuum?
Huddy: Uh... no.

by mendelbob on Jun 12, 2011 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Andre Ethier was a fine prospect, but

he wasn’t a sure-fire star at the time we gave him away. He was a pretty good player who was ripe for a try in the big-leagues. Sometimes those guys catch fire, sometimes they fizzle.

The same could be said of Vin Mazzaro, Corey Brown, Sam Demel, Aaron Cunningham, Jeff Gray, or Danny Putnam. But we only remember Ethier because he’s the one who turned out great.

Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.

by iglew on Jun 12, 2011 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Define "great".

In Eithier’s best year he had a 3.5 WAR, and he’s totally awful at defense and isnt much of a baserunner either. To compare: Ryan Sweeney has a 4.2 WAR season.

I cant stand people who fault the Bradley trade. Andre Either is just a barely average player. He’s exactly the kind of guy you trade, always. I dont give a crap he’s gone, and wouldnt want him here ever, if it meant missing the 06 playoffs.

by PL78 on Jun 13, 2011 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Two thoughts...

1) I know I’m in the minority, but I believe Schott/Hoffman deserve more credit than they get. There are times I’d rather have them than Wolff.

2) Is it possible that Beane isn’t the baseball god many have thought? Is it possible that his early stellar reputation was actually built on a foundation that Sandy Alderson put in place?

Pro-rated at 500 at-bats a year that means that for two years out of the fourteen I played, I never even touched the ball. ~Norm Cash, on his 1,081 career strikeouts

by UncleLeo on Jun 12, 2011 10:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Beane

It might be interesting to compare Beanes trade performance before and after he got an ownership interest (4/5/09??). That is when he stopped investing other peoples money and began investing some of his own in the A’s.

by kimo from kauai on Jun 13, 2011 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sort Of

1) I wasn’t fond of Schott&Hoffman, but they were better then Wolff.
2) Beane isn’t unbelievable, but he is a good GM. To be honest, Theo Epstein kind of did what Beane was doing in the early 2000’s, except he was more successful since he had much more money to work with. Needless to say, Beane’s moneyball formula wasn’t going to be successful in the long-term. It became famous because he used something no one had really used before, and it worked. Later, it started to fade, because ultimately, money’s important in baseball.

by Jason James on Jun 13, 2011 4:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Alderson was the GM when the Big 3, Giambi, Miggy and Chavvy were signed

Beane was the assistant GM. He may have had something to do with some of those signings, just as Forst has something to do with signings since he became assistant GM.

by OaklandSi on Jun 13, 2011 7:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Everyone complains about Wolff, and the A's not keeping players. I don't think people realize how the

salary structure has changed in the last 10 years. Jose Canseco, Mr 40/40 and MVP, never made more than 5 million as an Athletic, which would be the 5th highest on the roster, and with his talent, he would be closer to the A-Rod salary. Mark McGwire as late as 1997 was only making 7 million for the A’s. In 2001, when the A’s won 100 games, the Yankees led the league with a team salary of 109 Million, This year there are 12 teams over 109 million.

by theblackpearl on Jun 12, 2011 10:59 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

A's 3 Promlems

Let us not forget this decades old one! (my signature " Says It All ")

Ray Fosse... About as COOL as the Breeze Out A Camel's A$$!

by UncleRIDER44 on Jun 13, 2011 5:31 PM PDT reply actions  

I hope we haven’t fallen to the level that we are happy with winning one playoff series since the early 90’s. Beating the Twins was great but its not like they won a title. They got sweep the next round. We might as well be Pirates fans if thats the case And I do thing that there is a correlation with Beane and the moves he has made since becoming a part owner and father of twins.

by Boone55 on Jun 13, 2011 6:42 PM PDT reply actions  

We didn't beat the Twins.

The only team we beat in the playoffs since 2000 is the Tigers.

Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.

by iglew on Jun 14, 2011 1:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, we did beat the Twins and then lost to the Tigers.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jun 14, 2011 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oops. Um ... disregard previous comment.

<slinks away in shame>

Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.

by iglew on Jun 14, 2011 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

at this point

i’m really happy with meaningful games in september. of course every fan would love to see a championship, but after those painful game 5 exits, just getting past the first round in 2006 was a huge deal.

Zito: You ever think about the space time continuum?
Huddy: Uh... no.

by mendelbob on Jun 14, 2011 7:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

All games are meaningful.

Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.

by iglew on Jun 14, 2011 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Blows my mind people are pointing the finger at Beane.

He’s not the one who told Beltre and Berkman not to come here. He’s done a fine job except for the Holliday trade and the Hudson trade, and even then the Huddy deal looked okay at the time. Signing Dye and Loaiza wasnt good, but this guy got basically an entire franchise out of Mark Mulder. Thats doing something right.

by PL78 on Jun 13, 2011 9:44 PM PDT reply actions  

why wouldn't Beltré accept the most guaranteed years and $$?

the A’s did not make the best offer.

Why would Berkman rush to accept a DH job in the AL when he said he’d only consider it if he couldn’t get a starting position player gig in the NL?

by OaklandSi on Jun 14, 2011 6:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

... your point?

He was successful. The price went up. The A’s not only didn’t match the increase, they didn’t even come particularly close.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Jun 14, 2011 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

You think Beltre has 6 good years left? I sure don't.

I would have liked him in Oakland, but paying him $16M per for his age 35-38 seasons would have fucking SUCKED.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.

by mikev on Jun 14, 2011 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Er. 35-37, I mean.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.

by mikev on Jun 14, 2011 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

As would've paying him 13 million for those seasons,

like the A’s were planning to do.

Bottom line, any contract of that length to any player would likely suck by the end of it. The question of whether or not it’s worth it is determined by how much you think said player’s going to significantly increase your playoff chances in the first 3 or 4 years of that contract. A further factor to consider in this particular instance, because Beltre was either going to the A’s or a division rival, is how much he’ll help you increase your playoff chances by virtue of him being on your team instead of a division rival (and vice versa, how much he’ll further decrease your playoff chances if he’s on a division rival rather than your team).

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Jun 14, 2011 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

he also used the Angels to drive up his price

he was quite clear that he wanted the most guaranteed years and money that he could get.

by OaklandSi on Jun 14, 2011 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

To both you and Paul Thomas

What I meant to say really is that it isn’t like we low-balled him. Its not like we came in below everyone else. We came in at a high competitive price, people beat us. It doesn’t make sense to put such a huge chunk of your payroll into one guy. I’d feel like we were really bad at making offers if we were low-balling people. I don’t think we did with Beltre.

by dwishinsky on Jun 14, 2011 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't call it low-balling either

but the A’s did not make the best offer, or even the second best offer. I myself was not in favor of doing the kind of contract that would have been required to sign him. (I think Texas will regret the last half of that contract.)

by OaklandSi on Jun 15, 2011 7:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

that's true

it was also clear that he wasn’t going to simply take the first offer. Boras spent considerable time trying to stir up a bidding war, which he eventually did.

by OaklandSi on Jun 15, 2011 7:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

This is the team we used on Monday....at AAA.

1B: Chris Carter
2B: Adrian Cardenas
SS: Eric Sogard
3B: Josh Donaldson
C: Anthony Recker
LF: Shane Peterson
CF: Jai Miller
RF: Michael Taylor
DH: Andy Laroche

You could absolutely argue that this lineup would do as well as the one the big league team is using currently, if not better.

by PL78 on Jun 14, 2011 12:32 AM PDT reply actions  

it would be hard to do much worse

Zito: You ever think about the space time continuum?
Huddy: Uh... no.

by mendelbob on Jun 14, 2011 7:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, you couldn't.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.

by mikev on Jun 14, 2011 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly!

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.

by mikev on Jun 14, 2011 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying I am going to.

But if someone tried to, they could probably find a compelling argument for it, with SNTS etc at the heart of it. Some rookies destroy immediately because no pitchers have decent scouting reports on them, see: Weeks, Jemile.

by PL78 on Jun 14, 2011 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

7-21 is destroying?

OK.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.

by mikev on Jun 14, 2011 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I mean...

The DH is a guy who was cut because he had a .650 OPS and wasn’t good defensively.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.

by mikev on Jun 14, 2011 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A's relocation option from a legal expert on the issue
Oakland_athletics_team_logo_photofile_small
Prospects 1Q Report

Recent FanPosts

100_1536_small
My new smarts on the Fanpost, and Mr. Offseason is born, and getting to know me
Small
GOG 2012 #18: The Twins have a shiny new park, and not much else
Small
Gotta Be Their Pitching
Hardly-boys_small
Minor League notes on Major League Day Off
Small
Cespedes Upate?
Small
The SF Warriors, the LA Raiders and the Oakland A's
Photo__11__small
COG #17 - Yankees vs. Athletics or Spank me! Spank me!
100_1536_small
What to do? What to do?
Small
Fans Should Buy the A's
Reg3_small
Tom Milone's Nickname

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Sb_nation1_small ahhall

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late