Is it a "coincidence" or are we a product of design?
"I mean, no team should really have that kind of dominance over another one in our league," Geren said after Wednesday's 4-2 loss completed the Yankees' three-game sweep. "Our pitching's too good. It's just more of a coincidence."
Coincidence–noun
1. a striking occurrence of two or more events at one time apparently by mere chance: Our meeting in Venice was pure coincidence.
When asked about the 10 straight the A's have lost to the Yankees under his tutelage, our fearless clueless leader offered up this nugget of wisdom. Coincidence? Mere chance? Really Bob? So what you want us to believe is that you take two baseball teams, totally equal in this explanation, and roll them around, throw them up against the wall, and it comes out snake eyes 10 out of 10 times? Unfreakinbelievable. This is a grown man, in charge of multi-million dollar operation, asking us the public to believe that it has nothing to do with the fact that the Yankees pay one guy nearly the equivalent of our entire roster, or that it has nothing to do with the fact that our team is collectively batting somewhere near shame and silliness. No Bob, I am sorry, but either you are amazingly stupid and naive, or you think we are, to believe such an asinine explanation. However, I fear it is far worse than those two possible explanations: he really, really believes what he said. And if that is the case, it tells us a lot about Bob and his moves. If it's all just chance, then yes, the manager is irrelevant, has nothing to do with the outcome. You just run guys out there and some nights you get lucky, some nights the other team just gets lucky. Wow, all this time I thought it was because we suck at baseball and the Yankees kick our collective asses is why we lost 10 in a row.
Wait. It gets better.
"We don't necessarily play differently," he said. "We don't play tighter or anything like that. Our pitchers are aggressive. Our hitters ... I mean, the first night, they had a great pitching performance (by Bartolo Colon), and the other two (against Freddy Garcia and A.J. Burnett), we didn't swing that well."
If words mean things, which I think they do, then this is a treasure trove into the depth, or lack thereof, of Robert Peter Geren.
"We don't necessarily play differently"
We don't necessarily play differently. Well, in general, this is correct. We both play baseball, like saying Mother Theresa and Paris Hilton are both women. Which player (non-pitcher) on our current roster starts for the Yankees? Sorry Bob, but we do play differently. We do not play to the level of the Yankees and it's why we have lost 10 in a row. We don't have the caliber of players they do, and your sales ability is weak, old man. Shall I continue?
"Our hitters ... I mean, the first night, they had a great pitching performance (by Bartolo Colon), and the other two (against Freddy Garcia and A.J. Burnett), we didn't swing that well."
Bartolo Colon. 38 years old. Given up 8 HRs so far this year. Don't get me wrong, he is doing ok, but he is merely the latest in a long line of Cy Young reincarnations. What happened? Did somehow the Oakland Coliseum become the Field of Dreams for dying, dead and forgotten pitchers, and the moment they step onto the field, they are young and effective again? No Bob, it was not Colon. IT'S HAPPENED ALL SEASON LONG! WE DON'T HIT WELL!
And of course, the other "two", we didn't swing well. Oh yeah, that.
de·ni·al - noun b. Psychology An unconscious defense mechanism characterized by refusal to acknowledge painful realities, thoughts, or feelings.
Clueless, in denial, whatever you want to call it, it illustrates the painful fact that we are a rudderless ship adrift in a sea of insignificance, captained by a blind man with a crew of ghosts. We are merely fodder for the men of substance that people the teams of means.
Nick Swisher, lucky to have escaped a mean fate, brings reality back to the forefront and slaps Bob's pitiful ignorant bliss square in the jaw:
"We've got so much talent," Swisher said. "This team is so deep, anybody could go out there and get the job done. After losing those two tough games in Seattle, to come back here and play the way we did, that shows true tenacity."
In the words of Johnny Hates Jazz...."Woke up to reality to find the future not so bright."
My friends, this is your 2011 Oakland A's, and while this hollow shell is at the helm, we will wander in the desert of mediocrity.
One last nugget of beauty. When asked about Matsui, Bob surveyed the land, looked into his crystal ball and spewed this:
"He's just struggling a little bit right now," Geren said. "We've got a couple other guys swinging the bat pretty good. I fully expect him to be fine and contribute and have a nice second half."
What are we basing this on? Oh, that's right. Clueless
venting, complete.
398 comments
|
10 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Oh, Bob, how little you know about baseball.
by Rebuilding Season on Jun 1, 2011 11:10 PM PDT reply actions 5 recs
but that does not prevent him from commenting on it, does it?
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 1, 2011 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions
"denial"
It’s not just a river in Egypt anymore
by Twan54321 on Jun 1, 2011 11:53 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Poole's article echoes exactly how I feel
the management is just putting up with and staying satisfied with mediocrity, without considering the fans at all. And they have been doing this for many years.
i also had no idea that the ownership is the 4th richest in the mlb, how does that not translate at all out to the field?
by bamboobanga on Jun 2, 2011 12:27 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Some key quotes from it:
Moreover, Fisher and Wolff have shown no inclination of tending to their team anytime soon.
They have become a wealthy guy (Wolff) and an obscenely wealthy guy (Fisher) who acquired a valuable property, neglected it outright and continue to reap profits. It’s the slumlord model.
The heartbreaking thing for the fan — and the player who truly cares — is that none of the team executives is particularly enraged about this squalid condition, much less committed to promoting and demanding improvement.
There is no "i" in Teamocil. At least not where you'd think.
by GreenNGoldSooner on Jun 4, 2011 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions
It doesn't translate
because you shouldn’t expect ownership to operate a business at a loss, necessarily, to improve the product on the field. That’s what they’d have to do to substantially increase payroll, because the revenue the team actually generates does not support a payroll vastly larger than the one we have (though it does support one slightly larger.)
The fact that they are the fourth-richest ownership group does mean that any municipality that doesn’t make them pay their own way for a new facility, unless they share the ownership and revenue from it, is stupid.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
by jeepers on Jun 2, 2011 6:47 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
I shouldn't "expect" a car thief to walk past an unlocked Lexus with the keys in the ignition ...
But it sure would be nice. Jeepers, if you’re suggesting that “expecting” A’s ownership to spend more money is a bad idea, because it will only disappoint me? Ok, I agree with you.
But if you’re suggesting that A’s ownership shouldn’t spend more money/devote more energy and resources to building a contender, I completely disagree. In other words, I don’t think it unreasonable AT ALL to expect the fourth-richest ownership group to “operate at a loss” (which I think is a highly debatable statement) in order to build a contender. Especially because, even if it’s true that they may operate at a loss for a period of time, any losses could/would easily be recouped upon sale of said ballclub.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
A business that expends capital beyond its revenue goes out of business.
That’s nice in the short term, but then you end up like the Haas family.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
by jeepers on Jun 2, 2011 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yep.
I’d love to see Wolff and Fisher whip out the checkbook and expand the payroll to $100MM. But it’s silly to expect ownership to run a business like that.
But it's not silly to expect that they try to attract fans to the park instead of
engaging in anti-marketing
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Losing is its own anti-marketing
That’s our real problem.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions
This this this.
How bout not saying their product sucks and complaining that no one wants to buy it.
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Jun 2, 2011 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions
Wait a second guys,
First of all, this isn’t their only “business”. Yes, if the A’s were the only income source for ownership, I’d be inclined to agree with you. It isn’t. Wolff/Fisher have made millions in other business ventures, and will continue to, as well. There’s no way in hell I’m gonna believe that if the A’s don’t make money, then Wolff and Fisher end up in the soup line.
Secondly, I’m not convinced that even if the team expanded its payroll, ownership would then lose money. Not with revenue sharing. The A’s are a money-making machine, and Wolff/Fisher will profit handsomely whenever they choose to sell the franchise. Besides that, if the A’s expanded payroll, they’d be a much more attractive team to watch, and the team would profit that way as well. (We never had any attendance “issues” during the glory days of the late 80’s – early 90’s.)
I’m not trying to say that throwing a bunch of money around is the automatic answer to all our woes … I’m just not buying the whole “Wolff/Fisher are barely staying afloat” BS, either.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
There's a difference between Wolff/Fisher being in a soup line or staying afloat
And the team losing money. If they end up as the former, you’re right, it has nothing to do with the A’s and more to do with their primary businesses. The latter is problematic, because, well, who wants to lose money even if you’re rich?
The attendance issues after the 80s/early 90s are well-documented. Keep in mind, also, around that time:
Mt. Davis was built, making the stadium less attractive for baseball’98
-There was a strike
-McGwire was traded for a bag of balls
-The A’s were a losing team from ’93
Which all conspired to depress attendance that has never recovered. Even before then, the A’s have never killed with respect to attendance. They were average some years and below average in many other years. In the 2000s, the team was barely league average attendance despite an exciting product on the field. Therefore, it’s not clear that even spending more money on payroll would lead to greater attendance.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions
ergh, that wasn't meant to be struck through
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions
It's pretty clear that winning more would lead to greater attendance
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions
Look at the BBref attendance figures
The best attendance year was 2003:
2,216,596 (6th of 14)
The rest were average or below average.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions
I have. They've been average when winning and near the bottom when mediocre
Average is better than near the bottom.
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions
Also attendance numbers don't take into account that you can sell tickets at higher prices
Right now they are practically giving tix away to most games.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 2, 2011 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Higher prices would likely drive even more people away
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions
right, I meant
Sell tickets at higher prices when you are winning as opposed to now, when they have to keep them down due to their shitty on-field product.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 2, 2011 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
I assume this is the ultimate plan in terms of a new ballpark
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions
Nobody's saying they'll join the soup line
or at least I’m not. I’m saying that it’s stupid to run a business in a fiscally irresponsible way, and nobody should expect a business owner to conduct business stupidly.
There is data freely available on Forbes.com about what the A’s take in, and what they spend. There’s also a great deal of information available on how teams make money. The #1 factor is TV revenue, a revenue stream on which the A’s will always lag behind. The other primary factors are the ballpark itself and attendance. Given factor #1 and the A’s crippled ballpark, I don’t think increased capital investment on payroll will have nearly the impact on cash flow that you think it will.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
Then they should move
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions
They should definitely get a new ballpark.
Moving, I don’t know, unless you mean to another media market. I’m not sure there is a dedicated media market that would bring in more money than splitting the Bay area media market. San Jose isn’t going to make a difference on TV dollars.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
It is unfortunate that something as important and quasi-religious as baseball
should be sullied by being run like a business.
I hope that someday within my lifetime the sport collapses as a spectator business and is reborn as a primitivist religious ritual, where everybody involved with an organization is obsessed with winning and proving their worth to themselves and/or the baseball deities…
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 2, 2011 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Like cycling?
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm not gonna say NOT like cycling,
but cycling is modern and based around a machine… not pastoral, because you’re on a road or track… and if it were a religion, it would be Scientology.
If baseball were a religion, it would be Shinto/Buddhist/Klingon Warrior… maybe I should just say Viking…
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 2, 2011 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions
So....like chess?
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Jai Alai, imo.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
Kabbadi
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Saw a dude at the game on Saturday wearing a black and red baseball jersey with KLINGON on the front and the Klingon Empire emblem on the arm.
by LoneStranger on Jun 2, 2011 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions
I think that's the guy who used to wear a Baltimore Jack Cust jersey
Maybe the klingon outfit was more apropos?
New sig applied. Thanks GS!
If baseball were a religion, it would be Shinto/Buddhist/Klingon Warrior… maybe I should just say Viking… - Gaijin_Suketto
by fridaynightfan on Jun 3, 2011 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions
inserting my obligatory disclaimer
about the Forbes “data”.
Identifying the earnings or market value a large company is a tricky business even when you can audit their books. It’s even more of a shot in the dark when you can’t.
The Forbes folk do an excellent job of estimating the MLB teams’ finances given the meager information available to them, but it’s still an estimate. One should be careful not to assume the numbers are as reliable as earnings numbers Forbes might provide for a publicly traded company, nor anywhere close to the reliability of baseball players’ hitting stats.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
PS - I haven't seen any members of the Haas family down at Goodwill, lately, either.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
Well there you go ... and made a handsome profit, I might add.
Exactly my point.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
I don't get what you're saying.
The value of the team is not liquid. That means that it’s not cash just laying around, so “making a handsome profit” doesn’t mean that they can use that money while they own the team without giving up part of their ownership or using it as collateral for a loan. They would have a few options with a team that doesn’t pay for itself:
1. Hold onto the team and continue to spend, eventually being forced to sell because they’re broke.
2. Hold onto the team and stop spending more than it brings in.
3. Sell the team before they lose so much they have to sell their other investments.
4. Sell part of the team to investors to continue to spend (but investors kind of want to get something back, so…).
5. Take out a loan against the team (but banks want to be sure that you’ll be able to pay it back….)
Looks like they picked 3.
You guys explain to me where I'm going wrong
(and I mean that – not trying to be an asshole)
If I buy a lemonade stand for $100, and I know that I can turn right around and sell that business for $300-$400 after a couple years … then I have no problem losing $10 a year for a little while — I understand I can’t afford to lose $10 a year for 50 years, but I can for 4-6 years, perhaps.
Especially because I’m turning a profit in my other business ventures.
Is my $10 figure too low? I guess that would depend on incoming/outgoing … but the question is, am I an owner that doesn’t mind “losing money” in order to have the best lemonade stand in the country? Or is all I care about turning that $10 deficit into $10 profit?? Because if it’s choice #2, I’ve got no business buying the lemonade stand to begin with.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Jun 2, 2011 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The A's were bought for $180M in 2005
And the latest team valuation has them somewhere around $310M. And that doesn’t get into the gains/losses from the failed stadium ventures or how they’ve financed the team, etc. It’s hard to say how the A’s would sell for today, but we know in the future they’d sell for way more with a new stadium.
So, yes, they’d make money, but maybe not enough to offset what they’ve invested in the business. No one wants to lose money in anything, though; that’s what you and others seem to be missing.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not missing it ... I understand that
nobody “wants” to lose money, of course not. But here’s the thing that bugs me most of all.
In my opinion, a prospective buyer shouldn’t want to lose money, but he ought to want to win a championship more than turn a profit. If this isn’t his primary objective, than he shouldn’t be purchasing a sports franchise. There are other far better business ventures available if profit margin is the only concern.
Again, I get the whole “he can do anything he wants with his money/team” argument – and it’s certainly true. But a sports franchise owner should always put winning above profit. Usually, the two go together, so they’ve got THAT going for ’em.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
Update
I tweeted Maury Brown (@bizofbaseball) for a guesstimate of how much the A’s would sell for. He thinks $375M, and I’d say he’s a good authority. So, there you go.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 3:27 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
So I buy the A's for $180 million -
I’m financially well off with all of my other business ventures and investments – and a conservative estimate says that if I sell the team today, I get almost 200 million more than what I paid for ‘em.
Pardon my foul language, but ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?!!?
You mean to tell me that all of the expenses that come (have come) with running the team for 6 years even comes close to that? And the price of the team will only go up!!!
Shiiiiiiiit, someone explain how the A’s owners are “losing money”. That’s laughable.
And again, just because I can hear some people already — I’m not begruding the owners their money/profit in the least. This is their money and they can spend it any way they see fit. But please don’t tell me they’re “unable” compete financially. That’s just a flat-out f’in lie.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Jun 2, 2011 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions 6 recs
They aren't able to compete financially, period.
They aren’t losing money, either, but the Yankees are more than five times more valuable than they are, and generate more than two and half times more revenue.
The A’s may be spending less than they could—they could easily absorb an additional $20MM in payroll annually, IMO. But they’re also trying to build a new stadium. There goes the $200MM you just mentioned.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
Yeah, I didn't mean "keep up with the NY's and Boston's"
I just meant the A’s owners aren’t going broke – not by a long-shot. And they have the finances available to consistently put a competitive playoff contender on the field each and every season.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
by Vacafan on Jun 2, 2011 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I'm not among those who believe
the A’s owners are “losing money”.
However, I would point out that the ownership group has about $90 million of debt, so you need to figure the interest on that as part of the equation.
The Forbes figures for operating income are before interest and taxes. Based on those it appears that after interest and taxes the operations are close to break even. That suggests that a significant increase in expenses would turn the cash flow negative, which is probably what the owners have in mind when they talk about the possibility “losing money” in a particular year.
The profit all comes from increase in value of the team, which means it is only realized upon sale. (That also assumes that the market in baseball teams doesn’t crash, which so far it doesn’t appear to be doing, but one can’t be sure.)
If you’re asking the A’s owners to increase their payroll against the potential capital gain on sale of the team, that’s fine in the big picture, but it would require a regular influx of cash, whether from additional investment by the partners or taking on more debt.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Exactly.
The A’s franchise has certainly increased in value since this ownership group bought it (just like every other baseball franchise does), but that money is not at all liquid. The money that would be lost by increasing expenses today has to be liquid. They can’t say “I’ll backpay your salary when I sell the team” or something.
I also think no ownership group wants to be put in a position where they have to sell the team (due to losing too much money year to year or getting too far in debt). I don’t think most ownership groups treat a baseball team as another money making venture (at least I hope not), so I’m assuming they would like to stay owners for as long as it’s enjoyable for them.
That said, I do think the A’s owners could very much afford to spend more on the team, and could weather small year-to-year losses. I just find it hard to blame them for not doing so given the surrounding situation of the team. If I were them, from a “looking to increase the value of the franchise” standpoint, I would time my increased spending with the new stadium.
Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!
Another thing.
According to the valuations we’ve been using here, the team’s value is increasing by $32.5 million a year. Suppose the owners are willing to give that all back in spending to make the team win more. Suppose further that $50 million in extra payroll will generate an additional $17.5 million in revenues (which I think is wildly optimistic for the A’s). That means you’re adding $50m of payroll per year. That would bring the A’s into the range of the Angels-Giants-Cardinals spending budget, still not the Yankees nor even the Red Sox, Cubs or Mets. So basically we’re asking the owners to give up their entire earnings on a big investment for an increased chance at a championship which still is far from a lock.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
People who make tens of thousands of dollars unconsciously pretend that, functionally, billionaires handle their affairs similarly
which is, 2) a byproduct of the brainwashing going on in a society that fetishizes profit.
The conversation needs not go much further until the profit fetishists understand where they’ve gone astray.
by sleepingcobra on Jun 6, 2011 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions
One problem with your theory
is that 29 of 30 franchise owners are bound to fail in their objective.
Also, by your logic, why would anyone ever buy the Orioles or Pirates?
I understand that any owner has some interest in his team doing well, but I don’t think it’s realistic to assume every team owner cares more about a championship than he cares about profit.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
It might not even be about profit.
It might just be about having your team pay for itself so you can own it longer.
Not sure I understand your question
Of course, the “fan” owner is going to fail in his objective, more often than not. But he’s still going to do all he can in order to achieve his goal – this is the primary reason he owns a team. Mark Cuban cares more about winning than he does about turning a profit – he’s got his money – he’ll always have his money – he wants to win a title.
Jerry Jones, George Steinbrenner, the list goes on and on … why would I want to buy the Pirates? Because I’m a Pirates fan and I want to see the Bucs win a championship again – I want the prestige and accolades that come with owning a championship team – if I’m buying the Pirates, I’m filthy rich already, and I don’t need to worry about “making money” in order to pay the rent. I’m buying the Pirates primarily because I want a ring on my finger, and I’m going to take great pride in paying whatever I have to pay in order to accomplish this.
I agree that not “every team owner cares more about a championship than profit” – this is exactly the problem. Especially with the A’s, which is the only team I care about.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
Fanatics like you and me would value a championship
over our children’s inheritances.
I’m sort of anti-inheritance anyway. Becoming rich through inheritance is damn near a sure-fire path to becoming a complete dillhole.
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 3, 2011 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions
So maybe we want Warren Buffet for owner?
The A’s could play in the Berkshire-Hathaway Coliseum.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
More likely the Geico Coliseum, I guess.
with Dairy Queen kiosks.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
What's the point?
Go into the red each year to have a high payroll, then sell the team before too long?
Last of the Ninth - Photography
not exactly.
More like, build the value of the business, sell it for a solid profit.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 2, 2011 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes, this is what neither Schott nor Wolff has done
Schott did make a profit but not as much as other teams who invested more in their businesses.
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions
not really.
It was because they bought back Levi’s, which was public for a while.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 2, 2011 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions
Agree on both points.
I'm beginning to believe that Bud Selig wants to die of old age before he has to make a decision regarding Oakland vs San Jose.
No salary cap
that’s how baseball is run these days, if you don’t go with the flow, your team will play pathetic.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
The teams that spend a lot of money don't "go with the flow"
their baseball teams generate a lot of revenue. Or you can become Tom Hicks. Either one.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
Hicks' problem was that he was over-leveraged,
not that his team spent too much. If it were the latter, the team itself would still be in financial trouble, which it’s really not.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
The team or the new ownership group?
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I keep telling you guys ...
These owners are rich, billionaires, and look at how much these bozo’s spend. If your not going to spend any money, you don’t belong as a MLB owner.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
I agree that if you're not going to add value to your franchise you're a crappy owner, but
the personal net worth of the owners is irrelevant as long as it’s adequate
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions
They have money too spend...
they just prefer to buy art.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
What the Fishers have done with their art collection
is a good thing.
Say what you want about them neglecting their baseball investment, but don’t criticize other philanthropy.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
this
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Jun 2, 2011 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions
This logic is horrible.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
The last quote is fine...
…it’s the same spin ANY manager would put on a slumping and/or declining player.
I'm beginning to believe that Bud Selig wants to die of old age before he has to make a decision regarding Oakland vs San Jose.
Except the part where he says "nice second half." Considering it's a month before the ASB.
I'm here to talk about the past.
That's kind of nit-picky.
Then again, maybe he has no plans to use him until July. :-p
I'm beginning to believe that Bud Selig wants to die of old age before he has to make a decision regarding Oakland vs San Jose.
"We don't play tighter."
Clearly I have no way of proving this, but IMO, yeah, they do.
I'm here to talk about the past.
There was a time...
…back in the late 80s & early 90s that we simply dominated the Giants pretty much every time we saw them (i.e. spring traing, World Series, etc.). Even Giant manager Roger Craig said, “…you hate to get your butt kicked by the same team every time you play them.”. (paraphrasing, but that’s pretty close)
To a (very) small degree I believe this sucky run against the Yankees is coincidence, or bad luck, or whatever you want to call it, simply because as a general rule even the worst teams beat the best teams on occasion. But, that does not disguise the fact that ours is a seriously flawed team, and other better teams can take advantage of that… and do.
I'm beginning to believe that Bud Selig wants to die of old age before he has to make a decision regarding Oakland vs San Jose.
We just swept the Orioles, who aren't a horrible team these days
And have absolutely owned them the last decade. It just happens sometimes.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 7:43 AM PDT up reply actions
I completely agree.
And I think Geren would argue that this is what he means when he says the losing streak is a “coincidence” (the general rule that the worst teams beat the best ones on occasion.)
However, our beef, of course, is that Geren, Beane, and A’s ownership don’t seem to see your second point about the team’s flaws.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
Planes, Trains and Automobiles
First: Fire Bob Geren – This team needs a lift. Even if it’s an artificial lift (in Management/Owner’s eyes) It’s very apparent that the clubhouse needs it. This can unite the core of this group to make a run at things this year. The core being: Willingham, DeJesus, Crisp, Matsui, Ellis – Let it be known: You guys are playing for JOBS next year. Maybe not in Oakland, but somewhere else too.
Trade: Gio for David Wright: This would have to be a larger package based around these 2 guys. They throw in Fernando Martinez+ and we throw them Ian Krol + Connor Hoehn
Bring Up The Youth: Bring up Cardenas, Weeks, Recker, and Jai Miller…. DFA: Kouz. Send down LaRoche, Pennington and Powell.
1B: Recker/Barton
2B: Weeks/Ellis
SS: Sogard
3B: Cardenas/Conor Jackson
LF: Willingham/Sweeney
CF: Crisp/Miller
RF: DeJesus
DH: Matsui/Willingham
You're trading for David Wright and not playing him?
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 7:44 AM PDT up reply actions
Sogard sort of sucks
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 7:45 AM PDT up reply actions
It's called a short term Shakeup
Pennington kinda sucks too. There needs to be a “message” sent of some sort, this season. Grant Green isn’t the SS until 2013 (if that).
The problem is that the team above, even with Wright isn't good enough to contend
Even if you get a short term bump of 13-7 baseball, you’re then back to reality
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 7:53 AM PDT up reply actions
Do you think Wright + current guys is good enough?
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions
No, but I think Wright, Beltran, Reyes + current guys are good enough
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 7:55 AM PDT up reply actions
The chances of trading for all those guys is probably less than 5%
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 7:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Green, Taylor, Cardenas, De Los Santos, Stassi and Dixon isn't enough?
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 7:59 AM PDT up reply actions
I think they could get more by trading each of those guys to different teams
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions
OK then they should do that
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions
(I meant the Mets could get more)
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Wright should be gettable for a Top 100 prospect and 2 B-
guys in Green, Fautino and Stassi. For Reyes, I guess the Mets might prefer Zack Wheeler or Homer Bailey to Taylor and Cardenas, but they might not. Hmmm….we might have to add Krol and someone else to Dixon for Beltran.
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions
As something of an aside
I wonder how willing Sandy Alderson and Billy Beane are to do business with each other.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
If I'm their boss I'd fire them if they're not willing to
do business with whomever they need to in order to improve the team
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions
It could be an advantage, for all I know.
It’s just an interesting master/jedi sort of dynamic.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
For whatever it's worth,
the Mets haven’t made a trade with the A’s since 2001.
Off the top of my head I can only think of one team that has gone longer without dealing with the A’s.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Then it's high time!
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions
Confirmed
The other team is the Angels, whom we haven’t dealt with since 1999.
Other teams we haven’t dealt with recently: Yankees (since 03), Astros and Giants (both since 04). And the only Giants trade was a negligible scrub-for-cash deal.
Teams we trade with a LOT: Blue Jays, Padres
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Alderson
Wasn’t he with the Padres for a bunch of trades w/ Beane from 2008 – 2010?
Minaya didn’t know how to get a deal done with Minaya.
by Colorado Fan on Jun 2, 2011 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Alderson was CEO of the Padres
but never the GM.
I was about to say the A’s did plenty of trades while Alderson was CEO, but now that I look, that’s not quite true. There were a couple, but much less than both before and after Alderson was there. In fact, the flurry of A’s-Padres trades began right after Alderson left. Maybe a coincidence, or maybe not.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Depodesta was.
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Jun 2, 2011 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions
No, DePo was the Dodgers
GM of the Padres was Kevin Towers from 1995 through 2009 (and Jed Hoyer since then).
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
this
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Jun 5, 2011 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Would you take that if you were the Mets?
Good spec
Bust
Bust
Reliever
Mediocre Spec
Bad spec
That might work for one of Reyes or Wright… hardly all three
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Jun 2, 2011 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions
Do you really think Cardenas is a bust already?
Seems to me like he’s an OK spec right now. Might be good, might not.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
In a certain respect, yes.
Cardenas as a 3B or 2B playing good infield and OPSing in the mid .700’s would be awesome.
Cardenas putting up those numbers in LF would suck.
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 3, 2011 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions
Sadly, yes.
In the OF he’s just a poor man’s Sweeney, which is a broke man’s DeJesus.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
As long as you can tell when your bump is over, then you shake it up again.
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 2, 2011 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions
Won't frequent shaking lead to a brain hemorrhage?
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions
only if it's a baby bump
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 2, 2011 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Umm...David Wright on DL
Stress fracture in lower back. Sure, he’ll potentially be resuming baseball activities today, but I’m not trading more than a prospect for him and expect the Mets to pay a good portion of the salary.
Don't you realise you'll find next monday or next Tuesday/Your golden shoes day
by PDXAthleticsfan on Jun 2, 2011 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't really have a huge problem with what Geren said. What was he supposed to say in public?
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
This is true - we just hope it doesn't mean he actually believes it.
And I wish I could confidently say “Yeah, this is just some BS for the cameras” … but I can’t.
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
This is what I consistently fail to understand about the people griping about Geren's comments.
They’re public comments. Of course they’re BS. Does anyone actually expect anything different?
Not every manager or (to a lesser extent) GM is devoted to sounding like a politician in public.
Ours are unusually so, and so it makes sense that fans find this frustrating on occasion.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
Most are
Ozzie Guillen and Charlie Manuel are really the only two guys that will come out and bash guys or make off-the-cuff remarks.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions
Jim Leyland also leaps to mind.
Even when I listen to Bruce Bochy speak, it’s different. He certainly doesn’t sound like the aforementioned guys, but he is willing to assign blame where blame is due. Geren just sounds like he has a pat answer for explaining anything that’s going wrong. Sometimes, “we suck” is the right answer.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
Bochy actually thinks before he speaks.
He might still come out with a dumb answer but you can tell it’s thought out.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 2, 2011 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions
Beane used to speak his mind
Until the Lew Wolff era.
He just told Suzuki to stop blocking the plate
I think he has plenty of autonomy. In fact, isn’t the lack of engagement by Wolff what some fans rail against?
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions
No, that's not what I meant
I think he’s learning from Wolff, and I think what he’s learning is the executive BS that passes for press releases/news in this country.
It helps that Bochy, Manuel, and Ozzie have all won titles since 2005.
The worst person to run from is yourself.
How bout Collins' rant last night re: the Mets??
Very honest -straightforward – didn’t bash anybody by name or criticize anybody’s desire. But he went off … and every word, true.
It’s just refreshing when a fan can see that his manager is as pissed as he/she is and is unwilling to put up with mediocre/sloppy play. Damn, that was good – altogether appropriate and critical at the same time!
I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.
Didn't see it
But is there any point in disparaging professional baseball players as a manager? The team is good or bad, and the manager has some unknown minor effect on wins. Ozzie saying that he’d call Bobby Thigpen up after their bullpen blew up against us twice earlier in year didn’t help them. They are only doing better now because their hitters have starting hitting at their career norms.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions
I suppose.
But at some point, wouldn’t people come to the realization that A, Beane/Geren’s style is always going to be politician-speak in public, and B, this is NOT necessarily what they actually think? It seems silly to analyze these comments as if he was saying what he actually thinks.
To some degree, yes.
It gets old and hard to deal with, though. I know that when things are going bad, the last thing I want to hear is some formulaic answer about why things are going bad. I tend to want the fact that things are going bad acknowledged (if not apologized for), and an idea of what’s being done to correct them.
Moreover, when you never know what they actually think, it leaves all sorts of room for speculation. That speculation isn’t necessarily healthy.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
I think the reason for the continuance of that belief is that Geren never seems to show another side of himself
At least never when he is even remotely in the public eye. It would be one thing if he were making these comments and we could see him getting fired up or even just talking to players when the camera pans to the dugout during a game. But the only Geren that fans ever see is a blank-stared, slack-jawed, quiet and awkward one.
I mean, did you see Geren after Gio came out on yesterday’s game? He sat next him and looked like a pubescent boy on a first date with his crush. He was visibly tense and seemed to alternate between saying a few forced words and lapsing into silence. That sort of impression doesn’t lend itself to the idea that Geren is only being bland and political about his comments in public.
It’s certainly possible that “public Geren” and “private Geren” are very different, but nothing we’ve seen or heard as fans has suggested this. To me, that means that even if we all accept point A, people are still going to disagree about point B.
Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!
RoboBob has the sensors to indicate whenever a TV camera is pointed in his direction
RoboBob then acts accordingly.
Last of the Ninth - Photography
RoboBob is no match for MachaBot.
Introducing Oakland’s new manager….Johnny 5!
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
well I hope your right about these only being public comments
if he talks to players like this, this is a big problem
by Oaktown Shutout on Jun 2, 2011 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Olney
“Oakland’s best young players have to get over the emotional hurdle of playing the Yankees.”
I think this is very, very true. Guys like Ellis, Willingham, Crisp can say, “They put their pants on one leg at time like us…blah, blah, blah”, but who is the leader of this clubhouse? The pitchers lead by example. The veterans lead by ???.
We had a similar problem playing the Indians in the 1990s. We had to get better players to end it.
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 7:56 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I am missing something here
The manager is saying the team doesn’t play with confidence? Isn’t that the job of the manager to have a team well prepared and play at the top of their game no matter who they are playing? Losing to 2 crappy pitchers that shut down you ball club says more about the manager than anything. Wolff and Beane can’t see this or don’t want to see this.
I don't see where the manager said that
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions
read between the lines
He doesn’t know why the team keeps losing against the Yanks but makes some lame excuse that makes no sense. Once the team was down runs they gave up. No more excuses for this team how can you expect them to win when their own manager has no clue why they lose.
You have to look really deep to see where he even implies they're not playing with confidence
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions
His quote
We don’t necessarily play differently. That to me he is saying playing without confidence. What else could it mean? Same team that played the O’s.
Did the Orioles get swept because they were playing without confidence?
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions
What does it mean to you?
The problem is a manager who just throws lines out there which could be intrepid differently show why the A’s players have trouble understanding what he says. What do you think he means by that quote?
He's trying to maintain a calm demeanor and not get too high or too low
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions
Like it or not, if you really listen to his pre and postgame comments
He says all the things you want a manager to say. Last week, when we were getting all those 2 out hits, he was asked about it every day, and he was just like “well, guys are just hitting better” instead of some psychobabble. He just doesn’t emote as much as fans might like him to.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions
Same old quotes from him
Tomorrow is another day type of comments. No emotions or thought out reasons for loses.
I agree with this.
Not sure about your interpretation above…but definitely, never any emotions, nor thought out reasons for answers. Just bullshit day in day out….
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 2, 2011 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah it feels very script like.
"I thought it was going in," Warriors center Chris Hunter said. "It looked like the invisible man tipped it away at the last second."
"He's chicken curry right now. He'll become beef curry a little later on."
-Keith Smart
Cohn: A's Owner Spends on Art, Not Baseball
Great story on these so called MLB owners …
http://baseballoakland.blogspot.com/2010/08/cohn-as-owner-spends-on-art-not.html
ya know what i'am say'in .....
by joecooley on Jun 2, 2011 10:17 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Billions !!!
I’m told the entire collection is worth more than a billion. Poor? Is the A’s ownership poor? Oh, I know what you’re thinking. The fancy art represents the Fishers’ personal money, but the A’s don’t generate squat.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Glad you liked it ..
worst owners ever ..
ya know what i'am say'in .....
I don't think you understood
And most things written by Grant Cohn these days are terrible.
Last of the Ninth - Photography
A lot of great points in the article...
no such thing as a “small market team” in the bay area, which many owners like to say when they are losing ….
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Beane said it even while winning
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Which is why every A's game is sold out.
and their TV deal is on CSN California not CSN Bay Area
Oh, and incidentally, if you go to the CSN California web site, which team do you notice is listed first?
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
I agree that no SF Bay Area team can use "small market" as an excuse legitimately
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions
and I will continue to argue that the A's have a significantly smaller portion of this market
than the Giants.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
That wasn't always the case, and does not always have to be the case
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Then you would agree that right now it is the case?
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
Yes, at this moment the Giants are more popular than the Athletics
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions
So then they have a significantly larger piece of the SF Bay Area market.
and you could even go as far as saying the A’s share of that market is…
small?
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
The A's current share of the market is small
The market itself is not small, and the respective shares are not immutable.
by Glorious Mundy on Jun 2, 2011 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions
So, the SF Bay Area is a large market.
But the A’s don’t have the SF portion of that market, which is the biggest part.
They’ve basically got the East Bay. Sorta.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
Then they're incompetent
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions
They'd be incompetent in any stadium
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
As currently constructed, no stadium would help.
"I thought it was going in," Warriors center Chris Hunter said. "It looked like the invisible man tipped it away at the last second."
"He's chicken curry right now. He'll become beef curry a little later on."
-Keith Smart
It has nothing to do with geography.
When the A’s were better than the Giants and had an equivalent stadium to the Giants, they had more fans than the Giants—in Oakland, in San Francisco, and in San Jose.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
Then why are the Giants fighting so hard to keep San Jose for themselves?
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
To force Oakland out of the Bay area.
They don’t want to “keep San Jose,” they want to take the entire Bay area.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
True.
That’s their Plan A, to drive the A’s away altogether.
Plan B is to at least prevent the A’s from getting a new stadium anywhere for as long as possible.
If the A’s had a crappy stadium in San Jose and were trying to build a new one in Oakland, the Giants would be opposing that just as hard.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
And the point of plan B is to ensure that plan A ultimately succeeds.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
There were many years the A's outdrew that other team, yes, but...
…I think that other team always has had more self-proclaimed fans and more overall interest. IIRC, they have always sold more merchandise, got better television ratings, and so on. The A’s drew well in part because their stadium experience lent itself better to families.
I'm beginning to believe that Bud Selig wants to die of old age before he has to make a decision regarding Oakland vs San Jose.
Yeah but thats the A's fault
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Jun 2, 2011 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Because the Giants are more business savvy
than the A’s, the Giants partially own that channel.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Does the owner have any control over that? Yes.
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Indirect control
They can run lots of promotions, sign a big-time player, and giveaway a lot of tickets in hopes that people will pay to watch baseball. It’s a risk, and one that you can make a reasonable argument that it wouldn’t work right now with the A’s.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions
If they give away tickets, why would people buy them?
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
Bill Veeck cared.
Bill Veeck would have fired Geren, hired a veteran manager, and shaken up the roster by now.
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 2, 2011 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions
which is the problem
As it is, tickets are dirt cheap.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Any business owner is accountable for his/her revenue stream
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions
So which is it?
Should they spend, spend, spend? Or be responsible and spend within their means?
by LoneStranger on Jun 2, 2011 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Spend in a way to increase their means
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Yes but not only that. The Yankees and Red Sox increased
their revenues many times over without new stadia.
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions
Those aren't good comps
Like or not, as a whole, people in NYC and Boston take their sports more seriously than here. Plus, both franchises have unfortunately more lore in their stadiums.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions
Then why didn't they draw better in the 1980s?
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions
The Yankees have had 4 years since 1925 where they weren't at least in the top half of AL attendance
Those years were 89-92 and they averaged a 72-90 record during that time.
As for Boston, they’re a different story because they already have a tiny max in Fenway. What’s more important to note is they haven’t been under 30k+ a game since 1999 and they haven’t been under 25k a game since 1985.
Last of the Ninth - Photography
"I can't" is not an acceptable attitude in sports.
Period. That’s why Moneyball is becoming a movie; why it’s an interesting story. A team that played in an old crap stadium with not much fans, decided, we’re not just gonna say “I can’t”. That self-defeating attitude is pervasive. It’s why Carlos Gonzalez said that the A’s aren’t interested in winning.
What this is, is a difference between, saying “I can’t win and I can’t make this work” or saying “I can and I will do whatever it fucking takes to make this happen”
We shouldn’t have to sit back and give them a free pass for selling us this “I can’t and here are the reasons why” speech.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 2, 2011 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Moneyball worked because the team had many good and some great players
They were way better than this A’s team and probably better than any team as constructed this year. It had nothing to do with a can-do attitude.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions
I would argue that without a can-do attitude
they wouldn’t have had the talent they did
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions
It didn't matter what kind of attitude they had when opponents faced this
http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/OAK/2002.shtml
Hudson, Mulder, Zito. Chavez, Tejada, Dye. All in their primes.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 11:52 AM PDT up reply actions
It was good drafting to get Zito and Chavez
in the middle of the first round and it was strong player development to make something out of Hudson and Tejada, and it was a great trade to get Dye.
All those things are possible now
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
I hate to use the word "luck"
since it’s so misleading, but when a sixth-round guy like Hudson turns into a star, it’s a matter of grabbing as many decent prospects you can knowing that 90%+ will go bust and a few might hit it big.
I guess you can call that “strong player development”, but it’s not like you can decide to work on improving your “strong player development” and hey presto! your next 13th round pick turns into Albert Pujols.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
yes, but it wasn't "we can't compete"
It was, we fucking can compete. Let’s find a way to get Jermaine Dye for peanuts.
Let’s teach Eric Chavez to field at 3B.
What do we need to do to win? Let’s do it.
All we hear from current management is “realities of the marketplace” and “need new stadium to be competitive” and “we are waiting for Bud Selig” and blah blah blah.
It’s never inspiring. Never.
Right now we are 2-3 games out and from the way our management is acting, top to bottom, with quotes like that after getting swept, makes it seem like none of it matters to them.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 2, 2011 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm with you on the way they act
I hope something is done to shakeup the team and trades are made to make us better.
But, let’s not kid ourselves: no one here is turning into Eric Chavez, and we’re not getting Jose Reyes for a bag of balls.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
And yet the Yankees did get Curtis
Granderson and Nick Swisher for a Bag of Balls and did turn Robinson Cano and Brett Gardner from middling prospects to good players.
The Red Sox got Adrian Gonzalez and David Ortiz for a Bag of Balls and turned Kevin Youkilis and Dustin Pedroia from decent prospects to All-Stars.
It can be done and the good teams do it.
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions
There's no fairy dust here
They gave up Austin Jackson (and the corpse of Ian Kennedy who only now is somewhat good) for Granderson. They got a good deal for Swisher, I’ll give you that.
The only reason Gonzalez is in Boston is because he’s getting a fat contract extension. The other guys were just good; I don’t think the Red Sox and Yankees have exploited latent talent that others would neglect.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Bag of balls
To get Curtis Granderson the Yankees gave up Phil Coke, Austin Jackson, and Ian Kennedy in a three-team trade. Those players posted 1.1, 4.1 and 2.1 WAR respectively for Detroit and Arizona in 2010. That is not a “bag of balls”.
Also, the Yankees are paying Granderson $8.25 million this year, which I’m pretty sure is more than any A’s player earns.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
More bag of balls
The Red Sox traded three prospects and a PTBNL for Adrian Gonzalez. Two of those three were Boston’s first-round picks in 2008 and 2009. (Admittedly, Boston picked near the end of the round.)
Also, they’re paying $5.5 million for him this year (one year obtained in the trade) and will pay him even more in the new contract after that.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
To Add
Anthony Rizzo looks to be the next Adrian Gonazalez. In 217 PA, Rizzo is OPSing 1172. He’s 21 years old.
The YES network was pretty much a master stroke.
That kind of thinking is a significant reason why the Yankees are filthy rich.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
In a different market (big enough for another team or two), with better media deals, etc, etc.
by LoneStranger on Jun 2, 2011 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Mets are doing great
nice ballpark and losing record..
ya know what i'am say'in .....
It's amazing what a large media market and population center can make up for.
by LoneStranger on Jun 2, 2011 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions
A's have that
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions
Really?
NY CSA: 22 million people in 6.7k sq. mi. (11 million per team)
BOS CSA: 7.4 million people in 7.4k sq. mi
SFBA CSA: 7.4 million people in 8.8k sq. mi (3.7 million per team)
Looks like NY and Boston have more eyeballs and wallets.
by LoneStranger on Jun 2, 2011 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Assuming that the SFBA is divided equally.
It’s not.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
So you're advocating the A's move to NY?
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 3, 2011 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
I think the A's should move to Tokyo.
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 3, 2011 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions
No, TB should move there
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 3, 2011 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, TB should move.
I hear San Jose is open. Sharks, Rays, could have a whole theme going there.
I'm beginning to believe that Bud Selig wants to die of old age before he has to make a decision regarding Oakland vs San Jose.
Do you think if we had signed Werth/Crawford that $18M+ would be made up in increased attendance?
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions
You have to spend money to make money...
if you have a sport where their is no salary cap, that’s they way it is. BB designed this team as if there is a salary cap and it doesn’t work in this baseball climate.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
baseball is a business, but not a normal one
They have to put a product on the field for an indeterminate amount of fans who may or may not buy goodies and other things that make the team money. It’s not like selling a thing that makes a definite amount of money, and then expanding to sell more things definitely makes more money.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions
It's abnormal in a lot of other ways too
The number of such businesses is artificially capped, there’s an antitrust exemption, you have to be approved by your nominal competitors in order to buy in, the collective bargaining rules skew labor costs in crazy ways, teams are virtually insured against actually going out of business, the business is an important symbol of the community in which it is located, success is publicly measured in a way that is only loosely related to profit margins (i.e. wins and rings) etc.
by Glorious Mundy on Jun 2, 2011 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions
The sport and the business are two different things.
In the sport it’s a competition between 30 baseball teams. In the business, your competition is not just baseball or even other sports; in the business, you provide entertainment and you’re competing against everything else that occupies people’s attention and time while taking money from them — movies, concerts, games, spectator sports, participatory sports, amusement parks, etc, etc.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Agreed, but the two are difficult to separate
Especially for the A’s, who have to compete with the Giants in both arenas.
by Glorious Mundy on Jun 2, 2011 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions
I think those are some of the things that are right up a casual fan's alley, cup.
I'm here to talk about the past.
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
Awesome !!
If the A’s had to write their personal philosophy, it would go something like this: “We are committed to producing a below-average product and blaming it on Oakland and the Giants. We plan to suck until they let us move to San Jose. Then we’ll be a real work of art. Just wait and see.”
ya know what i'am say'in .....
by joecooley on Jun 2, 2011 10:20 AM PDT reply actions 5 recs
This is pretty accurate
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions
wow that is a pretty succinct summary of the current plan right now.
by Billy Frijoles on Jun 2, 2011 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions
and we're supposed to remain fans and follow them through this horseshit because...
?
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 2, 2011 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions
It's up to us whether we do or don't. Many people have not.
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
They don't deserve to have any support
What they deserve is 3,000 fans of the visiting team and Zero A’s fans showing up.
They're getting there
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions
I think someone should write a fanpost about Beane jumping the shark...
oh wait, we had that once before.
Or maybe a newspaper columnist could write a column about it.
That would be some bold and original thinking. But it would require someone who is really innovative and courageous to do so. I wonder if any columnist thinks he’s up to such a task.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
or she? i’m thinking of our local newspaper writers…
really don't care if i ever come back.
by AV on Jun 2, 2011 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions
What, did I not lay it on thick enough?
Our beat writers are awesome, in part because they aren’t smug pontificating buffoons.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I think it's really hypocritical that fans are supposed to bleed their team's colors and live and die with them for life,
while the teams themselves are being run like businesses rather than emotional vessels of hopes and dreams.
I think that in an environment where the clubs are all about business, the fans should be all about value for their entertainment dollar. To some people, the ballpark and fan experience in general is their value. To other people, winning is their entertainment value. If they can’t get it from the home team, though, it doesn’t mean they can’t get it here at home.
In an environment in which a fan can see/hear most any game they want if they’re willing to pay for it, and in a 2 team environment in which each of the 28 other teams pass through between one to four times a year, the Bay Area is a GREAT PLACE in which to be a fan of a non-local team.
“expAts,” the free agent fans will be called, as they spread their wings through the diaspora of worthy and honorable teams to root for, like the Rays, Rangers, and (insert team you don’t hate here).
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 2, 2011 10:54 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Lots of fans are about value for their entertainment dollar
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Jun 2, 2011 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
and then, those fans should ask themselves if they're in it mostly for the ballpark/fan experience, or for the emotional highs of winning.
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 2, 2011 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions
and if you agree that it's winning
become a yankees fan?
by Oaktown Shutout on Jun 2, 2011 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions
I wonder what people would do around here if the A's followed the Rays model.
From 99 to 08, the Rays’ first round picks have been (overall): 1, 6, 3, 2, 1, 4, 8, 3, 1, and 1.
There is a reason they have had (or still have) names like Upton, Young, Niemann, Townsend, Longoria, and Price.
They fucking SUCKED for a decade. (twss). Literally. Their worst pick was #8 overall. Compared to us, the only Top 10 picks we’ve had have been last year (Choice) and 98/99, when we got Zito and Mulder.
This team was in the ALCS 4 years ago and is rebuilding. Imagine what would happen if they were one of the worst teams in baseball for 10 years.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
People wouldn't go and they'd be stuck in a shitty stadium for the foreseeable future!
Oh…
For the record, I do not endorse this idea unless we want 3000 people every night, guaranteed.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
The sad part is ..
they cant afford to keep them once they go to FA. Selig is a dummy,
ya know what i'am say'in .....
I've been hoping for a full on, kill the cow, committed rebuild for nearly a decade...
If they’d started it when they should have, they’d be good again by now.
with revenue sharing it's not a bad idea
The ownership may break even since they’d be a perpetually worse team than they are and as such would get a larger slice of the pie. Draft high, use the extra revenue sharing money to sign the high round picks and hope that your scouting does its job correctly. 3,000 fans a night? From an ownership perspective who cares? You’re still generating a revenue stream whether it be from revenue sharing or from the mlb.tv pie(I don’t know how that’s split up)…the better prospects should inevitably lead to a better product on the field; put funding toward getting a new stadium deal, and then sell the team when the ‘value’ is at its peak.
The worst person to run from is yourself.
Revenue sharing receipts is not based on win-loss record.
It is (indirectly) based on local revenues.
All teams receive an equal “slice of the pie”. The net difference comes from how much they put in. Basically, each team contributes a fixed percentage of their local revenues, then the total is split equally. Those with larger-than-average revenues become net contributors; those with smaller-than-average revenues become net recipients.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
A couple of quibbles with your rant.
Losing to the Yankees ten games in a row is not like rolling snake eyes ten times in a row. The chance of rolling snake eyes is only 1/36. If two teams are evenly matched it should be a 50% chance each time. Even if the Yankees have an 80% chance of winning any given game against the A’s — which I think is a very high assumption — that still translates into only 10% chance of winning all ten of them. The losing streak is indeed a coincidence.
Where Bob said “We don’t necessarily play differently”, I don’t think he means the A’s don’t play differently from how the Yankees play. I think he means the A’s don’t play differently against the Yankees from how they play against anyone else.
On your general point, we’ve known since day one that Geren gives nothing but bland meaningless cliches in post-game interviews. Bob Geren may or may not be a bad manager or a stupid man, but the stupid things he says after the game are not demonstrative of either.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
by iglew on Jun 2, 2011 11:15 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
I know it'd be SSS but
Where Bob said "We don’t necessarily play differently", I don’t think he means the A’s don’t play differently from how the Yankees play. I think he means the A’s don’t play differently against the Yankees from how they play against anyone else.
I’d love to see a chart of the pitches made by each of the pitchers in the Yankees series, maybe separated by count, and see how it differs from their other starts against the rest of the teams. People talk about how they were ‘scared’ of the Yankees hitters, and I think this would be a place you could see that.
by LoneStranger on Jun 2, 2011 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions
I do think Bob's statement there is rebuttable,
but OP seemed to be rebutting the other interpretation of it.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I agree, he meant we don't play differently than we do against other teams
that is what he meant. But the problem is we do. Not only are we not very good, but we have a real problem with a lack of fire, passion and cockiness you need in baseball.
For example, as a great salesperson, I feel I can sell more than anyone, anywhere, because I think I am the best. Now, in reality, I realize that I am not going to sell to everyone, but if I maintain that belief, more likely than not that confidence carries me to my goal. On the other hand, if I have the attitude that I am not going to sell everyone, my subconscious attitude, my body language and my expectations prepare me to fail some of the time. There is a marked difference between cocky and confidence. This team lacks that Rickey Factor.
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions
So we're agreed? The A's need to hire Rickey!
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
by iglew on Jun 2, 2011 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Rickey is a class act ..
I remember when i was a young buck and Rickey was there too sign autographs at the Warriors game and it was towel night, he signed every kids towel that night. I still have mine and it’s over 25 years old, but faded.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
There aren't a lot of good comparisons to actual business here.
You could argue that confidence makes you more persistent, which would likely give you more sales. With 27 outs in any one baseball game, it doesn’t matter if you have persistence when a pitcher is dominating, or if you hit balls hard and they are hit right at someone. You can keep working on your baseball skills, but that might not pay off until after you’ve already lost several games in a row.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Your thoughts on this then
You go up to hit with the attitude that you are the greatest, you are driven and believe that you are going to get a hit every time.
Or
You realize that even the best hitters fail 70% of the time, so you go up thinking this is probably going to be one of the times you fail.
My feeling is that you are going to have more success planning to succeed than not.
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Pick one
If you blow, take more BP.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Your thoughts affect your ability
For example, if you are confident that what is behind a door is safe, you open it with abandon. If you don’t know what is there, you open it with trepedation. Confidence, swager, matters.
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Guys who are bad are just bad, swagger or not.
There might be a reasonable argument to be made for better players, but I don’t see it. The A’s have the problem of many mediocre players playing less than mediocre.
I think we’ll just have to agree to disagree
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions
No, I agree 100% with what you are saying here
I am just saying it starts at the top, that people need and want to be led, and Geren is a piss poor leader with the way he spoke after the game, his general lack of passion and the mediocrity he allows the team to operate with. Bad players suck, agreed. However, someone like Kouz runs from home to second if he knows the other players and/or the manager will get on his ass. There is no fire. If Rickey were on the team, HE would have been pissed and called people out.
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions
both make good arguments.
Talent is talent, but there is also such a thing as accountability.
And also, if you know you have less talent, then maybe you try different things when you play those teams. The A’s were lifeless Monday afternoon. Yeah, part of it was Colon, but come on man, don’t just lie down for these guys. Bunt for a hit, throw one in A-Rod’s ear, something. The Yankees knew they were better, and worse, they knew that the A’s knew they were better. And their fans knew it too. How do I know? I don’t. But it sure seemed that way.
I'm here to talk about the past.
The Yankees ARE a better team. Saying otherwise is silly.
Every position player on their team is better.
But we should have won at least one with our pitching. No need to throw at anyone.
"Once you go Bed....everything else is dead." - Bed
"So you're saying we should skin the Rangers and wear them as uniforms? I’m down." - Kyli
by cuppingmaster on Jun 2, 2011 4:18 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I was being metaphoric.
Again, if you know you have less talent, wouldn’t you try something different? Not try harder, just something different. In a 10-3 game it won’t make a shit, but in a 4-2 game, it might.
I'm here to talk about the past.
Yep
Hudson, Mulder, Zito at this same juncture had a ton more “Onions” than Cahill, Anderson, Gio. The Big3 thrived in tough games (Hudson/Garciaparra in Boston, Zito in NY, Mulder anywhere).
It’s time for this group of pitchers to show up in “Big” games vs. NYY & BOS.
We do play differently ...
BB telling Suzuki to not block the plate speaks VOLUMES !!!
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Clearly it would be much more preferable to tell him to risk crippling injury for plays which are trivial in a season-long context
I wish teams were even more aggressive about conceding obvious failures. I hate seeing guys pointlessly running out easy ground balls. I’d far rather see them out and still in the lineup than still out and out of the game on a stretcher. There is nothing whatsoever about making a judgment call that a play just plain isn’t worth attempting.
But, casual fans like blood sport, so we’re condemned to continue listening to psychobabble about “not trying hard enough.”
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
Nothing whatsoever wrong about, that is
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
Well, it's perpective and perception.
Some fans would like to see guys that get paid million dollars to at least appear that they give a shit, while others might think it’s pretty ridiculous and possibly unsafe to leg out a play that almost always ends up being an out anyway.
I'm here to talk about the past.
I'm thinking the first group are the same ones
who were always pissed off at Eric Chavez because he didn’t shout and stomp after striking out.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I agree on your general point, but you're framing it somewhat unfairly.
Obviously, everyone would rather see a player give up on a play than get injured, but you can’t know that ahead of time. Putting aside the whole “player X didn’t run that out, he obviously doesn’t care about the A’s!!!” mentality, do you think the A’s would win more games over the course of season by giving the opposing team the outs that should be outs (by giving up on should-be outs, and therefore allowing the opponents to take their time and not make/recover from an error and make the out anyway) in exchange for reducing the A’s players’ injury risk on the base paths?
Serious question by the way, I’m not challenging your assertion. My initial impression is that they wouldn’t, but I wouldn’t be that surprised if it turns out they would.
Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!
There are certain plays which I think should not be attempted, yes
Most ground balls to the right side of the infield or the pitcher are completely hopeless and should be conceded as soon as you see the guy field the ball cleanly. You already know my opinion on blocking the plate. And I would institute a blanket rule that you slow down as soon as you hit the warning track— I do not ever want a player playing for my team running into the outfield fence. If the ball’s hit high enough that you can get there at a jog, great; otherwise, concede the hit and stay on the field.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
I can agree with those three scenarios, and getting more specific about the types of plays to concede can only help.
The problem I see though is that there will often be a rather large grey area in there. For example, with ground balls to the right side of the infield, how far away from the second baseman does the ball have to be to change the play from a “concede it” to a “run it out?” Two steps? Three? Same thing with balls to the first baseman. Most 3U plays aren’t worth running out, but I think ones that require the pitcher to cover often are. There’s enough possibility of a mistake with a pitcher covering under pressure of a runner bearing down on first to make running hard worthwhile.
Having such hazy situational labels makes a whole-scale rule difficult. You end up having to either concede plays where the chance of mistake outweighs the chance of injury, follow through on plays where the reverse is true, or leave it up to the judgment of the batter, which is a proposition that is prone to incorrect decisions.
Personally, I think the third option is still best, as long as you make it clear that the batter won’t be penalized for quitting on such a play. Telling batters something like “I don’t want you to run hard on easy outs to the right side,” similar to what Beane did for Suzuki on blocking the plate might be a good way to do it. You’ll end up with incorrect decisions some of the time, but over the course of the season, the end gains will likely be better than the current situation. It’s an interesting avenue of exploration at least.
Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!
Given how this team is playing...
…every play is trivial in a season long context.
We should be limiting our starting pitchers to ninety pitches a game and our relievers to a single inning each. No need to put stress on their arms when we’re doomed to finish at best around .500
There is no "i" in Teamocil. At least not where you'd think.
by GreenNGoldSooner on Jun 4, 2011 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe BB should tell Suzuki
to clean the plate once the player steps on homeplate…
ya know what i'am say'in .....
or use a shop vac.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Baseball needs to implement a stunt double rule
when the runner is rounding third, the ump calls time, they bring in a stunt double at catcher, then resume the play
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions
That could work..
you might want to pass that along to BB
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Hi everyone, how are you today?
Just gettting back to this since last night, glad to see the discussion ensued. I guess why I reacted so strongly to Geren’s comments is because from my perspective as a manager of a company, at some point I’d like to see some personal responsibility for the play on the field. Blaming a 10 game losing streak on luck or lack thereof does not cut it for me. In my company, were I to produce 10 months of negative numbers, I would be out on my ass. Were I to tell the owner it was just bad luck would not go over well. I am well aware that luck factors into baseball; where a ball lands or doesn’t,etc. It’s a game of fractions of inches, of outcomes that our outside of our control. But there is a lot in our control as well. You can play better defense. You can lead with confidence and with passion, kick guys in the butt when they don’t do well. The other day when Kouz ran into an out that should have been a double because he lollygagged between home and first then turned on the gas, whent he camera showed him in the dugout afterwards he was smiling and laughing. If I were his boss I would have chewed his ass! He would have been benched, pulled out immediately. It’s the approach embodied, the intent behind what he said that rubbed me the wrong way. To blame fate instead of himself or performance. It was crap.
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 1:08 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, confidence does not replace talent
but I believe it drives it
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions
There are lots of guys, the minors are littered with them
players with ability, but its their head that keeps them from succeeding. You see it all the time in the example of a pitcher. When Gio first came up, electric stuff. But you could see his body language and subsequent meltdown when he lost confidence in his pitches.
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Geren has no personal responsibility because he has nothing the fuck to do with the play on the field
Him saying he’s taking responsibility for the play on the field is like me saying that I’m taking responsibility for the fucking North Japan Earthquake. In fact, I’ll do that. It was my fault. Blame me. I’m very sorry.
That should clearly fix things. Someone go check to see if a couple hundred thousand homes just sprang out of the ground over there.
If you had nothing at all to do with 10 months of negative numbers and your boss would fire you for it anyway, then your boss is a grade-A moron.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
by PaulThomas on Jun 2, 2011 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Whoa, the North Japan Earthquake reported to you?
How did you get it to exceed projections so profoundly?
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
This isn't "play," it's work
And your contention is that the way management operates has nothing to do with how workers perform.
That’s news to workers the world over.
I know that I, personally, when working,
work harder for people who respect me and I respect them back,
and I do as little as possible without getting fired when I’m working for someone like Geren.
Intelligent people would get beyond and self-motivate, for the sake of their own pride, numbers, and paychecks. However, these are athletes we’re dealing with here, and many of them are emotionally stunted overgrown children who wouldn’t necessarily know self-interest if it bit them in the ass with filed-down teeth.
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 3, 2011 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
If you read anything I've ever written on the subject,
you will swiftly find that my opinion on the near-uselessness of managers is hardly confined to the baseball context.
I doubt it’s a coincidence that the field I chose as a career, law, is the rare one in which even the nominal “management” is actually performing productive work for most of the time.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
Oh, it's ok, Matsui is going to have a great second half
which means he will only suck for two more months, then magically he won’t be old and slow anymore. Bob said so.
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Did Bob specify what team Matsui would play his great second half for?
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Matsui needs to heat up
so they can sell more A’s jersey’s overseas…
ya know what i'am say'in .....
The Chunichi Dragons, hopefully.
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 3, 2011 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
Poor Matsui
has no power hitters around him, he has absolutely no protection in the lineup, no fastballs for him…
ya know what i'am say'in .....
False.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
Please name a power hitter in this lineup, thanks.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Holliday did very well when he was here
not…
ya know what i'am say'in .....
How's Holliday in St.Louis..
thanks…
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Holliday in Oakland
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/h/hollima01.shtml
In 93 games:
11 HR, .286 BA, 54 RBI… yeah, what a bum!
"If you wrote something for which someone sent you a check, if you cashed the check and it didn't bounce, and if you then paid the light bill with the money, I consider you talented." —Stephen King
we need to trade him for a fat third baseman
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions
And then trade that fat third baseman
for a toolsy outfielder.
"If you wrote something for which someone sent you a check, if you cashed the check and it didn't bounce, and if you then paid the light bill with the money, I consider you talented." —Stephen King
Thanks for proving my point..
he played less games in St.Louis that year and had more production because of the lineup he was in and I didn’t say he was a bum.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Your point was that Holliday did not perform well in Oakland
I just responded to the comment below.
"If you wrote something for which someone sent you a check, if you cashed the check and it didn't bounce, and if you then paid the light bill with the money, I consider you talented." —Stephen King
All i'am say'in is that
if you put Matsui in the current Yankees lineup, he would have much better numbers than here…
ya know what i'am say'in .....
why?
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
If Matsui can't hit fastballs..
why did BB sign him …
ya know what i'am say'in .....
I wish I knew.
I was against it in the first place.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
this this this
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Jun 2, 2011 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions
not too mention..
better morale in NY also …
ya know what i'am say'in .....
You could say that about almost anyone
"If you wrote something for which someone sent you a check, if you cashed the check and it didn't bounce, and if you then paid the light bill with the money, I consider you talented." —Stephen King
I think the ballpark helped a little
And being more familiar with the NL already.
Last of the Ninth - Photography
Yes, 3 WAR in 93 games *sucks*
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
And you think that's entirely about protection?
He spent a lot of time in Colorado as an island as well.
There’s a dozen factors as to why he didn’t perform up to his usual standards (still better than anyone since Frank Thomas) but protection is not one of them.
This lineup strike fear in the hearts of no one
Matsui is sucking all by himself, I dont think it has to do with protection or the lack of it. I think it’s simply he is older and over the hill, which is why he is here.
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, besides that
“No fastballs” is wrong.
Matsui is seeing 57% fastballs, identical to what he saw last season, and he’s nearly 8 runs below average against the pitch.
He’s done, basically. His bat speed is gone.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
I would throw him curve balls
all day long, thats just what the pitchers are doing.
ya know what i'am say'in .....
No, the pitchers are throwing him fastballs
"If you wrote something for which someone sent you a check, if you cashed the check and it didn't bounce, and if you then paid the light bill with the money, I consider you talented." —Stephen King
Doesn't seem that way..
I would walk Matsui everytime…
ya know what i'am say'in .....
Facts don't seem that way?
I am confused. 2+2 doesn’t seem like 4 to me but I lose that argument every time. Not sure why.
by DrDoom on Jun 2, 2011 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Just to be clear
You are saying you would walk the guy hitting .222/.277/.340 everytime.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
I would certainly walk him every time.
I’m not sure I could throw a strike at all. And if somehow I did manage it, I’m pretty sure that even Matsui would be able to hit my 40mph fastslowball.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I would walk him everytime
But it’s probably because I’m an A’s fan….
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
So you missed the part where over half of the pitches he sees are fastballs, then?
Click here and it will show you the breakdown.
Frankly if I were a pitcher, he’d get nothing but fastballs up and in. His bat is SLOW.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
Josh Willingham.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
Josh Willingham has 10 home runs
That’s as many as Adrian Gonzalez, and one more than Alex Rodriguez.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
MLB Trade Rumors says the DBacks want a 7th inning guy
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/06/dbacks-seek-relief-help.html
who could the A’s get for one of the 16 middle relievers we have now?
That's easy.
The answer is Conor Jackson.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
by iglew on Jun 2, 2011 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Oh, you mean for *another* one....
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Can we get Danny Haren in return?
Damn.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
It's not to be taken at all seriously
this ownership is pretty much a propaganda machine at this point, and to expect Geren or Beane or Wolff to be open and forthright about the very real challenges and obstacles this franchise is eyeballs-deep in is really just a pipe dream. They value expressing an honest assessment of where their product is at to their customers almost as little as a business entity could and still survive. Really, they don’t need you because they profit anyway due to the luxury tax, so one way or another the natural mechanism of a corporation or business having some sort of fealty or fidelity to its customer base has been subverted out of the realm of what is to be expected from this situation.
I’ll be totally honest with all of you: if I wasn’t involved with this thing or sort of committed to writing or caring about it, I’d be way gone by now. The initiative — or lack of it — for all intents and purposes seems to be to let the A’s franchise kind of twist in the wind in perpetuity and that is as lethal a kiss-of-death for a product that is allegedly in the entertainment business as you could point to. Geren is maybe the most visible symptom of this (possibly terminal) malaise but it has spread throughout the whole business entity and has made it seem like the A’s top brass desire inertia over impetus and flatline over forwardness. This has provided the Giants even more opportunity to claim the whole Bay Area and even, in a strange way, serves to bolster their argument that the South Bay ought to be theirs, thus dragging out the T-rights battle yet longer and providing an ever-longer vine for the Athletics to die on. The withdrawal we have seen amounts very quickly, in a hyper-competitive business environment, to equate with the appearance, at least, of surrender. People come to the gladiator arena of sports to see triumphal strength and to see the will displayed to attain heights of achievement and excellence and excitement: almost the living definition of The Spectacle. They most certainly do not come to see and hear the sounds of surrender.
This is sick and sad to say but the truth is that if I wasn’t already into this for the long haul, I’d leave it be because there isn’t really anything much to recommend this product as an example of something excellent to root for and to believe in, and something which desires to be accountable to itself and the steering of its own progression. A stranger unfamiliar with the situation and simply observing as a potential fan whether or not the A’s would be a rewarding experience to care about would likely just dismiss it all — much as management has dismissed us — and move on. And the self-accountability to engage better with what it will take to achieve success — which is missing so glaringly from the manager’s comments cited here — is utterly integral to making it in any business field. Because as the fine author of this piece will tell you — and he lives doing what it takes on a daily basis to run a successful shop — if you’re not moving proactively ahead in business you are falling behind.
Rec’d as usual, Joe.
Josh.
"If we start getting into that sh*t, we might as well get out the plastic sheeting and have an orgy." --Gaijin Suketto
by emperor nobody on Jun 2, 2011 3:16 PM PDT reply actions 12 recs
I turned a good friend of mine into an A's fan
And he’s not happy about it at all.
For the past two years, there’s been a terrible malaise in the organization, as EN says. It was reflected in the odd business of Fox and Patterson last spring, and then this year in the odd business of keeping on a manager who does nothing to improve the club and a lot to keep it from moving forward. Billy Beane, every so often, steps forward and pulls together a series of moves that change everything - and in the end, nothing.
Nobody expects miracles. You can’t change what you can’t change. You’re stuck with this park; you’re stuck with limited resources. But there are things you can do. You can change the corporate climate. You can create an atmosphere that lures in fans, players and coaches, instead of driving them away. Bob Geren should go, at this point, not just because he’s a bad manager but because he’s a symptom of that terrible malaise. You start with what you can do, and that’s the first thing the A’s can do.
yeah Bryan, Ralph and I have converted our roommate James
he is on here and posting now, and I come home and he is riveted to the game on CSNBA. He even watches it in HD so he can see Coco’s braids. I feel badly to have hung this millstone around his neck but it is what it is.
Let’s also not forget the Supreme factor by which they keep us hangin’ on: this organization — for all its dead-man-walking flavor — happens to be very good at the singlemost difficult aspect of the game of baseball: that is, developing excellent pitchers. The saddest thing gets to be that our franchise is dominant of the crappier teams below us (the Baltimores, the Pittsburghs and the others that haven’t had a winning season in many, many moons) to just enough of an extent that we never finish much lower than the middle of the pack and thus never get any draft picks high enough up to complete the puzzle with a Bryce Harper-type stick. So the cycle goes on and on ad infinitum, which feeds the perception that all we have to hope for is this level of mediocrity and inertia.
"If we start getting into that sh*t, we might as well get out the plastic sheeting and have an orgy." --Gaijin Suketto
by emperor nobody on Jun 2, 2011 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions
EN..
awesome post….well worth the read…I share many of your feelings and sentiments but could not have expressed them more eloquently….For what it’s worth, I’m glad your obligations are making it so that you have to stick around
by JimBarnett2KevinGarnett on Jun 2, 2011 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks Josh
bleak, just bleak. cut me and I bleed Green and Gold though, there is no going back, I am going down with the ship
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 2, 2011 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions
highly rec'd
saying that your thoughts were well stated would be an understatement. Frank, honest, and concise…and unfortunately 100% correct.
Well said Josh, very well said!!
I just returned from an assignment in SE Asia, for a few weeks stay in the Bay Area, and purchased tickets to Wednesday’s day game [$154 for seats 8 and 9, row 1, section 125]. I had been a season ticket holder from 2002 through 2008, but gave them up since I was doing so much traveling. But the return to the colisium, after 3 years absence was very, very enlightening. My daughter had looked up on the A’s website that Kinders had this great bar-b-que she wanted; we couldn’t find it anymore: it was gone, no one was maintaining the website. I stopped in the little boy’s room like guys my age (72) have to do often, a urinal was overgflowing, flooding the room: no maintenance guy in sight, probably none on the payroll. At my $77 dollar seat, there was no room for my knees. We couldn’t find a cup holder, because there was none………but in a way I could easily have disregarded all of this is the A’s had come to play, but they hadn’t. They were walking through the motions. It was obvious to me and the 20 or so Yankee fans that surrounded us within ear shot. But my guess is that the team will need to reach rock bottom before it can be turned around, and they are well on their way.
Geren sounds like he's saying that he doesn't know why his team loses games.
I don’t think that’s what he means to say. Which is almost worse, given that he’s too stupid to realize what he’s saying.
This “you win some you lose some” attitude. Is not who I want at the helm. I want someone who’s trying to focus the team on preparing to win every game. Obviously you can’t win every game, but when you lose the team should understand why they’ve lost in and what they can do to increase their chances of winning.
No wonder the players don’t respect this manager.
Well despite how inept our manager is,
I was born an A’s fan and will die an A’s fan, so I’ll just keep supporting them and hope for a more promising future. May be a pipe dream, but maybe it won’t. I’ll just have to appreciate each win that much more i guess.
Great post OP, though. I enjoy knowing i’m not alone.
"Caring about stuff binds us to the other people that care about stuff, and that creates the communities that makes life worth living."
by thewhizkid on Jun 2, 2011 6:40 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I was born a fourth-generation Cubs fan...
…and went to my first game 50 years ago and will die a Cubs fan and know I’ll never see them win a World Series. But that’s OK because Cubs fans are fatalistic and value something other than championships. We know there will be sunny days at Wrigley or New Wrigley forever.
I am now more of an A’s fan and am deathly afraid we will lose them forever. That raises the stakes.
by vk on Jun 2, 2011 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions
this is a really complex stew...
that just isn’t simple to sort out without blowing several gaskets.
To me, the focus on Geren is fun but largely irrelevant. The A’s hurdles are institutional are sizeable. If they prove they can draw in Oakland too well, MLB will be hard pressed to permit a move outside Oakland, yet Oakland reputedly doesn’t want to shovel scarce taxpayer resources into making sure the A’s are happy and well-fed with guaranteed profit (and rightfully so for Oakland). As long as MLB drags out a firm decision one way or the other on Oakland’s relocation ambitions, mediocrity is almost guaranteed. And to be honest, Beane’s at least been straight on this slice of the problem, although that’s probably because it serves his interests to be.
Subordinate to this primary obstacle to baseball goodness ae several notable but lesser problems, like a GM who is also an owner which is pretty much a conflict of interest, as the goals of those roles often do not converge. Many owners actually make more money by sucking (see Royals, Pirates, and several others) because of revenue sharing. Few GMs are rewarded for sucking, intentionally or otherwise.
The A’s are also one of the most corporate organizations in the worst sense of the term: their obsession with numbers exposes their dominant accountant personality to the point where some of the intangibles that make for great franchises—see Yankees, Red Wings, Spurs, etc—, like pride, competitive fire, and flat out love for the game become buried under the soulless rubric of dollars and cents alone. Geren reflects that organizational sensibility. He reminds me of your average HR goon in any sizeable corporate unit.
At the end of this trail of bland corporate conformity are the players, many of whom are chosen as much for their “fit” in this organizational grind as for their talent. That can definitely effect the winning percentage of a team over time.
To me, focusing on Geren so heavily misses the point that he is but a tiny fish in a much larger pond of institutional madness. If Geren went today, the logic of the Oakland A’s is such that he would most likely be replaced by a clone anyway.
Personally, I don’t think the A’s will do a great deal more than what they’re doing now unless they a)get a plum relocation package that frees up sick cash or b) replace ownership with someone who is satsified with lower profit margins if it means he or she can win titles.
by Drone on Jun 3, 2011 1:11 AM PDT reply actions 6 recs
and as such, we are a product of design
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on Jun 3, 2011 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions
I've always held the same, unpopular opinion, but I'll repeat it anyway.
I judge the GM based on the team put on at the beginning of the year; I don’t think there’s all that much to be done midseason (except of course trades, which we haven’t seen much of this year). Saying Beane doesn’t care seems a little ridiculous to me, he acquired Willingham and Dejesus this offseason and signed Fuentes/Matsui/Balfour. I’m not gonna say whether or not those were the right moves, but saying our GM is asleep at the wheel when he made all those moves suggest the opposite.
"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime
Management has been too patient with Matsui and his lack of batspeed.
Management has been too lax in discipline in allowing balls to be run out lazily without punishment.
Management has been inefficient with bullpen usage, which has cost the club a lot of win probablility.
Management has been lax in regards to proactively soothing the egos of emotionally variant players like Kouzmanoff and Gonzalez.
Management has been negligent in the marketing department, which has allowed the fair-weather Giants’ culture to bloom like a fungus all over the East Bay and significantly pushed the A’s out of general public consciousness, except as occasional laughingstock.
I used to think that owning a piece of the club would motivate Mr. Beane to become one of the all-time great owner-operators, like Mr. Mack or Mr. Veeck, but I feel assured now that owning a piece of the club, combined with emotional detachment from the results on the field, have made him become complacent as a man with a cushy job and a comfortable investment and a family, rather than the restless combative gamesman that he used to be.
"Note to self, do not carve marionettes out of meat, sometimes they accidentally become big league managers."- Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 3, 2011 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions
My fear is that Beane has become like some of our posters:
The off-season is the “fun part” and the only part that still sustains his interest, and once the actual season starts he doesn’t get into the actual games/season all that much anymore. “It’s fun to assemble a team, but who really cares about the team itself?”
And that’s not the way it works — you need to constantly reassess and be responsive to the changing needs or you will be passed up and will sink to the bottom quickly, just as the team is doing.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Interesting, Nico
I hadn’t analyzed BB from that angle.
i've never tried to rank them to be honest. i guess i like beer.- stm72
He's been like that for awhile. There was even a section in Moneyball that talked about it.
2 months to see what you have (shitty offense)
2 months to get what you need (non shitty offense)
2 months for it to do its thing
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
It's your thing.
Do whatcha want to do.
by LoneStranger on Jun 3, 2011 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I can't tell ya
who to sock it to
"If we start getting into that sh*t, we might as well get out the plastic sheeting and have an orgy." --Gaijin Suketto
by emperor nobody on Jun 4, 2011 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions
I've always kind of felt that an organizations culture is usually a reflection of the leaders personality and attitude.
The malaise you guys are describing could just be a reflection of BB’s personal disinterest with the on the field performance.
Here’s a question I’ve been hesitant to ask for fear of a flame war; Do you think that BB’s personal interest in winning decreased when he began to personally profit from his baseball club? Is it possible that his own self interest began to interfere with his desire to win? As a GM, part of your job is to cajole, beg, borrow…anything you can do, to get more money or commitment from your owner. It certainly seems possible that you would be more content to spend less so that the club could profit more, thereby enriching yourself further.
So let me just hypothesize. I think it’s possible after he began to personally profit from baseball operations that he lost some fire and interest in winning. This reduced competitive drive and interest lead to the malaise that currently hangs over the club and organization.
"Never have a motto, that's what I always say" - Me
http://marcel-oehler.marcellosendos.ch/comics/ch/1986/05/19860506.gif
"I Hate SF" - The Chosen One.
I don't know, but something appears to have changed.
From his actions to his words, I just don’t get the same “competitor’s determination” from him that I got 10 years ago. Perhaps it’s simpler than a “conflict of interest” theory: Maybe the aggravating and disappointing lack of progress on a new stadium, and constant rejection by free agent targets, has robbed him of some of his spirit. Who knows?
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Perhaps he's just 10 years older than he used to be
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
He almost certainly is!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
There's a line between overreacting to a small sample and making the correct decision.
I understand the desire to call up Weeks/Cardenas, but that could easily be the wrong choice. Swallowing the contracts of Kouz/Ellis this early would be costly, and while it looks that way, their 200 AB’s don’t prove that they are done.
"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime
Vent.
The ownership group is going to give you all the spin about small market/low revenue/old venue and how that makes it tough to win in Oakland and the fans are going to say that they’re hesitant to support a team that as an ownership group that doesn’t provide a quality product. Blame Selig, the Giants, San Jose, Oakland government, etc….it will go on forever. The only thing that can be changed are the players and managers on the field, and the attitude(s) of those players/managers(I’m assuming ownership is not going to fire themselves). I agree that you can’t take a shitty player and by changing their attitude turn them into a superstar or perhaps even competent, but what you can do is to maintain an environment of exceeded expectation from everyone involved less you breed complacency…and that is where this team seems to be from my point of view. A’s sweep the O’s and get back to to .500 and the sentiment seems to be it was a good series with some things to build on. A’s get swept by the Yankees and it seems to be a series where we could have done some things better. I’m sick of the middle ground all the time. Players have ceilings and I understand that. Barton’s not going to hit 30 homers in a season; ever. Crisp isn’t going to develop a strong throwing arm; ever. What can change is organizational/managerial attitude and passion and Bobo, who is the steerer of this wayward ship, lacks the ability to adjust. I’m not going to say lead because I don’t him, maybe he’s a great leader when stuff happens to be coincidentally going well, but when the team is coincidentally playing poorly and not giving an all out effort he doesn’t respond like a manager should.
Manage: v. To handle or direct with a degree of skill
The skill is on the field, unfortunately for those he manages, that same ability does not, in my opinion, reside with Bob Geren
The worst person to run from is yourself.

by 



























