Can the A's Succeed in Oakland?
During the Giants and A’s series in San Francisco, KNBR host Damon Bruce posed this question to the Saturday morning audience: "What will it take to make the A’s work in Oakland." The idea of the A’s leaving Oakland is not feasible right now. No city, not San Jose, not Fremont, can take on the multi-million dollar project of building a stadium and infrastructure to lure a professional team, not with the current state of local economies and budgetary constraints. So how can the A’s thrive in the City of Oakland?
The first answer is the one everyone’s been screaming for years. The A’s need a new stadium. This is without a doubt the number one issue facing the A’s. Anyone who loves baseball, or even casually likes it, can tell you the Coliseum is a horrible place to watch baseball. The outfield sight lines are horrible. The infield seats, while providing a great view of the game, are too distant from the field, especially for today’s fans who are accustomed to breathing on the batter’s neck. While the atmosphere of the stadium doesn’t take away from the stadium, it definitely doesn’t add anything. Let’s not mention the neighborhood in which the ballpark resides. Definitely not conducive to the modern baseball fan’s desire to visit restaurants, shop and hang out around the park before and after games.
But a new ballpark only does so much. New parks with empty seats are scattered across the country. Fans will come to see the new digs, try the new entertainment options, and take pictures around the new landmarks for the first season, but come season two, there has to be something keeping them coming. This something has to appeal to casual fans because die-hard fans can be counted today in the 7th inning of a windy night game when the Royals are in town.
To succeed in a new park, the A’s need a product on the field that appeals to family of 4 who may only watch 2-3 games a year. The A’s need a team who has identifiable players, charismatic players who fans want to hang out with as much as they want to see play a game. (Speaking of which, why is Coco Crisp not on every billboard in Oakland, on every commercial during an A’s broadcast? Is there a more underrated spokesperson for a team than Mr. Crisp? The name, the smile, the hair and he’s an exciting ballplayer. Get this man some press!) The A’s need to appeal to the lowest common denominator. No, I’m not talking about "sex"-ing up the team, but my solution may be just as controversial.
Fire Billy Beane.
Let me explain before the torches are lit. Billy Beane is an amazing baseball mind. Moneyball changed the way baseball teams were run. The string of success he experienced with the Big Three can’t be overstated. He handled soon-to-be free agents just about as well as any GM could have hoped. Today, the A’s are poised to make a run at the West despite a payroll that ranks last in the division (less than half of the Angels payroll) and 21st in the Major Leagues.
Then again, he hasn’t been perfect. He chose one big name to keep around from that first era, and Eric Chavez wasn’t the correct guy. Who would have been best is hard to say, but Chavez wouldn’t be in the debate. Also, for a team who’s struggling to score runs, it’s hard to defend a GM who traded away Andre Ethier and Carlos Gonzalez for players who aren’t making any contributions to the current club. Even harder to defend when the team hasn’t made the playoffs in 5 years.
But why replace him? Billy Beane is a smart guy. He’s always after a challenge. One of the reasons he’s stayed in Oakland is that challenge. He likes to build a winner without a budget. Having a $100 Million dollar budget (modest in today’s landscape) would take all the fun out of it for Beane. He wants to be the smartest guy in the room, the guy who raced your brand new Ferrari with a car he built in his garage and won. There’s nothing wrong with that, and for loyal fans who watch 162 games a year, it’s endearing. He’s busting his ass to make this team what it is, and you can identify with that.
The problem is the casual fan doesn’t know that. The casual fan doesn’t know that Josh Willingham could be Jayson Werth in disguise (this year they look surprisingly similar, not in a good way). The casual fan doesn’t know that Anderson-Cahill-Gonzalez can compete side by side with any Lincecum-Cain-Sanchez, Greinke-Marcum-Gallardo or (dare I say) Halladay-Lee-Oswalt. The casual fan looks at a roster of names they’ve never heard (although that Coco Crisp sounds familiar) and a team that’s hovering around .500 in a stadium that no one likes. The casual fan will never understand or care about the principles of Moneyball and the craft of building a competitive team with a small budget.
Beane needs to embrace the idea of spending money. He needs to bring in a face for the franchise, or at least develop one and pay him. Beane needs to allow the payroll to grow, to play on the same field as other teams, even if it’s only in the middle of the pack and not at the front. The problem is, that’s not what Billy Beane wants to do. Sadly, that’s why Billy Beane needs to be fired for the A’s to succeed in Oakland.
Mario Rubio is a lifelong Giants fan and A’s season ticket holder. Normally, you can find him writing about craft beer but his love for baseball as well as beer inspired this piece on the A’s.
10 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
rec'd!
The Giants
I got nothin'
by OptimistPrime on May 25, 2011 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The casual fan doesn’t know that Beane has an ownership share in the franchise.
A B -3X = Swedish girls like chocolate @('.')@
by monkeyball on May 25, 2011 2:53 PM PDT reply actions 7 recs
What will it take for the A's to succeed in Oakland besides a new stadium?
Better drafting of position players.
So I'm Confused
Is the central tenet of the “Fire Billy” argument that the the A’s have money to spend, but that Billy refuses to spend it? Are we assuming that management is throwing hundreds of millions of dollars at Billy, shouting “Spend! Spend! In the name of all that’s holy, please spent this insane amount of money on exciting ballplayers!” and Billy’s response is “Screw you! I’m not spending money on ballplayers, and that’s final!” Is that the assumption we’re making here? And is that assumption correct?
Because if not, then this argument makes no sense.
www.curveballcity.com
I fully believe the A's can succeed in Oakland
However, it will take probable ten years and new ownership. What upsets me is the fact that Oakland has been dragging their feet in regards to a new A’s stadium for years. I am an obsessed follower of Cisco Field, where ever it may be. Victory Court would be awesome, however Oakland is light years behind San Jose in regards to EIR’s and land purchases necessary for Cisco Field. San Jose has but two parcels of land left to purchase at the proposed stadium site. As a student at San Jose State, and a member of the Greek Community…..also born and raised in San Jose, my city would support the A’s 110%, without a doubt. I read somewhere on a blog that someone claimed MLB wanted a new stadium for the A’s within 5 years….While I have no idea where they came to this conclusion, I agree this is the time frame that the A’s and Major League Baseball need to make a definitive plan on where Cisco Field will be built. That my friends is what can sustain the A’s as a competitive team.
We Can Win In Oakland
Eventually, though, the team has to get better. you know, we complain about Geren and the Coliseum and Lew Wolff (and for good reason), but it’s the team that plays the game. We can’t buy big stars; it’s a financial handicap we to live with. But if the players come through, then we’ll have a better chance of succeeding.
Of course, Geren and co. all deserve criticism at times, but the players deserve the blame too.
They can win and have won....with Schott and Hofman as owners.l
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on May 26, 2011 11:50 AM PDT reply actions
Haas and Finley, too.
One of these things is not like the other one.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
See, now, you can't be telling people facts like that.
They don’t like to hear good things about Wolff.
by LoneStranger on May 27, 2011 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions

by 




























