Really, It COULD Be Worse
The first two games have been brutally awfully horribly terrible to watch. Or not watch, since Comcast kills puppies for sport. Apparently the A's, in partnership with Yale's Molecular Biology Department, have devoted the 2011 season to testing whether Craig Breslow can pitch in, and ruin, 162 games. But it really could be worse:
* Like me, you would gladly have sold your soul to the devil in exchange for a promise that the 2011 A's would have the same record as the Red Sox. So far, so good.
* We could be pitching our #3 starter today, and it could be Matt Harrison instead of Gio Gonzalez. Please let "the back of the rotation" decide the AL West this year.
* Our starting rotation could be Kevin Correia, Paul Maholm, Ross Ohlendorf, Charlie Morton, and James McDonald. I'll leave it to you to guess which of those Pirates' starting pitchers had a farm, and which ones were 1-11, 2-12, and 9-15 last year.
* We could be complaining that our injured left-handed reliever was abused by our crosstown rival Mets, because they pitched him a major league record 344 times over a 4-year period, and have to listen to the Mets reply, "Didn't you know this when you decided to sign him to an $8million contract?" At least our overpaid sucky left-handed reliever is healthy, and we don't come across as whiny morons when he doesn't work out so well.
One of these days, hopefully today, the A's will come out of their collective "I'm trying too hard, and the result is that it I look like a Little Leaguer with his glove on the wrong hand" funk, and will start playing some real division-contending baseball. Remember, in baseball you're never as good as you seem when you're "up" and you're never as bad as you seem when you're "down" -- and right now, thank God for that!
88 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I really like this, and like that it's not a front page post yet.
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
As in, "When Nico pulls out his first front page 'It's gonna be ok, everybody' post,
you know the season is officially hopeless"? ;-)
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Why? There's no research, no Master Thespian, no photography, no interviews, in short no value add
It’s a good summary of his opinions, and I rec’d it but it’s far from automatic front page material
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Apr 3, 2011 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions
I was just saying that 'cause it's better than what I put up there this morning. :)
I'm here to talk about the past.
I disagree. Your post was well formulated as a frontpage post, as it asks the community to debate a question, what should Gio's expectations be.
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 3, 2011 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
Wasn't expecting to beat Felix
Last night is the only game we turned into a loss from the jaws of victory. Good Gio might be the best pitcher we have, or is at least very close to BA. No reason to worry other than Suzuki being hurt already.
A good team would have beaten the Mariners leading in the 5th inning, Felix or no Felix
I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min
by WaddellCanseco on Apr 3, 2011 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Really? Even if they arent allowed to score because the best pitcher in the game is on fire?
Respectfully disagree.
We could have too.
Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples
Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.
If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.
Me too
I never go into a game thinking there is no chance to win…unless Kenny Rogers is on the mound.
Josh Willingham hit a 2-run homer off King Felix- April Fools Day
by ohtobe21likehuston on Apr 4, 2011 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions
Join me on the dark side.
It makes these games far more expected.
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 3, 2011 10:58 AM PDT reply actions
I'll pass.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Well you really should be less surprised when they play this badly then.
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 3, 2011 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions
I expect us to score 2 runs/game a lot this year.
That puts a ton of pressure on the defense, pitching, and even the manager. Do you think Barton throws that ball away if hes not trying to prevent the go ahead run?
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 3, 2011 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions
We averaged 4 runs a game with the Matts (and worse) in the lineup.
I don’t doubt we’ll score only 2 runs a game here and there, but um… I seriously doubt we’ll score only 324 runs all year.
Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples
Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.
If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.
A lot? Maybe
The majority of the time? Not even close.
Even the Mariners, as bad as they were last year, averaged a little over 3 a game. The A’s are nowhere near that level of bad.
Last of the Ninth - Photography
Also
The A’s scored 4.1 runs a game last year. There is no way this team’s offense is going to be worse than last year’s, just no way.
Last year they scored two runs or less in 46 games, or 28.4%. Predictably, they only one two of them. They scored exactly two 19 times and in their first two games last year, they scored a total of five runs.
They scored six runs (picked because it evens out with the two-run games for their overall average) 20 times and only lost twice in those games.
I’m pretty sure the offense will score at least as many runs as last year, probably more.
Last of the Ninth - Photography
Why wouldn't we score around there with regressions from Ellis Coco and Pennington?
DDJ is projected to hit like not good, we got worse with Matsui. That seems to make up some of the Matt at bats.
We Might score 4.4 r/g but thats only good for 9th anyway.
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 3, 2011 8:25 PM PDT up reply actions
What's Sweeney's outlook on the year???
I can see where you’re coming from with out offense… It’s putrid when it’s down!!
I am still Hoping Kouzmanoff get’s things turned around better than what he put out last year!
Every man for himself...
No way Coco regresses to be worse than 50% Coco / 50% Matts from last year
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
The Matts were all of -.3 WAR.
Are you saying that Coco won’t regress into a less than 3 WAR player? Because his wRC+ for 82 89 99 94 before last year and he’s only been a 3 WAR player 3 times in his career.
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 4, 2011 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions
No. He won't.
Braids and Afros have magical powers.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
don't forget purple dreadlocks.
My wife would say that’s the most magical hair of all.
"So tired. So cranky. So full of rage. Ahhh, the baseball season." - Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Apr 4, 2011 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions
kind of self-serving of her. no?
Save it for the fast money round, Paddy.
by Leopold Bloom on Apr 5, 2011 8:11 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm saying 3 WAR is about a median projection for him this year
So that’s some regression (both reducing wOBA and increasing health)
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
Im saying that if he is 3 WAR he subsumes them Matts just by his own regression
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 4, 2011 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Then I misread your comment
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
No worries
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 4, 2011 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Even you know that the A's aren't this bad defensively, or that the bullpen isn't this bad
"Hey anyone can join in...as long as they talk about me." - Mr. Bed
"If aliens were going to communicate with Earth, they'd contact you first." - my GF
by cuppingmaster on Apr 3, 2011 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
That is a very nice invitation, dfa!
May I have a few days to ponder whether to accept?
"Honestly, the more I teach, the more I find myself in favor of medication. I don't think kids should take any, though." - Nico
of course.
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 3, 2011 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions
he wants to be on the dark side. He just isn't sure if your medical is as good as his current plan.
The A’s can cut and run, or they can wipe the blood from their face and rise, eyes ablaze and fists cocked.
by Leopold Bloom on Apr 4, 2011 6:15 AM PDT up reply actions
we have a very competitive PPO
You don't need a religion, you have the A's. - My girlfriend
by designatedforassignment on Apr 4, 2011 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm on the dark side on a lot of issues, but not baseball.
"So tired. So cranky. So full of rage. Ahhh, the baseball season." - Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Apr 3, 2011 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions
The Rangers sure got a steal in Napoli...
Effin Kinsler hit another HOMERUN!!!
Every man for himself...
I hope Gio pitches like Harrison today.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
He did!
I was there, and he stepped up, especially when he most needed to. Great job.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
We were there too!
Gio was awesome in the seventh. He slammed the door in their face, where in 2009 he would have blown up.
Life insurance s..cks. I'm now worth more dead than alive.
What made Gio
maybe even more impressive than one of his high K, breeze through and blow everyone away games….is that he did what he did today:
1. When he clearly did not have his best stuff. Curve wasn’t as sharp, strike to ball ratio not great, but Gio found a way and battled.
2. (Even though no game in April is “key,” or at least not the third of the year,) the team psychologically needed Gio and he delivered while not having his best stuff.
It seems the emotionally all over the place young man has turned that around into being quite mentally strong. Gio’s hard work and openness to new ways of thinking the game, along with Dallas’ mentorship in those areas, have given us quite the top shelf young stud. Gotta love Gio.
Nuance checkup here. I absolutely agree with you Nico, in general. However, i also think with all that said, there have been some rosecolored glasses going into the season surrounding our improved O and our bullpen. O is better but still will be only ok. ‘Pen just has too many issues, both now and portending into the future. If Bailey is ok, then i’ll step back from this stance some, but there’s no reason to assume he’ll be ok and stay ok.
Clearly Fuentes isn’t that good (which i and many said before the season,) and there are many injury questions to key guys. Throw in that Geren has “go with my guy” thinking re: closers, and it’s not a strength.
Why is it that the A’s are supposed to be a “think outside the box team,” yet here we are with a manager who does all these “the right way to play” kind of things like not being flexible with a ‘pen full of guys with heavy splits and going with the guy he labels closer even when it’s not wise to? It’s not even like he has to/should “establish roles” because we all know Bailey is the closer. There’s no reason, in fact a built in one not to have a set closer until Bailey is back. Geren has a built in excuse to use them according to splits, yet he says claiming Fuentes his guy as closer establishes roles…(Arg!)….
For a team led by outside the box thinking Beane, i just see too much classic “baseball men/right way to play the game” idiocy.
But yeah. It COULD be worse and we’re still a good team. Alls i’m saying is the pen isn’t and won’t be as good as assumed and the O is only slightly better than it was. That said, it could still be good enough with health and The Rangers pitching depth hurting them eventually (as i slobber over having an offense like theirs.)
by supersugarCrisp on Apr 3, 2011 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions
We're on the same page with the offense: Better but still just ok.
I’ve never thought or suggested otherwise. I think once Bailey is back and Breslow/Wuertz are not rusty, the bullpen will be far better than it is at this moment and will in fact be quite good. I’ll stand by that.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
For a bullpen to be good, it's essential you have a manager that knows what he's doing.
Misallocation of those resources can turn a positive into a negative. I mean, it’s just basic stuff like studying matchups, resting tired arms, that sort of thing.
"Never have a motto, that's what I always say" - Me
http://marcel-oehler.marcellosendos.ch/comics/ch/1986/05/19860506.gif
"I Hate SF" - The Chosen One.
My hypothesis is that Geren errs in favor of keeping the pitchers happy and in roles they like,
rather than sometimes swapping roles around when certain pitchers are tired or temporarily ineffective due to small injuries.
"So tired. So cranky. So full of rage. Ahhh, the baseball season." - Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Apr 4, 2011 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions
I hear you
But my point is:
1. Bailey is the “closer.” No need to anoint one, indeed a built in excuse NOT to for Geren.
2. Fuentes not a kid, a vet who knows the job he took here, to do whatever they needed. He even said that as recently as the bay bridge series. He would be absolutely fine closing some, not closing, just as Balfour would. Just as Breslow later when he’s healthy would.
3. I think we all err towards kneejerkedly accepting that these “baseball men” know better than us, even as we complain about some of their moves. I know most will reason their way towards assuming it’s just something we don’t know, but in this case it’s clearly not, it’s one of those idiot baseball “play the game the right way” things that indeed are hurting your chances of winning.
Someone needs to straight up put this stuff to Geren and Beane. I know the pro writers won’t because they have relationships they need to keep positive. And all of us, when we get the chance, just get overwhelmed by the presence of these big, confident seeming men who must, we feel, know better than us.
What could be the downfall of using them to their splits? That Fuentes’ ego will be crushed? That’s ludicrous. Same for all of our veteran ’pen. And they do have serious splits.
There’s no excuse for it. This is not one of those things we the fans just cannot know. It’s Geren being a inflexible creature of habit. Habit that stems from and over-adherence to “playing the game the right way” “thinking.”
by supersugarCrisp on Apr 4, 2011 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions
I disagree with this.
I think we all err towards kneejerkedly accepting that these "baseball men" know better than us.
To the contrary, I think a great many here kneejerkedly assume the opposite.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
by iglew on Apr 4, 2011 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Heh
Well, i know i don’t, and you don’t, and yes, many here don’t.
So yeah, i stand corrected. Guess what i was saying is we all succumb to somehow just accepting it, then time passes and so on and so on…
What I’m still axing is why does our team, known outside the box thinkers, still act this way, still make these in game decisions based on old school way to play the game-isms? And why aren’t they cornered and questioned, truly questioned regarding these moments?
The answer, i’m assuming, is that ya just can’t do that. And i get that on one level, but with all the interviews with Beane and Geren, all the examples that could be saved and brought up at a more peaceful time….it just never seems to get done.
I want someone to step by step take Geren and Beane through these myriad instances where Geren makes these counter-productive moves. I want, as Bob starts in with the answers that aren’t really answers, someone to not just move on in the interview, instead say “no Bob, there was no reason for that, here is why.”
Nothing changes. We’re supposed to be this smart team, and i’m sure it’d be worse if i were a fan of a more traditional team who bunts way more and has more of these stubborn basebally ways of doing things.
But every year there are (on top of all the decisions that probably fall into this but we cannot surely pinpoint it, so must let it go) at least a few of these uses of the ’pen, or bunting when it was crazy or misuse of substitutions (like PH Jackson when LaRouche was going in for D anyway and has been WAY hotter.)
I’m sick of the writers not really putting it to Geren and Beane and once again these foolish moves just moving on into the past.
Sorry for the rant. I know y’all are on my side here, most of you. Even as a kid i wondered why my team would hack away when the pitcher had been incredibly wild. As the A’s became one of the smarter teams who stopped doing that, i realized even kids are right about some of this stuff and a lot isn’t rocket science.
We’re supposed to be a smart team, but then i see Geren and it makes me sick.
by supersugarCrisp on Apr 4, 2011 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, here's an example.
Even as a kid i wondered why my team would hack away when the pitcher had been incredibly wild.
When I see this happen, I don’t automatically assume that I know more than the manager/hitters. Maybe they have good reason to continue hacking. Maybe they don’t.
But many — apparently including you — do conclude that you know better than the “baseball men”.
It’s not that I assume the manager is always right, either, but I don’t jump to the conclusion that I’m smarter than him just because something looks dumb to me and I haven’t thought of the reason why it might not be.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
And by the way, that's an interesting testable question.
In situations where a pitcher has been wild, does a hitter who subsequently swings against him get better results than against a pitcher who hasn’t recently been wild?
I could see this going either way. Maybe a pitcher who has lost his control enough that he can’t throw strikes has also lost the ability to avoid serving up meatballs.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
That's a "baseball men" thing.
If a guy is throwing the ball all over the place, you don’t go up there and hack at the first pitch you see — ie Miguel Tejada swinging at a pitch over his shoelaces after a 4 pitch walk to the guy before him.
To be honest, your constant berating of people about how they don’t know as much as “baseball men” is getting old. It’s like your M.O. here is to try and knock people down or tell them they don’t know as much as they think, or whatever.
Yet, you don’t either, and you don’t ever have counter points. It’s like you just wanna sit and wait for someone to say something and then shout HOW DO YOU KNOW YOU’RE NOT A BASEBALL GUY at them.
What is the deal?
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
Maybe it's time to change back to the Horatio sigline.
The deal is that everyone — baseball men, stat men, whatever — thinks the answers they know are the whole answers, so anyone who doesn’t know what they know is ipso facto stupider.
I wasn’t criticizing SSC, but he specifically said above that everyone here defers to traditional baseball knowledge, which is comically false: we do no such thing.
Sorry if it’s becoming old and repetitive to you. I’ll try to back off a bit.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I'll be more careful
to perfectly word what i mean.
I think my response directly above this one, in which i respond to Iglew, shows what i meant.
Point is, yes, folks here, including me, don’t just accept these things we’re talking of, these baseball men things.
What i meant was we just accept them for the moment, move on, and they never get truly answered.
As for my quote about hacking vs wild pitchers, and seeing that even as a kid, i think that’s clearly something valid. The fact that in the 30 years since then teams have been more patient in those situations (A’s, Yankees, Red Sox, all taking more patient approaches, and winning,) backs this up. Why bail struggling pitchers out?
To think a good study would come from seeing if those “off that day” pitchers perhaps gave up more meatballs down the middle is quite counter-intuitive to me, i mean, they cannot find the zone. Even if they were to throw one down the middle, you could easily still hit it right at someone, or make an out any number of ways. Makes more sense to just let him walk you. Sure, if you’ve got a big time hitter up and there’s now guys on, and the count is 3-1, 2-0 or something, maybe, take a hack if you see one coming down the middle. But that’s not what happens. Time and again they bail these guys out.
Wild pitchers who cannot find the zone (usually relievers who one never knows if they’ll “have it” that day,) are practically giving you the game, if you just DON’T swing. I see teams swing at a guy who came in, threw 6 or 7 straight balls out of the zone (would have been balls but a few were swung at,) only to give him a free strike by swinging again at a ball, calming him down, then hacking at another out of the zone, which then puts him in a pitchers count (all not only keeping you from putting runners on due to walks, but giving that pitcher life, getting him more confident and “on it,” when he was simply not. You’re letting him off the hook. Too many teams still do it.)
Recap: I know folks here also get frustrated by old school, stubborn crap lots of teams still do. I often say there are many (i’ve said even most) occasions we cannot know all the factors.
But many times there simply aren’t any good reasons, and i want those times pressed by the media more, we do it in other sports (TOs misused in football, when or when not to go for 2.) Why not MLB? I say it’s because there’s this traditional america vibe to it, it’s sacrilege to go there, for some reason, and i’m sick of it.
We know these guys aren’t the brightest bulbs in the basket (i’m guessing the folks on here have far, far higher IQs than most baseball men, and far higher than myself.)
I will say it again. There are still things that most baseball teams/players/managers do that need fleshing out if you’re interested in maximum production, still many things that could and should be done better.
by supersugarCrisp on Apr 6, 2011 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions
No hey
I never meant to imply you were raving about the O or ’pen, just that you voiced to me a lot more confidence Geren would use this pen correctly, i.e. Fuentes/Balfour splits wise. Three games and we see Geren, even in a situation he has a built in excuse to not “go with my guy,” a labeled “closer” in Fuentes (while his real closer is out,) he still does….against the splits. I would understand if Bailey was for sure out and he had decided to call Fuentes his closer for the rest of the year.
That’s my main point here. Why do Beane and the A’s, this supposedly forward thinking team, do this stuff? Also, Fuentes is a vet, he knows the deal. He’s not so insecure and in need of knowing he’s “closer” that he needs this. Geren is straight up an idiot and i want some with access to push these questions (of course more diplomatically of course.)
Also, my whole point is that Bailey isn’t healthy, when he does get back who knows how long until he goes right back out? It’s more than just “anyone can get hurt” too, he’s a serious injury risk.
Also, it’s the same with Breslow/Wuertz. Wuertz was great two years ago, but health has been dogging him. This is what i mean by sensing ebbs and flows when i say that kind of thing. There were all these serious serious question marks with the pen, but because they had that great year two years ago, and added to it this offseason i think people chalked it up too confidently. And i think you are too, a bit. There’s no reason to anything but hope they come back, and come back and be effective. But confident they will? I don’t know about that. I’ll agree with you once these guys come back and come back not rusty the pen will be better, but i still don’t think that means the pen will ever be “great” this year. It could be, but a whole boatload of things have to go right, starting with what the hell is with Bailey’s consistent arm troubles.
by supersugarCrisp on Apr 4, 2011 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Part of the weirdness was explained by the fact that there were off-days on either side of the opening series,
and the relievers had not got much work in the previous week with the starters going long.
Come on Matsui, do it for Japan
"Hey anyone can join in...as long as they talk about me." - Mr. Bed
"If aliens were going to communicate with Earth, they'd contact you first." - my GF
excellent
All we need is a triple to drive him in now.
"Hey anyone can join in...as long as they talk about me." - Mr. Bed
"If aliens were going to communicate with Earth, they'd contact you first." - my GF
It's early, but...
every game does matter. I think the A’s need a bit more of a sense of urgency and Geren is not the guy to instill it. “It’s ok, we will get them tomorrow” is fine if you are going well, but a relaxed attitude that the pieces will fall into place does not cut it when you have something to prove. I’m sure everyone is giving 100%, I am just tired of the excuses for uninspired performance. What the A’s need most is a bit more passion and a DH that’s not a year past his expiration date.
with our budget constraint, how do we get a DH who isn't past his expiration date?
Every man for himself...
give up on Carter ever playing the outfield and bring him up to DH.
I don’t think it’s time for that, yet.
"So tired. So cranky. So full of rage. Ahhh, the baseball season." - Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Apr 4, 2011 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions
First. 3. Games.
I think if we fall flat on this road trip, we might hear a different tone from Geren. No sense in sounding an alarm now though.
"Hey anyone can join in...as long as they talk about me." - Mr. Bed
"If aliens were going to communicate with Earth, they'd contact you first." - my GF
by cuppingmaster on Apr 4, 2011 6:56 AM PDT up reply actions
I am extremely impressed by your ability to psychically read the auras of the Athletics from a distance of somewhere between a hundred feet and fifty miles
and amplify to us their psychological condition from afar. Do you do table readings?
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
If I had significantly less scruples,
I’d quote you out of context and use it as a self-promoting sigline.
“I am extremely impressed by your ability to psychically read the auras of the Athletics from a distance of somewhere between a hundred feet and fifty miles
and amplify to us their psychological condition from afar.” -PaulThomas
"So tired. So cranky. So full of rage. Ahhh, the baseball season." - Kyli
by Gaijin_Suketto on Apr 4, 2011 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions
You sure do tire quickly.
I am just tired of the excuses for uninspired performance
After only two days!
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Cut the guy some slack
Channelling the spirit world isn’t easy.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
I have a question;
Why wasn’t Nico at the ballpark for any of the games?
We missed you!
#8. Seriously, how cool a name is Dallas Braden?
Yeah but why wasn't he at the games
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
BBG and I saw him...dressed in orange shorts and shirt.
he claimed something about the shorts being his only respectable pair and not being able to wear a green top with orange shorts.
the artist formerly known as inbillywetrust
That color scheme works for carrots.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I figure if it works for carrots, why wouldn't it work for me?
This is why the broccoli isn’t speaking to me at the moment.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
NOW it couldn't be any worse.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
OK...
…NOW.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
NOW IT'S BETTER!!!!!!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal



























