Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Rondo On Slowing Heat: 'They've Got To Hit The Deck, Too'

Trevor Cahill and Craig Breslow Traded to Arizona for Jarrod Parker, Collin Cowgill, Ryan Cook

The A's traded Trevor Cahill and Craig Breslow to the Diamondbacks today for Jarrod Parker, Collin Cowgill, and Ryan Cook. It is official, tweets Slusser.

Star-divide

For the record, Parker and Cahill are about 9 months apart in terms of age and are under team control for the next 6 years, though Cahill will be more expensive. Parker missed all of 2010 after having Tommy John surgery, but regained his form and pitched in the majors last September. He has been a perennial top 50 prospect in all of MLB ever since he was drafted 9th overall in 2007. He made a relief appearance in last year's NLDS against Milwaukee. It is entirely possible he is in the Opening Day rotation.

Cowgill was drafted by the A's in 2007, didn't sign, and then was drafted by Arizona in the 5th round in 2008. Billy Beane evidently covets him, and he got his man. Cowgill is a small outfielder who put up good numbers in the PCL last year, but he will be 26 next season. He has a career .299/.383/.490 line in 360 minor league games. It is entirely possible he is a starting corner outfielder for the 2012 A's.

As for Trevor, he could be maddening with his lack of control, but his stuff is off the charts. He really does have one of the best sinkers in baseball and Arizona is lucky to have him. He will be 24 on Opening Day.

I'm gonna say now I'm not a fan of this trade. This is roughly 60% of what I think Cahill is worth. Cowgill and Cook look like "stuff" to me. Parker is a stud and could be better than Cahill as early as 2012, but he's simply not enough for 6 years of Trevor Cahill. I'm sure Jarrod is a super cool dude that I will enjoy watching for the next few years, but this trade slants toward the Dbacks favor in my view. I think Cahill and Parker are lateral in terms of potential, but hey, Parker is new! At least he'll be fun to watch next year. I'm disappointed that the A's didn't grab one more potential all-star in this deal.

Here's hoping Parker is more Dan Haren than he is Sean Gallagher.

Kevin Goldstein disagrees with me, though:

Really good trade for A's. Peak lines up better with window, Cahill good but overrated.

Jarrod Parker tweeted this:

On to the next chapter...

Welcome the Jarrod Parker era in Oakland. I just wish there was a lot more to go with it.

Poll
Cahill and Breslow for Parker and Cowgill sound good to you?
Yes
439 votes
No
875 votes

1314 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 655 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Is the big blockquote you, or quoting someone else?

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 3:43 PM PST reply actions  

I just copied and pasted from mlbtr

as a placeholder to get to 200 words while I added my other thoughts. Just tried to get the thread up.

by BWH on Dec 9, 2011 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah, much clearer now. Thanks.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Deal is supposedly done

Link.

Jane Lee is the A’s beat writer for MLB.com. I assume Steve Gilbert does the same for the D’backs.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 3:45 PM PST reply actions  

Article says "closing in on a deal"

Although, I assume that means the players are set, just have to file the paperwork.

Don't you realise you'll find next monday or next Tuesday/Your golden shoes day

by PDXAthleticsfan on Dec 9, 2011 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

The important question

Does this deal vindicate you or the dude from the D-backs blog you were arguing with in that other thread? I couldn’t really keep up.

by Glorious Mundy on Dec 9, 2011 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Well...

Dan’s argument was that AZ wouldn’t have to include one of Bauer, Skaggs, Parker or Bradley.

Thus, I win.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 3:52 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Nick Piecoro @nickpiecoro
Told neither Miley nor Borchering is in the deal.

by sourstuff on Dec 9, 2011 3:45 PM PST reply actions  

No big loss on either

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah

i like davidson more than borchering. hope he is in it.

by sourstuff on Dec 9, 2011 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I really hope the third player in this deal

has some upside…

*Insert something witty here*. Oh, and Stanfurd Sucks.

by FrankCohen on Dec 9, 2011 3:53 PM PST reply actions  

looks like just a 3rd from Slusser's last tweet
susanslusser
It’s Parker and Cowgill and we’re not sure the third player yet. #Athletics

by Copenhagen on Dec 9, 2011 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

So the third player is to be named later.

That means it’s Bauer, right? ;-)

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Ryan Cook
JaneMLB
RT @dbackswriter Final piece of #A’s #Dbacks trade is likely RHP Ryan Cook going to Oakland. Details to come on mlb.com.

by Copenhagen on Dec 9, 2011 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Holy shit, he's horrible.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Dec 9, 2011 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

If this means Gio is staying put

then this doesn’t suck as much as it initially does, IMO.

Still, =/

by Johnny Bravo on Dec 9, 2011 3:55 PM PST reply actions  

Yep, EVERYONE must go.

Except the shitty players ’cos nobody else wants them.

"Nah, you look like Elijah Wood." - danmerqury

by OldhamA on Dec 9, 2011 4:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I think, if anything, this means Gio's gone.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Dec 9, 2011 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

This seems like a fair haul for Bailey

A- prospect who had TJS, plus a “David Dejesus” ceiling prospect?

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 3:56 PM PST reply actions  

But for Cahill? Damn nice job D'bags

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Wrong

You and J.J. Miller…

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

why?

dont just say wrong, provide an argument

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

As an A- grade SP

Jarrod Parker is probably one of the Top 10 pitching prospects in baseball. Maybe Mariano Rivera nets you a Top 10 pitching prospect. But he’d be about it.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Correct, absolutely

But a Top 10 pitching prospect who had Tommy John surgery?

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Then why is Molina not enough for Santos?

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

'Cause Molina comes with the rep of maybe heading to the bullpen

And there’s a pretty fair difference between an A- and B+ prospect.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Huh?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 4:12 PM PST up reply actions  

If Mariano is the only reliever worth an A- prospect, then you must think

Santos is worse than him, which means a B+ prospect is a reasonable return, no?

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

No

I’d explain, but I’m too pissed off.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 5:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Hee

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 5:15 PM PST up reply actions  

McCarthy

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Final piece is likely Ryan Cook

Says dbacks writer on Twitter.

Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Dec 9, 2011 3:58 PM PST reply actions  

Here is the tweet

dbackswriter Steve Gilbert
Final piece of #A’s #Dbacks trade is likely RHP Ryan Cook going to Oakland. Details to come on mlb.com.

Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Dec 9, 2011 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

A future Sam Demel?

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 3:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Really curious as to what the A's could've gotten as secondary pieces if they didn't insist on Cowgill.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Dec 9, 2011 3:59 PM PST reply actions  

At least he's not a pitching prospect.

Bleah, I hate trading for TINSTAAPP’s.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

this feels incredibly underwhelming

"BA doesn't stand for Batting Average. It’s Brandon Allen, as in the percentage of a hitter’s worth compared to Brandon Allen. Ted Williams, at his best, was only 4/10th of the hitter Brandon Allen is today." - YonYonson

by hero66 on Dec 9, 2011 3:59 PM PST reply actions  

Same it feels like Kevin Tower fleece Beane

"We drank, we fought! He made his ancestor proud!"

by inspyro on Dec 9, 2011 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Except we got parker...

How many A- prospects do we have in our system now? 1, and that’s parker…

by Maverick10126 on Dec 9, 2011 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

#2, #14, and #23 prospects

I feel ripped off

Ive got to think this is financially motivated too

by J.J. Miller on Dec 9, 2011 4:00 PM PST reply actions  

Az got an allstar frontline starter who is locked up

for a long time and a serviceable reliever.
Oak got what?
A maybe front line starter, a maybe serviceable reliever and a maybe replacement level OFer?
How did this happen?
It sucks to be an A’s fan right now.
Forst should be fired.

by gratefuldude on Dec 9, 2011 8:57 PM PST up reply actions  

*Looks for new MLB team*

"Nah, you look like Elijah Wood." - danmerqury

by OldhamA on Dec 9, 2011 4:00 PM PST reply actions  

I am with you with this one..

"We drank, we fought! He made his ancestor proud!"

by inspyro on Dec 9, 2011 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Go Rays!

Smart front office. Great 3b, small market. They’re the 2002 A’s.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Dec 9, 2011 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Friedman is just better at that than everybody else.

It’s unbelievable.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Well for one thing he has potential superstars coming out of the minors every year

That eliminates most of the other teams right there.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:52 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah, seriously.

Although pretty much every pro team I follow is terrible. Futility for life!

"The hard... is what makes it great."

by Jjjsixsix on Dec 9, 2011 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

A's love cowgill

drafted him, tried to acquire him a couple times last yr

but that was for ziegler, not freakin cahill

by J.J. Miller on Dec 9, 2011 4:01 PM PST reply actions  

Cowgill is at least fun to watch

I’m in Reno, where he played most of last year. The dude is a good player – fast, aggressive, gap power, pretty good in CF. He’ll be a good player.

"I'm more into going home and being horizontal" - Lew Wolff

by bvank on Dec 9, 2011 5:28 PM PST up reply actions  

This does not make me happy

Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!

by UrgentMirth on Dec 9, 2011 4:02 PM PST reply actions  

I didn't vote but I'm not that upset. He didn't have a fantastic year this year....and I think we have some depth in the rotation IF all our guys get healthy.

I don’t see this as a sky is falling move. Not sure why this one does not bother me so much…..we’ll see what the future brings. Perhaps I have been mentally getting ready for the raiding the A’s moves that I somehow knew were coming. I have been getting ready for a crap season and the idea that there is no chance we are gonna do anything next year. The only thing I am not certain of is whether the trade was good enough for Cahill’s talent. Is it possible that the pitcher we got is BETTER???

AN Tailgate = Euphemism for food porn.

by Berry Jo on Dec 9, 2011 7:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes it's possible that Parker is better. But it's not possible that Cowgill or Cook will

ever be star players on a championship team. Well they could be in the sense that Andres Torres and Santiago Casilla were, but it’s really improbable.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 7:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Well...

…that sucks.

All we’re getting is three years of service time on Parker, who may turn into as effective a pitcher as Cahill already is.

Cowgill is the latest iteration of a fourth outfielder we keep getting in these trades, and then we go and let them start. He’s Aaron Cunningham and Chris Denorfia and gawd…the mediocrity.

So much mediocrity. But then that’s what we’ve exemplified for the last several years.

by DavidS on Dec 9, 2011 4:02 PM PST reply actions  

It's getting really old

As if Ryan Sweeney wasnt retch-worthy enough, now here comes another like him.

by BigJ7489 on Dec 9, 2011 4:03 PM PST up reply actions  

On the plus side,

Colin Cowgill scores highly on the make-sexual-innuendo-with-his-name stat.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 4:03 PM PST reply actions  

:(
Mrs_McCarthy32 Amanda McCarthy
D’backs are lucky. We love the Cahills- so glad we got to know them and took an awesome couples trip to the Bahamas.. I am on suicide watch

by whiteshoes40 on Dec 9, 2011 4:04 PM PST reply actions  

Yay Amanda!

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:05 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

a 4th OF, and a Relief prospect

this deal practically hinges on Parker panning out. Unless of course, the aforementioned blu ray lord of the ring discs are a PTBNL.

by sourstuff on Dec 9, 2011 4:07 PM PST reply actions  

agreed

but i secretly live in fear of TINSTAAPP

by sourstuff on Dec 9, 2011 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Parker is

And Cowgill might turn into some sorta Kotsay/DDJ hybrid.

But Ryan Cook?!?!?!

I don’t understand why the A’s focused on prospects from the upper minors. I mean, Parker makes sense ‘cause he’s really freaking good. But I’d have rather seen Cook replaced with a long-shot C/C+ prospect from Short Season.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I hope the Ryan Cook thing isn't true

Bah, but I’m not pleased with any of this right now.

Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!

by UrgentMirth on Dec 9, 2011 4:12 PM PST up reply actions  

agreed again

I always like the idea of the final piece being a low minors/high upside guy.

by sourstuff on Dec 9, 2011 4:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep,

it looks like the A’s are assuming all of the risk in this trade. Beane thinks this kid Parker is a sure thing. And if he turns out to be another Sean Gallagher, then this is Huddy part duex.

Imo, Beane could have gotten more. At least toss in another offensive spec in the deal..

Re-sign Josh Willingham now!

by sf drift king on Dec 14, 2011 11:22 PM PST up reply actions  

The Country Music Artist Association vocalist of 2015 is....

Collin Cowgill (que intro music of take me out to the ball game with twang)

ack-A
Häägëñ Dääs

by ak_A on Dec 9, 2011 4:08 PM PST reply actions  

WTF
nickpiecoro
Dbacks are also getting cash considerations, I’m told.

by Copenhagen on Dec 9, 2011 4:09 PM PST reply actions  

its not a *good* contract.

We yet enjoy little to be envied, but endure much to be pitied.-Thomas Dudley

by Future Ed on Dec 9, 2011 8:25 PM PST up reply actions  

At least it's not much
Trevor Cahill, an All-Star in 2010, was sent to Arizona along with left-hander Craig Breslow and small cash considerations, a couple of hundred thousand dollars

From the always reliable Susan Slusser

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 10, 2011 10:20 AM PST up reply actions  

But the A's don't have any cash to consider....

"Nah, you look like Elijah Wood." - danmerqury

by OldhamA on Dec 9, 2011 4:12 PM PST up reply actions   4 recs

I think people may be overrating Trevor Cahill here a bit

And it may be more of a reaction that our team is being blown up yet again.

by Pop N' Locktapus on Dec 9, 2011 4:09 PM PST reply actions  

of course

If Cahill were still here, everyone would flip out how he’s not any more than a 4th starter…

by SeanR on Dec 9, 2011 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

It's not that I'm overrating Cahill. It's that even a 2.5-3 WAR pitcher with his contract has

about $20M-$25M of surplus value, and that’s worth either an A- position player prospect or a B+ position player prospect with high upside and other low level prospects with high upside.

I don’t see the great advantage in trading for Clay Buchholz, Aaron Cunningham and Sam Demel.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

This.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I really wish DFA wasn't banned for times like this

I would like to see his commentary on this trade

And actually PL78 as well, for entertainment value.

by Billy Frijoles on Dec 9, 2011 4:58 PM PST up reply actions  

How long ago were they banned?

"You're all like big, fat failure turtles." - Edge

by Rated-R Superstar on Dec 9, 2011 5:00 PM PST up reply actions  

They're both gone?

Wow….I really have been out of the loop!

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 5:08 PM PST up reply actions  

It was some time around June.

I think DFA was close to taking a voluntary sabbatical anyway.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 5:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Ahh....

I see. I have been posting very infrequently over the past six months so I missed all of that.
Thanks for the heads up, iglew.

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 5:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not so sure it would.

I think it would just add to disputatious meta discussions. But in the interest of “open government” on AN, here is the story as I saw it:

Both PL78 and DFA repeatedly got into exchanges of personal attacks, often with each other, and also frequently with others, including some well-respected veterans here. In some cases, with warnings and encouragement, they were able to pull back. Sometimes they were unable to stop. In nearly all cases, each protested that he wasn’t the one who started it, and there was some validity to that complaint, but it didn’t change the fact that the exchange of personal attacks did not stop. After several second chances, eventually there came a point where someone had to be banned.

With St Joe it was a similar story, except that he had the additional factor of having been banned and reinstated once before under his own name, and probably a few times before that under different names.

(St Joe and DFA also each would occasionally break the line and discuss politics on AN, which was sometimes strikeworthy, though I don’t think it had any bearing on his eventual ban.)

I would welcome DFA back, but it could only happen if he were truly resolved to stay out of squabbles, even if others were the ones who started attacking him first. I don’t know if he’s ready for that. It’s difficult, but others have done it (notably PT).

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 11, 2011 6:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I appreciate your disclosure on this

AN certainly has achieved a lot less meta with enforcing the bans.

by hishnik on Dec 11, 2011 6:54 PM PST up reply actions  

I need to clarify a bit:

The shorter comment further up, where I said “I think DFA was close to taking a voluntary sabbatical” was idle speculation (and possibly projection) on my part and I shouldn’t have said it. Although I really did think that, it has been suggested to me that I thought wrong, and I concede the point.

The longer post is the facts as I saw them, and I stand by it. However, DFA himself tells a different story. Those who want to know what really happened should seek out his story elsewhere as to hear all sides. I’d link if I knew where, but I don’t, and anyway it’s not my place to speak for him.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 12, 2011 10:50 AM PST up reply actions  

I've talked to DFA.

He doesn’t want to come back, sadly.

by danmerqury on Dec 11, 2011 7:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah that's too bad

I felt like he contributed a good amount.

by Cartwright on Dec 12, 2011 10:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Iam sure his opinion is somewhere on the intertoobs

We yet enjoy little to be envied, but endure much to be pitied.-Thomas Dudley

by Future Ed on Dec 9, 2011 8:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't recall seeing anything from him on Fangraphs or MLBTR

He’s gone rogue!

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 10, 2011 10:23 AM PST up reply actions  

you are not looking Free enough

or Sour enough

We yet enjoy little to be envied, but endure much to be pitied.-Thomas Dudley

by Future Ed on Dec 10, 2011 6:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't mind this deal as much as most

I think Parker could very easily be better than Cahill

*Insert something witty here*. Oh, and Stanfurd Sucks.

by FrankCohen on Dec 9, 2011 4:10 PM PST reply actions  

That's true

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

hard to be worse

We yet enjoy little to be envied, but endure much to be pitied.-Thomas Dudley

by Future Ed on Dec 9, 2011 8:29 PM PST up reply actions  

If they got an extra mid tier prospect

especially with including cash and breslow a solid reliever

by J.J. Miller on Dec 9, 2011 4:11 PM PST reply actions  

He's nothing exciting

But he should be a decent 4th OF (i.e. starting OF for the A’s)

Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!

by UrgentMirth on Dec 9, 2011 4:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Ryan Sweeney gets a friend!

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Dec 9, 2011 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

It always comes back to Sweeney

Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!

by UrgentMirth on Dec 9, 2011 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

not like it could go back to anyone else....

he’s all alone in the outfield!

There's no crying in baseball!

by gigglingone on Dec 9, 2011 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

half the size and twice the home run threat

We yet enjoy little to be envied, but endure much to be pitied.-Thomas Dudley

by Future Ed on Dec 9, 2011 8:30 PM PST up reply actions  

I should amend this to add

If this keep me from having to watch Miller then I’m slightly a fan of it.

by Copenhagen on Dec 9, 2011 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

There's No Way

There’s no way this team will be even remotely competitive next year or the year after. We’ll sink below the Mariners and when the Astros come over we’ll sink below them. Billy wants a top five draft pick for the next three years.

by DavidS on Dec 9, 2011 4:15 PM PST reply actions  

What made you think we we're competing or being competitive the next two year?

Or did you miss that the Angel signs Pujols?

"We drank, we fought! He made his ancestor proud!"

by inspyro on Dec 9, 2011 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I had a plan in place for Pujols.

It involved a van with blacked out windows, zip ties and balaclavas. I can’t be bothered putting it into action now.

"Nah, you look like Elijah Wood." - danmerqury

by OldhamA on Dec 9, 2011 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I doubt we'll be competitive

but below the Astros? ouch…

There's no crying in baseball!

by gigglingone on Dec 9, 2011 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

The competition for suckiest suck will be pretty good.

Should be a tight race between us, the Mariners, and the Astros

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 5:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I feel like the Mariners might actually have something going up here though.

I don’t have quite the same optimism about us. Which is fine because I feel like it’s about time a rebuild happens and I look forward to seeing some of the “younger” guys get a chance.

by Cartwright on Dec 12, 2011 10:26 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm hoping Beane trades Parker for another team's A- prospect hitter.

This guy is MLB ready, we dont need MLB ready pitchers yet.

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:17 PM PST reply actions  

Parker is not big league ready

Needs to throw his breaking ball more and it be best if he does that in the minors.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

If he comes up mid-season

Then he’ll be in his prime in the new ball park.

And could look with envy at Trevor’s two NY Cy Young awards.

by richwol1 on Dec 9, 2011 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Absolutely!

That’s what I’m waiting for, really is the stadium to be approved!

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 5:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Cahill Cy Youngs

Good one

Al Davis 1929-2011 Just rest in peace, baby

"Da greatness of Da Rooster" - RLangford

Follow me on Twitter @FernandoRGallo

by darooster on Dec 9, 2011 4:43 PM PST up reply actions  

sounds like....Cahill

We yet enjoy little to be envied, but endure much to be pitied.-Thomas Dudley

by Future Ed on Dec 9, 2011 8:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Myers, Montero and Brown

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Parker for Myers would make me excited about this trade

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Me too, except that teams never trade A- position players for A pitchers.

We’d be relying on Dayton Moore’s unorthodoxness.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I think teams would

if the A- position player is at a lower level then the A- pitching prospect

The lower the level, the greater chance of not making it

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Also the greater the upside.

I’d much rather have an A- prospect in Short Season ball than one in AAA being an upside seeking person

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

but that's factored into the letter grade.

If two guys are both rated A- but one guy is at a lower level and the other is at an upper level, the lower-level guy has bigger upside.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I miss Cahill already

Why trade one of our best players? I an very upset with this trade. We are getting worst
instead of better.

by Graybeard on Dec 9, 2011 4:23 PM PST reply actions  

Oh crap, really?

Didn’t realize that about the team control.

by danmerqury on Dec 9, 2011 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Cahill's 2 option years take him through '17

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

So the only difference is cost

Wonderful

Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!

by UrgentMirth on Dec 9, 2011 4:31 PM PST up reply actions  

yepppp

Did nobody read my post? I put so much time into it, and of course this is all about me.

by BWH on Dec 9, 2011 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Well...

Parker needs more minor league time, at least half a season in AAA, which buys the A’s a +1 year. Then, if they sign him long term (ala Cahill) they can probably add at least 1 more year to that.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

wait a second

Please explain how a minor league pitcher only gives us three years of team control.

by richwol1 on Dec 9, 2011 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah, okay

So three years before arbitration kicks in. And six years total?

So six years for both, only Parker is a lot cheaper…

by richwol1 on Dec 9, 2011 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

2 years from now

BB will do it all over again… A’s are the Washington Generals of MLB

by 3up3dn on Dec 9, 2011 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Dan Gilbert?

Is that you?

"Hello and welcome to another wonderful and frightening night of A's baseball." - Gaijin_Suketto

by EddieVegas_NRAF on Dec 9, 2011 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't mind being the Generals

if it nets us a #1 pick in the form of Stephen Strausburg.

Re-sign Josh Willingham now!

by sf drift king on Dec 14, 2011 11:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm just sick of losing to the Globetrotters.

Them and their silly show-off antics.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 15, 2011 7:54 AM PST up reply actions  

This is possible

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Good point.

"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."

by padmadfan on Dec 9, 2011 11:37 PM PST up reply actions  

this is interesting

last week Baseball America published its list of the Diamondbacks’ top prospects. Only one of the three prospects that the A’s will get is on that list, and he’s #4.

by OaklandSi on Dec 9, 2011 4:25 PM PST reply actions  

And check out where they project Parker in 2015

….The bullpen

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Nobody likes the trade?

Okay, I’ll just be over here in the corner by myself.

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:27 PM PST reply actions  

Why do you like it?

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm a big Cowgill fan.

I’m doing my homework on the other guys now, so not knowing about them yet could be why I like it

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not comparing him to anyone.

I think he’ll fit in nicely to the OF we have that doesn’t exist.

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I laughed at this.

and then I cried.

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

At least you didn't kick me in the shins

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Not yet.

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

(cowers)

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

(cowgills)

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Dec 9, 2011 4:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Cowgill could be like a 2008

Cody Ross

*Insert something witty here*. Oh, and Stanfurd Sucks.

by FrankCohen on Dec 9, 2011 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Uh.

Is that a good thing?

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes.

*Insert something witty here*. Oh, and Stanfurd Sucks.

by FrankCohen on Dec 9, 2011 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I'll take it!

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Nothing.

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 9:05 PM PST up reply actions  

I do!

*Insert something witty here*. Oh, and Stanfurd Sucks.

by FrankCohen on Dec 9, 2011 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

high five!

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I honestly think its not a bad trade

Cahill is likely not as good as we A’s fans think he is. We just all love the kid. I have a feeling that in 2 years we will look at this trade as Beane robbing Parker from the Diamandbacks.

I think the main reason we dont like this trade is that we felt like we could have gotten more from for Cahill

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah,

It’s going to be sad without him but I really don’t hate this trade. Maybe because even Pre-Pujols I didn’t expect much if anything out of this season. Also, I’m assuming we aren’t trading Gio know, and that makes me very happy.

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I think at this point its best to trade Gio

We definitely aren’t competing anytime soon, and we might as well get some hitters so we arent doing this all over again in 3 years.

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Why would you assume that?

Dealing him would still work towards the A’s goal of maximizing production in 2015

Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!

by UrgentMirth on Dec 9, 2011 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

I kind of assumed it was Gio or Trevor

getting shipped out. Since Trevor is the first to go, I just don’t see anything else happening. Then again, Beane could rain on my parade any day now…

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Are you not old enough to remember the Hudson-Mulder incident?

I believe the waiting period is two days.

(On the plus side, the second deal turns out much better….)

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 5:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd love it if he came back at some point

Whether it be to get his curtain call in his last season pitching or as a coach or Spring Training instructor…

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 10, 2011 10:26 AM PST up reply actions  

Nope.

First trade when I became a fan was Holliday.

Someday her tombstone will read,
"Here Lies MissOakland Barton. Hot baseball wife, beloved friend, defender of aprons." --Kyli

by MissOakland on Dec 9, 2011 9:05 PM PST up reply actions  

I remember those 48 hours so vividly

Still the craziest time in being a fan of any team for me.
A distant 2nd was the dealings of Seto and Heatley this offseason by the Sharks…

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 10, 2011 10:25 AM PST up reply actions  

It's not that Cahill got dealt

it’s that the return isn’t enough.

by BWH on Dec 9, 2011 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

And for me it's not the right kind of return.

I’d rather have lower level guys with higher upside.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly

This just feels lateral.

Get out the time-fracture wickets, Hobbes! We're gonna play Calvinball!

by UrgentMirth on Dec 9, 2011 4:43 PM PST up reply actions  

It's like we're trying to win 72 games in 2012 with a tiny payroll

Maybe Beane knows that San Jose isn’t happening?

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

It kinda does. You replace Cahill with a similar pitcher in 2012, you replace

Breslow with a cheap reliever and you fill the hole in LF for the minimum

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Someone mentioned that we're possibly gutting payroll for a run at Darvish

This actually makes a ton of sense.
Him or possibly a FA who is actually interested in being the face of the franchise in anticipation for a move to SJ.
Either way, with Bailey most likely gone, Cahill gone already and Gio probably soon to follow, 2 of our 3 highest paid players will be Balfour and Fuentes.

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 9, 2011 5:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm all for this

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 5:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I wish!

But I don’t see it, honestly.

"I'll guarantee this: The A's will have a better season in 2012." - George Zimmer

by cuppingmaster on Dec 9, 2011 5:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Honesty is overvalued

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 5:40 PM PST up reply actions  

FWIW Bill James projects

a .344 OBA for Cowgill next year. I know he’s always on the optimistic side but is a David DeJesus type of player out of reach at all? I saw him twice last year and he smoked the ball in both games.

by JPShark on Dec 9, 2011 4:31 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

.344 in Arizona is about a 112 wRC+, which would make him about a 2.5 WAR player

This would be useful if we were trying to fill a hole in a contending team with a replacement level corner OF. I’m not sure what it does for the A’s.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

The Oakland A's

Where Billy Beane develops talent for the rest of the league.

Parker and Cowgill could be great down the line for all I know but at some point, Beane has to stop shipping out established talent for youngins and try to build something here in Oakland, right?

The Curse of Lombardi
#TeamFireAndyReid
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."

by d-jackfan10 on Dec 9, 2011 4:33 PM PST reply actions  

He's trying to put together a team that will peak in the new stadium.

You know, to hook in those casual people who will be coming to games because the stadium is new.

by LoneStranger on Dec 9, 2011 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Heh.

Wait until January when the timeline for Cisco Field in San Jose is laid out.

by LoneStranger on Dec 9, 2011 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

this

We yet enjoy little to be envied, but endure much to be pitied.-Thomas Dudley

by Future Ed on Dec 9, 2011 9:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Isn’t that what we all told ourselves when he traded Haren, Harden, Hudson, Mulder and let guys like Tejada and Jason Giambi walk? If this kind of though process was actually legitimate, shouldn’t the A’s be competitive now considering that he’s been doing this for years?

The Curse of Lombardi
#TeamFireAndyReid
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."

by d-jackfan10 on Dec 9, 2011 11:01 PM PST up reply actions  

The process is fine; the choices and/or outcomes have been poor.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 10, 2011 2:30 PM PST up reply actions  

You know less about A's baseball than you know about Eagles football

I didn’t think that was possible.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

LOL

BEER IS GOOD. BEER IS GOOD. BEER IS GOOD, and stuff.

by doctorK on Dec 9, 2011 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Unsubstantiated shot is unsubstantiated.

And who are you anyways? Seriously? It just sounds like you’re mad for some reason. Whatever, your opinion of me doesn’t matter especially considering everything I do gets rec’d. But that is neither here nor there and this is an A’s blog, not an Eagles blog so keep your Eagles issues on BGN.

The Curse of Lombardi
#TeamFireAndyReid
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."

by d-jackfan10 on Dec 9, 2011 10:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Parker and Cahill are the same age.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Trust me on this one...

Trying to get through to d-jack is a waste o’ time.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I didn’t know that but I’m speaking more in terms of established talent and mileage anyways. How are the A’s ever going to be a good baseball team if they trade away every good player they have. The entire premise of all these trades is to get players who will be good in the future, right? Well not all of those players work out and doesn’t it defeat the purpose to trade the ones who do work out?

I just think that maybe Beane should stop reestablishing the core of this team by trading away all the decent players for unproven players and build on the core instead. And don’t give me that small market stuff, the Marlins, Rays, Brewers, Reds or Rockies for example.

The Curse of Lombardi
#TeamFireAndyReid
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."

by d-jackfan10 on Dec 9, 2011 10:48 PM PST up reply actions  

You answered your own question.

They don’t want to be good now, they want to be good in 2015 or 2016 or so.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Dec 10, 2011 8:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Cahill

doesn’t seem to do much else other than induce ground balls. He’s still only 23 and could refine his command as his career progresses, but Parker flashes up to three plus pitches. He still needs command improvement, more than Cahill, but I’d take upside here. He’s also cheaper, even if Cahill still has a good contract.

by CaptainCanuck on Dec 9, 2011 5:12 PM PST up reply actions  

WAIT. IT MIGHT BE OKAY.

PARKER HAS TWITTER

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 4:40 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

"Duh-duh-duh- duh!!!!!"

:_-0

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 5:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Is there admission for this bout?

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 5:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Is he married?

Does his wife send him birthday tweets about his saggy balls?

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 6:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Upside. Duh.

that’s what you get when you deal for a prospect.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 4:46 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Hee

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Star Wars Legos

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 4:47 PM PST up reply actions  

of course

There's no crying in baseball!

by gigglingone on Dec 9, 2011 4:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh

and apparently Parker and Brett Anderson roomed together in instructional league. (Thanks SuSlu, even if I can’t figure out how to link it because of new twitter!)

There's no crying in baseball!

by gigglingone on Dec 9, 2011 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Turns out we DID get a hitter!!

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:45 PM PST reply actions  

post fail.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69Y91BqZDco

C'mon Beane! Close off the bottom deck and reopen the top!

by proevn on Dec 9, 2011 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Parker

sure is gonna miss those beautiful, new-ish lockers in the clubhouse. I hope he likes wet, moldy cement lockers too.

I miss Eric Plunk

by chuckcheeze on Dec 9, 2011 7:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, that's gonna do it

Looks like I won’t be a baseball fan for the next three years. See ya’ll in 2015!

Al Davis 1929-2011 Just rest in peace, baby

"Da greatness of Da Rooster" - RLangford

Follow me on Twitter @FernandoRGallo

by darooster on Dec 9, 2011 4:48 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Hee

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I would gladly pretend to hate the team in exchange for this all being a bad dream

Like Newheart

Al Davis 1929-2011 Just rest in peace, baby

"Da greatness of Da Rooster" - RLangford

Follow me on Twitter @FernandoRGallo

by darooster on Dec 9, 2011 5:00 PM PST up reply actions  

And there were these three woodsmen....

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 5:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I know we got beyond the whole stadium thing in the last thread

but anyhow, I finally got the audio posted of the whole Quan and Company press conference, for those who care. Here and scroll down to “4:25 update”.

Scott Hatteberg, English major.

by Englishmajor on Dec 9, 2011 4:49 PM PST reply actions   4 recs

Thanks a bunch!!!!!

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Rec'd for effort

But if I wanted to hear someone spew a bunch of bullshit and try to pass it off as news, I’d just watch Fox News

Al Davis 1929-2011 Just rest in peace, baby

"Da greatness of Da Rooster" - RLangford

Follow me on Twitter @FernandoRGallo

by darooster on Dec 9, 2011 5:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Fair but...

While the deal seems fair, I don’t understand what the rush was. Why not wait for a deal to come along that beats the pants off of “fair”? So you decide you want to trade Cahill— that’s fine — but he’s under control til 2017 so there’s not much of a reason to take a “fair” deal before the season starts. Why not start 2012, see how things play out and if you somehow find yourself in a pennant race because every prospect finally decides they can hit, then great, you still have Cahill. And if you are out of the pennant race, someone is always shopping for a SP and willing to pay double the “fair” price.

It seems like Game Theory is never taken into account in any sort of dealings like this, and as a foreword thinking GM, he ought to be incorporating better timing and leverage into his deals.

Jeremy was safe. He jumped over the tag.

by mrrickyg on Dec 9, 2011 4:50 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Then why not keep him and hope he improves his value?

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:53 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

He lost a finger on his pitching hand in a terrible Lego accident a month ago

Shhhhhh, nobody tell Arizona!

Al Davis 1929-2011 Just rest in peace, baby

"Da greatness of Da Rooster" - RLangford

Follow me on Twitter @FernandoRGallo

by darooster on Dec 9, 2011 5:02 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Cahill was awful for pretty much the entire second half of 2011. It reminded me of

Mulder in 2004 – an impressively good first half followed by an equally impressively bad second half. Knowing how quickly, and sometimes inexplicably, pitchers can loose their form, it will be interesting to see what Trevor does next year.

by Aufheben on Dec 9, 2011 7:30 PM PST up reply actions  

So we traded for Dan Haren after all!

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 7:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe. His BABIP jumped in Aug and Sept. But his LD% did too.

Replacing Kouzmanoff, Barton and Ellis with Weeks, Allen and Sizemore definitely isn’t an upgrade defensively though.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 10, 2011 9:48 AM PST up reply actions  

He hung a ton more curves and changeups, and had poorer "fastball command," in 2011

Hard to blame Allen, Weeks, Penny, and Sizemore for that.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 10, 2011 2:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Except if he was trying to throw harder to strike people out.

And it just took the bite out of his curves and cost him command.

"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."

by padmadfan on Dec 11, 2011 2:54 AM PST up reply actions  

True. That's what I love about baseball --

every “answer” actually just yields two more “questions/possibilities”.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 11, 2011 1:45 PM PST up reply actions  

also

we no have outfielders to start in 2010 apprenly :)

Ray Fosse thinks Pete Rose is a prick......

by oakwin2004 on Dec 9, 2011 5:51 PM PST up reply actions  

THIS

"I'll guarantee this: The A's will have a better season in 2012." - George Zimmer

by cuppingmaster on Dec 9, 2011 5:35 PM PST up reply actions  

This deal doesn't make sense

It just doesn’t.

The A’s don’t need another Cahill and another Sweeney. They already have Cahill and Sweeney. Team control is six years for Cahill and (if he doesn’t come up til late in the year) seven for Parker. They’ll both be in the same position control and free-agent wise at the same time when the stadium opens. Cowgill may be good but he adds nothing to the team. The A’s can already afford another DeJesus type as a free agent. Breslow and Cook are a wash.

Before the trade was made, the A’s needed a third baseman and any player with power. After the trade, the A’s need a third baseman and any player with power.

Towers, on the other hand, gets an experienced starter with Cy Young potential right off the bat, plus the new team biophysicist and rabbi. And money.

by richwol1 on Dec 9, 2011 4:56 PM PST reply actions  

Yes

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 4:58 PM PST up reply actions  

umm

didn’t we lose all our outfielders? :)

Ray Fosse thinks Pete Rose is a prick......

by oakwin2004 on Dec 9, 2011 5:51 PM PST up reply actions  

who did he get with Cy Young potential?

We yet enjoy little to be envied, but endure much to be pitied.-Thomas Dudley

by Future Ed on Dec 9, 2011 9:16 PM PST up reply actions  

A's free up 25+ mill in commitments

that has alot to do with it

still think they shouldve got another top 20 prospect by adding breslow + cash

by J.J. Miller on Dec 9, 2011 4:58 PM PST reply actions  

I'm a little on the fence on this one

I like the looks of Parker for sure but I really don’t get too excited about the other two mugs. And, yes, we need impact bats for the future and we didn’t get one. Not yet at least….

Like I said earlier, it’s become “Who we gonna trade now?” every off season.

I just want a winner dammit! Hurry this shit up, tear it down, and build us a f$%^&Ug winner Billy!

“No time for losers….”

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 5:04 PM PST reply actions  

Color me unimpressed

The A’s needed one more prospect. This move just feels so lateral. Parker may have more upside than Cahill. Maybe. But he just had TJS and Cahill is coming off back to back to back 175+ IP seasons. I’m fine with Parker being the main piece for Cahill. But give me one more B prospect instead of 2 C+ guys. If it was Bauer instead of Parker I might have accepted the deal.

But I can’t. I think Beane is enamored with Cowgill and he cost Beane a ton of leverage forcing Cowgill in the deal.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Dec 9, 2011 5:08 PM PST reply actions  

You really would rather have had Patrick Corbin or Matt Davidson than Cowgill and Cook?

I guess I might too, but it still wouldn’t have been enough for me. Chafin maybe.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 5:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Even if this is just lateral...

Given the new competition, it makes sense to prep for the future.

by Bleedin' Green In Philly on Dec 9, 2011 5:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Do. Not. Like.

But then again I’m really not in favor of trading established, good, young starting pitching anyway.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Dec 9, 2011 5:17 PM PST reply actions  

Cahill doesn't matter

We were going to be miserable anyway. Now we’re just more miserable and for less money—with a little more hope for the future. I think that was the goal here, and I think that will be the goal of future trades.

We need to sink low and acquire top picks by being awful while we build a stadium.

by RLangford on Dec 9, 2011 5:17 PM PST reply actions  

Another plus of the trade

Cahill was often a frustrating pitcher to watch. Sure, the next man up will be worse, but he won’t be more frustrating because I won’t expect him to be much good.

by RLangford on Dec 9, 2011 5:18 PM PST reply actions  

I don't hate it.

I don’t particularly like it either, but I don’t hate it. Just seems like it all happened really quickly, I have to wonder how the rest of the league views Cahill.

"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime

by travdog6 on Dec 9, 2011 5:22 PM PST reply actions  

While Cowgill and Cook may not be worth jumping for joy

We did just get a very hyped pitcher who still showed some decent control and ability to strike guys out at the AAA level after just returning from Tommy John.
Sure, he’s no Strasburg or Moore, but this guy could potentially be something Cahill never was.
I don’t trust Beane when it comes to trading for hitting talent, but if there’s one thing he knows it’s how to get good pitchers. I for one am excited to see what he’ll do repeating AAA this year…

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 9, 2011 5:25 PM PST reply actions  

Sorry, meant AA

So, he’ll move up a level…

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 9, 2011 5:26 PM PST up reply actions  

eh

see earlier posts….

IDK, I love Jarrod Parker, but still, Cahill could have got us at least one other C+/B- Prospect

My mannerism a prism/ And it should shine
Light it if you would/ Be so kind, right now'd
Be A' Good Time

by DaRubiesSLOKingsA's on Dec 9, 2011 5:25 PM PST reply actions  

As a neutral fan

I like this trade for the A’s.

Despite his age, just look into Cahill’s numbers and tell me how you possibly can be impressed.

by TheFreakSFG on Dec 9, 2011 5:26 PM PST reply actions  

Or 5.7 fWAR...

The upside in Parker vs. Cahill combined with the state of the A’s makes me like this one for the A’s..

by TheFreakSFG on Dec 9, 2011 5:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm just confused why this came together so quickly

I mean I know Beane had said he’d listen on anyone, but it’s almost like the first team that offered a proposal for Cahill he accepted.
Either that, or he covets Parker and thinks he’ll be a #1. Which he very well could be, I don’t understand why he didn’t push for Davidson or Corbin though.

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 9, 2011 5:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Not a chance.

I’m pretty certain Beane was listening to offers for a while.

by danmerqury on Dec 9, 2011 5:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Well then why was everything so quiet on the Cahill front?

Yet we seem to know every team who’s interested in Gio…

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 9, 2011 5:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Not sure.

But not everything is made public.

by danmerqury on Dec 9, 2011 5:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Wouldn't be the first time Beane made a lot of noise about one guy

then traded a different one.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 6:05 PM PST up reply actions  

someone tweeted out that this was first discussed last week

"I'll guarantee this: The A's will have a better season in 2012." - George Zimmer

by cuppingmaster on Dec 9, 2011 5:41 PM PST up reply actions  

That's still fairly quick, IMO

From everything I can recall, Beane typically will float a trade proposal around for the better part of a month or so before accepting anything…

"Minutes from the last save opportunity...Balfour got 3 outs..."- Nico

by stranahanahan on Dec 9, 2011 5:42 PM PST up reply actions  

its a good deal.

Saw parker and cowgill during my time down here. Cahill may just be a league average pitcher while parker is loaded with talent. Dbacks fans like cowgill too, he came up with some big hits this year; easily could crack the starting lineup.

"Caring about stuff binds us to the other people that care about stuff, and that creates the communities that makes life worth living."

by thewhizkid on Dec 9, 2011 5:29 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

You really think he can beat out Sweeney?

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 5:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh yeah.

Or play them together. I think he can beat out Michael Taylor and Jermaine Mitchell, in other words.

"Caring about stuff binds us to the other people that care about stuff, and that creates the communities that makes life worth living."

by thewhizkid on Dec 9, 2011 5:55 PM PST up reply actions  

not a bad trade

Cahill for Parker straight up is decent. pitchers usually come to Oakland and do better than they would elsewhere. Sucks to lose someone that you figured would be apart of the team for a while but Cahill is extremely frustrating to watch and gets lucky. Problem is, our hitting situation is still unresolved. I figure we have 2 hitters in Choice and Weeks but still need 7 more.

by DJAX4Heisman on Dec 9, 2011 5:38 PM PST reply actions  

Bauer can't get traded and Skaggs would only get sent if we traded gio.

"Caring about stuff binds us to the other people that care about stuff, and that creates the communities that makes life worth living."

by thewhizkid on Dec 9, 2011 5:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Bye bye, Trevor-dactyl.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 9, 2011 5:43 PM PST reply actions   3 recs

I don't mind this trade

or the fact that the A’s going to suck the next few years as long as we get a new ballpark at end of the tunnel.

"If you want a happy ending, that depends, of course, on where you stop your story." Orson Welles
I used to love you then I took an arrow in the knee

by sfniners4life on Dec 9, 2011 5:45 PM PST via iPhone app reply actions  

I know that

but is the only reason I have that keep me sane and look forward yet other year of rebuilding.

"If you want a happy ending, that depends, of course, on where you stop your story." Orson Welles
I used to love you then I took an arrow in the knee

by sfniners4life on Dec 9, 2011 5:52 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Are the Dbacks seriously the only team we'll ever trade with again?

I know BB isn’t too fond of some of these new GMs, maybe Towers is one of the few guys he can work with.

by BWH on Dec 9, 2011 6:13 PM PST reply actions  

This would be very bad if true

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 6:22 PM PST up reply actions  

We SUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

even more now….good job Beane

Lance "you sunk my" Blankenship

by ryanmoser on Dec 9, 2011 6:27 PM PST up reply actions  

We trade with the Rockies too

I just hope the Mark Ellis trade turns out better than the Carlos Gonzales trade.

by BatDay on Dec 9, 2011 7:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Bruce Billings!!!

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 7:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Poor Dallas

@DALLASBRADEN209

Guess nobody will get the joke when i walk in day 1 with nothing but a storm trooper mask on wielding a massive light saber & a box of legos

by Glorious Mundy on Dec 9, 2011 6:29 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

That's what Saint just texted me.....

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 7:26 PM PST up reply actions  

nooooooooooooo

"This must be heaven," he says.
"No. It's Oakland."

by Kyli on Dec 9, 2011 7:40 PM PST up reply actions  

The so-called experts believe Parker's ceiling is higher than Cahill's...

Beane said he wants high-upside guys. He basically did what he said he’d do. If Parker has a good chance of being a better pitcher than Cahill in a couple years… then why not do this? Will they end up signing Parker to a contract as good as Cahill’s? Probably not. But so what? In a few years the A’s have a new stadium and can afford a contract that isn’t as good as Cahill’s, or they don’t have a new stadium and then nothing matters.

I think you’re over-thinking this.

by Brett Narloch on Dec 9, 2011 6:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Amen Grover.

I think you’re absolutely right about BEane and Co. giving MLB the finger sand saying, “See? We can’t keep our toys because they are out of our class range!”. Wah-wah-wah!!!!!!!

Rec’d.

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 6:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I basically agree, but the other possibility is that A pitching prospects have a markedly higher value now

than in 2009.

It’s also possible to value Cowgill not as a C+ prospect but as a 2.5 WAR CF right now. In which case Cowgill is worth $75M if he doesn’t improve or get worse for 6 years, with a possible salary in the range of $25M. In that case you’re getting a $50M surplus value.

There are ways to make this look good for Oakland but the lack of potential impact position players in the future makes it a bad strategy for me.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 6:46 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

The only thing we can't legitimately complain about w/this team is the quality of the posts on this blog

Thanks for doing a bunch of research and putting together a detailed, well-reasoned argument.

I don’t know if I agree with you and I also don’t know if surplus value is the best way to measure who wins a trade, and what kind of surplus value you could have for parker if you contract him through his arb years, etc. Any time you have a young player locked up for a while you have guaranteed surplus value. I know that you grabbed a $ amount for Parker from folks who put together a great algorithm, but so many things can change that I don’t think that really tells us all that much. What if we sign him to a Cahill-like extension?

But it’s something to think about.

by Billy Frijoles on Dec 9, 2011 6:46 PM PST up reply actions  

What I would really like

would be the actual muppet grover appearing on MLB Network or ESPN to say these exact words to Kruk or Valentine or Reynolds.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Dec 9, 2011 7:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Honestly, all I can say to this is 'fuck yeah grover'.

"This must be heaven," he says.
"No. It's Oakland."

by Kyli on Dec 9, 2011 7:26 PM PST up reply actions  

I really enjoy having you around to do all this research and share with everyone.

It allows people like me to learn a lot. Keep up all the great work you do grover.

by Cartwright on Dec 9, 2011 7:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Someone actually flagged this post?

I hope it wasn’t me on accident?

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 7:54 PM PST up reply actions  

grover's post, that is.

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 7:54 PM PST up reply actions  

where do you see a flag?

I just see lots of rec’s

There's no crying in baseball!

by gigglingone on Dec 9, 2011 8:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I saw it before I replied again to grover's post.

I don’t know if that was a blip or waht….anyways, wouldn’t make sense if that was the case.

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 8:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Uh oh. I guess it is almost impossible to accidentally flag something.

You have to submit your reasoning as to why you think it should be flagged. I think it might have been danbot that explained it a few threads ago?

by Cartwright on Dec 10, 2011 11:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Obviously fWAR isn't the best data available to the A's.

Regardless – I don’t find it that hard to believe Cahill won’t improve on his 2.5 WAR. He can’t strike anyone out unless he’s facing AA hitters or his curveball is working, which it looks like worked for a solid 7 starts last season.

The massive – MASSIVE – difference between Parker and Cahill is that Parker throws hard. Cahill looked like Nolan Ryan in single A, but his messy, 90-mph sinking junk gets spit on by the big boys. Don’t hard-throwers’ K-rates translate way more sturdily to the bigs, for instance, Jarrod Parker?

And yeah, he had TJS. Pffft. TJS is the new tribal tattoo – everyone has to get one even though they know it sucks.

by sleepingcobra on Dec 9, 2011 8:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, cause there's no chance he could get better with his curveball

Parker may throw hard (and I’m certainly not mocking his prospect status) but you’re hard-throwing boy has a lower K/9 then Cahill did in the minors.

Gee. Maybe being able to throw hard isn’t everything.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 11:14 PM PST up reply actions  

No, I was asking.

Aren’t hard thrower’s MiLB K-rates way less volatile projecting to MLB?

Cause Cahill can’t buy an 0-2 count.

by sleepingcobra on Dec 10, 2011 10:04 AM PST up reply actions  

I have no idea about that, but I'd suspect the presence of a plus plus pitch would make

the K-rate more projectable to higher levels, whether it’s a Nolan Ryan fastball or a Bruce Sutter splitter or a Bert Blyleven curve

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 10, 2011 11:23 AM PST up reply actions  

I think there's a consensus that Cahill has a different assortment of pitches

since he scrapped the knuckle-curve he threw in the minors.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Dec 10, 2011 11:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Good point.

And after 3 season’s-worth of data, it sure looks like Cahill doesn’t have anything even remotely approaching one of those.

by sleepingcobra on Dec 10, 2011 12:41 PM PST up reply actions  

I think it's also worth noting Cahill has averaged 1.8 fWAR a season.

Assuming he at least reproduces 2.5 fWAR every year of his contract is probably a bit optimistic. He, after all, hasn’t had a particularly impressive k-rate since single A – and an even worse walk rate.

Based on what we know, I think a safer bet is that he’s a 2 WAR player going forward.

by sleepingcobra on Dec 10, 2011 12:38 PM PST up reply actions  

The big problem I see with this response

Is that when you factor in injuries, pitchers get worse on average every year, regardless of age. And Cahill’s just not that great to begin with – we’re talking about a 2.5 win player right now with three full years of MLB data in the bank. I think your low end baseline case is actually a well above average case.

He’s really getting overrated in responses to this trade. It’s just as likely he underperforms his contract by 2015 and has his options declined as it is that he improves on the mediocre pitcher he is right now.

by thelincolndude on Dec 9, 2011 10:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Use Baseball-Reference WAR

And Cahill posted 4.0 and 3.5 Win seasons these last two years.

I think expecting Cahill to plateau at his current 2.5 Win status is a stretch. Expecting him to regress? Hate. Or stupid.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 11:11 PM PST up reply actions  

If he's actually 3.5 win player, then yes that's quite a bit different

I tend to go by FG numbers for pitchers because they don’t base it off of runs allowed, the way B-Ref does, but that’s a different argument.

I just went back and looked up the post I was thinking of (a really great post, I thought, and I was surprised it wasn’t more widely referenced). Clearly my memory is a little selective, because I hadn’t recalled the detail that pitchers were basically flat, again we’re including injuries, from about 21 or 22 through 26. (Damn MGL and his post titles…)

Anyway, this suggests that we shouldn’t expect him to improve just because he’s 23, and that in fact it’s not a stretch at all to expect the average case to be a plateau at his current level of production. The issue is how good he is right now. If he’s a true 2.5 win player, then your low-end scenario is actually above average. If you believe he’s better than that right now, then you have a good case.

by thelincolndude on Dec 9, 2011 11:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Even if you think Cahill is over-rated

The fact is Beane sold him as if you being right is a foregone conclusion.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 11:16 PM PST up reply actions  

If you look at it objectively, it's really not that bad of a trade

It’s a little light, and I would have rather had Davidson and Pollock than Cowgill and Cook. I would have rather had Skaggs, but Parker should be a damn good pitcher. My only big complaint is that it was too early to trade him. I’m confident he would improve in 2012 and be worth more.

Of course, looking at it with a fan bias, I hate losing Cahill and his personality.

by Furyan on Dec 9, 2011 6:49 PM PST reply actions  

No, there is a valid argument that the trade was fair in terms of talent, but it's hard to see how

this fits into a rebuilding effort

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 6:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Uh....how would this not fit into rebuilding?

It would give us another pitcher along with Gray who will come up mid-2012 or 2013. This would give them a couple seasons to develop to get ready for a “2015 playoff push.”

by Furyan on Dec 9, 2011 6:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Because in rebuilding you don't trade a 2.5-4 WAR player for a future 2.5-4 WAR player

and a couple of role players. You trade the 2.5-4 WAR player player for 3 potential 4 WAR players.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 7:00 PM PST up reply actions  

This concisely sums up why it's a bad trade.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Dec 9, 2011 7:34 PM PST up reply actions  

That doesn't really work when Parker will most likely be worth more than Cahill will

They aren’t both 2.5 – 4 WAR pitchers. I do agree that Beane sold low on Cahill, but there is no way in hell that Cahill is worth 3 4 WAR players. To be worth that, Cahill would either have to have a breakout season (in terms of FIP), or it would be 3 high risk, boom-or-bust single-A players. I wouldn’t want to count on that kind of crapshoot.

by Furyan on Dec 9, 2011 8:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes you would get one A- prospect and 2 C+ high upside/high risk guys

Why don’t you want that crapshoot? You might win. This way there’s no way to win except for the fact that Parker is cheaper and may have a higher upside. Incremental possible improvements like that aren’t going to change anything fundamentally for this team.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 8:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not arguing for Cahill being traded

I’m just saying that that kind of return is a fantasy.

by Furyan on Dec 9, 2011 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

It's very fucking light

And as an A’s fan you should be pissed off.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 8:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Cahill was worth more than Parker and change

The A’s really, really believe that Cowgill can play CF. Know who else thinks he can start in CF?

No one.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 8:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Who doesn't think he can stick in CF?

I’ve only recently been looking up scouting reports, but of the ones I’ve read, they describe him as being able to play all the OF positions. It may be as a 4th OF, but look at all the established OF’s we already have….

by Furyan on Dec 9, 2011 8:36 PM PST up reply actions  

4th OF means he can spot in CF

But would hurt the team with prolonged exposure due to sub-par defense.

He might be able to do it. I don’t know. But non-A’s sources doubt it.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 8:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Baseball America, John Sickels

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 9:08 PM PST up reply actions  

What Sickles article are you looking at?

From what I see, Cowgill seems to have the tools to be able to make CF work. Or at least, nothing to the contrary is said.

He has a very strong throwing arm and above average speed.
Nevertheless, with his speed, pop, and defensive versatility, he would fit perfectly into the fourth outfield role, but given his performance to date he deserves at least one shot as a regular.

I see nothing that doubts his defensive ability.

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2011/7/29/2301917/prospect-of-the-day-collin-cowgill-of-arizona-diamondbacks

by sc00by on Dec 9, 2011 9:15 PM PST up reply actions  

'Cause scooby

Any time a guy can hit a bit AND play an average starting CF he gets labeled a potential starting CF.

You qouted it yourself: 4th OFer. That means he doesn’t have the bat to start in the corners or the glove to start in CF.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 9:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Matthew Haas in Baseball America's 2011 Prospect Handbook
He probably won’t have….enough speed to play center field every day…profiles better as a versatile fourth outfielder

Goldstein did not rank Cowgill in his 2011 Top 20 Diamondback prospects despite a system he called an ugly combination

Sickels ranks him below Adam Eaton whom he calls a future superb fourth outfielder

I don’t see anyone credible saying he’s a future starting CF

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 8:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Hope the A's scouts see something

Kotsay didn’t really have CFer speed, but he was an awesome CFer.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Dec 10, 2011 8:34 AM PST up reply actions  

He actually did have CF speed, but I also hope the A's see something

almost no one else does

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 10, 2011 9:44 AM PST up reply actions  

He wasn't slow, but he was far from a burner.

He took impeccable lines on fly balls, which made him look faster than he was.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Dec 12, 2011 6:43 AM PST up reply actions  

Cowgill's speed

In 98 games in Reno last year, he had 30 SBs with only 3 CS, and also hit 8 3Bs. I have no idea how fast he runs a 40, but those are stats generally associated with good footspeed.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Dec 10, 2011 11:43 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes it's a good sign for sure

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 10, 2011 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

The thing that worries me

is that maybe Beane has set himeslef up to be “low balled” by other clubs in maybe dealing Gio/Bailey etc… in further trade discussions. Anybody ever think about that?

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 8:47 PM PST up reply actions  

That's what I'm saying....

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 10, 2011 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I think more likely the opposite.

If Beane had gotten a great value for Cahill, we’d now being worrying about how the other GMs will be scared of dealing with Beane, thinking he won’t offer anything that isn’t a fleecing.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 10, 2011 4:52 PM PST up reply actions  

That's another way of looking at it.

So, do we get Darvish for Christmas, now?

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 11, 2011 7:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I can't read Twitter

What was his exact qoute, Trainman?

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 7:17 PM PST up reply actions  

~
CraigBreslow
I can no longer denounce the relevance of Twitter. It broke the story of my trade…to me.

by Copenhagen on Dec 9, 2011 7:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow....that sucks.

Jesus…….that’s horrible.

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 7:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Ouch.

Just… ouch.

"This must be heaven," he says.
"No. It's Oakland."

by Kyli on Dec 9, 2011 7:26 PM PST up reply actions  

In their defense in this day and age with almost instant info I can see how this happens

Different players being tossed about before it become final and someone leaking out the details. I’m sure if you are on the cusp of dealing someone you don’t want to tell them and then have the deal fall through for whatever reasons so then things like this happen.

by Copenhagen on Dec 9, 2011 7:39 PM PST up reply actions  

oops, I hadn't read yours when I wrote mine below.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 10, 2011 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I have to disagree with this.

In defense of Beane Forst et al, Twittering is so obscenely freaking fast these days that it’s almost impossible to stay ahead of it. I mean, they have to sign the papers and stuff, then call everyone involved. Even if they’re absolutely prompt about everything, by the time they get to calling the players 15 minutes later, it’s already all over the Internet. The only way you could possibly inform the players earlier is if you call them before it’s actually final, in which case you run the risk of telling a guy he is traded but then having it fall through.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 10, 2011 4:55 PM PST up reply actions  

There was something last month

in NFL, where a backup guy got promoted when the main guy got traded, and he first heard it through Twitter.

I think we’ll be seeing this more and more.

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 11, 2011 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Story on Big League Stew says:
No! Breslow found out about his own trade on Twitter? It’s not the first time an athlete has learned such news from the media. Every so often you’ll hear about a guy who learned he was traded from TV or radio or even a newspaper (once upon a time). But this Twitter social media thing is kind of a new deal.

Doesn’t list any examples, though. (link)

Baseball is a stupid-making enterprise in that nobody wants to be singled out or say something dumb. —Michael Lewis

by iglew on Dec 11, 2011 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly

Also, when Breslow says he found out over Twitter it’s possible he’s being hyperbolic. There were tweets saying he was probably in the deal well before it was actually finalized. He may have meant those.

by thelincolndude on Dec 12, 2011 7:15 AM PST up reply actions  

This smells like the Hudson trade to me

Priming the pump to maximize the return on the shortly forthcoming Gio trade.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Dec 9, 2011 7:11 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Starring Jarrod Parker as Dan Meyer, Ryan Cook as Juan Cruz, and Collin Cowgill as Two-Buck Chuck.

Eerie, the more I think about it. Only difference is that all players involved were more advanced in their development.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Dec 9, 2011 7:40 PM PST up reply actions  

So we're trading Gio for Dan Haren!

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 7:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Biggest difference is that Hudson had one year of team control, Cahill has six.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Dec 9, 2011 7:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes but Hudson was a lot better than Cahill.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 7:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Doesn't come close to negating the tremendous value 6 cost controlled years has over 1

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Dec 9, 2011 7:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Right, in a surplus value analysis Cahill is a lot more valuable. If you're trying

to win the World Series next year, 2005 Hudson looked a lot more valuable in the prior offseason.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 9, 2011 7:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Cost controlled? Yes. Cheap? No.

Let’s remember what Cahill is actually going to be paid over this contract:

2012: $3.5MM
2013: $5.5MM
2014: $7.7MM
2015: $12MM
2016 $13MM ($0.3MM buyout) club option
2017: $13.5MM ($0.5MM buyout) club option

He’s very likely to be a bargain the next 2-3 years, but he could also be a bad contract towards the end of his deal. If the A’s are really in their new ballpark by 2015, and for whatever reason, Cahill is a back-of-the-rotation starter by then, how valuable is it to be carrying a $12MM sunk cost?

At a minimum, you’re paying $26.8MM over the next four years for his services. That’s quite a commitment. Maybe better than what he would have gotten paid by going through the arbitration process, but maybe not. One injury is all it takes.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Dec 10, 2011 8:31 AM PST up reply actions  

It's $29 million over 4 years

And the “one injury” argument then invalidates all contracts for every player.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 10, 2011 9:08 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm just saying "cost-controlled" is a bit of a misnomer.

If it were just about owning his rights, that would be one thing. If the wheels truly fall off with a team-controlled player for whatever reason, they always have the option of non-tendering him. Not so with Cahill, he’s going to get paid a lot of money no matter how good or bad he is.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Dec 12, 2011 6:45 AM PST up reply actions  

To be fair

Meyer was a great SP prospect who got hurt almost as soon as he came to Oakland. Hopefully, Parker is done with the getting hurt bit. I have more faith in Cowgill than I ever had in Chuck. Cook is meh.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 9, 2011 8:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I read that as "Cook his meth."

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 8:24 PM PST up reply actions  

too much Breaking Bad!

AN Tailgate = Euphemism for food porn.

by Berry Jo on Dec 9, 2011 8:39 PM PST up reply actions  

never watched it.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 9, 2011 8:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Parker's appearance in the NLDS las year

One-third of an inning pitched, two hits, one walk, one run (earned). The only Arizona pitcher who did worse was Brad Ziegler!

by BatDay on Dec 9, 2011 7:20 PM PST reply actions  

Hey, Shooty Babbit is on 95.7 FM talking with Townsend about the trade!

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 7:21 PM PST reply actions  

How will Parker win?

Who is going to drive in runs so Parker can get some wins? As soon as he gets good, Beane will trade him too so don’t get too attached to Parker.

by Charley Thompson on Dec 9, 2011 7:42 PM PST reply actions  

Anyone who thinks Gio will be an A at Christmas is smoking crack

Maybe we’ll turn these guys around + Gio for a good hitter, but I know Billy wanted Cowgill all year so I imagine he is staying. I think Parker for Cahill is probably, over the long haul, a + trade for us.

Don’t discount the idea that this might be nothing but a payroll dump. Basically about even in talent, but quite a savings in payroll. We already know that signing mid grade FA’s won’t put butts in the seats, so what’s the point in Billy trying that?

I think Tom Berenger may be our catcher next year.

I miss Eric Plunk

by chuckcheeze on Dec 9, 2011 8:06 PM PST reply actions  

rebuilding rebuilding rebuilding

how bout start building a stadium…………..

Haters Gonna Hate

by Wreckonized on Dec 9, 2011 8:20 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I think this may be getting lost in here

but I tried to emphasize it in my post: Jarrod Parker is gonna be fun to watch.

by BWH on Dec 9, 2011 8:27 PM PST reply actions  

Mom?

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

gonna have to disagree...

But more importantly his slider looks great.legit

by Billy Frijoles on Dec 10, 2011 10:29 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm sad to see Trev go,

But this is the type of trade we should have been expecting. Traded for someone who supposedly has higher upside than Cahill (same age, cheaper money for time being), got a young reliever and dumped Breslow, got a possible starter for next season in our vacant OF. What were you guys expecting?

by Menechino_Incarnate on Dec 9, 2011 8:40 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

But is that realistic?

I feel like everyone is beating around the bush here. How good do we really think Cahill is? And again, you have to remember that it is widely believed that Parker is as good or better.

by Menechino_Incarnate on Dec 9, 2011 8:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd have liked just two A/A- guys

let them keep Cook. Still, you can’t always get what you want.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Dec 10, 2011 8:35 AM PST up reply actions  

True, but I do get my fair share of abuse

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 10, 2011 9:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Looks pretty good from what I can tell.

Jury is still out.

"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."

-John "Blue Moon" Odom

by mrod on Dec 9, 2011 8:40 PM PST reply actions  

NEW POST UP

Because I know you just HAVE to hear what I think!

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 9, 2011 8:49 PM PST reply actions  

Not A Bad Trade

I think Parker and Cowgill have a lot of potential, and even though Cahill is a good pitcher with a great sinker, I think this could pay off for the A’s. Cowgill will probably be in the mix for a starting job in the OF next year, and Parker may soon be there. With Parker and Gray in our farm system, I think the rotation is pretty solid. Also, I would rather have traded Cahill then Gio.

by Sean Fortuna on Dec 10, 2011 1:11 AM PST reply actions  

Not either/or.

Gio’s gone within seven days, guaranteed.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Dec 10, 2011 8:36 AM PST up reply actions  

I might take that bet on Gio

It’s always more likely a player is kept than traded. I’d put Gio traded this offseason at 35-40%.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Dec 10, 2011 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Not a very good read

Someone tell Trueblood that AZ can keep Cahill for 6 years.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 10, 2011 8:22 AM PST up reply actions  

They aren't paid, are they?

And I’ll admit into being duped into briefly thinking he might be competent when I saw him use FIP.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 10, 2011 9:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Nope.

And as far as I know, anyone can make an account and start writing. It’s a cesspool of awful, awful writing.

by danmerqury on Dec 10, 2011 10:11 AM PST up reply actions  

I know a guy who writes for them is a sprinkler head installer in SF

He told me he is paid for writing for Bleacher Report and also a shiny press badge. Money is nothing to write home about, but is genuine $.

by hishnik on Dec 11, 2011 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow, seriously?

He gets paid AND a press badge?

by danmerqury on Dec 11, 2011 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

IS IT SHINY???

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 11, 2011 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I bet.

But does he get line graphs of Nico’s ass? That’s really the kicker.

by danmerqury on Dec 11, 2011 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

It's more of a bar graph these days.

I need to lay off the ice cream.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 11, 2011 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

bell curve.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR

by mikev on Dec 11, 2011 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

With more than a standard deviation, I'm told.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 11, 2011 5:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I was as stunned

IIRC, Athletics after dark had a press badge also, so it isn’t a huge shocker. He did have some interesting stories about how the players interact with the press, so I am confident he wasn’t blowing smoke.

by hishnik on Dec 11, 2011 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Me to

I was lured by the FIP and then I read the rest of the article after I posted it. It was poorly written.

Slegna must die!

by Athletics fan and runner on Dec 11, 2011 6:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Billy Beane is like that stupid guy in your fantasy football league. The one everyone tries to fleece (2 terrible players that I just picked up off the waiver wire for your best player… sounds good to me!) and it pisses everyone else off that didn’t make the trade because it screws up the competitive balance.

by BrianJ12 on Dec 10, 2011 8:33 AM PST reply actions  

Need to free up $ for new soccer stadium?
The overall budget for the 15000-18000 seat stadium would require “up to a $60 million investment” by team ownership and was not dependent on securing outside corporate funding.

http://www.fieldofschemes.com/news/archives/mls/san_jose_earthquakes/

AFC West Assassins...

by Porcupine on Dec 10, 2011 9:13 AM PST reply actions  

Two different entities and only Wolff (from ownership) bridges both sides.

The state of the ’Quakes has zero to do with Oakland and vice versa.

by Copenhagen on Dec 10, 2011 10:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A's relocation option from a legal expert on the issue
Oakland_athletics_team_logo_photofile_small
Prospects 1Q Report

Recent FanPosts

100_1536_small
My new smarts on the Fanpost, and Mr. Offseason is born, and getting to know me
Small
GOG 2012 #18: The Twins have a shiny new park, and not much else
Small
Gotta Be Their Pitching
Hardly-boys_small
Minor League notes on Major League Day Off
Small
Cespedes Upate?
Small
The SF Warriors, the LA Raiders and the Oakland A's
Photo__11__small
COG #17 - Yankees vs. Athletics or Spank me! Spank me!
100_1536_small
What to do? What to do?
Small
Fans Should Buy the A's
Reg3_small
Tom Milone's Nickname

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Sb_nation1_small ahhall

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late