Oakland A's GM Billy Beane, Post-Moneyball, Visits Athletics Nation Part III
Yesterday you had part 2 of AN's exclusive interview with Billy Beane. Wednesday you had part 1. Today the interview with Beane concludes. I want to thank Billy for sitting down and chatting with me for such a long period of time the Monday after Moneyball was released. I hope you really enjoyed it as much as I enjoyed conducting the interview.
Tyler Bleszinski: You have been a GM for 14 years now, how has your job changed since it first started?
Billy Beane: Well it's gotten more and more difficult. I don't think the job itself has gotten more difficult, but I just think our situation has gotten more difficult. I mean it was a challenge 10 years ago, it's more so of a challenge now. And the reasons are well-documented. And so, I think there are a lot of bright GMs in the game. I think the position itself has been filled by a great group of young intelligent, progressive GMs. And the guys who have been doing it a long time have lasted because they're very good. So you've got 30 teams that are by and large at some level pretty well-run and there aren't too many soft spots, so to speak. It's really become a meritocracy and I think that's ultimately good for the game. So from that sense it's intellectually far more competitive than I think 15-20 years ago.
TB: You say how tough it is and obviously a lot of it has to do with the market that you're in. Basically, it seems to me like the A's almost need to reinvent themselves year in and year out, or even moment-to-moment to try and be competitive with some of the other teams and what they're spending out there. In thinking that way, how much would a job like the Chicago Cubs GM job appeal to you?
BB: Obviously I've been asked about that the last couple of weeks because someone writes it. To respond to it would be both presumptuous and arrogant. And, having been a GM a long time, I've had these questions and the best way that I can answer them is not to answer them because it's really coming from speculation from somebody else. I mean the fact of the matter is I love this franchise. I've always loved this franchise and I have a lot of emotion invested in it and I'd like to see this thing through. And this is the job I'm happy with despite its challenges, and I expect to continue to be so going forward. When someone writes something, I don't think that you have an obligation to answer it because when you start answering it, you start believing what a third party said, which is arrogant.
TB: You turned down the Red Sox years ago and I've actually had Cubs people ask me if I think you would leave now, because they think that I have some idea what your level of frustration is. Basically I tell them that obviously everyone is extremely frustrated with the stadium situation. If it was to ever drive Billy to leave the A's, because he didn't leave the team back in 2003, I don't really see it, unless the stadium situation seems that hopeless, then that would be the only way I would see you leaving.
BB: Nobody wants to be in a situation that you feel is hopeless. The hope we have right now is that we'll get an answer and get a new venue. If you lose that hope, at that point you've got to ask yourself the question again. But our hope right now is that we'll get a decision, and with the decision comes a new venue.
TB: I know you're a very meticulous person when it comes to planning, thinking about timelines and whatnot. Do you have a deadline in your own head by which you want an answer by so you can figure out your own future and where you want to go? I mean, you don't have to give me what the deadline is.
BB: As soon as that hope is gone, I think we all sort of probably at that point would start reassessing everything. But to say that I actually have or that there is a specific deadline, I don't have that. As long as there is some hope, then it's easy to continue to get excited. But as soon as that hope gets taken away, you would have to ask me then. But I don't think I have a specific date or anything like that. Because I don't think you can afford to do that in this job. I think the idea that you got one foot in and one foot out, that's not going to work and that's not the type of person I am anyway.
TB: One of the themes of the movie obviously is you feeling a sense of loyalty to the A's and wanting to see this thing through to the end. Is that something that motivates you on a day-to-day basis, and sort of seeing the A's get to the pinnacle of where you want them to be?
BB: Yeah, and it's not so much for my own personal glory, it's as much for the people around me. I think people talk about winning the world championship or achieving things, even achieving things such as the playoffs. The most satisfying part about that is not what it does for you personally, but what it does for the people around you, you know. And the people around me are people I have been very, very close to and think very highly of for the past two decades. And I think I get as much fulfillment out of seeing the esprit de corps that comes with those victories, whether it be making the playoffs or I'm sure some people would tell you, would mean winning the world championship or getting into the World Series. So, I've been very fortunate myself. I have had a lot of great things come my way. But it is really nice to see how it benefits everyone around you and not just the people in the organization, but the people who come and watch the games as well. There's a certain amount of civic pride that comes with your team winning, and that's always something I get a lot of fulfillment from.
TB: Obviously this is still speculation but would you feel like you were leaving a job left incomplete if you were to leave the team? That's something that factors big into a decision like that, right?
BB: I've heard that form of a question before. I've never viewed things that way. I think at that point it's a different way of saying validation, which I don't see that as being a part of any of my decision-making. I think what you want to do if you ever leave, like retirement or something, if I ever retired, my idea in retiring would be to leave something bigger and better than when I took over. Something that sustains itself for a long time so that the next generation of fans and people around us, are taking something that you built up over years, and either continued it or made it better. That sort of drives me. Not creating a year, but creating an era. But as far as any sort of lack of fulfilling certain things, I don't quite view it that way. I don't necessarily view it as validating, like hey, this validates you. It just sounds too simple for me and that's not something that drives me. That's why the beauty of having a young team, the beauty of having a business plan is to be building something that's around for a long time. Once again, an era is more important to me than a single year.
TB: Do you feel like, I mean, we've talked about the offense and 2012 depending on what happens with the stadium situation and whatnot, but you have made some additions this year of young guys who can be kind of longer-term solutions than some of the free agents, the Willinghams, Crisp, Matsui, but you've added somebody like Brandon Allen, and you've got Jemile Weeks, and Scott Sizemore, just to name a few guys on the infield. How do you feel about each one of them and their prospects being kind of longer-term solutions for those holes in your lineup?
BB: Well, I think you don't know until a couple of years play out. First of all, we needed to add those guys. I think specifically if you look at the potential free agents that are leaving, probably our biggest area of need is going to be the outfield. As it relates to the infield, I think the guys that are here have a chance to be good major league players for a long time. When you mention all those guys, Brandon, Weeks, Penny (Cliff Pennington) - I think Penny has had a great second half, and then Sizemore as well. I think catching, I feel very comfortable with our catching situation long term. And I do like our pitching, which really gets down to the outfield. And because of the possible losses of the guys that are free agents, it is an area of concern and something hopefully with guys like Michael Choice and Grant Green, hopefully those are a couple of guys to fill that. Jermaine Mitchell is a guy that we think very, very highly of. He's a great talent who really put it together this year at the level that we had always hoped he would. The Texas Rangers have done a tremendous job investing in their scouting and player development over the last six years, and to compete with them we're going to have to do the same.
TB: That's going to be a tough sell to the fans going forward though. I mean, the fans want to put on the proverbial green and gold glasses and believe that the team has got a chance to compete every year.
BB: I think what's more important is actually being realistic. I don't think we should be on a quest for mediocrity. Having a Groundhog's Day conversation every year and once again remember, when this franchise has been good that's the way it's been built. And there really is no short cut. There have been times when there certainly have been pieces here that if the right things fell into place, maybe it would work. But understand the challenge of attracting players here because of the compensation level they demand and also the fact that this right now is a challenging venue to get players to come to, makes it that much tougher.
TB: One thing that has always been very important to you and that you've always seemed to value is pitching and defense. And one thing that hasn't gone the way it might have been expected is the defense is weaker than we would have thought this year. Are you concerned about weakening the defense too much in a quest to kind of improve the offense?
BB: It's like holding sand, you know? It's not unexpected when you take a guy like Ellis out of the middle of the infield, he's arguably been the best second baseman of the last decade and in the game, I think. And Daric Barton was a Gold Glove-caliber first baseman. Those two guys were gone. So you're going to take a step back. I also think that even when everyone was here, I think we got out to a tough start defensively; I think that would have evened itself out. But that's the whole trick. It is like holding sand. Ultimately, what you're trying to do is get players like Chavez and Tejada who win Gold Gloves, those are star players that do it on both offense and defense. Once again, it goes back to what I was saying, that that's an investment and total commitment to your farm system, the draft, and the international players that are available to you. In our market, you probably need to do it in a much bigger way than we've done it - then, once again, balancing the major league payroll investment in the infrastructure.
TB: How do you feel about the first base position with Chris Carter kind of there, Daric Barton and now Brandon Allen? Is it just something that you wait and see how it shakes out in spring training in 2012 or is it something where Daric's opportunity might have slipped through the cracks by now? How do you feel?
BB: I think each one has shown flashes that they can be good major league players and it's going to be up to one of those guys to show that they're capable of keeping the job full time. I mean, Daric did the job last year and this year it all kind of fell apart on him. And at times Brandon has been very good for us. I think Chris is a little bit behind both those two defensively. But until one of them grabs it, it's probably going to be up in the air.
TB: You've talked about free agents a little bit and one of the things that seems to be appealing about Oakland as a free agent obviously, would be pitching in the ballpark for 81 games, because it's such a pitcher-friendly park. Do you find that maybe a good strategy is to spend what money you do have and try and sign a starting pitcher or two, and maybe use them as a commodity to trade for a hitter later on? Do you find that pitchers actually want to pitch in Oakland compared to the hitters?
BB: It's a good ballpark to pitch in. One thing too is getting back a free agent pitcher that we could compete for. If you're looking at the premium free agent starting pitchers, it's just not a market we can afford to get into and it's extremely risky when you combine the risk health-wise. For us, our pitching has to come through the draft and selective signings like Brandon McCarthy, who I think is a good example. But the idea that we're going to go out in the free agent market and bid for the premium guys, it's just not going to happen. And for us, we've done a good job of putting together a competitive pitching staff and I think we learned long ago that it has to come through your own system. We're much better off going that route than we are putting together a significant offer for a 30-plus year old free agent - we're probably not going to be in that game anyway. So, what you would like to do is hope that your ballpark can attract players like Brandon McCarthy. That they have talent and are looking for an opportunity and a good ballpark to pitch in and Brandon is probably the best example. We're probably going to get more bang for our buck than going out and spending what we don't have on something that's very, very risky.
TB: Theo Epstein was quoted in Sports Illustrated talking about keeping your pitchers healthy as being sort of a new market inefficiency, so to speak, the thing that everybody is trying to figure out how to solve. Is that something that you see as being important - obviously you see it as being important considering how many guys went down for you - but is that something that you guys spend a lot of resources and time in trying to figure out? Or is it just, like, load up with as many starting pitchers as you possibly can and grit your teeth and hopefully they can bring you through a season? How do you approach that?
BB: I think you do both. First of all, you get as much pitching as you can and we all do that. But I do think in general the medical side of sports is actually one area we're trying to get our arms around because every GM when he's in spring training, or every GM when in the NFL, right before they start the season they usually end their team's prospects with the sentence, "if we can stay healthy." And it's a challenge and a dilemma for all sports and it's not necessarily just preventing them, it's minimizing the time down. They're going to have injuries, but if you can find a way to just narrow the timeframe a little bit, you'll have a huge advantage. The Red Sox are a great example this year. I mean, team health has such a big impact on where you finish, probably more so than people realize. It may be the most important thing. I truly don't believe that there was a better team put together than the Red Sox this year. I mean they had everything. And here we are and they're fighting for a playoff spot and I don't think it's necessarily through fault of their own. It's quite simply that the team that they've put together is not all there. And, here they are scrambling and it's all through injury. I don't know that Theo and his staff could have done a better job. And I would challenge anybody who thought going into the season that they weren't arguably the best team in the game. It's not really just preventing injuries but also limiting the time that the player is down and we're all trying to look for that magic formula by virtue of looking at conditioning, looking at how we give players days off, how we prepare for the season. Particularly a team like ours, a team like the Red Sox, I know now that have had significant injuries, you go through things at a much deeper level than you would if you stay healthy. We took these things for granted in the earlier part of the decade. Having been on both sides of it where we've been very, very healthy club and a healthy organization, and we've also been one that has been decimated with injuries that forces you to examine everything, which is also a good process.
TB: Obviously you guys had a whole lot of luck back in the day. I can't remember during those early 2000s how many...
BB: We were one of the healthiest teams.
TB: Yeah, you didn't have very many injuries. Were you doing anything different or was it just a matter of luck?
BB: I think you're foolish if you don't go back and see what you were doing and see what you're doing now. I think you have to examine the process as we did. I don't know if we were doing anything different. We changed what we were doing now from what we were doing the last few years, absolutely. We've made significant changes in our medical and I think those changes have been for the better. But you are going to go through periods where you have not just a year of injury, but a couple of years. And, I think the Red Sox face that. I mean, the Giants had a phenomenal year last year. They were very healthy. They've had their share of injuries, and as a result they're not going to make the playoffs. If you look at the two teams they had the biggest difference between them last year and this year, it's the fact that they weren't as healthy this year.
TB: Obviously Buster Posey is a big one.
BB: Yeah, no question. There was Brian Wilson for the time period. They lost Barry. So listen, it is, when I say the inefficiency, I do think it's an area that we're all looking at very hard right now - each organization, and trying to find a better way of treating injuries and hopefully preventing them and minimizing the down time.
TB: Sort of switching to your personal life really quick. You've been into soccer obviously, and punk rock for years now and they paid homage to that in the movie with a Clash poster.
BB: It was a Joe Strummer picture and a Clash picture back there. What they did is kind of look in my office and they took more things than I thought they would.
TB: What else outside of, because I know that you're a guy that has a lot of outside interests outside of baseball - what else outside of the sport gets your interest these days and gets your attention?
BB: Well, my kids obviously. I've always been somewhat intellectually curious and interested. It's always been that way and in some way, shape or form I'd like to think at times those interests lead you to things that can help you in other parts of this job. There are a lot of things in the world that are interesting. I think it would be foolish not to take advantage of them. One of the things I enjoy on my off time is fly-fishing. It's something that I have gotten into and enjoy. It's a great get away from this job when I can do it.
TB: Where do you do it?
BB: Most recently before my shoulder surgery, a couple of days before my shoulder surgery, just up north of Redding. In fact, it was a great day fly-fishing in the river on the lower Sac. It was also the day that we were down 7-0 and we got rained out in Texas. Very few times can your career be down that big in an away ballpark and actually get to have a mulligan. So that was the most recent one. I try to get up to my home - it's a little harder obviously during the season -and go up to Bend, Oregon, where we have a home, but it's something that I enjoy. And now that Hatteberg is back in the organization...
TB: You have someone to do it with?
BB: Yeah. We keep trying to plan a trip but our schedule, even though we work for the same employer, doesn't allow it and the tough thing is sometimes the best fly fishing time is during the summer when we're all very, very busy.
TB: What kind of fish do you usually catch up there?
BB: Rainbow trout.
TB: Is it sort of a "River Runs Through It" kind of thing, where they're in the waist-high boots?
BB: Yeah, that's probably a little dramatic with the rushing river up to your armpits. It's probably a little more tame than that. But it's something that I have really gotten into and really enjoy the last few years and it's something I'm hoping to pass on to my kids.
TB: Do you see yourself as a baseball lifer?
BB: Well, I already am. This is my 30-plus year, so I already am and certainly proud of it.
TB: But staying there until you retire, basically?
BB: It's probably a question that I'm going to have to answer later on. I don't really know. Are there things that I'm interested in? Sure. But right now, this is what I love doing. I think that as soon as you make absolutes about your life, you're probably destined to not live up to them. So no, I already am a lifer and will I continue? Certainly for the time being, that's for sure. I mean it doesn't necessarily preclude me from having a lot of interests, which is the way I've always been since I was a kid. How else do you get into punk rock?
TB: Well, you're a conservative guy who is into punk rock. I gotta say, I don't know too many of those.
BB: That means nobody can nail me down (laughs). I have a lot of friends and a lot of interests and I find it very stimulating to be interested by a lot of things. When you go on the road, one of our well-known players used to have trouble sleeping and I used to tell him, "What do you mean you have trouble sleeping? There are so many great books to read. Get yourself a great book." You know, there's not enough time in the world to read all the great books that are out there, and all the things that are out there to read and to be interested in and he wasn't quite buying that.
TB: Wasn't a big reader?
BB: Yeah, he immediately informed me that he had read two books and said that he really wasn't that into reading. So I realized I was going nowhere with that one. I think what I was doing was just...
TB: It was (Nick) Swisher, wasn't it?
BB: No, it wasn't Nick. Good guess, but it wasn't him.
TB: I actually had him tell me that in an interview once. He told me that he doesn't read.
BB: Then again, I don't play video games - actually, I do play Call of Duty. My wife gets mad at me.
TB: Are you kidding me? Do you play on the 360 or the PS3?
BB: You know, I don't get into it as much as I used to but my dad and me, we kind of get into it. It's fascinating the way they're put together. The graphics are unbelievable.
TB: You know who my brother is, right?
BB: No.
TB: He's the lead designer on Gears of War.
BB: I got Gears of War for my dad for Christmas. After he had gone through all the Call of Duty ones, I got him Gears of War. That one is tough, by the way.
TB: They just came out with a third one.
BB: Those are a lot of our Christmas Day exchanges. In fact, I can read an email he sent me. He sent me one saying there's a new one called Battlefield 3 and he sends the link and says, "Hey you gotta check this out. This will be great." Then he sends me an email this morning, "It won't work on a Mac." Yeah, I don't have a lot of time to do that.
TB: I don't have nearly as much time as I would like to do that either, but I've got to definitely play with you sometime on the 360.
BB: Well it's hard not to be fascinated by everything that goes into them and the artificial intelligence that goes into it is amazing.
TB: I will be asking for your gamer tag.
BB: No, no - I'm not that deep into it. My wife would never let me because any hour that I would possibly have in the day that I would do that I would have no chance of getting away with it. Yeah, I got no chance.
TB: And finally, just quickly out of curiosity, how much do you think Moneyball is going to change your life and how much do you think it has already changed your life?
BB: I don't quite think of it like that. One thing about being a GM of a major sports franchise is that you're in a public position anyway so I haven't really thought about how it's going to change my life. I've told this to people privately, what I really do still love is walking into this office on any given day and getting to do this job. As long as I still get to do that, whatever good comes out of it will just be an appendage to what I really like to do, which is this.
TB: Well that's good to hear as an A's fan. We definitely want you to keep walking into that office for years and years.
BB: Thank you. That's very much appreciated. And I can assure you the loyalty has always been returned from my end, I hope.
TB: Definitely. And I really appreciate it.
24 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
the Coliseum is a good place for Willingham to hit.
Willingham offers legitimate power, and if properly used (as Melvin did, alternating him in LF and DH) it appears to increase his chances of staying healthy. Willingham wanted to stay and would have signed – affordably – before reaching free agency, and for less guaranteed $$ and years than he may be offered once he hits free agency. Finally, Willingham would be a short term signing. Under no scenarios would he be playing in any new A’s ballpark.
Good interview by the way, I enjoyed reading it.
I just wish Beane had been challenged as far as lumping all “free agent” signings together and anchoring them to the ballpark decision.
Thanks you!
This has been one of the main reason AN is so unique from others!
I’ve always loved this franchise and I have a lot of emotion invested in it and I’d like to see this thing through. And this is the job I’m happy with despite its challenges, and I expect to continue to be so going forward. When someone writes something, I don’t think that you have an obligation to answer it because when you start answering it, you start believing what a third party said, which is arrogant.
Good enough for me! Seriously though, he for real better not leave now, or else that’s an absurdly cruel thing to say.
Me too
I love the fact that he still loves the A’s. I kinda already knew it, but it’s good to hear it.
Re-sign Josh Willingham now!
by sf drift king on Oct 7, 2011 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Great job, Blez!
All 3 parts! As to Willingham, I think we’re better off with draft picks and letting the young guys play! Green in center, Taylor left, Miller right, Carter dh.
"I'm not bad, I'm just drawn that way." -Jessica Rabbit
by A'sfansince1970 on Oct 7, 2011 9:42 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
So much good information in this series
Thanks again for doing this, Tyler.
Interesting to hear him bigging up Jermaine Mitchell (and not mentioning Adrian Cardenas) in reference to the outfield situation. Sounds like we’re likely to see Mitchell in Oakland next year.
Also, understatement of the year:
I think Chris is a little bit behind both those two defensively.
Yeah what's up with Cardenas?
He certainly can’t be any worse than Rosales or Sogard.
And I still really can’t believe the A’s are planning on having Chris Carter be a part of their future. That comment definitely didn’t hurt my presumption.
when I think of Chris Carter
the Scot Hatteburg from the movie Moneyball comes to mind.. lol
Re-sign Josh Willingham now!
by sf drift king on Oct 7, 2011 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions
International player signing
As has been pointed out elsewhere, for a baseball team with limited resources, one of the better opportunities for acquiring quality new players is on the international market. And that is like a chain – you get one player from an area, and he can point the way to other quality players in that geographic area. That is one opportunity the A’s have. However, the other opportunity, akin to the early application of statistics in looking for players, is to look for those players in countries where baseball is not so big as to attract the attention of the rich clubs. I am not that versed in the Taiwanese and Korean baseball; however I can speak for a couple of other countries.
One of them is Venezuela, where Moscoso could be a lead-in to a scouting program. I was just reading today’s AFL report, where the Venezuelan first baseman Jesus Aguilar (Indian’s prospect) is on a tear – the immediate question was – and why wasn’t he signed by the A’s? In fact, he is from the same area where Moscoso comes from. The A’s already had some good luck with Tony Armas, so they are aware that Venezuela produces more than just quality short-stops. Venezuelan baseball is not as developed as that in Mexico or Cuba, but Venezuelans are a proud and very independent people, with a strong military tradition, so they have a good character background to generate strong players. By contrast, without wanting to offend anyone, there is no such tradition of character in the Dominican Republic, in Puerto Rico, or in Panama.
The other possibility is that of finding very young potential athletes with baseball aspirations in Russia. Baseball is just starting in that country, with something akin to a short-season Summer league in operation. I happened to meet last summer, right on a busy corner in Moscow, a young man sporting an A’s t-shirt and baseball cap, with a sign inviting people to visit his baseball team; in talking to him I discovered that he is a pitcher, very proud of his 88 mph fastball. Of course, it will be a few years until the MLB teams discover Russian baseball; meanwhile, the country has a strong athletic and sports tradition, and the new capitalist environment makes young people hungry for money – they will train endlessly if there is a possibility of signing for a bonus! It is a strange coincidence that there is an A’s following already in place – in Moscow of all places! So if emphasis is made on athletics, rather on baseball skills – which can be developed at the Minor League level – Oakland has the chance of acquiring some young prospects within this nascent Russian baseball community – a secret source, for the time being.
Didn't the Mariners sign a Russian prospect a few years back?
It’s good to know that there is some baseball going on there. When I lived there 16 years ago, I tried to teach some of the kids I worked with (generally 10-15 year olds) the game. Too many rules for them. There is a similar game (lapta) that they played, but it seemed to be one of those games where you made up rules as you went – and the game never lasted very long or had a winner.
Don't you realise you'll find next monday or next Tuesday/Your golden shoes day
by PDXAthleticsfan on Oct 7, 2011 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for the interview
I wonder what his gamer tag is, 20gamesinyourface1989
When we played softball, I’d steal second base, feel guilty and go back.
- Woody Allen
by rhymeswithelephant on Oct 7, 2011 10:43 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
That's hilarious.
That rug really tied the room together...
by Streams Of Whiskey on Oct 7, 2011 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions
Unfortunately
Friedman, Anthopolous and Daniels are in hiz base, killing his doodz.
by Glorious Mundy on Oct 7, 2011 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
That's a real significant change in tone
on the question of rebuilding. Five years ago when Beane talked about that his answer always suggested that they don’t believe in the boom-and-bust rebuild cycle and they try to be good every year. Now he’s suggesting pretty much the opposite.
The former position was always based on the economics of the market — ie, that our particular fan base is more vulnerable to losing sales from a sequence of bad seasons than to gaining sales from a particularly good season, and so it made sense to try to keep fairly consistent.
I can think of two ways in which that may have changed. One is that now we’ve already had the bad seasons so maybe that damage is done. The other would be an anticipated change in venue.
Being wrong about something you’ve worked on is a blessing, not a curse, and people are so invested in being right that that gets lost. —Graham MacAree
I'm not sure what rebuilding really means anymore, anyway
Since everyone is potentially overvaluing prospects, it’s not really clear that you can trade average-to-good MLB players away and get a haul of anything useful unless the MLB player is a superstar. Whatever gains received from trading away current players are likely to be either lucky or utility players, in my opinion. This puts even more emphasis on the draft and international scouting, which can be done regardless of the team’s overall record.
"I'll guarantee this: The A's will have a better season in 2012." - George Zimmer
by cuppingmaster on Oct 7, 2011 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Plus, I should add, in this difficult rebuild environment, that also increases the price of FA.
"I'll guarantee this: The A's will have a better season in 2012." - George Zimmer
by cuppingmaster on Oct 7, 2011 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks Blez for another indepth interview
Blez, I would have liked for you to ask Billy the following question:
Has the Moneyball book (and movie to some degree) made it difficult or more challenging to do his job when it comes to having to do deals with other GMs throughout the league?
Re-sign Josh Willingham now!
Agreed
That’s one of those questions that came to me after it was over. That’s a fail on my part.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Oct 7, 2011 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions
There was a quote from Billy about that somewhere but I'm too lazy to google it right now
but it essentially said that with all the new blood GMs, there’s not really any actual negotiations anymore. It’s basically “Hey Billy I want Player X and I want to give you prospect A and B.” and it’s either yes or no, there’s no asking for prospect C, D, or E instead.
It’s more of a demand and not really negotiating.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR
I'll be the bitch and Google it
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/tom_verducci/08/02/billy.beane.moneyball/index.html
"I'll guarantee this: The A's will have a better season in 2012." - George Zimmer
by cuppingmaster on Oct 7, 2011 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Blez, thanks again for this wonderful interview series! And thanks to Billy too...
…this is the most candid I think I’ve ever seen (read?) Billy Bean being. Great stuff.
You know you are big-time when people chant your name while you pee. - 67MARQUEZ
Good interview.
Is it just me or does he say that he’ll walk if the stadium situation isn’t fixed?
Does this turn the stadium situation into one where if you don’t get a new stadium you might as well contract the team away?

by 


























