Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The MMA Hour Is Back

The Billy Beane I Know: The Man Behind the Moneyball Myth

I'm sure it won't be news to any of you that I loved the movie Moneyball. It's a pretty loose adaptation of Michael Lewis' book that was, in part, responsible for me starting blog (and thus SB Nation) back in 2003. And yet it also captures a Billy Beane that I've had the distinct pleasure of getting to know.

What I enjoyed about the movie more than anything else is that it paints a picture of Billy beyond the stereotype that many have come to know, in part, because of Lewis' book. Mention Beane to an A's fan and often times, you get people talking about the hyper-competitive guy who throws chairs, has little respect for managers and doesn't care for old school scouts. But I've come to know Beane well outside the confines of that image, thanks to Billy's reaction to my fledgling site six years ago.

Star-divide

I've been interviewed often about SB Nation and how it grew into this huge force for change in the online sports space. I usually give credit where it is due and say, "It's two things, technology and caring for quality." We wanted to have technology that brought the fan's voice to the forefront (at the time it was the Scoop platform which allowed for diaries - now called Fanposts) and it was important to find the best talent to lead these communities so that a powerful voice was helping captain the ship of informed and intelligent fans. Thankfully there were people like Grant Brisbee, Jeff Sullivan and Al Yellon out there to jump on board and buy into the grand vision of a new sports media. And we've also since added some of the greatest tech minds in the industry to take our platform to entirely new heights.

But one person who was also watching closely was Billy Beane and he became a big reason for SB Nation's success too. Yeah, that same guy who wound up being the subject of a book and a major motion picture. He was watching so closely that I remember he called me on my cell phone when my nephew Ben was visiting us and I missed the call. We were on a ferry over to visit Alcatraz with Ben when I realized I had a message from the 510 area code. I listened and nearly dropped my phone when I heard the message from Beane. Billy had become a mythical figure to me at that point. I'd read Moneyball. I loved the A's and he was the one who was going to keep my franchise competitive despite the competitive inequalities in baseball. I remember playing the voicemail for Ben and being barely able to contain my excitement. Ben, as many of you know, passed away in 2010 at the age of 20 but he was so very excited for me to the point that he read AN on a daily basis despite never being an A's fan.

It was partially that moment that connected me emotionally with Billy. I obviously didn't realize it at the time, but that's one of my fondest and most lasting memories of my nephew. I knew how special he was already but just seeing how happy he was for me made me realize that he wasn't a typical apathetic teenager.

The first interview with Billy was in Sacramento as Beane had come to watch the Rivercats in person. I met with him in the home team's dugout. Before we sat down, he told me, "Tyler, I really only have about 20 minutes to talk." I made sure I came prepared with at least an hour's worth of questions just to make sure that we had everything covered. Once we sat down, the discussion was free and easy and went on for close to an hour and a half. I struck a fantastic rapport with him almost immediately. My belief is that he knew my approach to covering the team was different than any media he'd ever dealt with before. I was an A's fan so my coverage would always be biased. More than that, I'd become a huge Beane fan so I would always make the assumption that whatever he did, he had a very specific reason for doing it. I wanted to understand what that reason was, rather than jumping to the conclusion that Beane was an idiot for making any given move.

As the years have passed, Beane and I have conducted about 10 lengthy interviews. Each time, I've grown a little bit closer to the man behind the Moneyball myth. One thing about Billy is that despite how busy he is, he always carves out a big chunk of time for me. And before the recorder is going and after it stops, we always sit and discuss our families, life, soccer, politics and music. In essence, my fandom for the A's has completely changed because of the relationship I've developed with Beane. My friendship with Beane has, at times, made it tough for me to participate at AN because I can only view things through his prism. This is a man who has offered me advice on raising children, running a business and handling relationships. He visited not one, but two AN Days at the Coliseum and took questions from the audience. I know this isn't something he does for everyone.

And that's what brings me back to the movie Moneyball. The reason I loved it was because that passion illustrated in the film is the man that I've come to know over the years. Sure he's the guy that loves winning so much he'll kill office furniture to try and get it done. But he's also that caring, loving father you see in the movie. He's also a dedicated friend who helped establish Athletics Nation as a dominant force in the baseball blogosphere. He helped lay the foundation upon which the rest of SB Nation would be built by validating this new media approach to sports: that wearing your heart on your sleeve was not only acceptable, but was to be embraced by intelligent, innovative personalities in sports management.

Not only did Billy help SB Nation become the media giant it is today, but in the process, he became someone I would call a friend.  Thus my fandom for the A's is now in large part because I want to see my friend win that championship and get that elusive ring. Sure I still bleed the green and gold that I did back on November 6, 2003 when I started this blog but it's become much more personal for me, so personal that I can't be rational about it. I guess that's why it's a good thing that Nico, Christy and the rest of the front page crew guide this ship now. Despite all the factual inaccuracies and bending of the truth of the Moneyball movie, one thing they nailed was the Billy Beane I know, and hopefully more than a few people have also become fans of the man behind the Moneyball myth.

Comment 26 comments  |  11 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Beautiful

Thanks for sharing this Blez. You’ve (we’ve) come a long way.

by vertig0 on Oct 10, 2011 7:11 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm glad his days of destroying office furniture are over.

But hey if he’s looking for a new desk…

Thank you, Tyler. Again.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Oct 10, 2011 7:27 AM PDT reply actions  

Thanks, Blez.

It’s kind of incredible to realize how much of a place Beane has had in the development of this little site into a sportsblog empire. <3

"This must be heaven," he says.
"No. It's Oakland."

by Kyli on Oct 10, 2011 8:45 AM PDT reply actions  

I smell a new show coming on TV next fall

Boardwalk “Sportsblog Empire”

"I'll guarantee this: The A's will have a better season in 2012." - George Zimmer

by cuppingmaster on Oct 10, 2011 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Awesome

Yeah, I can definitely see how the connection has helped shape the whole thing.

Last of the Ninth - Photography

by Flashfire on Oct 10, 2011 9:35 AM PDT reply actions  

Great post

There’s a lot of people who nit pick about the inaccuracies in the movie, but I wonder how many of them are considering the book to be ‘accurate’. Books are media too, and I’m sure the Billy we read about in ‘Moneyball’ is a bit of a dramatized character as well. Ironically, perhaps the movie felt that something closer to the true Billy Beane would translate better on the big screen and so his film character, while different in ways from the book, is closer to the real thing. Usually Hollywood takes it the other way.

by Hire Power on Oct 10, 2011 9:57 AM PDT reply actions  

Completely agree

My experience with Beane is nowhere near as extensive as yours. I live near him and my only interactions with him are pretty much running into him at the grocery store or something. Even still, he’s 100% approachable.

One time a few years back, right after his twins were born and right after the Swish and Haren trades, I believe, I saw him in a parking lot and called out his name. He called me over and was totally cool about discussing the trades for a good 10 minutes, despite his surely busy schedule. Things like that go a long way. I’m sure we’ve all run into people we admire but don’t know before and had them turn out to be jerks, but Beane is the polar opposite. Class act all the way.

I also feel a bit defensive around here sometimes when I see calls for him to be replaced, or accusations that he’s too into soccer to put a winning baseball team together, etc. In the brief interactions I’ve had with Billy Beane, he has seemed genuinely proud of his work, genuinely grateful for having fans, and completely committed to the Oakland Athletics organization. Your background with him, Blez, corroborates my assumptions and I’m happy about that.

by BWH on Oct 10, 2011 10:02 AM PDT reply actions  

we also called for Geren to be replaced

and pretty much every manager who does not go 161-1 for the year.

And we all have the boss / co-worker / sub-ordinate we want fired.

Sometimes we are right, sometimes not. (and other times we may be the one needing to be fired…)

So rant oniine, and be a class act in person.

by MobiusKlein on Oct 10, 2011 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I get

why it happens. It’s fine to be frustrated with under performance, but I don’t like the implication that failure is due to corruption or laziness.

by BWH on Oct 10, 2011 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm with you

not that corruption and laziness don’t exist – just that most accusations of them are just laziness, including this very sentence.

by MobiusKlein on Oct 10, 2011 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Awesome post, Blez

I really loved Moneyball, but over the years I’ve also been dismayed at how it has created a very warped perception of who Beane is and what the A’s are. If the movie has shown a different side to that, I think that’s a good thing.

I agree with Hire Power about the “inaccuracies” of the movie. Novel and film are too different art forms, and neither is reality. Art is best when it is not enslaved to a single interpretation.

Being wrong about something you’ve worked on is a blessing, not a curse, and people are so invested in being right that that gets lost. —Graham MacAree

by iglew on Oct 10, 2011 11:10 AM PDT reply actions  

The problem is, biopics and movies supposedly "based on a true story" prime audience expectations

We’re essentially told this is what happened, this is how it happened, and here are the people who were important. I’m sure most people understand that Hollywood Hollywood-izes history, but they don’t go out and research conflicting accounts of what happened, so the movie version ends up being the story that sticks.

I agree, iglew, that art is best when it’s not enslaved to a single interpretation, but mainstream movies are, in general, so reductive and unnuanced that there’s hardly anything to be interpreted; it’s all pre-digested for you. One basically has to be a film theorist, or hardcore baseball fan or the like to tease out some alternative interpretation.

That said, I appreciate Blez’s personal perspective on BB.

There is an evening coming in/Across the fields, one never seen before,/That lights no lamps. -- Philip Larkin, from "Going"

by Ray of Lite on Oct 10, 2011 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

The thing about film is that

it’s so easy for a single film to dominate its story.

My experience is primarily in the performing arts, where it is taken for granted that a given play will have numerous productions each of which will be different. No one gets all fussed about whether Hamlet is supposed to be short or tall, dark or fair. It is understood that the essence of the character is in the script, not one actor’s physical representation.

When a book is adapted to film, it could do the same, and yet what usually happens is that there’s a big buzz about whether the chosen actor “looks like” the character he is supposed to portray. We certainly saw this in Moneyball, where the characters were tied to real-life individuals, but it even happens with fictional characters, like with Lord of the Rings where people were saying, “Huh? that’s not what Gandalf looks like” or “No, that’s exactly what Gandalf looks like!”

While I will certainly criticize a film adaptation of a book if I think the film is just bad (eg, Dune), I appreciate the different vision, even if it isn’t true to the book. What I think bothered me more about LotR was not that it was “accurate” or “inaccurate” so much as it was such a huge affair that the film’s imagery has all but driven out the thousands of illustrations that preceded it, so that now in everyone’s collective mind Sam Gamgee must look just like Sean Astin, Legolas must have a long ponytail, and so forth. Some Disney interpretations have bothered me for the same reason (eg, Snow White, Winnie the Pooh, Jungle Book).

I like it when competing films tell the same story, because it throws the focus back on the essence of the story itself, not on a specific performance. It happens occasionally, though more often with classics. Still, you do sometimes see it with certain characters, like James Bond or Batman. I definitely like that.

Being wrong about something you’ve worked on is a blessing, not a curse, and people are so invested in being right that that gets lost. —Graham MacAree

by iglew on Oct 10, 2011 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sure Howe would heartily agree
Art is best when it is not enslaved to a single interpretation.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 10, 2011 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Moneyball has also created a warped perception of how and why the A's competed in the early 2000s.

They didn’t win because they uniquely realized, before anyone else thought of it, that OBP was more important than RBIs, and that a player’s production mattered more than their looks. They didn’t even win because they discovered Scott Hatteberg — teams discover players as good, and as uncoveted, as Hatteberg all the time.

The A’s won because they drafted, and developed, a terrific core of young players (Hudson, Mulder, Zito, Giambi, Chavez, Tejada), most of whom were “top 10 picks” and were deep enough that even when they lost Giambi they still had five stars to build around. Recently, the A’s have drafted neither as effectively nor as high and the result has been predictable: Not so good.

However, paragraph two is not the basis for a very good movie.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 10, 2011 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Paragraph 2 would be the basis of a great movie, though I'd fiddle with the ending a bit.

There is an evening coming in/Across the fields, one never seen before,/That lights no lamps. -- Philip Larkin, from "Going"

by Ray of Lite on Oct 10, 2011 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I appreciate that you consider Beane a friend and someone who's helped a lot in your

business venture, but he was never the iconoclastic pioneer that Moneyball seems to make him out to be. While he may well be the most famous GM in MLB, he has shown over the past 8 years that he’s pretty ordinary at the job relative to other MLB GMs. He just might be the most overrated baseball executive of all time.

I vibrated with joy that join A's. -- Kim Seong-min

by WaddellCanseco on Oct 10, 2011 1:45 PM PDT reply actions  

While I disagree with your sentiment

I do find it interesting how little credit Sandy Alderson gets.

by dwishinsky on Oct 10, 2011 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is interesting

This success at SB Nation is kinda like a cross between the success of Moneyball and Facebook. Perhaps there will be books written about SB Nation. I mean, what’s the audience these days? I visit about 5 SB Nation sites daily and see posts with over 1000 comments in multiple places.

I’ve been overwhelmed and I’ve been underwhelmed. Can I ever just be whelmed?

by closetasfan on Oct 10, 2011 4:56 PM PDT reply actions  

We have only three members (me, Blez, and Cindi)

but we post a TON.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 10, 2011 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope!

I’m “closetasfan”!!!!! (It’s what writers call an “alien”.)

-Cindi

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 11, 2011 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, I hope there's no SB Nation book

because then there might be a movie, and then we would all start bickering about who should play Nico, baseballgirl, et cetera. I, of course, would be bitter that my pivotal role was overlooked by the stupid screenwriter.

by bear88 on Oct 11, 2011 12:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well obviously I would play baseballgirl.

Duh.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 11, 2011 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nice post

Now we need to win a World Series. We don’t need the realist Billy Beane, we need the I can conquer the world Billy Beane. We need a WS win.

by coachmmm on Oct 10, 2011 8:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A's relocation option from a legal expert on the issue
Oakland_athletics_team_logo_photofile_small
Prospects 1Q Report

Recent FanPosts

100_1536_small
My new smarts on the Fanpost, and Mr. Offseason is born, and getting to know me
Small
GOG 2012 #18: The Twins have a shiny new park, and not much else
Small
Gotta Be Their Pitching
Hardly-boys_small
Minor League notes on Major League Day Off
Small
Cespedes Upate?
Small
The SF Warriors, the LA Raiders and the Oakland A's
Photo__11__small
COG #17 - Yankees vs. Athletics or Spank me! Spank me!
100_1536_small
What to do? What to do?
Small
Fans Should Buy the A's
Reg3_small
Tom Milone's Nickname

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Sb_nation1_small ahhall

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late