Has Kevin Kouzmanoff Worn Out His Welcome?
Marc Lancaster of fanhouse.com reports that the Athletics have signed FA relief pitcher and noted Australian Grant Balfour to a 2-year, $8.1 million deal -- with a club option for 2013 -- pending a physical in Oakland on Monday. This gives the A's another proven arm in the 'pen, as well as giving them the two most relevantly-named pitchers in MLB, Balfour & Outman. Balfour was 2-1 with a 2.28 ERA for the AL East champion Tampa Rays in 2010... let's hear your opinions of this signing in this JPShark fanpost right here. -EN
This week, I was asked to answer some questions for a Washington National's blog (you can view the interview here) and one of the questions asked made me take pause.
Has Kevin Kouzmanoff worn out his welcome?
I answered the question in a straightforward manner; Kouzmanoff replaced Chavez; (sadly) led the team in homeruns with sixteen, struggled overall on offense, but was ranked one of the best defenders in Major League baseball in 2010.
But I guess throughout all the excitement about a possible Beltre signing, I never really thought about how Kouzmanoff felt. Obviously, if the off-season was any indication, he has every right to feel like the A's exhausted every resource trying to sign a replacement third baseman, and when their efforts failed, they said, "Okay, we'll stick with Kouz." That's not exactly going to inspire confidence in anyone.
Kouzmanoff is probably feeling like he is playing the hot corner in Oakland because no one else will. And he's likely not wrong.
Jane Lee wrote a thorough piece on the Kouzmanoff story on MLB.com, so I'll just quote Kouzmanoff from the article:
There I am kind of sitting off to the side thinking, 'Where do I fit? Obviously, the A's don't really like me that much at third base if they're trying to get another third baseman.'
...
"I guess you can say I am a little surprised to be with the team right now because of the interest they showed in other third basemen," he said. "They got one third baseman, and then they tried to go out and get another one, so I feel like I'm kinda third in line now.
...
"I talked to my agent a few days ago, and he said everything is a go," Kouzmanoff said. "Billy Beane said things will be fine and we'll go through the arbitration process. We're going to be friendly about it and get on with the season."
Kouzmanoff joins Craig Breslow, Dallas Braden, Brad Ziegler, Josh Willingham, and Conor Jackson as the six players that have to settle with the A's before the start of the 2011 season. Joey Devine and Ryan Sweeney avoided arbitration by both signing contracts with the A's last year.
The A's are notorious for avoiding arbitration hearings, and all six players are expected to reach an agreement with the A's in the next month.
Professional player or not, I think the off-season action still has to sting for Kevin Kouzmanoff. It's nothing personal; just the business of baseball, but his 2010 offensive season is bound to be a reason why the A's were looking elsewhere. Although he led the club in homeruns, sixteen is nothing to write home about (unless you are Ryan Sweeney) and Kouzmanoff's abysmal .687 OPS is probably what most of us remember.
That being said, it would be hard to find anyone, including Eric Chavez himself, who could have played better defense at 3rd than Kouz did last season. But the A's are clearly hurting for power, and if Kouzmanoff wants to endear himself to the A's front office and the fans, he is going to have to put up better numbers than he did last year.
66 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice Guy, Need Better Stick
I like Kevin Kouzmanoff, I think he is a good guy and obviously hope he does way better than he did last year. Having lived in Buffalo, NY for a while I saw Kouz when he was with the Bisons and Tribe and he was a good consistent hitter, but at the level he’s at now where he is a MLB starter on a playoff contending team he can’t keep swinging at everything and walking so little. Jane Lee talked to Kouz about the deal on the A’s website and he felt like garbage about Oakland going after Beltre so hopefully that lights a fire under him. I still think though we should be looking for an upgrade (not sure who…)
Visit my blog the Todd Van Poppel Rookie Card Retirement Plan at tvprookiecardretirementplan.wordpress.com !
upgrade at 3rd
Yes, A’s definitely need to upgrade at that position. I think perhaps that upgrade could be Kouz himself. If he is the type player I think he is, he will be pissed, and he will want to prove Billy wrong. I think we will see improvement across the board. fingers crossed!
slide! jeremy slide!
Good Attitude, Better 2011
I don’t care if it’s your parents, a girlfriend or your employer, having someone actively try and replace you has got to sting. In the Lee article he’s at least saying all the right things. He’s got no delusions that 2010 was a good year offensively. He does seem to be heading in to 2011 motivated to improve. Also, a little “I’ll show them” never hurts.
I think Kouz also, maybe more than anyone else, benefits for the off-season additions. Not only does he get to slide down to a more reasonable spot in the order but he’ll no longer have the pressure of being “the heart” of the lineup. When I watched him at the plate last year I saw a guy trying to do too much. With a bit more lumber ahead of him, I think we’ll see a guy who doesn’t have to carry the burden of this offense and I fully expect offensive improvements across the board.
Plus the guy just has a great name for baseball.
He's said it himself
He feels crappy about it but he knows that this is business and that he has very little negotiating leverage over the next two years. If he turns in two respectful seasons and no one in the Athletics farm system or in the free agent market can adequately replace him, he’s likely to give the organization the cold shoulder…and it will be just business.
"It boils down to this. You guys aren’t fans of our management and look through that prism." ~ DrDoom
He shouldn't take it personal
Beltre is better than a lot of players. I don’t think it’s as much of a lack of confidence in Kouz, I think it’s a LOT of confidence in Beltre. Ultimately the fact that they didn’t overpay for Beltre was because they had confidence in Kouz.
And of course there were other 3rd basemen names through around, but I don’t think it’s that big of a deal. They offered him arbitration because they wanted him around. And I think they knew he was the back up option. But a back up option to some pretty good players.
Ultimately they attempted to replace him with one of the best. You can’t get offended. Move on and have a good year.
by OnlybuyBeaneJerseys on Jan 14, 2011 6:56 AM PST reply actions
Almost every 3rd basemen in the league
Would wisely be replaced by Beltre. So no need for any ego problems.
by OnlybuyBeaneJerseys on Jan 14, 2011 7:04 AM PST reply actions
Yeah, and his thought that they got Encarnacion to replace him makes no sense to me
Since they didn’t keep E5, and they did keep Kouz.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Jan 14, 2011 7:16 AM PST up reply actions
I read that as if he was musing about "at the time" of E5 coming aboard. and not after he was cut loose.
I took it that Kouz was thinking about what a good year he had defensively. It seemed that the A’s were going after E5’s bat, while ignoring his fielding. Almost as if were a shift away from the defensive strength of ’10.
I never really considered E5 as the starting 3bman myself,
I just thought of him as a backup 4C/DH guy; he’d probably get 400 at bats, but he wouldn’t be first on the depth chart anywhere unless there were injuries and/or he really came flying out of the gates.
by Rebuilding Season on Jan 14, 2011 9:32 AM PST up reply actions
He is a stopgap to someone -- maybe Green. His welcome isn't worn out yet, but maybe by 2012.
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
I thought I read "Geren will wear out his welcome by 2012", and got excited for a minute...
by asfansince1989 on Jan 14, 2011 10:23 AM PST up reply actions
Geren Wore Out His Welcome Before He Even Started Managing Us
And yet he’s still here.
Kouz, on the other hand, is still welcome in Oakland. Unless, of course, he doesn’t hit, gets injured, etc. etc.
by Billy Ray Williams on Jan 14, 2011 10:09 PM PST up reply actions
No he hasn't
and maybe with better hitters in the lineup (Willingham, Dejesus), we’ll get some better numbers from Kouz. I like the guy.
Don't forget about...
Chop Suey
When its time to shoot, shoot... don't talk
by Charlie O the Mule on Jan 15, 2011 6:56 AM PST up reply actions
Hope He Has A Better 2011
2010 was definitely a down year for Kouz (pretty obvious), perhaps because he had to adjust to a whole new league.
However, he didn’t receive much lineup protection at all. I don’t think Kouz is a number 4 hitter, probably 5 or 6. This year, he should be in those spots in the lineup, with Matsui batting cleanup and Willingham batting either before or after him.
I think Kouz is a good hitter and a great fielder, and that 2010 was just a fluke.
by Billy Ray Williams on Jan 14, 2011 8:42 AM PST reply actions
Do the A's believe in lineup protection?
Batting down in the order will hopefully help Kouz mentally, but I wonder how many pro batters still believe in lineup protection. I’d like to think protection still matters, but sabermetric study after sabermetric study continually debunks that bit of conventional wisdom.
I have no doubt that many, many hitters believe in it
Many hitters believe that wearing weird clothing, not shaving, or putting greasy substances on their headgear makes them hit better.
Baseball players (especially hitters) are not a population selected for intelligence; if anything, the opposite might be true.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
He looks like a poor man's Cliff Lee
"You ain't got nothin to say, it was perfect" -Dallas Braden, 05/09/10
hell hath no fury like a Cowboys fan scorned. -Leopold Bloom
by MissOakland on Jan 14, 2011 10:48 AM PST up reply actions
He didn't have a terrible year
His 2.9 WAR was a career best actually. His WARs of 2.5, 2.7, and 2.7 from ‘07-’09 were more offensive based though, so if he continues the stellar D and pumps up the offense to his career average he could have a big year.
FWIW I do not like this post title, its too tabloid-y
Big deal Kouz said some things about watching the team he plays for try and get players that play his position. He knows his offensive numbers were not good, and never said “screw this team” (didnt Harden do that?). Seeing how lopsided the poll is, its clear AN doesnt agree with OP either.
ditto
‘worn out welcome’ makes it a question if the FANS think he’s 3 day old fish.
If you look, that was the question she was asked by the Nationals blog.
I think she just didn’t know how to answer that question and thus posed the same question to us.
by Billy Frijoles on Jan 14, 2011 10:49 AM PST up reply actions
Thanks Billy Frijoles...
that’s exactly it. I answered the question, but wasn’t sure if I really did, so I was wondering what others thought.
And PL78, if you read my response, I CERTAINLY do not think Kouz has worn out his welcome. Far from it.
"Oh who am I kidding? The A's and Giants could stage a pillow fight, and I'd still care who wins." -67Marquez
by baseballgirl on Jan 14, 2011 4:40 PM PST up reply actions
Plus, it's somewhat open to interpretation
It could pertain to Kouz possibly wearing out his welcome with the front office (because they went searching for new third basemen) or with those of us who read the blog (evidenced, perhaps, with everyone being hot for Beltré). The only post titles I could actually see objecting to are the ones that are a mixture of baseless and misleading. We generally see these in the FanPost section: “PUJOLS TO A’S?!?!,” with the body reading “whut do u think it wuld take to get him?”
I love green because money be green.
I'm fine with Kouz
Yes, I wanted Beltre for all the reasons mentioned above, but by no means do I think we’re at a black hole at 3B. Kouz can be counted on (at the very least) for above average defense and 15 home runs, and has the capability of doing better. It didn’t help him that we were relying on him to be our cleanup hitter for the first couple months before Jack Cust regained the team’s trust (and then lost it again.) With the Matsui/Willingham signings, Kouz will probably be our 5 or 6 hitter, which will soften the blow a bit. 6 hole might suit him quite well with his OBP deficiency.
by Rebuilding Season on Jan 14, 2011 9:37 AM PST reply actions
I still love The Kouz!
And you will never meet a friendlier guy on the team. He’s probably the coolest guy I talked to last year, with Ziggy coming in a close second. I really hope this Beltre fiasco lights a fire under his ass as well so he can play with a chip on his shoulder. I’m rooting for the guy, personally, and am hoping for a much better season in 2011. Go A’s!
"You're early, but hang around; we'll have a fight for you sooner or later."
-John "Blue Moon" Odom
by mrod on Jan 14, 2011 10:09 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
Kouz got screwed by the expectation and FA market
We paid him similar amount as we paid Crosby in his last 3 years with the A’s. If Crosby had put up Kouz’s number and played the number of games as Kouz had, Beane would be patting himself on the back for not having completely screwed up the Crosby contract.
I think Kouz is a good deal for the A’s if we didn’t expect better offense from him to start with. He also got screwed because Beltre was the most obvious “gettable” premier FA for the A’s, and the team has to at least try. At the end of the day, Beane is going to face the fact that what he got out of Kouz is pretty good for the money.
by asfansince1989 on Jan 14, 2011 10:21 AM PST reply actions
Hopefully Kouz can be rational about the great 3B hunt
As was discussed many times during the hot stove league, there just weren’t very many spots where we had an oppurtunity to make improvements to the lineup. In the outfield, we went from black holes in the line-up to above average talent. At third, we were hoping to go from average to elite talent. If more great outfielders had been on the market this year, we would certainly have spent the money there and Kouz would have been a stone-cold lock for 2011.
At least Kouz can count on one of the greatest player fan clubs having his back again in 2011.
It wasn't just 2010 that got the A's looking elsewhere for a new 3B...
heck, they even threw a ton of money at Beltre last off-season.
In fact, all told, over the past two offseasons, they’ve reportedly offered Beltre a total of over $100 million in guaranteed money in the form of two separate contract offers ($24 million in 2009, and $75 million+ this past offseason). They obviously just really like(d) Beltre and Kouz should recognize that.
I mean, would anyone criticize the A’s for pursuing Albert Pujols if he was within their price range even though they still have Daric Barton around? I think not…
Besides that…the guy’s ISO has declined EVERY YEAR he’s been in the majors. He doesn’t take walks, so his offensive value is entirely tied into hitting for power, and since he’d doing that less and less every year, he has become a worse and worse offensive player every year as a result. He’s not fleet of foot, so his defensive value is entirely based on his positioning/instincts and arm, and with a nearly 30-year old guy with some recent back problems, I’m guessing he won’t be getting better defensively either.
He’s ok for now, but I would love to see one of two things happen at the midpoint this season if the A’s are seriously in the hunt for the division:
1) A’s trade for David Wright or another available 3B, or
2) Parker or Cardenas mash in the minors in the 1st half and prove they can handle 3B defensively at the highest level.
I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!
Perspectives...
Worn out his welcome? No.
Team was looking for a better option? Yes.
Does he feel slighted by the search? Yes, and I cannot blame him. He’s human. Of course, he does. Yes, he knows… and has acknowledged… it’s business, but that’s the kind of thing that people need to constantly remind themselves of. It’s still not a good feeling.
"We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are."
~ Anais Nin
Not such a big deal.
Yes, the A’s did make an offer on Beltre both this year and last. But I think that’s been terribly exaggerated here on AN, where the ten billion Beltre posts have us acting like we already went and signed the guy twice and had him stolen away from us both times.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
dont blame kouz for the lack of power
blame the A’s for not getting anything done for a new stadium. time and time again there is a plan but nothing is really getting done. there is no new stadium unless there is construction going on.
Haters Gonna Hate
Uh....
"You ain't got nothin to say, it was perfect" -Dallas Braden, 05/09/10
hell hath no fury like a Cowboys fan scorned. -Leopold Bloom
And Nothing Will Happen
We’re not going to have a new ballpark anytime soon. That much is clear. But you can’t necessarily blame the A’s. They’re stuck in a small, fairly unimportant city (no offense to anyone from Oakland), and so they have no other option.
I understand your frustration, though. Having your team struggle because of its stadium is no fun.
by Billy Ray Williams on Jan 14, 2011 10:14 PM PST up reply actions
"a small, fairly unimportant city"
And what, may I ask, is a city that meets your lofty criteria for “importance,” then? For my money, any city where hundreds of thousands of people struggle through the harsh realities of life to try to make their way in the world, often against long odds, is “important” enough for me.
Sometimes, the disparagement (sometimes bordering on naked contempt) for the city in which the team that is the focus of this blog plays just boggles my mind in a hundred ways, many of which I wouldn’t even detail in print here cuz it’d start a flame war to end all flame wars and that isn’t why we’re here.
Can we stop this? It happens again and again and to be honest it makes me wonder, if the city is so bad and sucks so very much, why do people root for the team? Why not root for a team that plays in a city you don’t feel such disgust for? I must be missing some central reality about all this that causes me to just not understand… perhaps I have gone senile in my old age.
Empires may crumble, FIP statistics may lose their meaning, but only a Keetsa mattress puts years back on your life while you're sleeping.
by emperor nobody on Jan 14, 2011 10:33 PM PST up reply actions
Sorry
For me, it’s the team that counts. But, if it’s a tender topic, I’ll leave it alone and just talk baseball.
Didn’t mean to offend anyone.
by Billy Ray Williams on Jan 14, 2011 10:42 PM PST up reply actions
if it's the team that counts
isn’t where the team calls home part of that equation? And in the case of this team, haven’t where the team plays and the conditions under which it operates created quite a lot of what there is to love about the team? They make movies about it, you know, about how the underdog small marketeers can get over on the big boys that play in more “important” places, through the use of innovation and alternative ideas about how to do it.
Empires may crumble, FIP statistics may lose their meaning, but only a Keetsa mattress puts years back on your life while you're sleeping.
by emperor nobody on Jan 14, 2011 11:05 PM PST up reply actions
and by the way of course your apology is very much accepted and appreciated
Sorry if I came on a little chuffy but the Oakland-negative stuff gets to me sometimes on here.
Empires may crumble, FIP statistics may lose their meaning, but only a Keetsa mattress puts years back on your life while you're sleeping.
by emperor nobody on Jan 14, 2011 11:25 PM PST up reply actions
It may not have been his intent...
… but I interpreted his original statement to mean that Oakland is unimportant to MLB because of its relatively small market size, and so they aren’t moving particularly fast to get this ridiculous situation solved (especially with reference to the Giants crying foul about territorial rights they didn’t even have ‘cept the A’s gave ’em to them). Put simply, I have a hard time believing Selig allow things to move so slowly were they taking place in New York.
I love green because money be green.
Claremont is a horrible, pointless little pimple of a town
… I still root for my college teams.
I can’t imagine more than an infinitesimal handful of people choose what team to root for based on the city it’s in. Root against, sure— I can see special dislike for a team from a place you hate— but choosing to actively follow a team just because you like a city? Can’t see it.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
I personally think kouz will rebound a bit after last year at the plate
but likely will regress defensively. he’s fine for another year or maybe two, but i’m hoping cardenas can come up and outplay him for his spot or something like that.
i also really like the balfour deal. not that much of a cost, and theres no such thing as too many bullpen arms. I think Beane realized that was one thing that hurt the A’s down the stretch last season(that along with just not quite enough power were the two real reasons we didn’t make the playoffs, and beane adressed both of those this offseason) so he went out and got some high risk/high reward guys as well as someone whos a bit more dependable in Balfour. thumbs up from me
www.kapayne.tumblr.com
I think even Kouz should be able to understand that the A's were't just tossing a line out there for any old 3B...
They were shooting for Beltre. Kouz should be like, “I get it. I try hard to produce at the plate every year, but that guy Beltre is a badass. I think I’m every bit as good as him on the field, but I also know the A’s are looking for chances to upgrade on offense. Not sure what the whole Encarnacion thing was about, but that’s all in the past. I’m stoked to be playing third for Oakland in the next two years.”
Or whatever. This armchair sure is comfortable.
Take your silver mod tubescreamer, your dr. z, your nocaster, put them in a pile and burn them. if god gave you a thousand years, you still couldn't touch this. you can't f***ing keep time to this.
I'm willing to give Kouz a pass on last season
If he’s still sporting a crappy OBP by the All Star break, that’ll be another story.
He kinda always sports a crappy OBP
You should probably amend that to, “If he’s still slugging under .440 (or whatever) by the ASB…”
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Yeah, you're right.
I still have faith that he’ll turn the corner and at the very least be better than replacement. That faith is probably misplaced, but pitchers and catchers haven’t even reported yet, so all I have at the moment is faith.
The Kouzzzz
I think he will have a better season based first and foremost on the improved lineup. He needs to raise that batting average, no doubt….
But I’d be happy with .260-.270, 20-25 HRS, and 80-85 RBI… I think those are reachable expectations from Kevin.
Also, I WOULD just like to mention, I do recall a user making his appearance on A’S NATION when the A’s were playing their final series of the season up in Seattle….He mentioned his avid readership of this great forum over the past years, and his highest praise to its most knowledgeable posters. He then outlined his hopes and his vision for the A’s 2010-11 off-season. He seemed like a smart and passionate A’s fan, and made some insightful and realistic predictions for the A’s upcoming off-season…But then I recall him being taunted in a manner that seemed better suited for ‘The Good Phight’ (Phillie’s Nation) or as if he was taking part in some banter better fit for a Fox News Show.
I believe he championed an off-season that would include the signing of a Top DH, an OF, and some pitching depth. (And while none of those quite happened, strides were made).
I recall that guy thinking that Dan Uggla could be had for a realistic package of Mark Ellis, VIn Mazarro, Jemile Weeks, and Paul Smyth. Then, the Atlanta Braves got Uggla for the small price of Omar Infante (yes, the Omar Infante who has a total of 45 HR in his 9 year career) and Michael Dunn. HMMM
He then mentioned trade targets of David DeJesus, Nate McClouth, Alex Gordon, Colby Rasmus, and Josh Willingham….
Well, the A’s landed both DeJesus and Willingham.
He also went on to predict that the A’s had money to spend, and would shock people with the money that they’d be willing to spend on an aging and overrated Adrian Beltre and a pitcher…who ended up being Hisashi Iwakuma. The A’s didn’t end up spending the cash, but they attempted to. And thank Morgan (God) Freeman that they didn’t spend that money on Beltre..
And now, with the signing of Grant Bal(Two, Strike Three)four, for the services of two years at 8.1 Million, it is safe to say the A’s had a decent offseason.
Other welcomed additions of Rich Harden, Brandon McCarthy, and Hideki Matsui.
I like what that kid prophesied, his knowledge and vision wasn’t far off.
Yet, here we stand. A solid rotation, great bullpen depth, and an improved lineup.
I’m very excited for the 2011 Season! I wish we could have landed a bat with more realistic power expectations then Matsui, but besides that I’m happy.
I think that Barton and Suzuki will have great seasons, and that (IF HEALTHY) CoCo could repeat his stellar play from the end of last season, and our OF will play some great ball.
Can’t wait for the season!
Glad to be on A’s Nation.
RIP Brett Favre. RIP Yao Ming. RIP Trevor Hoffman. RIP LeBron’s Twitter Account.
My mannerism a prism/ And it should shine
Light it if you would/ Be so kind, right now'd
Be A' Good Time
by DaRubiesSLOKingsA's on Jan 14, 2011 9:06 PM PST reply actions
I have a question. Without looking at stats, what do you think of Brandon Inge as a 3rd baseman?
The reason I ask, is I get the impression that Brandon is considered an “offense-based” 3rd baseman, with below average fielding skills. His 2010 hitting stats are almost identical to Kouz’, with Kouz having a MUCH better glove. And Kouz costs about 1/2 the payroll. In my limited understanding of stats, Kouz seems to be at the top of the second-tier 3rd basemen in the AL. There is a HUGE drop off from the 1st tier , to the second tier. Unless we make the huge jump in salary( which BB tried to do with Beltre), Kouz is the BEST option for the position. I really like going into 2011 with him anchoring the left side of the infield. I would be just as happy signing Kouz to the same salary,( about $5-6M), that the Tigers are paying Brandon, just for the better glove. And I’m not even including the advantage of his awesome chant. KOOOOOOUUUUUZ!
Brandon is considered "offense-based" in the same sense that Jack Cust is considered "defense-based"
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 15, 2011 10:28 AM PST up reply actions
Actually...
Inge is considered to be just the opposite…
"Some field has fences, and sometime, the field cant hold a player, but most of the time, a field cant hold Domingo"
www.domingobeisbol.com/Domingo/Home.html
Kouzz is the best option at 3rd
The only ones Id rather have are the obvious ones:
Evan Longoria
Alex Rodriguez
Ryan Zimmerman
David Wright
Michael Young
Jose Bautista
Aramis Ramirez
and maybe…………………………….Adrian Beltre
My mannerism a prism/ And it should shine
Light it if you would/ Be so kind, right now'd
Be A' Good Time
by DaRubiesSLOKingsA's on Jan 15, 2011 12:03 PM PST reply actions
But in that list, only Longoria, A-Rod, Bautista, Young, and Beltre play in the AL.
Young may be better offensively than Kouz, but not when you include his defense. I would also question Bautista , given that 2010 was his only good offensive year. That leaves Kouz as the #4-5 best in the AL. None of the ones better are even close to being available.
I agree
Wow, it is shocking to come to that realization…..But THE KOUZZZ may just well be one of the Top 5 (all around) 3B in the AL…..and with our improved lineup this year he won’t have as much pressure on him, and will surely have more RBI and run scoring opportunities.
I think he will have a nice year.
My mannerism a prism/ And it should shine
Light it if you would/ Be so kind, right now'd
Be A' Good Time
by DaRubiesSLOKingsA's on Jan 15, 2011 12:30 PM PST up reply actions
@BBG
Nice job on the Nats blogger interview. Your summary of Chavez’s last few years was elegant.
"...in baseball you wear a cap." -- george carlin
Awww...thanks!
"Oh who am I kidding? The A's and Giants could stage a pillow fight, and I'd still care who wins." -67Marquez
by baseballgirl on Jan 17, 2011 2:31 PM PST up reply actions
I think you are confused as to the title of your post
it should have been something along the lines of :
“Have the A’s made Kevin Kouzmanoff feel like last year’s model (without doing jackshit serious about third base, i.e. any friggin’ moron could have told them Beltre wouldn’t sign with the A’s in a million years)”.

by 





























