How Can We Keep Kurt Fresh?
Games Played
2007: 68
2008: 148
2009: 147
2010: 131
There's really no way to sugarcoat it—Kurt Suzuki is only 26, and he's caught the most innings out of any catcher not named Jason Kendall in the last three years. And, unfortunately, it looks like his body may have just caught up with the huge workload. Conventional wisdom states that catching is something that can't be a full-time job, because of the strain catching puts on the body. And while I've never been one to stick by conventional wisdom, I don't see much downside by following it in this case. Kurt's bat, while good, isn't exactly a Joe Mauer-caliber force that will be sorely missed on the days he sits.
So what are the options, assuming that trotting Kurt out there for 140+ games again isn't an acceptable plan?
wOBA
2007: .322
2008: .320
2009: .321
2010: .296
The way I see it, the A's have one choice. They need to permanently assign the backup catcher, Landon Powell, to Dallas Braden.
Landon and Dallas were both drafted by the A's in 2004, and spent significant amounts of time working with each other in the minors. It's a small sample size (84 innings), but Braden's career OPS Against when working with Powell is 39% better than his total numbers. And, oh, there was that little thing about the perfect game. Braden and Powell seem to work well with each other, and Kurt Suzuki would be better served by having a regular day of rest.
Percentage of Flyballs That Are Pop-ups
2007: 6.3%
2008: 8.5%
2009: 9.6%
2010: 20.2%
Are there any other options? Is the injury risk overblown? And what about Josh Donaldson? The AN community has got to have some answers.
132 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
my first reaction when i saw the post
who’s Kurt Fresh? i look forward to reading this!
www.kapayne.tumblr.com
Kurt Fresh
Is the brother of Doug E. Fresh. He’s on in 6 minutes.
Let's play two.
ziploc?
I have abandonment issues. Thanks Lew.
by OptimistPrime on Jan 11, 2011 10:41 AM PST up reply actions
Wrap him in wax paper and then put him in a ziploc bag.
No wait…that’s how you keep cheese fresh, not Kurt.
There is no "i" in Teamocil. At least not where you'd think.
by GreenNGoldSooner on Jan 11, 2011 7:08 PM PST up reply actions
You were thinking of Kurt Rondele-Gouda
Happens all the time.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
I'll pass
Talk to me when we have Slick Rick on board
The personal catcher idea might not be a bad one
But, really, the answer should be as simple as “don’t have him play in 45 games in June and July.”
I’m not worried about Kurt getting hurt as much as I’m worried about him wearing down. And, like you said, his offense isn’t so good that he has to be in the lineup every day. If the A’s really do want his bat in the lineup, give him off days from catching against lefties and let him DH on those days.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Jan 11, 2011 7:16 AM PST reply actions
"offense isn’t so good"
on a team with good offensive production maybe. But the unfortunate situation is the A’s DID need his bat in the line up everyday for the last 2 years. maybe the recent additions will alleviate that situation.
Suzuki was likely the team's worst offensive regular last year
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Jan 11, 2011 11:50 AM PST up reply actions
but is there a reason?
such as, he played too many games, was often batting 3rd, 4th and had no protection in the line up around him.
Well, even ignoring the down year, his bat is just average at best.
Which is good for a catcher, but generally, it’s…just average.
And Powell isn't that much of a slouch
by jeffro on Jan 11, 2011 3:24 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Kouz.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Jan 11, 2011 1:59 PM PST up reply actions
Great write up Dan
Fosse in his color commentary has many times mentioned how Kendell indoctrinated Kurt with the notion of not giving your job away and catch every game possible. I hope Powell/Donaldson can get some playing time so we don’t run Kurt into the ground.
if the numbers don't lie
then the answer is that he should be catching 147-148 games, not 131. There was a clear and obvious direct correlation to his reduced workload and reduced value at the plate.
/sarcasm
Incidently, if Powell started all of Braden’s starts last year, that would left 132 games for Suzuki to start. How many times did Suzuki start more than 6 games in a row last year, anyway?
Nick Swisher is handsome.
You can check his gamelogs on baseball-reference.com
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
Going by br.com game logs
I’m going to do days, not games, because I’d have to look up off days for the team to see if Kurt was given a day off or if the team was off. Anyway, a day off is a day off, so let’s go 6+ days of playing:
6 days in a row: 3
7 days in a row: 1
8 days in a row: 1
11 days in a row: 1 (then he promptly didn’t play for 4 days)
12 days in a row: 1
15 days in a row: 1 (this was 14 starts, 13 of them at catcher)
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Jan 11, 2011 9:44 AM PST up reply actions
I do recall thinking he was tired at times, last year.
Isn’t fatigue one of those things that causes a player to drop his shoulders and end up hitting more pop-ups? I’m no hitting coach, it just seems like something I’ve read somewhere.
15 days in a row: 1 (this was 14 starts, 13 of them at catcher)
Aside from the other streaks, that’s just stupid. 15 days in a row is upsetting, even if any one of them was a pinch-hit appearance.
I like the idea of having Braden throw to Powell. That’d force Zookz to sit fairly regularly.
Nick Swisher is handsome.
The thing about popups makes sense, and anecdotally, I can say it's true
Just from hitting in a cage, I know that if I take too many swings that’s what happens.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Jan 11, 2011 11:51 AM PST up reply actions
Put him in Tupperware and refrigerate him
Should keep him fresh for at least a week.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
More than jus Kurt
Geren always uses his hitters. All players on the team should get 1 day off a week especialy after long travel days. Geren only rested certain players but others played until they could barely walk and knows if they complain they might get bucked to the bench. Powell as the personal catcher thing would be a great start. Pennignton should sit against lefties once a week and go easy on Ellis once a week too. A slow bat swing is the first signs of a tired player.
Geren only rests his players...
…when they’re seeing the ball well.
I'm in favor of hot streaks. It's the cold streaks I don't like.
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:11 AM PST up reply actions
I appreciate him wanting to catch every day
but a manager has got to sit him despite his protesting. Watching almost every day it seems that he plays tired through the dog days of the season. It looks like he’s trying to keep up a brave front and play through the fatigue, but it’s not doing the team any real good, except perhaps as an example of hustle and drive. There were, it was apparent to me, long spells where he was an automatic out. Don’t get me wrong—there are very few catchers in the league (either league for that matter) that I would rather have playing for the A’s. I would love to see him start no more than ten games over any two week period. If his bat is hot, keep him in the lineup as DH against lefties (or righties too if Matsui is scuffling). If not, sit him down and tell him you’re doing what’s best for him and for the team. My guess is that he’d accept that even if he didn’t particularly like it. By the way, increased playing time for either Powell or Donaldson can’t help but make them better.
Play Landon, Josh, or Anthony
Stop trotting Kurt out there every single game even if he gets upset that he’s not starting.
I wouldn't mind Josh
taking some starts also. Kurt can catch the say, Trevor, Brett and Gio. Landon has Dallas. Josh can have the winner or the #5 spot
"You ain't got nothin to say, it was perfect" -Dallas Braden, 05/09/10
Eric Chavez smiled at me once and I got pregnant -Jennifer
by MissOakland on Jan 11, 2011 11:16 AM PST up reply actions
Willingham has played a total of 15 games at C in the bigs
Playing 2 games in 2006 was the last time.
I don’t understand why people suddenly want to slot Willingham or Barton at Catcher just because they have played the position in the last 5 years. It could have an even more negative effect, IMO.
Therefore, if we don’t think Powell can cut it, non tender him before ST, call Donaldson the 2nd Catcher and there ya go.
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 11:31 AM PST up reply actions
I assume she means Josh Donaldson
by Rebuilding Season on Jan 11, 2011 11:41 AM PST up reply actions
Definitely meant Josh Donaldson
In no way do I want Barton or Willingham at catcher
"You ain't got nothin to say, it was perfect" -Dallas Braden, 05/09/10
Eric Chavez smiled at me once and I got pregnant -Jennifer
by MissOakland on Jan 11, 2011 12:29 PM PST up reply actions
it'll be hard to find room on the 25 man roster
for Suzuki, Powell, and Donaldson. Unless you think that Donaldson can be a backup infielder as well, but I would definitely prefer Rosales in that role (or Sogard even).
Well damn, I'm an idiot
But it was more a reaction to others who were thinking we should make Willingham or Barton an emergency/ 3rd Catcher…
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 1:20 PM PST up reply actions
Lol
if I wanted anybody at catcher that is not a catcher I would hope someone would correct me. Barton can catch when there is a 20 inning blow out and there is nobody left, other than that no thank you.
"You ain't got nothin to say, it was perfect" -Dallas Braden, 05/09/10
Eric Chavez smiled at me once and I got pregnant -Jennifer
You mean if some team scores 12 runs in the top of the 20th?
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:12 AM PST up reply actions
Yeah.
I do that all the time. Type without actually thinking of how something couldn’t happen in a game
"You ain't got nothin to say, it was perfect" -Dallas Braden, 05/09/10
Eric Chavez smiled at me once and I got pregnant -Jennifer
by MissOakland on Jan 12, 2011 11:10 AM PST up reply actions
Sign Bengie Molina to back up
who cares if he’s slow. He’s good with the pitchers and he can come off the bench to pinch hit too.
by What Would Rickey Do on Jan 11, 2011 8:52 AM PST reply actions
But he's a terrible hitter
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:12 AM PST up reply actions
Whata u smokin Benjie Lover?!
Whata u Smokin, Bengie is over- the – hill!!!
OT: Olney
Heard this: Chad Qualls is looking for a one-year deal, looking to re-establish valuebefore going back out on the market.
1-year/$1.5 million?
Qualls has had one bad year, really.
I’d rather Qualls because I think they’ll put up about equal production, and Qualls will take one year and, likely, less money per year.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Jan 11, 2011 9:45 AM PST up reply actions
but but
Balfour’s an aussie!
!#%&$#@&%&% antioxidants! - pam
needs moar bacon
by cuppingmaster on Jan 11, 2011 1:27 PM PST up reply actions
Yay!
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:14 AM PST up reply actions
you don;t think about international diplomacy?
I am only pretty on the outside
dannycakes can also be called "hipsterbot"
Just can't get behind the idea of a pitcher with the name Balfour
Maybe Strickthree but not Balfour.
Admittedly, I have not looked at any numbers and am strictly going off name.
I like a lot
Like I’ve said before, don’t write him off for one bad year.
He was one of the best relievers in baseball for 3 years in a row while playing in Hitters’ Parks…
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 10:55 AM PST up reply actions
Can't. Stand. The. Suspense.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Jan 11, 2011 1:50 PM PST up reply actions
per Goldstein
Could, but defense has to improve. RT @rdgoldber: @Kevin_Goldstein Do you think that Parker could end up as the A’s 3B, long-term?
Start Parker at AA this year and hope he can make it up to AAA at the end of the year.
Interesting
I’ll have to make an early trip to ST this year and hopefully get a chance or 2 to see his defense…
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 10:56 AM PST up reply actions
Sickels had some questions about his D, too.
And he watched him in the AFL, so it’s not all based on reports.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Jan 11, 2011 11:56 AM PST up reply actions
Not that Goldstein's comments are only on reports. Didn't mean to imply that. I have no idea if Goldstein has watched him play D.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Jan 11, 2011 11:56 AM PST up reply actions
I'd prefer he based his comments on reports than giving us his personal opinion
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:15 AM PST up reply actions
In years past
The A’s often carried three catchers, but they could also play other positions. Gene Tenace, Jeff Newman played a lot of first base. My feeling is spread it around, Powell and, I know this will provoke some anger. Stick Barton back there when necessary. I really gets to me when Geren DH’s one of the catchers. If he has to come in on defense, there goes the DH.
Stomp,em, stomp the piss out of em.Then pound the budweiser after the game. Joe Schultz Seattle Piolts Mgr 1969
If Phil Nevin can do it, Daric can do it!
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:15 AM PST up reply actions
Willingham has caught in the majors
He’d be the #3 catcher, I think.
I'd rather not risk anything by putting Barton there...
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 10:56 AM PST up reply actions
Barton and Willingham are only emergency catchers
If Zook leaves for a pinch runner and Landon gets hurt or something wacky like that.
by Rebuilding Season on Jan 11, 2011 11:44 AM PST up reply actions
Yesterday
"You ain't got nothin to say, it was perfect" -Dallas Braden, 05/09/10
Eric Chavez smiled at me once and I got pregnant -Jennifer
by MissOakland on Jan 11, 2011 12:30 PM PST up reply actions
I think the Braden/Powell Battery is a perfect idea
wish that Oakland’s manager had ideas that good. fire Geren.
We could...play him less?
"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime
Intriguing thought. I like it.
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:16 AM PST up reply actions
Another aspect to look at...
I haven’t crunched the numbers, but would combining a better Suzuki and 125 games with an inferior catcher be better than a better Suzuki with 145 games and only 17 games caught by an inferior catcher?
In other words, we can’t just look at Suzuki’s numbers here.
I don’t know the answer to my question… but let’s discuss.
Let me furthr clarify this:
Which is better:
Suzuki – 125 games played – .750 OPS
Powell/Donaldson – 37 games played – .650 OPS
OR
Suzuki – 145 games played – .675 OPS
Powell/Donaldson – 17 games played – .650 OPS
I guess it all depends on how you view Powell and Donaldson.
Of course this analysis also doesn’t take defense into account.
by Brett Narloch on Jan 11, 2011 11:10 AM PST up reply actions
I believe Donaldson is better than that
I’m in favor of letting Donaldson catch ~50 games with a few starts at 1st and other PAs here and there to give him around 300 or so…
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 11:34 AM PST up reply actions
I think Powell is better than that, too.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Jan 11, 2011 11:53 AM PST up reply actions
ok, but
I can’t see any reason bench Barton for Donaldson more than a twice a month, if that.
I am only pretty on the outside
dannycakes can also be called "hipsterbot"
I agree
I’m not advocating putting Donaldson out there in favor of Barton or anything.
More having him out at 1st for starts maybe 10 times a year, 50 starts at C and then PHing or late inning replacement the rest of the time…
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 1:22 PM PST up reply actions
There's no point in having Suzuki out there b/c he's a "better hitter"
if he’s putting up the same slash line as Powell/Donaldson. He may be more talented than either as a hitter, but if he’s tired, then his performance is the same. Stick with Braden having a personal catcher.
"Today, I am the greatest of all time" - Rickey Henderson
Minor League Rankings
http://redsminorleagues.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/sickelsfarmrankings4.gif
Don’t know if anyone has seen this. Pretty interesting.
There is a write up from Neyer on ESPN
Just to be clear
This is Sickels’ graphic, not Neyer’s.
I know that isn’t what you meant, but I just want to give credit where it’s due…
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 1:23 PM PST up reply actions
Wow, the Royals with 3 A level hitters and 5 B+ Pitchers
""Expelliarmus!" said Eckstein, attempting to knock the bat out of Matt Kemp's hands, just before Kemp laced a single to center." -Ken Tremendous
I know, right?
I’m really rooting for them to turn things around.
Not that I have a vested interest, I would just like to see them turn this thing around…
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 7:16 PM PST up reply actions
it'd be fun for a few years
like the Rays without the Yankees and red sox
I am only pretty on the outside
dannycakes can also be called "hipsterbot"
You are talking about the big club right?
I am only pretty on the outside
dannycakes can also be called "hipsterbot"
Uhh their farm according to the Sickels ratings
""Expelliarmus!" said Eckstein, attempting to knock the bat out of Matt Kemp's hands, just before Kemp laced a single to center." -Ken Tremendous
What's REALY interesting in this graph is that it's not the position players that are dragging it down
We on AN constantly complain that the A’s can’t develop hitters, just pitchers, but now the farm system has the lowest grade of all teams in farm pitching prospects!
For position players, our grade comes out 12th best. Pitching? 32nd. And the Rays will be back in contention again soon, also- even before they get their picks from the FA’s they’ve lost this year, right?
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Jan 12, 2011 1:08 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, 32 out of 30 is pretty bad
""Expelliarmus!" said Eckstein, attempting to knock the bat out of Matt Kemp's hands, just before Kemp laced a single to center." -Ken Tremendous
Landon being a personal catcher is a great idea
Hell of a lot better than just rolling Suzuki out there everyday and seeing his tired ass pop up 20% of the time. Plus, I really don’t see any other solutions: Geren isn’t going to play him less (and I don’t think Suzuki wants to play less), I tend to think Donaldson is off in a trade sooner rather than later, and Recker is still not there defensively from what I understand.
So yeah. That or frequent DL trips.
!#%&$#@&%&% antioxidants! - pam
needs moar bacon
Every idea in this thread is already better than what the A's have been doing with Suzuki.
Including the Tupperware one.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
I like the personal catcher for braden
puttin in Powell during Braden starts,may give Suzuki an extra day off a week depending on the schedule.Up in Seattle Felix Rodriguez has Rob Johnson be his personall catcher.So it can work for the A’s.This also give you the ability to DH Suzuki against lefties and give Matsui time off the he WILL need.
Elephants on Parade
I know this is a bit off topic...
But you all got me thinking about our lineup (if the season were to begin today) and I think we still need to make one change. For the life of me, I cannot understand why Conor Jackson is slotted to be our fifth outfielder. There are currently 2 players on the bench whom I feel are significant offensive downgrades behind the starters: Jackson and Powell. A backup catcher is a necessity, however a fifth outfielder is not. I understand that trying to find an injured outfielder on the A’s is like trying to find hay in a haystack, but let’s move past that. We can always bring up Carter if someone goes on the DL. Why don’t we put that bench spot to use. We can sign another veteran bat to share time at DH with Matsui. They can get 2-3 starts per week at DH, and pinch hit in close games. If someone goes down in the field, they would also have to be an emergency OF, 1B, or whatever, but that would be a very temporary solution. I think if we’re serious about winning this year, this move makes sense. What say you?
To be perfectly frank, no
I don’t want to sign somebody and still pay Jackson’s salary. I think Conor Jackson is a perfectly fine 25th man. He’s two injury plagued seasons removed from 3 consecutive 800+ OPS seasons, and I think he could get back there if he could stay healthy. It’s not like we’re relying on Chavez to be our 3rd baseman on opening day; we’re saving a roster spot for a guy who could become the best hitter on the team if he returned to form.
by Rebuilding Season on Jan 11, 2011 3:13 PM PST up reply actions
I find it interesting how much fans concern themselves with payroll...
especially when owed on short term deals. If a team has money to burn—and the contract does not have the possibility of financially handicapping the team— fans have no reason to worry about it.
For Jackson to produce the year severals things have to go his way. A spots needs to develop for him to receive playing time, he needs to stay healthy, and he needs to “return to form”.
Sorry about replying twice, but formatting when posting on an iPhone is strange.
I just don’t see it happening for Jackson. As the fifth outfielder he will not see much playing time anyways. I think a proven hitter will find atbats. Just my opinion though.
Why not be concerned with payroll?
All I ever hear from sportswriters is how much fans don’t know. I heard Kevin Goldstein on a recent podcast say that he hates mock trade proposals because fans just assume “we can go and get a guy.” i.e. Yankees fans asking “Why don’t we just go and get Felix Hernandez?” I, personally, don’t want to feel like I’m missing something, so I try to take everything into account when evaluating the team.
The fact is we have Conor Jackson for now; Beane offered him arbitration. We could go to arbitration and then cut him pre spring training to owe him a smaller amount, but I’d rather just spend the money on the guy we have than take a flier on somewhere else. Is it really worth spending 6 million on a Vlad type guy who we’ll have trouble finding PA for anyway? Why can’t we just save that money for next year, for the draft, or put it towards finding a new stadium?
If we’re going to take a flier on a guy, I think Conor Jackson has just as much upside as any random 1 million/year guy you could find.
by Rebuilding Season on Jan 11, 2011 3:44 PM PST up reply actions
If by spending the money we are losing out on something else, then I agree.
But if we can have a better team by spending money that is burning a hole in our pockets, I don’t see a problem.
I do feel much better having Conor Jackson in a place that Fox and Patterson were last year.
The A's could cut Jackson in spring training and only be on the hook for about $500k
(assuming he’s signed for around $3 million). Considering that our other four OFers spent significant time on the DL last year and that the A’s were reduced to relying on Matts, I wouldn’t mind trying to upgrade Jackson’s spot. Branyan or Jones could fill in in the OF and spell Matsui or Barton if either is hurt. I’m guessing they’ll both sign for under $3mm, and if this is the case then it doesn’t really cost the A’s anything more than Jackson.
It depends on how high the A's are on Jackson.
Beane appears to have a slight man-crush on Jackson, so this is not something that I expect to happen. However Branyan and Jones—assuming you mean Andruw—are both perfect examples of who we could pursue to improve that last bench spot. They could do some damage with about 300 ABs next year.
They must have been high on something when they tendered him.
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:18 AM PST up reply actions
Cut Jackson. Sign Manny.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Jan 11, 2011 4:44 PM PST up reply actions
As 25th man?
Awesome!
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:18 AM PST up reply actions
I like this idea
I’m surprised it isn’t common practice already. Great post.
We all are
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:18 AM PST up reply actions
At what point does Donaldson take the backup spot from Powell?
Landon turns 29 this year, and sooner or later Billy is going to have to realize that he’s probably hit his ceiling. I don’t think Donaldson might end up being much better than Powell. In fact, they’re actually pretty similar. Seems kind of redundant to keep both around.
When Landon's injuries catch up to him again...
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 11, 2011 7:19 PM PST up reply actions
Are't we hoping for more from Donaldson?
I am only pretty on the outside
dannycakes can also be called "hipsterbot"
I'm not. I like Powell a lot more than Donaldson
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
by WaddellCanseco on Jan 12, 2011 12:19 AM PST up reply actions
I think his low BABIP from last year has turned some people off
But I don’t think he’ll make a habit of it…
All I can say about stats is…
SCOTT BROSIUS!!
by stranahanahan on Jan 12, 2011 9:31 AM PST up reply actions
Yeah, I really like Powell personally
but would prefer to see Donaldson win the backup C job and lend his RH bat as an occasional utility player elsewhere as needed. I think the A’s need to see what they have, and Donaldson just has more potential than Powell, due to age, health, and versatility.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Summer's Eve?
"You know, a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody's crazy."
-Charles Manson
KURT A'S CHICKEN MAUI WOWIE!!!
IT BE INETERSTING TO SEE THE #’S JUST HOW MANY GAMES/% OF THEM WERE WON WHEN MAUER WAS IN VS KURT IN-LINE-UP, GRANTED THE TWINS DO HAVE AN OVERALL BETTER “OFFENSE/HITTING” TEAM WHICH HELPS BUT W/ LESS PITCHIN!?
THE ONLY “BIG/BAD THING I DONT LIKE BOUT KURT” HE’S SOOO “SCARED/CHICKEN” TO STAND-IN N BLOCK/MAKE PLAYS @ HOME PLATE, AS HE ALMOST ALWAYS RUNS-UP OR SIDE-STEPS THE PLAY W/A SLOPPY TAG N MISSES THEM/RUNNERS WHO ADD-RUNS TO HIS “AVERAGE” DEFENSE/PLATE BLOCKING…WHY DOES HE DO THIS OR IS INSTRUCTED/ALLOWED TO BY THE COACHES??? BENCH, YOGI, SANTIAGO, RODRIGUES, KENDALL, CARTER NEVER DID THIS!?
Two words: Ray Fosse
"We've come a long way, and I'm not talking about Virginia Slims, either." - Art Howe
NOT RAY'S FAULT
GRANTED, RAY DIDNT OR SHOULDNT “MOST ALWAYS DODGE/SIDE-STEP RUNNERS BARRELING INTO HOME PLATE/HIM” LIKE SUZUKI HAS COME ACCUSTOMED TO DOING, BUT IN DEFENSE OF POOR RAYS CASE W/A CAREER-ENDING INJURY IT WAS MORE OF HIS “PROFESSIONAL PRIDE (HOW THE GAME IS/WAS SUPPOSE TO BE PLAYED) & A HOT-DOGGER/PLAYER” NAME PETE “MR HUSTLE?” ROSE THAT GOT CARRIED AWAY IN A “NO-COUNT ALL-STAR GAME” & A HARD-HEAD THAT ENDED IN RAY’S TRAGIC INJURY! RAY WAS THE BEST IF NOT ONE OF THE BEST CATCHERS THE A’S EVER HAD!!!
"FRESH"
Kurt tries to stay FRESH on his own by poping-up a lot, hitting into many double plays, letting the pitchers do the work/win games, side-stepping opposing-runners w/close plays @ home plate, and w/great pff-season R & R’s in Hawaii w/Saimin, Sashimi/Tataki Bowls, LocoMoco’s, KimChee Sandwiches, Mix Plates Lunches/Dinners, Shave-Ice, Malasada’s, Spam Musubi’s n lots of Beach/Surfin w/ da’ local girls!!!
Good Idea
Kurt has been overworked, and that showed this year. Landon Powell is a good solution to that problem, because not only should he be catcher in all of Braden’s starts (as mentioned, they work well together), but also get a game in here and there. Powell is a decent defensive catcher, he just needs to improve his offense.
If you look at Powell’s stats, it’s clear that he doesn’t swing the bat well. 2010 in particular was a terrible year for Powell at the plate. Pretty much all of his offensive stats went down. There doesn’t seem to be any clear solution, expect “get more hits”. And that’s not a good solution.
I f you look at Powell’s game-by-game log for 2010, you see that in the 35 games where Powell got an at-bat (he played in 41), he got at least one hit in 17 games. In 6 of those games, he had a multi-hit game. In 11, he had just one hit.
Now, what about those other 18 games? Well, in 4 of them, he went 0-for-3. In 5, he went 0-for-4. That leaves another 9 games where he either went 0-for-1 or 0-for-2.
In games where he got a hit, Powell went 24-for-50, adding up to a BA of just under .500. BUT, in the games where he was hitless, he went 0-for-62. The difference between games played where he was hitless (18) and those where he got a hit (17) was just 1 game, but 12 at-bats. That shows that Powell was hitless in games where he got more AB’s than in those in which he did get a hit. And that will definitely bring down your batting average.
Oh, and as for splits? Powell got nearly four times as many hits against righties than he did against lefties. He played 26 road games and just 12 home games. It would seem he was slightly better on the road than at home, until you see he struck out three times as any times than he did at home. Oh, and Powell struggled after the All-Star break, batting just .167.
Well, now that we’re at the end of that, what’s the solution? Simple. Be more patient (Powell saw over 100 fewer pitches than he did in 2009). Don’t get on top of the ball( too many groundouts, hitting the ball in the air gave Powell 8 more XBH in 2009 than in 2010, as well as 5 more HR’s). Those things, as well as minor adjustments to his splits, should improve Powell’s offensive stats. By following those things, as well as with a bit of luck, Powell could look like this in 2011:
G: 52
AB: 159
H: 49
BA: .257
HR: 8
RBI: 34
BB: 18
SO: 27
2B: 10
Not awesome, but a definite improvement.
So overall, I think that giving Kurt rest and Powell more time is a good idea.
by Billy Ray Williams on Jan 13, 2011 11:15 AM PST reply actions
A'S MGR/11TH MAN THE REAL PROBLEM!
BOB GEREN A’S MGR SHOULD BE A BIGGER CONCERN THAN SUZUKI, AS HIS MIS-MGT/ STYLE (OVER/UNDER MANAGES IN KEY SITUATIONS RESULTING IN LOSS OF RUNS/PRODUCTION/OUTS & GAME LOSSES THROUGHOUT THE PAST SEASONS) IS A THE REAL LIABILITY/PROBLEM FOR 2011, AS HE IS NOT CAPABLE OF GETTING/MAXIMIZING THE PLAYERS/TEAM PLAYING ABILITIES & TALENT TO VAULT THEM OVER THE TOP TO THE WS!!!

by 


























