Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

I've Been Push Polled: The SJ Stadium War Escalates

My household was just push polled.  That's right, there is no conformation on whether SJ can get a stadium, there is no ballot initiative scheduled for an election, but someone is paying (three guesses the first two don't count) for a robotic push poll to try to sway public opinion on a hypothetical Cisco fields.  I'm angry!

Here were the questions (paraphrased from the person in my household who took the call):

1) Do you support a ballot initiative for a new Baseball stadium in San Jose?

2) Would you still support the stadium if you knew public money would be used for the stadium at a time when the city doesn't have enough money for schools, public services, ect...

Also, for those of you who don't frequent the excellent New A's Ballpark blog, today the Giants just bought another 30% stake in the SJ Giants giving them the controlling stake in the team. The Giants spent years telling the city of San Jose to go insert a bat where the sun don't shine when the city begged them for help renovating the aging Municipal stadium, and now all of a sudden they care about the team?  BS!

What this is a Neukem "bunkering" down (fallout proof I hope).  After weeks of good news for San Jose on the subject, including a letter to Commissioner Selig signed by multiple fortune 500 companies, Neukem is feeling the pressure.  For him now to feel that he has to result in dirty tactics like push polling to sway public opinion or spending millions on a team he'll ignore again when this is over must mean he really feels his back is against the wall.

I'd like to ask the AN readers if anyone else has been push polled and what their thoughts on the topic are.

Poll
My own push poll: How does it make you feel that partys that have no stake in San Jose's well being are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a push poll to kill a San Jose baseball stadium?
I'm angry!
168 votes
I'm nutral.
24 votes
I don't want to see a stadium in San Jose to begin with.
62 votes
I'm a Giants fan.
10 votes

264 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 409 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I've been Rick Rolled

Does that count?

I'm here to talk about Don

by OptimistPrime on Sep 12, 2010 8:57 PM PDT reply actions  

Oh good, another stadium thread.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Sep 12, 2010 8:59 PM PDT reply actions  

Just another building where Jack Cust can strike out...

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Sep 12, 2010 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yea, I know there is a bunch.

But I really wanted to vent about the push polling. I can’t believe the Giants are already pulling dirty trick like push polls at this stage of the game.

What it is, is rich people with no connection to San Jose spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to cost San Jose the hundreds of job and millions in tax revenue a new stadium will bring—just so they can line their pockets with a little extra cash when the sell the Giants.

Neukem should be explaining to San Jose why him controlling the SJ terratory rights is more important than steady jobs and civic improvements for San Jose’s citizens, not trying to trick people into thinking that public money will be used on the stadium.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 12, 2010 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

That isn't a push poll

and there is no proof that its from Neukem or the Giants.

I use to work in politics and just because they asked someone about messaging doesn’t make it a push poll.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

DFA

With all due respect, if he received a call and in fact those were the questions, exactly as he stated, I do believe that is a push poll in the strictest sense. The second question shows that someone or some entity crafted the question to influence the recipient of the call. Someone had to pay for that call. A push poll is, according to Wikipedia, A push poll is a political campaign technique in which an individual or organization attempts to influence or alter the view of respondents under the guise of conducting a poll. In a push poll, large numbers of respondents are contacted, and little or no effort is made to collect and analyze response data. Instead, the push poll is a form of telemarketing-based propaganda and rumor mongering, masquerading as a poll.

I'm here to talk about Don

by OptimistPrime on Sep 12, 2010 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly

I poll testing for the idea of using public money would never have mentioned the part about schools. The question was set up the get you to make the connection about the stadium getting money at the expense of education or public services.

Since you work in politics you should know that how a question is written has a huge effect on the outcome of the poll. I stand by my assertion that it was a push pull based on the ordering and wording of the questions.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 12, 2010 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

You realize that that would make pretty much every internal poll for a political candidate a push poll if you used your definition

Asking if you would be willing to use public money for a stadium if it traded off with schools is a completely legitimate question and if you were going to run an ad about how public money was going to be used you would want to know if your demographic cares about schools or cops so that you know what ad you run, that using public money is going to take cops off the beat is more effective than it ups the number of kids that are in each class.

Its completely legitimate.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

and yet that is not what was said DFA

at a time when the city doesn’t have enough money for schools, public services, ect

The poll did not ask if he cared, it implied the city would not be able to adequately provide funds for basic services if a ballpark was built. I am surprised you are making this stretch to prove what?

I'm here to talk about Don

by OptimistPrime on Sep 12, 2010 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do you think that the city of SJ has enough money right now?

Its not making a stretch at all, pretty much every local in the state is broker than broke. Saying that is hardly a push poll.

This isn’t John McCain has a black love baby in SC.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Redevelopment funds are actually used for those services these days since the state keeps seizing them to fill the general budget gap.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

By law

RDA funds cannot be used for the general fund. Yes, there is some movement in Sacramento to change this (re: Tesla and City of Downey), however there is no real traction for this.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well the state was seizing RDA funds from counties so just because the county cant do that doesn't mean the state cant.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

True..

but how does this relate to city/county rda funds in question like SJ?

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess

there are probably a few ways most cities could spend redevelopment to to any desired end. City governments regularly do more serious “rule-bending.”

I think DFA’s point is that the state has for several years increased taxes on local government through the highjacking of local budgets nine ways to Sunday.

"Not in your wildest alcoholic nightmare would you ever imagine such events unfolding!" Bill King

by Buck Turgidson on Sep 16, 2010 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

It doesn't matter whether it's legitimate or not.

It was a poll obviously commissioned by an anti-stadium group. Given the followup question we can rule out NIMBYs which leaves us with the Giants or their front of a community group. There is no other credible party who would ask for a poll like that.

It was meant to illicit a negative response toward a stadium being built in San Jose from anyone taking the poll.

Randomness or not, I consider it to be a push poll.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 12, 2010 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Have you ever been involved in a poll before?

Either taking one or designing one?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, he didn't even take the poll, someone in his house did

and Im asking if hes has a baseline to compare it with.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

you do polling?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I've taken them

And I’m a Stats major. I haven’t done any big polling, but I know how they are run, I know the math behind them, and how to put one together. I have helped put small ones together in the past.

Why you feel the need to discredit me and others on here eludes me. I standing next to the person taking the poll, and talked to them 30 seconds after they were finished. Why you can’t handle that would blow my mind if I didn’t expect this kind of reaction on the internet.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 15, 2010 12:14 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Knowing polling math and designing political poll questions is 100 percent different

You didn’t record the questions and talking to another person editorializes the content.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2010 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, but it more then makes me qualified to recognize a biased question

written to illicit a negative response to a subject. This attitude that you know more then the rest of us about what a “real” push pull is, really reflects negatively on you.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 16, 2010 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

He has no reason to believe it to be a push poll

You have absolutely no evidence to suggest that the respondents aren’t chosen at random, that there are more than a sufficient number of respondents to get an adequate sample size, or that the data isn’t being analyzed.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, but is it not reasonable to assume

That since he is a random resident of San Jose, that it was a robotic call and the subject matter, it is more likely what it appears? Rather than what? What would postulate this was?

I'm here to talk about Don

by OptimistPrime on Sep 12, 2010 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

No

Robo polls are more accurate than polls that are conducted by humans and a huge chunk of legitimate polls are done with robo polling. Check out outfits like Survey USA which is used by a ton of news orgs (KTVU I think in the Bay) which are exclusively automated.

You don’t have the ability to know that how the sample was selected, nor do I so I cant comment on whether he was random or not.

I think it was probably baseline messaging poll. You don’t push poll this far out from a vote. That would be dumb.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree that it is very strange to receive a call this early in the game

considering that there may never be a game, at least until MLB has spoken.

I'm here to talk about Don

by OptimistPrime on Sep 12, 2010 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

There are quite a few statisticions out there (inclusding ALL the ones who I read) who would dissagree with you that robo-polling is more accurate then human polling.

The number of robo-polls has to do with the fact they are cheaper, not more accurate.

Also, a poll this far out is plausible. The Giants are is desperate need of some good mojo after the SV Leadership Group letter and all of the polls giving a stadium 60% approval in SJ.

A poll engineered to get a MUCH lower approval would give them a good response for the questions you’d hope the blue ribbon commission would be asking and create extra doubt on any vote.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 12, 2010 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah you just have to look at the robo polls correlation to elections results to see that not only is it legitimate its a better method of polling

Guess what tho the way the poll is designed makes it so that your reasoning is laughably implausible. If they are running a push poll they ask you the are you aware that its going to kill all the children question before they ask you if you are going to support the stadium.

Furthermore, why do you think that the Giants care whether SJ residents want the A’s? Their argument is that they have territorial rights down there, not that SJ people don’t want the A’s.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Giants care a hell of a lot whether SJ residents want the A's

If SJ gets the A’s and the ballot measure fails then the A’s get sold and more out of the Bay Area.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 12, 2010 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

hahahaha this is even more ridiculous

The they would want the A’s to get SJ and then just dump like 10m bucks into getting a no vote on the stadium plan. Doing a push poll now does nothing but undermine that possibility since it would make the A’s less interested in SJ since they will obviously do more polling since at best they a huge amount of time away from the next election.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

I've come to the conclusion that the two most important things in life are good friends and a good bullpen.
~Bob Lemon, 1981

by UncleLeo on Sep 13, 2010 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

you're just arguing to argue now

They want the A’s to have as little to do with SJ as possible.

!#%&$#@&%&% antioxidants! - pam

by cuppingmaster on Sep 13, 2010 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Basically yeah

You’d do this well in front of an election so that the next SJ/A’s driven poll would show a lack of support. If there’s a lack of support they don’t even bother putting the measure on the ballot and then the Giants wouldn’t need to spend as much money trying to nix it later on. Muddy the waters now and there’s less risk of it succeeding during the real deal. Same for the politicians currently behind it in the next election.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

More towards DFA

but the thing as a whole.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

You really think a push poll from the Giants is going to deter the A's San Jose ambitions?

Thats patently absurd. If the Giants released the poll they would have to release the questions or no one would take it seriously and if they released the questions to a push poll it would generate far worse press for the Giants than a illegitimate polling result would.

Come on people use some logic here.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

This

The goal is to confuse people into thinking that San Jose is about to spend tons of taxpayer money on a stadium.

The goal of the push poll is effect on recipients (spreading the Big Lie, you might say), not to generate an actual poll figure.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 13, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

The die is already cast

The Mayor and members of the city council have already tried to get the team. Basically from a political prospective theyre already tied to it. They’re already on record for giving a huge amount of money in the form of land to billionaires (or so the negative ads will say).

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 9:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's why I said it was "hair-brained" and "not likely to work"

But I also think that if they were to do a poll and 80% of the people or more said they were against it, regardless of how much they’ve pushed this, they’d back down.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Repeating the message

that this is a cash giveaway to billionaires is highly effective, a. regardless of whether it is true or not, b. regardless of whatever outcome the (notional) poll spits out, and c. regardless of the fact that the current administration’s support for the proposal is already on the record somewhere.

I don’t get why you’re acting so ingenuous about how propaganda works. It’s not about persuasion, it’s about tripping sub-conscious buttons in the reptilian brain. Broadcasting the message “tax-dollar giveaway” is effective regardless of the facts of the situation.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 13, 2010 10:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because if you read the questions that virtego links out to and look at the frequency its pretty clear it isn't a push poll

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

The poll is set up to deliver an anti-stadium response

Within the confines of that, it’s propaganda for those being polled. It can’t help but be that. Maybe the problem concerns the definition of “push poll”.

by richwol1 on Sep 13, 2010 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

It doesn't matter WHAT it is, push poll or other kind of poll.

PT and DMOAS’ points stand: it’s meant to instigate a negative feeling in the SJ community towards a new stadium. Period.

!#%&$#@&%&% antioxidants! - pam

by cuppingmaster on Sep 14, 2010 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Then every poll that isn't a horse race poll and does any messaging is.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

What do you mean "does messaging"?

A genuine poll asks a question. A push poll attempts to spread (mis)information under the guise of asking a question. If that’s what “does messaging” means (I can’t decipher politico-speak, so I won’t bother trying) then yes, every poll that does that is a push poll.

It is very clear, in any event, that this “poll” is the latter of the two. Whatever you call it.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Look at the poll down below that ST posts

Every campaign does polling to test messaging, aka which attack or positive ad will work the best. Every campaign does it. What makes it a push poll is the number of people that are talked to and whether an effort is made to analyze the data.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

"Every campaign does it"?

Seriously? We’re reduced to that level of discourse?

Every campaign (at least every decently run one) also uses blatant psychological manipulation on voters. Is that now OK, too?

This isn’t a focus group. The poll is a message in and of itself.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Just because a poll isn't a focus group doesn't mean that you don't ask focus group type questions

Both sides of the aisle run polls exactly like this in pretty much any campaign that can afford it so that they have a better understanding of their media strategy.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Those are most definitely NOT focus group type questions

In a focus group you do not lead the respondents. It’s a horrible, horrible research practice. I suspect most political polls are push polls because it can serve two purposes. But if you really cared about results you’d phrase all your questions without leading:

Of the following issues, which is most important to you?
Which of the following would you least tolerate from a public official?

You’d give options or leave it entirely open ended, you wouldn’t lead with an example that would muddy the analysis. Even if these people were trying to do an analysis, they’re creating a heavy bias in their questioning.

If this poll were truly for research purposes, the question would have been phrased in some form like “While currently we don’t know how the current stadium would be financed, but would you support public funds in order to help build the stadium?” Or “how likely would you be to support…” and give them a scale. You would not flat out put together a scenario where anyone in their right mind would say “Woooooh there, don’t use our education funds for this.” You can’t analyze that because it offers you nothing of value.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

NO NO NO this is so wrong
- Full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to libraries
- The team owners will receive land and be required to mitigate traffic impacts
- The team owners will receive land and be required to pay for all public safety needs due to increased traffic and activity

These are all questions on the poll that ST cites. You would absolutely not use those questions if you were running a push poll, or trying to generate a negative response.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

NO NO NO this is so wrong

The poll is being used to associate something negative with what they are trying to oppose. End of story.

by LoneStranger on Sep 14, 2010 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

If its trying to associate with something negative

What part of those questions are negative?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Um asking if how they would feel about a proposal that requires mitigating traffic isn't negative.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

um its not false

right now they would have to bear increased protection needs around the stadium from my understanding of the plan. Without an increase in General fund dollars thats a cut to regular services that are provided now.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thats my understanding

I could be wrong, others would know more than me.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

because I haven't seen a funding mechanism for it.

so that usually means there isnt one.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

do you have a page?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

But you're assuming.

Why do you get on people’s cases for not having the facts, yet you do the same thing?

by LoneStranger on Sep 14, 2010 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

because I hadn't seen it in the EIR

Ive never said im an expert on the San Jose proposal.

I have said that the poll isn’t a push poll.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

which you are only right about

if we use your definition

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by Future Ed on Sep 15, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not even discussing ST's whatever

I’m talking about the OP’s call. Those questions were completely out of line with Market Research/Analytical standards. I have absolutely no idea how your block quote has anything to do with the reality that these calls (as reported) as not for analytical purposes.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

because ST is claiming that this is the call that is going out

also the OP didn’t even take the call so Im going with the written down questions from a call, as its by far more accurate than what Mr. Clean Sweep is reporting.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought he posted something

from last year (12/16/2009). I don’t see where he claimed that was this call that the OP was talking about.

by LoneStranger on Sep 14, 2010 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

That list isn't even a list of questions.

So I’m really not sure why suddenly you’re changing the discussion. But then you’re so hung up on the verbiage, that you’re grasping at straws anyway.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, they can make the case to SJ residents themselves and try to sway them into not wanting a new stadium

I don’t like the tactic, but I can’t help but think it’s a good one for trying to get public opinion on your side. Basically, come out swinging first. Once people have one opinion, it’s hard for them to change. You know that.

!#%&$#@&%&% antioxidants! - pam

by cuppingmaster on Sep 13, 2010 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

There has been a lot of good press for the stadium in SJ recently.

According to the new A’s ballpark blog linked in this thread the Giant’s have been push polling all year.

I agree, the Giants obviously feel this is the time to start getting public opinion on their side before the good press hardens opinions,

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 15, 2010 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Depends on what the follow up question is.

Had he said no, he may have received an entirely different 2nd question or perhaps no second question at all. Just playing DA here, but you wouldn’t need to convince someone who doesn’t support the SJ A’s, but you would someone who does. So that’s why you wouldn’t ask the 2nd question first. No need to ask it because the answer would be the same. Could very well be a market research company handling the calls and not a standard polling group.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

also

With the Giants buying the extra 30% stake in the SJ Giants, the are obviously doubling down on the bet that a San Jose stadium will happen and they need more bargaining chips/roadblocks.

There is definatly a concerted effort going on by the Giants right now to shore up their defenses.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 12, 2010 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Um thats a territorial rights argument not a feasibility argument

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can see the Giants saying...

…“We (now) have more to lose, thus we need more compensation.”. Or, even more reason to outright roadblock.

I've come to the conclusion that the two most important things in life are good friends and a good bullpen.
~Bob Lemon, 1981

by UncleLeo on Sep 13, 2010 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

You're kidding, right?

The Giants have done this three times in the last 6-9 months. This is clearly a push poll.

by vertig0 on Sep 12, 2010 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

got a link?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

One link, plus additional reports

Link

You sure want to give the Giants the benefit of the doubt given the situation?

by vertig0 on Sep 12, 2010 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Unless you are showing that it was spread more than a normal sample size that looks pretty pedantic for a ballot measure poll.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Okay

I’ve gotten at least a dozen e-mails confirming the ongoing push-polling effort. But what do I know? It’s just a matter of phrasing or semantics, right?

by vertig0 on Sep 12, 2010 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

vertig0

you have to know that arguing with DFA is like fighting a war in Iraq. You never win.

I'm here to talk about Don

by OptimistPrime on Sep 12, 2010 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

dude WTF, I use to be involved with polling for a living and youre going to attack me like this. Give me a break.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

An attack on you would be directly calling you a name or making fun of you

I thought you, of all people, would be savvy enough to appreciate a backhanded compliment. Sorry you did not take it that way.

I'm here to talk about Don

by OptimistPrime on Sep 13, 2010 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

If that was the intent I apologize, I didn't read it that way.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Go with what you know

You know that you and I have known each other for a while now on AN, have always had friendly exchanges, and that I never use AN to attack anyone. While we of course may not agree on every topic, I would not make a discussion personal. It is a fact, however, and widely known that you do love to argue, sometimes just to argue. You have acknowledge the fact. I was merely playfully jabbing you that no matter what point he made, you would have a counterpoint. It was a nod to your ability to argue. Nothing more. No worries.

I'm here to talk about Don

by OptimistPrime on Sep 14, 2010 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

you got a dozen emails that said that people got polled or you have sources confirming that it has a broader sample size

one is not remarkable the other would be.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Linking to yourself as a source when youre a partisan isn't what I meant.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

If you went to the site today

You’d notice that the main feature from the weekend is a two-parter on an Oakland alternative site – one that makes a great deal of sense. If I was such a partisan, why would I run it? It wouldn’t serve my “all in San Jose” purposes. Perhaps you’re the partisan, pal.

by vertig0 on Sep 13, 2010 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

You called a messaging poll McCarthyism

to me that ruins all of your credibility.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Silly goose

It’s not about McCarthyism, it’s about Joseph Welch’s famous statement.

But hey, you’ve made it clear you’re tone deaf. So that comes with the territory. No biggie.

by vertig0 on Sep 13, 2010 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know,

while I think you’re right, the super-patronizing attitude you’re pulling on this thread is not helping your cause any.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 13, 2010 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, I realize that

I’m not worried about winning people over. Most people have already decided where they stand with this stuff.

by vertig0 on Sep 13, 2010 9:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

That rather begs the question of what you hope to accomplish with your commentary

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 13, 2010 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Really?

What does anyone hope to accomplish on a comments thread?

by vertig0 on Sep 13, 2010 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Evading the question

You may or may not actually be here just to troll, but you’re really making it easy to draw that conclusion.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Credibility

The guy attacked mine earlier in the thread. I’d like to say I’m a better man and just cavalierly blow that off, but I’ve been working at this stuff for over five years. I won’t take that lying down.

by vertig0 on Sep 14, 2010 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

right and if you linked to one reputable news org saying it was a push poll that would be legitimate

but its not a push poll.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dude, just give it up

No one cares whether you call it a push poll or a Push Pop. It’s what the thing is designed to do.

!#%&$#@&%&% antioxidants! - pam

by cuppingmaster on Sep 14, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

The way to defend credibility is by demonstrating past accuracy

not by making sarcastic jibes.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is this debate class?

I resent even having to defend my credibility against some political apparatchik.

Many here are already aware of who I am and what I represent. I’ll let the body of work speak for itself.

by vertig0 on Sep 14, 2010 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Whatever

All I really care about at this point is that people not somehow associate me with you because we’re on the “same” side of this issue, so I’ll just say that directly. I don’t approve of the tactics that you or ST are using on this thread. Not everyone who supports the move acts this way.

That’s all.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why are you so worried about that?

It is possible to have a nuanced position on the A’s future, and you have espoused that. Yet you’re worried about being lumped in with someone else because of how it may appear outwardly? This isn’t a religious war. Yeesh.

by vertig0 on Sep 14, 2010 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Shrug

It’s politics. Political “debates” are (as I observed higher on the thread) not about reason or fairness, which is why I don’t post at Huffington Post or the Drudge Report.

I’d rather just wash my hands of the whole thing at this point. If this is going to turn into a Huffington Post thread, I’m really not interested.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, the irony.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Sep 14, 2010 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Unnecessary.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're right, I couldn't resist.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Sep 14, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

How?

I’m all for telling people when they’re engaging in ineffectual or destructive argumentation. And I won’t object (though I might disagree) if someone says the same to me.

As for patronizing as a tactic, I have a palpable loathing of it and will never intentionally go down that path. It’s probably the one kind of comment that will reliably draw this sort of response from me even when I agree with the underlying content.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Let me get this right...

The guy who says, “I’d prefer the A’s in Portland to San Jose if the can’t be in Oakland” is calling the guy who has painstakingly researched the stadium issue for YEARS and supported plans in Oakland, Fremont and San Jose the partisan?

I guess sometimes we don’t care much about integrity.

by jeffro on Sep 13, 2010 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

That doesn't make me a partisan at all.

I have almost nothing invested in the ballpark site, Ive just said that I would probably go to more games in Portland than I would in San Jose.

Honestly Im perfectly happy letting them continue to play in the Coliseum

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

That kind of suggests partisanship to me.

Just a different kind than most around here.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can't decide if this sounds...
Ive just said that I would probably go to more games in Portland than I would in San Jose.

patently absurd or something even more ridiculous than that. But, hey, if it makes sense to you…

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 13, 2010 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why? I go to Mexico more often than I go to San Jose

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Um how the fuck do you think you have any ability to judge where I would go to my baseball games?

for someone who consistently goes after posters for daring to think that they might have a good plan for the teams on the field action because they don’t have enough information, how can you possibly think that you have enough information about my life to make that call?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Um

That’s a great point. I should have just taken this at face value and let it pass but, um, I thought you enjoyed the bluster and causticism. Um, maybe not from me though.

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 13, 2010 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think

he would of enjoyed it more if I asked it. ;)

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

WTF?

Do you see any question that I asked of him? Because if you did you’re totally clueless. I know, you’re just trying to bait me, aren’t you? Don’t be like everyone says you are, ST! What’s that even an abbreviation for, Super Troll?

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 13, 2010 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure

if that was sarcasm or a direct insult?! =/

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sarcasm, definitely

But when in doubt throw a flag…I did just attack you like I do to a great many posters here.

I’ve really got to work on my written delivery or just stop with the attempts at humor all together. It’s obvious I’m humor-challenged.

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 13, 2010 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hehe

I thought as such, but in these days of the intarweb, you can never tell. I did like the Super-Troll reference though…think I’ll add it to one of the top 5 acronyms for my ST references! ;)

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like bluster when you can back it up with something other than hypocrisy

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or at least a true sense of humor.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Sep 14, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Proof? No.
…there is no proof that its from Neukem or the Giants.

Likely? Yes. Somewhere behind the scenes.

I've come to the conclusion that the two most important things in life are good friends and a good bullpen.
~Bob Lemon, 1981

by UncleLeo on Sep 13, 2010 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Could just as easily be the Oakland Only Consortium.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe

Depends on if the Giants are helping to fund them :)

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Anything is possible, but I wouldn't bet any money on it.

I've come to the conclusion that the two most important things in life are good friends and a good bullpen.
~Bob Lemon, 1981

by UncleLeo on Sep 13, 2010 9:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Right.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also
Neukem should be explaining to San Jose why him controlling the SJ terratory rights is more important than steady jobs and civic improvements for San Jose’s citizens, not trying to trick people into thinking that public money will be used on the stadium.

What proof do you have that a stadium will provide steady jobs? Most stadium related jobs are terrible, low wage, seasonal jobs.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can't just look at the seasonal jobs.

There was an article in the Merc a few months ago about the large number of bars and restaurants in downtown that close every year because they can’t get enough traffic over the Sharks off season. A baseball stadium in downtown San Jose would keep the post-game traffic going to small businesses year round. That would mean steady work for hundreds of employees working at those businesses.

Also, you need grounds keepers to keep up the building, service staff to work at the events and parking, and police officers and the such for public protection.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 12, 2010 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

The civic improvements would require public funds, so you really cant have it both ways.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can

The extra revenue from the stadium = civic improvements. In fact, not only can he have it both ways, since one logically begets the other I’d argue it’s really the same way.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 12, 2010 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

no "civic improvements" generally cost public money: See every Olympic Games ever.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sure it costs money

But that’s why they’re called “improvements” to begin with. They’re not called “civic cash cows.” They’re designed to in some way, shape, or form to improve the quality of life of the people and/or businesses within the city. That always costs money to do. So it becomes a matter of how best to spend those funds and how best to maximize the level of improvements that money can buy the city. People have a new entertainment venue and businesses have an attraction to draw more clientele. So the question becomes whether those intrinsic and potential financial gains for the residents and businesses are worth the price of buying property, building some roads and parking lots.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

If public money is used...

…it usually turns into a net loss. The money collected in taxes, as little as it may be to everyone that has to pay it, does cause losses to occur that otherwise would not have. Those losses cannot be readily identified and largely go unseen but they do exist and sometimes for smaller fringe [fringe profitability-wise] businesses it can be the backbreaker. And as public funds pass through the bureaucracy there are dead-weight losses.

I’ve agreed with you in this discussion up to this point, though. Heck, maybe you’re not even arguing the public money thing and are just discussing this from a jobs standpoint if only private money were being used.

Also, yes, this did seem like a poll designed specifically to influence opinion and really nothing more. I’m not quite sure why anyone would dispute this as the primary reasoning. This whole relocation issue is a sad one to be sure. But one thing is very clear: Oakland’s ownership wants a new venue and it would seem that they’re fed up with Oakland as the venue’s location.

It seems that the people who desparately want the team to stay have treated this like a dissolution of marriage where they do not want to see the other spouse get out of the arrangement. And the people who really want to keep the Athletics from encroaching on ‘their’ territory are like over-protective spouse trying to keep their significant other from having a life outside the home. Controlling people {gag reflex}; pffft.

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 13, 2010 4:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bad anology

And the people who really want to keep the Athletics from encroaching on ‘their’ territory are like over-protective spouse trying to keep their significant other from having a life outside the home. Controlling people {gag reflex}; pffft. parents trying to keep their teenaged daughter from dating a nice young guy that the daughter really likes.

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 13, 2010 4:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Um, hundreds of years of ecanomic data says otherwise.

There was a study out a couple years ago, the number one way to stimulate the economy is using public money on things like food stamps, because the money goes right into businesses that are being hit hardest by recessions.

Wise public spending creates jobs, and jobs create increased taxes. If you don’t believe me go ask all the businesses in downtown who make the majority of their $$$ off of Shark fans before and ofter the games. Without public money spent on the Shark Tank, nobody traffics down town 40 times a year plus concerts, and hundreds of jobs are lost.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 15, 2010 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh dear God, another 'um'.

If the number one way to stimulate an economy [national, state, local…take your pick] was to stimulate through public spending, then why not push for public spending non-stop and full-throttle? At what point would it cease to become wise? Would it ever become unwise, since there’s always a spending multiplier effect that’s positive?

Wise public spending creates jobs, and jobs create increased taxes.

So that more wise public spending can occur and the cycle repeats endlessly?

If you don’t believe me go ask all the businesses in downtown who make the majority of their $$$ off of Shark fans before and ofter the games.

Wealth transfers to the wealthy through state interferrence in the marketplace: it’s your position that this is a good thing?

Without public money spent on the Shark Tank, nobody traffics down town 40 times a year plus concerts, and hundreds of jobs are lost.

Hundreds of jobs are never created, you mean. But what of the disposable income that will be lost due to the new taxation? How would that mobney have been spent? Do any fringe jobs get lost to that? Does anyone ever discuss those jobs or that loss of disposable income from the taxes? Lot’s of federal aid poured into New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Some say that the city is better off now with all the capital improvements. Why not begin the restoration of every American city in the same manner? Why don’t we do it simultaneously? Why should we wait for a hurricane to be the push? If natural dissasters are the only way to get the needed push, shouldn’t we root for more natural dissaters?

Here’s some counter-intuitive reasoning why I hold a different views on this:
http://bastiat.org/en/twisatwins.html#public_works
http://www.pioneerinstitute.org/pdf/pdialg_6.pdf

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 15, 2010 4:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

great more libertarian dreck that has almost no relationship to reality

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2010 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You know DFA

Besides not agreeing on the definition of a push pull, we agree on quite a lot.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 16, 2010 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Meanwhile, back in the real world...

Crowding out effect

If increased borrowing leads to higher interest rates by creating a greater demand for money and loanable funds and hence a higher “price” (ceteris paribus), the private sector, which is sensitive to interest rates will likely reduce investment due to a lower rate of return. This is the investment that is crowded out.
However, this crowding-out effect might be moderated by the fact that government spending sometimes expands the market for private-sector products… This accelerator effect is most important when business suffers from unused industrial capacity, i.e., during a serious recession or a depression.

Emphasis added, natch.

There are logical reasons why you should spend a lot of government money during recessions and after natural disasters.

That’s of little relevance to the question of stadiums, which are indeed typically boondoggles erected at the worst possible time in the business cycle that transfer money to the rich, but there’s no way I’m letting some Pioneer Institute nonsense go unanswered.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 15, 2010 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Since there's no free lunch...

…the debt becomes problematic. But even more problematic and less talked about is the malinvestment that occurs. These create bubbles that pop [housing sector] or, at the very least, short term demand that sends unhealthy and unreliable signals [cash for clunckers/first time home buyer tax credit]

With private investments, the gains are more likely and when their are losses, they are most certainly borne by those that take the risk rather than the taxpaying shlubs.

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 16, 2010 3:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

You asked "at what point would it cease to become wise"

thereby implying that if there was a reason to spend any money on services, it would inevitably lead to the conclusion that we should spend all money on services (which would effectively make the US a Communist government).

I provided a reason why that logic does not hold water. There are differing levels of effectiveness to government spending depending on when it happens. That is all.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 16, 2010 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree.

But I would also add that it’s not just when, it’s how.

For example, food stamps have been shown to assist the economy and create more jobs then almost any other type of government aid. They go directly to people in need who are forced to spend them at hard hit local businesses and keep them afloat.

Conversely, tax breaks to large corporations tend to have the least effect on the economy and create the least amount of jobs (no matter what they say on Fox Business Channel) because large corporations tend to throw the extra capital under their mattress and sit on it until the recession ends (which is good business, but horrible for the economy).

Remember everyone out there, it’s not what you got, it’s what you do with it.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 19, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agrie

This is not little league. The kid who strikes out the most is not the worst player on the team.

by eastcoasta'sfan on Sep 13, 2010 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Meh. I'm nutral.

The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. -Joe Posnanski 8/29/09

by pam5981 on Sep 14, 2010 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

The horrors! Someone called my house and asked leading questions about a controversial issue to manufacture a pre-desired resulting opinion!

That never happens in America!! Quick, someone send over a team of CPR paramedics to restart my heart, which has stopped!

Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?

by emperor nobody on Sep 12, 2010 11:22 PM PDT reply actions  

PS

I read the bllpark.org thing and it likened this polling tactic to Sen. Joe McCarthy.

Joe McCarthy. Really.

[[laughs at the manufactured drama]]

Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?

by emperor nobody on Sep 12, 2010 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Its pretty typical to be honest.

The last primary campaign I worked on our opponent claimed we did a push poll by testing negative messaging and yet their poll had very similar questions on it. Real push polling is far far more rare than people think.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

If I was running a anti campaign I would be paying for the same polling

and it would be worded pretty similarly.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

which means?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I should know that Id be running legitimate messaging polls?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's simple

One of the reasons why people bemoan the lack of real political discourse is that a professional can make a distinction between a “legitimate messaging poll” and a “push poll,” yet to the person on the other end they are one in the same. It’s so unbelievably tone deaf it’s startling.

by vertig0 on Sep 12, 2010 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

The dude who wrote the fanpost didn't even take the frickin poll

and yeah if you hit a hard core partisan regular messaging polls don’t make them happy, that doesn’t mean that political operatives shouldn’t test to see if they should go with one message or another.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 12, 2010 11:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Basically all you said is

blah blah blah justification blah blah blah

No thanks, I’m not buying it.

by vertig0 on Sep 12, 2010 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

in my darker, less optimistic moments where the spin-a-thon cuts into my intellectual flesh

it gets to seem like the whole of discourse has boiled down to professional wrestling, heel vs. hero manufactured dichotomies, with everyone taking whatever side they identify with but without any real attention paid to the middle view of anything.

I think I need drugs. Or at least better drugs.

Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?

by emperor nobody on Sep 12, 2010 11:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Push Poll Question

How angry do you feel about the San Francisco Giant’s connections with illegal drugs and exploitation of child labor?

(the trick is to pretend you are Ray Fosse)

"I wanted to see how much my computer programming skills had improved since the last time I was arrested." - octopus virus

by Zonis on Sep 13, 2010 5:47 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Ultra-Mo. Tommy Cam.

Losing this team would be a huge failure for this city and an affront to Oakland’s great sports legacy.

by skigurl on Sep 13, 2010 8:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Fenton's, pain meds.

Peter Gammons ran over his puppy. But that wasn’t the worst part. He then proceeded to back over it too. Then rolled forward again (#3), rolled down the window and said, "What are you going to do about it, kid? I’m Peter F**king Gammons, b**ch." Then drove away. -d to the moas

by Leopold Bloom on Sep 13, 2010 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

not til November.

Peter Gammons ran over his puppy. But that wasn’t the worst part. He then proceeded to back over it too. Then rolled forward again (#3), rolled down the window and said, "What are you going to do about it, kid? I’m Peter F**king Gammons, b**ch." Then drove away. -d to the moas

by Leopold Bloom on Sep 13, 2010 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

We're not friends, we're not buddies, we're not pals...

…we’re adversaries. The Giants are the competition, and it’s time we started treating them as such.

I've come to the conclusion that the two most important things in life are good friends and a good bullpen.
~Bob Lemon, 1981

by UncleLeo on Sep 13, 2010 8:50 AM PDT reply actions   5 recs

Um, I hate the shit out of them.

Can’t speak for anyone else here.

Peter Gammons ran over his puppy. But that wasn’t the worst part. He then proceeded to back over it too. Then rolled forward again (#3), rolled down the window and said, "What are you going to do about it, kid? I’m Peter F**king Gammons, b**ch." Then drove away. -d to the moas

by Leopold Bloom on Sep 13, 2010 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hi!

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

hullo.

Peter Gammons ran over his puppy. But that wasn’t the worst part. He then proceeded to back over it too. Then rolled forward again (#3), rolled down the window and said, "What are you going to do about it, kid? I’m Peter F**king Gammons, b**ch." Then drove away. -d to the moas

by Leopold Bloom on Sep 13, 2010 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

You can speak for me on that as well.

You know where i stand.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 8:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Now if only we could say this for all our friends...

Peter Gammons ran over his puppy. But that wasn’t the worst part. He then proceeded to back over it too. Then rolled forward again (#3), rolled down the window and said, "What are you going to do about it, kid? I’m Peter F**king Gammons, b**ch." Then drove away. -d to the moas

by Leopold Bloom on Sep 13, 2010 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Meh

What can you do sometimes. If that’s their worst character trait, I could live with that. I have plenty of experience with it.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Except Dave.

Dave has to go.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

In the place where you live?

(now face north)

Pam liked my old sig better.

by mikev on Sep 13, 2010 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Close

At the time I typed that, I was in the place where I live facing just North of West.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

heh.

The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. -Joe Posnanski 8/29/09

by pam5981 on Sep 13, 2010 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

And that..

is still underestimating my feelings on the Gnats…

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Turn this green!

!#%&$#@&%&% antioxidants! - pam

by cuppingmaster on Sep 13, 2010 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't see what the big deal is...

If it’s not a push-poll per se, then it’s a poll designed to promote an end-result that will make it look as if there’s strong opposition to a stadium in San Jose.

The Giants are well aware that an e-mail from Silicon Valley pledging there will be no cut-backs in support for the Giants by adding a stadium in San Jose isn’t worth the paper it’s not written on. That letter, plus this poll, are part of a battle between the Giants & City of Oakland vs. A’s ownership & City of San Jose with the huge elephant in the room being that neither city can actually afford the kind of funding and tax breaks that a new stadium will entail (unless a privately funded stadium is built on the current Coliseum parking lot, in which case the City won’t benefit from reconstruction in the surrounding area).

I’m still wondering if a lot of the anti-San Jose pressure comes from the Yankees and Mets, who are aware that if territorial rights are removed in this case, a precedent will be set for moving either the Marlins or Rays to Northern New Jersey.

by richwol1 on Sep 13, 2010 11:27 AM PDT reply actions  

Meh

I don’t see how this sets any sort of precedence for NY. There’s a major difference between A) adding a 2nd team into a market (the Nationals) B) Moving an existing team already inside a market into a new territory within that same market (the A’s) and C) Adding a third team into an existing market. Neither case really offers a comparable scenario. The sole exception might compensation, but even then because it’s an existing team in the market, the value lost from the encroachment isn’t as great.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

The New York-New Jersey idea isn't my invention

I’ve read a couple of reports along those lines.

The real last gasp for the Giants, and they must know it, is for the San Jose electorate to turn down a stadium, so it’s not surprising a poll like this would come along. The rest of it is extortion on the part of the Giants, getting the most for what they can.

Insofar as the Mets and Yankees are concerned, the parallel is greater than the Washington parallel because there have traditionally been teams in D.C. There has never been a team in Jersey. Opening up that territory not only impacts the Yankees and Mets, but potentially the Phillies as well. And opening a territory ceded to another team or teams is exactly what the San Jose situation is about. You can stress the differences or see the parallels.

by richwol1 on Sep 13, 2010 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I see the parallels easily enough

But adding a 3rd team to a region and/or in this case a possible “4th” team is without precedence and opening up a territory to an existing team already within the region is simply not going provide that slippery slope. That’s not to say they wouldn’t some day open it up for other reasons. I could easily see them deciding that’s a good idea, but this scenario wouldn’t be the catalyst for that one.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

uhhh

There hasn’t traditionally been two teams in the Bay Area? Really?

I mean when you say:

Insofar as the Mets and Yankees are concerned, the parallel is greater than the Washington parallel because there have traditionally been teams in D.C.

I fail to see the point. I agree that the teams who could have a beef are teams that have territories that could potentially have another team added, I think is patently absurd to pretend that the Giants aren’t the biggest stumbling block here. It isn’t like they have gone on TV and threatened law suits (which they can’t really back up, but as if) or anything.

by jeffro on Sep 13, 2010 11:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's will probably

be the final phase of the Giants propaganda machine. When the voter referendum is finally needed, I’m sure you’ll see a lot of TV ads sponsored by “Stand for San Jose”.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

OMG

“That’s will”….grammar/proofread fail! :(

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

SFSJ (and thier 21 Facebook Followers)

Has properly been outed as an astroturf extension of the SF Giants. I don’t think anyone that matters, meaning MLB, will be amused if that happens.

As I said on the newballpark site… If Bud says San Jose is the place, there will be no tolerating meddling by the Giants. The Lodge doesn’t tolerate owners who piss them off.

by jeffro on Sep 14, 2010 12:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Can you give me

a source for that (SFSJ outed as SF GIants)?

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

I found this to be funny
that an e-mail
isn’t worth the paper it’s not written on

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Congratulations,

We finally agree on something in this thread.

by Mr. Clean Sweep on Sep 15, 2010 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Mets or Yankees want to block the A's move to San Jose?

That makes little sense to me. The Mets and Yankees probably want to see the A’s stadium situation resolved as soon as possible, and out of court.

The one team that has the most to gain by blocking a move to San Jose is the Giants. It seems to me that they are trying to push the A’s out of the Bay Area so that they can have it all to themselves. The Giants have already invoked their territorial rights, as well as invested in the San Jose Giants.

by Russ on Sep 13, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

In other news, I've relocated.

Peter Gammons ran over his puppy. But that wasn’t the worst part. He then proceeded to back over it too. Then rolled forward again (#3), rolled down the window and said, "What are you going to do about it, kid? I’m Peter F**king Gammons, b**ch." Then drove away. -d to the moas

by Leopold Bloom on Sep 13, 2010 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Florida, NYC, what's the difference?

Now there's nothing left to say, so let's go drink beer.

by doctorK on Sep 13, 2010 5:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't even want to admit how long it took me to get that.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 13, 2010 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

LB

we usually are on different planes of thought, but I laughed out loud at this post.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

If the Yankees and the Mets are worried about a 3rd team in the NYC Area

They should be in favor of the A’s getting a new stadium in the Bay Area worked out so the A’s don’t have a reason to become said 3rd NYC team.

by throwmonkey on Sep 13, 2010 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ever heard of Stand for San Jose?

These are the kind of low key organizations that would do such a poll. It is a viral effort by the SF Giants to misinform and deter public sentiments for such an A’s move. Why pro-Oaklanders such as EN and DFA care and defend for such propaganda is beyond me, but here is more info about this supposed “grass roots” organization (sorry no link as the original article expired):

Mercury News: Group to fight public funding for A’s stadium in San Jose
(12/16/2009) After months of sharp rhetoric against the proposed Oakland A’s move to San Jose, backers of the San Francisco Giants have started swinging. Today, a group of San Jose Giants fans with support from the minor league team and, perhaps, its big league partner will unveil a coalition called Stand For San Jose to oppose public funds or subsidies that would bring the A’s to a new downtown ballpark.
 
The group plans a public relations campaign to argue the stadium would divert scant city resources from schools, police and fire services something San Jose officials say is untrue. Lawyers for the group members also plan to file a letter with the city today challenging a revised environmental impact report for the stadium.
 
At a meeting Monday night at Municipal Stadium, San Jose Giants president and Chief Executive Jim Weyermann met with a handful of neighborhood residents to discuss strategy. The team is partly owned by the San Francisco Giants, who took a 25 percent stake earlier this year in what was widely seen as an effort to strengthen their claim to the South Bay. The Giants own Major League Baseball’s territorial rights to the area and say the A’s move to San Jose would steal a significant chunk of their revenues.
 
Weyermann declined to say what role the San Francisco Giants are playing in the campaign, referring questions to the club. Officials there did not immediately return calls for comment. Asked who is paying for the law firm and the San Francisco public relations agency that’s assisting the fledgling group, Weyermann would only say the San Jose Giants were not footing the bill.
 
Most of the group’s 60 members live in Santa Clara County, Weyermann said.
 
San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed said the group is “certainly welcome” to challenge the supplemental environmental impact report, which is slated to be discussed at a public “scoping meeting” this evening at City Hall. The meeting will let residents and public agencies offer feedback about the report, which is expected to be finished early next year. San Jose Giants officials and members of the new group say the document initially prepared in 2006, before current talks with the A’s began doesn’t take full account of traffic impacts and other issues.
 
But Reed said the group’s efforts appear to be misguided. “They probably ought to take a look at the economic impact analysis we did that shows the project will generate money for the city’s general fund and redevelopment agency,” he said.
 
That analysis, prepared by a city-hired consulting firm in September, said the development of a 32,000-seat downtown ballpark would lead to $130 million in annual spending throughout the local economy and $2.9 billion over a 30-year period.
 
The report established a set of negotiating principles that insists the A’s and not taxpayers would be responsible for financing and building the stadium and financing all stadium operating costs.
But experts say the analysis doesn’t mention the cost of the land needed for a ballpark, nor the cost of infrastructure upgrading the adjacent intersections around the site, for example.
Reed said he believes the vast majority of people in San Jose would see an A’s stadium “as a big plus for the city.”
 
A June poll of 400 Santa Clara County voters by Oregon pollster Rick Lindholm showed that 45 percent would approve of the A’s moving to San Jose, with 39 percent disapproving.
A more recent poll by Lindholm in October showed a closer vote of city residents: 45 percent who would approve of the move, compared with 44 percent who would not. Support countywide was 45 to 37 percent, Lindholm said.
 
Lindholm told the Mercury News on Tuesday that he had conducted the polls for free and that no one had hired him to do them.
 
Reed said he was aware of another poll, commissioned earlier this year by the booster group Pro Baseball for San Jose, that showed substantial support for the A’s move. But that group did not publicly release the results of its poll, said Santa Clara County Assessor Larry Stone, a member of the group.
 
Earlier this year, Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig appointed a commission to study the A’s stadium options. That committee has met with San Jose officials at least once, but members will not comment on their work or say when they expect it to be finished.
 
Oakland officials are fighting to keep the team, but A’s owner Lew Wolff a college fraternity brother of Selig’s wants to move the team to San Jose, saying it has exhausted its options in Oakland.
 
It would take a vote of three-quarters of baseball’s owners to terminate the Giants’ territorial rights and let the A’s move to San Jose.
 
Weyermann said the new coalition is not anti-baseball. “The question is,” he said, “is this the time that public money ought to go to subsidize this particular project at a time when we are closing libraries, schools, and public safety issues are not being addressed?”
 
Weyermann added that county residents don’t want to see the San Jose Giants disappear, as team officials have pledged will happen if the A’s relocate.
In 2009, the San Jose Giants set all-time attendance and revenue records, drawing more than 200,000 fans for the first time.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 10:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Im not an Oakland backer

If the A’s want to move to SF im all for that.

Also copying an entire article and pasting it is no good and can get the site in trouble… don’t do it

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 13, 2010 11:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

RTFM

“sorry no link as the original article expired”. CGV me…

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 13, 2010 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

"The original article expired" is sadly not a defense to copyright infringement

The owners of it can put it up, take it down, or do whatever they want with it whenever they want to. Copying the whole thing to another site is infringement in any of those circumstances.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

bingo

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

The A's should move to AT&T Park

…and the Giants should move to Fresno.

by richwol1 on Sep 13, 2010 11:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Id support this.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wonder if the schedule could be made so that the would share the park ala the Jets and the Giants in the NFL

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

It could

The A’s & Giants rarely have home games on the same day. And when they do, they’re never at the same time.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes.

And tear down that ugly coke bottle. And adjust the seating so we can actually watch the game.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Heh.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

coke bottle pays for the stadium

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by Future Ed on Sep 14, 2010 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not after the A's lease the place.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

It would be so awesome if the A's just assumed the Giants stadium debt and played at the phone booth.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Being for an SF move isn't really an option and is by far the least likely scenario.

You’ve reiterated several times you see no reason why they should move. I think that makes you pro-Oakland.

!#%&$#@&%&% antioxidants! - pam

by cuppingmaster on Sep 14, 2010 7:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Which seems kind of contradictory...

(Going a bit OT here)

DFA advocates another complete tear-down and re-build (or, at least is open to the idea) in order to build a strong solid team for the future. Yet, he also advocates (as I also interpret his statements) keeping the team in Oakland which would, in effect, keep the team short on revenue and thus hinder said roster development into a good team.

I've come to the conclusion that the two most important things in life are good friends and a good bullpen.
~Bob Lemon, 1981

by UncleLeo on Sep 14, 2010 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, not really

I think the situation (as long as the team is in Oakland) is hopeless no matter what the team does. I’m entirely for moving to San Jose, because that’s the only way the A’s will ever have enough revenue to be competitive more often than once a decade or so.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Then what...

…was this [They already aborted the rebuilding process midway through so at this point the choices are to retry it, or to fail] about?

Are you for ‘fail’? Or are you now, perhaps, ready to backtrack on that earlier comment?

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 14, 2010 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

A poor attempt at a joke

You know, the whole abort/retry/fail thing?

Like I said, it wasn’t my best effort.

Uh, at this point, I probably am for “fail” actually, since at least that gives the current iteration of the team a puncher’s chance (10%? 20%?) of making a playoff appearance in the next year or two.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

this this this

!#%&$#@&%&% antioxidants! - pam

by cuppingmaster on Sep 14, 2010 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think they have plenty of revenue to field a competitive team

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously?

They have like the second or third-lowest revenue of any team in baseball at this point.

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think part of that is by design.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dude, obviously I know that.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't defend any propaganda in this thread or elsewhere

all I did was make fun of the dramatics on display. But you attack me anyway, even though I didn’t address you or make any statement one way or the other about these phone calls other than to laugh at the drama. Care to backpedal or should I just flag you?

Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?

by emperor nobody on Sep 14, 2010 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

never mind, flagged anyway

Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?

by emperor nobody on Sep 14, 2010 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Awww

thank you EN…you made my day ;)

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

LOL

sensitive aren’t we? When did i “attack” you? I just noted i don’t understand your positions thereof:

“The horrors! Someone called my house and asked leading questions about a controversial issue to manufacture a pre-desired resulting opinion!”

That would seem to imply that you are condoning this behavior by whomever is trying to slander the Baseball SJ movement (which we all know you are a strong opponent of). You seem to write it off as if it was standard American practice and should be tolerated.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

you are misrepresenting my posts in this thread, which are minimal and humorous and not intended to offer a pro-Oakland view whatsoever.

In fact, I stated outright that the questions are misleading and intended to get a desired resulting opinion…. how does that differ from your supposition that they are propaganda? What you’re doing here is deliberately trying to provoke me as you have done in the past, right down to your mocking little winking face right here when I flagged you, not for dragging me into this but for posting a verbatim article in its entirety in clear violation of the site rules, for which you have little or no observable respect.

Do me a favor: don’t mention me or my name in your posts anymore, please. Your tack in all of this is purely provocative and agenda-driven and I do not wish to be referenced by you to further abet your self-aggrandized, disrespectful way of addressing people and issues whatsoever.

Thank you.

Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?

by emperor nobody on Sep 14, 2010 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Knowing full well

your views on SJ as some “sprawling blight with bad air and no observable cultural history or character”, how could one not think that your posts in a anti-Giants/pro-SJ post not have some hidden provocation behind it? But hey, Mr. CGV, i’ll stay out of your way, if you stay out of mine. /winky wink ;)

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 1:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Anyone reading this would do well to examine this poster's commenting history

Very telling that you offer no, none, zero participation on any other topic other than the stadium issue, and always in this tone of disrespectful provocation and taunting, even daring to be CGV’d. I’ve never seen you in a game thread, never seen you in a recap thread, never seen you in a non-stadium-related Fanpost. Never witnessed you to make one single post on this site relating to any other topic whatsoever other than this one, and always in borderline cruel and rudely dismissive tones and often — as with the reprinting in its entirety of what must have been a copyrighted article — in full and clear violation of the site rules and seemingly amused and emboldened by such violation.

Isn’t what I have just described the very living definition of a troll?

Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?

by emperor nobody on Sep 14, 2010 1:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

You're making me blush..

but you really should try harder and actually do some research…however, you did tickled my fancy a second time today EN… ;)

- An in depth look at Rajai

- Open Thread: Game 32 – A’s vs. Rays (cont.)

- “(sorry no link as the original article expired)”

- and your requisite DLD made by Super Troll himself : DLD 08/19/08 – Insomniac Edition

Sorry, I’m not part of the kool guys clique of AN 2.0, but thanks for playing anyways Josh… ;)

P.S. Flagged..for I dunno..being stupid (the post that is)…

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 2:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

wow a DLD in 2008, a Fanpost in 2009, and a game thread in 2010

I stand corrected, you are truly a benevolently participatory, respectful and community-oriented member of this blog! How could I have been so very, um, stupid… to use your wonderful, mature and insightful terminology? The myriad times you’ve been flagged on this site are clearly all the fault of other, less conciliatory posters and should be dismissed outright as the mere illusion of provocation.

Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?

by emperor nobody on Sep 14, 2010 2:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes Josh

I need to participate everyday, every second, in every posts imaginable maybe from way back as 2002? You are really grasping for straws now and trying (futility i might add) at an attempt for personal attack….good luck with that. /winky wink ;)

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 2:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Interestingly enough..

did a quick web search for Jeffro’s post about SFSJ being outed as the SJ Giants and guess what i find?
San Jose Watchdog group finds SF Giants using push-poll tactics

The questions used before are almost inline with the OP as well:

For each of the following statements, if this were used as an argument for bringing a baseball team to San Jose would it make you extremely likely, likely, unlikely, extremely unlikely to vote yes?
- Full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to libraries
- The team owners will receive land and be required to mitigate traffic impacts
- The team owners will receive land and not be required to mitigate traffic impacts
- Bringing a team would mean the San Jose Giants are forced to leave San Jose
- The team owners will receive land and be required to pay for all public safety needs due to increased traffic and activity
- The team owners will receive land and not be required to pay for all public safety needs due to increased traffic and activity

Now if this isn’t the same organization running the same old propaganda, i don’t know what is. Worst of all, I can’t believe people condone or question this sort of tactic…

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

And another article on this..

Giants vs. A’s in San Jose:

Councilman Sam Liccardo tells Fly that political consultants working for the San Francisco Giants have been "push-polling" to turn the San Jose public against the idea of the Oakland A’s franchise coming to the South Bay.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 12:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Um one of your links doesn't work and the other is to some random blog. LOL

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

THe FLy is one of the oldest political columns in SJ

they are the ones that outed ROn GOnzales’ affair.

It is a column out of the Metro Silicon Valley.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by Future Ed on Sep 14, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

and you pay attention to local politics of other locals when you were 14?

That happened before I had even started high school

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Fly

Is currently a news outlet in San Jose/Silicon Valley. You know, when you wrote:

Um one of your links doesn’t work and the other is to some random blog. LOL

You really think this is about some story from 12 years ago? Geez you jump around when you know you don’t know what you are talking about but are trying to distract everyone from that fact.

by jeffro on Sep 14, 2010 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

The fetch was the random blog. The fly was the link that didn't work

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Geez, I screwed that up

The Fly is currently REPORTING for a news outlet in San Jose/Silicon Valley.

by jeffro on Sep 14, 2010 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

and has been called the fly since 2003

before that it was called…..Something else, I can’t remember. I personally know the people that have written it going back to the late 90s.

It is a well established well connected well sourced column.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by Future Ed on Sep 15, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

BTW -

Here’s the link to that article from the Fly :

http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/09.07.00/public-eye-0036.html

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

ps a search of google of fly and ron gonzales didn't even hit on the story.

Sorry I didn’t know that the Fly broke some story 12 years ago

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

see above

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by Future Ed on Sep 15, 2010 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Like I said I don't follow SJ local blogs

glad to see one of ST’s sources is legit

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2010 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry about the 2nd link

should be here:

http://www.sanjoseinside.com/news/entries/01_06_10_baseball_san_jose/

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

He I know it doesn't fit your meme but guess what
- Full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to libraries
- The team owners will receive land and be required to mitigate traffic impacts
- The team owners will receive land and be required to pay for all public safety needs due to increased traffic and activity

Are phrasing the question “in support” of a SJ stadium. It is obviously a fricking messaging poll to anyone who has ever done political polling.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, why can't we just argue about Jack Cust

Now there's nothing left to say, so let's go drink beer.

by doctorK on Sep 14, 2010 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

I can piss the furthest and you know it

Just accept that.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

and yet...here we are.

The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. -Joe Posnanski 8/29/09

by pam5981 on Sep 14, 2010 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Didn't you ever watch Ghost Busters?

You never cross streams.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Only when StayPuff is around.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Angels are in town?

Peter Gammons ran over his puppy. But that wasn’t the worst part. He then proceeded to back over it too. Then rolled forward again (#3), rolled down the window and said, "What are you going to do about it, kid? I’m Peter F**king Gammons, b**ch." Then drove away. -d to the moas

by Leopold Bloom on Sep 14, 2010 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

For some reason...

… all I keep thinking as I read this thread is Josh Lyman wandering around the West Wing screaming “It’s a push poll!”

by RickeySteals on Sep 14, 2010 11:59 AM PDT reply actions  

LOL. Thank you.

The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. -Joe Posnanski 8/29/09

by pam5981 on Sep 14, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

All I know is:

I’m at the window…

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Sep 14, 2010 12:55 PM PDT reply actions  

"Change it had to come. We knew it all along."

Those days are over now that there’s social networking and an ability to express oneself over the web. Instead of that [which you linked to above], we now have this.

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 14, 2010 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's worth a look. It has a familiar, if slightly less civil, tone than the local threads.

I think of that ‘Network’ clip as a proto-flashmob, like prisencollinansineinciusol is proto-rap.

The ’70s — were they great, or what?

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Sep 14, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

point 2 is well taken

this thread got hijacked by semantics. It would have been a much better discussion without it.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by Future Ed on Sep 14, 2010 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

can you please explain why a anti SJ push poll would have these questions
- Full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to libraries
- The team owners will receive land and be required to mitigate traffic impacts
- The team owners will receive land and be required to pay for all public safety needs due to increased traffic and activity

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

"'scuse me Mr. D, but I'm from the Humane Society...

… and that horse expired somewhere far up the road from here."

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Sep 14, 2010 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   5 recs

LOL

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

It would be very nice if this were to turn green

Now there's nothing left to say, so let's go drink beer.

by doctorK on Sep 14, 2010 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Since you are not familiar with SJ politics...

- Libraries, SJPD and SJFD recently had cutbacks (and layoffs) due to budget deficit thus trying to highlight to residents that spending money on the stadium should take a back door to spending on City needs. They fail to highlight that stadium efforts is sponsored by the RDA funding and does not impact general funding (by law).

- Increased traffic is always a concern to local residents and tries to argue against the latest EIR doesn’t address this. Doing another revision to the EIR would result in another delay to the stadium effort as well as cause more stress on the general fund which has cutbacks to local public safety programs (see above).

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

There would be an increased public safety expenditure on games from general fund dollars.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's what i was saying

you would need increased public safety, but the general fund is already stretched due to the deficits and may not readily support this, hence citing the Stadium Owners to incur the costs.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Those aren't questions.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

They are on the poll that ST claims was sent out

Again if there was a Giants push poll it would be written up by legitimate sources, like the Merc or Chron because it would be news. Guess what, its not.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Correction DFA

Those are the polls that the SJ Watchdog Group has cited that was sent out. The Merc and the Chron has outed SFSJ as a Giants front and Sam L. of the SJ City Council has stated as such in the other article. Why are you so adamant that this isn’t a Giants sponsored propaganda to try to derail the SJ Stadium effort? Your only argument is that it can be anyone, but who would stand to lose the most and has been publicly vocal in their dismissal of the effort, as well as financing lawyers, organizations, and rallies to support their cause? The Gnats of course.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Im not adament that the Giants aren't behind the polling. I wouldn't be surprised if they are

Im adamant that its not a push poll.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

On the poll how? They're a bullet list, NOT questions.

And that doesn’t even get into what that has to do with the call reported by the OP. You’re just arguing now for arguing’s sake at this point.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is the full question
For each of the following statements, if this were used as an argument for bringing a baseball team to San Jose would it make you extremely likely, likely, unlikely, extremely unlikely to vote yes?
- Full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to the police department
- A new stadium will be built only after full funding is restored to libraries
- The team owners will receive land and be required to mitigate traffic impacts
- The team owners will receive land and not be required to mitigate traffic impacts
- Bringing a team would mean the San Jose Giants are forced to leave San Jose
- The team owners will receive land and be required to pay for all public safety needs due to increased traffic and activity
- The team owners will receive land and not be required to pay for all public safety needs due to increased traffic and activity

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Gotcha

Well, whatever survey this was taken from likely wasn’t a push poll. Doesn’t say anything about the OP’s poll though.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

The claim by vertigo and ST is that this is the same shtick as that poll

the OP didn’t even take the poll so the OP has no idea what the poll was so really shouldn’t have made a push poll claim

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the OP has enough understanding about what the person they were talking to heard/took

As for the claim it’s like the others, well, that it’s highly unlikely that they were similar based on the difference in what the questions were. But then it could just as easily be different people administering the two surveys.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

not really I mean he doesn't even list questions.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

That "shtick"

is probably a cover up for one (or many) of the columnist on that site, which if you look at the list is pretty impressive including former SJ Mayor Tom McEnery.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have no idea what this means.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

It means

there’s a lot more credibility for that anonymous source that you are generalizing (e.g. “the shtick”). After all, he/she/they again did break the cover on the Ron Gonzales affair.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

BTW -

So you think ending a call with this message isn’t push-polling eh?

Liccardo reports that the phone poll ends with a message that says: "The greedy team owners will receive millions in city funds leaving less money for San Jose fire fighters, police officers and parks and traffic, which will be severely impacted."

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

link?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

can you just you know start linking to things instead of infringing on copy write or asking us to take your word that its legit?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can you like..

actually read the links i sent beforehand, so that I don’t have to repeat it?

http://www.sanjoseinside.com/news/entries/01_06_10_baseball_san_jose/

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

um how bout you don't send out broken links then

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

NT
Sorry about the 2nd link
should be here:

http://www.sanjoseinside.com/news/entries/01_06_10_baseball_san_jose/

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

How bout you use a source not named "The Fly"

Also that same councilman says that the SJ Giants won’t have to move if the A’s get a SJ stadium LOL.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Heh

Yeah, that last bit is soooo wrong.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Should I email Sam L

himself to appease you or do you have any supporting info to counter these allegations that it isn’t push polling?

And technically, the SJ giants don’t have to move (Wolf has also stated as such), even though realistically they probably have to.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

if there is actually push polling going on it would be in the chron or merc.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

So your only

argument is that it didn’t make it into the front page? If they queried the SF Giants, do you think they’ll go on record to deny it or confirm it? Most likely, it will be traced back to SFSJ, which is funded by the Giants, so can will cite plausible deniability. Anyhow, I emailed Sam L. on his comments anyhow, so this would substantiate or deny this source. If he confirms it, then what would be your take?

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

My take is of course hes going to call it a push poll

but I bet hes running a poll that asks if creating jobs with the stadium is going to make people vote for it. My point is that every political campaign does these kinds of polls its not dirty and its not rare. Every politician also vilifies their opponent of doing push polls when they run the exact same poll.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Obviously

there is no credible way short of the Giants admitting to these activities to dissuade you on your opinions, so i will leave the matter as is for others to decide themselves.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

no like I said a newspaper reporting that it went out would.

The fly says nothing about that either just that Lacardo claimed the Giants were push polling.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ha

Because if a newspapaer doesn’t report it, it didn’t happen!

by jeffro on Sep 14, 2010 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

what do you mean by that?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

My point is that every political campaign does these kinds of polls its not dirty and its not rare.

Usually you’re lying by omitting facts. That’s dirty.

by LoneStranger on Sep 14, 2010 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I believe that minor league territories are not related to major league territories.

So no, they wouldn’t be forced to move. They’d likely claim some kind of hurt though and ask to be reimbursed for a move. And I’d be fine giving it to them.

by LoneStranger on Sep 14, 2010 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I could have sworn there was rule that didn't allow minor league teams

within a certain distance of a major league team. It’s less to do with territories and more to do with not competing for dollars.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 14, 2010 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

This.

I've come to the conclusion that the two most important things in life are good friends and a good bullpen.
~Bob Lemon, 1981

by UncleLeo on Sep 15, 2010 6:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Can't be a very large radius

How close are the Mets and the Brooklyn Cyclones? 5 miles? Less?

"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.

by PaulThomas on Sep 14, 2010 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

It would be impossible for them to stay in business

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

By business

do you mean to develop young talents? that’s not impossible. Maybe to make a healthy profit it would, but I don’t think that’s been the general rule with MiLB teams.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

WTF are you talking about?

the team would go bankrupt. No one wants to see minor league baseball when a major league team is a hop a skip and a jump away.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately,

that hop and a skip away is a 30 minute commute or shorter to the SF Giants or Oakland A’s from the SJ GIants. I guess it’s not worth seeing Buster Posey or MAdison Bumgarner in the minors as they deveop….

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 4:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

um when did it ever take 30 minutes to get from SJ to SF at rush hour?

Ditto to Oakland

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can hop on

880 north to Oakland in less than 30 minutes for a daytime game. For a night game, i have gotten close to those times riding in carpool lane. Once you past 580, it is a breeze up north. I can also go up 280 with little resistance through embarcadero to Pacbell. It also helps that you go a little early.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you leave work a 530 you might get to a 7 pm game ontime.

I know because my girlfriend tried to do it for a work Giants game twice this summer from her job in DT SJ

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

5:30pm is probably too late

I tend to leave around 4:30pm with a friend and get to Oakland for early dinner by 5pm-5:30pm, then head to game early for batting practice.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Less than an hour from San Fancisco City Hall

to SJ Muni. for me on a Wednesday

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by Future Ed on Sep 15, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

what time?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2010 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Game time was 7

I made it and parked. I am guessing I left a little before 6. I used the car pool lane.

there were 2 accidents that slowed me down.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by Future Ed on Sep 16, 2010 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah but its an hour away.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dude, why don't you just like talk to yourself in the mirror for an hour. It'd be more effective

Brooklyn, Staten Island, Yankees, Mets, Kane County, Chicago… There are a bunch more. Go and read about where minor league teams are in relationship to Major League teams and then start picking apart individual examples rather than the larger point. Sheesh, you are fun to deal with.

by jeffro on Sep 14, 2010 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

all of those are difficult to get to from the suburbs

its not an individual example. Its all the examples.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

For a guy

that favors a move to Portland instead of SJ due to accessibility, your statements of it being difficult to travel much shorter distances is interesting, to say the least.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 5:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

why?

I recognize that im in the minority.

On a personal level if two places are inaccessible Id rather go to the place that is more fun and enjoyable. San Jose is not accessible to me. Portland isn’t either. But I like Portland far more.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because

that is like me saying i would prefer the A’s in China as opposed to Oakland, since I go there more often and it is much more fun.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

why is that illogical

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not true

Why have I gone to San Jose Giants games when I live in SF?

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by Future Ed on Sep 15, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

um because you represent .001% of baseball fans?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2010 10:24 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I go to San Jose Giants games and I live in Pleasanton

You are just flat out wrong… Where is your source for the .001 per cent?

by jeffro on Sep 15, 2010 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

um youre a fricking baseball blogger how many of those do you think there are

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 16, 2010 1:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

You've already gotten the goal post moved without any consession with this newest randomly selected decimal percentage.
No one wants to see minor league baseball when a major league team is a hop a skip and a jump away.

If you push poll it, he may drop the baseball fans portion of his latest claim without any consessions. Or, he may try to continue to define exactly what is meant by hopping, skipping, and jumping in terms of distance.

by LowcountryJoe on Sep 16, 2010 3:31 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

They are related

The original T-rights definition for Santa Clara County stated that any team could move there as long as it was AAA or lower. The resident SJ Giants would receive compensation from any invading team regardless of level.

A test of this came when the Mets initially showed interest in having a short season team in Brooklyn. It was only approved, along with stadium funding, when the Yankees also got a team in Staten Island.

by vertig0 on Sep 14, 2010 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not quite

Most teams have a general definition without spelling out specific levels. Santa Clara County was unique in that it had the AAA or lower distinction. It essentially said to the South Bay, “Anything but MLB here.”

by vertig0 on Sep 14, 2010 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wonder why it was spelled out like that.

Was anyone thinking about bringing their farm team there?

by LoneStranger on Sep 14, 2010 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sam Liccardi (SJ Councilman's response)
….that statement was based on the recollection of a woman who had
been surveyed by a phone call to her home. She lives in neighborhood
near the University, and she knew me, so she called me to let me know
everything that she remembered about the questioning. That question was
merely one of several questions that seemed tilted against a stadium
vote.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hehe

After thanking him for his time and dedication on the SJ Stadium:

Thanks * — I look foreward to pushing ahead to make this happen.
Please pardon any typos, as I’m typing this message from my Blackberry device.

Nice to see our civic leaders respond so quickly! Can’t someone from Oakland do the same there?

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

And if you asked my last campaign's primary opponent if we push polled he would tell you we did

and yet we ran a small sample poll and analyzed the data, which excludes it from the definition of a push poll.

Like I said asking the biggest political stadium backer isn’t going to get you anything but spin. The Fly didn’t even call it a push poll in his article.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're obviously

much more experienced in these sort of matters, but for an average Joe like me, this wreaks of push-poll or at least dirty propoganda tactics.

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

"Just play for the name in front of the uniform.." - Dallas Braden

"Oakland is the emotional choice, and could still work, but San Jose really is the best choice." - UncleLeo

by ST on Sep 14, 2010 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thats part of my point
for an average Joe like me, this wreaks of push-poll or at least dirty propoganda tactics.

Youve gotten all worked up here because Liccardi called it a push poll and dirty tactics, when its regular tactics.

Put it to you this way: Youre the campaign manager and you can only run one commercial because its really expensive, the polls are close so you are going to want to hit them with tough ad, are you going to want to see which message is most effective before you run the ad or not?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 14, 2010 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know why you are obsessed with pollsters definition of push-polls

When all the posters above are fine with saying “okay, it’s not a pollster’s definition of a push poll” while also clearly stating they don’t like polls that have leading questions. A whole lot of people don’t like polls that have leading questions, where the poll is about sending a message. These same people who don’t like “messaging polls” or whatever you want to call them don’t care what they are named, what they care about is getting called and asked leading questions. That’s what people object to, the behavior, regardless of what it is called, and it seems like all you can do is say “but that isn’t a push poll” while ignoring the behavior. They don’t like it when candidates for office do it, they don’t like it when ballot measure pro or con groups do it, they don’t like it ever. Yes, it happens often, no, people still don’t like it.

by el generico on Sep 15, 2010 3:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

You do realize using Dirty Ad Campaigns is also extremely common in politics, right?

Just because something is standard, does not make it clean. And yes, if you really cared about which ad was going to be most successful without muddying the waters, you could phrase it as such that it wouldn’t. But the act is intentional simply because it helps a campaign to be able to see which ad will incite more reaction while killing two birds with one stone. A regular tactic does not mean it’s not also a dirty tactic. The two aren’t mutually exclusive so stop acting as if it they are. Politics in general is a dirty game, it’s as simple as that and why so many people are disenfranchised over our political system. Yes, I get that you’ve worked on campaigns, but that just means your bias towards thinking that everything you’ve seen and done is on the up and up without crossing into morally ambiguous territories.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 15, 2010 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

the complaining about "dirty campaigning" is very very common because it allows people to mask legitimate questions.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow... just wow.

Then you’re already lost to the “game” that is politics and there’s really no reason to discuss this further.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 15, 2010 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not really, Im just saying that if people didn't cry wolf over this kind of stuff the real dirty campaigning would actually be damaging to candidates that partake.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2010 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

except this isn't a dirty tactic

its a messaging poll there is no evidence that suggests otherwise.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 16, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

You're wrong.

The evidence is in the wording. Either the people running the poll are complete idiots, or they are trying to influence people’s minds. I find it hard to believe that the wording didn’t pass through a few levels of approval before being used.

  1. Do you support user designatedforassignment for moderator on Athletics Nation?
  2. Would you still support designatedforassignment if you knew he was a convicted felon, owed child support for two children under the age of two, and kicked puppies locked up in a small 3×5 kennel in his back yard?

by LoneStranger on Sep 16, 2010 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Read the poll its far more like this:

1 Do you support DFA for moderator?

Would you be more or less likely to vote for DFA as a moderator if

1) He has gotten several strikes in the past.
2) He has had 30 posts on the rec list.
3) He believes that AN should be aggressively debate centric
4) He will be required to drop from being a moderator if he gets a strike
5) He wouldn’t be required to stop being a moderator if he gets another strike.

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 16, 2010 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes DFA.

If you were doing a poll and being honest about it for analytical purposes, that’s how you would phrase the question. Too bad that’s not how this latest poll is being reported as being handled, it’s how an old poll was done. The most recent poll, as reported by the OP, was how LoneStranger described it. Assuming he was factually correct, it was a push poll. The old poll, as reported by new articles mentioned elsewhere in thread, was not a push poll.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 16, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

again the OP didn't take the poll nor did Lone Stranger

what is more likely, that the Giants were running a non push poll messaging poll and then were like oh screw it lets do a push poll now or the OP who got the questions second hand and didn’t write it down was only told the questions that would get them riled up from the person that actually took the poll?

What we’re asking is for people to stop pretending that ipse dixit counts as a "source." When you make a claim about baseball, you should be willing to put some reasonable amount of effort into explaining why it’s correct if someone asks you to. That’s basic respect for the other poster. - PT

by designatedforassignment on Sep 16, 2010 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who cares?

You do understand that you’ve been arguing that it wasn’t a push poll from the very beginning before any discussion of other “Giant’s” related polls? If you felt this way, you could have and should have ignored the push poll reference and simply argued that the OP has his facts related to the actual questions wrong. But that’s not what you did. Instead you’ve spent this entire thread whining and crying out “it’s not a push poll” when in reality, simply based on the few facts from the OP, what was describe was a push poll. Now, if you want to put doubt on whether the actual poll took place as stated, okay, I could easily buy that. If you want to put doubt this poll came from the Giants as source, again, I could buy that. But instead you’ve gone off over and over on a load of BS on so many tangent arguments that have nothing to do with what the rest of us have been discussing and with such earnest that it goes beyond ridiculous.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 16, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

There's no proof... there's plenty of evidence.

And no, it’s not just semantics.

I've come to the conclusion that the two most important things in life are good friends and a good bullpen.
~Bob Lemon, 1981

by UncleLeo on Sep 16, 2010 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hiding behind semantics, that is.

That’s how politicians work.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Sep 17, 2010 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Great. Now the parrot's gone, too.

Won’t somebody think of the parrots?

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus

by The Dogfather on Sep 14, 2010 4:35 PM PDT reply actions  

apparently, you are back now! yay! Reno good?

Peter Gammons ran over his puppy. But that wasn’t the worst part. He then proceeded to back over it too. Then rolled forward again (#3), rolled down the window and said, "What are you going to do about it, kid? I’m Peter F**king Gammons, b**ch." Then drove away. -d to the moas

by Leopold Bloom on Sep 14, 2010 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

[[[pushes his poll too hard, breaks it, wonders what to do]]]

Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?

by emperor nobody on Sep 15, 2010 1:28 AM PDT reply actions  

Hospital. Stat.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.

by DMOAS on Sep 15, 2010 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A's relocation option from a legal expert on the issue
Oakland_athletics_team_logo_photofile_small
Prospects 1Q Report

Recent FanPosts

100_1536_small
My new smarts on the Fanpost, and Mr. Offseason is born, and getting to know me
Small
GOG 2012 #18: The Twins have a shiny new park, and not much else
Small
Gotta Be Their Pitching
Hardly-boys_small
Minor League notes on Major League Day Off
Small
Cespedes Upate?
Small
The SF Warriors, the LA Raiders and the Oakland A's
Photo__11__small
COG #17 - Yankees vs. Athletics or Spank me! Spank me!
100_1536_small
What to do? What to do?
Small
Fans Should Buy the A's
Reg3_small
Tom Milone's Nickname

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Sb_nation1_small ahhall

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late