Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The MMA Hour Is Back

Slusser: Eric Chavez Considering Retirement

Susan Slusser reports what many of us have thought of, if not said aloud, regarding Eric Chavez's future - it's possible he doesn't have one in a baseball uniform at all. Her column, which you can find here, reports that Chavez is as indecisive as ever, saying in an e-mail: "The truth of the matter is that I don't know what I'm going to do."

Chavez, as you know, won six Gold Gloves with the A's, from 2001 to 2006, and has 230 home runs with the team. At this point, his name pretty much hearkens back to the late 90's/early 2000's teams, featuring Miguel Tejada and Jason Giambi, as he has faded to memory, playing less than a full season's worth of games from 2007 through this year, including only 8 games in 2009 and 23 in 2008. He also has come to represent the futility of the A's spending, as his monster six year, $66 million contract has practically been a wash for more than half of its tenure.

With Kevin Kouzmanoff coming into his own at 3rd base and Daric Barton becoming a team leader at 1st base, one wonders if even a healthy Chavez could take time away at either infield spot, or just join the roster of players, led by Jack Cust, at designated hitter. For a guy once known for the best hot corner play in the league, if not the majors, for more than half a decade, the prospect of recovering from back surgeries and neck surgeries to be less than half a player can't be a happy one. If he does retire, I believe the A's fans will understand, and remember him for the glory days, not his trying again to come back as a broken man to the green and gold.

For me, being born in the same year as Chavez (1977), it's hard to think of this guy as more than over the hill, seeking retirement. Maybe it truly is too late for me to put on the spikes and try out for my minor league career. But Chavy, if you've got nothing going on after this, maybe we can go hit a few flies in the East Bay. For old timer's sake.

Much more from Chavez, via e-mail, in Slusser's story.

Comment 78 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'll always remember, somewhat fondly, really...

Chavez swinging at face high fastballs. It was just what he did. Most of the times he’d miss them, and I’d think, “Man, he’ll be good when he figures out not to swing at those.” But sometimes he’d hit one and tomahawk it over the right field fence, and it was just awesome.

by Emmett89 on Aug 8, 2010 5:47 PM PDT reply actions  

ahh, those face-high fastballs

It used to drive me crazy when he’d hit one out, because you knew he was going to swing at the next 50 trying to do the same thing. Man, it really seemed after 2004 that he might actually turn into a superstar. The dude hit 32 homers as a 23 year old playing great third base … what might have been. First his approach fell apart in 2005, then his body fell apart for good. Ah well.

I really miss the 99-03 A’s. Man, those were good times.

by jdr on Aug 10, 2010 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

but Ice is Dry

*WARNING!* Playing online multiplayer games may change your: Religion, Sexual Orientation, Race and/or Gender for undetermined periods of time.

by Zonis on Aug 9, 2010 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

and cold

"Like I said, it’s like me giving you a high-five and chest bump after you hit for the cycle against the kid in the wheelchair." Vacafan on May 14, 2010

by adragon on Aug 25, 2010 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sadface.

Its for the better but still sad to see the page turned nevertheless.

by brian.only on Aug 8, 2010 6:30 PM PDT reply actions  

don't look now but

the page turned a long time ago. he had many good years but they are long in the past. it is good to see he might not be burdening the team with his “attempt” to come back

by heartstopper on Aug 8, 2010 6:39 PM PDT reply actions  

What I would love to see

Yeah, we all know that Chavez’s career is over. His contract runs out after this year and there’s no way the option is picked up. Any decision about retirement isn’t about the old Chavvy being back in action; it’s about whether he officially calls it quits or whether he drags it out by being a crappy longshot with some other team’s AAA club.

I would love to see him end his career with class, and even more than that I’d love to see him play with the A’s one last time before his retirement. I want to see him healthy in time to be in the dugout with the rest of the guys for September call-ups. And although he doesn’t warrant a starting spot, I’d like to see him get a little bit of playing time here and there in the last few games. I’d like one of the games in the final homestand to be some sort of Chavez appreciation night, at which he’d announce that he’ll be retiring at the end of the year, so that the fans can express all our years of Chavvy love and appreciation.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Aug 8, 2010 6:41 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Chavez basically said as much in his email to Slusser

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Aug 8, 2010 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

He'd have to be on the 40 man roster for that to happen.

And while there are certainly irrelevant spots there, I’m not sure Beane will be willing to drop one just to give Chavez one last dance. That being said, he should spend the rest of the season traveling with the team and hanging out with them as part of a last hoorah.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

by DMOAS on Aug 8, 2010 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Totally worth it.

Yes, I know that from a winning-baseball-games point of view, clearing the 40-man spot is a cost, and having Chavvy on the team is no gain. But sometimes you do something just for the emotional importance of it, and for me having Chavvy in the clubhouse for the last few weeks of the season is one of those times.

How hard is it really to clear a spot? I see several guys on the 40-man I’d be willing to risk to waivers: Jeff Lyman, Cedrick Bowers, Matt Watson, Matt Carson. Are these guys really so great that some other team is going to snag them and make room for them on their own 40-man? And even if they do, do we really care that much?

People have been talking about a September call-up for Michael Taylor, and he’s not on the 40-man either. If we can clear a spot for Taylor, we can clear a spot for Chavvy. Looks to me like we could easily clear spots for both of them.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Aug 8, 2010 11:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

As long as it doesn't hurt the team, I'd be all for it.

“Extra” 40-man roster spot, September expanded 25-man roster spot, not hindering contention (if an issue at all), and so on.

Bob Geren... Jackie Moore without the personality.

by UncleLeo on Aug 9, 2010 7:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

And yet Chavvy can be in the clubhouse for the last few weeks of the season

Regardless of being on the 40-man. There are at least 5 or 6 spots that could be dropped for him and yes, all those players are roster filler, but they’re also filler that we’ve actually used. Chavvy can’t play anymore, so emotional attachment aside, I don’t see much use in dropping one of them for Chavvy to do what he’d be doing anyway, which is hanging out on the bench. Now, if you were suggesting giving that spot to Rickey, I think that would be a much more interesting idea given that he could conceivably play even at his age. Having Chavvy around the team is a great idea, I just don’t think he needs to be on the active roster to do that.

Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples

Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.

by DMOAS on Aug 9, 2010 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I want him on the team.

Who the f*** is Jeff Lyman? I’m just not seeing the 40-man roster spot as any sort of sacrifice. The guys that “we’ve actually used” are guys like Cedrick Bowers and Matt Watson. You think it’s going to cost us games if we’re forced to resort to Ross Wolf and Gabe Gross instead? Suck is suck; it hardly matters if you have to use this suck instead of that suck.

Even if you do come up with a scenario where it actually costs us a game I still want to do it. I want Chavvy to end his career on the team. I want him to go out and tip his hat to the crowd in the final homestand when everyone in the stands is thinking “Wow, this is probably the last game he’ll ever play in the MLB.”

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Aug 9, 2010 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd be surprised if Billy wasn't willing to do that.

Considering all the leeway he’s had with Chavvy and his health over the last 2-3 years.

The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. -Joe Posnanski 8/29/09

by pam5981 on Aug 9, 2010 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

There's a pretty easy way around it, especially if the A's are out of it

At some point at the end of September someone on the roster will be hurting a little. Just put that guy on the 60-Day DL. That way they can get Chavez another couple games while not actually losing a player.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Aug 9, 2010 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or just cut one of the players you were going to cut anyway

Every team outrights 5 or 6 players at season’s end.

Not really a big deal.

Arthur Dent: You know, it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse and about to die of asphyxiation in deep space, that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young.
Ford Prefect: Why, what did she tell you?
Arthur Dent: I don't know, I didn't listen!

by PaulThomas on Aug 9, 2010 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

that would be awesome

and I would have to buy tickets for Chavy night or my wife would kill me.

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Aug 10, 2010 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Would Chavvy night count as a "special occasion"?

(nudge, wink)

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Aug 10, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

LOL! :-)

doubtful

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Aug 10, 2010 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not even with role-playing?

You could get a uniform.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Aug 10, 2010 9:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

we've only been married 3 years

we haven’t quite reached that point yet :-)

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Aug 11, 2010 1:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Can't believe how sad it makes me to hear this,

even though we’ve all known it for so long.

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Aug 8, 2010 6:46 PM PDT reply actions  

What a spineless decision.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Aug 8, 2010 6:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Are you giving him the cold shoulder?

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Aug 8, 2010 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don't bend over backwards defending the guy.

Bob Geren... Jackie Moore without the personality.

by UncleLeo on Aug 9, 2010 7:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's sad for all us fans.

Of course he’s made a nice living but still.

I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters

by WaddellCanseco on Aug 8, 2010 7:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Chavy for Manager!

"The A's have to be setting some record this year for simultaneously maximizing team quality and player anonymity. I guess that’s sort of their thing though." - Luke in MN

by hero66 on Aug 8, 2010 7:09 PM PDT reply actions  

He'd be the most depressing manager ever

but I’m kinda for it.

"This must be heaven," he says.
"No. It's Oakland."

by Kyli on Aug 8, 2010 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

He'd tell the truth. No canned double talk

I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters

by WaddellCanseco on Aug 8, 2010 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

It would make me very happy.

If I can’t have Rickey, I’ll take Chavy as manager. He’s a smart player.

by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Aug 8, 2010 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

He'd make a bad manager.

All the greats do – they really struggle to get the most of out players less talented than they were.

"You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig."

by OldhamA on Aug 9, 2010 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Joe Torre was a terrific player, practically a border-line Hall of Famer

I wonder if some of the problem is that you do need to learn how to manage a team, and there aren’t too many great (and rich) players who are interested in riding around buses in the Appalachian League while they cut their managerial teeth. Giving anyone their first manager’s job in the majors is probably not a great idea.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Aug 9, 2010 9:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

My favorite post-2000 Athletic

It will be sad to see him go, but definitely it is time. When it is official I’ll be pouring some out for one of my favorite players.

by chri5 on Aug 8, 2010 7:12 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

I hope it's not the end of his days in uniform

because I think he could be an excellent coach or manager, if his health is up to it. Here’s hoping that the next stage of his life has some interesting new challenges, whether they’re baseball-related or not.

It's the fans that make the game fun. -- Rickey Henderson, July 26, 2009.

by Englishmajor on Aug 8, 2010 7:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Just curious...

…what makes you think he’d make a good coach?

I’ve always thought of him as non-cerebral, but that’s just the way he came accross to me.

by HCF from Oakball on Aug 8, 2010 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

He did improve his defense through hard work

I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters

by WaddellCanseco on Aug 8, 2010 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

People forget that when he was drafted his defense was considered a serious red flag. He (and Washburn) made him into a great defender through apparently a ton of work.

Though who can forget the brief “I want to play left field” portion of his career. That was odd.

by jdr on Aug 10, 2010 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

If he ever plays baseball again, watch him.

Part of it is being around the game so long, but he was paying attention for all those years. There hasn’t been a smarter baserunner in an A’s jersey since Rickey Henderson, and to me, smart baserunning=smart at baseball. If you can think baseball and know baseball well enough to run the bases better than most, you deserve a shot at managing a baseball team.

by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Aug 8, 2010 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Chavez...

…will make a very good analyst on CSN.

by HCF from Oakball on Aug 9, 2010 6:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

His health should be up to it...

We’d have to change the color scheme, though.

Bob Geren... Jackie Moore without the personality.

by UncleLeo on Aug 9, 2010 7:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kouzmanoff "coming into his own"?

HIs own what? HIs own universe of suckitude? The guy has an OBP of .302—by far the worst among the regulars—and has booted nine balls. The ONLY good thing that we could fairly say about this stiff is that he doesn’t suck quite as bad as Jack Hanaananananananahahananan.
THREE-OH-TWO! “Coming into his own”?

by kitoko on Aug 8, 2010 8:41 PM PDT reply actions  

He's improved defensively apparently

I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters

by WaddellCanseco on Aug 8, 2010 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hugs? :)

More than just ANtics: http://www.louisgray.com/live/

by louismg on Aug 8, 2010 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Of note...

Kouzmanoff’s OBP in 2008 was .299. In 2009 it was .302. In 2010, it is .300. We knew what we were getting. My comments essentially portray that we know what we are going to see. He has 10 HRs, which trails only Suzuki, even if that’s not a ton, and he leads the team with 55 RBI. RBI may be overrated, but it’s the most anybody on this team has. Stand down.

More than just ANtics: http://www.louisgray.com/live/

by louismg on Aug 8, 2010 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Kouzmanoff is filler...

….virtually every player in our lineup is filler. How I long for players who are…gosh, I don’t know…above league average in some discerable way, perhaps? This lineup is simply atrocious.

by kitoko on Aug 9, 2010 6:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, I'm not gonna "stand down"...

….and since you seem to be really enjoying the organization’s Kool-Aid, you can have the cup they’ve poured for me. I’ll pass on the Kool-Aid this time.
        To painstakingly target players who have a documented history of being well below average (and no one can tell me that OBP’s in 3 consecutive years of .299, .302, and .300 are anything but consistently and utterly DISMAL), and to give up valuable assets to acquire such underperformance is simply poor management. I’m no Jeff Baisley fan, but how much worse than a .302 OBP could he possibly deliver? It would have cost the team NOTHING to put Baisley there, or Rosales, or practically anyone with a pulse.
        The kid arriving in Seattle tonight, Chris Carter, has us all brimming with excitement because he has two things we haven’t seen in an A’s uniform in a very long time: POWER and UPSIDE. He could actually improve and become something special. Why is our organization targeting players with zero upside? Does a 3-year OPS record of .299, .302, and .300 promise anything in the way of upside? Kouzmanoff is an average MLB 3b with the glove, has below average power, has no clue how to work a count or manage his AB, and has never given any indication that he will “come into his own”. What a joke! Why are we constantly picking up garbage like this—and giving up prospects to do it, no less?
      You mention that you were born in ‘77. It’s too bad that you missed out on this team’s Golden Era. I’m glad I didn’t. I watched this team go from the glorious summit of ‘72-’74 to being laughably horrendous later in the decade. It’s always boom or bust. There actually is something even worse than the bust part of the cycle, and that’s the phase we have been in for the last several years. The A’s are irrelevant, faceless, and boring. The brutal lineups that we trot out there every night hoping to somehow win 2-1 or 3-2 are bordering on unwatchable. We have exactly ONE position player (Suzuki) who would be a starter on a decent team. THE ENTIRE REST OF THE LINEUP IS FILLER!
       I would really like to see BB target players that have upsides. He seems to have made a point of that in this year’s draft, which is a step in the right direction. Anyone remember when we were mentioned as a potential trade partner a few years back for Cincy (for Harden or Blanton, I think), and the players Oakland was supposedly targeting were Joey Votto and Johnny Cueto? It sure would be nice to have “high upside” players like that on our team. Note to BB: STOP throwing $5 mil at junk like Crisp when you can run Rajai out there for $1 mil, and HE IS THE SAME PLAYER! Also, Billy, while we’re at it, STOP throwing money at retread has-beens (read: Sheets, Piazza, Nomar, Giambi, etc.etc.) even if Bud tells you we must spend the revenue-sharing $$ on payroll. And above all, STOP giving up talent for useless stiffs who will OBP .302 from the cleanup spot!
      There—I’m finished now. I feel much better.

by kitoko on Aug 9, 2010 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just two points here
We have exactly ONE position player (Suzuki) who would be a starter on a decent team. THE ENTIRE REST OF THE LINEUP IS FILLER!

1) If you put Pennington on Boston, NY, the Rays, the Rangers, the Twins, or the White Sox, those teams would all be basically where they are right now. In a couple of cases the change would improve them. Those are all much, much better than “decent” teams.

2) The A’s are 1 game over .500. I’m not sure what your definition of “decent” is, but I infer that it doesn’t mean “winning more games than they lose” because empirically the entire A’s lineup is capable of starting, together, for a better-than-.500 team.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Aug 10, 2010 7:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

The A's are 1 game over .500--this is entirely true...

…but let’s not kid ourselves, the team’s record is 56-55 DESPITE the atrocious lineup, not because of it. The majority of the credit for the 56 wins belongs to an above-average pitching staff that succeeded 56 times in allowing fewer runs to the opposition than our flailing, overmatched hacks managed to score. Conversely, the majority of the blame for the 55 losses lies with the endless procession of ineptitude that steps up to the plate wearing green and gold. Every team has its strengths and weaknesses. Oakland’s strength is the battery—positions 1 and 2 on the diamond. The weaknesses? …Positions 3 through 9. We have a long way to go to become a decent team. We are at .500 because pitching is the most important aspect of baseball, and that is something we do well. To say that “hey, we’re at .500, so Kouz and Gross and the Matts and all of the dreck we march up to the plate must be decent, because they start for a decent team!” is giving them way too much credit. Pure and simple, our hitters SUCK! They SUCK!

by kitoko on Aug 10, 2010 7:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Okay

First, you’re wrong about “positions 3 through 9.” Pennington has been one of the best SS in the league this year, as I said above. None of those contending teams would be hurt by replacing their SS with Pennington, and a couple of them would do much better with Pennington than with who they currently have.

Second, you say “we have a long way to go to become a decent team” but you still haven’t said what “decent team” means to you. The A’s have outscored their opponents this year, and have a winning record. Isn’t that "decent’? And if that record does mean they’re a decent team, than obviously a decent team can start the guys the A’s have started. Remember that as bad as the A’s offense has been, there are 3 teams in the AL who’ve been even worse. They’re nowhere near the worst offense in the league, not by a long shot.

To say that "hey, we’re at .500, so Kouz and Gross and the Matts and all of the dreck we march up to the plate must be decent, because they start for a decent team!" is giving them way too much credit. Pure and simple, our hitters SUCK! They SUCK!

I didn’t say that. I think, and I said, that Pennington is better than “decent” this year among AL SSs. I didn’t say a thing about those other guys. It’ll be a lot easier to discuss this with you if you quote me and the arguments I actually make, rather than erecting strawmen to knock down. My comment was in reply to your statement, “We have exactly ONE position player (Suzuki) who would be a starter on a decent team,” which I disagree with because a) you’re dismissing Pennington, one of the better SS in the AL this year, and b) the A’s are a decent team.

Is the A’s offense decent? No, it’s crappy. Not the worst, by far, but crappy. If the A’s did have a decent offense (say, just league average) they’d have scored 47 more runs this year and, if their record matched their Pythagorean projections, they’d basically be tied with Texas for first and on pace to win 91 games. That would make them a very good team, not a “decent” team, which I think they already are by virtue of having outscored their opponents and won over half their games this season.

They’re a decent team with a crappy offense.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Aug 10, 2010 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

They are a decent team with a crappy offense...

…I think I can agree with that. I think I can also agree with "positions 3 through 9, with the exception of 6 (SS). Pennington is having a surprisingly solid year. Can we expect him to repeat or perhaps even (gasp) exceed this level of performance next year, or is this year an “outlier”, and will he regress next year to a level of performance more representative of his minor league resume? I hope for our sake that he still has some upside and is still figuring it out, but if he can just continue to play as he has this season, that position is in able hands for a while. We just need the system to develop a few more position players with some upside (and power wouldn’t hurt) in order to take it to the next level where our team will be relevant and interesting again. We don’t even need for offense to be a “strength” of the ballclub in order to rise again, we just need it not to be so brutal as to drag down the excellent young pitchers. The dominant A’s teams of the 70’s had very light hitting up the middle of the diamond (C, SS/2B, CF) and still crushed the league, because we had mashers in the corner OF and at 3rd. We don’t need to throw $100 million plus at every roster spot like NYY do in order to be decent, we just need maybe 3 solid, above average hitters, with the rest maybe being “average on a good day”. Pitching will carry this team, but we will go farther when we have fewer “dead weight” hitters with a documented and consistent record of seeing 7 pitches per night and OBPing .301, especially when we must give up talent to acquire said “dead weight”.

by kitoko on Aug 10, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree pretty much

The A’s simply have to do a better job of drafting hitters. Pitching, they’ve done amazing, but re: hitting, what’s the record of meaningful bats since drafting Chavez in 1996? Swisher in 2002, who is somewhere between good and very good. Ethier, but he broke out for the Dodgers. This decade has been a train-wreck of drafting when it comes to hitters, and the incredible thing is that for all the early-decade emphasis on walks and homers and how far those kinds of hitters took the team, they haven’t really used a high-round pick on a single bopper type until this year (with the very possible exception of 2007, and obviously one of the big bats there has been removed from the equation).

Personally I think they fell in love with positional adjustments and decided they needed to draft guys who could play tough positions and hit a little, rather than guys who could just sit on the corners and rake. But of course every successful team needs guys who can actually hit. I’m not sure where they expected the guys who could actually hit to come from, because they sure weren’t drafting them.

A note: In looking through the decade’s drafts for this post, I came upon the catastrophic 2003 effort. Every team in the league has had a few busted drafts, that’s just the way it goes, but 2003 was particularly terrible. Three first round picks. All washouts. Exactly one player who made any sort of impact, who was of course traded (a good deal at the time, I agree, and nobody really expected Ethier to turn into the hitter he has turned into). No one else in the entire draft who made any sort of impact whatsoever – I’m not sure anyone else in the draft even made it to the majors. I remember that draft and feeling excited about it because they had drafted Sullivan, who they were really excited about because he had fallen and they didn’t know why – as it turns out, he fell because he was injured, and the A’s didn’t know because they hadn’t scouted him because they didn’t expect him to fall. Agh.

by jdr on Aug 10, 2010 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm going to miss Chavy

He’s my favorite player and I’ll miss him, but he knows when he needs to hang em up. It sucks so bad that he couldn’t stay healthy for the past 5 years. I hope he stays apart of the organization if he retires though. He should eventually take the spot that Wash had as the 3rd base coach and the infielders coach. I think he could be great at that. Wash was Chavy’s biggest mentor, so it’s only fitting that Chavy take his spot eventually.

by duballers23 on Aug 8, 2010 9:39 PM PDT reply actions  

I've been saying Chavvy is my favorite

player on the team for so long I don’t even know who it will be without him. I guess Gio.

I like all the guys OK, but there’s no one I have a huge crush on like I did for Chavvy and Swisher.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Aug 8, 2010 11:43 PM PDT reply actions  

Braden's pretty lovable, IMO.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Aug 9, 2010 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh right, Braden is cool.

But not at Chavvy / Swisher level for me.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Aug 10, 2010 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Greatness and dread

The greatest play I’ve borne witness to at an A’s game was a spectacular catch by Chavez. He provided so much athleticism to the team it’s just hard to describe. Sadly he should have hung it up years ago as it’s been more frightening than exciting seeing him take the field in recent years. Not that I’m an oversensitive sports fan, but nobody wants to see him get injured playing the game he loves. Let’s hope the A’s can at least get him a roll within the organization so we don’t lose what he does have left.

by Jernskogen on Aug 9, 2010 12:05 AM PDT reply actions  

At the very least, get him in uniform, hold an "Eric Chavez Day" in September

(please, on a day with some good attendance?), and honor him the way he deserves to be honored.

Let’s get this relationship with a retired A’s great right from the beginning.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Aug 9, 2010 7:12 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

I think they'd do that only if he actually retired first

I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters

by WaddellCanseco on Aug 9, 2010 8:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

They could do it if he announced his retirement ahead of time, I think

but if he waits until the offseason, I think they should bring him back in 2011 for an Eric Chavez Day.

I’m kind of assuming he’s going to retire.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Aug 9, 2010 8:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

He's retiring after he picks up his $13m?

Colour me shocked.

"You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig."

by OldhamA on Aug 9, 2010 8:30 AM PDT reply actions  

He didn't say that. He just said he's considering it.

I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters

by WaddellCanseco on Aug 9, 2010 9:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I would.

Bob Geren... Jackie Moore without the personality.

by UncleLeo on Aug 9, 2010 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought he retired 4 years ago?

jk.. on a serious more serious note, I’m going to miss Chavy. He was and always will be one of my favorite players. I hope he stays in the organization somehow..
I was probably the only guy on AN who was happy that he was healthy and playing at the start of the season.

by sf drift king on Aug 9, 2010 10:50 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A's relocation option from a legal expert on the issue
Oakland_athletics_team_logo_photofile_small
Prospects 1Q Report

Recent FanPosts

100_1536_small
My new smarts on the Fanpost, and Mr. Offseason is born, and getting to know me
Small
GOG 2012 #18: The Twins have a shiny new park, and not much else
Small
Gotta Be Their Pitching
Hardly-boys_small
Minor League notes on Major League Day Off
Small
Cespedes Upate?
Small
The SF Warriors, the LA Raiders and the Oakland A's
Photo__11__small
COG #17 - Yankees vs. Athletics or Spank me! Spank me!
100_1536_small
What to do? What to do?
Small
Fans Should Buy the A's
Reg3_small
Tom Milone's Nickname

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Sb_nation1_small ahhall

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late