How are the ex A's doing one month in and what was Billy's biggest Mistake?
Here are some ex A's with stats on the year with who was traded for them. this isn't ment to bash anything or anyone, just a what if.
Dan Haren- 3-1 4.50era. For him we got:
Dana Evland- 2-1 4.76era. dont really miss him
Greg Smith-1-2 7.33era. really dont miss him
Brett Anderson, Chris Carter double boo-yaa and don't forget
CF Carlos Gonzalez- 3hr 17rbi 330avg 348obp 848ops. son of a bitch. for him we got
Matt Holliday- 4hr, 11rbi, 283avg, 313obp, 807ops, for which we also gave up
Huston Street. DL. had a good year last year but now costs 7million instead of a cheap Andrew Bailey till 2015
Brett Wallace came for Holliday and in AAA so far he's- 8hr 17rbi282avg 365obp 989 ops and.still playing 3rd?.
son of a bitch who we flipped for
Micheal Taylor- 2hr 15rbi 247avg 314obp 776ops.
I know its early in this trade but i think every A's fan would rather those Wallace/Taylor numbers be reversed especailly when i think about
Andre Ethier 9hr 26rbi 365avg 432 obp 1.161ops. double son of a bitch. who we traded for
Milton Bradley 2hr 12 rbi 226avg 333obp 737ops
and for those of you say we needed Milton in 06' I say
2006 14hr 52rbi 276avg 370obp 818ops Milton Clubhouse Cancer vrs
11hr 55rbi 308avg 365obp 842ops Ethier 06 '+4 more years
Milton fked us again when we had a trade worked out for
Leo Nunez 1-0 0.00 3saves. 26 saves last year. but Bradley ended up "injured" so we got Andrew Brown instead
more
Jason Giambi- 0hr 1rbi 100avg 387obp 537ops
Barry Zito-4-0 1.53 (he's costing almost 2 million a win since signing with the Giants, good for him this year)
Nich Swisher-15rbi 282avg 371obp 889ops (Gio Gonzalez, Ryan Sweeney, Fautino De Los Santos)
Jason Kendall -0hr 4rbi 287avg 361obp 694ops (Jerry Blevins)
Marco Scutaro- 2hr 7rbi 278avg 364obp 735ops (Grahm Godfrey 4.62 AAA sac)
Scott Hairston- 4hr 10rbi 271avg 357obp 892ops (Kouzmanoff)
Shawn Gallager -7.94era
Ryan Webb- reassigned
Craig Italiano- 0.00era in 22 AA/AAA innings
Rich Harden- 1-1 4.56era (Eric Patterson, Josh Donaldson, Gallager)
Bobby Crosby -1hr 5rbi 265avg 390obp 772ops
O.Cabrera- 2hr 14rbi 236avg 288obp 623ops traded for and we still have:
Tyler Landendorf SS. 306avg 375obp 783ops 0 errors in 15 games AA
Travis Buck- 1hr 2rbi 219avg 324obp 699ops. (how did he ever get 10million a year and how did Seattle end up with so many rejects and overpaid players this year?)
Adam Kennedy- 1hr 11rbi 214avg 268obp 598ops
Mark Kotsay -2hr 4rbi 159avg 245obp 540ops
Jerremy Bonderman-5.74era
some who got away when just a few more million could have got it done-
Justin Smoak- draft not signed 05, 1hr 4rbi 148avg 333obp 666ops. the next coming of Texeria?
Johnathan Papelbon-draft not signed 02' 2.77era 7saves
Adroldis Chapman (according to the A's we came in second in that sweepstakes. will 5million a year will be worth it when its all signing bonus and he can get even more in arbitration later?) 1.29 era. probably yes and he would get more today.
son of a bitch on all three.
Joe Blanton DL (Adrian Cardinas, Josh Outman)
Jack Hannihan Reassigned. ( Justin Souza 3.21 AA )
Arron Cunnighan Reassigned
A.Embree DFA
Kiko Calero FA-injury concerns. (1.95era in 09')
Dan Meyer 16.20era DL (3.09 in 09')
Chad Bradford FA-injury concerns (2.12 era in 08')
now there are more like Pena, Ludwick, Cruz (7HR)etc but there success was far removed many years and/or many teams after the A's let them go. if anyone wants to include them or the ex A's from a long time ago like Tejada (856OPS) feel free.
188 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don'y understand the Travis Buck comment
Are you from the future?
I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does.
The ninth fastest thirty year old in San Francisco
I ment Eric Byrnes, who was just released by Seattle. guess there were one too many names to get right
"Gratuitous gesticulating together sounds even better"
I like the idea, though, that in some alternate universe Travis got signed to a long term multi million dollar contract
which then, somehow, Seattle picked up…
I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does.
The ninth fastest thirty year old in San Francisco
by bobnothing on May 3, 2010 5:29 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree there were some bad trades here
but expect to be blasted by some for daring to criticize Billy. In that same spirit of blasphemy, I personally see him as a hit and miss kind of GM no more exceptional than some others. He’s did a great job with building up some fine young pitching but has given away some of that great pitching in some horrible trades as well. I will never forgive him for trading Hudson (my dog is named after Tim) for Charles Thomas and co.
The greenmachine
I never understand comments like this
“expect to be blasted by some for daring to criticize Billy” — do you READ AN? If you do, how can you come to the conclusion that one can’t criticize Billy Beane? Some of AN’s most respected, most prolific, and most high profile (front page) users do it all the time.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on May 3, 2010 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Brett Wallace
Brett Wallace came for Holliday and in AAA so far he’s- 8hr 17rbi282avg 365obp 989 ops and still playing 3rd?.
He is playing 1B for the ’51s
And the stadium is a launching pad, I wouldn't put that much stock into the 8 homers.
What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.
but look at the splits...
5 hrs in 60 home at-bats versus 4 hrs in 29 away at-bats (he hit a HR yesterday to bring his total to 9 on the season)
Oh well
we needed a top notch outfielder prospect, not a1B/DH prospect. We already have Barton and Carter.
Not exactly
Unless they completely soured on Buck (we know his issues)and Cunningham over the past yr. They also did the taylor trade long before trading away Hairston/Cunningham
Holliday trade
CarGo is such a fun player to watch. I’ve been watching a few Rockies games here and there and he is such a good young player. Holliday, who did not “suck” here, did not produce like he is capable of. Given we did get Wallace for him, but that trade is moot as well so this was the worst trade IMO. However, we also really got boned for Milton so that is a very close second.
Go A's!!!
Milton did help get to the ALCS in 2006 though.
Not having to suffer another Game 5 defeat….priceless.
But baseball! Fuck yeah! -- lynnzgal
by WaddellCanseco on May 3, 2010 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions
He was 1-13 in that ALDS...
So didn’t impact getting to the ALCS much.
Bring back Hammer.
by OaktownPower on May 3, 2010 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions
The ALCS was where he actually did something
Would’ve been nice if a few others did too.
Last of the Ninth - Photography
To say nothing of the regular season he had for us...
… which helped get us to the ALDS in the first place.
"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."
What if
easier said then done. Either and Cargone are the ones the A’s should have never traded. Othere would have been gone through FA. Harden, Scutaro, Kendal, Bradley and ect… What the A’s should do is stop picking up boderline players like Patterson and let the Chris Carter play in the big leagues.
You knew that Cargon and Ethier were going to be the players to break out?
Can you send billy your crystal ball?
"The A's get some action but they do not score..." -Glen Kuiper
"Anyone who calls themselves the Angels Angels should have to start over and ride the short bus." -timmeh from McCovey Chronicles
Interesting looking at Ethier's minor vs. major league numbers
Identical OPS of .853 before the season started, but his slugging is 26 points higher and OBP 26 lower.
Really though, it was a helluva lot to give up for Bradley in hindsight, especially after what he’d done in Midland that year.
Was it the right move at the time? Probably.
Was there a good chance that Ethier would eventually contribute as a starting OF? Probably, that’s why the trade was made straight up.
Were there many who truly saw this sort of production out of him? No, but I’m sure there’s still a share of “I told you so’s” out there.
AN: Where you will be an A's fan or Dallas Braden will show you the repercussions of your actions.
by stranahanahan on May 3, 2010 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions
It is all guessing
Either had the numbers in the minors to be a good hitter the only surprise out of him is the power. I picked the year he was traded because of his bat. As far as Cargon his hitting was there all along his only problem will be his OBA need to improve.
I strongly disagree Arc
Patterson is not remotely close to being good enough to be labeled borderline.
"-i never said half the things i said." --Yogi Berra
Carlos is definitely one guy I'd like to have back. I still have hopes for Taylor though.
I voted for Harden-Donaldson as the worst trade of that bunch. The others were all sort of defensible at the time.
But baseball! Fuck yeah! -- lynnzgal
I didn't like the Harden trade at all (too much filler not enough talent) but saying any of the moves above is worse than Holliday is absurd
The A’s had no business trying to contend last year and mortgaged a huge amount of their future, especially when you consider that George Sherrill picked up 2 B+ prospects at the trade deadline last year. Essentially we gave up 3 elite prospects and Gregg Smith for .5 a season of unused production and Brett Wallace. Guess what Carlos Gonzalez is far superior to Brett Wallace so that is an automatic huge loss for Beane.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions
2 B+ prospects?
Overstating it just a bit, don’t you think? I mean, Sickels gave Johnson a C+ and the Orioles didn’t even protect him in the Rule 5 draft. And Bell only earned a B.
http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/12/4/1186174/baltimore-orioles-top-20-prospects
Plus, I doubt the market for Street would’ve been as robust as it was for Sherrill due to a) Sherill’s left handedness, and b) Street’s injury history. The Dodgers, for one, likely would not have given that package for Street, already having Belisario, Mota and Transcoso in their set up queue.
But yeah, I generally agree, would rather have Gonzalez, et al. than Taylor.
If Taylor ends up being close to as productive as Gonzalez though
Then the deal doesn’t hurt very much.
AN: Where you will be an A's fan or Dallas Braden will show you the repercussions of your actions.
by stranahanahan on May 3, 2010 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions
yeah, it will definitely hurt less
and i agree with the comment elsewhere that Taylor’s control years are better timed from a rebuilding perspective, with Gonzalez likely reaching FA two years before Taylor does.
also think that mortensen ultimately develops into a decent sinker/slider bullpen arm.
by NRC on May 3, 2010 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Geren said in an interview
Mortensen was very close to making the team this year. I still remain skeptical any good team would consider having him on the roster.
Ok im more bullish on Bell than Sickles and I didn't look it up but lets actually use Sickles eval of the trade
George Sherrill to the Orioles for Josh Bell and Steve Johnson. I’ve never been a big Sherrill guy, so I think the Orioles did very well here to pick up a couple of prospects for him. Bell is a solid Grade B guy…his home run power is still developing and I’m not sure what position he plays long run, but I like his strike zone judgment and he’s young. Johnson doesn’t have blazing stuff, but could be a good inning-eater type, perhaps similar to Brad Bergesen down the road. I’d rate him as a Grade B- prospect right now.
rather than assessments half a year later if youre going to get technical on me. Also Street was under control for longer when traded which more than makes up for handedness.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions
those are both good points, but
i find it hard to believe that johnson was any less of a prospect at the end of the season, when Sickels gave him a C+ and the Orioles didnt protect him in the Rule 5, than he was at the time of the trade. in fact, he very pitched well in AA as a 21 yo after the trade – almost exactly in line with his career numbers. the more likely answer is that Sickels hadn’t put in the time when he made the above comments to accurately grade him. either way, he is and was a pretty marginal prospect, slightly better than mortensen, but probably projecting as a fringe starter or reliever in the long run.
i strongly disagree that street’s value at the time of the trade was higher than sherrill’s. for starters, most people thought colletti overpaid, so its tough to use the sherrill trade as a barometer (as a ceiling, perhaps). second, if anything, i’d say teams value relievers more highly during the playoff race – when they know they’re in trouble – than they do in the off season – when they’re more inclined to let their internal candidates sort it out. plus, when it comes down to fine tuning a playoff team, a late inning lefthander is just so much more difficult to find, and thus more expensive, than a righty. like i said, the dodgers simply would not have given up the same package for street – they already had plenty of capable righties. not to mention street’s long injury history that (rightfully) scared off suitors.
compare street’s value to other rhrps who’ve been traded in the offseason during last few years – rafael soriano for jesse chavez (admittedly different circumstances), jose valverde for chad qualls, juan gutierrez, and chris burke, brad lidge for michael bourn, geoff geary, and change, jj putz and sean green for franklin gutierrez, endy chavez, mike carp, and scraps. so the a’s could have gotten a young set-up man and a young fringey outfielder for street? we have plenty of both of those. and what were rhrp’s going for at the deadline last year? tony pena for brandon allen, jon rauch for emil bonifacio and later for kevin mulvey, rafael bethancourt for connor graham. you have to look at the market and the potential suitors, and, regardless of how good street has been, they just werent there.
im not saying it was a good decision to trade street. just that its quite a stretch to think the a’s would have gotten a player of bell’s caliber had they held on to him.
I would take Gutierrez right about now....
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
A's might disagree
Harden was basically useless for 2 seasons. They viewed gallagher who was one of the best mlb ready pitchers in the minors. Maybe overrated, but cant ignore his minor league trackrecord. Debate on the value of murton and patterson, but they viewed each as helping the roster at the time. They had liked murton going back years to that 2003 draft and at the time their 2b depth was terrible. Ellis had impending free agency and they had yet to draft Weeks or trade for Cardenas. They also had like Donaldson in the 07 draft and if you believe them were ready to take him #59 if he fell further in the draft. That wouldve ended a 3 yr stretch of the draft where they had ignored taking catchers with their high picks
Gallagher's problem was Geren making him pitch after he was hurt
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on May 3, 2010 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Harden was hurt. The A's knew, the league knew it.
If Gallagher had turned out to be even a decent #3 starter, that’s a good trade for Oakland.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Harden was always hurt... that was the problem.
It had a chance to be a great trade for us. Didn’t work out that way, but I don’t see how it really hurt us, either.
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
Of course the A's disagreed... they made the trade.
Murton was terrible. Donaldson had hit himself off of prospect lists as anything worthwhile. Patterson has never been able to field. That is a terrible diversification of talent when the only thing good in the package is a young pitcher. Also Harden was under team control for a year and a half more giving Beane ample time to try to trade him. I would have asked for a different filler package.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions
Considering the frequency in which Harden got hurt...
…I disagree with the “ample time” aspect.
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
they had a month before the dead line, the next off season, and the next trade deadline.
harden would probably be healthy for some of that.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 5, 2010 1:27 AM PDT up reply actions
Exactly my point...
…SOME of that. How much of that? Given his track record, very possibly not much. At that point he had actually strung together a couple solid months in a row… a rarity for him.
And the off-season would be the least opportune time. No sense of immediate need and urgency by the “buyers”.
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
it's no wonder
we suck at drafting position players, knowing that we once coveted the likes of Murton and Donaldson. I know it’s still early but Murton has proved to be a scrub and outside of that 2-run jack in Toronto, Donaldson looks to be another AAAA spec. And of course this team is loaded with them..
by sf drift king on May 3, 2010 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Dude youre on crack if you think that Donaldson's performance so far indicates that hes a AAAA spec
You do realize the A’s skipped him over AAA right?
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 4, 2010 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions
just going by the looks of his recent ABs,
he doesn’t look like anything special. I know, I know, it’s too early for him but I am sick and tired of seeing this collection of 4A players clog the roster, and Donaldson thus far, hasn’t done much to separate himself from that bunch.
by sf drift king on May 6, 2010 1:26 AM PDT up reply actions
Doesn't look like anything special?!
You could jump Ted Williams from AA to MLB and he wouldn’t do anything in the first three games either. I mean, come on, the kid’s had 11 plate appearances.
The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.
The kid has a good head on his shoulders
I’d like to see anyone try to say that about Ted Williams.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
How can you label Donaldson AAAA?
He’s been in the majors less than a week, after only playing 18 AAA games. Give the kid a chance.
rebuildingseason.blogspot.com
by Rebuilding Season on May 4, 2010 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions
jinx
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 4, 2010 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions
Fine, but I only owe you a regular coke
and not a 4 dollar ballpark coke.
rebuildingseason.blogspot.com
by Rebuilding Season on May 4, 2010 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions
um well coke is evil
unless its mexican coke with real sugar. Wait can you drink that in AZ now?
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 5, 2010 1:28 AM PDT up reply actions
Why are so many people suddenly trashing Donaldson?
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
Because he's worse than you think!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Carlos Gonzalez plays in the NL he would be nothing in the AL
"I managed a team that was so bad we considered a 2-0 count on the batter a rally." - Rich Donnelly, minor league manager
Oh geez. Not in here too, please.
If you are going to make statements like this, be prepared to at least try to prove it.
Letting Tejada leave
and keeping Chavez, will always be the worst Billy Beane for me.
by john the comic guy on May 3, 2010 9:32 AM PDT reply actions
Agree 100%
I was mad at the time, and it’s never gotten any better. At the time, I think Billy’s reasoning had to do with a) Tejada would have been more expensive to sign, and b) there were fewer top-flight 3B than SS. But the Bobby Crosby experiment turned out poorly.
@worldblee on Twitter.
Crosby was supposed to be better than he turned out to be.
It was sound reasoning at the time, and Beane shouldn’t be criticized using only hindsight as a guide.
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
This.
Runner-up: Not signing the talent you drafted or had an opportunity to draft.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
JUSTIN SMOAK WAS GOING TO COLLEGE
he was not going to sign with the A’s.
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
Though if it was the '09 draft
We would have given him the $1mil+ he asked for, as we did with Stassi.
AN: Where you will be an A's fan or Dallas Braden will show you the repercussions of your actions.
by stranahanahan on May 3, 2010 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions
I am sure the A's could have signed him. No doubt he had a strong commitment to South Carolina but Smoak and his father actually floated an asking price of $1m. To say the A's had no chance of signing him is wrong
"I’ll sign for one million dollars, and nothing less," Smoak says. "Right now I’m planning to follow my dreams to South Carolina and play for Ray Tanner. Coach Tanner has been in constant touch with me and I’ve always wanted to play at South Carolina."
Smoak said his conversation with Beane, who faced the same choice between college and signing when the Mets drafted him in the first round in 1980, centered on the value of a college education as well as some baseball talk.
"I was not made an official offer by the A’s, but they know what I am asking for and I expect to talk with them in person," Smoak says.
This is just dumb.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree
Quite a few posts over the years have noted that, under the circumstances present at that time, the decision made perfect sense. In the same way, I don’t think it’s very useful to analyze the personnel decisions simply in terms of,
1. We got Player X for Player Y;
2. since then, Player X has done this, Player Y has done that;
3. so, the trade was a good (or bad) one.
I would think you have to look at a myriad of factors to fairly judge a trade, e.g., how many more years is the player under control; if you’re looking to trade someone, do you have someone to fill that position; etc.
and in case people have forgotten those reasons
1) chavez looked like a 30 HR, gold glove 3B for years to come
2) we had a viable replacement in the pipeline at SS (Crosby) while we were barren at 3B
3) The front office KNEW Tejada was lying about his age, amongst other things
Try and tell me it would have been beneficial to sign a cornerstone player you had a replacement for who had lied about his age (and was 2 years older than everyone thought) AND choose to let a young, healthy cornerstone player walk who hadn’t done anything wrong.
Except....
Tejada was a proven superstar and MVP winner. Chavez was a great fielder but his hitting never measured up to the hype. Crosby could’ve slotted over to third.
well except Chavez was a better hitter and fielder than Tejada
EC 2000-2006 RC+ 115, 128, 127, 125, 125, 136, 113, 108
MT 2000-2006 RC+ 114, 111, 132, 114, 133, 126, 129, 128
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
Hold your horses there buddy
Tejada wasnt a superstar and take a look at the MVP voting and tell me you think he had the best year out of that group of players. I see a number of guys who were better. His “defense” was as hyped as Jeter’s, making 2 or 3 highlight reel plays a year and having the shittiest range out of many big league SS’s equaled = “GOLD GLOVE DEFENSE!”
Plus, he was on steroids, lied about his age and as mentioned, was completely shitawful at defense. Peter Gammons, clearly being a talentless hack who knows nothing about baseball* called non-roider Bobby Crosby** his 2005 MVP winner in his preseason predictions. We had every reason to run with a Crosby/Chavez combo, it looked incredible going into 2005.
*Im being sarcastic, obviously.
**Whoever was trying to argue that the NL is not some AAAA lesser league, Crosby has a 775 OPS right now playing there.
It also needs to be stated that Eric Chavez had a better year than Miggy in 2002.
Chavez WAR: 5.4
Tejada WAR: 4.4
Miggy cost so many wins with his outstandingly crappy defense.
Exactly.
You have to judge a decision based on the information that was available at the time.
The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.
YOU DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO, MERQ
I’m gonna judge every trade in hindsight, I’m gonna bitch about Holliday hating the A’s, and I’m gonna senselessly demand that Billy Beane sign every good homegrown player to gigantic contracts because GAAAAH FANDOM RULED BY MY EMOTIONS.
"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."
I just want Nick Swisher back.
Goddammit, Billy.
The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.
could've had him
if we were willing to let go of Wilson Betimit sized talent
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
That's still the one that hurts me the most
"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."
Since 2008
Ryan Sweeney = 6.1 WAR
Nick Swisher = 5.5 WAR
Oh so you want to win less games huh? That’s a weird thing to want…
Pst. don't forget Gio's 1.3
But I don’t think that is Dan’s point. The swisher trade certainly is a great one for the A’s hindsight foresight and sightsight. But who amoung us wouldn’t want that crazy ape back on the team?
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
Do I want a 3 and a half win player taking up a corner OF or 1B spot?
If that’s the best available, yeah. But those arent that hard to come by.
Im more about winning, the players personalities dont mean a damn thing to me. We won 3 championships in a row and every player was fistfighting in the dugout and they HATED each other. Team chemistry is completely irrelevant in baseball.
…and right about now I feel like I need to say again that we should sign Elijah Dukes to play LF.
You've been on the Dukes tip for YEARS now.
Not a criticism, just an observation…
"We support your economy. We make your food and tend your fields. All we want are the same rights and responsiblities as you. Please... Vote YES on Proposition 801- Equal rights for sock puppets!"
by Gaijin_Suketto on May 3, 2010 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I have only been posting since June 09
so “years” is an overstatement. I think I started with it the day the Nats released him. Unless he’s a serious risk to the health and wellbeing of his teammates (which is ridiculous to even think about), its absolutely absurd that he doesnt have a job right now. He’s better than all of our current LF options and could move to RF when Taylor comes up. His ceiling might even be higher than Carter or Taylors.
You weren't someone else back in AN 2.0?
never mind then… my mistake…
carry on.
"We support your economy. We make your food and tend your fields. All we want are the same rights and responsiblities as you. Please... Vote YES on Proposition 801- Equal rights for sock puppets!"
by Gaijin_Suketto on May 3, 2010 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions
gimme a 3 war player
that I like to root for, and I will be happy.
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
Um, the whole point of WAR is to equalize positions
such that players are not overrated or underrated based on the positions they play.
A 3.5 WAR player is worth exactly the same at 1B as it is at any other position.
Arthur Dent: You know, it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse and about to die of asphyxiation in deep space, that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young.
Ford Prefect: Why, what did she tell you?
Arthur Dent: I don't know, I didn't listen!
Eh, we can expect his UZR score to fall back down to reasonable levels.
After you regress for sample size, that 0.6 WAR advantage is essentially 0, if not negative.
Besides, I was talking personality. I’ll take that crazy bastard Swisher over jeans model Sweeney anyday.
The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.
"Eric Byrnes plays like his hair is on fire"
Well then, maybe he should take a minute to put out that fire, because it sure is interfering with him being good at baseball.
You think YOU like “crazy bastards”, I say I want Manny Ramirez and everyone acts like I’m Hitler. Manny is the ultimate crazy bastard and not to mention, ridiculously good at baseball. I wish we would get him every day.
-The president of the "Sign Elijah Dukes" fan club.
Byrnes's hair might be on fire, but so is his contract with the Mariners
He was released today.
Arthur Dent: You know, it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse and about to die of asphyxiation in deep space, that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young.
Ford Prefect: Why, what did she tell you?
Arthur Dent: I don't know, I didn't listen!
I'd take Manny.
I’d bitch about him, sure, but I’d stand up and clap when he launches HRs into the empty suites above the bleachers.
Problem with Manny is that he's bipolar crazy
Some days, his craziness is awesome, others it’s a trainwreck.
With Swish, it was always awesome. I liked Byrnes too. I understand he wasn’t particularly great at what he did, but he was fun to watch.
Byrnes is great at what he does
he just is a below average major league baseball player
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
Agree, but
the argument at the time was having Crosby as the replacement. No one thot at the time that he would be a colossal BUST.
Billy should have never let Tejada, who was then the heart & soul of our team leave. Trading Chavez at the time would have returned a boatload of specs, and Crosby could have switched over to 3B.
by sf drift king on May 3, 2010 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Only in hindsight
At the time, keeping Chavez and letting Tejada go was the logical thing to do. Chavez was the better player. He was also younger and there were many who believed Tejada was older than he claimed. (The speculation later turned out to be correct).
The A’s had Crosby coming up behind Tejada and Crosby looked like he had a very good chance of being an above average major league shortstop. There was no way to figure that Chavez would break down the way he did. And though Crosby suffered a couple of freak injuries in the minors, who could have predicted he would be so brittle? And how much of his failure to develop can be attributed to the time he spent on the shelf?
If you’re trying to identify a decision that hurt the team the most, this is probably at the top of the list. But if you’re looking for the one that could or should have been avoided, this one isn’t even on the radar.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
This.
If you’re trying to identify a decision that hurt the team the most, this is probably at the top of the list. But if you’re looking for the one that could or should have been avoided, this one isn’t even on the radar.
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
Except many did feel, at the time, that the A's should keep Tejada
Probably the biggest factor in Beane’s favor is that the contracts didn’t end concurrently, and he said he did not have the budget for Tejada whereas he did for Chavez. That alone might justify the decision.
But I think it’s not accurate to suggest the A’s had no inkling of Chavez’ health issues. IIRC, the A’s knew of his back problems by the time of the extension — even if they did not make it very public — and didn’t he have some shoulder issues (rotator cuff?) before he first reached the big leagues?
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Many people did want to keep both, I remember that.
But the stated issue was that we could not afford to keep both, so a hard decision had to be made. I tend to agree they could have seen some issues with Chavez coming, but I’d believe them if they claimed they didn’t see a total breakdown like what did happen.
IIRC, what’s ironic is that Tejada wanted Giambi-like money, then ended up signing for far less… an amount that Beane said later they would have been willing to re-sign him for.
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
No I meant wanted Tejada kept instead of Chavez
I think most everyone knew we couldn’t keep both.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Where did this occur?
I certainly didn’t suggest the A’s had no inkling of Chavez’s health issues.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
According to Fangraphs Milton bradley's WAR
in 2006 was 2.8 compared with eithier’s 2.1.
Buck (2.2 WAR in 2007) was blocking eithier who was never never going to break camp with the A’s in 2006.
Last yar was the only year that Milton’s WAR was below Eithier’s. Keep in mind milton bradley cannot stay on the field, yet he is consistently better than Eithier.
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 10:02 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
This a million times
Relying on a AA outfielder with what many thought was a limited power potential ti break camp and be an impact player for a legit contending team in his first year in the bigs while skipping AAA is not a good idea.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions
I have a new rule
I stop reading anything the minute it talks about Ethier for Bradley as if:
A) It was a bad trade at the time
and/or
B) Ethier, who is a butcher defensively, would be putting up an .866 OPS in the AL/Oakland (which means he’s really only about a 2-win player)
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on May 3, 2010 10:10 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Also Antonio Perez was a very good prospect at the time.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions
Of course.
Not only would I make that trade at the time, but a few years later I would still make that trade (not, like, in 2010…but using hindsight I still think it was a smart move).
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on May 3, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
If you look at process it was a great move.
If you look at results it was a mediocre move.
Sometimes the bet that will pay out 70% of the time goes bust.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions
I just don't think Ethier would be a better player than, say, Ryan Sweeney if he were on the A's
I’d make the trade again and again because I don’t think Ethier as an Athletic would be anything special at all.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on May 3, 2010 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions
I keep saying this
Ethier and Cargon would not be putting up their numbers they are putting up for us had they never been traded. Its such a flawed argument to say.
Im more mad we traded Milton Bradley, who promptly went berserk (977 OPS in SD, small sample scale but nonetheless impressive) over his next 168 games over a year and a half in both leagues. We could have used that bat.
Why not?
Park factors? Dodger Stadium and the Coliseum are pretty much the same. Pitching? Ethier faces good pitching in the NL West all the time.
Do you think the A’s don’t develop hitting prospects properly? If so, that’s another thing entirely…and something that would be very, very alarming.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
Agreed
AN: Where you will be an A's fan or Dallas Braden will show you the repercussions of your actions.
by stranahanahan on May 3, 2010 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions
I want the holliday trade back too
but, keep in mind, a .330 avg and 348 obp? His BABIP is .382, much higher than in in the past, His line drive rate is a little lower and groundball rate a lot higher and flyball rate a lot lower.
These numbers will fall back down.
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
This is the key point with CarGon
The biggest question with him has always been his plate discipline — secondarily there have been questions about whether he’d develop power, but I think those two will tend to go together over the long run. With the A’s, his K/BB was 81/13. Last year with the Rockies, it was 70/28 — still bad, but much, much better than he’d been in the past. This year, it’s 18/3, which is pretty much back to where he was with the A’s.
Unless he starts laying off bad pitches, those numbers, as you say, will fall back down.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
To me, OF defense is also key
Gonzalez played a very good CF with the A’s, but didn’t have that scouting reputation. If he is actually capable of playing CF better than Sweeney, or of playing RF as well as Sweeney, that’s different than if Sweeney is the clearly better defender.
I’m not comfortable with Sweeney in CF and actually was with Gonzalez, and the A’s have had a need in CF for a while — but then again, Gonzalez isn’t even playing CF anymore with the Rockies, so it’s hard to know what he can or can’t do.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
At my only Rivercats game a couple years ago I got Gonzalez' autograph on a baseball card
after Mike Sweeney’s mother called him over to sign for a few of us. She is such a sweetheart.
Well, if you're going to go and use logic...
"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."
The way I look at it
is do you like Taylor or CarGon more? Obviously including Street into the equation changes things but I try not to think of that or else my eyes start bleeding. Taylor is a very intriguing prospect and if he and Carter can tap into their potential that’s one badass middle of the lineup.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
the biggest benefit with Taylor
is he was not in the majors last year and this (so far). The A’s were not going to contend with Carlos Gonzalez in 2009 or 2016.
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
Think about this
We probably could have gotten Josh Bell for Street last year. Ignoring him hides the complete folly of what Beane did.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions
A's attempted to trade street multiple times in 2008
There was interest from boston, but deemed the asking price too high that offseason. Couldnt get any takers at the trade deadline. Street lost his closers job, that I remember fans even wanting brown and casilla to close. Unfortunately both of them struggled later on too, eventually surpassed by ziegler and devine who had great 1st full seasons with A’s.
Oh I agree
But I like to compare Taylor and CarGon in terms of top prospects. And the point that Ed makes above is a big one IMO.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
Also
I don’t think there was much interest in Street. I’m sure Beane tried to create a deal that centered around Street but the truth was that he was a little too injured/ineffective at times for teams to probably want to part with the type of player that Beane wanted. Huston could just as easily have gotten badly injured last year like he is this year so far.
I guess my point is that I seriously doubt Beane just decided to trade Street right then. I’m sure he did his homework and realized that most teams were wary of Street’s injury history.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
and guess what you have the opportunity to hold on those players rather than trying to sell low
because they are under team control.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions
There is also the mindset of selling low before the value goes lower.
I’m sure the numbers were run and the chances of a rebound were calculated. Like all trades made or not made, there is a gamble involved.
I really don't miss Carlos all that much.
On his career:
Percentage of balls out of the zone he swung at: 30.6% (Average: 25%)
Percentage of times he makes contact on those swings: 49.9% (Average: 61%)
Pitchers simply have no reason to throw him any hittable pitches. To survive with that high of an outside swing rate, he’s got to make contact on 60-70%. That’s the difference between someone like Pablo Sandoval and, say, Aaron Rowand.
The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.
Ethier
He didnt do much as a prospect until he got to AA and despite winning Texas League mvp was still labeled as a tweener OF. Then complained to the front office about not being promoted to AAA earlier. At the time they were getting bradley but also antonio perez who some were projecting to even start over crosby and ellis also providing a 3b backu to chavez. He ended up a huge bust here and is now out of baseball. The A’s were pretty loaded with OF’s at the time with Swisher, Payton, Kielty, Kotsay
Ethier was not the mistake, it was hoping Buck projected to be a similar player and he eventually looked like it being named a top 50 prospect and BA’s #1 A’s prospect soon after.
Beane's biggest mistakes
Counting on the durability of chavez, crosby, and ellis and being burned each season. Other than scutaro it has been a revolving door of infielders the past 3-5 seasons trying to build up that infield depth. Failed trades for perez, ginter. Letting scutaro go since they didnt want to pay him 1-2 mill and deciding on the hope of hannahan, murphy which backfired immensely. in 2006 playoffs stuck in using d’angelo jimenez, mark kiger.
Chavy had given no indication that he was an injury risk, so you can't use that as a reason.
Crosby was tabbed to be an MVP for ’05.
Ellis had no history of injuries.
Where is the mistake?
I agree the infield didn’t have enough depth.
Who would have thought
Crosby would crash into Ellis and basically snap him in half? No one could have predicted that, and Ellis was pretty darn durable before that crash.
Crosby himself, one of his injuries that caused a lot of DL time was breaking his ankle sliding into a base (or was it the catcher? I forget). Impact injuries you can’t label as a “durability” issue, so that’s kinda unfair.
Home plate, in Baltimore, IIRC
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
Against former A Sal Fasano, yep
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
For me, trading Scutaro was Beane's worst mistake.
By far. Being frugal is one thing, but the Scutaro trade was just him being cheap. Shortsightedly cheap.
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
Rant time
You know what I hate? I really hate posts like this. No personal offense O.H., however, it is and always has been so easy to look back and pick out mistakes Billy or any GM makes. I guarantee you if BB knew the future he would not have made some of those trades or signed some of those players, etc. Baseball is a big fat gamble. The players are human beings, capable of failing apart, losing their edge, getting sick, excelling beyond their skill set, etc. I think the only thing posts like this does is focus on the negative, when in reality we are a small market team with an owner who has an agenda that handcuffs the GM into working within a constricted budget. Billy has consistently squeezed value out of oft-injured, cast off, undervalued players, manipulating the market to stay competitive. He is human too, and capable of making mistakes. But let’s focus on some of the positives: We are in first place, competitive, we have some more BB magic in undervalued Scutaro-esque Rosales, Kouzmanoff is proving to be better than what we had in our system, and we traded for prospects, we have awesome home grown talent in our pitching staff. I personally am appreciative that we have a competitive GM with half a brain who is always looking to make the team competitive.
"The guy was tasting himself too long to apologize."~Dallas Braden
by OptimistPrime on May 3, 2010 12:51 PM PDT reply actions 6 recs
Or maybe OP can just nail it to the door of the church...
"We support your economy. We make your food and tend your fields. All we want are the same rights and responsiblities as you. Please... Vote YES on Proposition 801- Equal rights for sock puppets!"
by Gaijin_Suketto on May 3, 2010 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions
A counterpoint
I love fanposts like this. It makes my head hurt to compile all the players traded and what they are doing now, etc. It’s nice to look back just for curiousity’s sake.
Also, yes hindsight is 20/20, but good GMs do a lot better than bad GMs. They all make mistakes, but we can imagine the “son of a bitch” posts might be 10x higher for the Pirates GMs over the years than for Beane.
I don’t think the point is to bash Billy Beane using hindsight – it’s more of “what if” concept, and, most especially, it shows how we got to where we are.
The fact that this guy went through and looked up all this info is what has enabled us to have a lively discussion here. So I’m going to have to disagree.
He does list Kouzmanoff next to Hairston. I don’t think any of us are missing Hairston. This just gives us a great opportunity to look back at our GM’s track record and see how it came out. I’m not sure how else to evaluate a GM (or any employee in any other situation, in any industry) other than his track record.
by Billy Frijoles on May 3, 2010 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
The number of "son of a bitch" posts for the Pirates GM is actually less
because they’re too depressed to write them.
Pirates fans know they're screwed, and have no hope, so why bother?
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
Can we do a glow green for this?
Like visible from Florida type of green?
"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."
"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff
by ST on May 3, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions
wha?
sock puppets have never successfully defended castles, except when working with squirrels, which would never happen because squirrels know better than to trust sock puppets. -nm
by Leopold Bloom on May 4, 2010 6:31 AM PDT up reply actions
BRETT WALLACE HAS NOT PLAYED ONE INNING AT THIRD IN 2010
stop acting like we even have room for him. We dont.
Well said
Trading Wallace was not a big deal, Taylor is a bigger need
That said, we should have never had the option of getting Taylor because we should have never traded CarGon, but that is done with.
Lets hope that Taylor can become CarGon with better discipline
Go A's!!!
I didn't like the CarGon trade when it happened and don't like it now. I think he'll be a stud.
The future may well prove me wrong on that one. But it’s easy to cherry-pick one trade out of a multitude over the years. Overall, I’m no GM and not competent to carry his clipboard.
JJ Martin
The best way to catch a knuckleball is to wait until the ball stops rolling and then pick it up. ~Bob Uecker
I would just like to say that I wouldnt want ANY of the players we traded back.
I’d like Smoak and Chapman, but they did not want to play for us. Carlos Gonzalez is playing in the most offensively-charged park in baseball, stop acting like we would even get half of the production. We wouldnt.
Brett Wallace is a fat DH. This is a fact that people keep ignoring. Do we have room for a fat DH? No, actually we dont even have that.
It is funny how Brett Wallace went from being able to stick as a below average 3B to a fat DH the minute he got traded.
He should be fine defensively as a 1B but it is his bat that was always going to carry him. Whether we miss it remains to be seen.
yes and no
PL78 is one of the many people (like myself) that never thought he could play third IIRC
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 5, 2010 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions
Italiano and Webb
Until both were full time converted to relievers they finally improved. But that took Italiano till his 4th yr and Webb 5 years of pretty terrible results. Italiano did dominate kane county. I would be more worried about losing them if this was 3 or 4 years ago prior to the A’s developing any decent relievers. But they have not had issues in that area in recent seasons. Especially with pitchers with like Storey, Smith, etc
No point indwelling on what happened. Just be happy with the guys we have and the prospects we have.
did we ever have a chance at signing mike leake?
7th rounder in 06. really liked the dude at ASU. kind of wish he never went.
"The hard... is what makes it great."
Um, have you taken a look at Carlos's PD stats?
.382 BABIP?
44.5% O-Swing!!!
58% Swing rate
What does that say? Rocky Mountain Oyster luck!
"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."
"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff
Looking at his splits from 2009, he was a lot better at home than on the road. His OPS was .943 at home and .811 on the road. We’ll see how he fares this year.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on May 3, 2010 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Coors Field tends to do that.
The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.
Billy Beane's biggest mistake?
Writing Moneyball, according to a certain Hall of Famer that is.
More seriously, I’d say it was not accepting the job over in Boston. Big ass payroll and relative freedom to do what he wants in terms of player roster. Imagine what Billy could do if he had that payroll AND the “brand name” of the Boston Red Soxes when it came to acquiring players.
The media, though, is a whole other animal, so I think Billy was glad he didn’t do it.
Lucky for Scutaro he's on a winning team!
(Oakland: Better record, closer to 1st place, than Boston)
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Aw snap!
Scooter got Nicoed!
Marco Scutaro’s nothing more than a cupholder now!
"We support your economy. We make your food and tend your fields. All we want are the same rights and responsiblities as you. Please... Vote YES on Proposition 801- Equal rights for sock puppets!"
by Gaijin_Suketto on May 3, 2010 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions
I wish Beane took that job.
We could’ve had Youkilis and DePodesta at the helm.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
as long as youkilis is hitting home runs against the angels today
I am happy wiht him in boston
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
Yeah... we'd have some great prospects now from the eventual Youk trade.
Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.
The only trade I thought turned out truly disastrous...
… was the Huddy trade. I mean, we got nothin’— nothin’— for that guy. In fact, it’s even worse than that: Cruz was traded for Admiral Halsey, which everyone knows led to the Halsey Curse. That’s just science.
In all seriousness, though, the process was fine in that one, too. It’s hard to find a move that Billy made that defies all logic. Though I think the anti-Holliday-trade folks are reasonable in their arguments, I don’t necessarily agree with them.
"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."
Disastrous no, disappointing yes
Going into that season the bullpen was terrible, they made it a priority to transfor it into a power bullpen. They had dotel,cruz, calero. Unfortunately calero was the only one to work out. Cruz had one of the best reliever seasons in mlb the season before and there was even some thought returning him to SP. After being traded for halsey he went onto to a 4-5 yr stretch of being a solid reliever.
Meyer was ranked the #43 best prospect in mlb. At the time was thought to have more upside than both haren and blanton. He ruined his chances by hiding the injury, thats the biggest disappointment.
Debate charles thomas fluke 1/2 season with braves. But A’s obviously liked his defense and potential CF ability which they lacked in the system. From trade rumors I believe A’s wanted marcus giles, kyle davies but were deemed untouchable.
Well, that's kind of what I meant...
… when I said the process behind the trade was fine.
What I was getting at is that the Hudson trade stands out the most (in my eyes) as truly having no semblance of good return in retrospect. That’s why I used the word disastrous, though I’d certainly be willing to use your formulation of “disappointing.”
"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."
well you could call it a disaster
Because the other option was to let Huddy leave via FA and we could have gotten better prospects than the talent we got for him. I was pretty disappointed in the haul when it happened, I thought Cruz was unnecessary and Thomas was too much of a tweener. I had no problem with Meyer but but quickly forgot about it because of what happened two days later with Mulder.
In terms of value at the time between the hudson and mulder deals
meyer and cruz was considered to be better than haren and calero
Thomas and Barton-Thomas provided more immediate value, Barton was still 19 yrsoldin the lower minors. I would both hauls were close at the time. Haren obviously exceeded expectations during the following years.
Meyer was a really, really good prospect,
and having posted sub 3.00 ERAs at every level all the way up through AAA, he was as close of a can’t-miss, major league ready prospect as you can get. It was, IMO, a perfectly good trade that just ended up perfectly badly.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
they only way he wouldn't have made it is if he got injured
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
Or found God.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Do other teams ever have our kinds of problems?
I sincerely doubt it.
-The president of the "Sign Elijah Dukes" fan club.
Different teams have different problems
When was the last time an A’s prospect blew up his career with a coke addiction? Or was about to get drafted by the South Korean military?
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
to be fair, everyone in South Korea has to serve
that is something that should be known to all parties.
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury
I for one was happy that we traded for Bradley in 06
but why the hell did Billy Beane feel that he needed to trade away our #1 spec for a malcontent??? That bit doesn’t make any sense to me. I don’t think the Dodgers were holding out for A level specs to rid themselves of a clubhouse cancer.
because the A's had a terrible farm system
and it was a tallest midget situation.
"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT
by designatedforassignment on May 4, 2010 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't even think Ethier was the tallest midget
Ethier was a solid B prospect entering 2006 according to Sickels, good for 9th in the Dodgers system. Even in a weak system, that wouldn’t be better than 3rd.
In total, the A’s traded probably their 4th or 5th prospect for a hitter under club control for 2 years who had posted 4.6, 3.3, and 2.1 WAR seasons and a promising backup infielder. For reference, this is akin to trading Grant Desme (pre-Father Desme) for a more injury prone, bad mouthing Curtis Granderson (last two WAR 3.7, 3.1) and a prospect. It was highway robbery and I’d do it over again every time.
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
Do you the A's need a team minister?
Desme could travel with the team on the 25 man roster and launch a few Hail Marys.
by LoneStranger on May 4, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions
We could get Hairston back!
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
Would that make us the beast with two Hairstons back?
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by 























