Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The MMA Hour Is Back

How are the ex A's doing one month in and what was Billy's biggest Mistake?

Here are some ex A's with stats on the year with who was traded for them.  this isn't ment to bash anything or anyone, just a what if.


Dan Haren- 3-1      4.50era.  For him we got:

     Dana Evland- 2-1        4.76era. dont really miss him

     Greg Smith-1-2          7.33era. really dont miss him

     Brett Anderson,  Chris Carter double boo-yaa and don't forget

    CF Carlos Gonzalez- 3hr 17rbi 330avg 348obp 848ops. son of a bitch. for him we got

Matt Holliday-               4hr, 11rbi, 283avg, 313obp, 807ops, for which we also gave up

    Huston Street. DL. had a good year last year but now costs 7million instead of a cheap Andrew Bailey till 2015

Brett Wallace came for Holliday and in AAA so far he's- 8hr 17rbi282avg 365obp 989 ops and.still playing 3rd?.

son of a bitch  who we flipped for

     Micheal Taylor- 2hr 15rbi 247avg 314obp 776ops.

 I know its early in this trade but i think every A's fan would rather those Wallace/Taylor numbers be reversed especailly when i think about

Andre Ethier    9hr 26rbi 365avg 432 obp 1.161ops. double son of a bitch.  who we traded for

  Milton Bradley 2hr 12 rbi 226avg 333obp 737ops 

 and for those of you say we needed Milton in 06' I say

2006 14hr 52rbi 276avg 370obp 818ops Milton Clubhouse Cancer vrs

            11hr 55rbi 308avg 365obp 842ops  Ethier 06 '+4 more years

 Milton fked us again when we had a trade worked out for

 Leo Nunez 1-0 0.00 3saves. 26 saves last year. but Bradley ended up "injured" so we got Andrew Brown instead

 

more

Jason Giambi- 0hr 1rbi 100avg 387obp 537ops

Barry Zito-4-0 1.53 (he's costing almost 2 million a win since signing with the Giants, good for him this year)

Nich Swisher-15rbi 282avg 371obp 889ops  (Gio Gonzalez, Ryan Sweeney, Fautino De Los Santos)

Jason Kendall -0hr 4rbi 287avg 361obp 694ops (Jerry Blevins)

Marco Scutaro- 2hr 7rbi 278avg 364obp 735ops (Grahm Godfrey 4.62 AAA sac)

Scott Hairston- 4hr 10rbi 271avg 357obp 892ops (Kouzmanoff)

Shawn Gallager -7.94era

Ryan Webb- reassigned

Craig Italiano- 0.00era in 22 AA/AAA innings

Rich Harden- 1-1 4.56era (Eric Patterson, Josh Donaldson, Gallager)

Bobby Crosby -1hr 5rbi 265avg 390obp 772ops

O.Cabrera- 2hr 14rbi 236avg 288obp 623ops traded for and we still have:

  Tyler Landendorf SS. 306avg 375obp 783ops 0 errors in 15 games AA

Travis Buck- 1hr 2rbi 219avg 324obp 699ops. (how did he ever get 10million a year and how did Seattle end up with so many rejects and overpaid players this year?)

Adam Kennedy- 1hr 11rbi 214avg 268obp 598ops

Mark Kotsay -2hr 4rbi 159avg 245obp 540ops

Jerremy Bonderman-5.74era

 

some who got away when just a few more million could have got it done-

Justin Smoak- draft not signed 05,  1hr 4rbi 148avg 333obp 666ops. the next coming of Texeria?

Johnathan Papelbon-draft not signed 02' 2.77era 7saves

Adroldis Chapman (according to the A's we came in second in that sweepstakes. will 5million a year will be worth it when its all signing bonus and he can get even more in arbitration later?) 1.29 era. probably yes and he would get more today.

son of a bitch on all three.

  

Joe Blanton DL (Adrian Cardinas, Josh Outman)

Jack Hannihan Reassigned. ( Justin Souza 3.21 AA )

Arron Cunnighan Reassigned

A.Embree DFA

Kiko Calero FA-injury concerns. (1.95era in 09')

Dan Meyer 16.20era DL (3.09 in 09')

Chad Bradford FA-injury concerns (2.12 era in 08')

 

 

now there are more like Pena, Ludwick, Cruz (7HR)etc but there success was far removed many years and/or many teams after the A's let them go. if anyone wants to include them or the ex A's from a long time ago like Tejada (856OPS) feel free.  

Poll
What's the worst trade or missed signing BB has done with this group of players?
Bradley-Ethier
228 votes
Taylor-Wallace
5 votes
Papelbon for a few million signing bonus
4 votes
Holliday-Gonzalez etc
80 votes
Harden-Donaldson
8 votes
Chapman for 31 million over 6 years
7 votes
Smoak for a few million signing bonus
31 votes

363 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 188 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don'y understand the Travis Buck comment

Are you from the future?

I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does.

The ninth fastest thirty year old in San Francisco

by bobnothing on May 3, 2010 3:46 AM PDT reply actions  

I like the idea, though, that in some alternate universe Travis got signed to a long term multi million dollar contract

which then, somehow, Seattle picked up…

I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does.

The ninth fastest thirty year old in San Francisco

by bobnothing on May 3, 2010 5:29 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree there were some bad trades here

but expect to be blasted by some for daring to criticize Billy. In that same spirit of blasphemy, I personally see him as a hit and miss kind of GM no more exceptional than some others. He’s did a great job with building up some fine young pitching but has given away some of that great pitching in some horrible trades as well. I will never forgive him for trading Hudson (my dog is named after Tim) for Charles Thomas and co.

The greenmachine

by greenmachine on May 3, 2010 5:04 AM PDT reply actions  

I never understand comments like this

“expect to be blasted by some for daring to criticize Billy” — do you READ AN? If you do, how can you come to the conclusion that one can’t criticize Billy Beane? Some of AN’s most respected, most prolific, and most high profile (front page) users do it all the time.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 3, 2010 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Brett Wallace
Brett Wallace came for Holliday and in AAA so far he’s- 8hr 17rbi282avg 365obp 989 ops and still playing 3rd?.

He is playing 1B for the ’51s

by elcroata on May 3, 2010 6:19 AM PDT reply actions  

And the stadium is a launching pad, I wouldn't put that much stock into the 8 homers.

What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.

by winchester5 on May 3, 2010 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

but look at the splits...

5 hrs in 60 home at-bats versus 4 hrs in 29 away at-bats (he hit a HR yesterday to bring his total to 9 on the season)

by chipper079 on May 3, 2010 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh well

we needed a top notch outfielder prospect, not a1B/DH prospect. We already have Barton and Carter.

by duballers23 on May 3, 2010 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Holliday trade

CarGo is such a fun player to watch. I’ve been watching a few Rockies games here and there and he is such a good young player. Holliday, who did not “suck” here, did not produce like he is capable of. Given we did get Wallace for him, but that trade is moot as well so this was the worst trade IMO. However, we also really got boned for Milton so that is a very close second.

Go A's!!!

by stephanc101 on May 3, 2010 7:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Milton did help get to the ALCS in 2006 though.

Not having to suffer another Game 5 defeat….priceless.

But baseball! Fuck yeah! -- lynnzgal

by WaddellCanseco on May 3, 2010 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

He was 1-13 in that ALDS...

So didn’t impact getting to the ALCS much.

Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on May 3, 2010 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

The ALCS was where he actually did something

Would’ve been nice if a few others did too.

Last of the Ninth - Photography

by Flashfire on May 3, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

To say nothing of the regular season he had for us...

… which helped get us to the ALDS in the first place.

"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."

by Joey C. on May 3, 2010 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

What if

  easier said then done. Either and Cargone are the ones the A’s should have never traded. Othere would have been gone through FA. Harden, Scutaro, Kendal, Bradley and ect… What the A’s should do is stop picking up boderline players like Patterson and let the Chris Carter play in the big leagues.

by Arcman on May 3, 2010 8:04 AM PDT reply actions  

You knew that Cargon and Ethier were going to be the players to break out?

Can you send billy your crystal ball?

"The A's get some action but they do not score..." -Glen Kuiper

"Anyone who calls themselves the Angels Angels should have to start over and ride the short bus." -timmeh from McCovey Chronicles

by Cheezombie on May 3, 2010 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Interesting looking at Ethier's minor vs. major league numbers

Identical OPS of .853 before the season started, but his slugging is 26 points higher and OBP 26 lower.
Really though, it was a helluva lot to give up for Bradley in hindsight, especially after what he’d done in Midland that year.
Was it the right move at the time? Probably.
Was there a good chance that Ethier would eventually contribute as a starting OF? Probably, that’s why the trade was made straight up.
Were there many who truly saw this sort of production out of him? No, but I’m sure there’s still a share of “I told you so’s” out there.

AN: Where you will be an A's fan or Dallas Braden will show you the repercussions of your actions.

by stranahanahan on May 3, 2010 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

It is all guessing

  Either had the numbers in the minors to be a good hitter the only surprise out of him is the power. I picked the year he was traded because of his bat. As far as Cargon his hitting was there all along his only problem will be his OBA need to improve.

by Arcman on May 3, 2010 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I strongly disagree Arc

Patterson is not remotely close to being good enough to be labeled borderline.

"-i never said half the things i said." --Yogi Berra

by Ovale Fan on May 3, 2010 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Carlos is definitely one guy I'd like to have back. I still have hopes for Taylor though.

I voted for Harden-Donaldson as the worst trade of that bunch. The others were all sort of defensible at the time.

But baseball! Fuck yeah! -- lynnzgal

by WaddellCanseco on May 3, 2010 9:29 AM PDT reply actions  

I didn't like the Harden trade at all (too much filler not enough talent) but saying any of the moves above is worse than Holliday is absurd

The A’s had no business trying to contend last year and mortgaged a huge amount of their future, especially when you consider that George Sherrill picked up 2 B+ prospects at the trade deadline last year. Essentially we gave up 3 elite prospects and Gregg Smith for .5 a season of unused production and Brett Wallace. Guess what Carlos Gonzalez is far superior to Brett Wallace so that is an automatic huge loss for Beane.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

2 B+ prospects?

Overstating it just a bit, don’t you think? I mean, Sickels gave Johnson a C+ and the Orioles didn’t even protect him in the Rule 5 draft. And Bell only earned a B.

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/12/4/1186174/baltimore-orioles-top-20-prospects

Plus, I doubt the market for Street would’ve been as robust as it was for Sherrill due to a) Sherill’s left handedness, and b) Street’s injury history. The Dodgers, for one, likely would not have given that package for Street, already having Belisario, Mota and Transcoso in their set up queue.

But yeah, I generally agree, would rather have Gonzalez, et al. than Taylor.

by NRC on May 3, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Taylor ends up being close to as productive as Gonzalez though

Then the deal doesn’t hurt very much.

AN: Where you will be an A's fan or Dallas Braden will show you the repercussions of your actions.

by stranahanahan on May 3, 2010 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah, it will definitely hurt less

and i agree with the comment elsewhere that Taylor’s control years are better timed from a rebuilding perspective, with Gonzalez likely reaching FA two years before Taylor does.

also think that mortensen ultimately develops into a decent sinker/slider bullpen arm.

by NRC on May 3, 2010 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Geren said in an interview

Mortensen was very close to making the team this year. I still remain skeptical any good team would consider having him on the roster.

by hishnik on May 3, 2010 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ok im more bullish on Bell than Sickles and I didn't look it up but lets actually use Sickles eval of the trade
George Sherrill to the Orioles for Josh Bell and Steve Johnson. I’ve never been a big Sherrill guy, so I think the Orioles did very well here to pick up a couple of prospects for him. Bell is a solid Grade B guy…his home run power is still developing and I’m not sure what position he plays long run, but I like his strike zone judgment and he’s young. Johnson doesn’t have blazing stuff, but could be a good inning-eater type, perhaps similar to Brad Bergesen down the road. I’d rate him as a Grade B- prospect right now.

rather than assessments half a year later if youre going to get technical on me. Also Street was under control for longer when traded which more than makes up for handedness.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

those are both good points, but

i find it hard to believe that johnson was any less of a prospect at the end of the season, when Sickels gave him a C+ and the Orioles didnt protect him in the Rule 5, than he was at the time of the trade. in fact, he very pitched well in AA as a 21 yo after the trade – almost exactly in line with his career numbers. the more likely answer is that Sickels hadn’t put in the time when he made the above comments to accurately grade him. either way, he is and was a pretty marginal prospect, slightly better than mortensen, but probably projecting as a fringe starter or reliever in the long run.

i strongly disagree that street’s value at the time of the trade was higher than sherrill’s. for starters, most people thought colletti overpaid, so its tough to use the sherrill trade as a barometer (as a ceiling, perhaps). second, if anything, i’d say teams value relievers more highly during the playoff race – when they know they’re in trouble – than they do in the off season – when they’re more inclined to let their internal candidates sort it out. plus, when it comes down to fine tuning a playoff team, a late inning lefthander is just so much more difficult to find, and thus more expensive, than a righty. like i said, the dodgers simply would not have given up the same package for street – they already had plenty of capable righties. not to mention street’s long injury history that (rightfully) scared off suitors.

compare street’s value to other rhrps who’ve been traded in the offseason during last few years – rafael soriano for jesse chavez (admittedly different circumstances), jose valverde for chad qualls, juan gutierrez, and chris burke, brad lidge for michael bourn, geoff geary, and change, jj putz and sean green for franklin gutierrez, endy chavez, mike carp, and scraps. so the a’s could have gotten a young set-up man and a young fringey outfielder for street? we have plenty of both of those. and what were rhrp’s going for at the deadline last year? tony pena for brandon allen, jon rauch for emil bonifacio and later for kevin mulvey, rafael bethancourt for connor graham. you have to look at the market and the potential suitors, and, regardless of how good street has been, they just werent there.

im not saying it was a good decision to trade street. just that its quite a stretch to think the a’s would have gotten a player of bell’s caliber had they held on to him.

by NRC on May 4, 2010 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

I would take Gutierrez right about now....

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on May 4, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

A's might disagree

Harden was basically useless for 2 seasons. They viewed gallagher who was one of the best mlb ready pitchers in the minors. Maybe overrated, but cant ignore his minor league trackrecord. Debate on the value of murton and patterson, but they viewed each as helping the roster at the time. They had liked murton going back years to that 2003 draft and at the time their 2b depth was terrible. Ellis had impending free agency and they had yet to draft Weeks or trade for Cardenas. They also had like Donaldson in the 07 draft and if you believe them were ready to take him #59 if he fell further in the draft. That wouldve ended a 3 yr stretch of the draft where they had ignored taking catchers with their high picks

by AsFanInDC25 on May 3, 2010 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Harden was hurt. The A's knew, the league knew it.

If Gallagher had turned out to be even a decent #3 starter, that’s a good trade for Oakland.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 3, 2010 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Harden was always hurt... that was the problem.

It had a chance to be a great trade for us. Didn’t work out that way, but I don’t see how it really hurt us, either.

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 4, 2010 7:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Of course the A's disagreed... they made the trade.

Murton was terrible. Donaldson had hit himself off of prospect lists as anything worthwhile. Patterson has never been able to field. That is a terrible diversification of talent when the only thing good in the package is a young pitcher. Also Harden was under team control for a year and a half more giving Beane ample time to try to trade him. I would have asked for a different filler package.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Considering the frequency in which Harden got hurt...

…I disagree with the “ample time” aspect.

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 4, 2010 7:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

they had a month before the dead line, the next off season, and the next trade deadline.

harden would probably be healthy for some of that.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 5, 2010 1:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly my point...

SOME of that. How much of that? Given his track record, very possibly not much. At that point he had actually strung together a couple solid months in a row… a rarity for him.

And the off-season would be the least opportune time. No sense of immediate need and urgency by the “buyers”.

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 5, 2010 8:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

it's no wonder

we suck at drafting position players, knowing that we once coveted the likes of Murton and Donaldson. I know it’s still early but Murton has proved to be a scrub and outside of that 2-run jack in Toronto, Donaldson looks to be another AAAA spec. And of course this team is loaded with them..

by sf drift king on May 3, 2010 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dude youre on crack if you think that Donaldson's performance so far indicates that hes a AAAA spec

You do realize the A’s skipped him over AAA right?

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 4, 2010 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

just going by the looks of his recent ABs,

he doesn’t look like anything special. I know, I know, it’s too early for him but I am sick and tired of seeing this collection of 4A players clog the roster, and Donaldson thus far, hasn’t done much to separate himself from that bunch.

by sf drift king on May 6, 2010 1:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Doesn't look like anything special?!

You could jump Ted Williams from AA to MLB and he wouldn’t do anything in the first three games either. I mean, come on, the kid’s had 11 plate appearances.

The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.

by danmerqury on May 6, 2010 2:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

The kid has a good head on his shoulders

I’d like to see anyone try to say that about Ted Williams.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 8, 2010 10:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

How can you label Donaldson AAAA?

He’s been in the majors less than a week, after only playing 18 AAA games. Give the kid a chance.

rebuildingseason.blogspot.com

by Rebuilding Season on May 4, 2010 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

jinx

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 4, 2010 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Fine, but I only owe you a regular coke

and not a 4 dollar ballpark coke.

rebuildingseason.blogspot.com

by Rebuilding Season on May 4, 2010 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

um well coke is evil

unless its mexican coke with real sugar. Wait can you drink that in AZ now?

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 5, 2010 1:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why are so many people suddenly trashing Donaldson?

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 4, 2010 7:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Because he's worse than you think!

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 4, 2010 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Carlos Gonzalez plays in the NL he would be nothing in the AL

"I managed a team that was so bad we considered a 2-0 count on the batter a rally." - Rich Donnelly, minor league manager

by homerun13 on May 5, 2010 4:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh geez. Not in here too, please.

If you are going to make statements like this, be prepared to at least try to prove it.

by LoneStranger on May 5, 2010 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Letting Tejada leave

and keeping Chavez, will always be the worst Billy Beane for me.

by john the comic guy on May 3, 2010 9:32 AM PDT reply actions  

ding ding ding

we have a winner

i was just about to write that

by Sir Realist on May 3, 2010 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agree 100%

I was mad at the time, and it’s never gotten any better. At the time, I think Billy’s reasoning had to do with a) Tejada would have been more expensive to sign, and b) there were fewer top-flight 3B than SS. But the Bobby Crosby experiment turned out poorly.

@worldblee on Twitter.

by worldblee on May 3, 2010 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

and chavez was a better baseball player

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Crosby was supposed to be better than he turned out to be.

It was sound reasoning at the time, and Beane shouldn’t be criticized using only hindsight as a guide.

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 4, 2010 7:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

This.

Runner-up: Not signing the talent you drafted or had an opportunity to draft.

"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark

by carp on May 3, 2010 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

JUSTIN SMOAK WAS GOING TO COLLEGE

he was not going to sign with the A’s.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you, Papa Smoak.

"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark

by carp on May 3, 2010 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Though if it was the '09 draft

We would have given him the $1mil+ he asked for, as we did with Stassi.

AN: Where you will be an A's fan or Dallas Braden will show you the repercussions of your actions.

by stranahanahan on May 3, 2010 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I am sure the A's could have signed him. No doubt he had a strong commitment to South Carolina but Smoak and his father actually floated an asking price of $1m. To say the A's had no chance of signing him is wrong

"I’ll sign for one million dollars, and nothing less," Smoak says. "Right now I’m planning to follow my dreams to South Carolina and play for Ray Tanner. Coach Tanner has been in constant touch with me and I’ve always wanted to play at South Carolina."

Smoak said his conversation with Beane, who faced the same choice between college and signing when the Mets drafted him in the first round in 1980, centered on the value of a college education as well as some baseball talk.

"I was not made an official offer by the A’s, but they know what I am asking for and I expect to talk with them in person," Smoak says.

BA Link

by DeJay on May 5, 2010 2:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

This is just dumb.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

Quite a few posts over the years have noted that, under the circumstances present at that time, the decision made perfect sense. In the same way, I don’t think it’s very useful to analyze the personnel decisions simply in terms of,
1. We got Player X for Player Y;
2. since then, Player X has done this, Player Y has done that;
3. so, the trade was a good (or bad) one.

I would think you have to look at a myriad of factors to fairly judge a trade, e.g., how many more years is the player under control; if you’re looking to trade someone, do you have someone to fill that position; etc.

by Ray of Lite on May 3, 2010 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

and in case people have forgotten those reasons

1) chavez looked like a 30 HR, gold glove 3B for years to come
2) we had a viable replacement in the pipeline at SS (Crosby) while we were barren at 3B
3) The front office KNEW Tejada was lying about his age, amongst other things

Try and tell me it would have been beneficial to sign a cornerstone player you had a replacement for who had lied about his age (and was 2 years older than everyone thought) AND choose to let a young, healthy cornerstone player walk who hadn’t done anything wrong.

by noava22 on May 3, 2010 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except....

Tejada was a proven superstar and MVP winner. Chavez was a great fielder but his hitting never measured up to the hype. Crosby could’ve slotted over to third.

by richwol1 on May 3, 2010 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

well except Chavez was a better hitter and fielder than Tejada

EC 2000-2006 RC+ 115, 128, 127, 125, 125, 136, 113, 108
MT 2000-2006 RC+ 114, 111, 132, 114, 133, 126, 129, 128

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hold your horses there buddy

Tejada wasnt a superstar and take a look at the MVP voting and tell me you think he had the best year out of that group of players. I see a number of guys who were better. His “defense” was as hyped as Jeter’s, making 2 or 3 highlight reel plays a year and having the shittiest range out of many big league SS’s equaled = “GOLD GLOVE DEFENSE!”

Plus, he was on steroids, lied about his age and as mentioned, was completely shitawful at defense. Peter Gammons, clearly being a talentless hack who knows nothing about baseball* called non-roider Bobby Crosby** his 2005 MVP winner in his preseason predictions. We had every reason to run with a Crosby/Chavez combo, it looked incredible going into 2005.

*Im being sarcastic, obviously.

**Whoever was trying to argue that the NL is not some AAAA lesser league, Crosby has a 775 OPS right now playing there.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

It also needs to be stated that Eric Chavez had a better year than Miggy in 2002.

Chavez WAR: 5.4
Tejada WAR: 4.4

Miggy cost so many wins with his outstandingly crappy defense.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

You have to judge a decision based on the information that was available at the time.

The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.

by danmerqury on May 3, 2010 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

YOU DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO, MERQ

I’m gonna judge every trade in hindsight, I’m gonna bitch about Holliday hating the A’s, and I’m gonna senselessly demand that Billy Beane sign every good homegrown player to gigantic contracts because GAAAAH FANDOM RULED BY MY EMOTIONS.

"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."

by Joey C. on May 3, 2010 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I just want Nick Swisher back.

Goddammit, Billy.

The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.

by danmerqury on May 3, 2010 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

could've had him

if we were willing to let go of Wilson Betimit sized talent

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's still the one that hurts me the most

"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."

by Joey C. on May 3, 2010 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Since 2008

Ryan Sweeney = 6.1 WAR
Nick Swisher = 5.5 WAR

Oh so you want to win less games huh? That’s a weird thing to want…

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pst. don't forget Gio's 1.3

But I don’t think that is Dan’s point. The swisher trade certainly is a great one for the A’s hindsight foresight and sightsight. But who amoung us wouldn’t want that crazy ape back on the team?

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do I want a 3 and a half win player taking up a corner OF or 1B spot?

If that’s the best available, yeah. But those arent that hard to come by.

Im more about winning, the players personalities dont mean a damn thing to me. We won 3 championships in a row and every player was fistfighting in the dugout and they HATED each other. Team chemistry is completely irrelevant in baseball.

…and right about now I feel like I need to say again that we should sign Elijah Dukes to play LF.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

You've been on the Dukes tip for YEARS now.

Not a criticism, just an observation…

"We support your economy. We make your food and tend your fields. All we want are the same rights and responsiblities as you. Please... Vote YES on Proposition 801- Equal rights for sock puppets!"

by Gaijin_Suketto on May 3, 2010 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have only been posting since June 09

so “years” is an overstatement. I think I started with it the day the Nats released him. Unless he’s a serious risk to the health and wellbeing of his teammates (which is ridiculous to even think about), its absolutely absurd that he doesnt have a job right now. He’s better than all of our current LF options and could move to RF when Taylor comes up. His ceiling might even be higher than Carter or Taylors.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

You weren't someone else back in AN 2.0?

never mind then… my mistake…

carry on.

"We support your economy. We make your food and tend your fields. All we want are the same rights and responsiblities as you. Please... Vote YES on Proposition 801- Equal rights for sock puppets!"

by Gaijin_Suketto on May 3, 2010 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

gimme a 3 war player

that I like to root for, and I will be happy.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Um, the whole point of WAR is to equalize positions

such that players are not overrated or underrated based on the positions they play.

A 3.5 WAR player is worth exactly the same at 1B as it is at any other position.

Arthur Dent: You know, it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse and about to die of asphyxiation in deep space, that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young.
Ford Prefect: Why, what did she tell you?
Arthur Dent: I don't know, I didn't listen!

by PaulThomas on May 3, 2010 6:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Eh, we can expect his UZR score to fall back down to reasonable levels.

After you regress for sample size, that 0.6 WAR advantage is essentially 0, if not negative.

Besides, I was talking personality. I’ll take that crazy bastard Swisher over jeans model Sweeney anyday.

The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.

by danmerqury on May 3, 2010 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

"Eric Byrnes plays like his hair is on fire"

Well then, maybe he should take a minute to put out that fire, because it sure is interfering with him being good at baseball.

You think YOU like “crazy bastards”, I say I want Manny Ramirez and everyone acts like I’m Hitler. Manny is the ultimate crazy bastard and not to mention, ridiculously good at baseball. I wish we would get him every day.

-The president of the "Sign Elijah Dukes" fan club.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Byrnes's hair might be on fire, but so is his contract with the Mariners

He was released today.

Arthur Dent: You know, it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse and about to die of asphyxiation in deep space, that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young.
Ford Prefect: Why, what did she tell you?
Arthur Dent: I don't know, I didn't listen!

by PaulThomas on May 3, 2010 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd take Manny.

I’d bitch about him, sure, but I’d stand up and clap when he launches HRs into the empty suites above the bleachers.

by LoneStranger on May 4, 2010 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Problem with Manny is that he's bipolar crazy

Some days, his craziness is awesome, others it’s a trainwreck.

With Swish, it was always awesome. I liked Byrnes too. I understand he wasn’t particularly great at what he did, but he was fun to watch.

by rrryanc on May 4, 2010 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Byrnes is great at what he does

he just is a below average major league baseball player

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 4, 2010 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mmm, good point

I should have put a “tried” in there.

by rrryanc on May 4, 2010 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

We won more games with Sweeney?

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 4, 2010 7:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agree, but

the argument at the time was having Crosby as the replacement. No one thot at the time that he would be a colossal BUST.

Billy should have never let Tejada, who was then the heart & soul of our team leave. Trading Chavez at the time would have returned a boatload of specs, and Crosby could have switched over to 3B.

by sf drift king on May 3, 2010 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Only in hindsight

At the time, keeping Chavez and letting Tejada go was the logical thing to do. Chavez was the better player. He was also younger and there were many who believed Tejada was older than he claimed. (The speculation later turned out to be correct).

The A’s had Crosby coming up behind Tejada and Crosby looked like he had a very good chance of being an above average major league shortstop. There was no way to figure that Chavez would break down the way he did. And though Crosby suffered a couple of freak injuries in the minors, who could have predicted he would be so brittle? And how much of his failure to develop can be attributed to the time he spent on the shelf?

If you’re trying to identify a decision that hurt the team the most, this is probably at the top of the list. But if you’re looking for the one that could or should have been avoided, this one isn’t even on the radar.

Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!

by Monday Fan on May 4, 2010 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

This.
If you’re trying to identify a decision that hurt the team the most, this is probably at the top of the list. But if you’re looking for the one that could or should have been avoided, this one isn’t even on the radar.

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 4, 2010 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except many did feel, at the time, that the A's should keep Tejada

Probably the biggest factor in Beane’s favor is that the contracts didn’t end concurrently, and he said he did not have the budget for Tejada whereas he did for Chavez. That alone might justify the decision.

But I think it’s not accurate to suggest the A’s had no inkling of Chavez’ health issues. IIRC, the A’s knew of his back problems by the time of the extension — even if they did not make it very public — and didn’t he have some shoulder issues (rotator cuff?) before he first reached the big leagues?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 4, 2010 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Many people did want to keep both, I remember that.

But the stated issue was that we could not afford to keep both, so a hard decision had to be made. I tend to agree they could have seen some issues with Chavez coming, but I’d believe them if they claimed they didn’t see a total breakdown like what did happen.

IIRC, what’s ironic is that Tejada wanted Giambi-like money, then ended up signing for far less… an amount that Beane said later they would have been willing to re-sign him for.

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 4, 2010 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

No I meant wanted Tejada kept instead of Chavez

I think most everyone knew we couldn’t keep both.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 4, 2010 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, right. Got'cha.

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 4, 2010 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

maybe

but Chavez was still better at baseball at the time.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 4, 2010 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Where did this occur?

I certainly didn’t suggest the A’s had no inkling of Chavez’s health issues.

Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!

by Monday Fan on May 5, 2010 7:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

According to Fangraphs Milton bradley's WAR

in 2006 was 2.8 compared with eithier’s 2.1.

Buck (2.2 WAR in 2007) was blocking eithier who was never never going to break camp with the A’s in 2006.

Last yar was the only year that Milton’s WAR was below Eithier’s. Keep in mind milton bradley cannot stay on the field, yet he is consistently better than Eithier.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 10:02 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

This a million times

Relying on a AA outfielder with what many thought was a limited power potential ti break camp and be an impact player for a legit contending team in his first year in the bigs while skipping AAA is not a good idea.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

I have a new rule

I stop reading anything the minute it talks about Ethier for Bradley as if:

A) It was a bad trade at the time
and/or
B) Ethier, who is a butcher defensively, would be putting up an .866 OPS in the AL/Oakland (which means he’s really only about a 2-win player)

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on May 3, 2010 10:10 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

the entire post is pretty misleading

should lead to some delightful discussion

Save Rajai Davis

by oakinboston on May 3, 2010 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also Antonio Perez was a very good prospect at the time.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Of course.

Not only would I make that trade at the time, but a few years later I would still make that trade (not, like, in 2010…but using hindsight I still think it was a smart move).

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on May 3, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

If you look at process it was a great move.

If you look at results it was a mediocre move.

Sometimes the bet that will pay out 70% of the time goes bust.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I just don't think Ethier would be a better player than, say, Ryan Sweeney if he were on the A's

I’d make the trade again and again because I don’t think Ethier as an Athletic would be anything special at all.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on May 3, 2010 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I keep saying this

Ethier and Cargon would not be putting up their numbers they are putting up for us had they never been traded. Its such a flawed argument to say.

Im more mad we traded Milton Bradley, who promptly went berserk (977 OPS in SD, small sample scale but nonetheless impressive) over his next 168 games over a year and a half in both leagues. We could have used that bat.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why not?

Park factors? Dodger Stadium and the Coliseum are pretty much the same. Pitching? Ethier faces good pitching in the NL West all the time.

Do you think the A’s don’t develop hitting prospects properly? If so, that’s another thing entirely…and something that would be very, very alarming.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on May 3, 2010 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

AN: Where you will be an A's fan or Dallas Braden will show you the repercussions of your actions.

by stranahanahan on May 3, 2010 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I want the holliday trade back too

but, keep in mind, a .330 avg and 348 obp? His BABIP is .382, much higher than in in the past, His line drive rate is a little lower and groundball rate a lot higher and flyball rate a lot lower.

These numbers will fall back down.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 10:10 AM PDT reply actions  

This is the key point with CarGon

The biggest question with him has always been his plate discipline — secondarily there have been questions about whether he’d develop power, but I think those two will tend to go together over the long run. With the A’s, his K/BB was 81/13. Last year with the Rockies, it was 70/28 — still bad, but much, much better than he’d been in the past. This year, it’s 18/3, which is pretty much back to where he was with the A’s.

Unless he starts laying off bad pitches, those numbers, as you say, will fall back down.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 3, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

To me, OF defense is also key

Gonzalez played a very good CF with the A’s, but didn’t have that scouting reputation. If he is actually capable of playing CF better than Sweeney, or of playing RF as well as Sweeney, that’s different than if Sweeney is the clearly better defender.

I’m not comfortable with Sweeney in CF and actually was with Gonzalez, and the A’s have had a need in CF for a while — but then again, Gonzalez isn’t even playing CF anymore with the Rockies, so it’s hard to know what he can or can’t do.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 3, 2010 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

At my only Rivercats game a couple years ago I got Gonzalez' autograph on a baseball card

after Mike Sweeney’s mother called him over to sign for a few of us. She is such a sweetheart.

by LoneStranger on May 4, 2010 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well, if you're going to go and use logic...

"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."

by Joey C. on May 3, 2010 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

The way I look at it

is do you like Taylor or CarGon more? Obviously including Street into the equation changes things but I try not to think of that or else my eyes start bleeding. Taylor is a very intriguing prospect and if he and Carter can tap into their potential that’s one badass middle of the lineup.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on May 3, 2010 10:38 AM PDT reply actions  

the biggest benefit with Taylor

is he was not in the majors last year and this (so far). The A’s were not going to contend with Carlos Gonzalez in 2009 or 2016.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Think about this

We probably could have gotten Josh Bell for Street last year. Ignoring him hides the complete folly of what Beane did.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

A's attempted to trade street multiple times in 2008

There was interest from boston, but deemed the asking price too high that offseason. Couldnt get any takers at the trade deadline. Street lost his closers job, that I remember fans even wanting brown and casilla to close. Unfortunately both of them struggled later on too, eventually surpassed by ziegler and devine who had great 1st full seasons with A’s.

by AsFanInDC25 on May 3, 2010 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh I agree

But I like to compare Taylor and CarGon in terms of top prospects. And the point that Ed makes above is a big one IMO.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on May 3, 2010 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also

I don’t think there was much interest in Street. I’m sure Beane tried to create a deal that centered around Street but the truth was that he was a little too injured/ineffective at times for teams to probably want to part with the type of player that Beane wanted. Huston could just as easily have gotten badly injured last year like he is this year so far.

I guess my point is that I seriously doubt Beane just decided to trade Street right then. I’m sure he did his homework and realized that most teams were wary of Street’s injury history.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on May 3, 2010 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

and guess what you have the opportunity to hold on those players rather than trying to sell low

because they are under team control.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 3, 2010 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

There is also the mindset of selling low before the value goes lower.

I’m sure the numbers were run and the chances of a rebound were calculated. Like all trades made or not made, there is a gamble involved.

by LoneStranger on May 4, 2010 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

I really don't miss Carlos all that much.

On his career:

Percentage of balls out of the zone he swung at: 30.6% (Average: 25%)
Percentage of times he makes contact on those swings: 49.9% (Average: 61%)

Pitchers simply have no reason to throw him any hittable pitches. To survive with that high of an outside swing rate, he’s got to make contact on 60-70%. That’s the difference between someone like Pablo Sandoval and, say, Aaron Rowand.

The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.

by danmerqury on May 3, 2010 11:57 AM PDT reply actions  

Ethier

He didnt do much as a prospect until he got to AA and despite winning Texas League mvp was still labeled as a tweener OF. Then complained to the front office about not being promoted to AAA earlier. At the time they were getting bradley but also antonio perez who some were projecting to even start over crosby and ellis also providing a 3b backu to chavez. He ended up a huge bust here and is now out of baseball. The A’s were pretty loaded with OF’s at the time with Swisher, Payton, Kielty, Kotsay
Ethier was not the mistake, it was hoping Buck projected to be a similar player and he eventually looked like it being named a top 50 prospect and BA’s #1 A’s prospect soon after.

by AsFanInDC25 on May 3, 2010 12:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Beane's biggest mistakes

Counting on the durability of chavez, crosby, and ellis and being burned each season. Other than scutaro it has been a revolving door of infielders the past 3-5 seasons trying to build up that infield depth. Failed trades for perez, ginter. Letting scutaro go since they didnt want to pay him 1-2 mill and deciding on the hope of hannahan, murphy which backfired immensely. in 2006 playoffs stuck in using d’angelo jimenez, mark kiger.

by AsFanInDC25 on May 3, 2010 12:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Chavy had given no indication that he was an injury risk, so you can't use that as a reason.

Crosby was tabbed to be an MVP for ’05.
Ellis had no history of injuries.

Where is the mistake?

I agree the infield didn’t have enough depth.

by LoneStranger on May 4, 2010 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Who would have thought

Crosby would crash into Ellis and basically snap him in half? No one could have predicted that, and Ellis was pretty darn durable before that crash.

Crosby himself, one of his injuries that caused a lot of DL time was breaking his ankle sliding into a base (or was it the catcher? I forget). Impact injuries you can’t label as a “durability” issue, so that’s kinda unfair.

by Kaiser99 on May 4, 2010 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Home plate, in Baltimore, IIRC

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 4, 2010 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Against former A Sal Fasano, yep

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on May 4, 2010 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

For me, trading Scutaro was Beane's worst mistake.

By far. Being frugal is one thing, but the Scutaro trade was just him being cheap. Shortsightedly cheap.

Pitching and defense wins pennants, but offense sells tickets.

by UncleLeo on May 4, 2010 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or maybe OP can just nail it to the door of the church...

"We support your economy. We make your food and tend your fields. All we want are the same rights and responsiblities as you. Please... Vote YES on Proposition 801- Equal rights for sock puppets!"

by Gaijin_Suketto on May 3, 2010 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

A counterpoint

I love fanposts like this. It makes my head hurt to compile all the players traded and what they are doing now, etc. It’s nice to look back just for curiousity’s sake.

Also, yes hindsight is 20/20, but good GMs do a lot better than bad GMs. They all make mistakes, but we can imagine the “son of a bitch” posts might be 10x higher for the Pirates GMs over the years than for Beane.

I don’t think the point is to bash Billy Beane using hindsight – it’s more of “what if” concept, and, most especially, it shows how we got to where we are.

The fact that this guy went through and looked up all this info is what has enabled us to have a lively discussion here. So I’m going to have to disagree.

He does list Kouzmanoff next to Hairston. I don’t think any of us are missing Hairston. This just gives us a great opportunity to look back at our GM’s track record and see how it came out. I’m not sure how else to evaluate a GM (or any employee in any other situation, in any industry) other than his track record.

by Billy Frijoles on May 3, 2010 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions   4 recs

Can we do a glow green for this?

Like visible from Florida type of green?

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

by ST on May 3, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

wha?

sock puppets have never successfully defended castles, except when working with squirrels, which would never happen because squirrels know better than to trust sock puppets. -nm

by Leopold Bloom on May 4, 2010 6:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

BRETT WALLACE HAS NOT PLAYED ONE INNING AT THIRD IN 2010

stop acting like we even have room for him. We dont.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 12:52 PM PDT reply actions  

Well said

Trading Wallace was not a big deal, Taylor is a bigger need

That said, we should have never had the option of getting Taylor because we should have never traded CarGon, but that is done with.

Lets hope that Taylor can become CarGon with better discipline

Go A's!!!

by stephanc101 on May 3, 2010 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't like the CarGon trade when it happened and don't like it now. I think he'll be a stud.

The future may well prove me wrong on that one. But it’s easy to cherry-pick one trade out of a multitude over the years. Overall, I’m no GM and not competent to carry his clipboard.

JJ Martin
The best way to catch a knuckleball is to wait until the ball stops rolling and then pick it up. ~Bob Uecker

by JJ Martin on May 3, 2010 12:58 PM PDT reply actions  

I would just like to say that I wouldnt want ANY of the players we traded back.

I’d like Smoak and Chapman, but they did not want to play for us. Carlos Gonzalez is playing in the most offensively-charged park in baseball, stop acting like we would even get half of the production. We wouldnt.

Brett Wallace is a fat DH. This is a fact that people keep ignoring. Do we have room for a fat DH? No, actually we dont even have that.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 12:59 PM PDT reply actions  

It is funny how Brett Wallace went from being able to stick as a below average 3B to a fat DH the minute he got traded.

He should be fine defensively as a 1B but it is his bat that was always going to carry him. Whether we miss it remains to be seen.

by DeJay on May 5, 2010 3:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

yes and no

PL78 is one of the many people (like myself) that never thought he could play third IIRC

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 5, 2010 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Italiano

I can only find that he has 12 ip, all at AA

by JonL on May 3, 2010 2:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Italiano and Webb

Until both were full time converted to relievers they finally improved. But that took Italiano till his 4th yr and Webb 5 years of pretty terrible results. Italiano did dominate kane county. I would be more worried about losing them if this was 3 or 4 years ago prior to the A’s developing any decent relievers. But they have not had issues in that area in recent seasons. Especially with pitchers with like Storey, Smith, etc

by AsFanInDC25 on May 3, 2010 2:25 PM PDT reply actions  

did we ever have a chance at signing mike leake?

7th rounder in 06. really liked the dude at ASU. kind of wish he never went.

"The hard... is what makes it great."

by Jjjsixsix on May 3, 2010 3:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Um, have you taken a look at Carlos's PD stats?

.382 BABIP?
44.5% O-Swing!!!
58% Swing rate

What does that say? Rocky Mountain Oyster luck!

"Twenty minutes," says Jack Sr. "Thank god for Billy Beane."

"Any fan that wants us to do that is going to be disappointed because that just isn’t us." - Wolff

by ST on May 3, 2010 3:34 PM PDT reply actions  

Looking at his splits from 2009, he was a lot better at home than on the road. His OPS was .943 at home and .811 on the road. We’ll see how he fares this year.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on May 3, 2010 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Coors Field tends to do that.

The selfish, they're all standing in line, faithing and hoping to buy themselves time.
Me, I figure as each breath goes by, I only own my mind.

by danmerqury on May 3, 2010 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Billy Beane's biggest mistake?

Writing Moneyball, according to a certain Hall of Famer that is.

More seriously, I’d say it was not accepting the job over in Boston. Big ass payroll and relative freedom to do what he wants in terms of player roster. Imagine what Billy could do if he had that payroll AND the “brand name” of the Boston Red Soxes when it came to acquiring players.

The media, though, is a whole other animal, so I think Billy was glad he didn’t do it.

by Kaiser99 on May 3, 2010 3:57 PM PDT reply actions  

he could've signed Scutaro

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lucky for Scutaro he's on a winning team!

(Oakland: Better record, closer to 1st place, than Boston)

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 3, 2010 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Aw snap!

Scooter got Nicoed!

Marco Scutaro’s nothing more than a cupholder now!

"We support your economy. We make your food and tend your fields. All we want are the same rights and responsiblities as you. Please... Vote YES on Proposition 801- Equal rights for sock puppets!"

by Gaijin_Suketto on May 3, 2010 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wish Beane took that job.

We could’ve had Youkilis and DePodesta at the helm.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on May 3, 2010 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

as long as youkilis is hitting home runs against the angels today

I am happy wiht him in boston

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 3, 2010 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only trade I thought turned out truly disastrous...

… was the Huddy trade. I mean, we got nothin’— nothin’— for that guy. In fact, it’s even worse than that: Cruz was traded for Admiral Halsey, which everyone knows led to the Halsey Curse. That’s just science.

In all seriousness, though, the process was fine in that one, too. It’s hard to find a move that Billy made that defies all logic. Though I think the anti-Holliday-trade folks are reasonable in their arguments, I don’t necessarily agree with them.

"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."

by Joey C. on May 3, 2010 4:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Disastrous no, disappointing yes

Going into that season the bullpen was terrible, they made it a priority to transfor it into a power bullpen. They had dotel,cruz, calero. Unfortunately calero was the only one to work out. Cruz had one of the best reliever seasons in mlb the season before and there was even some thought returning him to SP. After being traded for halsey he went onto to a 4-5 yr stretch of being a solid reliever.

Meyer was ranked the #43 best prospect in mlb. At the time was thought to have more upside than both haren and blanton. He ruined his chances by hiding the injury, thats the biggest disappointment.

Debate charles thomas fluke 1/2 season with braves. But A’s obviously liked his defense and potential CF ability which they lacked in the system. From trade rumors I believe A’s wanted marcus giles, kyle davies but were deemed untouchable.

by AsFanInDC25 on May 3, 2010 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, that's kind of what I meant...

… when I said the process behind the trade was fine.

What I was getting at is that the Hudson trade stands out the most (in my eyes) as truly having no semblance of good return in retrospect. That’s why I used the word disastrous, though I’d certainly be willing to use your formulation of “disappointing.”

"Smokey, this be not the foul jungles of the darkest East Orient. This be ninepins. We are bound by laws."

by Joey C. on May 3, 2010 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

well you could call it a disaster

Because the other option was to let Huddy leave via FA and we could have gotten better prospects than the talent we got for him. I was pretty disappointed in the haul when it happened, I thought Cruz was unnecessary and Thomas was too much of a tweener. I had no problem with Meyer but but quickly forgot about it because of what happened two days later with Mulder.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

In terms of value at the time between the hudson and mulder deals

meyer and cruz was considered to be better than haren and calero

Thomas and Barton-Thomas provided more immediate value, Barton was still 19 yrsoldin the lower minors. I would both hauls were close at the time. Haren obviously exceeded expectations during the following years.

by AsFanInDC25 on May 3, 2010 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Meyer was a really, really good prospect,

and having posted sub 3.00 ERAs at every level all the way up through AAA, he was as close of a can’t-miss, major league ready prospect as you can get. It was, IMO, a perfectly good trade that just ended up perfectly badly.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 3, 2010 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or found God.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 3, 2010 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Do other teams ever have our kinds of problems?

I sincerely doubt it.

-The president of the "Sign Elijah Dukes" fan club.

by PL78 on May 3, 2010 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Different teams have different problems

When was the last time an A’s prospect blew up his career with a coke addiction? Or was about to get drafted by the South Korean military?

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 4, 2010 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

to be fair, everyone in South Korea has to serve

that is something that should be known to all parties.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 4, 2010 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

I for one was happy that we traded for Bradley in 06

but why the hell did Billy Beane feel that he needed to trade away our #1 spec for a malcontent??? That bit doesn’t make any sense to me. I don’t think the Dodgers were holding out for A level specs to rid themselves of a clubhouse cancer.

by sf drift king on May 3, 2010 11:39 PM PDT reply actions  

because the A's had a terrible farm system

and it was a tallest midget situation.

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

by designatedforassignment on May 4, 2010 1:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't even think Ethier was the tallest midget

Ethier was a solid B prospect entering 2006 according to Sickels, good for 9th in the Dodgers system. Even in a weak system, that wouldn’t be better than 3rd.

In total, the A’s traded probably their 4th or 5th prospect for a hitter under club control for 2 years who had posted 4.6, 3.3, and 2.1 WAR seasons and a promising backup infielder. For reference, this is akin to trading Grant Desme (pre-Father Desme) for a more injury prone, bad mouthing Curtis Granderson (last two WAR 3.7, 3.1) and a prospect. It was highway robbery and I’d do it over again every time.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on May 4, 2010 2:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

trade to the padres?

is that a cliche joke yet?

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 4, 2010 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Do you the A's need a team minister?

Desme could travel with the team on the 25 man roster and launch a few Hail Marys.

by LoneStranger on May 4, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

We could get Hairston back!

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 4, 2010 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

Eithier as top prospect?

news to me

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on May 4, 2010 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A's relocation option from a legal expert on the issue
Oakland_athletics_team_logo_photofile_small
Prospects 1Q Report

Recent FanPosts

100_1536_small
My new smarts on the Fanpost, and Mr. Offseason is born, and getting to know me
Small
GOG 2012 #18: The Twins have a shiny new park, and not much else
Small
Gotta Be Their Pitching
Hardly-boys_small
Minor League notes on Major League Day Off
Small
Cespedes Upate?
Small
The SF Warriors, the LA Raiders and the Oakland A's
Photo__11__small
COG #17 - Yankees vs. Athletics or Spank me! Spank me!
100_1536_small
What to do? What to do?
Small
Fans Should Buy the A's
Reg3_small
Tom Milone's Nickname

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Sb_nation1_small ahhall

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late