Lewis Wolff on Fremont, Free Agency and 2011 Team Budget: Athletics Nation Exclusive Interview Part II
BBG: The A's have just acquired OF David DeJesus (Royals) for Vin Mazzaro and Justin Marks. I love him.
Yesterday was part one of my interview with A's owner and managing partner Lew Wolff. Today is part two and much of it continues to revolve around the ongoing stadium situation. Unfortunately, it's the most pressing issue regarding the future of the Athletics franchise.
Without further ado, after the jump is part two of my interview with Lew Wolff.
TB: There are some conspiracy theorists out there who claim that you never really had any intention of moving to Fremont. They say that the Fremont stadium effort was an effort to get the Giants and baseball to consider San Jose more seriously. Someone even in the piece I ran yesterday about favorable/unfavorable put up a story from 1998 from the Chronicle, where you were quoted as saying, "I wouldn’t spend five minutes in any other city in California outside of San Jose."
LW: That was long before I was an owner, years ago. Yeah, we were trying to get the Giants to San Jose at that time. I was a business person in San Jose at that time so I was just trying to attract the Giants.
TB: Yes, it was 1998.
LW: Not sure what that has to do with it? Anyone who even remotely suggests that were not serious when we had to look at Fremont if 100 percent wrong. First just ask the Mayor of Fremont. Second, we spent $80 million in Fremont, at least $30 million that we will never recover.
TB: The land, right?
LW: No, $40 million of the $50 million on buildings around the area. We were going to deal with Cisco on the land, we had no problem with the land but you say, "Gee whiz, if you’re going to build a ballpark, why not control near-by land?" A lot of people – the Giants didn’t buy any land around them, maybe they couldn’t, you know what I mean? Why would we do that as a head fake? Then we spent…
TB: So you spent $40 million on…
LW…just on the real estate. Not on the other exploration we did.
TB: What would you estimate the total spent?
LW: As noted before we spent close to $80 million, of which, just give me a second – I have that number exactly someplace. I’ll give you a sheet with the number, I just can’t find it but I have it. We spent say $80 million of which roughly half is ancillary real estate, of which now that $40 million is worth $20 million – but we didn’t know that. And, we’ve written off another $28 to 35 million for EIRs (environmental impact reports) and hundreds of architectural costs. So anybody who says that that was some kind of head fake is totally, absolutely wrong. But I will submit to you at sometime if I can’t find it here, the exact number that we are out.
Here, I have a sheet with the numbers on it – and remember, this is about a year ago now. $80 million to the city of Fremont. $25 million to $30 million absolutely non-recoverable. Now I talked to one owner who told me that nobody would do that without knowing they can go ahead – and the A’s did not have a single option to support being mistaken. The number could have been $78 or something but it’s serious business. That’s why when I read – I won’t name the person – but some official in town say I’m lying…I’ve lived my entire life developing properties in cities. Never blaming others for what I can’t get done. So when someone says, "Wolff overstates his scrutiny of the city’s proposed stadium. I know what a developer is really looking in what we’re doing and evaluating. Lew Wolff did not do that." Now, it is this person who simply making up a story for their own grandstanding purposes.
TB: Would you say that Oakland’s leadership in that sense is a lot more complicated than the leadership in San Jose? Or obviously less motivated.
LW: No – I would say this – historically, the whole East Bay from Richmond over to Oakland was sort of haphazardly developed during World War II, so it wasn’t planned growth. Now you go and you want to assemble enough land to want to build a ballpark – either you have eight owners or 80, and each one of the land parcels may be in different ownerships which makes it all quite complicated. So when these people that are saying that Lew Wolff didn’t do anything they are just drawing a line here or there. The simple question is to go and ask each person that’s involved are they willing to sell their property and for how much? Take a little bit of time to do that. At least you get the first part. So all this flack about what I did not do is shadow without substance and all I’m trying to do is deliver a ballpark, which is what I committed to developing.
TB: If you do get approval for San Jose with the plans that you currently have in place for a smaller ballpark still be ideal?
LW: Yes, about the same size.
TB: Have you changed it all that much? I know you were thinking about putting apartment buildings.
LW: You’ll see it there – it may be a little hard to read. No more apartments, just a great ballpark.
TB: I’ll look at it later.
LW: That’s another thing – we’re recognizing that it has got to be a little smaller. We’re in a two team market, but why should anybody care if we have 32 – 34,000 seats?
TB: I know that this is kind of putting the cart ahead of the horse, considering especially where everything is here but if the new ballpark come to fruition, how would you anticipate it impacting team spending?
LW: Huge. We will be able to do so much we can’t do right now. However, I still don’t think we would be in a position or even interested in going after free agents on a large scale. The ideal for us, because we have guys that can spot talent pretty well, just like the Giants have, we would rather – after we know that they’re pretty good, buy them out of arbitration years and get a couple of extra years and pay for that. And even that still gives the player another bite of the free agent apple if we can’t keep them. The point is that we’d rather invest more money in younger people. I don’t think we’d go after (Mark) Teixeira for seven years or eight years, although who knows? But we would be in a much better position to attract and retain the players we want.
TB: So does that rule out going after say somebody like Carl Crawford this off season?
LW: I don’t want to get specific.
TB: I was saying someone like him.
LW: The problem we’re going to have is that if we have another person close to that that you may recognize he may be out of our reach. We feel that we’re close and we’re prepared to reach a bit. But the problem that we face all the time is that the guy says, "Well, that’s great but I got three other offers and I’d rather be in a great venue for a little less money."
TB: Well, one of the things that Billy has always said to me is that, and you mentioned it earlier, is that people run into issues when it comes to seeing the facility and not wanting to be a part of the facility, and he mentioned specific names to me over the past couple of years that you guys actually offered more money. Furcal.
LW: Yes and Beltre. Look, we don’t know if that’s the reason – some of these guys say that their wives say that they want to be near their mom who lives in San Diego. There are a lot of reasons.
TB: That’s true. But at the same time…
LW: We’re at a disadvantage that I’m sure most knowledgeable baseball fans will agree.
TB: Yeah. The team has gotten better obviously, clearly the young pitching is there, I remembered seeing and hearing about the fact that the A’s are basically two bats away from being a serious World Series contender.
LW: Somebody on ESPN this week said that we were the sleeper for next year. I hope they’re right.
TB: I was going to say, from several perspectives, you’re that close to a World Series, with such a young team, a relatively inexpensive budget and somebody like Eric Chavez coming off of the books this year, who I believe you were going to be paying $12 million or something if I remember off the top of my head.
LW: Right.
TB: Do you go out there and go crazy and overspend on somebody?
LW: The one thing that you may be missing – first of all we agree with you, we’re a couple of bats away from great success. Number one, great bats aren’t that easily available – even to the Yankees. Two, when people say, "Look at all the salary you have coming off." That’s for a year, but most great players want very long term contracts. If I can have one rule that I can see happen in baseball it would be to limit the contract length, but I don’t think that’s going to happen. But basically the answer is that we need some hitting and we have identified a few people – Billy has. Now, there could be eight other teams looking at the same players, but we’ll know soon about that.
TB: Going back to the stadium just really quick and I’m probably beating this horse to death…is it challenging for you as an owner to simultaneously be looking ahead to a new stadium while trying to maintain the satisfaction of a fan base now. I mean, I think part of why you get 67% of people saying your ownership group is viewed unfavorably is because all they see is the looking ahead and they feel neglected now. Even though in my eyes as a fan, one of the things I appreciate you as an owner is that you are clearly a fan. You are at the games, you’re sitting behind the dugout, not to disparage Steve Schott and Ken Hofmann, but how often did we ever see them at games?
LW: Here’s what I think I’ve accomplished, whether people agree or not. Number one – the first thing I did within 60 days of taking over the team was make a long-term contract with Billy and give him equity – now, that has never been done in baseball. In fact, a lot of owners said, "Oh, you shouldn’t have done that!" But, it was one of the smartest moves that I’ve made and I sensed that Billy’s capabilities were not just in baseball, which was huge – but he’s a fine, caring and intelligent human being. I call it our "little company" and I did similar things with Mike Crowley, our president. I don’t think that our fans care one way or another, but I feel that it’s really important. I can’t imagine, for example, if we sold the team to somebody and they came into run what we have today, to do as well as Billy has done. He gets a challenge out of it. That’s a major element. I can’t think of anyone that Billy has wanted that we haven’t tried to get. Obviously if you paid some guy whose worth $10 million, $20 million, I guess you can get him – but Billy simply will not make unsound baseball or business decisions. So we did that. We spent a lot of money exploring, trying to get a new ballpark within the market area. I don’t know what else we can do to enhance our potential.
TB: Do you regret any decisions like things that seem to create ill will right off the bat like the tarping off of the third deck?
LW: You know something; let’s assume that we didn’t tarp it. Let me read you another statistic. The tarping flack is just a straw man in my opinion – I don’t know if I have it right here – yes. The A’s put tarp in the entire deck to reduce stadium seating availability to a capacity of 35,067 seats. We had five sell outs only in 2008 and two of them were in Japan. The empty seats looked so bad to the players and everybody - it’s a football stadium when you have that third deck there. So that was the reason and if that bothered people, I apologize but we still haven’t had any sell outs.
TB: The team seems to have made progression though over the last year and if I remember the attendance numbers – you probably know them better than me – but the attendance seems to continue to go down, but the team actually performed better last year.
LW: When we won the division and we were in the "final four" three years ago.
TB: 2006
LW: 2006, right. We didn’t sell out any of those games in Oakland.
TB: Any of the ALCS games?
LW: If we did, you have to check on that I’m not exactly sure. But the most interesting part was we didn’t change prices significantly and we had less season ticket holders interested in buying season tickets for the next season than we had the year before. Hard to believe. You tell me why that is.
TB: Did the A’s turn a profit in 2010?
LW: This year? We just about broke even.
TB: is that a little over or a little under?
LW: I’m hoping it’s over. There are a couple of items that the league sends us that we never know whether we’re going to get all or not. We will be plus or minus around a million dollars one way or another, that’s where we’ll be at. We invest as all of our available funds back into the team.
TB: Will you be increasing the team budget for 2011?
LW: Yes. I’m not going to tell you by how much.
TB: Is it going to be significant?
LW: To us, all increases are significant. But what we don’t want to do is budget for it to lose. Because this is what I’ve seen happen, the one team that actually won the win the World Series but lost a fortune and then they had to get rid of players they probably wanted to keep.
TB: Everybody knows - the Marlins.
LW: If that happens then you’ve got four or five years or maybe longer of nothing. We’re not going to do that. We want to be competitive every year, if we can be.
TB: Curt Young reportedly left the team to pursue other opportunities. There are some whispers and rumbles that the reason that he left was because he was only offered a one year contract.
LW: On the coaching staff, I think they are all one year contracts but I’m not sure.
TB: They’re all one year this year?
LW: I’m not sure. That’s a question you have to ask Billy. I think we probably do not have a firm policy. Most of the personnel that leave move to a higher position somewhere else. Billy has always supported those who have done well for us, like Curt, who wish to move to other and perhaps greater opportunities.
TB: As a fan, not necessarily as an owner, what kind of job do you think Bob Geren has done with the A’s? There has been a lot of hand wringing, at least on Athletics Nation about him, at least as a manager. I wanted to get what your opinion is.
LW: That’s what I say, you have to go on the road to understand how important the manager is, not just with how he decides to have a runner go from first to third or steal a base, but how he handles the ballplayers, how he handles the personalities, how he handles himself, how he handles the coaching staff, how he keeps the spirit up when you lose six games in a row, you know what I mean? Things of that nature. I think Bob is simply outstanding.
I’m very pleased with Geren. Putting Billy aside and all that when we really sit down and look at all these managers who are more famous than the players you have to look at the budget that they’ve been given. Somebody may win the World Series with the Yankees and he may be on the cover of every magazine in New York and he moves someplace else where the budget isn’t the same and lo and behold he may not do as well. So, we’re nurturing young people – Geren has two sons – one just went to Princeton on a baseball scholarship and he’s got another one going there. I like the whole atmosphere, and his knowledge of baseball and instruction ability. He’ll drop everything to talk to somebody, whether it’s a player or an owner to explain why he did this or what he looks for here and there.
TB: So there’s a lot of thought behind the things that he does.
LW: It’s a job that I wouldn’t want to do. It’s huge. I go on a plane with Bob, with all the coaches and they all have their laptops – they’re studying everything. One thing you might want to do is spend a day or two with them one of these days, if you have the – it might be interesting. I am very pleased Bob is with us.
TB: Oh, I would be happy to spend a day and just see.
LW: Let me see if he would let you.
TB: To see how he does his job. I would love to do that.
LW: He is upbeat, which you have to be. For Bob, performance counts. When some famous name doesn’t get playing time – Bob has a sign in his office that says, "Performance Counts." I don’t know any player that doesn’t like him, but he also treats them all evenly and I just like the way it is. I’m sure that others have a different way of doing it.
TB: Any regrets about maybe not going with Ron Washington, seeing Ron in the World Series?
LW: This is another wonderful example of former A’s talent moving forward and getting an opportunity.
TB: I’m asking you more as a fan than an owner though. I mean, you are a fan. You’re at the games, you wear the cap.
LW: I have to tell you, I don’t feel that managers account for winning 50 games, you know? I think what they really need to do is to nurture players and teach them. Ron and Bob are both very good teachers.
TB: Is Bob so good with the young players that as the team ages, you look at getting somebody in there that works better with veterans?
LW: Interesting question. I wish it was such a fine line but I don’t see it. I don’t see it at all.
TB: Are you happy with Billy’s performance since you took over as managing partner?
LW: Absolutely. I think there are very good general managers in baseball, but I don’t think there are any that I’ve seen that have done better than Billy. I truly do not know where we would be without him.
TB: Do you view them strictly in terms of wins and losses or…
LW: I view them on…
TB: Revenue?
LW: No. First of all, I view loyalty to their staff and second I judge on budget performance.
TB: Would you prefer a caring human being or someone who would bring you a World Series title?
LW: I think you can have both.
TB: Do you think – I mean obviously there is a lot of buzz and discussion about the Moneyball movie since it’s coming out in 2011, and although you weren’t around for that period of time, do you think that there will be a lot of additional pressure on Billy in 2011 because of that movie?
LW: Pressure to win?
TB: Yeah, exactly.
LW: I hope so. Then I’ll make sure that there’s a movie every year. In all seriousness, I have never encountered another person who is more dedicated to winning than Billy, movie or no movie.
TB: You’ll make it yourself, right? Directed by and starring Lew Wolff.
LW: I used to be head of real estate for 20th Century Fox. I’ve read the script. I used to read scripts at Fox for fun all the time. I could never translate them onto the screen though. It takes a special talent.
TB: Did you read the script?
LW: Yes. I think most of the hard work on this has been done. And Billy hasn’t spent that much time on it. From my lay person point of view, the script looks great.
TB: I think it’s going to rehash a lot of the old – there was kind of a holy war back in the day between the stats people…
LW: Let me tell you, I’ll give you a little hint – if you had Moneyball (the script) sitting here, you might as well have the Bible and Webster’s Dictionary.
TB: Are they really that different?
LW: Well to me they are.
TB: Cause you can’t really go through the numbers that much.
LW: It’s sort of like making a movie out of a dictionary, you know? How can you do that?
TB: If you’ve read The Blind Side, the movie was obviously very different. It was obviously much more focused on the human element of things. Do you give Billy a hard time about Brad Pitt playing him at all?
LW: A little bit, but Billy is a good sport. It is going to make him even more popular than he is.
TB: So in other words it’s going to get people to woo him.
LW: I had this very interesting job years ago at 20th Century Fox. So my first day I got there – I go up and park my car and just because of the way it was set up I had my parking space and it was bigger than normal, and one of the older guys there at the lot that took care of the people at the facility came up to me and said, "How do you want your name on your space?" I looked across to see how others had it and said, "Oh, like that is fine." And he said, "You know, you have a double space, you should have a double size sign." And I asked, "Why?" And he said, "Around here, anything you get that is different and bigger you ought to do it." So I said, "OK." What I learned there is that Hollywood is one of the few industries, and I think baseball is another one, that appreciates ego – that nurtures ego, and instead of looking at somebody and mocking, "Look at that, they want their big name put on that." But there’s a value to that. Sports is entertainment too. I think nurturing ego in a positive is positive – high achievers, baseball players. I never thought of it because I was in normal business before that until this guy came up to me and said that to me – of course as long as a person doesn’t get crazy to a point where…
TB: …to a point where they’re unmanageable.
LW: Exactly.
Coming Thursday: The thrilling conclusion of my exclusive interview with Lew Wolff when he talks about how to attract casual fans to see this team, what he'll do if San Jose fails and the process he and Billy go through in attracting free agents.
427 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Again the problem seems to be that he thinks of himself as VP - New Stadium and not
“Maximizer of Shareholder Value Through Growing Recurring Revenues”
I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2010 6:15 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
But isn't he "VP - New Stadium?"
That’s one of the reasons he was brought on board in the first place.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 8:45 AM PST up reply actions
Wolff Interview
Reading this interesting, revealing interview, one can only hope that in the end the current ownership group decides to sell the A’s to baseball people who are not fixated on real estate issues—and whose top priority is to add quality veterans and have the team playing in October!
I think solving one of those things will help out with the other!
by sec119 on Nov 10, 2010 8:05 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I can't see how ignoring non-real estate issues helps the team get a new venue
I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2010 8:20 AM PST up reply actions
Maybe, just maybe, he seems fixated on real estate issues because he's being asked a lot of questions about real estate issues.
I think it’s fairly clear that the A’s need a new stadium, and I think it’s a good thing that our owner knows a lot about real estate development because that knowledge probably helps us in getting a new stadium.
And how exactly is Lew Wolff supposed to add quality veterans? It’s not that simple. Also, I think that’s more of Billy’s job.
"Everybody in the building is standing except for people in a wheelchair." - Doug Woog
"It’s like the lost burrito of Atlantis." - jeepers
by Where's My Burrito? on Nov 10, 2010 8:37 AM PST up reply actions
Why isn't he talking about other ways he's growing the business then?
I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2010 8:52 AM PST up reply actions
Exactly. If he's asked the question: "What other ways are you trying to grow business?", I'm sure he has answers.
Well, I HOPE he has answers.
"Everybody in the building is standing except for people in a wheelchair." - Doug Woog
"It’s like the lost burrito of Atlantis." - jeepers
by Where's My Burrito? on Nov 10, 2010 9:41 AM PST up reply actions
I'd imagine some of that will be illustrated (maybe indirectly) when he talks about how to attract the casual fan
as Blez says is coming in Part III.
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
I hope so.
As just one example, I’d like to hear why there are no longer any Fanfests? I personally don’t care for them, but many people do and they’re great for helping generate and keep fan interest.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
There are so many easy/cheap/free things the A's could do
It’s really a function of their Marketing and Community Relations departments, who knows how much Wolff even knows about their daily operations. We’ll see.
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
I think you're being a little too easy on him in this respect.
First, he’s the owner, and the buck stops with him. Second, he’s a pretty engaging kind of guy. I don’t think he lives in a vacuum. I believe he knows more of what goes on. Not every minute detail, but he’s not clueless either. Third, if attendance is going down… and all he needs to do is read a report about that… he should be pro-active and engage his marketing department to finding out why and what can be done.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
Oh, I agree with you that the ultimate responsibility lies with him.
I just don’t know that it’s happening.
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
That's a cop-out, Pam.
Just because you don’t know all the facts doesn’t excuse you from your obligation to draw conclusions and pass judgment.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
don't forget "wily"!
Ya can’t win without wily veterans.
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
don't forget "grizzled"!
"Burt Reynolds witnessed the conception of his own dad, and frankly, that's what's wrong with him."- TPDMTD!
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 11, 2010 5:07 PM PST up reply actions
I didn't realize he was so short.
Or, maybe it’s Billy that is so tall.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
According to BR, Beane is 6'4". Based on that picture I'd say Lew is in the 5'8" area.
"Everybody in the building is standing except for people in a wheelchair." - Doug Woog
"It’s like the lost burrito of Atlantis." - jeepers
by Where's My Burrito? on Nov 10, 2010 9:49 AM PST up reply actions
It's sad that in today's sanitized culture, public figures can't comment more candidly.
One has to imagine that if Lew is at all familiar with the ideas Billy Beane represents (or used to represent), he knows Geren is a crappy manager, but what is he going to say? Is he going to publicly bash his manager?
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 8:14 AM PST reply actions
Maybe he doesn't think Geren is crappy
I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2010 8:20 AM PST up reply actions 3 recs
Geren's not a crappy manager.
He’s a slightly below average manager.
Maybe Joel Skinner will help him with some of the tougher strategic decisions and be a positive asset.
"Burt Reynolds witnessed the conception of his own dad, and frankly, that's what's wrong with him."- TPDMTD!
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 11, 2010 5:08 PM PST up reply actions
who really cares?
I mean what difference does the manager make anyways? We are not talking about a head coach in football.
I do think Wolff is right in that if they make any difference, it’s just keeping the spirits up of the players and coaching staff.
Regardless, the manager is not our main problem.
Hitting is.
And he addresses that at least.
by Billy Frijoles on Nov 10, 2010 8:34 AM PST up reply actions
I've made and had this argument rejected about 23894x, but
tactically he’s a bad manager, just like every other manager. But who knows, maybe he’s really inspirational. I don’t know. I’m not ready to call him the worst manager ever based on something I literally know nothing about.
A's Fan in Sweden
"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime
I think we've seen far too much evidence of Geren being bad at all the non-tactical stuff to believe he's good in the way Ozzie Guillen is good
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Nov 10, 2010 8:42 AM PST up reply actions
I must have missed this.
What’s the evidence towards the bad?
A's Fan in Sweden
"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime
by travdog6 on Nov 10, 2010 8:43 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
See my post below.
I think ruining a pitcher’s arm – though somewhat related to on-field, also demonstrates his inability to relate to players – is a big deal. I think jerking players around and leaving them without any idea of what their role is or should be is a problem. I think when a respected (albeit bad) veteran is openly ripping his decisions it’s a sign that players don’t have much respect for the guy.
Also, if “Performance Counts” how come he sticks with truly horrendous players (usually bad veterans) for so long? You don’t think that mixed message bothers players?
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Nov 10, 2010 8:47 AM PST up reply actions
Are we sure he is the one sticking with the players?
Could Beane be giving him suggestions?
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 8:49 AM PST up reply actions
If so, that would contradict the supposed freedom he has to manage as he sees fit.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
He ruined Gallagher's arm?
How so? I’m outta the damn loop.
Anyways, I don’t buy into the “Alan Embree” ripping him crap. I’ve sat by the bullpen. I don’t think a respected veteran would do that, especially one that was asking to come back when we didn’t re-sign him. I’ve never been one to buy into the random fans having sources thing. If someone says something to the media, then I’ll bite, but anyone can post literally anything they want on here, so I think it needs to be taken with a grain of salt.
I don’t think he’s perfect. There are things he dos that I hate. I think right now, he’s ruining Suzuki’s career. But looking around the diamond, there are guys that are putting up better numbers than they put up in the minors. Suzuki, Barton, Pennington are all reaching their ceilings (well when Suzuki still had knees, that is). Rajai, Cust, and Ellis are all putting up numbers we’ve gotta be happy with. Then there’s the pitching staff. Do I attribute all the success we’ve seen with the core to Geren? No, but I have a hard time believing he’s not inspiring or sending the wrong message when guys are hitting their ceilings.
Also, I realize it’s comical calling what we’ve seen for the last 4 years success, but it’s the glaring holes and injuries, not the core, that’s bringing us down in my opinion.
A's Fan in Sweden
"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime
Piazza'a answer... when asked about playing for both Bochy and Geren(1)... was telling.
Praise for Bochy. The sound of crickets chirping for Geren.
Anyway, these are the types of question in which I never put any stock in the answers. There aren’t too many owners that are going to say the guy sucks even if that is what he thinks.
Interviewer: What do you think of your coach/manager?
Owner: Oh. My God. I have such a mancrush on the guy. He’s doing a fantastic job and he’s my guy come hell or high water.
Two weeks later he’s fired because the owner, “…wanted to go in another direction.”… (read: winning).
Not criticizing Blez or Lew on this one, just saying it’s a boilerplate question with a boilerplate answer and we really shouldn’t expect anything else.
I am so negative when it comes to this stuff. 0:-)
Footnote:
(1) In casual interview by AN member not too long ago. I forget AN member’s name.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
Piazza played a full season in SD and was good.
He played half of one here, was injured, terrible, and replaced. Maybe Bochy was really a lot better, but I bet his experience played some part in his feelings towards him.
I think we’re sorta getting at the same point. I don’t trust a lot of what’s said about managers.
A's Fan in Sweden
"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime
While he was out, injured, he also got replaced by a one Jack Cust.
And never got his job back as DH. I’m sure that skewed his perception, as you say.
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
Many of us needed to smoke cigarettes afterwards.
"Burt Reynolds witnessed the conception of his own dad, and frankly, that's what's wrong with him."- TPDMTD!
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 11, 2010 5:10 PM PST up reply actions
Oooh. Okay. I'm done for the day!
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
That was where I was coming from originally.
I don’t expect an owner to say anything but boilerplate, and it’s sad to me that we made a society in which that’s the way it has to be.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:20 PM PST up reply actions
boy are you annoying
(I am kidding)
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 1:39 PM PST up reply actions
So you're saying you want me to die?
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:40 PM PST up reply actions
No, not that at all. Just that you should never have existed in the first place
I blame your parents. I blame SBN for allowing your much too long screen name that I don’t understand.
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 1:41 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You don't understand it?
St Joseph = San Jose
Oak trees = Oakland
We’re not talking DaVinci Code cryptic here.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Actually, that's not what it means.
It’s a line from a poem.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 2:47 PM PST up reply actions
Right, and St Peter really was a man.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Not sure what that means,
but the first time I posted under this name and was asked about it, I said it was a line from a poem. It is a line from a poem. Why would I lie about that?
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 3:38 PM PST up reply actions
I'm just being silly.
Not calling you a liar.
So what’s the poem?
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Poem is called "Power," it's by a friend of mine.
Last Thanksgiving, we decided to try and each write a set of poems based on images from a tarot deck and name the poems after the cards they were based on. Neither of us made it past nine or ten poems, but that was from his version of “Power.” It’s the only line that I liked from his version, and I was reading it at the time I signed up.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 3:47 PM PST up reply actions
I was away for awhile
thanks for the answer. I googled the poem, but…
Of course I realize that is all a spurious front.
The real truth is San Jose burning the Oakland to the ground!
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 5:42 PM PST up reply actions
Sometimes it feels that way,
but that’s not what my username is intended to represent. If I wanted to convey that via a username, I would have made my username “SanJoseDoesn’tLikeOakland.”
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 3:44 PM PST up reply actions
So much for this whole "one Bay Area" thing that Giants fans and pro-SJ people like to talk about.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 5:39 PM PST up reply actions
Giants' fans are puny! There's only one "the city" in the Bay Area...
SJ people like to talk about how SJ is ‘the largest city in the Bay Area’ without mentioning how SJ has basically incorporated all the loose unincorporated property in Santa Clara county, just to pump up the city population statistics.
Meanwhile, the actual facts are that the East Bay, CoCoCo and Alameda Co, are much more populous than Santa Clara Co. I do think it’s too bad the A’s are probably moving to SJ, since the natural loacal population base is much smaller, and it’s much easier to get from SJ to the Coliseum than it will be to get from Oaktown (or Concord, or most of the East Bay) to SJ, completely leaving asid any hard feelings.
And that’s why I believe Lew Wolf when he says he tried, because he is a businessman, and if Oakland were viable, or nearly as viable as SJ, it would be a better choice. So I guess it isn’t viable… Not Lew’s fault. Blame Clorox and safeway etc, because they aren’t as hometown boosterish as the south Bay guys are…
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 5:48 PM PST up reply actions
Totally agree. Made a fan-post on subject.
mostly wise-ass replies due to a typo in subject line.
However, I am in total agreement that the East Bay has a much larger population overall.
Geren is just the newest fan whipping-boy
Fire Howe Now!
Fire Macha Now!
Fire Geren Now!
Fire [insert any new Athletics field manager] Now!
by LowcountryJoe on Nov 10, 2010 7:26 PM PST up reply actions
Who was our manager before Howe? Wasn't there someone between LaRussa and Howe?
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 9:27 PM PST up reply actions
Nope.
Art managed from 1996-2002. LaRussa left us in 1995. Right as the team started to completely collapse into the dark late 90’s years.
by athletics68 on Nov 10, 2010 10:34 PM PST up reply actions
Rickey Henderson is not as clumsy or random as a blaster.
An elegant weapon from a more civilized age.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 11, 2010 8:08 AM PST up reply actions
Um, the team collapsed in '93
And you could even argue that they collapsed in ’91 but had a flukey year in ’92.
Remember when Ben Grieve was going to save us all? Or hell, Lance Blankenship?
Ahhh, the bad old days.
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
Lance Blankenship was supposed to be a RoY in 1989.
Those weren’t the bad old days.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 11, 2010 1:40 PM PST up reply actions
I never understood any of the badmouthing of Howe and Macha- they won
Macha had nothing but winning seasons.
No other team’s fanbase would tolerate 4 straight non-winning seasons from a manager who took over a team that had 8 straight winning ones.
This team's fanbase doesn't either.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 17, 2010 9:39 AM PST up reply actions
Love it again, Blez.
If Geren gives the OK, I would love to read about the coaches and how they work off the field.
I agree, it would be great to hear a fan's opinion of how Geren and the rest of the staff are off the field
"Everybody in the building is standing except for people in a wheelchair." - Doug Woog
"It’s like the lost burrito of Atlantis." - jeepers
by Where's My Burrito? on Nov 10, 2010 8:39 AM PST up reply actions
Good interview, Blez
continuing praise from the last interview.
Great that you got yourself into a position to accompany Geren on a roadtrip, maybe, possibly.
I cannot think of a better “reporter” to report back with a report worth reading!!
( I was purposely goofing there..last sentence)
Officially awaiting the 2011 MLB season
by One won lost won on Nov 10, 2010 3:07 PM PST up reply actions
So far there's only one thing he's said that I think is BS
I don’t know any player that doesn’t like him
There have to be at least a handful of players who think Geren is a joke. His mismanaging ruined Sean Gallagher’s career. Travis Buck goes 0 for 3 and he doesn’t play for two weeks. Hell, Alan Embree was ripping on Geren’s idoicy in the bullpen within earshot of fans a couple years ago.
I’d be shocked if more than a handful of A’s players respect Geren. Maybe they “like” him, but I don’t buy Wolff’s argument here. I agree it’s more than just in-game tactics. I think Geren is bad at the other stuff, too. Players being unhappy with their role (or unhappy with not knowing WTF is going on) has been a recurring theme over the past four years.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Nov 10, 2010 8:41 AM PST reply actions
People like Travis Buck
might be frustrated by Geren, but do you think he’s going to go to Wolff and tell him that? I doubt it. It would take someone with huge cojones to saunter up to the owner of the ballclub and tell him, “You know what, our manager is kind of clueless.”
So I think from Wolff’s perspective, all is fine and dandy.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2010 8:49 AM PST up reply actions
Also Travis Buck doesn't have a lotta clout at the moment with Wolff, Beane or anyone else
I hate Bob Geren and his peanut brain so much -- lenscrafters
by WaddellCanseco on Nov 10, 2010 8:54 AM PST up reply actions
He does with me!
Stay strong, Trav!
A's Fan in Sweden
"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime
Who Cares if Buck Doesn't Like Geren
Buck is just lashing out b/c of his personal failings. It’s not Geren’s fault that Buck’s career has spiraled downwards. Some players in Buck’s situation would put their heads down, keep their mouths shut, and work harder. See Cust, Jack. Buck’s response is to mouth off and lose his focus.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
by johnjahafanclub on Nov 10, 2010 3:32 PM PST up reply actions
One Thing That Has Me Stoked
Wolff and Beane know we need hitting. And they have multiple specific targets in mind. And Wolff has given Beane the green light to get it done.
That is good news.
by Billy Frijoles on Nov 10, 2010 9:13 AM PST reply actions 3 recs
It's fun reading about Lew Wolff answering and rebutting the arguments that the "Wolff lied!" crowd spouts.
And the stuff about this offseason’s plans was really nice to hear. Great read as always, Blez.
But...
…he did lie. And he lost tens of millions of dollars just to cover up his lying. It makes perfect sense.
by LowcountryJoe on Nov 10, 2010 7:28 PM PST up reply actions
efen califronia, so many bs hoops for buissness to go through with every agency getting
there peice of the pie looking how to stop things rather than start them.
"Gratuitous gesticulating together sounds even better"
Needs more Walter Haas.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
In lemon butter sauce.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:45 PM PST up reply actions
Walter Haas is dead.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 10:32 AM PST up reply actions
there you go again with the death stuff
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 1:42 PM PST up reply actions
So you'
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:43 PM PST up reply actions
re saying you want Lew Wolff to die?
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:43 PM PST up reply actions
Who would we blame, then?
Jerry Brown, I guess…
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 1:46 PM PST up reply actions
no no no no... he's outside...
looking in…
"Burt Reynolds witnessed the conception of his own dad, and frankly, that's what's wrong with him."- TPDMTD!
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 11, 2010 5:15 PM PST up reply actions
I loved his answer about nurturing ego
I thought it was outstanding in terms of making sure that the A’s retain the best.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Nov 10, 2010 9:44 AM PST reply actions
I think it's interesting.
That the A’s don’t really take that tack – putting someone’s big name out there – they have this amazing history which they rarely celebrate – something which could in fact stand in as something for the fan base to grab onto since in their current situation they’re not able to sign big names or give out huge contracts. I know he was saying it more in terms of Billy Beane, but it makes me wonder why they don’t nurture the egos of their former stars.
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
Those egos would push the Coliseum 30 feet below sea level
A B -3X = Swedish girls like chocolate @('.')@
So what you're saying... if I'm totally understanding... is that... if I got you right... we should build a submersible floating stadium?
Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples
Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.
If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.
There are soooo many songs
that can be dirty if you just think of them right.
If you’re ready for an advanced exercise, try Octopus’s Garden.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
31 if you went to the game that day.
"Burt Reynolds witnessed the conception of his own dad, and frankly, that's what's wrong with him."- TPDMTD!
by Gaijin_Suketto on Nov 11, 2010 5:16 PM PST up reply actions
This is an often undervalued aspect of managing, IMO.
I still believe that Joe Torre is not that great a baseball manager, but… I believe he was fantastic at managing the Yankees clubhouse full of egos and constant media spotlight.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
I don't know if "managed" egos = more winning/production than "unmanaged" egos.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 12:03 PM PST up reply actions
unmanaged egos may not last on the team very long.
And if that guy is good, he’s taking his wins elsewhere.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 12:06 PM PST up reply actions
Didn't the 1970s A's win 3 WS in a row even though they all pretty much hated each other?
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 12:09 PM PST up reply actions
The egos were managed well enough to keep them together.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 12:12 PM PST up reply actions
Is that why Reggie Jackson and Billy Martin got along so well?
I’m not sure any managing of egos was going on. Martin pretty much pissed off everyone.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 12:18 PM PST up reply actions
They still respected him, if I remember correctly.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 12:35 PM PST up reply actions
Maybe that's the strategy Bob's going for.
Hated…but still respected (in his head).
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 12:38 PM PST up reply actions
Billy didn't manage the A's until the 1980s.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:21 PM PST up reply actions
Ah yes, you're right.
Still, they managed to win lots of games in 2 of those 3 years, making it the LCS one year.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 1:24 PM PST up reply actions
Incidentally, why is Martin considered such a great manager in A's lore?
He had one year of the team returning to decency, one year which you say doesn’t count (probably because of the strike), and one year of the team sucking.
In any case, he always seemed like a complete kook to me, and hurt the team significantly, especially in the future.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 1:47 PM PST up reply actions
I think its because they were so bad in 78-79
And in 1981 they went 11-0 (?) to start the season and started marketing “billy ball.” making the playoffs helps only if you forget there was a 1st half winner and a second half winner in 1981 meaning any team that got out to a good start had a chance in the playoff crap shoot.
The dodgers sucked in the 2nd half and got to the world series because fernando was lights out for the first month of the season. The reds had the best overall record in that division (if not baseball) yet didn’t get to the playoffs
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes
Billy doesn't come off real well in the Glenn Burke documentary airing tonight, from what I've heard
Baseball decisions to one side, he seems to have been a pretty bad guy.
by Glorious Mundy on Nov 10, 2010 3:27 PM PST up reply actions
he made the team watchable. Ill take that most years
"Gratuitous gesticulating together sounds even better"
Billy Martin, an alcoholic who fought with every single person he ever knew that wasn't named Rickey Henderson,
was a bad guy? You don’t say.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 9:28 PM PST up reply actions
Right, right. Dick Williams managed them for two of those WS.
That’s who I was thinking of.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 1:54 PM PST up reply actions
had fist fights regularly.
In fairness, they learned it from the neighbors….er, Raiders.
And the last remnants memory destroys.
by Leopold Bloom on Nov 12, 2010 8:25 AM PST up reply actions
Further evidence that the A's underpay the coaching staff
the Ivy League prohibits the granting of athletic scholarships; all scholarships awarded are need-based
A B -3X = Swedish girls like chocolate @('.')@
by monkeyball on Nov 10, 2010 9:58 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Thanks for this great interview series Blez!
FWIW, I just can’t see another owner in baseball willing to sit down with a fan of his team (granted a pretty high-profile one) and offering all the detailed information that Wolff does. I mean he’s giving pretty specific financial numbers that I would think most executives would keep under wraps. And offering to talk to Geren to see if he’d be ok with Blez shadowing him for a day? That’s pretty cool.
I think we’re pretty lucky to have an owner so willing to talk with (openly at that) the fans of their team. Can you guys see Nolan Ryan, Bill Neukom, Hal Steinbrenner, Arte Moreno, etc…(yes, i just listed the first four owners that came to mind) giving the same time and information to the ‘Blez’ of their team’s fanbase?
You know you are big-time when people chant your name while you pee. - 67MARQUEZ
Great piece
Even if you take some of the answers for what they are, and being public response so tempered by that fact, the access you get to the top players in the A’s is a great thing for this site. Reading these articles that last couple of days has been a decent distraction to the fact that baseball is not on right now, but also has me alredy looking forward to Spring Training.
.
I have to tell you, I don’t feel that managers account for winning 50 games, you know?
no, unfortunately most people around here don’t know that, lew.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Nov 10, 2010 11:40 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
That's right... it's far more.
Excepting the ’62 Mets, of course.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
Surprised that people haven't discussed what, to me, is the most important and telling quote of the article:
However, I still don’t think we would be in a position or even interested in going after free agents on a large scale. The ideal for us, because we have guys that can spot talent pretty well, just like the Giants have, we would rather – after we know that they’re pretty good, buy them out of arbitration years and get a couple of extra years and pay for that. And even that still gives the player another bite of the free agent apple if we can’t keep them.
I imagine the number one reason why most people here, myself included, are pro-wherever-the-team-can-make-the-most-revenue is because we believe that much of the additional revenue will go into payroll. Quite frankly, this quote does little to assuage that belief. I’m not interested in pointless, insignificant assurances that the A’s will basically keep doing what they’re already doing: buying out arbitration years. Since they have no trouble doing that right now, what’s the point in a move to San Jose?
I’m not saying I want Lew to proclaim that they’ll be Yankees West once the move happens. But reading between the lines here, I get the feeling that the future will be closer to “more of the same” rather than significant positive change. In that case, I, as a fan with selfish interests, would rather Wolff just sell the team and leave. I couldn’t care less about moving to San Jose and having the end result be pretty much what we’re doing already…with the one difference being more money in Lew’s pockets (not that I begrudge him, or anyone, for trying to make shitloads of money).
I also wish Blez had asked Lew about the Victory Court option in Oakland. I’ve yet to see a good rebuttal from Lew or anyone else as to why that option shouldn’t be considered.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
Even if Beane doesn't change what he's been doing now,
it’s still a plus. Perhaps if we had the new stadium, Furcal and Beltre and others would have signed.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 12:05 PM PST up reply actions
Then for nostalgia's stake, I would prefer it to be in Oakland.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 12:08 PM PST up reply actions
There's a false choice here
Wolff was picked by Selig because he was supposed to be able to broker a stadium deal, something Schott was politically incapable of doing right. Staying in Oakland indefinitely at the Coliseum is not an option for MLB. Staying in Oakland at a new ballpark where the public would have to bear half the cost is not an option for Oakland. A new ballpark in Oakland where there aren’t enough revenue guarantees to cover debt service won’t work for either MLB or the A’s.
We’ve projected revenue post-ballpark, and after stadium expenses deductions, it’s $20-30 million more than now. Unless that jumps to $50-60 million, the team will continue to have to spend wisely, and work towards increasingly better TV and radio deals – which they have been doing.
Educate me. Why would Oakland have to bear half the cost for a new stadium?
Does Lew’s private financing offer only extend to San Jose?
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 12:35 PM PST up reply actions
Correct.
It’s the missing revenue guarantees vertig0 mentions that makes privately funding it in Oakland not a wise move.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions
Corporate interests
Any large stadium built recently with private dollars has required significant upfront commitments from major corporate interests for naming rights, sponsorships, suites and so on. Oakland’s already behind the 8-ball because Cisco is not committing to Oakland, whereas they are in San Jose. How do you make up the shortfall? Let’s Go Oakland has some deposits from local business, but they’ll need a lot more than that.
Interesting.
So basically San Jose pretty much has to be a done deal right? I mean, clearly Oakland does not seem viable in any way, based on what you’re saying here. But why has it taken so long for the BRC issued the go ahead for SJ, if the answer is so clear cut? Why is there even a BRC to consider Oakland in the first place? It probably has something to do with the hefty compensation the A’s would probably have to pay the Giants for the territorial rights, right? If so, would the overall numbers come out to be more equal between Oakland and San Jose, in terms of financing? Also, perhaps we should factor in the compensation for AT&T as well?
Sorry for the loads of questions. I’m genuinely curious (and avoiding a half-written paper that’s due in about 5 hours). If the numbers do indeed come out to be more equal, then I remain in favor of Oakland. Like I said, I don’t really care about Lew getting a higher profit margin in San Jose (but of course, if the difference is indeed confirmed to be extremely significant and in no way viable, then I see no choice but to be in favor of San Jose).
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 1:08 PM PST up reply actions
Your guess is as good as mine, but...
Where there is smoke there is fire. Some South Bay interests who might know, like Larry Stone and Mark Purdy, have “speculated” recently that MLB may be working with the banks that backed AT&T Park. I consider that smoke. So, maybe there is fire in the form of nervous lenders.
Either way, this is all about following the money. AT&T Park was built, at a cost of $357M, with 95% private funds. Most people read that and think “That was a big loan?!?!?!?”
In reality the Giants paid for 48% with a loan, the rest was comprised of naming rights and presales for seats (Charter Seats/PSL’s). Roughly half of the private funding was actually a series of huge investments made by corporate interest.
The A’s stadium is going to cost, as of recent projections, $460M. Do the rough math and ask yourself how much Corporate support is required.
If this is the case...
…it would make sense why the process is taking this long.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
And if this is the case...
Oakland is screwed. I honestly feel like this is the case and the real reason that MLB won’t find any viable places for a stadium in Oakland has a lot less to do with available ground and more to do with huge S, G and A budgets.
Thanks jeffro, this makes a lot of sense and definitely tips the scale in SJ's favor.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 3:18 PM PST up reply actions
I should clarify
The banks, as I understood it, were not concerned about making new loans as much as the Giants ability to continue to pay. SO MLB is working to make the banks comfortable, or that is the inference we are suggested to make.
There is also the fact the San Francisco floated bonds to pay for about $15M bucks. I understand that they aren’t callable (meaning MLB couldn’t just buy the bond holders off). I think they had a 30 year maturity, or something like that. I am not well versed in bonds and strategies for retiring debt early.
Is this worrying to people?
Even if MLB gives Oakland the SJ rights and lets them move, will the A’s be able to come up with the financing?
This is the problem with Lew’s new stadium for the Earthquakes – he already has the land, all the permits have been approved by the government, but he isn’t putting shovels in the ground b/c he can’t get the financing and sponsorship together.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
by johnjahafanclub on Nov 10, 2010 3:40 PM PST up reply actions
The differences being
I can understand why sponsorship opportunities for Major League Soccer may not be attracting much attention. Meanwhile, the SVLG has already pledged “support” for a new A’s stadium and will make sure it doesn’t impact the Giants. The 60ish SVLG companies that signed that letter have very big S, G and A budgets.
Moving to SJ immediately gives them the $120 from Cisco.
The businesses on the SVLG letter will make up more.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 3:47 PM PST up reply actions
The Earthquakes situation is a bit different
Wolff has been running the Earthquakes as a separate entity since day one that his goal for is to be financially self sufficent. That requires the stadium to basically be paid for by itself, he doesn’t want to put his own money or the ownership group’s money into the soccer stadium unless absolutely necessary since when he bought the team the stadium was supposed to already be a money neutral proposition for him. However since then the housing collapse killed the original funding mechanism. Hence they’re waiting on finish finding sponsorship financing for the soccer stadium.
With Cisco Field they’re planning to fund from a combo of the existing naming rights deal, PSL’s and out of pocket due to the greater and quicker return on investment. For proof of how fast you can pay down debt service on a private stadium just look at the Giants. It’ll end up taking them less than 20 years.
So will the A's ownership need a loan?
They seem to have way more sponsorship money in place, but the Giants still needed a loan for 50% of the cost of their stadium… and it’s still kind of tough to get a loan in this economy.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
by johnjahafanclub on Nov 10, 2010 4:00 PM PST up reply actions
For guys with several billion dollars between them getting a loan probably won't be hard
I imagine they’ll actually get one quite easily. The A’s owners are far richer than the Giants owners were 15 years ago.
I just don't see the effort every having been made by Lew, though.
Even if he did do the due diligence he says he did on East Bay options, was he ever going around wrassling up private sponsorships?
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:32 PM PST up reply actions
Seriously. Why the hell didn't he stand outside Safeway with the Girl Scouts!?!
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2010 1:56 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Do you know how many thin mints he could buy?
He didn’t stand there because of all the weight he would have put on.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 1:57 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Other than Cisco, I don't think he went around wrassling up any sponsorship.
The SVLG letter was put together by San Jose, I believe.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 1:56 PM PST up reply actions
I think by "East Bay" here, you mean "Oakland"
It’s clear he did in fact, wrassle up private sponsorship in Fremont, in that Cisco was on board for both proposals.
I think it’s clear he was always probably in the “San Jose is the best choice” camp, with Fremont getting the nod because it was close enough to San Jose to bring in the South Bay money. We all have our biases, and Lew is biased towards the South Bay.
The problem is that no one in Oakland lifted a finger, other than Clorox and their silly pittance of 1/2 million in escrow, and only at the last minute.
Here’s the deal: when the Raiders left, the city and county, through the Coliseum kept after Evil Al the whole time he was in the Southland, and basically got raped, so, if the non-politico honchos of Oakland were even remotely interested in securing the A’s for Oakland, they should have recognized the city, politically, would not be able to offer funding except through redevelopment money. They did not step up.
You are expecting Lew to prefer Oakland, when what’s really at issue is that if Oakland really prefers the A’s to stay, it needed to outwoo San Jose, and it has not done so, for which I don’t blame the politicians, but rather the business community, the Safeways, Clorox’s, Kaisers, Chevrons of the world…
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 1:59 PM PST up reply actions 4 recs
Can I just express my love for the word "outwoo"?
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Well, for one thing
a six-letter word with four vowels in the outside position? How cool is that? And 50% of the letters are o.
That would be a trippy word for Hangman.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
too much scrabble, that's the reason...
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 2:17 PM PST up reply actions
Not Scrabbly at all.
Scrabble words. Boggle words. Hangman words. Three different things.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Yes, better.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I hate that show.
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
+
++++
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 2:21 PM PST up reply actions
wrest strew slew wren
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 2:32 PM PST up reply actions
I mean, the reason the word occurs to me
What to do with three o’s, 1 t, 1 w and a (say) v?
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 2:20 PM PST up reply actions
Great, so you get a shitty score
like maybe 18 points, probably leave some nice openings and you’re still left with a V in your rack, which is like the worst letter in the bag.
May as well swap tiles if it’s a closed board. Or if it’s open then try to plug it up by stuffing VOW somewhere and maybe still swap next turn depending on your draw.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I have no doubt you could outscore me
I only have to play Mrs. King, however, and try not to beat her by so much that she knocks the board over.
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 2:30 PM PST up reply actions
I'm actually interested in the construction "out-"
It’s sort of unusual for English, given that out by itself doesn’t mean anything close to what out means when it is a prefix…
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 3:17 PM PST up reply actions
It sucks when there are too many copies of the same letter in Hangman
Makes it very hit or miss.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
Hangman would be better
if you only reveal one letter if there are multiples. I think that’s how it works in Probe.
Not that Hangman is a really great game or anything anyway.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
+1000000
You’ve just condensed the last several years into a concise few paragraphs. As a person who has slaved over this for 5 years, I am astonished. And a bit jealous. Great work.
thanks!
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 3:41 PM PST up reply actions
why is that not an option?
Bear the cost dammit!!!
Sorry I know why, just venting. As I’ve said before, I really just want someone to throw some money into this and make it happen.
by Billy Frijoles on Nov 10, 2010 12:36 PM PST up reply actions
Because they're billionaires
They didn’t become billionaires by constantly digging into their pockets. They borrow money at a decent rate, make sure the revenue streams are lined up to pay that off plus some profit, and go from there. If Wolff/Fisher were to go into their own pockets, it wouldn’t be long before they were crying poor and asking someone to bail them out. The team would be worth $700 million without the revenues to take care of the bills. Who’s going to take care of that? It can’t be Oakland.
I don't think you understood my comment
I meant, why can’t Oakland just throw money at it, not why can’t the owners throw money at it. And I already know the answer, because they place baseball as a lower priority than other items, given their limited budget.
But whatever, can’t some kind of weed tax help fund a new ballpark?
That would be awesome.
by Billy Frijoles on Nov 10, 2010 1:08 PM PST up reply actions
Welcome to Prop 19 Stadium.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:31 PM PST up reply actions
Where are our seats?
fuckin’ wherever, man! Let’s get some nachos!
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
They became billionaires by inheriting a lot of money.
There’s a certain threshold at which, due to connections and investments made by people you pay to be smarter than you, it’s almost impossible to not be rich ever again. Wealthy people and families reach a point at which even if you liquidated everything and blew all your holdings on chocolate bars and whiskey, you could always find a way to get rich again. The riches-to-rags story only happens now if someone completely loses their mind and disappears beyond retrievability.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:31 PM PST up reply actions
That's...not really true.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 1:34 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, it's actually remarkable how many athletes (in particular) somehow manage this
Sometimes you just want to grab them by the lapels and scream “JUST PUT YOUR MONEY IN A (^&^ING MATTRESS, YOU DOLT!!”
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
"But I did put my money in a ...
oh, you said MAT-tress. I thought I was supposed to spend it on my MIS-tress."
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Nailed it on the head
This is why I really don’t like Wolff. Even though I consider myself an Oakland partisan, I could be convinced about San Jose. But if Lew Wolff’s philosophy if profitable mediocrity would continue in San Jose, I don’t think I could handle it.
"it's like an alarm clock, WOOT WOOT!" -Bubb Rubb
by secret ASian man on Nov 10, 2010 12:14 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
whoa, i haven't seen you post here in years.....
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05
Seriously. Good to see you again.
Are you still singing? or did you give it up and get a real job like the rest of us ex-bohemians?
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Still singing
But the gigs are fruit up. Considering law school fr next year taking the LSAT in a few weeks.
"it's like an alarm clock, WOOT WOOT!" -Bubb Rubb
by secret ASian man on Nov 10, 2010 10:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Still singing
But the gigs are drying up. Considering law school fr next year taking the LSAT in a few weeks.
"it's like an alarm clock, WOOT WOOT!" -Bubb Rubb
by secret ASian man on Nov 10, 2010 10:06 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Considering it because you love law, I hope.
If it’s because you think it’s a good way to make money, I’d you’re 10 years behind the curve. I’ll concede that law is still a more promising career than opera, but not by much.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Nailed it on the head
This is why I really don’t like Wolff. Even though I consider myself an Oakland partisan, I could be convinced about San Jose. But if Lew Wolff’s philosophy if profitable mediocrity would continue in San Jose, I don’t think I could handle it.
"it's like an alarm clock, WOOT WOOT!" -Bubb Rubb
by secret ASian man on Nov 10, 2010 12:14 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
That's not actually what we're doing though
Sure we buy out a few guys through arbitration, but we rarely keep them beyond that point. I read it as though we’re more likely to keep our name players than go and trade them or let them go b/c of free agency because we can’t afford them any more. We’re not likely to compete for the elites, but we could pick up high priced players via trade as well.
Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples
Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.
If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.
Agreed
I’d be happy if the change meant that we would be able to keep some of the Tejadas and Hudsons rather than have to let them go or trade them because we won’t be able to afford them soon. Or on the flipside, be one of the teams who is able to trade for a soon-to-be-pretty-high-priced stud and sign them to a contract extension.
Right
Which is what I think Wolff was poorly trying to say.
Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples
Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.
If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.
With all the "he actually meant this, he just didn't communicate it well" that seems to go around every time he says something in public,
you’d think the guy would figure out how to say what he means at some point.
Alternatively, maybe there’s a little bit of wishful thinking going on here.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:33 PM PST up reply actions
He obviously is talking about the Giants model
And looking at their major free agent signings, how overall they sucked, and their homegrown talent plus cheap/under the radar free agent signings carried the day.
That’s what he wants to do, I think, is build a team from the ground up, play in free agency but not sign huge free agents. That is a sound strategy and I think unless you are the yankees or red sox you can’t really do it any other way.
After reading the first 2 parts of this interview, I am actually happy the Giants won the WS. It seems to have made Wolff jealous and more passionate about winning. I am seeing more of a plan and a fire in his comments than I have ever seen, at least regarding the team on the field.
With regards to the stadium thing…well…yeah.
But I am seeing a little bit of “I want a fucking parade too” in his comments.
by Billy Frijoles on Nov 10, 2010 2:25 PM PST up reply actions
Can't blame him.
I want a fucking parade too.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
That's how I read it
""Expelliarmus!" said Eckstein, attempting to knock the bat out of Matt Kemp's hands, just before Kemp laced a single to center." -Ken Tremendous
We buy out the arbitration years and most likely, an extra year or two (see Brett Anderson, Kurt Suzuki, Haren, Swisher)
Can you tell me where you’re seeing that they’re going to look into keeping home grown players beyond that?
We’re not likely to compete for the elites, but we could pick up high priced players via trade as well.
Exactly, more evidence of doing what what we’re already doing (although I admit, one Matt Holliday is not much of a sample size).
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 1:21 PM PST up reply actions
It's funny. For the longest time, the gripe was the A's always traded their stars or let them go.
Giambi, Tejada, Hudson, Mulder, Zito, blah blah blah.
Now that it’s said that WON’T happen anymore, what happens? The gripe changes. OH, MAYBE YOU’LL KEEP YOUR PLAYERS BUT YOU WON’T GO SIGN FREE AGENTS!!!
Lew. Wolff. Can. Not. Win.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
I'm not sure what your point is.
Again, where did he say he won’t let the homegrown players go after the arbitration years + one/two extra years contracts?
And I don’t understand your point about the gripe changing? Not signing free agents has always been a gripe for A’s fans for as long as I can remember. In fact, that’s my biggest gripe. I don’t really care about signing Brett Anderson past his arbitration contract. But I do care about whether or not the A’s pursue marquee free agents like Carl Crawford.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 1:31 PM PST up reply actions
So basically you're upset because the A's arent the Yankees, then?
I don’t understand that. What if Brett Anderson goes on to have an 18 year career winning multiple Cy Youngs and goes into the HOF? Then would you care that they couldn’t keep him beyond his arbitration contract?
What if they’d been able to keep all three of Giambi, Chavez, and Tejada?
Creating a team out of mercenary free agents is a great way to become the Cubs or Mets. Frankly I’d hate it if the A’s turned into that.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
by mikev on Nov 10, 2010 2:00 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
No. Please stop spinning my arguments into a bunch of straw men.
I thought I made my points very clear in my original post and the previous comment. I’m going to reiterate them and hopefully this time you won’t go out of your way to ignore them.
I’m not asking for the A’s to become Yankees West. I do want them to be able pursue marquee free agents, as it fits the teams needs, like Carl Crawford this year. At the very least, I’m hoping that the A’s can regularly have budgets close to what the Angels and Mariners, and soon enough, the Rangers are spending. Obviously, this means becoming much bigger players on the FA market and having much more of a shot at the marquee names. Thus far, I’m not seeing anything from Lew that indicates any of this is close to happening in the future.
I’m generally opposed to signing pitchers past their arbitration years (which is why I used the Brett Anderson example). But if BA indeed goes crazy and ends up winning a bunch of Cy Youngs the next five years, then I’m hoping that the A’s indeed are major players for his continued services, even if he commands a Cliff Lee level contract.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 2:17 PM PST up reply actions
Okay, time out for a sec.
I do want them to be able pursue marquee free agents, as it fits the teams needs, like Carl Crawford this year. At the very least,
Furcal. Beltre. Scutaro. Aroldis Chapman. Iwakuma.
Furcal was the marquee shortstop available when Oakland tried to sign him. Beltre and Scutaro were the marquee 3B and SS available when Oakland tried to sign them. Chapman was the marquee IFA last year. Iwakuma was the best Japanese pitcher posted this offseason.
They HAVE tried to spend money, and/or taken on salary in deals (they spent several million to end up with Adam Rosales). I don’t understand how one can say that it hasn’t happened.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
Is anyone making the argument that the A's don't spend any money at all?
If anything, Beltre, Furcal, Scutaro are emblematic of the A’s approach: spending money on injured/old/average players and gambling on their upside. Beltre was coming off an injury-addled 2.5 WAR season. Furcal was coming off an injury-addled 2 WAR season. Both of them were on the wrong side of 30. They may have been “marquee” because of how terrible the other SS/3B were in their FA pool but that doesn’t mean they were marquee free agents. The A’s have been doing this awhile now, see Loaiza in 2006, and he was coming off a much better season than Furcal or Beltre. Heck, you can make the argument that he was more “marquee” than them.
Scutaro had two great years in Toronto to be sure but he was going to be 35 and the A’s were hardly throwing any major money at him. Chapman had a lot of upside but he was a huge risk. In any case, the A’s were bidding around 5 million per year for him. Iwakuma fits the narrative of the A’s spending money for average players. I must have missed something. So who was the last 5 WAR outfielder the A’s pursued in free agency? Who was the last 5 WAR player the A’s pursued in free agency?
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 2:52 PM PST up reply actions
Beltre was 7 WAR this year, so... there you go.
It’s quite simple. I’m not interested in the explanation or your attempt at talking down what happened. They were the best players available at positions of need, and the team went after them.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
Right.
To simplify and conclude:
He was coming off an injury plagued 2.5 WAR season. This was the best in a very weak FA 3B class. You think that constitutes marquee, I do not. The A’s often pursue these types of players. They do not seem to ever pursue 5 WAR free agents. Those are what I consider marquee.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 3:18 PM PST up reply actions
And how many teams do?
I’m not saying the A’s should not, just that the fact that the A’s do not, in the moneyball era, may not differentiate them from teams with the same amount of revenue (whether it’s revenue-sharing revenue of homegrown revenue).
Given the economics, I’m guessing you will find that the number of 5WAR free agents who are pursued by any small market teams is pretty small. I’m just guessing. I haven’t looked it up…
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 3:24 PM PST up reply actions
I am not the one making the argument that the A's, in fact, are presently pursuing marquee free agents.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 3:27 PM PST up reply actions
I realize that.
You are making the argument that the A’s do not pursue 5WAR players. My reply was a reply fail in that I meant it to reply to your post that said the A’s don’t pursue 5WAR players, not the post I actually replied to.
I am saying your complaint about the A’s approach ignores the fact that only ‘big market’ teams can afford to go after the players everyone covets, and that, currently, the A’s can’t play that game. And that they are not alone. Until this year, the Rangers, too, couldn’t play. Seattle traded for Lee, right? In fact, this was because even the Phillies decided they could not keep Lee when he reached FA at the end of this year because they’d spent (or were about to spend) a bazillion dollars to lock up Howard. Stupidly.
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 3:38 PM PST up reply actions
I am stating that the A's don't pursue 5 WAR players.
I’m not sure of where, if anywhere, I’m complaining about the fact that they aren’t, presently.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 3:42 PM PST up reply actions
Ah, OK. I certainly understand the distinction
On the other hand, how am I supposed to read this
The A’s often pursue these types of players. They do not seem to ever pursue 5 WAR free agents. Those are what I consider marquee.
Other than as a complaint?
Or, is there, somewhere in this comment of yours an implied understanding of their economic circumstances, which is all I have been pounding at, as opposed to what you seem to perceive to be their philosophical preference for has-beens, retreads, broken, risky players, etc.I doubt very much that they prefer this approach. it is what is available to them. Theo Epstein is a protege of Billy, right? He is moneyball without having to worry about the money. I believe if BB had unlimited funds at his disposal, he would go after more marquee players.
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 3:49 PM PST up reply actions
Epstein is not a Beane protegee
You may be thinking of Ricciardi, or DePodesta.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
My bad. In Boston they kept referring to him as Billy's 'understudy' when he first arrived
Maybe they just meant that he shared Billy’s sabremetric approach. During the 90’s and early 00’s (pronounced uh-oh’s), I was far away from A’s Nation and had to rely on (first) week-old Chron’s special-ordered, and later sfgate to get any Bay Area news, so I have only a cursory knowledge of the Schott-Hoffmann years and the A’s management structure.
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 5:11 PM PST up reply actions
I'm not sure I'm understanding.
But that may be because I’m pretty tired…
In any case, just read my comments matter-of-factly and take my word for it that I’m not complaining about anything other than my perception that the future A’s will have most of the future revenue going into Lew’s pockets. And I’ve been here long enough to understand what the A’s circumstances are.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 4:09 PM PST up reply actions
I hadda leave for a while
Did you get back to work on the paper or not???
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 4:48 PM PST up reply actions
Yup, just finished actually
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 4:58 PM PST up reply actions
Well, I'm sure it was much improved by sharpening your wits sparring and commenting on AN!
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 4:59 PM PST up reply actions
You're ignoring that his previous seasons were 4.0, 3.0, and 4.9 WAR on purpose then?
Adrian Beltre is and has been a really good 3B. He was the best available option in an offseason that 3B was a need, and they pursued him. Same with Scutaro, and Furcal the year before.
and that’s not good enough for you.
I guess if you define marquee free agent as “5 WAR regardless of position” then no they haven’t tried to sign anybody coming off a 5 WAR season — which basically means Jason Bay or Chone Figgins last year.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
Yes, there was a huge risk factor associated with Beltre.
He had 3 consecutive declining years of offensive production those three 3 years. He had the injury. He was going to be turning 31. And with the injury, no one was sure how his defense was going to hold up, especially with it being most of his value. There’s a reason no one was willing to give him a deal longer than 3 years and those were so unsatisfactory that he opted for a one year deal instead. How many marquee free agents end up with one year deals?
Btw, I would add Matt Holliday to that list…
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 3:37 PM PST up reply actions
the list including jason bay and figgins i mean
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 3:38 PM PST up reply actions
You are ignoring the point again and you're talking about specifics.
For the record, Beltre DIDN’T have 3 years of declining production. 108, 113, and 108 wRC+ is pretty much the model of consistency. Also you’re saying he came off an injury as if he tore his quad or had TJ surgery or something. He got hit in the balls by a grounder and had to have surgery to repair his testicle.
But if your only qualifier is 5 WAR, then sure, the A’s didn’t go after any 5 WAR players except for they traded for Matt Holliday after a 5.7 WAR season.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
What years are we looking at?
I assume we’re talking about 2007-2009. In which his wRC+ went from 113 to 109 to 88.
I’m not assuming that his balls injury would’ve hurt his defense. I’m saying it’s a big enough warning flag that a lot of teams stayed away. A lot of teams did in fact stay away (hence unsatisfying 3 year contracts, ended up with one year deal, etc).
Also, I’m not sure what Matt Holliday has to do with anything considering that he cost a king’s ransom, had one year left in his contract (another thing the A’s do often, the rent a player), and I thought we were talking about free agents?
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 3:58 PM PST up reply actions
I was discounting the injury year since he was injured. I meant the 3 years before that when he played full seasons.
but forget it, you’re going to discount whatever you have to to prove that they didn’t go after anybody. Not worth it.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
Well yeah, if you're going to discount a year marred by injury, which just happens to be the year right before free agency...
I mean c’mon are you being deliberately obtuse? How does that not affect his status as a free agent, perceived or otherwise?
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 4:30 PM PST up reply actions
No, you said he'd declined for 3 straight years, which was inaccurate.
and then he had a bad year when he was injured.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
Disregarding the wrangling over who-meant-what with regards to the years of decline,
I’m still not seeing how having a bad year with a simultaneous injury is doing anything to support this idea of Beltre being a marquee free agent.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 4:57 PM PST up reply actions
because it takes more than 1 bad year and a freak injury to kill someone's value?
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
Which goes back to the one year deal and the crappy three year contract offers he got.
Seriously, I’m not making up a bunch of stuff about what I think Beltre’s market value was. That’s stuff we already know that.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 6:03 PM PST up reply actions
8 million dollars per year.
Fangraphs assumes each WAR on the free agent market is worth about 5 million dollars.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 8:16 PM PST up reply actions
For a guy who was hurt and coming off a shitty year?
also the Phillies gave him the same offer, so obviously that was sorta what his market rate was…
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
I think one simple change will make you less despondent over the near future
Thus far, I’m not seeing anything from Lew that indicates any of this is close to happening in the
futurenear future.
It’s a process of ramping up. As vertig0 explains above, the stadium adds $20-30 million in revenue. That’s step one. If you spend it all on Carl Crawford, you have to let players go once they get to free agency. If you stay in the Coli, you don’t get Carl Crawford and you have to let all the babies go when they get to be 7 years old.
Hopefully, with a better team and a new stadium in play, the A’s then get serious about ramping up TV and radio. TV can be huge, if done right. (see Rangers’ Fox deal, which alone brings in $80 million)
TV can’t come first. Right now, the A’s would probably have to pay someone bigger than CSN, rather than getting money from the network…
A great team can’t come in the absence of an imminent better stadium, see Lew’s mention of the Marlins (and see the 2011 Rays, probably). But it’s impatient and unrealistic to suggest that a new stadium will immediately lead to a great team, and an end to money woes…
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 2:53 PM PST up reply actions
It's not a question of revenue.
I’m sure if the stadium happens, the TV and radio deals along with everything else will happen. It’s a question of how much of that revenue will eventually → spending.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 2:57 PM PST up reply actions
Right.
You’re saying that you don’t trust Lew to spend (enough) of that revenue. I’m saying that the revenue has to at least be foreseeable (as in a done stadium deal) before we can know whether he’s really going to go for a more big time approach, that’s all.
And that revenue from a new stadium only, which will net only $20-30 million per year, won’t magically increase to the point the A’s are not still a ‘small market team’ overnight.
Without the stadium, though…
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions
I basically agree with this. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 3:20 PM PST up reply actions
Not only that, but spending doesn't
always translate into winning, either. Lots of teams that spend craploads of money and still suck.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
And some GMs that spend money idiotically win the WS
While leaving, oh, $30 million per year either off the roster or sitting on the bench… I hope it all goes to his head and he does more of that sort of big-time aging FA stuff, and less of the on-the-fly pickups which he admittedly did so well or luckily this year
It helps to have enough money that you can afford to throw it away on really stupid mistakes, I guess.
contrast that to Beane, where each stupid mistake (they all make them) has the potential to set the team back for years. I was floored to find out this year that if the team had understood just how little Miggy would have taken to stay with them(and, presumably, if Miggy himself had understood just how little he’d have been offered), they could have afforded both him and Chavvy.
let that sink in. Now, with the left side set, the team has a ZOMG can’t miss prospect in Bobby Crosby, that they could’ve unloaded for yet another good player.
What a difference that would’ve made…
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 4:57 PM PST up reply actions
To be fair, the Tejada situation is 100% hindsight.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
I wasn't aware that people were only allowed to have one gripe at a time.
With so many to choose from, which one am I allowed to have so that mikev can’t accuse me of shifting my ground?
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:37 PM PST up reply actions
You'll just never know.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
MUST KEEP PLAYERS *AND* SIGN FREE AGENTS!!
50-man roster FTW!!
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
I didn't want to bring it up because people would just accuse me of being unreasonable without reading what I said,
but this has been my suspicion all along, and I’ve voiced it before. I don’t think Lew ever intended to spend much more with the supposed increased revenue that the SJ ballpark will bring in. He wants a sports team for the South Bay and he wants a big payoff for his wallet.
If the team is going to be more of the same, then as you say below, for nostalgia’s sake, I’d rather he sell to someone who will keep the team in Oakland.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:26 PM PST up reply actions
We differ slightly (although for you, I think it's probably significantly)
I’d rather he sell to someone who willkeep the team in Oakland.maximize spending on payroll, regardless of whether the location of the new ballpark is Oakland or San Jose.
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 1:33 PM PST up reply actions
If the reality is that SJ doesn't inherently increase payroll significantly more than a new Oak stadium would,
I don’t see the argument for an SJ ballpark.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:35 PM PST up reply actions
The problem is Oakland doesn't have a solution now
and San Jose does.
You are right that in a vacuum, New stadium will bring in similar revenues where ever it is. But right now and for the foreseeable future, Oakland is vastly more expensive on both the revenue and expenditure sides.
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes
Would the payroll have to increase significantly, immediately, for it to be a good investment and the right move for the future?
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
I think Wolff is being realistic here, though
Just because revenues increase by, let’s say $30 million, that doesn’t mean that the team will be able to dump all of that money into free agents. Buying out arby years of homegrown players will probably get more expensive as time goes on, possibly at a faster rate than the increase in revenue. And while a new stadium will mean increased revenue, it won’t necessarily mean that revenues will continue to increase at a pace equal to the rate at which player salaries increase. It may simply create a higher revenue plateau. If that turns out to be the case, then the team should definitely be careful about how it spends it’s new-found riches.
I read this to be on the upper ends of the free agent signing spectrum - like the...
…six/seven year mis to high 100-million dollar variety. I took this as his way of tempering fan expectations should the SJ move come to fruition not that he’d continue to be tight with the purse. But then again, he did say that staying competitive year-in/year-out was far better a strategy than going big only to rebuild shortly thereafter. I agree with this strategy but know that not every fan shares it.
by LowcountryJoe on Nov 10, 2010 7:36 PM PST up reply actions
Meh
I think Wolff has a mistaken assumption that South Bay alone can support the A’s. The A’s aren’t an Oakland team, they aren’t even an East Bay team. They are a Bay Area team that shares this market with Giants.
Regardless of whether the A’s will play at Diridion South or Victory Court, this team will need butts from all over the Bay Area to fill it. As such, why is the marketing for the A’s (and the Earthquakes, the Bay Area’s only pro soccer team) so conservative. It seems that they don’t want market outside of the 408.
Also, why can’t they “dress up” Coliseum, because the Coliseum is the stadium they have right now. Get better concessions, staff it better dress it up like the Giants dressed up Candlestick before they moved their current ballyard.
I just can’t shake the feeling that I am being nickled and dimed and that my business doesn’t matter because they’ll just find new fans if and when they move. That’s why I canceled my season tickets. Five years ago, I went to close to 45 games, this season barely 10.
If Wolff could just give a damn about the fans, market the team and the experience of going to the game fun regardless of the venue, perhaps people would care less about Oakland vs. SJ. He could have made the A’s one big party that everybody would follow down the road. Instead, the is Major League in real life.
"it's like an alarm clock, WOOT WOOT!" -Bubb Rubb
by secret ASian man on Nov 10, 2010 12:11 PM PST via mobile reply actions
As to why they can't "dress up" the Coliseum, that's already been covered
They don’t own it. They can’t make any changes to it. Also, any changes they make will likely benefit the Raiders as well and why should the Raiders get another free thing from someone else?
Last of the Ninth - Photography
Better concessions would be a good start
Adequately staffing the gates and concession stands so I don’t have to walk a third of the way around the coliseum to get food or beer if I have a ticket for any seat not between third/home/first.
Dressing up the coliseum doesn’t mean permanent improvements.
"it's like an alarm clock, WOOT WOOT!" -Bubb Rubb
by secret ASian man on Nov 10, 2010 12:40 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Regarding the closed concession stands,
it’s hard to plan staffing if you don’t know how many walk-ups you are going to get. Having a larger season ticket base would help with this, but of course the A’s don’t have that, so they have to play it by ear. Sometimes they get it wrong.
But I agree, Aramark should be ashamed of themselves for the service they provide at the Coliseum.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 12:43 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
what LS said.
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
It's a chicken-and-egg argument.
They can’t staff without knowing that attendance will be enough to justify it.
I am not encourage to go to a game if I think I’ll be ignored when I want refreshments.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
Took the words out of my mouth.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:38 PM PST up reply actions
its not a chicken and egg thing
people don’t make decisions based on lines at the concession stands.
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes
It could be just one of many factors, concession stand lines being a sub-part of "too crowded" in general, but be that as it may...
…I’m glad somebody that knows literally everybody else’s mindsets and reasons could clarify that for us.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
Sometimes I decide to get chicken strips because the Saag's line is too long.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions
Breaking news!!
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
Me too.
And I always always always regret it.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 3:40 PM PST up reply actions
I have regretted it, but sometimes you really want chicken that kinda tastes like it was fried in the oil used for fishsticks.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 3:49 PM PST up reply actions
The following is a true story
My wife used to work in a grocery store bakery back in the days when grocery stores made desserts and breads in-house from scratch. She was a relief bread baker, meaning she came in twice a week to bake bread on the days when the bread baker was off. One day, she noticed a bottle of Tabasco on the table where she made the breads. When she inquired about why it was there, she discovered that the guy who fried the donuts every morning would sometimes fry up some chicken wings for breakfast first, then fry the donuts in the same oil. Yep, he ate wings at 4am, tossed in nothing but Tabasco, and then re-used the oil for donuts.
Only in the South…
But the question is...
Were the doughnuts a hit?
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 4:12 PM PST up reply actions
Who wouldn't love chicken-flavored donuts? You could call 'em ChickenNuts!
Brought to you by the makers of:

I always regret it when I stay in the Saags line
The sausages, particularly the Chicken Parmesan one always give my stomach a ride, and it’s not pretty.
I only ever get the Atomic Big Hots.
And yea, sometimes that’s a ride.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 3:58 PM PST up reply actions
Big fun in the bathroom, 8th inning blowout!
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 5:15 PM PST up reply actions
Winning forgives many sins
The fanbase can absorb price increases, crappy concessions, bad customer service and all that stuff if the team was winning.
Our not quite a winning season at .500 this year was one of the better records of the recent past.
So the A’s haven’t been winning. So what are they doing to retain their business?
"it's like an alarm clock, WOOT WOOT!" -Bubb Rubb
by secret ASian man on Nov 10, 2010 10:09 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Just to point out again
(not that you’re the only one by any means), but people cancelling their season ticket plans is precisely one of the reasons that make adequate staffing harder on stadium ops. I’m not saying they couldn’t do a better job (I think they can), but it does present a challenge when they don’t know how many people to expect for any one game.
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
If only it was.
It’s kind of a vicious cycle though.
Poor concessions/offerings → bad experience → lower attendance→even poorer offerings
Perhaps if they invested money in keeping stands open, etc., people would want to keep coming back, thus eventually making the stands necessary.
by Billy Frijoles on Nov 10, 2010 1:12 PM PST up reply actions
I don't think concessions/offerings are that much of an influence.
It’s not a zero influence, but it’s not going to put too many butts in the seat or keep too many from leaving. It’s a good thing, it’s a necessary thing, but it’s the really the thing.
Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples
Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.
If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.
True. "THE" THING is WINNING.
It’s THE ONLY THING.
by Billy Frijoles on Nov 10, 2010 1:16 PM PST up reply actions
How many people do you know who say "Forget going to the game. The lines suck and the food's terrible!"
Last of the Ninth - Photography
Not a single one.
That’s the point I keep making about “the casual fan,” but everyone here seems to know dozens of casual fans who don’t come because they hate cement and want better food or something. I think people don’t come because they’re not being asked to come, and when they DO hear about this Lew Wolff character who apparently owns the A’s, they hear him slagging off the East Bay.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 1:42 PM PST up reply actions
To be fair, I don't either. I'm speculating,
because the only casual baseball fans I ever hear from talk about the A’s as if it’s a hidden Bay Area treasure that they discovered.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 2:51 PM PST up reply actions
And they ARE a hidden Bay Area treasure which a casual fan must discover...
Precisely because they are not marketed in any effective way. I can hardly wait for Lew’s spin on the A’s completely pathetic and awful marketing. The Gio Gonzales ad was and is wonderful. I have only ever seen it on CSNCA. ?
Hello? I’m al*read*y watching an A’s game…
I don’t live in the Bay Area any more. Does that add run on the local stations? I’ve certainly never seen it when the networks are running a Bay Area football game…
From what I read, the radio station isn’t easily picked up in the East Bay. Again, WTF? And, when I have tried to actually listen to an internet broadcast of a game with no tele, I had to go not to the radio station, but to a site that carries all available MLB broadcasts. Again, WTF? The game is not on TV, why suppress the radio??? And, very few day games are on CSNCA. Why not? CSNCA would rather run a ‘paid program’ infomercial? Yeah, they get paid, but at what cost to ratings?
I don’t have any other complaints about Lew. Most of what he’s said on CSNCA and with Blez makes sense. But his decision to forego effectively marketing the A’s does play like an evil scheme to depress attendance and make the trek to the South Bay all but inevitable and necessary.
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 5:26 PM PST up reply actions
That's my point.
People don’t think marketing would matter. I think it would make a huge difference. Much more than sprucing up the Coli.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 5:42 PM PST up reply actions
I am 100% with you there
Green collar baseball! It’s not just the uni’s, it’s the rings on the pee troughs!
In fact, I think that Lew’s whole focus on stadium first has been misguided. How did the Atlanta Braves become a major player? Cable TV. The same cable TV that made Atlanta itself into a major metro area. Why are the Bankees so rich? Hint, it’s not just the NYC metro area’s size, it’s YES network.
I do think that a huge marketing campaign would be much cheaper than the $80 mill he dumped into Fremont. Not to mention that that stadium would have been a disaster, not only for the A’s but for all 880 commuters, since it was not accessible from BART. I think it would have been the first new stadium with fail written all over it. SJ is more viable than Fremont. Who wants to travel to a park out in the suburbs? Texans and OC’ers, obviously, but everywhere else, new parks have been successful precisely because they were interfaced with downtowns. If Oakland didn’t have so much PC inertia against trying to retain a MLB team because ‘nothing else matters except all the poor people’, well, they would obviously have a huge leg up on SJ, not to mention Fremont.
Plenty of blame to go around.
But, yes, marketing.
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 5:59 PM PST up reply actions
I don't think the casual non-fan gives a rat's ass about who the owner is, but...
…I have no doubt they do care about the overall experience. They’re not there for the game only, they’re there for entertainment and a good time. If the food and drink is good, all the better. If they know it’s gonna suck, and they’re going to be stuck in lines all night missing “the action”, why bother going at all?
If the game is good, that’s just a bonus.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
The main issue with the Coliseum and the casual fan as far as I see
Which is my main complaint with the Coliseum also, is that there’s fuck all to do near the stadium. You look at AT&T or Safeco or PETCO, or any number of more downtown stadiums and there’s all these places to grab a drink or a bite to eat and hang out with your friends or other fans before and after the game. With the A’s, it’s come – possibly tailgate – go to the game – leave.
For me, this is especially annoying since I come from the far off land of prunes and silicon so I have to come up 880. With my work, I’m often in really early and can leave at 3:30 or so which means I could beat the worst traffic but then I get there and have nothing to do but sit in the parking lot for over an hour until the stadium opens at 5:30 or go somewhere a few freeway exits away. In order to get there when the stadium is actually open, it puts travel back into rush hours.
There was one game this last year that was the same day as a Sharks playoff game that started at 5. I wound up not going since I would have missed the first period waiting for the stadium to open. If they could have opened half an hour earlier than normal I would have gone early and watched the Sharks game in the Westside Club before the A’s game. Or if there was any viable bar next to the stadium I would have gone there and then headed into the stadium later. Outside of tailgating, there’s simply nothing to do within walking distance before the hour and a half before the game that the stadium opens.
by throwmonkey on Nov 10, 2010 10:28 PM PST up reply actions
Having gone to several of the new stadiums
And downtown arenas, that is also one of my biggest complaints with the Coliseum beyond the structural issues as well. They all have places to grab some dinner, or a beer before or after the game. They all have some place to hang out after the game nearby. They all have options for things to when baseball isn’t being played. The Coliseum has a parking lot, and the In-and-Out across the highway. That’s about it.
by athletics68 on Nov 10, 2010 10:38 PM PST up reply actions
Picture it like this
You’re around a place like Petco while doing other things and you can, on impulse, say, “You know what? Maybe I’d like to see what a game there is like!” Then you might get hooked and go to more.
The only way you’re going to a game at the Coliseum is if you’re already planning on it.
Last of the Ninth - Photography
Good points.
I used to go to the nearby Hof Brau. Loved that place.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
pity it's gone.
And the last remnants memory destroys.
by Leopold Bloom on Nov 12, 2010 8:41 AM PST up reply actions
But when the team isn't winning
the crappy food does become an issue.
"it's like an alarm clock, WOOT WOOT!" -Bubb Rubb
by secret ASian man on Nov 10, 2010 10:11 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Lose tons of money for the sake of the 5000 fans who showed up Monday night!!! Wooo!!!
Choosy Feebas choose Leopold Bloom nipples
Daring. Sensual. Invigorating. Squirrel.
BLOOM. For men.
If the eggs actually hatch I made more than a mistake, I made some scientifically impossible crime.
And it's not Major League in real life if they're working to improve their team and talking about making some moves this offseason
Last of the Ninth - Photography
Reality is bound to be a bit more nuanced than a 2-hour movie, right?
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 5:27 PM PST up reply actions
drools
Crisp
Barton
Suzuki
Dunn
Cust
Carter
Sweeney
Ellis
Pennington
However, I have no idea who plays where.
I'll give it a shot, with that exact lineup. FYI, it sucks ass defensively lol.
CF Crisp
3B Barton
C Suzuki
1B Dunn
DH Cust
LF Carter
RF Sweeney
2B Ellis
SS Pennington
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
Kurt Suzuki is completely awful at hitting though.
Him hitting 3rd instead of 7th like he needs to would cost us wins.
Carter and Dunn in OF
Coco, you’re gonna be busy.
by Billy Frijoles on Nov 10, 2010 2:27 PM PST up reply actions
Per travdog6
Adam Dunn would be redundant on that ballclub. Redundant.
A's Fan in Sweden
"Some of us know him as the a-hole who piled into Ray Fosse in an All-Star game (it's why Ray is the way he is folks)" - OptimistPrime
the tarp
The tarping flack is just a straw man in my opinion – I don’t know if I have it right here – yes. The A’s put tarp in the entire deck to reduce stadium seating availability to a capacity of 35,067 seats. We had five sell outs only in 2008 and two of them were in Japan. The empty seats looked so bad to the players and everybody – it’s a football stadium when you have that third deck there. So that was the reason and if that bothered people, I apologize but we still haven’t had any sell outs.
i have never understood why people complain about the tarped off third deck, or blame it for the a’s attendance problems.
the seattle sounders play in a football stadium, qwest field, and they tarped off tons of seats (more pics here). they still averaged 30k per game last year and 36k this year. the difference is one is a crappy stadium in oakland and the other is a nice stadium in seattle.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05
They complain because they don't have as many places to sit and smoke pot like they used to.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 2:21 PM PST up reply actions
And they can't buy a $2 ticket
then sneak down to the $15 section.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
They can on $2 Wednesdays! And they wouldn't have to move to be in the $18 section!
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 2:24 PM PST up reply actions
security is extra tight on Wednesdays, moustache. No, they can't.
And the last remnants memory destroys.
by Leopold Bloom on Nov 12, 2010 8:42 AM PST up reply actions
Sure they can!
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
also you know people would be complaining about how our owners are so cheap that they put up ads on the tarps for xbox 360 and samsung mobile
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05
It's the "Lew Wolff doesn't care about poor people in Oakland" argument.
You know, because tarping up the third deck removed ALL of the cheap seats.
Then or course ignore the plethora of cheap seats that are still around
Frankly I think they’re just justifying why they don’t go to the ballpark anymore so they can still complain at places like AN. Like they’d have gone even if the third deck was completely open.
by athletics68 on Nov 10, 2010 3:54 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Totally True
The price of a ticket in Oakland is still significantly lower than just about anywhere else. I visited 8 ballparks this season, and the only one that came even close to the pricing in Oakland was Colorado, where the price of living is significantly lower than in the Bay Area.
Going to sporting events, as a whole, is not as cheap as it used to be. But guess what, it’s a lot easier to watch at home, so you win some you lose some…
"I was right and you were wrong." - Ray Fosse
You nailed it
If the Coliseum is a so-so experience, and just about every game is available at home, in jammies, with replays, then…
The A’s have to provide a value-added experience to overcome those cold, damp nights. And as things are, the Coli can’t do that…
Does anyone know how their cable ratings look? Living 6 hours away from the ballpark, it’s been wonderful for me to have CSNCA.
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 5:36 PM PST up reply actions
Value-added?
How about going to a baseball game? What value could you possibly add to being at a baseball game in the East Bay?
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 5:44 PM PST up reply actions
I don't know, but the 3rd deck was fun.
When I was a kid we always sat there. It has some nostalgic value I guess.
by Billy Frijoles on Nov 10, 2010 2:51 PM PST up reply actions
I always hated the 3rd deck.
Too far from the game. I remember little league days in the early 70s… the 3rd deck would be packed with kids and the 1st & 2nd decks would be sparse. Looked really disproportionate and funny.
Though I always thought the tarp thing is a non-issue.
Billy Beane... What have you done for me lately?
by UncleLeo on Nov 10, 2010 3:22 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I mostly agree, but I do kinda like sitting on the third deck in the value seats.
It is a great view from behind the plate.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 3:52 PM PST up reply actions
well, they reopened those sections behind the plate.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05
I'm really very happy all the people who post what they think is our payroll is can STFU now.
Its never ever been set in stone and Wolff just said he is increasing it to an unknown amount. If you pay attention to the team, he has said this every year: that he will spend whatever Billy wants to, its just sometimes Billy doesnt want to.
And he trusts Billy's judgment about money, which is why he gave him equity in the team. so, I guess, he could then trust Billy's judgment a little more now than he used to?
"Feel so bad, feel like a ballgame on a rainy day"-Lightnin' Hopkins
by justANotherAsFan on Nov 10, 2010 2:40 PM PST up reply actions
OT: Ween tickets for the Fox Theater show go on sale soon.
Who is going!?
TicketMaster
Price Range: $35
I’d say General Admission is probably best to buy, so we can group up and sweat on each other. Unless someone wants to buy a shitton of tickets in the upper level.
we all wanna go here
let’s chat soon
Silence s'il vous plait!! Vous ne voyez pas que je suis en train de se masturber?!?
by emperor nobody on Nov 10, 2010 4:14 PM PST up reply actions
You got some kind of discount code?
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 5:44 PM PST up reply actions
NBC heard that too.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 3:43 PM PST up reply actions
Who's the "I"?
"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Nov 10, 2010 4:21 PM PST up reply actions
Pictures will help you remember the name.


Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
It does. I'm thinking top-shelf bourbon whiskey and club soda are involved.
Possibly a twist of lime or some other citrus fruit.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 5:45 PM PST up reply actions
DeJesus
Just what we needed another center fielder who hits 5 home runs. Way to go billy…
Who needs Gonzalez, Either, Cruz, Swisher, Holliday and their 30 HR seasons every year. Why not settle for 5 HR from your outfielders.
Morada Mudshark
by Morada Mudshark on Nov 10, 2010 8:36 PM PST up reply actions
You're right. If only there were a way to score runs that didn't involve HRs...
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 10, 2010 9:28 PM PST up reply actions
I especially like the part about "their 30 HR seasons every year."
Holliday is the only 1 whose had more than 1 30 HR season, and he’s had 2.
So does this mean that Carter won't be starting in left next year?
I’m just assuming he’ll be moved back to LF, since fangraphs says he’s been better there than in RF.
Also, how does this address the team’s lack of power?
Yea, the one time today that people come to my desk, I miss the news as it flies over the interweb.
Five minutes sooner and I would have been all on top of that.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 3:56 PM PST up reply actions
Coco's comments were pretty funny (no pun intended)
Maybe the A’s should go ahead and call up Ynoa and his beautiful eyes, too.
What happen if Giant's don't give up SJ?
This new ballpark thing is taking too long, to me SJ make sense for the A’s. But the fact of the matter is baseball is a business and is their goal to max profit and the only way to do so is to be the only game in town or the better opition for customers. So why would they allow A’s move into a new ballpark to complete against them? What if the A’s are not allow to move to SJ, than the only opition that make sense for Wolff is to sell the team? Than aren’t we back to square one with the ballpark since the only way A’s can have new ballpark in oakland is hell freeze over.
What do you mean "don't give up SJ?"
They really don’t have much of a choice. If the league votes to give the A’s the territory, it’s the A’s territory. (another solution is shared territory for SCC)
They may be a business, but they also are a franchise of an overall business, and moving the A’s to SJ helps all the franchises. If the committee rules against it, then yes, the team will be in quite a bind, because I don’t believe even then that Oakland has it’s shit together enough to build a stadium.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 3:55 PM PST up reply actions
The Giants aren't going to "give up" SJ
But it’s not up to them. They were granted SJ by MLB and MLB can just as easily take it away. It’s really quite simple, they’re just along for the ride just like the A’s are.
Dear Lew: Build it Now! (both of them)
Sincerely,
Earthquakes fans
If you walk the walk and act major league, and market yourself as big time, people will treat you as big time, and casual fans will come to your stadium to see what all the fuss is about.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
by johnjahafanclub on Nov 10, 2010 3:50 PM PST reply actions
I do agree on the Quakes stadium
Wolff has already blown more money on failed moves to Fremont ($80 mil) than he plans to spend on the Earthquakes new stadium ($60 mil). And unlike the A’s the Quakes are actually a playoff caliber team and are in even greater need of a new stadium than the A’s are. As has been the Quakes fans refrain since day one this season, “BUILD IT NOW!”
Hopefully Blez throws a question about the Quakes stadium at Lew at some point in this interview.
blez lives in socal and has never expressed an interest in soccer, i doubt he even knows who the earthquakes are.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05
but socal
has david beckham! gasp! he’s so pretty!
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
by johnjahafanclub on Nov 10, 2010 4:05 PM PST up reply actions
Besides, this is Athletics Nation, not Earthquakes Nation
Not to be rude, but I see no reason why Blez shouldn’t concentrate solely on the A’s in his interview.
I am interested in the differences between going after a new stadium for the Earthquakes and
the new one for the A’s. Comparisons/contrasts/lessons learned/synergy/etc.
by LoneStranger on Nov 10, 2010 4:13 PM PST up reply actions
Ok, fair enough.
Insofar as as how the Eathquakes’ stadium affects the A’s, it’s a reasonable line of questioning.
And vice versa
Many in the Quakes fan community are starting to think that the Quakes stadium may be implicitly tied to whether or now the A’s get approval to move to SJ. Even if only because the A’s are Wolff’s primary focus and the longer it drags out for them the longer he’s distracted from the Quakes, despite the Quakes FO stating otherwise.
True but the Quakes fans don't get the opportunities to talk to Wolff like this
As often as AN seems to. The Quakes are the smaller of the two teams for sure.
Clearly you don't follow him on facebook. His daughter's soccer team is updated regularly.
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor
Pam liked my old sig better.
Outstanding, Blez!
Looking forward to Pt. 3, AND your upcoming road trip with Geren and company. :)
"Anything that is the something of the something isn't really the anything of the anything." ~ Lisa Simpson
Jean Quan was just declared the winner in Oakland mayor's race
So Lew’s campaign contributions go the way of the EIRs for Fremont.
It's the fans that make the game fun. -- Rickey Henderson, July 26, 2009.
Won't really change much
Even if Quan went full bore tomorrow there’s little chance she’d be able to organize anything in time (she sure hasn’t had much impact as a city council woman all these years).
A pittance compared to the truckloads of money he spent on that stuff.
The funny thing about baseball is that people will believe what they want to believe. –Joe Posnanski 8/29/09
And a pittance compared to what he spent,
and what his assets are now worth. And he’s not the only one. The commercial market is going upside down, too. Its the next domino. I really don’t think this team is going anywhere soon.
"Anything that is the something of the something isn't really the anything of the anything." ~ Lisa Simpson
Wolff didn't really address Blez's question about the current fan base.
Blez asked him what he has done to keep his current fan base from feeling neglected. His answer was about giving Billy an ownership stake and taking care of Crowley. As a 20+ year season ticket holder, this means little or nothing to me. I wish he had said more about what can be done in the short term to keep the fans they have and maybe increase their season ticket base. Every year I debate whether or not to renew; every year I send in my money; and every year I wonder why I keep doing it when I don’t feel they appreciate me or make my game experience any better.
Losing this team would be a huge failure for this city and an affront to Oakland’s great sports legacy.
Quoting Pam,
I’d imagine some of that will be illustrated (maybe indirectly) when he talks about how to attract the casual fan
as Blez says is coming in Part III.
"Anything that is the something of the something isn't really the anything of the anything." ~ Lisa Simpson
But I'm not a casual fan,
and my wants/needs are different. I may not like the Coke bottle in the outfield, but I do appreciate that some (most?) fans need those kinds of diversions. I don’t need those things, but I do expect to have certain baseball needs met when I go to games. Such as being able to see over the guy in front of me. And having management make an effort to keep the aisles clear when the ball is in play. Things like that. And I feel less and less that my concerns are being addressed.
Losing this team would be a huge failure for this city and an affront to Oakland’s great sports legacy.
How can the FO effect if you can see over the guy in front of you?
They can’t demand he get shorter all of a sudden.
by athletics68 on Nov 10, 2010 11:36 PM PST up reply actions
no but a couple more ushers
could limit traffic flow to not while pitches are being thrown
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes
Wolff lied, he never tried
to make the guy in front of me shorter.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 11, 2010 8:10 AM PST up reply actions
Of course you are right
I was thinking of things that bug me and remembering someone’s comment here (maybe Flashfire?) that the slope of the seats in the lower bowl is so shallow that it makes it nearly impossible to see if you are a shorter person. But the other thing, as Future Ed says, could be handled much better than they do. I wrote to Dave Rinetti about this a number of years ago — my seat was on the aisle and my view of the batter’s box was completely blocked every time someone stepped in the aisle. They tried for a game or three to hold people at the top of the walkway, but the ushers didn’t really have their hearts in it (due to a lack of reinforcement from higher up, I imagine), and Rinetti ultimately told me it wouldn’t work because there isn’t enough room on the walkway and because the people in the seats above the walkway complained that now THEY couldn’t see. I ended up moving my seat to the next section over and I am much happier, though the problem continues and the people on the aisle continue to complain about it, to no avail. Again, a structural issue that probably won’t be solved in the current ballpark, but I didn’t feel they really made a big effort to improve the situation.
Losing this team would be a huge failure for this city and an affront to Oakland’s great sports legacy.
my friend Dave who is a Giants season ticket holder
had similar concerns for his seats, which are not nearly as nice as yours, but at least in a similar view (albeit significantly higher up). He was told by the ticket agents that it was simply a matter of moving across the aisle.
And the last remnants memory destroys.
by Leopold Bloom on Nov 12, 2010 8:47 AM PST up reply actions
I'm a little concerned about this
“If that happens then you’ve got four or five years or maybe longer of nothing. We’re not going to do that. We want to be competitive every year, if we can be.”
There’s a fine line between competitive every year vs. perpetual mediocrity. Obviously I would prefer legitimately competitive but I would prefer a boom/bust cycle to perpetual mediocrity.
Depends what you mean by mediocrity.
If it’s ~76 wins year after year, I agree with you. If it’s ~86 wins year after year, that sounds good to me.
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; / Our meddling intellect
Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things:— / We murder to dissect.
Agreed.
"I wasn't able to extend so I had a serious lack of extension."--Dallas Braden
by StJosephBurningTheOakTreesToTheGround on Nov 11, 2010 8:11 AM PST up reply actions
Depends on that ~ spread
Since 2000, there have only been 13 playoff teams (out of 88) that have won under 90 games and only 4 with 86 or less. Winning 86 a year every year isn’t going to get you to the post season much.
that's more than one a year
which seems like pretty good odds
"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - dannycakes

by 




























