Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 7 Important Questions About The Heat Vs. Celtics Series

Beane's next move?



  So now it comes down to what will be Beane's next move?  So far the 2 biggest moves have been surprises.  The Coco Crisp signing and Duke resigning.   Most loyal AN readers did not see them coming.  So on the plus side we have Dallas in minor move and Coco in the big move.  Taylor, fox and miles in trades.  On the negative side we lost Cust, Cassila,Wallace, Shaw, and Crosby.  Tomko doesn't count since he is injured and just a fill in last year. 

  Two holes still to fill in a back up DH/1b and a thirdbaseman.  The signing of the cuban pitcher I doubt very much since the Angels, Yanks and redsox are all after him pushing the price to overpaying him.   Beltre could still come to the A's if his price is around $32 million for 4 years but it looks like the redsox are pushing hard now that Bay is off their books.  Cust could comeback since his value is dropping everyday. 

  My best guess is that Cust will resign at $3 million a year while the A's take a flyer on minor league contract with a remaining 3b major leaguer  that can't find a job in Feb.  The far dark horse move would be the A's sign the cuban pitcher after out bidding the top dogs.  Any other guesses?

Comment 184 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Agree Cust will likely re-sign.

And cheaper than the award he would have gotten in arbitration, making it a smart move all around. I don’t think the A’s will get Beltre, because Boston will outbid them.

I doubt there will be any other moves other than ones that involve shuffling of minor-league talent. The commitment to youth is very clear, and little is going to be done to stand in its way.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Jan 4, 2010 9:24 AM PST reply actions  

I was under the impression that Boston is out of the Beltre running

because Lowell wasn’t dealt.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 4, 2010 9:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Boston is never out of the running.

They can always revive that deal, and/or buy Beltre on spec.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Jan 4, 2010 9:42 AM PST up reply actions  

Yep.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Jan 4, 2010 6:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Boston was out

  but when Bay didn’t resign with them they went back after Beltre. Beltre price is dropping. Boras never likes his players going past the end of the year unless the money is not out there. With holliday they know that offer will be waiting but with Beltre there has been little bidding and Epsten is good at not driving up prices unlike the yanks.

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 9:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Mm?
Epsten is good at not driving up prices unlike the yanks

Dice-K and Lackey say hi.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Jan 4, 2010 11:23 AM PST up reply actions  

I'd seen a rumor that Lowell could still be moved closer to spring once he's healed

I wouldn’t consider Lowell a block to a potential Beltre signing for them at all. If they want Beltre over Lowell they’ll find a way to do it.

Last of the Ninth - Photography

by Flashfire on Jan 4, 2010 11:36 AM PST up reply actions  

agree

  He will hit well the first month in Pitt but after that it will be the same old Crosby.

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 9:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Beat me to it. Addition by subtraction.

What are we at the park for except to win? I'd trip my mother. I'd help her up, brusher her off, tell her I'm sorry. But mother don't make it to third. ~Leo Durocher

by UncleLeo on Jan 4, 2010 1:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Neither was I

But the Crisp signing was a total surprise.

MLB Trade rumors thinks that Beltre is choosing between the Sux and A’s. I’m not sure how much the Sux can offer without going over the luxury tax limit, or if that’s a serious concern for them.

Cust said a couple of weeks ago that he was planning to sign before the new year, but I haven’t seen any indication that he’s done so.

by OaklandSi on Jan 4, 2010 10:48 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

the Duke

  He was a surprise to me since he didn’t want arbitration and talked about being closer to his son. I guess the offers were not there and the A’s treated him first class.
  Beltre rumor is heating up but I would not be surprised if the Giants jump in on him.

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 11:03 AM PST up reply actions  

Would be a smarter move than signing LaRoche

Sandoval to 1B, Uribe to utility or displacing Rent-a-wreck (what SHOULD happen), and DeRosa to LF moving to 2B when Sanchez gets hurt/experiences sharp decline.

DeRosa made limited sense, but playing him in LF wouldn’t be bad.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Jan 4, 2010 11:24 AM PST up reply actions  

The A's offered Duke good money with lots of reachable incentives and they can not offer Arb after this year.

So it will be easier if Duke has a good year for him to sign with an east coast team next year.

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Jan 4, 2010 11:45 AM PST up reply actions  

They can offer him arby if he's a type B

Since he was out all of 2009, its unlikely he even reaches type A satus

by MagicMike23 on Jan 4, 2010 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

I read that the agreement is that they won't offer arb

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Jan 4, 2010 1:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I thought it was only if he's a Type A, but I could be mistaken.

What are we at the park for except to win? I'd trip my mother. I'd help her up, brusher her off, tell her I'm sorry. But mother don't make it to third. ~Leo Durocher

by UncleLeo on Jan 4, 2010 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

He's more likely to hit Type A if used as a reliever than as a starter

Another reason the FA compensation system is asinine and archaic. With how much the A’s pen will be used due to the youth of the staff, he’s more likely to hit type A.

And of course its easier for a top pitcher to post a low ERA as a reliever than as a starter.

But then, he doesn’t hit his incentives if he’s used as a reliever.

So a huge win-win for the A’s.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Jan 4, 2010 2:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Boston Herald says...

The Red Sox are not in on Beltre.

by jeffro on Jan 4, 2010 11:34 AM PST up reply actions  

you're too quick

I was about to link the Tweet

oh well, I might as well link it anyway…;-)

by OaklandSi on Jan 4, 2010 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

The Gray Fox deal was a surprise to me

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Jan 4, 2010 11:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, it was a shocker and made no sense

swapping Gray and the two fringe prospects for Fox makes sense, even with the money the A’s are taking on, but knowing Geren, he will find a way to play Miles. The money makes the deal a draw, but the objective is not to win deals.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Jan 4, 2010 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

But Crisp was completely asinine and confusing.

I’m fully expecting an OF trade, soon.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Jan 4, 2010 11:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Hairston to Braves?

  Braves are said to be looking for outfield help but what will the A’s get for Hairston?

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 11:46 AM PST up reply actions  

They didnt give up much though

They traded 2 prospects who was in the mid 20s-30 ranking range, at depth positions

by MagicMike23 on Jan 4, 2010 11:50 AM PST up reply actions  

I hope it's either Chapman for 5-6 years

or Beltre for 1-2 years. Or even Tejada for 1-2 years.

Zeigler to Geren…."A-Rod? He’s my bitch." -alox

by mrod on Jan 4, 2010 11:06 AM PST reply actions  

Im going crazy and hoping all 3

Belre and Chapman for baseball reasons, Miggy for selfish ones.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Jan 4, 2010 11:11 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

That beltre talks are heating up, nothing about Chapman recently

I’m assuming its one signing or the other. I still view chapman as a long shot

by MagicMike23 on Jan 4, 2010 11:51 AM PST reply actions  

another tweet

has Beltre choosing from three teams, one of which is Boston

by OaklandSi on Jan 4, 2010 11:55 AM PST reply actions  

So it looks like...

Best case scenario in 2010 for the A’s actually winning some games has a lineup something like:

Davis
Sweeney
Beltre
Cust
Barton
Suzuki
Ellis
Crisp
Pennington

with what should be a great bullpen, above average rotation, and an ok bench. That looks like maybe the best deffensive team in the league on paper, but almost certainly below average offense.

With that team, where do you guys think we finish? I’m not nearly the expert that some on this site are, but to me, it looks like if some things break right, that this team could 85 maybe 90 games.

by WhiteElephants on Jan 4, 2010 12:06 PM PST reply actions  

Also could be 75

THings break right 90, but that’s asking a lot of Crisp pennington, and davis. ALso Barton and Suzuki to a certain extent. BUt I would be happy with those players.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on Jan 4, 2010 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

.500

  To many things need to go right to be above .500 and only a few to be below.500. The starting pitching is the real question. Duke, Braden and Cahill needs to pitch above average for the team to be over .500. Anderson should improve but the others are bog question marks.

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Still looks like a team no one will want to watch.

At least until Taylor/Carter come up.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

I told Randolph that Bill Russell would tell him to keep that ball in play and start the break.

RANDOLPH: "I know. But sometimes, you gotta let ‘em know."

(MT)

by kenntoe on Jan 4, 2010 12:53 PM PST up reply actions  

only if the sole thing you're interested in watching is home runs

I’d be pretty excited about that side. At the very least, there would be a lot of very close games.

Which is fun, if not necessarily good for the heart muscles

I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does.

Goals on Film, coming to San Francisco in 2010

by bobnothing on Jan 4, 2010 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

It seems like maybe two years ago

Fans were complaining that all the A’s do is take walks and try to hit homeruns, that they need to run more, make more contact, etc. Now the team figures to have at least three base stealing threats in Pennington, Crisp and Davis, and fans are worried that it’ll be a boring team.

by Opus Youngblood on Jan 4, 2010 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Obviously

since we’re on this site we’d all watch and root for the A’s no matter what. But the Coliseum is still going to be devoid of people. Unless they start 20-5 I guess.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

I told Randolph that Bill Russell would tell him to keep that ball in play and start the break.

RANDOLPH: "I know. But sometimes, you gotta let ‘em know."

(MT)

by kenntoe on Jan 4, 2010 5:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Of course he is.

Pro sports is all about entertainment. He’s supposed to build a team to satisfy all our aesthetic needs.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 5, 2010 1:28 PM PST up reply actions  

... by winning.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Jan 5, 2010 2:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Fortunately for owners, that's not the only path.

Otherwise, 50% of all franchises would be doomed to failure.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 5, 2010 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

No. Just mine. ;-)

What are we at the park for except to win? I'd trip my mother. I'd help her up, brusher her off, tell her I'm sorry. But mother don't make it to third. ~Leo Durocher

by UncleLeo on Jan 5, 2010 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Instead of Cust

Does anyone see Sheffield, Vlad, Delgado or Thome signing for big bucks? I dont. Cust probably wont make as much as any of them but I’d like to see any of them at DH for us next year.

If Beltre falls through, what about Felipe Lopez to play 3B?

SIGN. ADRIAN. BELTRE. NOW.

by PL78 on Jan 4, 2010 1:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Cust is going to be better in 2010 than any of those guys mentioned

And he’ll be cheaper. It’d make a lot more sense to just resign him.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 5, 2010 8:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Hey, check your yahoo mail.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 5, 2010 8:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Cust served his purpose BUT...

I don’t think he’s a good fit for this team any more. I believe the A’s need to bring it with their running game if we want to improve our offense in 2010 and Cust might be great at getting on base but walks are less valuable when you’re team is stealing lots of bases (um, unless the base stealer is the one who walked… and Cust doesn’t fit that description!) I’d love to see us sign someone like Vladdy for the cleanup spot – less HRs than Cust but he’ll put the ball in play and still hits .300. (Or bring back JD?) We’d still need a 3-hitter unless Sweney really brings it with the doubles. But unless we sign Beltre AND a FA DH, I assume Sweeney will be our 3-hitter opening day. Either way the starting lineup will look different by the allstar game!

If we’re going to sink $20 mil in a player this offseason I hope its Chapman!!! But Beltre at 2-3 years still makes sense to me.

by dockellis on Jan 4, 2010 12:31 PM PST reply actions  

its the lsd

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on Jan 4, 2010 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

what LSD?


         please explain

Hey, I just bought the team from Lew Wolff... who wants to play third?

by emperor nobody on Jan 4, 2010 1:24 PM PST up reply actions  

That's what the subject line is for!

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 4, 2010 3:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Cue the end of Pink Floyd's "Interstellar Overdrive"

I am Ray Fosse's infatuations with Clay Wood and high-definition television.

by franks a lot on Jan 4, 2010 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

is that the floating sound?

why yes, it’s resounding around the icy waters underground.

"Sniff some krazy glue, and start a religion!"- The Reverend Billy Lard

by Gaijin_Suketto on Jan 4, 2010 5:17 PM PST up reply actions  

what Crosby stares at

before an at-bat?

100% Athletics, 100% Baseball. 2009 Athletics, 40% Baseball.

by fruitattack on Jan 4, 2010 3:38 PM PST up reply actions  

What Crosby thinks he's seeing as he swings during an at bat?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 4, 2010 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Cust actually stole one or two bases last year

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Jan 4, 2010 1:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't forget the infield singles!

never forget them…

I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does.

Goals on Film, coming to San Francisco in 2010

by bobnothing on Jan 4, 2010 2:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Cust bunting for hits...

was the high point of my 2009.

by DDroney on Jan 5, 2010 1:37 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

hey dock

Youre my fave!

SIGN. ADRIAN. BELTRE. NOW.

by PL78 on Jan 4, 2010 1:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Cust slightly out hit Vlad last season, is younger, much less injury prone and is going to be cheaper.

I can’t see any sense in non-tendering Cust only to go and sign a more expensive, older, injury prone DH.

by DeJay on Jan 5, 2010 1:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Beltre Beltre Beltre

The rumors are coming in pretty fast now. I would not be surprised to see Beltre sign in the next two days. And the rumors are all mentioning the A’s. Still, I’d say they aren’t the favorite. But one can hope.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Jan 4, 2010 12:36 PM PST reply actions  

Wonder how much yearly

I actually wouldn’t mind a 2 year contract, even if it was “overpaying” at say 2/20 or 2/22.

If Cardenas is ready for the big leagues in 2011, let him play 2B for a year and then take over third base after Beltre is gone.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 4, 2010 3:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Not happening

according to Ken Rosenthal’s tweet, which I don’t know how to link to.

by oblique on Jan 4, 2010 3:18 PM PST up reply actions  

here you go

link to both Rosenthal and Olney

for some reason I can’t access the original tweets…they both say the A’s gave it their best shot but are now out

by OaklandSi on Jan 4, 2010 3:52 PM PST up reply actions  

To White Elephant:

My point was not that Cust is too slow, but that he is not a contact hitter. Vlad doesn’t walk a ton but he doesn’t strikeout too much either. Anyway I think we might be able to get by without a real slugger until Taylor and Carter are ready, but only if we can run and hit for contact. Anyways I’m no Cust hater, I just don’t think he would be a good cleanup hitter for this particular A’s team. But holy shit do we need a cleanup hitter right now!!!

As far as Floyd’s Interstellar Overdrive goes, I’ve got Piper at the Gates on vinyl, 2nd pressing on Tower Records (rainbow label) … But I still like the A’s more. Ha!

Anyway that last post was my first! It’s nice to finally be part of the A’s Nation!

by dockellis on Jan 4, 2010 2:06 PM PST reply actions  

Ok I can see that...

And Cust will never be the player Vlad’s been throughout his career. It’s just that at this point my money’s on Cust being the better and cheaper player in 2010.

by WhiteElephants on Jan 4, 2010 6:33 PM PST up reply actions  

If Cust isnt a contact hitter

how does he hit those mammoth HRs?

Give me strickouts, walks and 30+ HR or give me death.

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 8:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Who's the guy that hits 30+ homers?

He isn’t Jack Cust, that’s for sure.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Jan 5, 2010 9:09 AM PST up reply actions  

What happens IF....

What happens if Chavez returns, and is actually able to play, and the A’s have already acquired another third baseman like Beltre. If Barton hits, moving Chavez to first may not be an easy option. Do we DH Chavez? Maybe thats why Cust is gone…well other than the money aspect.

by Mississippi A's Fan on Jan 4, 2010 2:21 PM PST reply actions  

Hm, also, I'm engaged to be married to Anne Hathaway and Zooey Bechamel

seriously, it’d be nice problem to have, but it’s so much not likely.

Still, buy a hat, you’re all invited to the nuptials

I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does.

Goals on Film, coming to San Francisco in 2010

by bobnothing on Jan 4, 2010 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm still confused by this "Bechamel" business.

Is it because she reminds you of lasagne?

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 4, 2010 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

It's because her legs look like cheese

that’s why she wears opaque tights all the time!

"Sniff some krazy glue, and start a religion!"- The Reverend Billy Lard

by Gaijin_Suketto on Jan 4, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Opaque tights are hot.

(Also means she doesn’t have to shave her legs.)

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 4, 2010 5:21 PM PST up reply actions  

they are hot... sweaty too...

but, unfortunately, she would have to shave her legs, because little spikey hairlets would stick out and possibly be caught by photographers in the bright lights.

"Sniff some krazy glue, and start a religion!"- The Reverend Billy Lard

by Gaijin_Suketto on Jan 4, 2010 5:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Stupid photographers.

Fuck ’em. Have spiky hairlets anyway.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 4, 2010 6:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Damn you for ruining my dream image!!!!!

What are we at the park for except to win? I'd trip my mother. I'd help her up, brusher her off, tell her I'm sorry. But mother don't make it to third. ~Leo Durocher

by UncleLeo on Jan 5, 2010 9:11 AM PST up reply actions  

its the lsd

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on Jan 4, 2010 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Trade someone (Chavez)?

It seems like an unlikely “problem.”

by Opus Youngblood on Jan 4, 2010 2:54 PM PST up reply actions  

every year

  what if Chavez. It is better to count him out than count him in.

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 2:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Counting him out

Counting him out seems to be way the A’s are progressing, but it could make for an interesting “problem” if he is able to play. Especially given Beane’s past favor of him.

by Mississippi A's Fan on Jan 4, 2010 2:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I've heard it said locally

that the Mariners could sign Beltre, move Figgins to 2B, and move Lopez to 1B.

Mind you, I don’t believe that. I think it’s just that fans have recent positive memories of Beltre so they’re going out of their way to imagine scenarios in which he’s not gone.

The scenario isn’t completely implausible, but I haven’t seen any evidence that it’s actually being pursued.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 4, 2010 3:22 PM PST reply actions  

blargh.

I sure hope grover is right and Cardenas is ready for a callup this year and Opening Day 2011.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 4, 2010 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

No Beltre

  So what is Beane’s back up plan??

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 4:02 PM PST reply actions  

McPhoxez

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 4, 2010 4:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm fine with McPhoxez as a back-up plan.

If we find a better deal elsewhere, great. If not, McPhoxez it is. I just don’t want to do something desperate and stupid just because we feel like we need a better 3B.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 4, 2010 5:23 PM PST up reply actions  

and I don't want young pitchers suffering through statues with gloves at the hot corner.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 4, 2010 5:45 PM PST up reply actions  

A trade would be my guess.

I’m really hoping Beane isn’t relying on Chavez/McPherson to stay healthy, or Fox being adequate at 3B. We need someone who can field the position well with out young, groundball inducing pitching staff. Maybe Beane re-visits trade talks for Callaspo, or has another target in mind.

by JPShark on Jan 4, 2010 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Uggla?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 4, 2010 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Uggla

is already a horrible defender … at 2B!

by TBRMKane on Jan 4, 2010 4:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Correct -- but may be better suited to 3B (and maybe always have been)

Or not. He doesn’t have the greatest hands, though range would be less of an issue at 3B.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 4, 2010 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think Uggla wants to move to 3B, nor do I think he could play it adequately.

Like JPShark said, I would like to see Beane revisit the Callaspo situation.

Or, better yet, find out what the Orioles asking price is for Josh Bell. Seeing as their bullpen sucks (even after the Gonzalez signing) and they’re 1B situation is about as grim, I wonder how much it would take to pry Bell out of Baltimore.

by Opus Youngblood on Jan 4, 2010 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I like Callaspo a lot.

He’s kind of what Cardenas will be if he succeeds.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 4, 2010 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I doubt

the O’s will trade Bell

by TBRMKane on Jan 4, 2010 4:46 PM PST up reply actions  

a year away still

  Bell isn’t being counted on by the O’s to make the team.

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 5:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Hasn't Bell

played primarily catcher and die in the 90’s?

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on Jan 4, 2010 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

He died so quick

he reincarnated before his old body was even cold.

"Sniff some krazy glue, and start a religion!"- The Reverend Billy Lard

by Gaijin_Suketto on Jan 4, 2010 5:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Andy LaRoche?

What do the Pirates need, besides a total team overhaul? Pitching, probably, and middle infielders? We have both – send them Mazzaro and Petit + a reliever like Storey for LaRoche and a scrub or two.

by oakballnack on Jan 6, 2010 11:26 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't want to give up Mazzaro for LaRoche.

Am I wrong?

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 7, 2010 12:13 AM PST up reply actions  

If I'm not mistaken, it'd be 5 years of Vin for 5 years of Andy.

Andy was a 2.5 WAR player last year. I’d do it. But then again, I’m not as high on Mazzaro as a lot of people are, I guess.

Falling from grace, cause I've been away too long
Leaving you behind with my lonesome song
Now I'm lost in oblivion.

by danmerqury on Jan 7, 2010 1:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Id do that in a nanosecond Mazzaro is completely expendible here’s why:

A) Our current best option at 3B is Dallas McPherson. LaRoche is a massive upgrade.

B) Eveland, Outman, Mortensen, Ynoa, Leon, Ross, FDLS, Capra, Simmons, Hornbeck, Figeroa all dont really have a place reserved in the rotation. Braden/Anderson/Gio are seemingly locks for the next 4 years, plus you never know about Beane and trades/FAs. You have to assume at least one of those 12 will either match/outpitch Mazzaro or at least be a league average SP.

by PL78 on Jan 7, 2010 9:30 AM PST up reply actions  

One can never have enough pitching

Pitchers get injured and flame out at a rate that I would not be surprised if all the depth you list isn’t enough to fill the rotation with league average or better.

Then again, Mazzaro could be one of the pitchers who gets injured or flames out. I would probably think long and hard about trading him for LaRoche.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Jan 7, 2010 10:30 AM PST up reply actions  

so youd rather have a copy of the december 1967 issue of Playboy

sitting on 3B?

I’d rather have an actual player who is young and can play excellent defense and hit okay. You’d rather a guy with an iffy ceiling that he might not reach?

In my opinion, youre crazy if you dont do Mazzaro for LaRoche.

by PL78 on Jan 7, 2010 11:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Lynn Winchell

RAWR

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 7, 2010 11:47 AM PST up reply actions  

In the end I probably do it

But if it weren’t for September, LaRoche might be FAT right now. LaRoche’s season line was terrible until the last month. And he’s 26. Hopefully he’s turned a corner and the A’s can get him. But I would not be totally surprised if he ends up released or a bench player by the end of 2010.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Jan 7, 2010 12:01 PM PST up reply actions  

"LaRoche’s season line was terrible until the last month"?

Try replacing “season line” with “career.”

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 7, 2010 5:00 PM PST up reply actions  

career?

all 261 games??? The guy hasn’t even played two complete seasons. Miguel Tejada’s line after his first 260 games didn’t look so hot either. I think it’s a bit early to pass judgement on a guy who hit .300 with nearly 100 bombs over 5 seasons in the minors and only just turned 26 in September.

As for Mazzaro – I’m with the above group that feels he’s expendable. Count me as one who’s always felt Mazzaro was a bit overated.

by oakballnack on Jan 8, 2010 12:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Gammons on beltre

“Beltre 1 yr. Deal for $9m with player option for $5m. Physical coming.”

I think its obvious he didnt want to come here and dont blame him

by MagicMike23 on Jan 4, 2010 4:52 PM PST reply actions  

It is the park

  Beltre probably thinks he can hit more homeruns in fenway and increase his deal for next year.

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

agreed, the only thing that seems obvious

is that Beltre thinks he can improve his offensive numbers playing in that little park with the Green Monster almost in touching distance for right handed hitters, and that would help him get a better contract next year. He probably didn’t get many offers over concerns about his offense.

by OaklandSi on Jan 4, 2010 5:00 PM PST up reply actions  

A frontloaded contract

NO WAY.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 4, 2010 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

player option

  Is security incase of a bad injury but rarely ever used.

by Arcman on Jan 4, 2010 5:12 PM PST up reply actions  

To tell you the truth, I think this might be a blessing in disguise for the A's

If Beltre really didn’t want to come to Oakland, even though there may have been more money on the table for him so be it. Let’s hope Billy has another backup plan working here, and perhaps pull off a trade or just sit tight with what is in house. Chapman might be his true target if he feels like this year is not a true contending year for the A’s.

Zeigler to Geren…."A-Rod? He’s my bitch." -alox

by mrod on Jan 4, 2010 9:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Apparently player options count toward the salary cap,

and years are averaged. So it’s a clever way for Boston to trim $2 million off their total salary in terms of reaching the luxury tax threshold.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 5, 2010 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I would like Chapman, but that't it

I would not want to see Oakland give Cust another contract, or Tejada, they both would be a waste of money. I would like to see us get something for SS though, I think Pennington will be horrible. I would like to see what Carter and Taylor can do also.

by Dohman on Jan 4, 2010 6:38 PM PST reply actions  

Pete Gammons mentioned us on twitter today:

“The gathering storm between large/small revenues: Oakland offeried 3 yrs. to Scutaro and Beltre and they sign for 2 + 1 w/ Boston”

INTERESTING…

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 8:17 AM PST reply actions  

Wonder what the dollar amounts were.

Normall the Players Union would push toward the longer term higher $$ deal.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 5, 2010 8:20 AM PST up reply actions  

not that hard to understand

Scutaro is in his mid-30’s. He said he wanted to play for a contender, and I’m sure he meant a team that expected to contend in 2010.

Beltre needs to improve his offensive stats in 2010 in order to cash in on a better contract. He wasn’t offered all that much this time around. I’m guessing that the A’s offer was less than $10 million per year, and would have tied him down for several years. This way he gets $10 million guaranteed for 2010, plus can opt to be a FA in 2011 he wants.

by OaklandSi on Jan 5, 2010 8:25 AM PST reply actions  

so true

  Beltre plays more for the money than the team. A good example how he took more money to play with the Ms than the dodgers who were a little less in what they offered. This year Beltre did not want a multi year contract instead wanted a park to improve his stats and getting the bigger deal next year. With bonous it could push it more closer to $11 million and has a sfaety net with a player option in case he get hurts.

by Arcman on Jan 5, 2010 8:37 AM PST up reply actions  

It would be ironic if he suffered a nagging season-killing injury in May and his market value tanked next off-season because of it.

What are we at the park for except to win? I'd trip my mother. I'd help her up, brusher her off, tell her I'm sorry. But mother don't make it to third. ~Leo Durocher

by UncleLeo on Jan 5, 2010 9:16 AM PST up reply actions  

but he TURNED DOWN more money to play for us

In these economic climes, that’s an extraordinarily risky move. To me it looks like he wants to play for a WS contender in 2010, which Boston is and we arent.

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 9:32 AM PST up reply actions  

*play for them not us

Beane offered him 27-33 million, he took 9 million. Thats hardly “playing for himself”

Where the flying fuck did Beltre get such a shitty reputation? Straight up lies being told in these posts…

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 9:34 AM PST up reply actions  

So barring injury

if his next contract is 3/17-23 its a wash. he will still get his money. (less commission, of course.)

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on Jan 5, 2010 11:46 AM PST up reply actions  

nothing wrong with playing for money

  Some players play for the money not for a ring and nothing is wrong with that. Some players sign for the opportunity and others sign for a ring. If you are a player that is looking at his last big pay day you would sign for the money not a ring or the other hand if you are a old player that have a offer for to a playoff team or a non-contender with a million more most likely for the payoff team.
  In Beltre’s case he signed a contract with a safety net in case of injury which he would make about the same amount a year if he signed a 3 year deal. It is a small gamble. I have no problem with a player playing for the most money as long as they don’t give me the crap I always wanted to play there. Its a business more than a sport.

by Arcman on Jan 5, 2010 12:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Its like if all of a sudden you could make millions by doing something youre not that into

Even if Beltre found computer programming to be his favorite thing on earth, he’d still be insane to not do what pays irrationally large amounts of money for. Its like “oh damn, Im good at baseball…whatever am I to do?” You do what you can on this earth to either:

A) make you happy
or
B) make you money

Thats all there is to it.

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 12:41 PM PST up reply actions  

money is the factor

  Most players go for the money and why not when your major income for your whole life comes down to a 5 year window. Tejada signed with the O’s because of the money and you can’t blame him for that. It was a great move by him. Consider what he will get this time around. Beltre has a good deal with the redsox in that he will be a FA next year and a safety net in case of injury. Very little gamble unless he has a major injury.

by Arcman on Jan 5, 2010 1:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, no way Tejada could have survived on the 11.6 million the A's paid him over his career.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 5, 2010 1:13 PM PST up reply actions  

50 million +

  Is much better than 11 million

by Arcman on Jan 5, 2010 1:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Point being

You’re going from “enough money for a lifetime” to “stupid money for several lifetimes”

It’s not like these guys are scraping by and NEED that extra few million dollars.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 5, 2010 1:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Depends

Pro atheletes go broke fairly regularly (stupid decisions+getting scammed+expensive lifestyle).

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Jan 5, 2010 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

That says more about how dumb they are with money management than anything.

I’m pretty sure you could walk up to any random ANer and give them a few million bucks and they’d be pretty well set for life.

or they’d do 2 chicks at once. Either or.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 5, 2010 2:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Sure

But whatever the reason it goes directly to your “who cares about an extra $40M?” question. One answer would be “people who are dumb with money management”

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Jan 5, 2010 3:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Sure, with some people it doesn't matter how much money they have.

But again that’s a reflection on them, in which case the extra 40M probably won’t matter anyway.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 5, 2010 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

That doesn't follow

It’s easy to imagine a lifestyle that won’t run for 50 years on 11 million but will on 50 million.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Jan 5, 2010 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

When I saw Dave Chappelle in early 09

someone asked him (it was a Q&A type show, no set material) what was it like to walk away from $50MM and he said “well, i’ll be real with you, when I did that, I already had $10MM in the bank so its not like I was broke or anything….but let me tell you, every night when I go to sleep theres a $50MM hole located right about here” /points to stomach.

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 8:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Really

Even if you lost 50% of that to taxes, you’d have 5.5 million.

If you did nothing but put that into a savings account at 2% you’re talking about living off over 100K per year without even touching the original money. If you can’t live off that, you’re doing it wrong.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 5, 2010 8:41 PM PST up reply actions  

I have

a Faberge egg addiction though

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on Jan 5, 2010 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

100K doesn't buy a lot of house

Just as an easy example. Especially in SF. 100K 50 years from now is almost certainly a low-end salary.

Look, if your point is that $10M is a nice thing to have I agree. If your point is there is no material difference between retiring with $10M and $50M (when you’re still young) I just don’t see how you get there. Platitudes about “doing it wrong” notwithstanding.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Jan 5, 2010 10:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Because basically anybody with a reasonable amount of intelligence

would be able to make that much money last the rest of their life.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t think I’m going to make 5.5 million dollars in my life.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 5, 2010 10:31 PM PST up reply actions  

not counting

  The people living off them. Look at hammer who had about 30 people living off his wealth and that went so fast. take 50 million then take the agent % and then tax % now half is gone before you get it.

by Arcman on Jan 5, 2010 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Leaving you with a mere $25 million!

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 5, 2010 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Man, how can you get by on 25M!?!?!

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Jan 5, 2010 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

except AB, AAB, BBA, and ABBA

I heart ABBA. I’m glad they made the Rock’N’Roll Hall Of Fame, even though they didn’t really rock all that hard.

"Sniff some krazy glue, and start a religion!"- The Reverend Billy Lard

by Gaijin_Suketto on Jan 5, 2010 1:08 PM PST up reply actions  

well now Gammons said he turned down a pair of 3/24 offers

That makes more sense, and keeps the players union from interfering. He did take a lesser year higher money offer to play for Boston.

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 9:35 AM PST reply actions  

apparently the early offer was 3 years/$24 million from the Phillies

but at that time Boras’ opening figure was four years/$40 million.

…and the later A’s offer was the same, according to Rosenthal.

This is a gamble that Beltre will rack up better offensive numbers in 2009 and try again in 2011 for a big contract.

by OaklandSi on Jan 5, 2010 9:57 AM PST up reply actions  

He will rebound

unless he get a new injury. Book it.

"The ego, the super-ego, and the Ed" - danmerqury

by Future Ed on Jan 5, 2010 11:47 AM PST up reply actions  

I haaaate to bring this up, but

as of right this second, this is our starting lineup:

1B: D. Barton
2B: M. Ellis
SS: C. Pennington
3B: D. McPherson
C: K. Suzuki
LF: R. Davis
CF: C. Crisp
RF: R. Sweeney
DH: J. Fox

I think I just threw up in my mouth a little. Like, the BEST case scenario is we get 90 HR from this crew, ugh.

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 10:13 AM PST reply actions  

Don't haha forget haha about haha Chavez haha

He’s feeling great as of now. And the NOW I speak of is limited to everyday activities and nothing remotely baseball related.

I am Ray Fosse's infatuations with Clay Wood and high-definition television.

by franks a lot on Jan 5, 2010 10:34 AM PST up reply actions  

O course he's feeling great

That $12MM check just cleared and he realized no one at all expects him to play more than 10 games this year. $12 milli for a weeks “work” playing a game? I’d feel SPECTACULAR!

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

90?

  Isn’t that a little high for this group? Beane is having nightmares over this lineup so I expect a trade coming since no free agent wants to play here.

by Arcman on Jan 5, 2010 12:31 PM PST up reply actions  

I said best case scenario

meaning barton, suzuki, ellis, fox, mcpherson and crisp all hit 15.

Could happen….still outright misery, offensively speaking.

by PL78 on Jan 5, 2010 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Predictions

My predictions are both Cust and Kennedy resign. Cust will only be a DH, since we now have a swarm of outfielders available. Kennedy will come in and play 50% of the time at 3rd sharing with Chavez, until, lets face it Chavez gets injured again or just sucks so bad he gets benched. Im sure Ellis will get most of the playing time at 2B. He is paid to much to be benched and he still has solid defensive skills. That leaves SS and 1B open.

I think that Beane will make one more big deal. He will trade Buck and/or get himself another SS/3B candidate. If it’s a solid 3B man, then Kennedy will move to SS and switch off turns with Aaron Miles. If Beane picks up a solid SS, then he’ll play SS most of the time. If it is a whatever IF man, then he’ll probably switch off with Miles. I’m sure sometimes Jake Fox will get some action on the left side of the infield also along with Cardenas, McPherson, and Weeks if they make the team after Spring Training. Then of course there is Pennigton and Petit, but I don’t see them as starting much.

Now to 1B, we still have Barton. For some reason Beane has a lot of faith in this guy and I’m sure he is thinking of starting him at 1B. Depending on how that goes, Carter may step in as the 1B man at some point along with Everidge.

Sorry if it got confusing. Basically the entire infield is pretty much up for grabs, unless Beane signs a very solid player that he will for sure start at some position. It seems though he is going to try his very best to start Chavez and Ellis at their positions, as long as everyone is healthy.

by Mikey6rocker on Jan 6, 2010 2:39 AM PST reply actions  

There's not many people

I like at SS less than Pennington. Aaron Miles and Adam Kennedy, however, both grace the list.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Jan 7, 2010 12:44 AM PST up reply actions  

be happy you were right about cust because pretty much none of the rest of that is happening

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05

by xbhaskarx on Jan 7, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions  

2010 starting lineup

If Beane doesnt do anymore transactions, this is my predictions for opening day lineup:

P: Duke
C: Suzuki
1B: Barton
2B: Ellis
SS: Kennedy
3B: Chavez
LF: Davis
CF: Crisp
RF: Sweeney
DH: Cust

Then of course we have these boys in reserve, and as we all know the most surprising A’s seem to come off the bench.
Bench:

Patterson
Miles
Carter
Galarraga
Hairston
Carson
Taylor

by Mikey6rocker on Jan 6, 2010 3:20 AM PST reply actions  

so how many pitchers make the team?

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05

by xbhaskarx on Jan 7, 2010 3:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Sorry, I had a couple too many position players. Normally Beane’s roster looks like this on opening day: C-2 IF-6 OF-5 P-12. So 12 pitchers and 13 position players.

by Mikey6rocker on Jan 8, 2010 1:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Urban says we are kicking tires on Andy LaRoche and Kouzmanoff as well as Cust

YES! Finally some interesting moves. Either of those 3B and Cust would be nice pickups.

C: Suzuki
1B: Barton
2B: Ellis
SS: Pennington
3B: Kouzmanoff or LaRoche
LF: Davis
CF: Crisp
RF: Sweeney
DH: Cust

Me likey, its no Beltre+a HOFer DH but its galaxies better than our current situation.

by PL78 on Jan 6, 2010 2:27 PM PST reply actions  

I'd trade Eveland to the Dodgers for Hu

Then put Hu at SS and make Pennington the utility guy and cut Miles. Of course Colletti would have to cooperate, but the Dodgers need starters and Hu is redundant to Furcal.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Jan 7, 2010 8:45 AM PST reply actions  

Hu hits as well as Petit though

He makes Pennington look like A-Rod. Terrible fit on an offensively-challenged team like us.

by PL78 on Jan 7, 2010 9:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Not really. CHONE projects him as slightly worse than Pennington and better than Jack

Wilson. So he makes Pennington look like maybe Kurt Suzuki.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Jan 7, 2010 10:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Problem is, he needs to be better than Pennington to be worthwhile

Because Pennington is actually a plus defender (people somehow forget this).

I’d have no problem with Hu if he could gaurantee a 750 OPS with plusplus defense.

I’d rather have Pennington at 750 OPS with plus defense than Hu at 625 OPS with plusplus defense.

by PL78 on Jan 7, 2010 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

People forget this

because the numbers don’t necessarily support Pennington’s plus defense. UZR doesn’t like him even if his TZ numbers are good. I don’t see much reason to believe that Pennington is much better than average, if better at all.

And I still see huge downside with Pennington’s bat. Hu seems kind of like a Pennington-clone to me though.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Jan 7, 2010 12:09 PM PST up reply actions  

That would be good

we just better hope Colletti has never seen Eveland pitch.

by Trainman on Jan 7, 2010 9:56 AM PST up reply actions  

I want to see Eveland pitch to Hu

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Jan 7, 2010 10:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Beane's next move turns out to be a callback

Cust is back in the fold for $2.5 mil, according to Ms. Slusser.

by Spass30 on Jan 7, 2010 11:36 AM PST reply actions  

uh

I believe that’s “Mrs.”

by oakballnack on Jan 8, 2010 12:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A's relocation option from a legal expert on the issue
Oakland_athletics_team_logo_photofile_small
Prospects 1Q Report

Recent FanPosts

Small
GOG 2012 #18: The Twins have a shiny new park, and not much else
Small
Gotta Be Their Pitching
Hardly-boys_small
Minor League notes on Major League Day Off
Small
Cespedes Upate?
Small
The SF Warriors, the LA Raiders and the Oakland A's
Photo__11__small
COG #17 - Yankees vs. Athletics or Spank me! Spank me!
100_1536_small
What to do? What to do?
Small
Fans Should Buy the A's
Reg3_small
Tom Milone's Nickname

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Sb_nation1_small ahhall

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late