Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeff Sullivan's MLB Trade Deadline Primer

Why Billy Beane Has Had Not A Good -- But A Great -- Off-Season

UPDATE, 5:25pm PST. According to Jane Lee, the A's have signed OF Gabe Gross to a 1-year deal worth $750,000 plus incentives that could bring the total deal up to $1,000,000.

Food_medium


I try to call 'em as I see 'em, which sometimes puts me in the position of criticizing the One In Whom We Trust. Today, I offer one of those articles I hope Mr. Beane should happen to see -- because I have only good things to say, and I have a lot of them.

Star-divide

Process, Not Just Outcome
First of all, I think Beane has to get due credit for the players whom he gave "the ol' college try" to add, and that means acknowledging that he made truly competitive, multi-year offers to Marco Scutaro and Adrian Beltre, before saying "Well you can't make them sign" and using that money to add more pitching (Justin Duchscherer, Ben Sheets) when that's what was out there. This is the off-season where Beane finally made repeated efforts to improve the left side of the infield, not just for 2010 but for several seasons. Even though in the end only Kouzmanoff was added, when you go "all out" for Scutaro, then Beltre, then Kouzmanoff, all as 3-year solutions, you've addressed the left side of the infield for real.

Fixing Mistakes
Meanwhile, most of the moves Beane has made have solved multiple problems at once. For example, while giving the A's a chance to trot out an excellent starting rotation in 2010, he has also pulled a Kendall/Rhodes and offered the club an opportunity to get back the lost year of service time from Trevor Cahill. If keeping Cahill in the big league rotation all last season was a mistake, the some of the mistake is being undone. In other words, don't think of it so much as having lost a Carlos Gonzalez as having gained a Michael Taylor.

Duke & Sheets
Honestly, I never thought I'd see Justin Duchscherer throw another pitch for the A's. His return is a tribute not only to Beane's wisdom in recognizing a damn good pitcher when he sees one, but also to his management skills in knowing that sometimes you "pay it forward" when you treat players as people first and prioritize "baseball," "business," and "life" in the correct order.

I have, in the past, been known to criticize Beane for treating players as "commodities" or acting too "corporate" in one way or another, and I don't know whether he has changed or whether my perspective has changed, but I have seen many examples recently of exactly the opposite. It has made me proud and it has made the A's a better baseball team.

I think the Sheets signing is brilliant. Starting pitching wins games, and nowadays you seem to need at least 8 good starting pitchers just to field one good rotation for a year. The A's might actually have that. If you're going to roll the dice, you may as well do it on the health of starting pitchers who are really, really good when they can pitch, and the A's found a way to add not one but two of those.

Giving Me "All I Can Ask For"
Especially during a rebuilding process, all I feel I can really ask for is a team that could be a contender if things roll right. That's not mutually exclusive from a team that could lose 90 games -- injuries and the development of young talent can quickly turn a team from better than average to "wait'll next year." Let's not get carried away: The A's outfield could combine to hit 15 HRs and that's not a good thing. But I also don't have to squint too hard to see how the A's could surprise, if health and development roll their way.

The starting rotation, with Brett Anderson as the #3 starter, could be as good, top to bottom, as any in the league. The bullpen could be, and probably will be, one of the very best in all of baseball. Defense will be a strength. Daric Barton and Ryan Sweeney have the tools, and are young enough, that a jump in offensive production in 2010, following a "2009 to build on" is quite possible.

As for depth, currently Jack Cust is backed up by Jake Fox, Rajai Davis and Coco Crisp by each other, Gio Gonzalez by Vin Mazzaro by Trevor Cahill -- heck, even Kouzmanoff by the tattered remnants of what archeologists believe were an Eric Chavez and a Dallas McPherson.

And all this is without even mentioning 3 potentially exciting hitters who are on the way sooner rather than later. Is this a good team? Don't know yet. Is it a bad one? Not really. Is it a great time to be an A's fan? I think so.

Speaking of great, armed with Cindi's "Omigod This Is Sooooooo Much Better Than Shari's!!!!" Potato Salad, I'm off to fANfest to ransack Optimist Prime's place when he isn't looking have a fun time with my fellow fans. Catch you later!

0 recs  |  Comment 114 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I've enjoyed this off season too

Taylor rocks my world to be honest, in a way that Wallace didn’t.

That’s what she said

Is this the real life-
Is this just fantasy-
Caught in a landslide-
No escape from reality-

by Daniel777 on Jan 31, 2010 7:17 AM PST reply actions  

I like what Beane has done too...

I think the off season has been very productive. My favorite move was the Kouzmanoff trade. I think both Kouzmanoff and Sogard will each give the A’s more than Hairston or Cunningham.

by Bay Area Sports Fan on Jan 31, 2010 8:18 AM PST reply actions  

Great article

I just wish bb will finish up this off season with picking up a real option at the utility INF role, and put all rumors about Jonny “capt. Caveman” Damon to rest, by breaking his code of silence and easing our minds.
Can we get a cherry on top?

When its time to shoot, shoot... don't talk

by Charlie O the Mule on Jan 31, 2010 8:33 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Duke & Sheets

I never thought Duchscherer would resign, so that was a surprise. I got about 14 fist pumps out of that one. Then Ben Sheets, the guy rumored to go to every team but the A’s over the last couple months. I was looking to dish out a couple chest bumps for that signing, but found no takers.

Without these two, the A’s are easily the worst team in the AL West. Now Beane has added a 1 and a 2, who are essentially replacing the 4 and the 5, which improves their chances to win 40% of their games by 60%.

by Thefirstletterofthealphabet on Jan 31, 2010 8:40 AM PST reply actions  

That's 100%!

The A’s shall go undefeated!!!

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 31, 2010 8:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Easily

After updating my MLB ’09: The Show rosters with the moves and what not, I did an 8-0 crushing of the Marlins. They owe me Hanley Ramirez and that makes our roster complete. By the way, I hit a two-run home run with Kevin Kouzmanoff!

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jan 31, 2010 9:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Ben Sheets was totally rumored to go to the A's...

That signing was not a bolt from the blue.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 31, 2010 11:11 AM PST up reply actions  

Maybe on AN

I don’t recall reading a Sheets to the A’s rumor on a slightly less biased website until two days before he signed.

by Thefirstletterofthealphabet on Jan 31, 2010 11:44 AM PST up reply actions  

14 fist pumps like champs yo

"-i never said half the things i said." --Yogi Berra

by Ovale Fan on Jan 31, 2010 1:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I lol'd.

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Jan 31, 2010 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes.

Andy Lee for MVP! Hey, that rhymes...

by Ramah71 on Feb 8, 2010 5:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh my eyes.

I can smell the axe from here…

by brian.only on Jan 31, 2010 2:23 PM PST up reply actions  

It must take hours...

to perfect the “we just stepped on a landmine” cut.

"-i never said half the things i said." --Yogi Berra

by Ovale Fan on Jan 31, 2010 2:26 PM PST up reply actions  

What the hell are those things???

"To tell the truth, I'm not excited to go to Cleveland, but we have to. If I ever saw myself saying I'm excited going to Cleveland, I'd punch myself in the face, because I'm lying" - Ichiro

by Philip Christy on Feb 1, 2010 12:49 PM PST up reply actions  

gremlins.

don’t feed em after midnight, don’t get em wet, don’t give em Axe body spray.

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Feb 1, 2010 5:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh no.

I know what you’re trying to do, Nico. You’re trying to get me excited (about the upcoming season…duh). It’s not going to work. I’ve been bitten in places where no man should be bitten. I’ve fallen in love with this team in July too many times, and it’s NOT going to happen again!

Wait, this isn’t the Raider site?

Oh.

Never mind.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on Jan 31, 2010 8:51 AM PST reply actions  

Let's. Go. OAKLAND!

Oakland A's, Oakland Haze, Nothin' Beats Livin' By Your Oakland Bays

by DyeLongJustice on Jan 31, 2010 11:50 AM PST up reply actions  

clap, clap, clapclapclap?

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Jan 31, 2010 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Can we please bring back the classic

LETS GO A’S LETS GO A’S LETS GO A’S LETS GO A’S

Please!!!

I'll have a sandwich and a draft(sic). - Bill King (RIP)

by BleedGreen on Jan 31, 2010 10:38 PM PST up reply actions  

does it mean we have to get rid of the let

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Feb 1, 2010 5:45 PM PST up reply actions  

's go oakland chant?

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Feb 1, 2010 5:45 PM PST up reply actions  

agree about Beane rectifying mistakes

such as not adding a veteran starter last offseason, and also not addressing the third base issue earlier.

The Kouzmanoff trade was necessary, and he did it without giving up the bank. The Sheets signing was terrific. I’d rather have Sheets – a top of the rotation starter who has had proven success – and hope he stays healthy (and get Alejo to work out a program designed to keep him healthy), than a pitcher with a healthier history who is not as good.

I too am glad that Duchscherer was signed, but I still think he must be considered an injury risk as that is his major league history, particularly as a starter.

by OaklandSi on Jan 31, 2010 10:12 AM PST reply actions  

I won't rehash this, but "without giving up the bank" is a phrase that continues to irk be with regards to that trade

But, again, I just see Cunningham as a special player and I don’t think Kouzmanoff plays 3 seasons in Oakland. Still, I like Beane’s offseason overall, I guess. The Fox trade was fairly pointless if he planned on re-signing Cust all along, but he didn’t really give up anything. I just hope Aaron Miles doesn’t receive a single at bat that matters.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 31, 2010 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Soon you will be the only remaining holdout.

It’s been interesting to watch the community’s opinions of Cunningham and Sogard evolve in opposite directions over the past few weeks, as the endowment effect wanes for the one and waxes for the other. How long before people start saying they wouldn’t give up Sogard for Cunningham straight up?

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

I honestly never saw Cunningham

As anything more than a 4th outfielder, maybe here and there starter, maybe full time starter for a year or two at best, on a bad team kind of player.

I mean really. What is it people really liked about the guy other than “grit?” (I agree with PT’s hate – sorry for words in the mouth if i’m wrong on this – for the transparent, STILL, usage by white announcers, pundits and fans of grit onto mostly white players.)

Cunningham had some pretty good minor league seasons, but they weren’t off the charts good and that usually portends OK at best. He doesn’t have the size to be a slugger, isn’t really a CF, and well, he seems THE definition of 4th OF.

Deswho?

by supersugarCrisp on Jan 31, 2010 1:48 PM PST up reply actions  

It has NOTHING to do with grit. I actually never considered him a gritty player.

It’s his near .900 OPS in AAA that makes me think the A’s made a huge mistake here.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 31, 2010 3:29 PM PST up reply actions  

JD's Cunningham love is genuine.

For the rest of us it’s probably 90% endowment effect, which is why it’s so fun to watch it shift over to Sogard now.

(Also, he was Tintin. But then Sogard is Ikea, so I guess that’s a wash.)

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Beane continues to impress, given his constraints.

Kouzmanoff shores up the left side for the moment. I think he’s relying on developing the proverbial “power threat” from within the existing organization, but I also believe he has little choice in the matter. Our rotation looks down right formidable on paper. I think it’s reasonable to expect a couple of the young starters to sharpen their game this season. The pen will be lights out. A couple of decent breaks and things could very well go our way. What more can you expect out of our GM? He’s given us a legitimate reason to be optimistic about the season.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Jan 31, 2010 10:55 AM PST reply actions  

Bullpen pitching is the least consistent from year to year.

That is, the correlation of how good a guy was last year and how good he’ll be this year is weaker for relievers than for any other position. The A’s have profited from this past by selling off “good” relief pitchers and grabbing up “bad” relief pitchers on the cheap.

But another consequence of this fact is that we’re assuming too much when we credit our bullpen for being better than any other team’s. Yes, it is. Sort of. But it’s not at all unlikely that one or two or our “lights-out” relievers will turn into junk while on some other team some guy picked up off the scrapheap turns out to be a star. It happens all the time. Heck, we saw both on the A’s just last year.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 1:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Eh

Bullpen pitchers whose peripherals actually support their performance are pretty consistent. No one thinks Mariano Rivera is suddenly going to turn into a pumpkin next season.

Except for Breslow, all the A’s bullpen pitchers have peripherals that back up their performance. This is not a 2005-Neil-Cotts scenario here.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 31, 2010 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I didn't realize that. Good to know.

I still don’t feel as confident in our bullpen as many people here seem to be. I just don’t think any bullpen is ever anything close to a sure thing.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I think the depth is what's different

One guy will get hurt and one will disappoint — yet the pen will still be outstanding.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 31, 2010 5:50 PM PST up reply actions  

fANfest

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"When you go to a club at 4 in the morning, and you’re just waiting, waiting, a 600-pounder looks like J. Lo. And to me this is Jennifer Lopez right here. It’s 4 in the morning. Too much to drink. So, Nationals: Jennifer Lopez to me." - Julián Tavárez

by YonYonson on Jan 31, 2010 10:57 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

where's that at?

"They (The 1989 A's) are the best team I ever saw"- Mike Krukow

by 9Custs on Jan 31, 2010 11:09 AM PST up reply actions  

OMG the battle plans

Now I propose we use that and march south, cut off those guys across the bay and also take the AL West.

100% Athletics, 100% Baseball. 2009 Athletics, 40% Baseball.

by fruitattack on Jan 31, 2010 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

A's added hitting by trading away their hitting.

Look at the giants for example, they have offensive issues. Yet Sabean is so dead set on not trading away their pitching depth, which has limited their potential trades. The A’s kept their pitching core in tact and continued to add to it by signing Duke and Sheets. The only pitcher traded away this offseason was Jeff Gray and it remains to be seen if he’s anything more than a middle reliever. Who wouldve been headed back to AAA with the bullpen depth.

by MagicMike23 on Jan 31, 2010 11:38 AM PST reply actions  

Overall, I'm pleased with what Beane has done this off-season.

I think he’s been able to strike a good balance between trading FOR this season while not losing too much… if anything… from the future.

What are we at the park for except to win? I'd trip my mother. I'd help her up, brusher her off, tell her I'm sorry. But mother don't make it to third. ~Leo Durocher

by UncleLeo on Jan 31, 2010 12:44 PM PST reply actions  

Well put.

We started this offseason with a very impressive future, looking to come together around 2011 or 2012, but the current team sucked. Now the current team sucks not nearly as much, but very little of the future has been given up to achieve it.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 1:11 PM PST up reply actions  

You could argue NONE of the future has been given up.

Grey was a marginal relief pitcher. Cunningham wasn’t necessary. Wallace was replaced with someone equally as talented.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Jan 31, 2010 1:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I count Cunningham as some future.

I know that others don’t.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 3:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm with you and jd

I miss me some Cunningham

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Jan 31, 2010 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

A future as what?

A maybe 4th outfielder in the Padres system?

Thats how you should now be seeing him.

I'll have a sandwich and a draft(sic). - Bill King (RIP)

by BleedGreen on Jan 31, 2010 10:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe a 4th outfielder.

Maybe a high OBA #2 hitter. I think either is a real possibility at this point. He should get 200 at bats in the sencd half with us, We’ll see what he’s got then.

It’s too soon to cap his future at this point.

"Never have a motto, that's what I always say" - Me

by padmadfan on Feb 1, 2010 5:03 AM PST up reply actions  

It's been a solid offseason, but not great

The Kouz trade was nice. The Sheets signing was very exciting. You can’t argue with Duke. But the original Cust DFA? It showed that Beane was willing to give up Jack just to save a million or so. Maybe he played the market, but that’s very risky. The Crisp signing? Very meh. The A’s will enter the season with a bunch of players whose value will only go down: I’m looking at you Wuertz, Davis, and Pennington. The A’s still lack a future SS if Green busts. And I don’t see how it’s a good thing if your Plan A (Beltre), B (Scoot), and C (Chapman) all turn you down.

Still the positives outweigh the negatives (at least to a fan in January they do), and I won’t lie: I’m excited about this team.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Jan 31, 2010 1:23 PM PST reply actions  

Scoot signed before Beltre...

So how can Plan B come before Plan A?

Also, I don’t think leaving Cust to the open market was about saving a million bucks and it wasn’t a great risk. If Cust didn’t resign, the team would probably be very much the same and Fox would just get those ABs.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Jan 31, 2010 1:33 PM PST up reply actions  

Now just don't sign Gross

What’s with the Gross interest?

I swear, if Beane doesn’t give Buck another shot, Buck will go somewhere else and figure it out.

This may be irrational fear on my part, sure. I just feel Beane’s past lack of “feel” for the ebbs and flows of hitters due to health, inspiration, and usage could rear its ugly head again.

I know it was when Buck hadn’t been figured out by the league yet that he had his one really good stretch of hitting. But whether it was health or suckitude lately, Buck DOES have the size to slug, and he isn’t useless in the field.

Now Buck has seen the whole circle. Great start. HIgh expectations. Injuries. Back and forth to AAA. Etc. To my thinking, this is when young players GET IT. This is when they push extra in the offseason. It’s when they get their mind right and put the blame on themselves and FOCUS.

If Beane doesn’t sense this (and in the past he’s shown this) i wouldn’t be at all surprised if Buck goes somewhere else and finally hits again.

Deswho?

by supersugarCrisp on Jan 31, 2010 1:56 PM PST reply actions  

It's irrational to expect that someone getting hurt for several years...

and sucking for those years in AAA to suddenly “get it”. If Buck is in AAA, stays healthy, plays well, and forces the issue… then we can all bitch about him not getting his chance. But let’s not bitch until he’s played 50 straight games and is OPSing over .850 in AAA.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Jan 31, 2010 1:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not saying start him or even have him on the 25 man

But don’t push him out the door with no opportunity to fill in for injuries, prove he’s “gotten it,” or even win a job in spring.

That’s all i’m saying. I have a (sure, my thing) sense that the psychology of what Buck’s been through and the guy he is will see him put it together soon, if healthy.

I think he had a big head and always knew success coming out of ASU. Then he gets to the bigs quickly. Then he mashes out of the gate.

It takes a few mental stages to get through the first failure in your life. I think he’s probably gone through the cycle, finally, now and is focussed to prove himself.

Things like this are the little things that teams need to have a sense of, to go with their stats oriented view. The psychology of the players has to be sensed. Like all the times Beane has gotten players who performed elsewhere but not for the A’s. Some players need the energy in the stands the A’s often don’t have. Some players cannot hit in the cold air in Oakland. Some (i think) don’t really like what the A’s are perceived to be about and sometimes all these factors add up to see guys just not be the kind of players Beane should have expected to do well in Oakland.

These guys get traded out of Oakland, play in front of bigger crowds, in warmer weather and for organizations that aren’t (wrong or right) seen as robot-like. If Buck is given the chance, why wouldn’t he figure it out? It seems he’s got the size and skill to hit, just injuries and the aforementioned mental factors stopped him. Seems to me he’s more likely to figure it out than not and i’d like to see that with the A’s, at least until you know for sure what you have. I don’t think the A’s or us know what we have in Buck yet. With that size and swing i think it’s worth it to make sure.

Deswho?

by supersugarCrisp on Jan 31, 2010 2:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah... he can prove himself...

in AAA while playing in enough games to prove he’s healthy.

If he’s figured it out, then he’ll push the issue in June or July. But if he should be playing everyday, then the A’s getting a 4th or 5th OF who is not in the future plans of the team has nothing to do with Buck.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Jan 31, 2010 2:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Hmm

Sure, let Buck and Taylor get ABs in Sac. But doesn’t there have to be a better, just as obscure and cheap or cheaper option than Gross who’s better?

I guess i didn’t do my homework and scan the available. But wow, Gross?!

Deswho?

by supersugarCrisp on Jan 31, 2010 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

He plays above average D and hit righties at an average clip...

and will probably be signed for around 1 or 2 million bucks. What’s not to like?

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Jan 31, 2010 2:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Other than signing Coco Crisp

which makes no sense to me at all, I like everything the A’s have done this offseason.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Jan 31, 2010 1:59 PM PST reply actions  

Crisp

It’s whatever. He probably won’t be back in 2010 with Taylor in left field.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jan 31, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

He won't be back in 2010?

Wow, Coco we hardly knew ye.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 31, 2010 5:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Sigh

I blame television.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Jan 31, 2010 5:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Good call.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

A little, but I still don't like it.

I don’t think he’s very good at baseball, and I don’t think there’s much reason to expect him to bounce back.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Jan 31, 2010 8:19 PM PST up reply actions  

we signed Crisp?

oh yeah, yeah…..so much has transgressed since.

alaska A residing in northern Idaho.

by ak_A on Jan 31, 2010 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

TransGRESSed?

Father Desme is displeased.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 5:59 PM PST up reply actions  

transGROSSed?

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Feb 1, 2010 5:46 PM PST up reply actions  

On the ol' college try front

Don’t forget about Aroldis Chapman— good to see the A’s staying aggressive in the international market.

The glare was not practiced. I would get into the game situations, and when that happens, there comes a level of concentration that most can only imagine but can never achieve. You become what you are doing, and that is what you see on my face. -Dave Stewart

by Hegenberger Road on Jan 31, 2010 2:11 PM PST reply actions  

I'd say its been one of his greatest offseasons.

Here’s why:

Last year Wolff said “GET BATS”, he did, they failed. This year he went back to what he knows plays best at the Coli: pitching and defense. Even though they are flawed players, Duke+Sheets have Cy Young ceilings when healthy. Getting both might be one of the most important moves of this offseason.

Beane went against last years’ Holliday+G-Man+Cust all hitting lineup and stacked the defense as much as he could. We now are the only team in baseball with plus defenders at every position. This is going to lead to some remarkably low ERAs from all the staff, if you play fantasyball at least, this is the year to grab any and every A’s pitcher you can. But this is important: his goal was clear and he stuck to it (I dont believe we were ever interested in Damon for a second). Even if Gross comes on board: hey look its another plus defender. I dont think there’s ever been a team like this other than the 85 Cardinals, that’s been so focused on defense&speed. In many ways its like a little test just to see how important those things are in the modern game.

Best of all, its simply another year “rebuilding while contending” but this time it looks better than 08+09 because we know even crappy pitchers like DiNardo & Tomko can pitch well here, but we cant wait to see what Sheets does. Taylor & Carter & Cardenas are waiting in the wings and look to provide the offensive noise in the 2nd half and 2011. This is hands down the most exciting wave of young players we have all had come up around the same time since the Canseco/McGwire era.

The Kouzmanoff trade was excellent because he’s a guy who had been handicapped by playing in SD. Moving to AL might cancel that out, but I dont think so. He’s also young and fits right into our core crop of players. The severe lack of depth out there at 3B & SS means that if he’s just league average, thats a huge coup for Beane.

I think he housed the Jays in getting Taylor for Wallace. The odds of that being like trading Hafner for Winfield are higher than any other comparable for the two. Wallace is a slow fat DH type, Taylor looks like the best athlete in the game. Both can hit like crazy, but my money is on Taylor having a more relevant career than Wallace.

I honestly don’t think Beane could have done any better. Perhaps signing Lopez for the MI bench spot or trading for Jed Lowrie for Pennington insurance would be a fine cap on the offseason, but Beane has already gotten an A from this writers’ eyes.

by PL78 on Jan 31, 2010 3:47 PM PST reply actions  

I'm very excited about Beane's moves too...

But… it’ll be EXTREMELY hard to beat the Giambi, Tejada, Mulder, Zito, Hudson, Hernandez, Ellis crew that came up around 1999-2000.

That crew had a couple MVPs and Cy Youngs… not to mention a nice streak of playoff appearances.

The chances of this new crew doing that are not very high.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Jan 31, 2010 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Ellis was a minor league piece in the trade that brought Damon to Oakland in 2001

Ellis himself didn’t make the big club until 2002.

the others – Giambi, Tejada, Zito, Hudson, and Hernandez – were originally signed by the A’s and came up in their organization. As assistant GM Beane may have had something to do with some of those signings, but they were all in the organization by the time he became GM

by OaklandSi on Jan 31, 2010 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I was wrong about Ellis, but I still don't see your point.

PL78 said the following: This is hands down the most exciting wave of young players we have all had come up around the same time since the Canseco/McGwire era.

I pointed out that the A’s core that came up around 2000 will be pretty tough to beat.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Jan 31, 2010 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

referring to Beane's' moves

the crew that came up were not the products of trades, and perhaps were not really signed by Beane either. That’s all I was referring to, since this thread is about Beane’s trade and signing moves.

I do agree with you, by the way, that it was really exciting when they came up to the big show. I was fortunate to watch it as it happened.

by OaklandSi on Jan 31, 2010 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Bring back Grady Fuson!

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 6:01 PM PST up reply actions  

wasn't there a rumor

that he was being interviewed by the A’s?

by OaklandSi on Jan 31, 2010 6:06 PM PST up reply actions  

You misconstrued my comment pretty hard.

What I said meant that that wave of guys you mentioned were touted as being anything but low B-grade prospects. No one on earth saw Tejada as anything but a utility man until he used steroids out of nowhere blew his ceiling out of the water. Bottom line: No one knew Miggy or Giambi or Zito would do what they did, they exceeded their ceilings as prospects. The ones we have now coming up now DO have those lofty ceilings, and we as fans are much, much excited over them than we were in the late 90s.

by PL78 on Jan 31, 2010 9:16 PM PST up reply actions  

That's not true.

I was with the A’s when Giambi was drafted. He was a 2nd round pick expected to be a great hitter.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 31, 2010 9:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Expected by you, maybe, but not by the guys

who write Baseball America’s prospect rankings.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 10:54 PM PST up reply actions  

BA top 100 lists for every year are available on the internet

i’m too lazy to check but i’m pretty sure most of the top a’s players from the early 2000s are on there.

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05

by xbhaskarx on Jan 31, 2010 9:47 PM PST up reply actions  

They have lists going back to 1990

You can read them all here.

Of the guys mentioned above, Tejada was ranked #6 in 1997 and #10 in 1998. Mulder was ranked #27 in 1999 and #12 in 2000. Ramon Hernandez was ranked #74 in 1998, and Zito was ranked #41 in 2000.

Tim Hudson, Mark Ellis, and Jason Giambi never cracked the top 100 in any year. (Jeremy Giambi, then with the Royals, was ranked #64 in 1999, a decision which may or may not have been partially influenced by the success Jason was having in the big leagues that year.) Two other guys from that era who were much more highly ranked were Ben Grieve and Eric Chavez.

Here’s a list of A’s prospects in the top 100 for each year.

2009
#7 Brett Anderson
#11 Trevor Cahill
#54 Michael Ynoa
#55 Aaron Cunningham
#74 Adrian Cardenas
#76 Chris Carter
#97 Gio Gonzalez

2008
#22 Carlos Gonzalez
#26 Gio Gonzalez
#36 Brett Anderson
#48 Daric Barton
#60 Fautino de los Santos

2007
#50 Travis Buck
#67 Daric Barton
#89 Kurt Suzuki

2006
#28 Daric Barton
#74 Javier Herrera
#83 Cliff Pennington

2005
#24 Nick Swisher
#32 Daric Barton
#43 Dan Meyer
#68 Javier Herrera
#97 Huston Street

2004
#32 Bobby Crosby
#43 Joe Blanton

2003
#29 Rich Harden

2002
#5 Carlos Peña
#91 Eric Byrnes

2001
#34 Jose Ortiz
#59 Jason Hart
#81 Ryan Ludwick
#84 Justin Miller

2000
#12 Mark Mulder
#41 Barry Zito
#53 Jesus Colome
#90 Mario Encarnacion
#93 Adam Piatt

1999
#3 Eric Chavez
#27 Mark Mulder
#53 Eric DuBose
#95 Chad Harville

1998
#1 Ben Grieve
#10 Miguel Tejada
#30 Eric Chavez
#42 A.J. Hinch
#74 Ramon Hernandez
#100 Chris Enochs

1997
#6 Miguel Tejada
#18 Ben Grieve
#53 Eric Chavez
#91 Brad Rigby

1996
#37 Ben Grieve
#84 John Wasdin
#85 Brad Rigby
#87 Steve Cox
#88 Miguel Tejada

1995
#10 Ben Grieve
#53 John Wasdin
#97 Jose Herrera

1994
#12 Steve Karsay
#97 Jose Herrera
#98 Curtis Shaw

1993
#7 Todd Van Poppel
#56 Brent Gates
#76 Curtis Shaw

1992
#2 Todd Van Poppel
#43 Mike Neill
#65 David Zancanaro
#88 Scott Erwin

1991
#1 Todd Van Poppel
#27 Kirk Dressendorfer
#54 Don Peters

1990
#54 Felix Jose
#64 Joe Slusarski
#71 Darren Lewis

With 100 prospects named from 30 teams, on average each team ought to average three and one-third on the list per year. Looks like the A’s have done better than average in most years. Interesting that BA likes our system even more in 2008 and 2009 than it did in the late 1990s (though they liked it quite a bit then, too).

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Jan 31, 2010 11:11 PM PST up reply actions  

"Interesting that BA likes our system even more in 2008 and 2009 than it did in the late 1990s (though they liked it quite a bit then, too)."

Yeah, because that was what was just argued against what I said, sheesh.

You know guys, there’s being “cautious” then theres flat out being ignorant and I feel like thats what going on here. People are just straight up being scared little babies with what we have right now. It sucks that my POSITIVE opinion is looked down upon, when really, its completely relevant. Stop being scared everyone, we have unreal prospects who are going to be awesome big leaguers. Im truly bummed that people are so scared of recognizing this.

by PL78 on Feb 1, 2010 1:53 AM PST up reply actions  

No, people have every right to be "cautious" and people have every right to be realistic.

Taylor, Carter, Cardenas are great prospects. But the A’s prospects of the late 90s (Chavez, Zito, Mulder, Grieve, Tejada, etc) are just on a whole different level. This line here:

No one on earth saw Tejada as anything but a utility man until he used steroids out of nowhere blew his ceiling out of the water. Bottom line: No one knew Miggy or Giambi or Zito would do what they did, they exceeded their ceilings as prospects.

is just flat out inaccurate. And with prospects, you can never say something like:

Stop being scared everyone, we have unreal prospects who are going to be awesome big leaguers.

and expect to be taken seriously. You can’t predict inevitable “awesome” from any prospect, no matter how high they’re rated. In fact, realistically, the odds are quite against all three of Carter, Taylor, and Cardenas turning out to be above average big leaguers. Considering that ~95% of A’s fans were big fans of Daric Barton pre 2008, you probably were one too. How do you feel about him now? That guy was the closest thing to a “sure thing” since Chavvy. Eh, such is the nature of prospecting.

Your optimistic attitude towards the team’s prospects is nice and all, but please don’t belittle other people who have decided to adopt a more realistic attitude towards the prospects.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Feb 1, 2010 3:18 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm pretty optimistic about Barton now.

He’ll probably be an average 1B this year and is likely to improve over the next 3-4 years barring further diving accidents.

But baseball! Fuck yeah! -- lynnzgal

by WaddellCanseco on Feb 1, 2010 3:45 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree with this.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on Feb 1, 2010 8:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Does "PL" stand for "PoLlyanna"?

You must not have been around prospecting long enough. Go look at Sickels’s top 50 lists from five years ago that he just posted a few days back at minorleagueball. He makes a living analyzing this stuff… and yet like 50% of the guys on those lists (roughly the top 100 prospects of 2005) look like worthless garbage at this point.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Feb 2, 2010 12:19 AM PST up reply actions  

because taylor wasn't with the a's yet?

i’m assuming barton made the top 100 list with the cardinals.

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05

by xbhaskarx on Feb 1, 2010 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

ACK!

Make the Van Poppel go away! Make the Van Poppel go away!

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Feb 1, 2010 5:47 PM PST up reply actions  

This is a blantant lie

Tejada was never seen as utility infielder. BA twice ranked him in the top ten of their league prospects list. He was seen as a raw and unpolished prospect who had huge potential.

Zito was a legitimate top 10 overall draft talent. Giambi was no slouch either, and while he may have exceeded expectations, if you are using steriods as a disqualifier, then surely Canseco should get the same treatment?

by DeJay on Feb 1, 2010 4:18 AM PST up reply actions  

I'd liked to have seen Hardy with the A's, but other than that, Beane's done just about everything

one could reasonably hope. It’s not his fault that the Brewers love Carlos Gomez for whatever reason.

But baseball! Fuck yeah! -- lynnzgal

by WaddellCanseco on Jan 31, 2010 4:58 PM PST reply actions  

I would have taken Iwamura as a backup who plays a ton too

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Jan 31, 2010 5:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Iwamura as a backup?

He’d start on the A’s.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 31, 2010 5:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Whoever, as long as they wash the Sheets!

Oakland A's, Oakland Haze, Nothin' Beats Livin' By Your Oakland Bays

by DyeLongJustice on Jan 31, 2010 6:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I dunno, I think there's a number of bad moves on the list of off-season moves

I just don’t see this as a great offseason. I think it’s pretty easy to argue against it being even “good” at this point.

For example, what’s the point in giving a million bucks to a defensive replacement when your starting OF will never need one?

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 31, 2010 11:33 PM PST up reply actions  

The value of defensive replacements is so near zero as makes almost no odds

The difference between a guy who’s -15 runs per full season and a guy who’s +15 runs per full season is 30 runs over approximately 1440 innings, or about 2 runs per 100 innings.

A defensive replacement might, optimistically, play 100 innings as an actual mid-game replacement. Even a change of that magnitude, you’re looking at a couple of runs per season. I mean, I guess it’s better to have a defensive replacement when your starter is epically bad in the field, but the difference just isn’t that large.

By contrast, the guy might play 500+ innings as an injury/day-off fill-in for the starting lineup. In that situation his value over the guy he’s replacing is irrelevant, because the guy he’s replacing isn’t available.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Feb 1, 2010 1:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Besides trading away Cunningham, what else do you see as a bad move?

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

by iglew on Feb 1, 2010 9:46 AM PST up reply actions  

possibly the coco crisp signing?

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones."
-BB 07/27/05

by xbhaskarx on Feb 1, 2010 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I like what Beane did not do

Did not resign Tomko
Did not resign Kennedy

Not sure about the Cust signing at any price as I believe we have better internal options that deserve a go.

by bashbro89 on Jan 31, 2010 7:30 PM PST reply actions  

Who gets dropped from the 40 man roster with the Gross signing?

I didn’t mean to say it was a gross signing. I think Petit is gone, but Eveland could be another option, with the crowded rotation.

by Thefirstletterofthealphabet on Jan 31, 2010 7:46 PM PST reply actions  

It would be incredibly stupid to DFA the backup shortstop.

Aaron Miles can only play there in the way Daric Barton can be a catcher.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 31, 2010 11:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I like the creativity

Beane & Co. are showing, this years strategy has a far better chance of working then signing all those has beens last year, but results not effort count to me. I’m a paYing customer and I want an enjoyable product that wins games. I would see if they can play .500 ball or at least something close before you put your lips on Beane’s butt.

by Boss Playa on Feb 1, 2010 1:10 PM PST reply actions  

Creativity doesn't hit home runs

There is no power in the line up. Good defense. Good pitching. If they are lucky health-wise, they’ll do what the Giants did last year and get not quite enough wins to make the playoffs. If they aren’t – Sheets has arm trouble, Chavez never plays, etc. – 83 wins would be a fantastic year for them. There are a lot of people smoking happy cigarettes here.

by rovingralph on Feb 1, 2010 6:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

08-_the_author_small
DLD 7/29/10: Floats, Anyone?
Tsgirlbass_th_small
DLD 7/28/2010: MLBlinology
Img_1848_small
Exploring an Andrew Bailey-for-Jesus Montero trade
Tsgirlbass_th_small
For those going to be extras in "Moneyball"....
Baseball_small
AN interviews Mike Piazza

Recent FanPosts

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small
What Do iglew, jeffro, and Craig Breslow Have In Common?
Small
Minor Athletics 7/19-7/27 (Part I)
Nx74205_small
August GOGpicker
Whyoffry180_small
Michael Choice Signs For $2MM Bonus
Images_small
Who Should The A's Sign To Big-Time Contracts?
Zuke_small
AN Day 8/21?
Small
Trading Relievers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

HOUSTON - JULY 24:  Pitcher Roy Oswalt #44 of the Houston Astros throws against the Cincinnati Reds in the first inning at Minute Maid Park on July 24 2010 in Houston Texas.  (Photo by Bob Levey/Getty Images) +13 updates

Done Deal: Roy Oswalt Traded To Phillies, Will Make Debut Friday Night In Washington

WASHINGTON - JULY 29:  Adam Dunn #44 of the Washington Nationals watches the game against the Atlanta Braves at Nationals Park on July 29 2010 in Washington DC.  (Photo by Greg Fiume/Getty Images)

MLB Trade Deadline: Where Does Your Team Stand As Saturday Approaches?

Florida Marlins' Jorge Cantu watches his double against the Colorado Rockies in the first inning of a baseball game in Miami, Wednesday, July 21, 2010. Dan Uggla scored on the double. The Marlins won 5-2. (AP Photo/Alan Diaz) +2 updates

Marlins Trade Jorge Cantu To Rangers For Pitchers Evan Reed, Omar Poveda

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

Green_small iglew

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Whyoffry180_small danmerqury

Logo_small gigglingone

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

A_s_pic_5 emperor nobody

Editors

As_kings_cal_small louismg

902484_big_small Leopold Bloom

Authors

Myeyebrowpose_small jeffro

Moderators

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Img_1848_small notsellingjeans

Small vignette17