Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

Minor League Update: 9-15-2009 A Picture's Worth a Thousand Words... I didn't have that much to say

 

First, the really cool news.

 

The Sacramento River Cats and the Midland RockHounds have both advanced to the next round of their respective play-offs. The River Cats are going for their 3rd consecutive PCL crown and what’s great about this season’s squad is that the current roster includes a fair number of high end prospects. Exposing them to the pressures of play-off baseball (even if it’s the minor leagues) can only help their development as ballplayers. The A’s have always believed that winning in the minors is important; as it helps the individual players unite as a team to strive towards a common goal.

 

Now if only we could get the organization to start winning in Oakland again… that would be a good thing. (Mean? Probably. Honest? Brutally.)

 

And how well are these wonder prospects doing in a play-off environment? I’ll tell you after the jump… so come on over!

 

 

You know you want to.

Star-divide

 

 

AAA

 

Henry Rodriguez: 1.1 IP  0 H  4 BB  2 K  3 ER

Sam Demel: 1.2 IP  3 H  0 BB  3 K  0 ER

 

Chris Carter: 5-17  4 HR  2 BB  5 K

Adrian Cardenas: 7-15  2 D  3 BB  2 K

Brett Wallace: 5-17  1 T  2 HR  2 BB  1 K

 

AA 

 

Graham Godfrey: 6.2 IP  1 H  3 BB  5 K  0 ER

Tyson Ross: 6.1 IP  4 H  2 BB  8 K  2 ER

Mickey Storey: 4.2 IP  3 H  0 BB  5 K  0 ER

 

Jemile Weeks: 4-13  1 HR  2 BB  2 K

Josh Donaldson: 3-16  1 D  2 HR  1 BB  5 K

Matt Spencer: 7-15  2 HR  2 BB  1 K

Corey Brown: 1-8  5 K

Shane Peterson: 3-15  1 D  1 BB  4 K

 

The numbers pretty much speak for themselves. Chris Carter… he hits ball really far. Ross had maybe his best start in AA and Mickey Storey has been nothing short of sensational this year, pitching for Kane County, Stockton, Midland and Sacramento. He has, amazingly enough, given up only 8 walks while striking out 71 in 51.2 IP.

 

The A’s are sending/inviting 36 players to Instructs this fall. I’m not going to write up the whole list but the notable names include 2009 draftees Ian Krol, Paul (Haven’t given up a run in the first 25 games of my pro career) Smyth, Josh Leyland, Max Stassi, Conner Crumbliss, Grant Green, Stephen Parker and Myrio Richard. Third rounder Justin Marks might join halfway through if he gets over a groin injury. Other folks of interest include Ben Hornbeck, Brett Hunter, Fautino de los Santos, Anthony Capra, Michael Ynoa, Nino Leyja, Jeremy Barfield, Rubin Rosario and Rashun Dixon.

 

The Oakland contingent to the AFL has been decided, health permitting. Jemile Weeks, Corey Brown, Grant Desme, Clayton Mortensen, James Simmons, Justin Friend and Sam Demel get to be Desert Dogs this year.

 

There’s a rumor that the A’s might call up Brett Wallace and Chris Carter after Sacramento’s season ends, but that would mean first putting them on the 40 man roster. It would be a dick move but I could see the A’s releasing Nomar and placing Chris Denorfia on waivers to make room for Carter and Wallace. I’m not particularly attached to Garciaparra but firing the guy with 2 weeks left in the season would be a classless move.

 

In a recent interview with Scout.com A’s Director of Player Development Keith Lieppman said that the A’s consider 2B to be the best place for Cardenas. He sees Carter at 1B long term and counts Wallace strictly as a 3B. It is what it is, but the A’s seem to be fast tracking Jemile Weeks; if Cardenas is destined for 2B then ultimately wither Weeks? Keep an eye out during the AFL to see if Weeks plays some OF.

 

And thank you for your support.

Comment 65 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think Keith is being political there

and listing guys at the positions they currently are. Perhaps not “Political” but definitely conservative. I think you’ll see all four of these guys tried at different positions before its’ all said and done. Carter at 1B and RF, Cardenas at 2B and 3B, Wallace at 3B and 1B, and weeks at 2B and maybe CF/LF. Of course, Sweeney and Davis may have done enough to prove to the A’s that they’re the RF/CF of the future, and throw a complete monkey wrench in our plans. And of course, the position changes will all be based around whether Wallace can stay at 3B.

But I think he’ll get every shot to prove he can play 3B, with Carter at 1B, Cardenas at 2B, and Weeks in center. I wonder if we’ll see Carter or Cardenas tried in LF at all, while we’re at it. One wonders if Cust and Davis will be around still when all these kids are ready, or if those DH and CF positions will be open. The A’s seem to really like Sweeney, so I have to assume he’ll still be here. I also wonder if maybe the A’s will experiment with Weeks at SS.

But having too many people for the positions available is a good problem and one that typically figures itself out in the end.

by thashyt on Sep 15, 2009 4:57 AM PDT reply actions  

Whoa, whoa

let’s not get carried away here. Regardless of where you stand on Sweeney v. Davis, neither of them are “of the future” players. It’s a matter of who should be a stopgap where, and for how long, until we can get some real outfielders.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Sep 15, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

disagree completely

I am sick of players with the ‘top prospect’ hype hetting the lion’s share of the organizational attention. Rajai has shown himself to be the sort of threat the A’s have not had in over a decade- a Chone Figgins type threat, and is Sweeney continues to hit with authority through the next two weeks he should get every chance to be the every day RF in 2010. If we keep cherising players based on what baseball prospectus thinks we will be a losing team for another 5 years- let the guys who show it get the opportunity. The kids can sit back and learn.

oh and Cust can go find a softball team somewhere and Travis Buck can carry his gear.

by incarnate on Sep 15, 2009 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

If Davis

was as good at playing as many positions as Desmond DeChone Figgins, I might agree. But he is not. Davis is having a career year, it may be that he has turned a corner and is now going to be a great talent.

I actually would not compare the two. DdC Figgins has more value because of his versitility.

What is the alternative to Cust that is better? Why do you think Geren and Beane would let Travis carry anything?

by Future Ed on Sep 15, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I love when people make evaluations of a player using 200 at bats or so.

It’s like his previous 500 at bats worth of suck don’t even matter at all.

by Tripp on Sep 15, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

200 productive AB's in the show

is worth more than 1000 in the minors, slick. or perhaps you are making the laughable point that 500 ab’s of suck spread out over x number of seasons forever makes you a bad player? please clarify.

IF sweeney has progressed into more than a singles hitter than he should replace Cust in the fiels. if cust is not DHing he has no value in my opinion.

I am not saying these guys are all stars they just deserv the starting nods in 2010 and lets see if they can sustain….

by incarnate on Sep 15, 2009 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

What exactly are the instructs?

When are they? How long do they last? Do we play against other teams or just our own? Is it in Phoenix?

by SeanR on Sep 15, 2009 7:00 AM PDT reply actions  

The Instructs are in Phoenix, using the A's ST facilities

They are, in fact, very much like Spring Training. There’s a lot of mentoring and one-on-one coaching. It’s a time when the coaching staff will have pitchers tinker with grips and adding/subtracting pitches while the hitters will work on their swings. They do play games, much like they do in minor league camp towards the end of ST but the emphasis is more on developing technique than winning. The program lasts (I think) between 4 and 6 weeks.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is it fair to compare Chris Carter to Ryan Howard?

Of course they swing from different sides of the plate, but they’re both huge monsters that really know how to hit baseballs.

I believe that Carter’s stats have been better in the minors and he’s been younger at every level. if so… watch OUT!!!

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Sep 15, 2009 7:28 AM PDT reply actions  

No, it isn't.

Ryan Howard is a freak.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Sep 15, 2009 7:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nope

"It ain't over till it's over." - Yogi Berra

by 49er16 on Sep 15, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

If this is true...
The A’s have always believed that winning in the minors is important; as it helps the individual players unite as a team to strive towards a common goal.

…then doesn’t this contradict those who feel the A’s should tank the rest of the season in order to get a better draft pick?

After all, minors vs majors would/should be irrelevant, and that unity and common goal thing would apply regardless what level.

In 2008 I was watching a team that was rebuilding. In 2009 I feel like I'm watching a team that just sucks.

by UncleLeo on Sep 15, 2009 7:31 AM PDT reply actions  

Obviously, based on recent history...

Oakland is the exception in regards to “winning” being a goal.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 7:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

as for Nomar...

Isn’t this what they did with Mike Sweeney last September? There’s been a precedent set with dick moves:

It would be a dick move but I could see the A’s releasing Nomar and placing Chris Denorfia on waivers to make room for Carter and Wallace. I’m not particularly attached to Garciaparra but firing the guy with 2 weeks left in the season would be a classless move.

"just a beating heart ... plasma that we'll put into our uniform." - Billy Beane

by athleticsBB4life on Sep 15, 2009 7:35 AM PDT reply actions  

Maybe if he didn't suck we wouldn't have to consider a "dick" move!

If Nomar stays on it also sets the precedent that Oakland will keep shitty players just to not be “dicks”.

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Sep 15, 2009 7:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not arguing that Sweeney didn't deserve to be released....

all I’m saying is that BB will not be afraid to do it. IMO, Nomar should have been cut in May.

"just a beating heart ... plasma that we'll put into our uniform." - Billy Beane

by athleticsBB4life on Sep 15, 2009 7:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly. Since when does not being a dick trump building a better roster?

Nomar is chronically injured and doesn’t have a position and yet he gets to spend at least 11/12 of the season on the A’s roster. I wouldn’t be surprised if the A’s gave him the option of leaving in August, but maybe Nomar felt no one would pick him up for the stretch run, or was otherwise content to finish out his career in Oakland.

I would personally feel worse for Denorfia, who has not made millions of dollars and may never see a 40-man roster again.

"When you get that nice celebration coming in the dugout, and you're getting your ass hammered by guys, there's no better feeling than to have that done." -Matt Stairs

by Aufheben on Sep 15, 2009 7:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Precedent doesn't make it right

What can I say, I feel like doing That Which Is Right this morning. Ask me again after I’ve had some caffeine.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

This

There is no reason to cut Nomar with a few weeks left and no need to bring up Wallace or Carter.

by jeffro on Sep 15, 2009 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mortensen in the AFL?

I thought he wasnt’ allowed to go because he’s played in the big leagues now?

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Sep 15, 2009 7:55 AM PDT reply actions  

An AFLer can have limited big league time

That or Lieppman is mistaken.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 8:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

I heard Mortensen on the radio pregame

He said he would be going to Arizona. So either Lieppman and Mortensen are both mistaken, or he is going to Arizona.

by jeffro on Sep 15, 2009 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

as I recall Jeff gRay pitched in the AFL last season...

after a cup-of-coffee with the A’s

"just a beating heart ... plasma that we'll put into our uniform." - Billy Beane

by athleticsBB4life on Sep 15, 2009 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

So consensus is...

The A’s hierarchy knows what the Hell they’re talking about in this regard?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Or maybe he just has Suns tickets?

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on Sep 15, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

if the player doesn't have more than one year's service time in MLB as of August 31, he is eligible

although there is an exception for a Rule 5 player who spent the entire season on the 25 man roster.

Here is the link to the AFL website page on eligibility.

by OaklandSi on Sep 15, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mickey Storey

Whoa. I don’t think I ever read anything about him until now. 31st round of the 2008 June Draft, but some amazing stats. The guy’s been at 4 different levels in the A’s system and somehow strikes out 71 in a little over 51 innings, while only walking 8!

Will he get cursed by his 31st round signing or will the A’s take his performance seriously?

Sorry if I’ve totally repressed previous mentions of this guy but it sure seems like he came out of nowhere.

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/S/Mickey-Storey.shtml

by Mark H on Sep 15, 2009 9:22 AM PDT reply actions  

Storey got hurt in college and he fell off the radar

Now, his best fastball maybe hits 90 and he’s generally a notch or two below that. His curve has been dynamite this year and guys who can change speeds, hit their spots and throw a breaking ball for strikes can carve up minor league hitters.

How well that combination will work against big league hitters remains to be seen. The A’s seem to be taking his performance seriously and there’s a good chance he starts next year in AAA although Lieppman did let it slip that the organization thinks Storey could go back to the rotation.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

I just noticed that baseball-reference.com doesn't have any record of these postseason games

Chris Carter’s stat line still shows 4 HRs in AAA this year. Minorleaguesplits.com seems to include the playoff stats in its total statlines, however.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Sep 15, 2009 9:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Correct

MiLB.com also fails to track postseason numbers.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Which, to me, is stupid

The Oakland A's: Pissing off fathers of disappointing baseball players who still managed to be better than their dads (charter club members: Tom Grieve & Ed Crosby)
Last of the Ninth - Photography

by Flashfire on Sep 15, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Unless you're Corey Brown's agent

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Sep 15, 2009 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Doesn't that start their arbitration clocks?

Plus the whole cutting someone with 2 weeks left part. And I really just don’t want to rush him at all, in any sense.

Founding member of the Eric Patterson fan club.

by travdog6 on Sep 15, 2009 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hmmm I've read so many different things lately.

But I believe you. I still don’t want them up though.

Founding member of the Eric Patterson fan club.

by travdog6 on Sep 15, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sure it does... they accrue service time like any other big-leaguer

Also means that they have to be optioned down next year, although in Carter’s case he would have to be put on the 40-man anyway to protect him from Rule 5.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Sep 15, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I looked at Cots for a September exception and it does not exist

Which means that you are extending the amount of time that the A’s would need to keep Carter in the minors to start the season to retain the extra year of control.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

A player can only accrue 172 days/whatever of service time

If the River Cats go all the way (including the face-off vs. the IL champ) then neither Wallace or Carter would be coming to Oakland until the end of September. Any service time earned would be minimal, at best, and would not shorten the A’s ability to retain the players over a full 6 years.

And if you want to sit on the guys for a month or so in order to squeeze an extra season out of them then 2009 service time wouldn’t really slow you down.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

for someone that makes the OMG we could lose the division by ONE GAME argument a fair amount this is illogiacl

as that could be ten games in 2010 that you don’t have Chris Carter mashing baseballs.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

News flash... we've already lost the 2009 season by more than 1 game!

And near as I can tell, Geren isn’t stupid enough to have Carter pitch the 9th inning night after night.

On to your larger point, however, it is harder for a single batter to have as direct an influence on the 9th inning as a closer does. Maybe if the batter in question was a pinch hitter but no one is suggesting Carter for that role.

Besides, my official stance is that the idea of keeping a guy in the minors to avoid starting his arbitration clock just so you can squeeze another year out of him prior to his FA eligibility is bullshit. If you’re going into a season with no pretensions of contention then yeah, it’s a plan that has some merit. But if you’re going into 2010 expecting to compete for the division and you don’t put your 25 best players on the roster then you are essentially forfeiting games early in the year for the sake of saving a couple bucks. That is short sighted and harmful to what you’re trying to accomplish, which is win as many games as possible.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

From an Expected Value theory prospective it is almost always the correct decision to protect service time.

Especially when you have years like 2009.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hang on

The A’s were thinking they had a shot at contending in 2009 and that changed the way they viewed the roster. They were a trendy pick to give the Angels a run for the division and yeah… that didn’t work out so well.

If you expect 2010 to be as bad as 2009 then yes, EV Theory has a say. But if you’re planning to go for it in 2010, if you’re trying to make the play-offs than sacrificing wins to better yourself in 2016 is a foolish self-inflicted handicap.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wrong

With BPs projections I showed an approximately $2.5m expected loss in starting Cahill at the beginning of the season. Defending the roster choices made in the last year is not a winning proposition for you.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2009 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're going to have to link your write up, 'cause I've got zero memory of it

You expected a $2.5 million loss where?

I’m not defending the roster choices of 2009, I’m stating what they were. The A’s gambled and lost. Spilt milk and all that.

The point I will defend is if the A’s feel like they’re in a position to contend in 2010 and they believe that Chris Carter is the best 1B/DH/RF/Whatever in their organization then they are slitting their own throats if they don’t start him on Opening Day. In a scenario where the ball club is trying to win as many games as possible in 2010, it would not be advisable for them to to send one of their perceived best hitters to the minors for 4-6 weeks in order to keep him around an extra season down the road.

If the A’s decide to focus on the near term in 2010 than Expected Value has to take a back seat to the more immediate need. Go ahead and call it short sighted, but sometimes that’s the decision you make.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Sep 15, 2009 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Looking back it was $4.5m

and its derived from this fanpost’s comments

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Sep 16, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I really don't know enough about this stuff

to make a cogent argument, but it sure seems counter intuitive to protect a “mythical” year six years in the future. If the A’s anticipate a competitive window in the next few seasons, why should they concern themselves with 2016? I would assume the window would have come and gone by then. My initial assumption would be that there are far to many variables in baseball to make this a legitimate strategy.

Why is this wrong? Just so I’m clear, this is a legitimate question.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Sep 16, 2009 4:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well that changes the expected value equation a bit

also a close division race changes the value a bit. But basically i found that for the A’s to be doing the economically sound thing by starting Cahill in the rotation. Even if Cahill pitched at Lincecum levels and his replacements were replacement level filler, the odds on whether the A’s went to the playoffs by 1.3 wins or less had to be greater than 11% of all possible outcomes, which was not the case. Without the odds that the A’s made the playoffs by less than 1.3 wins being greater than 11% there is an expected value loss in compromising Cahills last year of control for trying to compete this year.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Sep 16, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

sept callups=service time an issue?

carter will have to be added to the 40 man roster this offseason anyways, rule 5 eligible. they can easily dump a 40 man player like reineke, munson, petit, cameron, marshall etc so thats not a big issue.

They probably still want to evaluate barton at 1b, so bringing in carter even for a brief sept callup may cut into his ABs.

by Asfan4ever723 on Sep 15, 2009 10:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Munson got called up, didn't he?

Would be kinda hard to dump him.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Sep 15, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

That was fantastic.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Sep 15, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

re: getting a taste of the playoffs

warning, this is going to be a ramble, but hopefully somebody feels like reading it and responding with some insight.

when the A’s kept flaming out in the first round and blew two 2-0 series leads, i couldn’t help but think that maybe it was their youth catching up to them. it might have just been a real easy thought that came up without having to think too much (a lazy thought), but it seemed like maybe they would have benefited from having some playoff grizzled veterans on the team.

so first: did they actually have some guys with playoff experience who just happened to get overshadowed by all the young studs, or was it really just a bunch of youngsters swashbuckling around?

and second: how do people feel about the usefulness of minor league playoff experience when you get to the majors? do you think that all of this (winning!!!) PCL playoff experience will actually help these guys at all in, say, the 2011 AL playoffs?

by jlanning17 on Sep 15, 2009 10:58 AM PDT reply actions  

IMO...

experience in the MiLB playoffs is overrated. If the A’s thought it made that much of a difference they would have left Barton there in 2007 for the PCL championship. Pennington in 2008. Patterson in 2009

"just a beating heart ... plasma that we'll put into our uniform." - Billy Beane

by athleticsBB4life on Sep 15, 2009 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nice job as always grover

Go Riverhounds!!!…I mean Go Rockcats!!!…you know what I mean…;-)

PREPAREDNESS_Because those goddamn zombies aren’t going to kill themselves

by adragon on Sep 15, 2009 12:17 PM PDT reply actions  

do not give up on eric patterson

limited AB’s, but in sept .294/.409/.821 OPS

he barely has accumulated 140+ ab’s with his stints last 2 seasons w/ A’s…i’d much rather see him get some consistent AB’s than a semi injured hairston out in LF for the next 2 weeks

by Asfan4ever723 on Sep 15, 2009 1:07 PM PDT reply actions  

I'll agree with that

Hairston is clearly not even close to 100% right now.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Sep 15, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

And continuing to play someone with a pulled quad or hamstring can create longterm problems

It makes no sense for the A’s to play him at hall anymore.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

If not at hall, what about playing him at dining room?

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Sep 15, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

With Col. Mustard and the wrench?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Sep 15, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Roster spot

If they did decide to make late season roster moves, I’d be in favor of DFAing Casilla, rather than do that to a veteran like Nomar. Yes, Nomar isn’t of much worth to us at this point, but cutting him wouldn’t be the right move. I’m not opposed to Carter and / or Wallace getting a two week cup of coffee up here, even if they don’t see much game action. It’s not a long enough period that if they struggle, it will destroy their confidence.

by GreenOctober69 on Sep 15, 2009 2:36 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #3
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook
Img_1877_small
DLD 1/30/12 - fANfest!

Recent FanPosts

Small
NYY Proposal
Small
Roy Oswalt = opportunity
Choice_small
Tom Milone, by the numbers: Maddux, Glavine, Halladay, Radke...
Img_1877_small
Behind Enemy Lines
Lt-922060_small
All-Time Oakland A's team
Aoakland_a_s_05_small
Manny vs. Magglio
Cimg3825_small
The Closer Battle Between T-Rex and The Mad Aussie
Small
Rich Harden to the bullpen?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late