The Annual Questionable All-Star Post
One year ago, I posted my first-ever fan-post on AN about my amazement that Jason Varitek was an All-Star. One year later, it's that time again.
The rules: Any player who is their team's only selection I cannot take issue with due to the fact that every team has to have at least one selection. Other than that, any stupid selection is fair game.
For the second year in a row, my "Questionable All-Star Selection" Award goes to a member of the Boston Red Sox.
Congratulations, Tim Wakefield! Come on down!
Let's play a little game. I'm going to give you the stats of 5 pitchers without any names. Then, we'll choose which selection should be the all-star.
W-L ERA WHIP K ERA+ K/BB
Pitcher A 6-7 3.13 1.260 67 130 2.39
Pitcher B 8-3 3.10 1.127 86 144 2.61
Pitcher C 10-3 4.30 1.354 53 108 1.47
Pitcher D 8-5 2.80 1.244 74 158 1.90
Pitcher E 6-4 3.10 1.304 49 131 2.19
Which one of these is not like the others???
If you guessed Pitcher C, then you'd be right! Let's take a look at that again, this time with names.
W-L ERA WHIP K ERA+ K/BB
Dallas Braden 6-7 3.13 1.260 67 130 2.39
Jered Weaver 8-3 3.10 1.127 86 144 2.61
Tim Wakefield 10-3 4.30 1.354 53 108 1.47
Kevin Millwood 8-5 2.80 1.244 74 158 1.90
Nick Blackburn 6-4 3.10 1.304 49 131 2.19
For the sake of expediency, I only included 4 other pitchers. But even a cursory glance at the stats seems to indicate that that Tim Wakefield is by far and away the worst of that bunch. You can exclude K/BB, because Wakefield is a knuckleball pitcher and isn't going to strike so many guys out. The only stat that Wakefield has an advantage over any of the others in is wins, which is probably the least helpful pitching statistic there is. In one of the more helpful stats, park-adjusted ERA+, Wakefield is a staggering 22 points below the lowest one of the other 4 pitchers. The other 4 pitchers are not All-Stars. Say what you want about Millwood or Weaver, but both of them, or Braden or Blackburn, easily gets the nod over Wakefield.
Let's put this into perspective. Wakefield is 29th in the AL in ERA and he did not even crack the top 50 in the MLB. Say what you want about ERA as a statistic, but it shows us that Wakefield is nowhere near the top of the list for pitchers who should be in the All-Star game.
It's pretty obvious how Wakefield made this All-Star team. Which brings me to the crux of what this selection tells us, which is that
Wins is still a way overrated statistic
While the other pitchers have much better overall stats, Wakefield does sport a nice 10-3 record, which is tied for the league lead. When I asked one of my friends how the hell Wakefield made the All-Star team, he replied "He's tied for the league lead in wins... you can't argue with that." Well, I can, I have, and I will. Wakefield's secondary stats make it look ridiculous that he's an All-Star... he's giving up over 4 runs a game! Kevin Slowey has 10 wins too, but I don't think anyone would make the case that he should be an All-Star... Wins tell you absolutely nothing about a pitcher's ability to get somebody out. A deserving pitcher lost out on an All-Star appearance because of a stupid obsession with wins.
Until next year...
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
It's more than just the wins
Maddon himself said something along the lines of wanting to give Wakefield a little “lifetime recognition.”
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Jul 5, 2009 8:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i thought that also...
its funny when you realize that his career stats are actually even worse than this year’s.
why wakefield over anyone else in the twilight of their career though?
holdin' it down for the bay from upper westside manhattan
by SamYam on Jul 5, 2009 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's a lifer, a gamer, and
this year’s recipient of the award for outstanding achievement in the field of excellence!
"Flea Markets aren't just for blind dates anymore!"- The Reverend Billy Lard
by Gaijin_Suketto on Jul 5, 2009 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah. It's called Baseball Tonight.
"You end up with a name like ‘Outman,’" he said last week. "What else are you going to do? You’re going to get people out, man." ~ Dallas Braden
Free Travis Buck.
by Blicks on Jul 6, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wakefield positively creams Braden
in the crucial stat of run support.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan
by iglew on Jul 5, 2009 11:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I would have gone with Jered Weaver or Nick Blackburn instead of Tim Wakefield.
Also, I would have gone with Robinson Cano over Dustin Pedroia, Adam Lind over Josh Hamilton and Kurt Suzuki over Curtis Granderson.
Then, I would have pulled Andrew Bailey in favor of George Sherrill.
The Ultimate Opportunist
by Rated-R Superstar on Jul 5, 2009 11:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Suzuki over Granderson?
I would’ve canned Hunter before canning Granderson. Torii Hunter = drastically overrated.
"You end up with a name like ‘Outman,’" he said last week. "What else are you going to do? You’re going to get people out, man." ~ Dallas Braden
Free Travis Buck.
by Blicks on Jul 6, 2009 7:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but torii hunter is actually having a much, much better year
a .304 BA to go with 17 HR and a 142 OPS+, versus .256, 18 and 108 for granderson. the power numbers are comparable, but no matter which other way you cut it, hunter is having a much better season. hunter is definitely overrated, but hes much better than granderson this year.
holdin' it down for the bay from upper westside manhattan
by SamYam on Jul 6, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Braden definitely, Suzuki ...yeah.....Bailey....dude's been a revelation!
Ian Kinsler over Pedroia but Granderson is having a very nice year. Just say no to Derek Jeter!
Zeigler to Geren…."A-Rod? He’s my bitch." -alox
by mrod on Jul 6, 2009 1:41 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The A’s have had a habit of Matt Caining there pitching staffs the past few years.
In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. ~ Thomas Jefferson
by ZacharyCF on Jul 6, 2009 6:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Pitcher record needs to be abolished. Its been irrelevant ever since relief pitching became a mainstay of the game and the SP didnt go 8+ every time out.
by PL78 on Jul 6, 2009 9:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Did you know?
In his 17 seasons in the bigs, Wakefield has never managed to crack an All-Star squad before this year. I can’t think of another starter with that kind of longevity who didn’t make the All-Star squad at least once. He was snubbed in ‘92 and ’95, both times because he didn’t start pitching until mid-May. He could have made it 2002, but was pitching mostly out of the pen. I really wish 5 other Red Sox weren’t going, because it takes perspective away from a touching gesture. Love him or hate him, Wakefield’s been a mainstay of the MLB landscape long enough to earn this.
I challenge you to name a single AL pitcher who was truly locked out becuase of Wakefield. There’s a drop-off after Greinke, Jackson, and Hernandez. Halladay’s an established star and Buehrle had to go as the lone White Sox. The next roster slot would likely have belonged to Jered Weaver, but he’s still young and about equal with Buehrle this year. After that your dropping out of the top 5 SP and into non-All Star range. If anything, I’d take Fuentes off and put Weaver on. I don’t love the Wakefield pick but I’m okay with sentimentality every now and then. Final question, if Wakefield had bee a Royal or Pirate most of his career instead of a Red Sox, would you still despise this selection?
"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball." - Connie Mack
by GoA's on Jul 6, 2009 1:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
if wakefield had been a royal or pirate...
nobody would have despised the selection because it never would have been made. he gets the sentimental vote because he’s on a high profile team. if he had done the same thing for any other team outside the AL east, no chance he gets in at all.
holdin' it down for the bay from upper westside manhattan
by SamYam on Jul 6, 2009 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why does the saves leader have to be an All-Star?
Seems like every year the current saves leader gets a free pass to All-Star weekend. Sometimes it’s earned (Heath Bell hasn’t given up a single home run this year) and sometimes it’s not. Fuentes sports a 3.38 ERA (I don’t care how silly a stat ERA is, 3.38 ‘aint All-Star material). He’s got a 1.23 WHIP, 9.8 SO/9, and all kinds of other good not great stats. Michael Wuertz has had a better season than Fuentes. You want an Angel, send the much more deserving Jered Weaver to the All-Star game, bump out Justin Verlander, and let a Frank Francisco or a Scott Downs receive some glory.
"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball." - Connie Mack
by GoA's on Jul 6, 2009 2:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This.
And its another way to get an additional slegnA in the ASG, since “Sciosciaball” is conducive to save opps.
"You end up with a name like ‘Outman,’" he said last week. "What else are you going to do? You’re going to get people out, man." ~ Dallas Braden
Free Travis Buck.
by Blicks on Jul 6, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















