The Non-Sacredness of Territorial Rights
A minor bit of blogwhoring, but Bud Selig's recent comments on the Giants' territorial rights being "sacred" are just so much hooey, as the Angels expansion into Los Angeles shows. For the right price, a deal can be done.
6 months ago
scareduck
3 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
Of course it could happen for the right price.
But if they don’t pretend that they’re sacred, then they really mean absolutely nothing instead of mostly meaning something.
by LoneStranger on Jul 15, 2009 11:55 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
And Walter O'Malley had much more pull in those days
If anything, the owners are on much more even ground these days.
Witty .sig goes here.
by scareduck on Jul 15, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So
something the A’s once gave the Giants is now sacred. Selig is such a idiot. How a guy who let a World Series get canceled gets to make $18 million a year and keep his job for life is beyond me.
I wouldn’t let proud to be your Bud Selig be the commissoner of my fantasy league team.
by sirbed on Jul 15, 2009 3:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
SBNation.com Recent Stories
Big League Stew - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
- Be Like Lincecum: Little Leaguer copies Timmy's windup
- Stewards Debate! Does Bud Selig deserve a Miller Park statue?
- Ask Alex: Will Ben Zobrist replicate his outstanding '09 season?
- D12: Lenny Dykstra wants to sell you his stock tips again
- Dodgers caravan chases away Barry Bonds from chicken, waffles
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
