Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Just a few Gripes

Although I planned to launch into a profanity-laced tirade following the team's 18th embarrassing loss of the season yesterday, I've calmed my jets over the past 12 hours or so and only have a few gripes to get to this early afternoon:

 

Star-divide

1. I think what most of us here on AN are most frustrated about is this team's lack of fire, or at the very least, lack of concern about their monumental offensive struggles. Far too many times this season you'll hear a player here or a player there just shrug-off a shut-out or near shut-out and just say, "Well, Giambi and Holliday have been too good in the past to stay this bad in the future. So we'll be fine." That's just ridiculous to me. The way to win ball games when the heart of the order is not producing is not to just wax-nostalgic and wait for the OTHER guy to pick up the slack...it's to do what Kurt Suzuki and Jack Cust are doing and just shut the mouth, bear down, make some adjustments and get some hits yuorself. For some reason, it seems (at least from the outside) that no one is taking responsibility for communicating this to the rest of the team, which leads me to...

2. I think the culture that has been fostered in this clubhouse over the past few years has really made the "Oakland Brand" a difficult product to market, a boring team to follow and has hampered any ability for the organization to gain positive traction both on the field and off. THe culture I am talking about is one where Bob Geren, a nice guy to be sure and certainly a life-long "baseball man" that was a helluva minor league manager, turns into a "made man" without really being challenged or showing any results. It's the culture where everyone just kind of bumbles around (including the management team) crossing fingers and hoping the best for/planning post-season runs on chronically injured players...and when those players STAY injured, everyone just throws up their arms and no one bats an eye...

3.I sense just an overall disturbing trend that a lot of offensive players that have been brought up through the A's system seem to just stop learning at the major league level and hit a wall or plateau (with the lone exception in recent years being Kurt Suzuki). Guys like Barton, Buck and now Sweeney, who all had solid minor league numbers and had flashes of brilliance at the major league level, just seem to stop making adjustments, or shoring up weaknesses or building up strengths. I really think of this as a major organizational/cultural problem in Oakland. Players CAN'T stop learning at the major league level...if they do, this organization is doomed. It just seems like less and less importance is being placed on the major league coaching staff, especially on the offensive side, when players are just thrown out there everyday without a lot of guidance when they are clearly not up to the task...

4. Regarding Clubhouse Culture: I think Jason Giambi is really doing his best to be the father figure and take the pressure off the young guys and be a good role model. But it's not 2001 anymore. Giambi still has a little pop and can work a walk and get hit by a few pitches, but he's not the dynamic player/personality that he once was - the type of human tonic that a dormant offense needsto burst out of it's slumber. I think it's nearly impossible to really put a price on "dynamism" and clubhouse presence and whatnot, but I will say that it would sure be nice right now to have Nick Swisher on this team. It's nice having Ryan Sweeney too and Gio still has "upside" and DLS might put it all together now that he's healthy, but I still think there's a sneaky, lingering, lasting price to be paid when an organization moves on from a proven leader and quality individual...

4. Just overall, I would like to see more accountability in this organization. I'm not going to go all off on a rant on a person by person basis. I would just hope that everyone in the organization, from Lew Wolff down, at some point this year, will take responsbility for their own actions, deal with the adversity they've been pitted-against and play the hand they've been dealt...get off the matt, chip away at the issues and slowly but surely work out a plan that works more often than not...instead of just waiting around for "someone else" to figure it all out for them.

 

5 recs  |  Comment 206 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Your gripe is a microcosm of the A's!

OMFG I’M SO PISSED I’M GONNA RIP INTO EVERYBODY AND EVERYTHING INVOLVING THE A’S AND SWEAR A LOT AND I’M GONNA MAKE THEM CRY I’LL BE SO PISSED OFF.

Uh..

I’m upset. Things need to be changed.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 11, 2009 12:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but did you hear Duke remains on track to start?

And that Nomar’s rehabbing calves haven’t felt this good since they were legging out bumbled grounders in T-ball?

And that Giambi is having one of his characteristic slow starts and he plans on issuing 25 gold thongs?

I am Ray Fosse's infatuations with Clay Wood and high-definition television.

by franks a lot on May 11, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't foget Chavez 2011 option can still be picked up so pencil him in there for another 2 plus

seasons…

I also hope they pick up Geren’s option too?

"Where's the beef?"

by MMunoz33 on May 11, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I completely understand

the sentiment. And while there’s still a lot of baseball left, we are getting to the point where it “get’s late early”. If this team is going to make a move, then they better get cracking fairly soon.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on May 11, 2009 12:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Taj.....

thanks for expressing what’s been on my mind for a LONG time.

by 33SwisherSweet on May 11, 2009 12:38 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

How bad do the A's have to be before Beane fires his best buddy Geren?

Unfortunately, I think we’ll have to be near 90-95 losses before that happens. I don’t think Beane has the balls to fire him mid season although I do feel that is what the team needs.

The A’s have talent, it is still early enough to turn this around, but they lack a fire/desperation and that eminates from the top. Geren’s got to go.

by 33SwisherSweet on May 11, 2009 12:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

There is a lot of baseball left, but it’s no longer “early” in the season, as some continue to claim. We are well beyond the one-month mark into the season, and this A’s team is off to the 2nd worst start in Oakland history, our bats fail to show up half the time, our players continue to get hurt. I think a big problem with this team is that the organization keeps trying to push the Moneyball style of play even though we clearly do not have the right personnel; we can’t continue to single, walk, walk and then hope for the long ball to score our runs. Below, Taj brings up the “small ball” offense that some teams employ, including the Angels. We have so much more speed in this current roster than we did in years past. I don’t see why Beane is so hesitant about his offensive approach. True that we are stealing more these days, I’m quite certain that we are still one of the last in the league in bunting, and stealing bases. He needs to craft his offense around the kind of talent he has on the roster. It’s like going out there and signing a whole starting rotation of fly ball pitchers when Coors Field is your home field. It’s foolish…and so is his decision to appoint his buddy Geren as our manager.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 7:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Moneyball is not a style of play.

Just FYI.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 12, 2009 7:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pardon me…you guys get the idea: walk, walk, single…walk, pop-up, single…walk, home run. It’s crap. The only reason Beane was successful was because of Hudson, Mulder and Zito. Those guys collectively carried the A’s. After Hudson and Mulder left, Zito had Harden, Haren to carry the tam. We don’t have any of those guys left, nor do we have established, consistent pitching. Our pitching is not bad but young guys can’t keep this up all season. Our offense is God awful, and they need to start “creating” more runs instead of waiting for opposing pitchers to make mistakes of walking batters and throwing the meat pitches every once in a while.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol.

Okay.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 12, 2009 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yahoosports?

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 12, 2009 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Earl Weaver....

begs to disagree. He used the same philosophy with the Orioles in the dim, distant past.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on May 12, 2009 9:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, if you go back and look at the stats...

…the offense was pretty good in the early 2000s.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was reading yesterday

about Geren’s ejection from Saturday’s game, and didn’t know exactly how to take Giambi’s comment afterwards:

“A manager’s got to do that.”

I mean, not to take a quote out of proportion, but you have to wonder if there is a hidden message there.

Anyways, I absolutely agree in regards to holding the players (and management) accountable. Enough with the excuses already.

I was at both games this past weekend, and with the exception of Saturday’s ninth inning, there was “no there there” on the offensive end. Pitiful. I’ll take wins any day over being entertained or inspired. But if you must lose, at least compete.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on May 11, 2009 12:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If you must lose, at least compete.

I’d like to add that you should be a little pissed about losing to boot. People who expect to win most often do just that.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on May 11, 2009 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agrd.

Hierarchy of LB’s preferences:

1. Win and be entertaining;
2. Win and be boring as hell;
3. Lose and be entertaining;
4. Lose and suck the life -force out of your fanbase, til they see only black, long for the sweet release of death and openly wish to be distracted from this trainwreck of a season.

I’m not saying we’re at four, but…

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Call it Death-Con 4

JJ Martin
The best way to catch a knuckleball is to wait until the ball stops rolling and then pick it up. ~Bob Uecker

by JJ Martin on May 11, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ask not for whom

the A’s roll over and play dead. They roll over and play dead for whomever they’re playing against.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice use of "whom" and "whomever." I appreciate that.

JJ Martin
The best way to catch a knuckleball is to wait until the ball stops rolling and then pick it up. ~Bob Uecker

by JJ Martin on May 11, 2009 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank John Donne.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 12, 2009 8:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't ask who the bell rings for.

It rings for you.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on May 12, 2009 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As I was writing this, I started thinking about the Angels.

Now, I never really like getting into the “Moneyball” vs. “Smallball” argument, especially in a thread that I create. But, I think there’s something interesting about the differences between the A’s and Angels in the last few seasons. Both teams have had pretty poor overall offensive teams the past few years, but one team has been able to maximize the personnel and opportunities they have, and have been able to score “enough” runs in order to prevail in “winnable” games.

Of course, the Angel pitching has always been able to make “enough” runs closer to 3 or 4 than to 5 or 6, but still, the Angel’s have a knack for just getting things done and not making excuses when they are dealt some adversity (see: yesterday’s game and the entire 2009 season up to this point) while the A’s don’t quite get that idea…

I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!

by Taj Adib on May 11, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Angels force the issue and succeed in part because of that

The A’s wait for things to happen and they usually don’t.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 11, 2009 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That seems to be the philosophy surrounding some of the recent signings, i.e. Nomar, Giambi. Let’s just wait around to see if they have any juice left in the tank…

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 7:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought Geren ran out and argued balls and strikes

precisely to get ejected and keep Holliday from getting tossed.

I didn’t read anything more into it.

by OaklandSi on May 11, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, cause he was about to get tossed.

It was the right move by Geren. But, unlike 67M, I wasn’t there Saturday and none of us saw it on television, right? Maybe he saw something we didn’t hear.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw it.

Geren was ejected about two seconds after forcefully pushing Holliday away from the ump. I think if he had been any slower, Holliday would have taken the fall. Holliday was, of course, ticked that the pitch was called a strike. There was a big cheer when Geren was ejected.

by LoneStranger on May 11, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As in:

“Yay! Our manager just did the right thing and fell on the sword instead of Holliday!”

or

“Yay! That worthless PoS won’t be able to destroy our chances of coming back now!”

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I cheered.

I’m not sure why, but I hope it was for the first option. I think it was for the first option. It was mostly for the first option. It was the first option for sure. I think maybe it was just because something exciting happened.

by LoneStranger on May 11, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I watched it live on mlb.tv

Holliday was going to get thrown out and Geren basically took the bullet for him as all good managers should. Now I am not saying Geren is a good manager but I did appreciate him doing that and I am sure his players did too.

by DeJay on May 12, 2009 7:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He didn't need to take the bullet for him at all.

All Geren needed to do was to get inbetween Holliday and the Ump so Holliday wouldn’t get himself thrown out by saying something stupid. Geren then proceeded to get thrown out by arguing balls and strikes – to me that’s a little silly, he’d done his job by ushering Holliday back to the dugout.

by OldhamA on May 12, 2009 8:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Umpire was ready to throw someone out

I seem to remember Holliday arguing a call in a previous at bat too. Geren hardly said a word – it took all of two seconds for the Ump to throw him out. Also as long as he doesn’t make a habit of it it sends a good message to the rest of the team.

by DeJay on May 12, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's exactly how it happened. Geren had barely had a chance to say anything

before the Ump tossed him.

My take on it was that Holliday said something that was going to get him thrown, but the ump did us a favor by throwing Geren for it.

by LoneStranger on May 12, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fair enough I suppose.

One of the intricacies of baseball I’ll never get.

by OldhamA on May 12, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think it's really that intricate

There’s a very clear rule against arguing balls and strikes.

9.02
.
.
.

(a) Players leaving their position in the field or on base, or managers or coaches leaving the bench or coaches box, to argue on BALLS AND STRIKES will not be permitted. They should be warned if they start for the plate to protest the call. If they continue, they will be ejected from the game.

(It’s a little like rules against touching the referee in soccer/football, or maybe a bit like the rules against anyone except the captain arguing with the ref. If you do either of these things and get carded, it’s your fault.)

Sometimes umps let managers or players argue or yell a little, but technically the rule is, if you argue balls and strikes you’re ejected.

Managers don’t want players ejected for this, and really don’t want players getting suspended for 3 games if they get ejected and then get even angrier about it. So managers often intervene and go after the ump instead of the player.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 12, 2009 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually that doesn't say anything about the batter.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 12, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's true

But the previous paragraph says that no one at all is allowed to argue any judgment call (fair/foul, ball/strike, safe/out) but doesn’t have the ALL CAPS YOU WILL BE EJECTED baNiNG WanD stuff in it.

I think the idea might be that once you’ve K’d, you don’t belong in the batter’s box any more.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 12, 2009 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not the balls and strikes thing, the manager being ejected

because the umpire ‘just felt somebody had to go’. Surely the player should be ejected if he’s the one that has started the argument – the manager stepping in and crossing the line would only mean that both of them would be ejected.

by OldhamA on May 13, 2009 3:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, it's "tradition".

The ump has to generate a written report on ejections, and I imagine that they get called on the carpet for to many. So one will do if it gets his point across.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on May 13, 2009 8:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right.

That’s what happened, and should have happened. Was just wondering if Giambi’s comment in which he pretty much states the obvious was a tiny jab in the direction of Geren to step it up.

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on May 11, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe we should fire Geren,

make JG player/coach.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's older that AJ Hinch

I'm not a big wine guy... Where do you grow the BEER?

by str8tarrow on May 11, 2009 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was at the game

and when I saw it, I actually assumed it was Holliday that got tossed. I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually said, point blank, “OK, throw me out instead.”

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point on the Swisher thing

I know there a lot of reasons to not put a lot of stock in “team chemistry”

but Swish is a one-man chemistry builder if I ever saw one. Also, I think (and wow, this is impossible to prove) that chemistry DOES have value. Baseball is a mind-game. Players who are too stressed, etc press a lot, become one dimensional, and so on.

by ohmangoAs on May 11, 2009 12:58 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

As far as chemistry goes.

I’ll use a simple example. When you really enjoy the people with whom you work, it generally has a positive effect on performance. IMO, what is more difficult to determine is how one’s performance is affected when working with people of whom you are not particularly fond.

by Pucking Insane on May 11, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would argue that in some instances, a little bit of prickliness can keep you on your toes...

and improve your performance.

That’s kind of what I think this team had in 2006. You had guys like Frank Thomas, Jason Kendall and Milton Bradley who really didn’t fill you up with that “warm and fuzzy come over here and hug me” feeling, but rather seemed to get pissed when things went badly and showed some emotion and lit some fires in the clubhouse and on the field.

I think that’s really missing with this group.

I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!

by Taj Adib on May 11, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd hug Frank.

and he’d have to hug me back, too. I bet Frank gave good hugs.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I love that man.

He will always be the #1 object of my man-crush.

"You know, a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody's crazy."

-Charles Manson

by kaweahkaweah on May 11, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've played Strat-O-Matic with that 2006 team

and I understand that any “season” can produce variances, but you know what?

They’re under .500. That team should never have won 95 games and gone as far as they did. Which makes your point, I believe.

by jasonthea on May 11, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They still make Strat-O-Matic?!

I loved that game!

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In other words

why is every team Lou Piniella manages good?

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not true...

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on May 11, 2009 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Every team except the Rays, then.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm..not true again.

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on May 11, 2009 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm...you're insightful.

Excluding his Tampa years, he has a winning record in 14 of 19 seasons.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 8:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why stop there?

Why not exclude all his non-winning seasons? Then he’ll have a perfect record!

Have you considered that maybe player talent is what dictates whether or not Lou Pinella (or any manager) has winning seasons or not…rather than what he actually does as a manager + however much “fire” he has?

"We were shit, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."

by lenscrafters on May 11, 2009 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why stop there?

Because that was the substance of my statement that he’s been successful in all cases other than Tampa.

Yes, I have considered that talent has something to do with it, so you can quit being a condescending asshole. I actually believe a manager can have an impact on success, too! Leadership counts, in every walk of life.

Finally, learn how to spell “Piniella.”

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

Because it’s silly to pare it all down to whether the manager has good players or not. It gives the manager zero credit whatsoever (and is often used in various debates like “The team sucks! Fire the manager!” vs. “The team’s good because the players are good!”

That’s too simplistic an argument.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 11, 2009 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chemistry is a funny thing.

Swisher tried his act in Chicago, a team desperate for a jolt of life and better “chemistry.” The experiement lasted one year and failed miserably. Ozzie booted him all the way to NY, where he is enjoying a rejuvenation of sorts. If only it were as simple as adding Swisher or subtracting Geren.

JJ Martin
The best way to catch a knuckleball is to wait until the ball stops rolling and then pick it up. ~Bob Uecker

by JJ Martin on May 11, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's why it's called chemistry and not math

you never know how the reaction will happen. add one thing to another, they could just sit there or they could explode. don’t know which till you try it.

don't care if i ever get back.

by AV on May 11, 2009 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Uh, chemistry has advanced since the 1800s

Figured out that adding acids and bases causes stuff to happen, etc.

Jeeze, you act like Chemistry is Rocket Science, or something.

by MobiusKlein on May 12, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes

I think the “missing ingredient” in the analysis of the A’s success in the late 90s/early 00s was a loose and fun clubhouse dynamic. People were having fun playing here, and it makes pretty basic sense that people play better when they feel as if they’re part of something larger than themselves. Obviously, people also are having more fun when they’re winning, but the positive vibe was pretty important to our teams’ successes over those years, I think.

That may just be the way that I want to imagine it, of course, and there are counterexamples, like the Bronx Zoo (but those guys were extremely talented compared to the rest of the league.) But strong clubhouse guys could become the new undervalued entity in the age of statistical analysis.

by DiegoSegui on May 11, 2009 8:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and they had good players

"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball

by flipgatey3 on May 13, 2009 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re #1

I don’t know about “most of us here on AN”, but speaking just for myself, what I’m most frustrated about is not the “lack of fire” nor apparent “lack of concern”; what I’m most frustrated about is that the team is losing.

I just want the team to start winning again. If some sort of change in chemistry helps, fine, but for me the problem is the win-loss record, not what sort of emotion the players are displaying for my cathartic benefit.

If the team were still 11-18 but I saw several of the players getting all pissed off about it, would I be any happier? Not at all. If the team had the same blah personality but had a record of 15-14, would I be happier? Definitely.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on May 11, 2009 1:23 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

For me, the "emotion" and whatnot is a means to an end.

The emotion itself is not gonna win any games…but it’s a signal that the players actually care about winning and losing and most importantly, improving.

I would agree with you, I’d rather the team just wins. But in the absence of any type of consistency, something has to be done to get some momentum, in my opinion.

I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!

by Taj Adib on May 11, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am skeptical that the alleged means have any connection to the end.

I wonder if there have been any studies on it. “Emotion” is a fuzzy thing to measure, but it’s observable, so it seems like this could be examined scientifically. I imagine it would be a challenge to separate correlation from causation, too.

In my mind, this is a classic example of observational bias. We’re likely to notice and remember the guy who gets visibly pissed off and then improves or the guy who seems lackadaisical and continues to slump, because it confirms our personal biases; we’re less likely to notice the guy who stays mild through a slump and then pulls out of it, or the guy who gets a fire lit under him but still sucks.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on May 11, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 11, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're probably right, but it makes me feel better about spending my hard earned cash on this team.

Cry a little, woudja, Matt Holliday?

Nico: Okay. We have twelve hours to make a really big pickle.

by pam5981 on May 11, 2009 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ring of fire

I’ve complained more than usual about Geren, and remain biased against him because of the whole Best Man thing, but the average manager doesn’t make a difference in team performance.

I’m not concerned about the team’s lack of “fire.” I’m concerned because the team can’t hit, and the starters aren’t good enough – and can’t last long enough – to compensate for that. The A’s were a horrible offensive team last year. A whole season of statistics tell us that. Thus far, the additions who were supposed to fix, or at least alleviate, that problem have not done so. The A’s are still a dreadful offensive team.

I’m with iglew and Leopold Bloom on this one. I want a team that wins.

by bear88 on May 11, 2009 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Their on the field display of emotion

Feeds our optimism. It one of those rare times we can see how they feel other than the bland pre and post game interviews. We believe and when they show emotion we believe they do also.

Baja been here

by bajablue on May 11, 2009 7:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what's got two thumbs and is frustrated by lack-o-fire?

fire isn’t just getting “pissed off” though. it’s taking that piss and… what? nooooo…. it’s um. it’s NOT 1-2-3 innings! it’s NOT they’ll warm up eventually! it’s NOT looking at strikes by decree! yeah. that’s what it’s not. what it is, is playing TO win even if you don’t.

and i have to say i’m on the other camp of your 15-14 with boring/11-18 with fire. those numbers matched with those qualities actually suggest to me a better season for the fire guys.

don't care if i ever get back.

by AV on May 11, 2009 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wwL this guy Jww

(that’s supposed to be two thumbs pointing at me)

by LoneStranger on May 11, 2009 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ha ha

good try

don't care if i ever get back.

by AV on May 11, 2009 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If a team is going through the motions, most people can see it clearly

This team is going through the motions right now.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 11, 2009 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some good points Taj

I agree with what you’ve written especially the part about some prickliness missing from the team. I’m thinking about all the great coaches and managers and most of them had an edge. Now you have to have more than that and if your constantly a jerk it’ll wear thin fast but sometimes you need someone to give the team a kick in the ** and God knows this team needs that. Keep up the good work.

by sirbed on May 11, 2009 1:26 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

as a life long athlete and a guy that works in an uber-stressful industry...

the best coaches and bosses i’ve had are the one’s that cause you to excel out of shame. maybe joe maddon is the best current example. he’s not a yeller or a screamer, but the players want to do right by him. they’ll run througha brick wall for him, not because he’ll cuss ’em out but because the player genuinely wants to excel for the man.

by inbillywetrust on May 11, 2009 2:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I disagree.

The best players want to do it for themselves and for their team.

The best coaches and bosses help the players figure that out.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 11, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There seem to be several examples of what Billy's talking about, though.

Maddon, sure, but my mind goes to Parcells, Belicheck, Bobby Knight, Woody Hayes, Lou Pinella….

But there are examples for your side as well. I’m not sure where Coach K falls in the spectrum, but it would appear he’s more toward your line of thinking. Actually, you know what? The more i think about it, Mike, the more I disagree. I think even someone like John Wooden had a kind of shame you into playing well aspect to him. Landry and Shula…huh.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it's hard to equate MLB managers to football or basketball coaches.

There’s a much bigger influence with the latter two on a day to day basis.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 11, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 11, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not all successful teams are managed by redasses

Joe Torre, the most successful manager of the last few decades, is incredibly laid-back. He was practically a statue in the Yankees’ dugout.

Joe Maddon doesn’t seem like a guy who screams or throws around the post-game spread — unlike his much less successful predecessor, Lou Pinella. Charlie Manuel is known as a players’ manager, who’s gotten much more out of the Phillies than his hardass predecessor, Larry Bowa, ever did.

It might be viscerally satisfying to watch a team’s manager rip into the players if they’re not playing well, but I don’t think there’s much evidence that establishes a correlation between “edginess” or whatever and success in a manager.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 11, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

with guys like torre, maddon, francona, etc....

the respect of the players tells you what they’re doing behind the scenes to motivate players. it’s not always obvious in the dugout during games.

the a’s are a little different. we have less superstars and are more barbelled around guys at the very beginning and end of their careers. that makes the managers job a bit more challenging than yelling and screaming.

by inbillywetrust on May 11, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't stand when managers act like children,

whining and screaming and kicking dirt. But that’s not what managers like Torre or Maddon do – what they DO is they hold players accountable. Don’t run out a fly ball? Sit. No yelling, no tantrum, no gruff, just actions that convey expectations.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 11, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Bob Geren's actions and words

likely do not convey a high sense of expectation. People with expectations get agitated or upset when their expectations are not met.

REVISED- The magical goblins that live in the Reverend Billy Lard's shower just told him that actually, Crosby's not gonna improve this year and he'll be released by June... Sorry, kids...

by Gaijin_Suketto on May 11, 2009 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or at least take actions that suggest the status quo is not ok.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 11, 2009 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think a lot of those guys are caricatured

I’d wager that most of Lou Piniella’s former players think of him as a player’s manager, the occasional tirade aside. JIm Leyland’s players certainly do, and he’s hardly a Boy Scout.

All of them are successful in their own way, because they command respect, one way or the other, quiet or loud. Who the hell respects a guy whose primary accomplishment as a manager is being Billy Beane’s best man?

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I'd wager that Geren's being caricatured, too

just like Torre and Charlie Manuel used to be — before they won the World Series.

Incidentally, the number of division winners managed by Torre before he was hired by Steinbrenner? 1. Out of 14 seasons. Number of times he’d led a team to 90 wins? 0.

It would have been really, really easy before the 1996 season to say that Joe Torre, who’d been an almost universally unsuccessful manager since he began his career in 1977, was a bad motivator, a guy with no fire, a guy who couldn’t lead players effectively. That’s why he was so bad! Then, he got to a new team and, after winning 6 WS and taking them to the playoffs for 12 seasons in a row, he’s up there in people’s minds with McGraw and Stengel and Durocher and Weaver.

Look at Terry Francona, who’s managerial career high in wins in 4 years with the Phillies was 77 — four losing seasons, a cumulative winning percentage of .440. Pathetic. A loser. And then he goes to the Red Sox and he’s suddenly a miracle worker.

I think lots of people here are stitching together causes for the A’s losses and then blaming them reflexively on the manager.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 11, 2009 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

That's fair.

I just wonder why the A’s always hire managers that nobody else wants. With Francona and Torre, they were hired by extremely high profile organizations with a lot to lose, in spite of the track records you mentioned. There had to have been something there that suggested they possessed the qualities you look for in a manager.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 8:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Red Sox wanted Macha when he was the A's bench coach

and the A’s refused to let him interview for the Red Sox gig, which was a huge deal at the time. Then he was hired by the A’s. After Beane fired him, he got hired by the Brewers.

Art Howe got hired by the Mets after Beane got rid of him, too.

I have no idea exactly why the Yankees hired Torre or why the Red Sox hired Francona. Sometimes I think guys get hired sort of as placeholders, and then they start winning so the club keeps them. The Phillies wanted Leyland, but he wouldn’t commit to them, so they settled for their 2nd choice — Manuel.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 11, 2009 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Point taken regarding Macha.

Although the main reason they wanted to talk to Macha is that he was a bench coach on a hugely successful team. It wasn’t because he’d proven he could be successful as a manager, nor were there other teams clamoring to talk to him.

I’m not as concerned with what happens after they manage the A’s, just the effort made to get somebody in demand before he becomes A’s manager. Even then, it’s surely possible to hire someone without that track record and have them be successful, much as you illustrate above.

I believe regardless that the manager does matter—not as much as the talent, for sure—but they matter. I have worked for good leadership and poor leadership before, and the difference among the same pool of talent can be profound.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i work 100 hour weeks and i travel a ton. do i want to do well for myself and my firm?...of course...

but there are lots of days where i don’t want to get out of bed or push a rock up another big hill. if my boss was a yeller or a screamer, i’d be a lot less motivated. i have a good boss, one that i want to work hard for and one that motivates for more subtly. have too pansy a boss and the office gets a way with murder. have a yeller or a screamer and the firm attracts mercenaries.

geren is a pansy. piniella is a screamer. neither work

joe maddon? francona? joe torre? tony larussa? they know how to get it done.

by inbillywetrust on May 11, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

It's funny because I'm a pessimist.

You know, at the end of a soccer match in which my side has lost, I take it personally. I feel responsible for it, and I feel like I let down the other players on the squad. There’s no coach needed to make me want to play better.

I can only imagine how that same feeling would be even MORE magnified were I a professional caliber athlete.

The bottom line is this: at the MLB level, everybody is a good player. Some of them are headcases and might need some choice words here and there, but said player isn’t going to go out and play better BECAUSE of those words.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 11, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

everybody is wired a bit differently, but i think the highs and lows of being a pro athlete

are magnified by the pressure, the press, the lonliness of travel, playing for a contract, the prospect of failing at something that you love, etc… it’s why rockstars get into drugs and what not off stage. there is very little in the world that can compare to the high of being on stage with the adrenaline pumping through your veins. being too emotional everyday would kill you as a person.

yeah words don’t make you play better, but they sure can be more motivating than some dude screaming at you the whole time

by inbillywetrust on May 11, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the most successful people in the world...people that are at the tops of what they do...music, art, business,

etc….all have life coaches and mentors/advisors. everybody has doubts, up days and down days.

in a 162 game season, motivation can’t soley come from within and it can’t come solely from a paycheck either.

by inbillywetrust on May 11, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um, that's exactly my point.

The best coaches are the ones who help the players figure out where their motivation comes from and how to get motivated again.

They aren’t the actual reason for being motivated.

Flipping out and throwing shit and kicking things isn’t gonna do a damn thing to motivate Matt Holliday.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 11, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mister, there are two kinds of stupid. One kind is the man who strips naked and runs through the woods howling at the moon. The other is the man who does the same thing in your living room. One of them you don’t have to worry about, the other you’re kind of forced to deal with.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again, sorry.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 11, 2009 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

was that last week you did that?

alaska A residing in colorado. (soon in Idaho)

by ak_A on May 11, 2009 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think one of the problems in baseball is there are so many games

It may be hard for someone to take the average loss too hard when you figure most teams are going to win or lose a minimum of 60 games with the the other 62 really determining who’s good or not.

So, aside from blowouts or close losses where the team really had a chance to win and should have, the usual response is probably going to be along the lines of “Well, we just didn’t get this one. There’s always tomorrow.”

Losing streaks and slumps ought to bring the urgency to win out a little more, with pennant races of course being the biggest sense of urgency. Still, it’s not like a 16-game football season where you only have so many chances to get those wins and a few losses can really damage your season.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 11, 2009 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Someone needs to infiltrate the Big Screen at the Coli

as they are about to play the national anthem and run a 30 second video about how pathetic and embarrassing the team is and to pull their heads out of their arses before it’s too late.

They can play this before the 234 people that are present and on national TV. That ought to shake things up a little

by Trainman on May 11, 2009 2:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd vote

for the latter in my Hoosiers quote above. He did that in BB’s office, I’d say he at least gets suspended.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 11, 2009 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but what would you do if Ryan Sweeney

stripped naked and ran through your living room howling at the moon?

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on May 11, 2009 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd probably say, "Oh not AGAIN!"

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 11, 2009 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Escaped!

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on May 11, 2009 8:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bring Back the Ghost of Billy Martin

Manager Billy Martin / Resting in Peace with a nice beer in his hand, was the epitome of a fiery manager. He got the most out of the A’s players in the early 80’s. He also caused a few pitchers to blow out their arms, but that’s another story. We need a manager who can be a firebrand, cheerleader, counselor & if need be, a total a-hole.

The A’s could also use a motivational speaker like Chris Farley to fire these guys up. You can’t use the threat of living in a van down by the river, because all of these guys at the very least can live in a modest townhome or penthouse somewhere. Do you ever get the feeling some of the A’s players are content to collect their paychecks & call it a day? I understand it’s a 162 game season & you can’t go full-tilt all the time.

A good start for us will be the healthy return of Duke to the rotation. I truly hope he fully recovers. We need him.

Paddle Faster! I hear banjo music.

by alpine26 on May 11, 2009 4:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

So who gets the 22 complete games in a row? Cahill?

Anderson gets the 14-inning complete game.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 11, 2009 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We don't need a new Billy Martin,

but we need some Billy Martinsauce on our managerial tacos.

Bob Geren is a Jack-In-The-Box taco… you know… with the thick slice of american cheese

I don’t eat those.

REVISED- The magical goblins that live in the Reverend Billy Lard's shower just told him that actually, Crosby's not gonna improve this year and he'll be released by June... Sorry, kids...

by Gaijin_Suketto on May 11, 2009 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

EEWWWW Martinsauce

As well as JITB tacos

A fractured sinus is nothing to sneeze at.

by somebodyelse on May 11, 2009 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Make that Anderson, Cahill, Braden, and Gallagher

because Norris, McCatty, Keough and Langford all pitched 14-inning CGs in 1980, IIRC.

Plus, Cust needs to steal home.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 11, 2009 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

For my money

Billy Martin is the best manager of the last 50 years. He made every team he ever touched win, and nearly immediately.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oy. He was great short-term and a disaster long-term.

He destroyed the careers of Mike Norris, Rick Langford, Matt Keough, and Steve McCatty, all of whom were outstanding pitchers before they were asked/allowed to go 14 innings at a time, 22 complete games in a row…Thank GOD Billy Martin is not managing Cahill, Anderson…

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 11, 2009 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's a fair point.

He still won everywhere he went, though. I’m not saying I’d want him to be manager, either. I just can’t think of another manager that was such a difference maker in the win loss column. Big market, small market, good team, bad team, didn’t matter.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously, if the world was going to end in 365 days, he's your guy

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 11, 2009 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

didn't pablo escobar help to ruin Mike Norris' career also?

Your 2009 Oakland Athetics: This time, it's personal.

by Kallus on May 11, 2009 8:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he was a coke dealer, then yes

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 11, 2009 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, he was a Colombian drug lord from the '80s

Your 2009 Oakland Athetics: This time, it's personal.

by Kallus on May 11, 2009 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

mcbainthatsthejoke.gif

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on May 11, 2009 10:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This...
1. I think what most of us here on AN are most frustrated about is this team’s lack of fire, or at the very least, lack of concern about their monumental offensive struggles. Far too many times this season you’ll hear a player here or a player there just shrug-off a shut-out or near shut-out and just say, “Well, Giambi and Holliday have been too good in the past to stay this bad in the future. So we’ll be fine.” That’s just ridiculous to me.

…has been said by so many players that it’s coming off as a crutch.

I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup

by UncleLeo on May 11, 2009 6:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

They have been saying we will be fine for 6 weeks.

Someone on the team should come out and say, “We are playling like shit, Our hitters are an enbarrassment and we currently suck. We need to pull our heads out before we are in too deep”

by Trainman on May 11, 2009 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A little city, chilling by the North Bay.,

Needless to say, our boys don’t play, fool.
I

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 12, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can't believe I'm saying this

But we don’t have to look far to see a team that is playing to the best of their abilities and not making any excuses for a sub-par offense. I’m of course talking about the hated Giants and their above .500, second place record. Not only are they playing better than the A’s but they seem to be waaaaaay more personable and “fun” to watch.

Their commercials, while lame and containing horrible acting, include pretty much every player on the roster rather than just focusing on a couple players. I remember when our commercials were cool and funny and our players were fun to root for while the Giants were the geezers. It has definitely been switched even though we still have tons of young players.

Sure they have a nicer stadium and more money but at least they’re finally doing something with it. They’ve created a fun atmosphere while it appears that the A’s have done everything in their power to lose their own. This comes from the loss of countless players, constant changes in the coaches so that the staff doesn’t have an established “style”, Wolff bashing Oakland repeatedly, and an overall stagnancy in the overall MO of the organization.

I don’t really feel like I’m watching the A’s anymore which I thought would be impossible in the offseason after the addition of Giambi. I thought that with Jason back in the fold the team would be at the very least watchable but I think it’s even worse than it was the last two years because this team lacks any true identity. I’m sure everyone is aware of the fact that a sizable chunk of the team probably won’t be back next season (Holliday, O-Cab, Nomar, Springer, Crosby, and probably way more knowing the annual turnover).

I’m sure a nice winning streak will cure all of these things, or at least mask them, but for now the team is exposed for what it is. Lifeless.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on May 11, 2009 8:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

They are indeed better than the A's right now

but it’s much simpler than all the above. They have way better starting pitching.

"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico

by jeepers on May 11, 2009 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

starting pitching and the schedule makers. While the A;s have played half there games

against the best division in baseball. The Giants have only played 6 outside ot the worst division in baseball. Without Manny, the NL West is the Pac 10.

by theblackpearl on May 12, 2009 6:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe that's the solution

We need better commercials.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on May 11, 2009 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of commercials...

Those “100 percent thunder” ads are starting to make me bitter. They must be talking about the kind of thunder that wouldn’t even scare my 4-year-old nephew.

They say every sin is deadly but I believe they may be wrong
I'm guilty of all seven and I don't feel too bad at all

by day-to-day on May 12, 2009 1:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The other day, some guy commented on that commercial by saying something like: It’s ground out, on top of pop out, on top of fly out, on top of DL… That was great!

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 8:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It wouldn't hurt

I get the sense when I see the Giants’ commercials that they’re a fun team to watch. When I see the A’s commercials I do not get that feeling. Watching the actual product on the field re-enforces this belief.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on May 12, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well said - my thoughts precisely.

The Giants had no expectations on them based on their off-season moves. After the A’s acquire Giambi, then (not Furcal, not Hudson, definitely not Crosby but) Cabrera, add Nomar on top of that – expectations were that the offense HAD to be better this year and it just isn’t. So look at those Giants, having fun playing ball. And here we sit on the same ole pile of injuries, except for Crosby who got demoted and still starts every game, and whodathunk we’d be thanking our lucky stars for Dallas Braden last season?

June is generally a good month for the A’s. If things don’t turn around then, …. well, what am I saying. It’s baseball. The Royals are freakin’ leading the AL Central right now.

Good thing I’ll be at the game tonight. I clearly need to get some things off my chest.

Bob Geren, on 8/2/07, on the success of Alan Embree as new interim closer: "What can I say,... he's been our Steady Tremendous Bullpen Man"

by popcornjames on May 12, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+eleventymillion

’Nuff said all around.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 11, 2009 10:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Tampa Bay Rays

Anybody here familiar with the Rays organization? How did they end up being this good of a club, despite having signed any huge FA’s? More importantly, who is their GM?? Whoever he is, he doesn’t seem to get a lot of publicity for developing a lot of solid players.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 7:58 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What's their philosophy?

Suck for years, pile up the draft picks, and finally have some of them pay off?

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, don’t look now but the A’s are getting there!

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 8:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I also don’t think it’s that different from Beane’s philosophy of stock piling minor-leaguers, picks, and hoping that a few out of the XX amount of picks pay off. I mean, does he think Kristian Bell will pay off or something?

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 8:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Note: After starting their history with 90+ losses each of their first 10 years...

…they finally had some things fall into place for them last year.

It now becomes something they need to sustain, but I’m not ready to crown them as an organizational model anyone should follow yet.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 8:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know, despite jeepers/lenscrafters III above,

I think at least part of the credit for their success should go to Piniella. He was adamant/vocal/belligerent about wanting the owners to spend more money. When it was clear they were operating on a very small budget, Lou did everything in his power to build the organization up from the ground floor. He literally forced the organization to grow the eff up.

Now he failed where Maddon’s succeeded, but again, as lenscrafters points out above, it does have a lot to do with the roster. Conversely, to sit here and say, “Well, all they really did was suck for years on end, stockpile draft picks and reap the rewards.” If that were the case, both the Royals and the Pirates would’ve both been awesome at the latest five years ago. It’s having the right draft position, but it’s also drafting Michael versus drafting Sam Bowie.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 12, 2009 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Plus, Andrew Friedman knows what the hell he's doing.

Chuck Lamar, not so much.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 12, 2009 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently, Tito Ortiz knows what he’s “doing”.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have it on good authority

that the Huntington Beach Bad Boy is an asshole. Hard to believe.

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 12, 2009 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point. I dig the Michael versus Sam Bowie bit.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 8:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a simplistic way of looking at it, sure

And I’d agree about Piniella. He’s someone who can make things change even if it’s not seen for a few years, which you’d expect if you have an organization that’s nothing but crap. Improvement isn’t going to happen overnight.

They did get some very good players who have the talent to be mainstays and forces in the league for years, no question. They’re doing some things the right way now but going from another 90+ loss season to their first 90+ win season and the World Series from one year to the next is still a larger, faster turnaround than anyone has the right to expect.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 8:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In case it wasn't clear, I was referring to my comment as being more simplistic.

Obviously there’s more to it than “suck for years, get good draft picks, watch them pay off all at once.”

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most of those young players that they had had breakout seasons last year. I would expect them to be competitive for the next few years, especially when they are still under the Rays’ control. Their young pitching is a lot like the A’s earlier this decade. I do think that they have outstanding managing and hitting coach. Carlos Pena is tearing the cover off the ball, they’ve got Longoria, and even Jason Bartlett…where was this guy when he was in Minnesota???

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 8:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but that's not a philosophy so much as it's good fortune

I mean, “Let’s wait for everyone to have a breakout year at the same time” isn’t exactly the plan, I don’t think.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But isn’t that what essentially happened with us around 1999-2000?

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to this extent, it didn't

And I’m not talking a World Series. I’m talking a 31 game improvement the Rays had in 2008 over 2007.

The A’s had some things come together in the time you point out, but their low water mark in the 1990s was 1997. Let’s start there:

1997: 65-97
1998: 74-88 (9)
1999: 87-75 (13)
2000: 91-70 (4)
2001: 102-60 (11)
2002: 103-59 (+1)

For five years in a row they increased their win total. Two were by double digits with a third missed by one, so in their case it was a bit more gradual compared to the sudden shift the Rays experienced last year.

If anything, it sounds like you’re hoping for a Rays-like turnaround but the A’s weren’t as low as the Rays were for years. Having an A’s-like turnaround of the late 90s would be more accurate to ask for. The A’s still haven’t had a 90-loss season since that one in 1997, and it was one of only two (the other being 1994) since 1982.

They’re on pace to change that this year, which hopefully doesn’t happen.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good post. I actually failed to remember how gradual our wins increased over that period of time.

The Rays were an expansion team in 1997, so you’ll have to give them some years to be competitive especially playing in the AL East with teams like the Yanks, BoSox and I recall that even the Orioles were decent around that time. But the key to the Rays’ change in success were the changes in front office in 2004. They canned LaMar and brought in new team president and EVP. I still don’t know who does the GM duties for the team but I don’t get the impression that their success last year was a fluke, even though it was a sudden shift as you pointed out. Sure, they may have increased win totals by 30+ games and they may not even get to that same 97 wins this year but even if they continue to win high 80’s-mid 90’s number of games, I would still consider that a successful transformation by the organization.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed re: the transformation

And yep, I figure an expansion team is going to have five or so years where they’re really terrible, but of the four that are newest to the league they were the last to really go anywhere. The Marlins and Diamondbacks have already won World Series while the Rockies finally got to the World Series the year before the Rays but had been to the playoffs before that.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

For some reason I think some of the + signs didn't make it into the comment

The number after the record, of course, is their improvement in wins over the prior season.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t you think that Billy is doing that to a certain extent with our pitching this year along with young players like Buck and Sweeney? He was able to plug in an old washed-up Giambi, O-Dawg and Nomar but I am under the impression that he chose not to address the starting pitching rotation via FA because he was waiting and expecting his young pitchers to have a breakout year.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 8:21 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The pitching staff was also like 8 guys deep.

Even before free agency, there was:

Duchscherer, Gallagher, Eveland, Braden, Outman, Anderson, Cahill, and Gio. You could probably throw Edgar Gonzalez and Jerome Williams into the mix too, not that they’d be any good, but probably capable of being 5th starters.

All that and they kicked the tires on Randy Johnson during free agency.

So that’s 11 guys who were potentially going to be a part of the rotation, and that’s not all young guys expected to have a breakout year.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 12, 2009 8:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are all you guys in favor of having Duke back in the rotation when he’s cleared to play? I really love that kid Bailey. I was hoping that they’d reconvert him into a starter, plug Duke in the bullpen for this season.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 8:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He's already rehabbing as a starter.

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 12, 2009 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure.

I think Bailey has more value out of the bullpen at this point, especially if he pitches more aggressively when he knows he’s only getting an inning or two.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about Bailey as a closer? I like how he wears that cap.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love this idea

Ziggy can go back to comming in when we need a GIDP.

a ground rule double followed by three unproductive outs, sounds like my sex life - dayzd toe

by adragon on May 12, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Although I prefer a "Billy Martin-type" manager,

I agree that being yelled at isn’t going to make Giambi, Holliday, and the gang hit or play any better. You would think that professional athletes would take some pride in their work and need little outside motivation.
However, that being said, there is absolutely nothing wrong with calling the team out. Perhaps not by name, but simply coming out and telling us something we already know …. and that is, this team is underperforming (offensively, anyway) at an alarming rate. I agree with some of the comments above … there is absolutely no guarantee that “well, so and so has always hit for average (or power) and his numbers will be there at the end.” Not if he keeps playing like s*** they won’t!! Those kinds of comments are simply lame, worn-out cliches — a different spin than telling the truth. “We’ve got a bunch of guys who aren’t doing their jobs right now, and they really need to turn it around — what we’re forcing the fans to watch right now is garbage.”
I can take losing. I can even take losing when the team really ought to be better. What I can’t take is losing, and the front office/manager/players not admitting that they’re playing like s***. And trying to put some sort of postitive spin on it is the same thing as not admitting you’re horrible.

I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.

by Vacafan on May 12, 2009 9:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What's annoying now is even Jim Skaalen is buying into the "we'll be fine" POV

A’s hitting coach is staying the course

A couple parts:

“It’s just staying the course and doing the daily work and routine,” Skaalen said. “Yeah, there’s been a little bit of pressing going on. It’s been a combination of things. We’ve hit a lot of balls good and haven’t hit with a lot of luck. But I’m seeing some really good swings.”

And:

“We’ve sputtered because we haven’t had the consistency that you need through the lineup,” Skaalen said. “Combine that with the fact that we’ve had some good games pitched against us, and it’s kind of where we are. But where we are is not where we’re going to be.”

What consistency is he talking about? The same people being in the same spots in the order, or people underperforming? How much of it is good games pitched against them vs. hitters just not hitting?

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on May 12, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, seriously. When you have several young hurlers pitching gems against us, and shutting us down, I’d say that it’s more of the offense’s problem.

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 9:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mean, just off the top of my head, we’ve been shut down by these pitchers: Adenhart, Ricky Romero, Brett Cecil, Brian Tallet (two times by this dude with a mustache whose ERA is just under 5). And I think Loux gave up one run in 7 innings against us…I don’t even want to know what his ERA is like…

by ATLDuck on May 12, 2009 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We have had hitting coaches telling us this for the last 5 years

The offense has remained a constant pile of shit. That is consistent.

You can mark down a “L” most everytime we face a LHP, that also is a constant.

We seem to face Cy Young at least 90 times a year

by Trainman on May 12, 2009 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thought experiment

Suppose, for the sake of argument, that it has been scientifically proved to a reasonable degree of certainty that bland positive talk like “Yeah, we’ve struggled a little but we need to stay the course and we’ll be fine” is significantly more likely to help the hitters improve than blunt admissions like “we’re playing like crap right now, guys just aren’t getting the job done.”

If that is indeed the case, then which do you prefer: Would you rather hear the former, even though we know it’s bullshit and surely the coaches do, too, but at least have the consolation that it may help them get better? Or would you rather hear them tell it like it is anyway, because the season is probably beyond hope and at least you can have the satisfaction of hearing the truth?

I honestly don’t know which kind of talk is more likely to help the hitters, or indeed if it makes any difference at all. I think either possibility is plausible.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on May 12, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if it were even plausible that it could help the batters, I'd rather have them say that.

It’s self-evident that their hitting sucks right now. We know it. They know it. The coaches know it. Unless you’re neck deep in Pharoah’s river, you’re gonna know when you’re hitting well and when you’re underperforming. What does them being honest about a self-evident truth provide for us as fans, other than some kind of sick gratification, or further evidence of their ineptitude?

Define "succeed." --Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on May 12, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Said gratification seems to matter a great deal to many on AN.

Ultimately it’s a spectator sport. Winning games is the primary means to the end, but the ultimate end is to entertain the fans. If the fans want emotional gratification more than they want to see the team win, well, it’s then I guess it’s the job of the players to emote.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on May 12, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll try and respond Leopold and iglew both ...

“what good does being honest about a self-evident truth provide for us as fans, other than some sick gratification … "

I’m not sure why the gratification needs to be “sick”, but I’ll let you define that when you can. I guess my question would be “why not?” What’s the problem with being honest, or telling the truth … actually the way I’d like to put it is “holding oneself accountable”?! I mean, the players have to say something, right? Why not tell me/us that you’re not doing your job right now? You’re right, Leopold, it IS self-evident — all the more reason to own it and not try and duck and dodge it by hauling out some tired cliche.

And iglew, I can assure you that winning games is waaaaaayyyyy more important to me than the emotional gratification that comes from players owning up to their performance. The emotional gratification that comes from winning games can’t be beat … but if I’m not getting that kind, then you’re damn right, I want the other. I wanna know that Player A realizes he’s stinkin’ up the joint, and he’s gonna do something about it.

I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.

by Vacafan on May 12, 2009 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This whole owning up/in denial thing

has been rolling around in my head all day. I’m not even sure which one I prefer anymore.

I’ve heard a manager or players say, “We’re just not very good right now”, and admit that it was refreshing.

I have also looked to a manager or players during a rough stretch for some kind of hope, and was comforted by them saying, “We’ll be fine.”

So either can be “emotionally fulfilling” so long as there is an actual plan in place to improve the results.

I think what it comes down to is that neither are meant to become repetitious.

“We’re just not very good right now.”
We know. And we know you know. Now howzabout changing some things, hmm?

“We’ll be fine.”
Awesome. Um, will that be anytime this season?

I'm here to talk about the past.

by 67MARQUEZ on May 12, 2009 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great point.

I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.

by Vacafan on May 12, 2009 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't disagree with your first paragraph, and...

…even feel it has merit, but the whole ‘stay positive’ thing only works for so long. I’m all for staying positive, but a good kick in the butt has it’s place, too. At some point the words become empty and even the players know it.

I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup

by UncleLeo on May 12, 2009 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could....

pitch a good game against this team and I can’t break a pane of glass with my fastball!

by Keystone State on May 12, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's a great question iglew ...

I’m not sure “talk” helps or hurts the hitters, either. What an honest evaluation does do, however, is let the paying public know that the coaching staff/organization is unhappy with the results as well. And you know what? That’s important. Trotting out the same ol’ cliches every day is unbelievably NOT helpful — to anybody — I do know that!
I disagree with some AN’ers who claim that “being honest” doesn’t do anybody any good in the long run. It reminds the players that their performance(s) isn’t being taken in stride – that they are being held accountable (hopefully) for piss-poor execution night in and night out. But most of all, it sends a message to the most important group involved with a team ~ the fans!!~ that “yes, we realize that we are letting you down at every turn, and we’re working to correct it.” Regardless of what some may say, answering to us by being honest is incredibly important!!

I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.

by Vacafan on May 12, 2009 2:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You know (well, Giambi aside) the rest of them will probably be fine, right?

"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."

by mikev on May 12, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Probably" is the key word though, mikev

You know I’m not much of a stat-head, but I do agree with you if you’re saying that, in the long run, players usually perform at or near their seasonal averages. (Home runs, RBI, slugging, OBP, etc.)
But not always … there are no guarantees … Holliday could just end up having a really crappy year, for example. But it’s the “company line” that bugs me the most … yes, Mr. Holliday (just to pick on him for a minute) I realize you probably will end the season with 25 HR’s and around a .280 average (or whatever stat you want to pick). My question is, will we be 15 games out of first by the time you heat up?
It isn’t so much the underperformance that bugs me … it’s the underperformance combined with a “we’ll be fine” attitude. Cuz you know what? If this kind of play continues, we won’t “be fine”. We’ll be 25 games out at the end of the season, but you’ll still manage to hit your 25 bombs cuz 15 will come when nobody gives a damn and we’ve become the Pittsburgh Pirates.

I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.

by Vacafan on May 12, 2009 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Slight correction....

Scott Boras and Matt Holiday will both give a damn.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on May 12, 2009 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really, because Holliday's numbers will still look good.

The team won’t. But his numbers will. (Assuming he reaches his career-average in most categories.) I was just trying to say that I agree Holliday will probably end up looking “fine” stats-wise, but he will not have helped the team much.
How many HR’s does he have now … 4? He’ll probably have around 10-12 by the break. If the team continues to flounder (and 8 HR’s by Holliday won’t change that much), we’ll probably be about 8-10 games out.
So Holliday adds another 15 jacks when we’re completely out of the race … looks good on that stat sheet come contract time, but he will have been a complete bust in my book.

I needed a team so I wouldn’t turn into one of the eighty million pink hat-wearing Bud Light-drinking mulleted idiots at Fenway.

by Vacafan on May 12, 2009 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beyond the Boxscore reports

that the A’s have been the 2nd-unluckiest team in the AL and have played the 2nd-hardest schedule in the majors so far (scroll down the comments for that info).

These numbers are based on the Baseball Prospectus adjusted standings — specifically, “third-order wins”, which means taking the run-components of the A’s offense and pitching/defense, analyzing how many runs they should have scored/allowed, adjusting for park and strength of schedule, and calculating a pythagorean W-L based on that.

At least, that’s how I understand the process. People who actually understand stats well should correct my summary if I’m wrong.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 12, 2009 5:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm no stat-head either

but the A’s are third on that list, so doesn’t that make them the 3rd-unluckiest team?

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on May 12, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have a hard time

taking any list seriously that places the A’s anywhere other than last.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on May 12, 2009 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whoops, you're right!

3rd-unluckiest, and have played the 2nd-hardest schedule.

One of the commenters over at BtB noted that the Indians’ “luck” score is skewed by that 24-4 game at Yankee stadium a few weeks ago. We’re obviously still in the SSS part of the schedule for those kinds of things.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on May 12, 2009 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

SSS?

Sassy Skewed Stat part of the sched? Also brings to mind the three military Ss: shit, shower, and shave.

"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball." - Connie Mack

by GoA's on May 13, 2009 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As for the A's schedule strength bad luck...

A couple thoughts:

1) We’ve yet to feast off the cellar-dwelling Indians and Orioles.

2) Of the teams coming strong out of the gate, Seattle and Toronto have been the two big surprises. They happened to be two of the teams we’ve faced twice already.

"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball." - Connie Mack

by GoA's on May 13, 2009 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cause and effect with Seattle?

The M’s can’t buy a win since we left town. Weren’t they pretty much an April surprise precisely by way of beating Oakland 5 out of 6?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on May 14, 2009 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where is..

Al Davis when you really need him. If this were the Raiders, Geren would be toast, along with a coach or two as well.

We need a manager who brings motivation to this club. FAST!!

The Swingin A'zzzzzzzzzzzzz!!

by OakFaninFL on May 14, 2009 2:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ph3spec_small
Having fun with Pythagoras, or, who got lucky during 2009
Dsc00764_small
DLD - 11/07/2009 - How to Keep Yourself Occupied in the Off-Season
527918550406_0_bg_small
2010 Off-Season Blueprint
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #15
Super_grover_small
2010 Offseason Primer

Recent FanPosts

Countdown_small
Bill James 2010 Projections Now on Fangraphs
Depaulbluedemons_small
Zonis's Off Season Charter
Bill_king_small
AFL Rising Stars Showcase Tonight on MLBN @ 5PM
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 4: The Biggest Off Season (Potential) Decision Doesn't Involve Free Agents
Oaklandathletics_small
Hardy to Minnesota. What's with the early offseason trades?
Tyler_at_maya_school_small
Happy 6th Birthday, AN!
Oaklandathletics_small
facebook Members: Keep the A's in OAKLAND
Bill_king_small
Organizational Statistics: Winter Leagues

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans