If you really really need to -- Implications of the Crash on the Standings
I don't have anything to say about this ... I just suspect that others might ... and think it's better to have a dedicated thread for discussion of the baseball implications of the Adenhart crash, so that the memorial/mourning oriented threads can go on without interruption.
If you feel the need to talk about it in that context -- please do it here and not there.
If you think it's way too soon to be talking about this, that's fine too. Please stay out of this thread -- it's clear from the title that it's not for you.
Let's just all be respectful to everyone else. Thank you.
5 recs |
229 comments
Comments
People are already talking about the baseball implications of this?
Sad, very sad. Give it some time to set in, will ya?
by 33SwisherSweet on Apr 9, 2009 10:51 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That's the idea ...
As you might notice below — there are people who want to talk about this stuff — I’m not one of them, I’m just being proactive to try to keep the two conversations separate …
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on Apr 9, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was a good idea.
Not to sound callous, but dwelling on the tragic loss of Nick is not something I particularly relish.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Apr 9, 2009 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Diversion
Without wanting to minimize in any way the sadness associated with this situation, I heard "Fresh Air" on NPR today in the car. It’s an interview with a NYT reporter who recently wrote a book on umpiring. I thought it was interesting.
As there’s no game tonight, Bay Areans can hear it again on KQED 88.5 at 7 PM. It’s also podcast at their website link if you’d prefer to save it for later.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Apr 9, 2009 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I heard that interview as well, and enjoyed it. I had to bite my tongue several times later that night at the Sharks' game
…since my brother-in-law’s birthday is next week and he would love that book. I didn’t want to have him go out and get it before I had a chance to buy it for him.
by LoneStranger on Apr 10, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Way, way too soon.
"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."
by mikev on Apr 9, 2009 10:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
we have to be honest with ourselves
You can’t tell me we’re all not thinking about these things a little bit even as the shock and sadness dominates. Devo was right to place the thread here… but there are some pertinent questions. Will they even play tonight? And if so, will the emotion overwhelm Anderson and the A’s? In what could be a very close pennant race, every game matters.
Will this be a rallying cry for an Angels team that causes them to play beyond their capabilities? Or in a 162 game season will it dwindle— not Nick’s memory mind you, but the psychological effect? And of course their rotation was already looming on threadbare— this was a devastating shock there, too, though only a small fraction of the personal shock and loss. How did that Cardinal team do after Darryl Kile passed? I think it was the year before they won the WS, or maybe two?
I’m just saying that we are capable as humans to show genuine sadness and shock and yet also wonder what the impact is when the Angels are the A’s biggest competitors. If there is a game tonight after all Geren must ask his team to put aside those feelings for 3 hours and try their hardest to win a baseball game— as will scioscia.
by jasonthea on Apr 9, 2009 11:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
They're not playing tonight. The game is cancelled.
Spend some time thinking about stuff other than baseball. There’s another game tomorrow.
"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."
by mikev on Apr 9, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough
My father died last week. the opposite of last night— not a surprise, after 86 years. And we are all mourning and thinking and celebrating. But life goes on. I was able to get excited about a baseball game last night, then have the slap in the face this morning about Nick.
But overall I’m glad for everyone’s sake they’re not playing tonight.
by jasonthea on Apr 9, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry for your loss.
Even when it’s expected, that’s not an easy thing to deal with.
"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."
by mikev on Apr 9, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The "baseball implications" have not crossed my mind once. In fact, this young man's death
makes you realize how unimportant the GAME really is.
by 33SwisherSweet on Apr 9, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
On the contrary...it proves how meaningfull baseball is...His death is hitting hard across the country....
Whereas if the person who died was a no name person, it wouldn’t be a story. Hopefully this event can help stop some drunk drivers in the future, which would never have happened if Nick wasn’t the person. I’m obvisouly not saying what happened was good, but rather hopefully we can learn something from this.
What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.
by winchester5 on Apr 9, 2009 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No one will learn anything from this. In a month almost no one will even remember it besides Angels fans.
by chri5 on Apr 9, 2009 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
you are probably right that it wont be discussed everyday but that doesnt mean it wont be remembered…Ultimately it is each of our jobs to take lessons from this and figure out how to prevent pointless deaths like this one…If it means someone donates money to a charity against drunk driving or maybe people begin to realize we all need to be more responsible for our friends who we may know that drive drunk or whatever…do your part to make sure that this death makes a difference and then even though it may not be remembered in the sense of talking about it or mentioning it, it will be remembered in a more broad and much more important sense of the good things that could come out of it as far as each of us trying to prevent needless deaths such as these…My thoughts and prayers are with everyone directly affected by this because more than just a baseball player has died today…
by yawedout21 on Apr 9, 2009 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey I'm not saying that no one is ever going to drive drunk again, but I'd be willing to bet that it effects
some people enough to actually have some meaning…Imagine a kid, who admired Adenhart…You think that kid is going to grow up and drink and drive? I doubt it. Some people, even if its a small amount of people, will remember.
What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.
by winchester5 on Apr 9, 2009 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would like to encourage everyone to SLOW DOWN ...
at every intersection — whether you have a green light or not.
I am definitely not saying that anyone in Nick Adenhart’s car did anything wrong — but most accidents happen at intersections and in most cases, if the person driving the car that wasn’t at fault had been doing something particularly right, he or she would have had a good chance of avoiding it.
Even if you have a green light, take your foot off the accelerator, put it over the brake and look both ways — every single time — the life you save might just be your own …
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on Apr 10, 2009 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A "defensive driving" policy I use for myself, and urge young people to follow,
is that when the light turns green, don’t go. Wait a moment and look for red-light runners. It has saved me on more than one occasion.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 10, 2009 6:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The other thing
Yellow =/= Green. Too many people in our society think that yellow is code for speed up. I went to DC earlier this year and a friend warned me about the drivers there running red lights and to be careful while walking around. Sure enough in the week I was there I saw three people blatantly run red lights. The rules of the road only work when enforced and I think if we cracked down on people who were safely able to stop for a yellow light and didn’t we’d get a lot less people running reds.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was taught that yellow means
“slow down and stop, unless you’re too close to comfortably stop in time”
Nowadays everyone seems to interpret it as
“speed up and go, unless you’re too far away to comfortably make it through”.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 10, 2009 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
From personal experience
I’d say this will not serve as a rallying cry at first. It may in the long run, but I imagine that like the rest of us and in a much deeper way, the Angels players are going through a very rough time. My guess is that the next few weeks will be hard for them to care much about baseball.
I am thinking back to the season when the Indians lost Time Crews and Steve Olin in Spring Training. I think it was 1993. I remember watching the highlights of Bob Ojeda coming back for his first game and crying at how proud i was of him and his teammates even though I knew nothing about any few them.
I’d say, baseball will become part of the healing process. And the biggest triumph for these Angels players will be making it through the season, regardless of standings or trophies. I fell greatly for them and for the first time in my life, I am going to be rooting for them in every game they don’t play against the A’s.
myspace music
by jeffro on Apr 9, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was 3 years
between Darryl Kile’s death and the Cardinals’ WS victory.
I doubt that his death has any significant impact on their performance beyond 2003.
"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."
by VORP is too nerdy on Apr 9, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the game tonight is canceled I will be very excited to see Anderson pitch the home opener
I wanted to say that in a response to a comment in the other thread, but felt that was wrong.
by drink409 on Apr 9, 2009 11:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm looking forward to seeing Anderson as well.
I’m hoping Holliday loads up on Zinc and C and can start as well. Don’t succumb to a runny nose Matt for the love of God!
"-i never said half the things i said." --Yogi Berra
by Ovale Fan on Apr 9, 2009 11:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
FAIL - Talking about the game being played Friday night
I’m glad tonight’s game is being canceled as it just doesn’t feel right to play after last nights events. The players however will need to be professionals and punch through the emotions before tomorrows start and that won’t be easy.
"-i never said half the things i said." --Yogi Berra
by Ovale Fan on Apr 9, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not even thinking about that part of it now
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Apr 9, 2009 11:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A's Web site is still oblivious
Enjoy the game
by DCinWC on Apr 9, 2009 11:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
not any more
The Schedule on the A’s website has been updated to show that tonight’s game has been postponed. No story about it on the front page though and the “next game” is tomorrow with Outman starting for the A’s.
by skwid on Apr 9, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Devo, good move.
I appreciate it, because this does have serious repercussions for the Angels both now and in the long term from an on the field perspective.
It will be nice to have a place to talk about them, when it feels like something to talk about.
I am still in shock and wondering if it would be bad for the A’s to have an OPD patch on one sleeve and an Adenhart patch on the other.
myspace music
by jeffro on Apr 9, 2009 11:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree; good call, devo
Everyone grieves, or handles tragedy, differently. And if folks want to talk about how the Angels rotation now looks, that’s ok and it doesn’t mean they don’t care about the humans who lost their lives.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 9, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agree.
"If I was any more warm and fuzzy I’d be lint." -grover
by baseballgirl on Apr 9, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree 2
What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.
by winchester5 on Apr 9, 2009 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+3
Everybody deals with tragedy in their own way, and wanting to talk about the game does not automatically label someone as uncaring.
I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup
by UncleLeo on Apr 9, 2009 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree.
I love devo but this is in poor taste . Yes, in time in would be discussed but this was not needed on the first day and is a little like…people discussing what was left to them by a deceased person after someone has just died. It is insensitive to those who may be grieving.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 9, 2009 8:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, it's not.
Because devo made it clear this thread wasn’t for those who were grieving.
RagingHarden: Yeah if you get 20 starts out of me I'll be shocked. Like, I'll wreck my drawers.
by walk off bunt on Apr 9, 2009 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes he did.
But to discuss these things even among those who are not grieving is tasteless. Some boundaries you don’t cross . This is one of those.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 9, 2009 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did it ever occur to you
that this is what some people actually need to do in order to grieve? People who go through the more traditional process of grieving normally are unable to understand it, but some people genuinely need to joke or openly move on after a tragic event. The pain of dwelling it or taking a moment is as bad as watching someone move forward to someone like you. Everyone has their own way of dealing with these sorts of things and like it or not, I think you need to take a step back and really try to let it go. Move off this thread and try to let it go. If you feel it’s distasteful, that’s fine, but simply walk away and let it be.
CuttheMullet, from "The Thread":
"Whenever I’m about to do something, I think "would an idiot do that?" and if they would, I do not do that thing."
by DMOAS on Apr 9, 2009 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree.
It just isn’t respectful to discuss the baseball implications of Adenhart’s death this soon after his passing. It just isn’t right and is gauche IMO.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 9, 2009 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some people would discuss it anyway.
At least this way it’s not there on the other thread. Most people who would be upset by this will be following the other thread and not this one.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 9, 2009 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus this sentence is pretty direct:
“If you think it’s way too soon to be talking about this, that’s fine too. Please stay out of this thread — it’s clear from the title that it’s not for you.”
Your opinions on how one shouldn’t grieve, or deal with grief, suggest there is a wrong way to grieve or deal with grief.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 10, 2009 6:50 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
BTW? I am just answering posts made to me ...at this point.
I am not dwelling on the faux pas that this thread is IMO. The other point is just because someone says don’t come and read this thread doesn’t make it ok. I am not attacking anyone.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 9, 2009 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you're really attacking anyone, certainly not on purpose
But in way, you’re basically saying “our way” of grieving is entirely unacceptable. If you’re warned ahead of time, as you were, to go ahead and go that route isn’t really fair. I’m not saying your opinion is wrong, it’s your opinion, a fair one, just not one that I personally feel is being fair to people who have their own way of dealing with this sort of thing that’s different from yours.
CuttheMullet, from "The Thread":
"Whenever I’m about to do something, I think "would an idiot do that?" and if they would, I do not do that thing."
by DMOAS on Apr 9, 2009 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A little harsh
if you ask me. I’m not saying I disagree (in terms of there being different grieving processes) but if I had to form an opinion on the post itself, I do think it’s too soon. Even to have it stated the way it was. It’s almost an invite to those who think that it’s too soon. Not sure if this makes any sense.
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on Apr 9, 2009 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually it looks to me like devo also thinks it's too soon
and therefore wanted to isolate this talk to somewhere where he wouldn’t have to look at it. I don’t know devo and I’m sorry if I’ve come to the wrong conclusion, but that conclusion is based on (a) his wording in the post, and (b) the fact that he has not participated in this FP at all other than posting it.
by oblique on Apr 9, 2009 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ding ding ding ...
This diary almost certainly has the highest ratio of posts by others to posts by me of any diary I have ever posted …
It was just something I thought would be good for the community to exist … that’s all …
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on Apr 10, 2009 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed-and I think it was a good idea
Seeing as how we had a huge blow up recently about someone going into a thread where people were mourning and grieving and making a comment that was felt by some to be in poor taste, it made total sense to try and open a thread for people who wanted to discuss this outside of what most thinkof as the normal grieving discussion.
I wouldn’t argue that some will find it in poor taste, and that it is too soon. But I would rather have it confined to one thread here than have it start a chain reaction that gets someone banned, the site flipped on end, and 2000 of the same comments about respect…
"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty
by 5Aces on Apr 10, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Regardless of where I sit
on the “timing” fence, I do agree with your thoughts overall, 5A.
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on Apr 10, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I yours
I felt like Devo felt put it here for a reason, and not necessarily that he was totally interested in putting his thoughts into it. I also didn’t want to talk about it, but was glad that someone who wanted to could in their own space. (And a day later it is a bit more interesting read…)
So since you do agree with my thoughts, all I now ask is that you have a cold one for me at the tailgate tonight. I hate all of you RAF’s and your “lets get together and have fun” mentality.
I will be having one by the TV for all of you tonight (well maybe not one for all of you, after about 15 or so I might start getting sleepy.)
"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty
by 5Aces on Apr 10, 2009 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will definitely have one for you.
Cheers, 5Aces.
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on Apr 10, 2009 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It wasn't intended to be harsh
It was intended to be a request to accept that there are a wind variety of people on this site with a wide variety of different was people deal with these sorts of situations. What Devo attempted to do is give a subset of those people an opportunity to say what they wanted or needed to say in a thread dedicated towards that end instead of hijacking a thread intended for a different type of grieving. Hate to go here, but it’s like PT turning that cop thread into something it wasn’t intended, to come here and, politely, blast the tread, isn’t appropriate. I’m not saying IM4Oakgal is going that far, mind you, but there’s definitely a comparison there that I don’t think she intended.
CuttheMullet, from "The Thread":
"Whenever I’m about to do something, I think "would an idiot do that?" and if they would, I do not do that thing."
by DMOAS on Apr 9, 2009 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
This isn't a thread about grief.
It’s a thread intended to discuss the implications of a young man’s death on the standings and how that effects the A’s. My original comment was a simple one. TOO SOON for that kind of talk. It’s a strong opinion. I answered the posts because I was being criticized. I can walk away now. I have said everything I need to. If the conversation continues it will be without me.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 9, 2009 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don't understand
Despite the fact that you were told to not read this thread if it would make you upset, you are telling all of us that anyone who has processed their feelings and moved on is/was inadequately upset about someone who the didn’t know dying.
We are not saying that you are waiting too long because we aren’t judging you. You are judging us and we object.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 9, 2009 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Edit: I shouldn't try speak for others, change that we to I
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 9, 2009 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
But at this point, she’s said all that she really wants to say on the matter and wants to drop it, so I think it’s time to move on.
CuttheMullet, from "The Thread":
"Whenever I’m about to do something, I think "would an idiot do that?" and if they would, I do not do that thing."
by DMOAS on Apr 9, 2009 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe this is a little too PT but is it because he was a professional athlete?
Every year 15 million children die of hunger, should we not talk about whats for dinner?
Devo did the right thing by warning you not to come to this thread. Coming here and insulting people was seriously not cool.
My best friend died in a car crash on his way home for Thanksgiving in 2006… He was 22. I know how bad these kinds of tragedies hurt people who know the victim.
However, we turn a blind eye to death every day and go on with our lives unaffected. Some of us feel like the Rev over at HH, some of us don’t place the same kind of reverence on someone we didn’t know just because he could throw a baseball well. When was the last time you were upset about the regular joe that dies every 40 minute from a drunk driving related crash? Let people have our differences, we didn’t try to impede your expression of your feelings.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 9, 2009 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I am sorry about your friend.
It always hurts to lose someone you care about. I am sorry that you think that I am being insulting. I don’t agree that I am and I don’t think i can make you understand the point I was trying to make.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 9, 2009 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
*shakes head*
This is an unfortunate comment.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Apr 10, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
re: DFA
I think your comment really helps put this story in perspective. Yes, Adenhart’s death is a senseless tragedy, but this story isn’t just about Nick. It’s about the drunk driving epidemic that our country faces today.
You mention that someone dies in a drunk driving crash every 40 minutes, elsewhere I read it was every 22. Either way that’s way too freaking often. There’s no bringing back Mr. Adenhart now, but if the memory of his death can help combat this larger societal problem in the least, well, that’s a start.
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 4:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re stats, I believe every 40 minutes is for the US
and every 22 minutes is worldwide. However, I looked it up and the numbers have changed over the years so that the “every 22 minutes” stat is outdated. Drunk driving fatalities peaked in 1982 and have been cut nearly in half from then to now, thanks in large part (I think) to the efforts of MADD. Now it’s “only” about 15,000 fatalities a year in the US instead of about 30,000.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 10, 2009 7:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for clearing the stat issue up, Nico.
Whatever the actual figure is, my point was that this type of crap happens way too much. Instead of just saying: Oh god this is terrible, I think it’s useful to think about these four deaths in this broader context and try and figure out how they can be memorialized/mobilized to limit similar tragedies in the future.
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting that U.S. has more than half of the world's total
I must say, though, I dislike any stat that takes the form of “once every [short amount of time], [shocking event] happens [x] times”. You don’t have to be a stat-head to realize that this is completely meaningless without factoring in the overall population.
If you say, for example, “Every 15 seconds, somewhere in the world someone sticks a raisin in his ear”, that sounds like a shockingly high frequency, but in actual fact, given that there are more than 6.7 billion people in the world, that only tells your that the chance that any given person will stick a raisin in his ear on any given day is something like 0.0008%, which doesn’t sound nearly as alarming.
What’s particularly irksome about this sort of stat is that the person citing it is not just being sloppy but is deliberately attempting to mislead. Whether it’s with good intentions or bad, the express aim is to make the reader think something is more frequent than it is, by taking advantage of the fact that the average person really doesn’t have any intuitive sense of the large population. That is, it is using stats to mislead rather than to enlighten.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 10, 2009 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could that be because other societies..
A) have a lower drinking age or B) have better public transportation?
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
C) have high import tariffs on raisins
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Apr 10, 2009 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Naw its because the export all of their domestic rasin supply
:-P
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure a lot of it is because
America has a disproportionate number of the world’s cars. But I still doubt we have more than half.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 10, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
but I also think that America’s “puritan attitude” towards alcohol has something to do with it as well.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You also have to take education into account as well
CuttheMullet, from "The Thread":
"Whenever I’m about to do something, I think "would an idiot do that?" and if they would, I do not do that thing."
by DMOAS on Apr 10, 2009 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
gotta disagree with this characterization:
What’s particularly irksome about this sort of stat is that the person citing it is not just being sloppy but is deliberately attempting to mislead.
I explicitly said in my post that I didn’t know nor care what the exact figure was. I was simply using it to illustrate how tragically frequent drunk driving crashes are. Maybe you can call that “sloppy”, but “misleading”? that’s just not fair.
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with his characterization of it
especially when it’s typically done so it such a generalized sense. Your use wasn’t really apart of that (at least how I read it). You’re basically extrapolating it to say “I don’t care if it’s 15,000 or 30,000, it’s too damn much” while more or less ignoring the statistical side of the conversation completely. You’re statement is entirely true. It is way too damn many.
CuttheMullet, from "The Thread":
"Whenever I’m about to do something, I think "would an idiot do that?" and if they would, I do not do that thing."
by DMOAS on Apr 10, 2009 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
thank you DMOAS,
this was exactly my point. It’s way too damn much. In retrospect I should have left the numbers out of the discussion since i was using them in such an imprecise sense.
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, didn't mean to single you out.
I was referring to the journalistic practice generally, wasn’t thinking of anyone in this thread at all.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 10, 2009 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sadly, it's all too common:
Every 19 minutes a stat is used by a journalist to shock and mislead.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 11, 2009 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Will Anderson start home opener tomorrow?
Id imagine so.
"Their Triple-A rotation, led by Trevor Cahill and Brett Anderson, could be better than some big-league rotations; Michael Ynoa is the best Latin American prospect of the decade; 2008 draftees Jemile Weeks and Rashun Dixon bring much-needed tools to an advanced group of hitters." - BaseballProspectus.com
by Syphon on Apr 9, 2009 11:38 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You would have to think so.
Might be a better atmosphere for him than an opposing stadium…?
"If I was any more warm and fuzzy I’d be lint." -grover
by baseballgirl on Apr 9, 2009 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More pressure tho.
"Their Triple-A rotation, led by Trevor Cahill and Brett Anderson, could be better than some big-league rotations; Michael Ynoa is the best Latin American prospect of the decade; 2008 draftees Jemile Weeks and Rashun Dixon bring much-needed tools to an advanced group of hitters." - BaseballProspectus.com
by Syphon on Apr 9, 2009 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A's site just dropped tonights game and shows Fridays game with Outman
Enjoy the game
by DCinWC on Apr 9, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but that isnt very reliable.
Its wrong more often than you think.
"Their Triple-A rotation, led by Trevor Cahill and Brett Anderson, could be better than some big-league rotations; Michael Ynoa is the best Latin American prospect of the decade; 2008 draftees Jemile Weeks and Rashun Dixon bring much-needed tools to an advanced group of hitters." - BaseballProspectus.com
by Syphon on Apr 9, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Logic would assume an Anderson start
Enjoy the game
by DCinWC on Apr 9, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably
I honestly don’t know how efficient of a pitcher Anderson is, but I assume the A’s aren’t expecting 7+ innings from him in his first start. I think the best solution would probably be to let Anderson start, and have Outman work out of the bullpen that day — planning ahead of time to be ready in the mid-innings. That way, everyone stays on schedule, save for Anderson.
by rageon on Apr 9, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They could even skip Outman's start if they want
Only the lack of an off-day forced the A’s to use the #5 starter every time for the first 3 weeks.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 9, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I favor skipping Outman.
"Their Triple-A rotation, led by Trevor Cahill and Brett Anderson, could be better than some big-league rotations; Michael Ynoa is the best Latin American prospect of the decade; 2008 draftees Jemile Weeks and Rashun Dixon bring much-needed tools to an advanced group of hitters." - BaseballProspectus.com
by Syphon on Apr 9, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be the simplest, and would give Oakland
an extra long-reliever for a couple days. Though that probably doesn’t matter since Gallagher hasn’t even gotten into a game yet.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 9, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Limiting the innings by resisting skipping starters is best IMO
We really don’t want any of these arms throwing 200 innings this year to the point that a 6 man rotation might even be advisable so paring that down to a temporary 4 man rotation doesn’t make much sense to me if you are trying to limit the innings of AC
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts
For those of you who feel that it’s way to soon to start talking about this sort of stuff that’s perfectly fine. But that doesn’t mean that there aren’t people who are ready to talk about so there’s no need to come in here and say it’s way to soon to discuss the baseball implications of Nick’s very untimely death. Please don’t make us feel like horrible people for wanting to discuss baseball.
That being said I’d say this is an obvious big blow to the Angels rotation for years to come. Adenhart was a top prospect expected to help anchor the rotation along with Santana and possibly Saunders once Lackey and Escobar are either gone or way to injured to contribute. I don’t know a whole lot about the Angels’ system so I’m unsure if there are any other promising pitching prospects in the wings or not. This definitely helps tip the balance of power over the coming seasons in the A’s direction. It’s just too bad that it had to come at the expense of someone’s life.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Apr 9, 2009 12:54 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I should really proofread
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Apr 9, 2009 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
If you want to talk about drunk drivers and tragedy, there’s a place for that in the original thread. And if you don’t want to read someone discussing the affect on the Angels, then don’t read any further. That’s the great thing about the internet — no one forces you to read it.
And better to have it in a separate thread, so that someone doesn’t say something that offends someone, leading to 1000 posts about the subsequent banning on said alleged insensitive person.
Look, I admit wondering about the effect on the Angels, and do not believe I’m a bad person for doing so. No one, not even A’s fans, want something like this to happen. There’s certainly a difference between being realistic and being glad. I’m sure everyone agrees we’re all in the former. What happened is terrible, but that doesn’t mean baseball is over. And even if it were appropriate to stop discussing baseball, just how long do we have to wait? For some, a day. For others, a season. I’m certainly not going to stop, and I can do so while at the same time feeling appropriately horrible for what’s happened.
by rageon on Apr 9, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
the angel's system has some good arms
obviously adenhart’s loss is huge. he was given a b- by sickels, while others were higher on him. walden is a good arm, as is reckling, but neither have advanced above a+ ball. according to sickels, they have 9 pitching prospects in the c+ range. not all are starters tho, and most are likely to peak around a #3 (at best) and are more likely to be a 4/5.
"True fact: In a global thermonuclear war, the only human who would survive would be David Eckstein" -PT
by travdog6 on Apr 9, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seems like we have a huge leg up on them
At least in terms of pitching talent.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Apr 9, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm curious about their rotation depth
they might fast track fireballer walden
ortega might be their most mlb ready prospect in AAA
former A’s minor leaguer denham, but not sure he’s an option
they also have brad knox in AAA
maybe the angels pickup gaudin?
they are loaded w/ lower minors pitching but not quite ready
here’s their AAA roster
Andrew Gallohttp://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=t_ros&cid=561&stn=true&sid=t561
by Asfan4ever723 on Apr 9, 2009 1:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I heard that one of the injured veterans was supposed to make a minor league start soon
so, that may be what they do, one start, and bring him back. I think it is Escobar.
by theblackpearl on Apr 9, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Escobar had a setback, though, when he tried to throw in the last couple days
Correct if I’m wrong; I just thought I heard that.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 9, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I heard it on the radio last night
From one of VC or KenKo.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Apr 9, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah I heard that too
Angels do have the money and position prospects to get a stud starter close free agency, by the way…
by OaklandSi on Apr 9, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
walden's only pitched 9 games total in A+ ball
i doubt they’d fast track him that much
"True fact: In a global thermonuclear war, the only human who would survive would be David Eckstein" -PT
by travdog6 on Apr 9, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pedro Martinez would be an option
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on Apr 9, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I've been thinking about, and didn't feel I should post
(so thank you, devo), is that apparently Cahill and Anderson became friends with Adenhart at the Olympic games. Plus it’s Anderson’s debut that is postponed due to the death of his friend. It must all be very confusing for him, and for Cahill, who on top of all that have to be thinking, as 21-year old rookies, “Man, that could have been me.”
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 9, 2009 1:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought
That Adenhart pitched for the Olympic qualifying team and not the actual Olympic squad in Beijing. I could be completely wrong though…
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Apr 9, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is a good site: http://www.mlbdepthcharts.com/2009/04/los-angeles-angels-2009.html
doesn’t have knox listed for some reason.
With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery
by mikeA on Apr 9, 2009 2:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm a little concerned about the implications for the A's in the very near term
There’s no question that this a a trajedy, and I feel badly for Adenhart’s family and the Angel team.
But going forward with the games for the A’s this weekend against an otherwise very beatable Mariners team, I hope there won’t be any lingering affects to the A’s psyche. The Mariner’s are too far from the situation to have it affect them.
The same problem exists for the Angels, who’ll be even more affected than the A’s, and have to play a team who’s too far from the situation to really care that much.
by runnerJ on Apr 9, 2009 2:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Implications - My reactions to this news
gut reaction thoughts, in order:
1) damn, that sucks
2) damn that sucks for the angels
3) damn that sucks that his team blew his first W for him just hours before it happened
4) damn, this puts a damper on the celebration from last night
5) Well, I didnt want to win this way, but this could really hurt the Angels this season
6) Shit, Anderson was going to own tonight.
7) Hey, looks like the A’s just won their first series!
Seriously, I can’t allow myself to feel bad all day every time a human dies. I took a few moments for Nick because it was an oddly cruel fate for him, and for a moment our lives were tied last night.
I miss Chad God
by ChadGod on Apr 9, 2009 2:43 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
I think the fact that everyone just saw or heard him pitch last night and then he gets killed a couple hours after that intensified the shock and sadness. When that one minor leaguer who was traded for the bats died this offseason there wasn’t that big of a reaction but because the whole Adenhart situation was so sudden really affected all of us strongly.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Apr 9, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the method also affects things.
There is a pretty strong societal stigma concerning suicide compared to being killed by a drunk driver.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 9, 2009 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wondered for a brief moment...
…how “affected” we would have been had he not pitched against us just a couple hours before. What if he had pitched Tuesday instead of Wednesday. Would that have made a difference in our reaction?
I know it’s a HUGE “what if”, and most certainly a rhetorical question, but just sayin’ the thought crossed my mind.
I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup
by UncleLeo on Apr 9, 2009 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For me I think it did make a difference
Maybe not for any rational reason but it did.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 9, 2009 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did think the same thing.
Weird what crosses our mind sometimes. I thought, “What if the Angels had played any other team this week?” It’s all surreal. I had gone on to ESPN (I know) to read their recap, and the last thing I read there was Adenhart’s s quotes from the game. Then I switched over here and saw Jennifer’s post. I actually had to switch back over to make sure it was the same player, even though I knew the answer. I called a friend of mine down there to see if she had heard (she’s an Angels fan) and she was in tears. My stomach was in knots pretty much the rest of the day.
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on Apr 9, 2009 10:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Death is a natural thing
even if its causes are not. Life is a cycle that begins in the womb and ends in the grave. Some choose to accept that differently than others.
With that said, I’m glad that we have this thread so we can talk about the baseball implications. Like it or not, both the A’s and the Angels have to be ready to pick up the baseball tomorrow night.
The Angels don’t necessarily have to deal with this immediately. They can take the day and mourn. They will, however, have to find a solution for their rotation in the next couple of days… and as it looks now their options are not very good. The A’s could jump out to an early lead in the standings.
"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."
by VORP is too nerdy on Apr 9, 2009 3:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
One Implication from the Thread on our main page
is that AN is more loving than HH, because we have over 100 more posts of people ofering their condolences. And we’re the ‘enemy’
We are a loving community so go us
:)
but still sad day
:(
My favorite player is whoever is hitting behind Bobby Crosby because no matter what they always look so good.
by supermarc589 on Apr 9, 2009 3:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd expect the same from HH
if one of our players died, god forbid.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Apr 9, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not a contest
(even though if it were, we’d win).
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 9, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But there are also many more ANers than HHers, right?
So it doesn’t necessarily say anything about the individuals who participate, either way — just about how many are participating.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on Apr 9, 2009 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't that just because AN has a much larger population?
False comparison.
I remember back in the day some corporation had a television ad boasting about California and one of the lines was “there are more hospitals in California than in the entire nation of Sweden”. Well, yeah, I should think so, since California has about four times the population.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 9, 2009 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anderson is now listed as the starting pitcher.
"If I was any more warm and fuzzy I’d be lint." -grover
by baseballgirl on Apr 9, 2009 3:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Kinda fitting, being that he and Adenhart became friends.
"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."
by mikev on Apr 9, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't skip Outman's start...
This give the A’s the opportunity (albeit in a sucky situation) to keep their young pitchers from throwing every 5th day. This also helps the bullpen.
"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra
by brenarlo on Apr 9, 2009 3:33 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the fifth starter usually gets skipped
when a day off — in this case an unplanned one — means they only need four starters
by OaklandSi on Apr 9, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My point is that Anderso, Cahill, Eveland, and Braden are young...
and could dramatically slow down after hitting 180 IP. If the A’s are in contention late in the season, that could affect how they pitch down the stretch.
"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra
by brenarlo on Apr 9, 2009 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Outman < Braden, Cahill, Eveland, Anderson
Outman just isn’t that good and is probably a better pen arm anyway. I think if the A’s have a chance to skip him they will be better off for it. Especially because if they don’t, Outman will end up pitching against King Felix, which would be a BIG no no.
Sometimes life will strike you out on a curve ball and the only choice you have is to flip off the umpire and walk to first base anyway.
by Threepwood XX on Apr 9, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am with you
This may be an opportunity to lessen innings pitched/pitches thrown.
myspace music
by jeffro on Apr 9, 2009 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Angels were pursuing former A Aaron Harang from the Reds, and Scott Olsen from the Nats during ST
I think this might rekindle those conversations. With Adenhart gone, the Angels are in desperate need for rotation depth. They also just took a huge hit to their farm system.
So I expect that in the next few days, the Angels will acquire a Starting Pitcher, by Trade or Free Agency, to fill that void, at least until their 3 starters get off the DL. That could be Pedro, that could be Harang, or that could be Gaudin. It depends on how they want to do this.
Chicago. Where the Dead can Vote. Where the Voters of Tomorrow are found in the Obituaries of Today.
by Zonis on Apr 9, 2009 4:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
great idea
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
by what_the_crap on Apr 9, 2009 4:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking about the patches that the Angels players have on their sleeves
this year. I believe that they are already honoring a “Preston” who died this year? They have a black patch of the baseball diamond with his name on it. I assume that this is a tribute. Now, they will have two names on there……sad
"RIP: UserID: 553"
by Masaryk on Apr 9, 2009 4:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Found this.
The Angels this season will wear black diamond-shaped patches, inscribed with the name “Preston,” on the right sleeves of their jerseys in honor of Preston Gomez, the team’s beloved advisor, scout and coach who died in January at 86.
If it were up to Jose Arredondo, the hard-throwing 24-year-old reliever who had a breakthrough 2008 season for the Angels, the patch would be sewn over his heart.
"RIP: UserID: 553"
by Masaryk on Apr 9, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In other news, I think the A's are now the only team not to have a homer
The Padres commentators claimed they had been the last team to get one when Adrian Gonzalez went deep today.
I miss Chad God
by ChadGod on Apr 9, 2009 4:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ray Fosse
doesn’t count? WTF?
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Apr 9, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks alo(t)x.
I smiled for the first time today.
The artist formerly known as HigherPie.
by vegAN ryAN on Apr 9, 2009 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
qotm
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 9, 2009 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seconded
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
by WaddellCanseco on Apr 9, 2009 8:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, that made me laugh.
I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup
by UncleLeo on Apr 9, 2009 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Confusing for me...
Man, I really dislike the Angels and I want the A’s to beat the snot out of them every time they take the field and to never even show them any form of mercy. I’d even go so far as to say that I took just a wee bit of satisfaction after hearing that John Lackey was a little banged up and wouldn’t be starting the season in the Angel rotation.
To that end, I love it whenever the A’s can take one or two steps forward, while the Angels take a step back or just flounder. However, I would never, ever in a million years ever want things to end up that way because of a tragedy like the one that occurred this morning. Although I understand that this turn of events might be “advantageous” from an A’s perspective, I would truly, honestly rather have watched Nick dominate the A’s for the next 5+ years than to have just watched his 4th and final major league start less than 24 hours ago.
This is truly a very saddening event for everyone associated with major league baseball. I will definitely be rooting HARD for the Angels this weekend as they can hopefully band together, find some inner strength and honor Nick’s memory by playing some inspired baseball against the Red Sox.
I'm never gonna do it without the fez on!
by Taj Adib on Apr 9, 2009 4:42 PM PDT reply actions 4 recs
+ infinity
Join PETPT....People for the Ethical Treatment of Paul Thomas
by OptimistPrime on Apr 9, 2009 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said... and I agree completely.
I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup
by UncleLeo on Apr 9, 2009 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ill be rooting for them to band together
not to win.
I miss Chad God
by ChadGod on Apr 9, 2009 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everybody grieves differently, heals at a different pace
Some people deal with it by thinking about other things, some allow the emotion to flow, so I think it is a bit pretentious to say “it’s too soon” to some, as much as it would be wrong for others to say “you are dwelling”.
I have a 20 year old son and tried calling him all day and he returned my call at 3pm. I cannot tell you the relief I felt. This impacts everyone differently, so to that I say thank you Devo. What would Adenhart say? “Play Ball” I bet, and yet, we take a day to sort out our feelings. We so closely identify with baseball players that it feels like a family member. Take your time, or talk baseball, but please don’t judge others on how they choose to deal with the news or how quickly or slowly they move on.
I look forward to seeing the boys back in town tomorrow, to seeing Anderson pitch after meeting him at fan appreciation day, and cannot imagine the emotion the ballplayers must be feeling. Top it off, we have the memorial for the officers tomorrow too. God, what a range of emotions tomorrow!
Thank you Devo
Join PETPT....People for the Ethical Treatment of Paul Thomas
by OptimistPrime on Apr 9, 2009 5:49 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Baseball implications...
… are zilch.. Baseball is a game – not important, not life changing, simply a stage upon which fine people entertain us from time to time. The truth is that baseball is just another simple human pleasure that we use to distract us from horrors such as this death. The game of baseball will go on because we need it, because things like this tragedy are all too common.
by Chilango on Apr 9, 2009 5:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Baseball and life
About seven months ago, a good friend of mine was killed while stopped at a red light. I remember feeling the regret of not having been a better friend, the pain of knowing he’d never achieve the countless goals he had set.
Last night, I looked at the box score and thought, “Man, another stud Angel pitcher for the A’s to worry about for years.” This morning, I read the news that he had been killed, and my heart sunk into my stomach. I want my team to win, but never at the expense of another player’s health.
It really sucks that Nick Adenhart died. It sucks that he didn’t get to play out his career, settle down with a family, and accomplish the things I’m sure he would have liked to accomplish.
My hatred of the Angels is suspended indefinitely. I can’t muster the guts to despise them anymore. Outside of Lackey, I can’t think of a single player on their team that, performance aside, I wouldn’t welcome in Oakland.
All that said, we (the citizens of the world) didn’t just lose a person— we lost a talented baseball player. It definitely changes the look of the Angels’ rotation. To say that there are no baseball implications is a lie. We will all mourn him in our different ways, but as baseball fans, we’ve all lost a potential star. All at the hands of a drunk driver.
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Apr 9, 2009 6:19 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The only thing I want to talk about associated with baseball and the Angels today is
how hard is it going to be for any Angels’ fifth starter for the next couple of months. Especially if it’s a callup from the minors. That’s not exactly the kind of environment you want to break a rookie into.
"If Bowden was a general contractor, he'd build houses with nine bedrooms, six garages, no bathrooms, and half a roof."
by DyeLongJustice on Apr 9, 2009 6:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This had crossed my mind today too.
Can you imagine being that guy? Man.
by oblique on Apr 9, 2009 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's my thought.
Next time any A’s fans here want to go into self-pity mode and say, “whine whine whine, we got hit by all those injuries, it’s not fair,” hopefully they’ll think twice and hit cancel before they post. I saw a lot of that last season and I sure got sick of it.
There are a whole lot worse things that can happen to your rotation than having a bunch of guys spend time on the DL. Next time someone complains about our injuries, I won’t say it, but I’ll be thinking it.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 9, 2009 7:23 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Next time the A's don't come back to win,
I’ll try to remember that as exciting as last night’s win was at the time, I now wish Adenhart was here tonight talking about winning last night’s game.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 9, 2009 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Words I wish I could take back.
In the game thread last night you’d come on during commercial break, as is your habit, and posted your thoughts about Nick’s pitching, his strengths and weaknesses. I responded with “Take him out early boys”. I will never, EVER, utter those words again.
"You have to score to win"~Rickey Henderson
by lynnzgal on Apr 9, 2009 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember someone posted
“We’ll get to Adenhart eventually” after the first 3 or so scoreless innings. That comment is so weird in context, now.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 9, 2009 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A couple weeks ago, in the context of
whether our young rookie pitchers could lose confidence if they have a bad start, I asked about Adenhart’s debut here last year and said, “Did we succeed in destroying his confidence when beat him up in his MLB debut last May?”
I distinctly remember that in my first draft I said something stronger than “beat him up” but on preview I decided to tone it down a little. Now I’m very glad that I did.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 9, 2009 11:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eh, I wouldn't worry
We know darn well you meant “run up his pitch count so we can get into the bullpen”.
by Nate on Apr 9, 2009 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
iglew-
I’m not really sure if that’s a fair comparison you make. Having a ton of guys end up on the DL is bad baseball luck. Having a 22-year-old rising star die a senseless death is downright tragic.
I think fans can complain all they when their team endures a disproportionate number of injuries while still fully appreciating the fact that things could be way, way worse.
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 8:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the final sentence of the above post should read:
I think fans can complain all they want, not all they when
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I'd probably be less miffed about it if the
“disproportionate” part were actually true. Every fan thinks that his team has worse than average luck with injuries. Half of them are wrong.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 10, 2009 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair point.
I used the term “fans” but was really just referring to A’s fans, and if you look at the statistics you will see that the A’s have in fact over the past two seasons had a ridiculous amount of injuries.
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"If you look at the statistics" ... I'd love to
Serious question: Do you know where I can find a list of total DL time by team and season? I can’t find it. I’d love to check the real numbers and find out whether my impression from general news is right or wrong.
If the number of injuries the A’s suffered over the past two seasons is “ridiculous” then I suspect those suffered by the Mets, the Royals, the Nationals, the Tigers, and the Marlins are equally or nearly as ridiculous.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 10, 2009 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe a place like baseballreference?
I do agree with your argument that every team thinks they suffer the most injuries, but my point was this:
A) Team X faces rash of injuries=baseball issue and baseball issue alone.
B) Player dies=baseball issue, yes, but also a life issue, and I think the latter is way, way more important.
I just see A and B being on such disparate levels that it’s really not worth even comparing the two.
by Darryl P on Apr 11, 2009 3:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was watching a replay they are showing here on FSW of last night's game
Before the replay all the Angel radio and TV announcers were together at the stadium talking and said MLB has not confirmed but the makeup day may well be August 27 which is Thursday and will make this a 4 game series with us.
I am sure if this is the case that the Thursday game will be dedicated to Nick and will be understandably difficult for the team even 4 months down the line.
by Trainman on Apr 9, 2009 8:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding, people actually wrote about this today
And then spent time justifying their right to as part of the “grieving process.”
That’s really ridiculous. There are some things you can think, but you know better not to say or act on. This would be one of those things. And that’s not repression or denial or dishonesty. It’s just simple decency.
The fucking “baseball implications.” My god.
by RLangford on Apr 10, 2009 12:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If you had to take a guess...
…how long after the Angel’s management heard the news did they start thinking about who they were going to have to call up from the minors?
An hour? A day? A week? Immediately?
I’d be willing to bet they had already talked about it before the press conference, or at least not too long thereafter. The ‘business of life’… to use an awkward phrase… still has to go on, and there’s really no reason that it and the grieving process cannot run parallel to each other.
Is that the same thing as fans discussing the same thing? I don’t know. When do fans get to discuss the future? A day? A week? What is the “approved” time line?
And when that magical day does come, how do we handle it? Do we talk about the Angels’ rotation and never mention Nick’s name ever again as if he never existed? Would the fact that he died a tragic and senseless death at the hands of a selfish idiot be treated any different than if he merely blew out his shoulder and had a career-ending injury?
The point is that there is no “one” way to deal with this. When people hear that a loved one dies in a crash the responses are as varied as the people. Some weep. Some get quiet and retreat into a corner. Some might go into the garage… alone… and work on a project. But they’re not escaping or ignoring their pain, they’re dealing with it and sorting their thoughts in a way that works for them. They’re not suddenly concerned about their project. Far from it. They just have this need to do ‘something’ and it’s more ‘nervous work’ while they sort through it.
I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup
by UncleLeo on Apr 10, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is America: We pretend dead people never existed
and that buying stuff will keep us immortal!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 10, 2009 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It sure seems that way sometimes.
It’s like the only way people can ever be remembered openly and realistically is if they die of old age sometime after age 70.
General comment on my part, not just about this situation.
I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup
by UncleLeo on Apr 10, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm completely lost with this discussion
Discussion the baseball implications is an open, honest, realistic remembrance? Not discussing the baseball implications is pretending the dead don’t exist?
And of course the Angels’ management was dealing with the business end of this right away. They didn’t have any choice. But I’m guessing an executive for the team wasn’t on the radio the next day breaking down the new rotation. Because that would have been pretty disrespectful.
And starting this thread isn’t like going into the garage after the death of a close relative and working on a project. I’m not asking people to pretend they’re grieving. I wouldn’t call what I felt grieving. His death just felt haunting most of the idea because we had entered into his life for a few hours the night before. It meant next to nothing to my fellow workers who weren’t baseball fans, it meant little to those who had been watching the Giants’ game and don’t follow the AL. But it meant quite a bit to one fan who has played and really follows baseball closely. He felt connected to it from his connection to baseball. So he could imagine and talk about the promise of Nick Adenhart’s career in a way that was tangible and meaningful to himself.
Most of us probably felt that connection from, yes, being big baseball fans, and being A’s fans, and from watching that game the night before. Given that we felt that, so much so that we posted diaries on our home page paying tribute, it just felt unnecessary and unfitting to immediately begin a diary about the implications of the death on the standings. Even if it’s somewhere in somebody’s head. It’s just seems incredibly insensitive.
by RLangford on Apr 10, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Somebody had mentioned in one of the other threads,,,
…about how this red light running crash and resulting deaths would have been nothing more than a local story if nobody involved was famous or a professional baseball player, and I believe that’s true.
I guess the implication was that maybe we’re putting too much emphasis on this because it hits closer to home yet is really no different than other DUI-involved killings, I don’t know. I know that I can read a similar news story about somebody across the country and think “that sucks.” and move on with my day, yet for reasons that I cannot fully explain this left my stomach in knots all day and I even stayed up late last night to watch as much commentary on it as I could even though it was all repetition to me by that time.
If you’re looking for logic and consistency in human emotion, it’s just not there.
I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup
by UncleLeo on Apr 10, 2009 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
very true
What you fail to understand in your joyless myopia is that baseball is the key to life-- the Rosetta Stone, if you will. If you just understood baseball better all your other questions your, your... the, uh... the aliens, the conspiracies they would all, in their way be answered by the baseball gods.
by winchester5 on Apr 10, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Grow up
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Apr 10, 2009 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's childish
to think discussing the baseball implications of this is unseemly? I think you’ve got it exactly backwards.
by RLangford on Apr 10, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's childish
to expect everyone else to conform to what you consider unseemly.
by Nate on Apr 10, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He writes
upset that I’m not conforming to his view. Dude, are you following me around or something, making sure you defend your right to break down the affect of this death on your fantasy league. Okay, it’s your right. I get it.
by RLangford on Apr 10, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is your argument that you're not childish?
“Stop following meeee!”
by Nate on Apr 10, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's childish to drop a profanity based tirade in a place where you know it isn't welcome
It is unhelpful. It is counterproductive.
Think whatever you want, post whatever you want, just do it somewhere other than this specific thread. Your “fuck you guys” approach is childish.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Apr 10, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think people who feel this discussion is inappropriate,
should probably not participate in it.
It’s their right to, of course, much as it’s the right of any A’s fan to talk about how the Angels’ rotation affects their team, a right that I don’t think needs to be abrogated just because a terrible accident befell one of the players.
Much as it’s my right to point to specific posts and say, “could you be any more sanctimonious if you tried? Just a tiny bit more?” but have so far refrained from doing so.
by Nate on Apr 10, 2009 1:34 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
I'm guessing if I began a thread
that you and others thought was disrespectful of someone’s death, you and others would feel free to explain why it was disrespectful. Something like, “Now that this Angel player is dead, let’s consider what this means to the A’s chances of winning the West.” That’s really disrespectful. And that’s what this diary is. And if it’s sanctimony to point that out, then I’ll gladly own up to that.
And, yeah, of course it’s people’s “right” to talk about this. They can sit around and mull over the implications of the Rangers plane going down too and no one will abrogate that right either.
But they shouldn’t.
And by the way, the logic of “don’t participate if you think it’s inappropriate” is nonsense on its face, especially given that your participation is based on you thinking something I wrote was inappropriate. So, hey, next time you feel the need to tell me something I’ve said is inappropriate, why don’t you just keep your sanctimony to yourself and not participate.
In the meantime, I’ll still be thinking that talking about the “baseball implications” of somebody’s death in the immediate aftermath of that death is pretty disgraceful.
by RLangford on Apr 10, 2009 2:21 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
“Thanks for sharing.”
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Apr 10, 2009 7:08 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Give me a break
First you were told that if you would find this kinda talk callous to GO AWAY. Second if youve notice no one has done what you said short discussions of things like who is going to start on Friday have occurred but nothing more. Third if I was killed like this (we are the same age) would AN, the rest of the blogosphere, and national media all be mourning? The only reason we give a damn about this kid (unless you knew him in the real world) is because he threw a baseball well, so is it really so shocking to talk about why we care about him?
Can you not be a sanctimonious asshole? K thx bye.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Totally agree.
I’m not saying we shouldn’t mourn the death of Nick Adenhart; we should. I just find it to be somewhere between arbitrary and downright nonsensical that we dwell so long on this death (what? 1 out 15,000 that will occur as a result of drunk driving this year alone) for the sole fact that this guy happened to be really good at throwing a little white ball.
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m guessing if I began a thread that you and others thought was disrespectful of someone’s death, you and others would feel free to explain why it was disrespectful,
I would feel free to do so.
I would almost certainly choose not to.
If I object to a discussion’s topic, my initial tendency is not to try to shut down that discussion, but simply to avoid it.
by Nate on Apr 10, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm going to start a new thread all about how I disagree with that
No I’m not.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 10, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL. I keep wanting to come back and see what it says.
I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone - the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.
~George Gallup
by UncleLeo on Apr 10, 2009 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have here the very makings of a Classic.Pointless.Internet.Dustup, folks.
Sites like AN really oughtta have a code sheet so we can just call out numbers in cases like this one.
Dramatis Personae:
Officious Intermeddler (here, RL)
Obnoxious Civil Libertarian (DFA, TDF)
Script:
Our scene opens with OI objecting, on thoroughly principled grounds, to something in a thread:
OI: “You shouldn’t do that.”
OCL, equally principled, replies: “If you don’t like it, then don’t watch.”
OI, needing to instruct, with snark quotient rising: “You shouldn’t do that because [restates principle, with extreme strawman examples] and that makes you an immature, unfeeling jerk.”
OCL takes the bait: and with condescending erudition, pokes at the principle and tries to ignite the strawmen, adding, “…and if you don’t bow to my superior intellect, you’re stoopid — and an intermeddling asshole.”
OI: can’t resist responding, although by now it’s almost completely personal: “Yeah? Well, YOU’re a bigger, more obnoxious asshole, and what’s more — yer mother swims after troop ships!”
OCL, now red around the ears retorts : “cuz yer daughter’s too busy to throw her a lifeline! Ya prick!”
OI, thoroughly enraged: Fuck-off and Die, you pathetic piece of shyte!!"
OCL, apoplectic: “No, FUCK YOU!!!!”
Chorus (a/k/a Moderator): “You’re both banned. Go soak your heads.”
After which time, meaning overnight, OI and OCL become embarrassed at their behavior. They go have a virtual beer and talk about how the Moderation system sucks.
The End.
Except that, instead of virtual beers, we can all go have real ones at the AN Tail-Gate ExtravagANza this afternoon.
I’m buying — anybody care to skip ahead and join me?
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Apr 10, 2009 9:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm in.
I mean, free beer; who can refuse that?
And as usual, I find your humor most humorous. What? You weren’t kidding? Oh.
I'm here to talk about the past.
by 67MARQUEZ on Apr 10, 2009 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Quit Stalin!" they told the moderators
and so they acted with alacrity. Which was a mistake, because Alacrity was not technically a moderator.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 10, 2009 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ni-ice
Reminds me a little of the Steven Wriight one-liner: he named his very disciplined East German Sheppard, “Stay” — when it was just a puppy — so that he could go, “Come here, Stay. Come here, Stay” Now his dog just ignores him and keeps on typing.
by LowcountryJoe on Apr 10, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can I join ya'll in a virtual beer, too?
Just know that I am engaging in some self-flagellation as I’m consuming because, goodness knows, some Angels fans might be lurking and seeing alcohol consumptiuon as celebratory in nature. They must know that I feel their pain to some degree. I certainly do not want to leave them with the impression that I am a cold and insensitive asshole even though the thread’s title might suggest an indifference to the situation at the current moment; how do they know they I had not Ben Grieving?
The more you publicly demonstrate suffering, the more it shows you really care; right? ~ paraphrasing Offspring.
by LowcountryJoe on Apr 10, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I always assumed
that’s why people drove Priuses.
by Nate on Apr 10, 2009 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
All I'll do with that is LOL.
Anything more on my part will earn me a comment’s FLAG-on-Athletics-Nation. CGVs are seemingly easier to come by when the commentor has a history of pushing it. And I’ve pushed it.
by LowcountryJoe on Apr 10, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Virtual brewski for my friend LCJ -- the rest of y'all can go sit/shit in a corner/hat.
You can get it at the App Store.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Apr 10, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wish I could but the GF is flying in tonight and I have to pick her up from the airport
rain check?
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You bet. I'm not hard to find.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Apr 10, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is fucking ridiculous
I don’t care if I’m not supposed to be commenting, the title of the thread is intentionally provocative. Show some basic perspective. A twenty-two year old young man just died. Don’t reduce him to a statistic, or to a pawn in a larger scheme. This isn’t war; it’s baseball. I’d like to see you guys shrugg off Angel’s fans discussing the implications of an A’s player’s death. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
by natethesnyde on Apr 10, 2009 11:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank you
You can only imagine the explosion that would erupt if a thread with a title this tactless showed up immediately after an A’s player died—whether on this site (where it never possibly could) or somewhere else. And it would be a justified reaction.
by RLangford on Apr 10, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The title couldn't be more tactful
The benefit that it served when posted was valuable
You two calling anything tactless is hilarious
Grow up and/or go away.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Apr 10, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand what you mean by "intentionally provocative."
The way I read it, the title of this thread is essentially saying that only someone who drowns puppies would care what the implications on the standings are.
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really? Really?
the title of the thread is intentionally provocative.
Really? I mean, come on — the title was meant to convey my general feeling that it is too soon to be talking about that stuff, while acknowledging the reality that some people probably would want to and thinking it best for everyone if they had their own space to do that.
Seriously, was that not clear?
I assure you, no one will think you are any less mournful about this tragedy if you don’t feel the need to adopt a holier than thou attitude about it …
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on Apr 10, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personal story but I feel like this fits here
My best friend in grade school died at age 10 when the car she was in was hit by a reckless driver. She was mentioned in the obituary but that was it. There was no national mourning for her. There were no columnists writing deifying articles about her. There were no people on message boards arguing about how long the mourning period should last, and how we should grieve for her. But was her life any less precious than Nick Adenhart’s? Of course not. Why does Nick Adenhart’s death get so many people’s (most of who had absolutely no connection to him at all other than seeing him throw a ball on TV) attention and grief and outrage when my friend deserved just as much? Where were the tears? For that matter, where are the tears for the nobodies who die every 22 minutes (or whatever the hell the statistics are)?
So if anyone deserves to be outraged, it should be her family.
But hey, I realize it’s impossible to show equal respect for every single person who dies that every 22 minutes. The public figures who get into a tragedy always have and will be treated on a different level than these “nobodies.” So it’s probably best not to lecture others on the lack of respect you think they’re showing or how much they’re “reducing someone to a statistic” because unless you mourn equally for each and every one of these people and burst into tears every 22 minutes, you’re probably doing the exact same thing you’re preaching against.
"We were s--, pathetic," Guillen growled early in spring training. "We hit too many home runs."
by lenscrafters on Apr 10, 2009 3:04 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I forget which comedian pointed out so beautifully the difference
between being a celebrity and being a non-celebrity:
If you’re a celebrity, the headline reads, “Smith Found Bludgeoned In New York Apartment,” whereas if you’re not a celebrity it just reads, “Man Stains Carpet.”
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 10, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said lenscrafter.
I tried to express the same sentiment earlier in the thread I just didn’t do as good a job as you.
by Darryl P on Apr 10, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your logic fails
I don’t object to you talking about baseball. I object to you talking about the impact of Adenhart’s death on baseball. The two shouldn’t mix because by talking about how his death leaves a void in the Angel’s rotation, for instance, you imply that that is of equal importance as his death. Do I really need to spell it out? The title of the thread is provacative because you refer to Adenhart’s death as “the crash.” You don’t even dignify his death by refering to it in a slightly less graphic way.
by natethesnyde on Apr 10, 2009 3:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Your comment is both wrong and mislocated
Solution 1:
Learn to English. The assertion that “you imply that that is of equal importance as his death” is wrong as a matter of logic, a matter of grammar, and a matter of common sense.
Solution 2:
Follow the instructions in the intro and just leave
Solution 3:
When called out for self-righeousness, best to tone it down rather than ramp it up.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Apr 10, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tried ending this when I saw that some were getting carried away.
The bottom line is that many of us were raised with old-fashioned values that include waiting a decent period of time before discussing how someone’s death may benefit us. I expressed that point of view as did some others. It’s just as appropriate for those of us that feel that way to say so as it is for those that think this was a great old idea for a thread. AN is all of us..and reflect the posters here. It’s ok to be critical and let people know when you think they went in the wrong direction. I tried to express myself in a polite way and when I saw that others were upset by what I said I walked away. This has nothing to do with this young man being famous…I would feel the same way if one of my children started discussing how someone’s death would benefit them career-wise or anything else.
There’s a TIME for everything … I didn’t feel that the day after the accident was respectful or appropriate. But the rest of you turned a simple disapproving comment into a hullabaloo. I do not take responsiblity for the direction the comments have taken…some of you are far more interested in stirring the pot than anything else and it’s a shame.
Let’s all try to drop this topic…it’s obviously something that isn’t going to be resolved.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 10, 2009 4:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If you really want people to leave things alone, you shouldn't try to get the last word in.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am trying to help.
I am sorry that you can’t see that.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 10, 2009 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you're trying to be inciteful. And I do think you're trying to be respectful
That much I’ve taken away from your comments. But I don’t see how continuing to basically call people out on grounds of “old-fashioned” values is helpful or is going to resolve anything. And in case you didn’t notice, there’s been very little, if any, talk about the implications on baseball. There’s only been talk about whether or not it’s okay to have a place to do so when you’re ready.
CuttheMullet, from "The Thread":
"Whenever I’m about to do something, I think "would an idiot do that?" and if they would, I do not do that thing."
by DMOAS on Apr 10, 2009 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was what I was trying to say but couldn't find the right words.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
TY for the first sentence DMOAS.
I appreciate that you wrote that and I agree with the rest of the post too.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 11, 2009 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How can you not see that the first sentence is nothing other than an insult?
How is posting this anything other than being “far more interested in stirring the pot than anything else?”
Finally, how can you pat yourself on the back for walking away in a post that returns unprovoked to renew your your opinion that the existence of this thread is indecent and proof that no one has values?
Beyond that, though, you certainly are the selfless hero and impartial arbitrator of this thread.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Apr 10, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aha! An opportunity presents itself to discuss who is in fact a "hero"!
That’s a word that will never be the same on AN. :-)
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Apr 11, 2009 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suppose that's a fair point.
And unfortunate
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Apr 11, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"If you think it's way too soon to be talking about this, that's fine too. Please stay out of this thread -- it's clear from the title that it's not for you."
This must have read like an invitation to those AN members who would lecture about what’s appropriate and what is not.
I bet on some level, these same members wish that the comments here were actually insensitive so that they’d really have something to complain about and conjure up some real blog drama.
by LowcountryJoe on Apr 10, 2009 5:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The defenses of this thread are a joke
It’s bad enough that you all defend this tactless thread without even a single concession. But most of you go one farther and attack those who point out the insensitivity of it, charging them with sanctimony and adopting a holier than thou attitude.
And this is on the same site that less than a month ago saw a poster assailed and banned for his insensitivity in the use of a word. How many people stepped into that discussion and pointed out that the poster was in the wrong?
I even seem to remember the originator of this thread, who above takes the time to mock people’s holier than thou attitude, explaining that you don’t get to choose what other people are offended by.
by RLangford on Apr 10, 2009 5:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Dude
I’m sorry. But in this scenario YOU ARE PT. PT went into a tread that was intended to be about mourning the officers and said something that was deemed inappropriate to the thread. Then he defended himself. Then he carried on despite people asking him to stop. This is a thread about talking about the baseball implications. You’re here calling people out in a very inappropriate and disrespectful way. You can believe this thread is disrespectful. That’s perfectly fine. But trying to condemn people in this thread (hardly any, if ANY who have NOT actually discussed the baseball implications) is not only rude, but also breaks a couple of the CGVs as well. Face it, whether the thread itself is right or wrong, your actions in this thread are VERY wrong. Call it sanctimony, call it “holier than thou”, whatever. It’s uncalled for and you are more than capable of flagging the thread and moving on. SO DO IT.
CuttheMullet, from "The Thread":
"Whenever I’m about to do something, I think "would an idiot do that?" and if they would, I do not do that thing."
by DMOAS on Apr 10, 2009 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL ...
I even seem to remember the originator of this thread, who above takes the time to mock people’s holier than thou attitude, explaining that you don’t get to choose what other people are offended by.
Nice …
I’m sorry if I offended you — that certainly wasn’t my intent. My intent, as I have tried to make clear, was to help to assure that others did not offend you and others in a more severe way. If I have failed in that endeavor, I apologize.
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on Apr 10, 2009 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For all the heated discussion of how it is "too soon"
for us to be talking about baseball implications of Adenhart’s death, there has been precious little actual discussion of baseball implications here. I see only two or three comments that touch the surface of that topic, and those only barely, and nothing at all that resembles IM4Oakgal’s alleged discussion of “how someone’s death may benefit us”.
The fact of the matter is that, even here on this thread, no one particularly wants to discuss that and therefore we don’t. What this thread does provide is a separate forum for general observation and discussion about the death but with a tone which is rather more detached and less sentimental. This, in my opinion, is a very good thing to have provided. People have different personalities. Some want to emote and cry, others want to ponder the mysteries of life with a more intellectually aloof attitude. It’s good to have a place for either.
As for the unwelcome interlopers who have come into this thread to tell the rest of us how wrong we are to be having our discussion, it’s hard to tell whether (1) in their agitation and outrage they failed to actually read the thread and notice that the sort of discussion they accuse us of isn’t actually happening, or (2) they do realize it’s not happening but they don’t care because what really pisses them off is that our tone isn’t sufficiently sentimental, that we can sit here and nod our heads saying “yeah, that’s what happened, he’s dead now” instead of “oh my god, I was so shocked, I’m crying my eyes out right now!”.
Either way, I think they’re wrong. More important, they’re in the wrong place.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 10, 2009 5:57 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Well said
CuttheMullet, from "The Thread":
"Whenever I’m about to do something, I think "would an idiot do that?" and if they would, I do not do that thing."
by DMOAS on Apr 10, 2009 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel like the last guy to put his finger on his nose.
Iglew put it well. I have mostly staid out of the other threads exactly because I generally take a more detached view of theses kinds of things.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Apr 10, 2009 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I enjoyed both threads, but
I felt like an outsider in the other one. I mean, sure, it was a bit of a shock when I heard the news, and I enthusiastically support the proposal to make some sort of charitable donation in his name. … But there were an awful lot of posts by people talking about how they broke down in tears, repeatedly. I’m sure I’m not the only one who read those and thought, “Hmm. It didn’t make me cry. Is there something wrong with me?”
It’s great that they had a place to share their feelings, but those of us who didn’t cry ought to have a place for discussion, too, without having to feel like cold-hearted ogres because we didn’t react the same way. This thread was something of a refuge, which I think is why people got so defensive here when a couple of the others came into our room just to lay on exactly the same emotional guilt trip we were trying to get away from.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers."
by iglew on Apr 10, 2009 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
To devo...
I know that your motive in posting this thread was 100 percent good, and that you thought that you were doing AN a service. I disagree with that idea but you are well-respected by me. I am truly sorry I didn’t say that to you before. I should have done so.
by IM4Oakgal on Apr 11, 2009 12:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No worries ...
thanks for the kind words …
"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback
by devo on Apr 12, 2009 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just my 2 pennies...
I understand how this man’s death could affect people. We’d just watched him pitch against our team. It was an emotional come from behind win. I felt shock hearing the news the next morning. I know we sometimes feel a connection to people we don’t really know. I respect the feelings of those who are grieving for him.
But I don’t feel any real connection to him. It’s sad and tragic- for the guy I saw on t.v. and the other two people who were killed. I’m still glad we won. I still hate the angels.
It’s sad but I didn’t know him. I don’t know Blez either, but his loss hurts me more. Probably because I’ve read his words for years and he seems to be a kind person.
Losing the ones I love in my immediate life, naturally, hurts the worst.
Not saying the people shedding tears for Adenhart haven’t suffered personal lost- AT ALL. Just saying some of us who have been seasoned well with that pain aren’t necessarily going to feel that level of grief for a stranger who pitched for another team. Either way it doesn’t make any “side” better or worse. It’s probably more about where you currently are in life.
...being a role model I probably wouldn't recommend eating dirt. But at the same time, I'm not trying to be a role model. I'm just trying to eat some dirt.
by attijah on Apr 11, 2009 4:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















