Nico's Impressions From The Ballpark, Mon 3/16
Hey all. Just thought I'd weigh in with some "eyeball analysis" of some of the young players who saw action in today's 10-8 win over the Dodgers.
Trevor Cahill
For Cahill's first 2 innings, I sat right behind the plate in an available seat to get the best view. It seemed to me as if Cahill's mechanics were inconsistent. In the first inning, Cahill dominated with a delivery in which he stepped a little towards third base and threw a bit across his body (something I worry about long-term for injury potential). Then in the second inning, it looked to me as if he started to step more towards third and throw more across his body, and his control slipped considerably as he hit Casey Blake, walked a couple, and was not in charge of his command. When he shortened that stride a bit again, he settled down. If I'm right that he did not repeat his delivery well and that this caused his problems, I would say that Cahill is going to be just fine but that he would benefit from some AAA time to refine that consistency - this is in line with the notion many have had that Cahill needs to bring his BB/9IP ratio back down to pre-AA levels before he's ready for the show. So right now, I'd put Anderson ahead of Cahill because while Cahill has the nastier stuff Anderson has simpler mechanics that he can control more reliably.
Josh Donaldson
In his two at bats, the first two I've seen, Donaldson hit a smash to SS (great short hop pick for a slick 6-3 putout) and doubled down the right field line. I have to tell you, I have had a good feeling about Donaldson from the start and today I was really impressed by his two ABs. He is patient and relaxed, and his swing is quick and forceful. Don't judge the Harden trade until this guy makes it to the big leagues (or doesn't), because he could turn out to be the hidden gem in the deal.
Jared Lansford
I didn't have a great look at Lansford, as by the time he pitched I was back in seats behind the first base dugout. But from what I could tell, Lansford looked outstanding with a lot of life on his pitches and the ability to change speeds effectively. He looked better than I expected. Meanwhile...
Henry Rodriguez and Andrew Carignan
Meh. Hard throwers who have no idea where the ball is going don't do a whole lot for me, and these two guys were as advertised, consistently falling behind in the count and then throwing "challenge fastballs" because they had to. Rodriguez had more success, thanks to a circus catch by Ben Copeland up against the CF wall, but both looked far from ready to face big league hitters in big league situations.
Jack Hannahan, 2Bman
Hannahan looked comfortable and smooth over at 2B, and I would be fine with seeing him there defensively in a big league game. In contrast, Crosby looked very shaky at 3B, letting the only tough ground ball play him for an infield hit that could easily have been ruled an error. I'm actually wondering if the A's best option for two backup infielders would be Garciaparra and Hannahan, not Garciaparra and Crosby. My reasoning:
Defensively, with Cabrera's track record of playing nearly 162 games/year, the need for a backup SS is only an emergency one. The real needs are to backup at 2B and 3B, so Nomar (1B/3B) and Hannahan (2B/3B) really give the A's what they need defensively.
Meanwhile, Hannahan is not a good hitter but IMO he is as good as Crosby. Offensively, Hannahan figures to give you a better OBP and there are actually some pitchers he matches up well against (softer throwers), whereas there really isn't a type of pitcher against whom Crosby matches up especially well. It seems to me as if the A's could get more mileage out of Hannahan than out of Crosby, given that Crosby's only good defensive position is the position of least need for Oakland and given that Crosby can't help you much offensively even as a platoon or part-time player.
Final Random Thoughts
I love Corey Wimberly. And I like it when Travis Buck takes an easy swing, only to deposit the ball over the CF wall. And Rajai Davis should be fined every time he hits the ball in the air. And Jeff Weaver really sucks.
Look for my interview with Dallas Braden, set to run on the front page tomorrow (Tuesday) night at 7:00pm. Hugs from Phoenix. -Nico.
6 recs |
72 comments
|
Comments
Awesome scouting report, Nico.
The Donaldson bit is especially encouraging.
The artist formerly known as HigherPie.
by vegAN ryAN on Mar 16, 2009 5:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Especially agreed with the
observations on Donaldson and Crosby.
Copeland hit that wall hard… kinda crazy when you can hear a thud all the way in seats behind the dugout.
by buddahead9 on Mar 16, 2009 5:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Apparently he's now injured
One senses his days in the Athletics system are dwindling rapidly.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 16, 2009 6:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well they could 60 day DL him
and keep him. Is Copeland worth 50k? No snark, actual question.
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
by vignette17 on Mar 16, 2009 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Putting a player on the DL doesn't exempt him from Rule 5, it just delays the inevitable
Sooner or later, he has to spend 5 months on a 25-man roster, or you have to give him back.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 16, 2009 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Thought it was otherwise, but will assume you’re right.
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
by vignette17 on Mar 16, 2009 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it is possible that the A's might have more space next year
and that an extended DL stint until Rajai gets hurt or rosters expand could give him the chance to stick with the A’s
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Mar 16, 2009 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not right, I don't think.
I believe the player has to spend 90 days on the active roster (plus a full season on the 40-man). It seems to me that this means they can stash Copeland on the DL all year if they wanted, but then he’d have to spend 90 days on the 25-man roster next year.
What I’m not sure about is if you can 60-day DL the guy and if having him on the active roster during September only (when the rosters expand) counts towards that 90 days.
by thejd44 on Mar 17, 2009 2:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
September time never counts toward Rule 5
That would be a rather silly loophole to leave, since the whole purpose of rule 5 is to force you to not have a guy in slots 26-40, which don’t exist in September.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 17, 2009 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sept. time still counts for the Rule 5
It’s just active roster time, period. If Copeland remained with the A’s but didn’t acrue 90 days in the regular season, he’d have to start ’10 on the big league roster.
There’s probably some some union grievance issue to keep teams from faking DL stints for that purpose…but if you look at the transaction log for Jared Burton’s Rule 5 year with the Reds, it looks awfully suspicious.
Batting 4th for the 2014 San Jose A's: 26-year-old RF Justin Upton, in the 1st season of a nine year, $250M deal.
by notsellingjeans on Mar 17, 2009 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, they do what they can to keep a team from stashing a guy on the DL all year (the 90 days thing)
But the A’s can DL Copeland at the start of 2009 and keep him around. It’s prolonging the inevitable since he’s not going to spend 90 days on the team at any point I don’t think, but there are ways to keep him around a while longer.
by thejd44 on Mar 17, 2009 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
has pennington looked as bad as his stats?
by Asfan4ever723 on Mar 16, 2009 5:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Pretty much. They can play the Kendall defense on him,
and unlike Kendall he doesn’t always make contact.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 16, 2009 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Hugs from Phoenix."
Who is Phoenix? And should we be jealous???
\;0
Zeigler to Geren…."A-Rod? He’s my bitch." -alox
by mrod on Mar 17, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hugs is Tug McGraw's little brother.
He’s from Phoenix.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Mar 17, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
qotm.
AN: the new twitter of sportsblogs. -Dogfather
by Leopold Bloom on Mar 17, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but at least Kendall
had value in that he could call a decent game and throw runners out….oh wait, that’s a skill he picked up after he left the A’s.
by oakballnack on Mar 19, 2009 6:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Donaldson is the man.
"With 16-year-old Dominican righty Michel Inoa in tow, Gio Gonzalez improving at Triple-A and lefty Brett Anderson carving up Double-Abatters along with Simmons and Trevor Cahill, Oakland’s pitching depthis officially the envy of baseball." - BaseballAmerica.com
by Syphon on Mar 16, 2009 6:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i really like wimberley too
i dont know why cough socks cough. I think his are way better than crosby. plus hes fast and pretty good defensively.
bye bye DRE
by robbo650 on Mar 16, 2009 8:33 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
has sisco shown up to camp yet?
im not expecting much of him, but it would be nice to get a look at what he can do. perhaps be a cheaper LOOGY than Beimel.
by diehardoaklandfan22 on Mar 16, 2009 9:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You think Beimel's WHIP is high? Wait'll you see Sisco!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 16, 2009 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Behind Home Plate as well
When Weaver came in, I told my friend, here is the A’s chance to come back.
I love Wimberley too, but it dfoesnt much look like he can hit.
Also I liked Powell’s hitting the last couple of days, but what is his shot realistically?
"It's better to live rich than die rich" -- The Fat Lady
by geogrman on Mar 16, 2009 10:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Powell's shot is excellent
It looks to me as if he has the backup catcher job secured, barring an injury. Bowen was put on waivers and Powell has performed. Personally, I don’t think Powell is up to catching (even today he didn’t move all that well behind the plate on errant pitches), but he could make it as a backup if he only has to catch one day each week. It looks like he’s a better hitter than Bowen, so maybe it’s worth it – after all, on the A’s a backup catcher is mostly a pinch hitter anyway.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 16, 2009 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
According to Slusser, Powell has a legitimate shot
I’m sure you caught the “Bowen on waivers” story, and I haven’t heard of anyone claiming him. If he can clear and the A’s can send him to Sacto for insurance, Powell has a very good shot at making the 25-man. I wouldn’t mind having a backup catcher with some pop to showcase for other teams.
I just remembered I love Eric Chavez.
by Joey C. on Mar 16, 2009 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it's just a legitimate shot...
if Powell stays healthy, he’s the backup catcher. The guy can mash, so let him be backup catcher/pinch hitter. Bowen is gone.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 16, 2009 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea of keeping Hannahan over Crosby
But that contract… you might as well keep the guy around to see if he can hit a hot streak, maybe rehabilitate his trade value from non-existent to existentially existent, right?
I just remembered I love Eric Chavez.
by Joey C. on Mar 16, 2009 10:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
At this point, I'd do whatever makes the team better going forward,
even if it means eating the contract because no one wants Crosby. The time to avoid eating that contract was when the A’s offered it in the first place, not now. The A’s need a decent backup 2Bman more than they need a decent backup SS, and Hannahan, for all his problems hitting, can actually get on base a bit.
I’d even consider keeping Petit, who is a really slick fielder and who I think can handle 2B, SS, and 3B all pretty well, over Crosby or Hannahan and just going for defense. Crosby’s probably third on my depth chart for that final infield spot.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 16, 2009 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Petit. The A's need a backup for all 4 infield positions and between Nomar and Petit they have that.
Also, Petit has shown he can hit also.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Mar 16, 2009 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suspect Petit actually can't hit in the bigs over time
and that’s why the A’s have been more conservative about moving him up on the depth chart. But at this point, a “GG / no hit” infielder who can play three positions really well might be “Hannahan plus” – because Petit can play a really good SS, as well as 2B and 3B.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 17, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My take on Petit's hitting is that he has an upside of league-average
but isn’t likely to reach it. He hasn’t hit well in the minors, but he does have the advantage of generally having been young for the levels he’s played at. Sometimes those guys figure it out eventually (obvious precedent being Omar Vizquel, who was godawful at the plate when he came up but eventually became sort of OK).
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 17, 2009 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which sounds perfectly suited for the utility infielder/defensive replacement role
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
by DMOAS on Mar 18, 2009 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd go with Hannahan and Crosby/Petit
Hannahan can platoon with Nomah since Chavvy will be DLed. Petit/Crosby then becomes the backup MI. Another thing to keep in mind: if we’re counting on a ton of PT from OCab, Nomar could be the emergency backup SS.
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
by vignette17 on Mar 16, 2009 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll got out on a limb and predict the A's don't eat Crosby's contract...
he’ll either get traded or he’ll be on the team. Admittedly, Billy has made it tough for him to be on the team, so it is more likely the former.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 16, 2009 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But who the heck's gonna take him?
It’s not like we haven’t been dangling him. For a while.
AN: the new twitter of sportsblogs. -Dogfather
by Leopold Bloom on Mar 17, 2009 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
I don’t think Crosby’s trade value will ever be reestablished, and there is no viable argument for keeping a player on a roster simply because he is being paid more than other players.
and I like Petit.
I'm starting to like our bullpen......Wuertz and all.
by scatterbrian on Mar 17, 2009 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is becoming really sad
for Crosby.
Zeigler to Geren…."A-Rod? He’s my bitch." -alox
by mrod on Mar 17, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cabrera at second
If Ellis is out, the A’s can move Cabrera to second and play Crosby at short. I’d think that would be the wisest move if they’re planning to keep Cros.
by richwol1 on Mar 17, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree
I just don’t feel like it’s gonna be a good idea to start Crosby at second.. At least we know Cabrera can play 2nd. Watching footage of Crosby today, he was practicing turning the dp from 2nd base……..needless to say he looked like a fish out of water. Not good.
Zeigler to Geren…."A-Rod? He’s my bitch." -alox
by mrod on Mar 17, 2009 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do not see
having all these backup infielders
Someone is going to get the boot and it is going to be Hannahan If someone doesn’t take Crosby (LOL)
by Trainman on Mar 20, 2009 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
cahill
just from the numbers and your account, i really liked cahill’s outing today. i feel like everyone (the team as well as the fans) was looking for an excuse to put him back in AAA and got it in the second inning. but at the same time, it looks like he recovered quite nicely from that rough inning, which speaks volumes and is another reason to be excited about this kid.
by tas7b on Mar 16, 2009 10:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Cahill or Mazarro... hmmm... who should be our 5th starter?
that is the question… because I’ve already awarded #4 to Anderson.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 16, 2009 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So
1. Eveland
2. Gallagher
3. Gio
4. Anderson
5. Mazzaro/Braden
Duke starts the season on the DL, then worked in through the bullpen.
by Colorado Fan on Mar 17, 2009 7:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Far from being a "possible 5th starter"
Braden is closer to being the Opening Day starter, IMO. I don’t think anyone has a spot nailed down more than he does.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 17, 2009 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree that Gio seems to get lost in our salivations over the MAC kiddies.
I saw him Thursday, and there was only one solid contact off him by the DBacks — granted that one needed an over-the-fence assist from Rajai to avoid damage, but it was his first batter, he did settle down and he had ’em off-balance.
I conclude, with others, that his arm is ahead of his head, and especially his heart. Based on that small sample, I’d pencil him in, lightly, at 4 or 5.
This is more in response to CF than Nico.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Mar 17, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
100% agree
he’s looked solid in each of his outings and is putting together some good control…
by stranahanahan on Mar 17, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It looks like both Mazzaro and Gallagher are scheduled to go today
I won’t be able to report on it until tomorrow (I’m flying out right after the game), but it should be interesting.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 17, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I was just feeding into Foolsh game.
I think:
1. Eveland
2. Gallagher
3. Gio
4. Braden
5. Mazzaro
by Colorado Fan on Mar 17, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good rotation prediction
With a healthy Duke (HA!) and starting rotation filler in Sacramento (Williams and Edgar Gonzalez) waiting in the wings as secondary options.
I am Ray Fosse's infatuations with Clay Wood and high-definition television.
by franks a lot on Mar 17, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup, that's exactly how I think it will/should be
And not to be underhanded about it, but if they can hold off on calling up AC until later in April, the A’s get a years-of-service advantage with them.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on Mar 17, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mazzaro didn't look so terrific today
He showed good stuff but really had no command. Of the three MACs, only Anderson had the polished “ready for prime time” look to him. Of course, I happened to see Cahill’s and Mazzaro’s only bumps in the road to date, so it’s not the broadest sample.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 17, 2009 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm actually surprised they brought him in as a reliever
I’d usually take that as a signal that he’s not going to start for the A’s out of the gate. But given how early it still is, and how many young starters the A’s are considering, maybe I’m reading too much into it.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on Mar 17, 2009 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you've already clarified... but, mine would be
1. Gallagher
2. Eveland
3. Braden
4. Anderson
5. Cahill/Mazzaro
I still think Gio might work his way into the rotation, but he probably won’t last long.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 17, 2009 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"I still think Gio might work his way into the rotation, but he probably won’t last long."
Why? Cause he had 30 bad innings?
"With 16-year-old Dominican righty Michel Inoa in tow, Gio Gonzalez improving at Triple-A and lefty Brett Anderson carving up Double-Abatters along with Simmons and Trevor Cahill, Oakland’s pitching depthis officially the envy of baseball." - BaseballAmerica.com
by Syphon on Mar 18, 2009 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice writeup Nico...
Good to see ya today and talk some pitching. Always great (and impressive) to hear your insights.
Bring back Hammer.
by OaktownPower on Mar 16, 2009 11:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks - great to see you too, OP
Also great to see the A’s go 3-0, regardless of how much it “counts.”
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 17, 2009 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
With the possible emergence of Powell
and Suzuki as our catchers, and Barton, Carter and Doolittle at 1B, is there any chance that Donaldson moves to third? I’ve read that his glove as a catcher is shaky. Is there a realistic chance he makes a move to third?
by NateHST on Mar 16, 2009 11:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that decison can wait a year
Donaldson still has a way to go before he’s playin’ in Oakland, they can let him keep working at catcher and see if his bat continues to play at higher levels. At this time next year hopeful we’ll have a better idea of exactly how good he is and also another year of growth from Suzuki. If he shows that he deserves to play then next year in AAA the A’s can start working him at other positions.
There has been talk that Donaldson can move to 3B but I don’t think that it will happen this season.
by DiegoAsFan on Mar 17, 2009 12:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Donaldson to 3B
From what I gather Donaldson’s got as good a shot at sticking at 3B as Carter does (meaning barely any chance). If one of them could make the transition adequately then I’d be ecstatic.
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Mar 17, 2009 1:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The question is
Is the gap significant or is it like saying that Cust > Abreu in RF?
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on Mar 17, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
With towering overweight of literary types at AN
you neglected to come back with some basic -AN-type info…
to wit: “Nomar”, which is “Ramon” spelled backwards. Ramon is his father’s name..
Now fit the the slegnA into the whole mix….
Somehow, there’s something to write about in all this!
'I never predict anything, and I never will.' Paul Gascoigne, footballer
by One won lost won on Mar 18, 2009 10:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If it doesn't involve that stupid angels nickname I'd be interested in reading it.
"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson
by nevermoor on Mar 18, 2009 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
really? I kinda like Slegna as a nickname for them...
it does rather suit them. Upon reflection, though, my name spelled backwards is Nad. Not sure I like that so much. I’ve been called worse, but still…
What’s your name spelled backwards? I should turned this into a diary (errr… fanpost). Haven’t done one of those in a while and this would have been a perfectly ridiculous enough topic to elicit 300 comments or so. Especially, with a poll.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 19, 2009 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just as long as your name isn't Lana....
it’s all fun and games.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Mar 19, 2009 7:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."
by mikev on Mar 19, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why -- what's a vekim?
Some new variation the kids are trying?
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Mar 19, 2009 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spring Training games....after game "watering hole"?
Just arrived in Scottsdale for the weekend A’s games. I understand that Buan sometimes hosts a post-game interview session after the games in a local “water hole”. If so, does anyone know the name or location of the site and whether it is the best post-game spot to link up with other A’s fans in town.
Cheers
by Vegas Ace on Mar 20, 2009 10:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
last Sunday he hosted his postgame show at the Valley Ho
by OaklandSi on Mar 22, 2009 7:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That name is even more offensive to women than Hooters!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 22, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Mar 22, 2009 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs





















