Have Your Feelings On The WBC Changed?
Last chance for tickets to the Tuesday, April 7th game in Southern California! The A’s play the Angels, and there is a group of 51 of us attending the game. To purchase additional tickets (at $24/each, saving $9), we need another group of 10. My waiting list is half that number right now. If you will be in the SoCal area and want to buy tickets to the game, email me today at baseballgirl1976@hotmail.com.
Now that the much-talked event is underway, I’m curious to know how you feel now about the World Baseball Classic. Of course, it’s somewhat disingenuous that I ask this on the day following the nail-biting, shocking, tremendous second game between the powerhouse Dominican Republic, starring Reyes, Taveras, Cano, Ramirez, Ortiz, Tejada, Guillen, Aybar, Cruz, and Olivo and the Netherlands, who not only upset the Dominican team once, but twice in this contest! For those of you who couldn’t watch, or simply didn’t care to, in addition to Sunday’s shocking win; where they held the DR to eight hits and two runs, all while scoring three runs of their own; on three infield hits, the Netherlands scored the game-wining run yesterday in the bottom of the 11th inning--only the third run of the game--stunning one of the best teams in the world and advancing to the next round.
I’ve heard all the objections to the WBC, and I get it, I really do. I understand that the World Baseball Classic takes MLB players away from Spring Training; it exposes them to additional injury risks; especially at a time when their bodies aren’t used to the rigors of everyday play and the high level of competition. I also understand that the World Series could be played in the snow this year. I get why some players choose not to participate and why managers are relieved when theirs turn it down.
But what you just have to see to believe is the sheer excitement that comes with the games. There is something magical when a country out of nowhere, with no MLB stars to boast of, can beat a team with some of the very best players the MLB has to offer.
The world seems smaller, and more connected, when you think of the player who knows his name will be displayed on a big-time United States sports channel--likely for the only time in his life.
Even our own A’s players feel a sense as if being picked for an All-Star team; both have expressed that it was an honor to be chosen; Ziegler for Team USA, and Denofia for Italy. All you have to do is look into the U.S. dugout during a game; despite being filled with stars that make more money than the GDPs of some of their rival countries--they want to win the game. They want Team USA to shine in world competition, and they want to be a part of it.
It’s not hard to enjoy the games; especially coming off a masterful recent Olympics, it’s natural to side with and root for your native country, whatever that may be. It’s not hard to cheer for the Netherlands; the cannon fodder of the first round, as they now find themselves advancing to Florida (the U.S. team will advance as well). Try telling the Dutch manager, Rod Delmonico, how the WBC doesn’t matter:
Source
Delmonico had to fight off tears during his postgame news conference when talking about his team. "I am a blessed man to have had the opportunity to manage them," he said of his Netherlands players.
And try to convince these two that they should be at Spring Training:
"He really wanted to do it and thoroughly enjoyed the experience and said it was one of the highlights of his career," Axelrod said of Peavy's participation in 2006.
Washington Nationals’ Adam Dunn: “In the ninth inning, if your blood wasn't boiling and your heart wasn't pounding, you don't have a heartbeat. This is the best experience I have ever had in baseball.”
Maybe it’s because the semi-finals and finals are in my backyard this year. Maybe it’s because I just miss competitive baseball games. Maybe it’s because I have a sense of country pride this year. For whatever reason, the WBC has been a treat so far, and as a baseball fan, I think you’re missing out if you don’t give it a shot.
The United States will play Venezuela today at 3:30. There will be a game thread.
1 recs |
140 comments
|
Comments
I love the WBC. They take it seriously here in Japan.
Great post.
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Mar 11, 2009 12:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the WBC isn't really what I consider baseball
The whole point of baseball, to me at least, is that there is so much luck and randomness involved that it requires a long grueling season where a team bonds tinkering, injuries, and resting the best players happens to have teams prevail from a crucible to the playoffs.
These teams play together for what a week before hand and if you loose two games youre done? That doesn’t embody the magical journey that is a baseball season.
Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom
by designatedforassignment on Mar 11, 2009 12:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
it is baseball, it isn't the baseball season
every game matters, having the most talented team won’t get you far if they make three errors a game and can’t hit pitchers who will likely never even reach AAA.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Mar 11, 2009 12:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
totally agree
as random as baseball is, there is no excuse for 3 errors in a game, and not being able to get clutch hits against (low) minor league pitchers. One guy gets in a slump over a couple of games is what I call random, a whole team, scoring 3 runs in 21 innings, with a thrashing of Panama sandwiched in between? This is not a random occurrence. The Dutch earned the wins.
by asfansince1989 on Mar 11, 2009 1:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorta like a mini-universe of the Yanks' 21st Century drought...
They’ve got the best team this year (on paper). As an A’s fan, I’m scared of ’em. Specially, with not much hope for Chavez, Ellis or Duke.
But, never know when the young guys are gonna step up.
I know you won’t see this, but… maybe, to your horror, others will “quote” me. LOL
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 1:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Count me as a Joker to your right
But I don’t think the Yanks are that scary this year. I might be wrong.
Gimme Steam!! - P Gabriel
by somebodyelse on Mar 11, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But what's the most memorable?
True a MLB season is long and there are many strategic parts of the season, but what’s the most memorable? What makes you want to watch baseball? It’s the 9th inning walk off, think Scutaro’s HR off Rivera, or the incredibly close play, think Jeter’s relay to home to beat the A’s. Yes it’s a long season, but when the talent levels and effort are so perfectly matched bewteen teams made up of the best players in the world, it comes down to 1 game, 1 inning, and 1 play. That’s what makes the long season so exciting, because you know what it’s leading up to.
And in the WBC case, I look at it as though we just skip the preliminaries, and skip right to the final games of a long season. I don’t see anything wrong with it, it’s perfectly fine baseball to me.
by asfansince1989 on Mar 11, 2009 1:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
that scutaro walkoff
was one of my favorite coliseum moments EVER, and I grew up in Oakland
i was wrong to do that stuff
by jaylikewise on Mar 11, 2009 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i guess we shouldn’t have playoffs either then.
by ErikFanClubPres on Mar 11, 2009 1:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll go along with that.
Eliminate the playoffs.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on Mar 11, 2009 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better yet, do what they do in Europe
and have both, just don’t call the playoffs the championship of the regular season.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very similar to any major international tournament in that respect
Obviously it’s due to time constraints, but you make do with what you’ve got. The cream will rise to the top in the end.
by OldhamA on Mar 11, 2009 4:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't have to be a 162-game season plus a month of playoffs for it to be baseball
They play a 40-some game season in the Netherlands that’s mainly just on weekends. That’s still baseball.
Baseball is baseball regardless of how long a team plays for.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the WBC is great
and every objection/criticism is stupid.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Mar 11, 2009 12:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, that settles it.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on Mar 11, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Tastes great" is the only criteria for judging beer
and the fact that people think it’s “less filing” is stupid!
Play more Conan!
by oaklandSMASH on Mar 11, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Tastes great" is the only criteria for judging beer
and the fact that people think it’s “less filing” is stupid!
Play more Conan!
by oaklandSMASH on Mar 11, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's baseball... and, obviously...
I root for the underdog. So, go Netherlands! Until, of course, you come across my team. Then, go down hard in flames!!!
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 1:04 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That's what he said
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Mar 11, 2009 1:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
and, a perfunctory “lol.” I’m not sure “perfucntory” is quite the correct word because I’m quite enthusiastic about the general direction.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 1:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What is that thing hanging next to the Netherlands shirt?
Or do I want to know?
"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."
by VORP is too nerdy on Mar 11, 2009 1:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a shirt from some baseball blog
Oh, wait, you mean the harness?
by elcroata on Mar 11, 2009 1:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, just an ol' AN tee-shirt...
we all wear them. Harness? I didn’t even notice. The thing to my right? What’s that for?
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 1:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Free climbing
To great delight of my significant one, I’ve actually built this whole exercise wall in our appartment.
by elcroata on Mar 11, 2009 1:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow! Climbing wall in a room...
my 3-year old will love Daddy’s remodel.
1. Climbing wall;
2. 64" HD Cable TV (with Tom & Jerry on Demand);
3. T-Ball ready… hit it in any direction you like.
I think I’ll put a Hotwheels track in there, too. Just so he won’t demand I catch his T-Ball hit so often.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
for the record
that one is actually a ’06 shirt

by elcroata on Mar 11, 2009 8:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
HUP HOLLAND!
Cust is the new Jaha.
by johnjahafanclub on Mar 11, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bring out the Gimp!
Gimme Steam!! - P Gabriel
by somebodyelse on Mar 11, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But the gimp's sleepin'...
Play more Conan!
by oaklandSMASH on Mar 11, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But the gimp's sleepin'...
Play more Conan!
by oaklandSMASH on Mar 11, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the problem with the WBC
is that it can’t be realistically implemented properly no matter what. Scheduling, for instance, is probably the worst part of it. Baseball has to choose from holding the contest in November when players have just endured a grueling season, or March when players are going through spring training.
In 2006 and thus far in 2009 the pitching has not been very sharp in just about every game. I think that’s a direct result of the timing of the tournament.
It’s really not all that competitive compared to MLB. Most of the players on the most talented teams (USA and DR) are just getting ready for the season and haven’t quite hit their stride like the Cubans, Koreans, or Japanese probably have.
"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."
by VORP is too nerdy on Mar 11, 2009 1:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It is imperfect by any and all means
I think nobody will argue that. Even under the given constraints it could very probably be organized much better. But once the games start, I find it pretty enjoyable to watch, not pretending it is an actual answer to which country has the best team or that it competes with MLB in terms of quality.
by elcroata on Mar 11, 2009 1:49 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Of course watching any baseball is better than not watching baseball
But it’s hard for me to get past all the obvious BS about the whole thing to really enjoy it. I’ll watch an inning if it’s on, but the other day the Cubs/Brewers game was on at the same time as the WBC. I watched Cubs/Brewers. I just don’t find the Bud Baseball Classic even a little bit compelling (in addition to the stuff that really irks me).
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 1:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True. It's utter BS.
But it is baseball. Better than no baseball.
Gimme Steam!! - P Gabriel
by somebodyelse on Mar 11, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
How are there people here who feel less baseball is better?
Play more Conan!
by oaklandSMASH on Mar 11, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That goes double for me.
If there were no other games for me to watch, I’d tune in. But Cactus League, Grapefruit League and college games are much more interesting to me. I tried to watch some of the Italy vs Venezuela game last night but it just didn’t hold my interest. I’d have to be pretty baseball-starved to watch this.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on Mar 11, 2009 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It helps if you're watching a game that's more compelling
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, they will probably never have a perfect time for it
Doesn’t matter to me. Every time they have it, I’ll attend part of it if I can.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They really ought to hold it in mid-summer...
well, whatever. Apparently it would fatally wound baseball, or something. Just like every other rules change that has ever been suggested by anyone.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd be for them doing it like the NHL does when it's during an Olympic year
I don’t remember if they skip the All-Star Game but they do shut down the season for a couple weeks.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They do skip the ASG in such seasons, yes
They didn’t in 1998 or 2002 but did in 2006 and plan to in 2010.
You could fit the WBC into 2 weeks by removing the irrelevant seeding games. Same is true for the Olympic tournament, if that ever gets reinstated, although that seems to be embroiled in international politics in some fashion I don’t really understand.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I stand by my belief that it's the dumbest event in sports, possibly ever.
It’s a pointless made-for-TV creation of Bud Selig that’s sole purpose is to generate revenue at the expense of professionals who are getting injured for nothing. Nobody really remembers or cares what happens because, in the end, the best players aren’t playing – and they shouldn’t.
I wish the owners and GMs wouldn’t have been given a gag order on this. They don’t like it either. They don’t want the people they’re paying millions to get hurt in some silly national pride event that doesn’t actually prove anything. 162 games is barely enough to decide the best teams – one-game “series” are hardly worth getting excited over.
This might be fun as some pointless exhibition if the guys playing were college players or recently retired players. Then it could be a fun little distraction. But as long as players are being bullied into leaving the teams that are cutting the checks, no thanks. I’m far more interested in what the real teams are doing in games that, believe it or not, are more important: spring training.
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 1:45 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Politely disagree
Well, with a part of it, at least.
It is not an answer to the question which country has the best baseball team. It would not be a definite answer to that question even if it was held during a two week mid summer break, where each country really fields all of its best athletes in their best shape. Competitions not always provide an answer to it, especially time constrained international ones, often including a single knock-out part of the tournament.
Roster eligibility is a joke. I will not argue that one at all. But then again, it is a show tournament. If one wants the strict eligibility rules and no pitch counts (and I mean no pitch counts, as I once witnessed a game where starting pitcher went well over 170, and another where Belgian starter pitched 7 innings left handed, only to switch the pitching hand afterwards), he or she should watch the real baseball World Cup. Yes, it actually exists.
It is driven by huge marketing machinery and you can see how everybody is trying to make it look like some non plus ultra event, constantly repeating how great and competitive it all is. The difference to Yankees vs. Red Sox is what, again? That they really are great or what? But the part where people behind it are actually trying to sell a product remains, so I guess WBC should not be dismissed on the merits of marketing hype alone, although it definitely makes it harder to enjoy.
The part where I lose you is that you seem to find no justification for international sport events, period. (I admit, not necessarily the position of this very post, but I’ve read similar posts of yours in previous days and I hope I have not misunderstood that position). I will not argue that World Cups and Olympics are all great, or that national pride is necessarily more of a virtue than a danger. But for every athlete you say was “bullied into leaving the teams that are cutting the checks”, there are at least a dozen or a thousand kids dreaming of donning that very national team jersey, be it soccer, basketball or even baseball.
On one hand, we are quick to judge A-Rod et al. for being money biatches, but on the other it also bothers us when someone wants to play for free, representing his family and the place where he grew up, his childhood teammates and coaches, the ones who helped him hone the skills used today to entertain you. Sport is a business, like any other and I understand players have contracts, just like engineers or doctors. But there also insurance policies and it’s not like they are suddenly off to do something they are not adept at. It is in most cases, exactly the one thing they know how to do, yet some people get not only indifferent, but even bothered that they play for something other than the money.
And last but not the least – international sport events are not only about the athletes competing, it is also about the supporters. Supporters traveling around, meeting people from around the world, learning about and from each other. During the soccer World Cup in Germany, I met some Aussie fans, just before the Croatia-Australia game. We had some beers together and it turned out they were leaving for Croatian coast next day and I was able to give them some good tips as where to sail. Now, this has not made the world a better place to be, but I felt better for meeting some nice people I would have never met if it weren’t for an international sport event. (I should probably also mention that it was the first time I actually met someone from AN in person, as quite a few found their way to Europe)
My little cousin is a good skier. Quite a remarkable feet considering that Croatia has basically no mountains, but that’s besides the point. Our family lives one part in Croatia (cousin), one part in Germany (me) and one part in Switzerland (uncle), as finding a decent job in Croatia is not a given. I try to see both parts as often as I can, but I just realized that we were not together, all of us, for more than 10 years. Until Val d’Isere and the skiing world championships this year, as we all gathered to support my little cousin in what turned out to be his road to a medal. We had a great time, preparing support banners, cheering with the fans from around the world and just hanging around each other in an incredible atmosphere, the one that actually turned French hosts into determined users of their English vocabulary. I kid you not. And the only reason I ever discovered beautiful Val d’Isere and was able to experience something incredible like that is yet another international sport event, one you ad hoc declare for meaningless.
I’ve never been to Canada and I am absolutely thrilled that it is where the next Winter Olympics are. I’ll be there and can’t wait to relive the ambient of 2006 Turin, Italy, to watch some good sports and to learn about the country and their people.
International tournaments are fun, both in sports and social aspects. Check out one or the other diary I posted here couple years ago. Different things work for different people and I don’t really want to argue with you, but I for one definitely enjoy me some good international sporting events.
by elcroata on Mar 11, 2009 3:31 AM PDT up reply actions 12 recs
great points
While I believe that a great part of the reason for WBC is the grand $, there are some pretty significant reasons for continuing it – including those above, and to expand the popularity of baseball worldwide.
If it started to lose significant money, I don’t know that it would be continued. If it were a break-even or small loss, the benefits and expanded popularity of baseball would make the WBC continue.
"To me, boxing is like a ballet, except there's no music, no choreography, and the dancers hit each other." - Jack Handey
by JJ on Mar 11, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Great post.
"I know they're the defending World Champs, but they are the whiniest team in baseball" -Rays announcers
by baseballgirl on Mar 11, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Turn this post green please
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is one of the best comments I've seen on AN in a long time
I heard it mentioned on one of the broadcasts the other day that when Japan held a team practice in some city I forget the name of, the stadium was completely filled with fans there just to see that, and it brought millions of dollars worth of tourism to the area. That alone is pretty cool.
There are people out there who couldn’t care less about the WBC or international sports, but there are so many that love to see as much of it as they can. Same thing with some athletes. Some don’t care. Some wouldn’t risk the injury. Others are more than happy to wear a uniform and play, with most of them counting it as one of the most exciting experiences they’ve ever had.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
One thing you may not know
A lot of money from the tournament goes to baseball federations to promote the growth of the sport.
If you don’t like the tournament itself, you should at least like that.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
dumber than BCS college football championship game?
Really? No, that has to be the dumbest!
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 1:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
thejd... knows to whom I'm responding...
even if I don’t.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 1:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
of course, I'd have to rank nearly every major sport's "all-star" game...
close to the top of the list. When it ends in a tie, it’s dumb.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 1:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The concept of All-Star games is great, but it's a bit antiquated
And wait – you think the idea of players playing in one meaningless game where they don’t even try that hard is actually worse than playing in a handful of meaningless games where they’re expected to try hard when they’re not actually ready to do so? Wow.
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 1:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
much worse...
because back in the day… All-Stars did actually try to win. They weren’t meaningless games. I know a person your age won’t understand that… but, it really, actually happend. Really!
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also...
If I recall correctly, the proceeds from the All-Star game went into the players’ pension fund at a time when the players didn’t make much money. Though the All-Star Game seems pointless in the age of interleague play and multi-million dollar salaries, it was interesting and served a useful purpose at one time.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on Mar 11, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You keep repeating the word "meaningless" as if saying it enough times will make it true
I refute it THUS.

Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2009 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
"I know they're the defending World Champs, but they are the whiniest team in baseball" -Rays announcers
by baseballgirl on Mar 11, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+2
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I challenge anyone...
…to walk up to any player on the Netherlands and tell them what they did to the Dominican Republic not just once, but twice, has no meaning at all.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a long walk.
"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."
by mikev on Mar 11, 2009 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but the dominican players didn't care

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Mar 11, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually think the BCS is far superior to the absolute mess that existed before
College football is an impossible sport to determine a true champion. I don’t think a playoff, outside of maybe a 4-team set-up, is a good idea. Tournaments are designed to not give you the best team (look at March Madness, where upsets are the entire point). People who demand a playoff are speaking out of both sides of their mouth – they say they want the best team and the BCS doesn’t provide that (not true, usually), yet they want a tournament so the 8th or 16th best team in the country could get lucky a couple times and make for some exciting games where the best team doesn’t win.
That’s a flawed system that can’t possibly be fixed for so many reasons, but the idea of the BCS isn’t as fundamentally dumb as trying to “grow the game” by having a bunch of countries that already play the game and a bunch of Americans playing for foreign countries to fill out rosters.
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 1:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
please... it is hardly impossible...
8 teams… all Bowl Games. Everybody is happy.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 1:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
besides...
Football fans are pretty used to one-game upset fuckery… as a Raider fan, I put up with the bullshit newly-invented “tuck-rule.” Only once used in NFL history… for the Raiders.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A) There's no such rule as the "Tuck rule"
B) The referees got the call right because they went by the letter of the rule. The rule was specifically designed to remove human interpretation. The league did not want the situation to come up where a referee had to guess the intentions of the quarterback, so the rule is a black and white issue.
C) The rule – the actual rule – probably comes into play 10 times (at least) a week in the NFL. WTF are you talking about?
D) Regardless of that, the referees missed a blatant, obvious hit to the helmet of Brady on the play. There should’ve been a 15-yard-penalty (which would have occurred before the fumble/no fumble) that would have made the whole mess a moot point anyway.
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you can say there is no such thing as the "tuck rule"
ummm… but, nobody will believe you because that’s all the fuckin’ talked about.
And, you’d be wrong.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
wiki says you're wrong, too...
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
All I said was there isn't a rule called the Tuck Rule
There are just the rules that determine what is a forward pass, and basically if the arm is going forward it’s always called a forward pass. Even the announcers of the game, I believe it was Simms on color, said the play would be overturned.
There really wasn’t anything at all controversial about the call. That’s the whole point. It probably happens once a game where the “was his arm going forward?” question is asked. I’ve never understood why this is a big deal except that Raiders fans won’t let it go.
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha... there's a lot controversial about the call...
since it was the first and only time ever called.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's not true
That’s not even remotely true. It is ALWAYS called. You just don’t understand the rule.
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I fucking understand the arm going forward rule...
every moron does. That wasn’t the fucking call. Please.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
YES IT WAS!
WHAT THE FUCK DON’T YOU GET ABOUT THAT?!
THAT IS THE GOD DAMN RULE!
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tire of you...
you can say it was. It wasn’t.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do me a favor
Never again reply to one of my posts. I’m flagging every one after this moment as trolling because you’re obviously trying to bait me. I like it here, and I’d prefer to stay.
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
do as you please...
flag as you want.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Flag this as entertaining, at least
Gimme Steam!! - P Gabriel
by somebodyelse on Mar 11, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This was hilarious
and then I realized you guys were serious, and I wept.
"To this day and dating back 25 years, before every game he plays, Henderson stands completely naked in front of a full length locker room mirror and says, "Ricky’s the best," for several minutes."
by VORP is too nerdy on Mar 11, 2009 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good grief.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Mar 11, 2009 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Time to move on
Eight years ago called, they want their argument back. I’d be more pissed at Al Davis for ruining the franchise than the “tuck rule”.
Gas to Chicago- $23.87 A's/White Sox Tix- $28 Watching the A's whipping the Sox in July 05'- Priceless
by WiscoFan on Mar 12, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Somebody needs to look up the NFL rule book
There is nothing actually called the “tuck rule” or anything like that. People refer to it as that – and it’s become sort of a buzz word – because the play would have been considered a fumble had he tucked the ball back into his body. I don’t think people even know what they’re actually talking about when they say “tuck rule.”
Don’t believe me? Well, this is from the nfl.com Rules Digest:
By interpretation, a pass begins when the passer — with possession of ball — starts to bring his hand forward. If ball strikes ground after this action has begun, play is ruled an incomplete pass. If passer loses control of ball prior to his bringing his hand forward, play is ruled a fumble.
When a passer is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional movement forward of his arm starts a forward pass. If a defensive player contacts the passer or the ball after forward movement begins, and the ball leaves the passer’s hand, a forward pass is ruled, regardless of where the ball strikes the ground or a player.
Brady’s arm was moving forward when he was hit (illegally), correct?
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see anything in that rule...
that would explain anything except: FUMBLE!!! Damn, can’t embed the video. Oh well, you’re wrong.
It was a travesty.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What? I put the god damn text in bold!
You really don’t understand what “arm moving forward” means, do you?
I’ve watched the play, at minimum, a hundred times. Not only is Brady hit in the head, he drops the ball after his arm moves forward. THAT IS THE RULE. THAT = INCOMPLETE PASS.
Are you being obtuse just to piss me off?
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
From the guy who is the head of the effing officials
“The rule is very specific,” Pereira said. “We have to make our decision based on the rule. Intent doesn’t factor into the rule. Does the ball come out after [the quarterback’s] arm is going forward and before he tucks the ball back into his body? If so, then it’s an incomplete pass.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/14/AR2005101401828.html
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok... that rule you quoted is just the normal rule for passing and is not relevant, the dispute is about when a pass ..
ends. The article you linked below is about the “tuck rule” which you claim does not exist. Wikipedia page with relevant rule:
^ NFL Rule 3, Section 21, Article 2, Note 2: “When a Team A player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his hand starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuck_rule
Probably a good call based on that rule, but it was controversial because it’s sort of a ridiculous rule from the standpoint of common sense of what is going on in football. Brady did a pump fake, finished the pump fake, and put his other hand on the ball when he was hit. He was not in the process of throwing the ball by the standards of common sense. The rule as written and applied allows a QB to pump fake, leave his arm outstretched in front of him, and run around for the next minute with no possibility that he could fumble as long as he doesn’t tuck the ball backs such that it touches his body, which is absurd.
With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery
by mikeA on Mar 11, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have wondered about this
It seems like it would make sense if you were a QB to immediately do a pump fake on every play. As I read this rule, it would then be impossible for you to fumble the ballafter that.
And I agree that the rule was probably called correctly, although I wonder if it was overwhelming enough to be an overturn. And regardless of that ruling, the Raiders should blame themselves for bad play calling. And if you want to look at a conspiracy, shouldnt the league have considered moving the game time when they knew well in advance that a huge storm was coming in? That played as big of a role as anything…
"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty
by 5Aces on Mar 11, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, I just watched the play several times
I’ve never heard anyone mention a hit to the helmet. I did not see any hit to the helmet after watching it let alone one that is blatant or obvious.
With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery
by mikeA on Mar 11, 2009 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Every Pat fan I have ever met says that Brady was nearly decapitated.
They also say that the “tuck” ruling was completely right and no big deal, and then immediately say the league was just paying back their team back for the Roughing the passer call on Sugar Bear Hamilton in 1976.
Now how it can be totally legit and payback at the same time is beyond my, but I am not a NE sports fan.
"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty
by 5Aces on Mar 11, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Slow motion good angle at the 1:00 mark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHEQtASq9BI&feature=related
Watch that and then tell me that this sentence:
the referees missed a blatant, obvious hit to the helmet of Brady on the play.
isn’t completely preposterous.
With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery
by mikeA on Mar 11, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps
it was the second blitzing CB on the grassy knoll?
"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty
by 5Aces on Mar 11, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What does an organic former Steeler coach have to do with it?
Play more Conan!
by oaklandSMASH on Mar 11, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except the 8th best team does NOT deserve to be a champion
And even if you can argue that the 8th best team does have some right to it – who decides the 8th best team? What about the 9th best team? You can expand the argument to as many teams as you want, but the crux of it stays the same: every team wants a chance to be the champion.
Your 8-team tournament really doesn’t solve any problems, though I do agree with one thing (and this counters some of the anti-playoff argument, a side of it with which I disagree): If you were to do a playoff, you can easily appease all the major bowl games by assigning one of those to each game of the tournament on a rotating basis. And you could theoretically even have a lot of the smaller bowls outside of the tournament. This isn’t the real issue for me anyway.
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
who is to say...
the Cardinals didn’t deserve to be Champs in MLB? They sucked. But, they won.
Did they “deserve” it? You tell me.
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, they didn't
And that’s why I want each round of the playoffs to be 9 games.
Actually, in wanting the absolute best team to be the champion each year, I would get rid of playoffs entirely. No more AL/NL. Just a big group of 30 teams that all play an equal number of home/road games against every other team. That’s as fair as you can make it. After 162 games, or whatever number around there would allow for equal matchups, the best record is the champion. Maybe go to a playoff if there’s a tie.
But that’ll never happen, so more games would be a good way to keep shitty/lucky teams like the Cardinals from winning.
by thejd44 on Mar 11, 2009 2:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
a purist...
you should be a libertarian. LOL
Clowns to the left of me... Jokers to the right...
by FoolshGame22 on Mar 11, 2009 2:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, a lot of people don't say they want the best team.
Rather, they say they want the champoinship decided on the field. The BCS system does at least make it possible for schools from smaller conferences to get into the pool hall if you will, but they almost have no chance of getting to the main table.
The heads of all the big conferences will crow all the time about how the BCS let a Boise or Utah get into a major bowl game and “really prove they can play with the big boys”. But if you took those teams and put them in a tournament, then they would have a shot at proving they are the best. And I agree with Foolsh above me that you could do it through the major bowl games with minimal fuss. And there is no reason you could not still have all of the other bowl games you have today, which for some reason the conference heads seem to think would have to disappear just because you have a playoff.
"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty
by 5Aces on Mar 11, 2009 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've grown to like it
Sure, players have a risk of getting injured. But, hell, they could get injured at spring training. So guys might be trying a little harder than they would be in ST. That (unproven) small added possibility in getting injured is worth seeing fans from Venezuela, the DR, Japan, Korea, and smaller countries root for teams as hard as they can. Position players aren’t that much more likely to be injured and pitchers aren’t being pitched like Lincecum or CC last year.
Point is it might bring more talent and added fans from the Netherlands and even Australia if they advance (Aussie Aussie Aussie!!). And I love seeing baseball where they actually try to win as opposed to putting in guys like Todd Linden and Matt Carson in in the sixth. I bought tickets to the finals of the WBC this year and I am looking forward to it.
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
by vignette17 on Mar 11, 2009 2:12 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Netherlands over the Dominican Republic: Biggest Upset in Baseball History?
I debated making this a fanpost, but there’s basically just one point to make:
We’ve all seen cellar-dwelling teams beat division leaders during the season. Heck, sometimes they’ll take a series. The winning team’s fans will crow and the losing team’s fans will be eating that crow, but it’s not really that big a deal. What doesn’t tend to happen is that sort of David/Goliath atmosphere in a game that has vital importance for both teams. The MLB’s season structure tends to take would-be Davids out of the picture, so by the team the postseason rolls around, an ‘upset’ is a slightly smaller Goliath knocking off a slightly bigger one.
Olympic and other amateur baseball events just don’t have the kind of variance in talent where you can have a team comprised mostly of major leaguers, many of whom are legitimate all-stars, get knocked off by a team of players that largely competes in what passes for baseball leagues in Europe.
This isn’t like a major league team getting beat by its own AAA squad in a spring training exhibition game, this is like that team getting beat by a motley crew of A and AA players in a game that definitely matters to the veterans, and I’m not sure we’ve ever seen that before.
by Nate on Mar 11, 2009 3:39 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
But this is what's wrong with the WBC
I love the WBC and wish it well. I’ve said before that I hope it becomes something to rival (in a small way) soccer’s World Cup, and, while I think it’s possible, I really think it’s unlikely.
That being said, I think the Neth. beating the DR is great news and PR, but it highlights precisely what’s wrong with the WBC. It’s basically spring training with a motley crew of players. At this point in the pre-season, simply getting an unknown pitcher – not nec. a good one – is enough to make an outcome like this entirely possible.
Now, I hope the netherlands wins the whole thing, because it’ll be great for the sport and the tournament. But for the WBC to really work, it needs to be something like every four years at the start or in the middle of the MLB season, with a true selection of the best available players from each team.
Yes, this will be a financial disaster the first time around. But, if it works, it’ll be a financial boon in the long run, and if it doesn’t, they can say they tried and give it up.
"I hate the Wild Card." - - Dave Stewart
by eastcoasta'sfan on Mar 11, 2009 6:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is abolut what's right with the Dutch team
instead of what’s wrong with WBC or the DR team. DR did torch panama in between the Dutch upsets, so I wouldn’t call them totally unprepared for this tournament. But the 2 upsets and the close loss to PR clearly shows that the Dutch are ready to play. I don’t buy the BS about MLB players not being ready to play. Most of them work in the off season to stay in shape nowadays, with all the scientific training method and medical technology. If anything, it’s the amateurs who would have more problem finding good facilities in off season to work out. You hear about professional athletes who come to camp in shape, and that’s supposed to be a good thing, supposed to be a role model to all players, and now all of a sudden for WBC, they are supposed to come in out of shape, forgotten how to throw a pitch or swing a bat? C’mon, play ball already!
by asfansince1989 on Mar 11, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not about being in shape
They’re (almost) all in incredible shape. they are professional athletes. let’s not discuss sidney ponson, though.
But spring training, while too long and not predictive, is still NOT BS. THEY WOULD NOT DO IT IF IT WERE. It takes a few weeks of seeing major league pitching and hitting before you’re in tune, and seeing a new batter or pitcher introduces an extra variable.
I don’t think anyone in their right mind thinks the dutch would beat the dominicans if 1) both were in midseason form, and 2) batters and pitchers had mostly seen each other.
Don’t get me wrong, I love the fact that the dutch beat the dominicans. But don’t kid yourself that it says anything about the dutch other than that they belong on the same field, or that it’s a huge upset. It’s not. When you introduce a lot of new variables, you change the range of likely outcomes. It’s no miracle.
And that’s what needs to get fixed about the WBC.
"I hate the Wild Card." - - Dave Stewart
by eastcoasta'sfan on Mar 11, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whatever the excuses, any time a team with as much talent as the Dominicans loses...
…to a team with the kind of talent the Netherlands has – remember, most of the runs the Netherlands scored were because of Dominican mistakes – it’s an upset. Sorry.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For a team to win at that kind of talent disparity,
a. they need to play about their best possible game,
b. they need the other team to play about their worst possible game, and
c. on top of that, they need to get lucky.
I don’t really see how any of these factors is influenced heavily by the early WBC. Sure, maybe the DR guys are more likely to screw up… but so are the Dutch players. It’s not like they’ve been cranking away in indoor stadiums for the last month.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
there may be an option d
the Dutch team is a lot better than people gave them credit for. Watching them in today’s game against PR, down only 1-0 in the 4th, I really think they are that good.
by asfansince1989 on Mar 11, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They can't hit to save their lives, though
Their pitching and defense is good, however, but they’re getting out of jams as well.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
true that
baseball is 50% pitching, 50% hitting, and 50% defense. The Dutch is giving it 100% + just enough timely hits. The DR only gave it 50%, the pitching part, and even that faltered at the end of the 2nd game.
by asfansince1989 on Mar 11, 2009 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They are like the 2008 A's
winning games like 3-1 and 2-1, all pitching and defense. Now I have to root for them, unless if they play the US.
by asfansince1989 on Mar 11, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually . . .
I’m pretty sure a lot of the Dutch were working out at IMG as a team for quite some time before spring training started, so that does help explain some of this.
You’re of course right that a, b and c all needed to happen. I just think that the talent / skill gap is SO big that the luck part – esp. given 2 wins – needs a bit of explanation, because that luck is probably a lot more than 3 std’s from the mean.
I’m guessing you of all people would agree that, in baseball, luck (aka normal distribution) can easily explain individual outcomes but cannot explain long term results. Two games are closer to an individual outcome than a long term result, of course, but I think the probability of that dutch team beating the DR team twice is close enough to zero to require explanation that goes beyond luck.
To me, the two most likely explanations are the early workouts at IMG and the likelihood that the skill / talent difference may either be compressed early in spring training. Another possible explanation is that the variance of performance early in spring training is so large that the probability of a strange outcome is higher.
But we’re probably overanalyzing this (or at least I am).
"I hate the Wild Card." - - Dave Stewart
by eastcoasta'sfan on Mar 12, 2009 8:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was reading one of PR newspapers
which had an extensive interview with some of PR’s players about the Dutch team. They observed that many of the players had been playing together for years. They praised their playing as a team, doing the little things right, taking advantage of the strong prevailing easterly win during the second game against the DR, and being patient while taking advantage of their opponents’ mistakes.
by OaklandSi on Mar 12, 2009 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More on their stint at IMG
IMG runs a baseball academy in Florida; my son was working out there for a week in February. I mentioned the Dutch team to him last night, and he told me that in fact he did see them working out on the field next to him the whole time he was there. He knew they had been there for some time, and they seemed to be a close knit and hard working group. FWIW his only assessment was “well, they’re a lot better than I am.”
"I hate the Wild Card." - - Dave Stewart
by eastcoasta'sfan on Mar 13, 2009 8:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like it a lot more if there were no professionals playing.
"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."
by mikev on Mar 11, 2009 8:29 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I may like it even more now than I did before
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 8:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I loved it in 2006 and feel the same this year
in 2006 I was fortunate to actually be in Puerto Rico so I got to attend some games — it was a tremendous experience.
This time I haven’t been able to go, but I’m still enjoying the games.
by OaklandSi on Mar 11, 2009 10:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I wasn't a big fan of the 2006 version
It just seemed like it wasn’t planned well. But this time, I’m liking what I’m seeing.
My buddy and I just bought tickets to the final @ Dodgers Stadium. Sure, we might be sitting in the cheap seats, bought we’re gonna have a helluva lotta fun watching it…
by stranahanahan on Mar 11, 2009 10:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Does anyone know
whether the US/Venezuela game is being televised today? It looks like ESPN is only showing the Holland/PR game.
"Good or bad, I don't know. This is awesome." ~Nick Swisher after being asked if it was wise to poor beer on Lew Wolfe's head.
by humdinger on Mar 11, 2009 11:58 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
MLB network, I think
"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."
by mikev on Mar 11, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think I answered my own question.
It’s on MLB Network, which, of course, I don’t get because I have Dish. MFer.
"Good or bad, I don't know. This is awesome." ~Nick Swisher after being asked if it was wise to poor beer on Lew Wolfe's head.
by humdinger on Mar 11, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
WBC should mean more to American Sports Fans
I love the WBC. It is another example of how passionate non-Americans are about national sports. We love our baseball and our A’s, but when it comes to national (team USA) sports, short of the Olympics, no one gives a damn. I love the World Cup too. Most people here in the States either love soccer (futbol as it can be known) or think its worthless next to “American” football. Hopefully, if the USA team can get further in the WBC this year, like to the semis, then people will take interest. Maybe if win lose in the championship, then next time, people will care. Look at the Rays. No one cared until they made the playoffs. Even then it was the fevered excitement of the Yanks or Indians in the playoffs, but it was starting to grow. Sadly it takes success for many to take notice in America. I have always loved sports too much to ignore any sporting event (short of staged wrestling – which is more like a violent soap opera).
by chillicothe20 on Mar 11, 2009 1:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
mistakes
I made a few mistakes in my above comment. I meant “if WE lose in the championship” and “it WASN’T the fevered excitement.” Sorry.
by chillicothe20 on Mar 11, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even the Olympics has, as it were, a lot less of a damn given about it than in most other countries
Olympic athletes are national icons in many countries, but most of them toil in complete obscurity here. Instead, the only individual sports that get real play here are golf (bleargh) and tennis (wake me for game 5 of the fifth set, thanks). I find it very weird. Give me a judo bout or a ski race every day of the week.
I was loving the streaming coverage of minor Olympic sports this time around, though. That was good times, even if I was looking like death on toast from sleep deprivation by the end…
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2009 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The WBC is absolutely fantastic.
I wouldn’t mind seeing it rescheduled for either November or mid-season, but losing it would be an utter travesty. I hope I’ll be able to go next time.
"PECOTA can pretty much kiss my ass."-Nico
by jeepers on Mar 11, 2009 1:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not a fan...
I understand if it means something to other people but for me it just doesn’t do anything. I’d rather be getting complete coverage of the A’s from MLBTV and ESPN then hearing about Netherlands beating the DR. PLUS….I can’t stand 99% of the players on USA team so despite the Red,White and Blue they wear, it’s hard for me to cheer for them.
by LVElephant on Mar 11, 2009 1:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Even if you just like Brad Ziegler, he's only 3.6% of the roster. You must only like part of him. ;-)
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
really?
i was pleasantly surprised to find that i like almost every hitter on the team, aside from the sox-yanks trio.
A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05
by xbhaskarx on Mar 11, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm stoked baseball is gaining a world stage.
And to get to the world stage (which i’m assuming baseball always aspired to, what with the name of its highest challenge, the “world” series) baseball has to stop being MLB-centric.
I’m a huge soccer fan and one of the thrills of soccer is precisely the variety of different overlapping tournaments, national and international, short- and long-term, important and obscure. And because I’ve been brought up with these various formats, I actually think that the WBC isn’t enough to make baseball truly interesting, but it’s a huge step in the right direction.
So, through my soccer-afflicted vision, I don’t see the complaint about players missing spring training—that’s barely a sacrifice toward making the game more exciting and interesting. For example, Zanetti and Tevez are right this minute fighting against each other for their respective pro teams—Inter Milan and Manchester United—which are playing outside of their leagues on a Wednesday even though they both have league games later this week, and even though Tevez and Zanetti will probably both play on the same national team later this month. In other words, in one month, I’m going to see two top players play each other near the top of an international club competition, play against others in the middle of their respective leagues, and with each other in a lesser game qualifying toward the world cup. How thrilling is that?
About the complaint of how the elimination works… so what? The long season measures one thing. The sudden elimination measures another. OK, so you do get aberrations of some sort or another—if it’s the long season, does that actually measure the best team or does it measure the least-injured one? If it’s the elimination, does it measure the best team, or the best night by a given pitcher or hitter? Then again, it’s just a sport. It’s not like we have to find the perfect set of bests to measure or we’re all going to die (we are all going to die, aren’t we?). And since we can’t find the perfect set of bests, let’s just have a variety of tournaments and measure all the bests! It’s still baseball (even with the tiebreaker inning, men on 1st and 2nd, no outs rule—which is way more fair than 5 penalties by the way) and it’s still fair within the tournament (because both teams play under the same challenge).
As a matter of fact, we need more international play. The WBC itself needs to be bigger—every two years with a bracket of 32! Then we need mini tournaments—how about a California cup? Then we need a world cup of clubs. How rad if the A’s were playing a quad against Tecolotes, Dragons, and Metropolitanos. Not to overlook continental cups that end with a final series between the best team from each continent.
And no, this isn’t diluting the thing. Having more tournaments available to the players from your home team doesn’t mean that the tradition of baseball would diminish in any way. Just think how much richer baseball would be if everybody in the world liked it. Even within the US we see the variation of style between the 2 leagues, and we get a glimpse of another style when watching Japanese players in the US. Imagine if every country could develop their own style, instill their own players in it, share it across borders when players are drafted, and test it against other countries in a true world series. Yeah, then baseball would be as cool as soccer.
Wait, no. Actually, baseball would also have to get familiar with “descenso” and “ascenso”… When a major league team that’s been struggling for 3 years becomes a minor league team and when a minor league team that’s been king of diamonds gets to make it to the show, wholesale. Yeah, Rivercats host Yankees and Giants at Asheville Tourists. Don’t worry, Lincecum would still get to pitch for team USA. See how it all works out?
don't care if i ever get back.
by AV on Mar 11, 2009 2:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Quoted for truthery.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the WBC
U-S-A!
U-S-A!
U-S-A!
You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}
by micdog2001 on Mar 11, 2009 3:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
just hope we don't draw the Dutch
by asfansince1989 on Mar 11, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's a very real chance we will
Winner of US/Venezuela plays loser of PR/Netherlands. As of right now, PR is up 3-0 over Holland. If that score holds and we beat Venezuela, that’ll be our next game.
by Nate on Mar 11, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather face the Netherlands in the first game than Puerto Rico
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 11, 2009 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
US loss means we (see? appropriate use of “we”!) play PR next.
Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"
by PaulThomas on Mar 11, 2009 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
To summarize (with appropriate rounding since things only add up to 70% with no decimals)
72% like it
8% don’t like it
20% are neutral
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Mar 12, 2009 12:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
when a guy with the nickname "The Flyin' Hawaiian" gets lifted for a pinch runner
it feels like an All-Star game rather than a real baseball game that the players are trying to win. I shouldn’t say that actually; I’m in no position to judge effort or desire. It’s more about in-game management, where they placing players egos and organizational demands ahead of winning the game at hand. It great to see baseball on TV earlier than usual, but I really can’t get worked up over it. I mean, how many major league teams would have Derek Jeter batting third?
I'm starting to like our bullpen......Wuertz and all.
by scatterbrian on Mar 12, 2009 1:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
























