Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dog Football! Which Breeds Are Best Suited For The Gridiron?

Early Schedule and Pitching Staff Issues

Today I took my first glance at the A's regular season schedule.  Something stuck out to me: the A's will probably need a 5th starter from the get-go. 

http://espn.go.com/mlb/teams/schedule?team=oak

 

Star-divide

Let's assume that this is the starting rotation:

  1. Duke
  2. Eveland
  3. Gallahger
  4. Braden
  5. Gonzalez
Here's how the season would probably go:
4/6 - Duke 4/7 - Eveland 4/8 - Gallahger 4/9 - Braden 4/10 - Gonzalez 4/11 - Duke 4/12 - Eveland 4/13 - Gallahger 4/14 - Braden 4/15 - Gonzalez 4/16 - OFF 4/17 - Duke 4/18 - Eveland 4/19 - Gallahger 4/20 - Braden 4/21 - Gonzalez 4/22 - Duke  4/23 - OFF
With the young pitching staff, which tends to throw a lot of pitches, and an unfavorable schedule, it looks like they'll have to carry 12 pitchers.  Would 13 even be out of the question?  I'd suggest having Duke go on 4 days rest after his first start, but he's so injury-prone.

Comment 33 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

13 is unlikely but not unprecedented

IMO, MLB should allow expanded 28-man rosters for the first 10 days or so of the regular season so teams could carry some extra pitching. This would allow them to shorten spring training by that same 10 days, since everyone acknowledges that the ridiculous length of spring training (which is even worse this year due to the WBC) is “for the pitchers”. The minor leagues would start their seasons about 12 days after the start of the MLB season.

This year the A’s pitchers and catchers reported on Feb. 14. We hope they are still playing on Nov. 5. That’s just too long a season; cutting it by 10 days (or about 17 days in a non-WBC year) would be good for everybody.

by Soaker on Mar 1, 2009 3:44 PM PST reply actions  

I don't think the A's can carry 13 pitchers, because

they really need 2 backup infielders for Chavez and Ellis (i.e., “corners” and “middle INF”) and at least one OFer and a backup catcher.

But the need for a 5th starter could benefit the A’s overall. Their #5 starter is likely to be better than the #5 starters of their opponents, whereas their #2-#3 starter is less likely to be.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 1, 2009 3:51 PM PST up reply actions  

This makes great sense to me

although I think sometimes people forget that in a dire emergency you can move your DH to a defensive position, at the price of forfeiting the DH privilege for the rest of the game. It sometimes results in Cust playing RF, Travis Buck playing 3B, Eric Chavez moving over to 2B and Brad Ziegler batting, or similar horror.

Anyway, the decision about the 25th position on the roster usually comes down to who is out of options and who are you willing to expose to waivers.

by Soaker on Mar 1, 2009 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe between PLAYERS, but not necessarily between POSITIONS

The A’s need to have someone who can play 3B, they need to have someone who can play the middle infield, they need to have a 4th OFer, and they need to have a backup catcher. Given that they don’t have a Figgins who can play two of those, you’ve pretty much filled your roster with 12 pitchers.

Now whether it’s Davis or Denorfia, Bowen or Powell, Nomar or Hannahan is another question. But I think it’s safe to say the A’s will need to carry 4 backup fielders, which means only 12 pitchers to go with the starting 9.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 1, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I would like to see Baisley instead of Nomar or Hannahan

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Mar 1, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess it depends who he's paired with

Nomar can play SS while Baisley can’t, so you could have (Baisley + Pennington) or (Baisley + Petit) but not (Baisley + Barton) or (Baisley + a 2Bman).

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 1, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Good point

But Baisley is a much better hitter than Hannahan. Of course if they A’s sign Nomar then Baisley can come up with Nomar is on the DL.
I don’t like having Barton taking up a spot because he can only play 1st and we need two backups for with Ellis and Chavez and McRosby. I like both Baisley and Petit or Pennington. Give the kids a chance.

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Mar 1, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Barton could play third in an emergency ...

If Ellis and Chavvy both got hurt at the same time … otherwise, Petit/Pennington/Nomar/whoever would backup all three infield positions …

"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by devo on Mar 2, 2009 10:04 AM PST up reply actions  

I imagine the A's need to carry

5 outfielders (including Cust)
2 catchers
5 starting pitchers
6 infielders (including two backups)

which leaves room for 7 relief pitchers. I don’t think they’d be willing to carry only one backup infielder or no extra outfielders besides Cust.

by OaklandSi on Mar 1, 2009 4:26 PM PST reply actions  

I wonder if Casilla might be "odd man out" -

the A’s should be fine with 7 relievers as long as someone can go long. If Devine, Ziggy, Blevins, Springer, and Wuertz are in, that leaves two spots. Add Dennys Reyes and the last spot probably needs to go to a starter (who doesn’t win the #5 spot). Don’t add Reyes and you’re more likely to see Casilla and either Outman or Gio Gonzalez.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 1, 2009 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

With how Duke is doing I would like to see Outman or Gio as the long reliever.

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Mar 1, 2009 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm a little surprised not to have heard Casilla in these games

I’ve kind of thought that they might showcase him, and if he’s doing well perhaps he’d be a trade candidate. In any event I believe Casilla is out of options, so if he’s healthy he’ll likely have a spot.

I think since Gio is being considered a starter, if he doesn’t clearly win the #5 spot I’d expect them to send him to Sacramento.

by OaklandSi on Mar 1, 2009 4:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Casilla did pitch today,

but just 0.1 IP to finish the inning Wuertz had started. He’s pitched twice in the first five games, but only a total of 1.1 IP.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 1, 2009 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Wuertz isn't really any better than Casilla. He's also more ROOGY-ish.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Mar 1, 2009 5:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Wuertz is better if you factor in "certainty"

You pretty much know what you’re going to get with Wuertz and it’s an above average reliever. Casilla’s level of performance is very much up in the air, because he was really quite poor post-DL in 2008.

“Casilla at his best” may be better than Wuertz but not at his best he is significantly worse, and Casilla’s window of being at his best in the big leagues has been a small one.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 1, 2009 5:31 PM PST up reply actions  

We should carry 12 total pitchers.

I think the starting pitchers should be Duchscherer, Eveland, Gallagher, Braden, and G. Gonzalez.

The seven relief pitchers should be Ziegler, Devine, Springer, Blevins, Wuertz, Casilla, and Reyes if we sign him, or maybe even Outman if Reyes isn’t signed so that we have two left-handed pitchers in the bullpen.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 1, 2009 5:10 PM PST reply actions  

sounds about right

"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball

by flipgatey3 on Mar 1, 2009 5:37 PM PST up reply actions  

disagree slightly

The last relief pitcher should have the ability to be a spot starter, thus Ziggy, Devine, Springer, Blevins, Wuertz, Casilla & Reyes is a group that would not work…and that, I think, is where Outman or Gio comes in. My own feeling, just a hunch, is that the fifth starter when the team comes north will be Jerome Williams. And either Outman or Gio will accompany the team as the seventh relief pitcher. If the A’s do sign Reyes, I think Casilla is history.

by richwol1 on Mar 1, 2009 7:16 PM PST up reply actions  

That's exactly my best guess too

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 1, 2009 7:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I’d rather have Outman than Gonzalez, then, and have Gonzalez pitch in Triple-A.

The Ultimate Opportunist

by Rated-R Superstar on Mar 1, 2009 7:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd take it a step further

and say if Williams earns a spot and we have a choice between Outman/Gio & Williams starting, even if Williams performs better, give it to the Outman/Gio combo and have Williams for long relief. Neither Outman nor Gio should be wasting away as a long man.

In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!

by DMOAS on Mar 1, 2009 7:41 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not sure that's true for Outman

He may benefit from some low-pressure major league time to get his control/mechanics to 100% capacity. It’s no guarantee that his future is as a starter anyway, whereas with Gio it is.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 1, 2009 7:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Thing is, we're pretty sure already that Williams isn't really a major leaguer

Certainly nothing special. So better to give Outman the chance to fail in the highest level he can amount to instead of not really knowing for sure in a lesser role which usually goes grossly under used by the A’s.

In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!

by DMOAS on Mar 1, 2009 8:22 PM PST up reply actions  

We don't know that about this Williams

The Williams that struggled in Washington and then was out of the MLB certainly had no future. But the one that excelled in SF and is now re-motivated in camp may have the potential to be very good. I’m not saying that he is going to perform like the SF version, just that a lot of people are saying he looks good and has slimmed down. I’m cautiously optimistic.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Mar 1, 2009 8:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Who's sure Wiliams isn't really a major leaguer?

He was very impressive his rookie season for the Giants, and good overall from 2003-05. Actually, even despite getting derailed by bad habits and personal distractions, his career numbers just taken as a whole are pretty solid. I think you’re selling Williams a bit short.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 1, 2009 8:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Not really; 258 K, 171 BB is pretty terrible

I don’t know what’s been going on with him one way or another, so maybe he was having issues that he’s solved, but since he’s been terrible since 2004, I don’t know why fifth time would be the charm this year….

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Mar 1, 2009 9:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Those ratios are borne mostly out of two

REALLY bad stints. He has shown an ability to sustain a pretty solid ledger (around a 1.30 WHIP, . 250 BAA, 3 BB/9IP) when not at his worst.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 2, 2009 9:53 AM PST up reply actions  

At no point in his career has he posted even a 2/1 BB/9, much less 3/1 ...

"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by devo on Mar 2, 2009 10:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Re-read

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Mar 2, 2009 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

This is all well and good, but

Mazzaro is going to sneak attack for the 5th spot in the rotation.

I miss Chad God

by ChadGod on Mar 1, 2009 11:35 PM PST reply actions  

Or Cahill

12 pichers has been a norm lately, and this year should be no exception. It is probably unrealistic to assume that Numbers 1-4 will all be healthy in April— meaning another potential opening for one of MAC.

it would seem right now that Gio has the inside track— Outman obviously had a setback; hard to judge Edgar G off a wind game. Jerome Williams is a decided longshot. Cahill had a very nice first outing.

Round Two this week.

by windyfelix on Mar 2, 2009 7:14 AM PST up reply actions  

and what it (12 pitchers) means is:

Probably only one backup infielder

either 5 OFers or no Barton.. or two backup infielders and 4 OFers (a lot depends on just how healthy Chavy and Ellis are in a month)

by windyfelix on Mar 2, 2009 7:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook

Recent FanPosts

Fubarcloud_small
Wolf being told to spend money
Small
The wRC+ Challenge
Pumpkin_small
Maybe this is a stupid stats question
Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract
Small
fantasy baseball league for A's fans!
Small
NYY Proposal
Small
Roy Oswalt = opportunity

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late