Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: More Televised Winter Baseball, Please

DLD 12/08/09 - Stallone, Willis & Schwarzenegger! Now with a xkcd comic


I thought this xkcd comic would fit in nicely with the discussion

The_sun_medium

 

via imgs.xkcd.com


 


I had to make a DLD just for this.  I was reading totalfilm.com's feature on the 49 films that will define 2010 and I saw this: The Expendables

The Talent: Directed by Sylvester Stallone, and starring every bicep in Hollywood.

The Pitch: Sylvester Stallone directs the ultimate ‘80s action flick 20 years too late: a crew of mean mercenaries head to South America to chew bubblegum, kick ass and overthrow a government.

The Hook: It’s a who’s-who of Hollywood hardmen: Stallone, Statham, Lundgren... Even Schwarzenegger and Willis. Expect muscle, fire, and brainless brilliance.

Star-divide

The film will feature a scene with Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, and Arnold Schwarzenegger together in a movie for the first time ever.  Now that is all kinds of awesome, too bad Willis and the Governator couldn't have played bigger roles in the film.  Also according to wikipedia:

  • Jean-Claude Van Damme was personally offered a role by Stallone, but turned it down
  •  Steven Segal was asked to play a cameo role, but turned down the offer due to negative experiences with producer Avi Lerner.
  • The role of the man who hires the Expendables, Mr. Church, was very difficult to cast. Initially offered to Schwarzenegger, he declined in favor of a smaller cameo due to his political career. The role was then offered to Kurt Russel whose agent replied that he was not interested in "ensemble acting" at the moment.

Man! If they could have convinced those guys to be in it also I think the universe would have exploded.  I'm surprised they didn't offer Kevin Costner a role ;-)  (speaking of Costner, Russell Crowe is starring in another Robin Hood movie, it is on the list as well.)

Anyways, despite missing some cool 80's action stars the film will feature a bunch of butt kickers.  Here are the names I recognized that actually WILL be in the movie.

  • Stallone
  • Jason Statham
  • Jet Li
  • Terry Crews (in a non-comedic role! that's a first for me)
  • Mickey Rourke
  • Willis
  • Schwarzenegger
  • Dolph Lundgren
  • Steve Austin

I'm sure it's going to be cheesy and I liked other 80's action stars more than Stallone but I'm glad he is doing this.  Here is the trailer on youtube.com.  I guess they are still trying to decide if it is going to be PG-13 or R.  I think the cheesiness would be greatly increased if it goes PG-13.  They compare the success of Live Free or Die Hard as a PG-13 cut as opposed to Stallone's rated R Rambo.

 

  • Daybreakers (Vampires as they should be, awesome and evil) with William DeFoe, Ethan Hawk, and Sam Neil
  • The Book of Eli (Denzel Washington in a post-apocalyptic Western, nuff said)
  • Clash of the Titans
  • Iron Man 2 (War Machine!!)
  • Predators (direct sequel to the 1987 action classic. with Topher Grace & Adrien Brody? odd casting IMO)
  • The A-Team
  • Toy Story 3 (just so you don't think I only like action movies)
  • Salt (a female Bourne Identity with Angelina Jolie)
  • Priest (Paul Bettany as a vampire-stomping Priest on a mission of revenge and rescue? Yes, please.)
  • Oobermind (Dreamworks animation with Will Ferral and Brad Pitt)
  • Tron Legacy
  • The Green Hornet (Seth Rogen)

The totalfilm list also has a few other flicks that look promising.

Poll
Does the Expendables make you smile in anticipation like I did when I heard about it? (actually, my mouth dropped open but now it's just a smile)
Yes
30 votes
No
4 votes
You have got to be kidding
16 votes
Who is Sylvester Stallone?
1 votes

51 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 97 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I hate movies,

that is all.

"Sniff some krazy glue, and start a religion!"- The Reverend Billy Lard

by Gaijin_Suketto on Dec 8, 2009 2:24 PM PST reply actions  

Actually, the film I was most looking forward to in 2010 isn't being made -

to whit, the Will Smith remake of Old Boy. I loved the original feature film, and, yes, a Will Smith version would have been awful, but worth it for various I’m-not-going-to-plot-spoil-this moments, too.

I’ve you’ve not seen it, do it. DO IT.

I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does

by bobnothing on Dec 8, 2009 3:04 PM PST reply actions  

the Korean Oldboy movie?

or is there another one? Seems like a Will Smith project, I think he likes that isolated shouty stuff.

Me, I’m looking at the Princess and the Frog website and that hand-drawn animation looks so beautiful. But that’s out this year so perhaps I shouldn’t talk about it.

by stormtown on Dec 8, 2009 3:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I believe they were going to do it faithful to the Manga

which was an awesome manga, btw.

But I just dont see Will Smith as the guy. Can’t picture it.

But I think I heard that Smith wanted the role because he himself loved the manga, and wanted to stay true to it.

Don't believe in yourself.
Believe in Me who believes in You.

by Zonis on Dec 8, 2009 9:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Randy Couture is in it as well

I’ve never been a Stallone fan at all, but that movie looks awesomely cheesy. And I do love Stratham (Snatch is an all-time favorite).

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Dec 8, 2009 3:19 PM PST reply actions  

The A Team

Clash of the Titans,Toy Story 3…great to see Hollywood coming up with some new ideas.

As far as the Expendables it would have been better with Jean Claude and Stevie Segal rather than wrestlers I mean if you’re going for 80’s cheese don’t those two have to be in it?

One prediction the Green Hornet will be a huge bomb.

by sirbed on Dec 8, 2009 3:26 PM PST reply actions  

If you cut out the 4th wall moment in JCVD-

That movie would have been pretty awesome.
Still good though.
Excited for Watson and Salt in a pure popcorn fashion.

by brian.only on Dec 8, 2009 5:57 PM PST up reply actions  

dear hollywood, re: coming up with new ideas

it’s fine to repeat the classics. but please have some sense of what they were originally about!

don't care if i ever get back.

by AV on Dec 8, 2009 7:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I think I'm just the type of person that Hollywood is marketing to

because that looks like a great movie to me :-)

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 9, 2009 11:34 AM PST up reply actions  

sure, all that ultimate fighting and hilarious bondage, all the ingredients of a summer hit in winter, but call it “micdog daydreams through the 18th century” or something. it’s got nothing to do with what doyle wrote. besides, everything holmes-on-screen has already been nailed once. (or twice.)

don't care if i ever get back.

by AV on Dec 9, 2009 11:48 PM PST up reply actions  

LOL :-)

I’ve never read the books but I have seen the Sherlock Holmes by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle before and despite being a little stuffy it was good (My Mom and sister love those british murder mysteries). I haven’t seen the Gene Wilder movie, thought it looks funny. How many freaking movies were Wilder and Madeline Kahn in together? I know of Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein plus this one.

Perhaps the trailer is misleading? Sometimes a trailer is nothing like the complete movie. I read the wikipedia entries on Sherlock Holmes and the movie and it seems that in some ways they are trying to stay close to original interpetation but are emphasizing certain things that haven’t been before. He seems to be a brawler in the film which isn’t that far fetched since apparently he was skilled in boxing, fencing, and knew a little “matial arts”.

Besides, we are talking about a fictional character. Is it really that bad to reinvent him?

Perhaps the plot of a madman destroying Britian is too grandeous (spelling?) for your tastes in Holmes?

Did you ever see Disney’s The Great Mouse Detective?

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 10, 2009 3:33 AM PST up reply actions  

"Besides, we are talking about a fictional character. Is it really that bad to reinvent him?"

How ’bout inventing your own one?

Hollywood getting their pawns on every successful novel or movie ever made and then changing it to the imaginary one size fits all mold is rather annoying.

But it is also funny, as the patented story developments always remind me of Kurt Vonnegut’s classification of different tales, this one being the Hollywood fave:

And that in turn, reminds me of one of the funniest things I ever read, a chapter or two later:

Now there’s a Franz Kafka story .

A young man is rather unattractive and not very personable. He has disagreeable relatives and has had a lot of jobs with no chance of promotion. He doesn’t get paid enough to take his girl dancing or to go to the beer hall to have a beer with a friend. One morning he wakes up, it’s time to go to work again, and he has turned into a cockroach. It’s a pessimistic story.

by elcroata on Dec 10, 2009 5:14 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Dostoyevski was kind of a downer, too.

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Dec 10, 2009 6:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Don't worry

Raskolnikov Identity will have a happy ending.

by elcroata on Dec 10, 2009 8:24 AM PST up reply actions  

but inventing new ones is so hard! ;-)

I get everyone’s point, I just like to be entertained and usually it is easily done. Perhaps when I get older I will tire of the lack of creativity. (wait, is that the correct form of tired?)

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 10, 2009 10:24 AM PST up reply actions  

aaaaand… even when hollywood takes the high road, they end up messing it up half the time. good thing not enough people saw the trial to say they ruined kafka for us.

don't care if i ever get back.

by AV on Dec 12, 2009 1:36 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm about 100 pages from the end

of reading the Complete Sherlock Holmes, which has taken me the better part of 2009 (with lots of other books mixed in for variety, of course). So I have quite a few concerns from the looks of that trailer.

While there are certainly a lot of action scenes sprinkled throughout the stories, Holmes is really not an action hero. The stories are all designed with Holmes remaining totally passive as he unravels the mystery and then springs the trap on his opponent at the last possible second. Maybe part of it is due to the fact that most of the stories are 10-20 pages long, but they are all structured with just one sudden reveal at the end. So there is just a fundamental design difference between a Sherlock Holmes story and a hollywood action movie, that is pretty much required to feature big flashy set pieces at regular intervals.

by colin on Dec 10, 2009 7:50 AM PST up reply actions  

You could make a similar argument about

most of the Harry Potter books, and they managed to make movies out of them without losing any of the story.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Dec 10, 2009 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

bingo. thank you. i read the complete when i was like 14 and have always loved the feeling of this guy who can figure everything out without leaving his room, then takes the game afoot but just to catch the fiend. that’s what’s bugging me, that it’s almost a personal memory for me, one of my earliest obsessions, and they’re changing it so that other kids can’t enjoy it the same way (as if they’d ever pick up the book, i know, i know…).

don't care if i ever get back.

by AV on Dec 12, 2009 12:56 AM PST up reply actions  

This has been going on since at least 1939.
they’re changing it so that other kids can’t enjoy it the same way

Wizard of Oz, Bambi, Jungle Book, Mary Poppins, Winnie the Pooh, Alice in Wonderland, Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, Harriet the Spy, Princess Diaries, Harry Potter, Narnia, Tolkien….

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Dec 12, 2009 8:45 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm trying to figure out how I can keep my 17 month old from watching the Potter movies

until he reads the books. I know, it’s years away, but I think about these things. Same with Tolkien and Narnia. Part of the reason for building my library collection is so that my kid can read from it when he’s old enough. Also, I think seeing three full shelves (sets of shelves, not three separate shelves) will help raise the worth of books in his eyes as he grows up.

by LoneStranger on Dec 14, 2009 10:43 AM PST up reply actions  

I think it's too late

The bug-eyed Elijah Wood version of Frodo is now as indelible as the comical Disney drawing of Tigger.

With Harry Potter there’s the added twist that so many of the characters were cast when they weren’t fully grown and they could only guess how they’d turn out after puberty. The most extreme case is Neville Longbottom, who as a teenager looks absolutely nothing like described in the book.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Dec 14, 2009 11:29 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't remember how they describe him in the book,

but I also don’t remember thinking that anything was odd in the way he looked in the movie.

by LoneStranger on Dec 14, 2009 11:57 AM PST up reply actions  

"short and plump and blond"

Also, “round-faced”.

When I saw the movie — I forget which one, the first one in which Neville is prominent enough to notice — I thought “that’s Neville??”

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Dec 14, 2009 1:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah. That explains why I don't remember the "blond" part.

I do remember him being short and plump in the books, though. I’d have to read again to find it.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Dec 14, 2009 3:38 PM PST up reply actions  

The Wikia page says that he was called 'fat'

but that it could have been an exaggeration by the character who called him that, since she was a meanie.

Neville was described as round-faced, with a short, plump build and blond hair. He was called “fat” by Pansy Parkinson, but this may have been an exaggeration, as Pansy frequently made disparaging comments about Gryffindor students.

Neville article at the HP Wikia

Here’s the NPR interview from 2000 where they get the blond hair.

by LoneStranger on Dec 14, 2009 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't remember how he looked before Elijah.

How sad.

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Dec 14, 2009 12:22 PM PST up reply actions  

but very Sebaldian.

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Dec 14, 2009 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Segal isn't a big loss, but Van Damme is.

I hope they don’t edit it to fit into the PG-13 rating – Die Hard 4.0 was terrible because it was basically a Disney film.

Some motherfcukers are always trying to ice skate uphill - Blade.

by OldhamA on Dec 9, 2009 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

I kinda liked the preview for Grownups

And I’ll probably check out Toy Story 3 in 3D. Up in 3D was pretty sweet.

The horse jumped over the f---ing fence. / My photography

by JLaff on Dec 8, 2009 4:29 PM PST reply actions  

Not really pertinent to the subject…but does anyone have any info if and when there’s gonna be a 2010 fanfest?

by dshiba on Dec 8, 2009 4:52 PM PST reply actions  

If they do it like they did it last year (right before the season started)

we probably won’t hear anything until January. If they were going to do it in January like they have in the past, we’d probably have heard about it by now.

by LoneStranger on Dec 8, 2009 5:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Peter Gammons

The reporter/analyst jumped from ESPN to MLB Network today, a source said.

For those who haven’t read it… here’s Gammons’ deadline story on Game 6 of the 1975 World Series (Carlton Fisk and the foul pole)

The horse jumped over the f---ing fence. / My photography

by JLaff on Dec 8, 2009 5:36 PM PST reply actions  

Apparently the Rangers offered Smoak and Feliz to the Marlins for Josh Johnson

and got turned down. I haven’t seen any reaction to this trade other than the Marlins turning it down is an unfathomably horrible move. Link one, link two.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Dec 8, 2009 5:44 PM PST reply actions  

The Marlins are in a contending phase (relatively speaking)

It was correct to turn the deal down. Smoak and Feliz would peak at the wrong time for their efforts at putting together a critical mass of good players.

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 8, 2009 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Still, as a team that's constantly fighting financial restrictions

Turning down two prospects of that caliber who are basically MLB-ready. I would have made that trade in a heartbeat if I was Beinfest.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Dec 8, 2009 7:19 PM PST up reply actions  

They should be doing the opposite

and selling their prospects for short-term upgrades to the MLB roster. They have some good ones— I’d think Mike Stanton and Logan Morrison could fetch some pretty, uh, fetching players in return. They’re one of the few teams, for instance, that could seriously explore the notion of trading for Grady Sizemore.

I think if they went all-in they could probably pick up something like Sizemore and Verlander. That gives them two seasons as the clear favorites in the NL East, after which they strip down and rebuild again.

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 8, 2009 9:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, they are about due to win it all and then firesale everything, aren't they?

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Dec 8, 2009 10:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, the Marlins are due for another lucky postseason any year now...

"Sniff some krazy glue, and start a religion!"- The Reverend Billy Lard

by Gaijin_Suketto on Dec 9, 2009 9:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Did anybody read the news story to the right??

Moneyball is back on! Yeah – Sure – I have heard that story before!!!

It’s starting to look as though the story behind the movie version of Michael Lewis’ book Moneyball could end up being more interesting than the movie itself.

Check it out!

by Berry Jo on Dec 8, 2009 5:51 PM PST reply actions  

Bennett Miller?

Interesting. Obviously I prefer Soderbergh (who wouldn’t?), but Bennett Miller’s an intriguing choice. Never saw Capote, and although it was an Oscar contender a couple years back, I think I recall most of the praise being heaped on Phillip Seymour Hofmann for his performance, rather than Miller’s direction.

Your day breaks, your mind aches.
You find that all her words of kindness linger on
when she no longer needs you.

by danmerqury on Dec 8, 2009 7:24 PM PST up reply actions  

I hated Capote

but thats because I hated the character. My father hated that guy too, but he said that he did the character perfectly.

Don't believe in yourself.
Believe in Me who believes in You.

by Zonis on Dec 8, 2009 9:19 PM PST up reply actions  

He was a flawed, creepy man, but an enormous talent

“In Cold Blood” and “Music for Chameleons” are particularly masterful, and “Other Voices, Other Rooms” is also haunting. Like Andy Warhol, he dove headlong into a life of frivolous celebrity, becoming a caricature along the way, but by then he had already proven himself to be a genius.

by Ray of Lite on Dec 9, 2009 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Ballot-stuffing opportunity

The comic strip “Non Sequitur” ran a “you write the caption” sort of contest and four finalists were chosen from the entries. You can go here and vote for your favorite.

Or you can vote for my Mom. (Yes, she writes multilingual puns, too.) (Actually, there are two entries that meet that description, and the other one is quite good, too.)

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Dec 8, 2009 6:02 PM PST reply actions  

I voted for her because she gave birth to me.

So I figure I owe her something, right?

I actually like the “entrée: vous” one just as much. The other two are lame, though.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Dec 9, 2009 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Entree: vous was good

But the fact that the other was your mom put it over the top for my vote.

by el generico on Dec 10, 2009 4:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Speaking of Willis, I just watched

Live Free or Die Hard for the very first time on Sun. (awesome, but scary), and that made me think of the first Die Hard and Alexander Godunov (who was very sexy), which made me think of Funny People and Seth Rogen (super hero? hmmm).

Does anyone else have these weird trains?

I never considered taking him out. I had a commitment to his heart. - Johnny King

by lynnzgal on Dec 8, 2009 9:57 PM PST reply actions  

you had me at train

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Dec 8, 2009 10:56 PM PST up reply actions  

all the time

sometimes I stop and think, “um why was I just thinking about that?”.

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 9, 2009 11:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Toy Story 3!

To infinity and beyond!

I heart Pixar.

by whiteshoes40 on Dec 8, 2009 11:16 PM PST reply actions  

"49 films that will define 2010"

Isn’t there a list of “49 films in 2010 that will actually be good” anywhere?

by elcroata on Dec 9, 2009 9:52 AM PST reply actions  

You've not been to the cinema lately I take it. Good films nowadays are

few and far between. Put it this way, I saw a re-showing of Gladiator this summer and it’s by far and away the best film I saw at the cinema this year (and I’ve seen a fair few).

Some motherfcukers are always trying to ice skate uphill - Blade.

by OldhamA on Dec 9, 2009 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh, you're just not looking hard enough.

There are plenty of good films. Unfortunately, there are even more of these crappy sort, so you have to a little digging to find them out.

"When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years."

by LongLiveLangerhans on Dec 9, 2009 11:31 AM PST up reply actions  

Yep.

The good stuff is still there—it’s just being buried underneath Transformers and Saw and such.

2007, for example was a banner year. There Will Be Blood would have easily won Best Picture any other year. Unfortunately, it ran into No Country for Old Men.

Your day breaks, your mind aches.
You find that all her words of kindness linger on
when she no longer needs you.

by danmerqury on Dec 9, 2009 11:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Movies that I'm looking forward to in 2010

If you like Christopher Nolan (Memento, Dark Knight), he’s got a new movie coming out called Inception which I think he describes as taking place within the architecture of the mind. Weird, but it stars DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Marion Cotillard.

If you like Rian Johnson (Brick, Brothers Bloom), he’s got a movie coming out called Looper. Very little details (I think it’s a contemporary sci-fi), and no one’s attached to it but he’s made some pretty good movies so I’m looking forward to this.

There’s an Arrested Development movie coming out (maybe 2011) and I think the entire cast is on board, so that should be entertaining.

Phillip Seymour Hoffman has signed on to Paul Thomas Andersons’ next movie. I forget what it’s called but its about an academic who invents his own religion in the 1950s. Unofficially, its a satire of Scientology and L. Ron Hubbard, but officially it is definitely, definitely not. Though clearly it is.

I’m also looking forward to the American adaptation of “Let the Right One In” though the original was fine and didn’t need to be remade. Even so, I’ll probably watch it. It’s about vampires, which everyone seems to love right now.

I don’t know if it’s ever going to happen but supposedly the Coen Brothers are making “The Yiddish Policemen’s Union” based on the Michael Chabon novel of the same name. It’s a detective story that takes place in an alternate history where the United States gave Jewish refugees of WWII a temporary settlement in Sitka, Alaska and now are reclaiming the land. It was a pretty gripping read, though if you saw A Serious Man (the Coen’s latest) and hated that I can see that you might not like this one either. A lot of the Jewish humor and focus on cultural identity might be lost on those unfamiliar with Jewish culture.

Those are just some of the movies with big names attached that I could think of off the top of my head. There will undoubtedly be a lot of crappy movies made next year, but there is a lot that I, at least, am very excited about.

"When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years."

by LongLiveLangerhans on Dec 9, 2009 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Much More Interesting List

Than in the original post. Sequels to Predator & Iron Man, a billion vampire movies.

I didn’t particularly like Chabon’s novel, but it could make a very good film, particularly done by the Coen Brothers. The Paul Thomas Anderson film sounds wonderful. So does the Nolan film. Two films coming out in February that I’m really looking forward to: Martin Scorcese’s Shutter Island, and Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland.

Oh, been reading some buzz on Avatar. Apparently those who saw the 3D trailer before Disney’s Christmas Carol were blown away. Would love to hear some direct experience of that trailer.

by richwol1 on Dec 9, 2009 12:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Let the Right One In was superb.

Almost more of a coming of age love story/ drama than vampire/ horror film.
I hope you got a chance to see it on the big screen.

by brian.only on Dec 9, 2009 4:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah, the fabled Arrested Development movie.

So much hype, so little information.

Your day breaks, your mind aches.
You find that all her words of kindness linger on
when she no longer needs you.

by danmerqury on Dec 10, 2009 2:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Let's hope it fares better than the TWO! Deadwood movies Milch/HBO promised.

Lying bastards.

Think about that when you wonder why nobody watched John from Cincinnati, you POS.

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Dec 10, 2009 6:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Hmm

I’m sensing some bitterness there Bloom. David Milch was the driving force behind NYPD Blue so I’ll always like the guy but I couldn’t get through more than 20 minutes of John from Cincinnati it was both weird and awful.

by sirbed on Dec 10, 2009 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

AND

was the reason he killed Deadwood without more than a peep.

Fuck David Milch. Traitor.

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Dec 10, 2009 11:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Rich Harden returning to the AL West?

The Texas Rangers are closing in on a deal with right-handed pitcher Rich Harden, sources told ESPN The Magazine’s Buster Olney on Wednesday.

http://sports.espn.go.com/dallas/mlb/news/story?id=4728983

by theblackpearl on Dec 9, 2009 3:18 PM PST reply actions  

So you're saying this one isn't true?
According to NBCSports.com, Rich Harden has agreed to a one-year contract with right-hander Rich Harden.

http://www.fantasysp.com/player/mlb/Rich_Harden/687193

will crosby spread his legs so far apart at bat that the games will have to be rated nc-17 -- emperor nobody

by day-to-day on Dec 9, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I wonder if he was able to negotiate a no-trade clause.

Your day breaks, your mind aches.
You find that all her words of kindness linger on
when she no longer needs you.

by danmerqury on Dec 9, 2009 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Reports are that there is a mutual option for a second year.

"When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years."

by LongLiveLangerhans on Dec 9, 2009 6:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Boy, that's some self-love

March 13, 2010: Rich Harden placed Rich Harden on the DL with “blindness.”

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 9, 2009 9:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Wouldn't he go out with a blister first?

Then have blindness come up during his rehab assignment…

"Camelot sure fell apart, didn't it?"-Steve McCatty

by 5Aces on Dec 10, 2009 7:57 AM PST up reply actions  

hey... if Rich joins the Rangers, that means I can see him! A lot!

Better think twice about this, Rich… Texas means you have to deal with me again…

(that makes me sound like a creepy stalker-fan… but I am only a slightly creepy stalker-fan — there’s a difference)

by whiteshoes40 on Dec 9, 2009 5:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Mark my words - AL CY YOUNG WINNER 2010

He gets to pitch to us, Seattle and the Lost Angels and I have a funny feeling he’ll finally be healthy for a full year for the first time in my kid’s lifetime. Add all those up and it screams AL CY YOUNG WINNER

"Baseball is like a church. Many attend, but few understand." - Wes Westrum

by oaklandfan40 on Dec 9, 2009 4:50 PM PST reply actions  

I don't think anyone who pitches in Arlington

can win a Cy Young.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Dec 9, 2009 5:17 PM PST up reply actions  

If it's possible...

then I think a healthy RH is the one pitcher who could pull it off.

Of course, he’ll pitch a perfecto against us.

"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer

by alox on Dec 9, 2009 7:36 PM PST up reply actions  

MSN article

What if the internet broke?

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 10, 2009 11:33 AM PST reply actions  

sports pictures, chewbacca
see more Sports Pictures

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 10, 2009 11:35 AM PST reply actions  

I love this.

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Dec 10, 2009 11:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Christmas gift from the A's

Present Tags (or season tags as they call it)

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 10, 2009 4:34 PM PST reply actions  

New ballpark discussion tomorrow

on KQED’s Forum in the 9 AM (Pacific time) hour. Both the A’s and 49ers prospects, featuring our own Marine Layer.

It's the fans that make the game fun. -- Rickey Henderson, July 26, 2009.

by Englishmajor on Dec 10, 2009 4:40 PM PST reply actions  

If we're going to put webcomics in the DLD, we totally should go with mine (even if it has nothing to do with AN or baseball)

Am I spamming if I link it here? What if I pretend it has nothing to do with me and just say I love it?

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Dec 10, 2009 9:27 PM PST reply actions  

put it up already.

Sock puppets have never been able to successfully attack castles. -NM

by Leopold Bloom on Dec 10, 2009 11:22 PM PST up reply actions  

LINK THAT SHIT.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Dec 10, 2009 11:30 PM PST up reply actions  

+1

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 10, 2009 11:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Fine fine

I feel as though now it’s been hyped too much.

www.zekeishungry.com

I try not to do too much promotion since we (yes, we, this is a two-person operation) have just fifteen strips up, but I suppose it’s time to really start getting the word out a little bit.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Dec 11, 2009 12:33 AM PST up reply actions  

my favorite was the clown jokes

So, did you name the Dog after Bobby Crosby?

You have to include smiley faces - Poppy
;- ) :- ) :-O : -> : -] : -}

by micdog2001 on Dec 11, 2009 12:57 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm trying to imagine

how you pronounce “xkcd” so that you would say “a xkcd comic” rather than “an xkcd comic”.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Dec 14, 2009 1:08 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook

Recent FanPosts

Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract
Small
fantasy baseball league for A's fans!
Small
NYY Proposal
Small
Roy Oswalt = opportunity
Choice_small
Tom Milone, by the numbers: Maddux, Glavine, Halladay, Radke...
Img_1877_small
Behind Enemy Lines
Lt-922060_small
All-Time Oakland A's team

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late