Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Where each team stands right now

A's Off-Season Pattern: It's ALWAYS Darkest Before The Dawn


This one's for you, PT!

Litigation Café

Welcome to the Litigation Café, where the main entree is Chop Suey and for dessert you can claim a tort. Or if you prefer, two of you can order a large tapioca pudding and work out shared custardy. The bottom line is that the food will always settle eventually, so come on by. Just don't submit any briefs because we don't do that anymore.

On to baseball...

NOTE: Special feature coming at 6:00pm PST today! Noah Frank, the Media Relations director for the Fresno Grizzlies who was with the Chicago Cubs in 2008 and in the Texas League (San Antonio Missions) in 2009, will weigh in with an "inside look" at 3 players with whom he is familiar: Jake Fox, Bobby Cassevah, and Beau Vaughan. Stay tuned!

Star-divide

Beware of analyzing an A's off-season midway through. One thing that is comforting about having Billy Beane as your favorite team's GM is that you know he has a plan and that he's smart. That gives him two advantages over many GMs.

So far the A's have spent the off-season creating more holes, and only adding players who were available on the cheap because no one in their wrong mind would pay them very much based on the health and/or baseball ability they have shown so far.

That's because whatever Beane plans to do in the "big picture" scheme of the whole off-season, it's still ahead. Perhaps it involves signing Jack Cust after all and paying him less than he would have had Cust been tendered. Maybe it involves putting more FA dollars than we're expecting to the best hitter that the market overlooks. Perhaps this is another Winter where Santa will bring an unexpected trade right around Christmas -- remember that the Hudson, Mulder, Haren, and Swisher deals have gone down after the Winter Meetings, not during. It's tough when the subtractions precede the additions, but it doesn't matter in what order you do it -- what matters is how the roster looks at the end.

Here's what we know, and it's not much: In sizing up trade partnerships with other GMs, Beane found that in order to get the guys he wanted, he would have to part with players that are on his "untouchable" list -- these names probably include Suzuki, Sweeney, Anderson, Carter, Wallace, Cardenas. The A's are resolved to create a core of young, good players that can grow up and thrive together, and while Beane has said many times that no player is ever "untouchable," this particular rebuilding plan includes getting and keeping a key core that are here for the glory years to (hopefully) come.

So Beane can't easily address 3B, SS, big bat, without dealing the very players he is not open to moving. Good players aren't affordable on the FA market, and young players aren't even available. I could see the A's signing Glaus or Tejada as short-term stop-gaps, or trying to replace Cust's bat cheaper with a flyer on Delgado or Thome.

What I can't see is how the A's will continue to add young, up-and-coming pieces at positions that are still weak. Are Wallace, Carter, and Cardenas closer than we think, a la Anderson/Cahill? That's many ANers' nightmare: Start the service clock now, but why? Or are the A's just planning to be really uncompetitive, with a lousy left side of the infield and no power, for at least half a season until Wallcarternas are ready to take over? Or does Beane have something up his sleeve that I haven't thought of?

History would suggest the last one. And since it doesn't much matter what the roster looks like on December 13th, I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop. There will be additions. But who?

Brandon Inge!!!

0 recs  |  Comment 92 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thome and Glaus!!!

Do it.

"They (The 1989 A's) are the best team I ever saw"- Mike Krukow

by 9Custs on Dec 13, 2009 10:08 AM PST reply actions  

Starting the Service Clock...

I’m losing patience with the team keeping good players down just to delay their service clock. If they’re good enough to play on the team, let’s get them up here.

Few players seem to last with the A’s very long anyway. I’d much rather see the best players on the field (and start rooting for them right away). I’m tired of hearing about the potential greatness waiting at the minor league level.

I’ve been following the team for 30 years, and it’s getting hard to root for a squad that seems to have a 50% turnover every year.

don’t confuse me with StewCrew, there’s a copyright lawsuit pending :)

by Stew's Crew on Dec 13, 2009 10:09 AM PST reply actions  

You would prefer they kept players once it was no longer worth keeping them

or pay them more than they should?

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Dec 13, 2009 10:18 AM PST up reply actions  

You seem to misunderstand the service time argument

The main complaint comes when the team rushes a young player who isn’t ready for the Bigs but is unfortunately the “best” option for the club to play. Trevor Cahill is a great example of this. He was one of the 5 best SP performers in ST last year but as a guy with 6 weeks of AA experience he wasn’t really ready to pitch in Oakland. He could have definitely used more minor league time before making his Oakland debut. That burns service time.

Moving on to this coming season… based on where they left off at the end of last season I do not believe that Wallace or Carter are ready to play for Oakland come Opening Day 2010. They are still in the learning phase of their game and it is possible that they could overcome their deficiencies during winter ball and ST but that’s not a likely scenario. Based on where they left off last year (in terms of their development) the A’s would be wasting their service time by playing them in Oakland at the start of the 2010 season. They just don’t look to be ready and it would be unwise for the A’s to use up a year of cheap labor.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 13, 2009 10:34 AM PST up reply actions  

missed the point

Yah, I took Nico’s comment “Start the service clock now, but why?” and used it to vent on a marginally related theme. Oops.

Maybe it’s just the “rebuilding years”, but there’s been so much turnover these years, that it’s hard to follow a game when you can’t recognize the players without a nametag. I’m able to keep up – I’m an AN member, so of course I know who’s who :) – but I think you’re losing the casual fan when they don’t even know who they’re rooting for.

I guess after following the team for so long, I am tired of the turnover of players. The philosophy of “players don’t bring fans, winning brings fans” seems flawed. Next time I’ll try to post that in a more relevant discussion.

don’t confuse me with StewCrew, there’s a copyright lawsuit pending :)

by Stew's Crew on Dec 13, 2009 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't see how you can be impatient with the team

for doing something that it doesn’t actually do. Seriously, there are zero examples of the A’s “keeping good players down just to delay their service clock” (or can you name one?). On the contrary, the problem is that they start burning their service time when they’re not yet “good enough” (Cahill being the most egregious example).

I wish they would keep players down a bit longer to extend their club-controlled time, but for whatever reason the club doesn’t seem to do that. I’m going to be pissed if Wallace or Carter breaks camp with the team.

by Faust on Dec 13, 2009 10:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Mulder

…is the only example where a player could have started the season in the majors, but was withheld til May for service time reasons.

by richwol1 on Dec 13, 2009 12:58 PM PST up reply actions  

How do we know about Hudson and Zito?

Both midseason callups, ostensibly because they weren’t ready yet but possibly because of service time considerations. We really have no way of knowing.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 13, 2009 1:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, Mulder really showed he was ready his rookie year

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Dec 14, 2009 12:12 AM PST up reply actions  

I thought Mulder did amass a full year of service time his rookie season

Didn’t he make only one start in AAA that year?

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 14, 2009 9:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes, he did

But he also wasn’t pitching that hot, either

.305 avg against / .326 BABIP / 1.69 WHIP

(though I seem to remember him getting better as the year wore on)

"Do I talk to myself? No, I just remind myself of what I'm trying to do. You know, I never answer myself so how can I be talking to myself?" - Rickey

by cuppingmaster on Dec 14, 2009 10:08 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

good points, i agree, bb has something up his sleeve. i just wonder

sometimes if he (or many a’s fans) will ever have the patience required to truly rebuild. i think that means we honestly concede the division for at least a year, and actually hold on to those untouchables. i’d rather watch the a’s lose a chunk of close scoring games and play well— play like they did the second half of last season— than trade some of these guys for a better chance at a .500 season next year. i’ve got nothing against winning games, but how much are we willing to sacrifice in order to let these guys grow?

by oaklidiot on Dec 13, 2009 10:12 AM PST reply actions  

All I know is that I'm not paying for the lemon chicken

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Dec 13, 2009 10:47 AM PST reply actions  

Um...You pretty clearly had two more shrimps than I did

(and when I say shrimps, I mean squid). I hope we can settle this amicably, but I’m fully prepared to take you to small clams court if you insist on being so utterly shellfish.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 13, 2009 11:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Small clams court?

I have a court date scheduled there next week. Has something to do with a tip and a miscalculated bar tab…

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Dec 13, 2009 11:09 AM PST up reply actions  

The waiting... aka "darkest before the dawn"... is a double-edged sword.

On the one hand it does help economize. And that is a fiscal reality of this team… though I do question the extremes they have taken in economizing the last couple years.

On the other hand, it usually leaves us with scraps. We severely limit our chances if we just scoop up everybody else’s unwanted scraps. Sometimes it works, but usually it doesn’t.

Every hitter likes fastballs, just like everybody likes ice cream. But you don't like it when someone's stuffing it into you by the gallon. That's what it feels like when Nolan Ryan's thrown balls by you. ~Reggie Jackson

by UncleLeo on Dec 13, 2009 10:51 AM PST reply actions  

Could be worse

  Watching the warriors lose again and again.

by Arcman on Dec 13, 2009 10:57 AM PST reply actions  

RAIDERRRRRRRZZZZZ!!!!111!!11

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 13, 2009 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

OK, I'll climb back in off the ledge

I still believe in Beane as a generally smart GM who operates with a plan so it’s definitely worth waiting to see how this all turns out. I’m still a fan of Cust though and I am concerned that this move is a case of squandering value which is something the A’s can’t really afford to do.

by DiegoAsFan on Dec 13, 2009 10:58 AM PST reply actions  

I'm calling it: Beane's solution to 3B...

Doolittle! The first LH thirdbaseman in the majors since Mike Squires!

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Dec 13, 2009 11:00 AM PST reply actions  

You don't count Ohlone field softball?

I played a pretty darn good 3B there long after Squires had hung up his spikes.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 13, 2009 11:05 AM PST up reply actions  

So that explains why the A's non-tendered Cust

They’re tired of the ball going over the fence for a strike.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Dec 13, 2009 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Mario Valdez

Played one inning at third for the White Sox in 1997

by elcroata on Dec 13, 2009 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Gomes has nowhere to play

We already have a lefty-masher in Hairston. Why two?

Barton is a better hitter than Atkins, who can no longer play 3B, making him kind of useless.

Thome, Glaus & Delgado are all decent options, if no one really wants Jake Fox playing everyday at DH (which I think is the plan as of this second).

by PL78 on Dec 13, 2009 11:33 AM PST up reply actions  

Gary Sheffield is another option

I dont think he will get much money this year but he can still hit, and would be a nice platoonmate for Hairston or could DH too.

by PL78 on Dec 13, 2009 11:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm not a big fan of The Sheff

I’d rather go after Glaus and Tejada, or Thome/Delgado.

Zeigler to Geren…."A-Rod? He’s my bitch." -alox

by mrod on Dec 14, 2009 4:29 PM PST up reply actions  

No Sheffs,

just prep cooks plz.

"Sniff some krazy glue, and start a religion!"- The Reverend Billy Lard

by Gaijin_Suketto on Dec 14, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

The only player I really hope we sign

is Aroldis Chapman. And I really hope we trade Travis Buck somewhere as Sweeney has made him redundant. If Cardenas blazes early we can trade Ellis somewhere too.

I really dont mind going with Pennington all year and the Chavez/McPherson→Wallace group at 3B. Every other position we can fill internally pretty easy. Adding a name bat to DH would be nice, but its not 100% necessary.

The odds of this being our opening day lineup are pretty good:

1B: Barton
2B: Ellis
SS: Pennington
3B: McPherson/Chavez
C: Suzuki
LF: Cunningham/Hairston
CF: Davis
RF: Sweeney
DH: Fox

Uninspiring? Yes. Horrible? Nah, its not as bad as you might think.

by PL78 on Dec 13, 2009 11:25 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

It's bad enough that I'd go ahead and just make the lineup

in order of position, like you do. Why bother thinking more about it?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 13, 2009 11:26 AM PST up reply actions  

uninspiring

Uninspiring is a great word here.

We follow the team because we are inspired by what they can do, not because they are a short walk from BART.

Suzuki, Ellis, some starting pitching, and a bunch of maybes. I’d still wear my green & gold all the time, but would this team bring any fans to the park?

by Stew's Crew on Dec 13, 2009 12:36 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Dude the 2006 team barely brought any fans to the park.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Dec 13, 2009 9:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Bad enough to still not draw people to the Coliseum? Yep.

Warriors, Stupidest franchise in the league.

I told Randolph that Bill Russell would tell him to keep that ball in play and start the break.

RANDOLPH: "I know. But sometimes, you gotta let ‘em know."

(MT)

by kenntoe on Dec 13, 2009 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Okay i'll make a better lineup out of the remaining FAs we could feasibly get

1B: Delgado/Glaus
2B: Ellis
SS: Pennington
3B: Chavez
C: Suzuki
LF: Sheffield/Hairston
CF: Davis
RF: Sweeney
DH: Thome/Glaus

by PL78 on Dec 13, 2009 11:44 AM PST reply actions  

Why are people enamored with replacing Barton at 1B?

I can’t see Delgado being an improvement over Barton. What Delgado adds with the bat he takes away with the glove.

Barton getting placed out by a top prospect is one thing, but Barton shouldn’t be benched/moved for an aging vet. We’re not talking about the Giants here.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 13, 2009 12:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Not only that, but why are people so enamored with inserting Chavez at 3B?

It ain’t gonna happen, people.

Every hitter likes fastballs, just like everybody likes ice cream. But you don't like it when someone's stuffing it into you by the gallon. That's what it feels like when Nolan Ryan's thrown balls by you. ~Reggie Jackson

by UncleLeo on Dec 13, 2009 2:18 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

December is the only month Chavez has the potential to be in the lineup is why.

Every day is just a little worse than the previous, that means every day is the worst day of my life.

by shooting4life on Dec 14, 2009 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Ick. What a waste of money

Between Sheffield, Glaus, Thome, Delgado and Chavez, at least two to three of these players will probably fall off the table into oblivion during 2010. Sheffield is very old. Thome and Delgado are in steep decline. Chavez may never play another game. Glaus is the only one that isn’t a huge risk.

by richwol1 on Dec 13, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

funny you have chavez in the lineup...

there’s a better chance that bonds gets more AB’s for us than chavez

"They (The 1989 A's) are the best team I ever saw"- Mike Krukow

by 9Custs on Dec 13, 2009 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

im not

i was just posting that having one of those FA mashers is a sexier option than what we are going to go with, I mean Delgado/Sheff&Thome are borderline HOFers, thats more interesting than Barton, Cunningham and Fox. Just sayin.

by PL78 on Dec 13, 2009 12:06 PM PST reply actions  

I just think its too much like the 2009 Giambi Experiment

which we both can agree with doesn’t work.

I’m not opposed to Thome or Delgado at DH if Cust isn’t back, but nobody should be replacing Barton at 1B.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 13, 2009 12:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Dye & Thome

I’m not sure how much each would cost, but it’s worth considering.

Although, if we could get SpartaCust cheaper than Thome then I’d take that.

It’d be nice to have a few hitters for the 3-4-5 spots. Unless you’re looking forward to Hairston batting cleanup…

by Stew's Crew on Dec 13, 2009 1:11 PM PST reply actions  

Beane understands that there are PLENTY of DH options this year

The list goes on and on and with the economy in the pooper right now, I am sure plenty of these guys could be had for cheap
Cust
Dye
Thome
Sheff
Delgado
H. Blalock
R. Branyan
M. Jacobs
N. Johnson – like nick
A. LaRoche
C. Tracy
Miggy
T. Glaus
G. Anderson
R. Ankiel
Vlad
X. Nady
Huff
Matsui

by ryanmoser on Dec 13, 2009 2:33 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I think the A's should sign Nick Johnson, period.

If you’re worried about his health (and who wouldn’t be), you stick him at DH and enjoy his career .402 OBP — the guy is a terrific hitter. If Barton tanks, you have a 1B option in hand.

It’s kind of like signing Giambi, only this time the FA is the 1B “fall back plan,” not the Opening Day guy. And Nick Johnson can still hit. You just have to keep him healthy to get a really good hitter into your lineup, and the A’s might be able to do that in ways his former NL teams couldn’t.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 13, 2009 2:38 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd tap that

but it’ll require two years guaranteed, and probably $14M or more.

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 13, 2009 3:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Gah!

Nick Johnson has got some ridiculous skills, and would be a great addition for the right price, but damn, he’s going to be just as boring as every other high OBP, middling power guy. I know he puts up a lot more value than other guys who have more power but walk less, but if we aren’t going to be good next year, I hope we’re at least exciting. I’m starting to wonder if we’re even going to have a 20 HR guy next year.

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Dec 13, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

At least he's not bordering on decrepit

The others (Thome, Sheffield, Delgado) haven’t played the field reliably for years. At least Johnson has useful skills in addition to his bat.

I have to say, though, that Thome coming here is a little far-fetched. He left for the Dodgers to play a backup role because he thought they might win the WS. Coming to Oakland, where it is all but assured he won’t get into the WS this year, seems against his wishes.

"Do I talk to myself? No, I just remind myself of what I'm trying to do. You know, I never answer myself so how can I be talking to myself?" - Rickey

by cuppingmaster on Dec 13, 2009 4:03 PM PST up reply actions  

well, considering that we just nontendered the only 20hr guy we had LAST year

I’d probably say no.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Dec 13, 2009 10:00 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd totally be down to bring Jermaine Dye back to Oaktown

I Liked the idea a few weeks ago and I like it now.

Zeigler to Geren…."A-Rod? He’s my bitch." -alox

by mrod on Dec 14, 2009 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

no way man

NJ is not getting $14MM committed to him in this economy. Im thinking he will take a 1/$6MM offer from an NL team that will let him play 1B.

BTW I’m all for us getting him and playing him as a DH/PT-1B.

by PL78 on Dec 13, 2009 5:21 PM PST up reply actions  

You wouldn't want to give up what they would want in return.

But, then again, this is the team that just gave Pudge Rodriguez 2 years and real money.

Maybe they’d take Eveland.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Dec 14, 2009 8:03 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah we could have them throw in Strasburg

They won’t miss him, right?

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 14, 2009 9:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Nah!!

Why would we want that joker?

We need to keep things realistic… This is the Oakland Triple A’s Paul!

by MMunoz33 on Dec 14, 2009 9:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Hey hey, look at the non-tenders

I know a lot of people are resistant to pay for relief help, but bringing in Matt Capps would only bring us to a greater position of strength.

And then there’s the Yankee scrap heap. Chien-Ming Wang and Hideki Matsui would also be interesting additions to the team. All of these players would cost money, but they wouldn’t be crap additions like the last few years.

by noava22 on Dec 13, 2009 3:26 PM PST reply actions  

Wang

I thought he made more than $5M last year. Wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world.

Then again, injuries and suckitude (potentially related to injuries) the last two partial seasons. Still think we ought to just bring back Tomko.

"Do I talk to myself? No, I just remind myself of what I'm trying to do. You know, I never answer myself so how can I be talking to myself?" - Rickey

by cuppingmaster on Dec 13, 2009 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

All three would (more than likely) be productive and worth the money

Wang gives us our veteran 5th for awhile, Matsui takes over the Cust role…but actually hits, and Capps comes in and solidifies the bullpen. Our starters would only have to go 5, and then we hand it over to some combination of Breslow/Capps/Divine/Wuertz/Bailey. Hell yes. Capps and Matsui will cost some money (as might Wang), but they won’t be useless. It’s better than throwing money down a sink (Glaus = busted shoulder, Tomko = worthless) or at a thief (Beltre = Boris client).

by noava22 on Dec 13, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't know about Wang

He’s got a messed up shoulder and even in the best case scenario he won’t be able to pitch until June. Some other team can pay him and hope he can be healthy and productive for half a season.

by DiegoAsFan on Dec 13, 2009 8:19 PM PST up reply actions  

The A's already have at least six relief pitchers who are better than Matt Capps

Best case scenario for him is that he becomes an emergencies-only mop-up man. I can’t think of a bigger waste of money, and that includes Jermaine Dye, which is saying a lot.

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 13, 2009 8:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I am depressed

My reading of the general AN consensus is that we knew that we had our top untouchable young players and prospects, but we thought we had an abundance of “really good but touchable” prospects that we could trade for hole-fillers.

Alas, the depth and quality of our prospects must just be in our heads because, as Beane says, nobody wants to trade us anyone unless they touch our untouchables.

Similarly, I think AN tended to think that we might lose one or two guys to the Rule 5 draft because our depth was so great. No cigar. Nobody wanted anyone on our Rule 5 list.

Are we in some sort of Billy Beane twilight zone bubble, where we see the world one way, but the rest of the baseball world sees our prospects differently?

Help! It is winter, cold and dark. Keep me away from sharp comments.

by redtopcowboy on Dec 13, 2009 4:00 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I think what it shows is that other GMs aren't nearly as dumb as often portrayed on AN

The prospects they want for their valuable players are the very ones the A’s don’t want to move, and they’re not settling for Buck or H. Rodriguez or James Simmons.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 13, 2009 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

keep your wang out of oakland

na…actually, he would be a nice fit for approx 2.5-3.5 million

by ryanmoser on Dec 13, 2009 5:41 PM PST up reply actions  

An odd phenomenon that I've noticed

is that teams seem to care, at times, more about the position of the prospect they’re getting within the trading team’s farm system than about the actual skills of the prospect in question.

I can’t explain this. It seems like if you have a crappy farm system, you can actually acquire players in trade for less value than if you have a good farm system. If you’re giving up “your #5 and #10 prospects” either way, it’s much less lost value if you have a crappy farm.

I don’t mean to suggest that teams are literally calling up other teams and just asking for their #5 prospect, but somehow it seems to be easier to sell a trade partner on a fringy guy if he doesn’t look bad by comparison to numerous other good prospects in your system. Maybe because the “buyer” GM doesn’t get the feeling that he’s getting second-rate goods in return.

O'Hara: Detective Lassiter is literally on fire.
Spencer: What kind of fire are we talking about-- "Michael Jackson in the Pepsi commercial" fire, or "misusing the word literally" fire?

by PaulThomas on Dec 13, 2009 8:53 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Isn't just a matter of need?

Someone got called up/let go/retired and the team needs a replacement NOW. Therefore, they look specifically for someone at that position.

I agree that you ought to just acquire the best talent possible and work to build overall strength. I just think that’s the ideal and it’s not that clear cut for teams sometimes.

"Do I talk to myself? No, I just remind myself of what I'm trying to do. You know, I never answer myself so how can I be talking to myself?" - Rickey

by cuppingmaster on Dec 14, 2009 10:12 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind Alfredo Amezaga. A good defensive SS and can play anywhere except C.

Sounds better than Miles.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 13, 2009 7:28 PM PST reply actions  

From Heidi Watney?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 14, 2009 10:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Someone needs to tell Lackey

that the guy who did that prostate exam wasn’t a doctor nor was he affiliated with the Red Sox. I’m not gonna be the one to tell him, but someone oughta.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 14, 2009 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Wang

Looks like that’s not going to happen

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4740892

"Do I talk to myself? No, I just remind myself of what I'm trying to do. You know, I never answer myself so how can I be talking to myself?" - Rickey

by cuppingmaster on Dec 14, 2009 11:08 AM PST reply actions  

Pleasepleaseplease Angels trade Weaver

Just because it would be absurdly stupid and linear improvement at best, regardless of whether the pitcher was Halladay or Lee.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 14, 2009 1:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Trading Weaver for Halladay or Lee would NOT be linear.

Not for 2010, anyway.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Dec 14, 2009 4:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, the team is the Mariners.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 14, 2009 1:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

08-_the_author_small
DLD 7/29/10: Floats, Anyone?
Tsgirlbass_th_small
DLD 7/28/2010: MLBlinology
Img_1848_small
Exploring an Andrew Bailey-for-Jesus Montero trade
Tsgirlbass_th_small
For those going to be extras in "Moneyball"....
Baseball_small
AN interviews Mike Piazza

Recent FanPosts

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small
What Do iglew, jeffro, and Craig Breslow Have In Common?
Small
Minor Athletics 7/19-7/27 (Part I)
Nx74205_small
August GOGpicker
Whyoffry180_small
Michael Choice Signs For $2MM Bonus
Images_small
Who Should The A's Sign To Big-Time Contracts?
Zuke_small
AN Day 8/21?
Small
Trading Relievers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

HOUSTON - JULY 24:  Pitcher Roy Oswalt #44 of the Houston Astros throws against the Cincinnati Reds in the first inning at Minute Maid Park on July 24 2010 in Houston Texas.  (Photo by Bob Levey/Getty Images) +13 updates

Done Deal: Roy Oswalt Traded To Phillies, Will Make Debut Friday Night In Washington

WASHINGTON - JULY 29:  Adam Dunn #44 of the Washington Nationals watches the game against the Atlanta Braves at Nationals Park on July 29 2010 in Washington DC.  (Photo by Greg Fiume/Getty Images)

MLB Trade Deadline: Where Does Your Team Stand As Saturday Approaches?

Florida Marlins' Jorge Cantu watches his double against the Colorado Rockies in the first inning of a baseball game in Miami, Wednesday, July 21, 2010. Dan Uggla scored on the double. The Marlins won 5-2. (AP Photo/Alan Diaz) +2 updates

Marlins Trade Jorge Cantu To Rangers For Pitchers Evan Reed, Omar Poveda

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

Green_small iglew

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Whyoffry180_small danmerqury

Logo_small gigglingone

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

A_s_pic_5 emperor nobody

Editors

As_kings_cal_small louismg

902484_big_small Leopold Bloom

Authors

Myeyebrowpose_small jeffro

Moderators

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Img_1848_small notsellingjeans

Small vignette17