AFL PitchFX Pt. 2: Sam Demel and Mickey Storey
Hope everyone had a great turkey weekend (even if turkey wasn’t your dead animal of choice). Today I’m going to cover two more of the pitchers we sent to the Arizona Fall League.
Sam Demel (RHP) - 2007 3rd Round, Texas Christian University
PitchFX caught only 2.2 innings of work from Demel, on three separate occasions. He has a two-seam fastball that averages around 92-93 mph with good lateral movement, tailing inside to right-handed hitters by nine inches. He also throws a mediocre mid-80’s changeup that doesn’t tail as much, unfortunately. It looks like Demel spent the AFL experimenting with his slider. On 10/17, he featured an 85-mph slider with plenty of lateral movement. On 10/29, he slowed it down to 82-mph, and sacrificed some of the lateral movement for more sink, making it more of a slurvey hybrid pitch. I have PitchFX data for his appearance on 11/19, but he didn’t throw a single slider. Definitely would have been nice to see if he ended up settling on any particular movement. Here’s his movement chart. It’s kind of a mess, but I’ve read scouting reports that say that he’s comfortable adding or subtracting from his pitches. If that’s the case, I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and say that he knows what he’s doing with this spread out pitch distribution. This is a league to try new pitch movements and styles, but if he's not generating this kind of graph on purpose in the regular season, it's worrying.
Mickey Storey (RHP) - 2008 31st Round, Florida Atlantic University
And now we come to the deception artist that is Mickey Storey. I’m just going to post his movement chart first, allowing you guys to, er, soak in the mediocrity.
He’s definitely not a guy who will wow you with his raw stuff, but when you have his control, you don’t need to. His fastball is an 88-89 mph affair that ranges from an acceptable amount of tailing action to being as straight as an arrow. I do like his changeup quite a bit because it comes in looking like his fastball, except that it’s 15-mph slower and drops 10 inches lower. He didn’t throw the changeup much, though, preferring to dismantle hitters with his 72-mph curveball. Storey’s curve doesn’t have very much drop, but it has a decent amount of lateral motion, coming into left-handed hitters. His stuff really isn’t all that great, but I can’t argue with his obscene 12.4 K/9 and ridiculous 8.88 K/BB in 2009, with time spent everywhere from low-A to AAA. PitchFX doesn't do a good job of showing how good a pitcher’s control is, and in some way or another, smoke and mirrors or not, Mickey Storey’s getting it done.
Odds and Ends
- Here's two more graphs for Demel, showing velocity against lateral and vertical movement, respectively. And the same for Storey (lateral, vertical).
- It looks like these two guys weren't fiddling with their mechanics. Everything looks nice and tight as far as release points go.
- Well, it turns out that spin graph I created earlier was entirely useless. Somewhere along the line, I screwed up a calculation. Now, with the right math, the polar spin angle vs. spin rate graph is entirely identical to the movement graph, giving me precisely no new information for a whole lot more work.
- Note to self: Excel works in radians, not degrees.
- In the the last part to this AFL PitchFX series, I'll touch on the last of the four pitchers we sent to Arizona, Justin Friend. I'll also figure out something to analyze about everybody's favorite incendiary topic: Grant Desme.
8 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If Storey can really convert to starter, that would be quite a coup.
It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver
Just in case you don't already know this (and I'm pretty sure you do)
You can get Excel to auto-convert between degrees and radians.
I really like these posts, incidentally. Great work!
I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does
Excel! Is there anything it can't do?
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan
lots and lots. Excel is about the limit, though.
I’m a sorely limited man, in many many ways
I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does
Excel is the one reason not to hate Microsoft.
"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan
I don't know about that
Excel is a pretty terrific product; I use it heavily every workday. But although when Bill Gates ran Microsoft he was almost wholly incapable of uttering two consecutive sentences without using the word “innovation,” I always thought Microsoft’s actual business strategy was more about the stifling of innovation than about actual innovation. That is, who’s to say that if Microsoft hadn’t used the leverage of its Windows operating system to choke off any market for rival software products like Lotus (not beating them on the merits), vigorous competition between rival spreadsheet products might have produced more innovation and something better than Excel, and sooner? We can’t really know the answer of course, since we don’t have the Star Trek option of going to an alternate universe and eyeballing out how things worked out there.
Thanks!
And yeah, heh, I used the RADIANS function on the spin angle, but stupidly subtracted 90 degrees instead of pi/2. That explained the funky rotation I had with the Simmons graph.
No, there's no light,
in the darkest of your furthest reaches.
Storey intrigues me due to the Duchscherer comparisons
and the possibility of him moving into the rotation. Seems like the kind of guy who could be underappreciated by many organizations — as Duke was — but has “hidden gem” potential.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by 


























