Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: More Televised Winter Baseball, Please

Community Prospect List #18

For Reference:

Scout's Mid-Season Top 50. 

Scout's End-Seasn Top 50.

Star-divide

Prospects up for Vote:

Rashun Dixon, OF, Age 18

Year Team Lg Age Org. Level Pos Ln G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO HBP IBB SH  SF DP  AVG OBP SLG OPS
2008 Azl Athletics Ariz 17 OAK Rk of   45 179 32 47 3 10 8 42 5 2 18 68 1 0 0 3 .263 .328 .525 853
2009 Vancouver Nwst 18 OAK A-     57 196 25 42 7 0 2 16 6 4 23 73 2 0 0 2 .214 .300 .281 581
Minor League Totals - 2 Season(s) 102 375 57 89 10 10 10 58 11 6 41 141 3 0 0 5 .237 .314 .397 711

 

Pedro Figueroa, SP, Age  23

2009 Stats G W-L ERA IP H BB K SV WHIP
KAN (oak) A- 18 10-2 3.23 86.1 89 31 76 0 1.39
STO (oak) A+ 11 3-4 3.56 56.2 62 35 67 0 1.48

 

James Simmons, SP, Age 22 - Video

2009 Stats G W-L ERA IP H BB K SV WHIP
SAC (oak) AAA 23 7-7 5.72 119.2 139 47 81 0 1.55

 

Ben Hornbeck, SP, Age 21

2009 Stats G W-L ERA IP H BB K SV WHIP
MID (oak) AA 1 0-1 16.20 3.1 5 4 1 0 2.70
STO (oak) A+ 21 5-4 3.52 76.2 64 32 111 1 1.25

 

Shane Peterson, OF, Age 21

2009 Stats G Bavg OBP SLG HR RBI SB R 2B
SFD (stl) AA 18 .284 .338 .405 1 7 2 10 4
MID (oak) AA 57 .276 .335 .399 4 24 6 26 14

 

 

Sam Demel, RP, Age - 23 - Video

2009 Stats G W-L ERA IP H BB K SV WHIP
MID (oak) AA 27 0-2 0.61 29.1 23 9 26 11 1.09
SAC (oak) AAA 28 2-3 3.62 32.1 27 21 33 3 1.48

  

Brad Kilby, RP, Age 26 - Video

2009 Stats G W-L ERA IP H BB K SV WHIP
OAK MLB 11 1-0 0.53 17.0 10 4 10 0 0.82
SAC (oak) AAA 45 4-2 2.13 63.1 40 24 77 2 1.01

 

Henry Rodriguez, RP, Age 22 - Video

2009 Stats G W-L ERA IP H BB K SV WHIP
SAC (oak) AAA 37 2-1 5.77 43.2 38 38 71 4 1.74
STO (oak) A+ 3 0-0 0.00 5 3 1 11 0 0.80

A's Community Prospect List

1. Chris Carter, 1B, Age 22 - 76% (of 5) - Video

2. Brett Wallace, 3B, Age 22 - 79% (of 5) - Offense Video  / Defense Video

3. Adrian Cardenas, IF, Age 21 - 75% (of 5) - Video

4. Jemile Weeks, 2B, Age 22 - 36% (of 8) - Video

5. Grant Desme, OF, Age 23 - 29% (of 8) - Video - OmahaHi's case for Grant Desme

6. Grant Green, SS, Age 21 - 32% (of 7) - Video

7. Josh Donaldson, C, Age 23 - 31% (of 7) - Video - DesignatedForAssignment's case for Josh Donaldson

8. Corey Brown, CF, Age 23 - 37% (of 8) - Video

9. Michael Ynoa, SP, Age 17 -  40% (of 8) - Video

10. Sean Doolittle, 1B/OF, Age 22 - 41% (of 8) - Video

11. Arnold Leon, SP, Age 20 - 46% (of 8)

12. Tyson Ross, SP, Age 22 - 23% (of 8) / 42% (Runoff) - Cal Sports Profile Video

13. Fautino De Los Santos, SP, Age 23 - 34% (of 8)

14. Max Stassi, C, Age 18 - 45% (of 8)

15. Anthony Capra, SP, Age 22 - 41% (of 8)

16. Dustin Coleman, SS, Age 22 - 21% (of 8)

17. Brad Kilby, RP, Age 26 - 25% (of 8) Video

Poll
Who is the A's #18 Prospect?
Pedro Figueroa, SP
21 votes
Rashun Dixon, OF
18 votes
James Simmons, OF
70 votes
Sam Demel, RP
44 votes
Ben Hornbeck, SP
68 votes
Henry Rodriguez, RP
46 votes
Shane Peterson, OF
37 votes
Matt Spencer, OF
15 votes

319 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 138 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

at this point

i’m really kind of clueless. ive heard of most of them, but don’t know previous injuries, comparisons, etc. does someone have a quick rundown of each prospect available?

by thewhizkid on Nov 21, 2009 5:54 PM PST reply actions  

Has to be H-Rod at this point.....

The guy can throw 100+ and thats gotta be worth 18th i think

Let the Kids play Billy!! No More Rent-a-Vet in Oakland!!

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 21, 2009 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

He can throw 100, but can he throw strikes?

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 21, 2009 6:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes, but not very often.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 21, 2009 7:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Here's a ??? for you......

Do you need to be able to throw strikes to be the #18 prospect?

Yep, I’ll take the heater thanks….

Really, I just dont know any of these other folks enough….

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 21, 2009 7:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Not to mention 70+ Ks in 43 Innings

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 21, 2009 7:46 PM PST up reply actions  

If we're talking about baseball prospects...

then I think throwing strikes is a huge prerequisite. I understand he has good strike-out numbers but there is more to being a good pitcher than strike-outs. I’ll keep plugging for Ben Hornbeck, his K-rate is almost as good as Rodriguez and he doesn’t walk nearly as many people… oh yea, and he is still starting games.

by OkayJay81 on Nov 21, 2009 7:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I like Hornbeck too for the reason you cite.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 21, 2009 8:50 PM PST up reply actions  

I like Hornbeck as well.

Plus, he sounds like some kind of hard cider.

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 22, 2009 9:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I hope you got that I was kidding about the whole throwing strikes thing.......

though I believe its 6 of 1, half a dozen of the other, between H-Rod and Hornbeck, and will give Hornbeck the benefit of the doubt as you say starters are more valuable.

HOWEVER,

Upon further review, I change my mind! The best prospect on the board is clearly Rashun Dixon.

“Drafted in the 10th round by the A’s, Dixon cancelled his scholarship to play WR for Mississippi State and signed a $600 K bonus. He immediately reported to Oakland’s Arizona League rookie affiliate where he mashed 8 HR and 10 triples in 45 games. Rashun oozes athleticism and power potential and his initial adjustments to professional pitching has A’s officials laud him for his tremendous make-up and work ethic. While his raw tools are quite exciting, there is much room for refinement. Dixon’s garnered an 18 BB/68 K ratio and his swing, while powerful and fast, lacks fluidity and balance at times. The A’s project that Dixon will be a CF at the major league level, though he mainly played RF and catcher in high school.”

via www.hot-prospects.net

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 21, 2009 10:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I can't tell if you're being serious about changing your mind to Dixon

But if so, I have a problem with your logic. You liked Henry Rodriguez at the beginning of this thread because he had a rocket of an arm, but no control. “Do you really need to be able to throw strikes to be the #18 prospect?” Then you change your mind to Dixon because off of a super hot streak in 45 games two years ago, but ignored the fact that last year he OPS’d .581 last year in 57 games.

My problem with your logic is, why not choose a player that does everything well, than one person who does one thing great, and nothing else even remotely well. Rodriguez has a good arm (that might be an understatement) and Dixon has good tools (that also might be an understatement) but guys like Hornbeck or Figueroa have good K-rates, relatively good BB-rates, and have been relatively successful in most of their minor league stops.

I certainly don’t think Henry Rodriguez’ velocity, as impressive as it may be, is enough to overshadow his complete and utter lack of control, nor do Dixon’s tools warrant a pass on what he did (or didn’t) do this season.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 21, 2009 10:45 PM PST up reply actions  

It's not just the velocity, it's the strikeouts with basically one plus pitch.

And to a lesser extent, the ground balls.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 21, 2009 11:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I must have missed the point at which "only one plus pitch" became a good thing

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 22, 2009 9:33 AM PST up reply actions  

well, maybe

if you are referring to a game of speed softball in which the loser must take shots in relation to time spent on the field.

In regards to reality/baseball, no.

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 22, 2009 9:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Would a boxer that won matches using only one hand be more

impressive to you than one who used both?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 22, 2009 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I assume you mean he has a second hand and isn't using it

as opposed to the boxing version of Jim Abbott…

Uh, anyway, the difference between those two situations is that we don’t know whether Rodriguez HAS a second “hand” or not. He’s never shown a good second “hand.”

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 22, 2009 10:00 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd say he's shown an potentially good change-up and

very occasional slider. So it’s more that his second hand is really really out of practice.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 23, 2009 5:48 PM PST up reply actions  

A lot of clocks have that problem.

Fortunately, there are “second hand stores” that can help.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 23, 2009 6:52 PM PST up reply actions  

but even a broken clock is right twice!

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 24, 2009 9:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Well H-Rod and Dixon

are the only ones I really know about, and yes I was being serious about Dixon, cause if he achieves his potential, well it would be ridiculous how good he would be. Way better than anyone on this list. Thats a big IF though, but I think at #18 its worth the risk.

I honestly have no problem with Hornbeck or Figueroa. I actually believe amongst those three (including H-Rod) its 6 of one, half-dozen of the other. I just happen to personally like H-Rod out of that group cause of the heater, the K rate, etc etc.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 12:01 PM PST up reply actions  

But if H-Rod and Dixon are the only ones you know about...

Why are you campaigning for them? To vote for them is one thing, I guess that’s your right to make an uninformed decision. But why try to sway other voters by calling Dixon, “clearly the best prospect on the board right now” if you admittedly know very little or nothing about the others?

And again, with Dixon, I point to his .581 OPS last year. Young? Yes. But awful? Also yes.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 22, 2009 1:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Read any scouting report on Dixon.....

and it will say, "he has all the tools and makeup to be RIDICULOUSLY GOOD, perennial All Star good, one of the greats, and he’s only 18. If you can find someone else on this list that has that kind of potential, tell me about him, but I think I would have at least heard about it, and thats the point I was trying to make about not knowing the other guys. Its not that I haven’t ever heard these players names, or glanced at their stats a few times. If they had Dixon’s potential, regardless of whether or not he achieves that potential, I think I would have heard about them all more.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Well he's not on the list

But Wilfredo Solano has a potential that’s right up there with Dixon and he’s even younger. The problem with these guys is that they have no production to show for all their tools.

by OkayJay81 on Nov 22, 2009 5:10 PM PST up reply actions  

+1

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 5:23 PM PST up reply actions  

There are tons of plays that have toolsets better than

you could ever imagine, and we’ll never see them in action because the only way they can hit the ball 500+ feet is if it’s on a tee. Or the only way they can throw the ball 100mph+ from the outfield is if it goes into the stands.

Tools =/= perennial all star

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 22, 2009 5:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I believe we made the same point.......

No one said he was, or even would be an all star, just that he could be, potentially.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 5:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, Jorge Posada was a perennial all star

and he’s a bit of a tool

I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does

by bobnothing on Nov 23, 2009 7:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow, really?

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=neighb001jas

He has a 100+ mph fastball and a devastating curveball. Both pitches were given a perfect 80 from scouts. Averaged over a K per inning through his entire minor league career.

No, there's no light,
in the darkest of your furthest reaches.

by danmerqury on Nov 21, 2009 10:00 PM PST up reply actions  

wrong link.....

But if your talking about H-Rod I totally agree. He is the best pitcher on the board IMO.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 21, 2009 10:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Heh.

No, that was the right link. Jason Neighborgall had a 100+ mph fastball and a ridiculous curve, both career-making pitches. And yet, he never made it out of single-A. Why? He couldn’t throw strikes.

I realize that Henry’s potential is really high, and I’d love to have that triple-digit heater in Oakland, but he’s simply not going to be productive without any control.

No, there's no light,
in the darkest of your furthest reaches.

by danmerqury on Nov 22, 2009 12:02 AM PST up reply actions  

I think I'd like H Rod more if

he’d take 5 MPH off the fastball and locate it. Sure he’d be just another mid 90’s fastball throwin’ RHP, but so what?

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 22, 2009 9:47 AM PST up reply actions  

It would be great of Rodriguez could just do that.

But it’s difficult to assume that he or any other player is capable of that. I was a pitcher in high school, and most of the time it didn’t matter if I threw my hardest or if I eased up a little bit, because it’s all in muscle memory, and it’s probably safe to say that Rodriguez has been throwing as hard as he possibly can for a very, very long time.

And if we talk about these things here, I’m sure every pitching coach that H-Rod has been groomed by has suggested at some point or another, “Hey, H-Rod, take a little off and hit the corner.” It just isn’t that simple.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 22, 2009 1:22 PM PST up reply actions  

lol.....

I thought we were talking about H-Rod? But now I understand your reasoning behind the link. And I will pose the same question to you as I have to others. Does it really matter at #18 who we choose? None of these guys are AWESOME prospects at this point, rather they are all just average. At this point we could pull names out f a hat, and it wouldnt really matter, IMO.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 12:05 PM PST up reply actions  

That's a fair point.

I guess I value some of these control guys over a probably flameout like Henry.

No, there's no light,
in the darkest of your furthest reaches.

by danmerqury on Nov 22, 2009 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess what Im saying....

is to me, at this point, it seems like a crapshoot. The guys on the list are average, or have a ton of potential but have yet to realize any of it, or have one/two great tools while possessing serious weaknesses at the same time. I think we could literally roll the dice and come up with better projections, cause so many of these guys development is so up in the air, and present such unknowns.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

If you think that the vote is meaningless and irrelevant,

why are you voting and posting on this thread?

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 22, 2009 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

flagged

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

haha this flaggage is hilarious

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 22, 2009 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

What's funny is this guy wastes his time.....

trying to bring me down to his level on every thread. He feels threatened, and gnaws on my ankles like a little brother. Its actually kind of funny….. pathetic, yet funny.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 4:30 PM PST up reply actions  

It's okay to have disagreements

But you shouldn’t flag people for making better arguments than you.

by OkayJay81 on Nov 22, 2009 5:12 PM PST up reply actions  

+yes

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 22, 2009 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

shit. am i gonna get flagged for this?

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 22, 2009 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

And there is a difference between writing 'flagged'

and actually keeping a flag on a guy. I did flag him for about 20 seconds till I realized writing it would be better.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 5:40 PM PST up reply actions  

What argument did he make?

To my eyes it just looks like a snide comment.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

You said it didn't really matter who we voted as the 18th best prospect

and he asked why you were voting if it doesn’t matter. That’s as valid a question as I’ve seen today.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 22, 2009 5:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Fair enough....

still a snide comment, and only one in a long line of many he has made over several threads.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 5:30 PM PST up reply actions  

You ever want to kick a small dog.....

cause he keeps trying to jump on your leg? I haven’t, but I think I now understand people that have after PTs recent comments.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 5:34 PM PST up reply actions  

and for all you dog lovers, I am too,

and probably could have used a better analogy. Dont protest me like PITA please.

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 5:35 PM PST up reply actions  

I thought it was PETA

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 22, 2009 6:39 PM PST up reply actions  

lol......

I blew that one….Errr……I was totally talking about Gyros!

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 23, 2009 12:17 AM PST up reply actions  

People for the Inhumane Treatment of Animals?

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Nov 22, 2009 8:35 PM PST up reply actions  

PITA PIT!!!!

In Davis, it’s where all the drunk people go.

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 22, 2009 9:06 PM PST up reply actions  

almost played football for UC Davis.....

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 23, 2009 12:23 AM PST up reply actions  

Actually PITA does stand for something,

and it’s most ironic.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 23, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Pacific International Trapshooting Association?

or Pain In The Ass?

If its the first, Awesome! If its the second…..

(tears)

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 23, 2009 6:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh, I definitely meant Trapshooting

I didn’t even know about the other one.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 23, 2009 6:52 PM PST up reply actions  

TWMSS

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 23, 2009 7:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm just chuckling at this point

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 22, 2009 10:05 PM PST up reply actions  

(kicks dog)

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 23, 2009 12:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh....

and to answer your question.

Im here cause Im an A’s fan, and enjoy talking about the A’s prospects no matter what they rank in the system. I just could care less who is #18 cause IMO it makes no difference.

CHECK PLEASE!

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 5:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Then don't vote.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 22, 2009 5:51 PM PST up reply actions  

haven't.....

but now will……randomly…..

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 23, 2009 12:19 AM PST up reply actions  

Gotta pipe up here.
haven’t…..

That is a false claim. You voted for Henry Rodriguez on November 21st. Simply viewing your profile tells us that.

but now will……randomly…..

Although there has not been a CP poll since the present one, for some reason I suspect that’s NOT a lie.

by CletusSJY on Nov 23, 2009 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Perhaps by "haven't" he meant

that he hadn’t yet voted randomly.

Or maybe it’s another play on words.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 23, 2009 12:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Yea I forgot........

Theres been so many of these, 18 of um, I had forgotten I had voted on this one and only realized it after I wrote the comment, hence the “but I will”. My bad, but I wish I could vote randomly again…..

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 23, 2009 2:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Paul's question is valid.

Yes, we’re all aware that when you get this deep in the system there’s a whole lot of uncertainty. That’s why sometimes last year’s #48 jumps to this year’s #17, and last year’s #28 jumps to all-star. Of course, we’re just guessing with very little information.

There are plenty of active members of AN who have no opinion on lower-level prospects. Those members choose not to vote on this thread. It’s not necessary to put a finger in every pie.

If you really like Rashun Dixon, just say, “I think Dixon is awesome, so I’m voting for him.” Nothing wrong with that. But why come in here and say Dixon is “clearly the best prospect on the board (even though I know nothing about most of the others)” and then go on to call the whole poll stupid? Stuff like that is why people don’t like you.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 22, 2009 9:20 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Dont like me!?!?!

(tears)

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 23, 2009 12:18 AM PST up reply actions  

Ya, Juan Morillo is another example.

I’ll give up on Henry when he’s 26 like they were.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 21, 2009 11:19 PM PST up reply actions  

The A's are going to have to give up on him when he's 23 and still sucks

because he’ll be out of options at that point.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 22, 2009 9:34 AM PST up reply actions  

But I'll still be in his corner!

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 22, 2009 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Because winning boxing matches with one hand is more impressive

than winning with both hands. It shows that if the boxer ever used the second hand, he/she’d be that much better.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 22, 2009 4:16 PM PST up reply actions  

love it.....

have you ever seen the Cuba Gooding movie ‘Gladiator’? All I have to say is, “when your strong you act weak, and when your weak you act strong, Strategy……”

Cult Classic!

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 22, 2009 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Ugh. This showed up as a response in the wrong place.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 22, 2009 6:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I Always Love Reading His Stats

27.2 BB/9, 17.22 ERA, 59 wild pitches, 0.38 K/BB ratio, but with a 10.2 K/9.

That’s epic.

Hey guys, I run a music blog. alternative, powerpop, punk, electronica, screamo, etc etc, check it out. http://muzikdizcovery.blogspot.com/ artist interviews and many other stuff. free cookies! (not really, but still) :D

by cwhitman412 on Nov 22, 2009 12:26 PM PST up reply actions  

thats cuz everyone is scerred!

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 22, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Jeff Passan over at Y! Sports had a great article on him.

The text is periodically interspersed with single-game pitching lines. I go back and read it every once in a while for hilarity’s sake.

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=jp-neighborgall050307

I think my favorite is

April 29: 0 IP, 0 H, 4 ER, 3 BB, 0 K, 3 WP, 1 HBP

No, there's no light,
in the darkest of your furthest reaches.

by danmerqury on Nov 22, 2009 1:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Haha
He pitched there for three years, walking 113 and striking out 115 in 101 innings

"Chicks dig the long ball, although fat chicks will settle for warning track power" - Nick Diamond

by hero66 on Nov 24, 2009 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Sounds like the 3 years probably encompassed one long-ass outing.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 24, 2009 8:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Seriously?

After all the thought-out debate in the previous thread?

"Life is a horizontal fall" -Jean Cocteau

by King Richard on Nov 21, 2009 7:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Yea, at this point....

we should just roll dice and pray I think……..

"I mean, come on, man. I'm a vet. Don't talk to me like that. If they do, I'll just smile." Nnamdi Asomugha

by s0sNe@kYbUtY? on Nov 21, 2009 7:44 PM PST up reply actions  

If I had watched that Kilby video for the last post

Without a doubt, I would have voted for him.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 21, 2009 5:55 PM PST reply actions  

Henry again. I predict he'll make the Top 50.

Ian Krol as my next nominee

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 21, 2009 7:18 PM PST reply actions  

Leaning Henry

Going to hold off and see if someone makes a convincing argument otherwise. I think this is about low enough for ol’ Hank though. There’s this idea that his recent performance has completely sucked. It hasn’t. It’s mostly sucked, but 34% k rate at AAA is no joke. Total Ks is influenced by how many batters a pitcher faces, but the rate is not. 34% is absolutely elite. He has dominant swing and miss stuff. And, he’s demonstrated that against the best minor league hitters. You can’t buy that for a dollar.

Also, despite the fact that we’ve been talking about him for years now, he’s still very young. Some people are forgetting that. At 22 years old, he was younger than 80% of the players he played against. More importantly, he has time to sort out his command issues. The A’s can leave him in AAA with the best instruction for another year and a half with no problem. If he can get the BB rate back to something like 12.5%, well below average, but where he was at with Stockton in 2008, then he’s going to be a contributor, at the big league level. If he can develop just average control, no more, he’s going to be an elite back of the pen guy. Do I think that’s particularly likely? No. But that’s the reason I’ve voted for 17 guys ahead of him on the list.

by AgitationStation on Nov 21, 2009 8:25 PM PST reply actions  

Rodriguez runs out of options after next season

So, he’s got a year, after which it’s fish or cut bait time.

It’s fine to say that K rate is influenced by batters faced, but it’s also influenced by not throwing strikes. It’s a lot easier to have people not make contact with your pitches on their swings when most of the pitches aren’t in the strike zone.

Being even an “elite back of the pen guy” is barely worth what a league-average position player is. Barely worth what an average rotation pitcher is. Relief prospects are not worth very much at all. Factor in the fact that his chances of developing “even average control” are wretched, and he’s not even close to my top 30 A’s prospects. Not close.

I think the guy to vote for here is Hornbeck, who’s shown an ability to miss bats combined with tolerable control, projectable velocity and most importantly, the ability to handle starting a baseball game.

That being said, none of the voting options is wrong vis a vis Rodriguez (even Peterson, who I’m not a fan of at all).

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 21, 2009 8:38 PM PST up reply actions  

You've made some good points here

The thing that keeps me from getting on the Rodriquez bandwagon is that it would take a fairly large improvement in walk rate just to be a mediocre reliever. The strike-outs are impressive, but he walks way too many people. I understand his age allows for some improvement but you also have to consider that he has 4 years of pro track record which suggest he has not made any improvements in his control. If you believe that coaches could help him to control that electric arm why wouldn’t they have done it in the last four years?

by OkayJay81 on Nov 21, 2009 8:40 PM PST up reply actions  

And it's not as if the A's coaches have a blind spot when it comes developing pitching, either

I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does

by bobnothing on Nov 21, 2009 8:45 PM PST up reply actions  

If he can develop just average control,

why would we want him in the bullpen…?

"Life is a horizontal fall" -Jean Cocteau

by King Richard on Nov 21, 2009 9:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe a better question even is,

if he can develop just average control why doesn’t he go ahead and do that?

I mean if they can send a man to the moon, why can’t they send them all?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 23, 2009 4:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Because the moon sucks and no one wants to go there.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 23, 2009 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I've heard mixed reviews on the restaurants --

great food but no atmosphere.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 23, 2009 6:53 PM PST up reply actions  

but at least the dessert is light!

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 24, 2009 9:12 AM PST up reply actions  

good video of AFL prospects over at...

minorleagueball.com

includes Desme, Brown, Weeks and Friend

"just a beating heart ... plasma that we'll put into our uniform." - Billy Beane

by athleticsBB4life on Nov 22, 2009 9:44 AM PST reply actions  

ZOMG!

THE A’S signed Dallas McPherson! Hurray baseball gods. 2010, we are going to dominate you.

"I am happy because I do not have unrealistic expectations"- Karma Ura...or an A's fan.

by DyeLongJustice on Nov 22, 2009 10:12 AM PST reply actions  

Where'd you see that?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Nov 22, 2009 10:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Craznick on ESPN

link

"Since other people actually read these threads, though, probably best that your particular brand of wrongness not go completely unchallenged." - PT

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Nov 22, 2009 10:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Question for those who know

Why do you factor in a player’s signing bonus when discussing where he should be ranked on a prospect list such as this one. A lot of people used that as an argument for where Stassi should be ranked and other such players in the past. I understand that the higher a player’s signing bonus usually correlates with how talented said player is but I feel that it can be flawed if you have a FO that doles out large sums of cash.

For instance if you looked at Barry Zito’s contract you’d say “he must be good” under this argument. Obviously he doesn’t really justify the cash coming his way and can’t it be the same with prospects?

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Nov 22, 2009 6:42 PM PST reply actions  

I'm on your side

It seems that people look at a guy like Stassi and think, “A catcher that got 1st round money? He must be as valuable a prospect as all first rounders.” But history shows that most high school catchers don’t succeed. I do think Stassi is an intriguing prospect but I don’t agree that his bonus has anything to do with it.

If you think Billy Beane is a bad GM, I hate you and find you stupid.

by NateHST on Nov 22, 2009 7:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I think it's a justifiable appeal to authority

The choice to spend a bunch of cash on a prospect may be a mistake but sometimes it’s the best evidence we have to go on. The difference between cases like Stassi and Zito is that there is a lot of freely available evidence to judge Zito’s talent on. With recent draft picks (especially high school picks) it’s tough for internet commentors to really get a handle on a players actual talent. I have never seen Stassi play baseball and there is not a lot of relevant statistical record of his ability so I am willing to give proper deference to the opinion of the team who is taking the financial risk on the player and has experienced talent evaluators.

by OkayJay81 on Nov 22, 2009 7:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree

I know that looking at signing bonus can be a good indicator of a player’s talent, I just don’t agree when it seems to be the major item that a person points to when trying to judge how good a player is. Stassi is just one example and I guess that signing bonus is the best (and only) thing to go on for now but with other players, specifically college players, I wouldn’t look at signing bonus alone.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Nov 22, 2009 9:13 PM PST up reply actions  

No, but it IS a good judge of how good the TEAM thinks he WILL be

Not a bad indicator, especially when the team is putting their money where their mouth is.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 23, 2009 4:54 PM PST up reply actions  

I trust the A's front office enough to value signing bonuses given.

Plus, most guys who do get higher signing bonuses have detailed scouting reports to justify the bonus.

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Nov 22, 2009 8:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Signing bonus is a better predictor of future performance than draft position alone

Although draft position+signing bonus is better than either of them alone…

Overall I think your approach is fairly correct. Should it be taken into account? Sure, that’s why I have Stassi ranked slightly in front of Ryan Ortiz (who should be on the voting-eligible list, BTW, along with Solano— I’d boot out Peterson and Henry Rodriguez to make room). But I’m not willing to take it into account to the point where I rank the guy over players who’ve shown major ability in professional baseball.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 22, 2009 10:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Use all the information you have available

And then weight that information according to how useful it is.

What do we know about Stassi? We know BA rated him as the ~30th best prospect in the draft. We know that he slipped to the 4th round because of his bonus demands. We know that he received the 15th highest bonus of any player in the draft. We know that he held his own in the Northwest League as an 18 year old in a very small sample. We know that the scouting reports on his defense discuss whether he’ll be an adequate catcher or a good catcher, rather than whether he’ll be able to stick behind the plate. We know that a couple studies have shown that high school catchers taken in the first round over the past ~15 years have tended to produce less value than typical first round picks.

Taking all of that information together, I would say Stassi’s value as a prospect is similar to a late-1st round pick. The question then becomes whether you would rather have the 25th pick in next year’s draft (without having to pay a bonus), or whether you’d rather have this other prospect. I would trade Ben Hornbeck for the 25th pick in next year’s draft without thinking twice. I would do the same with guys like Capra, Coleman, Simmons, Leon, DLS, and Kilby.

If all we knew about Zito were his contract, then our best guess would be that he’s a very good player. If all we knew about Joe Carter was that he drove in 100 runs every year, our best guess would be that he’s a pretty good player. But we have a ton of other information on those guys which tells us they’re not very good players. With Stassi, all the information we have on him suggests he’s a very good prospect.

by Danny on Nov 23, 2009 6:50 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

I would trade Ben Hornbeck for the 25th pick in next year’s draft without thinking twice. I would do the same with guys like Capra, Coleman, Simmons, Leon, DLS, and Kilby.

Wow, seriously? OK.

Setting aside the fact that I don’t think Stassi is that good, there’s no way I’d deal most of those guys for a late-first-round draft choice. (Although, oddly, the 25th pick has been much more successful than most late-first-round draft picks. I think that can safely be written off as a coincidence.)

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2009 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

I would trade Coleman and Kilby without thinking twice

Simmons is probably about what the expected value of the 25th pick is. He was picked somewhere in the 20s…

I love Leon, so I could be biased when I say I wouldn’t trade him. DLS is a really interesting upside pick but I probably end up trading him for the pick. Capra I’m unsure on.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Nov 23, 2009 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Simmons was chosen #26

Obviously when a player is drafted there is much uncertainty about how he’ll turn out. As time passes and he turns out, the uncertainty is gradually stripped away. So, assuming that the pick was a good one at the time, comparing a prospect to his draft position is a matter of assessing whether he has turned out better or worse than expected at draft time.

A great deal of the uncertainty is the possibility that any player must just crap out completely, so the very fact that a prospect is still on track at all should be seen as better than expected simply by virtue of the fact that he hasn’t busted yet. But if he’s still going but not as well as we hoped, that can also be worse than expected.

How is Simmons right now relative to his expected value when picked #26 in 2007? I’d say he’s underperforming, though probably not quite as much as it seems on first glance.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 23, 2009 12:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd trade Coleman for the 25th pick.

Probably Hornbeck, maybe Simmons. None of the others, though, and Leon isn’t even close.

Actually, I’m not sure I’d trade Stassi for the 25th pick either, though that one’s close.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 23, 2009 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd definitely trade Stassi for the 25th pick, without question (given no signing bonus for the guy)

He wasn’t even rated that high by BA, and that’s coming from a publication that routinely overrates his class of player (high school catchers).

And I’d cash in Simmons (I think he’s pretty clearly a disappointment at this stage) and Kilby (relievers just aren’t a team concern right now). Otherwise I’m hanging on to those guys.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2009 1:22 PM PST up reply actions  

If Hornbeck were eligible for the 2010 Amateur Draft,

do you think he’d be picked in the first round? I certainly don’t.

by Danny on Nov 23, 2009 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Hm

Lanky lefty with rapidly increasing velocity and good offspeed stuff, who has already posted huge K numbers in A ball?

I have no difficulty at all seeing him getting picked in the first round.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2009 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Not only would I trade those guys for the 25th pick, I'd add everyone else in the system

other than Green, Ynoa, Carter, Cardenas, Weeks and Wallace. That’s a very high pick.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 23, 2009 5:56 PM PST up reply actions  

You'd trade Desme for the 25th pick?

He was a 2nd-rounder anyway, and now two years later he’s shown himself even better than expected.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 23, 2009 7:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess that would be about where I'd be indifferent.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 24, 2009 3:17 AM PST up reply actions  

It's actually not

The average surplus value of that pick is somewhere around $5M. Not very high at all. Basically, anyone who projects to provide more than about 1 WAR in his life is better than the 25th overall pick.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 23, 2009 9:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I guess that computes arithmetically, but I'd phrase it more like anyone who has

more than a 10% chance at 10 WAR. And I don’t think anyone other than the top prospects have that. There are guys like Doolittle, Brown and Desme who might be on the cusp, I suppose.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 24, 2009 3:19 AM PST up reply actions  

I forgot Stassi. I'd not trade him for the 25th pick either.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 24, 2009 3:22 AM PST up reply actions  

You don't believe Anthony Capra has a 10% chance of being a league-average pitcher for 5 years?

TEN PERCENT?

Ok that’s just nutty. That’s not even to mention the guys who are already in AAA and are almost certain to provide more than 1 WAR value like Kilby.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 24, 2009 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

I never got the attraction of Capra. I guess I'll start to believe if he impresses

in AA. But I won’t really be on the bandwagon until he succeeds in the majors. I personally don’t see him being anything more than a fringe player if he makes it at all. I’ll be thrilled if he turns into the next Lefty Grove for the A’s though.

To me the idea that a career 1 WAR player has any value at all is simply wrong. It may well be true that GMs act as though WAR has linear value but to me it doesn’t. So I would gladly trade a high level prospect with a 100% chance at a 1 WAR career for a draft pick with an expected value of 1 WAR….if that means I get to pick a player with a 10% chance at a 10 WAR career.

Beane is good at finding below average players off the scrap heap. If he needs a 1 WAR player to fill a bench hole, he can find one pretty easily. Why not trade Kilby for a 10% chance at a 10 WAR player when you can have Craig Breslow off waivers?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 24, 2009 8:00 PM PST up reply actions  

If it really is easy to find a 1 WAR player

off the scrap heap, then they need to recalibrate the definition of R.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 24, 2009 10:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Right

It is, of course, NOT easy to do that. Sometimes you end up with a -1 WAR player instead and spend half a season figuring that out, resulting in a black hole at a position for that year.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Nov 25, 2009 12:28 PM PST up reply actions  

After some dithering, I went with Simmons.

My theory is that he did show a lot of promise not too long ago, so maybe his recent bout of mega-suck will prove temporary and he can get back to where he was. That’s a slim maybe, but I judge it to be marginally less slim than the maybes of the other distant prospects here living up to their promise at each step still to climb.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 22, 2009 9:24 PM PST reply actions  

I agree with you

I’m sort of going against what I said just above and preferring him over Hornbeck because of where he was drafted. But I’m also remembering what he did before this season and also realizing that he was probably putting a lot of extra pressure on himself after he saw the bevy of young starters pass him on the depth chart. I’ll give him all of next year to re-prove himself before I write him off completely.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Nov 23, 2009 1:16 AM PST up reply actions  

It's a close call, though.

And I’m not at all confident that I’m right.

But it’s my best guess.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 23, 2009 1:39 AM PST up reply actions  

I really hope not. Does anyone really care who's #18 and who's #19?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 23, 2009 5:57 PM PST up reply actions  

So you're saying just flip a coin and move on?

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 23, 2009 7:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Why not just go

16.
17.
18.
18.
20.

Call it a tie.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 23, 2009 7:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, at the moment,

Hornbeck has a small but significant lead. If it holds, there may be no need for a runoff anyway.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 24, 2009 12:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Uh oh, now it's neck and neck again

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Nov 24, 2009 11:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Well take the guy with the most votes at #18 and move on. Even if it's one more vote.

If you want to make the second place guy #19 I’m OK with that too.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Nov 24, 2009 3:21 AM PST up reply actions  

I went Hornbeck

Because you really care.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 23, 2009 4:58 PM PST reply actions  

Hornbeck...

Because he didn’t have a crappy year. Hope I was the deciding vote (63-62 now).

by henduisabadboy on Nov 24, 2009 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

OK...I'm ready to cast my vote!!!

Looks really, really close!

Hmm…Hornbeek or Simons.

This is hard! Because Hornbeek’s birthday is July 22nd, which is right on the cust of Cancer or Leo.

OK, I voted. But I’m not telling anyone for whom I voted for, because it’s totally consequential. Go person I voted for!!!!!!! :-)))))

-Cindi

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Nov 24, 2009 12:53 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aperture_logo_small
Community Prospect List #4
Img_2672_small
Long-Term Outlook

Recent FanPosts

Small
A's reportedly sign Cespedes
Unknown_small
Is It Really Worth It: Three Veterans Who May Be Playing Oakland Next Year, But Shouldn't Be
Small
Manny's Contract
Small
fantasy baseball league for A's fans!
Small
NYY Proposal
Small
Roy Oswalt = opportunity
Choice_small
Tom Milone, by the numbers: Maddux, Glavine, Halladay, Radke...
Img_1877_small
Behind Enemy Lines
Lt-922060_small
All-Time Oakland A's team

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Front Page Writers

Maya_papi_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Josefav2_small danmerqury

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

Img_0653_small dwishinsky

Front Page Writers

Smiley_face_small gigglingone

Venasfans_small OaklandSi

60-minutes-clock_small cuppingmaster

Patpicturebucky2_small YonYonson

Img_3830_small David Fung

Moderators

Photofunia-5c770b_small coffee roaster

Denver_small Colorado Fan

Ls_logo100_small LoneStranger

Thumbs_up_small LongTimeFan

Marty_profile_in_green_small mrod

Img_1877_small Billy Frijoles

Babycomputergeek_small paris7

Img_0115_small Tutu-late