Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Iron Bowl Thoughts... Right Now

Josh Donaldson Is Better Than You Think

I am a big believer in Josh Donaldson. If his defense was a little better he would be the A's number 3 prospect on my list a head of Brett Wallace.  Find out why you should be too and you should vote for him as the #4 prospect in Zonis' community poll after the fold.

Star-divide

The first thing that I like about Donaldson is his plate discipline. He has a career 153/200 BB/K ratio and 85BB to 99Ks on the year (including playoffs).  He has a career .374 OBA which was .380 this year.  This year he has walked in 15% of his regular season plate appearances.  This is very very impressive especially for a catcher and could allow him to be a very very very good baseball player.  His ceiling is very high despite people thinking otherwise.  If Donaldson walks in 15% of his MLB PAs and gets 600 PAs Donaldson will walk 90 times on the year.  If he hits .275 in his 510 ABs that is 140 hits. Combined he would have a .384 OBA.  Donaldson has never had a below .132 ISO and has 15 hr potential so when you project slugging his ceiling around a .150 ISO leading to a .425 SLG.  A .275/.384/.425 slash line is approximately a .359 wOBA.  This year that would be good for 16 BRAA.  With a 12.5 run positional adjustment for catching and 20 runs for replacement Donaldson would be 48.5 runs above replacement without factoring in defense.  If his upside behind the plate is -5 FRAA then he has All-Star upside as a 4.3 WAR player.

 

If he hits .260 which is below his career aver in the bigs and maintains his even a decreased walk rate (12.5% or 75 walks over 600 PAs) he still gets 136 hits and has a .353 OBA.  With a .125 ISO (which is below any of the minor league seasons hes had to date) he slugs .385.  He still has a league average bat with a .328 wOBA.  when coupled with replacement runs, position, and assuming -12.5 FRAA defense behind the plate he still projects to be a league average player.

If he is forced to move back to his college position at third base he won't get the positional bump but he should be able to provide league average defense there since reports were that he was a good fielder in college.  

Pgcrosschecker.com

SCOUTING REPORT: Donaldson is a first-rate defender at third base, but his profile plays better behind the plate and he began a successful conversion to catching a year ago, successfully completing the transition this year.

Also from his MLB draft profile. Link:

Fielding: Donaldson is new to full-time catching, but has good hands and caught fairly well. Some think he’s athletic enough to handle a Biggio-like move to second.
Some see a switch to the infield — he’s played third in college — but he may make for a good backup catcher who plays the game the right way.

More PG

In games Donaldson isn’t behind the plate, he’s at third base, as he has the lateral quickness and incredibly strong arm to play either position. He has alternated between the two positions the last couple of years after starting his college career as a full-time third baseman, so he is still a little unrefined behind the plate, but has the tools to succeed there.

The positional adjustment for catchers is 12.5 runs where as it is only 2.5 runs at 3b.  If he moves to 3b I expect him to be a league average 3bman defensively (though there is potential for him to be better). If his upside is +5 FRAA at 3b his upside projection as a catcher is still valid at 3b.  Reports of his poor defense behind the plate, while coupled with some that say he has improved slightly, suggest that he could be a -10 FRAA as a catcher.  Therefore moving him to third loses him 10 positional runs but he gains +10 FRAA, as the his defense when compared to his peers is significantly better at the hot corner, using reasonable projections making the switch likely to have a negligible effect on his value.

Because Josh Donaldson has All-Star (4+WAR) upside at two positions and conservative projection puts Donaldson as a league average player at either of those two positions,  you should vote for Donaldson as the number 4 prospect in the A's system.

6 recs  |  Comment 299 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Look at how insanely well Youkilis controlled the strike zone in the minors though

He wasn’t just walking a lot – he was walking twice as much as he was striking out in double-A, at the same age that Donaldson is now.

http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/Y/Kevin-Youkilis.shtml

Batting 4th for the 2014 San Jose A's: 26-year-old RF Justin Upton, in the 1st season of a nine year, $250M deal.

by notsellingjeans on Oct 5, 2009 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, Youkilis is a total freak in that regard.

and isn’t really a great comp because of his status as an outlier.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

excellent

Thanks for the write up dfa. I appreciate you putting your money where your mouth is, in terms of support for affirmative statements.

My question about this argument: What seems notably missing is any talk about MLEs. Now I’m not at all knowledgeable in that particular field, but I wonder about what is the right way to project some of these rate stats forward to the Majors. For instance, in the upside projection, he maintains his minor league BB% and ISO while making the leap up to the majors. Is that really an upside projection, or is it an insane/never going to happen projection?

oops, it looks like Nick just posted a very similar comment to mine.

by colin on Oct 5, 2009 1:14 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Loosely speaking, I think it's reasonable to characterize minor league numbers as a player's major league ceiling

In other words, Donaldson might be as good as he’s shown in the minors, but probably will be somewhat worse.

There are exceptions to this rule, but for a college draftee like Donaldson who’s moved at a basically typical rate toward the majors, it’s pretty solid. He’s been right about the “correct” age relative to level throughout his career.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 5, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks

That sounds pretty reasonable to me. I meant to mention in my comment above that, though dfa doesn’t state it explicitly, I’m sure he is referring to Donaldson’s accumulated performance through the team controlled years of his career (which should also include his peak years, since the guy is 23 already). Assuming that this is indeed the case, and no one is expecting a .320+ wOBA in his rookie year, then this seems like a strong argument.

I’m still curious about whether there is a difference in how well plate discipline can be projected forward, as opposed to something like power. I mean, if you bumped Chris Carter up to the majors now, he would still be huge (though strength is not the only thing that contributes to a big ISO, obviously). But I imagine that ML pitchers are significantly better at working the strike zone than their minor league counterparts.

by colin on Oct 5, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

15% BB rate in the majors is not going to happen; the "decreased" 12.5% is unlikely, although he could maybe do that for a year or two

I would say his power upside is somewhat higher than what he’s shown in the minors. So I think his slg upside is more along the lines of .450, and obp upside is more like .360, since he’s unlikely to have a particularly high BA. Also, BB% goes down in the majors, and K% and BA get worse, while power tends to increase with age.

Projecting a league average bat is reasonable enough (I would probably guess a little bit below), so a lot depends on the defense which is extremely unclear in his case.

I would guess an average of about .260/.340/.410 in years 3-6.

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 5, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

His MLE suggests a 10.5% walk rate from this years numbers.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and that's about the level I'm projecting him at in that line I gave...

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 7, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder how good he is at 3B

that is a position of need for the A’s

by OaklandSi on Oct 5, 2009 1:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

IIRC, there was question of arm strength, no?

Maybe you can find one made by Go F**k Yourself San Jose... -Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 5, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

but they converted him TO catcher?

If he didn’t have a good arm, why not like 2B or something?

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Oct 5, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He apparently doesn't have a good arm for C

but anyone who is even a remotely plausible catcher has a good enough arm for 3B.

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 5, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, then, IIRC,

I am wrong.

Maybe you can find one made by Go F**k Yourself San Jose... -Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 5, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There were rumors he was into field hockey players.

A B -3X = Swedish girls like chocolate @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 7, 2009 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like Donaldson

And continue to be amazed at the people who say they don’t like the Harden trade still. Donaldson’s my #5 prospect at this point behind Weeks at #4 and I feel that’s a good spot for him. It’s very possible that Donaldson will become better than both Wallace and Weeks but I feel there’s a better chance that those two will be better than Josh.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Oct 5, 2009 2:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He strikes me as a Ramon Hernandez type of player...

is that accurate?

"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra

by brenarlo on Oct 5, 2009 2:21 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A B -3X = Swedish girls like chocolate @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 5, 2009 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nothing blocking the plate?

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Oct 5, 2009 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If I've never thought about Josh Donaldson

how can he be better than I think he is?

Of course now that I’ve read this fine post by DFA I now know who is and I’m sure my life will be much better having this information.

No matter what I think or don’t think about him if he can hit I’m a fan as more than anything else this team needs to develop some hitters.

by sirbed on Oct 5, 2009 2:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great question, very Cartesian.. :

If I’ve never thought about Josh Donaldson
how can he be better than I think he is?

by GusanoQuemador on Oct 5, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because if you have never heard of him you have never though of him as an excellent prospect.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What about if I knew him personally, but did not know him as a baseball player,

but nonetheless, I thought highly of him?

Maybe you can find one made by Go F**k Yourself San Jose... -Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 5, 2009 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm....that's deep Bloom

I’m going to have go sit in sweat lodge and have a vision quest to figure out your question.

Or I may just have another bowl of ice cream we’ll see which happens first.

by sirbed on Oct 5, 2009 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You'll notice how you're the only to answer me.

The rest of these statheads think I’m a moron.

Maybe you can find one made by Go F**k Yourself San Jose... -Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 5, 2009 9:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In fairness, I've seen your metrics and can understand why.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 6, 2009 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, I just felt the joke was getting strained

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think?

waves

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 6, 2009 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll always answer your call Bloom

and you know what being a moron isn’t so bad. If you register with the goverment you get special deals on goverment cheese.

by sirbed on Oct 6, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I eat a massive quantity of sliced cheese

oh wait this isn’t story time… my bad.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

:-)

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 6, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah i just figured that....

the secondary headline of:

“Unless you already think he is awesome and they youre a head of the game and can move along”

was a little wordy.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you made a wise decision on that one DFA

I always look forward to your posts about prospects. Who knows maybe I’ll even know who the next one is….probably not though.

by sirbed on Oct 6, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

awesome info. Rec'd.

Batting 4th for the 2014 San Jose A's: 26-year-old RF Justin Upton, in the 1st season of a nine year, $250M deal.

by notsellingjeans on Oct 5, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

your prospect knowledge and research is a big asset to this site, g

Batting 4th for the 2014 San Jose A's: 26-year-old RF Justin Upton, in the 1st season of a nine year, $250M deal.

by notsellingjeans on Oct 5, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

woof!

Maybe you can find one made by Go F**k Yourself San Jose... -Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 5, 2009 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is very problematic arguementation

First I used the scouting reports available. Find me a scouting report since then that suggests that he is no longer able to be a league average 3bman and Ill cede the point. However, youre criticizing me for using the best information available from most recent large sample size. Furthermore, you point out that Total Zone agrees with my projection.

Your suggestion that I shouldn’t use 2009 numbers is similarly flawed. I am using the most recent sample I have against the highest competition. Why do I have to wait till hes seen AAA pitching before projecting his ceiling? Im projecting that if everything goes 100% right for him he could be a 4+ WAR player at either 3b or C, which assumes that he handles AAA. If you can’t project major league performance from AA, the logical extension of your argument is that you cant project MLB performance based on AAA because the player hasn’t seen MLB pitching yet. Without projection there really isn’t much of a point of talking about prospects. Now if you think I have slighted his other years performance that is something to discuss but you failed to make that argument here.

Yes I think everyone acknowledges that his catching is bad which is why with my conservative projection he I credited his butchery with -12.5 FRAA. However, that is actually the point that being able to play a league average 3b is more preferential to him being a butcher so the move is really neutral or improves his value.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 6:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll make this simple

Donaldson hasn’t played 3B regularly since, what, 2006 while in college? You’ve got the A’s knowing they need another option at 3B and have known that since at least 2008 and yet they never bothered to try this former college 3B regularly at the position while in their minor league system. Let’s go on the likelihood that Donaldson doesn’t have the chops to make it as a full time Catcher, and even if his bat could compensate for some defensive issues the A’s already have Kurt Suzuki entrenched behind the plate. The A’s have every reason in the world to try every possible option to find their 3B of the future and yet they’ve hesitated to move Donaldson off Catcher.

You’re position on Donaldson’s defensive abilities center around scouting reports from his 2006 season and an extremely small sample of play this season and yet you’re willing to proclaim he could be a league average defender at one of the harder defensive positions in baseball.

And my argument is problematic?

As for the bat, yes, you can use AA to help project big league performance. I’ve used MLE’s on prospects at various times and I can assure you that I have never, not ever, seen an MLE take a AA player with a .795 OPS in the Texas League and project a .809 OPS for him while playing his home games in Oakland.

How long are you seeing it take for Donaldson to become this 4+ WAR player? Because your post is making it sound near term and that doesn’t look likely.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 5, 2009 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eh, they don't have every reason to move him off catcher.

If there’s a reasonable expectation that a player might be able to handle the most valuable defensive position on the diamond, you leave him there until he absolutely proves he can’t handle it. That doesn’t mean Donaldson can play 3B of course, but I don’t think we’ve evidence that he can’t either.

by Elston Gunn on Oct 5, 2009 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 5, 2009 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not too worried about

“how Donaldson’s bat plays at 3B…how his defense plays at C…” because I think the days of “He plays position X” are waning and the Figgins (or in theory Patterson) player is on the rise.

Donaldson may make it as a “sometimes C with a bad glove, good bat, sometimes 3Bman with a decent bat and ok glove, sometimes 1Bman with a good glove and so-so bat,” and so on.

Look at Cardenas, Wallace, Carter — if they can hit they’ll play, and they may move around a bit based on their skills and the team’s needs.

And nobody is blocked by anyone. If you can play, you’re going to play. Someone will move, or be traded, or get injured.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 5, 2009 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True, he could end up being sort of a poor man's Sandoval

which isn’t half bad in itself.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 5, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you see Buster Posey save his life yesterday?

In a Dan Meyer – Jack Hannahan kind of way?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 5, 2009 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he were to play third

he might be a sort of right-handed Dave Magadan (who’s an excellent example of the high BB, low HR hitter).

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Oct 5, 2009 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can we just accelerate him to hitting coach now

and skip the whole “pretty good career”?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 5, 2009 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This

I think the kid ( yeah i know hes the same age as me) will hit and the defense will take care of itself either by positional adjustment behind the plate or skills at third.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you may be right about this Nico,

and it’s a really interesting prediction. I’d like to see some sort of study into this, to see if players really are being used more versatilely than they were 10 years ago.

"Life is a horizontal fall" -Jean Cocteau

by King Richard on Oct 5, 2009 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The A's prefer Cardenas at 2B instead of 3B

Prior to the acquisition of Wallace (who may or may not be able to stick at 3B himself) the A’s best 3B prospect (meaning, actually playing 3B in the system) was Low-A 3B Jason Christian. Christian is at least 2+ years away from the Show (and that’s if everything breaks right for him) while Chavez could’ve auditioned for Zombieland without needing to wear any make-up. If that doesn’t signify a pressing need then I don’t know what does.

Oh yeah, Adam Kennedy is currently your starting 3B.

I’m not saying Donaldson can or can’t play a big league 3B. We simply don’t have the information. Suggesting there’s evidence that he can be an average defender at the hot corner is more like wishful thinking than analysis.

And it looks like Donaldson can’t hack it at Catcher.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 5, 2009 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, but you don't align your minor leaguers by need.

You don’t move a CF to 1B because you have a decent CF and need a 1B even if you think he’d be good defender at first. C-3B isn’t quite the same loss in positional adjustment, but the principle is the same. FTR, I agree that DFA is a little too confident that Donaldson can play a league average 3B, and also a little too confident that he’ll hit well in the majors, but I don’t think that he hasn’t played third is evidence one way or the other.

by Elston Gunn on Oct 5, 2009 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, you do align them by need

Donaldson hasn’t shown the bat that makes you say… this guy can DH if nothing else. A prospect has the ability to play a select number of positions. Sometimes that position is limited to one spot. If you’ve got a prospect who can only play 2B and you’ve got Chase Utley signed for the next 5 years than your prospect becomes trade bait.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 5, 2009 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two contentions

1 trade bait is extremely valuable and shouldn’t impact the value of a player on a prospect list.
2 Position switches generally happen above the low minors since before that they are so far away that the number of things that can happen. If I were the A’s I would keep him at C until AAA and play him at third then if he cant hack it at C.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're forgetting the reality of the situation

Donaldson is going to be in AAA next season, of that there’s almost no doubt.

Brett Wallace will be the River Cats’ 3B in 2010.

Trade bait can be extremely valuable but if the guy is blocked then barring catastrophic injury your big league team can’t use him. Other teams will realize this obvious situation and it will cost our hypothetical prospect value… because the less available a player appears the higher the price a buyer will pay to acquire the object of their obsession.

If a guy’s stuck in the minors you’re either forced to find him a sub-optimal defensive home or you’re forced to make a trade. And any time you’re in a position where you have to make a trade you’re not at a great advantage in the negotiations.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 6:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kurt Suzuki is not Chase Utley.

I’m sorry, but this line of argument is ridiculous. Unless Donaldson is Jesus Montero behind the plate, it’s totally reasonable to let him see if he can figure out C.

by Elston Gunn on Oct 6, 2009 9:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Suzuki is young, cheap and good

That is not a combination you’ll find in abundance at Catcher in the majors. You’re right, he’s not a superstar like Utley but Kurt is very valuable given the other alternatives with his skill set.

And I agree with letting Donaldson continue behind homeplate. All I’m saying is that to date, he’s failed to show the necessary skills to be considered a starting caliber big league Catcher.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, I agree.

Nor has he shown he can be an average defensive 3B.

by Elston Gunn on Oct 6, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A couple of things

I rate prospects in a vacuum. So I don’t care what stadium they play in or whether or not there is someone blocking them.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you can park adjust what i put out there for my projection

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh... thank you!

I can do your work and park adjust for the numbers you intended to be Year 3 production? I feel so lucky.

Funny, I never realized I had “I’m nice” tattooed on my body. That’s it, no more binge drinking!

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dude this is being a dick

Most people would be perfectly happy with projections for a neutral park. If you don’t want that, fine you can do what you want with it. What matters is BRAA which if you use neutral park for your projection is accurate.

Im under no obligation to do this fanpost so to say that Im making you do my work is being a punk.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Saying "No" to you is not me being a dick

Being a dick is having access to better information and not using it to further your argument.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, grover, you're being a dick.

I very much appreciate your minor league scouting reports, but DFA’s mode of projection is entirely reasonable. Putting a player in a different park doesn’t change his value, just the numbers (i.e. relative to the others, it will be the same, and the wOBA will be the same). DFA did a lot of work here, and while I disagree with him, criticizing him for not freaking park adjusting his numbers is ridiculous, and doing it the way you are is out of line.

by Elston Gunn on Oct 6, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How do we value baseball players?

By how they perform. By the numbers they put up. If you do not account for park and league adjustments you will struggle to get an accurate value of the player. DFA projection does not account for these things. It makes no attempt to adjust for ARL, although admittedly in Donaldson’s case that’s not really an issue.

If the projection cannot be used for all players then it should be questioned.

And if you don’t like my attitude… I don’t like being asked to clean up other people’s mistakes. So tough shit all around.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

TWHS

A B -3X = Swedish girls like chocolate @('.')@

by monkeyball on Oct 6, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

very very well played

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How can you park adjust when you don't know where they're going to play?

It would obscure, rather than illuminate, true talent.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 6, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I must be reading your question wrong

Are you saying that using park adjusted numbers obscures talent?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes it would

because you aren’t able to take park neutral numbers and translate them in your head to Coli numbers. You are a better analyst than most people. Therefore most people can’t translate Colit numbers to park neutral numbers. Park neutral numbers are what is used to calculate WAR. Putting Coli numbers would obscure the average persons ability to see the value of the player.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's the problem

You took Texas League numbers, make no effort to adjust for anything, then omit the fact that you’re talking 2013 peak production.

I’m not the one obscuring the message.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't get what your problem is

I said that that was his ceiling which means perfect world peak performance.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

With no timeline!

Which means after he’s had two full seasons of big league experience. Except it’s hard to see how he’s going to get that experience with Suzuki at Catcher and Wallace the heir apparent at 3B.

But you like to work in a vacuum.

Fine, what’s his realistic performance taking into account that he’s probably going to be be a minimum -10 BRAA defensive Catcher if given the a starting gig.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you not read the third paragraph?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're right, my bad

I was so busy trying to figure out the things you weren’t saying that that tidbit slipped my mind.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Youre so right

calling one the ceiling and the other a conservative projection totally don’t give you any idea wtf im talking about.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, I'll go really slowly for angry grover

1. A player has X true talent
2. That player might someday make it to the big leagues.
3. If that player plays for the A’s, he’ll perform at X – Y (Y being the part adjustment).
4. If that player plays in a bandbox, he’ll perform at X + Y
5. Either way, Y is beyond the player’s control, and therefore not interesting when you want to speculate/analyze/uncover X.

Basically, you seem to be advocating systematically overestimating A’s pitching prospects and systematically underestimating position players. I don’t know why you don’t think that’s wrong.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 6, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And your assumption is completely wrong

What I’m saying is taking Donaldson’s AA numbers and calling them X, and X = true talent, is a mistake. Taking those numbers, putting them in context with the park and league he played in, could produce X. And I only say could because there might still be room for projection in a specific prospect. (I’m trying to expand the point beyond Donaldson, who’s fairly developed.)

DFA has taken those AA numbers and has reached too far to try and project a peak big league line 4 years down the road. There are too many variables for his outcome to have any kind of accuracy at this time.

It is just too early to conclude how good Donaldson could be when there are very real questions about how often he’s going to be able to get on the field. He’s not going to put up All-Star numbers as a bench player.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don't know that to be the case

Seth Smith put up All-Star numbers as a bench player…

The reason, getting more general for a minute, why there are very few players who put up All-Star numbers as bench players is that those players are almost without fail promoted to starting jobs. No doubt that would happen with Donaldson as well. If not with the A’s, believe me, someone would be willing to pay top dollar for a slugging catcher.

DFA’s approach (judging the prospect in a vacuum according to his own skills and ignoring the team context) is ultimately, I’ve concluded, the correct one.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Donaldson could actually catch

Would you judge a SP with fly ball tendencies any differently if he pitched for the Rockies?

Of course you would.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 7:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And... my wife says I'm done for the night

G’nite!

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You might have an argument

if you could argue that something specific that a player does is a problem for a specific ballpark, like left-handed power hitters at AT&T or right-handed power hitters at Safeco.

I’m not aware of any such effects in the Coliseum, though. The park is symmetrical— it seems to have just as big a negative impact for everyone.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Listen to yourself

We KNOW that home parks and league can have a heavy (I’m loath to say significant) influence on a player’s production. Yet here we are looking at a projection that doesn’t consider the park or league of the minor league numbers at the center of all this.

And what happens if Donaldson gets traded? Again, I mean. Does that ceiling get transferred to his next team?

And I wouldn’t care if DFA was talking in a more general tone, but he’s being pretty damn specific by claiming a 4.3 WAR ceiling. If he’s going to use a model that is supposed to produce to the tenth percentile then it better be able to be used on any minor league hitter and it needs to adjust their numbers for league and park effects.

Zips makes those adjustments and I think PECOTA does as well, Bill James does… why shouldn’t we ask DFA to do the same?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 7, 2009 6:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

HELLO

WAR is a fucking park independent statistic. Therefore adding park is useless since I would then have to take it out. It only complicates and adds to the likelihood that I miscalculate the numbers with the extra step. Furthermore park adjusting would hide the true talent of the player, we aren’t playing fantasy baseball the stats don’t matter what does matter is value, which is independent of park. Plus Donaldson’s OPS goes up .002 with park adjustments so really who the fuck cares.

To my knowledge neither ZIPs nor Bill James project ceilings (if they do I have not seen them) but rather the next years performance, which HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT.

To quote PT

Loosely speaking, I think it’s reasonable to characterize minor league numbers as a player’s major league ceiling
In other words, Donaldson might be as good as he’s shown in the minors, but probably will be somewhat worse.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are some problems here

Powell can’t play every day at C so it Suzuki or bust is our catching situation besides Donaldson at AA. With the way they are running him into the ground and with arbitration they need to have another internal quality backstop option. Also keeping him at catcher dramatically increases his trade value. Taylor Teagarden was netting offers of Bowden and Masterson from Boston this off season and hes the exact opposite of Donaldson, all glove no hit. His bat needs time so even putting him at 3b doesn’t really solve any problems before 2011 anyway.

The scouting reports are from 2007 when he was drafted from his 2007 collegiate season when he split time. They show that at one point that he was a good defender at third. I have seen no evidence to indicate that that isn’t the case anymore or that Donaldson would be bad at third. Nor Is 3base one of the harder defensive positions in baseball its in the middle of the pack.

Im not projecting Donaldson who had a .811 park adjusted OPS including playoffs in AA to OPS 809 in Oakland. Those are vacuum numbers without any kind of park adjustment. Furthermore I am projecting that to be his ceiling not his immediate performance in Oakland. It would probably be his year 3 output if he ever reaches that as it is a best case scenario.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't use the catastrophic injury argument with me

Suzuki is locked in until further notice and while I agree that Powell hasn’t shown the ability/availability to be more than a back-up the A’s are not without internal options. Recker stepped up this year and the A’s FO is impressed with his progress. They also expect Joel Galarraga to be in the mix in AAA next year.

Yes, keeping Donaldson at C enhances his trade value… unless, of course, there’s evidence to support the idea that he won’t stick at C! Which there is. Both statistical and via scouting reports. And you’ve got your history all screwed up. The Rangers offered Teagarden to the Red Sox and asked for Bowden and Masterson. Boston told Texas to fuck off.

The scouting reports from Donaldson’s draft year are from 2007 but when I read them the first time I got the impression they were referring to his 3B play in the past tense, i.e. 2006. Looking at them again I just fucked that up. Donaldson started maybe 25 games (out of 55 games played) at 3B in 2007.

That still doesn’t excuse the fact that you’re using 2007 scouting reports to support an argument that Donaldson could be (nay, should be) an average defensive 3B in 2010 and beyond. The 12 or so games Donaldson played the hot corner this year provide way too little data to get an accurate statistical read on his current level of play. What you need are current scouting reports and I suggest you try and get in on the Oct. 12th BA chat that’ll discuss Texas League prospects.

I have seen no evidence to indicate that that isn’t the case anymore or that Donaldson would be bad at third.

How about… he hasn’t played the position regularly in 3 years? That throws a shadow of a doubt in my book.

Nor Is 3base one of the harder defensive positions in baseball its in the middle of the pack.

Where is it likely Donaldson will play? 3B, C, LF, RF, 1B. Catcher is the hardest of those positions and right now he can’t hack it, he makes too many mistakes. Of the rest of the positions it is likely Donaldson could play for Oakland at some point, which is the hardest defensive position?

I know SS, CF and 2B are graded as tougher defensive positions but Donaldson has almost no chance of playing any of those positions so why even factor them into the discussion?

As for his offensive projection, you go back and read your original post and tell me where you talk about his Year 3 production. Because I read a whole lot of “this year” and nothing about “3 years in”.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 8:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A couple of things

the phrase “this year” appears three times in my post two of those times it had noted that the statistic presented was from 2009. The only other time I used it was to establish that the league average wOBA I was using for my calculation was from this year. Im sorry if that wasn’t clear.

I am extrapolating from all the data available. Just because he hasn’t played third regularly since 2007 doesn’t mean that he can’t, and he did play fifteen games there this year with an average TZ rating. Its not as if im suggesting that a fringe average fielder two years ago is average in the future because of those reports. I am suggesting that a good above average fielder two years ago would slip to being average.

I believe you are the one with the incorrect history. Texas asked for Buchholz and was told that they could have Masterson or Bowen but they could fuck off if they were only going to take Buchholz.

I don’t have BA and I know you do. If you were willing to ask a question about Donaldson’s defense at 3b and behind the plate I would be grateful.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You need to be more precise with your message

The phrase “this year” appears 3 times… how many times did you say that Donaldson’s projected .809 OPS was meant to be his 2013 peak number?

Donaldson hasn’t played 3B regularly since 2006. How has 3 years behind the plate, 3 years of physical maturation, affected his game at the hot corner? Has he put on weight? Have his legs lost some of their juice?

I’m not saying Donaldson can’t be an average defender at 3B, I’m saying we don’t have any recent, relevant data to make any kind of conclusion one way or the other. It’s an idea that can be explored but in no way should we proclaim an ability level with the kind of certainty you are suggesting.

Re: Boston and Texas… in your previous post you said “Teagarden was netting offers of Bowden and Masterson”. Which is what Texas asked for when Buchholz was off the table. That is not what Boston was offering, they were offering/considering one or the other as you stated above. “And” vs. “or” is a pretty big deal.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most of this is stuff we have said a million times before

Is it certain that Donaldson will be able to play league average 3b? No of course it is not. I think he can and I showed you why I do.

Im really confused why you don’t think that someones celling is translated into peak performance.

Re: Boston and Texas. By saying netted “offers” I was saying that there were multiple offers as in

" After putting my house on the market I received offers of 500k and 600k for it"

not

“After putting my house on the market I received offers of 1.1m”

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK

If you can’t tell the difference between saying “Bowden and Masterson” vs. Bowden or Masterson" then there’s no hope for the English language.

I get ceiling = peak, my problem is you didn’t put a time stamp for when Donaldson could be expected to hit his ceiling. You’re argument for Donaldson to be the 4th best prospect on the A’s list is centered around offensive production that shouldn’t be expected for 4 more seasons if he could find the big league playing time to build the necessary experience to finally break out. With Suzuki at C and Wallace and Cardenas ahead of him on the 3B depth chart that big league prerequisite is like saying “after you add the magic pixie dust”.

Especially when we’re talking about a guy who doesn’t look like he can stick as a starting C.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Id appreciate it if youd either stop being an ass or left the thread

The plural of offers tells you that there are two of them not one combo offer. If there were two offers one offer being Bowden and then another offer being Masterson, then my sentence construction is perfectly fine. I have already clarified what I was talking about and yet you insist on continuing this line.

Ceiling is independent of park, time it takes to get there, or prospects/established players in front of them. What you are arguing is that he won’t reach that ceiling in Oakland. The likelihood of reaching a ceilings is completely independent of projecting his ceiling. So if you could stop being condescending about how I improperly projected his ceiling when you aren’t actually talking about that at all, I would appreciate it.

Finally, I think there is a very low likelihood that Wallace plays third base and you yourself have said that the organization prefers Cardenas at 2b, which presents plenty of opportunity at 3b.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 9:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just leave him alone, DFA.

I don’t know what his deal is about this, but I don’t it’s going anywhere. Sorry this happened to your thread.

by Elston Gunn on Oct 7, 2009 12:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

grover is usually awesome... im not sure why this got so far out of hand

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

grover has his times of the month where this happens

Not your fault, and nothing you can do to avoid it.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 7, 2009 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You want me in a better mood?

Stop mangling the English language.

Stop taking minor league numbers and plugging them into a metric designed to quantify big league production without first trying to account for park/league/ARL of those minor league numbers.

Would you declare an All-Star ceiling if Donaldson had done what he did in Midland as a 25 year old? I’m betting no. If you can’t apply your “projection system” to other minor league players equally then it’s flawed.

And to be perfectly honest, there are too many people around here who listen to you for you to be giving out bad info.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 7, 2009 5:54 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Take some prozac

I FUCKING CLARIFIED IT EVEN IF YOU THINK MY CONSTRUCTION WAS BAD WHICH IT WASN’T SO SHUT UP ABOUT THE GOD DAMN ENGLISH LANGUAGE.

Donaldson is on a normal career path and considering that he is playing behind the dish even spending two full years in AAA wouldn’t significantly impact his career. So why should I adjust anything for Donaldson’s age?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I lovvveeeee flamewars!!!

Keep em coming! No, wait. It’s baseball. Get over yourselves. You don’t hate each other, you just disagree. Now have a fucking civilized conversation. Not. That. Hard.

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Oct 7, 2009 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's apparently flamewar week on AN

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 7, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know whats more obnoxious than flamewars is people griping about them

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well if you think that, it must be true.

From what I’ve read, people agree with you….

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Oct 7, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

You know what's more obnoxious than people griping about flame wars?

People griping about people griping about…

You write a thread on a site on which we’re all free to comment. I don’t know if you realize this, but you actually don’t have any say in how we respond to your threads and comments. Telling people to leave your threads as if you own them is not a very productive endeavor. If you feel people are out of line, flag their comments.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 8, 2009 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lemme back off a bit and say first that I appreciate your contributions to AN

These are great threads. I guess it just irked me that you have now at least twice taken offense to reactions that have been an everyday part of AN.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 1:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let me address a couple of things

I do feel like i own this thread. I created it, I can destroy it. Furthermore I feel the same way about all of my threads. They are the product of my work, my thoughts, my existence.

There is a general truce that makes AN an enjoyable place to be. That truce is that the sexual innuendo and related ridiculousness stays in the community threads, which are game threads, DLD, and other similar endeavors. To that end you don’t have analytic posters jumping down people throats for being silly or being wrong about baseball in those threads like they would if you say those things in the analytic threads.

My Ryan Sweeney thread was hijacked from an analytical discussion by commentors who ignored the truce beyond just a few incursions, and after I had gently tried to steer the comments back. My post shouldn’t be subject to discussion of Ryan Sweeney’s dick. That in my view is unacceptable.

I love grover, who not only has been a great poster on AN has been kind enough to help me with research on occasion. In this case he continued to freak out about things I explained my reasoning on but where he wanted me to throw away a lot of conventions and definitions, while taking a hostile attitude. Im not going to flag grover when I and others telling him he was out of line should have worked and isn’t punitive.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you don't like what's going on, feel free to delete your post

But you have no right to tell us what we can and can’t post. You need to deal with the fact that some people want to make jokes and don’t really care about the deep analysis. They have every right to make jokes in your threads, whether you like it or not. Lighten up and appreciate the stuff you do like—let the stuff you don’t like slide, unless it’s a personal attack, in which case you flag.

This truce that you speak of is completely fabricated in your own mind. It’s a truce that perhaps you wish existed, but never has. Every single thread is a community thread, whether you created it or not and whether you like it or not.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

No, its not in my mind

According to leopold bloom

I would posit that the

"rules" for stat-based threads and the "rules" for game threads are two different sets of rules.

These types of issues arise where we share mutual space, like this thread.

The list of people who actively participate in both kinds of threads is pretty short. And, fairly or unfairly, I think it’s up to the individuals who are familiar with both sets of rules to keep the peace between the Hutus and Tutsis Statheads and yahoos.

Look, the reality is both sets of people are equally fans and equally welcome at AN. That easy or uneasy truce between the two is one of the things that makes AN special.

So my suggestion, which is in no way directed at one individual or one faction, but at the collective, is that we agree to try to respect one another and realize that our common bond is stronger than our differences. And that we try to let go of whatever differences separate us.

Go A’s.

If I and everybody else is suppose to not care about what they don’t like then A) you shouldn’t be complaining now and B) no one should ever complain if i go stat Rambo on some poor unsuspecting sap in a game thread or DLD.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, come off it

Jokes have been a part of for years longer than you have. There has never been a strict divide between humor and statistical analysis. Just because you—contrary to your sigline—don’t have a sense of humor, it doesn’t mean that anybody else has to stay out of “your threads”.

If you want a place that’s free from innuendos, start your own damn blog. Complaining about something and acting like you own the freaking internet are two separate things.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

or you know people could just respect my wishes with regards to things i write

and the sig line is funny for the introspective self doubt comment far more than the sense of humor section.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And only respond in ways that you deem appropriate, rather than ways in which the community has responded for years?

Got it.

People generally do try to respect certain unspoken rules around here. Getting worked up over six little jokes in a 400 comment thread seems a little unnecessary, though.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Look I didn't bring it up

you did.

you are the one who thinks that being laissez faire is the way to go but you are complaining rather than I.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jokes have been a part of *AN*

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And for that matter

Feel free to use stats in game threads or DLDs. They’ve always been welcome there and will always continue to be. But just because you think you’re the next PT doesn’t mean you have to be a caricature of the things that people dislike about him.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

um other people disagree
If we start assigning money values to

WAR here in the game thread, I’m going to have to put a rally Salma in the next rosterbation thread.

from our very own Iglew.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great, that's what iglew said. See anything about it in the community guidelines?

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

did i ever say it was a written concrete rule? No. Its a community standard that leopold was talking about.

But here Iglew acknowledges both that putting sexual inuendo and pictures in a stat thread is something that would make stats people upset, just like if I went really Rambo stats on people in gamethreads would make people upset.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except that stats people never said anything in the past

And they certainly didn’t try to control everybody else.

Also, I disagree with the notion that statistical analysis and innuendo are mutually exclusive preferences.

Here’s my angle: I come to AN for info the A’s first, humor second, and the statistical analysis third. I generally avoid the game threads, because I don’t enjoy being exposed to all the ridiculous flirting and innuendo.

I made a pun (that happened to involved a penis) and you jumped down my throat in the previous thread.

Frankly, I don’t care what iglew says, because he’s not speaking for me, or the whole community. It’s his preference. A couple harmless jokes do not equal thread hijacking. Had those jokes continued throughout the thread without any actual analysis, you might have a point. Instead, your point is nothing more than a logical phallusy.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Im really done arguing this because its borign and fustrating
I generally avoid the game threads, because I don’t enjoy being exposed to all the ridiculous flirting and innuendo.

I generally avoid threads that i know will have those things unless I want to seek them out. But those who posted those jokes deprived me of my ability to enjoy my thread without those things.

I didn’t mean to jump down your throat which is why I included smilies in my responses to you and tried to nip it in the bud and it was more than a few by the time it was over.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have every right to be irritated.

But you still can’t control other people. This is a public forum. There are no rules posted about making jokes in “serious” threads. Just admit you went overboard and realize when people make jokes they are just having fun. There are plenty of people who will respond in ways that you like to your hard work…jokes don’t mean disrespect.

by IM4Oakgal on Oct 9, 2009 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Im not controlling people

Im asking that people do a certain thing. I am forcing no one to do anything.

And yes I feel like people making crass jokes is disrespectful to my work, regardless of whether that is right or in keeping with the sites policy it is how I feel. Therefore if people want to show my work respect they will keep their jokes witty and away from crass sexual innuendo because they know that it makes me happy when they do that.

If they don’t want to I can’t stop them, though I can ask them to stop. If they continue to do so my only option is lump it or destroy the thread.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 10, 2009 12:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Truce? ;)

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 10, 2009 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 10, 2009 12:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, leave me out of this

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 10, 2009 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry

I meant no disrespect to you. And in your defense, you’re quite agreeable.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 10, 2009 1:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, DFA, I don't know why you keep bringing that up.

The dick jokes took up, at most, 10 posts out of the 450+ comments in that thread. And there was some damned good analysis going on in there. People are going to make jokes. They weren’t mean-spirited, and they weren’t aimed at you. I don’t know why it was such a big deal.

Lay down, black gives way to blue.
Lay down, I'll remember you.

by danmerqury on Oct 9, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If it weren't guaranteed NSFW

I’d make a playful rebus out of it, but dude … can you say “control freak”?

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 9, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This standard is unrealistic and would prevent any reasonable stat-based discussion of prospects.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 7, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So we should continue to look for our keys under the streetlamp?

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 7, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see how this is pertinent in any way to the discussion...

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 7, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bad metaphor, I guess.

I have no clue about who is right on the substance of this question. You guys are way over my head, which is why I’ve stayed out of it.

But I do see that grover is saying that a certain methodology is inadequate to support the claims being made by it. Whether that’s true, I don’t know, but your response that without that methodology you’d have no methodology at all does not rebut his argument.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 7, 2009 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really

grover is saying the equivalent of “Heisenberg uncertainty principle means that we shouldn’t try to study particle properties.”

PT and I are saying, “Just because Heisenberg uncertainty principle exists doesn’t mean we shouldn’t use the best information we can have to study particle properties.”

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 11:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm finally convinced that PT and DFA are actually the same person

And that person is Sheldon from The Big Bang Theory.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 12:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

but Im not a fan of that show!

I tried but i just cant get into CBS shows.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

this is a bad example

Quantum mechanics is a very well defined theory. The uncertainty principle leads to paradoxes of interpretation but it doesn’t have any negative impact on the ability of quantum mechanics to predict the results for any possible experiment.

by colin on Oct 9, 2009 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Physics major?

I was struggling to find a good example, I guess I failed.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We can keep the example a physics one

Grover was effectively saying that the fact that quantum physics exists means you can’t use Newtonian physics to measure how fast a ball will fall if you drop it off the roof of a building.

Which is ridiculous. Newtonian physics is plenty sophisticated enough to say useful things about dropping a ball off a roof, and there’s an excellent reason for using it there— it’s a bazillion times easier to wield and explain.

Grover’s alternative is, as Twain would put it, killing a bug with a battery of artillery.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 9, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love you, g

But you harping on someone else about mangling the English language has got to be one of the highlights of AN Flame War Week™.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 12:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

At best he is Daric Barton

Without the power I just don’t see it. He hits .270 in AA with little power. If he sticks at Catcher, he will be a useful major leaguer… otherwise he is replacement level imho.

by DrDoom on Oct 5, 2009 5:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd look at his OBP and his BB/K ratios

Donaldson consistently walks and he keeps his Ks down. The former will give him a solid major league OBP while the latter gives him the chance to keep hitting for a decent average as he moves up, a la Kurt Suzuki. (In his minor league seasons for Stockton, then Midland, then Sacramento, Suzuki hit .277, .285, .280).

I keep hoping the A’s will play him full-time at 3B, because he seems like a lousy catcher who is athletic enough to learn to play 3B with enough practice — he certainly has a better physique for it than Wallace does.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 5, 2009 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even if he is Suzuki with bad defense

Thats not a high ceiling… especially at 3B. And he has not proven he is that good yet. He has as much chance at being that useful as any of the other guys. And the other guys have the chance to be more.

by DrDoom on Oct 5, 2009 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

His strikeout numbers aren't really that good...

Suzuki is not a great comp for anyone in the BA department because he’s cut way way down on his K% in the majors from what it was in the minors, which is pretty unusual. Suzuki’s major league batting averages have been much better than would be expected from his minor league numbers.

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 5, 2009 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I'm interested in figuring out why Suzuki

has hit so much better for BA than projected. Personally, I think the hard to quantify “work ethic” has a lot to do with it — overachieving through hard work, persistence, maturity, intelligence, etc. — but maybe there were statistical indicators I/we just didn’t see. Not complaining, though!

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 5, 2009 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Work ethic caused him to suddenly abandon the concept of plate discipline?

Yeah, no.

Any time a guy dramatically upticks the number of swings he takes he’s likely to hit for a higher average— the problem is he’s also likely to have a worse OBP, which is the stat that actually matters.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 5, 2009 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Suzuki's OBP in his last minor league season (2006, Sacramento) was .351

Suzuki’s OBP in his first full major league season (2008, Oakland) was .347.

What might have correlated with the drop in OBP this year would be the increase in slugging. Suzuki’s batting averages in 2008 and 2009 were practically identical. It’s just that this year the SLG went up while the OBP went down, while BA remained the constant.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 5, 2009 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

or he got worn out and sucked in the second half.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Oct 5, 2009 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, thereby making him a worse player

I’m not quite feeling ironic enough to blame that on “hard work” or “intelligence”.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like to call it "sucktoitiveness"

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Oct 9, 2009 12:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Daric Barton who can play league average third is valuable.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But not exciting

I think I just value upside and others value likelihood of being serviceable. To each his own.

by DrDoom on Oct 5, 2009 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why should I care if it is exciting

I mean should I value a player that can juggle knives because it provides exciting entertainment?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If I rated players just on how valuable they are,

I’d be a Yankee fan. And that just ain’t happening. A player might not be more valuable because they are entertaining, but I love some players just because they are entertaining.

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Oct 6, 2009 1:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually if you were a Yankees fan you should value entertaining more that value

Being and A’s fan means you cant afford to ignore likelihood of success, but if you are a Yankees fan you need players that will crack your free agent line up.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree,

being a fan of any sports team menas you value more than actual ability and on field contributions. This is different than just evaluating a player based on actual basebal value, and I’d rather have a more valuable player. But my point is, I’m fans of different players and I dislike other players due to how much they entertain me/their personality/other things, and it’s part of being a fan.

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Oct 6, 2009 2:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eh

The problem isn’t that, it’s that your definition of upside is completely whack.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Completely whack?

Are the 90’s back already?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

FACE!

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Oct 6, 2009 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

HRs and steals are so whack

I’d say different, not whack. Lets not get angry over this.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, defining upside in a way that excludes defense is most definitely whack

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But he does not exist

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never said he did.

But if Donaldson hits like Barton and plays third he is a good player.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not as good as...

a lot of our other players if you also project their minor league stats to the MLB level.

If you take everyone’s minor league stats as an indication of major league success, Donaldson is not even top 10 in our system regardless of position.

I’ll boost him up a bit because the walk rate indicates he sees the ball well and might develop into something more.

I think I will have Donaldson around 8-10 in our system. Thats pretty generous considering he only posted a .270 average and 9 home runs (.795 ops) in a full year on a team that I think posted an .800 OPS as a whole.

by DrDoom on Oct 7, 2009 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who has a realistic projection that is better?

please explain who has All Star (4 WAR) upside but also a reasonable shot at getting to 2 WAR if things just break OK for them.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I rec'd both Nick and MikeA's points above

I too believe that Donaldson’s walk rates will evaporate at higher levels due to an inability to hit for plus power.

I really like the 260/.340/.410 line that mikeA posted. Well, I don’t really like it – I just think it’s really realistic.

I can’t see a guy with 10 homer pop and no speed posting a .380 obp. MLB pitchers throw tons and tons of strikes to guys who can’t beat them deep.

This is Daric Barton’s biggest problem, and why his shiny single A stats were a mirage.

Batting 4th for the 2014 San Jose A's: 26-year-old RF Justin Upton, in the 1st season of a nine year, $250M deal.

by notsellingjeans on Oct 5, 2009 5:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the rec

but Barton did, in fact, just post a line of .269/.372/.413, with a BABIP of .292. Those numbers include his bad stretch early this season, of course. After September 1, his line was .306/.402/.469.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Oct 5, 2009 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's broken my heart too many times before

He was lucky that he didn’t have to hit in the Coli in April and May. 70%ish of his at-bats came in September and October, when the weather is nice and the ball carries better.

I’m still a Barton agnostic at best. I think he’s a second-division first baseman, which is kind of appropriate for our team until Wallace/Carter/Cardenas hit their prime, anyway.

Batting 4th for the 2014 San Jose A's: 26-year-old RF Justin Upton, in the 1st season of a nine year, $250M deal.

by notsellingjeans on Oct 5, 2009 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He really hates hitting at the Coliseum

I mean, I’ve never discussed it with him or anything, but with splits like these he should.

2009
H: .212./.337/.339
R: .333/.414/.507

Career
H: .238/.328/.331
R: .261/.369/.438

Although I did hear that Geren has forbidden him to do the splits from now on.

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Oct 5, 2009 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I discussed it once with Daric,

and he responded by diving head first into an empty pool.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 5, 2009 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I got about halfway through a mini-study of hitters with low power

before realizing that the stat that I wanted (minor league walk percentages) isn’t available. I’d have to calculate it by hand, which would require probably an hour or so. Might happen someday— ain’t happening today.

In lieu of that, I’ll just point out my preliminary finding that of the 77 qualified hitters who were below median in home runs this season, 27 of them were above the median walk rate. It’s hardly an uncommon phenomenon.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 5, 2009 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe you already know this.

At Baseball Reference, you can sort for whichever players and stats you want (ie, walks and ABs), then use the “share” function to export the relevant columns as a tab- or comma-delimited file. You can then pull that into Excel, write the relevant formula and copy it to every row, and then you can sort on the results of that formula.

It’s still a bit of work, of course, but it’s an improvement over punching each guy’s numbers into your calculator. And the work is all overhead, so you can get 100 guys nearly as easily as 10.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 5, 2009 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I basically know nothing whatsoever about computer programs

so, yes, this is good.

Still not happening during the lifespan of this thread, though.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Barton's problem is not BBs evaporating...

He’s at 12.6% for his career in the majors which is great (and 12.5% last year when he was sucking.) His problem has been a poor batting average; last year a big spike in Ks and a decline in power were what hurt him, and he reversed both this year. I don’t have any problem projecting a .380+ obp for Barton in a few years. He put up much better numbers at a much younger age than Donaldson has, and his minor league BB% is higher than Donaldson’s last year, which probably is not sustainable in the minors given that it was such a huge jump.

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 5, 2009 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last year his problem was a .238 BABIP for the Cubs

and you know it was flukey because his ISO was still pretty good. Also he had a higher walk rate in 2007.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also, a max potential OPS of .800...

doesn’t impress me much… thats best case too and a bit lofty if you ask me.

Guys like Weeks and Desme could completely crash and burn but at least there is a small change they will be all-star caliber. Its all about the upside…

by DrDoom on Oct 5, 2009 5:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

A max potential OPS of .800, OBP heavy, from the catcher's spot

is huge upside.

“Upside” does not consist solely in a player’s future seasonal home run totals.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 5, 2009 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

In AA this year, Donaldson had a .370 wOBA (a stat which attempts to effectively quantify hitting into one easy to read number, weighting OBP and SLG at their correct percentages, as well as taking baserunning and other factors into account). People forget that OPS weights slugging percentage much to high compared to OBP. A .370 wOBA is excellent, and last year (granted in a much smaller sample size), Donaldson had a wOBA of .412.

For reference, some major leaguers whose wOBAs were right around .370 this year were:

Justin Morneau
Robinson Cano
Andre Ethier
Michael Cuddyer
Ichiro Suzuki
Billy Butler
Russell Branyan
David Wright

"Life is a horizontal fall" -Jean Cocteau

by King Richard on Oct 5, 2009 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The one you wouldn't so much expect in that list?

Billy Butler.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 5, 2009 7:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm less surprised by his presence there than by some of the others

Butler was a heavy-duty hitting prospect a few years ago. A lot of those sluggers who reach the majors at super-young ages seem to fall off the radar screen for a while because of SNTS, only to reemerge as forces in a couple of seasons. We’re seeing it now with Travis Snider, and to some extent with Barton himself, actually.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 5, 2009 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with this a lot

do you think it has something to do with having the MLB really be their first hitting challenge?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

Who was it, I think Mulder maybe, I think it was Mulder and it was mentioned in Aces, but he really never had to “try” very hard until he reached MLB, and it was a huge shock to him.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Oct 5, 2009 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I buy that

It certainly squares with my life experiences (although, of course, my “having to try” threshold was waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay lower than his)

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 6, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"SNTS"?

Google not helping me.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 6, 2009 1:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Shiny new toy syndrome.

(I think).

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Oct 6, 2009 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bingo

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and Branyan and Cuddyer, really.

They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick

by mikev on Oct 5, 2009 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Billy Bulter

is ridiculously awesome. He’s 23 and is coming off an 853 OPS year. He was bought up early but now he’s “figured it out” so to speak and will be a beast over the next 10 years.

by PL78 on Oct 6, 2009 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is a problem with this... I'll try to illustrate.

No one in baseball posted the power and speed combination that Desme showed in High A ball.

Therefore, Desme will be better than any current major-leaguer with the possible exception of Mark Reynolds who seems to be his best comp.

Sounds silly doesn’t it?

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why do these California League statistics taste so salty?

Oh, right, it’s because I basically don’t believe them.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ooh, I like that.

Almost as good as, “sniff, sniff, is that burning denim I smell?”

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 6, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think that's what's being said.

He’s taking Donaldson’s minor league numbers as his ceiling, and saying if he puts those numbers up in the majors, look how freaking good he’d be. I don’t think anyone’s saying he’s likely to hit a .370 wOBA, just that saying he doesn’t have much upside doesn’t seem right.

by Elston Gunn on Oct 7, 2009 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you!

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

.270 with 9 home runs

Is the defintion of not much upside… even for a catcher. Spin the stats any way you want, but I want more from a top prospect.

by DrDoom on Oct 7, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think you understand how bad a catcher can hit and be league average

12.5 runs! Thats a wOBA of .305. If he hits anywhere close to what I project his ceiling to be he is a significantly above league average.

Weeks is below him on my list because of the leg injuries, but other than that I don’t see anyone that offers Donaldson’s upside with a reasonable fall back to league average.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is not a good catcher though

And we don’t have a near term need for a catcher. Do you just like him as trade bait and assume he will get better on defense?

And half the time we are talking about him as a 3B. You can’t move him around based on what suits your arguement without acknowledging that there is a good chance he will not stick at catcher and an even better chance he won’t stick at 3B.

He also saw time at 1B in the AFL. I think there is an equal chance of him being a 1B/DH type as there is of him being a 3B.

His only hope is to improve on his defense at catcher and hope he can stick there with another team. If he doesn’t do this, I don’t think he becomes and major league regular.

Its funny, I used to be high on Donaldson, but taking this closer look at his stats and learning more about his defense has actually lowered my opinion of him.

by DrDoom on Oct 7, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your consistent failure to understand the concept of positional adjustment

seems to be having a much stronger impact on your opinion of him…

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 7, 2009 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He won't play C or 3B at the major league level any time soon...

from what I have seen, so why should I adjust for it? Putting in a terrible defensive catcher so we can get 9 home runs in 500 ABs makes no sense.

Your failure to attach realistic expectations is causing you to overvalue him.

He is a poor man’s Daric Barton and will likely end up at the same position but with worse stats.

by DrDoom on Oct 7, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please show me any legit source who thinks hell end up at 1b

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you understand how awful a catcher has to be before moving him to first base makes sense?

Stipulating for the sake of argument that a guy will be a GOOD first baseman, say 5 runs above average, he would still have to be 20 runs below average as a catcher for that move to make sense.

That’s mind-boggling. 20 runs below average on defense is almost impossible to conceive of. He will be afforded every opportunity to become even a bad defensive catcher before the team moves him to first base.

Also worth noting is that a player would have to be 15 runs below average as a third baseman to be equivalent in value to an average defensive first baseman. Not quite mind-boggling, but you basically have to not be able to play the position at all before that shift makes sense.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 7, 2009 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be fair, if I were forced to pick a "sabr concept we're sure of today but will look silly in 10 years"...

My first two guesses would be:

1. Defensive stats (which is fair, we don’t have great raw data yet)
2. Positional adjustments

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 7, 2009 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and to be fair

if I was going to pick an area sabr knows the least about it would be catching defense.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What sabr concepts from 10 years ago look silly today?

I mean, people used to think defense wasn’t that important, but that was due to lack of information, not misinterpretation of information.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 7, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The idea that JP Riccardi knew what he was doing?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do people put much stock in Win Shares or power-speed number?

Power-speed was never more than a kind of curiosity, so maybe that part isn’t fair. Still, Win Shares?

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Oct 8, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That wasn't a sabr concept, that was a Bill James concept

Bill James is, as he will undoubtedly be the first to tell you, not a true sabermetrician in the MGL/Graham/PizzaCutter/Tango mold.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 9, 2009 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This explains a lot.

I thought Bill James was the sabermetrics hero, but I find I invariably love Bill James whereas true sabermetricians piss me off about 25% of the time.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 9, 2009 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A true sabermetrician would come up with a

cleaner number than “about 25% of the time.”

Maybe you can find one made by Go F**k Yourself San Jose... -Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 9, 2009 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Bill James would question that number!

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 9, 2009 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

(so would I)

Maybe you can find one made by Go F**k Yourself San Jose... -Poppy

by Leopold Bloom on Oct 9, 2009 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who is PizzaCutter?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 9, 2009 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

IIRC, Pizza is the main guy at

StatisticallySpeaking.

I don’t think he uses that name any more, though, which may be why you aren’t familiar with it.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 9, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the various values of the positional adjustments are pretty uncertain and subject to change

but they’re not going to change a LOT, and the concept is solid.

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 7, 2009 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Which is one of the reasons I originally hoped the A’s would try to keep Barton at C when they acquired him.

However, even if Suzuki wasn’t blocking him in Oakland, it just doesn’t look like Donaldson is going to be able to stick at C… not as a starter. You could probably get away with him as the back-up and his extra versatility on the infield corners would be a definite plus.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 5, 2009 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It won't be from the catcher spot...

He is blocked at Catcher and his defense is not good. At any other position he would be sub-par. And wouldn’t SLG heavy be better than OBP heavy? Not important really.

Look, I like Donaldson. He may be useful someday. He is not in the realm of Weeks, Ynoa, or Green though. And in my opinion he is also not in the realm of Desme, but some people hate Desme since 30/40 season don’t count if you are 23. Donaldson is 23 by the way… almost 24.

When the prospect lists come out Donaldson will be behind all these guys… I think we all know this. Why would all those people be so wrong?

by DrDoom on Oct 5, 2009 7:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, OBP-heavy is much, much better.

OBP is worth about 1.7 times as much as SLG in creating runs. Look it up if you doubt. And it is important, actually—OPS significantly undersells Donaldson.

by Elston Gunn on Oct 5, 2009 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

makes sense

a double isn’t worth twice as much as a single so I can see the logic. Still, I would need to see more SLG from Donaldson to get excited considering he lacks speed or above average defense.

by DrDoom on Oct 5, 2009 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

um hes always had a good iso especially for a catcher.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Either.

like I said whether hes a bad catcher or an average 3bman doesn’t change anything.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another way to think of it besides the 1.7 thing is that

OPS underrates BBs and overrates HRs, and gets the other stuff reasonably close to correct. Since HRs and BBs tend to go together, usually OPS will give an answer pretty close to wOBA, but it will be wrong for certain extreme high HR/low BB or high BB/low HR players like Bengie Molina/Pedro Feliz on the one hand or something like the good version of Jason Kendall on the other hand.

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 5, 2009 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's a shorter term for "the good version of Jason Kendall," you know

It’s “Pirate.”

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Oct 5, 2009 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm just going to take this time to say the phrase "Pirate Kendall".

I have to jump at every opportunity. It’s so much fun!

Lay down, black gives way to blue.
Lay down, I'll remember you.

by danmerqury on Oct 5, 2009 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

some statheads take a little too much exception to OPS and OPS+ because it’s usually only a big deal on the margins, but in some cases (like this one) it does matter.

by Elston Gunn on Oct 7, 2009 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wOBA is just as easy to look up, people should just use it

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's kinda not as easy

I think fangraphs puts sb/cs in, which some people may not like and which causes confusion, and statcorner isn’t always reliable for accuracy. Fangraphs should put all the formulas they use in the glossary…

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 7, 2009 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They link to Tom Tango's site with the formula on it.
(0.72*non-intentional walks + 0.75*HBP + 0.90*1B + 0.92*reached on error + 1.24*2B + 1.56*3B + 1.95*HR) / PA

http://www.insidethebook.com/woba.shtml

Lay down, black gives way to blue.
Lay down, I'll remember you.

by danmerqury on Oct 7, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure that's what they actually use, though...

as I said, I think they add sb/cs. Not sure if they include roe. In any case, they have different wobas than fangraphs. And “they” is just a Dave Cameron blog post which does not say what they use…

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 7, 2009 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

23 in low-A ball is crazy different from 23 in AA

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 5, 2009 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Desme owned high A, not low A.

He dominated stockton more than Donaldson ever did. After the AFL, Donaldson and Desme will be at the same point in their development and the same age. Both will start 2010 at or near AAA. Desme will have better defense, speed, power and possibly average on his side. Donaldson might have OBP.

Desme is an injury risk in theory so he has that working against him.

by DrDoom on Oct 5, 2009 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not true Donaldson did AFL last year so hes epically better

what is up with you valuing AFL time so much. Chris Carter isn’t playing in the AFL so he must suck right?

Also the likelihood that Desme is better than +7.5 in a corner coupled with Donaldson being -12.5 behind the plate or -2.5 at 3b isn’t that high.

Also Donaldson is going to start in AAA where as Desme will start in AA.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A lot will depend on how Desme performs in the AFL

Donaldson, Brown and Desme all have a good chance of being at or near AAA next year. That would seem to indicate they are close in their development. Desme might be slightly behind but he is also younger and has posted the best stats of the 3 by a wide margin this year albeit at a level 1 step below the others.

Its similar to the margin Carter has over some of our AAA players… lower level, but the stats are the stats. To me Desme is to Donaldson as Carter is to Everidge. (sounds crazy but Everidge is only 2 years older than Donaldson, and is at least a year ahead of him in development and has put up superior numbers with similarly marginal defense). Ok maybe that comparison is a bit far off but I think it makes a valid point.

I do think that scouts and analysts will rank Desme above Donaldson and Brown. They are also swayed by potential upside and high risk high reward guys. Donaldson might be the safest bet out of the 3, but Desme is the only one with all-star potential. We can find another Donaldson without much effort. We don’t get many all-stars so we should value those opportunities when we can get them even if they are a long-shot.

One could make the arguement that Donaldson is about the same level prospect as Matthew Spencer. The only counter to this arguement would be Donaldson’s walk rates, and those don’t always translate to big league success. Meanwhile Spencer would have a few other stats on his side and an easier path to a big league defensive position.

But lets please agree to disagree. I like all our prospects and arguing about them to this extent is silly. Lets vote for our guys and see what actually happens. I hope they all do well.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would not trade Donaldson for 22 Matt Spencers...

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 6, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

One could make the arguement that Donaldson is about the same level prospect as Matthew Spencer.

One could make this argument, if one ignored the reality, indeed the entire concept, of defense.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe he means they were both at AA. That would be a very strong argument.

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 6, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know why I bother

Hard to have a debate when people just act belligerent. I don’t think anyone can win an arguement based on Donaldson’s defense but I won’t pointlessly mock you for trying.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um because your argument flat out ignores the facts

Donaldson hit better than Spencer this year. This is also while Spencer who is the same age spent time repeating low A and Donaldson was at a higher level.

Spencer is also bad at defense at 1b and Corner OF so he has to hit anywhere from 10 to 25 runs better than Donaldson to break even in terms of value with the positional adjustment.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd say they hit about the same at AA

In a similar number of at bats too.

You can cherry pick stats from both sides. Donaldson takes more walks… thats it… thats all he has on his side. They strike out at the same rate roughly.

Spencer has more power, and hits for a higher average.

Donaldson’s OBP makes up for his lower BA, but a hit is still better than a single and coupled with Spencer’s added power, it really does look like a statistical wash.

Spencer is also younger.

Neither is winning points for defense.

For the record I like Donaldson more than Spencer… But I am just pointing out how its reasonable to make a comparison and how Donaldson is being vastly overrated because he has a good BB/K ratio despite nothing else standing out. As a comp to a player with a similar walk rate, Barton OPS’d in the .800s at a much younger age and its taken him a while to transition that to the majors.

And I still don’t think Donaldson sticks at Catcher in the bigs so I don’t give him bonus points for the position.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

*typo*

hit is still better than a “walk”

Wish I could edit…

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can you please stop

Spencer is 50 days younger.

Donaldson had a better wOBA which is what you should be looking at.

3b is 10 runs better than COF and 15 runs better than 1b.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Neither is winning points for defense."

This is a false statement (or, if you’re being pedantic, irrelevant as neither may be winning points, but Spencer is sure losing a lot more)

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 6, 2009 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Show me where Donaldson is good at his position

I want to see some numbers. I am willing to believe you, but I was under the impression he wasn’t a good catcher and no one knows if he can stick at 3rd because he hasn’t played there much in recent years.

I don’t know much about Spencer’s D but I am guessing he is like most average corner OF. You have to try really hard to suck at COF (see Jack Cust).

Hard to give Donaldson “10 runs” when he really isn’t going to play 3B and he isn’t very good at catcher either.

I’ll admit I am downplaying defense in general but its because I don’t think any of these guys can really make a positive contribution on D. If Donaldson sucks at C or 3B, does that really make him better than someone who sucks at COF? He will have a lot more chances to make errors on the infield.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Errors are you meausre of defense?

srsly?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is more valuable to have a 5 run below average 3B than a 5 run below average COF

So to answer your question: Yes.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 6, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was about to disagree with this but

I assume you’re adding those numbers up before positional adjustment?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 6, 2009 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Copy that

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So you think Donaldson can stick at 3B?

Thats a perfectly fine assumption but its still an assumption. I could assume that Desme’s tools and speed could make him a plus OF defender given time and coaching.

I would think that if Donaldson was going to make it as a 3B, he would be seeing more time there. It still seems to be a work in progress. But I guess we will just have to see how this pans out.

We really should be clear on what position we project Donaldson for though. I get shot down because his stats are good for a catcher, but when we point out he isn’t good there I get shot down because he is a 3B. His value changes depending on where you put him and if you think he can actually handle that position. Some people might contend his long term potential is as a DH… what is he worth then?

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

DFA is using WAR to make his case

WAR has a positional adjustment for DH equal to -17.5 runs per 162 games.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he is a DH he is worthless.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

DFA's argument is that he can be an average 3B

Grover disagrees.

An average 3B is worth roughly the same amount as a pretty bad catcher, so if those are the choices we don’t have to be clear at all.

If it’s between really bad catcher and pretty bad 3B, we still don’t have to be clear but the player is less exciting.

"There's never enough time to do all the nothing you want" -Bill Watterson

by nevermoor on Oct 6, 2009 5:46 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Actually

I think the information we have regarding Donaldson’s defensive ability at 3B is inconclusive at best and borders on non-existent the rest of the time. There simply isn’t enough info to make a call in any direction other than I-Don’t-Know.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 6, 2009 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, if he's an I-Don't-Know

then he should definitely be playing 3B!

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 6, 2009 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well played.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 10:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then you should acknowledge that Donalson could be a significantly positive 3bman

if your true position is that you really can’t make a projection with the information we have.

There isn’t a lot of info. But the preponderance of the evidence that we do have suggests that league average is plausible.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We've got jack shit for evidence

What we have is either old or of such a small sample that it is rendered statistically meaningless.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 7, 2009 5:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kennedy is a better 3B than Donaldson

double digit homers… 20 steals… likely will hit for a similar average as this year. Kennedy’s floor is Donaldson’s ceiling. At least for the next year or two.

Kennedy is old and will get paid this year, but if we really value the stats Donaldson could give us so much, then we should just pony up and sign Kennedy and take the risk out of it.

For the record, I don’t want to sign Kennedy and I don’t think Donaldson will see any time for the A’s at 3B. Either Wallace sticks there or we sign someone else. We need 20 homer power at the corner and Kennedy and Donaldson can’t provide that.

by DrDoom on Oct 7, 2009 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

...

Adam Kennedy: career OPS+ of 89. Career SB% of less than 74%. Has hit double digit home runs in 3 out of 11 seasons.

This is just ludicrous.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 7, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Somewhat ridiculous

In that I don’t like AK much.

But you can’t argue they didn’t have comparable seasons this year. AK makes up for his OPS with the speed.

And he did it at the major league level.

Donaldson isn’t a 3B anyways, so its moot.

And you are an angry angry man by the way…

by DrDoom on Oct 7, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Makes up for OPS with speed is a ridiculous thing to say

Actually Kennedy this year is not a bad conservative estimate of what Donaldson will be… league average.

That being said the problem with kennedy is this is a career year with the bat and he plays bad defense.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kind of my point

League average offense and poor defense.

Thats not upside. Maybe at catcher its slight upside.

I’m just not convinced on the defense. Thats where we disagree. I think we are on the same page about his offense.

I think we also just disagree about our other prospects. I like them more than you do, which knocks Donaldson down a bit.

by DrDoom on Oct 7, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please stop using the term upside

since you clearly have no idea what it means.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Angry?

I don’t get angry about bad arguments. Sorry to disappoint…

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 7, 2009 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny

Bad arguments or not, Desme will rank higher than Donaldson.

But I guess everyone is a moron right? You are the only one that gets it?

Just chill… its a difference of opinion on a subject that is unpredictable and open to interpretation.

Desme is more boom or bust and I lean towards that model more than high floor, low ceiling. We have enough average players.

by DrDoom on Oct 7, 2009 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um PT voted for Weeks over Donaldson

Plus you really haven’t shown that Desme has a better ceiling than Donaldson.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 7, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of which, didn't Donaldson play 3B last AFL?

You might be able to unearth a more recent scouting report if you check coverage from about that time.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He played mostly 1b due to possitional distribution on the team

but I haven’t been able to find anything on his d but remember it being good.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You realize that BA rated Desme terribly

the 17 best prospect in LOW A?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that should say

The 17 best prospect in the MWL which is Low A.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the top spots in those lists go to guys who played the whole season in a particular league

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 6, 2009 12:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you have a link that says that because the list doesn't

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is well known and obvious if you read all the lists the past few years

that it is largely based on how long each player was in the particular league and how well they played in that league, not who the best prospects are overall that played in the league. e.g. the Cal. League list has Pedro Figueroa 7th, Desme 16th, and Weeks 18th. Their order of the A’s will surely be reversed. There is not any chance they think Figueroa is a better prospect than Weeks. Also, Desme is higher than Figueroa on the MWL, but that is probably a matter of different people writing these….

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 6, 2009 7:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought it was based on who showed themselves to be the best

prospect based only on their play in that league.

IOW if you only saw the players and their stats in that league in that year, who would you think was the best prospect.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Oct 6, 2009 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is what I was under the impression of.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

right, but that includes how long they were there

With stout hearts, and with enthusiasm for the contest, let us go forward to victory. ----Hero Defector Montgomery

by mikeA on Oct 6, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those lists are one guys opinion and not the BA consensus

The guy who did the Cal League had Figueroa at 7th, Desme at 16th and Weeks at only 18th. In fact he wasn’t going to include Weeks at all but was convinced to by other colleagues.

by DeJay on Oct 6, 2009 7:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Considering he dominated high A

That list must be very old… Likely so old that Desme had not played a full year of organized ball yet and they had nothing to go on but his injury. Completely not a factor in this discussion…

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's like a week old.

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Show me the link

I don’t believe you especially if it also has Weeks that low. Most lists will have Weeks ahead of Cardenas… shocking I know.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

here you go

linky

you can get to both the Cal and MWL lists from there.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well based on that

Desme is ahead of Weeks so he should be 4th overall.

I am really not sure what to make of that list… What is it based on? Why is Posey on it when he was promoted a long time ago?

I get the feeling that the list is from the start of the season and the article is a follow up, looking back over the year that was. The list looks about right if it came out in March, although I would still say Weeks is too low.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats not the point

the point is that you keep saying oh the prospect pros will say this oh the prospect pros will say that, when really they aren’t saying either.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am saying they are

In the few places you can get a sense of these things… Brief articles and chats. There is buzz about Desme. Wallace is seen as our top prospect hands down. I feel confident enough in making these statements. Some lists will disagree but many will be along these lines.

The lists aren’t out yet and I don’t think anyone can make sense of this particular list unless they agree its from the start of the year.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you were to consolidate all the opinions out there...

And get a rough average of whats being said, I think our hitting prospects would be ordered as follows:

1. Wallace
2. Carter
3. Weeks
4. Cardenas
5. Green
6. Desme

I doubt we will see any real lists until next year though so there will be some movement between now and then.

This is just based on what I have seen. I don’t see everything. I don’t subscribe to BA. I don’t even agree with the list. But this is the sense I get.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you are mis IDing that buzz

the buzz is sleeper buzz. Being hyped as a sleeper isn’t the same as being a top prospect.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True

I could be misinterpreting the buzz. But at least his name gets dropped.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Miss iDing

sounds like the spokesmodel for a new Apple product.

"Go ahead and overachieve, you scrappy Brett-Favre-colored walk-takers." —Rev Halofan

by iglew on Oct 6, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

you mean the iRAN?

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You seem very confident about what "most lists" will say

Why don’t you just publish most lists before their authors do and make a buck?

Linda's in the cold ground, won't see her anymore
Somewhere out on the highway tonight, the drunken engines roar
It's just one of those things, one of those things
-- Al Stewart, "Accident on 3rd St."
In memory of Nick Adenhart and all victims of drunk driving

by PaulThomas on Oct 6, 2009 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am going off espn MLB chats with Law, Callis, Grey etc.

Recent things I have seen that would shock people here:

Weeks > Cardenas
Wallace > Carter
Desme is a good prospect

No one else gets mentioned.

by DrDoom on Oct 6, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the great fanpost, DFA

I always enjoy reading your work and research. I know you put a lot of time into these.

I think prospects #4-9ish are all pretty close, and none of them are surefire future league-average or better players the way our top three are.

Batting 4th for the 2014 San Jose A's: 26-year-old RF Justin Upton, in the 1st season of a nine year, $250M deal.

by notsellingjeans on Oct 5, 2009 5:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Your welcome.

I don’t think hes surefire but I think that he has the best combination of upside and likelihood.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 5, 2009 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really admire and appreciate your effort and enthusiasm

But at the end of the day I’m still not sold that Donaldson is anything more than a utility guy who can play C-3B-1B and maybe LF and 2B. His bat doesn’t look good enough to make it as a starter at any position other than C, and his C tools aren’t thought to be that great. I don’t see how he’s a better prospect than guys who could become major league starters.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Oct 6, 2009 9:31 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Whats funny is that if you stopped me on the street and asked me

“what do you think of A’s prospect Josh Donaldson?”

Id have said “he’s a decent prospect with a high ceiling who might be playing in the bigs by late 2011 at the earliest.”

…and I dont think Im alone in that opinion. So in what way is he is better than “I” think? Not to be a smartass or anything, but who was under-rating him so bad that this post needed to have been made? I cant think of anyone who wouldnt list him as being one of our top prospects. Now I guess you are trying to say he’s a better prospect than Wallace, which to me is ridiculous to rate a AA guy over a AAA one unless the AA is fast-tracking themselves, and Donaldson certainly isnt doing that.

by PL78 on Oct 6, 2009 6:28 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hence

the secondary headline of:

"Unless you already think he is awesome and they youre a head of the game and can move along"

There are plenty of people rating Desme before him which I think doesn’t make any sense.

I didn’t say that he was better than Wallace as my list goes

Carter
Cardenas
Wallace
Donaldson

I said if he had better defense he would be.

There are differing opinions on me. According to Iglew "DFA is PT with a sense of humor. PT is DFA with introspective self-doubt. I like them both" but according to sirbed Im "The Stats Killer"

by designatedforassignment on Oct 6, 2009 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Shane Peterson made #18 on the FSL list

From BA:
18. Shane Peterson, of, Palm Beach (Cardinals)
Age: 21. B-T: L-L. Ht.: 6-0. Wt.: 195. Drafted: Cardinals ’08 (2)
The Cardinals sent two of their top three 2008 draft picks to the Athletics in a trade for Matt Holliday in July. First-rounder Brett Wallace was the headline prospect in the deal, and second-rounder Peterson also went to Oakland shortly after St. Louis had promoted him to Double-A.

After struggling to pull the ball in his 2008 pro debut, Peterson showed this year that he can yank inside pitches as well as serve line drives to the opposite field. He should hit for average and get on base, though he’ll need to develop more power if he’s to be an everyday player on an outfield corner. He stole 16 bases in 17 attempts between three minor league teams this year, a credit to his instincts as much as his slightly above-average speed.

Peterson played all three outfield positions for Palm Beach, displaying an average arm, but his defensive instincts aren’t as good as his baserunning savvy. He also saw time at first base but lacks the raw power to profile at that position.

www.baseballamerica.com

by Asfan4ever723 on Oct 7, 2009 12:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Wishyouwerehere250_small
AFL PitchFX Pt. 1: James Simmons
Imgp0089_editedagasin_small
DLD 11/24/09 - Fine, I'll make another video game dump
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 7: Transportation Proclamation
Me_at_att_park_small
Old McPherson is an A, e yi e yi yoooooooo
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #18

Recent FanPosts

Waregroupcheck_small
DLD 11.25.09 - Thanksgiving eve
Pulp_fiction_small
A's interested in Cuban defector Arguelles
Small
The A's Move to Oakland in 1968
Funny-pictures12_small
If Jack Cust Traded, Then To Whom And For What?
Small
Jack Cust Drawing Trade Interest?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans