The End of An Era
It's been a long free-fall for the A's since they lost the series against their division rival, the LA Angels, back on July 13. The A's lost 19 of their last 21 and 10th straight game today. Their offense scored 3 runs or less in 16 games, and when they did manage to score some runs, the pitching staff couldn't hold off the opposing team. During this abysmal stretch, the ERA leader, Justin Duchscherer, has gone 0-2 with a 4.9 ERA and the closer Huston Street 0-3 with a 6.75 ERA and three blown saves. The A's still have the best team ERA in the majors, however. Pitching has been the least of their problems so far.
Many would say that hitting is their biggest problem. The A's have the lowest batting average in the majors this year. But, looking back on the stats, with the possible exception of 2002 and 2004, the A's have been one of the worst, if not the worst, hitting teams in the AL for more than a decade. For example, they had the lowest batting average in 2003 and the second lowest in 2006, but they won both years.
Pitching has always been the A's winning formula. Many credited the A's success in the early 2000's to the Big Three, when they made the playoffs 4 consecutive years. But, pitching alone doesn't make a championship team, as their stats this year can attest to.
The winning teams also have had a nice blend of experienced veteran players, who provide consistency and guidance, and exciting young talents, who provide enthusiasm and energy. Besides the Big Three, the A's of the early 2000's also had Hernandez, Giambi, Tejada, Dye and Chavez.
When many of the core players were traded away or left the team for free agency, the A's lost the division to the LA Angels. The A's have missed the playoffs in 4 of the last 5 years (including this year). In a sense, the 2006 A's were an excellent patchwork by Billy Beane. He brought in a young talent in Haren, veterans Bradley and Thomas, who all played a major role in the A's winning the division.
Perhaps it was not a mere coincidence that the A's had their first losing season since 1998 in 2007, right after the last of the Big Three, Barry Zito, left the team in the offseason, and their gold-glove thirdbaseman Eric Chavez was shut down due to shoulder injuries. Zito and Chavez were the only remaining core players from those championship years. Now that Billy Beane has sent away Milton Bradley, traded away Haren and Harden, and Eric Chavez shoulder injuries have ended his season again (perhaps even effectively his career). I wonder whether this also marks the end of an era for the A's.
When will the A's develop into a winning team again? Who will be the core players on that team?
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't know what you're griping about...
...I mean the WHOLE LEAGUE’s only playing .500 ball!
"All managers are losers, they are the most expendable pieces of furniture on the face of the Earth."- Ted Williams
Actually
the AL is over .500 this year. Or maybe you meant the MLB.
"All your baserunner are belong to Greg Smith" ~ walk off bunt
by Philip Christy on Aug 8, 2008 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions
2000 - 2008
Overall Record: 793 – 616 … That’s a pretty good damn era.
When will the A’s develop into a Winning Team Again? I’d say there’s an outside chance in 2009. But defintiely 2010 – 2015… if not further.
Who will be the core players? There’s a lot to choose from. The players will decide that, but some of the talent is on the team right now (Gio, Gallagher, CarGon, R. Sweeney, Barton, Suzuki, Ziegler, Devine, Blevins), some in AAA (Mazzaro), some in AA (Cahill, Anderson, Simmons, Cardenas, Doolittle), and some in A-Ball (Carter, H-Rod, Donaldson).
You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake.
There were a lot of stupid, long confusing words that I’m sure normal people don’t use. @('.')@
How about OBP?
.318, with the worst in the Majors being .313. That’s also good for third-worst in the AL.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
Actually second-worst, since they're tied with Seattle. Only KC is behind them at .317
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
SLG is also worst in the AL by a considerable margin: .366 w/ SEA at .383
And WAS is just ahead at .367. Yep, we have the worst SLG in the Majors.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
We are last in baseball in OPS
Maybe low OPS is undervalued now?
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Aug 9, 2008 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions
DFA everyone
ziggy for president in ‘08
take off the tarps
bring back rickey
"the A's need more quality preembreetive pitching" ~monkeyball
Please stop bringing up Milton Bradley
It’s a known fact by now that he forced his own way out of Oakland and it was highly unlikely the team would’ve kept him around once his contract expired anyway.
I know some people like to look at what he’s doing in Texas and imagine the same happening here, but that’s pure fantasy:
- He’s DHing there. He wouldn’t be doing that here.
- His home field is in Arlington, not Oakland.
- He has a real offense around him.
If he was still in Oakland, he’d be lucky to be hitting .280 with 12 homers and 40 RBI right now, let alone play in 80% of his team’s games like he has this season.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
I'm more familiar with 5150s
As a matter of fact, another loss and I may need one.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
Would you be
A danger to yourself, a danger to others, or gravely disabled unable to care for yourself?
Stomp,em, stomp the piss out of em.Then pound the budweiser after the game. Joe Schultz Seattle Piolts Mgr 1969
by billyball1981 on Aug 8, 2008 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Is a "danger" someone who says "dang" a lot?
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
I Duchscher quite a bit
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
But no one can Ch like Cher.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by 























