A's lose 7-5
Let's start with the good news...the A's actually scored five runs!* Notice the asterisk, though. We'll return to that in a moment.
He made it interesting, but J.J. Putz shut the door on the A's in the ninth by getting Frank Thomas to hit into a double play to end the game and end the A's hopes of a two-game win streak.
The A's still have not won consecutive games since July 10-11.
Gio Gonzalez delivered five innings of decent work, allowing four runs (two earned, but that's deceptive; Patterson's error didn't hurt him as much as the boxscore indicates), walking three and striking out seven.
He was in line for a win until Jerry Blevins allowed three runs in his 1.2 innings of work. Blevins hung a few pitches, didn't appear to hit his spots well and got burned.
(On a tangent, this was my first chance to see Jeff Clement hit, and he was impressive. He took two pitches from left-handers to the wall opposite field and burned the A's tonight. Beautiful swing. Not hard to envision him joining Wieters-Soto-McCann-Mauer as one of the five best hitting catchers in the game someday soon).
*About that A's offense...
Rajai Davis put the A's on the board with a patented Rajai Davis home run: the dead-pull paint-scraper just over the left-field wall.
But the truly fortuitous inning for the A's came in the top of the sixth. Frank Thomas and Zooks were beaned to lead off the inning, and Daric Barton and Pennington eventually followed with back-to-back, opposite field, check-swing, bloop RBI singles - which is about common as the five-hyphen sentence.
You could blame Blevins, and he definitely didn't pitch great. But the A's also should've done more damage to the Mariners' starter, Feierabend, who's simply not that good of a pitcher. The fact that a Rajai Davis paint-scraper was our only offense against him over five innings is not acceptable.
Two more shots against Seattle this weekend as the A's continue a grueling stretch and limp toward an off-day and expanded rosters on Sept. 1.
0 recs |
65
comments
Comments
I think the error hurt quite a bit -
Without it, it’s only runner at third one out and there’s a lot less pressure on Gio than first/third nobody out. That being said, the leadoff walk was bad and Gio didn’t rise to the occasion following the error. My problem with the error was it was such a stupid one – not bothering to follow through on a routine throw.
I noticed Gio’s changeup came in around 84 MPH. That’s too close to his fastball (90) – it was a changeup that Lopez hammered for the key double.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Aug 22, 2008 10:22 PM PDT 0 recs
It seems like with that much difference...
you can be out in front and still not pull it foul, thats not good.
by mattman on
Aug 22, 2008 10:29 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Baby steps
First score some runs consistently, then worry about winning.
The monster at the end of this blog.
by grover on Aug 22, 2008 10:27 PM PDT 0 recs
Baby steps
First try to beat the Mariners. Then worry about beating a real team.
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on
Aug 22, 2008 10:29 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Maybe
It’s more like the baby that takes two small steps forward and then falls back on its ass. I know it takes time to mature, but some of the recent additions to this pitching staff aren’t doing their part in keeping the momentum moving forward.
"I'm going to take a camera crew and march into Billy Beane's office and demand to know why instituting his newfangled cost-saving measures means that the run manufacturing plant had to get shut down." FJM
by Elvez on
Aug 22, 2008 11:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
No, they weren't
Frank Thomas and Zooks were beaned
“Beaned” = hit in the head.
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Aug 22, 2008 10:28 PM PDT 0 recs
my mistake
I thought I could use that term interchangeably with hit-by-pitch. Never knew it connoted the head, thank you. My bad.
"Innings eater? Depends on whether you want delicious innings or burnt, moldy innings. Kirk Saarloos is the Hot Pockets of inning eaters." - Gallagher's Watermelons
by notsellingjeans on
Aug 22, 2008 10:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I thought "beaned" was when you
worked hard to become really accomplished, only to be traded for four prospects.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Aug 22, 2008 10:34 PM PDT
up
0 recs
"plunked" works.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on
Aug 23, 2008 5:12 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I disagree with this
Any HBP is a beanball, even though the etymology of the term goes back to bean being another word for the head. This is a case where the word has evolved to mean something beyond the denotation of the word, at least in the context of baseball.
But at least he didn’t say “beam.” For some reason, a lot of people said this growing up and it made me want to strangle them.
by thejd44 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:01 AM PDT
up
0 recs
So, then you know how I feel about the misuse of "bean."
Do you have any source material for the contention that bean=hbp, other than nsj, who, as a former pitcher, is inherently unreliable (unless left-handed)?
This issue was discussed in a diary a while back when they were diaries. Consensus then was that “bean” referred to head hits. I could not, however, get many responders to care about my annoyance that “batters” are routinely called “hitters” before they’ve even swung, much less made contact with anything, as in “Daric Barton is the next hitter.” Pf-f-f-f-f-t.
And whist I’m on my coffee rant, why the hell must Kuiper always refer to any multiple-run inning as an “x-spot,” where apparently x = any integer > 1? Anybody know from whence this “spot” business derives?
To me, this is Spot:
And this is a 101-spot: 
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on
Aug 23, 2008 5:57 AM PDT
up
0 recs
"Ray, you almost get the feeling that..."
“…x > 1.”
"Innings eater? Depends on whether you want delicious innings or burnt, moldy innings. Kirk Saarloos is the Hot Pockets of inning eaters." - Gallagher's Watermelons
by notsellingjeans on
Aug 23, 2008 7:36 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Daric -- you are welcome to make me eat my words any time you wanna tee-off again.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on
Aug 24, 2008 12:54 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Also, why did Cust have to leave the game with blurred vision -
How would that really affect his batting or his fielding?
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Aug 22, 2008 10:32 PM PDT 0 recs
It would've given him a third strikeout...
instead of his usual 1-2 K’s.
by mattman on
Aug 22, 2008 10:36 PM PDT
up
0 recs
USA baseball
They beat Japan 8-4 for the bronze medal!
Not bad considering how dominant South Korea and Cuba have been in the tournament.
Brett Anderson pitched 7 strong innings for the USA. 3 hits, was victimized by a 3-run homer after a little wildness early, but he settled down and finished very well.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Aug 22, 2008 10:41 PM PDT 0 recs
USA wins bronze...
they just beat Japan 8-4. Our very own Anderson Anderson started the game and went seven solid innings giving up only 4 runs, both via homers. A solo shot was hit in the first inning and he also gave up a three run jack after walking two men. Jepsen came on in the 8th and also worked the ninth to get the six out save.
by mattman on Aug 22, 2008 10:41 PM PDT 0 recs
This is a sad team....
more bad than sad actually. An epic collapse post ASB, truly one for the ages. And yet, no explanations forthcoming from the front office. Strange.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Aug 22, 2008 10:41 PM PDT 0 recs
Not strange. They (the front office) gave up. What's strange is that a lot of AN'ers go along happily with it.
by jdub69 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:41 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Because some of us understand what the team is trying to do and accept it.
We did talk about this earlier, you and I. It seems there are people on both sides of that fence. Not really surprising or strange, is it?
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on
Aug 23, 2008 1:10 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Everyone has an opinion. That is good. Strange that people like to lose. Nothing personal.
by jdub69 on
Aug 23, 2008 1:34 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Where do you get the idea that people like to lose?
This is about people who are looking at the bigger picture and seeing a plan. That doesn’t mean they’re sitting around going, “You know, I sure am glad the A’s are crap right now!”
That makes no sense at all.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on
Aug 23, 2008 1:40 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Easy killer. I'm on your side. The only difference is I want to win now and every year after now.
by jdub69 on
Aug 23, 2008 1:46 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I'm just taking issue with the claim that people here like to lose.
I can only assume you’re making that up for the response it’ll get because there’s been no evidence at all of people liking the losing except for the few who chalk up every loss as a chance at a higher draft pick.
That’s all I’m saying. I want to win every year as well but I know that just isn’t possible.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on
Aug 23, 2008 1:49 AM PDT
up
0 recs
It is possible (to win every year) but I do apologize (for the happy loser statement) as I'm not really looking to pick a fight.
i just want people to demand more from the Beane/Wolff “no money” situation we’re in.
by jdub69 on
Aug 23, 2008 1:59 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Nobody is happy with this crap...
regardless of the plan. The plan may work and it may not. But, almost one thing is for sure… it is not possible to win every year. Show me one MLB team that has won every year. Just one. ;-)
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 2:24 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Nobody is happy about it here.
Epic collapse, and DL bloat, and all makes us sick to our tummies.
by MobiusKlein on
Aug 23, 2008 1:22 AM PDT
up
0 recs
And they're playing "Celebration" in Beijing
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Aug 22, 2008 10:41 PM PDT 0 recs

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Aug 22, 2008 10:44 PM PDT 0 recs

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Aug 22, 2008 10:44 PM PDT 0 recs
this team is so terrible...
they’re almost fun to watch. Just to see how they’ll manage to lose. Now, I won’t pay to go see their antics live at the ballpark, but it’s good comedy on TV.
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on Aug 22, 2008 10:46 PM PDT 0 recs
I'm realizing the usual allure of expanded rosters come 9/1 isn't really there for me this year.
Maybe it’s because we’ve already seen almost everyone who would’ve been considered for a call-up.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site / jamesvenes.com - Blog
by Flashfire on Aug 22, 2008 11:10 PM PDT 0 recs
if they call up Cahill, Anderson, Doolittle and Carter...
I’ll be interested. But, it’ll be Buck and ummm…. somebody else, so I probably won’t watch.
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:02 AM PDT
up
0 recs
oh yeah, Lenny...
I knew there was a pitcher I was forgetting. I actually kinda like Lenny, but not enough to watch.
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:08 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Not to nitpick, but, I will anyway
Frank Thomas and Zooks were beaned to lead off the inning, and Daric Barton and Pennington eventually followed with back-to-back, opposite field, check-swing, bloop RBI singles – which is about common as the five-hyphen sentence.
Technically, your sentence only has four hyphens and one dash. They’re two different punctuation marks. (Random aside: One of my favorite scenes from The West Wing is when they were trying to figure out the fourteen types of punctuation in English grammar. I am, in fact, a total language dork.)
by thejd44 on Aug 23, 2008 12:05 AM PDT 0 recs
I think he meant to put a hyphen between...
bloop and RBI… the appropriateness of which, I am not sure. But, just out of curiousity, what are the fourteen types of punctuation?
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:12 AM PDT
up
0 recs
A hyphen wouldn't go there, but a comma possibly should (I should know this, but it's 2:15 AM)
They are: Period, comma, colon, semi-colon, quotation marks, apostrophe, parenthesis, brackets, braces, ellipsis, dash, hyphen, exclamation point, question mark.
Another good question from that same episode: Which three words in the English language begin with the letters “dw”? (Dweeb, a slang word, apparently doesn’t count)
by thejd44 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:17 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I love ellipsis...
even when inappropriate… I use them in almost every AN post. ;-)
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:30 AM PDT
up
0 recs
even google didn't help on the "dw" words...
dwarf and dwindle. It returned dweeb, but, if you say that doesn’t count, there must be two more.
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:32 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I'm going with dwell and dwelling...
which are, obviously, derivatives of the same word, but, nevertheless, different words.
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:38 AM PDT
up
0 recs
wow... I just reread your post...
and, you said there were only three. I found four. No wonder Galt is a genius!
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:42 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I am excluding plurals, of couse...
because that would be more.
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:46 AM PDT
up
0 recs
dwarven then too
dwindling, dwindled, dwarfed if we’re going for derived words.
dweomer too if you count words backformed from obscure 1215 texts stuffed into Dungeons and Dragons:
http://phrontistery.info/disq6.html
by MobiusKlein on
Aug 23, 2008 1:30 AM PDT
up
0 recs
yes...
see, many more that three. LOL
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 2:25 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Thomas
Isn’t it about time for someone to call out Thomas for sucking bad. I didn’t watch or follow the game because i can’t stand it anymore. It’s even more gruesome than the Sweeney Todd movie i just finished watching. But reading the play by play – it is time for the Big Hurt to give it up. He’s horrible.
by sacto on Aug 23, 2008 12:20 AM PDT 0 recs
he's not the "big bat" he proclaimed himself to be when he came off the DL...
but, you’re right. He’s the least of our problems right now.
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 12:56 AM PDT
up
0 recs
please tell me we have this Teagarden guy...
is that how you spell it? If we don’t have him, I want to know why Billy didn’t draft him or trade for him.
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on Aug 23, 2008 1:02 AM PDT 0 recs
Yeah
And Pujols, too!
"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin
by Helloooo 1st on
Aug 23, 2008 1:03 AM PDT
up
0 recs
did Billy draft and trade Pujols?
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on
Aug 23, 2008 1:04 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Random A's and Radiohead note
At their show tonight in Golden Gate park, the intro to National Anthem had overlays of Ken Korach and Vince calling the game.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Aug 23, 2008 1:22 AM PDT 0 recs
Thomas and Mike Sweeney
I thought it was interesting that Mike Sweeney went on a rehab assignment and Frank basically said, “I don’t need one,” and that Frank didn’t go. You could argue that with his career numbers and his age, he’s earned that right, especially since he didn’t need to practice playing the field. Or you could argue that he and Sweeney really aren’t that different, and if one guy went on a rehab assignment, they both should’ve.
I also will be interested to see how many ab’s Mike Sweeney and Thomas get in September. If Thomas continues for the next two weeks to hit like he has since he came off the DL, I hope the team uses the opportunity to get more at-bats to someone else – someone like Baisley or Cunningham, while still playing Pennington/Petit/Patterson as much as possible in the field.
From a “developing for the future” perspective, it makes almost no sense to give Thomas and Sweeney much action. But that wouldn’t sit will with the two older guys who have worked hard to rehab for months, only to sit when they’re finally healthy.
What do you guys think? And how will it play out?
"Innings eater? Depends on whether you want delicious innings or burnt, moldy innings. Kirk Saarloos is the Hot Pockets of inning eaters." - Gallagher's Watermelons
by notsellingjeans on Aug 23, 2008 7:48 AM PDT 0 recs
If they are not part of the plan for 09,
then the team should sit them down. They’ll get the message, and it will make things much easier in the off season. I mentioned the epic collapse post ASB earlier, so I’m wondering how the FO tends to view the matter. I can’t help but think that the rapid implosion caught them off guard too, as evidenced by their silence. If so, its become rather obvious that they are unsure how to react to it going forward. They are going to have to make some wholesale changes, which probably means that Ellis, Thomas, Sweeney, and E. Brown are going to be relegated to the dust bin. If they do cut that many position players, I can see them attempting to bring back Giambi for the proverbial, “veteran presence” in the lineup. For the first time in a while, the A’s are going to have to overcome a losing culture. Bringing back Jason would go a long way in reinforcing the idea that the A’s are serious about winning, even while rebuilding. A healthy Chavez, a resurgent Giambi, along with a core of young players may just do the trick.
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on
Aug 23, 2008 10:35 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Thomas looked slow at the plate
whether he’s “done” or just needs more ABs to “heat up”, it’s a bit late in the season…then again, it’s not like the A’s are in contention or anything.
by OaklandSi on
Aug 23, 2008 3:22 PM PDT
up
0 recs












