The Corner Infielders
I think the team will have some big decisions to make about the crop of guys who are currently playing 1B/ 3B.
Right now the catchers are pretty much set. The outfield I think will be pretty much the same unless the team trades for an OF and then would have to decide who to drop Brown or Davis. They may have to drop one no matter what once F. Thomas gets back. Overall, I think the outfield is relatively set. Ellis and Crosby are barring a trade or injury are set. The corner guys have to be wondering what will happen with them.
First, Chavez. I don't think the A's will be able to trade him due to his high price and injury history. My guess is that if he is healthy they will put him in. They will need to keep a decent back-up infielder around if he comes back.
Barton. I think he is one of the first to go once Thomas and Sweeney get back. Once these two return, the A's are going to have to have reserves who can play multiple positions. Unless, Bankston is a total flop, Barton goes down to AAA. Barton can only play 1B, this might make the A's decide to keep Hannahan, Murphy or Bankston. Barton has had several months to play and is getting worse at the plate. For his sake, I think he needs to go back to AAA and regain his skills. I also think its possible that he could get traded. The A's have some real good 1B prospects in the minors, Sweeney can start most of the games for the rest of 2008 at 1B and use the back-up corner infielder as a spot starter to give M. Sweeney a rest. IF the A's fall out of contention then I think he obviously comes back for the last 6 weeks or so.
Murphy, I think remains on the team no matter what. They need a guy who can play nearly every infield position. Hannahan, Barton and Bankston are not so much better at hitting to justify dumping such a versitile player as Murphy.
Hannahan or Bankston- I think one will have to go down to the minors as well once Thomas and Sweeney return. Both can play 1b and 3b. We will have to keep one around to back up Sweeney. I don't think either has much upside as a future star. I suppose Hannahan wins out because he is a left handed hitter and has more experience.
I think the manager should give Bankston some chances until the big hurt returns and see what he could do.
I really think the team should bring in a 3B from another team. It doesn't have to be a star but I am certain there is someone out there who can come in and put up better numbers than Hannahan, Barton and Bankston.
When Thomas gets back. I think Bankston goes down. (1b- Barton, 3B- Hannahan/ Murphy)
When Sweeney gets back. I think Barton or E. Brown goes down. (1B- Sweeney/ backup. 3B- Hannahan/ Murphy)
IF Chavez comes back. Who knows.
Any thoughts on these guys??
PS- I think if Emil Brown wants to stay on the team needs to be willing to try some 3B or 1B. Davis has the speed advantage over him as a PR for Cust/ Thomas. Also, Davis can play 2B.
0 recs |
20
comments
Comments
Bankston doesn't play 3rd base
at least not well enough for AAA (let alone MLB).
by rebus on Jul 4, 2008 1:41 PM PDT 0 recs
Yeah if that is the go to guy at third
The A’s may as well just put a glove over there and let who ever is playing SS just run over there and snag any balls that happen to land in the glove
by A'sfaninNC on
Jul 4, 2008 1:51 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think Barton's job is safe
He’s playing good defense, he’s 22 and part of the rebuilding process (meaning patience with struggles). I’d say Bankston is gone first, Hannahan the one who could lose his spot – in that he may be on the bubble if the A’s look outside for a 3Bman, or if Chavez returns healthy (which won’t be a sure thing before 2009).
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 4, 2008 1:50 PM PDT 0 recs
Rajai Davis has played one inning at 2B in his life.
Both at the minor and major league level.
I think there’s very little in the way of decisions to make about the people who play 1B and 3B on this team. Barton and Chavez are the only ones worth playing, and in Barton’s case, that’s because of upside, not performance. Everyone else can be released at whatever time the A’s deem convenient.
So it goes.
by jeepers on Jul 4, 2008 3:09 PM PDT 0 recs
Great points everyone
I guess I was mistaken about Bankson as a 3B. I would say he is definately the first to be shipped down once some guys get back. UNLESS, he really hits well.
by Yellowhorse on Jul 4, 2008 3:21 PM PDT 0 recs
He'd have to hit like Garrett Atkins
for the team to be able to afford to put up with Atkins-like defense at third. Which is basically what he would “provide.”
Actually, now that I think about it I might rather give Barton another try over there. If he could play third passably it would solve a lot of problems for the franchise in the future.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Jul 5, 2008 12:33 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Wouldn't that be a better thing to try in Sacramento?
Don’t want to put too much on Barton’s plate right now, but if they think he might be able to handle third, they should just send him down and let him work on his swing and third there. I’m not really an advocate of sending him down, but this could be a situation where I’d support it.
http://bocropleasestopswingingatbadpitches.blogspot.com/
by thejd44 on
Jul 5, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Good points
The team really doesn’t have nay great prospects at 3B while it seems to have several good guys at 1B (not counting Bankston or Hannahan).
Also, trying him out at 3B is a nice way for Barton and the management to ‘save face’ about his need to return to AAA
by Yellowhorse on
Jul 5, 2008 11:26 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Prepare to come up with another plan
If Barton loses his job as the regular first baseman, it won’t be Mike Sweeney who replaces him. The only thing he can do regularly with any effectiveness is return to the DL.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on Jul 4, 2008 11:04 PM PDT 0 recs
Really? Crap, I'm in trouble.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Jul 5, 2008 12:42 PM PDT
up
0 recs
O.K. then I think Bankston and Sweeney can split 1B
I don’t understand why people on this site always rip on Sweeney. HE is a good man who had nice numbers before his injury.
by Yellowhorse on
Jul 5, 2008 11:23 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I don't think everyone believes he'll come back healthy
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Jul 6, 2008 9:13 AM PDT
up
0 recs
No its because many on the site
favor young prospects who came up with the A’s minor leaguers.
The focus on the future is often what people are thinking of. Mike Sweeney is not part of the plan for 2010 or beyond.
If Sweeney is healthy then the A’s will play him. Unless, he returns at a point where the team is out of contention.
by Yellowhorse on
Jul 6, 2008 10:25 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Nice numbers before his injury in 2005
I don’t understand why anyone would pine for the return of a player who hasn’t been good or healthy since 2005. He’s two weeks away from his 35th birthday and trying to come back from surgery on both knees. Everything there except his positive attitude says, “BEWARE!” I’d rather have a bad man who can hit, field, and run the bases.
Root for the Giants? Not even if they're playing al-Qaeda!
by Monday Fan on Jul 6, 2008 12:43 AM PDT 0 recs
He was hitting close to .300 before getting hurt
With the exception of R. Sweeney and F. Thomas he was one of the more productive hitters.
Do people want us to win this year? Its not only about 2010 or 2011.
The Angels and other major league teams will still be good in the future no matter how much playing time young prospects play in 2008. We have a chance to win in 2008. WHY NOT play the best players.??
by Yellowhorse on
Jul 6, 2008 10:29 AM PDT
up
0 recs
BECAUSE THEY'RE HURT!
I’m pretty sure that’s why Thomas, M. Sweeney, and Chavez aren’t playing right now.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Jul 6, 2008 4:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Forget Sweeney
I think a move over to third for Barton makes sense for the future cuz we have some prospects at 1st like Chris Carter and Sean Doolittle and pretty much nobody at 3rd
by C-Gon on Jul 6, 2008 1:54 AM PDT 0 recs
Would it make more sense
to move Carter or Doolittle over to third?
OZZIE GUILLEN IS A CHILD MOLESTING CARCINOGEN
by gimpy989 on
Jul 6, 2008 7:53 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Carter's been taking balls at third
I’m not optimistic, given that he’s been described as an indifferent fielder even at first, but once in a blue moon a guy actually plays better further up the defensive spectrum so I guess it’s worth a shot.
Doolittle is a lefty, so he’s not really an option at third. He has a great glove for an infielder, it’s just bad luck that he’s basically a non-option at anywhere but first. Although as devo pointed out when this was discussed a while back, if he was a quality 3B as well, he almost certainly would have been picked before the A’s could have gotten to him.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Jul 6, 2008 10:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs


















