LaRoche Off the Table; Dealt to Pirates in Manny Ramirez Trade
Yes, Manny Ramirez was traded to the Dodgers, but the big news for A's fans is that a long-sought A's target (if you believe the rumors) is that Andy LaRoche is now in Pittsburgh.
It was all quiet on the Western Front for the A's today. Beane wasn't able to move Huston Street, Justin Duchscherer, Mark Ellis or Alan Embree, which likely means that the A's will be looking to make some of these deals in the offseason. I like the fact that the A's didn't go out of their way to move Street. I don't think he would've brought back much right now because his of-late performance hasn't been stellar.
I am surprised that someone didn't try and blow away Beane for Justin Duchscherer. I mean look at this stat line:
And his career as a top set up man is just as good. Duchscherer has proven for many years that he can pitch and pitch well no matter what role it is. AND he's cost controlled. But at the same time, I know how GMs love guys with velocity. Maybe it's because Duke doesn't have enough time as a starter. Still, I don't mind because now the tattoo that I have on my rump isn't obsolete.
Part of me wonders if Beane stocking up on so many young, great arms in the minor leagues has led to opposing GMs to do nothing but ask for multiple young arms back in return. And if Beane is going to trade a Cahill, Simmons or Rodriguez (or any of the other good arms in the system), I'd want a young great bat in return like a Holliday or a Jason Bay (that ship hath sailed).
So, one of the most interesting days of the year comes to a close without the A's having done anything. They did most of what they were going to do with Blanton and Harden already. And it's obvious to me that no one was offering much for Street. Now we move to Boston where the team will be hopefully be getting Frank Thomas back shortly and at least we'll have some mammoth Hurt home runs to watch.
September call-ups this year should be fun as well.
0 recs |
261 comments
Comments
I don't even feel like watching until September.
I’m really sick of watching AAAA filler.
by mikev on Jul 31, 2008 2:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
LaRoche to LaRoche in Pitt
Well on 1st is big brother and on 3rd is little brother.
Hopefully with the A’s surplus of arms in the minors and Walker and possibly Alvarez in Pittsburgh they make Andy LaRoche available in the offseason and the teams can work out a deal.
Till then good luck Andy after being freed from LA
by Bud Light on Jul 31, 2008 3:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Freed from LA is a good way to put it
The Dodgers seem to continue to have all this great talent and then keep f’ing it up.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jul 31, 2008 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And yet they won't let us take advantage. We should file a grievance with someone.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
re
I really like LaRoche, and admittedly was hoping the A’s could swing a deal for him, but if you step back for a moment, the A’s really don’t need injury prone players right now, especially amongst position players.
by 31Boots on Jul 31, 2008 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure we do. Our injury prone guys are dropping like flies.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
we should switch things up, and get some injury supine players
Greed and fear cause over-reactions in both directions. @('.')@
by monkeyball on Jul 31, 2008 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm Addicted
I really have no choice. Hopefully Thomas can actually drive in a run or two, and… ooh. So that means Cust goes back to LF. Crap, we really needed a 1B, 3B or SS who was good at hitting baseballs. It will be another long, painful end to the season.
Enjoy the game
by DCinWC on Jul 31, 2008 3:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh and the A's get the first look at Jason Bay
in a Red Sox uniform.
by Tyler Bleszinski on Jul 31, 2008 3:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather face him than Manny.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
12 times a series, man.
No doubt.
Can Magic Sprinkles Now!!! @('.')@
by Leopold Bloom on Jul 31, 2008 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1000000
Manny is a beast at the plate still and I can’t help but think Boston is a little foolish in getting rid of him this year, even if he is a loudmouth.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on Jul 31, 2008 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
several A's players had called Manny
the best RH hitter in the AL
by OaklandSi on Jul 31, 2008 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah....but really,
what would they know about that?
"You may glory in a team triumphant, but you fall in love with a team in defeat."--The Boys of Summer
by alox on Jul 31, 2008 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They know what a good RH hitter is supposed to look like, and secure enough to
admit, that they aren’t one of them.
by theblackpearl on Jul 31, 2008 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
(chuckles out loud)
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly my thought
There's no crying in baseball!
by gigglingone on Jul 31, 2008 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Me
I’d rather have Manny for the next 3 years. That guy is priceless. You never know.
by Colorado Fan on Jul 31, 2008 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd love to sign Manny to a 5 year $90M deal!
Just the awesomeness of him and Cust in the same OF would be worth it.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you for the most part except Bay and Holliday aren't
really “young” nor “great”. They’re more like “at their offensive peak”, “past their defensive peak” and “very good”. That sounds like a recipe for a massively overpriced FA contract to me.
I’d rather see Beane trade for a young bat like Gamel, Kemp, Carlos (done), LaRoche (ouch), Barton (done), Maybin, Carter (done), Wood, F-Mart, Vitters (inappropriate), A Jones (ouch), LaPorta (ouch), Balentien, Brignac, Fowler, A Jackson, Gorkys, Cardenas (done), Reimold, Kalish, Headley, Lowrie, Pearce, Moustakas, Reddick, Revere, G Parra, Weglarz, C Davis, Pence, McCutchen (ha), Heyward (ha), Schafer, Rasmus (ha), Stewart
There’s no shortage of them, and the A’s mound prospects are pretty similarly regarded as a bunch of these guys. If we’re going to sign a monster FA deal, I’d rather not trade prospects for the privilege.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 3:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
How about trading...
Barton? Barton, H-Rod, and Mazzaro. I’d trade those 3 guys for 1 great (young) shortstop.
But, I’m convinced that Barton is a great bat w/ a terrible mind.
by Colorado Fan on Jul 31, 2008 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are no "great young shortstops"
None attainable for that group, anyway. Jose Reyes is going nowhere.
Leaguewide the position is really in desperate straits right now.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why Bobby Crosby actually isn't that bad right now
He’s probably around average for major league shortstops. Maybe a little below. I’m no fan of the guy by any means, but the A’s actually could be a lot worse off at that position.
by thejd44 on Aug 1, 2008 1:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If only
When you factor in defense, Crosby is below replacement level this year. The guy is absolutely killing this team.
If nobody’s shortstop can hit, fielding becomes all the more important at the position.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Aug 1, 2008 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never want to trade Henry.
I’m taking up his cause.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I too would like to get a 3B and a SS
But I am glad there was no deadline deal impatience on our side. We don’t have a contender this year so there wasn’t much point unless we wanted to get a young prospect some seasoning on the left side of the infield. Why budge on our young pitching when those kids will be even stronger trading cards as they continue to develop?
I feel a lot more comfortable with a deal happening on our terms this coming offseason where the market is steady and we can present our case for guys like Duke and Street who have terrific stats and records but don’t necessarily impress anyone with their raw stuff and velocity.
In the meantime, gear up for some really awful 100% baseball.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on Jul 31, 2008 3:19 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Which slogan will hold more true over the second half?
“100% Awful” or “All Outs, All Season”?
Inquiring Bay Area baseball fans want to know.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This year's slogan:
Your 2008 Oakland Athletics: “Who?”
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on Jul 31, 2008 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know where the "offense" went
But I know where the AAA’s are…
"A’s baseball….It’s almost better than a stick in the eye." ~ alox
by Gallagher's Watermelons on Jul 31, 2008 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How's about...
The 2008 Oakland A’s: No offense intended.
The monster at the end of this blog.
by grover on Jul 31, 2008 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or taken
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
100 percent baseball,
And by “baseball” we mean called third strikes
Bob Geren and Ken Macha both enjoy jai lai.
by CarGon's Jock on Aug 1, 2008 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Put Theo Epstein in the Hall of Fame.....alongside Billy Beane
Wow. Theo Epstein unloads Manny and gets Jason Bay. Manny is going to be a free agent. He can’t play defense at all, and his elevator goes up half way; and you get rid of him and replace with him a pretty stellar guy in Jason Bay….outstanding move for the Redsox. I thought only Billy Beane had the vision for something this good.
Here in Seattle the Mariners were lucky to send Arthur Rhodes to the Marlins for a prospect…..while they have and play both Jose Vidro and Miguel Cairo. When you follow the Mariners and watch how stupid they are it was easy to switch to an intelligent team like the A’s, and become a fan.
All that said I assume that Billy and David did not find anything to their liking, and are standing pat for now. In Billy and David I trust!
by hokecole on Jul 31, 2008 3:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
All true, and yet I'd rather sign Manny as an FA than Bay or Holliday or Dunn.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd much much much rather sign Bay or Holliday
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Any particular reason? I'd actually choose Dunn over either of those.
Just the thoughts of Dunn and Cust in the same lineup amuses me.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They're both
1)Better
2)a lot younger
I’d like Dunn too…
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
uh...
Bay’s birthday is Sep 20, 1978
Holliday’s birthday is Jan 15, 1980
and Dunn’s birthday is Nov 9, 1979
So Dunn is younger than Bay, and basically the same age as Holliday while being a better hitter. I’ll take Dunn.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
plus, I think Dunn will be a bit cheaper.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant a lot younger than Manny
I’m more down on Dunn because I see his skill set as more likely to significantly decline than the other two, and his defense is terrible. Holliday has been a better hitter the last several years and his D is waaaaaaay better. Dunn’s been a somewhat better than Bay on offense, and the D probably draws it even.
As I said though, I would support getting Dunn.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
or even Manny
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
apparently Manny's team options were eliminated in the deal ...
... and he’s agreed to decline arb.
Greed and fear cause over-reactions in both directions. @('.')@
by monkeyball on Jul 31, 2008 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sox are out....
Torre will probably piss him off, so the Dodgers are out…
That leaves… the A’s!
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's agreed to decline arb?
Linky?
Interesting. That means that he immediately becomes a high-profile target if the A’s finish in the top 15.
Not that that’s exactly looking likely right now.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
via MLBTR
This dude, who is an actual (albeit minor, albeit for the … Yankees?) beat writer.
Greed and fear cause over-reactions in both directions. @('.')@
by monkeyball on Jul 31, 2008 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh, I see.
I like Dunn because he’s been playing to about the same numbers for 6+ seasons. And I think he would take to the A’s as a change of scenery.
Holliday’s great, but his big seasons were the past two… I think he’s primed for an overpayment. It would be nice to have passable D in the corners though.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather have an all-time great in his late 30's than a guy in his mid thirties who was
merely very good at his peak.
Bay/Holliday may be better in that they can at least play defense, although I can see that being only sort of true by the third year of a six or seven year deal. FWIW, PECOTA (I’m addicted to it now) likes Manny better as a hitter than either Bay or Holliday (it likes Dunn the best). I can see adjusting PECOTA up somewhat for Bay because of his recovery from his 2007, but then it basically becomes even with Manny in the very best scenario.
I have a feeling Manny’s contract is going to be similar on a per year basis than Bay and Holliday and shorter due to his age and temperament. Also his FA deal starts now and not after 2009. This is probably the cheapest he’ll ever be, unless he’s World Series MVP or something. Bay and Holliday next year are going to be way overpriced in my view—favorable parks, non-superstars entering their offensive decline years, already in their defensive declines.
I’d rather sign Manny/Adam for five years at $90MM this offseason, than Bay/Holliday for six years at $130MM next offseason. My order of preference would be Dunn, Manny, Holliday, then Bay. I’d pursue either Dunn or Manny and not the other two.
What am I missing?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
what aboot Giambi? 2yr deal w/option kinda sounds good to me.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like that too
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What might make sense
would be to sign Giambi to play 1B (some DH) the next two seasons, keep Barton in AAA for 2 years, let Barton refine his swing, power, diving ability, etc. and then call him up for keeps when he’s 25 for the next five years (2011-2015). If he’s tearing up AAA he gets called up mid-season in 2010 with Giambi moving to DH.
Then you not only add power, you do it at 1B, allowing you to upgrade the OF and add another power bat (Bay, Holliday, etc.) at any time, and to upgrade the left side of the infield without having to focus too much on power instead of defense, speed, etc.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Diving ability?
What is this, soccer?
If the A’s are bumping Barton off of first for anyone, they’d better have him learning third instead. He’s not going to improve parked in AAA for 18 months.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea of Barton to 3B.
Let’s park him in AAA while we do that.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he's made enough progress defensively that it's worth trying
His D at first has been better than I could possibly have hoped for, even though his offense has been the opposite. I don’t think he’s really a viable candidate at corner OF, and there’s going to be a lot of pressure on the 1B/DH slots in the near future.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chavez at 1st?
It’s really his only shot at continuing his career. and with the numbers he has left on the books, wouldn’t it be prudent to try
"I was right and you were wrong." - Ray Fosse
by kbtoyz on Aug 1, 2008 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I was thinking more along the lines of
“generic FA deal” for those guys. Manny and Dunn will probably get cheaper/shorter and “starting right now” contracts, so I guess they might be better, but really they’re DHs, so if the hitting declined much it would sap a lot of the value.
PECOTA right now would I’m sure give Holliday a better projection than Manny going forward (along with the 20-40 run difference on D.) Last four years, eqa:
Holliday:
285
310
325
339
Manny:
315
330
289
305
Never forget: we’re leading the league in ERA/RA/g largely because of defense.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
PECOTA projections for Manny and Holliday
If posting this is a violation, please feel free to delete.
Manny:
2008 – .302 (actual YTD .315, 75th percentile .316)
2009 – .300
2010 – .291
2011 – .293
2012 – .289
2013 – out of baseball
Matt:
2008 – .293 (actual YTD .339, 90th percentile .321)
2009 – .296
2010 – .292
2011 – .295
2012 – .294
2013 – .289
2014 – .281
Manny’s a DH and Cust would have to play LF. Holliday’s OK in LF now, but likely to decline to Custian levels by end of contract. Cust is among the worst LF in MLB now, like Burrell or Carlos Lee. Manny is one of the worst LF of all time. Dunn is having a surprisingly good year defensively.
Manny 2009-2013 for $90MM
Matt 2010-2015 for $130MM
You make the call!
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pat Burrell!
Here’s the reason why I favor Burrell: I think he’s actually signable. By the A’s.
Perfect world scenario, he might not be the best of the group, but as a Bay Area product with a rocky relationship in his current city, the A’s will have by far the easiest time selling him on the “intangible” aspects of playing for them (I’d feel the same about Sabathia, if they were looking for a pitcher).
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take him
Instant lineup credibility.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Duelling righty - lefty Custs! I like it!
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
and play 'em BOTH in LF at the same time!
Greed and fear cause over-reactions in both directions. @('.')@
by monkeyball on Jul 31, 2008 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do that and they might actually be league-average defensively
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
not so sure about that ...
... I see multiple humorous/tragic collisions in that scenario.
Greed and fear cause over-reactions in both directions. @('.')@
by monkeyball on Jul 31, 2008 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Burrell isnt horrible in the outfield...
He’s just horribly horribly slow.. The man has 12 OF assists this year, and I can assure you, they aren’t the Alfonso Soriano type assists.
Burrell is very adept at reading the ball of the wall and getting it back into the infield, he also has a plus throwing arm as he played 3B in college.
That being said, he’s got to be the slowest player in the MLB, and it looks even worse because he takes long, jumping strides which makes it look like he’s trying really hard and going nowhere..
Still, I would say Burrell ranks above average in every OF defensive category except for probably the most important one, speed.
A's Fan in Philly
by Duby on Jul 31, 2008 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bengie Molina will be along to dispute
Burrell being the slowest player in MLB…just as soon as he gets here from the kitchen…
...Hang on…
...He’ll get back to you.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Slower than a Molina??
"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk
by iglew on Jul 31, 2008 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but he went to Bellarmine...
ugggh
"I was right and you were wrong." - Ray Fosse
by kbtoyz on Aug 1, 2008 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Philly Loves Pat the Bat...
He’s the only man in Phillies history who could sign a huge contract, hit .212 and never get boo’d. I was actually quite astonished by the amount of support he received while he was struggling for an entire year..
That being said, I’m not sure if he’s in their future plans, I think they hoped Golson would be ready, but he’s not. And Jayson Werth is probably best served as a 4th OF, so if they can sign him for discounted prices (and he’s indicated he’d be inclined to a hometown discount), and they can sign him for no more than 3 years with an option for 4, I think they get it done.
A's Fan in Philly
by Duby on Jul 31, 2008 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
really?
I lived in Philly too and all I heard was endless bitching about him. I would have said the exact opposite until this year now that he’s hitting huge and is getting all the love.
by jdr on Jul 31, 2008 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Jonah Keri thought he was the most hated player in baseball as of last season’s ASB (when his numbers were terrible).
I know Philly fans are fickle as all get out but I really don’t expect a groundswell of support for paying him after this year.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not trying to make sense of it..
And I have no clue who in the Blue Hell Jonah Keri is…
But I’ll tell you that in 2003 when he hit .209 (i gave him .003 too much credit) Burrell was heavily cheered everytime he came to the plate, although it was more of a “we’re cheering you so you dont fall below .200, not cuz we like you” than anything else, I’ve never heard any type of similar reaction from the Philly faitful..
Burrell was very bad at the start of last year and was boo’d, but I gauruntee any fan base paying attention would’ve boo ‘d his approach at the plate, him jumping back from fastballs on the inside corner for strike 3, him viciously pulling of sliders (worse than Crosby) to the point that his helmet would repeatedly pop off, and his comically baffled look whilst walking back to the dugout after getting called out on strikes.
He was very bad at the start of last year, and theres nothing worse than taking called strike 3’s in big situations.. (Melhuse,Long?).. So of course he was boo’d..
Since then he’s been a fan favorite, I mean, Jimmy Rollins and Ryan Howard are hated on and boo’d much more than Pat the Bat at this point. And with the Phils losing Rowand last year, the need for a veteran RH bat might be too great for them to let go of.
And lastly, everybody, including posters on this site, and every single Sports writer, loves to vilinize Philly fans… And while a good percentage of it is founded, writers especially tend to take liberties and assume things based on reputation and not on fact, and I personally have a qualm with this trend.
A's Fan in Philly
by Duby on Jul 31, 2008 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do we know why Burrell was so bad in 2003?
Was there injury? Talk of PED stuff? I don’t recall.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Given how grossly out of line with his other numbers it was
I’m guessing it was some kind of nagging injury—similar to Bay’s 2007.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Burrell gets booed.
I was at a game a couple of years ago – he was flirting with .200 at the time. It was Pat Burrell Bat Day. He spent about 20 minutes before the game, signing tons of those bats. The stadium was lit up with boos when he struck out in the first – cheered when he homered later in the game, and then booed him when he made an out (in the ninth, I believe). Guy goes 1-3 with a HR and a walk and the fans couldn’t stand him after the game. Phillies lost the game because someone on the team still thought that Jose Mesa could get guys out.
still Swish Fan #1.
by ChrisCEIT on Aug 1, 2008 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1 on signing Manny as a FA for LF
perhaps either Big Hurt for one more year or Giambi for DH/1st base backup and you have two big bats right there.
Jack Cust needs to go somewhere else after this season, in my opinion.
by mrod on Jul 31, 2008 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The very fact
that the Mariners have physically placed as much distance as possible (and still be in MLB) between themselves and TARE is enough to call their mid-season a success.
Can Magic Sprinkles Now!!! @('.')@
by Leopold Bloom on Jul 31, 2008 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that Beane doesn't agree with the SS need and has already filled the 2nd need for the future.
I can see a competition next spring for Petit, Pennington and Crosby for SS. Just because we don’t like Crosby doesn’t mean that Beane feels the same.
I do believe that Ellis could be gone after this year which would put Gusman and Patterson in the competition for 2nd. Although Sac shows Patterson as OF not 2nd.
I would love to see us get rid of Cust and put Buck and maybe even Covington in the Outfield. We can sign Frank for another year. He is more of a threat and can protect Swooney and Cargon in the lineup a lot better that Cust (The strikeout machine).
3rd is the only spot I have concerns with but Beane may get fruitful with free agency there this year.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Jul 31, 2008 3:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the free agent market at third looks piss poor to me
Hank Blalock * TEX
Joe Crede CWS
Morgan Ensberg NYY
Chipper Jones * ATL
Corey Koskie MIL
Greg Norton TB
The Blalock and Jones options should be picked up. Who would you like from that group? I’d prefer Jesus Guzman or Jeff Baisley to those options.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd take Norton
just for the local angle. He went to my high school, and might enjoy playing in front of old family and friends.
Bob Geren, on 8/2/07, on the success of Alan Embree as new interim closer: "What can I say,... he's been our Steady Tremendous Bullpen Man"
by popcornjames on Jul 31, 2008 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd give him a NRI, but Hannahan's a better player.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Chipper Jones....that would intrigue me
I don’t know if Atlanta will pick up his option since they seem like they will need to be doing some rebuilding of their own. “Just my opinion, though.”
by mrod on Jul 31, 2008 4:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think his option vests on performance... dunno, it's complicated.
But I’d feel safe saying he’s a career Brave. At least next season is safe, with his big year and the option being a bargain (I think it’s 11M max).
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As always, the politics involved with NOT re-signing Hall of Famers
make it highly likely that Chipper will be retained by the Braves well into his years of decrepitude.
Not that he’s reached those—he’s always been injury-prone but he’s still a great player when he’s on the field.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
One day I hope we have that problem
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probaly right rebus
Do the Braves have another 3rd baseman prospect in their organization?
by mrod on Jul 31, 2008 4:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't look like it
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"I want, I'd rather have" etc
The words of a fanbase doomed to watch Emil Brown the rest of the season. The A’s need to do something (I wish I knew what) to better develop hitters like they do pitchers. Either that or open the wallet.
"The two of them deserve each other. One's a born liar, the other's convicted."
by SwampyD on Jul 31, 2008 4:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Some crazy ideas
Some have already advocated some of these ideas but I think it’s time for these actions:
We have a ton of semi-prospects in AAA (and by a ton of semi-prospect I don’t just mean Powell’s weight). It’s time to give guys like Putnam, Petit, Patterson, Bankston and Denorfia a chance to get more than 15 ABs. It’s time to see if Buck, Barton, and Murton can turn it around. It’s time to see if Pennington, Powell, and Robnett can become more than the next Nelson Cruz/Dallas MacPherson (though I would like to see if either of them can be the next Jack Cust/Luke Scott; first we’d have to acquire them). It’s time to find out if anyone knows what the hell happened to Jesus Guzman. Too bad Jeff Baisley is injured.
And that’s a lot of ABs to hold “tryouts” (for lack of a better word) for 2009. And I will be very, very disappointed for every Emil Brown, Brooks Conrad (who has less chance of making it than any of the aforementioned), and Jack Hannahan AB we see. Though Hannahan would be acceptable to me as a Raj Davis-type bench guy, who’s not taking many ABs. I would also put Crosby on waivers and hope LA pulls another Loaiza and claims him. If they don’t (or no else does) I would explore some trades, though I’m unsure how the process works. Can we trade Little Bunny Bones BoCro for prospects who didn’t go through waivers if he goes through waivers? Or do we have to trade for another guy who cleared waivers? I know it would be against all principles but I might even want to put the struggling Ellis on the DL if he’s not at 110% (Rotoworld suggested this), and extend him now at something like 3/21 so he doesn’t throw a Bradley/Halsey type fit. After performing pretty badly offensively, the extention might be cheap enough to make Ellis a bargain for us.
Anyway, this is where I want to go a little crazy. Sure, the biggest problem I’ve posed is I want to get regular ABs for 5 OFers not counting CarGo, Swooney, and Patterson (who could see PT at 2b). So why not another one? I think we should call up Javy Herrera. Herrera used to be our top OF prospect but as a prospect, Javier has been passed by Buck, Sweeney, CarGo, and Cunningham at the upper levels and Sulentic (though he may be injured) and Brown at the lower levels. Plus there’s the aforementioned adequate to average outfielders who’ve put up better stats at higher levels like Murton, Patterson, Putnam, Denorfia, and Robnett. But scouts say Herrera has some of the best tools of the bunch. Maybe he does something crazy like Hanley and actually becomes a somewhat valuable commodity. And he’s already on the 40 man.
This is already somewhat long-winded so I’ll try to wrap it up.
We should do similar with pitchers. Every IP that goes to Embree (although he could have a little trade value in the offseason, but that means risking getting stuck with his option in 2009, ugh), Foulke, or DiNardo is a wasted opportunity. Those innings should go to Meyer, Marshall, or being super aggresive with a guy like Andrew Bailey or Josh Outman. Jared Lansford and Jose Garcia (though he may be injured) could be similar type rush guys but I want to see both starting in Midland in August with Anderson/Cahill at the Olympics or when Mazzaro/Simmons are called up to AAA when Gio/Meyer are called up to the show.
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
by vignette17 on Jul 31, 2008 4:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree, to a point
The guys who, IMO, should be up right now getting a real look are Meyer, Patterson, and Murton, who have little to gain by playing at AAA and whom the A’s need to assess against major league competition. The rest either aren’t ready (there’s nothing to suggest Herrera can play at the major league level right now – .679 OPS in AA this year) or aren’t good enough – they’re just organizational filler.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
I think Putnam could be a good fourth OF. Robnett, Bankston, and Denorfia are pretty much filler, you’re right. But they’re better to waste AB’s on than Brown. Buck and Barton could use a little more time to get in grooves in AAA. Pennington and Petit should be playing SS and 3b in my opinion. It’s better than BoCro, Conrad, and Hannahan. Powell deserves at least a few ABs (and Recker deserves a few hacks in AAA).
Herrera is obviously a reach but I think he’s the toolsy type who could maybe Bowker it. But I guess the lineup I really want to see is:
Patterson 2b
Sweeney RF
CarGo CF
Cust/Thomas DH
Suzuki (who we rest FREQUENTLY for Powell, i.e. TWICE A WEEK) C
Murton LF
Petit 3b
Pennington SS (could switch positions with Petit)
Barton 1b (I guess)
One of Herrera/Putnam/Robnett/Denorfia are then the 4th OF and get frequent AB’s, resting Sweeney and CarGo a lot. I would not mind seeing Sweeney traded this offseason, his BABIP is abnormally high and he still isn’t OPSing .800. He’s like Buck last year but not as good. The Cards wanted him and Harden for Rasmus. Maybe we could change Harden for Duke and get some other good prospects.
"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton
by vignette17 on Jul 31, 2008 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone see enough of Petit/Pennington to comment on defense?
From what I understand, Petit is a better defender, so at the very least I would play him at SS before Pennington. In fact, I would rather play Patterson at 3B and play two legit SS up the middle.
by MrIncognito on Jul 31, 2008 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't seen Pennington-- supposedly he's a decent defender
but Petit, while still a little erratic, has all the tools to be a legit Gold Glove shortstop. (Setting aside the fact that the GG usually goes to the best offensive player…)
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pennington has very good arm and great defense
Everything ive read is hes lacking in the hitting, i went to A&M and i saw him play alot and his defense was awesome but stick was little weak
by buckfan6 on Jul 31, 2008 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I basically agree with vignette.
I would call up Barton, Murton, Patterson, Cunningham, Denorfia and Petit in Sept. I’d just as soon give Buck the off-season to recover, and Powell the off-season to get into better shape. I’m all for giving Baisley a chance to be Olmedo Saenz next year. I could wait on Herrera, Guzman and Robnett until they actually hit in AAA. I don’t really believe in Putnam enough to use a 40-man spot, so I’d wait till spring. I’d wait on all the pitchers vignette listed till they were actually good in AAA as well.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ditto, in that
there’s no reason to spend at bats on veterans for the rest of the season. We might as well see if any of the AAA dreck that still might have a future actually do. Crosby, Brown, Hannahan, bleh. The ship has sailed.
by jdr on Jul 31, 2008 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some of this is good
But we already know what Petit and Bankston will do. They have plateaued as hitters already and IMO are garbage. I’d like to see Buck and Barton in there to at least let them get a chance to salvage their seasons. And I’d like to see Murton and Denorfia as well. The problem is, what do we do with all those outfielders? Brown and Davis should be gone. Aside from that, we’ll be a team with 6 outfielders if we include Cust. Patterson should get reps at 2B in the minors before moving up to the big club. Pennington, Powell, and Robnett simply aren’t ready, but there’s no reason why they can’t get some PT in September. Putnam is a AAAA guy and is way too far down in the food chain to even sniff the majors. Crosby is garbage but would catch on elsewhere. He’s useful as a SS filler for a team in the offseason.
Cunningham is really close; I believe he’ll get some ABs in September as well and then be in the running for the 2009 A’s outfield.
I would love to see Meyer up. He’s doing well in AAA and we’re just wasting his arm down in the minors, so we might as well see what we can get out of him.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on Jul 31, 2008 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you familiar with the concept of "plateau"?
It doesn’t appear so if you’re claiming that Petit has “plateaued,” because he’s clearly made huge improvements as a hitter over the last two seasons and I don’t see any reason at all to think that he won’t continue to refine his game.
It’s particularly a bad assessment when you consider that he doesn’t even have to hit well to be an above-average player. If Petit OPSes .650 at the Coliseum, he is probably solid-average. Anything on top of that is gravy.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you can assume his D will be that good
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In his brief stint with Oakland,
I was pleasantly surprised by Petit’s hitting but unpleasantly surprised by his fielding.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 5:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't minor leaguers frequently struggle in their first big league experience?
Third decks, more fans, and the like.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Defensively I mean.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What does the third deck have to do with the major leagues?
{snerk}
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's the malign influence of that tarp
leering over the players and making them constantly hit weak fly outs to the opposite field.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
card-counters have the same problem
Greed and fear cause over-reactions in both directions. @('.')@
by monkeyball on Jul 31, 2008 6:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The pit bosses are pretending to be fans now?
“Oh, I love card-counting, it’s so cool. Is that what you’re doing?”
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shrug
You say assume, I say project… is there really any difference? It’s educated guesswork either way.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think there are probably a fair number of guys in the minors
about whom it is said that they “project to be gg caliber.” Hell, BP said that about Hannahan.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Hannahan was a -5 to -10 offensively he'd be a solid player
Problem is, he isn’t. He’s more like 15 to -20- once you adjust for him playing third instead of short, which is critical.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
-15 to -20
Can’t account for that weird typo.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Hannahan is a legitimate back up -
Good late-inning defensive replacement (for, say, an Allen Craig – ok fine, I’ll stop), and a guy you could start occasionally against a softer-tosser, or pinch hit against a non-flame thrower, and he could have success.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Allen Craig a personal friend of yours?
Do you own his rookie card? I live in St Louis and I’ve never heard of the guy.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL - I had never heard of him
(even though he went to Cal) until I happened upon him in a search for “MLB ready or close to MLB ready 3Bmen”. He doesn’t look like the be all and end all – which is why I think he might actually be attainable – because it’s unclear how well he’ll be able to play 3B, but it appears he can hit and hit with power, and boy could the A’s use somma dat.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK I went to Cal too...and I still needed you to inform me of his
existence.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll jump on the bandwagon
Probably better than Hannahan. Probably better than Josh Fields. Sounds good. I have no idea if he’d be difficult to acquire.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 9:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cards have Glaus, so I doubt it.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the thing - sounds like a potential
“low-key” acquisition, maybe a swap of minor leaguers. Lord knows the A’s could afford to part with a decent pitching prospect for a chance to solve their 3B quagmire.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So....Carignan for Craig?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd try for Alvarez or LaRoche first.
Pitching prospects not named Cahill of Anderson available.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Simmons for Alvarez?
That would be bold indeed. I still refuse to trade Henry till he’s 29.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bold, yes
In the sense that most GMs would slap you in the face and demand satisfaction if you made that offer. Better brush up on the pistol skills.
26th overall pick vs. 2nd overall pick.
Not a whole lot of GMs are going to make that move.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah.
In that case we’ll have to settle for Andy.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where are the huge improvements?
His OPS has consistently been around .700 for the last few years in the minors. And he hasn’t demonstrated that he’s a slick fielder at the big league level yet. I don’t even see what you are talking about here, but okay. To me when someone holds constant in OPS for multiple years, they have plateaued. I’d say an OPS of .630 at the Coliseum is more likely for Petit, which is pretty terrible.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on Jul 31, 2008 7:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's holding "constant" in OPS because he keeps moving up levels!
I guess you think someone is in decline when they drop from a 1.200 OPS in college to a mere .900 in A-ball, then?
Here are his numbers, by year:
.583 in rookie ball
.669 in short-season A
.769 in low-A
.688 in high-A
.730 in AA/AAA
.700 in AAA/MLB
His MLE has jumped 150 points in the last two years. Still not that great… but way better than it was and showing consistent improvement. Considering he’s only 23 and has mostly been young for his levels, it’s not difficult at all to see him putting up a .700 OPS in the majors in a couple of years.
As for his defense, I guess you either believe the scouting reports or you don’t. If you don’t, I really don’t know what you’re going on other than his minimal MLB time to date, which isn’t exactly a fair sample—primarily because it’s still an incredibly tiny sample.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Has he ever been a good hitter? At any point in his life?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Has Omar Vizquel ever been a good hitter? At any point in his life?
Is Omar Vizquel good at baseball?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 9:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Petit as good as Omar Vizquel on defense?
Doubtful.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on Jul 31, 2008 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The scouting reports suggest that he's an excellent defender
I would guess that 50-75% of major league SSs similar scouting reports in the minors. He figures to hit like Vizquel did in his mid-20s. If he plays Vizquel-like defense then great, but I don’t think the scouting reports suggest that at all (I don’t think they suggest that for pretty much anyone; A. Escobar, maybe). He also seems to be a bit raw still on defense. He could be superb or he could be Betancourt. He should be a useful player, but I’ll need to see some evidence of the big defensive contribution in the majors before I think of him as more than a pretty poor option as starting SS.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've flipped through the BA prospect handbook for this year
and no way do 50% of shortstops get described as favorably as Petit. Not even close.
I would be willing to bet that if they did a position prospect ranking based solely on fielding ability, Petit would be at least in the top 20, if not in the top 10, in the entire minor leagues. At all positions.
With that said—yes, I acknowledge that some players are overrated defensively (and others are underrated—and the A’s seem to do an unusually good job of picking out the underrated ones). I’ll jump off the bandwagon if his fielding stats suck over an extended period of time. And I’m aware that he still has a long way to go with the bat to be an offensive asset. I’m not crowning him the next great A’s shortstop—just reacting to the statement that he is “garbage”, which is preposterous.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant 50% of SSs
who are regular major league players. I am not denying at all that he is a great prospect defensively. I’m saying that a great number of SSs who make it as every day players were described in their minor league days as glowingly as Petit is, if not moreso. And that’s not to say any of them (or Petit) were not or are not deserving of that. Just that there are a lot of superb fielders at SS in the majors and therefore, Petit needs to actually be superb, which is in doubt, if he is to make up for his sure-to-be-bad offense.
And he’s definitely not garbage, but I think you are too high on him…
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which SS prospects are head and shoulders above Petit?
I like Wood and Lowrie on offense. I hear Escobar is awesome defensively. Other than that….who exactly should we actually trade for that’s going to put Petit to shame?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I'm not saying it's going to be easy (I'd like Brignac)
or even that have to get someone besides Petit. Just that… Petit will most likely continue the tradition of bad SSs in Oakland if that’s what it comes to.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I forgot about Reid
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Aug 1, 2008 3:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of "plateaued"... Reid Brignac!
Now there’s a guy whose MLEs haven’t improved in three seasons.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Aug 1, 2008 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I said he had a 10% chance of being a good to excellent player,
a 40% chance of being a more or less league-average player, and a 50% chance of being a more or less crappy-hitting utility guy, would you say I was too high on him?
That’s about what I think his odds are… and those are solid numbers for a mid-level prospect. I’d give him a B- on the Sickels scale if he was still eligible.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would put the 40% chance of "more or less league average"
more around 20%.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not really that farfetched
Any of these scenarios would do it:
.680 OPS with average defense
.630 OPS with good defense
.580 OPS with outstanding (i.e. best in league) defense
Those would be 20 points or so higher if he wasn’t in Oakland but I’m assuming the park effect is pretty much constant for all hitters.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 11:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's a great defender at the minor league level
But my guess is he’d be above average (not spectacular) defensively while poor offensively. That is the perfect recipe for a utility infielder at best. And I realize he’s moving up levels, but he’s never had a good full season at .750 OPS above A ball. Which makes it highly doubtful that he will post a .700 OPS in the majors. In fact, he has regressed in terms of home run power (IsoSLG has declined for 3 years running) and while he continues to hit for average, he hasn’t shown any new skills of getting on base via walks in over 500 at bats in AAA (IsoOBP has remained steady during his two years in AA/AAA and AAA/MLB). Bobby Crosby posted over a .850 OPS in AAA at 23 before his rookie year and he hasn’t even cracked a .700 OPS for his career in the majors. In my estimation, Petit could hit .250-.270 in a full major league season, which puts him at around a .620 to .660 OPS major league OPS, good for maybe a 70-80 OPS+. There’s no sugar coating it, those are not good numbers for a starting SS. He’d be about where Bobby Crosby has been the last 3 years with a little better glove. I would hope we can find better out there.
Petit might be young for his levels, but he hasn’t developed enough in the last few years to be considered a true prospect. He’s gone from future grocery bagger to below average with the bat, which isn’t very impressive.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on Jul 31, 2008 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bankston's 24 and coming off an injury. I'm not sure he's plateau'ed.
I’d want to see how he does for at least 100 AB before drawing a conclusion.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 5:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As a Dodger fanI have mixed feelings about the Manny trade. He’s really good, don’t get me wrong… but he’s basically a rental for a couple months and the Dodgers already have too many outfielders. I wish the Dodgers traded one of the OF to open a spot for him. Maybe they’ll actually bench Jones now. I don’t know that Manny’s going to be enough of a difference to beat the Diamondbacks. Would’ve been nice for the Dodgers to get some pitching for the extra OFs or whatever. I wouldn’t have hated some kind of a Kemp for Street and/or Duke trade. Obviously LaRoche to the A’s for pitching would’ve been the best for both of them, but Ned Coletti is an idiot so I wouldn’t expect him to make a trade that made both of my favorite teams better.
I dunno I kinda think the Pirates got the best deal out of this, but I don’t really know much about the guys they got so I am kinda just guessing haha.
by drmmerchk on Jul 31, 2008 4:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm thinking the Dodgers got the best of this.
Manny is a huge upgrade over Jones and Pierre. LaRoche is a waste there. Morris is a non-prospect. Their salary stays the same. If I were a Dodger fan I would be ecstatic.
Pirates traded Bay for LaRoche, Moss and two other guys. That strikes me as worse than Niemann and Brignac if that were ever offered.
Red Sox downgrade from Manny to Bay, but get Bay pretty cheap in 2009. Moss and Hansen are not at all important to them.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And if they were to extend Bay, who's younger than Manny,
it could be quite a good deal for Boston.
Definitely the team that got the worst of it was Oakland – our lineup, and the left side of our infield, still sucks!
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather have Manny's 2 option years than sign Bay to a six year deal.
I don’t really believe Boston wants to sign Bay as a FA.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Manny's options were voided as part of the deal...
and the Dodgers agreed not to offer arbitration to boot.
No one was getting those option years other than Boston—and Manny made sure Boston would not be politically able to use them.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought the deal was that the Dodgers would offer arbitration with Manny's would that he'd decline.
So they can get the draft picks.
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Manny's word. Not his would (or wood).
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Jul 31, 2008 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That makes a lot more sense.
Dodgers not offering might make a team think twice about giving up a pick, but I doubt it would make much difference in Manny’s market. You either want Manny or you don’t.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The link monkeyball posted said the Dodgers aren't offering it
i.e. no picks.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent! Manny is ours for a mere $90MM!
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
quote from the post
He also will agree to decline arbitration so they can get draft picks when he becomes a FA.
I take that to mean “He” {being Manny} will decline the Dodgers offer of arbitration so “they” {the Dodgers} can get draft picks.
No?
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Aug 1, 2008 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hm
No, you’re right. Reading comprehension was never my strong suit in those standardized tests in grade school…
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Aug 1, 2008 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not?
They have plenty of money. Your concerns about Bay are reasonable, but who else are they going to sign? They’d be better off going for Holliday, but there aren’t that many good FAs out there, so I would think they’d try to keep Bay, since they like him enough that they traded for him.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking Manny for 2 years wouldn't block anyone.
They seem to like Reddick. He might be ready then. Not sure about Kalish.
Markakis appears to be the only FA who’s good now and will still by young by his 2011 FA. Dunn is an option as well. They probably have enough to trade for Gamel. There’s probably some Cuban or Japanese guy I’ve never heard of.
I’d really explore all of those things and others I haven’t thought of before signing Bay.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The team that got the worst of it was
Tampa Bay. Jason Bay would have really helped that lineup; instead, he ends up on their divisional rival.
by LogicRules on Aug 1, 2008 6:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aaron Cunningham is 2 for 2 so far tonight for Midland,
BA up to .315. Wouldn’t mind seeing him instead of Emil Brown right about…
...Now.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 6:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The only qualm I have with that
is that I want to see him playing every day and there really isn’t any opportunity for that yet with Sweeney, Cust, Thomas and Gonzalez all in front of him. I don’t mind seeing Emil platooned because I couldn’t care less about his long-term future.
Once the AA season ends, though, he should be up for good. I think Sweeney will regress into the 4th outfielder/spot starter against righties role that I expected, with Murton or Denorfia as the #5 for next season. The question remains, though—who’s #1? (Or #2 if you count Cust.) The A’s need one more guy to take their outfield from “probably pretty average” to “probably pretty good”—enter Burrell.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I kinda wonder if Sweeney is passing through
If the A’s do sign a Burrell-type “big bat who plays OF” then he, along with Gonzalez and Cunningham, could have 3 every day spots secured without Cust. I think the A’s are very high on Cunningham and plan for him to make a one-way trip to Oakland in September, 2008. Where that leaves Sweeney and his unsustainable BABIP? Great trade bait, possibly.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beane wouldn't trade Sweeney with Harden for Rasmus so I bet our #1 and #2 outfielders next year are Sweeney and Cargon.
Then if Cunningham makes it up you have your three starters.
Sorry PT but I don’t agree with you about Sweeney regressing. He has a lot of upside as does Cargon.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Jul 31, 2008 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I suppose the best approach anyway is to plan for
4 every day OFers. Best case scenario is that Sweeney, Cunningham, and Gonzalez all excel and your Winter acquisition is a power bat at a different position – ideally 3B, since power at SS isn’t going to happen. J. Giambi at 1B also intrigues me, but it means asking Barton to try 3B again or to spin his wheels at AAA for a while.
But you could do worse, offensively, than something like:
Sweeney – RF
Suzuki – C
Giambi – 1B
Gonzalez – CF
Ellis – 2B
Cust – DH
Cunningham – LF
Barton – 3B
Crosby – SS
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like that lineup
Not found of Cust but at DH he is ok..
I don’t know if Ellis will be here next year.. so 2nd could be Patterson or the loser of the Petit / Pennington SS contest.
Also how is Guzman’s fielding at 3rd?
I am hoping that Doolittle comes up quickly at 1st and Carter excels defensively at 3rd. That would be a nice lineup of:
Sweeney – RF
Suzuki / Powell – C
Doolittle – 1B
Cust / Barton??? – DH
Gonzalez – CF
Patterson – Pennington – 2B (maybe Patterson as 4th OF) –
Cunningham – LF – CF
Carter – 3B
Petit / Pennington – SS
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Jul 31, 2008 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not Fond of Cust.. I have no idea if he has been found
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Jul 31, 2008 7:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Cust, if batting 6th and adding 26 HRs
with a high OBP, would actually be very helpful. The walks now allow a second mini-heart-of-the-order (spleen-of-the-order) in Cunningham and Barton to bat with runners on base. The HRs should often come with guys on base, but since Cust is at the end of the “heart-of-the-order” the Ks more often end rallies/innings (as fly out and grounds outs do) rather than coming in situations where contact is especially important (second nobody out, third one out, etc.).
Basically your first 5 hitters manufacture runs and rallies, Cust hits some 2 and 3-run HRs, starts new mini-rallies for the bottom of the order, and strikes out a bunch, and the bottom of the order, while fine for a 6-9, is not asked to pose as a 3-6.
Ellis batting 5th might be a stretch, though – but overall it’s a lineup that ought to be able to score enough runs to win for a strong pitching staff, because it has some power as well as some guys who can get on base, move around the bases, and move runners over and in.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barton at 3B instead of Giambi?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait, let me make sure I understand this correctly
Are you actually suggesting Jason Giambi play third base for a Major League Baseball team?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has major league 3B experience. Barton only at AAA.
Should I keep going?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No. My real question is why not bat Cust #2 where his team
leading OBP would be appreciated, and his horrible OBI wouldn’t hurt much. #6 is still an OBI not OBP position.
The other question was just to get your attention.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would start the lineup with four lefties
but still might be worth it – or you could just buck “convention” and bat Suzuki 3rd even if he doesn’t really “fit” there:
Sweeney
Cust
Suzuki
Giambi
Gonzalez…
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The 4 Non Righties at the top only matter if you're worried
about late inning LOOGYs. We should be so lucky if it gets to that point. I want to see more than 2 runs scored by the sixth inning. I’m thinking bunching your best hitters at the top overwhelms the one painful LOOGY inning later. Also most teams have at most one good LOOGY (not the Angels).
Note: This would only be the lineup vs righties.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better lineup with those 9 players:
Sweeney
Cust
Suzuki
Giambi
Cunningham
Gonzalez
Ellis
Barton
Voldemort
You really want the OBP at the top of the lineup, not at the bottom. (You also don’t want doubles-hitting Carlos Gonzalez right after slow-as-molasses Giambi.) Gonzalez can move up in the order when he learns how to take a walk.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cunningham 5th! That's unconventional!
What the heck is Ellis doing there? Did we re-sign him without my celebrating?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Replace him with Patterson if you want
I doubt Patterson would be worse on offense… defense/overall, sure, but not offense…
Cunningham can f*ing rake. I’m really high on him as a hitter now that he seems to be fully over the wrist injury. He’s got like an .890 OPS in AA now.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cunningham/Gonzalez/Sweeney
Has a shot at really being a very nice outfield. A little lack of power but all high average hitters with a little pop and good to great defense.
"With 16-year-old Dominican righty Michel Inoa in tow, Gio Gonzalez improving at Triple-A and lefty Brett Anderson carving up Double-Abatters along with Simmons and Trevor Cahill, Oakland’s pitching depthis officially the envy of baseball." - BaseballAmerica.com
by Syphon on Aug 1, 2008 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
With Buck as a 4th OFer
Or starter if one falters. I also share your Cunningham man love PT.
"With 16-year-old Dominican righty Michel Inoa in tow, Gio Gonzalez improving at Triple-A and lefty Brett Anderson carving up Double-Abatters along with Simmons and Trevor Cahill, Oakland’s pitching depthis officially the envy of baseball." - BaseballAmerica.com
by Syphon on Aug 1, 2008 1:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey! Where's Cust?
Manny has to be DH.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Aug 1, 2008 3:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree - that's a better order for those 9
Though I wonder if we’re both overestimating Suzuki’s true expected hitting line – I wonder if he can be expected to carry an OBP of .350+ and he won’t provide a lot of power. If Suzuki’s true line is something like .260/.340/.380, that’s still fine for a good defensive catcher, but he shouldn’t bat in the 1-4 slots in the order. So if Cunningham can carry either a .350 OBP or 20+ HR power, maybe buck convention the following way (though in reality they’ll never bat a rookie third from the “git go”):
Sweeney
Cust
Cunningham
Giambi
Suzuki
Gonzalez
Ellis
Barton
Voldy
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Aug 1, 2008 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ideally, Barton starts hitting like he's actually capable of
and you can switch the two of them up.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Aug 2, 2008 1:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did the Cardinals offer Rasmus for Harden and Sweeney?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe:
According to a Mariners beat writer who emailed an A’s scout “very involved with the talks.”
Haven’t seen it anywhere else.
http://www.athleticsnation.com/2008/7/8/567453/harden-and-gaudin-to-cubs#7252392
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm...that would have tempted me.
It would be like trading Harden and Kotsay for Edmonds….sort of.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
More tempting before Rasmus got hurt...
I would have taken that back when the trade happened, but I like what I’ve seen from Gallagher a lot, and Swooney has continued to impress, low upside though he may have.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is his upside worse than Kotsay?
That wouldn’t be that low if true.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think offensively, but not defensively
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am the inventor and standard-bearer of "Swooney's upside is good-Kotsay"
It’s low in the sense that Kotsay at his best offensively was no star, so that’s not great as far as upside. I definitely wasn’t saying that it wouldn’t be good. And I think he has a great chance to reach that upside. I believe in him as a .300 hitter a lot more than Suzuki, and the power sort of has to go up a bit. So I think I’m higher on him than various other similarly-minded-as-me people, especially since people forget that a solidly above average bat and a great glove for the corners is pretty nice, but still, I think an .850 OPS is his ceiling in Oakland, and that is a low upside for a corner OF.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you concerned with Ryan's .338 BABIP for the year?
Do you believe his LD% is sustainable?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
.338 babip is hardly outlandish, and it’s even a bit under what the LD% would suggest. I don’t think he’ll keep up that high of a LD% going forward, but I’m quite confident that it’ll be high. He has the perfect swing for it.
Basically, he never rolls over as is almost always looking to go to the opposite field. That is a great recipe for a high LD% and high BABIP. On the other hand, it is exactly that approach that limits his power.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
FWIW THT really likes his defense in RF
Has him right up there with the best in MLB—Murphy, Gutierrez, Drew, Fukudome, Winn, Pence. Higher RZR than all but Murphy. Lots of OOZ plays for his innings.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that's worth much of anything
but given that he plays at least a plausible CF, is fast, has a good (though not great) arm, looks very good to my eyes at the corner positions, and is not a slow-footed slugger as many corner OFs are….
(too many clauses new paragraph)
He figures to be a stellar defender in the corners.
And: People think: “defense is for the infield and the center fielder. We want offense from the corner OFs.” And, to be sure, teams need to get offense from the corner OFs. But: a run is a run is a run, and OF defense is really very important. If Sweeney could have turned three of his outs into HRs (sort of an absurd task, granted), he’d be as good as Manny.
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And when we sign Manny we'll need 2 CFs in the
other positions - Ryan, Carlos and Aaron - with Cust in LF not Manny.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd say, when we get Manny it'll be:
2009:
Gonzalez for sure in CF + Cust/Sweeney/Buck
Manny at DH
2010:
Gonzalez for sure + Sweeney/Buck/Cunningham/Cust, with Cust probably being the odd man out. But it’s extremely difficult to predict who the 3 best OF options will be in 2010 be among those five, especially since there’s also Murton, Patterson, Sulentic, even possibly Weeks and Spencer.
Manny at DH
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now you're talking!
Welcome Manny!
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Red Sox get completely shafted in this deal?
Let’s see…they gave up Ramirez, Moss, and Hansen and got back only Jason Bay?!
That’s absolutely ridiculous, considering they’re paying Ramirez’s salary and Bay is a worse player than Ramirez, let alone Bay for Moss Hansen AND Ramirez.
by halflink123 on Jul 31, 2008 6:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think they overpaid in order to get the Manny problem off their hands
That’s not the same as getting shafted, though. From Boston’s perspective overpaying isn’t a problem.
Bay isn’t worse than Ramirez—not anymore. Manny is not the hitter he once was, although he’s still quite good.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but...
It’s just that I don’t think Bay will be much better than Moss, anyway. It’s tough to say as Moss is a career .804 OPS guy and Bay is a career .890 but Bay only started playing full time at 25, Moss is 24, and Bay’s last 2 years haven’t been stellar offensively. I’m cherry picking stats, but still.
Manny’s a pain in the ass, they should’ve known that before signing him, but as long as he puts up numbers for them (this year), what’s the difference? Take his .950 OPS this year, then cut the cord next year; decline the option. It’s none of Manny’s business, but I have seen this Red Sox drama with other players ie Pedro, Nomar, etc.
Then keep Moss and next year start him at LF.
Red Sox overpaid in cash, by paying Ramirez’s salary, but also really overpaid with the prospects.
by halflink123 on Jul 31, 2008 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait...?
Do you really think that Ramirez is not a better hitter than Jason Bay? Especially for a team in a playoff run?
I mean, I like Jason Bay a lot, and I understand the Red Sox wanting to get rid of Manny, and one could claim (incorrectly in my book) that Bay is a better “fit” for Boston right now than Ramirez, but those arguments are almost purely chemistry driven. Manny Ramirez is a HOF caliber hitter, and maybe the 2nd best RH hitter in the game behind Pujols. Bay is a very good RH hitter, but he hasn’t established himself, nor put up the numbers Manny has.
And I know you discount “clutch” factors, but the fact of the matter is, come playoff time, Manny makes the Red Sox lineup a lot more deadly, his mere presence lets hitters in front of him see fastball after fastball because nobody wants to pitch to him in the playoffs (especially with men on base) Jason Bay doesn’t have that kind of Cache, so while he may be close to his level in pure hitting talent, and I’d definitely rather have Bay for the A’s for a few years than Ramirez… I can’t see any argument that says a lineup with Bay in LF “isn’t worse” than a lineup with Ramirez in LF… Can’t see it…
A's Fan in Philly
by Duby on Jul 31, 2008 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed I think it's a downgrade
and I would presume that noone can complain, whine and moan about the Red Sox for two months, not even Manny Ramirez…he will get tired and can it eventually, one would think. chemistry problem solved, for now.
by halflink123 on Jul 31, 2008 7:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Depends which stats you like
Offensively, Jason Bay vs. Manny Ramirez this year is close to a wash.
Manny: .927 OPS, .305 EqA (adjusted for season)
Jason Bay: .894 OPS, .320 EqA
It gets more complicated if you want to talk projections for next year, and include salary and defense, but I think it’s hard to argue that Manny is head and shoulders above Jason Bay. It’s not like they traded Manny for Ryan Sweeney (as much as I like the guy, he’s no Jason Bay).
by el generico on Aug 1, 2008 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is overpaying different from getting shafted on purpose?
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Money =/= talent
The Sox ate Manny’s salary to get rid of him, but all that does is make Henry’s checkbook a little lighter.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes but Bay is worse. That's talent.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No he isn't
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is too....Is not....Is too...Is not....
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're just trying to trick me into saying "is too"
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So you've watched Bugs Bunny as well....
Curses! Foiled again!
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
moss/hansen are marginal guys
might be solid, but not a big deal giving them up…sort of similar to patterson/murton
solid mlb ready types that can help now, but once something better comes along…see ya
by Asfan4ever723 on Jul 31, 2008 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hansen might not even be that.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In Sacramento
Joey Devine is set to pitch the first inning on his rehab assignment.
Daric Barton is starting at first. It’s gonna be a long 24 hours for him if he’s really going to be activated for tomorrow’s game in Boston.
And Travis Buck is back on the DL with a concussion. I don’t know if this is another one, or a recurrence of symptoms from the one he suffered last month.
"May a nit suck Cajun geese?" wonders Red. No, we see gnu Jack Cust in a yam.
by andeux on Jul 31, 2008 6:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Travis go diving with some of Daric's friends the other day?
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 6:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The real story
He was bemoaning his decision not to drink a V8 and didn’t realize his own strength.
"May a nit suck Cajun geese?" wonders Red. No, we see gnu Jack Cust in a yam.
by andeux on Jul 31, 2008 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A V8...Is that where you
hit a routine vly ball to the CFer?
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In Russia,
vly ball catch you!
Can Magic Sprinkles Now!!! @('.')@
by Leopold Bloom on Jul 31, 2008 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
$%*&%%
Stop fucking around with concussions, you brainless idiots. This stuff is not a joke.
If there’s one thing that is guaranteed to set me off, it’s playing a player with a concussion. They may possibly have just wrecked his baseball career for the sake of six games in AAA. Even if it doesn’t linger permanently they almost certainly have now cost him more games than he “gained” by playing through it.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
(Just to clarify, that first sentence was apostrophizing the A's training staff, not referencing anyone here at AN...)
Sorry. This is an issue that really, really bothers me.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jul 31, 2008 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The whole A's training staff is an issue that bothers me
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see it as the result of viewing players as six year depreciating assets
Tape ‘em up. Get ‘em back out there. Use ‘em up. Toss ‘em out. DL don’t feed the bulldog.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Duke's num,bers
are rather helped by the fact that he pitches at the pitcher friendly Coliseum and many were not buying him into a starter’s role at the beginning of the season.
All Games and Comments are Subject to Blackout
by Hit4TheCycle on Jul 31, 2008 6:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Duke's numbers are better at home than on the road,
but his road ERA (8 starts) is 2.54, and his road WHIP is 1.13 – not too shabby indeed.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
duke isn't as good as his numbers so far this year
but i think he’s going to be a very good starter for us. i’m kind of glad we didn’t trade him. i think we can sign him to a reasonable extension. duke’s a great guy to have leading the staff for the next 2 seasons until cahill, anderson, et. al. start making their way to the big club. i do think he’s for real – he’s only gotten hit hard in 2 starts, his last one and the one cust made the error in that resulted in a lot of unearned runs. other than that, he’s either given up 2 or 3 ER every time, mostly 2 or less. that’s incredible consistency. he’s done it against very good offenses. hopefully billy signs him to an extension soon.
by guy incognito on Jul 31, 2008 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't agree more -
He’s a great veteran to lead a young rotation and bridge the years until Cahill and Anderson truly arrive. Every extension has risks; you could do a lot worse than to take your chances with Justin Duchscherer.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope he doesn't lead from the Disabled List.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, he is a veteran
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jul 31, 2008 9:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im still pissed off we didnt make any cool trades
to get more B+ prospects.
"With 16-year-old Dominican righty Michel Inoa in tow, Gio Gonzalez improving at Triple-A and lefty Brett Anderson carving up Double-Abatters along with Simmons and Trevor Cahill, Oakland’s pitching depthis officially the envy of baseball." - BaseballAmerica.com
by Syphon on Jul 31, 2008 9:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We have all the B+ prospects
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
all your B+ prospects are belong to us
by ohmangoAs on Jul 31, 2008 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your 2008 Oakland B+'s!
"God doesn't pay attention to your cute little hypotheticals." -- Jeff from LL
by oblique on Aug 1, 2008 7:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
what will be the low mark for attendance this year...
7000? Bleh… Go RAIDERS!!!
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on Jul 31, 2008 9:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Barton hit a HR...
Lifted his average to .194…..
The A's colors are green and gold.
by mikeA on Jul 31, 2008 10:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
beane's asking prices
so its obvious street, his value was down fair enough…dont sell low on him and take a subpar deal. they can wai on him
but if the rumors are true, why ask so much for duke…fowler and stewart…i’d settle for stewart and a couple solid guys
they are really playing with fire since you expect regression from duke and his value may likely never been higher
i guess wait till winter meetings then…4-5 more months of rumors and speculation
by Asfan4ever723 on Jul 31, 2008 10:38 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Good. I haven't enough of rumours or speculation.
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years"
by WaddellCanseco on Jul 31, 2008 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but if the rumors are true, why ask so much for duke…fowler and stewart…i’d settle for stewart and a couple solid guys
because they’d rather extend him than trade him?
The 2009 A's draft pick... getting higher every game.
by rebus on Aug 1, 2008 8:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thomas
With Frank back in the lineup and the AAA guys gone does that move Crosby to 9th?
Enjoy the game
by DCinWC on Aug 1, 2008 7:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Do the A's seem interested in any
of the Nationals released players???
F. Lopez could push Crosby with both .230 something batting averages maximizing team utility by competition?
Could we use LoDuca as a right-handed bat at first to spell Barton???
Beating LAA or wherever the fu*k they are, Priceless!
by MMunoz33 on Aug 1, 2008 8:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
NO
There needs to be a rule—if you are released by the Nationals or the Pirates, no one else is allowed to claim you.
It would prevent crimes against humanity like Jose Castillo…
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Aug 1, 2008 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about released by the Royals?
Such a noted group includes our very own Wes Bankston and Donnie Murphy! Woot!
I am Ray Fosse's infatuations with Clay Wood and high-definition television.
by franks a lot on Aug 1, 2008 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
we love our Royals!!!
Mi.Sweeney, D.Murphy, Emil “DFA”, and Wes Bankston!!!!!
Oakland Royals 2008 playoff oush begins today!!!!
Beating LAA or wherever the fu*k they are, Priceless!
by MMunoz33 on Aug 1, 2008 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who would ever have guessed
that fielding that many KC castoffs would result in such a lousy offense?
"May a nit suck Cajun geese?" wonders Red. No, we see gnu Jack Cust in a yam.
by andeux on Aug 1, 2008 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
B...B...BUT
He’s so expressive!
Enjoy the game
by DCinWC on Aug 1, 2008 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
By the by...In the Chron today:
Dustin McGowan had surgery to repair fraying of the labrum in his right shoulder and is expected to be ready in time for spring training. And that’s a pitcher. Just saying…
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Aug 1, 2008 11:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Zito is still with the Gigantes!!!
If I am not mistaken!
Beating LAA or wherever the fu*k they are, Priceless!
by MMunoz33 on Aug 1, 2008 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
pipe dreams ...
all the chatter about trading for offense. a’s never have and never will trade for an offensive bat nearing or in prime. too much emphasis on youth, no power hitting. a’s strategy is to get power hitting on the cheap. a’s spend money on pitching and defense. that’s why first half of season looks good, then a’s choke in second half when arms are tired and bats can take advantage.
by Grumpy50 on Aug 1, 2008 11:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ummmmmmmmm.....
Jermaine Dye… Ray Durham….
"I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did." -Yogi Berra
by brenarlo on Aug 1, 2008 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You really are grumpy
[Crosby] "Guy that has driven in some big runs for the A's over the years" - Vince Cotroneo
by WaddellCanseco on Aug 1, 2008 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
The A’s get their bats from Gilligans Island, castaways all. Erubial Durazo, David Justice, Frank Thomas, Mike Piazza, Todd Walker, Jose Guillen, Milton Bradley, Scott Hatteberg, Ron Gant, John Mabry, That Guy from the Dodgers, the Professor and Mary Anne. Mary Anne could bat ahead of Crosby.
Enjoy the game
by DCinWC on Aug 1, 2008 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry, were you living outside the country in 2000-2006?
In, say, Malawi?
Yeah, they’ve really choked in the second half under Beane.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Aug 2, 2008 1:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess Keith Law doesn't think highly of Gio Gonzalez
Pete (New Mexico): Is Gio Gonzalez a front of the rotation pitcher?
Keith Law: (2:38 PM ET ) No, back of the rotation.
I hate unproductive outs and the A's are producing them at record production
by Trainman on Aug 1, 2008 1:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sounds to me as if the true answer is..."middle of the rotation"
Seems like a #3 starter in the making – plus stuff, so-so or inconsistent command.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Aug 1, 2008 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Law thinks Gio throws mid-80s
because he once saw Gio throw and he was throwing mid-80s that day.
Pretty safe to ignore anything he says on the subject.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Aug 2, 2008 1:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
no ill will intended by pipedreams comment...
it’s just frustrating. before the all-star break when the a’s were in contention, instead of following a course that athletic nations contributors (and for that fact of the matter probably a’s fans generally) knew needed to be done, ownership/management showed no commitment to the team. if it’s any indication from the trades that were announced, it seems probable that the a’s could have got a batter. what were the benefits of the harden/gaudin/blanton trades? why didn’t the a’s get a nady, larouche, etc. a’s ownership/management failed to balance the team’s competing needs. too much in the distant future is illustrated by the perverbial question, “what is a million dollars worth to you a hundred years from now?” who cares your gonna be dead when you get it. that’s why a’s attendance is about the lowest in the league…if the owners aren’t committed to the team why should the fans. other a’s fans i know tell me things like, “i wanna bring a sign to the game that reads: i’m scared to go to games because i might get traded”, or “it’s best to buy an a’s jersey with no name or your name on it because if you put your favorite player’s name on it, by the time you get it in the mail, that player won’t be on the team.” no disrespect to beane and company, but the a’s fans aren’t allowed time to develop a relationship with players. why would fans want to go to a game? would you rather go to a function where you know some of the people or where there are in attendance only complete strangers? couldn’t sell out red sox, yankees, angels with reduced seating capacity…when was the last time that happened? if that ain’t a clue, i don’t know what is…
by Grumpy50 on Aug 1, 2008 1:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Indeed, the whole "get better now and later" mantra of trades
seems to have vanished in favor of, “See you in 2010.”
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Aug 1, 2008 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















