Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Rickey Henderson Coming Back to A's? Bar-right-arrows



Duke... should he stay or should he go now?

Why yes, I am playing the Clash as I start to write this.

Here's the deal.

As things stand now, Justin Duchscherer is a year and a half from becoming a free agent for the first time in his pro career. He will be 31 when that happens, his 32nd birthday will be right around the corner. And as much love as Duke may have towards the Oakland organization he will know that he has one shot at landing a big payday before his career is over. Chances are he'll get more money to play somewhere other then Oakland and he will leave the A's.

The A's rarely keep their free agents once they taste the free market.

There are those on AN who are fine with that outcome. They would say that we should enjoy Duke for one more full season and then bid him farewell and take the draft picks as compensation. I assure you, in conversation they will say the A's will get 2 1st round picks in return for letting Duke go. Now I'm certain that Duke will put up numbers that will earn him Type A free agent status, so that's not the issue. No, the issue is Barry Zito. See, I spent a year listening to people say again and again that the A's should keep Zito till his 6 years were up and then let him walk as a free agent. For a year people were telling me that getting 1 more year of performance out of Zito, plus two 1st round draft picks, was a better deal then trading Barry. Maybe they were right.

Not that we'd know because Zito signed with Giants, a team so bad they weren't forced into surrendering their 1st round pick to sign a marquee FA like Barry Zito so instead of enjoying 2 1st round picks the A's got a Sup 1 plus a 2nd round pick for their troubles. That bit.

I have no desire to experience the same damn thing with Duke.

So I say trade Duke or sign him to an extension and you do it before July 31st rolls around.

First the arguement for trading Duke.

If it was ever Beane's intention to trade Duke, now is the time. He will never have more trade value then he has now. Two time All-Star, leading all SP in ERA and playing for a team in contention. Even better for a buyer, Duke will be under their control through 2009. There is a limited supply of reliable SP available on the trade market and the two most desired arms have already been moved to contenders. I repeat, Justin Duchscherer will never have more trade value then he has right now! He might just be the best arm available.

Now the arguement for signing Duke to an extension.

I propose a 3 year/$30 million guaranteed deal with a team controlled 4th year option at $10 million. Let me break down how the money would be distrubuted, 'cause this is a key point in what makes the deal so attractive for the A's. My plan includes a $6 million signing bonus paid in full THIS season. Total 2008 salary expenditure for Duke: $7.2 million.

2009-2011: $7 million annual salary.

2012: Team controlled $10 million option with a $3 million buy-out. I look at this as saying the A's are willing to pay Duke another $7 million to pitch 1 more season for them.

Total payout (assuming option is activated): 4 years/$37 million.

A year and a half from now, Duke shouldn't have any problem landing a $9 million annual deal on the free agent market. My plan pays Duke the same figure, only he gets more cash earlier and the A's get to spread the payment of a 3 year guaranteed deal out over 5 seasons at roughly $7 million annual.

So the deal sounds fine fiscally, how about in terms of performance? Well, PECOTA is going to have to re-do their projections since Duke is now a SP but cominh into this season they weren't projecting any drop-off in performance through 2009 and only a slight dip in 2010. 2011 could see a decline but that's also the last guaranteed year on the proposed deal. Duke will be 33 in 2011, not so old that we need to worry about a dramatic drop-off in his stuff. Assuming Duke doesn't lose his command and control (which seems unlikely) his performance shouldn't be a negative. And in case there is a drop-off you can let him walk after the season.

As I see it, both options have their merits. The only plan that is truly open to suckitude is the one that stays the course and lets him walk as a FA after the 2009 season.

Poll
Should Beane trade Duke or sign him to an extension?
  • Trade him!
  • Sign him to an extension!
  • Be incredibly stupid and do nothing!

  238 votes | Results

8 recs | Comment 93 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Keep him

He’s one of those pitchers who just knows how to get people out without blowing them away and he has an aggressiveness to the way he pitches that you just don’t see with someone like Zito.

With the young pitchers coming up through the A’s system, it’s easy to make the case that we should just let them be the ones when they get up here. I think the staff needs one proven vet who knows how to get the job done and actually does it. Blanton is not the guy, at least not now. Smith, Eveland and Gallagher are all young and inexperienced by comparison. They’re all at rookie level.

I say give Duke an extension for a few years. He can be a leader by example. The health may be a question but I think he can handle the rest.

At the same time, it’s going to be important for the A’s to sign certain people and make sure they’re around instead of continuing the revolving door program.

Last of the Ninth - Photography Site
jamesvenes.com - Blog

by Flashfire on Jul 16, 2008 11:07 PM PDT   0 recs

zito
He’s one of those pitchers who just knows how to get people out without blowing them away and he has an aggressiveness to the way he pitches that you just don’t see with someone like Zito.

Are you forgetting FITZ already?

by chri5 on Jul 16, 2008 11:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm really torn with Duke as I am with Ellis

I love Duke. He somehow gets it done every start even when nobody believes in him. But he’s on the wrong side of 30, and has had back problems (and as we know from Kotsay those never really go away). So I’m going to take the copout approach. Without knowing the market it’s impossible to tell. If Duke can get us a couple top hitting prospects or can get us a good young player already in the majors, you gotta do it. If not, extending him wouldn’t make me angry.

"Loyal? I'm the most loyal player money can buy." - Don Sutton

by vignette17 on Jul 16, 2008 11:17 PM PDT   0 recs

I must be losing my touch

2 comments and 1 rec in half an hour?

I’m not letting you cop-out!

Sabathia landed the Indians a blue-chip B+ prospect in LaPorta, two solid arms who’ll probably end up in the bullpen and a PTBNL, supposedly someone fairly high on the food chain, maybe someone in BA’s pre-season Top 10 list.

Duke will not land a package of that quality and quantity. I do think he could land a B grade prospect, especially one who’s below AA. A guy like Philadelphia’s Dominic Brown, who earned a C grade in Sickels’ pre-season book but will be looking at a much higher grade in the next book. I think the best approach in a trade involving Duke would be to focus on going after going after high upside guys in A-ball. You start picking guys AA and above and it gets tougher to get a deal done.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jul 16, 2008 11:35 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Good analogy with Zito

I remember those rumors about trading Zito to Baltimore for Bedard and change. If we had done that, and later flipped Bedard to Arizona instead of Haren, we’d be so drool-worthy right now. But then we might never have advanced to the ALCS. Really tough choice ahead with Duke…

by Deep Puddle on Jul 17, 2008 12:35 AM PDT   0 recs

Did Arizona want Bedard?

I heard Haren was the guy they wanted. What makes you think we could have substituted?

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Jul 17, 2008 10:01 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I wonder...

How his trade value is affected by the fact that he is now at a point where he has surpassed his career high in innings at the major league level. If I am trading for him, I am surely worried about a tiring effect as he gets more and more innings past what he has thrown in the Majors. I truly wonder if he has has 200 great innings in him or if at some point, he is going to hit a wall in his first year as a starter and his first 100 IP will be significantly better than his second 100.

I love Duke and love how well he has pitched and thought he would be great for us this year (although of course not THIS good)......but I sure would be wary as a buyer of paying a lot for him hoping he was going to throw 200 IP and then start games in the playoffs, thus really piling on the innings. He just doesnt have a track record as a starter….he might be fine the whole way, but hard to give up a lot without a true track record. Not to mention, he threw 16 IP last year….hard to imagine he stays this fresh all year.

Just a thought…..

Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Jul 17, 2008 12:49 AM PDT   0 recs

im also curious

what his value is right now. like most people, i overestimated Harden. I wouldnt be surprised if I am doing the same with Duke.

by oakinboston on Jul 17, 2008 6:31 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

i agree

i’d like to have an unbiased opinion of Duke’s trade value.

by echerrst on Jul 17, 2008 10:47 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I too think Duke's trade value is probably lower

than it “should be,” i.e., his value to the A’s. All the guy does is confound critics and get hitters out – that doesn’t stop the critics from thinking he’s about to stop getting hitters out any moment.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jul 17, 2008 10:54 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Exactly....

And couple that with the concern over innings and first year starting…..and I dont think we get enough for him to make it worthwhile.

Bring back Hammer.

by OaktownPower on Jul 17, 2008 12:58 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Which is fine by me!

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jul 17, 2008 2:38 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Trade Him

I love Duke, but I think that all diehard A’s fans know that Beane usually does what is best for the team. I think that if we can get a few of the better position players we should really take a shot at it. The ones in our system don’t really make my jaw drop.

I think that it will be much more fun to watch the A’s if we could get some bats to grow with the tremendous pitching we have assembled.

by FrozenA'sFan on Jul 17, 2008 1:08 AM PDT   0 recs

I can see both arguments

much as I love having Duke with the A’s, if someone makes a really good offer it would be difficult to refuse (and Beane probably wouldn’t refuse).

by OaklandSi on Jul 17, 2008 7:15 AM PDT   0 recs

Yep

That’s the thing w/ Beane. He’ll trade anyone if the price is right. However, in Duke’s case (and Ellis… and even Blanton), he have more value with the Oakland A’s. So, I don’t see Beane trading any of these guys because there isn’t a trading partner meeting Beane/Forst’s asking price. Harden would not have been traded if the Cubs hadn’t included the previously “untouchable” Sean Gallagher.

So, I would recommend extending Duke this offseason. I’m still a little concerned about his health and I want to see him pitch a full season as a starter before I’m fully convinced he’s worth 30-Million.

2010 Starting Rotation Possibilities : Gallagher, Cahill, Anderson, Smith, Blanton, Eveland, Gio, Simmons, Mazzaro, Jose Garcia (darkhorse).... A 5-Man Rotation is 2010 could cost 2.5 Million (w/o Blanton) Is Duke that much (10M/Season) of an upgrade?

by Colorado Fan on Jul 17, 2008 8:59 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

You nailed it

I’d be surprised if Duke, who iirc has made less than $5 million his entire career, could turn down a contract that sets him well for life, really anything over $20 million. $30 million with the option would be generous, but I would be thrilled if they got that done (and he’d still be tradeable if the budget required so.)

As far as trading him, boy that’s difficult to forecast. I have no clue who to compare him to. With a fairly cursory glance at the last five years of deadline deals, I think the closest is actually Jose Guillen when the A’s got him (player coming out of almost nowhere to be one of the best in the league.) IDK, GMs don’t like risks, I think it’s going to be hard for Beane to get much. I’m guessing (guessing) he’d have to deal with a progressive thinker like Byrnes or Daniels (that would actually be great if he could pull off a deal with the Rangers; we have what they need, they have what we need.)

But, overall, I absolutely agree that Beane should do one or the other right now. Good post Grover.

by 31Boots on Jul 17, 2008 7:35 AM PDT   0 recs

It's a funny world

where we think of $5 million as small. If I had earned $5 million by the time I was 30, I’d already be “set for life”.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Jul 17, 2008 10:04 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

re

You’d have to be pretty damn smart with your money if you didn’t want to work again.

by 31Boots on Jul 17, 2008 1:59 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I suppose it's a question of what you call "set for life"

You don’t have to be smart to get, say, 2% return. That’s $100K a year. Right now my wife and I are muddling by OK with about $60K a year for one and a half jobs. If that became $100K a year and we didn’t have to work again unless we wanted to, I think that would be a great life.

The question is whether you’re content with an easy and comfortable life, or if you feel a need to go out and spend it on a bunch of extravagant stuff that you’re doing just fine without now.

I guess I’m saying is that what would make my life better is simply to have a nice home, pay all the bills and not have to work. The ability to go out and buy a mansion and a private jet doesn’t add much more on top of that. YMMV.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Jul 17, 2008 2:19 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Ooh, look at me, I have way too many yachts!

I told them 'My game is like a blog.' Because I don't know what a blog is, but it don't sound good. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jul 17, 2008 2:26 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

YACHTDOO!

I told them 'My game is like a blog.' Because I don't know what a blog is, but it don't sound good. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jul 17, 2008 2:41 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

A couple of things

First, that theoretical $5 Million is subject to taxes and an agent’s fee, so that’s probably between 40% and 50% of it off the top that the player never sees at all.

Second, I’m like you in that I’d rather have a comfortable but modest life free than a bunch of extravagant luxury goods, but you have to keep in mind the circumstances in which ballplayers make their money. If I were to win a one-time $5 million lottery jackpot, I’d certainly do what you suggest to make sure I was set for life. But baseball players are making high yearly salaries at a young age, hanging out with teammates who have already hit the free agency jackpot, and usually can see that jackpot in their own futures. I can understand the temptation to spend the money they’re already making, expecting that they will be making even more in the near future, even though those expectations are sometimes not met.

(And third, though this isn’t really the point now, it looks like Duchscherer’s career earnings to this point are actually only a little over $3 million, though he will at least double that next year barring a catastrophic injury. )

"May a nit suck Cajun geese?" wonders Red. No, we see gnu Jack Cust in a yam.

by andeux on Jul 17, 2008 2:40 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

my career earnings to this point are actually only a little ... pathetic

I told them 'My game is like a blog.' Because I don't know what a blog is, but it don't sound good. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jul 17, 2008 2:42 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh, absolutely.

I don’t disagree with any of that. I never meant to suggest baseball players are, or even should be, like you and me. I do recognize that $5 million is small potatoes. I’m just saying … it’s a funny world they live in where that’s the case.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Jul 17, 2008 7:19 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

He's actually earned $3.4 mil ...

~$1-1.25m of it went to taxes and $170k-$340k went to his agent., meaning he’s taken home about $2m. Assuming he hasn’t spent ANY of it, he would have to get a consistent return of 7% per year in order to return $100k a year (in today’s dollars, assuming 3% inflation) and not run out of money in the next 40 years (he’d run out of money in 41 years).

Of course, he’ll also collect an MLB pension … so that’ll help … but, realistically speaking, he’d have to work again in order to leave a relatively comfortable life for the rest of his days.

"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by devo on Jul 17, 2008 2:47 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

A's pitching coach

teaching all the prospects how to throw a nasty cutter?

by rebus on Jul 17, 2008 2:49 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

One more thing

being a player of Duke’s caliber is a product of lots of things, not the least of which is very very lucky 99.9th percentile skill at throwing a ball. That’s the kind of skill which should be rewarded- handsomely. The biggest reason he deserves that is because we all love watching him. If you went and rented a movie instead, you’d be paying blockbuster. The point is, comparing our pays to that of ballplayers is apples and oranges. In fact, the fact that our salaries are even in a distant ballpark with Dukes speaks to his being underpaid.

Virtually any skill in the 99.5th percentile is well paid, as it should be.

by ohmangoAs on Jul 17, 2008 3:26 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

It's funny

A couple of crazy quotes I just read today on a weightlifting site, by a trainer who works with many pitchers.

http://www.t-nation.com/article/most_recent/6_mistakes_fitting_round_pegs_into_square_holes

• Considerable research suggests that congenital shoulder instability is one of the traits that make some pitchers better than others, as it allows for more external rotation during the cocking phase to generate velocity.(4)

• Most pitchers lack internal rotation range of motion (ROM) due to posterior rotator cuff, and possibly capsular, tightness and morphological changes to bone (retroversion). This increases the risk of anterior instability.(5)

Pitchers throw so hard because of defects in their anatomy? That’s crazy.

by 31Boots on Jul 17, 2008 3:48 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Extend him now!

I’ve said this soooooo many times already and this will be the last. Lock him up and the money/contract that you suggested was almost perfectly in line with what i was thinking.

Nice devil’s advocate post, Grover.

by mrod on Jul 17, 2008 8:57 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I disagree - why not sign him to an extension

at the end of the season in an “avoid arbitration, three year deal” type of negotiation? If you do an extension now, you’re negotiating with a player while he’s at his statistical peak – why negotiate an extension with the major league’s ERA leader when you can negotiate with the same pitcher who has a 2.70 ERA or whatever Duke may finish the season with?

There is no reason the A’s have to negotiate with Duke now when he’s under contract for 2009 – if they want to keep him and extend him, how would it be in the A’s best interests to talk figures today instead of in October?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jul 17, 2008 7:53 AM PDT   0 recs

re

Imo, the reason you lock him up now is because at the end of the year, he only has to go one year to get to free agency. Chances are, he’s a lot more likely to take his chances on one season rather than two, particularly after he makes at least $5 million in arbitration. And even if he gets through this year leading the league in ERA, his value probably won’t be tremendous on the market in the offseason. Like I mentioned in my other post, he just doesn’t have comparables, and I expect many GMs to think he’s a one year wonder (particularly since he doesn’t work with power stuff.)

Also, if they wait until next year, if the A’s are two or three games back of the Angels at the deadline, they can’t deal him. If his peformance goes down, he might bring even less back. If his performance is still great, it’s still not a fantastic scenario, because teams aren’t paying big prices (in prospects) for rentals anymore. And, worst of all, if he keeps playing well above average, he’s as good as gone. The A’s will have zero chance to extend him if they let it go into next season and he plays well.

Fraught with peril all around, imo. Ftr, I don’t think a half season of great pitching makes his bargaining power anything the A’s can’t handle. He’s still coming off injury, he hasn’t made much in his career (relatively), and he doesn’t have the track record. Like I wrote before, I imagine it would be very hard for him to turn down any contract over $20 million which sets him up financially for life (let alone the $30 million Grover proposes.)

Sorry if that rambled and was disjointed a little. I’m working on about four projects over here.

by 31Boots on Jul 17, 2008 8:12 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

+1

I agree with grover that Duke’s value is high right now. A great time for a trade and a terrible time for a contract negotiation.

Didn’t Duke broach this publicly and Beane comment that he’d like to wait until the season’s over? A quick search says yes.

To me, that screams “Let’s wait until you settle into numbers that jibe with your true talent level so we don’t seriously overpay.” I guess it could also be interpreted as Beane stalling to wait for trade offers, but I doubt teams start lining up for this Duck dude.

by rebus on Jul 17, 2008 10:20 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I interpreted Beane's comments as indicating

that he wanted to talk extension but not when Duke’s stats were at the best they’ll ever be.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jul 17, 2008 10:55 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Well signing him now

would make a whole lot of us A’s fans feel alot more relaxed and happy. But, I get your point. Who knows what the A’s brass will do…..............

by mrod on Jul 17, 2008 9:03 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Totally agree.

There is no reason to do an extension right now. The GM has other pressing needs to deal with before the trading deadline.

I think we are stocked in pitching prospects, DH, and relievers. Perhaps he can use the upcoming weeks to make some moves that would help us in both the short term and long term.

Contracts for current players could be extended after the trade deadline.

by Yellowhorse on Jul 17, 2008 9:23 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Trade Duke and Ellis

Justin the Duke’s (or Duck if you are Joe Buck) BABIP is oscenly low no? Isn’t he really over performing? Wouldn’t he bring more for next year than Blanton?

by jeffro on Jul 17, 2008 8:12 AM PDT   0 recs

If there's an incredible offer...

of course you take it (and we’ve seen how Beane is willing to pull the trigger even when the offer is less than that).

That said, Duke keeps on doing a great Greg Maddux impression this season, and if he can be had for under $10 mil/year. Wow.

If he can stay healthy during that period, who’s to say he won’t retain trade value? Contending teams are always looking for good arms. So I’d vote for trying to see if he’s willing to sign now at a rate amenable to both sides. If not, well, there are always more pitching prospects out there, waiting to be stockpiled, I guess.

by sarchasmic on Jul 17, 2008 8:14 AM PDT   0 recs

Here's the problem, as I see it, with trading Duchscherer

The A’s will have to receive a more or less majors-ready pitching prospect if they want to have any chance of competing this year (dubious) but they will also need one if they want to have a chance of competing NEXT year (otherwise the MLB-ready rotation looks terribly thin).

But, well, we saw with Harden what happens when you tie up so much of the value of a deal in a majors-ready pitching prospect. The rest of it ain’t so hot. Long term, it’s clearly better for the A’s to focus on hitting prospects. But that would make it hard for the team to be good in 2009.

As much as the “wait and let him walk” approach seems weird, and I fully agree that it’s not normally sensible, it makes some sense here. I realize I haven’t made a great case for it yet but I’m about to be computer-free for most of the day and so I’m in kind of a hurry.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jul 17, 2008 9:17 AM PDT   0 recs

Makes Sense

But then again, I’m not one of those people who feel a player must be traded the instant that player hits his moment of maximum value, which sets me apart from a whole lot of people on AN.

by richwol1 on Jul 17, 2008 9:27 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I agree

While it may make business sense to think trade at the best of times for a player, it’s not enjoyable as a fan. Unless I become a front office cronie for a major league team, I’m going to continue to have the mindset of a fan and enjoy a stellar performance of, say, the Duke and not think about the LaPorta’s and the LaRoche’s at these moments.

"Their batters are patient to the point that it's annoying." -Ryan Franklin

by Helloooo 1st on Jul 17, 2008 12:51 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Nice diary G, rec'd

(and I enjoyed our discussion in person along these lines at AN day, albeit across the aisle and shouting to hear each other). :)

First of all, I love that you mentioned the murkiness of the “two first-round draft picks”. That’s continually written in the mainstream press, but it’s sort of a shortcut that does a disservice to the reader. It makes free-agent compensation seem more attractive than it really is.

As most ANers know, the first 15 overall picks are protected, which could have the effect of emboldening those 15 teams to make the most competitive FA offers, since they give up less value in terms of prospects than, say, the team that would’ve had to give the 16th or 17th overall pick.

For those who are advocating letting Duke walk in FA, assuming he never gets hurt in the next year in a half, his draft pick compensation will probably be something like the 35th overall pick (the supplemental pick), and the 55th overall pick. That’s assuming 15 Type A comp picks that sign with other teams, and that the 10th worst team record-wise in MLB signed him.

At pick 35, you’re not getting a mercurial, high-price talent that slipped only due to bonus demands, because the Yanks or Tigers or Red Sox already took him at the end of the first round with their pick. You’re getting two picks at 35 and 55 that have some legitimate question marks. You’re paying ~$1 million for the supplemental pick and ~$800K for No. 55, and for slightly less than 2 million you’re far from guaranteed to be getting a future major leaguer. Bottom line, it’s not a sexy haul, IMO.

Via trade, after you’ve seen a few extra years of maturity and performance with/against wood bats and grown men, you can get minor leaguers who you know will be major leaguers. They have enough of a performance record that you can reasonably forecast their future – not perfectly, but far better than you can an amateur’s future. That’s why I’m almost universally in favor of trading guys rather than letting them walk in FA – because in return, you’re getting guys you’ve had a better chance to evaluate and project.

The rare exception to that would be Ellis, because, as luck would have it, no contender is looking to upgrade second base during the pennant race, so he will garner more by walking than he would via trade.

Back to the Duke…

I think if the A’s package Duke and Street and Embree, they can get the kind of high-impact (top 20 prospect overall) minor league bat they desire, like Rasmus of the Cardinals. Ideally he’d be a right-handed hitter, though. With LaPorta out of the question, who are the three best right-handed hitters in the minor leagues?

"The painting was a gift, Todd. I'm taking it with me." -Wedding Crashers

by notsellingjeans on Jul 17, 2008 9:25 AM PDT   1 recs

So if they

(wait, no, we) ship off Duchscherer plus X (plus Y) for that high impact bat everyone keeps talking about, doesn’t that sort of bankrupt our 2009 rotation, without the counterbalance of increased offense, since said high impact bat is in AAA now, and is unlikely to instantaneously morph into Grady Sizemore?

Or are you counting on an immediate, near elite-level impact from Gio, Cahill, et al?

If trading Duchscherer pushes our contender horizon further into the future, I am stridently, fervently, profoundly opposed to it, from the deepest recesses of my A’s addicted soul, even if it is the “right” thing to do from a “value” perspective.

Postscript: After considering all of this for a few moments over coffee, jam-slathered raisin bread, and a work-related email string that appears to have been conjured by chimps gulping Red Bull, I have decided that I don’t care if my position is misguided and/or illogical, nor do I regret the gratuitous use of scare quotes in the preceding paragraph.

Postcript II: If this thread fails to spawn an epic PT-grover hypothetical trade valuation showdown, disillusionment, regret, and, yes, sorrow will pervade the 74mk household tonight. I’ll probably have to drink myself to sleep while reading archived Cesar Izturis debates.

by 74mk on Jul 17, 2008 10:35 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Drink yourself to sleep while

reading archived Cesar Izturis debates? Welcome to my world.

Who’s Cesar Izturis?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jul 17, 2008 10:57 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

This opens up an interesting debate ...

“Postscript” and “Postscript II” vs. “P.S.” and “P.P.S.”

+1 on your thoughts before the … post-cripts … are those like autopsies?

Brainless Automaton #439

by rubin sierra on Jul 17, 2008 12:36 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I make the following assumptions about the writer whenever I see "PPS"

He/she:

1. Writes with a sparkly pen
2. Dots i’s with hearts
3. Has attended a minimum of two Hannah Montana concerts
4. Is in fourth grade

by 74mk on Jul 17, 2008 2:07 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I think of "P.P.S." as entirely normal

1. occasionally, but not usually
2. never
3. none
4. long long time ago

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Jul 17, 2008 2:22 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

1. See??
2. Fair enough
3. I’m skeptical
4. Got me there. I don’t know any fourth graders who would use the word “panegyrics” while elucidating the unreliability of traditional Byzantine history. Though if such a fourth grader did exist, he/she would be awesome.

by 74mk on Jul 17, 2008 2:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

If "awesome" means

“beat up every recess,” you’re probably right.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jul 17, 2008 2:48 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

You might want to think twice before disparaging my make-believe fourth grade prodigy, who in addition to possessing mind-boggling reservoirs of historical and philosophical understanding is also able to shoot lasers out of her eyes and make volcanoes erupt just by squinting hard. I’m pretty sure it would only take one lava scalded, laser shredded snot-nosed bully to convince the rest of the schoolyard to show a little respect.

by 74mk on Jul 17, 2008 3:57 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

If I recall correctly,

in the third Dune book there are some panegyrists, so maybe your hypothetical 4th grader found the word there.

"Dispatch knuckleheadedness with Bond-like aplomb." –74mk

by iglew on Jul 17, 2008 7:27 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Amen brother!

I’m with you on this one 74mk!

”#58 is kick ass!”

by mrod on Jul 17, 2008 9:10 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm guessing the 74mk household wasn't fun city last night

No PT raining objections on my proposal.

No me crushing those objections under my heel.

And now no Blanton.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jul 18, 2008 7:13 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Evan Longoria's a good right handed bat.

let’s get him :)

Per Baseball Prospectus :
1. Maybin (Fla)
2. Wieters (Bal) – Switch hitter
3. Andy LaRoche (LAD)
4. Desmond Jennings (TB)
5. Joey Votto (Cin)
6. Chase Headley (SD)
7. Reid Brignac (TB)
8. Chris Marrero (WAS)

Per ESPN :
1. Jennings
2. Maybin
3. Wieters
4. Vitters
5. Villalona (SF)
6. Jose Tabata (NYY)
7. Austin Jackson (NYY)
8. LaRoche

Sickel’s Top 50 Hitters

This was just a quick list, hands from memory, so I may have missed a guy or two.

I still think that LaRoche is the best right handed bat the A’s should target. With DeWitt passing him on the depth chart, then he may be more easily available.

by echerrst on Jul 17, 2008 11:07 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

LaRoche would be my favorite too.

Unfortunately, I think the A’s make a poor trading partner for the power bereft Dodgers. What are they gonna do with their squad anyway? Trade for a shortstop and move Garciaparra to third?

by rebus on Jul 17, 2008 12:35 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

This is one of the worst Clash songs. They should have broken up before doing it.

Thankfully they did break up soon afterwards. Top 30 Clash songs (all UK versions):

1) Charlie Don’t Surf
2) Career Opportunities (1977)
3) Guns of Brixton
4) I’m So Bored with the USA
5) Lost in a Supermarket
6) White Riot
7) Bankrobber
8) Rudie Can’t Fail
9) London Is Burning
10) Tommy Gun
11) Spanish Bombs
12) English Civil War
13) The Call Up
14) Clampdown
15) In Hammersmith Palais
16) Janie Jones
17) Hitsville UK
18) The Card Cheat
19) Deny
20) Police On My Back
21) London Calling
22) Police and Thieves
23) Somebody Got Murdered
24) Capital Radio
25) Safe European Home
26) Sound of the Sinners
27) What’s My Name
28) The Right Profile
29) The Magnificent Seven
30) Armagideon Time

This is off the top of my head. I’d probably modify it if I had the time to think about it.

When you have a chance to get a guy like Sean Gallagher, you take it!

by WaddellCanseco on Jul 17, 2008 9:55 AM PDT   0 recs

The Clash: The Wire of punk bands

I told them 'My game is like a blog.' Because I don't know what a blog is, but it don't sound good. @('.')@

by monkeyball on Jul 17, 2008 10:08 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

me too

"Don't be an ass!" --Bill King

by batgirl on Jul 17, 2008 12:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Fond memories of that day in 1977

when the art teacher opened the morning assembly with Career Opportunities.

by green star oakland on Jul 17, 2008 10:43 AM PDT