Pitcher Analysis: Justin Duchscherer

Before I start the analysis of Justin Duchscherer (hereafter called “The Duke”), I want to confess that The Duke is my favorite pitcher of all time. He gets it done at the major league level without a 90+ mph fastball and throws five pitches for strikes, relying on his pinpoint control and his ability to change speeds and locations at will. He has been a setup man, a closer, and now finally gets his wish and has been converted into a starter (he did win a minor league Cy Young, after all). How does the Duke do it?
Well, the Duke throws the following pitches (source: Fangraphs):
- Fastball: 86 mph (47.1%)
- Slider: 81.3 mph (3.2%)
- Cutter: 81.6 mph (26.0%)
- Curve: 69.8 mph (22.8%)
- Change: 79.9 mph (0.9%)
A soft-tossing righty junkballer that dominates the American League? You bet. More after the break…

Statistical Analysis
The Hardball Times has some of the best free stat breakdowns of players today. Here’s what the Duke looks like from a statistical standpoint:

Let’s take a look at his Basic Pitching chart first. The Duke has thrown 54.3 innings with a 2.32 ERA and a 1.03 WHIP, surrendering only 2 home runs and a .285 SLG-Against statistic (much better than Batting Average Against). He has a 38:15 k/bb ratio, or 2.53:1 (good). Furthermore, he also controls the running game very well - he has a short, compact stride and is quick to the plate. He has a good pickoff move to keep the runners close, and he varies his hold times well to confound would-be runners.
As we focus on the THT Pitching chart, we get to the good stats. The Duke’s Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) stat is 3.22 - when you compare this to his actual ERA (2.32), we can see that he has been a bit lucky in regards to balls put into play. Sure enough, his DER behind him is at a .750 rate, giving him an approximate BABIP of .250 (we’ll check Fangraphs for the exact number later). Most pitchers surrender a BABIP of .298 or so, confirming that the Duke is a bit fortunate. He has actually induced more fly balls and his Infield Fly (IF/F) percentage is low. The key stat here is the HR/F stat - or Home Runs on Fly Balls. It is a ridiculous 3.9%. HR/F is a stat that normalizes in a small range (11-12%) for most pitchers in the league, and the Duke has shown no ability to depress this rate at such a high level. Lastly, his LOB% is low, at 72.2%. When you add everything together, you can draw a very simple conclusion: The Duke is getting really lucky on balls put into play this year!
However, let’s give credit where credit is due. The Duke is posting an above-average k/bb ratio of 2.53:1 (league average is about 2), and he is actually giving up a bunch more line drives than usual:


Though we can expect the Duke to regress to the mean, we should also expect his LD% to go down a bit while his GB% also goes up. This should help him, since it’s pretty hard to hit grounders over the fence!
The Duke’s BABIP is indeed below league average:

Fangraphs says BABIP under .298 is “good,” when in reality it should read “lucky.” This will regress slightly back to the league average, meaning that the Duke can expect more bloopers and grounders to find holes and create hits.
So, what does it all mean? Statistically speaking, we should expect the Duke to give up some more hits and home runs on his flyballs throughout the year, and his ERA will certainly finish above 3. However, what we know about the Duke is that he has pinpoint control and depresses SLG-Against well. He doesn’t give a lot of free passes on the bases, and when you don’t walk batters and it’s tough to hit doubles or home runs off a pitcher, it is consequently difficult to score runs. My prediction for the Duke’s final ERA would be around 3.70 - still quite good!
Mechanical Analysis
Before I go into the video of the Duke (taken from his start vs. the Tigers on June 4th), I’d like to discuss this photo I ran across while doing a Google Image Search for him:

This is a perfect example of what Tom House calls “equal and opposite arms.” Note how his glove arm mirrors his throwing arm - this helps to keep the pitcher balanced and free of timing flaws.
Here’s a video of the Duke inducing a groundball to Hannahan at third base with a cut fastball:

Note how quick and low his stride is - as a runner, it’s very difficult to pick this up. When you combine it with frequent throws over and an ever-changing hold time before leg kick, it’s nearly impossible to time the Duke to successfully steal.
Arm Action:

The Duke does an outstanding job of keeping his shoulders closed and turning his hips well ahead of his upper body. This is a major component of velocity, though in the Duke’s case, you might not notice it! Regardless, it is a major plus to look for in a pitcher’s mechanical analysis. The Duke has a nice clean pendulum swing arm action and his elbow stays below the level of his shoulders throughout his delivery. He does not reverse rotate his shoulders or hips, adding to the deception on his pitches and helping to ensure his arm gets up on time at footstrike. The Duke also does not feature much horizontal abduction (scapular loading) of his arms, which should reduce the load on both the anterior and posterior structures of his shoulders.
At footstrike/point of turning the shoulders, the Duke’s arm is up through the horizontal plane and not late. This will reduce the load on his Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL). I give the Duke’s arm action an Excellent rating - in fact, the best I have analyzed on this site! (No bias, I swear!)
Tempo
Out of the stretch, the Duke is 16 frames from maximal leg lift into footplant. This is Excellent.
Ball Release / Followthrough

The Duke points the Pitching Arm Side (PAS) shoulder at the target after release and sets himself up for a good followthrough phase. Furthermore, the Duke “yanks” his head out of the way at the last minute as he delivers the ball from a high 3/4 arm slot, much like Tim Lincecum. This will add to the deception and make it harder for the batter to pick up the pitch on time - giving the Duke a few more mph in perceived velocity. His ball release phase is Excellent.
As for the Duke’s followthrough, it is picture-perfect - Excellent. He passively decelerates his arm uniformly across his body, letting his pitching hand slap against his left hip/butt as he points the PAS shoulder at the target. He firms up the glove arm and doesn’t “sling” it back (much like Scott Kazmir), giving him a stable foundation to throw against. He doesn’t lock out his Glove Arm Side (GAS) knee, which I don’t care much about, but it will reduce the load on his knee/hips.
Overall, the Duke is mechanically outstanding. The only problems he will have are due to supinating the release of his breaking pitches - his overhand curve, his cutter, and his “slider” (I think he only throws a cutter, so the Pitch f/x or Fangraphs system might be picking up cutters as sliders). This will cause soreness in his elbow due to the olecranon process slamming into its fossa, and he will lose range of motion and flexion about his elbow joint with every supinated release. He can also strain his upper arm muscles as a result of this mechanical flaw, as fans saw him land on the 15-day DL with biceps soreness/strain. Hopefully as the Maxline Pronation Curve makes its way through baseball, we will see less of these injuries.
The Duke’s back injuries are not a result of pitching and more of an unfortunate reality that athletic competition does not affect all humans equally. The Duke is almost certainly genetically predisposed to back problems/injuries, and will suffer them throughout his life. Hopefully the Oakland A’s medical staff has good chiropractors and massage therapists on hand to work with the Duke between starts.
This fanboy gives the Duke two thumbs up from a statistical, mechanical, and performance stance. There’s something awesome watching a right-hander get people out without throwing over 88 mph and usually sitting well below that by using his pinpoint control and wits to outsmart the hitter.
Read more about pitching/hitting mechanics at Driveline Mechanics.
22 recs |
34
comments
Read Related
Comments
very educational, recommended
I believe Duke’s back problems date from a serious car accident some years ago. It’s actually a testament to lots of hard work (and possibly some good luck) that he can be a successful major league pitcher.
by OaklandSi on Jun 8, 2008 6:09 AM PDT 0 recs
Great Work
Good Analysis, seems like you know a lot about effective pitching mechanics! I have one question and it is not baseball related, by what means do you get those frame by frame videos uploaded into the article?
by SwishMyNish33 on Jun 8, 2008 6:10 AM PDT 0 recs
Video.
I use various feeds and capture equipment/software. I can’t be more specific since MLBAM gets on people for doing this. :)
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Thanks for the thorough analysis, as always!
But “the olecranon process slamming into its fossa”? First Pete Rose, and now this?
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on Jun 8, 2008 9:16 AM PDT 0 recs
Fantastic stuff. Please, please, PLEASE can you do Barry Zito and Tyson Ross (the A's 2nd round pick)
Thanks!
by mikev on Jun 8, 2008 10:45 AM PDT 0 recs
Barry Zito / Tyson Ross
I mentioned Tyson’s mechanics on my site and in a comment on AN. I don’t like his arm action.
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 12:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Well then screw you.
I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal
by Nico on
Jun 8, 2008 5:47 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Sorry.
It’s not personal.
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 9:11 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Barry Zito, I forgot
As for him, I have always disliked his mechanics. He has a major L-arm in his delivery and hangs his arms, no doubt taught by Tom House to do so. He supinates the release of his curveball.
I think all these factors contributed to his continuing drop in velocity, dating back to 2002.
I should have a piece on Zito going up at SI.com – I’ll be sure to let you know.
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 2:25 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Very interesting
"To me, boxing is like a ballet, except there's no music, no choreography, and the dancers hit each other." - Jack Handey
by JJ on Jun 8, 2008 11:17 AM PDT 0 recs
I disagree with the conclusion that the Duke is getting lucky on balls hit into play. His whole success this year is based on the cut fastball, which he is dominating with by getting mis-hits, ie balls off the barrel or the end of the bat. I believe you have a great shot of him throwing one in the article. The pitch looks some juicy high heat, before it slides inside and ends up jamming the hitter. Surely there is some systematic variation in BABIP for some guys.
In his radio interview before the game yesterday he said as much, that he was getting lots of outs with his cut fastball, which floats off the sweet spot of the bat and forces tons of pop-ups.
I do, however, think Duke is going to fade over the course of the year, simply based on fatigue. Two hundred innings is a lot for a guy who hasn’t thrown anything like that in years. If he doesn’t get injured, he will still need a lot of help to keep his stuff together. I think he’s got a sub-3.00 ERA in him, but expect 3.25.
by Mark Borgschulte on Jun 8, 2008 5:18 PM PDT 0 recs
That shot in the article
Is not a cut fastball. That’s a two-seam fastball with tailing action. Regardless, your point is well taken that all of his pitches have significant movement, causing more mis-hits than swing and misses because of the lower velocity.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on
Jun 8, 2008 7:50 PM PDT
up
0 recs
BABIP
Surely there is some systematic variation in BABIP for some guys.
There is, but BABIP stabilizes for almost all hitters. Your statement:
His whole success this year is based on the cut fastball, which he is dominating with by getting mis-hits, ie balls off the barrel or the end of the bat.
Could literally apply to all pitchers in the MLB.
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 8:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
BABIP Part 2
And by hitters, I mean pitchers. Pitchers by and large cannot control the result of balls put into play, with the exception of SLG-Against as well as IF/F .Voros McCracken is the one that initially published these findings (with his studies on Defense Independent Pitching Statistics).
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 9:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
This sort of begs the question
Duke may well have excellent mechanics—I really am not an expert at all. Assuming that is true, why does he have such mediocre velocity? Is he just a crummy athlete (by MLB standards)? If his properly maximized throwing force is still not that great, that would imply that there’s not a lot of oomph there.
This is not to slag Duke—he could throw upside down and underhanded and I wouldn’t care as long as it got results. I’m just curious.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on Jun 8, 2008 5:26 PM PDT 0 recs
Maximizing velocity is just genetics taking over
Certain body types and people are able to generate higher arm speeds. So in terms of pitching, yes, he would be considered a below average athlete at the major league level.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on
Jun 8, 2008 7:53 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Velocity.
There are probably a few things he could do to tick up his velocity, but he really doesn’t need to. Most people have genetic ceilings for arm speed, or at least, that’s the prevailing theory.
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 8:51 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Tell Me More About the Maxline Pronation Curve
I work with athletes often. I see more elbow injuries than you want to know. If you could reference your resources, I would be grateful.
"I've been accused of using too many words...I suppose that's like accusing Mozart of using too many notes." Bill King
by Gerard on Jun 8, 2008 5:37 PM PDT 0 recs
MPC.
Email me for more information.
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 8:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Who is this Driveline Mechanics Person?
This is a great fanpost. Very well-done and informative. Keep posting DM! The Audience is listening. :-)
by IM4Oakgal on Jun 8, 2008 6:21 PM PDT 0 recs
Who am I?
Just an A’s fan who writes his own blog – and a big fan of the Duke. :)
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 8:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Great analysis again, Kyle -- much appreciated!
Since AN’s own Brad Ziegler made it to the majors, and I noticed a resemblance between his motion and Dan Quisenberry’s (mostly his follow-through, with a little hop to the right), I’ve been wondering:
Has anyone studied sidearm or submarine motions from a kinesiological perspective? There might not be enough sidearmers to really draw conclusions, but someone who knows their stuff (i.e., someone other than me) should be able to assess the mechanics of various motions, even without a lot of major-league examples to draw on.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on Jun 8, 2008 7:16 PM PDT 0 recs
Most of the advice I have seen on pitching from the sidearm and submarine motions
Is similar to overhand throwing. It’s just creating body tilt via the waist; the elbow still stays roughly level with the shoulder (or at least it should to avoid injury concerns). Obviously DM would be more of an expert, but I would think the difference in mechanics is almost all in the lower body.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on
Jun 8, 2008 7:56 PM PDT
up
0 recs
It seems like you'd naturally supinate the elbow in a submarine motion though, wouldn't you?
From what I’ve read, the current thinking about overhand pitchers is that doing that is a big no-no—but submarining is also thought of as a much more natural motion for the shoulder, putting way less stress on the rotator cuff. So one practical question would be, is supination a red flag for a submariner, or is it a natural way for the elbow to move with that motion? It doesn’t seem to hurt fast-pitch softball pitchers any, and they throw crazy numbers of pitches and innings.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
by Nick on
Jun 8, 2008 8:11 PM PDT
up
0 recs
If you supinated your elbow in a submarine motion
You would throw a frisbee slider, and yes, if the wrist is hooked or bent inward towards the forearm it would be harmful. Same as if the supination was continued on the follow through. Softball pitching is entirely different; submarining is still overhand pitching, just with a tilted torso. The only reason it would be more natural would be that velocities are lower, and that you are probably using more of your core torso muscles to generate torque.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on
Jun 9, 2008 7:58 PM PDT
up
0 recs
They mentioned on today's telecast
that Quisenberry was the guy that Ziegler and Romanick patterned his submarine motion on.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
by PaulThomas on
Jun 8, 2008 8:47 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Excuse me if this has been asked already but..
Who’s Mechanics in the Majors right now do you love? Who’s would you put in your top 5 deliveries?
When will then be now? Soon.
by Syphon on Jun 8, 2008 10:56 PM PDT 0 recs
Hm. Good question.
I don’t think I can put them in a numerical order from 1-5, but the top five in no particular order off the top of my head would be something like:
Greg Maddux
Tom Glavine
Justin Duchscherer
Tim Lincecum
Zack Greinke
Of course, I have probably evaluated about 5-7% of the current starters in the MLB at the moment. Without video and slowing down the mechanics of a pitcher, it is nearly impossible to tell whether or not they have injurious flaws.
http://www.drivelinemechanics.com - An unconventional look at baseball video analysis.
by Driveline Mechanics on
Jun 8, 2008 11:26 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Thx for response.
Seems now that Grienke is on his meds hes an outstanding pitcher. Love Linceum as well. Good to hear he has good mechanics since hes so small and throws so hard I figured he was an injury risk. The good mechanics should help him to stay healthy. Of course anything can happen but it cant hurt.
When will then be now? Soon.
by Syphon on
Jun 8, 2008 11:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Lincecum's mechanics
I’ve read really different things about Lince’s mechanics… seems like the one thing people agree on is that he is really consistent and deliberate with all of his movements:
Video analyzing Lince’s mechanics:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1aYXDjEpjf4
Can you offer some insights on why you think his mechanics are good besides simply being consistent? It just looks so weird and the way his back twists so strangely, so I’d love a professional analysis of it. Thanks!
And can you tell us why on earth Dontrelle WIllis does that CRAZY high leg-kick?
by C-Gon on
Jun 9, 2008 3:06 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Lincecum is pretty good mechanically, I would agree
I’d like to see a couple of adjustments though. He has a slight hitch in his arm during windup, and while his timing is good, his arm is completely straight before he starts forward, which doesn’t seem like it would be the most healthy thing for an elbow. He also turns his back a little too much to the hitter. He gets away with it by clearing his hips well, but he also flexes his back to the extreme. I could see him having back problems if his core loses strength over time, leading to some non-arm related durability issues. His follow through is explosive but I’d like to see him firm up his front side a little more by keeping his lead arm strong through follow through. He tends to pull his glove back and out of the way of his throwing arm, and I think that hurts his ability to locate consistently and probably puts a little more stress on his throwing shoulder.
Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?
by baseb3383 on
Jun 9, 2008 8:10 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Duke's velocity
I was sitting in the bleachers during the A’s-Red Sox series and some Red Sox fan was going on and on about how Beckett hit 96 on the gun and Duke topped out around 87 for the day… while Duke was no hitting his team for 6 1/3… haha. Made me nervous though that he had so many fly balls, but your analysis makes a lot of sense cuz he induced a TON of pop-ups and shallow fly-outs.
by C-Gon on Jun 9, 2008 3:02 AM PDT 0 recs




















