Athletics Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

Staturday: Draft Edition

Some readers of this site may have noticed that there has been quite a lot of activity surrounding a recent event, the 2008 Major League Rule 4 Draft. Although it is not typically accompanied with the same fanfare of the NFL or NBA’s draft, these two days in early June have more of an impact on the fate of our beloved franchise than virtually any other in sports. As such, loyal readers must forgive this author for taking a break from his ongoing series, Pitch, Blease, which, you need not worry, will be picked up in three weeks, to delve into some numbers surrounding the draft.

No, the topic has not yet been beaten to death. The numbers I will be exploring are very different from the extensive set provided by Taj Adib and others over the last two days. Instead of focusing on the players drafted, I will be looking at trends over the last few years and what that tells us about this class.

The data is courtesy of Baseball America and runs from 2005 through 2008. I would have preferred to go back a couple more years, but that is as far as they do and this author is lazy. In case anyone has become interested, Staturday is in search of an intern to help out in compiling the basic data that allows us to do our work.

Star-divide

Rounds 1 through 3
With their first pick, the team selected the super-athletic Jemile Weeks. The younger brother of Brewer second baseman Rickie and the child of two track stars played baseball for the U.

With the second pick, the team selected Tyson Ross, a converted infielder who is still learning to pitch. He has the athleticism of a shortstop who outgrew the position. If he were still playing the field, I would imagine he would be a top defensive right fielder (assuming he can catch the ball). Instead he will be king of the hill, throwing nasty sinking fastballs and a wicked slider at a very low minor league level and working on his mechanics, trying to bounce back from a disappointing season at the University of California.

Arizona State catcher, Petey Paramore finishes this year’s opening troika. He is a patient hitter with a line drive approach but a lack of homerun power. The polished soon to be pro is a defensive wiz behind the plate, with a quick and accurate, but average arm.

So we have a second baseman, a right handed pitcher and a catcher, each drafted after their junior year out of top tier colleges. How does that compare to the previous three years? As it turns out, fairly normally. Eleven of the sixteen picks the team has made in the first three rounds were college educated, six were pitchers and two were middle infielders. Paramore was the first catcher the team has taken in the first ten rounds over this period, though. Perhaps more importantly, all sixteen picks signed with the team.

Rounds 4 through 10
In the fourth round, the team went for Anthony Capra, a lefty starter from Wichita State. Many think his future is in the bullpen but he pretty much is what he is, a left with an average fastball, good control and good secondary stuff who should move quickly through the organization.

They followed that up with Jason Christian, the Michigan Wolverine’s shortstop. A nice combination of a sweet glove and a frame that could add some real muscle, he is someone I like a lot.

In the sixth round the team switched gears and went with junior college super athlete Tyreace House. The outfielder has not really learned how to play baseball yet, but if he does, this is a pick that could pay off in a big way.

In the seventh the team grabbed Brett Hunter, another high upside player, coming off a season wrecked by injuries at Pepperdine, The fireballing righty has electric stuff, with a plus-plus fastball and a nasty 12 to 6 curve but inconsistent command and mechanics that make scouts wonder if he can ever stay healthy.

The team rounded out the group with JC outfielder Jeremy Barfield, who features major league bloodlines and, apparently, a temper to match, JC catcher Mitchell LeVier and high school outfielder Rashun Dixon.

All told, it adds up to two pitchers, one from each side, a shortstop, a catcher and a trio of outfielders. Three went to college, three to JC and one was drafted out of high school.

The team definitely leaned much more heavily on the junior college ranks than is typical. Only once in the previous three years had the team drafted a junior college player this early. Chad Lee, a right handed pitcher from Barton Community College was drafted in the 4th round in 2006 but washed out quickly. He is the only player the team has selected with any of its first twenty picks over the previous three years. The entire draft was JC heavy, as the team selected seven, while only having pick 9 over the previous three years.

The team has signed 81% of its picks in this portion of the draft over the last three years, so there is a good chance one or two will not be starting their professional career with the A’s.

Rounds 11 through 20
11th Chris Berroa OF, Junior College
12th Zac Elgie 1b, High School
In the 13th the team took injured college RHP Daniel Thomas.
14th David Thomas OF, College OF
15th Nino Leja SS, High School
In the 16th, college RHP Matt Fitts, drafted for the second time out of Lewis-Clark State, but he is eligible to return.
In the 17th, college 3b Bradley Glenn who you can watch take on Weeks’ Hurricanes in the NCAAs.
18th, Rayan Gonzalez RHP, High School
19th Michael Hart RHP, College
In the 20th Rodney Rutherford 3b, College

That makes for a total of six college kids, one JC player and three high school players. Over the past three years the team has gone much more heavily towards college talent at this point of the draft, selecting at least eight each year.

The team has seen four of their thirty selections in this group return to school, so one or two from this group may be lost.

Rounds 21 through 30
21st Mathieu LeBlanc Porter RHP, Junior College
22nd Preston Guilmet RHP, College
23rd Chris Rusin LHP, College
24th Ken Smalley RHP, College
25th Trey Barham, College
26nd Ryan Doolittle RHP, Junior College
27th Brent Warren OF, High School
28th Dusty Coleman SS, College
29th Justin Murray RHP, College
30th Kevin Jernigan 2b, College

That makes seven college players, two JC, one HS and a total of seven pitchers. I would guess that this will surprise many, that this late in the draft the team is still drafting so many college players. Even more surprising, perhaps, is that the team actually usually drafts even more. The three non-college players the team drafted this year matched the number it had picked over the previous three combined.

The team managed to sign the exact same portion, four out of thirty, as they did with the previous group.

Rounds 31 through 40
31st Mickey Storey RHP, College
32nd Ben Hornbeck LHP, College
33rd Shawn Haviland RHP, College
34rd Riley Welch RHP, High School
35th Virgil Hill CF, Junior College   
36th Jonathan Berti SS, High School    
37th Ryan Doiron RHP, High School
38th Bobby Crocker OF, High School    
39th Dennis Clement RHP, High School
40th Jeffrey Dennis LHP, College

That makes four college players, one JC, five HS and six pitchers. It is only at this point in the draft that the team typically turns away from college players and focuses on younger talents. Over the last three years, only 32% in this group have come out of college.


We should not focus too much on these guys, though, as the team typically only signs about 25% of the players it drafts this late. Of the seven that signed, four went to college, three to JC and none only to HS – this, despite more than half of the team’s picks being spent on high school players. Additionally, the team only signed one pick in the last half of the group over those three years.

Conclusions
Overall, this draft looks fairly typical – with a heavy emphasis on college talent, especially in the late rounds and a ton of pitchers selected. The team has also continued its recent trend of going after high upside, high risk picks in the middle rounds. That said, while it may not show up in these numbers, the team did seem to move more towards athleticism and raw tools than it has in the past.

This leaves the question of whether the team will continue to sign its picks at the same rate – whether it will be able to bring any of the seven high school kids, some of whom have very live arms, into the organization.

How the team answers that question, I suspect, will have a huge bearing on how AN ultimately feels about this draft.

Poll
How do you feel about this draft?
Love it.
83 votes
Like it, after the first round.
107 votes
Meh.
161 votes
Not a fan.
38 votes
Fire Geren Now!!!!!!
40 votes

429 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 50 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Athletics Nation

Staturday: Baserunning & CF Defense

Feb 2009 by grover - 182 comments

Staturday: Monday Free Agent Edition

Dec 2008 by devo - 170 comments

Comments

Display:

Nino Leja, now that's a major league name.

Matt Fitts, however… that’s a AAA name.

As for Mickey Storey… that’s a used car salesman kind of name.

"You have to have a catcher or you'll have all passed balls."- Casey Stengel

by Gaijin_Suketto on Jun 7, 2008 1:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I thought Mickey Storey sounded like

a private eye in one of those Fabio-on-the-cover romance novels.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Jun 7, 2008 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mathieu LeBlanc [Porter]

Sounds like a guy from “Friends”

by rightbackin on Jun 7, 2008 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the idea of the team taking more risks

especially in the middle rounds. I’d love to find out how many guys taken in the middle rounds turn into successful major leaguers. That would probably give more insight as to why they went in that direction.

Nice piece, devo.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Jun 7, 2008 8:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Do you mean in general?

We’d be very fortunate if a single player taken after the third round made the majors.

"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by devo on Jun 7, 2008 8:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

I mean in general. So why not take chances on raw, high upside guys once you start to get into the middle of the draft.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Jun 7, 2008 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Teams do need organization players

Most of the picks in rounds 21-30 were guys that the A’s probably see as career minor leaguers, but hope can make it up the ladder a few rungs to fill out their rosters. (The one exception I see there is Ryan Doolittle, who is a flyer on a guy that they hope has good genes.)

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jun 7, 2008 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder...

what is the overall percentage of post-3rd round draft picks who make the majors? I’m sure there are some stats on it somewhere, but I’ll be damned if I can find ‘em.

But, obviously, there are overlooked diamonds in the rough that can be plucked from the later rounds: Later round picks who’ve developed rather nicely

Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb

by FoolshGame22 on Jun 7, 2008 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Other than "signability" picks that get first-round bonuses,

it is extremely rare for a player taken on the second day of the draft to make the majors.

FWIW, I imagine that it’s a lot rarer for college players than younger guys; the older a guy is the more likely the evaluations made of him will have ranged in on his true talent level.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jun 7, 2008 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not clear on the difference betwee "Meh" and "Not a fan"

Also, nice summary Devo! I understand the idea of taking high school position players later in the draft, but I didn’t think that spending on bonuses for high school pitchers was generally fruitful. I guess it doesn’t matter since they were mostly drafted after the 30th round though.

by WaddellCanseco on Jun 7, 2008 8:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

"Meh" means you could take it or leave it ...

“Not a fan” means you actively do not like it …

"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by devo on Jun 7, 2008 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I totally misinterpreted that.

I assumed “not a fan” meant you’re not into all this draft-pick wonkery so you have no opinion.

How the heck does “not a fan” mean you actively dislike something? I’m “not a fan” of the San Diego Padres, but it doesn’t mean I dislike them. I have no opinion of them at all (except when we’re playing them). Ditto for most the other teams in the NL, and about half the AL, too. Not to mention other sports that I don’t follow at all.

formerly known as mdl

by iglew on Jun 7, 2008 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sure that's the literal definition

but “not a fan” is kind of slang (or just an understatement) for “i don’t approve”.

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05

by xbhaskarx on Jun 7, 2008 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks

It’s hard to know when an idiom is truly litotic.

“Not bad” = good, but “not terrible” =/= excellent.

formerly known as mdl

by iglew on Jun 7, 2008 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the first round pick unlike many

I think Weeks has the potential to become a Kenny Lofton type player; a guy with an OPS of around .800 plus burning speed and great range in the outfield. I can’t see him sticking at 2B, his speed could be better used elsewhere.

I was also impressed by Capra and Hunter. Capra is your typical polished college lefty; great control, a variety of solid pitches. Lots of lefties that sit at around 89-91 mph are still very effective. I think he will rise fairly quickly and be able to help out relatively soon in the bullpen at least. Hunter has a wicked fastball. Anytime you get a chance to pick up an arm like that after the first 5 rounds, you take it.

Ross is a huge project. He needs to fix his delivery period. He’s going to get hit at the major league level with such a short stride. Even if he throws 91-95 mph (which I didn’t see, mostly was at 89-91), it probably looks like it’s in the high 80s to the hitter because he releases the ball so far back. So he’s not just losing velocity with his delivery, he’s also not shortening the distance between himself and the hitter. Also, I didn’t really see a third out pitch, which you would usually expect from a guy being touted as a top of the line starter.

Prince: This bores me. Is anyone up for a game of basketball?

by baseb3383 on Jun 7, 2008 8:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

BA says Ross has 3 legit pitches, fastball, slider, change ...

I don’t think it’s accurate or realistic to say that they all have to be “out” pitches.

I disagree with your reasoning for moving Weeks. 2b is far and away the most valuable position that he can realistically play. He loses a fair amount of value if he has to move to the outfield.

"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by devo on Jun 7, 2008 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice write up devo

There’s an underlying theme with the early round pitchers that you touched on. The A’s have gone after guys who haven’t been pitchers their entire amateur career. Ross, Cahill and Lansford (all 2nd round picks) played primarily as infielders before converting to pitching full time a year or two before getting drafted. That means these guys are athletic and have fresh arms.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jun 7, 2008 9:11 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No plan is perfect

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jun 7, 2008 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

so... you're saying any individual pitcher may suffer arm injuries? no way.

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05

by xbhaskarx on Jun 7, 2008 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Question for you Devo

Which of our top 10 picks is most likely not to sign?

by faninphilly on Jun 7, 2008 9:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

not devo but

Dixon (round 10) and Hunter (round 7)

by jakarta on Jun 7, 2008 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not the guy to ask ... PT or Taj would have a better idea than I ...

"It's for your own good. Big strong Devo knows whats best for Poppy" -- Mossback

by devo on Jun 7, 2008 6:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dixon for sure

He has a football scholarship offer. I can’t see how they sign him without going over slot; however, I think they might, because if they weren’t going to it’s hard to see why they’d have picked him at all.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jun 7, 2008 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

After the first five rounds, few of us can know

If they can sign Hunter, Barfield, Dixon, Elgie, then I think I like that middle part of their draft.

I was disappointed with Weeks, but not surprised, you could kind of see that coming months ago. The difference between having the 10th or 11th pick and getting the 12th was a big difference. I get that Weeks should be a major league starter, and that he was the only other non 1B/DH who looks like a pretty sure-fire starter. And they already believe in /have seen his ability to hit with wood.

Ross. I know that they love his power cutter and feel comfortable developing that pitching repertoire. They certainly have had ample opportunity to scout him. I trust their judgment on this pick. They clearly were happy he was available. Reminds me of the Cahill pick, in that they didn’t expect him to reach that slot, but he was the obvious person on their draft board.

Paramore. safe pick. they know what they are getting. Not very exciting. Should make the bigs as a backup at least , would have to really improve as a hitter to jump ahead of Suzuki/Bowen/Powell/Recker. But they don’t have a catching prospect below AA, and it makes me wonder if the Miller/Kendall/post Ramon Hernandez fiasco is making them want to be extra sure that they don’t need to burn resources trading for a catcher.

Capra. I have no idea. There’s no doubt that he’s been well scouted and they are pretty sure what he is. He should do well quickly, but we probably won’t know how successful he is until he gets to the high minors. Hard to see how we need him in the system, but you don’t throw back pitchers who can start in the bigs.

Christian. makes sense here. Still not too exciting.

So they went for a 2B/CF, RHP, C, LHP, SS in the first five picks, and then went for obscure or gamble picks after that. It makes sense, but only if they scouted well.

by jakarta on Jun 7, 2008 9:57 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think my discussion with Billy

leaves me confident that they’re doing a much more thorough job scouting than ever before so I feel good about the obscure and gamble picks. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a couple of them emerge as really nice picks.

by Tyler Bleszinski on Jun 7, 2008 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That comment really bothers me

For a team that flies the small market banner so eagerly it would be incredibly foolish for them to ever slack off on scouting. Signing amateur talent is the most cost-efficient way to build a baseball team and the A’s know this.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jun 7, 2008 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with your perception blez

and grover, the way I see it is that there was a transition post Fuson in the 2002-2004 years when they were not putting their board together optimally, and to which they have continued to adjust. Reading between the lines of a bunch of a conversations, it seems like they addressed a problem and have been encouraged enough by their reads of the draft class the last few years to give them confidence to blend styles and trust their board.

by jakarta on Jun 7, 2008 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Signing those guys partly depends on how much money the A's are willing to spend

Is Oakland willing to go above slot on any of the names you mention? Are they willing to offer a 2nd/3rd round bonus to a 7th round pick? If not, then the odds of signing said player drops a lot.

I really like the Paramore pick because it addresses an organizational need.

Capra is interesting in that he’s only been a SP for a short period of time. Let’s see how he developes with a full season workload in the rotation.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jun 7, 2008 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The joy of reading Baseball america and

Boy I do love looking at my Baseball America Prospect book and the Draft Issue. A few interesting notes the I have found.

1. Going into the year, they ranked the top 100 college prospects and had Ross at #11, Weeks at # 19 and Paramore at # 35

2. Nick Maronde was the #70 prospect in their draft issue and A’s picked this guy in the 40 something round. Is there any way he will sign? Boras is agent, so I am guessing that would be a big no! So I guess we can look forward to to the same, “if we only signed Smoak” stuff in a few years for this guy.

3. A’s picked the 27, 51, 58, 70, 114, 117 and 152 of Baseball America top 200 prospects. Great, if they get most of these guys signed.

by dougald1 on Jun 7, 2008 10:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Maronde was picked

just to keep someone else from getting him and paying him first-round money—something I wish the A’s (and all small-market teams) would do a lot more of.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jun 7, 2008 11:01 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

okay but if he's really a #70 prospect... we could also just give him #70 prospect money, right?

i guess keeping him away from other teams is good, but if he’s any good, actually signing him would be nice.

A's v Giants "is kind of like the difference between going to see the Ramones and going to see the Bee Gees. A's fans will go see the Ramones." -BB 07/27/05

by xbhaskarx on Jun 7, 2008 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's a Boras dude...

so even if he’s the #70 guy, he’s probably looking for #10 guy money…

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jun 7, 2008 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

some thoughts

Ross – power sinker, high character guy..kind of similar to cahill. the big issue is his delivery, if they cant tweak that he’ll take off

weeks- slight overdraft, but one of the top athletes and one of the few college middle infielders on the board. i think he wouldve gone soon after to cards at 13 or mets at 18. filled a need. could’ve gone w/ wallace, but they were probably convinced he wasnt a 3b long term

Paramore- C from ASU, i saw some mocks as high as late 1st/supp rd. defense mlb ready, switch hitter. they needed catching in the lower levels of the system. i guess solid value in rd 3

the college pitchers they took had great 07’s, but iffy 08’s Ross Cal/Hunter Pepperdine/Guilmet AZ. if healthy they were good value and probably some of the better trio of west coast SP’s at the college level

4th rd Capra, a lefty starter from Wichita State. puzzling pick since Gorgan was still on the board and went a pick later to STL. i’m surprised they took another lefty, maybe they move him to the BP who knows.

5th SS Christian Michigan tall, toolsy SS…dont know much but Sickles thinks its a solid pick

6th House/10th Dixon are athletic Cf’s, tons of speed. Dixon has a football scholarship at Miss St. that will be a tough sign

Barfield is huge w/ plus plus power, but not much else…maybe he is similar to Chris Carter

Sp’s Fitts/Rusin were thought to go around the top 6 rounds, i guess solid value in the 16-20th rd range

day 2 A’s took alot of tough sign HS’s like Warren/Elgie/GOnzalez/Messer/Moronde.
i have doubts they can even sign one of those but it would make up for not having extra supp picks

overall solid, but could end up good if they get some tough signs…other than weeks and maybe ross, not really an fast track guys compared to 07 w/ Simmons/Doolittle/Carignan/Brown/Demel etc.

very late they took a couple infielders in SS Coleman/2b Walton. both can go back to school also.

the strength of this draft early was 1b types and relievers which A’s already had depth in

lots of athletes, high upside picks, but its all about signability. if they stick to there plan of not going over slot, i think we’ll all be disappointed.

i dont want the draft to be known as the draft they just missed smoak

by Asfan4ever723 on Jun 7, 2008 11:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Who said their plan was to not go over slot?

We have no idea what their plan is right now.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jun 7, 2008 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The A's should at least have drafted a guy named Mirrors,

so they could point out that they conducted the draft without Smoak and Mirrors.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jun 7, 2008 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Refresh my memory

Who was the left-handed catcher that everyone was talking about? Was that Paramore, or someone else?

formerly known as mdl

by iglew on Jun 7, 2008 1:58 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Mike Squires?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jun 7, 2008 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he's really a CF

The video they had on mlb.com showed him charging singles in CF. I think “C” was just a typo for “CF”

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Jun 7, 2008 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or else he's a catcher who plays really deep

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jun 7, 2008 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's funny

So it’s a few days later and we still don’t know if he’s really a C or a CF?

I’m bummed if he’s CF. I think it would be really cool to have a LH catcher. Sort of like having a submariner. It’s weird and unexpected, but I don’t see that it’s that much of a disadvantage.

formerly known as mdl

by iglew on Jun 7, 2008 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Both would even better -

I would love watching throws to second from a submarine-throwing left-handed catcher.

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jun 7, 2008 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But if you tag a baserunner with a submarine before he gets to 2nd, is he out?

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Jun 7, 2008 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Scout.com says he's a CF

and if you google his full name, every hit lists him as a CF. So I’m going with my typo theory. Sorry!

"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s

by Nick on Jun 7, 2008 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My thoughts on the first round pick, Weeks vs Wallace

The mantra to many in baseball drafts is always take the best player available, ignoring needs and current system talent. The theory is that a good GM can trade for positions of need or move players around to make things work, and its easier to acquire these players when you have the most talented players to trade. While I like this theory and think Billy Beane does as well, I’m not sure he adhered to it fully with this pick, or not in the sense that Weeks is a "better player" than Wallace. Here are a few reasons why I think he went with Weeks anyway.

There is a lot of talent already in the 1B/DH mold in the A’s system. Daric Barton is the A’s starting 1B, and while his poor start this season (.230/.347/.342) has lowered his value some, he still was a top 50 prospect coming into this season and is likely the 1B of the next 5-6 years for the A’s. The A’s Single A Stockton Port team also has 2007 Supplemental Pick Sean Doolittle who has found his power stroke this season with 15 HR and an overall .327/.417/.627 line. Its only one more HR than his teammate Chris Carter, the 21 year old 1B/DH acquired as part of the Dan Haren trade. While his .221/.348/.495 line isn’t nearly as impressive, a lot of that is tied up in the low batting average, as his Isolated Power (SLG minus AVG) is a robust .274. With this talent already in the lower levels of the system I’m not sure Wallace would really fit. If he was an elite player like Smoak then you can make room for him. But I’m not sure Wallace was that guy.

I also think position scarcity played a huge role in this pick, and this is not only in regards to the A’s. Counting Wallace as a first basemen (which almost unanimously scouts believe is his destiny), 7 1B went in the first round this year. Once the two Beckhams (no relation) went off the board, there were few up the middle prospects available. And this is a trend that is prominent throughout baseball’s minor leagues. Scouring the top 100 prospect reports before the season came out and the only 2B to pop up on any lists was the Padres’ Matt Antonelli, who has put up a dismal .179/.315/.283 line this season. While there are many more shortstops on the list and it is assumed you can move a SS to 2B, most of them are very young like the Rangers’ Elvis Andrus or Mariner’s Carlos Triunfel, who appear to be at least 3 years away. Upper level offense-talented middle infield prospects are a hard commodity to come by, and I think teams are much less willing to trade the few that do exist.

The trend continues in the majors, where 2B put up around a .755 OPS last year, and in 3700 PA this season AL 2B have put up a .700 OPS (the NL’s is much higher at .751 but that’s just driven by Chase Utley’s 1.064 OPS), though to be fair AL 3B are OPSing .664 so offense is down across the spectrum. Though Mark Ellis is a defensive stalwart, he will be a free agent at the end of this season and he’s just turned 31 today (Happy Birthday Mark!), and should not be a part of the A’s future 3 years from now. While SS Josh Horton is looking good in Single A right now, there is a lack of middle infield depth in the A’s system and in most teams across baseball. Its for this reason I like the Weeks pick, while it appears to be a pick of need per se, it really is more of a pick of positional scarcity, a term more commonly associated with fantasy baseball than it is in "real" baseball. I think it is still plenty relevant though and visible with this pick.

This is all assuming he sticks at 2B, where reports on his defense vary greatly. While he’d still be plenty useful as a centerfielder, his value diminishes if he can’t stick at second base. I think the A’s organization has already taken this into account with the pick and think he’ll be able to hold onto the position.

by iamawesomer on Jun 7, 2008 4:27 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for the great breakdown

I guess it make me feel a little better about the Weeks pick. Now that the pick has sunk in a little bit, it does make more sense to me. I mean the A’s do have some 1st base prospects in Carter, Doolittle. I would also think that the A’s are waiting to see which, if any Outfield prospects develope. I mean Robnett, Putnum, Mitchell, Deno, Sweeney, Sulentic, Gilbert, Herrera, Cunningham, Desme, Just to name a few. Im not a the best source as far as which of these guys have a huge upside but I would imagine Oakland sees a few of these guys making the big club down the road. We all also know that the Minors have some high upside pitchers also. So with the Organization full of Outfield and 1st Base/DH types I understand the middle Infield pick in Weeks. I was wondering from some of the picks this year if Beane and company are going to start looking more at speed guys as power numbers seem to be dropping?

by asfaninpismobeach on Jun 7, 2008 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't object to picking Weeks vis a vis Wallace

I do object to picking him over Hicks and Martin, because I felt they were higher upside and the team could use the down-the-road prospect given how much of the talent projects to show up around the same time that Weeks does.

Shrug. I’m not the expert here.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Jun 7, 2008 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Oakland Athletics.

Community Guidelines ANcillary Terms
Start posting about the Athletics »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dsc00764_small
DLD - 11/07/2009 - How to Keep Yourself Occupied in the Off-Season
527918550406_0_bg_small
2010 Off-Season Blueprint
Depaulbluedemons_small
Community Prospect List #15
Super_grover_small
2010 Offseason Primer
Oaklandathletics_small
The (un)Official bit... uh.. Feedback thread for the layout change

Recent FanPosts

Bill_king_small
AFL Rising Stars Showcase Tonight on MLBN @ 5PM
Me_at_att_park_small
Greener Grass, Episode 4: The Biggest Off Season (Potential) Decision Doesn't Involve Free Agents
Oaklandathletics_small
Hardy to Minnesota. What's with the early offseason trades?
Tyler_at_maya_school_small
Happy 6th Birthday, AN!
Oaklandathletics_small
Let's Go Oakland: Keep the A's
Bill_king_small
Organizational Statistics: Winter Leagues
Funny-pictures12_small
My Rant Against The Champions And MLB In General

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Tyler_at_maya_school_small Tyler Bleszinski

08-_the_author_small 67MARQUEZ

Baseball_small baseballgirl

Poochini-butt_in_box_2_small Nico

As_kings_cal_small louismg

Editors

Countdown_small Taj Adib

Ziegler160px_small Flashfire

527918550406_0_bg_small notsellingjeans