A's Attendance Woes
Attendance, attendance attendance...here we go again. Attendance this year at the Coliseum has continued to be a sore point despite a surprisingly competitive (yet everchanging) team that is sent to play night in and night out; one that is within spitting distance of first place. There've been articles recently regarding the A's home attendance slump this year and this most recent one, as well as past articles highlight a few points that may be reasons casual fans are staying home:
1.The departures of Swish and Haren this past off season.
Sure, this was tough for everyone. Trading these two went a long way in anonymizing this team as did the Scutaro trade prior to these. Who were we left with to really root for? Chavez, Crosby, Harden? Yeah...no. Ellis? I love the guy as much as the next person and think he may have been the most valuable player for the past couple of years for his stellar defence and consistency but he doesn't really make me feel all warm and fuzzy. How about Jack Cust ...not so much. We were all waiting for Blanton and Street to be delt so that pretty much ruled them out. That basically left Travis Buck and Daric Barton to fill that void. Barton's time with the big club last year was a nice surprise but that was all of 18 games and Buck, when he was healthy, really tailed off as the year went on. And then there's Bob Geren . Enough said.
Has the casual fan given up on the A's due to the departures of great players the likes of Tejada, Giambi, Dye, Mulder, Zito, Hudson, etc.?
2. The faltering economy.
This one hurts everyone in just about every business, however certain areas of the country namely the Northwest and Bay Area are feeling the effects much less than most other areas. Attendance is down all over baseball but some teams in good positions are drawing very, very poorly like the A's, Marlins, Rays and Rangers. Dont' forget, the Rangers are right on our heels. The A's average attendance this year is 18,968 and it wasn't too long ago when we weren't selling out playoff games. The Giants average attendance this year is 33,708 and they watch a far inferior team with almost no hope but they do get to watch them in a far superior satdium, which brings me to my next point:
3. The Coliseum
I remember one writer some time ago refer to it as looking like a post nuclear apocolypse version of a ballpark, or something to that effect. No one can deny the fact that it really does look like a concrete turd and there really isn't much in the way of amenities to be had once inside the stadium.
I live in Chicago where there's the Oh So Mighty Cubs and then the white sox. Both teams are in first place in their respective divisions but much like the Bay Area one team can do no wrong and the other is an afterthought. Much like the Giants fans, many Cubs fans know little to nothing about baseball (not nearly to the extent as Giants fans, they're on another level) and most Sox fans are die hard. My friends that are Sox fans point to the stadium issue as a big reason for the Cubs bias that goes on here and just about everywhere else. Wrigley field is located right in the heart of the north side (aptly named Wrigleyville), surrounded by numerous bars, restaurants and night clubs all shrouded in Cubs flags and paraphernalia. Whereas U.S. Cellular field (nicknamed The Cell) is in an industrial area of the south side that doesn't really have much to offer other than the ball park itself much like The Coliseum in Oakland. Most Cubs games sell out and Sox games aren't even close.
So what do you guys think? Why aren't people showing up to the games in Oakland? What are the main issues as to why the seats only fill up when the Red Sox are in town? As I said before, I'm in Chicago and looking at it from an outside perspective.
91 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
a's fan
means never having to say you’re sorry about attendance. tarp. fremont.
owner of a lonely tarp
owner publicly slagging current facility
Is it prurient? I don’t know what to tell you. I think it’s odd and interesting. It’s part of life. @('.')@
Two teams in town.
Mesozoic Era stadium.
Rebuilding year.
Crappy broadcasting deals.
Crappy marketing.
Eric Chavez unable to hit his way out of wet rice paper.
Notes From The Nat has a new home: http://www.natnotes.com
Ditto
Ditto
Sometimes life will strike you out on a curve ball and the only choice you have is to flip off the umpire and walk to first base anyway.
by Threepwood XX on Jun 12, 2008 5:46 PM PDT up reply actions
beautiful, indeed...
it will be sold out for a solid decade!
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on Jun 12, 2008 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Wanna bet?
How do the angels get to sleep when the devil leaves the porchlight on?
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jun 12, 2008 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions
an earring piercing?
;-)
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on Jun 12, 2008 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions
hell yeah
that’s what I’m talkin about. Sweeet.
by sf drift king on Jun 13, 2008 3:41 AM PDT up reply actions
What the hell is hovering over the top of the stadium?
It looks like a chain linked fence? Is it clear plexiglass? Regardless of what it is, is its purpose to keep fans dry or stop balls from leaving the stadium? Whatever the purpose, it’s God-awful and needs to go before it ever arrives.
Other than that (as well as the location), I approve. The surrounding area reminds me of Camden Yards, which is beautiful.
http://www.myspace.com/ryanmac10
by RyanFromBonas on Jun 13, 2008 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions
I think that's a cut-away
The roof isn’t pictured so that you can see the seats below it.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
The Coliseum being a bad ballpark is a bunch of overrated malarkey.
While the concessions and gear aren’t well represented in the outfield… the inner portion of the Coliseum is just fine by my standards. I have been to several ballparks and this one has plenty of charm even if I do drink the Kool-Aid. However, I would have given anything to see it before Mt. Davis fucked up the view of the bay. That’s for sure.
I feel somewhat out of place to even post my opinion since I’m not from the area but it’s very disheartening to see the attendance every night. The Oakland area is a very loyal bunch even though there numbers aren’t always strong but life, in general, comes down to money. The economics are the only thing that matters to ownership these days and Gordon Gekko’s foreshadowing is eerily familiar in this instance.
I think it’s inevitable that the A’s have to move to Fremont or someplace else but that is only the case because of economics. If I had season tix for years, I would be very upset but I wouldn’t necessarily blame ownership for what they are doing. They are acting within their own rights and the local politicians seem very disinterested in their local constituents or might be acting on behalf of the majority of them.
Was Black Snake Moan a comedy or a drama?
by ohtobe21likehuston on Jun 12, 2008 5:57 PM PDT reply actions
When you say "view of the bay"
...do you mean “view of the rock quarry?” The stadium looks away from the bay and into the Oakland hills. Not the nicest part of the hills but, you’re right it was much, much better before the second coming of the Raiders.
by WhiteElephants on Jun 13, 2008 12:18 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm a NRAF but have seen a lot of video footage of when Mt. Davis
wasn’t there. That is the worst idea I’ve ever seen when going from original specs to renovation or adding seats.
Was Black Snake Moan a comedy or a drama?
by ohtobe21likehuston on Jun 13, 2008 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions
They'd have been much better off
bowling it out in the outfield and throwing in the private boxes elsewhere (maybe along the fence line for a near ground level field view). Throwing up a huge monstrosity that isn’t good for either sport, bad idea.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
You left out the part
about the ownership’s calculated alienation of fans who like cheap seats and the City of Oakland.
How do the angels get to sleep when the devil leaves the porchlight on?
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jun 12, 2008 5:58 PM PDT reply actions
you're alienated already?
Just wait ‘til Wolff converts to Statanism!
Is it prurient? I don’t know what to tell you. I think it’s odd and interesting. It’s part of life. @('.')@
Yes, but as a hopeless codependent
I’ll probably brand an inverted Pythagorean star onto my bicep and keep showing up regardless. Albeit with scammed free tickets.
How do the angels get to sleep when the devil leaves the porchlight on?
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jun 12, 2008 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions
What's really needed here at AN
is a discussion among RAFs regarding specific reasons why each of us don’t go to more games.
The Coliseum has always offered terrible sightlines for watching baseball. Good grief, you sit in the 25th row directly off first base, how many feet are you horizontally from the foul line? That did not make so much difference when the seats in Section 112, Row 25 were maybe $15. But now those seats are $35 (or $40 for a “premium” game, i.e. Yankees). I have a much better seat from my living room couch, for no marginal cost. Granted, I pay Comcast more than $1000 per year for that seat, but Comcast is providing other services as well for that price. I would be paying that $1000 even if baseball shut down in yet another labor dispute.
The “old” Coliseum did offer good value and good sightlines from the pre-Mt. Davis bleachers. The current “bleachers” are some football seats that remain after enough other seats are moved away to permit a baseball field to be laid out. From most of the seats in the Mt. Davis area, you cannot see a substantial portion of the outfield. I would be willing to pay the current “bleacher” price of $13 ($15 “premium”) to sit in the old bleachers, but that option is not available.
In summation, I think live attendance at A’s baseball games at the Coliseum is a lousy value. I still go once in a while, out of loyalty, addiction, however you want to phrase it, but I’ll be in my living room tonight, and I’ll use the money on a Lake Tahoe trip this upcoming weekend.
OK, RAFs, here’s you’re opportunity. What is your reason for watching games on TV when you could be at the Coliseum?
$8 beers add up quickly...
If one stays home and watches the game on TV, one can have a six pack of beer, a nicely grilled salmon filet and ice cream, all for less than you’d pay for a couple of beers and parking at the Coli; nevermind the price of the tickets.
And, you get instant replay.
Foolsh, the most insane regular poster on AN since oaktoon left - salb
by FoolshGame22 on Jun 12, 2008 6:38 PM PDT up reply actions
What you said
I just don’t really enjoy going to the Coliseum any more.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site
jamesvenes.com - Blog
The value question
The “seat quality per ticket dollar” curve got steep when Mt. Davis made the bleacher seats suck, it got a lot steeper when the upper deck was closed, then grew steeper still with the price hikes of the last two years. I think that’s the biggest part of the attendance drop: if a good clean view is a big part of why someone goes, they’re going less now.
Moreover, the savvy fan used to have lots of discount options to work around this. But the awesome old coupon sheets are now gone, kid tickets are proportionally pricier, and the various discounts have either been reduced (AAA) or changed to apply to only the more costly sections (like the ANG family packs and the Chevron BOGOs). On top of a capacity with like 60% fewer cheap seats than it used to have (the rest being tarped), the low-end really gets squeezed. I’d say that’s the second biggest cause of the attendance plunge.
(The third biggest cause I’d attribute to fan resentment of the relentless trashing of the Coliseum in and City of Oakland by ownership, but I’ll leave that aside now).
All this said: there are still really good values to be found at A’s games. I still go to lots of games. You just have to work for it, taking discounts where you can, going to $2 games, sniffing out freebies, never paying to park, eschewing all concessions, and finding your way to seats with good views (whether the exact ones printed on your ticket or not).
How do the angels get to sleep when the devil leaves the porchlight on?
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jun 12, 2008 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Couldn't agree more on all your points.
I still want to go, but when the value for the buck isn’t as good declines so rapidly and the economy tanking, really it’s much easier just to watch the game from home with all the amenities instead of spending $20 bucks on gas, $15+ on parking (instead of a really great meal or two) on top of whatever you spend on the game instead. For someone in the north bay, really you’re already spending upwards of $30 or more just to get to the Coliseum, let alone get in to watch the game.
In search of a new signature. Say something funny and you may see your comment here!
Because I like watching games on TV more?
I think I’ve mentioned this before, but while an individual game is fine as an occasional social event or day trip, I have no desire to attend large numbers of games. Particularly not large numbers of night games, which are bloody cold and end so late that the entire evening is shot by the time I get home.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
I think this is the general sentiment of most fans here in the bay area
And really the weeknight games is where the A’s take the biggest hit in attendance and I think 2 factors come in to play:
1) The Weather: We have fantastic weather that not only allows us to enjoy more options with our entertainment dollar but it also spoils us (nothing personal Paul). In cold weather cities everyone spends so much time bundled up over the winter that once the summer comes they are dying to get outside in any way they can. Weekend, weekday, weeknight, it doesn’t matter. People jump at the opportunity to get out to a ballgame because outdoor activities are only an option for less than half the year.
2) Time Zones: Back east people are more geared to a late rise, late night, whereas out here folks are more geared to an early rise, early bed time. We have more early risers who have jobs, especially in finance, that demand they be in at 6AM when the market opens, whereas folks back east with the same job don’t have to be in until 9. And if I’m not mistaken, I believe San Francisco has significantly more jobs per capita in finance than Los Angeles does.
by GusanoQuemador on Jun 13, 2008 12:05 PM PDT up reply actions
OTOH, bleacher seats at ATT ($33 on the Giaunts site for Sat night's game) seem to cost more than lower bowl infield at the Coli ($30).
Don’t know if the team jacked-up prices for our benefit or for weekends generally, but that’s a lot of money for the bleachers.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Jun 13, 2008 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions
Giants jack up the price for A's and Dodger games
As an apperence fee for being outnumbered by Giants fans over there, but by outcheering them.
Compare this series at AT&T to the midweek series against Detroit afterwards. The difference, espcially in the cheap seats is noticible. During the middle of the week, their cheapest tickets compare favorably with ours.
by VivaOakland on Jun 13, 2008 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Cool part about A's games.
I was able to make it out from ATL to the coliseum for the first time in four years last Friday for the Angels game. I will say one thing, for the few fans that are there, the support is great. I swear almost every person in the stands has some sort of A’s shirt, jersey, jacket, or hat. I mean everyone has green. The few people that I did talk to had a good knowledge of the team as well. This is a huge contrast to the Braves here in ATL where you are lucky to see 5 Braves logos in an entire section. More on this later.
With that said, I had some sweet seats in section 121. Albeit expensive ones, but I can say I had no complaints. The problem with this is, when you start to head more down the baselines you get so dang far away from fair territory. It’s like you are so disconnected from the field it feels like you are watching it on tv. Couple that with the fact the outfield bleachers sit 20ft. off the playing field, there is really no sense of intimacy to the ballpark. You don’t quite get the same affect at the coliseum as in parks where you can see the players faces, here them chat, and the sounds are so much more defined. Also, the isles throughout the concourses are so dang narrow, it’s a pain in the ass trying to get out of the game, even when there are only 15k there. For true baseball fans these are all huge detractors.
I feel really bad that the team has so little attendance. I can totally understand it though. To go to more than a couple A’s night games a year you really have to be a die hard fan. The place isn’t exactly beaming with charm, or drawing the casual person in either. For instance I have met friends at college in Auburn, AL that say, “Dang, have you ever been out to that new Giants park in San Fran. We had some free time and stopped in to see a game while on vacation. It was so cool…” Places like Wrigley, Pac Bell, Fenway, and Yankee stadium not only have their own unique charm, but they are also tourist destinations. I’m curious of the percentages, but there are undoubtedly thousands of out of towners who make it a point to see these places while in the city.
When Cisco Stadium opens, if they can ever get the crazy environmental people to chill out over the pile of dirt on the site, I’m sure it will be drawing just like AT&T. I’m just hoping that the casual people in attendance won’t drown out the 10k or so die hards. I think thats kind of what happens in ATL.
What about Barry?
"Barry who?" Forst said, and I felt like I was in the middle of a knock-knock joke.
I went to two games at the Coliseum last week
As an Iowa A’s fan, I’ve only been to Oakland twice during baseball season—and really enjoyed both games. The first game I sat in the ‘bleacher’ seats; the second game I splurged for tickets behind home plate.
Even though the crowds were sparse both games, I had a lot of fun at both games. This was likely partially because I’m used to seeing the A’s in opposing ballparks (Minneapolis, Kansas City) or on internet radio or MLB.TV. There’s definitely something to be said for being surrounded by fans in A’s shirts and hats and chanting “Let’s Go Oakland.”
I talked to a friend who had moved to SF last year, and she had a terrible experience at her first A’s game. She went on opening day, and it took a long time to get in, concession lines were bad, and she didn’t have any interest in going back. Not a fan of the A’s (or even baseball), per se, but definitely the ‘ordinary community person’ you would maybe want to get into the game to boost attendance numbers—and she didn’t have any intention of going back. (I encouraged her to check out a game against a less popular team.)
I dont think
the $15 parking helps with attendance problems.
It's a boring team
I was talking to a co-worker about this same subject and we agreed that this team has no personality and little entertainment factor. People enjoyed/related to Swisher, Giambi, Tejada, Hudson…....... Also, the greats of the A’s past were very entertaining with their offensive prowess; lots of homeruns. This team, though, is a bunch of walk taking and singles hitting sissies. (i.e. Suzuki, Sweeney the younger, Hannahan, Barton, Davis, etc.) Of course Crosby leads in doubles, but whenever he is at the plate I still expect him to swing at an outside slider. The pitching has been great, but Blanton just does not thrill me with his ability. Same goes for Eveland and Smith. But, I would pay to see Harden and Duke pitch. All in all, watching this team play is uninspiring. Perhaps others feel the same way and are staying away from Oakland more than usual.
+1
It is a boring team. As much as I love them, it’s just not that exciting to watch.
by 33SwisherSweet on Jun 12, 2008 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions
+2.
I agree 100%. This was my primary reason for wanting Barry Bonds. Even with his excess baggage, he brought a certain level of excitement to the game. If we had him, we wouldn’t be here talking about attendance issues. And I would have found a way to renew my season ticket package.
by sf drift king on Jun 13, 2008 3:54 AM PDT up reply actions
the solution is obvious, then
Beane needs to sign Chuck Norris.
Is it prurient? I don’t know what to tell you. I think it’s odd and interesting. It’s part of life. @('.')@
Couldn't disagree more.
First of all, to draw a parallel to homegrown heroes like Hudson or Swisher – let alone MVP’s Giambi and Tejada – is downright unfair. From roughly 2000 through 2006, when the A’s were one of the most successful teams in baseball, fans were absolutely spoiled by an overachieving front office that produced more wins than its payroll ever suggested it should. To expect anything close to magical seasons like 2003 or 2006, with what we’re working with, is absurd. I realize you didn’t make a case-and-point comparison, but you drew a parallel to the elite-level talent, which I still feel is unrealistic, if not unfair.
You guys don’t know how good you have it. Stranded here in Buffalo, thousands of miles away from the team I’ve now supported for 20 of my 25 years, I get fired up when my neighbors internet reception comes in well enough to give me uninterrupted MLB Gameday radio feeds. I get a kick out of it when the operators of the A’s Extra Innings post-game show don’t believe me when I call in after a big, extra inning win, because they know it’s the middle of the night in New York, and guess what? I’m fired up over the 35-31 Oakland Athletics.
If you’re not as excited about this team as I am, here are 10 things, off the top of my head, about which you should be excited:
1) One of the five youngest players in the bigs, Carlos Gonzalez, is making his mark as a five-tool talent. Moving on.
2) Rich Harden is (knock on wood) healthy and as dominant as ever. Enough said.
3) Bobby Crosby, of all people is among the league leaders in not just doubles like pedoman said, but games played, and is at long last showing his promise.
4) Gold Gloves or not, Crosby and Mark Ellis constitute one of the best defensive middle infields in baseball, which I think is saying something.
5) Who could talk defense without talking about the six-time consecutive Gold Glover? I don’t care if he’s not .280/32/101, if he’s anything close to it, he’s the middle-of-the-lineup presence we’ve lacked for a good part of the year, and he’s still makes the most difficult plays look routine at the hot corner.
6) Huston Street, other than the past week, has been arguably as dominant as ever, regaining the velocity that made him Rookie of the Year.
7) I totally disagree on Raj Davis. Yes, he’s a reserve, but he impacts almost every close game the A’s play with the blinding speed we’ve lacked since Rickey in his prime.
8) Frank Thomas, prior to his injury, appeared to be regaining his form that made him again one of the most feared hitters in baseball in Oakland just two seasons ago, and I expect nothing less than for him to continue that pace upon his looming return.
9)
Buck
Crosby
Chavez
Thomas
Cust
Ellis
Barton/M. Sweeney
Gonzalez/R. Sweeney
Suzuki
While it’s a ways away, I’m excited to see what such a lineup could do over the bulk of the season.
10) The second youngest team in baseball and youngest in the AL having the fifth best record in the league. That says it all.
http://www.myspace.com/ryanmac10
by RyanFromBonas on Jun 13, 2008 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm a lawyer and work 70 hour weeks yet I can find
a way to make 3-4 games a week. Why? Because I love baseball and the A’s. I sit in shit seats (actually I like the 9 dollar seats first row dead center), but I make the games and cheer on the home town 9.
The problem can’t be blamed on weak economy (attendance has sucked the last decade or so), the trading of players (see last point), or exorbitant parking fees. I’ve gone over this many times before. I grew up in So Cal going to hundreds of Angels games (1985 through my first year at berkeley in 1997). The Angels were second fiddle to the dodgers from their birth through 2002. Now it can be argued that the angels are the more popular team in so cal. What changed. Sure they won a World Championship, but the bottom line is Arte Moreno is a great owner.
First thing he did was lower beer prices. He now sells 2 for 1 season tickets to get the butts into the seats. It is actually “cool” to go to an Angels game; it is a destination. The difference is their owner (the once second class citizen) thinks outside of the box. The best our owner can do is try to rip off the rally monkey. That there friends is our problem. A COMPLETE LACK OF BUSINESS SENSE, MARKETING SENSE, ADVERTISING SENSE, ETC.
I’m tired of hearing the coliseum be put to shame, i’m tired of hearing that it’s due to the fact that we don’t keep our players, and I’m tired of all these lame ass excuses.
The bottom line is we don’t have owners with vision. It is that lack of vision that is killing us. If I had the all the answers I’d be a millionaire and I wouldn’t be wasting my time as a lawyer. However, the problem is clear – the answer my friends is blowing in the wind.
by 33SwisherSweet on Jun 12, 2008 11:08 PM PDT reply actions
Trumpet Puppet - come on!
Lew, I’m happy that you stay to the end when other fans have left, but please try to think outside of the box buddy. You are a millionaire. I know you didn’t get there by not taking risks and knocking off other people’s stupid ideas.
by 33SwisherSweet on Jun 12, 2008 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Lew has been brilliant
as an owner. He has robustly grown the value of the Oakland Athletics Baseball Corporation, and if he pulls Fremont off he’ll be a goddamn sports business genius.
Sadly, putting numbers of butts in Oakland seats isn’t a part of his model, and I despise him for it. But as for him doing his job--making his owner group a ton of money—he’s great. The bastard.
How do the angels get to sleep when the devil leaves the porchlight on?
by FreeSeatUpgrade on Jun 12, 2008 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Lew the screw
Lew is throwing all of his chips into the Fremont basket. He does not care about Oakland at all. True- he is making money in the short term. And after the Fremont thing fades away … the ownership group will sell to the next sucker who believes they can rip the A’s from Oakland’s clutches.
To be fair – the City of Oakland has done a piss-poor job of marketing the city, and revitalizing Oakland’s reputation. SF has its share of “problems”. But when you hear about them – its the “western addition”, the “fillmore” or “hunters-point”. Its never San Francisco. Because “they” protect the name brand. I have lived in Oakland for 40 years. I live in a wonderful neighborhood. Full of wonderful people, and we are so tired of all the negative hype about our city. Yes, there is crime. But definitely not everywhere.
The Coliseum is good enough to have hosted (4!) World Championship teams. I’ll take that and pass on “beautiful” AT&T or Wrigley field, that for some reason can’t seem to host any championship flags since before World War I.
I look forward to the day we bring in new ownership. Ownership commited to Oakland.
by GrewUpAtTheColiseum on Jun 13, 2008 6:13 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree 100%
I agree with you completely. Thats one of the reasons I hate the Giants. In fact, almost all of the reasons I hate the Giants are off-field ones. The on-field teams they have fielded have been pretty weak. I live in the glenview district between 580 and montclair and my neighborhood is sleepy, friendly, and quiet, but all I hear about is how bad international is from people who don’t even live over there.
by VivaOakland on Jun 13, 2008 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions
I can fix the attendances in five minutes.
1. All seats 50% off on every game that isn’t a weekend.
2. All beer $5. All the time.
3. $2 hot dogs. All the time.
4. Free parking on weekdays.
That’s it. Fill the stadium by making less money. Fill it for three weeks straight, then inch things back when people have had a chance to get back into A’s baseball.
SRO.
Notes From The Nat has a new home: http://www.natnotes.com
You're right
This would do the trick, do you want butts in the seats? Or do the A’s want empty seats?
Problem is that those aren't decisions that can be made by Lew
Concessions: Aramark is the company running concessions and they can charge whatever they want for beer & hot dogs. The A’s can ask them to make a change, but have very little say so.
Parking: Controlled by the city of Oakland. They own the parking lot so they make the decision on price, deals, etc. Again the A’s can make a suggestion, but really have little control in the end.
by GusanoQuemador on Jun 13, 2008 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions
The club can work something out.
Even if the club had to pay a set fee to the city to ‘buy’ the parking lot for a night, it’d be a marketing smash and well worth it.
And Aramark isn’t stupid – they know that if they do their part to reduce prices for a short period, they’ll sell more food to more people, and make roughly the same amount of profit as those low-attendance days, with the benefit that they’ll be helping bring more people back long term and building an audience for when prices go back to ‘nasty’.
That, and when it comes time to renew contracts, assistance in such plans would surely be looked on more appreciatively than obstinance.
Notes From The Nat has a new home: http://www.natnotes.com
Do you really think customers are that stupid?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
Right. And that's why you get a bunch of degenerates on the...
...cheap Wednesdays that come out to those games and few others.
You’re going from three weeks of half-off seats, cheap beer, cheap hot dogs and free parking to “Well, maybe the team can do it for a night or a few games.”
A temporary change isn’t going to lead to a sharp spike in long-term attendance. It just doesn’t work that way.
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site
jamesvenes.com - Blog
You're going to have to come to terms with the fact...
..that if you want to attract the casual fan, you’re going to get degenerates.
Which do you want? Empty seats and empty coffers or full stadium and a couple of jackasses occasionally taking swings at each other in the parking lot?
And I’m not ‘going from’ anything. I’m saying that if the A’s can make such changes for one-offs (like those degenerate-filled cheap seat/cheap hot dog days), they can make them for periods that run longer.
They just won’t, because it’d cost money in the short term to make it long term, and that ain’t the way the A’s play it.
Notes From The Nat has a new home: http://www.natnotes.com
Hey! I'm a cheap degenerate who mostly only goes to Wednesday games!
Is it prurient? I don’t know what to tell you. I think it’s odd and interesting. It’s part of life. @('.')@
I'll never understand it
and I’ve given up trying. I go to at least forty games every year. The A’s have played great baseball the last ten years (if you think they’re “boring” I’ve got no idea what you want from baseball). I have always loved the Coliseum, but I go to be at the game, not the ballpark. And if you think watching the game on TV is a superior experience… too bad for you.
by Brian in 317 on Jun 13, 2008 7:12 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I like the Coliseum
I think it is a good place to WATCH BASEBALL. I don’t go to a game to be seen or to soak in all the non-baseball activities. Let those clowns across the bay do that.
I also don’t think this A’s team is boring. It is a young team with some shortcomings but I find them fun to watch.
We may be de-sensitized to it, but the whole "Coliseum experience" is awful for casual fans.
From beginning to end: My bottom 10—there are many more:
1-ugly(ass) approaches over the stalag BART bridge or in the lots
2-cattle drive to the over-enthusiastic strip searches by Security
3-parking structure chic decor
4-dingy, crowded underworld routes to the seats
5-vastly over-priced, uninspired crap for concessions and merchandise
6-shallow, distant sitelines
7-ushers who refuse to keep promenaders out of the aisles except between batters->obstructed views
8-unintelligible scoreboard stats
9-no buzz from the scoreboard content (except the li’l ‘phant puppet - I love Lilpant)
10-a team built for people who are deeper in the baseball onion
Okay, a bonus one: 11 - team website that is poorly organized and where stuff is hard to find
Fix it, Unca Lew!
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
LOL @ "strip searches"
I know you don’t mean that literally, but this is about the 4th comment I’ve seen in the last few weeks about Security’s pre-entry “searches.” I’ve never, ever, hundreds-of-games ever had Security do anything more than give a cursory glance into my bag or maybe briefly pat my blanket while I’m on my way into the stadium. Even in Fall 2001. Is it really just that I have such an innocent face, they’re giving me special “light treatment?” ;)
AN 3.0's Search Function is *hawt*!
There's a woman at Gate A who must be paid by the seized item.
We try to avoid her. Anyway, you’ve got an honest face.
I’m sort of numb to it, but really, all those back-ups, barriers, temporary tables and uniformed personnel don’t convey “fan-friendly.”
Truth be told, I suspect they’re mostly looking for alcohol. The solution to that was suggested by Ozzzz above.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Jun 13, 2008 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions
I accidentally took an Exacto knife into a game with me once.
That’s about as potentially dangerous as I get.
AN 3.0's Search Function is *hawt*!
I got searched so thoroughly...
I had to tell the security guard afterwards that in some countries we would be considered married.
strip searchs
they just pat my bag, they don’t even lift or look at it sometimes. If this was a newer staduim like Pac Bell or a classic like Yankee Staduim or Wrigley you’d be worried about a terror attack, but only us true fans love the coliseum.
by VivaOakland on Jun 13, 2008 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions
12. The slo-mo concession stand workers
Even during poorly attended games (which is to say, all of them) they take forever.
How hard can it be to pluck a pre-cooked veggie dog out of a bin and pour a beer from a tap situated right in front of them?
Maybe I’ve just stood in the wrong line. Every single time. For the past 13 years or so.
by Ray of Lite on Jun 13, 2008 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions
A's Attendance thoughts
I recently read a great book on the A’s of the 1970s and the author made several comments on the very low attendance of the great A’s teams. The A’s have had attendance problems year after year (except for the late 80s). The attendance problems through the years led me to believe that while some things about this year (poor economy, gas prices, lack of stars, high turnover) are causing the drop from 2006, I think the consistent attendance woes for the team can be attributed to the following reasons, all of which have been constant.
1- The major reason is that the Bay Area is the smallest populated Metro area in US with 2 teams. Wash- Balt. is somewhat similar numbers in population. They are both having attendance problems. (LA, Chi, NY metro areas are probably double the pop.)
Some cities that have 1 team with only slightly smaller metro pop. areas than Bay Area have decent attendance (Boston, Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Seattle, Philadelphia, Phoenix)
The fact that the A’s have had attendance problems except for late 80s through their history is primarily due to the fact that the Bay area’s population is not great enough to support 2 teams with great attendance.
2- Coldness. It has always been cold at night at Coliseum, a complaint for decades.
3- Oakland- The city is not very affluent. Lots of people in Oakland are struggling to pay their bills and have for years. This can cause a drop in crowds as poorer people have less disposable income. Crowds at Major League Baseball in the 2000s has become even more affluent. There are millions of people in East Bay that can afford to attend many games but there are not as many as other cities (like SF, Northside of Chicago, Boston, Seattle).
The great attendance of the late 80s can be attributed to
1- absence of Raiders (I am sure many in Oakland had to choose between football tix. and A’s tickets throughout the years, well there was no choice from 1982-1994)
2- AWESOME TEAM. The A’s of late 80s would win 100 or more games and had some of the biggest stars of the era. (Henderson, Canseco, McGwire, Eck.) were the best players at their position of that time.
3- Owner- I wasn’t a fan then but I understand the owners in that time were much beloved.
don't forget that Pac Bell...
is much closer to the east bay, and many suburban fans who used to go to A’s games, decided to go to Pac Bell becuase it was much easier to get to than Candlestick.
by VivaOakland on Jun 13, 2008 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions
The ushers don't help matters.
A note sent to Customer Service this AM:
I am writing to ask that you reconsider instructions to the ushers.
1-item - we are partial season ticket holders in 1xx. We come in A Gate from the north lot or down the ramp from the BART bridge. Twice on arrival for recent games, the usher at the top of the 125 aisle has tried to force us to walk around to 1xx in the dark, dank, dingy and over-crowded underworld. Note that this was at 6:30ish, when sweet-farkall nothing was happening on the field. Last evening, he accused me of “thinking I’m a guy the rules don’t apply-to.” He may be right, especially when/if it’s a senseless rule like that one. Neither the stairs nor the aisle was crowded, at all, at the time—and this was a pretty well-attended game.
2-item-we sat with friends on the homeplate-side aisle in 126 over the weekend. During the game, the top and bottom ushers (not the same guy as above) refused to limit the aisle promenaders to times when there was nothing going on in the game - like between batters or between innings. Consequently, my view was as often blocked as it was open. You would have to be at least five seats-in the row before that was not a problem. A direct, polite request that they try to limit traffic was met with this response: “but what if they want to go buy something?” Answer: they learn to do it between innings - as at the competition’s facility across the Bay.
The upshot is that the ushers attempt to control the aisle when there’s nothing going on (1, above), but not when the game is in progress (2). This seems backwards to me. At a time when attendance is down, I think this is a management matter that would help improve the “best possible fan/family experience” at the Coliseum.
Thanks for considering.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
The aisle problem...
seems to get worse every year. They really do need to do something about it. I sat in section 120 last night and it was a constant parade of people coming in and out during the at-bats. I am not quite as bothered by this as my husband is…but for him it aggravates him so much! I get tired of listening to his complaints about it. it’s so easy to teach people to be courteous too. The Giants have done very well with their ushers directing people to wait. People will still get up to buy food between innings and when there is no batter in the box …they should know that’s the time t do it. The Oakland fans need educating on game ettiquette. It’d be a better game experience for all if that were to happen.
Did you really use the term "sweet farkall nothing" in a letter to the A's?
I mean no offense by this, but saying things like that is invariably counterproductive when you’re complaining about customer service. It makes you come off as a crank who can be easily dismissed and won’t be satisfied anyway, so why bother.
I know it feels nice to vent, but if your goal is actual results I’d suggest a different tack.
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
Yes. I did.
I did not write it expecting real change to come about as a result, and I think ‘sweetfarkallnothing’ is kind of quaint. .
But I do not expect my phraseology to affect the content or timing of the bedbug letter I will receive in response.
We’ll see.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Jun 13, 2008 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions
You must be a crank. I easily dismiss you.
But seriously, WTF is their problem with forcing you to enter closer to the section your seat’s in? What if I want to pick up something from the store near the back of the first base seating down the line and come back into the lower bowl there, then take the walkway there back to my seat, especially if it’s during batting practice?
And people walking all over the place while the game is going on need to knock it off when it blocks the views of others. I actually like a policy of “wait until the at-bat is over.”
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site
jamesvenes.com - Blog
Cranks a lot.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Jun 13, 2008 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Lack of Offense may be the Key
A lot of posters have alluded to this, but I think the lack of offense on this year’s team may be part of the drop, that and the huge vacant tarp thing over everyone’s head. The colsieum is still a good place to watch baseball, despite what sportswriters call the place. You can get good seats almost anytime and the access is great with BART at the front door. Part if it might be the makeup of the Oakland population also- younger, busier, less interested in the slow game of baseball.
The greenmachine
Everyone has an excuse
I’ve given up trying to figure out why attendance is so poor. When I was living in San Jose, I could only make a handful of games a year (because of school, then work etc) even though my family had season tickets. Since moving back to Fremont in 2001 (which is where I was raised in the green and gold) I have attended at least 20 games a year. My father is a (senior citizen) season ticket holder, and I had been able to sit in lower level seats for well under $20.00 for many seasons. I wasn’t happy when the tickets went up to $25.00 each, but it’s not going to keep me from the ballpark. The people who give excuses as to why they don’t attend games (the prices, the parking cost, the bleachers, the food, the tarp, the players being traded, the team moving, the owner, the fees when buying tickets online, the security guards . . . . etc.) are going to find an excuse no matter what the situation. I feel fortunate that year after year I watch the A’s contend for the division and/or the wild card. There are plenty of places (i.e. across the BAY) that don’t have that luxury.
My excuse...
I would say that my wife and I averaged about 5 or 6 games a year (more if the A’s were in the playoffs). I haven’t been to a game yet this year, and other than maybe my birthday or if someone invites me, I probably won’t go to very many… or any. Here are my reasons:
- My two favorite players were traded… again. Haren and Swisher were fun to watch and fun to cheer on. Swish especially had a personality. Just listening to Suzuki or Buck do radio promos makes me cringe. Maybe some of the new guys will develop into stars (either on talent or personality or both), but until that happens I really don’t feel the draw to support them in person.
- $8 beer. I know this is typical and has been for a while, but, c’mon.. eight bucks for 16 oz of Miller Lite And if I drink in the parking lot before the game, I’m usually cashed-out by the 7th inning.
I can accept high ticket prices, but the cost of concessions is out of hand.
- The Richmond/Fremont BART line being down for most of the summer isn’t helping things. I don’t own a car, and $15 parking is insane. I know two people who have had their car windows smashed and items stolen from the truck during A’s games at the Coliseum.
- Clearly Lew and the A’s owners have given up on Oakland and the Coliseum and are focusing completely on Fremont and 2012. I’ve just following their lead.
- The odds for seeing something “amazing” happen has gotten slim. Heck, I feel like the odds of seeing a win are slim (I’m happy to be proven wrong thus far this season). Except when Harden is on the mound, and we all know that you can’t rely on Harden starting all season.
I know walk-off homers and complete game shutouts are rare, but there used to at least be a sense that “it could happen tonight” almost every night. Particularly with Hudson-Mulder-Zito,
- And, most importantly, an overall disgust of the business of baseball that I’m feeling. The whole Mitchell report – HGH – Clemens scandal has left a real sour taste in my mouth. MLB reports record profits and attendance and yet I feel that it is continually disregarding its fans. I feel Selig and scumbags like Clemens, Giambi, and the rest of the clearly guilty dopers are mostly responsible for this, and the A’s are just my local team so they are getting hurt by being part of what I am beginning to feel has been a pretty corrupt business. It is hard to give hundreds of dollars to a game (and business) I am conflicted about financially supporting while I can just as easily enjoy it on the radio or television for free.
So yeah, screw Selig, screw their record profits while clearly looking the other way while players doped, screw these vague apologies and rediculous denials, screw Wolfe and his real estate development business (which is what Cisco field is all about), screw these pointless television blackout rules, and screw $30 for a t-shirt. I can enjoy A’s baseball without all that by staying home and listening or watching a game with my friends for free.
In addition, I want to make clear that many of the reasons listed in this topic are NOT why I’m not attending games this season. The Coliseum and its sight-lines are fine with me. Ticket prices are pretty decent when compared to most other ballparks. And I’m not going clubbing after the game so I really am not concerned about taking the train to East Oakland. These factors have not changed since I moved to Oakland started going to games in 1996, and they aren’t a factor now.
Live forever or die trying.
Radio and TV Deals
Espcially Radio, must be boosted. The radio signals are so weak and their radio network is pretty bad.
And then glare resentfully at the ticketholders who show up to take those seats.
There are 300 empty seats in the same damn section, can’t they take those instead of seats that have been designated as footrests?
AN 3.0's Search Function is *hawt*!
Soooooo ... where'd the profanity fanpost go?
I can’t find it, and when I go to my Profile, my several comments in that thread are gone, too.
Did somebody say something naughty?
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
Unlucky you.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Jun 13, 2008 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh, be-HAVE!
Ask yourself: would a 12-year-old be embarrassed at my immaturity?
Hmmmm?
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Jun 13, 2008 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions
12-year-olds, Dude
Is it prurient? I don’t know what to tell you. I think it’s odd and interesting. It’s part of life. @('.')@
Does it still count towards "posts made"?
Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.
I guess not
The comments can’t be accessed and QuietFan’s post count disappeared.
I did see this in his fan profile:
“I enjoy reading and learning from AN fans’ comments on the AN blog. My two favorite among regulars are Blez and Nico whose professionalism, maturity, insights on baseball, and eloquent writing distinguish themselves head and shoulders among all at AN. I also admire those occasional posters who provide excellent, penetrating insights while respecting the decency of others.”
Last of the Ninth - Photography Site
jamesvenes.com - Blog
Ah -- so QuietFan is Nico?
Maybe the thread’ll be reposted on the front page just prior to the Game Thread this evening.
The meaning of life is not so much 'found,' as it is 'made.' --Opus
by The Dogfather on Jun 13, 2008 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Two factors
They raised ticket prices and gutted the team in the same offseason. Mr. Wolff made it clear that he cared nothing about the fans who have been supporting the team for years. Right back atcha, pal.
"If you make up your mind not to be happy, there's no reason why you shouldn't have a fairly good time." -Edith Wharton (The Last Asset)
by Oakville Athletic on Jun 13, 2008 2:12 PM PDT reply actions
I did a bit of marketing for the A's, prior to this season
My experience – the biggest complaint was the loss of Swisher and how, for some, it was ‘the last straw’
by SwisherThresher on Jun 13, 2008 3:42 PM PDT reply actions
Die hards and that's about it.
They A’s have always lost players but losing Swisher and Haren. Not to mention Kotsay and Scutaro. Was brutal last winter. I honestly thought this team might lose 100 games this year when I thought about who was going to be on it. Now to my happy surprise those players we got in return have turned out well but for many fans it is too little too late. The team has zero marquee names. The team is moving within the next 5 years. If I didn’t have a tatoo on my arm that said A’s I wouldn’t be going to games either.
As for me if the A’s really did lose 100 games this year I would still come to games. But I’m a die hard. The A’s just don’t have that many die hards.
It sure has gotten expensive.
It’s much simpler for me, though. I moved to Sacramento so I could buy a house before I die.
So it goes.

by 


























