Bay Area commerce and the move to Fremont

Well, the Bay Area's Bestest Newspapers [retch] came out with their regular 50 Biggest Companies reports on Sunday  link , toting revenues and profits for both the 50 largest businesses in the East Bay (generously defined) and the Bay Area at-large.  Of course, they misspelled a word in the headline ("trial" meaning "trail"),  but hey, they don't call themselves the Bay Area's bestest  proofreaders, and I think I know where they made their most recent cuts.  But I digress, hoping I haven't made similar blunders in this here fanpost. 

I was surprised at the results, and thought I'd share 'em on which for folks to chew.  Now, I'm perfectly well aware that this is only one measure of economic activity, but if we concede that the A's are organized and intended to be a profit-making entity, then these kinds of numbers are not insignificant.

For the Bay Area at-large, I would divide the geography as follows:

SF= SF,  SSF and North Bay

Silicon Valley = peninsula, San Jose, Fremont, Hayward, Union City

East Bay = everything else east of most of the bridges

The Top 50 settle into those areas as follows:

SF = 14

SV = 30

EB = 6

So it's really no mystery why the Giaunts are so proud and jealous of "their" territory to the south.

Looking at the East Bay Region specifically, I would resolve the geography as follows:

Oakland = Oakland, Emeryville, Alameda, Berkeley, Hercules

San Ramon/Tri-Valleys = everything east of the Caldecott Tunnel, and Dublin and Sunol grades

Fremont = Fremont, Hayward, Union City

Defined so, the numbers are as follows:

Oak = 12

SRV/TriV = 20

Fremont = 18

By this logic, the new ballyard might better be in Walnut Creek or Pleasanton than Oakland.  And if we just look at companies HQ'd within the city limits of Oakland and Fremont, per se, Oakland loses 3 to 15.

Now, I've heard Fremont disparaged around here as a parking lot with a City Council, but it's pretty clearly more than that.  And one could take away from the  above data that the tech industries centered in the Silicon Valley, of which Fremont is best considered a part, are the economic engine of the Bay Area.  It also seems clear that Oakland in particular, and to a lesser extent SF, just aren't the commercial centers they were when the teams moved here 40 and 50 years ago.  At those times, the peninsula was fruit orchards, and there really were walnut groves in Walnut Creek.  Or so I'm told.

Viewed using this metric, the move south makes a lot of sense.  Yes, companies aren't people, but to an increasing degree they are ticket-buyers, and they do represent sponsorship sources.  Oakland, for all its natural beauty, infrastructure advantages and head start, just hasn't kept pace.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Athletics Nation

You must be a member of Athletics Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Athletics Nation. You should read them.

Join Athletics Nation

You must be a member of Athletics Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Athletics Nation. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.